Documents

Via shaw 10, Grosvenor William 2006 – p8

From Bin[email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:01 EST 2007
Article: 65089 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:585425 soc.culture.german:375303 soc.culture.swiss:65089 alt.politics.europe:64606 de.soc.politik.misc:881249
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: BinyaminKramer2
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.swiss,alt.politics.europe,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: Der Jude ist ein Parasit! (Teil 3 der Parasiten-Serie) Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 503
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:36:04 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1181745364 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:36:04 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:36:04 MDT

Der Jude ist ein Parasit! (Teil 3 der Parasiten-Serie)
From: BinyaminKramer2
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 08:44:56 -0600

On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:04:56 -0600, in de.soc.politik.misc Ernst Zundholz
wrote:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:56:39 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc egon-karl ullrich
wrote:

Nachdem meine Artikel vom 25. und 26.12.2006 FF über den jüdischen
Parasiten so wunderbar erfolgreich eingeschlagen sind, seien hier noch
einmal zu Erinnerung zwei der vergoldeten Zitate aus der zionistischen
Original-Literatur wiederholt, welche das unter den Zionisten
durchgehend verbreitete Judenverständnis bezeugen (so der Autor Lenni
Brenner in Teil 2 der Parasiten-Serie), bevor wir uns weiter dieser Art
Bestseller-Literatur und Denkweise zuwenden. Übrigens: “Teil 1”, “Teil
2” stand zu Beginn der Serie noch nicht im ‘Subject’, an eine
Erfolgsserie in diesem Kino glaubte ich da noch nicht. Vielen Dank,
verehrtes Publikum!! :-).

Die 2 Zitate:
**********************************************************************
[…] ein Parasitentum, mag es auch
riesenhaft sein, ein Parasitentum, wie es in keinem Volke
seinesgleichen hat – denn bei anderen gehört schließ-
lich der Ausbeuter wie der Ausgebeutete dem gleichen
Volke an […]

**********************************************************************
http://groups.google.de/group/de.soc.politik.misc/msg/1179a72afe84ea7e?hl=de&
(Quelle: Aaron David Gordon, ‘Erlösung durch Arbeit’, Seite 47,
Zionistischer Bücherbund, Berlin 1929. Gordon lebte von 1856 bis 1922)

sowie dazu passend:
**********************************************************************

Wir [Juden] nehmen unter ihnen [den anderen Völkern]
keinen Rang ein als Volk, als besonderer nationaler Kör-
per; wir sind kein Glied in der Kette der Menschheit,
kein Organ ihres Leibes, sondern Parasiten am Körper
anderer Völker

*********************************************************************
(Quelle: wie oben, Seite 144)

(An dieser Stelle sei nochmal die URL zum Komplett-Download des Buches
‘Erlösung durch Arbeit’ wiederholt:
http://putstuff.putfile.com/29257/3484261
Ca. 17 MB, bitte die Anmerkungen im obigen verlinkten Artikel in
Google-Groups beachten!)

Hier spricht der “Geist des Humanismus” zu uns, welcher nach Auffassung
hochgestellter Politiker des Bundeslandes Wien bereits vor hundert
Jahren durch Herzl auf Erden inkarniert ist, wie ich ebenfalls in Teil 1
der Parasiten-Serie am 26.12.2006 bewies,

Zitat:
**********************************************************************
Die Stadt drücke ihren Respekt vor dem Werk Theodor Herzls, ihren Stolz
auf ihn mit der Widmung eines zentralen Platzes in der Innenstadt aus,
sagte Kulturstadtrat Mailath-Pokorny. Herzl habe eine politische Vision,
getragen aus dem Geist des Humanismus gehabt, die Wirklichkeit geworden
sei. Der Platz solle zugleich für das friedliche Miteinander der
Menschen, für die gegenseitige Anerkennung der unterschiedlichen
Ethnien, Sprachen, Mentalitäten und Kulturen in Europa und in der Welt
stehen.
**********************************************************************
http://www.wien.gv.at/vtx/vtx-rk-xlink?SEITE=020040702012
(Quelle: Webservice der Stadt Wien, Archivmeldung der
Rathauskorrespondenz vom 2.7.2004: Ein Platz für Theodor Herzl)

Zufolge dem “Wirklichkeit gewordenen Geist des Humanismus” aus Wien ist
der Jude ein Parasit unter den Völkern ohnegleichen!

UNSER HEILIGER FÜHRER DANKT VIELMALS!!!! 🙂 🙂 🙂
DANKE DANKE DANKE!!

Begeistert auch die Reaktion aus dem deutschen Marxismus über den von
den NaZions (danke dir, Manfred Glahe!) geplanten Aufstieg der Juden
mittels Einreise nach Palästina, das sei hier ebenfalls aus dem Teil 1
der Parasitenserie wiederholt,

Zitat:
**********************************************************************
[man]
arbeitete an einer umfassenden Berufsumschichtung, die im neuen Land
einen neuen Menschen zur Folge haben sollte. In den Vorstellungen von
Aaron David Gordon steigerte sich dies zur Erlösung durch Arbeit: die
Juden seien Parasiten, von der wahren Quelle des Lebens – der Arbeit –
entfremdet, durch eigene Arbeit werde der Jude aber zum Menschen und
könne seine »Händler«-Existenz mittels Selbsterziehung und
Selbstverwirklichung in der Arbeit beenden.

**********************************************************************
http://www.wildcat-www.de/zirkular/62/z62aufhe.htm
(Quelle: Wildcat-Zirkular Nr. 62, Februar 2002, ‘Hintergründe der
Intifada im 21. Jahrhundert’. Übersetzung aus dem Englischen, im
Nachwort des Übersetzers finden wir oben zitierten arglosen, aber
sachlich zutreffenden Kommentar)
+++++++++++++++++++++

Nun aber, wie versprochen, weitere Texte, wobei ich jetzt die
marxistische Fachkunde verlasse und mich sozusagen deren Gegenpol
zuwende, dem Standpunkt der authentisch jüdischen Theologie in Bezug zum
selben Thema. Sehr interessant und vor allem überzeugend, wie sehr sich
anti/nicht-religiöser Marxismus und Gottesglaube bei der
Betrachtung/Analyse bestimmter Sachverhalte doch annähern können…

Beginnen wir mit einem Artikel, übernommen von der Webseite
“jewsagainstzionism” (JudengegenZionismus). Der jüdische Autor
beschäftigt sich mit den zionistischen Machenschaften. Der
ultra-orthodoxe (=sehr strenggläubige) Autor aus dem traditionellen
Judentum richtet seine Erklärung zuförderst an die abtrünnigen
(=zionistisch/weltlich beeinflußten) Juden, welche er im Sinne des
authentischen, frommen Judentums zurückzugewinnen sucht. Anmerkungen im
Text in [eckigen Klammern] stammen von mir [eku],

Zitat:
**********************************************************************
Zionismus and Anti-Semitismus

Wir flehen und ersuchen unsere jüdischen Brüder darum, zu erkennen, daß
die Zionisten nicht die Retter der jüdischen Leute und die Garanten
ihrer Sicherheit, sondern eher die Anstifter und Ursache der jüdischen
Leiden im Heiligen Land und weltweit sind.

Der Einfall, daß Zionismus und der Staat “Israel” der Beschützer der
Juden seien, ist wahrscheinlich der größte Schabernack [im Originaltext
steht “Hoax”], der jemals gegen das jüdische Volk verübt wurde.

In der Tat, wo anders seit 1945 standen Juden in solch großer Gefahr,
wie in dem Staat der Zionisten?!

Juden ist es durch ihre religiösen Gesetze auferlegt, loyal zu den
Ländern zu stehen, in denen sie Bürger sind.

Immer seit der Zerstörung des Heiligen Tempels in Jerusalem und dem Exil
des jüdischen Volkes über 2000 Jahre, waren wir verpflichtet, uns
peinlich loyal zu den Ländern unseres Aufenthaltes zu verhalten.

Einer der großen biblischen Propheten, Jeremiah, proklamierte in Kapitel
29 seines Buches Gottes Botschaft zu allen Verbannten; in Vers 7 lesen
wir [lt. Luther-Übersetzung], “Suchet der Stadt Bestes, dahin ich euch
habe lassen wegführen, und betet für sie zum HERRN; denn wenn’s ihr wohl
geht, so geht’s auch euch wohl.”

Dies ist unsere ganze Geschichte hindurch ein Eckstein jüdischer Moral
gewesen, bis zum heutigen Tage.

Thora-treue Juden wünschen in Frieden und Harmonie mit ihren Nachbarn zu
leben, in jedem Land der Gemeinschaft der Nationen, einschließlich im
historischen Palästina.

Sie mißbilligen Handlungen und Taktiken der Gewalt, ausgeübt durch Jene,
unter Mißbrauch des Namens Israel unserer Vorväter, welche die ewigen
Werte der Thora, das ewige gottgewidmete Erbe des jüdischen Volkes,
ersetzt haben durch das Ideal des chauvinistischen Nationalismus.

Es ist die immerwährende Absicht des Zionismus, vorsätzlich und überall,
wo irgend möglich, Antisemitismus zu erregen und sogar noch häufiger,
einen Nutzen aus jeglichem jüdischen Leiden zu ziehen um in der Tat
seine Sache zu fördern. Hass gegen Juden und jüdisches Leiden ist der
Treibstoff der zionistischen Bewegung, und von Anfang an wurde ganz
bewußt und vorsätzlich Hass gegen Juden angestachelt um dann, in
geheucheltem Entsetzen, dies zu gebrauchen, um die Existenz des
zionistischen Staates zu rechtfertigen – dies ist, natürlich,
Machiavellismus, zum höchsten Grade getrieben.

Das Gedeihen des Zionismus auf Hass und den Leiden der Juden, und dem
Bestreben, davon zu profitieren, indem die Juden in beständiger Furcht
gehalten werden, verursacht ihre Ignoranz gegenüber der wahren Natur des
Zionismus und stattdessen den zionistischen Staat als ihre Erlösung zu
betrachten.

ANTISEMITISMUS DURCH DEN POLITISCHEN ZIONISMUS

Obwohl Zionisten und Andere darüber streiten, ist es eine unabweisbare
Tatsache, daß revolutionäre, säkulare und abtrünnige Elemente der
jüdischen Gesellschaft Europas nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg einen großen
Beitrag zur Feindschaft gegen Juden leisteten. Diese erregten ganz
allgemein den Judenhass unter vielen Nicht-Juden.

Während Hitler 1924 als Häftling in der Festung Landsberg am Lech
einsaß, schrieb er sein Buch ‘Mein Kampf’. Als er im Jahr 1933
Reichskanzler von Deutschland wurde, standen ihm Goebbels, Rosenberg und
Streicher bei.

Von ihnen kamen die Erklärungen, “Die Juden Deutschlands verursachten
die Niederlage Deutschlands im Krieg 1914-1918;”

“die Juden Deutschlands waren verantwortlich für die schrecklichen
Bedingungen, die in Deutschland dem Krieg folgten”;

“die Juden Deutschlands sind Fremde und sie wünschen, Fremde zu bleiben”;

“sie haben keine Treue zum Land ihrer Geburt”;

“sie sind keine Menschen”;

“sie sind dreckige Hunde”;

“sie haben kein Recht, sich in die Angelegenheiten Deutschlands
einzumischen”;

“es gibt zu viele Juden in Deutschland”.

Soweit es den Zionismus betraf, versuchte der Begründer des Zionismus
und Abtrünnige [=Herkunfts-Jude. Zur Definiton s.a. die berühmte
judenfreundliche Rede des Dr. Martin Hohmann, CDU], Theodor Herzl, den
Hass auf die Juden zu verstärken, um die Sache des politischen Zionismus
zu unterstützen.

Hier einige seiner “Perlen”:

“Es ist unerlässlich, daß die Leiden der Juden … schlimmer werden …
dies wird die Verwirklichung unserer Pläne unterstützen … Ich habe
eine exzellente Idee … Ich werde die Antisemiten dazu verleiten, den
Wohlstand der Juden auszulöschen … Die Antisemiten werden uns dabei
unterstützen, weil sie die Verfolgung und Unterdrückung der Juden
verstärken werden. Die Antisemiten werden unsere besten Freunde sein.”
(Aus seinem Tagebuch, Teil 1, ab Seite 16,)

[der Autor zitiert hier offenbar die engl. Ausgabe der Herzl-Tagebücher,
diese liegt mir nicht vor, dafür die deutsche]

Weitere Worte aus dem anschaulichen Einfallsreichtum dieses Träumers von
Seite 68, Teil 1 seines Tagebuchs:
[Angaben des Autors zu Band und Seite beziehen sich wohl ebenfalls auf
die engl. Ausgabe der Tagebücher, darum hier meine Rückübersetzung aus
dem Englischen]

“Daher wird der Antisemitismus, welcher eine tief verwurzelte Kraft im
Unterbewußtsein der Massen ist, den Juden nicht schaden. Ich finde ihn
sogar nützlich, um den Judencharackter zu stärken, Erziehung durch die
Massen, welche zur Assimilation führen wird. Diese Erziehung kann nur
mittels Leiden erfolgen und die Juden werden sich anpassen.”

[hier nun d. Originaltext aus dem in Deutschland erschienenen Tagebuch,
Leipzig 1922/23, Band 1, Seite 12:

“Der Antisemitismus, der in der großen Menge etwas Starkes und
Unbewußtes ist, wird aber den Juden nicht schaden. Ich halte ihn für
eine dem Judencharakter nützliche Bewegung. Er ist die Erziehung einer
Gruppe durch die Massen und wird vielleicht zu ihrer Aufsaugung führen.
Erzogen wird man nur durch Härten. Es wird die Darwinsche Mimikry
eintreten. Die Juden werden sich anpassen.”

http://www.literature.at/webinterface/library/ALO-BOOK_V01?objid=12794&zoom=3&ocr=&page=19&gobtn=Go%21
Originalscan der Buchseite. Die Tagebücher wurden 2 Jahrzehnte nach dem
Tode Herzls 1904 von dessen überlebenden Vater editiert und
herausgegeben. Im Vergleich der beiden Zitate stimmt also der engl. u.
d. deut. Text sinngemäß weitgehend überein, allerdings nicht die
Paginierung.
Nun weiter mit der Sicht vom Standpunkt des Theologen:]

Hassvolle Sichtweisen auf Juden als Untermenschen mußten
Nazi-Theoretiker wie etwa Hitler, Goebbels, Rosenberg und Streicher
nicht neu erfinden. Diese Ideologie wurde einfach angepaßt aus
Erklärungen politischer Zionisten, wie man sie z.B. in den Schriften des
Zionisten Yehezkel Kaufman im Jahr 1933 vorfand.

Im Jahr 1920 tauchten an der Universität Heidelberg judenfeindliche
Erklärungen auf.

Diese Erklärungen argumentierten damit, daß die Juden Deutschlands den
Aufruhr in der Folge des Krieges verursacht hatten; daß die Juden von
Deutschland nichts gemeinsam mit den Deutschen haben und daß die
Deutschen das Recht haben, die Juden Deutschlands aus den
Angelegenheiten betreffend ihres Volkes herauszuhalten wurde nicht etwa
von Adolf Hitler in ‘Mein Kampf’ geäußert, sondern von Nahum Goldman,
der zum Präsidenten der Zionistischen Weltorganisation [WZO] und zum
Führer des Zionistischen Weltkongress [WJC] aufstieg und der –
unstrittig – der einflußreichste politische Zionist der Welt wurde,
gleich an zweiter Stelle hinter dem Premierminister des Staates Israel.

Im Jahr 1921 wurde den Juden in Deutschland erklärt:

“Wir Juden sind Feinde … ein fremdes Volk in eurer Mitte und wir …
wollen dies bleiben. Ein Jude kann niemals ein loyaler Deutscher sein;
wer immer das fremde Land sein Vaterland nennt ist ein Verräter am
jüdischen Volk”.

Wer sprach diese hinterfotzigen Worte?

Es war Jacob Klatzkin, die Nummer Zwei der politischen zionistischen
Ideologen in Deutschland, zu einer Zeit, als sich die Juden Deutschlands
der vollen politischen und bürgerlichen Rechte erfreuten.

Er war es, welcher die Untergrabung der jüdischen Gemeinden verfocht,
als dem einzigen sicheren Weg, einen eigenen Staat zu erwerben.

“Sie hatten keine Skrupel dahingehend, die existierenden jüdischen
Gemeinden zu zerstören.”

Wer erklärte in einer öffentlichen Ansprache auf einem Treffen der
politischen Zionisten in Berlin, daß “Deutschland … zu viele Juden
hat”? War es Hitler oder Goebbels?

Nein, das war Chaim Weizman, welcher später der erste Präsident des
Staates Israel wurde.

Diese Ansprache wurde im Jahr 1920 veröffentlicht, und dies sogar vier
Jahre, bevor Hitler sein Buch ‘Mein Kampf’ schrieb.

Wie viele zionistische Juden wissen von dem teuflischen Verrat, geäußert
von den rangältesten zionistischen Führern, diesen Abtrünnigen des
jüdischen Volkes?

Im Nürnberger Prozeß gegen die Hauptkriegsverbrecher, bezeugte
Nazi-Propagandist Julius Streicher: “Ich tat nicht mehr, als zu
wiederholen, was die führenden Zionisten erklärt hatten” – es ist klar,
Streicher sagte die Wahrheit.

Neben Hitler, Rosenberg, Goebbels und Streicher, gebrauchten viele
weitere Nazi-Führer Erklärungen von Zionisten, um ihre Anklagen gegen
die Juden Deutschlands zu bestätigen.

Darin bestehen die Anstrengungen der zionistischen Führer bis zum
heutigen Tag, einen hohen Grad des Antisemitismus aufrecht zu erhalten
um ihnen mittels geheucheltem Abscheu zu ermöglichen, von dem so
angespitzten Antisemitismus Unterstützung ihrer idolatrischen und
anti-jüdischen Sache zu erhalten.

Im Jahre 1963 erklärte Moshe Sharett, damals Präsident der Jewish
Agency, vor der 38. Jahrestagung der Skandinavischen Jugendorganisation,
daß die Freiheit, welcher sich die Mehrheit der Juden erfreut, den
Zionismus gefährdet und auf dem 26. Zionistischen Weltkongress wurde den
Delegierten erzählt, daß die Juden vom Nachlassen des Antisemitismus in
den USA bedroht seien, “Wir sind in Gefahr durch die Freiheit”, erklärte er.

Wie schon weiter oben erwähnt, floriert der Zionismus durch den
Antisemitismus.

Ben Gurion erlärte, “… nicht immer und nicht überall stelle ich mich
gegen den Antisemitismus”.

Die Zionisten spielen regelmäßig die handliche “Antisemiten”-Rassenkarte
aus, gegen jederman, sei er Jude oder Nicht-Jude, welcher seine Stimme
gegen die Boshaftigkeit der Zionisten erhebt.

Während des 2. Weltkrieges [1941, über türk. u. liban. diplom. Kanäle]
suchte die Lehi-Organisation, Ableger von Begins ‘Irgun’ unter Führung
von Yitzchak Shamir, ein Bündnis mit den Nazis einzugehen! Folgend ein
Zitat aus dem Brief der Lehi im Kontakt mit den Nazis:

“Die Errichtung des historischen Judenstaates auf nationaler und
totalitaerer Grundlage, der in einem Vertragsverhaeltnis mit dem
Deutschen Reiche stuende, im Interesse der Wahrung und Staerkung der
zukuenftigen deutschen Machtpositionen im Nahen Orient sei…
… tritt die N.M.O. in Palaestinam … mit denn Angebote einer
[b]aktiven Teilnahme am Kriege an der Seite Deutschlands[/b] heran…
… Die Kooperation der Israelitischen Freiheitsbewegung wuerde auch in
der Linie einer der letzten Reden des deutschen Reichskanzler liegen, in
der Herr Hitler betonte, dass er jede Kombination und Koalition benutzen
werde um England zu isolieren und zu schlagen.”

[folgender Link hinzugefügt, im engl. Original dieses Textes hier nicht
vorhanden.

http://www.marxists.de/middleast/ironwall/irgunazi.htm

“Aus David Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics,
1889-1945, (Phd.), Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel, 1974. Die
Rechtschreibung wurde nicht geändert.”
Das militärisch-politische Bündnisangebot der ‘LEHI’ an das 3. Reich
liegt unter dem obigen Link im deutschen Volltext vor, von dort ist auch
die engl. Version verlinkt. Weiter mit dem jüd. Theologen:]

Für jene, welche den Zionisten unterstellen, sie würden auf der Seite
von Freiheit und Gleichheit stehen, klingen diese Worte befremdlich.
Jenen jedoch, welche die Wurzel des Zionismus verstanden haben, welche
die Transformation und Ausrottung der Auffassung vom traditionellen
Juden und Judentum umfaßt, sind diese Erklärungen überhaupt nicht
absonderlich. Sie [die zion. Worte] sind so zu erwarten.

Die Zionisten stimmten mit den Nazis im Allgemeinen überein, sogar schon
vor dem Aufschwung des Nazismus. Sie glaubten, daß Juden nicht in
Harmonie in irgendeiner anderen Gesellschaft in der Welt leben könnten
und nicht sollten und daß die Trennung von diesen Gesellschaften ein
Vorteil für diese Gesellschaften sei.

Sie glaubten, daß die neue jüdische Existenz in ihrem eigenen Staat das
Bild vom Juden als “nutzlos” und “Parasit” umkrempeln würde. Diese Ideen
existierten lange vor Adolf Hitler!

Es gibt eine große Anzahl Literatur darüber, die beschreibt, wie die
Zionisten es sehr erschwerten, während und nach dem 2. Weltkrieg Juden
zu retten. Während verschiedene Personen und Organisationen versuchten,
die Ausreise von Juden in die westlichen Ländern zu arrangieren,
investierten die Zionisten in Überstunden, um eben dies zu verhindern.

In der Tat, Yitzchak Greenbaum, ein berühmter Zionist, proklamierte, daß
“eine Kuh in Palästina mehr Wert sei, als all die Juden in Polen.”

Der schändliche David Ben-Gurion erklärte im Dezember 1938:

“Wenn ich wüßte, es wäre möglich all die [jüdischen] Kinder in
Deutschland nach England zu retten, jedoch nur die Hälfte der Kinder,
indem sie nach Eretz Israel gebracht würden, ich würde die zweite Lösung
wählen. Wir dürfen nicht nur das Leben dieser Kinder berücksichtigen,
sondern auch die Geschichte des Volkes Israel.”

Nach dem Krieg, am 2. Mai 1948, präsentierte der zionistische
“religiöse” Führer, Rabbi Klaussner, welcher mit der Sache der
‘Displaced Persons’ befaßt war, einen Bericht vor der Jewish American
Conference:

“Ich bin überzeugt davon, daß die Leute gezwungen werden müssen, nach
Palästina zu gehen… Für die scheint ein amerikanischer Dollar das
höchste aller Ziele zu sein. Mit dem Wort ‘Zwang’ schlage ich ein
Programm vor. Dies dient der Evakuierung der Juden in Polen und diente
in der Geschichte dem ‘Exodus’ [Auszug der antiken Juden aus Ägypten]
… Zur Ausführung dieses Programms müssen wir, statt den ‘Displaced
Persons’ Behaglichkeit zu bringen, ihnen die größtmöglichen
Unannehmlichkeiten bereiten … in einer zweiten Stufe folgt dann die
Methode, die Haganah aufzufordern, die Juden zu drangsalieren.”

Es ist eine Ironie, daß die Zionisten ihren Staat als den sicheren Hafen
der Juden proklamieren, wenn doch seit dem 2. Weltkrieg kein Platz auf
der Erde derart gefährlich für Juden ist, wie der zionistische Staat, in
spiritueller Hinsicht wie physisch.

Nachdem der zionistische Staat gegründet war, wirkten die Zionisten
unbarmherzig dahin, um Furcht bei den Juden in den arabischen Ländern zu
erzeugen. Ihre Taktik funktionierte höchst erfolgreich im Yemen,
Marokko, Irak, Algerien, Lybien, Tunesien.

Es ist unter irakischen Juden allgemein bekannt, daß während 1949 und
1950 der berühmte Zionist Mordechai ben Porat, welcher den Spitznamen
Morad Abu al-Knabel (Mordechai der Bomber) bekam, nach der zionistischen
Staatsgründung dabei half, irakische Offizielle zu bestechen, damit sie
Gesetze verabschiedeten, welche die Auswanderung der Juden aus dem Irak
förderten.

Dies wurde dadurch verstärkt, indem die Zionisten im März 1950 Bomben in
Baghdads Synagogen pflanzten. Informationen darüber liegen griffbereit
im Internet.

Die Schrift von Herrn Naim Giladi dokumentiert im Detail, was die
Zionisten im Jahr 1950 in Baghdad anrichteten um die Flucht der Juden in
den zionistischen Staat zu provozieren.

[die aus dem Engl. auszugsweise übersetzte Schrift des irakischen Juden
Naeim Giladi ‘Ben Gurion Scandals’ liegt bereits im Internet vor,
gelegentlich setze ich sie auch in diese NG reinsetzen…]

Die Zionisten machen sich keine Sorgen um die Effekte, welche ihre
Taktiken auf die jüdischen Gemeinden überall in den Ländern haben. Wenn
sie die europäischen Nationen jeder Sünde unter der Sonne anklagen,
kümmerts die Zionisten, daß dies Feindschaft gegenüber den Juden
produzieren wird? Nein! Nicht im geringsten. Ganz im Gegenteil, wie oben
behandelt, ihr Geschäft blüht unter solchen Umständen, sie klammern sich
an die vergebliche Hoffnug, daß diese jüdischen Gemeinden zur “Erlösung”
in den “sicheren Hafen” des zionistischen Paradieses hineindrängeln, wo
sich die Juden in permanenter Gefahr befinden, da das zionistische
Regime jede Form der grausamen Provokation gegen Nicht-Juden unternimmt.

In der Vergangenheit haben die Zionisten jede Gelegenheit gesucht, die
Juden zum Verlassen ihrer Heimatländer zu drängen. Jedesmal, wenn auch
nur der geringste judenfeindliche Vorfall auf den Fersen der
zionistischen Taktik folgt, oder wenn Anzeichen ökonomischer Not und
Verwerfung auftauchen, verstärken die Zionisten dies ums Tausendfache,
suchen sie rücksichtslos die betroffenen Nationen zu erniedrigen und
hetzen die Juden auf, zu dem zionistischen Staat zu gehen, der
sogenannten “natürlichen Heimat” des jüdischen Volkes.

Dies war so der Fall in Ländern wie Frankreich, Argentinien, Uruguay,
der früheren Sowjet-Union und Ägypten.

“Die Verheißungen der Thora werden sich immer verwirklichen.” Dieser
Vers aus der Thora legt dar, daß jene, welche Seine Feinde sind, einen
Preis zahlen werden, wenn das Königreich Gottes herrschen wird.

Deuteronomium 32:43 [Fünftes Buch Mose 32,43, nach der
Eberfelder-Übersetzung]: Jubelt, ihr Nationen, mit seinem Volke! Denn er
wird rächen das Blut seiner Knechte und wird Rache erstatten seinen
Feinden, und seinem Lande, seinem Volke, vergeben.

Fußnoten und Quellen:

* Guardian Volume two Issue 7
* Satmar Grand Rebbe Joel Teitelbaum
* The Jews of Batna, Aleria: A Study of Identity and Colonialism
by Elizabeth Friedman.
* The Jewish Communities of Morocco and the AIU by M. Laskier,
State University, Albany, N.Y.
* The Impact of Western European Education on the Jewish Millet of
Baghdad by Maurice Sawdayee.
* Outcaste Jewish Life in Southern Iran by Laurence D. Loeb.
Gordon and Breach.
* The Last Arab Jews. The Communities of Jerba, Tunisia by Abraham
Udovitch and Lucette Valensi. Harwood Academic Publishers.
* The GENOCIDE IN THE HOLY LAND (available for purchase on the site)
* Ben Gurion’s Scandals by Naeim Giladi (available for purchase on
the site)
*********************************************************************
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/zionism/zanda.cfm
(Quelle: eine Webseite des traditionellen, ultra-ortodoxen Judentums)

Die Juden lügen nicht!

eku

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:03 EST 2007
Article: 65090 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us de.soc.politik.misc:881251 soc.culture.europe:585426 alt.politics.europe:64607 uk.politics.misc:1912382 soc.culture.german:375304 soc.culture.swiss:65090
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Pravda2
Newsgroups: de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Re: Did 6 Million ZYDS Really Die – Or HOLOHOAX to Extort Billions?
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 750
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:48:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1181746080 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:48:00 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:48:00 MDT

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:43:44 -0700, Yitzhak Goldstein
wrote:

Did 6 Million ZYDS Really Die – Or HOLOHOAX to Extort Billions?

From: “Merlin”
Newsgroups: soc.culture.austria,de.org.politik.spd
Subject: Re: Diminishing Numbers Holohoax Dead in
Oswiecim=HOLO-SCHWINDEL ZAHLEN AKTUALISIERT!!
Date: 9 Jan 2006 12:15:47 -0800

Die Gedenkstätte Yad Vashem (häbräisch “Denkmal und Name”) wurde
1953 auf Beschluss der Knesset gegründet.
Fünf Jahre nach der israelischen Staatsgründung begann dort eine
umfassende Aufarbeitung des Holocaust. In Yad Vashem wird geforscht,
gelehrt und gesammelt.
Eine riesige Datenbank mit den Namén der Holocaust-Opfer zählt
inzwischen fast 3 Millionen Einträge. Vor 30 Jahren kam zur
Gedenkstätte ein Museum hinzu.

Das ist der amtl. Stand der Dinge. Wo keine Leiche, da kein Mörder.
Wenn diese Zahlen, die zur Eröffnung der in Jeusalem neu eröffneten
Gedenkstätte stimmen, dann frage ich mich allerdings wie der Holocaust
mit 6 Millionen offenkundig sein kann?

With the annual HOLOHOAX DAY coming soon, one MUST question the
so-called facts provided by the cursed Christkiller ZYDS!!

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:11:07 -0700, Joe Rosenburg
wrote:

>With now at least 52 well documented cases proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
>NAZIS, including the notorious KASTNER case, proving the escape of ZHID
>prominente, one MUST now question the alleged 6 million HOLOHOAX figure!!

>From: Ernst Zundholz
>Newsgroups:soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austria,soc.culture.new-zealand,soc.culture.palestine
>Subject: Did six million really die – Or, HOLOHOAX to Extort Money?

>With more and more evidence proving the ZHID COLLABORATION WITH THE
>NAZIS, the 6 million HOLOHOAX figure is now highly suspect!!

>After all, now that there are an additional 51 cases documented of
>ZHID COLLABORATION WITH NAZIS, besides notorious KASTNER case,
>who can believe the holohoax figures any more?

>On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:20:10 -0700, Riain Y.Blankski
> wrote:
>>On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:31:51 +0100, Helmut Wabnig <**************>
>>wrote:

>>>On 28 Nov 2004 11:04:09 -0800, [email protected]
>>>(HeinrichHimmelfarb) wrote:

>>>>issue has editorials by other emigrants children who say
>>>>they were equally surprised when they discovered their
>>>>Jewish origin.

>>>>Guess, how many Austrians and Germans were equally surprised
>>>>when they discoverd their Jewish origin,
>>>>and nobody would help them to get “aryanized”.
>>>>They ended in a death camp, because grandmother
>>>>used to work as a janitor in a synagogue.
>>>>w.

>>>Kenneth McVay,SOBC, the well-known fag in Canada,
>>>Fag McVay of Vancouver, convicted of child molesting
>>>and car theft in California and Oregon, and still
>>>unemployed gas pump boy, mastermind of the
>>>Canadian branch of NAMBLA, wants all to know
>>>about all his fellow criminals and perverts.
>>>Here is the latest…….

>>>From: KenMcVaySOBC
>>>Subject: Comments About – Did 6 Million Really Die?
>>>Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,sci.skeptic

>>>Did Six Million Really Die?

>>>COMMENTS ABOUT
>>>DID SIX MILLION REALLY DIE?

>>>Dr. Kuang Fann, Professor of Philosophy at York University
>>>of Canada, formerly China: “The whole pamphlet . . .
>>>obviously should be classified as a political opinion . . .”

>>>Ditlieb Felderer, Historical Researcher, Writer, Sweden:
>>>”. . . the booklet has proven to be more true as the years
>>>have gone by, and it is exterminationists who are coming
>>>now to start arguing like Harwood did when the booklet was
>>>first published, so the exterminationists are
>>>moving . . . toward the booklet more and more.”

>>>Dr. Robert Faurisson, Expert of Ancient Texts and Documents,
>>>Lyon University: “The thesis of the book is that it’s not
>>>true that six million Jews died, and it is not true that
>>>there was an extermination plan, and it is not true that
>>>there were gas chambers.

>>>What I find right is, first, the title. The title is good.
>>>Did Six Million Really Die?” That’s really the problem . . .
>>>This man, Richard Harwood, brought plenty of information
>>>for the layman in ’74. He said in ’74 that there were no
>>>order(s) from Hitler to exterminate the Jews.

>>>Three years after, when David Irving said it, it was an
>>>uproar, so it was really new and true. We know it now in
>>>1988 . . . this . . . was so important that when it was
>>>published in France, the man who distributed (it was)
>>>murdered . . . Francoise Duprat. We don’t know who exactly
>>>did that, but the interesting point is, first, that it
>>>has been done by people very clever in those kind of bomb
>>>handling, and what was published in the journal Le Monde
>>>after was interesting. This murder was revindicated by a
>>>so-called “Memory of Auschwitz” organization. It was
>>>justified by a man called Patrick Chairoff – saying
>>>that Francoise Duprat, in distributing this kind of
>>>pamphlet, had taken a responsibility which kills.”

>>>David Irving, British Historian, author of over 30 books
>>>on WW II and its aftermath: “. . . I read it with great
>>>interest and I must say that I was surprised by the quality
>>>of the arguments that it represented. It has obvious flaws.
>>>It uses sources that I personally would not use. In fact,
>>>the entire body of sources is different. This is based
>>>entirely on secondary literature, books by other people,
>>>including some experts, whereas I use no books. I use
>>>just the archives. But independently, the author of this
>>>came to conclusions and asked questions of a logical
>>>nature which I had arrived at by an entirely different
>>>route, so to speak.

>>> . And if I was to ask what is the value of a brochure
>>>like this, I think it is that it provokes people to ask
>>>questions, rather as my book on Hitler’s War provoked
>>>the historians. . . This is the kind of value which I
>>>found this brochure to have. It was asking proper
>>>questions on the basis of an entirely different set of
>>>sources.”

>>>Mark Weber, American Historian, Author: “I believe that
>>>the thesis of the booklet is accurate. . . that there
>>>was no German policy or program to exterminate the Jews
>>>during the Second World War. . . The booklet is a
>>>journalistic or a polemic account that is designed to
>>>convince people, and it does not purport to be a work
>>>that can be held up to the same standards of rigid
>>>scrutiny that a scholarly work and a detailed work
>>>by someone who is a historian normally would be. .
>>>its main value lies in encouraging further discussion
>>>and thought and debate on the subject it raises.”

>>>Colin Wilson, well known British author: “. . . I
>>>received in the post a pamphlet. . . entitled
>>>Did Six Million Really Die? I must admit that it
>>>has left me thoroughly bewildered. What Harwood says,
>>>briefly, is that Hitler had no reason to murder Jews
>>>when he needed them for forced labor. . . it is worth
>>>asking the question: Did the Nazis really exterminate
>>>six million Jews? Or is this another sign of the emotional
>>>historical distortion that makes nearly all the books on
>>>Hitler so far almost worthless?. . . Is there, then, any
>>>reason why we should be afraid to dig down until we get
>>>at the truth?”

>>>WHAT’S WRONG WITH DID SIX MILLION REALLY DIE?

>>>After 10 years of wrangling, what follows is the essence
>>>of what was found wrong with the pamphlet by the prosecution
>>>witnesses. In italics are the primary parts of the pamphlet
>>>disputed by the prosecution followed by evidence given by
>>>expert witnesses on both sides.

>>>1. By 1939, the great majority of German Jews had emigrated,
>>>all of them with a sizeable proportion of their assets.
>>>Never at any time had the Nazi leadership even contemplated
>>>a policy of genocide towards them. . .
>>>Had Hitler cherished any intention of exterminating the Jews,
>>>it is inconceivable that he would have allowed more than
>>>800,000 to leave Reich territory with the bulk of their wealth . . .
>>>(p. 5,6)

>>>Prosecution historian Christopher Browning’s opinion
>>>was that slightly over half of German Jews emigrated
>>>by 1939. Browning testified that the figure 800,000
>>>was an exaggeration; by 1941, the total of Jews who
>>>had left Germany, Austria and the Protectorates was
>>>530,000. Because of measures taken against them, it
>>>was false to say they left with a “sizeable proportion”
>>>of their assets. Browning admitted under
>>>cross-examination, however, that he was not a
>>>demographer nor a statistition and that any population
>>>statistics concerning Jews could only be estimates. He
>>>also admitted that he could not give a precise
>>>percentage or even proportion of their assets Jews left
>>>with. He only knew that considerable efforts were
>>>made to prevent property getting out.

>>>2. The founder of political Zionism in the 19th century,
>>>Theodore Herzl, in his work The Jewish State, had originally
>>>conceived of Madagascar as a national homeland for the Jews,
>>>and this possibility was seriously studied by the Nazis. It
>>>had been a main plank of the National Socialist party platform
>>>before 1933 and was published by the party in pamphlet
>>>form. (p.5)

>>>Browning testified it was not a plank of the Nazi Party
>>>platform before 1933 that the Jews go to Madagascar
>>>as a national homeland. The first time a Nazi leader
>>>mentioned Madagascar was 1938. The first time there
>>>was a plan for madagascar was 1940.

>>>3. The fall of France in 1940 enabled the German Government
>>>to open serious negotiations with the French for the transfer
>>>of European Jews to Madagascar. A memorandum of August, 1942
>>>from Luther, Secretary-of-State in the German Foreign Office,
>>>reveals that he had conducted these negotiations between July
>>>and December 1940, when they were terminated by the French. (p.7)

>>>Browning testified that there were no such negotiations
>>>with the French. The Madagascar Plan failed because
>>>of continuing British control of the high seas.

>>>4. Reitlinger and Poliakov both make the entirely unfounded
>>>supposition that because the Madagascar Plan had been shelved,
>>>the Germans must necessarily have been thinking of “extermination”.
>>>Only a month later, however, on March 7th, 1942, Goebbels wrote a
>>>memorandum in favour of the Madagascar Plan as a “final solution”
>>>of the Jewish question (Manvell and Frankl, Dr. Goebbels, London,
>>>1960,p. 165). In the meantime he approved of the Jews being
>>>”concentrated in the East”. Later Goebbels memoranda also stress
>>>deportation to the East (i.e. the Government-General of Poland)
>>>and lay emphasis on the need for compulsory labor there; once
>>>the policy of evacuation to the East had been inaugurated, the
>>>use of Jewish labor became a fundamental part of the operation. (p.7)

>>>Browning said that Goebbels did not write a
>>>”memorandum”, he wrote a “diary entry.” Goebbels
>>>did not lay emphasis on the need for compulsory labor
>>>but said exactly the opposite; for example, on March
>>>27, 1942, he wrote that 60% of the Jews will have to
>>>be liquidated and 40% used for forced labor. Browning
>>>admitted he had never checked the authenticity of the
>>>original Goebbels diaries but had accepted the
>>>commercial printed version. Historian Weber testified
>>>there was great doubt about the authenticity of the
>>>entire Goebbels diaries because they were typewritten.
>>>There was therefore no way to verify their authenticity.
>>>The U.S. Government itself indicated that it would take
>>>no responsibility for the accuracy of the diaries: the
>>>original clothbound edition contained a U.S.
>>>Government statement that it “neither warrants nor
>>>disclaims the authenticity of the manuscript”. Browning
>>>relied on other documents such as the Seraphim report
>>>to show that the Germans did not put priority on using
>>>Jews for labor. Historian Weber disagreed with this
>>>opinion. In his view, the Jews were a valuable source
>>>of labor for the Germans; Himmler himself ordered
>>>that concentration camp inmates be used as extensively
>>>as possible in war production.

>>>5. Statistics relating to Jewish populations are not everywhere
>>>known in precise detail, approximations for various countries
>>>differing widely, and it is also unknown exactly how many Jews
>>>were deported and interned at any one time between the years
>>>1939-1945. In general, however, what reliable statistics there
>>>are, especially those relating to emigration, are sufficient to
>>>show that not a fraction of six million Jews could have been
>>>exterminated. (p.7)

>>>Browning testified that contemporary German
>>>statistical studies showed that there were enough Jews
>>>in Europe to exterminate 6 million of them. These
>>>studies were: (a) the Burgdörfer Study (estimated that
>>>there were about 10.72 million Jews in Europe); (b)
>>>Madagascar Plan (4 million Jews under German control
>>>in 1940); (c) Wannsee conference protocol (11 million
>>>Jews). In Browning’s opinion, even the German studies
>>>done at the time showed in the area of 10 million Jews
>>>under German control in Europe. Therefore, 6 million
>>>could have been exterminated. He admitted, again, that
>>>he was not a demographer or a statistician and that the
>>>problem of changing borders and the various definitions
>>>of “Jew” made any conclusions in this area difficult to
>>>the point that they could only be estimates.

>>>6. According to Chambers Encyclopaedia the total number of
>>>Jews living in pre-war Europe was 6,500,000. (p.7)

>>>Chambers Encyclopedia dealt only with the total
>>>number of Jews living ont he continent of Europe apart
>>>from Russia, not the total number living in pre-war
>>>Europe as stated by the pamphlet.

>>>7. In addition to the German Jews, 220,000 of the total 280,000
>>>Austrian Jews had emigrated by September, 1939, while from March
>>>1939 onwards the Institute for Jewish Emigration in Prague had
>>>secured the emigration of 260,000 Jews from former Czechoslovakia.
>>>In all, only 360,000 Jews remained in Germany, Austria and
>>>Czechoslovakia after September 1939. (p.7,8)

>>>These numbers did not accord with the German studies
>>>done at the time, Browning testified. A comparison
>>>with the Wannsee Conference protocol statistics
>>>showed that 360,000 Jews had emigrated from
>>>Germany; 147,000 had emigrated from Austria; 30,000
>>>had emigrated from the Protectorate. These figures
>>>were all much lower than Harwood’s figures.

>>>8. In addition to these emigrants, we must also include the
>>>number of Jews who fled to the Soviet Union after 1939, and
>>>who were later evacuated beyond reach of the German invaders.
>>>It will be shown below that the majority of these, about
>>>1,250,000, were migrants from Poland.

>>>But apart from Poland, Reitlinger admits that 300,000 other
>>>European Jews slipped into Soviet territory between 1939 and
>>>1941. This brings the total of Jewish emigrants to the Soviet
>>>Union to about 1,550,000. (p.8)

>>>Browning testified that the reference to Reitlinger was a
>>>mis-cite; Reitlinger said that 300,000 Polish Jews in
>>>total fled to the Soviet Union, not “other European
>>>Jews” as stated by Harwood. The figure of 1,250,000
>>>given by Harwood was therefore 5 times too high.

>>>9. The 1931 Jewish population census for Poland put the number
>>>of Jews at 2,732,600 (Reitlinger, Die Endlösung, p. 36). (p.8)

>>>Hilberg testified that this was wrong; in fact, the figure
>>>of 2,732,600 came from a census taken in the 1920s.

>>>10. When the Jewish populations of Holland (140,000), Belgium
>>>(40,000), Italy (50,000), Yugoslavia (55,000), Hungary (380,000)
>>>and Roumania (725,000) are included, the figure does not much
>>>exceed 3 million. (p.8)

>>>These statistics were not in accord with the Nazis’ own
>>>statistics, said Browning. For example, the German
>>>statistics for 1942 listed the Jewish population of
>>>Hungary at 743,800. German records of the
>>>deportations from Hungary showed more Jews were
>>>deported than the number given by Harwood as the
>>>Jewish population of Hungary.

>>>11. So far as is known, the first accusation against the
>>>Germans of the mass murder of Jews in war-time Europe was
>>>made by the Polish Jew Rafael Lemkin in his book
>>>Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, published in
>>>New York in 1943. (p.9)

>>>The first accusation of mass murder of the Jews was
>>>made on December 17, 1942 by the Allies in a Joint
>>>Declaration. Lemkin, as far as Browning knew, never
>>>used the 6 million figure in his book. Weber pointed
>>>out this mistake made no difference to the substance of
>>>the thesis of the pamphlet.

>>>12. Gerstein’s sister was congenitally insane and died by
>>>euthenasia, which may well suggest a streak of mental
>>>instability in Gerstein himself. . . Gerstein’s fantastic
>>>exaggerations have done little but discredit the whole
>>>notion of mass extermination. Indeed, Evangelical Bishop
>>>Wilhelm Dibelius of Berlin denounced his memoranda as
>>>”Untrustworthy” (p.9)

>>>It was not Gerstein’s sister, but his sister-in-law, who
>>>was killed in the euthenasia program. Dibelius in fact
>>>stated that he was convinced of the trustworthiness of
>>>Gerstein, the opposite of what Harwood had written.
>>>However, Hilberg admitted that he would not
>>>characterize Gerstein as being totally rational and that
>>>there was no question that he was capable of adding
>>>imagination to fact. Browning acknowledged there
>>>were “problems” with Gerstein’s testimony; his obvious
>>>exaggerations resulted because he was “traumatized” by
>>>his experiences, said Browning.

>>>13. It should be emphasised straight away that there is
>>>not a single document in existence which proves that the
>>>Germans intended to, or carried out, the deliberate murder
>>>of Jews. (p.10)

>>>In Browning’s opinion, there were such documents,
>>>including the Hans Frank diary, the Wannsee
>>>Conference protocol, and the 1943 Posen speech of
>>>Himmler. Historian Robert Faurisson pointed out that if
>>>these documents “proved” the existence of a deliberate
>>>plan to murder the Jews, there would be no debate
>>>between the “functionalists” and “intentionalists” in the
>>>Holocaust academic circles. This debate in and of itself
>>>showed that no proof of a deliberate plan existed.
>>>Hilberg had testified in the 1985 Zündel trial that there
>>>were two oral orders from Hitler for the extermination
>>>of the Jews. He denied that he had changed this view
>>>in his then forthcoming second edition of his book The
>>>Destruction of the European Jews, which was to be
>>>published shortly thereafter. In 1988, Hilberg refused
>>>to testify at the second Zündel trial, citing in a
>>>confidential letter to the prosecutor that he had “grave
>>>doubts” about testifying again; ‘the defence,’ he wrote,
>>>’. . . would . . . make every attempt to entrap me by
>>>pointing to any seeming contradiction, however trivial
>>>the subject might be, between my earlier testimony and
>>>an answer that I might give in 1988.” Browning
>>>admitted in his testimony that Hilberg had made a
>>>”significant” change regarding the role of Hitler in the
>>>decision-making process between his first edition and
>>>the second edition, published in 1985. In an article
>>>entitled “The Revised Hilberg”, Browning wrote that in
>>>his second edition, Hilberg had “systematically excised”
>>>all references in the text to a Hitler decision or a Hitler
>>>order for the “Final Solution”. In the new edition, wrote
>>>Browning, “decisions were not made and orders were
>>>not given”.

>>>14. Attempts to find “veiled allusions” to genocide in
>>>speeches like that of Himmler’s to his S.S.
>>>Obergruppenführers at Posen in 1943 are
>>>likewise quite hopeless. (p.11)

>>>Browning testified that the Posen speech contained
>>>explicit references to exterminating the Jews. Historian
>>>David Irving testified, however, that those portions of
>>>the original manuscript of the Posen speech which dealt
>>>with “extermination” had been tampered with; they
>>>were written in a different typescript using different
>>>carbon paper and were numbered in pencil. Irving also
>>>pointed out that the Israelis had Himmler’s private diary
>>>but refused to allow any historians to have access to it.
>>>If Himmler’s diary supported the “Holocaust”, Irving
>>>said, the Israelis would be the first to release it.

>>>15. Most incredible of all, perhaps, was the fact that
>>>defence lawyers at Nuremberg were not permitted to
>>>cross-examine prosecution witnesses. (p.12)

>>>Hilberg testified that defense lawyers were allowed to
>>>cross-examine witnesses at Nuremberg. Weber testified
>>>that many affidavits were entered into evidence,
>>>however, upon which no cross-examination was
>>>possible.

>>>16. The Soviet charge that the Action Groups had wantonly
>>>exterminated a million Jews during their operations has
>>>been shown subsequently to be a massive falsification.
>>>In fact, there had never been the slightest statistical
>>>basis for the figure. (p.14)

>>>Browning testified that on the basis of the
>>>Einsatzgruppen reports and the works of other
>>>historians that at least 1 million Jews were killed
>>>by the Einsatztruppen. Historian Weber testified,
>>>however, that in the major work on the Einsatztruppen,
>>>Die Truppe des Weltanschauungskrieges, the two authors
>>>calculated that if all the figures in the Einsatztruppen
>>>reports were added up, there would be a total of 2.2
>>>million Jewish dead. The authors admitted this was
>>>impossible and conceded that the Einsatztruppen report
>>>figures were exaggerated. In Weber’s opinion, the
>>>figure of about 1 million was not believable because it
>>>was known that the great majority of Jews fled or were
>>>evacuated from the eastern territories before the
>>>German invasion in 1941.

>>>17. Thus between July and October 1942, over three quarters
>>>of the Warsaw Ghetto’s inhabitants were peacefully evacuated
>>>and transported, supervised by the Jewish police themselves. . .
>>>A total, however, of 56,065 inhabitants were captured and
>>>peacefully resettled in the area of the Government-General. (p. 19)

>>>Browning stated that reports of the Warsaw Ghetto
>>>clearing indicated it was done brutally and not
>>>”peacefully” as alleged by Harwood. In Browning’s
>>>opinion, they were not resettled but taken to Treblinka
>>>and Majdanek and either gassed or shot. Historian
>>>Mark Weber testified that the record as to what
>>>happened to these Jews was still unclear. In Weber’s
>>>opinion, Treblinka and Majdanek were simply
>>>concentration and/or transit camps.

>>>18. Of course, no Jew would ever be found who claimed to
>>>have been a member of this gruesome “special detachment”,
>>>so that the whole issue is left conveniently unprovable.
>>>It is worth repeating that no living, authentic eye-witness
>>>to these events has ever been produced. (p.20)

>>>One of Browning’s main differences with the pamphlet
>>>was that it denied the existence of the homcidal gas
>>>chambers for the purpose of killing Jews. He testified
>>>Jews had come forward claiming to be members of the
>>>Sonderkommando, such as Filip Mueller, whose
>>>accounts he found to be “moving”. Browning admitted
>>>under cross-examination, however, that he had never
>>>seen a technical plan that purported to be either a gas
>>>chamber or gas van. He had never enquired about
>>>cremation processes or how much heat or how long it
>>>took to cremate a human body. Browning had not
>>>looked at the aereal photographs taken by the Allies of
>>>Auschwitz during the war except for one on the wall of
>>>Yad Vashem. Neither Browning nor Hilberg knew of
>>>any autopsy report showing that any camp inmate was
>>>killed by Zyklon B. Hilberg and Browning visited the
>>>concentration camps only for the purpose of looking at
>>>memorials or as members of Holocaust Commissions.
>>>Witnesses Leuchter and Roth gave evidence which
>>>showed that samples taken from the walls and floor of
>>>the alleged “gas chambers” at Auschwitz and Birkenau
>>>showed either no traces or only minute traces of
>>>cyanide, while the walls of a known fumigation
>>>chamber at Birkenau which had used Zyklon B had
>>>over 1000 times as much traceable cyanide. In
>>>Leuchter’s opinion, as an expert in gas chamber
>>>technology, the alleged homicidal gas chambers at
>>>Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek were incapable of
>>>being used as gas chambers for the killing of human
>>>beings because of their structure, including such factors
>>>as lack of exhaust systems, stacking and sealants. Ivan
>>>Lagace, a cremation expert, testified that in modern
>>>crematories it took a minimum of 1 1/2 hours to
>>>cremate a human body in one retort; he termed
>>>”ludicrous” the extermination claim that over 4.400
>>>bodies were cremated in 46 retorts at Birkenau per
>>>day. With respect to the veracity of “eyewitness”
>>>testimony, Weber testified that Yad Vashem had
>>>admitted that over half of the “survivor” accounts on
>>>record there were unreliable as many had “let their
>>>imagination run away with them.” Historian Faurisson
>>>quoted from the Jewish writer Michel de Bouard, who
>>>admitted in 1986 that “the record is rotten to the core”
>>>with obstinately repeated “fantasies’ and inaccuracies.

>>>19. Of course, no Jew would ever be found who claimed to
>>>have been a member of this gruesome “special detachment”,
>>>so that the whole issue is left conveniently unprovable.
>>>It is worth repeating that no living, authentic eye-witness
>>>to these events has ever been produced. (p.20)

>>>Browning believed Eichmann to be the highest central
>>>figure in the plan to exterminate the Jews who survived
>>>the war and testified. Eichmann testified that Heydrich
>>>told him that Hitler had ordered the extermination of
>>>the Jews of Europe. Browning admitted, however, that
>>>Eichmann had “more than a little trouble” in sorting out
>>>events in his mind. In historian Irving’s opinion
>>>Eichmann was on trial and under considerable physical
>>>and mental coercion; such testimony did not advance
>>>historical knowledge but polluted it.

>>>20. . . . only seven years after its initial publication,
>>>a New York Supreme Court case established that the book
>>>was a hoax. . . It established that the Jewish novelist
>>>Meyer Levin had written the dialogue of the “diary” and
>>>was demanding payment for his work in a
>>>court action against Otto Frank. (p.21)

>>>This was not true; in fact Levin had sued for payment
>>>for writing a play based on the diary itself. Faurisson
>>>and Irving testified that other proof existed, however,
>>>that the diary’s authenticity was suspect. Expert
>>>examinations of the original diary by graphologists and
>>>West German criminal laboratories showed that one
>>>person had written the diary and part of it was written
>>>in ball-point pen ink, which only came into use in the
>>>1950s. Faurisson believed the diary was written by
>>>Otto Frank, the father of Anne Frank.

>>>21. As a result, eastern camps in the Russian zone of
>>>occupation such as Auschwitz and Treblinka gradually
>>>came to the fore as horrific centres of extermination
>>>(though no one was permitted to see them), and
>>>this tendency has lasted to the present day. (p.23)

>>>Browning testified that it was false to say no one was
>>>permitted to see the camps in the Soviet zone. He cited
>>>a New York Times article by journalist W. Lawrence
>>>of a tour of Majdanek given to journalists by the
>>>Soviets in 1944. Browning admitted that the article had
>>>significant errors regarding the numbers of people who
>>>allegedly died there and how Zyklon B worked.
>>>Historian Weber testified that Western Allied
>>>investigators were not allowed to investigate
>>>concentration camps in the Soviet zone of occupation
>>>after the war. The visit to Majdanek by newspaper
>>>reporters was a guided tour by the Soviets for
>>>propaganda purposes; it was not an investigation by
>>>any specialized person.

>>>22. Finally, Professor Rassinier draws attention to an
>>>important admission by Dr. Kubovy, director of the World
>>>Centre of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Tel-Aviv,
>>>made in La Terre Retrouvée, December 15th, 1960.

>>>Dr. Kubovy recognised that not a single order for
>>>extermination exists from Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich
>>>or Goering (Le Drame des Juifs européen, p. 31, 39).(p.29)

>>>Browning had never heard of Kubovy or the World
>>>Centre of Contemporary Jewish Documentation. But
>>>both Faurisson and Irving knew of Kubovy and Irving
>>>had cited Kubovy’s quote from La Terre Retrouvee in
>>>his book, Hitler’s War.

>>>23. However, {Rassinier} regards such a figure as a
>>>maximum limit, and refers to the lower estimate of
>>>896,892 casualties in a study of the same
>>>problem by the Jewish statistician Raul Hilberg. (p.29)

>>>Hilberg testified that he was not a statistician and had
>>>never given an estimate of 896,892. His own
>>>calculation in fact was over 5 million. Weber testified
>>>that Harwood had taken this information from Paul
>>>Rassinier’s boos; the original mistake was therefore
>>>Rassinier’s and not Harwood’s.

>>>24. … Professor Rassinier concludes . . . that the number
>>>of Jewish casualties during the Second World War could not
>>>have exceeded 1,200,000, and he notes that this has finally
>>>been accepted as valid by the World Centre of Contemporary
>>>Jewish Documentation at Paris. (p.29)

>>>Hilberg testified he had never heard of this Centre or
>>>the figure cited by Harwood.

>>>25. RICHARD HARWOOD is a writer and specialist in political
>>>and diplomatic aspects of the Second World War. At present
>>>he is with the University of London. (p.30)

>>>Historian Weber testified that the author of the
>>>pamphlet was a man named Richard Verrall, who had
>>>used the pseudonym “Richard Harwood”. Verrall was a
>>>graduate of the University of London with High
>>>Honours; he was a writer and had a specialized interest
>>>in political and diplomatic aspects of the Second World
>>>War. Verrall relied upon secondary sources published
>>>in the 1950s and 1960s in writing the pamphlet, which
>>>was published in 1974. Most errors made by the author
>>>were errors originally made by Paul Rassinier, the
>>>pioneer revisionist historian, whose works Verrall had
>>>relied upon heavily.

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
against them — except force.” — John Bryant

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
John Bryant

We all like late night discussions, even from Stormfront,
Christian Identity, Pamyat, Aryan Nations, etc.
We are together with McVay, regional managers for NAMBLA.
We like young children, so that we can train them our way.

Ken McVay invites callers,and visitors,to his homosexuals escorts
office: VISIT at:
#5 – 1601 – Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada, or my home at:
Apt. 3108 – 995 Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada
or call: 1-250-616-9431

As everyone can see McVay takes it as a compliment when he is
called a “confessed child-molester” and the additional material
should give an indication as to the why.

“I am weary of seeing the issue of “child porn” blown out of
proportion (I’ve been on and around the Net since 1988, and have
yet to come across anything I’d consider “child porn.” I’ve
seen photos of naked children, but then I’ve got some of those in
my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or any great
moral danger to our society).” – Nizkor Director Ken McVay
http://www.spectacle.org/695/mcvay.html [Many paedophiles
also have family albums with naked children photos in them.]

Look at Ken McVay’s photo and ask yourselves; “Does he not look like
a disheveled unkempt pervert or someone who would molest your child
even if he or she were not naked”?
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg

For detailed and documented evidence of McVay’s questionable
background and details of convictions, please refer to Dr.David
Michael’s detailed expose on McVay. McVay is a distraught paranoid
molester, and is known for claiming that anyone who refutes his lies
must be a grosvenor!!
It is also suspected that McVay fabricates responses using aliases,
just to justify his existence to his ZHID masters.

Since I am a female, I also like to receive many calls, to discuss
NAMBLA,lesbianism, JEW atrocities and similar.
Email me, Shiksa Susan Cohen at: [email protected], especially
late nights.

Also,be sure to include me on maillists:
Keith Spencer,5005 Whitemud Road,Edmonton,AB,Canada T6H5L2
I welcome phone calls, late nights:(780)437-1787

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

They also are involved in exposing Ken McVay for the crook he is,
and passing on information to the appropriate criminal prosecutors.

Reply-To:Frank Arthur
or to [email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the
like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:05 EST 2007
Article: 65101 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:585506 soc.culture.swiss:65101 soc.culture.usa:2008221 soc.culture.australian:411401 alt.politics.nationalism.white:531640
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Pravda2
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.canadadian,soc.culture.australian,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: World Jew Congress Fights to Suppress Publication of TRUTH!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 41
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:47:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1181832420 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:47:00 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:47:00 MDT

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:01:45 -0400, in alt.revisionism “Neil Harrington”
wrote:

>From Prof. Norman Finkelstein’s site, January 2006 article

New Woes at the House of Hucksters (w/Finkelstein’s comment)

NGF comments: In The Holocaust Industry I documented the World Jewish
Congress’s double shakedown of Swiss banks and Nazi holocaust victims. The
mastermind of this plot was a repellant sewer rat named Rabbi Israel Singer
who headed the World Jewish Congress. In the appendix to the second
paperback edition of my book I stated that Singer won’t be stopped “unless
he is finally put where he belongs, behind bars.” It seems that day might
not be so far off. In the past year it has been reported that while
denouncing the Swiss banks for using secrecy laws to deny Jews access to
their Holocaust-era accounts, Singer himself opened up a secret Swiss bank
account where he was squirreling away monies pilfered from the World Jewish
Congress. Now it seems that the House of Hucksters is beset with yet new
scandals.

Ganzfried, the Swiss journalist, has been sharply critical of Jewish
communal efforts to win back Holocaust-era assets, which have roiled Swiss
Jews’ relations with their neighbors. He said his upcoming articles will be
aimed at documenting the shortcomings in that process.

WJC Fights Publication Of Articles On Its Woes

January 20, 2006 | The Forward
By NATHANIEL POPPER

The World Jewish Congress is fighting to block publication in Switzerland of
a series of magazine articles that reportedly will contain damaging new
allegations about the organization’s management and handling of funds.

(article continues at this link)

http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=3&ar=55

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:05 EST 2007
Article: 65107 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:787549 soc.culture.europe:585615 soc.culture.russian:461418 soc.culture.german:375361 soc.culture.swiss:65107
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Pravda2
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian
Subject: DIE MACHT DER GLOBALEN JUDEN-MAFIA – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 252
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:47:29 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1181954849 64.59.135.176 (Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:47:29 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:47:29 MDT

From: Ken McVay
Subject: DIE MACHT DER GLOBALEN JUEDEN-MAFIA!!
Newsgroups:
soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.austria,soc.culture.polish

NOTE: Do not print this out if you reside in Austria;
Belgium; France; Germany; Israel; Spain or Switzerland.

WARNING To People in Austria; Belgium; France; Germany;
Israel; Spain and Switzerland. You can be fined,
imprisoned or both for discussing the topics set
forth in this article.

From: [email protected]
Subject: DIE MACHT DER GLOBALEN JUDEN-MAFIA
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:10:10 -0500
Newsgroups: de.soc.politik.misc

22.1.2001

DIE MACHT DER GLOBALEN JUDEN-MAFIA

Pardon, was wir genau sagen wollten ist DROGEN-, WAFFEN-,
PORNO- und ABZOCKMAFIA.

Waehrend heutzutage rechte und braune Furze weltweit auf
den Titelseiten der Freimaurerpresse Schlagzeilen
machen, werden andere Meldungen – die tatsaechlich
veruebten Verbrechen der Globalisten und Juden betreffend,
bestenfalls als Minimeldung auf der Chronikseite gebracht.

Der freimaurerisch-judea kontrollierten Medien-Mafia ist
es z.B. gelungen einen blutigen Massenmord und
Massenvergewaltigung in Wichita (USA) an 5 Weisse
durch zwei Neger voellig zu unterdruecken.
Wird jedoch einem Nigger-Drogendealer in Deutschland
auch nur ein Haar gekruemmt, gibt es sofort in allen Medien
einen Proteststurm, Kerzerlmaersche und alle irren
Gruen-Bolschewisten weltweit beginnen schlagartig mit
Lichterketten, Sanktionen und sonstigen Unsinn.

Ein weiteres Beispiel fuer die Macht der Juden-Mafia:
Aus Mexiko wurde heute gemeldet, dass der Ober-Pate
und einer der maechtigsten mexikanischen Drogenbosse,
der Jude Joaquin Guzman aus einem luxurioesen
“Hochsicherheitsgefaengnis” offenbar problemlos
entfliehen konnte. Wie das?

Der Direktor dieses noblen “Etablishments” und weitere
30 Waerter (!) wurden als mutmassliche Fluchthelfer
verhaftet. Eine reine Alibihandlung, denn welcher
Richter oder Polizist dem seine Karriere, sein Leben
oder/und Familie lieb und wert ist, wird der
“Ueberredungskunst” oder/und Scheck eines Mosche
Rothschild oder Sharon Feigenbaum einen Widerstand
entgegensetzen?

Beweis: Die russisch-juedischen Pornohersteller in Moskau,
die zwar pro Forma verhaftet wurden, aber nach drei Tagen
schon wieder ihren Geschaeften im Internet nachgehen konnten.
In russischen Gefaengnissen gibt es offenbar kein koscheres
Essen und keine Synagoge. Das Verbrechen dieser
beschnittenen Ratten aus der ostjuedischen Khasarengosse:
Vor laufender Videokamera wurde Babys zu Tode vergewaltigt
und diese Videos mit horrenden Profiten verkauft, im
Internet angeboten und Teilausschnitte davon (dank
einem juedischen TV-Boss) im italienischen Fernsehen
gezeigt. Eindeutig ein Fall fuer unsere Politiker
auch diese Art von Kulturbereicherung zu foerdern.

Da fast alle globalen Top-Verbrecher und Mafiosi
(egal ob Drogen, Menschen- oder Waffenschoieber oder
Pornokoenige) dieser Erde aus dem auserwaehlten Volk
Gottes stammen, besitzen sie zumeist auch eine israelische
Staatsbuergerschaft. Oder sie geben mitunter auch
vor, Jude zu sein. Wohl wissend, dass Israel nicht
nur der groesste antisemitische und rassistische
Killerstaat der Erde ist, sondern auch das Paradies
fuer jede Art von Dieben, Betrueger, Schwindler,
Spekulanten, Kriegsverbrecher, Holocaust-Luegner
und auch Massenmoerder ist.

Grund genug fuer den oesterreichischen Bundeskanzler
Wolfgang Schuessel und Co. dieses dekadente Volk von
Ganoven und Banditen und ihre menschenrechtswidrigen
Verbrechen (3 Millionen Semiten aus ihrer Heimat vertrieben,
hunderte Tote in wenigen Monaten) mit weiteren
Milliardenbetraegen zu finanzieren. Die Ausbeute
des von “Jahwe auserwaehlten Volk” fuer nur 12 Monate
Erpressung kann sich sehen lassen: 15 Mrd. AS die man
dem Volk und der Wirtschaft frech aus der Tasche stiehlt.

Sei’s wie sei, Oesterreich ist nicht das einizige Opfer
dieser Parasiten, denn auch andere Laender werden von
diesen genetisch kaputten Blutegeln zu Kasse gebeten –
und von der Presse tunlichst verheimlicht.

Mit rund 100 Millionen US$ wird auch Frankreich zur
Kasse gebeten. Geld bekommen auch jene Nachkommen
und Kinder die nur GLAUBEN, dass ihrer Eltern ein Konto
bei einer Bank oder Versicherung hatten. Beweisen
muessen sie als Juden nichts.

Mit rund 4,4 Milliarden wird Deutschland zur Kasse
gebeten. Oder hat man das schon wieder vergessen?
Das inkludiert selbstverstaendlich nicht die laufenden
Geschenke wie zum Beispiel hochmoderne Atom U-Boote.
(damit die Israelis weltweit unbemerkt ihre Bio-Chemischen
voelkervernichtenden Waffen abfeuern koennen)

Und diese Summen inkludieren aber keine Sonderleistungen
wie bezahlte Urlaubsreisen in Luxushotels, Schulen, Synagogen,
und die Pflege der juedischen Friedhoefe bzw.
“Holocaustdenkmaeler” (in Berlin alleine fast 500 und
weltweit werden es sicher bei 10.000 sein).

Und diese Liste des Horrors laesst sich fast endlos fortsetzen.
Nur von den Eskimos am Nordpol, den Buschnegern
Zentralafrikas oder den Kannibalen Borneos wurden
noch keine “Wiedergutmachungen” und “Entschuldigungen”
(spricht Kniefall und Fuesse kuessen) verlangt. Kein Land
der Welt kann heute mehr sicher sein, nicht in den Zangengriff
dieser beschnittenen Raubritter zu gelangen.

Man schaetzt, 300-400 Milliarden US$ an Mafia-Schutzgelder
wurden seit 1948 mit Hilfe der Holocaust-Keule
und Gaskammerschwindel an die Juden bezahlt. Und dieser
Betrag ist sicher nicht zu hoch gegriffen. Wieviele Milliarden
davon allerdings in den Aufbau und Erhalt des organisierten
Verbrechens geflossen sind, kann nur geschaetzt werden.

I am together with McVay, regional managers for NAMBLA.
We like young children, so that we can train them our way.
I like late night discussions, even from Stormfront,
Christian Identity, PAMYAT, HAMAS or Aryan Nations,etc.

CALL late nights best, or even VISIT me:
Dr Laurence B. Shiff (Nazihunter)
327 Cortleigh Boulevard
Toronto, Ontario M5N 1R2 CA
Tel: 416-785-4574.

alternate

KASPU COM
2788 Bathurst St.
Toronto, Ontario m6b3a3 CA
Tel: 416-789-5691
(FAX) 416-789-5691
E-Mail: [email protected]

My associate in the USA, who is like me, is:
Donald Ray Ellis
aka Pat Blakely/RevWhite/Mike Kalvatis/Rob Stewart ET AL
108 E. Victory Street
Star City, Arkansas 71667
Tel: (870) 628-1437
Email: [email protected]

Posted courtesy of : Paul Kneisel, who likes late
night discussions, even from Christian Identity,
Pamyat, Aryan Nations, Stormfront, HAMAS, etc.
I am together with McVay and L.Schiff,
regional managers for NAMBLA.
We like young children, so that we can train them our way.

Ken McVay invites callers to his homosexuals escorts office:
1-250-616-9431
Or, VISIT at:
#5 – 1601 – Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada, or my home at:
Apt. 3108 – 995 Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada

As everyone can see McVay takes it as a compliment when he is
called a “confessed child-molester” and the additional material
should give an indication as to the why.

Look at Ken McVay’s photo and ask yourselves; “Does he not look like
a disheveled unkempt pervert or someone who would molest your child
even if he or she were not naked”?

http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg

Also,be sure to include me on maillists:
Keith Spencer,5005 Whitemud Road,Edmonton,AB,Canada T6H5L2
I welcome phone calls, late nights:(780)437-1787 or
send lots of emails to: [email protected], or phone to work:(780)492-0473

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the website for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Or, other useful websites include:
National Alliance – www.natvan.com
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natvan.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

They also are involved in exposing Ken McVay for the crook he is,
and passing on information to the appropriate criminal prosecutors.

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
–John Bryant

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

As a service to the public, this article is posted worldwide by a
victim of the molester pervert Ken McVay. May he rot in hell.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:06 EST 2007
Article: 65109 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.german:375368 soc.culture.swiss:65109 soc.culture.europe:585684
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Pravda2
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.europe
Subject: Der Jude ist ein dreckiger Hund, erbärmlich, Parasit usw. (Auflösung) – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 558
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:33:30 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1182011610 64.59.135.176 (Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:33:30 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:33:30 MDT

Der Jude ist ein dreckiger Hund, erbärmlich, Parasit usw. (Auflösung)

On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:59:13 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc egon-karl ullrich
wrote:

Ein Teil der Auflösung des ‘Rätsel – ja-wie-kann-denn-der-sowas-sagen-?’
ist ja bereits veröffentlicht im Artikelstran “Der Jude ist ein Parasit”
(wer lesen kann und will ist klar im Vorteil, der meist dämliche Spruch
trifft hier mal wirklich zu), dort gibts auch ein zion. Original-Buch
zum runterladen:

Es handelt sich in den “Subjects” um Zitate aus der zionistischen
Literatur von zionistischen Philosophen und zion. Vordenkern bzw. aus
der unangefochtenen Fachliteratur über den Zionismus bzw. über die zion.
Ideologie. Und die zitierten sind noch harmlos, statt “dreckiger Hund”,
kann man auch übersetzen “stinkender Hund”, lt. ‘LEO.dict’

Wer meine Schriften kennt, dem war das auch von Anfang an klar. Anfänger
und Deppen gibts aber auch hier in dieser NG.

Hier der Beweis aus dem marxistischen Bereich (eigentl. jüd.-marx.
Bereich) des Herkunftsjuden Lenni Brenner, Wissenschaftsjournalist:

(aus dem Englischen)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Lenni Brenner

Zionismus im Zeitalter der Diktatoren
(Zionism in the Age of the Dictators)

2. Blut und Boden (Blood and Soil)

Die Wurzeln des zionistischen Rassismus

Es war der Antisemitismus – alleine – welcher den Zionismus begründete.
Herzl konnte seine Bewegung in keiner Weise auf irgendeinem positiven
jüdischen Selbstverständnis aufbauen.

Obwohl er die Unterstützung durch die Rabbiner anstrebte, war er
persönlich nicht gläubig. Er hatte kein besonderes Interesse an
Palästina, dem antiken Heimatland; er war ganz erpicht darauf, daß das
kenianische Hochland akzeptiert wird, zumindest auf einer zeitweiligen
Grundlage. Er hatte kein Interesse an Hebräisch; er betrachtete seinen
jüdischen Staat als ein sprachliches Abbild der Schweiz.

Der Rassengedanke lag für ihn in der Luft; die deutschen Antisemiten
sprachen von den Juden als Rasse, bald jedoch verwarf er diese Doktrin
und nutzte in einer paradoxen Diskussion Israel Zangwill, einen seiner
frühesten Gefolgsleute, als ein Beispiel für seine Ablehnung dieser
Idee. Er beschrieb den englisch-jüdischen Autor so:

“… vom langnasigen Neger-Typ, mit wolligem, tief-schwarzem Haar … er
stützt jedoch den Rassegedanken – manches daran kann ich gelten lassen,
ich muß lediglich ihn und dann wieder mich anschauen. Alles was ich
sagen kann: wir sind eine historische Einheit, eine Nation mit
anthropologischer Vielfalt.” [1]

Unbekümmert von religiösen Überlegungen, schlug er einen Atheisten, den
damals weltberühmten Autor Max Nordau, als seinen Nachfolger als
Präsident der WZO (Zionistische Weltorganisation) vor.

Und wieder waren die Jünger weniger liberal als ihr Herr.

Nordau war mit einer Christin verheiratet und befürchtete, daß sich die
Orthodoxen auf allen Ebenen daran stoßen würden. Er war bereits
verheiratet, als er zum Zionismus konvertierte und wurde bald, trotz
seiner nichtjüdischen Ehefrau, ein anerkannter jüdischer Rassist.

Am 21. Dezember 1903 gab er Eduard Drumonts radikal antisemitischer
Zeitung ‘La Libre Parole’ ein Interview, in welchem er sagte, daß der
Zionismus keine Sache der Religion sondern der Rassen-Exklusivität sei
und “es gibt keinen, mit welchem ich in größerer Übereinstimmung in
diesem Punkt stehe, als M. Drupont”. [3]

Obwohl sich nur ein einziger nationaler Ableger der WZO (der
holländische Verband im Jahr 1913) jemals darum bemühte, die Juden,
welche in gemischten Ehen lebten, auszuschließen, starb der
kosmopolitische Zionismus einen frühen Tod mit Herzl im Jahr 1904. [4]

Die Bewegung in Osteuropa, ihre Massenbasis, teilte die spontanen
volks-religiösen Vorurteile der orthodoxen Gemeinden ihres Umfeldes.

Obwohl die traditionellen Juden Missionierung kannten und Ehen mit
Nicht-Juden als Verstärkung ihrer Glaubenskraft ansahen, brachte später
von der katholischen Kirche ausgehender Druck die Rabbiner dazu,
Konvertierungen als “lästiges Jucken” zu betrachten und sie stellten die
Missionierung ein.

Im Laufe der Jahrhunderte, wurde die Selbst-Abgrenzung zum Kennzeichen
der Juden. Mit der Zeit betrachteten die Massen Mischehen als Verrat an
der Orthodoxie. Obwohl im Westen nur manche Juden die Religion
abwandelten und “Reform”-Sekten bildeten sowie andere sich vom Gott
ihrer Vorväter gänzlich abwandten, ging der Lauf im Wesentlichen weg vom
Judaismus.

Wenige nur stießen zur jüdischen Welt hinzu, entweder durch
Konvertierung oder Heiraten.

Obschon der westliche Zionismus sich in einer mehr säkularen Atmosphäre
entwickelte als jener Ost-Europas, betrachtete die Masse seiner
Mitglieder Misch-Ehen eher als Wegführung der Juden von der Gemeinde
denn als Hinzufügung zu ihr.

Die deutschen Akademiker, welche die zionistische Bewegung nach Herzls
Tod übernahmen, entwickelten die modernistisch-rassistische Ideologie
vom jüdischen Separatismus [Loslösungsstreben].

Sie waren stark beeinflußt von ihren pan-germanischen Studenten-Kollegen
der ‘Wandervögel’ (Zugvögel oder Freigeister), welche den deutschen
Campus vor 1914 dominierten. Diese Chauvinisten wiesen die Juden als
nicht von germanischem Blut zurück; folglich konnten sie niemals Teil
des Deutschen Volkes sein und waren grundsätzlich Fremde auf deutschem
Boden. Alle jüdischen Studenten waren gezwungen, sich mit diesen
Konzepten, welche sie umringten, auseinander zu setzen.

Ein paar bewegten sich nach links und wurden Sozialdemokraten. Für jene
war dies [der Wandervögel-Chauvinismus, Anm. eku] nur ein mehr
bourgeoiser Nationalismus und war als solcher zu bekämpfen.

Die meisten blieben herkömmlich kaisertreu, standhafte Nationalisten,
welche darauf beharrten, daß tausend Jahre auf deutschem Boden aus ihnen
“Deutsche mosaischen Glaubens” gemacht hatten.

Aber ein Anteil der jüdischen Studenten eignete sich die
‘Wandervögel’-Ideologie an und übertrug sie einfach in zionistische
Terminologie.

Sie stimmten mit den Antisemiten in mehreren Punkten überein: die Juden
waren kein Teil des Deutschen Volkes und, natürlich, Juden und Deutsche
sollten sich nicht geschlechtlich vermischen, nicht aus den traditionell
religiösen Gründen, sondern um der Reinheit ihres eigenen einzigartigen
Blutes willen.

Da nicht von deutschem Blut, hätten sie zwangsläufig ihren eigenen Boden
zu bekommen: Palästina.

Auf den ersten Blick schien es befremdlich, daß jüdische Studenten aus
der Mittel-Klasse derart beeinflußt durch antisemitisches Gedankengut
sein sollten, besonders, da zur selben Zeit der Sozialismus mit seiner
assimilationistischen Haltung gegenüber den Juden beträchtliche
Unterstützung in der Gesellschaft um sie herum gewann.

Der Sozialismus appelierte jedoch vorwiegend an die Arbeiter, nicht an
die Mittel-Klasse; in ihrer Umwelt herrschte der Chauvinismus vor,
obwohl intellektuell, lehnten sie ihre Verbindung zum Deutschen Volk ab,
und in der Tat, niemals emanzipierten sie sich von der deutschen
Kapitalistenklasse, den ganzen Ersten Weltkrieg hindurch unterstüzten
sie leidenschaftlich ihre eigene Regierung.

[Anm. eku: s.a. “Max-Bodenheimer-Archiv”. Deutsche Zionisten bilden im
1. WK mittels maßgeblicher Beteiligung der Kölner Fam. Bodenheimer
(=zionistisches Establishment) Unterstützungskommitee, dieses reist an
die Ostfront, bildet Judenräte in den befreiten Gebieten Polens, nennt
die Juden Europas “Deutsche” oder “deutschenfreundlich” und – nicht
zuletzt – sitzt buchstäblich als Ehren-Gast an Kaisers Esstisch!]

In all ihrem grandiosen intellektuellen Anspruch, war ihr völkischer
Zionismus doch nur einfach eine Imitation der deutschen
nationalistischen Ideologie. Deshalb war der junge Philosoph Martin
Buber fähig, während dem Ersten Weltkrieg den Zionismus mit inbrünstigem
deutschen Patriotismus zu verbinden.

In seinem Buch ‘Drei Reden über das Judentum’, veröffentlicht im Jahre
1911, sprach Buber über einen Jugendlichen, der:

“einen Sinn hat für die Unsterblichkeit der Generationen einer
Blutgemeinschaft, welche er als Vorgänger seines Ich empfindet, dessen
Ausdauer wird unendlich währen.

Hinzu kommt die Entdeckung, befördert durch sein Bewußtsein, daß Blut
eine tief verwurzelte, nährende Kraft im Inneren jedes einzelnen
Menschen ist;

daß die tiefsten Schichten unseres Seins vom Blut bestimmt sind;

daß unser innerstes Denken und unser Wille davon gefärbt sind.

Jetzt findet er heraus, daß die Welt um ihn eine Welt der Eindrücke und
Einflüsse ist, wohingegen Blut das Reich einer beeinflußbaren und
beeindruckbaren Substanz ist, einer Sustanz die alles in ihre eigene
Form aufnimmt und anpasst, und, wer auch immer, vor die Wahl, Umgebung
oder Blut gestellt, sich für die Substanz entscheidet, fortan ein wahrer
Jude aus seinem Innersten sein muß, um zu leben als ein Jude mit all den
Widersprüchen, der Tragödie und all der späteren Verheißung seines
Blutes” [5]

[Anm. eku: naturgemäß unvollkommene Rückübersetzung, werde noch
versuchen, den Originaltext Bubers zu bekommen…]

Die Juden leben in Europa seit Jahrtausenden, weit länger, sagen wir
mal, als die Ungarn. Niemand träumte davon, sich auf die Ungarn als
Asiaten zu beziehen, jedoch, so Buber, die Juden Europas wären noch
Asiaten und würden es voraussichtlich immer bleiben.

“Du kannst den Juden aus Palästina rauskriegen, aber niemals Palästina
raus aus dem Juden.”

Im Jahr 1916 schrieb Buber, daß der Jude:

“vertrieben wurde aus seinem Land und über die Länder des Abendlandes
verstreut wurde, jedoch, trotz all dem, blieb er ein Orientale. Man kann
all dies im noch so sehr assimlierten Juden entdecken, wenn man Zugang
zu seiner Seele gewinnt … der unvergängliche, allen Juden gemeinsame
Trieb – dieser wird in das Sein einkehren nach einer Fortdauer des
Lebens in Palästina … Sobald der Trieb mit seiner Mutters Scholle in
Berührung kommt, wird er wieder schöpferisch.” [6]

Bubers völkischer Zionismus, mit seinen ausgesuchten Strängen mystischen
Überschwangs, war jedoch zu vergeistigt um ein breites Publikum
anzusprechen.

Was gebraucht wurde, war eine populäre zionistische Version des
Sozial-Darwinismus, welcher die bourgoise intellektuelle Welt des
aufbrechenden europäischen imperialen Wettbewerbs nach Afrika und nach
Osten überschwemmte.

Die zionistische Version dieser Auffassung wurde von dem
österreichischen Anthropologen Ignatz Zollschan entwickelt. Für ihn war
der verborgene Nutzen des Judaismus, daß jener, obgleich unabsichtlich,
das Wunder der Wunder bewirken würde:

“Eine Nation von reinem Blut, unverdorben von den Krankheiten des
Exzesses oder der Unmoral, von einem hoch entwickelten Sinn für
familiäre Reinheit und von tief verwurzelten tugendhaften Gewohnheiten
würde eine außergewöhnliche geistige Regsamkeit entwickeln.
Darüberhinaus sorgt das Verbot der Mischehen dafür, daß dieser
höchst-ethische Schatz durch reinmixen von weniger umsichtig
hervorgebrachten Rassen nicht verloren geht … daraus resultiert eine
naturgemäße Auswahl, welche keine Parallele in der Geschichte der
menschlichen Rasse findet … Wenn eine Rasse, die so hoch beschenkt
ist, die Gelegenheit bekommt, erneut ihre ursprüngliche Kraft zu
entwickeln, kann dem nichts gleichkommen, soweit es den kulturellen Wert
anbelangt.” [7]

Sogar Albert Einstein unterschrieb die zionistischen Rassenkonzepte,
damit verstärkte er den Rassismus und verlieh ihm das Prestige seiner
Reputation. Seine eigenen Beiträge zur Diskussion klingen entsprechend
tiefsinnig, sie beruhen jedoch auf dem selben Unsinn.

“Nationen mit rassischen Unterschieden scheinen Instinkte zu besitzen,
welche gegen ihre Verschmelzung wirken. Die Assimilation der Juden in
die europäischen Nationen … konnte nicht das Gefühl eines Mangels an
Verwandtschaft zwischen ihnen und jenen, unter denen sie lebten,
beseitigen. Letzten Endes ist das instinktive Gefühl des fehlenden
Verwandschaftsverhältnisses auf das Gesetz der Energieerhaltung
zurückzuführen. Aus diesem Grund kann es [das instinktive Mangelgefühl,
Anm. eku] durch keinen noch so wohlmeinenden Druck ausgerottet werden.” [8]

Buber, Zollschan und Einstein waren nur drei der klassischen Zionisten,
welche hochtrabend gelehrt über Rassen-Reinheit redeten. Jedoch konnte
der schiere Fanatismus Einiger nicht den des Amerikaners Maurice Samuel
einholen.

Als ein gut bekannter Autor jener Zeit – später, in den 1940er Jahren
arbeitete er mit Weizman an dessen Autobiographie – wendete sich Samuel
im Jahre 1927 in seinem Werk, ‘Ich, der Jude’, an die amerikanische
Öffentlichkeit. Er denunzierte mit Horror eine Stadt, der er
bereitwillig zugestand, daß er sie nur vom Hörensagen kannte – und von
der uns die vorgelegten Hinweise nahelegen, daß es sich um die
ungebunden lebende Künstler-Kolonie bei Taos, Neu-Mexiko, handelt:

“Auf diesem kleinen Platz kamen Repräsentanten der afrikanischen Neger,
der Amerikaner und der chinesischen Mongolen zusammen, der Semite und
der Arier … freie Mischehen setzen sich durch … Warum erfüllt mich
dieses Bild, teils wirklich, teils phantastisch, mit einem befremdenden
Abscheu, suggeriert es das Ekelerregende, das düstere Bestialische? …
Wieso ruft dieses Dorf, wie meine Phantasie heraufbeschwört, den
Gedanken an einen Haufen Reptilien hervor, die hässlich in einem
Wasserkübel brüten?” [9]

“Um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit sein”

Obwohl ‘Blut’ ein wiederkehrendes Thema in der zionistischen
vor-Holokaust-Literatur war, war dieses nicht so zentral wie die
Botschaft vom ‘Boden’.

Solange Amerikas Grenzen [relativ, Anm. eku] offen blieben, fragten
Europas Juden: wenn der Antisemitismus nicht in seiner Heimat bekämpft
werden konnte, warum sollten sie nicht einfach der Menge nach Amerika
folgen?

Die zionistische Antwort war doppelt gewappnet: Antisemitismus würde die
Juden begleiten, wohin immer sie auch gingen, und, darüberhinaus, es
waren die Juden selbst, welche den Antisemitismus durch ihre eigene
Charackteristik hervor riefen.

Die Wurzel des Antisemitismus, beharrten die Zionisten, war die jüdische
Exil-Existenz.

Die Juden lebten parasitär von ihren “Wirtsvölkern”. Es gäbe so gut wie
keine jüdischen Bauern in der Diaspora. Die Juden lebten in den Städten,
sie waren der manuellen Arbeit entfremdet, oder, um es unverblümt zu
sagen, sie mieden diese und beschäftigten sich lieber mit
intellektuellen oder kommerziellen Angelegenheiten. Ihre Beanspruchung
des Patriotismus war bestenfalls hohl, da sie ewig von Land zu Land
wanderten. Und als sie selbst sich einbildeten, sie wären Sozialisten
und Internationalisten, waren sie in Wirklichkeit nicht mehr als die
Mittelsmänner der Revolution, welche die “Schlachten anderer Leute”
ausfochten.

Diese zusammengefaßten Lehren waren bekannt als ‘Shelilat Ha’galut’ [Die
Verneinung der Diaspora], an der sich das gesamte Spektrum der Zionisten
festhielt, nur in Details variiert.

Sie wurden in der zionistischen Presse energisch vertreten, in der die
ausgeprägte Qualität vieler Artikel aus der Feindseligkeit gegenüber dem
gesamten jüdischen Volk bestand. Wenn irgendjemand diese Fetzen ohne
Kenntnis der Quellen las, würde er automatisch vermuten, daß sie der
antisemitischen Presse entstammten.

Die ‘Weltanschauung’ der Jugendorganisation ‘Hashomer Hatzair’ [Junge
Wächter], ursprünglich verfaßt im Jahr 1917, allerdings erst 1936 wieder
neu veröffentlicht, war typisch für diese Art Ergüsse:

“Der Jude ist die Karikatur eines normalen, natürlichen Menschen, in
physischer wie spiritueller Hinsicht. Als Einzelwesen in der
Gesellschaft rebelliert er und wirft die gesellschaftlichen Bindungen
ab, er kennt weder Ordnung noch Disziplin.” [10]

Ganz ähnlich konnte so im Jahre 1935 Ben Frommer, ein Autor der
ultra-rechten zionistisch-revisionistischen Bewegung, nicht weniger als
16 Millionen seiner Mit-Juden [offenbar wurde seine Erklärung weltweit
verbreitet, Anm. eku] erklären, daß:

“Die Tatsache ist unabweisbar, daß die Juden kollektiv krank und
neurotisch sind. Jene Berufs-Juden, welche nun erschüttert diese
Wahrheit entrüstet zurückweisen, sind die größten Feinde ihrer Rasse,
denn sie führen sie dadurch auf die Suche nach falschen Lösungen oder
zumeist nur nach Beschönigungen.” [11]

Diese Art des jüdischen Selbsthasses durchsetzte einen großen Teil des
zionistischen Schrifttums.

Im Jahre 1934 erregte Yehezkel Kaufman – damals berühmt als Gelehrter
für biblische Geschichte an der Hebräischen Universität zu Jerusalem,
und obwohl selbst Zionist, dennoch ein Gegner der bizarren Theorie der
Negation der Diaspora – wütende Kontroversen durch eine Auswahl der
hebräischen Literatur mit noch schlimmeren Beispielen.

Auf Hebräisch konnten die pathetischen Schreiber ihre Mit-Juden ohne
Furcht vor dem Vorwurf, den Judenhassern Munition zu liefern, regelrecht
zur Sau machen. Kaufmans ‘Hurban Hanefesh’ (Holokaust der Seele) zitiert
dazu drei der klassisch-zionistischen Vordenker.

Für Micah Yosef Berdichevsky waren die Juden “keine Nation, kein Volk,
keine Menschen”.

Für Yosef Chaim Brenner waren sie nicht mehr als “Zigeuner, dreckige
Hunde, nicht-menschlich, erbärmliche Hunde”.

Für Aaron David Gordon war sein Volk nicht besser als “Parasiten,
grundsätzlich unnütze Leute”. [12]

[Anm. eku: dieses Buch Kaufmans, wohl als eine Kritik an den
zionistischen Pöbeleien gemeint, hatte Julius Streicher lt. Text der
Webseite der frommen, ultra-orthodoxen Juden, JewsAgainstZionism,
gekannt, aus dieser Quell hatte Streicher offenbar eine Reihe seiner
Beschreibungen und Ausdrücke für die Juden gewonnen]

Natürlich mußte Maurice Samuel seine Schönschrift einbringen, um
Verleumdungen gegen seine Mit-Juden zusammen zu brauen.

Im Jahr 1924 fabrizierte er in seinem Werk ‘Ihr Nicht-Juden’ (You
Gentiles) eine von ihrem eigenen bösartigen Schöpfer gegen die
christliche Ordnung angetriebene Judenheit:

“Wir Juden, wir, die Zerstörer, werden für immer die Zerstörer bleiben.
Egal was ihr macht, nie wird es unserem Anspruch genügen. Ewig werden
wir zerstören, denn wir brauchen unsere eigene Welt, eine Gottes-Welt,
zu deren Erschaffung ihr nicht veranlagt seid … jene von uns, welche
diese Wahrheit nicht begreifen, werden sich immer wiederfinden in
Allianz mit euren rebellischen Gruppen, bis die Desillusionierung kommt,
unser elendes Schicksal, welches uns in eurer Mitte verstreute, hat uns
diese unwillkommene Rolle aufgedrängt.” [13]

Der Labour-Zionismus [linke, nicht-marxistische Strömung] brachte seine
eigene einzigartige Sorte des jüdischen Selbsthasses hervor.

Trotz seines Namens und Anspruches, war der Labour-Zionismus niemals
fähig, einen signifikanten Anteil der jüdischen Arbeiterklasse in auch
nur irgendeinem Land der Diaspora für sich einzunehmen.

Seine Mitglieder führten ein selbst-widerlegendes Argument an: sie
behaupteten, daß die jüdischen Arbeiter nur in “marginalen” Industrien
beschäftigt seien, in solchen wie der Nadel-Industrie [Nadeln für
Textilherstellung und Grammophone, Anm. eku], welche keine wesentliche
Bedeutung für die VolksWirtschaften der “Wirts”-Nationen hatten, daher
würden die jüdischen Arbeiter immerwährend marginal für die
Arbeiterbewegung in den Ländern ihres Aufenthalts bleiben.

Jüdische Arbeiter, so wurde behauptet, könnten einen “gesunden”
Klassenkampf nur in ihrem eigenen Land wagen.

Arme Juden zeigten natürlich wenig Interesse an einer sogenannten
Arbeiter-Bewegung, welche ihnen nicht etwa erzählte, mit allem was sie
vermochten für die Verbesserung der gegenwärtigen Bedingungen zu
kämpfen, sondern sich eher um das weit entfernte Palästina zu sorgen.

Der Ruf der zionistischen Arbeiter-Bewegung richtete sich paradoxerweise
primär an jene jungen Mittelklasse-Juden, welche den Bruch zu ihrer
Herkunfts-Klasse suchten, war jedoch nicht bereit, sich dann den
Arbeitern der Länder ihres Aufenthalts zu zuwenden.

Der Labour-Zionismus wurde so eine Art Gegenkultur-Sekte, welche die
jüdischen Marxisten wegen deren Internationalismus und die jüdische
Mittelklasse als parasitische Ausbeuter der “Wirts”völker anprangerte.

Im Endeffekt übertrugen sie den traditionellen Antisemitismus ins
Jiddische: die Juden waren in den falschen Ländern in den falschen
Berufen und machten die falsche Politik.

Es brauchte den Holokaust, um diesem Gejammer einen Sinn zu geben.

Erst dann erkannten sie den gemeinsamen Nenner in ihrer eigenen
Botschaft und der anti-jüdischen Propaganda der Nazis.

Im März 1942 gestand Chaim Greenberg, zu der Zeit Herausgeber des
Labour-zionistischen Presse-Organs ‘Jewish Frontier’ in New York,
schmerzlich ein, daß es tatsächlich

“eine Zeit [gegeben hat,] als es für zionistische Sprecher
(einschließlich den Schreiber) modisch war, von ihrem Standpunkt aus zu
erklären, ‘um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit
sein’. Bis zu diesem Tag stehen die zionistischen Labour-Kreise unter
dem Einfluß der Vorstellung, daß die Rückkehr nach Zion einen Prozeß der
Reinigung von unseren ökonomischen Unsauberkeiten einschließt. Jeden,
der keine sogenannte ‘produktive’ manuelle Arbeit ergreift, hält man für
einen Sünder gegen das Volk Israel und gegen die Menschheit.” [14]

[b]”Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda”[/b]

Wenn irgendjemandem ohne weitere Fakten erzählt würde, daß die ersten
Zionisten Rassisten waren, würde derjenige automatisch vermuten, daß
dies ein Teil der kolonialistischen Seite des Zionismus in Palästina sei.

Tatsächlich ist dem nicht so; Der ‘Blut-Zionismus’ hätte sich auch
entwickelt, wenn Palästina komplett unbewohnt gewesen wäre. Die
Begeisterung für ‘Blut und Boden’ war bereits Teil des Zionismus, bevor
der erste moderne Zionist jemals Europa verließ.

Der Rassen-Zionismus hingegen war ein merkwürdiger Ableger des
Rassen-Antisemitismus.

Gewiß, so argumentierten die Zionisten, die Juden waren eine reine
Rasse, bestimmt reiner als, sagen wir mal, die Deutschen, die einen
großen Zuschlag slawischen Blutes besaßen, wie sogar die All-Deutschen
eingestanden. Für diese Zionisten konnte jedoch noch nicht mal ihr
Glaube an die Rassen-Reinheit den einen Makel der jüdischen Existenz
überspielen: die Juden verfügten nicht über ihren eigenen jüdischen Boden.

Wenn die teutonischen Rassisten sich als ‘Übermenschen’ sehen konnten,
sahen diese hebräischen Rassisten die Juden eben nicht in diesem Licht;
eher war das Gegenteil der Fall.

Sie glaubten, daß wegen des Fehlens eines eigenen Bodens die Juden
“Untermenschen” wären, daher wären diese, aus der Sicht ihrer “Wirte”,
wenig mehr als Blutsauger: die Welt-Pest eben.

Wenn man an den Wahrheitsgehalt der rassischen Exklusivität glaubt,
fällt es schwer, etwas gegen den Rassismus von irgendjemand anderem
einzuwenden.

Wenn man weiters daran glaubt, daß es für ein Volk unmöglich ist, gesund
zu bleiben, außer in seinem eigenen Heimatland, kann man nichts gegen
irgendeinen anderen einwenden, der “Fremde” von seinem Territorium
ausschließt.

Tatsächlich jedoch dachte der Durchschnitts-Zionist selbst niemals
daran, das zivilisierte Europa zu verlassen, um es gegen die Wildnis
Palästinas einzutauschen. In Wirklichkeit ist es offensichtlich, daß ihm
die zionistische ‘Blut und Boden’-Ideologie eine vortreffliche
Begründung lieferte, den Antisemitismus nicht auf dessen Heimatboden zu
bekämpfen: Es war nicht der Fehler der Antisemiten, es kam von dem
eigenen Pech der Juden, ihrem Dasein im Exil.

Die Zionisten konnten tränenreich darlegen, daß in dem Verlust
Palästinas die Wurzel des Antisemitismus lag und die Wiedergewinnung
Palästinas die einzige Lösung der Judenfrage wäre. Alles andere könne
nur Beschönigung sein oder zwecklos.

Walter Laqueur, Wortführer der zionistischen Historiker, fragte in
seinem Buch, ‘A History of Zionism’ [Die Geschichte des Zionismus], ob
das zionistische Beharren auf der Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus
nicht doch das “Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda” war. [15]

Sicher war es das.

Laqueurs Frage kann jedoch am besten mit einer anderen Frage beantwortet
werden: ist es schwierig, den leichtgläubigen Leser einer Nazi-Zeitung
zu verstehen, der daraus schloß, daß das, was die Nazis erklärten und
welchem die Zionisten – Juden – zustimmten, richtig sein müsse?

Und es kam noch schlimmer: jede jüdische Bewegung, welche über die
Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus schwätzte, geradeso, als wäre jener
“natürlich”, strebte nach vertraglichen Übereinkommen mit den Nazis, als
diese an die Macht kamen.

——–

Fußnoten und Quellen:

1. Marvin Lowenthal (ed.), The Diaries of Theodor Herzl, p.78.

2. Amos Elon, Herzl, p.255.

3. Desmond Stewart, Theodor Herzl, p.322.

4. The WZO is structured by national states, and elections are held on a
national basis for the World Zionist Congress; the various ideological
tendencies which are world-wide in their structure, run in the various
national elections for delegates.

5. Martin Buber, On Judaism, pp.15-19.

6. Ibid., pp.75-7.

7. Ignatz Zollschan, Jewish Questions (1914) pp.17-18.

8. Solomon Goldman, Crisis and Decision (1938), p.116.

9. Maurice Samuel, I, the Jew, pp.244-6.

10. Our Shomer “Weltanschauung”, Hashomer Hatzair (December 1936), p.26.

11. Ben Frommer, The Significance of a Jewish State, Jewish Call
(Shanghai, May 1935), p.10.

12. Yehezkel Kaufman, Hurban Hanefesh: A Discussion of Zionism and
Anti-Semitism, Issues (Winter 1967), p.106.

13. Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p.155.

14. Chaim Greenberg, The Myth of Jewish Parasitism, Jewish Frontiers
(March 1942), p.20.

15. Walter Laqueur, A History of Zionism, p.500.

************************************************************************
http://www.marxists.de/middleast/brenner/ch02.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:08 EST 2007
Article: 65114 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:787796 soc.culture.german:375388 soc.culture.swiss:65114 soc.culture.europe:585737 alt.politics.europe:64634
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Pravda2
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.europe
Subject: DIE MACHT DER GLOBALEN JUDEN-MAFIA – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 119
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:49:52 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1182095392 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 17 Jun 2007 09:49:52 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 09:49:52 MDT

DIE MACHT DER GLOBALEN JUDEN-MAFIA

From: “Public ”
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:44:46 -0500
Local: Sun, Jun 17 2001 1:44 pm
Subject: Re:DIE MACHT DER GLOBALEN JUDEN-MAFIA

22.1.2001

DIE MACHT DER GLOBALEN JUDEN-MAFIA

Pardon, was wir genau sagen wollten ist DROGEN-, WAFFEN-,
PORNO- und ABZOCKMAFIA.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:08 EST 2007
Article: 65118 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:585866 soc.culture.swiss:65118 soc.culture.polish:788217 soc.culture.ukrainian:132887 soc.culture.german:375438 uk.politics.misc:1915073 pl.regionalne.warszawa:440227
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Jules Striker
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.german,uk.politics.misc,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: ZYDS=NAZI COLLABORATORS!! KASTNER CASE,RUMKOWSKI+50 More Cases Documented! Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 1288
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:22:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1182288147 64.59.135.176 (Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:22:27 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:22:27 MDT

This article is so important, it needs to be reposted and passed on,so
that more and more people around the world will come to know the truth
about the ZYD COLLABORATION with nazis.
It will not be surprising to find after even more research, that even
more incidents of ZHID/Nazi COLLABORATION happened!!

Even about the HOLOHOAX, based on zyd lies!!

More and more truth is coming out, about the perfidious ZYD
COLLABORATION with the nazis!!

Surely this should cause those countries paying tribute dollars to the
ZYDS, to consider demanding repayment?

>>>>On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:08:44 -0700, Joel Eichmann
>>>> wrote:

It will not be surprising for researchers in Poland, Russia and even
Germany and Switzerland, to produce even more evidence of even more
COLLABORATION between the zionists and their colleagues in Germany!!

>>On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:41:32 -0700, dandelion
>> wrote:

>>Now that more and more research, with supporting documentation, is
>>being made public, documenting the collaboration of the ZIONAZIS
with
>>the nazis, slime like Shiksa Sueee Cohen do not want this TRUTH made
>>public.

>>Even German historians such as C. Lange are now making public their
>>findings, to the chagrin of the ZHID COLLABORATORS.

>>It was not only the notorious KASTNER CASE!!

>>>On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:51:02 -0700, Heinrich Himmelfarb
>>> wrote:
>>>Newsgroups:soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.european,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.germany
>>>On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:25:52 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis
>>>September 2004, page 86
>>>Book Review
>>>51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis
>>>By Lenni Brenner, ed. Barricade Books, 2002, 342 pp. List:$22; AET:
>>>$15.
>>>Reviewed by Sara Powell
>>>It’s no secret that Zionism embraced political expediency to
advance
>>>the cause of carving Eretz-Israel from the land of its native
>>>inhabitants. In his 1983 book, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators,
>>>Lenni Brenner shows that 20th century Zionists observed shockingly
few
>>>limits to that expediency. Not surprisingly, the book received
little
>>>coverage in the American media.

>>>Now, in 51 Documents, Brenner has compiled a wide variety of
letters,
>>>statements, articles, and judgements?some of which appeared in his
>>>earlier book?by a broad array of activists and authors, that
>>>documents Zionist cooperration with the Nazis.

>>>On the face of it, the notion seems absurd. However, Brenner
>>>presents the case?made in many Zionists? own words?that the Nazi
>>>agenda of expelling the Jews from Germany fit nicely with the
>>>Zionist plan for enticing those Jews into settling in Palestine and
>>>creating a new Jewish nation.

>>>In addition to introductory and concluding chapters, the book is
>>>organized into five sections which lead the reader through early,
>>>pre-Zionist documents; pre-Holocaust ideological factions; the
>>>Holocaust era itself; and a chapter on the Stern Gang and the
Nazis.

>>>Readers should note that a few documents are not indicative of
>>>collaboration in and of themselves, but provide the background to
>>>others written in response.

>>>These latter do indicate levels of collaboration between Zionists
and
>>>fascists, both the Nazis in Germany, and those in Mussolini’s
Italy.
>>>Brenner’s brief explanatory notes at the beginning of each document
>>>are helpful, as are the glossary and index.

>>>51 Documents assumes a certain knowledge of Zionist history, and
>>>requires a close reading and some deconstructive efforts on the
part
>>>of the reader. Those willing to commit the time and effort,
however,
>>>are rewarded with some stunning revelations. The reason some
>>>Zionists eschewed the boycott against Hitler?s Germany, for
instance, is
>>>that they had a financial deal?Ha’avara?with Germany allowing Jews
to
>>>exchange their wealth for goods to be exported to Palestine at less
of
>>>a loss, as an incentive to emigrate. Those wondering why Zionists
>>>today are so organized and experienced in their public relations
>>>efforts discover that these battles have been fought before.
>>>Moreover, the section on Nazi and Zionist understandings of
‘nationality’
>>>versus citizenship reveals how German and Israeli practices are
based on
>>>the same concept.

>>>51 Documents also sheds a whole new light on the term Holocaust
>>>guilt, frequently understood to mean Western, non-Jewish guilt for
>>>not acting against the Holocaust earlier. However, these documents
>>>make it clear that Holocaust guilt began with those Zionists who
>>>made the undoubtedly difficult, but politically expedient choice to
>>>place Eretz-Israel at the top of their priorities, above the lives
of
>>>their threatened European brethren.

>>>From a Zionist Executive Meeting speech by Yitzhak Gruenbaum on
>>>Feb. 18, 1943:

>>>And when some asked me: Can’t you give money from Keren Ha Yesod
>>>(Palestine Foundation Fund) to save Jews in the Diaspora? I said:
>>>?No! And again I say no….And, because of these things, people
>>>called me an anti-Semite, and concluded that I’m guilty, for the
fact
>>>that we don’t give ourselves completely to rescue actions.(p. 211)

>>>However difficult it may be, the reader must confront some rather
>>>disturbing conclusions. The most unsettling realization for this
>>>reviewer is that pre-Holocaust Zionists were able to politically
>>>align themselves with the Nazis because both groups fundamentally
saw
>>>race as an important dividing line?and, moreover, were determined
to
>>>keep it that way.

>>>From Vladimir Jabotinsky to Albert Einstein,’assimilation’ of Jews
>>>into the societies in which they lived was not an acceptable
option.
>>>Rather, Jewish nationalism required equality on a national level,
not
>>>a personal one. As Jabotinsky explained, ‘It is impossible for a
man
>>>to become assimilated with people whose blood is different from his
>>>own’
>>>(p. 10); in Einstein?s words, ?Palestine is first and foremost not
a
>>>refuge for East European Jews, but the incarnation of a reawakening
>>>sense of national solidarity? (p. 29).

>>>Finally, David Yisraeli, a member of the STERN GANG, , wrote the
>>>following in late 1940, as part of a proposal to Hitler. It was
>>>delivered in 1941 to two German diplomats in Lebanon.

>>>3. The establishment of the historic Jewish state on a national and
>>>totalitarian basis, bound by a treaty with the German Reich, would
be
>>>in the interest of a maintained and strengthened future German
>>>position of power in the Near East (p. 301).

>>>Such beliefs, of course, were not limited to Nazis and Zionists.
>>>Scientific and philosophical constructs of the day considered such
>>>differentiation legitimate, and ideas of racial difference?and,
>>>therefore, racial supremacy?were practiced around the world.

>>>Another disturbing conclusion a reader must inevitably face is that
>>>Zionists learned both tactical and political lessons from the Nazis
>>>and that, even today, these lessons are applied to further the
>>>Zionist cause. Although most likely known to potential readers of
this
>>>book,another disturbing element is the cover-up of the less than
savory
>>>roles of current Israeli leaders, including former prime ministers,
in
>>>the terrorist Irgun and Stern Gang just before, during, and after
the
>>>Holocaust. Likewise, the succumbing of various U.S. officials to
>>>Zionist pressure is a familiar, but distressing, story.

>>>51 Documents seems to represent a renewed attempt by Brenner to
>>>bring information regarding Zionist collaboration with the Nazis to
U.S.
>>>supporters of Israel, as well as to Jews and Muslims, in order to
>>>expand dialogue with knowledge, and save lives ‘both Palestinian
>>>and Israeli’ in the process. Readers of 51 Documents will find it
>>>difficult not to remove the rose colored glasses that so many seem
to wear
>>>when examining Zionism.

# 5 The Kastner Case
ZHID KOLABORACI WITH EICHMANN & NAZIS!!
Extracted from a pamphlet issued by BAZO-PS – 1981

Introduction

The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is
that involving Rudolf Kastner.

Most Jewish people have never heard of Rudolf Kastner.
Those who have, are generally under the impression that
there is some “controversy” about negotiations he undertook
for “the purchase of Jewish lives for money and military
equipment,” but that he was “fully rehabilitated” by the
Supreme Court of Israel.

The Accusations

Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:

Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the
British Medical Research Council, was one of the few
escapees from Auschwitz. In his memoirs published in
February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he wrote:

I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that –
I accuse certain Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly
deeds of the war.

This small group of quislings knew what was happening to
their brethren in Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their
own lives with the price of silence.

Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke
for all Jews in Hungary.
While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the number is
still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the
exterminations…I took these terrible statistics with me
when I escaped in 1944 and I was able to give Hungarian
Zionist leaders three weeks notice that Eichmann planned
to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…
Kastner went to Eichmann and told him, “I know of your plans;
spare some Jews of my choice and I shall keep quiet.”

Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S.
uniform and took him to Belsen to trace some of his friends.

Nor did the sordid bargaining end there.

Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this
little fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom
when Germany collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…
(Ben Hecht, Perfidy, pp 261-2)

These accusations are confirmed by the “Eichmann Confessions”
published in Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:

This Dr. Kastner was a young man about my age, an ice-cold
lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He agreed to help keep the
Jews from resisting deportation – and even keep order in the
collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let a few
hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to
Palestine. It was a good bargain. For keeping order in the
camps, the price…was not too high for me.

“…We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me,
Kastner smoked cigarets as though he were in a coffeehouse.
While we talked he would smoke one aromatic cigaret after
another, taking them from a silver case and lighting them
with a silver lighter. With his great polish and reserve
he would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.

“Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for
a select group of Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Palestune…

“As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity
between our attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these
immensely idealistic Zionist leaders….I believe that Kastner
would have sacrificed a thousand or a hundred thousand of his
blood to achieve his political goal…
‘You can have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have
this group here’. And because Kastner rendered us a great
service by helping keep the deportation camps peaceful, I
would let his groups escape. After all, I was not
concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews…
That was the ‘gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner.”
(Hecht, Ibid., pp.260-61)

Quite clearly these accusations, whether true or false,
do not relate merely to “the purchase of Jewish lives for
money and military equipment.”

Are the accusations against Kastner true?
According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie.
When Malchiel Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli
citizen published these accusations against Kastner, the
Israeli Government did rather more than demand that his
views should not be broadcast. Because a prominent Zionist
official Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the Ministry of
Trade and Industry) was involved, the Attorney General
of the State of Israel prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.
-88-
———————————————————————–
Posted by Robert E. Nordlander
[email protected]

Subject: Kastner Case=ZHID KOLLABORACI WITH NAZIS!!

From: Elias Davidsson ([email protected])
Subject: Zionism. The Kastner case (1/2)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.israel
Date: 1997/07/12

The Kastner Case

Introduction

Rather than answer every complaint in the same detail, we are taking
up the issue which the VJBD has declared to be the most offensive of
all and will show that on this question ‘The documentation available
is overwhelming and its message is thundering”, just as Palestine
Speaks claimed in one of the extracts complained about by the VJBD.

Since the accusation of direct Zionist cooperation and assistance in
the extermination of hundreds of thousands of Jewish people, and the
accusation that this flowed logically from shared aims, are clearly
the most ‘extreme’ and ‘offensive’ accusations of Nazi-Zionist
collaboration broadcast on 3CR programs, we will deal with this first,
and in greater detail.

Since the ‘Kastner case’ is the subject of most of the broadcasts
concerning collaboration which have been specifically complained
about, we shall go into this in greatest detail, and have put some
books in as evidence about it. Having answered the VJBD where its
case appears strongest, and on the points to which it has given
greatest emphasis,we hope it may become apparent to the Tribunal that
things are not quite what they may have appeared before this inquiry
began.

The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is that
involving Rudolf Kastner.

Most Jewish people in Australia have never heard of Rudolf Kastner.
Those who have, are generally under the impression that there is some
‘controversy’ about negotiations he undertook for ‘the purchase of
Jewish lives for money and military equipment’, but that he was ‘fully
ehabilitated’ by the Supreme Court of Israel.

That is exactly the line taken by Dr. John Foster, the Victorian
Jewish Board of Deputies expert witness, in his evidence condemning
3CR for anti-semitism.

It is quite clear from this evidence, that Dr. Foster does not know
anything at all about the Kastner case, since he does not even know
what Kastner was accused of.

This may not be his fault however, since one cannot read an accurate
account of the Kastner case in any of the widely available works
dealing with the Holocaust, either in bookshops or libraries. Apart
>from 3CR, the suppression of information has been so complete, that
even an expert like Dr. Foster, specifically asked to give evidence on
the matter, has been unable to find out what it is all about.

The Accusations
—————-
Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:

“Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British
Medical Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz.
In his memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily
Herald, he wrote:

‘I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse
certain Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war.

This small group of quislings knew what was happening to their
brethren in Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their their own lives
with the price of silence. Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the
council which spoke for all Jews in Hungary. While I was prisoner
number 44070 at Auschwitz – the number is still on my arm – I compiled
careful statistics of the exterminations…I took these terrible
statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I was able to give
Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that Eichmann planned to
send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner went to
Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my
choice and I shall keep quiet.’

Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and
took him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid
bargaining end there.

Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this little
fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany
collapsed,to set himself up in the Argentine…”(Ben Hecht, op.cit.
pp261-2)

These accusations are confirmed by the ‘Eichmann Confessions’
published in Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:

“I resolved to show how well a job could be done when the commander
stands 100% behind it. By shipping the Jews off in a lightning
operation, I wanted to set an example for future campaigns
elsewhere…In obedience to Himmler’s directive I now concentrated on
negotiations with the Jewish political officials in Budapest…Among
them Dr. Rudolph Kastner, authorized representative of the Zionist
Movement. This Dr. Kastner was a young man about my age, an ice-cold
lawyer and a fanatical Zionist.
He agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation – and even
keep order in the collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let
a few hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to
Palestine.
It was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price…was
not too high for me.

We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me, Kastner smoked
cigarets as though he was in a coffeehouse. While we talked he would
smoke one aromatic cigaret after another, taking them from a silver
case and lighting them with a silver lighter. With his great polish
and reserve he would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.

Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for a select group
of Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel…

As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity between our
attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic
Zionist leaders….I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a
thousand or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political
oal…’You can have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have this
group here’.

And because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping
keep the deportation camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape.
After all, I was not concerned with small groups of a thousand or so
Jews…
That was the ‘gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner” (Hecht, ibid,
p.26ö-61)

Quite clearly these accusations, whether true or false, do not relate
merely to ‘the purchase of Jewish lives for money and military
equipment’, as Dr. Foster imagines, and the term ‘collaboration’ is
the term that would apply. It seems unlikely that if Dr. Foster had
known what the accusation actually was, he would have condemned 3CR
saying ‘In these circumstances, to talk of collaboration is malicious
and absurd’.

Are the accusations against Kastner true?

According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie. When Malchiel
Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli citizen published these
accusations against Kastner, the Israeli Government did rather more
than demand that his views should not be broadcast. Because a
prominent Zionist official (Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the
Ministry of Trade and Industry) was involved, the Attorney General of
the State of Israel prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.

The Verdict
————
Let the verdict of Judge Benjamin Halevi in Israel’s District Court of
Jerusalem speak for itself, given in criminal case No. 124 of 1953.
The Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald. This material should be
studied carefully, since a substantial extract from it, broadcast on
3CR, has been complained about by the VJBD as allegedly offensive to
the Jewish community, likely to promote anti-semitism, likely to
promote racism, in bad taste and contrary to common sense.

It is the actual words used that are the subject of the Board’s
complaint, not the manner of their representation by 3CR. Presumably
the Board itself was not aware just whose words they were when it made
its’ complaint, which shows how complete suppression of information
can backfire on the censors themselves.

Here then are excerpts from the verdict of Judge Halevi, who later
became one of the panel of three judges that tried Eichmann:

“The masses of Jews from Hungary’s ghettos obediently boarded the
deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of
confidence in the false information that they were being transferred
to Kenyermeze.

The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had
they not spread their false information through Jewish channels.

The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and
others used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to
mislead the Jews.
They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help
of Jewish leaders.

The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local
leaders of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were
spreading such false information and did not protest.

Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local ‘rescue work’.

The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of
knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be
deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain
quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or
hampering the deportation orders.

Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few
dozen police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attemptt to
overpower these few guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance
activities to the deportations were organized in these ghettos.

And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the
Jews in the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities.

The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of
Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn
their own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish
leaders who did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of
deportations…these same leaders did not join the people of their
community n their ride to Auschwitz, but were all included in the
Rescue train.

The Nazi organizers of extermination and the perpetrators of
extermination permitted Rudolf Kastner and the members of the Jewish
Council in Budapest to save themselves, their relatives, and friends.
The Nazis did this as a means of making the local Jewish leaders, whom
they favoured, dependent on the Nazi regime, dependent on its good
will during the time of its fatal deportation schedule. In short, the
Nazis succeeded in bringing the Jewish leaders into oollaboration with
the Nazis at the time of the catastrophe.

The Nazi chiefs knew that the Zionists were a most vital element in
Jewry and the most trusted by the Jews.

The Nazis drew a lesson from the Warsaw ghetto and other belligerent
ghettos. They learned that Jews were able to sell their lives very
expensively if honorably guided.

Eichmann did not want a second Warsaw. For this reason, the Nazis
exerted themselves to mislead and bribe the Jewish leaders.

The personality of Rudolph Kastner made him a convenient catspaw for
Eichmann and his clique, to draw into collaboration and make their
task easier.

The question here is not, as stated by the Attorney General in his
summation, whether members of the Jewish Rescue Committee were or were
not capable of fulfilling their duty without the patronage of the S.S.
chiefs.

It is obvious that without such S.S. Nazi patronage the Jewish Rescue
Committee could not have existed, and could have acted only as an
underground.

The question is, as put by the lawyer for the defense, why were the
Nazis interested in the existence of the Rescue Committee? Why did
the S.S. chiefs make every effort to encourage the existence of the
Jewish Rescue Committee? Did the exterminators turn into rescuers?

The same question rises concerning the rescue of prominent Jews by
these German killers of Jews. Was the rescue of such Jews a part of
the extermination plan of the killers ?

The support given by the extermination leaders to Kastner’s Rescue
Committee proves that indeed there was a place for Kastner and his
friends in their Final Solution for the Jews of Hungary – their total
annihilation.

The Nazi’s patronage of Kastner, and their agreement to let him save
six hundred prominent Jews, were part of the plan to exterminate the
Jews.
Kastner was given a chance to add a few more to that number. The bait
attracted him. The opportunity of rescuing prominent people appealed
to him greatly. He considered the rescue of the most important Jews as
a great personal success and a success for Zionism. It was a success
that would also justify his conduct – his political negotiation with
Nazis and the Nazi patronage of his committee.

When Kastner received this present from the Nazis, Kastner sold his
soul to the German Satan. The sacrifice of the vital interests of the
majority of the Jews, in order to rescue the prominents, was the basic
element in the agreement between Kastner and the Nazis. This agreement
fixed the division of the nation into two unequal camps: a small
fragment of prominents, whom the Nazis promised Kastner to save, on
the one hand, and the great majority of Hungarian Jews whom the Nazis
designated for death, on the other hand.
An imperative condition for the rescue of the first camp by the Nazis
was that Kastner will not interfere in the action of the Nazis against
the other camp and will not hamper them in its extermination. Kastner
fulfilled this condition. He concentrated his efforts in the rescue of
the prominents and treated the camp of the doomed as if they had
already been wiped out from the book of the living.

One cannot estimate the damage caused by Kastner’s collaboration and
put down the number of victims which it cost Hungarian Jews. These are
not only the thousands of Jews in Nodvarod or any other community in
the border area, Jews who could escape through the border, had the
chief of their rescue committee fulfilled his duty toward them.

All of Kastner’s answers in his final testimony were a constant effort
to evade this truth.

Kastner has tried to escape through every crack he could find in the
wall of evidence. When one crack was sealed in his face, he drated
quickly to another.”

(Judgement of Judge Benjamin Halevi, Criminal Case 124/53; Attorney
Generalv. Malchiel Greenwald, District Court, Jerusalem, June 22,
1955).

Judge Halevi reverts to the meeting of Kastner with the S.S. officers
Becher and Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz at the time when the
‘new line’ of rescuing Jews was revealed by Hoess. He says:

“From this gathering in Budapest, it is obvious that the ‘new line’
stretched from Himmler to Hoess, from Jutner to Becher and Krumey.

According to Kastner, however, these Nazis were all active in rescuing
Jews.

This meeting of these important German guests in Budapest exposes the
‘rescue’ work of Becher in its true light. It reveals also the extent
of Kastner’s involvement in the inner circle of the chief German war
criminals.

Just as the Nazi war criminals knew they needed an alibi and hoped to
achieve it by the rescue of a few Jews at the eleventh hour, so
Kastner also needed an alibi for himself.

Collaboration between the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee and the
Exterminators of the Jews was solidifed in Budapest and Vienna.
Kastner’s duties were part and parcel of the genral duties of the S.S.

In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department,
the Nazi S.S. opened a Rescue Department headed by Kastner.

All these extermination, robbery and rescue activities of the S.S.
were coordinated under the management of Heinrich Himmler”. (ibid)

Judge Halevi continues:

“Kastner perjured himself knowingly in his testimony before this court
when he denied he had interceded in Becher’s hehalf. Moreover, he
concealed the important fact that he interceded for Becher in the name
of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish World Congress.

As to the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, it was enough for the
defense to prove Becher was a war criminal. It was up to the
prosecution to remove Becher from this status, if they wished to
negate the affidavit.

The Attorney General admitted in his summation that Becher was a war
criminal.

The lies in the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, the lies in his
testimony concerning the document, and Kastner’s knowing participation
in the activities of Nazi war criminals, and his participation in the
last minute fake rescue activities – all these combine to show one
overwhelming truth – that this affidavit was not given in good faith.

Kastner knew well, as he himself testified, that Becher had never
stood up against the stream of Jewish extermination, as Kastner has
declared in the affidavit.

The aims of Becher and his superior, Himmler, were not to save Jews
but to serve the Nazi regime with full compliance. These is not truth
and no good faith in Kastner’s testimony, ‘I never doubted for one
moment the good intention of good Becher’.

It is clear that the positive recommandation by Kastner, not only in
his own name but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish
World Congress was of decisive importance for Becher. Kastner did not
exaggerate when he said that Becher was released by the Allies because
of his personal intervention. The lies in the affidavit of Kastner and
the contradictions and various pretexts, which were proven to be lies,
were sufficient to annul the value of his statements and to prove that
there was no good faith in his testimony in favor of this German war
criminal.
Kastner’s affidavit in favor of Becher was a willfully false affidavit
given in favor of a war criminal to save him from trial and punishment
n Nuremberg.

Therefore, the defendant, Malchiel Greenwald, was correct in his
accusations against Rudolf Kastner in the first, second and fourth of
his statements.” (ibid)

Judge Halevi’s verdict found Malchiel Greenwald generally innocent of
libel against Kastner, but fined him one Israeli pound for the one
unproven accusation – that Kastner had actually collected money from
his Nazi partners for his aide to their slaughter program. The judge
also ordered the Government of Israel to pay Greenwald two hundred
Israeli pounds as court costs.

In fairness to Kastner it should me mentioned that as well as having
been unpaid, it was never established that he ever wore S.S. uniform.

Nevertheless, this verdict, and the evidence on which it was based,
completely establishes the truth of everything said on 3CR about the
matter.

If the story ended there, it would only prove conclusively that the
individual Kastner was a collaborator and the Israeli Government had
attempted to defend him, although facts brought out in the trial
pointed to much more than that.

But the story does not end there.

The Reaction
————-
Public opinion in Israel was almost unanimous in demanding that
Kastner and his associates should be put on trial. Remember that up to
now it was Kastner’s accuser who was on trial.

The Communist Party newspaper Kol Ha’am (Voice of the People) wrote:

“All those whose relatives were butchered by the Germans in Hungary
know now clearly that Jewish hands helped the mass murder” (23 June
1955)

In the authoritative Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, the leading political
journalist, Dr. Moshe Keren wrote:

“Kastner must be brought to trial as a Nazi collaborator. And at this
trial, Kastner should defend himself as a private citizen, and not be
defended by the Israeli Government…” (14 July 1955).

*Haboker*, the pro-Government General Zionist party paper stated:
“The public wants to know the real facts about Kastner, and not about
him alone. The only way to find out the truth is to put all the Rescue
Committee people on trial and give them a chance to offer their
defense.” (23 June 1955)

But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing
Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the
Government of Israel.

As the evening paper *Yedi’ot Aharonot* said:
“If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total
political and national collapse – as a result of what such a trial may
disclose.” (23 June 1955)

Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial,
instead it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for
criminal libel.

As Dr. Karlebach wrote in Israel’s largest evening newspaper,
*Ma’ariv*:
“What is going on here? The Attorney General has to mobilize all the
government power, appear himself in court, to justify and defend
collaboration with Himmler! And in order to defend a quisling, the
government must drag through the streets one of the grimmest stories
of our history!

At 11 P.M. the verdict was given. At 11 A.M. next morning the
government announces the defense of Kastner will be renewed – an
appeal filed.
What exemplary expediency! Since when does this government possess
such lawyer-genius who can weigh in one night the legal chances of an
appeal on a detailed, complex verdict of three hundred pages?! (24
June 1955)

At the appeal hearings before the Supreme Court, the Attorney General
of Israel, Chaim Cohen, explained clearly why the Government of Israel
was defending Kastner so strongly: “The man Kastner does not stand
here as a private individual. He was a recognized representative,
official or non-official of the Jewish National Institutes in
Palestine and of the Zionist Executive; and I come here in this court
to defend the representative of our national institutions.” (Hecht, p.
268)

The truth of this statement cannot be denied. Kastner’s collaboration
was not that of an individual. It was the collaboration of the Zionist
leadership.

So far, it has only been established that the Government of Israel
continued to support a Nazi collaborator after the facts about his
collaboration had been conclusively established in an Israeli court.
But the story gets worse.

The Supreme Court of Israel unanimously found that Becher was indeed a
Nazi war criminal and that Kastner had without justification, and in
the name of the Jewish Agency, helped Becher to escape justice. On
this point Greenwald was acquitted of libel and Kastner was not ‘fully
rehabilitated’.

The Supreme Court also accepted the FACTS established in the lower
court – that Kastner DELIBERATELY concealed the truth about Auschwitz
>from the majority of Hungarian Jews in exchange for Nazi permission to
take a thousand or so to Palestine. Again, Kastner was far from being
‘fully rehabilitated’.

The Majority Judgement
————————-
But now comes the really nasty bit. After unanimously acknowledging
these FACTS, the Supreme Court of Israel, by a majority of three to
two, found that Kastner’s actions were MORALLY JUSTIFIABLE and
convicted Greenwald of criminal libel for calling this
‘collaboration’.

In saying that 3CR broadcasts concealed the fact that Kastner had been
fully rehabilitated by the Israeli Supreme Court, Dr. Foster is
totally missing the point.

Kastner’s actions only proved that HE was a Nazi collaborator. It is
the defense of these actions by the Government and Courts of Israel
that prove conclusively that ZIONISM approves of Nazi collaboration.

The majority of the Supreme Court of Israel did not REHABILITATE
Kastner.
They JOINED him.

Let us read from the majority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Shlomo
Chesin:

“…What point was there in telling the people boarding the trains in
Kluj, people struck by fate and persecuted, as to what awaits them at
the end of their journey…Kastner spoke in detail of the situation,
saying, ‘The Hungarian Jew was a branch which long ago dried up on the
tree’.
This vivid description coincides with the testimony of another witness
about the Hungarian Jews, ‘This was a big Jewish community in Hungary,
without any ideological Jewish backbone’ (Moshe Shweiger, a Kastner
aide in Budapest, protocol 465).

I fully agree with my friend, Judge Agranot, when he states that, ‘The
Jews of Hungary, including those in the countryside, were not capable,
neither physically nor mentally, to carry out resistance operations
with force against the deportation scheme’…From this point of view
no rescue achievement could have resulted by disclosing the Auschwitz
news to the Jewish leaders there, and this…is a consideration which
one can properly conclude that Kastner had in front of his eyes.

.And I take one more step. I am certain that the silence of Kastner
when he arrived in Kluj was premeditated and calculated and did not
result from his great dispair because of the helplessness of the
Jewish community.
Even then, I say, this is still not considered willful collaboration
and assistance in the extermination, because all the signs indicate
that Kastner’s efforts were aimed at rescue and rescue on a big
scale…And towards the end I take one last step. In doing so I go
very far and say that even if Kastner ordered himself to keep silent
knowingly, in submission to the strong will of the Nazis, in order to
save a few Jews from Hell – this is still no proof that he stained his
hands by collaborating with the enemies of his people and carrying out
their plan to exterminate most of the Jewish community in Hungary.

Even if, through these activities of his – or rather, his omission –
the extermination became easier. And as to the moral issue, the
question is not whether a man is allowed to kill many in order to save
a few, or vice-versa. The question is altogether in another sphere and
should be defined as follows: A man is aware that a whole community is
awaiting its doom. He is allowed to make efforts to save a few,
although part of his efforts involve concealment of truth from the
many or should he disclose the truth to many though it is his best
opinion that this way everybody will perish. I think that the answer
is clear. What good will the blood of the few bring if everybody is to
perish?…As I said, I am not arguing with the basic factual findings
of the learned President of the Jewish District Court (Judge Halevi)
but it seems to me, with all due respect, that his findings do not, as
of necessity, demand the conclusion he has arrived at.
That is to say, collaboration on the part of Kastner in the
extermination of the Jews. And that they better coincide with bad
leadership both from a moral and public point of view…

In my opinion, one can say outright that if you find out that Kastner
collaborated with the enemy because he did not disclose to the people
who boarded the trains in Kluj that they were being led to
extermination, one has to put on trial today Danzig, Herman, Hanzi,
Brand, Revis and Marton, and many more leaders and half-leaders who
gagged themselves in an hour of crisis and did not inform others of
what was known to them and did not warn and did not cry out of the
coming danger….

Because of all this I cannot confirm the conclusion of the District
Court with regard to the accusation that Greenwald has thrown on
Kastner of collaboration with the Nazis in exterminating the Jewish
people in Hungary during the last war.” (Hecht, ibid, pp.270-2)

n other words, the Court approved of Kastner’s contempt for the
Hungarian Jews and could not allow him to be condemned for doing
exactly what many other Zionist leaders had half-leaders did –
concealing their knowledge of the Nazi extermination plans so that
Jews would board the trains to Auschwitz peacefully while their
Zionist ‘leaders’ boarded a different train for Palestine.

The Minority Judgement
————————–
It cannot be said that ALL top Zionists leaders actively approved of
Nazi collaboration in this way. Indeed the most precise answer to this
sickening judgement of Judge Chesin is provided in the minority
judgement of S>>>>The declaration of the learned Attorney General
therefore shrinks into Supreme Court Judge Moshe Silberg:

“I do not say that he was the only man who possessed information among
the leaders. It is quite possible that somebody else as well does not
have a clear conscience with regards to this concealment. But we are
dealing here with the guilt of Kastner and we do not have to make
judgements on the guilt of others….

an opinion….’Kastner was convinced and believed that there was no
ray of hope for the Jews of Hungary, almost for none of them, and as
he, as a result of his personal dispair, did not disclose the secret
of the extermination in order not to endanger or frustrate the rescue
of the few – therefore he acted in good faith and should not be
accused of collaborating with the Nazis in expediting the
extermination of the Jews, even though, in fact, he brought about its
result.’

I am compelled to state that it is very difficult for me to conceive
such an intention. Is this good faith? Can a single man, even in
cooperation with some of his friends, yield to despair on behalf and
without the knowledge of 800,000 other people? This is, in my opinion,
the decisive consideration in the problem facing us. The charge
emanating from the testimony of the witnesses against Kastner is that
had they known of the Auschwitz secret, then thousands or tens of
thousands would have been able to save their lives by local, partial,
specific or indirect rescue operations like local revolts, resistance,
escapes, hidings, concealment of children with Gentiles, forging of
documents, ransom money, bribery, etc – and when this is the case and
when one deals with many hundreds of thousands, how does a human
being, a mortal, reject with complete certainty and with an extreme
‘no’ the efficiency of all the many and varied rescue ways? How can he
examine the tens of thousands of possibilities? Does he decide instead
of God? Indeed, he who can act with such a usurpation of the last hope
of hundreds of thousands is not entitled to claim good faith as his
defense. The penetrating question quo warrento is a good answer
to a claim of such good faith…

If the superintendent of a big hospital lets thousands of sick people
die so that he may devote himself to the sure rescue of one soul, he
will come out guilty, at least morally, even if it is proven that he
as an individual erroneously thought that there was no hope of saving
the other patients. He is a collaborator with the angel of death.

Either a complete atrophy of the soul or a blind involvement with
complete loss of senses and proportion in his small but personal
rescue operation could bring a man to such a gigantic, hazardous play.

And if all this is not enough to annul the claim of good faith which
was put before us on behalf of Kastner by the Attorney General, then
Kastner himself comes and annuls it altogether. Not only did he never
make this claim, but his own words prove the contrary. He writes in
his report to the Jewish Agency that the Committee sent emissaries to
many ghettos in the countryside and pleaded with them to organize
escapes and to refuse to board the trains. And though the story of
these pleadings is untrue, and the silence of Kastner in Kluj is
proven, the very uttering of these statements entirely contradicts the
claim that Kastner had concealed the news about the fate of the ghetto
inmates in good faith and only as a result of his complete despairing
of the chances of escaping or resisting the Germans. You can not claim
at the same time helplessness and activity.
Anyway, such a claim is not convincing…

We can sum up with three facts:
A. That the Nazis didn’t want to have a great revolt – ‘Second Warsaw’
– nor small revolts, and their passion was to have the extermination
machine working smoothly without resistance. This fact was known to
Kastner from the best source – from Eichmann himself – And he had
additional proofs of that when he witnessed all the illusionary and
misleading tactics which were being taken by the Nazis from the first
moment of occupation.

B. That the most efficient means to paralyze the resistance with – or
the escape of a victim is to conceal from him the plot of the coming
murder.
This fact is known to every man and one does not need any proof of
evidence for this.

C. That he, Kastner, in order to carry out the rescue plan for the few
prominents, fulfilled knowingly and without good faith the said desire
of the Nazis, thus expediting the work of exterminating the masses.

And also the rescue of Becher by Kastner…He who is capable of
rescuing this Becher from hanging proves that the atrocities of this
great war criminal were not so horryfying or despicable in his
eyes…I couldn’t base the main guilt of Kastner on this fact had it
been alone, but when it is attached even from afar to the whole scene
of events it throws retroactive light on the whole affair and serves
as a dozen proofs of our conclusion.” (Supreme Court Judge, Moshe
Silberg, 1957)

Conclusion
———–
If that had been the majority judgement, one could say that whatever
their attitudes to the Arabs, and whatever their past behaviour might
have been under pressure, the Zionist leadership today did not
advocate collaboration with the Nazis.

One could then at least understand the complaints by Mr. Bloch,
President of the Victorian Jewish Board of Deputies, about the
‘dragging in of alleged episodes in the history of Jewish/Nazi
relationships’.

But Judge Silberg’s judgement was that of a minority.

The Kastner case is therefore not an alleged episode in past history,
being ‘dragged in’ to discredit an opponent.

It is a continuing controversy in which the top Zionist leadership of
Israel stand indicted of continuing to publicly defend collaboration
with the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.

Despite the unanimous finding of the Supreme Court of Israel that Kurt
Becher was a major war criminal, the Jewish Agency (World Zionist
Organization) refused to withdraw the fraudulent certificate Kastner
gave on their behalf, which saved Becher from hanging, and allowed him
to remain a free man in West Germany, the head of several corporations
and with an estimated personal worth of $30 million.

Becher has even used his certification as a ‘good’ SS officer to give
evidence in support of his associates at other war crimes trials in
West Germany.

Since the prosecution, representing the Israeli Government agreed with
the Supreme Court that Becher was a major war criminal, one can only
presure that the Israeli Government did not want him put on trial for
fear of what might come out.

Likewise, none of Kastner’s associates on the Zionist Relief and
Rescue Committee or his bosses in the Jewish Agency have ever been put
on trial as demanded by Israeli public opinion. Let alone the hundreds
of ‘prominents’ who helped Kastner to reassure the Hungarian Jews that
they were going to Kenyermeze and not Auschwitz, in exchange for
tickets on the one train that took them eventually to Palestine.

As for Kastner himself, he will cause no further embarassment to the
Zionist leadership with his undisputed claims that everything he did
was approved by the Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization)
leadership in Palestine. He is, as Dr. Foster so delicately puts it,
‘now dead’.

Or putting it less delicately, on 3 March 1957 he was shot by Zeer
Eckstein – immediately after the appeal hearings were concluded, and
before the judgement ‘rehabilitating’ him was delivered. Eckstein was
not a Hungarian avenger. He was a paid undercover agent of the Israeli
secret service.
(Hecht, ibid., p.208. Another ‘fantastic allegation’ no doubt; but
admitted in court during the murder trial).

Clearly this issue has a major indirect relevance to the Arab-Israeli
dispute. Apart from countering Israel’s cynical use of the holocaust
as a propaganda weapon, it answers a very real concern that many
people have about the State of Israel and the Jews. This concern is
whether, if Jews had a State of their own during the holocaust many
more could have been saved, and whether this is not an essential
future consideration, at least as an insurance policy.

The facts of the Kastner case show that the very existence of the
Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization) was an actual help to the
Nazis and that more could have been saved if the Zionist movement had
not existed.
Having a State that approves of actions like those of Kastner for an
insurance policy, is like using petrol for a fire extinguisher.

Zionism is not the answer to anti-semitism, but a cowardly proposal to
run away from it. The only answer to anti-semitism is to fight back.

We shall go on to prove this in detail.
——————————————————————
Elias Davidsson – Oldugata 50 – 101 Reykjavik – Iceland
Tel. (354)-552-6444 Fax: (354)-552-6579
mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.nyherji.is/~edavid

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:35:10 -0700, Ernst Zundholtz
wrote:

Looks like the filthy ZHIDS just do not like this well-documented
expose of their holohoax, and the fact that it documents 52 cases of
ZHID COLLABORATION WITH THE NAZIS!!

>>On 28 Nov 2004 10:59:36 -0800, [email protected]
>>(HeinrichHimmelfarb) wrote:

This article is so important, it needs to be reposted and passed on,
so that more and more people around the world will come to know the
truth about the ZHID COLLABORATION with nazis.
It will not be surprising to find after even more research, that even
more incidents of ZHID/Nazi COLLABORATION happened!!

Even about the HOLOHOAX, based on zhid lies!!

More and more truth is coming out, about the perfidious ZHID
COLLABORATION with the nazis!!

Surely this should cause those countries paying tribute dollars to the
ZHIDS, to consider demanding repayment?

>>>On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:08:44 -0700, Joel Eichmann
>>> wrote:

>>>>On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:41:32 -0700, dandelion
>> wrote:

>>>>Now that more and more research, with supporting documentation, is
>>>>being made public, documenting the collaboration of the ZIONAZIS
with
>>>>the nazis, slime like Shiksa Sueee Cohen do not want this TRUTH
made
>>>>public.

>>>>Even German historians such as C. Lange are now making public
their
>>>>findings, to the chagrin of the ZHID COLLABORATORS.

>>>>It was not only the notorious KASTNER CASE!!

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Posted by:
Steven Horn (KCOM)
1836 NW 11th St
Oklahoma City, OK 73106
(405) 524-0576

together with

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
–John Bryant

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
John Bryant

TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions.
G. K. Chesterton.

Posted by:
Patrick Lee Humphrey
7500 Bellerive #1807
Houston, Texas 77036-3040
1-713-266-7764

Steven Horn (KCOM)
1836 NW 11th St
Oklahoma City, OK 73106
(405) 524-0576

together with
Boris Dynin = NAMBLA executive &
Henry
CALL late nights to discuss: (408) 773-0984
Email me: [email protected] , [email protected] or even
VISIT me at:
55 Chumasero Drive, Daly City, San Francisco 94132

As everyone can see McVay takes it as a compliment when he is
called a “confessed child-molester” and the additional material
should give an indication as to the why.

For detailed and documented evidence of McVay’s questionable
background and details of convictions, please refer to Dr.David Michael’s
detailed expose on McVay. McVay is a distraught paranoid molseter, and is
known for claiming that anyone who refutes his lies must be a grosvenor!!
It is also suspected that McVay fabricates responses using aliases, just
to justify his existence to his ZHID masters.

Since I am a female, I also like to receive many calls, to discuss
NAMBLA,lesbianism, JEW atrocities and similar.
Email me, Shiksa Susan Cohen at: [email protected], especially late
nights.

And also: George Firestone: “George” ,
and [email protected].

Here is Fag Rianin’s own web page: http://gaydar.co.uk/riain_il
Notice he is a self confessed ZionistFagJew!

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

They also are involved in exposing Ken McVay for the crook he is,
and passing on information to the appropriate criminal prosecutors.

As a service to the public, this article is posted worldwide by a
victim of the molester pervert Ken McVay, with the assistance
of a group interested in detailing the depredations of the ZHIDS.
May Ken McVay and his like,rot in gehenna.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:12 EST 2007
Article: 65215 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.german:375637 soc.culture.swiss:65215 soc.culture.europe:586825 alt.politics.nationalism.white:531875 soc.culture.australian:412058
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Venceremos2
Newsgroups: de.soc.politic.misc,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.australian
Subject: Germany in u-turn on EU swastika ban – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 154
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:24:48 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1183231488 64.59.135.176 (Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:24:48 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:24:48 MDT

GERMANY IN U-TURN ON EU SWASTIK BAN
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:37:13 GMT, in soc.culture.german [email protected]
or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:

Germany in u-turn on EU swastika ban

By Helena Spongenberg
euobserver.com
Tuesday, January 30, 2007 at 0930 hours CE

[Caption] In Hindu tradition, it is one of the religion’s
most sacred symbols of peace

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS – Germany has made a u-turn on its
plan to criminalise Nazi insignia — such as the swastika —
across the European Union, and will leave it up to the 27
member states whether or not to punish people who deny the
Holocaust.

The move comes after European Hindu groups this month
joined forces to fight the German plan saying that the
swastika had been one of their religious symbols for around
5,000 years before Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party adopted it in
the 1930s.

Last week, the Italian government published a draft law
which proposes penalties of up to three years in jail for
inciting racial hatred, but which stopped short of making
Holocaust denial a crime.

The German Justice minister Brigitte Zypries said earlier
this month that Germany — which currently holds the six-
month EU presidency – wanted to harmonise rules throughout
the bloc for dealing with Holocaust deniers and for
punishing displays of Nazi symbols, banned in Germany and
eight other EU states.

But in an emailed statement, the German EU presidency said
it would “not seek to prohibit specific symbols such as
swastikas” when setting out plans for an EU-wide anti-
racism law.

It would also not try to push all EU states to say it is a
crime to deny that 6 million Jews were exterminated during
the Second World War, guaranteeing “the member states the
necessary leeway for maintaining their established
constitutional traditions.”

“The goal is to attain minimum harmonisation of provisions
on criminal liability for disseminating racist and
xenophobic statements,” the German EU presidency said in
the statement.

The European Commission proposed in 2001 an EU-wide anti-
racism law, but EU states failed to agree, struggling over
the issue of freedom of expression.

Two years ago, a Luxembourg presidency attempt to push
through legislation to unify legal standards for Holocaust
denial, was frozen after Denmark, Italy and the UK voiced
concerns that it would violate civil liberties.

Germany is now considering reviving the Luxembourg idea
which suggests that incitement to racism and xenophobia
should be punishable by at least one to three years in jail
in all 27 EU states, but leaves it to each state to decide
on the specifics.

The Luxembourg blueprint, which Germany is studying, says
that racist declarations or Holocaust denial would not be
prosecuted if they were expressed in a way that did not
incite hatred against an individual or group of people,
according to the DPA news agency.

More at:
http://euobserver.com/9/23377

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/yhjyp5
http://www.mantra.com/jai
http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur ,
or to Steve Horn ,
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:12 EST 2007
Article: 65216 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:586826 soc.culture.swiss:65216 soc.culture.german:375638 soc.culture.polish:790474 alt.politics.europe:64691 uk.politics.misc:1919675
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Venceremos2
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.polish,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc
Subject: Gestapo & ZYD/Jew Agents – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 302
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:30:20 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1183231820 64.59.135.176 (Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:30:20 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:30:20 MDT

Gestapo and its Jewish agents

On 10 Feb 2007 10:27:00 -0800, in soc.culture.polish “Syja Macohstain”
wrote:

“Notes from the Warsaw Ghetto – The Journal of Emmanuel Ringelblum”
by Emmanuel Ringelblum – Schocken Books Inc., New York.

“The Jewish gangster police exploit every situation to make
money. Recently they invented a new swindle. The Germans
are making a motion picture these days, so the police go to
restaurant owners demand food for a ball that’s being filmed
much bigger than necessary. A short time ago the police went
to an apartment 37 Leszno Street and stated that, since the
place was going to be filmed, everyone had to leave the
apartment at once. However, for 50 gold pieces they would
take care of the matter. While they were at it one of them
picked up a gold watch that happened to be lying on the table.”

“The Jewish Council people have tried to exploit the bloody
Friday for their own purposes: to repress completely the
social and political life of the Ghetto. First they spread
the rumor that Friday’s massacre was attributable to the
illegal publications. And then warned the people of the Ghetto
that if these (illegal publications) were to be repeated,
the fate of Lublin would be visited on Warsaw- i.e. the
deportation of the Jewish population. Bloody Friday
has had strong repercussions. The illegal press has stopped
publishing . Since the slaughter was the result of tattling
by the Jewish informers (apparently from the Kohn and Heller firm)
people tremble to speak a word.

“The Gestapo is destroying its Jewish agents one after
another. The consequence is that the chief Jewish agents,
men like Gancwajch Kohn and Heller, and Ehrlich live in
constant dread, in anticipation of the mortal blow. The reason
for this (liquidation of Jewish agents) is probably the
following: First of all, the jewish agents know too much,
many “businesses” being partnerships (between the
Gestapo and Jews); the Gestapo are fearful lest the Jewish
partner blab to another German, and the Gestapo lose out in
profitable undertaking. Secondly, there are rival Gestapo
apparatuses. Every chief, every Gestapo department, has its
own Jewish agents. When the Gestapo chiefs quarrel, each kills
the other’s agents.”

“The jewish police had a very bad name even before the
resettlement. The Polish police didn’t take part in the
forced – work press gangs, but the Jewish police engaged in
that ugly business. Jewish policemen also distinguished
themselves with their fearful corruption and immorality.
But they reached the height of viciousness during the
resettlement. They said not a single word of protest against
this revolting assignment to lead their own brothers to the
slaughter. The police were psychologically prepared for the
dirty work and executed it thoroughly. And now people are
wracking their brains to understand how Jews, most of them
men of culture, former lawyers (most of the police officers
were lawyers before the war) , could have done away with
their brothers with their own hands. How could Jews have
dragged women and children, the old and the sick, to the
wagons – knowing they were all being driven to the slaughter ?
There are people who hold that every society has the police it
deserves, that the disease – cooperation with the Occupying
power in the slaughter of 300 000 Jews – is a contagion
affecting the whole of our society and is not limited to the
police, who are merely an expression of our society. Other
people argue that the police is the haven of morally weak
psychological types, who believe that the end determines all
means, and the end is to survive the war – even if survival is
bound up with the taking of other people’s lives.

In the presence of such nihilism, apparent in the whole gamut
of our society, from the highest to the lowest, it is no surprise
that Jewish police executed the German resettlement orders
with the greatest of zeal. And yet the fact remains that most
of the time during the resettlement operation the jewish
police exceeded their daily quotas. That meant they were
preparing a reserve for the next day. No sign of sorrow or pain
appeared on the faces of the policemen. On the contrary, one
saw satisfied and happy individuals, well fed, loaded with the
loot they carried off in company with the Ukrainian guards.

Very often, the cruelty of the Jewish police exceeded that
of the Germans, Ukrainians, and Letts. They uncovered more
than one hiding place, aiming to be plus catholique que le
pope and so curry favor with the Occupying Power. Victims
who succeeded in escaping the Germans eye were picked up by
the Jewish police. I watched the procession to the wagons on
the Umschlagplatz for several hours and noted that many Jews
who were fortunate enough to work their way toward
the spot where the exempted people were standing were
forcibly dragged back to the wagons by the Jewish police.
Scores, and perhaps hundreds, of Jews were doomed by the
Jewish police during those two hours. The same thing
happened during the blockades. Those who didn’t have the
money to pay off the police were dragged to the wagons, or
put on the lines going to the Umschlagplatz.

A scene I witnessed ar 3 Dzszika Street, opposite the
Umschlagplatz, one day when every policeman had to meet a
quota of four “heads” will remained in my mind the symbol for
the Jewish police in Warsaw. I saw a Jewish policeman
pulling an old woman by the arm to the Umschlagplatz. He
had a hatchet on his shoulder. He used the hatchet to break
down locked apartments doors. As he approached the
Umschlagplatz where the watch was stationed, the policeman
shamefacedly took the hatchet off his shoulder and
transferred it to his hand. It was the general rule those
days to see individual policemen dragging men, women, and
children to the Umschlag. They took the sick there in rickshas.

For the most part, the Jewish police showed an incomprehensible
brutality. Where did Jews get such murderous violence ?
When in our history did we ever before raise so many hundreds
of killers, capable of snatching children off the street,
throwing them on the wagons, dragging them to the Umschlag ?
It was literally the rule for the scoundrels to fling women on
to Kohn-Heller streetcars, or on to ordinary trucks, by grabbing
them by the arms and legs and heaving. Merciless and violent,
they beat those who tried to resist. They weren’t content simply
to overcome the resistance, but with the utmost severity punished
the “criminals” who refused to go to their death voluntarily.
Every Warsaw jew, every woman and child, can cite thousands of
cases of the inhuman cruelty and violence of the Jewish police.
Those cases will never be forgotten by the survivors, and they
must and shall be paid for.

Beside the police, another group of (Jewish) organizations
shared in the resettlement operation. Gancwajch’s redcapped
Special Ambulance Service was the worst. This organization of
swindlers had never given a single Jew the medical aid they
promised. They limited their activity to issuing authorization
cards and caps, for thousands of zlotys. Possession of these,
together with Gancwajch’s personal assistance, exempted the
owner from forced labor and was a defense against all kinds
of trouble and taxes in general. Besides, a Special Services
uniform enabled its wearer to perpetrate a variety of swindles
and blackmail associated with sanitation.

It was this pretty gang that now voluntarily reported for the
assignment of sending Jews to their hereafter – and they
distinguished themselves with their brutality and inhumanity.
Their caps were covered with the bloodstains of the Jewish
people. The officials of the Jewish Council also cooperated in
the “operation” as did the Service of the K.AM. – City Aid
Committee.

So long as the “operation” was in progress (that was the
name for the massacre of the Warsaw Jews) the populace
was silent. They allowed themselves to be led to the slaughter
like sheep. I know that porters from the CENTOS (Children’s Aid
Society) warehouse, who had many a time displayed courage in
the face of danger, allowed themselves to be led off like
lambs during the “operation”. The same can be said of most
men and women taken to the Umschlag at that time. This will
be an eternal mystery this passivity of the Jewish populace
even toward its own police. Now that the populace has
calmed down somewhat, and they are reviewing what took place they
are becoming ashamed of having put up no resistance at all.
People remembered who was responsible for the mass slaughter,
and concluded that it was the Jewish police who were the chief
culprits;
some people go so far as to lay the whole guilt on the
police’s shoulders. Now people are talking their revenge. They
pass up no opportunity to remained the Jewish police of their
crime. Every policeman you talk to nowadays acts as innocent as
a newborn babe. He never took part in the operation. He was
assigned to this or that institution. Or else, if he was there ,
he saved people, from the Umschlag. Others did the seizing, not he.
>From these protestations, one would gather that those who seized
people from the Umschlag were themselves deported to various
labor camps or to Treblinki – since none of them are around; we
know the truth is exactly the opposite. It is the hoodlum and
the criminal element in the police that has remained among the
among the 300 policemen who now on guard duty in the Ghetto, while,
on the contrary, the less diligent, who didn’t have enough money
for “protection”, have gone either to Treblinki or to camps like
those at Lublin.

So the time for soul-searching has come, the time for
revenge. A secret hand did away with Lejkin the police chief
in charge of the resettlement. The jewish police are persecuted
at every step. Not only by the Jews – the Poles, too,
demonstrate their hatred for the Jewish police. The ex-Jewish
policemen working on the streetcar platforms are constantly
persecuted by the Polish workers. In Rembertow even German
soldiers persecuted them. Many shops protested against hiring
policemen. One shop voted to have all former policemen dismissed.
I know for a fact that ex-policemen in one outside work detail
wear their caps until they reach the watch at the Ghetto Wall,
because a cap is a sign of importance in the Ghetto. Once
outside the Ghetto, they take their caps off, because they are
afraid of the Polish populace, who hate the Jewish Law and
Order Service for what they did during the resettlement. A man
recognized a policeman who had taken away his parents in the
street, and attacked him. In Hallman’s shop the relief committee
distributed dole to a sick ex-policeman. The furor against the
relief committee cannot be imagined. This happens everywhere
– ex-policemen are persecuted at every step.

People keep bringing up instances of the jewish police’s
brutality during the resettlement. They tell this story:
A Jew was killed at 50 Leszno Street. His body lay there
in front of the gate. Two undertakers came along in a wagon
to remove the corps. That day, the police were scurrying
around like poisoned rats, because their quota for the day
was five “heads”. If they didn’t meet it, they and their
families faced the deportation. Without thinking overlong
the police took away the two undertakers, leaving the corpse
to lie unattended in the middle of the street. Another incident
that took place at 24 Leszno Street: A sixteen-year-old
baker’s boy beat up a policeman who was trying to take away
boy’s mother. The boy tore the policeman’s short coat. he
was taken to the courtyard of the police headquarters, and
there given twenty-five stripes, as a result of which he died.

Still another, no less horrible, instance: A policeman enters,
or rather, to be precise about it, breaks into an apartment.
All the tenants are hiding somewhere or other, leaving only
a three-month-old baby in his cradle. Without a moment’s thought,
the policeman calls the German who is supervising the operation
in front the courtyard The German makes a face at being offered
such a victim. He beats the policeman up badly and shoots the
baby.

A number of people have assured me this is true.
There are many number of horrifying stories about the conduct
of the the Jewish police at the Umschlag. To them, nobody
was a person, only a “head” that could be blackmailed. The
only way to escape was by buying the police off with money,
diamonds, gold, and the like. The price per head varied. At first
it was 1000 or 2000 zlotys. Later it went up, until it reached
10000 zlotys per head. The exact sum depended on a complex of
subjective and objective factors, into which the Jewish police
had sometimes to draw “Yunakes” as partners, as well as the
Letts or Ukrainians who were on service in the Umschlagplatz.

The Jewish police were without mercy. You could be the
most worthy of persons, if you didn’t have ransom money,
or relatives to pay the asking price, you would be sent away.
There are known cases where the police, in addition to money,
demanded payment in the form of woman’s body. My friend Kalman
Zylbergberg knows the badge numbers of the policemen, and
the names of the women who paid for freedom with their bodies.
The police had a special room in the hospital for this purpose.
As general rule, the police were beside themselves during the
resettlement. They were always furious at the recalcitrance who
refused to allow themselves to be resettled. The police
themselves were continually threatened with being sent to the
Umschlag with their wives and children. And then, they were
demoralized from before the resettlement. Those seized for the
Umschlag, particularly the women, put up resistance. All these
things created an impossible situation for the police, who reacted
like beasts.”

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Those who have failed to learn from the past 2000 years of history,
will be doomed to repeat history.

With now an extra 51 well documented proven cases of ZHID
COLLABORATION WITH NAZIS, besides notorious KASTNER case,
plus RUMKOWSKI, one MUST question the HOLOHOAX figures!!

Now even the notorious Simon WIESENTHAL is proven to be a nazi
GESTAPO COLLABORATOR!!

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur ,
or to Steve Horn ,
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:13 EST 2007
Article: 65217 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us de.soc.politik.misc:886264 soc.culture.german:375639 soc.culture.swiss:65217 alt.politics.europe:64692
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Venceremos2
Newsgroups: de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,alt.politics.europe
Subject: Harris – Heydrich: Ein Unterschied? – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 83
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:32:30 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1183231950 64.59.135.176 (Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:32:30 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:32:30 MDT

Harris – Heydrich: Ein Unterschied?

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:19:36 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc Werner Schneider
wrote:

Nein.

Begründung:

1) Harris wollte soviele Deutsche wie möglich umbringen
lassen, Heydrich soviele Juden wie möglich.

2) Heydrich wollte natürlich auch die jüdische Kultur mit
allem, was dazu gehört, beseitigen. Harris liess bevorzugt
deutsche Innenstädte bombardieren, um soviel deutsche Kultur
wie möglich zu zerstören.

3) Grossbritannien führte gegen das Deutsche Reich einen
selbst erklärten Krieg, dessen Bestandteil “Luftkrieg” mit
grösstmöglicher Grausamkeit geführt wurde. Auch jeder deutsche
Zivilist war Angriffsziel. Für die Nazis waren die Juden
schlechthin Angriffsziel. Es fehlte bei beiden jegliche
Differenzierung nach gut und schlecht, nach erlaubt und
nicht erlaubt. Erlaubt war alles. Sowohl hier wie da.

4) Die Briten gaben und geben vor, gegen ein Verbrecher-
Regime zu kämpfen bzw. gekämpft zu haben und nutzen dieses
Argument als Begründung für ihre brutale Luftkriegsführung.
Es zieht allerdings nicht. Wie kann man 500.000 Zivilisten
töten und sich dann die Hände in Unschuld waschen? Auch
den 500.000 wurde ein Holocaust bereitet. Wenn Harris
gekonnt hätte, wären ihm auch 6 Millionen Recht gewesen.

5) Verbrechen sind Verbrechen, egal, wie man sie begründet.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

6) Worin unterscheiden sich also Harris und Heydrich:
Für Harris wurde in London ein Denkmal errichtet.

Werner

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:19:36 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc Werner Schneider
wrote:

Nein.

Begründung:

1) Harris wollte soviele Deutsche wie möglich umbringen
lassen, Heydrich soviele Juden wie möglich.

5) Verbrechen sind Verbrechen, egal, wie man sie begründet.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

6) Worin unterscheiden sich also Harris und Heydrich:
Für Harris wurde in London ein Denkmal errichtet.

Werner

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:14 EST 2007
Article: 65223 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us de.soc.politik.misc:886397 soc.culture.german:375655 soc.culture.swiss:65223 soc.culture.europe:586873 alt.politics.europe:64698 soc.culture.polish:790643
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-14!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Venceremos2
Newsgroups: de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.polish
Subject: Harris – Heydrich: Kein Unterschied?
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 83
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 12:39:16 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1183293556 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 01 Jul 2007 06:39:16 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 06:39:16 MDT

Harris – Heydrich: Ein Unterschied?

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:19:36 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc Werner Schneider
wrote:

Nein.

Begründung:

1) Harris wollte soviele Deutsche wie möglich umbringen
lassen, Heydrich soviele Juden wie möglich.

5) Verbrechen sind Verbrechen, egal, wie man sie begründet.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

6) Worin unterscheiden sich also Harris und Heydrich:
Für Harris wurde in London ein Denkmal errichtet.

Werner

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:19:36 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc Werner Schneider
wrote:

Nein.

Begründung:

1) Harris wollte soviele Deutsche wie möglich umbringen
lassen, Heydrich soviele Juden wie möglich.

5) Verbrechen sind Verbrechen, egal, wie man sie begründet.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

6) Worin unterscheiden sich also Harris und Heydrich:
Für Harris wurde in London ein Denkmal errichtet.

Werner

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:14 EST 2007
Article: 65224 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.palestine:569014 soc.culture.europe:586884 soc.culture.swiss:65224 uk.politics.misc:1920186 soc.culture.usa:2014534 soc.culture.canada:580022 soc.culture.australian:412077
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Venceremos2
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.australian
Subject: ADL ZYDS Dislike Methodists’ for Divesting From Israel
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 125
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 15:25:23 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1183303523 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:25:23 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:25:23 MDT

ADL ZYDS Dislike Methodists’ for Divesting From israel

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:24:43 -0600 (MDT), in soc.culture.europe FrankArthur
wrote:

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:32:23 GMT, in soc.culture.jewish “torresdD”
wrote:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3418316,00.html
Methodists ‘bordering anti-Semitism’

ADL Director slams American Christian group for Israel
divestment call

Yaakov Lappin Published:
06.27.07, 16:37 / Israel Jewish Scene

The United Methodist Church’s call to divest from companies linked to
Israel “is bordering on anti-Semitism,”

Anti-Defamation League Director Abraham Foxman told Ynetnews
on Wednesday.

Foxman furiously condemned recommendations made by the
New England branch of the Methodist Church for its members to divest
“from twenty companies identified as supporting the Israeli occupation
in Palestine.”

The recommendations were made by a “task force” of clergy and church
members set up to implement a “resolution to end the Israeli occupation,”
a statement by the Church added.

Foxman, who is currently in Israel, said it was “sad that a religious
institution whose job should be to reconcile continues to be biased
and bigoted.”

He added that in the past two years, “there has been a war perpetrated by
Hizbullah, katyushas rockets, and terrorist acts.

Now Hamas, that does not recognize Israel’s right to exist and perpetrated
violence, has gotten itself elected, and is in control of a million and a half
Palestinians.

And the Methodists are still there to teach Israel a lesson.”

“My reaction is one of outrage to this biased decision,
which borders on anti-Semitism.

The facts show that any decent fair-minded, spiritual, godly person would not
come to a conclusion to boycott the victim, the one that has been praying for
peace, suing for peace, hoping for peace.

To make Israel the target is just outrageous,” Foxman added.

In the Church’s statement, William P. Aldrich, chairperson
of the ‘Divestment Task Force,’ was quoted as saying:
“Selective divestment is consistent with the United Methodist commitment
to a just and sustainable peace for all the people of the Middle East.”

He added that the divestment campaign
“offers a tangible way of working toward this goal.”

In its press release, the Church said it knew its actions would not have an
impact on Israel’s economy, adding that “this is not the goal.”

“The goal is to make all United Methodists and other Americans aware of their
relationship to companies that benefit from the Israeli occupation,” the
statement added.

“The urgency of the humanitarian crisis in the occupied Palestinian
territories cannot be overstated,” the United Methodist Church
declared on its website.

Church ackowledges bias

In a separate development, the ADL has welcomed the United
Church of Christ’s (UCC) acknowledgment that it has advocated
an unbalanced and one-sided policy against the state of Israel.

The UCC passed a new resolution this week calling for a more
balanced approach to the Middle East conflict.

“We are heartened that members of the United Church of Christ
have come to recognize that Israel deserves a fair hearing and
that some of their policy declarations in the past were based
on unfair and biased assumptions,” Foxman said.

“It is a welcome development, and the start of a healthy process
toward a better understanding of a very complex and complicated
history,” he added.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur , or to
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:14 EST 2007
Article: 65225 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:586887 soc.culture.swiss:65225 soc.culture.usa:2014540 soc.culture.australian:412079 alt.politics.nationalism.white:531884
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Venceremos2
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.canadadian,soc.culture.australian,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: World Jew Congress Fights to Suppress Publication of TRUTH! Bronfman Now resigns!!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 40
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 15:35:26 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1183304126 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:35:26 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:35:26 MDT

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:01:45 -0400, in alt.revisionism “Neil Harrington”
wrote:

>From Prof. Norman Finkelstein’s site, January 2006 article

New Woes at the House of Hucksters (w/Finkelstein’s comment)

WJC Fights Publication Of Articles On Its Woes

January 20, 2006 | The Forward
By NATHANIEL POPPER

(article continues at this link)

http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=3&ar=55

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:18:14 EST 2007
Article: 65236 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.palestine:569241 soc.culture.europe:587050 soc.culture.swiss:65236 uk.politics.misc:1921831 soc.culture.usa:2015665 soc.culture.canada:580307 soc.culture.australian:412176
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Venceremos2
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.australian
Subject: ADL ZYDS Dislike Methodists’ for Divesting From Israel – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 125
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:17:48 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1183555068 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:17:48 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:17:48 MDT