Via shaw 10, Grosvenor William 2006 – p6

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:33 EST 2007
Article: 64719 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us can.general:370883 mtl.general:147361 soc.culture.europe:581479 soc.culture.palestine:563541 alt.politics.europe:64158 soc.culture.swiss:64719
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: ArthurFranks
Newsgroups: can.general,mtl.general,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.palestine,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Rising Anti-ZYDism in Canada – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 213
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:23:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1177601007 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:23:27 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:23:27 MDT

On 1 Aug 2006 17:04:37 -0700, in ab.politics “[email protected]
wrote:

With the rising tide of anti-Jewish hostility in Europe getting so much
attention in recent years, it is somewhat surprising that an equally
worrisome trend across the Atlantic has gone largely unnoticed,
mounting anti-Semitism in Canada.

With 360,000 Jews, Canada is home to the fifth largest Jewish community
outside of Israel, and America’s northern neighbor has long prided
itself for its tolerance, openness, and freedom. But that legacy is now
under assault amid a spate of recent, and deeply troubling, incidents.

Over the past few, there have been many high profile anti-Semitic
incidents in Canada. Synagogues have been the targets of arson attacks,
Jewish day schools have received bomb threats, and there have been
numerous property crimes and hate propaganda directed against Jews and
their institutions. The most serious incident occurred in July of 2002,
when David Rosenzweig, an Orthodox Jew, was murdered outside a kosher
restaurant in Toronto by a neo-Nazi skinhead.

For a country that has spent the past two decades fostering
multiculturalism and decrying xenophobia, the spate of anti-Semitism in
Canada is especially disconcerting. The fact that it has received less
global attention than it deserves does not take away from the danger
which it poses to Canadian society and its democratic institutions.

One Jew was already murdered in the heart of Toronto because of his
identity. It is time for the Canadian government to step in and take a
firmer stand against anti-Semitism, before this age-old prejudice
claims any more victims.

Since Stephen Harper assumed the leadership of the new Conservative
Party of Canada, all of the progressive, centrist, practical, reasonable,
pluralistic policies held by the former Progressive Conservative Party of
Canada have been almost completely abolished from the new Conservative
Party of Canada. Furthermore, all socially moderate conservatives
such as Red Tories and Libertarians have been either silenced or purged
>from positions of power within the new Conservative Party of Canada; and
replaced with American style Conservatives who harbour racist, sexist,
homophobic, bigoted, recklessly populist, rigidly social conformist ideals.
Among those who have been card carrying members of the former Reform
Party/Canadian Alliance in the past and who are either themselves
still members and/or have influential supporters currently within the
new Conservative Party of Canada seem to be many anti-Semites.

In particular, Stockwell Day, the former leader of the old Reform
Party/Canadian Alliance which has now more or less simply been
rebranded and repackaged as the new Conservative Party of Canada, has
come under suspicion for his past remarks. Charges that Stockwell Day
is an anti-Semite, or at least in the past promoted hostility to Jews,
continue to circulate. During the Reform Party/Canadian Alliance
leadership race Stockwell Day tried to lay such allegations to rest.
Yet questions about Stockwell Day’s beliefs persist. Stockwell Day is
currently Canada’s Minister for Public Safety.

Stockwell Day has a past association with James Keegstra, a vile
holocaust denier and notorious anti-Semite. As a church school
principal and spokesman for the Alberta Association of Independent
Church Schools, Stockwell Day promoted a Christian fundamentalist
curriculum that included materials that denounced Jews, Muslims, and
the purported, “liberal-humanist fallacy of democratic government”. And
last but not least, there is the new Conservative Party of Canada
itself-its policies and origins and the people it attracts. The new
Conservative Party of Canada’s own predecessor, the Reform
Party/Canadian Alliance, frequently made racist, sexist,
homophobic, anti-feminist, anti-immigrant, anti-French Canadian,
anti-Quebec, anti-Ontario,anti-Atlantic Canadian,
remarks and blatently Anglo chauvinist appeals.

During the 2000 federal election campaign, the former Reform
Party/Canadian Alliance had sought to depict the most impoverished and
marginalized section of Canada’s population, the native peoples, as a
“coddled minority”. Unlike the Reform Party/Canadian Alliance, the new
Conservative Party of Canada does not expressly call for a sharp cut in
immigration, but it suggests, even if its subtlety and by way of
remarks made by its backbench MPs, that the Liberals have been allowing
the wrong type of people into the country. Several former Reform
Party/Canadian Alliance candidates during the 2000 federal election
campaign made even more blatant appeals to anti-immigrant prejudice.
Calgary Center MP Eric Lowther has said Canadians could use the Reform
Party/Canadian Alliance’s scheme for citizen-initiated referenda to
limit immigration. Betty Granger resigned as a Reform Party/Canadian
Alliance candidate in Winnipeg after she spoke of an “Asian invasion”
of Canada’s West Coast and accused Sri Lankan Tamil immigrants of using
Canada to support “terrorism”. Many of these vile, disgusting,
despicably racist comments from former Reform Party/Canadian Alliance
candidates beg the question: How many of these same candidates,
employees, and MPs both past and present are still actively involved
with the new Conservative Party of Canada?.

Neo-Nazi scumbag James Keegstra and his associate Jim Green, a fellow
anti-Semite and an official in the national Social Credit party,
attended prayer meetings led by current Conservative Party of Canada
foreign affairs critic Stockwell Day. Moreover, according to James
Keegstra, in 1983 and 1984 he and Stockwell Day had chats about
“freedom of speech issues” and James Keegstra’s own case.

In May 1983 the Tory Premier of Alberta, Peter Lougheed, felt it
necessary to deliver a prepared speech to the provincial legislature
that condemned James Keegstra’s views as “unequivocally racial,
religiously prejudiced, historically inaccurate and distorted.” He
pledged the province would undertake a review of the curriculum and
classroom monitoring to ensure “greater tolerance and respect for
minority groups.”

Reputedly, Stockwell Day first met James Keegstra in 1983, after James
Keegstra, who had been fired from his job at the Eckville public high
school, moved to Bentley so he could work as an auto mechanic. Earlier
this year, Green told freelance journalist Gordon Laird that Day “had
said he wanted to be one of the first ones in there when Keegstra
opened his garage.”

In Bentley, James Keegstra continued his fascist political activities.
He won election to the post of second vice-president for Alberta of the
national Social Credit Party and with Green founded the Christian
Defence League to raise founds for his battles with the Alberta
government and courts. In 1984, the arch neo-Nazi Ernst Zundel made the
pilgrimage to Bentley to solidarize himself with James Keegstra.

It might appear strange that someone like the new Conservative Party of
Canada’s foreign affairs critic Stockwell Day, who was involved in his
own struggle with the government and interested in making a career in
politics, did not take pains to disassociate himself from fascists scum
like James Keegstra and Jim Green. But anti-Semitism has long had a
popular base in rural Alberta, where it has fed off two distinct but
intertwined traditions,
that of extreme right-wing Protestant fundamentalism and extreme
right-wing populism.

>From 1935 to 1971, Alberta was ruled by a party that drew its name and
initial political inspiration from the doctrine of Social Credit.
“Bible Bill” Aberhart, the preacher who founded Alberta’s Social Credit
Party, made openly anti-Semitic speeches and, as a concession to
the social credit ideologues in his party, founded a government board
to disseminate social credit propaganda, principally populist and
anti-Semitic writings. In 1947-48, Aberhart’s successor as Alberta
premier, Ernest Manning (father of Reform Party/Canadian Alliance
Preston Manning), purged the party’s leadership of anti-Semites and
closed down the Social Credit Board. But anti-Semitic views continued
to circulate among the Social Credit periphery and feed into the
religious intolerance promoted by extreme right-wing Protestant
Fundamentalist sects, who exercised a great deal of power within the
party.

In 1980s Alberta, anti-Semitic views were not the exclusive preserve of
the remnants of the Social Credit party. One reason Alberta Premier
Lougheed publicly denounced James Keegstra was that one of his own Tory
MLAs had given a press interview in which he claimed he had never seen
“any evidence Jews were subject to mass extermination or even
persecuted under the Nazi regime”. This sort of vile, disgusting,
dispicable anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial is to be found within the
grassroots of the new Conservative Party of Canada’s Alberta faction.

Neo-Nazi scumbag trash James Keegstra is a product of rural Alberta’s
right-wing religious/political tradition. Stockwell Day, by contrast,
was drawn to Bentley, which has been called the buckle in Alberta’s
Bible belt, by his increasing commitment to religious fundamentalism.
While Stockwell Day reportedly disagreed with James Keegstra and Jim
Green about their virulent hatred of Jews, he gravitated to the very
milieu of fundamentalist religion and political reaction from which
they emerged. Moreover, Stockwell Day, whether because of sympathy or
political calculation, saw no reason to vigorously disassociate himself
>from ethier of this Neo-Nazi pigs. For their part, James Keegstra and
Jim Green continue to express admiration for Stockwell Day, thus
further underscoring that their parting, such as it was, was amicable.

Stockwell Day’s successful struggle to secure legal recognition for 15
unlicensed Christian schools, including his own Bentley Christian
Training School, helped precipitate his entry into party politics. In
this fight, Stockwell Day vigorously advocated before various
government bodies the Accelerated Christian Education (ACE) curriculum
prepared by the Texas-based School of Tomorrow. He even said that he
was prepared “to go to jail, if need be” to uphold the right of his
school to chose what it taught.

The ACE curriculum propagated the views of the American religious
right, and arguably its more extreme elements. The curriculum was
criticized by an Alberta government Committee on Tolerance and
Understanding as promoting “a degree of insensitivity towards blacks,
Jews and natives.” According to Ron Ghitter, the Committee’s chairman
and a Tory of Jewish decent, “ACE schools were schools of dogma …the
kids who came out had sort of a twisted Christianity with anti-Semitic
overtones.” Remember folks, the Conservative Party of
Canada’s Stockwell Day could become our next foreign minister!!!.

The ACE curriculum dismissed evolution and espoused “creation science.”
Science booklets instructed, “Not all sickness is caused by demons, but
some sickness is.”

Democracy was condemned, while Ian Smith, the prime minister of the
white minority-led Republic of Rhodesia, Ian Paisley, Northern
Ireland’s anti-Catholic demagogue, and Chilean military dictator
Augusto Pinochet were lauded. Democracy, declared an ACE publication,
“represent(s) the ultimate deification of man, which is the very
essence of humanism and totally alien to God’s word.”

Obviously, there is the difficulty of explaining how a man purportedly
free of antipathy to Jews simultaneously found himself keeping company
with virulent anti-Semites and fighting for the right to use a school
curriculum which included anti-Semitic materials. More fundamentally,
Stockwell Day’s defenders are most anxious that his fundamentalist
beliefs and the right-wing political tradition from which he emerges
not be made the object of public scrutiny, because they recognize the
vast majority of Canadians will find them abhorrent.

If not anti-Semitism per se, certainly intolerant attitudes toward
women, jews, gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, trangendered people,
aboriginals, and other historically marginal groups seem to be integral
both to the new Conservative Party of Canada and the
political-religious make-up of Stockwell Day and many others within the
party.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:34 EST 2007
Article: 64720 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us alt.politics.europe:64161 soc.culture.europe:581483 soc.culture.swiss:64720 soc.culture.polish:778509 soc.culture.ukrainian:132532 soc.culture.russian:457791
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: ArthurFranks
Newsgroups: alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.russian
Subject: How Many ZYD Holohoax Survivors? Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 151
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:24:44 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1177601084 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:24:44 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:24:44 MDT

On 15 Aug 2006 06:29:08 -0700, in alt.revisionism “GB”
wrote:

How Many Survivors Are There?
Studies counted on to allocate funds for the distressed are far apart
on the number.
Stewart Ain – Staff Writer

Two new studies to determine the location of Jewish Holocaust
survivors, for use in making future allocations to the most needy,
differ widely on the number of survivors worldwide, The Jewish Week has
learned.

Sergio Della Pergola, a demographer for the Institute of Contemporary
Jewry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, found 1,092,000 survivors
worldwide. Jacob Ukeles, a policy researcher in Manhattan, found
688,000.

The Ukeles survey, an update of one he prepared in 2000 for the
Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, found only minor
differences from his previous effort.

Lawrence Eagleburger, chairman of the International Commission on
Holocaust Era Insurance Claims, commissioned both surveys.

Eagleburger had hoped to use the figures in determining how to
distribute $13.2 million annually in humanitarian funds for needy
survivors worldwide. The funds were obtained as part of a settlement
for unpaid Holocaust-era insurance claims against German and other
European companies.

Brooklyn Federal Judge Edward Korman, who is presiding over the $1.25
billion Swiss bank settlement, has been using the original Ukeles
survey to allocate money to needy Jewish survivors.

Both surveys found the highest percentage of Jewish survivors are
living in Israel. In his updated version, Ukeles reported the figure at
265,000, or 38.5 percent. Della Pergola put the number at 511,000, or
46.8 percent.

The numbers breakdown of where survivors are living:

The United States: Ukeles, 110,000 survivors, or 16 percent; Della
Pergola, 174,000, or 15.9 percent.

Europe: Ukeles, 126,000, or 18.3 percent; Della Pergola, 229,000, or 21
percent.

The former Soviet Union: Ukeles, 150,000, or 21.8 percent; Della
Pergola, 146,000, or 13.4 percent.

Other parts of the world: Ukeles, 38,000, or 5.5 percent; Della
Pergola, 32,000, or 2.9 percent.

The difference in the studies stems from the fact that Della Pergola
included as survivors Jews who lived in Arab countries – Morocco,
Tunisia, Libya, Syria, Lebanon and Algeria – that passed anti-Jewish
laws. Ukeles did not.

Asked his reaction to the disparities, Ukeles said that since their
purpose is to determine allocations based on need, a new needs
assessment study might be in order.

In such a study in 2000 for the Claims Conference, Ukeles found 119,000
survivors in the former Soviet Union in need – almost double that of
any other area.

Gideon Taylor, executive vice president of the Claims Conference, said
his organization’s allocations committee would be meeting Monday to
vote on staff recommendations for the allocation of more than $50
million.

Taylor said the staff considered both the Della Pergola and Ukeles
studies, as well as recent needs studies performed in the United
States, Israel and the former Soviet Union. He said those studies would
soon be posted on his organization’s Web site.

Elan Steinberg, executive vice president of the World Jewish Congress,
said despite the different number of survivors in the studies, the
percentage of Jews does not differ markedly except in Israel and the
former Soviet Union.

He said Della Pergola’s figures represent a “dramatic shift” in
populations that “call into question the basis on which distributions
have been made.”

Taylor stressed that both the Claims Conference and the World Jewish
Restitution Organization “can only act in an empirical manner” and
thus must base their allocations “on the most recent statistics and
on the basis of where the greatest needs are.”

The allocations committee of the Claims Conference will be submitting
its recommendations to its full membership in coming weeks. Steinberg
said the WJC, a member of the Claims Conference, would take into
consideration Della Pergola’s statistics when voting on the
committee’s recommendations.

Israel Singer, president of the Claims Conference, said that instead of
each organization determining on its own how best to allocate
settlement monies to needy survivors, there should be a “global,
coordinated strategy” in determining allocations. He said it should
apply to the insurance and Swiss bank settlements, as well as the
allocations from the Claims Conference.

Samuel Dubbin, an attorney for the Holocaust Survivors Foundation,
welcomed such a move. He said he is convinced that if there was a
global allocation, “there would be enough funds available to meet the
needs of survivors all over the world.”

Singer said he would be meeting shortly after Thanksgiving with Korman
to review the latest demographic statistics and to discuss the global
allocation idea.

“I’d love the judge to look at it and if he has to make allocations
earlier, it does not mean we can’t reassess our allocations based on
what he does,” Singer said.

Singer stressed that all of the settlements combined, along with money
the Claims Conference obtains from various sources, contains hundreds
of millions of dollars that together might meet the needs of survivors
for the next five years.

Any distribution plans that call for allocations beyond that time frame
should be shortened, he said.

“Survivors are dying at the rate of 15 percent a year,” Singer
said. “We should telescope the amount of time allocations are
made.”

In addition, Singer said the money must go directly to help survivors.
If the survivors have moved, they should still receive the money if
they are in need.

“The money should not be an entitlement for places but for
individuals,” he said.

At a meeting this week in Jerusalem, the executive committee of the
Claims Conference decided to press the German government to provide
funds for homecare for Holocaust survivors in need worldwide.

Dubbin pointed out that the Association of Jewish Family and
Children’s Services Agencies in 2002 estimated that a minimum of $30
million is needed annually to care for needy survivors in the United
States.
http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=8774

All this quvatch about the ZYDs, but no concern for the many MORE
MILLIONS of Polish, Ukrainian, Russian, German people killed!!

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:34 EST 2007
Article: 64721 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.russian:457795 soc.culture.austria:53724 uk.politics.misc:1892846 soc.culture.swiss:64721 soc.culture.german:374197 de.soc.politik.misc:864013
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-14!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: ArthurFranks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.austria,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.german,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: Re: “Six Million” Untrue According to Neutral Swiss
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 48
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:29:37 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1177601377 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:29:37 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:29:37 MDT

On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:34:58 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>From: “Salah Jafar” >Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:04:07 GMT

> “Six Million” Untrue According to Neutral Swiss
> It is clear, therefore, that the Germans could not possibly have gained
>control over or exterminated anything like six million Jews.
>Excluding the Soviet Union, the number of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe after
>emigration was scarcely more than 3 million, by no means
>all of whom were interned. To approach the extermination of even half of six
>million would have meant the liquidation of every Jew living
>in Europe.

> Nothing better illustrates the declining plausibility of the Six Million
>legend than the fact that the prosecution at the Eichmann trial
>deliberately avoided mentioning the figure. Moreover, official Jewish
>estimates of the casualties are being quietly revised downwards. Our
>analysis of the population and emigration statistics, as well as the studies
>by the Swiss “Baseler Nachrichten” and Professor Rassinier,
>demonstrate that it would have been simply impossible for the number of Jewish
>casualties to have exceeded a limit of one and a half million.

> Doubtless, several thousand Jewish people did die in the course of the Second
>World War, but this must be seen in the context of a war
>that cost many millions of innocent victims on all sides. To put the matter in
>perspective, for example, we may point out that 700,000 Russian
>civilians died during the siege of Leningrad, and a total of 2,050,000 German
>civilians were killed in Allied air raids and forced repatriation
>after (Operation Keelhaul) after the war.

> The question most pertinent to the extermination legend is, of course: Ho
>many of the 3 million European Jews, under German control,
>survived after 1945? The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee estimated the
>number of survivors in Europe to be only one and half million,
>but such a figure is now totally unacceptable. This is proven by the growing
>number of Jews calming compensation from the West German
>Government for having allegedly suffered between 1939 and 1945. By 1965, the
>number of these claimants registered with the West German
>Government had tripled in ten years and reached 3,375,000. (Aufbau, June 30th,
>1965)

> Nothing could be a more devastating proof of the brazen fantasy of the Six
>Million. Most of these claimants are Jews, so there can be
>no doubt that the majority of the 3 million Jews who experienced the Nazi
>occupation of Europe are, in fact, very much alive. It is a
>resounding confirmation of the fact that Jewish casualties during the Second
>World War can only be estimated at a figure in thousands

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:35 EST 2007
Article: 64722 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:581489 soc.culture.russian:457796 soc.culture.polish:778515 alt.politics.europe:64168 uk.politics.misc:1892847 soc.culture.swiss:64722
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-14!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: ArthurFranks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.polish,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Solzhenitsyn Exposes ZYD Crimes In Russia!! Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 108
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:29:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1177601351 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:29:11 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:29:11 MDT

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:23:48 -0400, in soc.culture.canada “serwad”
wrote:

Solzhenitsyn breaks last taboo of the revolution

Nobel laureate under fire for new book on the role of Jews in Soviet-era
repression

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who first exposed the horrors of the Stalinist
gulag, is now attempting to tackle one of the most sensitive topics of his
writing career – the role of the Jews in the Bolshevik revolution and Soviet
purges.
In his latest book Solzhenitsyn, 84, deals with one of the last taboos of
the communist revolution: that Jews were as much perpetrators of the
repression as its victims. Two Hundred Years Together – a reference to the
1772 partial annexation of Poland and Russia which greatly increased the
Russian Jewish population – contains three chapters discussing the Jewish
role in the revolutionary genocide and secret police purges of Soviet
Russia.

But Jewish leaders and some historians have reacted furiously to the book,
and questioned Solzhenitsyn’s motives in writing it, accusing him of factual
inaccuracies and of fanning the flames of anti-semitism in Russia.
Solzhenitsyn argues that some Jewish satire of the revolutionary period
“consciously or unconsciously descends on the Russians” as being behind the
genocide. But he states that all the nation’s ethnic groups must share the
blame, and that people shy away from speaking the truth about the Jewish
experience.

In one remark which infuriated Russian Jews, he wrote: “If I would care to
generalise, and to say that the life of the Jews in the camps was especially
hard, I could, and would not face reproach for an unjust national
generalisation. But in the camps where I was kept, it was different. The
Jews whose experience I saw – their life was softer than that of others.”

Yet he added: “But it is impossible to find the answer to the eternal
question: who is to be blamed, who led us to our death? To explain the
actions of the Kiev cheka [secret police] only by the fact that two thirds
were Jews, is certainly incorrect.”

Solzhenitsyn, awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970, spent much of
his life in Soviet prison camps, enduring persecution when he wrote about
his experiences. He is currently in frail health, but in an interview given
last month he said that Russia must come to terms with the Stalinist and
revolutionary genocides – and that its Jewish population should be as
offended at their own role in the purges as they are at the Soviet power
that also persecuted them.

“My book was directed to empathise with the thoughts, feelings and the
psychology of the Jews – their spiritual component,” he said. “I have never
made general conclusions about a people. I will always differentiate between
layers of Jews. One layer rushed headfirst to the revolution. Another, to
the contrary, was trying to stand back. The Jewish subject for a long time
was considered prohibited. Zhabotinsky [a Jewish writer] once said that the
best service our Russian friends give to us is never to speak aloud about
us.”

But Solzhenitsyn’s book has caused controversy in Russia, where one Jewish
leader said it was “not of any merit”.

“This is a mistake, but even geniuses make mistakes,” said Yevgeny
Satanovsky, president of the Russian Jewish Congress. “Richard Wagner did
not like the Jews, but was a great composer. Dostoyevsky was a great Russian
writer, but had a very sceptical attitude towards the Jews.

“This is not a book about how the Jews and Russians lived together for 200
years, but one about how they lived apart after finding themselves on the
same territory. This book is a weak one professionally. Factually, it is so
bad as to be beyond criticism. As literature, it is not of any merit.”

But DM Thomas, one of Solzhenitsyn’s biographers, said that he did not think
the book was fuelled by anti-semitism. “I would not doubt his sincerity. He
says that he firmly supports the state of Israel. In his fiction and factual
writing there are Jewish characters that he writes about who are bright,
decent, anti-Stalinist people.”

Professor Robert Service of Oxford University, an expert on 20th century
Russian history, said that from what he had read about the book,
Solzhenitsyn was “absolutely right”.

Researching a book on Lenin, Prof Service came across details of how
Trotsky, who was of Jewish origin, asked the politburo in 1919 to ensure
that Jews were enrolled in the Red army. Trotsky said that Jews were
disproportionately represented in the Soviet civil bureaucracy, including
the cheka.

“Trotsky’s idea was that the spread of anti-semitism was [partly down to]
objections about their entrance into the civil service. There is something
in this; that they were not just passive spectators of the revolution. They
were part-victims and part-perpetrators.

“It is not a question that anyone can write about without a huge amount of
bravery, and [it] needs doing in Russia because the Jews are quite often
written about by fanatics. Mr Solzhenitsyn’s book seems much more measured
than that.”

Yet others failed to see the need for Solzhenitsyn’s pursuit of this
particular subject at present. Vassili Berezhkov, a retired KGB colonel and
historian of the secret services and the NKVD (the precursor of the KGB),
said: “The question of ethnicity did not have any importance either in the
revolution or the story of the NKVD. This was a social revolution and those
who served in the NKVD and cheka were serving ideas of social change.

“If Solzhenitsyn writes that there were many Jews in the NKVD, it will
increase the passions of anti-semitism, which has deep roots in Russian
history. I think it is better not to discuss such a question now.”

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:35 EST 2007
Article: 64724 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.palestine:563543 soc.culture.swiss:64724 soc.culture.europe:581491 uk.politics.misc:1892852 alt.politics.europe:64171
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: ArthurFranks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,uk.politics.misc,alt.politics.europe
Subject: Israel Founded by Terrorists!! – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 54
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:34:54 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1177601694 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:34:54 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:34:54 MDT

On 29 Nov 2006 23:27:44 -0800, in uk.politics.misc “Arthur Brain”
wrote:

The media seem institutionally incapable of surmounting the
government-proscribed pro-Israel bias in order to discuss honestly and
openly the facts surrounding the problems created in Palestine by the
zionists.

Fact#1: Zionism is a marxist-inspired ideology. Ironically, Zionism’s
greatest supporters are the right-wing fringe of US/UK/Australian
politics. Hilarious, if this particular axis of evil hadn’t been the
cause of 60 years of warfare and untold tens of thousands of deaths.

Fact#2: Palestine was a fact, Israel an invention of the zionist
movement. This is the fact that scares them the most, hence the
perpetual zionist bleating about Palestine “not existing” – patent
nonsense, of course.

Fact#3: The zionist movement was represented by a variety of
bloodthirsty terrorist organisations such as the Haganah, Stern gang
(of which Israeli PM Shamir was a member), Irgun (of which Israeli PM
Begin was a member). The fact that notorious terrorists should be
considered suitable PM material says a lot about the philosphy of the
state of Israel.

Fact#4: The UN partition plan for Palestine was democratically rejected
by a majority of the population of Palestine, due to its proposal to
hand over more than 50% of Palestinian territory to a jewish population
which at the time only owned 6% of Palestine.

Fact#5: Disregarding the democratically-expressed wishes of the
Palestinian people, the zionist terrorist groups fought together in
1948 to take the land by force, during which they forcibly expelled
800, 000 Palestinians from their homes in a monstruous act of
ethnic-cleansing. The zionist “Plan Dalet”, which informed these acts,
also led to the deliberate and systematic razing of 400 Palestinian
villages in order to prevent the cleansed Palestinians from ever
returning to their homes – this act falls under the
internationally-recognised definition of “genocide”.

Fact#6: War crimes are also an integral feature of the zionist state:
remember the Israeli invasion of Lebanon (yes, there have been a
few…) during which Israeli officers including Ariel Sharon directed
an attack on Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatilla during
which women and children were mass-murdered. Earlier in his Israeli
army career Sharon was responsible for the slaughter of 69 civilians in
the Qibya village in Jordanian-controlled territory in 1953.

Fact#7: After 60 years of continual warfare, is it not time to admit
that Israel, a marxist-inspired ideologically-driven religious state
which is not inclusive and discriminates against non-jews, is not a
going concern and for the good of the entire world’s peace and security
should be dismantled once and for all?

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:35 EST 2007
Article: 64725 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.usa:1994199 soc.culture.europe:581492 soc.culture.swiss:64725 soc.culture.polish:778518 soc.culture.russian:457800 alt.politics.europe:64172 uk.politics.misc:1892853
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!news.glorb.com!feed.cgocable.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: ArthurFranks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc
Subject: Haaretz – Attacks On ZYD/Jew Lobby Keep Coming!!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]change.com
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 115
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:35:06 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1177601706 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:35:06 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:35:06 MDT

On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:07:32 GMT, in can.politics “torresdD”
wrote:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/rosnerBlog.jhtml?itemNo=841010&contrassID=25&subContrassID=0&sbSubContrassID=1&listSrc=Y&art=1

Rosner’s Blog
Shmuel Rosner Chief U.S. Correspondent
www.haaretz.com/rosner

The attack on the ‘Jewish lobby’ keeps coming and coming

Soros

Some American Jewish leaders are worried, and for good reason. They are paid
to be worried, and paid well. We’re heading for hard times, said one,
recounting several reasons. For one, the pro-Israel lobby has been on the
defensive for the past several months.

This week Jewish billionaire George Soros joined the chorus, not for the first
time, writing an article in the New York Review of Books in which he accused
AIPAC of exerting a damaging influence over American policy.

“Supporters of Israel have good reason to question AIPAC’s advocacy and they
have begun to do so,” he wrote. It appears that Soros considers himself to be
an Israel supporter, even if many would disagree. In the article, Soros did
not repeat past statements in which he accused Israel of exacerbating
anti-Semitic trends, but he provided readers with different reasons to doubt
the sincerity of his support. Regarding Hamas, for example, he wrote that
“according to some reports it has a military wing.” In other words, Soros
isn’t quite convinced that the rumors are true. He also trotted out the
standard accusation, which Carter also made, that AIPAC silences criticism of
Israel.

Soros is a prominent contributor to the Democratic Party. He was surely
somewhat disappointed when it became clear that its leaders are not
enthusiastic about responding to his call to arms. Sure, they want his money,
but not his image. Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, who is
seen as being further to the left than other candidates, and whose candidacy
has elicited a great deal of interest from Soros, has officially stated that
he does not agree with Soros’ views on Israel. This will certainly strengthen
Soros’ feeling that AIPAC is indeed succeeding in silencing others, in taming
even the lions. And the article won’t be Soros’ last word in his struggle
against AIPAC. The pro-Israel lobby won this round, but no tranquility is
guaranteed by long-term trends.

Note to the readers: this part of the blog was taken from my weekend print
edition column.

Commitment

The New York Jewish Week reported this morning that Soros has decided not to
fund a dovish alternative to AIPAC. Soros spokesman Michael Vachon told the
paper lack of prior involvement in Jewish life was the prime reason for his
decision. “He feels he would not have the necessary standing in the
community,” said Vachon. “Some people might even be put off by his involvement
in such an effort.”

If you regularly read this blog you will not be surprised by this decision.
Back in October, I quoted an Israeli well-versed in the intricate ways of
American politics. He wanted to explain how difficult it is to set up an
efficient Washington lobby, one that would exert considerable influence and
chose to use the following joke: The chicken and the pig decided to give the
farmer a present for his birthday. They were trying to figure out what to
bring when the chicken had an idea: “Why don’t we make him breakfast? What do
you say about bacon and eggs?” No way, answered the pig, and he had his
reasons: “Bacon and eggs might be a contribution for you, but for me it’s a
commitment.”

Criticism

You can read a summery of Soros’ criticism – and that of others – in Nathan
Guttman’s Forward comprehensive piece: Major critiques of Jewish lobbying were
published by controversial billionaire George Soros, Pulitzer Prize-winning
columnist Nicholas Kristof, the respected British newsmagazine The Economist
and the popular Web site Salon. The replies were furious. The New York Sun
accused Kristof and Soros of spreading a “new blood libel.” The American
Jewish Committee’s executive director, David Harris, wrote in a Jerusalem Post
opinion article that Kristof had a “blind spot” and had “sanctimoniously
lectured” Israel. The editor of The New Republic, Martin Peretz, renewed an
attack on Soros that he began a month ago when he called the Hungarian-born
Holocaust survivor a “cog in the Hitlerite wheel.”

Defense

When I wrote about the Carter book a while ago, I referred to the fact that
“The critics [of the book], as Carter justly claims, are almost all Jews. That
is the only card left in his hand, but it is a strong one, which embodies a
trap from which there is no escape.”

This reality didn’t change much since, and an especially painful manifestation
of it was a speech Bill Clinton gave in which he stated that “If I were an
Israeli, I wouldn’t like it because it’s not factually accurate and it’s not
fair.” Clearly, he didn’t agree with the book, but fell short of saying that
he was upset about it as an American. Has this started to change? I’m not so
sure. Clinton sent a letter to AJC’s Executive Director David Harris, thanking
him for “your articles about President Carter’s book. I don’t know where his
information [or conclusions] came from”, Clinton wrote. Again, unhappy with
the book but shy of making it clear that he is upset.

Maybe it’s a polite way for an ex-President to rebuff a fellow ex, maybe its
Clinton’s habit to stay vague whenever possible. Bottom line: Jews are still
those who make the case against Carter. Cheering from the sidelines doesn’t
count as much.

Rules

And look what my weekly guest has to say about AIPAC: recent (poorly
researched and politically slanted) publications have transformed this
organization into something quite sinister. Personally, I do not share the
underlying philosophy of AIPAC, in particular its unreflective support of
hard-line, right wing policies in Israel. But this organization is merely
playing by the rules governing the American political system.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:36 EST 2007
Article: 64726 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.palestine:563549 soc.culture.europe:581503 soc.culture.german:374201 soc.culture.swiss:64726 soc.culture.polish:778520 alt.politics.europe:64173
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: ArthurFranks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish,alt.politics.europe
Subject: Zionism & Third Reich = KOLLABORATEURS!! Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]oc.usenetexchange.com
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 733
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:47:33 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1177602453 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:47:33 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:47:33 MDT

And never forget the ZYD prominente Kollaborateurs such as KASTNER,
RUMKOWSKI and WIESENTHAL!!

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:45:26 -0400, in alt.revisionism Gallows Cheater
wrote:

http://www.rense.com/general34/ZAND.HTM

Zionism And The Third Reich
By Mark Weber
Institute for Historical Review
2-8-3

Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German
port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, “Tel
Aviv,” while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the
ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member.
Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic
combination as a “metaphysical absurdity.”1 Absurd or not, this is but one
vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging
collaboration between Zionism and Hitler’s Third Reich.

Common Aims

Over the years, people in many different countries have wrestled with
the “Jewish question”: that is, what is the proper role of Jews in
non-Jewish society? During the 1930s, Jewish Zionists and German National
Socialists shared similar views on how to deal with this perplexing issue.
They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities,
and that Jews did not belong in Germany. Jews living in the Reich were
therefore to be regarded not as “Germans of the Jewish faith,” but rather
as members of a separate national community. Zionism (Jewish nationalism)
also implied an obligation by Zionist Jews to resettle in Palestine,
the “Jewish homeland.” They could hardly regard themselves as sincere
Zionists and simultaneously claim equal rights in Germany or any
other “foreign” country.

Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that
anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely
understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes.
The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in
a separate state of their own. “The Jewish question exists wherever Jews
live in noticeable numbers,” he wrote in his most influential work, The
Jewish State. “Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving
Jews … I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex
phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear.”
The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. “It is a
national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international
political issue …” Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews
constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a
Volk.2 Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome “final solution of
the Jewish question.”3

Six months after Hitler came to power, the Zionist Federation of Germany (by
far the largest Zionist group in the country) submitted a detailed
memorandum to the new government that reviewed German-Jewish relations and
formally offered Zionist support in “solving” the vexing “Jewish question.”
The first step, it suggested, had to be a frank recognition of fundamental
national differences: 4

Zionism has no illusions about the difficulty of the Jewish condition, which
consists above all in an abnormal occupational pattern and in the fault of
an intellectual and moral posture not rooted in one’s own tradition.
Zionism recognized decades ago that as a result of the assimilationist
trend, symptoms of deterioration were bound to appear …

Zionism believes that the rebirth of the national life of a people, which is
now occurring in Germany through the emphasis on its Christian and national
character, must also come about in the Jewish national group. For the
Jewish people, too, national origin, religion, common destiny and a sense
of its uniqueness must be of decisive importance in the shaping of its
existence. This means that the egotistical individualism of the liberal era
must be overcome and replaced with a sense of community and collective
responsibility …

We believe it is precisely the new [National Socialist] Germany that can,
through bold resoluteness in the handling of the Jewish question, take a
decisive step toward overcoming a problem which, in truth, will have to be
dealt with by most European peoples …

Our acknowledgment of Jewish nationality provides for a clear and sincere
relationship to the German people and its national and racial realities.
Precisely because we do not wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we,
too, are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the
Jewish group and reject any trespasses in the cultural domain, we — having
been brought up in the German language and German culture — can show an
interest in the works and values of German culture with admiration and
internal sympathy …

For its practical aims, Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration of
even a government fundamentally hostile to Jews, because in dealing with
the Jewish question not sentimentalities are involved but a real problem
whose solution interests all peoples and at the present moment especially
the German people … Boycott propaganda — such as is currently being
carried on against Germany in many ways — is in essence un-Zionist,
because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to build …

We are not blind to the fact that a Jewish question exists and will continue
to exist. From the abnormal situation of the Jews severe disadvantages
result for them, but also scarcely tolerable conditions for other peoples.
The Federation’s paper, the Jüdische Rundschau (“Jewish Review”),
proclaimed the same message: “Zionism recognizes the existence of a Jewish
problem and desires a far-reaching and constructive solution. For this
purpose Zionism wishes to obtain the assistance of all peoples, whether
pro- or anti-Jewish, because, in its view, we are dealing here with a
concrete rather than a sentimental problem, the solution of which all
peoples are interested.”5 A young Berlin rabbi, Joachim Prinz, who later
settled in the United States and became head of the American Jewish
Congress, wrote in his 1934 book, Wir Juden (“We Jews”), that the National
Socialist revolution in Germany meant “Jewry for the Jews.” He
explained: “No subterfuge can save us now. In place of assimilation we
desire a new concept: recognition of the Jewish nation and Jewish race.” 6

Active Collaboration

On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood,
National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group
believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler
government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine
>from 1933 until 1940-1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive
collaboration.

Even as the Third Reich became more entrenched, many German Jews, probably a
majority, continued to regard themselves, often with considerable pride, as
Germans first. Few were enthusiastic about pulling up roots to begin a new
life in far-away Palestine. Nevertheless, more and more German Jews turned
to Zionism during this period. Until late 1938, the Zionist movement
flourished in Germany under Hitler. The circulation of the Zionist
Federation’s bi-weekly Jüdische Rundschau grew enormously. Numerous Zionist
books were published. “Zionist work was in full swing” in Germany during
those years, the Encyclopaedia Judaica notes. A Zionist convention held in
Berlin in 1936 reflected “in its composition the vigorous party life of
German Zionists.”7

The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal
June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for
Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage
emigration of Germany’s Jews to Palestine. This would require increased
Jewish self-awareness. Jewish schools, Jewish sports leagues, Jewish
cultural organizations — in short, everything that would encourage this
new consciousness and self-awareness – should be promoted, the paper
recommended.8

SS officer Leopold von Mildenstein and Zionist Federation official Kurt
Tuchler toured Palestine together for six months to assess Zionist
development there. Based on his firsthand observations, von Mildenstein
wrote a series of twelve illustrated articles for the important Berlin
daily Der Angriff that appeared in late 1934 under the heading “A Nazi
Travels to Palestine.” The series expressed great admiration for the
pioneering spirit and achievements of the Jewish settlers. Zionist
self-development, von Mildenstein wrote, had produced a new kind of Jew. He
praised Zionism as a great benefit for both the Jewish people and the
entire world. A Jewish homeland in Palestine, he wrote in his concluding
article, “pointed the way to curing a centuries-long wound on the body of
the world: the Jewish question.” Der Angriff issued a special medal, with a
Swastika on one side and a Star of David on the other, to commemorate the
joint SS-Zionist visit. A few months after the articles appeared, von
Mildenstein was promoted to head the Jewish affairs department of the SS
security service in order to support Zionist migration and development more
effectively. 9

The official SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, proclaimed its support for
Zionism in a May 1935 front-page editorial: “The time may not be too far
off when Palestine will again be able to receive its sons who have been
lost to it for more than a thousand years. Our good wishes, together with
official goodwill, go with them.”10 Four months later, a similar article
appeared in the SS paper: 11

The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on
religion leads the German government to guarantee without reservation the
racial separateness of this community. The government finds itself in
complete agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry, the
so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry around
the world and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis,
Germany undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the
future in the handling of the Jewish problem around the world.

A leading German shipping line began direct passenger liner service from
Hamburg to Haifa, Palestine, in October 1933 providing “strictly kosher
food on its ships, under the supervision of the Hamburg rabbinate.” 12 With
official backing, Zionists worked tirelessly to “reeducate” Germany’s Jews.
As American historian Francis Nicosia put it in his 1985 survey, The Third
Reich and the Palestine Question: “Zionists were encouraged to take their
message to the Jewish community, to collect money, to show films on
Palestine and generally to educate German Jews about Palestine. There was
considerable pressure to teach Jews in Germany to cease identifying
themselves as Germans and to awaken a new Jewish national identity in
them.” 13

In an interview after the war, the former head of the Zionist Federation of
Germany, Dr. Hans Friedenthal, summed up the situation: “The Gestapo did
everything in those days to promote emigration, particularly to Palestine.
We often received their help when we required anything from other
authorities regarding preparations for emigration.” 14

At the September 1935 National Socialist Party Congress, the Reichstag
adopted the so-called “Nuremberg laws” that prohibited marriages and sexual
relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect, proclaimed the Jews an
alien minority nationality. A few days later the Zionist Jüdische Rundschau
editorially welcomed the new measures: 15

Germany … is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it
declares the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the
Jews have been stamped a national minority it is again possible to
establish normal relations between the German nation and Jewry. The new
laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own cultural life, its own
national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its own
theatre, and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own
future in all aspects of national life …

Germany has given the Jewish minority the opportunity to live for itself,
and is offering state protection for this separate life of the Jewish
minority: Jewry’s process of growth into a nation will thereby be
encouraged and a contribution will be made to the establishment of more
tolerable relations between the two nations. Georg Kareski, the head of
both the “Revisionist” Zionist State Organization and the Jewish Cultural
League, and former head of the Berlin Jewish Community, declared in an
interview with the Berlin daily Der Angriff at the end of 1935: 16

For many years I have regarded a complete separation of the cultural affairs
of the two peoples [Jews and Germans] as a pre-condition for living
together without conflict… I have long supported such a separation,
provided it is founded on respect for the alien nationality. The Nuremberg
Laws … seem to me, apart from their legal provisions, to conform entirely
with this desire for a separate life based on mutual respect… This
interruption of the process of dissolution in many Jewish communities,
which had been promoted through mixed marriages, is therefore, from a
Jewish point of view, entirely welcome.

Zionist leaders in other countries echoed these views. Stephen S. Wise,
president of the American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress,
told a New York rally in June 1938: “I am not an American citizen of the
Jewish faith, I am a Jew… Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the
Jewish people a race and we are a race.” 17 The Interior Ministry’s Jewish
affairs specialist, Dr. Bernhard Lösener, expressed support for Zionism in
an article that appeared in a November 1935 issue of the official
Reichsverwaltungsblatt: 18

If the Jews already had their own state in which the majority of them were
settled, then the Jewish question could be regarded as completely resolved
today, also for the Jews themselves. The least amount of opposition to the
ideas underlying the Nuremberg Laws have been shown by the Zionists,
because they realize at once that these laws represent the only correct
solution for the Jewish people as well. For each nation must have its own
state as the outward expression of its particular nationhood.

In cooperation with the German authorities, Zionist groups organized a
network of some forty camps and agricultural centers throughout Germany
where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine.
Although the Nuremberg Laws forbid Jews from displaying the German flag,
Jews were specifically guaranteed the right to display the blue and white
Jewish national banner. The flag that would one day be adopted by Israel
was flown at the Zionist camps and centers in Hitler’s Germany. 19

Himmler’s security service cooperated with the Haganah, the Zionist
underground military organization in Palestine. The SS agency paid Haganah
official Feivel Polkes for information about the situation in Palestine and
for help in directing Jewish emigration to that country. Meanwhile, the
Haganah was kept well informed about German plans by a spy it managed to
plant in the Berlin headquarters of the SS.20 Haganah-SS collaboration even
included secret deliveries of German weapons to Jewish settlers for use in
clashes with Palestinian Arabs. 21 In the aftermath of the November
1938 “Kristallnacht” outburst of violence and destruction, the SS quickly
helped the Zionist organization to get back on its feet and continue its
work in Germany, although now under more restricted supervision. 22

Official Reservations

German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials
were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities
in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize “their”
governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry
remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long
as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to
resettle in the Zionist “promised land,” a sovereign Jewish state in
Palestine would not really “solve” the international Jewish question.
Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this
dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore
limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British
control, not a sovereign Jewish state. 23

A Jewish state in Palestine, the Foreign Minister informed diplomats in June
1937, would not be in Germany’s interest because it would not be able to
absorb all Jews around the world, but would only serve as an additional
power base for international Jewry, in much the same way as Moscow served
as a base for international Communism.24 Reflecting something of a shift in
official policy, the German press expressed much greater sympathy in 1937
for Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist ambitions, at a time when
tension and conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine was sharply
increasing. 25

A Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937, cautioned that in spite
of support for Jewish settlement in Palestine, “it would nevertheless be a
mistake to assume that Germany supports the formation of a state structure
in Palestine under some form of Jewish control. In view of the anti-German
agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation
of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the
nations of the world.”26 “The proclamation of a Jewish state or a
Jewish-administrated Palestine,” warned an internal memorandum by the
Jewish affairs section of the SS, “would create for Germany a new enemy,
one that would have a deep influence on developments in the Near East.”
Another SS agency predicted that a Jewish state “would work to bring
special minority protection to Jews in every country, therefore giving
legal protection to the exploitation activity of world Jewry.”27 In January
1939, Hitler’s new Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, likewise
warned in another circular bulletin that “Germany must regard the formation
of a Jewish state as dangerous” because it “would bring an international
increase in power to world Jewry.” 28

Hitler himself personally reviewed this entire issue in early 1938 and, in
spite of his long-standing skepticism of Zionist ambitions and misgivings
that his policies might contribute to the formation of a Jewish state,
decided to support Jewish migration to Palestine even more vigorously. The
prospect of ridding Germany of its Jews, he concluded, outweighed the
possible dangers. 29

Meanwhile, the British government imposed ever more drastic restrictions on
Jewish immigration into Palestine in 1937, 1938 and 1939. In response, the
SS security service concluded a secret alliance with the clandestine
Zionist agency Mossad le-Aliya Bet to smuggle Jews illegally into
Palestine. As a result of this intensive collaboration, several convoys of
ships succeeded in reaching Palestine past British gunboats. Jewish
migration, both legal and illegal, from Germany (including Austria) to
Palestine increased dramatically in 1938 and 1939. Another 10,000 Jews were
scheduled to depart in October 1939, but the outbreak of war in September
brought the effort to an end. All the same, German authorities continued to
promote indirect Jewish emigration to Palestine during 1940 and 1941. 30
Even as late as March 1942, at least one officially authorized
Zionist “kibbutz” training camp for potential emigrants continued to
operate in Hitler’s Germany. 31

The Transfer Agreement

The centerpiece of German-Zionist cooperation during the Hitler era was the
Transfer Agreement, a pact that enabled tens of thousands of German Jews to
migrate to Palestine with their wealth. The Agreement, also known as the
Haavara (Hebrew for “transfer”), was concluded in August 1933 following
talks between German officials and Chaim Arlosoroff, Political Secretary of
the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the World Zionist Organization.
32

Through this unusual arrangement, each Jew bound for Palestine deposited
money in a special account in Germany. The money was used to purchase
German-made agricultural tools, building materials, pumps, fertilizer, and
so forth, which were exported to Palestine and sold there by the
Jewish-owned Haavara company in Tel-Aviv. Money from the sales was given to
the Jewish emigrant upon his arrival in Palestine in an amount
corresponding to his deposit in Germany. German goods poured into Palestine
through the Haavara, which was supplemented a short time later with a
barter agreement by which Palestine oranges were exchanged for German
timber, automobiles, agricultural machinery, and other goods. The Agreement
thus served the Zionist aim of bringing Jewish settlers and development
capital to Palestine, while simultaneously serving the German goal of
freeing the country of an unwanted alien group.

Delegates at the 1933 Zionist Congress in Prague vigorously debated the
merits of the Agreement. Some feared that the pact would undermine the
international Jewish economic boycott against Germany. But Zionist
officials reassured the Congress. Sam Cohen, a key figure behind the
Haavara arrangement, stressed that the Agreement was not economically
advantageous to Germany. Arthur Ruppin, a Zionist Organization emigration
specialist who had helped negotiate the pact, pointed out that “the
Transfer Agreement in no way interfered with the boycott movement, since no
new currency will flow into Germany as a result of the agreement…” 33 The
1935 Zionist Congress, meeting in Switzerland, overwhelmingly endorsed the
pact. In 1936, the Jewish Agency (the Zionist “shadow government” in
Palestine) took over direct control of the Ha’avara, which remained in
effect until the Second World War forced its abandonment.

Some German officials opposed the arrangement. Germany’s Consul General in
Jerusalem, Hans Döhle, for example, sharply criticized the Agreement on
several occasions during 1937. He pointed out that it cost Germany the
foreign exchange that the products exported to Palestine through the pact
would bring if sold elsewhere. The Haavara monopoly sale of German goods to
Palestine through a Jewish agency naturally angered German businessmen and
Arabs there. Official German support for Zionism could lead to a loss of
German markets throughout the Arab world. The British government also
resented the arrangement.34 A June 1937 German Foreign Office internal
bulletin referred to the “foreign exchange sacrifices” that resulted from
the Haavara. 35

A December 1937 internal memorandum by the German Interior Ministry reviewed
the impact of the Transfer Agreement: “There is no doubt that the Haavara
arrangement has contributed most significantly to the very rapid
development of Palestine since 1933. The Agreement provided not only the
largest source of money (from Germany!), but also the most intelligent
group of immigrants, a nd finally it brought to the country the machines
and industrial products essential for development.” The main advantage of
the pact, the memo reported, was the emigration of large numbers of Jews to
Palestine, the most desirable target country as far as Germany was
concerned. But the paper also noted the important drawbacks pointed out by
Consul Döhle and others. The Interior Minister, it went on, had concluded
that the disadvantages of the agreement now outweighed the advantages and
that, therefore, it should be terminated. 36

Only one man could resolve the controversy. Hitler personally reviewed the
policy in July and September 1937, and again in January 1938, and each time
decided to maintain the Haavara arrangement. The goal of removing Jews from
Germany, he concluded, justified the drawbacks. 37

The Reich Economics Ministry helped to organize another transfer company,
the International Trade and Investment Agency, or Intria, through which
Jews in foreign countries could help German Jews emigrate to Palestine.
Almost $900,000 was eventually channeled through the Intria to German Jews
in Palestine.38 Other European countries eager to encourage Jewish
emigration concluded agreements with the Zionists modeled after the
Ha’avara. In 1937 Poland authorized the Halifin (Hebrew for “exchange”)
transfer company. By late summer 1939, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary and
Italy had signed similar arrangements. The outbreak of war in September
1939, however, prevented large-scale implementation of these agreements. 39

Achievements of Haavara

Between 1933 and 1941, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to Palestine
through the Ha’avara and other German-Zionist arrangements, or about ten
percent of Germany’s 1933 Jewish population. (These German Jews made up
about 15 percent of Palestine’s 1939 Jewish population.) Some Ha’avara
emigrants transferred considerable personal wealth from Germany to
Palestine. As Jewish historian Edwin Black has noted: “Many of these
people, especially in the late 1930s, were allowed to transfer actual
replicas of their homes and factories — indeed rough replicas of their
very existence.”40

The total amount transferred from Germany to Palestine through the Ha’avara
between August 1933 and the end of 1939 was 8.1 million pounds or 139.57
million German marks (then equivalent to more than $40 million). This
amount included 33.9 million German marks ($13.8 million) provided by the
Reichsbank in connection with the Agreement.41

Historian Black has estimated that an additional $70 million may have flowed
into Palestine through corollary German commercial agreements and special
international banking transactions. The German funds had a major impact on
a country as underdeveloped as Palestine was in the 1930s, he pointed out.
Several major industrial enterprises were built with the capital from
Germany, including the Mekoroth waterworks and the Lodzia textile firm. The
influx of Ha’avara goods and capital, concluded Black, “produced an
economic explosion in Jewish Palestine” and was “an indispensable factor in
the creation of the State of Israel.”42

The Ha’avara agreement greatly contributed to Jewish development in
Palestine and thus, indirectly, to the foundation of the Israeli state. A
January 1939 German Foreign Office circular bulletin reported, with some
misgiving, that “the transfer of Jewish property out of Germany [through
the Ha’avara agreement] contributed to no small extent to the building of a
Jewish state in Palestine.”43

Former officials of the Ha’avara company in Palestine confirmed this view in
a detailed study of the Transfer Agreement published in 1972: “The economic
activity made possible by the influx German capital and the Haavara
transfers to the private and public sectors were of greatest importance for
the country’s development. Many new industries and commercial enterprises
were established in Jewish Palestine, and numerous companies that are
enormously important even today in the economy of the State of Israel owe
their existence to the Haavara.”44

Dr. Ludwig Pinner, a Ha’avara company official in Tel Aviv during the 1930s,
later commented that the exceptionally competent Ha’avara
immigrants “decisively contributed” to the economic, social, cultural and
educational development of Palestine’s Jewish community.45

The Transfer Agreement was the most far-reaching example of cooperation
between Hitler’s Germany and international Zionism. Through this pact,
Hitler’s Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930s to
support Jewish development in Palestine.

Zionists Offer a Military Alliance With Hitler

In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a
formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political
alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical
underground “Fighters for the Freedom of Israel,” better known as the Lehi
or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the
radical nationalist “National Military Organization” (Irgun Zvai Leumi)
over the group’s attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned
further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main
enemy of Zionism.

This remarkable Zionist proposal “for the solution of the Jewish question in
Europe and the active participation of the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the
side of Germany” is worth quoting at some length:46

In their speeches and statements, the leading statesmen of National
Socialist Germany have often emphasized that a New Order in Europe requires
as a prerequisite a radical solution of the Jewish question by evacuation.
(“Jew-f ree Europe”)

The evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe is a precondition for
solving the Jewish question. However, the only way this can be totally
achieved is through settlement of these masses in the homeland of the
Jewish people, Palestine, and by the establishment of a Jewish state in its
historical boundaries.

The goal of the political activity and the years of struggle by the Israel
Freedom Movement, the National Military Organization in Palestine (Irgun
Zvai Leumi), is to solve the Jewish problem in this way and thus completely
liberate the Jewish people forever.

The NMO, which is very familiar with the good will of the German Reich
government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and
the Zionist emigration program, takes that view that:

1. Common interests can exist between a European New Order based on the
German concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as
embodied by the NMO.

2. Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folk
ish-national Jewry [Hebr_ertum].

3. The establishment of the historical Jewish state on a national and
totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty with the German Reich, would be in
the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of
power in the Near East.

On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German
Reich government recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom
Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part
in the war on the side of Germany.

This offer by the NMO could include military, political and informational
activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational measures,
outside as well. Along with this the Jewish men of Europe would be
militarily trained and organized in military units under the leadership and
command of the NMO. They would take part in combat operations for the
purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front by formed.

The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order
of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with a
positive-radical solution of the European Jewish problem on the basis of
the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would
greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all
humanity.

The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be consistent with
a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed
that he would utilize any combination and coalition in order to isolate and
defeat England.

There is no record of any German response. Acceptance was very unlikely
anyway because by this time German policy was decisively pro-Arab.47
Remarkably, Stern’s group sought to conclude a pact with the Third Reich at
a time when stories that Hitler was bent on exterminating Jews were already
in wide circulation. Stern apparently either did not believe the stories or
he was willing to collaborate with the mortal enemy of his people to help
bring about a Jewish state. 48

An important Lehi member at the time the group made this offer was Yitzhak
Shamir, who later served as Israel’s Foreign Minister and then, during much
of the 1980s and until June 1992, as Prime Minister. As Lehi operations
chief following Stern’s death in 1942, Shamir organized numerous acts of
terror, including the November 1944 assassination of British Middle East
Minister Lord Moyne and the September 1948 slaying of Swedish United
Nations mediator Count Bernadotte. Years later, when Shamir was asked about
the 1941 offer, he confirmed that he was aware of his organization’s
proposed alliance with wartime Germany. 49

Conclusion

In spite of the basic hostility between the Hitler regime and international
Jewry, for several years Jewish Zionist and German National Socialist
interests coincided. In collaborating with the Zionists for a mutually
desirable and humane solution to a complex problem, the Third Reich was
willing to make foreign exchange sacrifices, impair relations with Britain
and anger the Arabs. Indeed, during the 1930s no nation did more to
substantively further Jewish-Zionist goals than Hitler’s Germany.

Notes

1.W. Martini, “Hebr_isch unterm Hakenkreuz,” Die Welt (Hamburg), Jan. 10,
1975. Cited in: Klaus Polken, “The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi
Germany, 1933-1941,” Journal of Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, p.
65. 2.Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen: Die “Reichskristallnacht”
(Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), p. 212. See also: Th. Herzl, The Jewish State
(New York: Herzl Press, 1970), pp. 33, 35, 36, and, Edwin Black, The
Transfer Agreement (New York: Macmillan, 1984), p. 73. 3.Th. Herzl, “Der
Kongress,” Welt, June 4, 1897. Reprinted in: Theodor Herzls zionistische
Schriften (Leon Kellner, ed.), erster Teil, Berlin: Jüdischer Verlag, 1920,
p. 190 (and p. 139). 4.Memo of June 21, 1933, in: L. Dawidowicz, A
Holocaust Reader (New York: Behrman, 1976), pp. 150-155, and (in part) in:
Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin:
Univ. of Texas, 1985), p. 42.; On Zionism in Germany before Hitler’s
assumption of power, see: Donald L. Niewyk, The Jews in Weimar Germany
(Baton Rouge: 1980), pp. 94-95, 126-131, 140-143.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich
(Austin: 1985), pp. 1-15. 5.Jüdische Rundschau (Berlin), June 13, 1933.
Quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (New York:
Ballantine, pb., 1971, 1984), pp. 376-377. 6.Heinz Höhne, The Order of the
Death’s Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 376. 7.”Berlin,” Encyclopaedia
Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971), Vol. 5, p. 648. For a look at one
aspect of this “vigorous life,” see: J.-C. Horak, “Zionist Film Propaganda
in Nazi Germany,” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Vol. 4,
No. 1, 1984, pp. 49-58. 8.Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), pp. 54-55.; Karl A. Schleunes, The Twisted Road
to Auschwitz (Urbana: Univ. of Illinois, 1970, 1990), pp. 178-181. 9.Jacob
Boas, “A Nazi Travels to Palestine,” History Today (London), January 1980,
pp. 33-38. 10.Facsimile reprint of front page of Das Schwarze Korps, May
15, 1935, in: Janusz Piekalkiewicz, Israels Langer Arm (Frankfurt: Goverts,
1975), pp. 66-67. Also quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death’s
Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 377. See also: Erich Kern, ed.,
Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: FZ-Verlag, 1988), p. 184. 11.Das Schwarze
Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), pp. 56-57. 12.Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age
of the Dictators (1983), p. 83. 13.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), p. 60. See also: F. Nicosia, “The Yishuv and the
Holocaust,” The Journal of Modern History (Chicago), Vol. 64, No. 3, Sept.
1992, pp. 533-540. 14.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine
Question (1985), p. 57. 15.Jüdische Rundschau, Sept. 17, 1935. Quoted in:
Yitzhak Arad, with Y. Gutman and A. Margaliot, eds., Documents on the
Holocaust (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1981), pp. 82-83. 16.Der Angriff, Dec.
23, 1935, in: E. Kern, ed., Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: 1988), p.
148.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 56.; L. Brenner, Zionism in the
Age of the Dictators (1983), p. 138.; A. Margaliot, “The Reaction…,” Yad
Vashem Studies (Jerusalem), vol. 12, 1977, pp. 90-91.; On Kareski’s
remarkable career, see: H. Levine, “A Jewish Collaborator in Nazi Germany,”
Central European History (Atlanta), Sept. 1975, pp. 251-281. 17.”Dr. Wise
Urges Jews to Declare Selves as Such,” New York Herald Tribune, June 13,
1938, p. 12. 18.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich (1985), p. 53. 19.Lucy
Dawidowicz, The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (New York: Bantam, pb.,
1976), pp. 253-254.; Max Nussbaum, “Zionism Under Hitler,” Congress Weekly
(New York: American Jewish Congress), Sept. 11, 1942.; F. Nicosia, The
Third Reich (1985), pp. 58-60, 217.; Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement
(1984), p. 175. 20.H. H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (Ballantine,
pb., 1984), pp. 380-382.; K. Schleunes, Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p. 226.;
Secret internal SS intelligence report about F. Polkes, June 17, 1937, in:
John Mendelsohn, ed., The Holocaust (New York: Garland, 1982), vol. 5, pp.
62-64. 21.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 63-64, 105, 219-220. 22.F.
Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 160. 23.This distinction is also implicit
in the “Balfour Declaration” of November 1917, in which the British
government expressed support for “a national home for the Jewish people” in
Palestine, while carefully avoiding any mention of a Jewish state.
Referring to the majority Arab population there, the Declaration went on to
caution, “…it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which
may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish
communities in Palestine.” The complete text of the Declaration is
reproduced in facsimile in: Robert John, Behind the Balfour Declaration
(IHR, 1988), p. 32. 24.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 121. 25.F.
Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 124. 26.David Yisraeli, The Palestine
Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Bar-Ilan University, Israel, 1974),
p. 300.; Also in: Documents on German Foreign Policy, Series D, Vol. 5.
Doc. No. 564 or 567. 27.K. Schleunes, The Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p.
209. 28.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS.
International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before
the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), vol. 32, pp.
242-243. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, DC: 1946-1948), vol.
6, pp. 92-93. 29.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 141-144.; On Hitler’s
critical view of Zionism in Mein Kampf, see esp. Vol. 1, Chap. 11. Quoted
in: Robert Wistrich, Hitler’s Apocalypse (London: 1985), p. 155.; See also:
F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 26-28.; Hitler told his army adjutant
in 1939 and again in 1941 that he had asked the British in 1937 about
transferring all of Germany’s Jews to Palestine or Egypt. The British
rejected the proposal, he said, because it would cause further disorder.
See: H. v. Kotze, ed., Heeresadjutant bei Hitler (Stuttgart: 1974), pp. 65,
95. 30.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 156, 160-164, 166-167.; H.
H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (Ballantine, pb., 1984), pp. 392-394.;
Jon and David Kimche, The Secret Roads (London: Secker and Warburg, 1955),
pp. 39-43. See also: David Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and Palestine,”
Middle Eastern Studies, October 1971, p. 347.; Bernard Wasserstein, Britain
and the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945 (1979), pp. 43, 49, 52, 60.; T.
Kelly, “Man who fooled Nazis,” Washington Times, April 28, 1987, pp. 1B,
4B. Based on interview with Willy Perl, author of The Holocaust Conspiracy.
31.Y. Arad, et al., eds., Documents On the Holocaust (1981), p. 155. (The
training kibbutz was at Neuendorf, and may have functioned even after March
1942.) 32.On the Agreement in general, see: Werner Feilchenfeld, et al.,
Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972).; David
Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and the Transfer Agreement,” Journal of
Contemporary History (London), No. 2, 1971, pp. 129-148.; “Haavara,”
Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 7, pp. 1012-1013.; F. Nicosia, The Third
Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin: 1985), pp. 44-49.; Raul Hilberg,
The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1985),
pp. 140-141.; The Transfer Agreement, by Edwin Black, is detailed and
useful. However, it contains numerous inaccuracies and wildly erroneous
conclusions. See, for example, the review by Richard S. Levy in Commentary,
Sept. 1984, pp. 68-71. 33.E. Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 328,
337. 34.On opposition to the Haavara in official German circles, see: W.
Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972), pp. 31-33.;
D. Yisraeli, “The Third Reich,” Journal of Contemporary History, 1971, pp.
136-139.; F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question, pp.
126-139.; I. Weckert, Feuerzeichen (1981), pp. 226-227.; Rolf Vogel, Ein
Stempel hat gefehlt (Munich: Droemer Knaur, 1977), pp. 110 ff. 35.W.
Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 31. Entire text in: David
Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel:
1974), pp. 298-300. 36.Interior Ministry internal memo (signed by State
Secretary W. Stuckart), Dec. 17, 1937, in: Helmut Eschwege, ed.,
Kennzeichen J (Berlin: 1966), pp. 132-136. 37.W. Feilchenfeld, et al,
Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 32. 38.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp.
376-377. 39.E. Black, Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 376, 378.; F. Nicosia,
Third Reich (1985), pp. 238-239 (n. 91). 40.E. Black, Transfer Agreement,
p. 379.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich, pp. 212, 255 (n. 66). 41.W. Feilchenfeld,
et al., Haavara-Transfer, p. 75.; “Haavara,” Encyclopaedia Judaica, (1971),
Vol. 7, p. 1013. 42.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp. 379, 373, 382.
43.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS. International
Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the
International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), Vol. 32, pp.
242-243. 44.Werner Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina
(Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972). Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen
(Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), pp. 222-223. 45.W. Feilchenfeld, et al.,
Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972). Quoted in: I. Weckert,
Feuerzeichen (1981), p. 224. 46.Original document in German Ausw_rtiges Amt
Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E 224152 and E 234155-58. (Photocopy in author’s
possession).; Complete original German text published in: David Yisraeli,
The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1974), pp.
315-317. See also: Klaus Polkhen, “The Secret Contacts,” Journal of
Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, pp. 78-80.; (At the time this offer
was made, Stern’s Lehi group still regarded itself as the true Irgun/NMO.)
47.Arab nationalists opposed Britain, which then dominated much of the Arab
world, including Egypt, Iraq and Palestine. Because Britain and Germany
were at war, Germany cultivated Arab support. The leader of Palestine’s
Arabs, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el-Husseini, worked closely
with Germany during the war years. After escaping from Palestine, he spoke
to the Arab world over German radio and helped raise Muslim recruits in
Bosnia for the Waffen SS. 48.Israel Shahak, “Yitzhak Shamir, Then and Now,”
Middle East Policy (Washington, DC), Vol. 1, No. 1, (Whole No. 39), 1992,
pp. 27-38.; Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s Fateful Hour (New York: Harper and
Row, 1988), pp. 213-214. Quoted in: Andrew J. Hurley, Israel and the New
World Order (Santa Barbara, Calif.: 1991), pp. 93, 208-209.; Avishai
Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books,
May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986),
pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, “Yitzhak Shamir: On Hitler’s Side,” Arab
Perspectives (League of Arab States), March 1984, pp. 11-13. 49.Avishai
Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books,
May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986),
pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, “Skeletons in Shamir’s Cupboard,” Middle East
International, Sept. 30, 1983, pp. 15-16.; Sol Stern, L.
Rapoport, “Israel’s Man of the Shadows,” Village Voice (New York), July 3,
1984, pp. 13 ff.


SSGG – When somebody talks of shutting them down, you get three hundred
thousand “1st amendment” types jumping to the guy’s defense, giving you a
class on the Bill of Rights – Jacob Baltuch, Brandeis University
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/051115chicago.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:39 EST 2007
Article: 64727 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.usa:1994213 soc.culture.canada:573732 uk.politics.misc:1892860 soc.culture.europe:581505 soc.culture.polish:778521 soc.culture.russian:457802 soc.culture.swiss:64727
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: ArthurFranks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.canada,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: ZYD Holohoax Costs Yanks Over $35 BILLION A Year!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 118
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:49:40 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1177602580 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:49:40 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:49:40 MDT

On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:26:45 GMT, in alt.revisionism “abc”
wrote:

“Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced
that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.

Fred A. Leuchter is America’s leading specialist on the design and
fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers. In
1988, Leuchter scraped samples from the alleged gas chamber walls in
Auschwitz, Birkenau and Lublin. Cyanide residue would be clearly evident on
all these walls if gassings did occur. To his astonishment, Leuchter found
no significant cyanide traces in any one of these rooms.

In 1991, the Polish government repeated these tests to disprove Leuchter’s
findings, but they as well found no evidence of any gassings ever occurring.

The structural integrity of these “gas chambers” is also extremely faulty.
These rooms have ordinary doors and windows which are not hermetically
sealed! There are large gaps between the floors and doors. If the Germans
had attempted to gas anyone in these rooms, they would have died themselves,
as the gas would have leaked and contaminated the entire area. Also, no
equipment exists to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings.
Nothing was made to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chambers.
There are no provisions to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floors
or ceilings. No exhaust stacks have ever existed.

Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body
has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have
been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died
of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were
murdered Germans, not Jews. Roughly the equivalent of ten football fields
should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one
body has ever been discovered.

The Germans documented everything in meticulous detail from shrubbery to
arbors, but no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or
even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide. All documents ever
presented were drawn up AFTER the war.

Even if we threw away all the evidence and accounted for every so-called gas
chamber, it would have taken 68 YEARS to accomplish gassing six million
Jews!

Even The Diary of Anne Frank is a hoax. Portions of the diary were written
with a ball point pen. These pens were not in use at the time Anne Frank
lived.

It is not denied concentration camps existed. Tragically, many died of
typhus or starvation, as often happens in such situations. There is,
however, no evidence that any gassings occurred for the reasons of genocide.

Israel continues to receive trillions of dollars worldwide as retribution
for Holocaust gassings. Our country has donated more money to Israel than to
any other country in the history of the world — over $35 billion per year,
everything included. If not for our extravagantly generous gifts to Israel,
every family in America could afford a brand new Mercedes Benz. Surely the
American people would be outraged if they realized their hard-earned money
is being squandered in these difficult times.

With all this money at stake for Israel, it is easy to comprehend why this
Holocaust hoax is so secretly guarded. The Jewish name for Holocaust is
“Shoah.” In Zionist circles, it is known as “Shoah Business.” If nothing
else, this unbelievable coverup demonstrates the irrepressible Zionist
influence and control of our country. Their only defense against the facts
is to cry out “antisemitic,” “Skinhead” or “Nazi,” whereas the majority of
those who question the Holocaust are ordinary citizens…though you would
never know it from the media.

In whatever way you can, please help shatter this profitable myth. It is
time we stop sacrificing America’s welfare for the sake of Israel and spend
our hard-earned dollars on Americans.

(For more information contact The Institute for Historical Review P.O. Box
2739 Newport Beach, CA 92659 USA).

There are compelling reasons to believe that the so-called holocaust never
existed. Page 223, in The Diary of Anne Frank, (Pan Horizons edition, Pan
Books Ltd., London, 1989), indicates that the size of Auschwitz, the most
notorious of all German work camps, WAS VERY SMALL, with only 11,000 people
(many of whom may not even have been Jews) being evacuated by the Germans at
the time of the Russian advance in 1945. Certainly, compared to Spielberg’s
film, Schindler’s List (which Emilie Schindler, Oskar’s widow, said was full
of lies), and other Jewish propaganda, that millions upon millions of Jews
were systematically exterminated, 11,000 people is a very small number.
Simple arithmetic tells us that the Germans would have had to have had
hundreds of camps, or else they would have had to exterminate 137 people PER
HOUR, in order for six million Jews to have been exterminated at such small
camps as Auschwitz, a feat that would have been humanly impossible
considering that, according to Douglas Reed’s Behind the Scene and The
Controversy of Zion, a mere 850,000 soldiers and others were killed by the
entire German and Japanese war machines combined during WW2 (see p.397-400
of Douglas Reed’s book Controversy of Zion). People who would believe the
Jewish propaganda that six million Jews were exterminated by Hitler must
KEEP IN MIND THE SMALL SCALE CONSTRUCTION OF AUSCHWITZ AND THE VERY FEW
OTHER GERMAN WORK CAMPS THAT EXISTED DURING WW2.
On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh
broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS – KENW-TV) said that when
Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was
told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years. Again, simple arithmetic tells us that
25,000 times a half dozen camps does not equal 6,000,000. In fact, it
doesn’t even equal 600,000. . . .

It is an interesting fact that the number of so-called persecuted Jews KEEPS
INCREASING. Hal Greenwald, program director for the Hillel Foundation at
Duke University, a Jewish student group, has been promoting the idea that
NINE MILLION JEWS WERE EXTERMINATED IN HITLER’S GAS CHAMBERS (New York
Times, Nov. 9, 1991, AP). NOW IT’S 9 MILLION AND GROWING. ..JUST LIKE OUR
DEBT/TAX MONEY SUPPLY…THE NUMBERS JUST KEEP COMING OUT OF THIN AIR. .
.(The Bible Caused Economic and Financial Slavery in the New World Order by
Lee Cheney)”.

Read the entire article online in depth:

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:39 EST 2007
Article: 64835 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.swiss:64835 soc.culture.europe:581942 alt.politics.europe:64217 soc.culture.polish:779430 soc.culture.german:374338 uk.politics.misc:1895581 soc.culture.australian:409574
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.german,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.australian
Subject: Holohoax Story Starts to Crumble – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 56
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:32:21 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178123541 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:21 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:21 MDT

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:59:20 +0200, in alt.revisionism “Heinrich”
wrote:

All across Europe, from Scandinavia to Britain, from France to Switzerland,
Europeans are waking up to the scandal that is the Jew-imposed Holocaust
story and its related laws which make questioning the Jewish version of
World War II a criminal offence.

In Switzerland, the gloves are off: Swiss justice minister, Christoph
Blocher, has now openly called on the Swiss government to repeal the law
which makes historical revisionism illegal.

Minister Blocher, leader of the Swiss Peoples’ Party, is on a campaign to
change the law, according to the Neue Zuercher Zeitung (NZZ) newspaper –
even if it will impinge upon the sensitivities of minority groups, including
the country’s Jewish communities.
Blocher claims that freedom of expression is more important than protecting
the sensibilities of minority groups, NZZ wrote. Blocher just returned from
a trip to Turkey where a public discussion of the Armenian genocide is de
facto punishable by a court of law. Upon his return home, Blocher said that
he believes that Swiss laws need to be a beacon for other nations.

As far as the minister is concerned, a ban on free speech in Turkey has made
an effective public discussion of the Armenian genocide and Kurdish issues
there impossible. In effect, he claims that widening the possibilities for
freedom of speech in Switzerland might entice other countries to do the
same.
Article 261 of the Swiss criminal code punishes genocide-denial. Currently,
anybody is punishable in Switzerland if they “deny, belittle, or relativise
genocide or crimes against humanity,” NZZ wrote.

Because of this law, Swiss lawmakers who travel abroad are required to
discuss this topic with their counterparts in those countries which have
been accused, by the global community, of genocide.

Blocher’s trip to Turkey is a case in point. He believes that his having
been required to bring up the topic of the Ottoman Empire’s Armenian
genocide with his Turkish colleagues will have created unnecessary friction
during his meetings in the Eurasian nation. However, the minister’s failure
to guarantee that two Kurdish activists, held in Switzerland would be
extradited to Turkey has also put a damper on Swiss-Turkish relations, in
recent years.
The minister is apparently very much aware that a change in the law will
only entice Holocaust deniers to question the existence of gas chambers as
well. “I do not want that an opinion cannot be uttered only because someone
will be offended by it,” the minister said.
According to the minister, the definition of genocide needs to be decided by
historians. “A debate on the subject, however, will have no basis if diverse
opinions are banned,” he said.

http://www.ejpress.org/article/11252

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:39 EST 2007
Article: 64836 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.swiss:64836 soc.culture.europe:581943 soc.culture.german:374339 soc.culture.palestine:563932 alt.politics.europe:64218 uk.politics.misc:1895582
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.palestine,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc
Subject: How Do Zyds/Jews Get Away With the HOLOHOAX Scam? – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 98
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:32:43 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178123563 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:43 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:43 MDT

On 8 Dec 2006 13:38:56 -0800, in can.politics “krOne”
wrote:

“Plus Ca Change, Plus C’est la Meme Chose”

The more things change, the more they stay the same. As the
article below shows, Jews thruout history have been allied with the
ruling aristocracy and assisted in the abuse and oppression of the
non-Jewish majority. And guess what…that is exactly what is
happening today. Super-wealthy white gentiles and organized Jews
are working together to eliminate national borders, to flood our
Western countries with poor, incompatible immigrants from the third
world, and to move much of our industry to countries where slave
labor is available – all for the purpose of enriching themselves
while reducing our living standard to that of a Chinese peasant.

If you have wondered how the Jews manage to get away with what they
do – their infernal ‘holocaust’ racketeering and forcing our
governments to blindly support their outlaw state of Israel (which
now includes fighting wars against Israel’s enemies) as well as
their endless financial scams – here is your answer. They’ve got
very powerful allies in high places. Those allies who protect and
enable them – in exchange for a quid pro quo, of course – are our
very own traitorous elites.

************************************************************

Jewish Elite Is Part Of The Governing Class
By Henry Makow, PhD

Israel Shahak’s book “Jewish History, Jewish Religion; The Weight of
3000 Years” (1994) shows how the past provides a key to understanding
the present.**

According to Shahak, the Jewish elite always had a symbiotic
relationship with the governing class. The Jews would “administer the
oppression” of the masses. In return, the governing class would force
Jews to obey their “leaders.” Sometimes a pogrom would do the trick.

The “Jewish” position was always strongest when the governing class
was most at odds with the masses, and when there was least national
feeling.

Today, specific Jews (in finance, government, education and especially
the media) play a prominent role in the world elite’s preparation for
“globalization,” which many see as a modern form of feudalism. Once
again, “anti Semitism” is exploited to mobilize Jews (and Christians)
to support oppression (e.g. “The War on Terror”), disarm opposition
and to deflect blame.

THE TRUTH IS BITTER

History is propaganda about the past. Most historians don’t tell the
truth because they would be fired. Israel Shahak, who died in 2001,
was not an historian. He was a professor of organic chemistry at
Hebrew University, who had a scientist’s respect for objective truth.
He was also a concentration camp survivor, an Israeli army veteran and
a campaigner for Arab human rights.

History repeats itself because we lie about it. Shahak believes that
Jews need to re-educate themselves about their history and religion.
Jews are “a closed society” that uses “anti Semitism” to quash
criticism, which is considered “hatred” or “self hatred.”

Shahak says Judaism is largely a primitive, materialistic,
authoritarian credo. The Talmud is devoted to Jewish supremacy and
contempt for Christ, Christianity and non-Jews in general. The Cabala
embraces many gods including Satan.

The following is a brief summary of Shahak’s argument in the chapter,
“The Weight of History.”

1. In spite of persecution, Jews throughout history formed an integral
part of the privileged classes. The poorest Jew was immeasurably
better off than the serfs. Until roughly 1880, their most important
social function “was to mediate the oppression of the peasants on
behalf of the nobility and the Crown.”

2. Classical Judaism (1000-1880 AD) developed hatred and contempt for
agriculture as an occupation and for peasants as a class. “The
supposed superiority of Jewish morality and intellect…is bound up
with a lack of sensitivity for the suffering of that major part of
humanity who were especially oppressed during the last 1000 years, the
peasants.” (53)

3. While Gentiles in general were reviled, Jewish laws made an
exception for the elite – king, nobleman,etc. The Jewish community
enjoyed autonomous status and Jewish rabbis and rich were part of the
governing class. Together they oppressed the masses.

http://rense.com/general43/elite.htm

**note: Shahak’s book is available in adobe acrobat format (pdf) for
free download at:
http://www.solargeneral.com/library/JewishHistoryJewishReligion.pdf

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:40 EST 2007
Article: 64837 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.palestine:563933 soc.culture.swiss:64837 soc.culture.europe:581944 uk.politics.misc:1895583 alt.politics.europe:64219
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,uk.politics.misc,alt.politics.europe
Subject: Israel Founded by Terrorists!! – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 54
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:32:35 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178123555 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:35 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:35 MDT

On 29 Nov 2006 23:27:44 -0800, in uk.politics.misc “Arthur Brain”
wrote:

The media seem institutionally incapable of surmounting the
government-proscribed pro-Israel bias in order to discuss honestly and
openly the facts surrounding the problems created in Palestine by the
zionists.

Fact#1: Zionism is a marxist-inspired ideology. Ironically, Zionism’s
greatest supporters are the right-wing fringe of US/UK/Australian
politics. Hilarious, if this particular axis of evil hadn’t been the
cause of 60 years of warfare and untold tens of thousands of deaths.

Fact#2: Palestine was a fact, Israel an invention of the zionist
movement. This is the fact that scares them the most, hence the
perpetual zionist bleating about Palestine “not existing” – patent
nonsense, of course.

Fact#3: The zionist movement was represented by a variety of
bloodthirsty terrorist organisations such as the Haganah, Stern gang
(of which Israeli PM Shamir was a member), Irgun (of which Israeli PM
Begin was a member). The fact that notorious terrorists should be
considered suitable PM material says a lot about the philosphy of the
state of Israel.

Fact#4: The UN partition plan for Palestine was democratically rejected
by a majority of the population of Palestine, due to its proposal to
hand over more than 50% of Palestinian territory to a jewish population
which at the time only owned 6% of Palestine.

Fact#5: Disregarding the democratically-expressed wishes of the
Palestinian people, the zionist terrorist groups fought together in
1948 to take the land by force, during which they forcibly expelled
800, 000 Palestinians from their homes in a monstruous act of
ethnic-cleansing. The zionist “Plan Dalet”, which informed these acts,
also led to the deliberate and systematic razing of 400 Palestinian
villages in order to prevent the cleansed Palestinians from ever
returning to their homes – this act falls under the
internationally-recognised definition of “genocide”.

Fact#6: War crimes are also an integral feature of the zionist state:
remember the Israeli invasion of Lebanon (yes, there have been a
few…) during which Israeli officers including Ariel Sharon directed
an attack on Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatilla during
which women and children were mass-murdered. Earlier in his Israeli
army career Sharon was responsible for the slaughter of 69 civilians in
the Qibya village in Jordanian-controlled territory in 1953.

Fact#7: After 60 years of continual warfare, is it not time to admit
that Israel, a marxist-inspired ideologically-driven religious state
which is not inclusive and discriminates against non-jews, is not a
going concern and for the good of the entire world’s peace and security
should be dismantled once and for all?

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:40 EST 2007
Article: 64838 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.swiss:64838 soc.culture.german:374340 soc.culture.europe:581945 alt.politics.europe:64220 uk.politics.misc:1895584 soc.culture.polish:779431
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.polish
Subject: ZYD/Jew Law Overturned by Swiss – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 28
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:32:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178123547 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:27 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:27 MDT

On 26 Oct 2006 19:42:55 -0700, in soc.culture.canada “Venceremos”
wrote:

Ministers Announce: Jew Law To Be Overturned in Switzerland
By: Bulov/LSN Staff on: 26.10.2006

Bern, Switzerland – Eight ministers of Switzerland’s white
nationalist-leaning government, including Justice Minister Christoph
Blocher, have announced that Switzerland’s Anti-Racism Act, which
makes it illegal to incite “hatred” against Jews and non-whites by
questioning immigration or the “Holocaust”, will be reviewed and
likely suppressed or thrown out by the end of the year.

The law was passed in 1994 at the insistence of world Judaism,
which hailed it as a great victory and then immediately used it for
the criminal prosecution of seven prominent political dissidents,
many of whom fled to Russia for sanctuary.

The Swiss People’s Party, the national socialist governing party of
Switzerland, also announced that the Federal Commission Against
Racism, set up by Jew Ruth Dreifuss in 1995, will be disbanded
and stripped of its powers to arrest and prosecute “racists”.

The moves demonstrate that the changes Jews have made to
Western cultures over the past twenty years c…

http://www.overthrow.com/

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:40 EST 2007
Article: 64839 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.usa:1995823 soc.culture.europe:581947 soc.culture.swiss:64839 soc.culture.polish:779433 soc.culture.russian:458220 alt.politics.europe:64221 uk.politics.misc:1895585
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc
Subject: Haaretz – Attacks On ZYD/Jew Lobby Keep Coming!!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 115
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:33:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178123607 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:33:27 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:33:27 MDT

On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:07:32 GMT, in can.politics “torresdD”
wrote:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/rosnerBlog.jhtml?itemNo=841010&contrassID=25&subContrassID=0&sbSubContrassID=1&listSrc=Y&art=1

Rosner’s Blog
Shmuel Rosner Chief U.S. Correspondent
www.haaretz.com/rosner

The attack on the ‘Jewish lobby’ keeps coming and coming

Soros

Some American Jewish leaders are worried, and for good reason. They are paid
to be worried, and paid well. We’re heading for hard times, said one,
recounting several reasons. For one, the pro-Israel lobby has been on the
defensive for the past several months.

This week Jewish billionaire George Soros joined the chorus, not for the first
time, writing an article in the New York Review of Books in which he accused
AIPAC of exerting a damaging influence over American policy.

“Supporters of Israel have good reason to question AIPAC’s advocacy and they
have begun to do so,” he wrote. It appears that Soros considers himself to be
an Israel supporter, even if many would disagree. In the article, Soros did
not repeat past statements in which he accused Israel of exacerbating
anti-Semitic trends, but he provided readers with different reasons to doubt
the sincerity of his support. Regarding Hamas, for example, he wrote that
“according to some reports it has a military wing.” In other words, Soros
isn’t quite convinced that the rumors are true. He also trotted out the
standard accusation, which Carter also made, that AIPAC silences criticism of
Israel.

Soros is a prominent contributor to the Democratic Party. He was surely
somewhat disappointed when it became clear that its leaders are not
enthusiastic about responding to his call to arms. Sure, they want his money,
but not his image. Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, who is
seen as being further to the left than other candidates, and whose candidacy
has elicited a great deal of interest from Soros, has officially stated that
he does not agree with Soros’ views on Israel. This will certainly strengthen
Soros’ feeling that AIPAC is indeed succeeding in silencing others, in taming
even the lions. And the article won’t be Soros’ last word in his struggle
against AIPAC. The pro-Israel lobby won this round, but no tranquility is
guaranteed by long-term trends.

Note to the readers: this part of the blog was taken from my weekend print
edition column.

Commitment

The New York Jewish Week reported this morning that Soros has decided not to
fund a dovish alternative to AIPAC. Soros spokesman Michael Vachon told the
paper lack of prior involvement in Jewish life was the prime reason for his
decision. “He feels he would not have the necessary standing in the
community,” said Vachon. “Some people might even be put off by his involvement
in such an effort.”

If you regularly read this blog you will not be surprised by this decision.
Back in October, I quoted an Israeli well-versed in the intricate ways of
American politics. He wanted to explain how difficult it is to set up an
efficient Washington lobby, one that would exert considerable influence and
chose to use the following joke: The chicken and the pig decided to give the
farmer a present for his birthday. They were trying to figure out what to
bring when the chicken had an idea: “Why don’t we make him breakfast? What do
you say about bacon and eggs?” No way, answered the pig, and he had his
reasons: “Bacon and eggs might be a contribution for you, but for me it’s a
commitment.”

Criticism

You can read a summery of Soros’ criticism – and that of others – in Nathan
Guttman’s Forward comprehensive piece: Major critiques of Jewish lobbying were
published by controversial billionaire George Soros, Pulitzer Prize-winning
columnist Nicholas Kristof, the respected British newsmagazine The Economist
and the popular Web site Salon. The replies were furious. The New York Sun
accused Kristof and Soros of spreading a “new blood libel.” The American
Jewish Committee’s executive director, David Harris, wrote in a Jerusalem Post
opinion article that Kristof had a “blind spot” and had “sanctimoniously
lectured” Israel. The editor of The New Republic, Martin Peretz, renewed an
attack on Soros that he began a month ago when he called the Hungarian-born
Holocaust survivor a “cog in the Hitlerite wheel.”

Defense

When I wrote about the Carter book a while ago, I referred to the fact that
“The critics [of the book], as Carter justly claims, are almost all Jews. That
is the only card left in his hand, but it is a strong one, which embodies a
trap from which there is no escape.”

This reality didn’t change much since, and an especially painful manifestation
of it was a speech Bill Clinton gave in which he stated that “If I were an
Israeli, I wouldn’t like it because it’s not factually accurate and it’s not
fair.” Clearly, he didn’t agree with the book, but fell short of saying that
he was upset about it as an American. Has this started to change? I’m not so
sure. Clinton sent a letter to AJC’s Executive Director David Harris, thanking
him for “your articles about President Carter’s book. I don’t know where his
information [or conclusions] came from”, Clinton wrote. Again, unhappy with
the book but shy of making it clear that he is upset.

Maybe it’s a polite way for an ex-President to rebuff a fellow ex, maybe its
Clinton’s habit to stay vague whenever possible. Bottom line: Jews are still
those who make the case against Carter. Cheering from the sidelines doesn’t
count as much.

Rules

And look what my weekly guest has to say about AIPAC: recent (poorly
researched and politically slanted) publications have transformed this
organization into something quite sinister. Personally, I do not share the
underlying philosophy of AIPAC, in particular its unreflective support of
hard-line, right wing policies in Israel. But this organization is merely
playing by the rules governing the American political system.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:41 EST 2007
Article: 64840 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:779437 soc.culture.europe:581952 soc.culture.german:374341 alt.politics.europe:64223 soc.culture.palestine:563937 soc.culture.swiss:64840
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Is There A HOLOHOAX Industry? – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 142
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:34:23 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178123663 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:34:23 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:34:23 MDT

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:43:51 +1000, in alt.revisionism “Bennie C’ra”mer”
wrote:

Is there a Holocaust ‘Industry’?

By the BBC’s Andre Vornic
As the annual Nazi Holocaust day approaches, delegates have gathered for a
commemorative international conference in the Swedish capital, Stockholm.
And as compensation claims continue against companies and countries with
one-time Nazi associations, tributes and museums have multiplied: many
American cities now have their own memorials, and European cities such as
Stockholm and Berlin are preparing to acquire theirs.
It all testifies to the central – and haunting – position which the murder
of between five and six million Jews by Nazi Germany has acquired in the
Western consciousness.
But for the first time in the last quarter of a century, a new school of
academic thought is emerging – one which questions the accepted vision of
the Holocaust and the universality of its moral teachings.

In more recent years, the Holocaust industry has effectively turned into a
shake-down racket in which more and more countries throughout Europe are
being bludgeoned into coughing up compensation.

Professor Norman Finkelstein
In his forthcoming book, “The Holocaust Industry”, Professor Norman
Finkelstein of the University of New York argues that our present
interpretation of the Holocaust has been deliberately devised by American
Jewish groups for purposes of ethnic supremacy, political advantage and
financial gain.
“Since the late 1960s, there has developed a kind of Holocaust industry
which has made a cult of the Nazi Holocaust. And the purpose of this
industry is, in my view, ethnic aggrandisement – in particular, to deflect
criticism of the State of Israel and to deflect criticism of Jews
generally,” Professor Finkelstein says.
The discovery of the Nazi concentration camps of World War Two by allied
troops and journalists has shaped our perception of the very worst of human
nature.
It has also defined our view of Hitler’s principal victims, the Jews, as a
martyr nation deserving eternal atonement. But for Professor Finkelstein,
himself the son of concentration camp survivors, that view of the Holocaust
is a manufactured one.
For Professor Finkelstein, the Holocaust is not incomparable. To compare and
contrast – he argues – is a historian’s duty.

Attempts were made to relativise the Holocaust. “Oh, what happened to the
Jews is no different to what happened to the Armenians or what happened to
the Biafrans or Rwandans. ” Well, it was different. It was different in
scale, in quality, and above all its origins are quite singular.

David Cesarani
For most scholars, however, the Nazis’ barbarity in their treatment of the
Jews was unique and unparalleled. This case is argued by David Cesarani, a
teacher of modern Jewish history at the University of Southampton in
England.
“The Nazis’ attempt to exterminate the Jews of Europe, and indeed the Jews
of the world, is unique, because it’s the first time that all the apparatus
of a modern state was applied to destroying a group of people who were
defined according to racial, biological politics,” Mr Cesarani says.
Although Professor Finkelstein’s view is shared by few in today’s academia,
he is not an entirely isolated figure. Several younger scholars agree that
the Holocaust should not be a moral narrative with a single authorised
reading.
For Tim Cole of the University of Bristol, an authority on the Budapest
ghetto, the Holocaust’s significance has varied considerably according to
place and time.

Writing in a diary is a really strange experience for someone like me – not
only because I’ve never written anything before, but also because it seems
to me that later on, neither I nor anyone else will be interested in the
musings of a 13 year old school girl

The Diary of Anne Frank
Tim Cole draws attention to the fact that there were no Holocaust museums
back in the 1960’s.
“It’s only much more recently that museums have been built. If you like,
it’s a kind of 1980s, 1990s ideology, sentiment thing, if you like, to build
Holocaust museums – that we, at this particular point in history, remember
the Holocaust for all sorts of reasons,” Mr Cole says.
This is disputed by Michael Friedman of the Jewish Congress. It took 20
years, he says, to build these memorials because the shock of the Holocaust
was so great.
“How could the brain immediately react? Take a private tragedy – if you lose
your parents or children by accident, how long do you need to come back to a
minimum of emotionality and working out this tragedy. And multiply this by
the biggest human tragedy that ever happened on earth,” Michael Freidman
argues.
Schindler’s list, the Oscar-winning film about the Holocaust directed by
Steven Spielberg, was a huge success across the world in 1993 – and is said
to have popularised the suffering of the Jews to an unprecedented extent.
Some academics have scorned such material as a less than accurate and easily
digestible view of history.
Historians are increasingly disputing another historical interpretation –
that the whole of the German nation was to blame for the fate of the Jews.

There is something slightly absurd – if not laughable – about the fact that
the United States should erect a museum to the Nazi Holocaust, but not, for
example, erect a museum to commemorate the African-American slavery or the
extermination of the native population

Professor Norman Finkelstein
It is, however, something that Dr Friedman of the Jewish Congress strongly
believes.
“After World War Two, when I came to Germany at the age of 10, 15, the
majority of Germans said to me: “We didn’t want Auschwitz”. And I would
believe them, that they didn’t want it.
“But what does this mean, this statement? Was what happened not enough to
say “No” to? Because they didn’t say “No”, Auschwitz happened. Even if they
didn’t want it, they are responsible for it. They are responsible because,
without their daily acceptance of the steps beforehand, it wouldn’t have
been possible to build the concentration camps,” Dr Friedman says.
<>

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur , or to
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:41 EST 2007
Article: 64841 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.german:374343 soc.culture.swiss:64841 soc.culture.europe:581954 soc.culture.polish:779439 soc.culture.russian:458222 soc.culture.australian:409578 uk.politics.misc:1895593
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.australian,uk.politics.misc
Subject: Globalist Parasites Fear Growing Anti-ZYD Trend in Germany
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 168
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:35:46 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178123746 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:35:46 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:35:46 MDT

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:20:22 -0500, in alt.revisionism Doc Tavish
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:26:59 -0400, <[email protected]>, “127.0.0.1”
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Globalist Parasites Take
>Fright As German Patriots
>Prepare for Government
>By Michael James in Frankfurt, Germany
>9-23-6

>Swimming against a swelling tide of popular anger, disillusionment and
>despair, Germany’s corrupt and self-serving political elites are reacting
>with horror to the quiet revolution that is taking place in the heartlands
>of the German nation.

>Galvanised by a growing rage at the massive annual transfers of taxpayers’
>money to the state of Israel and the European Union against the backdrop of
>Germany’s biggest tax hike in history, a bankrupt and collapsing health
>sector, failed education system, mass unemployment and a tidal wave of
>immigration, voters are terrifying their ruling masters by switching their
>allegiance to radical patriots.

>Michel Friedman, a notoriously sleazy Jewish politician, wealthy activist
>lawyer and heavily promoted television personality with a criminal record
>for cocaine abuse and a penchant for vicious anti-German tirades, was among
>the first to condemn voters for sending nationalist candidates to the state
>parliament in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern last Sunday.

>”The patient Germany must now be healed with antibiotics because Aspirin no
>longer works,” the enraged Friedman wrote in Stern Magazine. “We must make
>it clear to voters that while protest votes in a democracy are legitimate
>they should not be used to legitimate hostile parties.”

>The pro-German Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (National
>Democratic Party of Germany) secured six seats in the new parliament, which
>oversees a constituency suffering an 18 percent jobless rate, widespread
>poverty, swingeing cuts in public welfare and an invasion of immigrants
>seeking handouts and black market jobs. The success follows its 2004 entry
>into the state parliament in Saxony, where it now boasts twelve
>representatives, and the consolidation of a substantial parliamentary
>presence in Bremen and Brandenburg in the shape of its sister party, the
>German People’s Union (DVU).

>The NPD gained significantly in stature last year by staging a walkout in
>the Saxon parliament in Dresden, protesting a one-minute silence in
>remembrance of the “victims” of Auschwitz in place of a similar
>commemoration for the victims of the Dresden Holocaust. Between February 13
>and 15, 1945, an estimated 250,000 German civilians, most of them women and
>children, died in a terrorist firestorm of nightmare proportions unleashed
>by American and British bombers. It has been described as a war crime of an
>even greater magnitude to that of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and
>Nagasaki, amounting to a cold and calculated act of genocide against the
>German people and the irrational destruction of one of Europe’s most
>beautiful historical cities, which at the time posed no military threat.

>Efforts to ban the NPD failed spectacularly in March 2003 when Germany’s
>Federal Constitutional Court rejected a petition from the government and
>mainstream political parties. The court was unable to obtain testimony from
>operatives working for the federal secret police, who had infiltrated the
>NPD as informers and agents provocateur.

>However, members of Angela Merkel’s increasingly unpopular coalition
>government have moved swiftly to re-state plans for a new banning order.
>Complaining that the NPD’s “increasingly aggressive self-confidence” is
>partly based on its constitutionality, the Vice-President of the German
>federal parliament, Wolfgang Thierse (Social Democratic Party of Germany),
>and the chairman of the SPD’s parliamentary faction, Peter Struck, are
>seeking urgent talks with the Minister of the Interior, Wolfgang Schaeuble
>(Christian Democratic Union), ahead of moves to outlaw German patriotism.

>Demanding “a tougher response from the police and a prohibition of the NPD”,
>Thierse reiterated Friedman’s argument that protests could only be
>tolerated insofar that such protests are not translated into support for
>anti-Zionist and pro-German political movements. It was acceptable, he
>stated, that the communist PDS be allowed to absorb “rage, indignation and
>disappointment”, but the same should not apply to the nationalist NPD. If
>you can’t beat it, he argues, ban it.

>”Unconstitutional wickedness,” says Gerhard Frey, leader of the DVU and
>historical truth campaigner. “It’s a cheap idea.”

>NPD leader Udo Voigt also remains unfazed at the fuss generated by a
>frightened elite and its journalists-for-hire in the Zionist mainstream
>media, pointing out that most of the damage directed at campaign posters
>during the election had been directed at the NPD by their opponents. The
>Berlin police went on record by saying that the emotional hysteria whipped
>up by the tabloid press in regard to alleged attacks on globalists had no
>foundation in reality “and could not be established”.

>Voigt is now eyeing upcoming elections in the states of Bavaria, Hessen,
>Niedersachsen and Saarland and expects a steadily increasing “momentum in
>the west” with the ultimate prize in mind: the Bundestag in 2009. But for
>the moment, all eyes are on Udo Pastoers, the prospective chief of the
>NPD’s parliamentary group in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Less than a day after
>securing victory, Pastoers paid special tribute to prisoner of conscience
>and historian, Ernst Zundel, placing him alongside Mahatma Gandhi as an
>idealist and freedom fighter.

>”Ernst Zundel has achieved the unbelievable,” Pastoers said admiringly.

>Zundel, who was illegally kidnapped from his home in the United States by
>Zionist agents working on behalf of the German government, is currently on
>trial in Mannheim for publishing scientific and historical information that
>brings into question the factual integrity of the so-called
>Jewish “holocaust”. A succession of defence lawyers have been dismissed and
>threatened with prosecution for attempting to provide the court with
>evidence that Mr Zundel is correct in his assertions: a bizarre and surreal
>legal process that is unique to Germany, and which has angered millions of
>civil libertarians in Europe, Britain, Ireland, America, Canada and the
>Arab world.

>Both Voigt and Frey have emphasised their keen willingness to work with
>other national independence movements in Europe as part of a long-term
>strategy to bring an end to the European Union, NATO, the World Bank, the
>United Nations and other institutions that represent corporate and global
>parasiticism at the expense of ordinary working and middle-class people.

>”There are only two different causes that historically lead over and over
>again to destruction, murder, war and suffering,” says 17-year old
>Sebastian Seidel, a member of the NPD’s youth wing, the Freien
>Kameradschaften. “On the one side is the abuse of power, greed and the
>arbitrary expansion of hegemony that embraces the insanity of world
>government. On the other side is the response to injustice, resistance to
>the dark powers of evil, the struggle against those who would eliminate us,
>and the dawning of a new will to freedom that fights against everything
>that falsifies and destroys the survival imperative of peoples and their
>cultures.”

>As the Berlin coalition government comes to typify the worst excesses of the
>decadent Weimar Republic, endlessly promoting abortion, homosexuality,
>atheism and a hatred of all things German while sending precious young
>soldiers to die for counterfeit Israel in Afghanistan and the Lebanon,
>increasing numbers of angry German citizens are quietly and patiently
>preparing to take back their nation and declare independence from the
>Satanic New World Order.

>”This time,” says Voigt, smiling. “This time.”
>http://www.rense.com/general73/global.htm
(Archived locally as: Rense_Global)

Looks like good news and hopefully the tide will turn in Canada and
America as it is in Germany and France as well!

Tavish

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/4f3f54c2954fe23?fwc=1
Subject: UPDATED! Nizkor Project Director Kenneth McVay is a Mamzer Totally
Owned and Controlled by Jews v4.0
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:48:29 -0500
Message-ID:
AND
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/13b49b6b7212c3a3?fwc=1
Subject: Re: UPDATED! Nizkor Project Director Kenneth McVay is a Mamzer
Totally
Owned and Controlled by Jews v4.0
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:37:48 -0500
Message-ID:
References:
PLUS
http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/7e8cbfce5f14ee8c?fwc=1
Subject: The reason Canadian Kenneth McVay is distancing himself from the San
Antonio Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund? (It’s illegal for one thing!)
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:50:56 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:42 EST 2007
Article: 64842 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.palestine:563942 soc.culture.europe:581961 soc.culture.german:374348 soc.culture.swiss:64842 soc.culture.polish:779446 alt.politics.europe:64226
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish,alt.politics.europe
Subject: Zionism & Third Reich = KOLLABORATEURS!! Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 733
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:51:02 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178124662 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:51:02 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:51:02 MDT

And never forget the ZYD prominente Kollaborateurs such as KASTNER,
RUMKOWSKI and WIESENTHAL!!

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:45:26 -0400, in alt.revisionism Gallows Cheater
wrote:

http://www.rense.com/general34/ZAND.HTM

Zionism And The Third Reich
By Mark Weber
Institute for Historical Review
2-8-3

Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German
port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, “Tel
Aviv,” while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the
ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member.
Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic
combination as a “metaphysical absurdity.”1 Absurd or not, this is but one
vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging
collaboration between Zionism and Hitler’s Third Reich.

Common Aims

Over the years, people in many different countries have wrestled with
the “Jewish question”: that is, what is the proper role of Jews in
non-Jewish society? During the 1930s, Jewish Zionists and German National
Socialists shared similar views on how to deal with this perplexing issue.
They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities,
and that Jews did not belong in Germany. Jews living in the Reich were
therefore to be regarded not as “Germans of the Jewish faith,” but rather
as members of a separate national community. Zionism (Jewish nationalism)
also implied an obligation by Zionist Jews to resettle in Palestine,
the “Jewish homeland.” They could hardly regard themselves as sincere
Zionists and simultaneously claim equal rights in Germany or any
other “foreign” country.

Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that
anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely
understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes.
The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in
a separate state of their own. “The Jewish question exists wherever Jews
live in noticeable numbers,” he wrote in his most influential work, The
Jewish State. “Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving
Jews … I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex
phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear.”
The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. “It is a
national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international
political issue …” Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews
constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a
Volk.2 Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome “final solution of
the Jewish question.”3

Six months after Hitler came to power, the Zionist Federation of Germany (by
far the largest Zionist group in the country) submitted a detailed
memorandum to the new government that reviewed German-Jewish relations and
formally offered Zionist support in “solving” the vexing “Jewish question.”
The first step, it suggested, had to be a frank recognition of fundamental
national differences: 4

Zionism has no illusions about the difficulty of the Jewish condition, which
consists above all in an abnormal occupational pattern and in the fault of
an intellectual and moral posture not rooted in one’s own tradition.
Zionism recognized decades ago that as a result of the assimilationist
trend, symptoms of deterioration were bound to appear …

Zionism believes that the rebirth of the national life of a people, which is
now occurring in Germany through the emphasis on its Christian and national
character, must also come about in the Jewish national group. For the
Jewish people, too, national origin, religion, common destiny and a sense
of its uniqueness must be of decisive importance in the shaping of its
existence. This means that the egotistical individualism of the liberal era
must be overcome and replaced with a sense of community and collective
responsibility …

We believe it is precisely the new [National Socialist] Germany that can,
through bold resoluteness in the handling of the Jewish question, take a
decisive step toward overcoming a problem which, in truth, will have to be
dealt with by most European peoples …

Our acknowledgment of Jewish nationality provides for a clear and sincere
relationship to the German people and its national and racial realities.
Precisely because we do not wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we,
too, are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the
Jewish group and reject any trespasses in the cultural domain, we — having
been brought up in the German language and German culture — can show an
interest in the works and values of German culture with admiration and
internal sympathy …

For its practical aims, Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration of
even a government fundamentally hostile to Jews, because in dealing with
the Jewish question not sentimentalities are involved but a real problem
whose solution interests all peoples and at the present moment especially
the German people … Boycott propaganda — such as is currently being
carried on against Germany in many ways — is in essence un-Zionist,
because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to build …

We are not blind to the fact that a Jewish question exists and will continue
to exist. From the abnormal situation of the Jews severe disadvantages
result for them, but also scarcely tolerable conditions for other peoples.
The Federation’s paper, the Jüdische Rundschau (“Jewish Review”),
proclaimed the same message: “Zionism recognizes the existence of a Jewish
problem and desires a far-reaching and constructive solution. For this
purpose Zionism wishes to obtain the assistance of all peoples, whether
pro- or anti-Jewish, because, in its view, we are dealing here with a
concrete rather than a sentimental problem, the solution of which all
peoples are interested.”5 A young Berlin rabbi, Joachim Prinz, who later
settled in the United States and became head of the American Jewish
Congress, wrote in his 1934 book, Wir Juden (“We Jews”), that the National
Socialist revolution in Germany meant “Jewry for the Jews.” He
explained: “No subterfuge can save us now. In place of assimilation we
desire a new concept: recognition of the Jewish nation and Jewish race.” 6

Active Collaboration

On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood,
National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group
believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler
government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine
>from 1933 until 1940-1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive
collaboration.

Even as the Third Reich became more entrenched, many German Jews, probably a
majority, continued to regard themselves, often with considerable pride, as
Germans first. Few were enthusiastic about pulling up roots to begin a new
life in far-away Palestine. Nevertheless, more and more German Jews turned
to Zionism during this period. Until late 1938, the Zionist movement
flourished in Germany under Hitler. The circulation of the Zionist
Federation’s bi-weekly Jüdische Rundschau grew enormously. Numerous Zionist
books were published. “Zionist work was in full swing” in Germany during
those years, the Encyclopaedia Judaica notes. A Zionist convention held in
Berlin in 1936 reflected “in its composition the vigorous party life of
German Zionists.”7

The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal
June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for
Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage
emigration of Germany’s Jews to Palestine. This would require increased
Jewish self-awareness. Jewish schools, Jewish sports leagues, Jewish
cultural organizations — in short, everything that would encourage this
new consciousness and self-awareness – should be promoted, the paper
recommended.8

SS officer Leopold von Mildenstein and Zionist Federation official Kurt
Tuchler toured Palestine together for six months to assess Zionist
development there. Based on his firsthand observations, von Mildenstein
wrote a series of twelve illustrated articles for the important Berlin
daily Der Angriff that appeared in late 1934 under the heading “A Nazi
Travels to Palestine.” The series expressed great admiration for the
pioneering spirit and achievements of the Jewish settlers. Zionist
self-development, von Mildenstein wrote, had produced a new kind of Jew. He
praised Zionism as a great benefit for both the Jewish people and the
entire world. A Jewish homeland in Palestine, he wrote in his concluding
article, “pointed the way to curing a centuries-long wound on the body of
the world: the Jewish question.” Der Angriff issued a special medal, with a
Swastika on one side and a Star of David on the other, to commemorate the
joint SS-Zionist visit. A few months after the articles appeared, von
Mildenstein was promoted to head the Jewish affairs department of the SS
security service in order to support Zionist migration and development more
effectively. 9

The official SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, proclaimed its support for
Zionism in a May 1935 front-page editorial: “The time may not be too far
off when Palestine will again be able to receive its sons who have been
lost to it for more than a thousand years. Our good wishes, together with
official goodwill, go with them.”10 Four months later, a similar article
appeared in the SS paper: 11

The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on
religion leads the German government to guarantee without reservation the
racial separateness of this community. The government finds itself in
complete agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry, the
so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry around
the world and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis,
Germany undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the
future in the handling of the Jewish problem around the world.

A leading German shipping line began direct passenger liner service from
Hamburg to Haifa, Palestine, in October 1933 providing “strictly kosher
food on its ships, under the supervision of the Hamburg rabbinate.” 12 With
official backing, Zionists worked tirelessly to “reeducate” Germany’s Jews.
As American historian Francis Nicosia put it in his 1985 survey, The Third
Reich and the Palestine Question: “Zionists were encouraged to take their
message to the Jewish community, to collect money, to show films on
Palestine and generally to educate German Jews about Palestine. There was
considerable pressure to teach Jews in Germany to cease identifying
themselves as Germans and to awaken a new Jewish national identity in
them.” 13

In an interview after the war, the former head of the Zionist Federation of
Germany, Dr. Hans Friedenthal, summed up the situation: “The Gestapo did
everything in those days to promote emigration, particularly to Palestine.
We often received their help when we required anything from other
authorities regarding preparations for emigration.” 14

At the September 1935 National Socialist Party Congress, the Reichstag
adopted the so-called “Nuremberg laws” that prohibited marriages and sexual
relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect, proclaimed the Jews an
alien minority nationality. A few days later the Zionist Jüdische Rundschau
editorially welcomed the new measures: 15

Germany … is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it
declares the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the
Jews have been stamped a national minority it is again possible to
establish normal relations between the German nation and Jewry. The new
laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own cultural life, its own
national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its own
theatre, and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own
future in all aspects of national life …

Germany has given the Jewish minority the opportunity to live for itself,
and is offering state protection for this separate life of the Jewish
minority: Jewry’s process of growth into a nation will thereby be
encouraged and a contribution will be made to the establishment of more
tolerable relations between the two nations. Georg Kareski, the head of
both the “Revisionist” Zionist State Organization and the Jewish Cultural
League, and former head of the Berlin Jewish Community, declared in an
interview with the Berlin daily Der Angriff at the end of 1935: 16

For many years I have regarded a complete separation of the cultural affairs
of the two peoples [Jews and Germans] as a pre-condition for living
together without conflict… I have long supported such a separation,
provided it is founded on respect for the alien nationality. The Nuremberg
Laws … seem to me, apart from their legal provisions, to conform entirely
with this desire for a separate life based on mutual respect… This
interruption of the process of dissolution in many Jewish communities,
which had been promoted through mixed marriages, is therefore, from a
Jewish point of view, entirely welcome.

Zionist leaders in other countries echoed these views. Stephen S. Wise,
president of the American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress,
told a New York rally in June 1938: “I am not an American citizen of the
Jewish faith, I am a Jew… Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the
Jewish people a race and we are a race.” 17 The Interior Ministry’s Jewish
affairs specialist, Dr. Bernhard Lösener, expressed support for Zionism in
an article that appeared in a November 1935 issue of the official
Reichsverwaltungsblatt: 18

If the Jews already had their own state in which the majority of them were
settled, then the Jewish question could be regarded as completely resolved
today, also for the Jews themselves. The least amount of opposition to the
ideas underlying the Nuremberg Laws have been shown by the Zionists,
because they realize at once that these laws represent the only correct
solution for the Jewish people as well. For each nation must have its own
state as the outward expression of its particular nationhood.

In cooperation with the German authorities, Zionist groups organized a
network of some forty camps and agricultural centers throughout Germany
where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine.
Although the Nuremberg Laws forbid Jews from displaying the German flag,
Jews were specifically guaranteed the right to display the blue and white
Jewish national banner. The flag that would one day be adopted by Israel
was flown at the Zionist camps and centers in Hitler’s Germany. 19

Himmler’s security service cooperated with the Haganah, the Zionist
underground military organization in Palestine. The SS agency paid Haganah
official Feivel Polkes for information about the situation in Palestine and
for help in directing Jewish emigration to that country. Meanwhile, the
Haganah was kept well informed about German plans by a spy it managed to
plant in the Berlin headquarters of the SS.20 Haganah-SS collaboration even
included secret deliveries of German weapons to Jewish settlers for use in
clashes with Palestinian Arabs. 21 In the aftermath of the November
1938 “Kristallnacht” outburst of violence and destruction, the SS quickly
helped the Zionist organization to get back on its feet and continue its
work in Germany, although now under more restricted supervision. 22

Official Reservations

German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials
were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities
in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize “their”
governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry
remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long
as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to
resettle in the Zionist “promised land,” a sovereign Jewish state in
Palestine would not really “solve” the international Jewish question.
Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this
dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore
limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British
control, not a sovereign Jewish state. 23

A Jewish state in Palestine, the Foreign Minister informed diplomats in June
1937, would not be in Germany’s interest because it would not be able to
absorb all Jews around the world, but would only serve as an additional
power base for international Jewry, in much the same way as Moscow served
as a base for international Communism.24 Reflecting something of a shift in
official policy, the German press expressed much greater sympathy in 1937
for Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist ambitions, at a time when
tension and conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine was sharply
increasing. 25

A Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937, cautioned that in spite
of support for Jewish settlement in Palestine, “it would nevertheless be a
mistake to assume that Germany supports the formation of a state structure
in Palestine under some form of Jewish control. In view of the anti-German
agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation
of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the
nations of the world.”26 “The proclamation of a Jewish state or a
Jewish-administrated Palestine,” warned an internal memorandum by the
Jewish affairs section of the SS, “would create for Germany a new enemy,
one that would have a deep influence on developments in the Near East.”
Another SS agency predicted that a Jewish state “would work to bring
special minority protection to Jews in every country, therefore giving
legal protection to the exploitation activity of world Jewry.”27 In January
1939, Hitler’s new Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, likewise
warned in another circular bulletin that “Germany must regard the formation
of a Jewish state as dangerous” because it “would bring an international
increase in power to world Jewry.” 28

Hitler himself personally reviewed this entire issue in early 1938 and, in
spite of his long-standing skepticism of Zionist ambitions and misgivings
that his policies might contribute to the formation of a Jewish state,
decided to support Jewish migration to Palestine even more vigorously. The
prospect of ridding Germany of its Jews, he concluded, outweighed the
possible dangers. 29

Meanwhile, the British government imposed ever more drastic restrictions on
Jewish immigration into Palestine in 1937, 1938 and 1939. In response, the
SS security service concluded a secret alliance with the clandestine
Zionist agency Mossad le-Aliya Bet to smuggle Jews illegally into
Palestine. As a result of this intensive collaboration, several convoys of
ships succeeded in reaching Palestine past British gunboats. Jewish
migration, both legal and illegal, from Germany (including Austria) to
Palestine increased dramatically in 1938 and 1939. Another 10,000 Jews were
scheduled to depart in October 1939, but the outbreak of war in September
brought the effort to an end. All the same, German authorities continued to
promote indirect Jewish emigration to Palestine during 1940 and 1941. 30
Even as late as March 1942, at least one officially authorized
Zionist “kibbutz” training camp for potential emigrants continued to
operate in Hitler’s Germany. 31

The Transfer Agreement

The centerpiece of German-Zionist cooperation during the Hitler era was the
Transfer Agreement, a pact that enabled tens of thousands of German Jews to
migrate to Palestine with their wealth. The Agreement, also known as the
Haavara (Hebrew for “transfer”), was concluded in August 1933 following
talks between German officials and Chaim Arlosoroff, Political Secretary of
the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the World Zionist Organization.
32

Through this unusual arrangement, each Jew bound for Palestine deposited
money in a special account in Germany. The money was used to purchase
German-made agricultural tools, building materials, pumps, fertilizer, and
so forth, which were exported to Palestine and sold there by the
Jewish-owned Haavara company in Tel-Aviv. Money from the sales was given to
the Jewish emigrant upon his arrival in Palestine in an amount
corresponding to his deposit in Germany. German goods poured into Palestine
through the Haavara, which was supplemented a short time later with a
barter agreement by which Palestine oranges were exchanged for German
timber, automobiles, agricultural machinery, and other goods. The Agreement
thus served the Zionist aim of bringing Jewish settlers and development
capital to Palestine, while simultaneously serving the German goal of
freeing the country of an unwanted alien group.

Delegates at the 1933 Zionist Congress in Prague vigorously debated the
merits of the Agreement. Some feared that the pact would undermine the
international Jewish economic boycott against Germany. But Zionist
officials reassured the Congress. Sam Cohen, a key figure behind the
Haavara arrangement, stressed that the Agreement was not economically
advantageous to Germany. Arthur Ruppin, a Zionist Organization emigration
specialist who had helped negotiate the pact, pointed out that “the
Transfer Agreement in no way interfered with the boycott movement, since no
new currency will flow into Germany as a result of the agreement…” 33 The
1935 Zionist Congress, meeting in Switzerland, overwhelmingly endorsed the
pact. In 1936, the Jewish Agency (the Zionist “shadow government” in
Palestine) took over direct control of the Ha’avara, which remained in
effect until the Second World War forced its abandonment.

Some German officials opposed the arrangement. Germany’s Consul General in
Jerusalem, Hans Döhle, for example, sharply criticized the Agreement on
several occasions during 1937. He pointed out that it cost Germany the
foreign exchange that the products exported to Palestine through the pact
would bring if sold elsewhere. The Haavara monopoly sale of German goods to
Palestine through a Jewish agency naturally angered German businessmen and
Arabs there. Official German support for Zionism could lead to a loss of
German markets throughout the Arab world. The British government also
resented the arrangement.34 A June 1937 German Foreign Office internal
bulletin referred to the “foreign exchange sacrifices” that resulted from
the Haavara. 35

A December 1937 internal memorandum by the German Interior Ministry reviewed
the impact of the Transfer Agreement: “There is no doubt that the Haavara
arrangement has contributed most significantly to the very rapid
development of Palestine since 1933. The Agreement provided not only the
largest source of money (from Germany!), but also the most intelligent
group of immigrants, a nd finally it brought to the country the machines
and industrial products essential for development.” The main advantage of
the pact, the memo reported, was the emigration of large numbers of Jews to
Palestine, the most desirable target country as far as Germany was
concerned. But the paper also noted the important drawbacks pointed out by
Consul Döhle and others. The Interior Minister, it went on, had concluded
that the disadvantages of the agreement now outweighed the advantages and
that, therefore, it should be terminated. 36

Only one man could resolve the controversy. Hitler personally reviewed the
policy in July and September 1937, and again in January 1938, and each time
decided to maintain the Haavara arrangement. The goal of removing Jews from
Germany, he concluded, justified the drawbacks. 37

The Reich Economics Ministry helped to organize another transfer company,
the International Trade and Investment Agency, or Intria, through which
Jews in foreign countries could help German Jews emigrate to Palestine.
Almost $900,000 was eventually channeled through the Intria to German Jews
in Palestine.38 Other European countries eager to encourage Jewish
emigration concluded agreements with the Zionists modeled after the
Ha’avara. In 1937 Poland authorized the Halifin (Hebrew for “exchange”)
transfer company. By late summer 1939, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary and
Italy had signed similar arrangements. The outbreak of war in September
1939, however, prevented large-scale implementation of these agreements. 39

Achievements of Haavara

Between 1933 and 1941, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to Palestine
through the Ha’avara and other German-Zionist arrangements, or about ten
percent of Germany’s 1933 Jewish population. (These German Jews made up
about 15 percent of Palestine’s 1939 Jewish population.) Some Ha’avara
emigrants transferred considerable personal wealth from Germany to
Palestine. As Jewish historian Edwin Black has noted: “Many of these
people, especially in the late 1930s, were allowed to transfer actual
replicas of their homes and factories — indeed rough replicas of their
very existence.”40

The total amount transferred from Germany to Palestine through the Ha’avara
between August 1933 and the end of 1939 was 8.1 million pounds or 139.57
million German marks (then equivalent to more than $40 million). This
amount included 33.9 million German marks ($13.8 million) provided by the
Reichsbank in connection with the Agreement.41

Historian Black has estimated that an additional $70 million may have flowed
into Palestine through corollary German commercial agreements and special
international banking transactions. The German funds had a major impact on
a country as underdeveloped as Palestine was in the 1930s, he pointed out.
Several major industrial enterprises were built with the capital from
Germany, including the Mekoroth waterworks and the Lodzia textile firm. The
influx of Ha’avara goods and capital, concluded Black, “produced an
economic explosion in Jewish Palestine” and was “an indispensable factor in
the creation of the State of Israel.”42

The Ha’avara agreement greatly contributed to Jewish development in
Palestine and thus, indirectly, to the foundation of the Israeli state. A
January 1939 German Foreign Office circular bulletin reported, with some
misgiving, that “the transfer of Jewish property out of Germany [through
the Ha’avara agreement] contributed to no small extent to the building of a
Jewish state in Palestine.”43

Former officials of the Ha’avara company in Palestine confirmed this view in
a detailed study of the Transfer Agreement published in 1972: “The economic
activity made possible by the influx German capital and the Haavara
transfers to the private and public sectors were of greatest importance for
the country’s development. Many new industries and commercial enterprises
were established in Jewish Palestine, and numerous companies that are
enormously important even today in the economy of the State of Israel owe
their existence to the Haavara.”44

Dr. Ludwig Pinner, a Ha’avara company official in Tel Aviv during the 1930s,
later commented that the exceptionally competent Ha’avara
immigrants “decisively contributed” to the economic, social, cultural and
educational development of Palestine’s Jewish community.45

The Transfer Agreement was the most far-reaching example of cooperation
between Hitler’s Germany and international Zionism. Through this pact,
Hitler’s Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930s to
support Jewish development in Palestine.

Zionists Offer a Military Alliance With Hitler

In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a
formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political
alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical
underground “Fighters for the Freedom of Israel,” better known as the Lehi
or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the
radical nationalist “National Military Organization” (Irgun Zvai Leumi)
over the group’s attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned
further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main
enemy of Zionism.

This remarkable Zionist proposal “for the solution of the Jewish question in
Europe and the active participation of the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the
side of Germany” is worth quoting at some length:46

In their speeches and statements, the leading statesmen of National
Socialist Germany have often emphasized that a New Order in Europe requires
as a prerequisite a radical solution of the Jewish question by evacuation.
(“Jew-f ree Europe”)

The evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe is a precondition for
solving the Jewish question. However, the only way this can be totally
achieved is through settlement of these masses in the homeland of the
Jewish people, Palestine, and by the establishment of a Jewish state in its
historical boundaries.

The goal of the political activity and the years of struggle by the Israel
Freedom Movement, the National Military Organization in Palestine (Irgun
Zvai Leumi), is to solve the Jewish problem in this way and thus completely
liberate the Jewish people forever.

The NMO, which is very familiar with the good will of the German Reich
government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and
the Zionist emigration program, takes that view that:

1. Common interests can exist between a European New Order based on the
German concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as
embodied by the NMO.

2. Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folk
ish-national Jewry [Hebr_ertum].

3. The establishment of the historical Jewish state on a national and
totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty with the German Reich, would be in
the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of
power in the Near East.

On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German
Reich government recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom
Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part
in the war on the side of Germany.

This offer by the NMO could include military, political and informational
activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational measures,
outside as well. Along with this the Jewish men of Europe would be
militarily trained and organized in military units under the leadership and
command of the NMO. They would take part in combat operations for the
purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front by formed.

The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order
of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with a
positive-radical solution of the European Jewish problem on the basis of
the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would
greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all
humanity.

The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be consistent with
a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed
that he would utilize any combination and coalition in order to isolate and
defeat England.

There is no record of any German response. Acceptance was very unlikely
anyway because by this time German policy was decisively pro-Arab.47
Remarkably, Stern’s group sought to conclude a pact with the Third Reich at
a time when stories that Hitler was bent on exterminating Jews were already
in wide circulation. Stern apparently either did not believe the stories or
he was willing to collaborate with the mortal enemy of his people to help
bring about a Jewish state. 48

An important Lehi member at the time the group made this offer was Yitzhak
Shamir, who later served as Israel’s Foreign Minister and then, during much
of the 1980s and until June 1992, as Prime Minister. As Lehi operations
chief following Stern’s death in 1942, Shamir organized numerous acts of
terror, including the November 1944 assassination of British Middle East
Minister Lord Moyne and the September 1948 slaying of Swedish United
Nations mediator Count Bernadotte. Years later, when Shamir was asked about
the 1941 offer, he confirmed that he was aware of his organization’s
proposed alliance with wartime Germany. 49

Conclusion

In spite of the basic hostility between the Hitler regime and international
Jewry, for several years Jewish Zionist and German National Socialist
interests coincided. In collaborating with the Zionists for a mutually
desirable and humane solution to a complex problem, the Third Reich was
willing to make foreign exchange sacrifices, impair relations with Britain
and anger the Arabs. Indeed, during the 1930s no nation did more to
substantively further Jewish-Zionist goals than Hitler’s Germany.

Notes

1.W. Martini, “Hebr_isch unterm Hakenkreuz,” Die Welt (Hamburg), Jan. 10,
1975. Cited in: Klaus Polken, “The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi
Germany, 1933-1941,” Journal of Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, p.
65. 2.Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen: Die “Reichskristallnacht”
(Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), p. 212. See also: Th. Herzl, The Jewish State
(New York: Herzl Press, 1970), pp. 33, 35, 36, and, Edwin Black, The
Transfer Agreement (New York: Macmillan, 1984), p. 73. 3.Th. Herzl, “Der
Kongress,” Welt, June 4, 1897. Reprinted in: Theodor Herzls zionistische
Schriften (Leon Kellner, ed.), erster Teil, Berlin: Jüdischer Verlag, 1920,
p. 190 (and p. 139). 4.Memo of June 21, 1933, in: L. Dawidowicz, A
Holocaust Reader (New York: Behrman, 1976), pp. 150-155, and (in part) in:
Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin:
Univ. of Texas, 1985), p. 42.; On Zionism in Germany before Hitler’s
assumption of power, see: Donald L. Niewyk, The Jews in Weimar Germany
(Baton Rouge: 1980), pp. 94-95, 126-131, 140-143.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich
(Austin: 1985), pp. 1-15. 5.Jüdische Rundschau (Berlin), June 13, 1933.
Quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (New York:
Ballantine, pb., 1971, 1984), pp. 376-377. 6.Heinz Höhne, The Order of the
Death’s Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 376. 7.”Berlin,” Encyclopaedia
Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971), Vol. 5, p. 648. For a look at one
aspect of this “vigorous life,” see: J.-C. Horak, “Zionist Film Propaganda
in Nazi Germany,” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Vol. 4,
No. 1, 1984, pp. 49-58. 8.Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), pp. 54-55.; Karl A. Schleunes, The Twisted Road
to Auschwitz (Urbana: Univ. of Illinois, 1970, 1990), pp. 178-181. 9.Jacob
Boas, “A Nazi Travels to Palestine,” History Today (London), January 1980,
pp. 33-38. 10.Facsimile reprint of front page of Das Schwarze Korps, May
15, 1935, in: Janusz Piekalkiewicz, Israels Langer Arm (Frankfurt: Goverts,
1975), pp. 66-67. Also quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death’s
Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 377. See also: Erich Kern, ed.,
Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: FZ-Verlag, 1988), p. 184. 11.Das Schwarze
Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), pp. 56-57. 12.Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age
of the Dictators (1983), p. 83. 13.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), p. 60. See also: F. Nicosia, “The Yishuv and the
Holocaust,” The Journal of Modern History (Chicago), Vol. 64, No. 3, Sept.
1992, pp. 533-540. 14.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine
Question (1985), p. 57. 15.Jüdische Rundschau, Sept. 17, 1935. Quoted in:
Yitzhak Arad, with Y. Gutman and A. Margaliot, eds., Documents on the
Holocaust (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1981), pp. 82-83. 16.Der Angriff, Dec.
23, 1935, in: E. Kern, ed., Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: 1988), p.
148.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 56.; L. Brenner, Zionism in the
Age of the Dictators (1983), p. 138.; A. Margaliot, “The Reaction…,” Yad
Vashem Studies (Jerusalem), vol. 12, 1977, pp. 90-91.; On Kareski’s
remarkable career, see: H. Levine, “A Jewish Collaborator in Nazi Germany,”
Central European History (Atlanta), Sept. 1975, pp. 251-281. 17.”Dr. Wise
Urges Jews to Declare Selves as Such,” New York Herald Tribune, June 13,
1938, p. 12. 18.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich (1985), p. 53. 19.Lucy
Dawidowicz, The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (New York: Bantam, pb.,
1976), pp. 253-254.; Max Nussbaum, “Zionism Under Hitler,” Congress Weekly
(New York: American Jewish Congress), Sept. 11, 1942.; F. Nicosia, The
Third Reich (1985), pp. 58-60, 217.; Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement
(1984), p. 175. 20.H. H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (Ballantine,
pb., 1984), pp. 380-382.; K. Schleunes, Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p. 226.;
Secret internal SS intelligence report about F. Polkes, June 17, 1937, in:
John Mendelsohn, ed., The Holocaust (New York: Garland, 1982), vol. 5, pp.
62-64. 21.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 63-64, 105, 219-220. 22.F.
Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 160. 23.This distinction is also implicit
in the “Balfour Declaration” of November 1917, in which the British
government expressed support for “a national home for the Jewish people” in
Palestine, while carefully avoiding any mention of a Jewish state.
Referring to the majority Arab population there, the Declaration went on to
caution, “…it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which
may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish
communities in Palestine.” The complete text of the Declaration is
reproduced in facsimile in: Robert John, Behind the Balfour Declaration
(IHR, 1988), p. 32. 24.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 121. 25.F.
Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 124. 26.David Yisraeli, The Palestine
Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Bar-Ilan University, Israel, 1974),
p. 300.; Also in: Documents on German Foreign Policy, Series D, Vol. 5.
Doc. No. 564 or 567. 27.K. Schleunes, The Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p.
209. 28.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS.
International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before
the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), vol. 32, pp.
242-243. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, DC: 1946-1948), vol.
6, pp. 92-93. 29.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 141-144.; On Hitler’s
critical view of Zionism in Mein Kampf, see esp. Vol. 1, Chap. 11. Quoted
in: Robert Wistrich, Hitler’s Apocalypse (London: 1985), p. 155.; See also:
F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 26-28.; Hitler told his army adjutant
in 1939 and again in 1941 that he had asked the British in 1937 about
transferring all of Germany’s Jews to Palestine or Egypt. The British
rejected the proposal, he said, because it would cause further disorder.
See: H. v. Kotze, ed., Heeresadjutant bei Hitler (Stuttgart: 1974), pp. 65,
95. 30.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 156, 160-164, 166-167.; H.
H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (Ballantine, pb., 1984), pp. 392-394.;
Jon and David Kimche, The Secret Roads (London: Secker and Warburg, 1955),
pp. 39-43. See also: David Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and Palestine,”
Middle Eastern Studies, October 1971, p. 347.; Bernard Wasserstein, Britain
and the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945 (1979), pp. 43, 49, 52, 60.; T.
Kelly, “Man who fooled Nazis,” Washington Times, April 28, 1987, pp. 1B,
4B. Based on interview with Willy Perl, author of The Holocaust Conspiracy.
31.Y. Arad, et al., eds., Documents On the Holocaust (1981), p. 155. (The
training kibbutz was at Neuendorf, and may have functioned even after March
1942.) 32.On the Agreement in general, see: Werner Feilchenfeld, et al.,
Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972).; David
Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and the Transfer Agreement,” Journal of
Contemporary History (London), No. 2, 1971, pp. 129-148.; “Haavara,”
Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 7, pp. 1012-1013.; F. Nicosia, The Third
Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin: 1985), pp. 44-49.; Raul Hilberg,
The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1985),
pp. 140-141.; The Transfer Agreement, by Edwin Black, is detailed and
useful. However, it contains numerous inaccuracies and wildly erroneous
conclusions. See, for example, the review by Richard S. Levy in Commentary,
Sept. 1984, pp. 68-71. 33.E. Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 328,
337. 34.On opposition to the Haavara in official German circles, see: W.
Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972), pp. 31-33.;
D. Yisraeli, “The Third Reich,” Journal of Contemporary History, 1971, pp.
136-139.; F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question, pp.
126-139.; I. Weckert, Feuerzeichen (1981), pp. 226-227.; Rolf Vogel, Ein
Stempel hat gefehlt (Munich: Droemer Knaur, 1977), pp. 110 ff. 35.W.
Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 31. Entire text in: David
Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel:
1974), pp. 298-300. 36.Interior Ministry internal memo (signed by State
Secretary W. Stuckart), Dec. 17, 1937, in: Helmut Eschwege, ed.,
Kennzeichen J (Berlin: 1966), pp. 132-136. 37.W. Feilchenfeld, et al,
Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 32. 38.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp.
376-377. 39.E. Black, Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 376, 378.; F. Nicosia,
Third Reich (1985), pp. 238-239 (n. 91). 40.E. Black, Transfer Agreement,
p. 379.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich, pp. 212, 255 (n. 66). 41.W. Feilchenfeld,
et al., Haavara-Transfer, p. 75.; “Haavara,” Encyclopaedia Judaica, (1971),
Vol. 7, p. 1013. 42.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp. 379, 373, 382.
43.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS. International
Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the
International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), Vol. 32, pp.
242-243. 44.Werner Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina
(Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972). Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen
(Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), pp. 222-223. 45.W. Feilchenfeld, et al.,
Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972). Quoted in: I. Weckert,
Feuerzeichen (1981), p. 224. 46.Original document in German Ausw_rtiges Amt
Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E 224152 and E 234155-58. (Photocopy in author’s
possession).; Complete original German text published in: David Yisraeli,
The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1974), pp.
315-317. See also: Klaus Polkhen, “The Secret Contacts,” Journal of
Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, pp. 78-80.; (At the time this offer
was made, Stern’s Lehi group still regarded itself as the true Irgun/NMO.)
47.Arab nationalists opposed Britain, which then dominated much of the Arab
world, including Egypt, Iraq and Palestine. Because Britain and Germany
were at war, Germany cultivated Arab support. The leader of Palestine’s
Arabs, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el-Husseini, worked closely
with Germany during the war years. After escaping from Palestine, he spoke
to the Arab world over German radio and helped raise Muslim recruits in
Bosnia for the Waffen SS. 48.Israel Shahak, “Yitzhak Shamir, Then and Now,”
Middle East Policy (Washington, DC), Vol. 1, No. 1, (Whole No. 39), 1992,
pp. 27-38.; Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s Fateful Hour (New York: Harper and
Row, 1988), pp. 213-214. Quoted in: Andrew J. Hurley, Israel and the New
World Order (Santa Barbara, Calif.: 1991), pp. 93, 208-209.; Avishai
Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books,
May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986),
pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, “Yitzhak Shamir: On Hitler’s Side,” Arab
Perspectives (League of Arab States), March 1984, pp. 11-13. 49.Avishai
Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books,
May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986),
pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, “Skeletons in Shamir’s Cupboard,” Middle East
International, Sept. 30, 1983, pp. 15-16.; Sol Stern, L.
Rapoport, “Israel’s Man of the Shadows,” Village Voice (New York), July 3,
1984, pp. 13 ff.


SSGG – When somebody talks of shutting them down, you get three hundred
thousand “1st amendment” types jumping to the guy’s defense, giving you a
class on the Bill of Rights – Jacob Baltuch, Brandeis University
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/051115chicago.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:45 EST 2007
Article: 64843 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us pl.regionalne.warszawa:434707 soc.culture.polish:779448 soc.culture.europe:581966 soc.culture.german:374350 soc.culture.swiss:64843
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!nntp.csufresno.edu!tethys.csu.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: ZYD Kollaboraci With Nazis=KASTNER, RUMKOWSKI, WIESENTHAL + 51 More Documented!!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 200
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:56:35 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178124995 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:56:35 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:56:35 MDT

Unfortunately, too true.
Always, the ZYDS do their best to foment wars, and other miseries, everywhere
in the world, just to increase their power and the Jew World Order.

On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:19:19 -0700, FredBurg
wrote:

>Those who have failed to learn from the past 2000 years of history, will be
>doomed to repeat history.

>With now an extra 51 well documented proven cases of ZHID COLLABORATION
>WITH NAZIS, besides notorious KASTNER case, one MUST question the
>HOLOHOAX figures!!

>Now even the notorious Simon WIESENTHAL is proven to be a nazi GESTAPO
>COLLABORATOR!!

>On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:11:30 -0700, Ken Levi wrote:

>>For the past 2000 years, the world has suffered because of the cursed
>>Christkiller ZHIDS.

>>Not just the Kollaboraci of the ZHIDS with the nazis.

>>On 27 Sep 2004 16:03:09 -0000, PhilMathews >>wrote:

>>>Kenneth McVay,SOBC, the well-known fag in Canada,
>>>Fag McVay of Vancouver, convicted of child molesting
>>>and car theft in California and Oregon, and still
>>>unemployed gas pump boy, mastermind of the
>>>Canadian branch of NAMBLA, wants all to know
>>>about all his fellow criminals and perverts.

>>>Here is a photo of Ken McVay, director of WWW.NIZKOR.ORG–
>>>Does he not have the uncouth look as to fit the profile of a
>>>person who would say in general regarding child porn:
>>>”I am weary of seeing the issue of “child porn” blown out of
>>>proportion (I’ve been on and around the Net since 1988, and
>>>have yet to come across anything I’d consider “child porn.”
>>>I’ve seen photos of naked children, … and fail to see the
>>>harm, or any great moral danger to our society).”?
>>>http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg
>>> Would any of you want to leave this person, Ken McVay,
>>> alone with your children?

>>>From: [email protected] (JohannSebastianBott)
>>>Subject: Re:ZHID ORDNUNGSPOLIZEI = ZYDOWSKY KOLABORANCI!!!
>>>Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.krakow,pl.regionalne.wroclaw
>>>On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:33:28 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>>Another significant article that merits discussion!!!

>>On Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:15:13 -0400, PAWLIKOWSKI
>> wrote:
>
>> > Just a moment ago, on soc.culture.polish,
>> > Dr. J. Ilicki, Associate Professor of Sociology
>> > and Judaic Studies on Upsalla University raised
>> > the question of Polish Polish in the service of
>> > Germans during occupation of Poland. The only
>> > reason for this question at this time seems to be
>> > his need to stir interethnic hatered. Provocatively,
>> > Dr. Ilicki asks:
>> > 1) who were the members of the
>> > police, volunteers or draftees?,
>> > 2) what was their social status?
>> > 3) what happened to them after the war?
>> > Just to play completely innocent (and dumb) he also asks
>> > why they were called Granatowa (dark-navy-blue) Police.
>
>> > Only naive will believe that Prof. Ilicki does not
>> > know the answers.
>> > Also only naive will believe that he is not interested
>> > in Pinsk the hometown of his parents and allegedly
>> > the site of the burial of his grandparents and over
>> > 30,000 pinksers (Jews from Pinsk). He admitte
>> > that his mother listed them as killed there with
>> > Yad Vashem. However, young (about 40 years old)
>> > Julian pretends disintrest, because he is afraid that
>> > exhumations might start at the alleged burial site
>> > and will find no skeletons as same happened last
>> > year at nearby Mariompole, presently in Lithuania.
>
>> > But coming back to Dr Illicki question: Polish Police
>> > during German occupation was dramatically reduced
>> > in numbers and pre-war policemen were forced to
>> > serve as an auxillary force to German Ordnung Polizei.
>> > They were ususally not armed,and when armed never
>> > given more than five bullets for their long rifles.
>> > Moreover, after each use of firearm they
>> > (as well as the Ukraininan Police) had to write
>> > a report for what target each bullet was used
>> > and with what effectivness, hardly an invitation to
>> > the genocide.
>
>>>>>>> Hardly truth to Pawlikowski’s story too.
>
>> > On the other hand there was a police force in
>> > the Third Reich, in which service was completely
>> > voluntary. It was called Ordnungdienst. Their
>> > emblem was a light alloy Star of David. The
>> > social background of these Jewish collaborators
>> > according to Iasaiah Trunk was as follows: 18%
>> > with post-graduate degrees, 60% with college degree,
>> > 20% with elementary education. These are data
>> > from self-serving, post-war questionaries.
>
>> > But even Trunk admits that in Warsaw the
>> > requirement was that EACH Jewish policeman
>> > has at least matura (two years of college)
>> > see page 489 of his book. In practice, the
>> > Jewish policemen were all lawyers and
>> > journalist who with the day of German
>> > occupation immediately were fired from
>> > their jobs, like the Polish teachers, because
>> > the schools were closed.
>
>> The service was voluntary. Take the job and keep
>> your life a little longer or die now!
>
>> Pawlikowski forgot how the Soviets were conscripted.
>> Under Stalin they ran to enlist hoping to avoid being
>> killed in the next “relocation”!
>
>> > While Polish teachers joined the underground,
>> > unemployed Jewish intelligentia clamored for the police work.

>> > Some of it was really gruesome as you remember
>> > from our previous description of the Feb. 1942
>> > execution on Rybna Street market place in Lodz.
>> > German newsreel of this horrible hanging is shown
>> > endlessly in Wiesenthal Museum in LA. Thousands
>> > of Jews standing and watching behind three
>> > uniformed Germans with their backs and holstered
>> > pistols facing Jewish crowd and about to be hanged
>> > women passing out and forced into
>> > the noose by Jewish Policemen.
>> > ————-
>> > Jozef Pawlikowski

>> Herman

>First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
>First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao Tse Dung
>Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!! Me

>If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
>then visit www.freedomsite.org

>Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

>”At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
>is a revolutionary act.”
>(George Orwell)

>David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

>”All truth passes through three stages.
>First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
>and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
>(Arthur Schopenhauer)

>”The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
>but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
>falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
>they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
>against them — except force.” — John Bryant

>”To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
>acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
>and impossible to ignore.”
>–John Bryant

>For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
>JEW-WATCH:
>http://www.jewwatch.com

>Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
>NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
>people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

>Or, other useful websites include:
>ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
>IHR – www.ihr.org
>OSTARA – www.ostara.org
>PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
>Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
>AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
>THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
> Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
> Subscribe: [email protected]

>Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
>They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:45 EST 2007
Article: 64844 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.usa:1995842 soc.culture.canada:574170 uk.politics.misc:1895605 soc.culture.europe:581967 soc.culture.polish:779449 soc.culture.russian:458229 soc.culture.swiss:64844
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.canada,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: ZYD Holohoax Costs Yanks Over $35 BILLION A Year!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 118
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:56:42 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178125002 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:56:42 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:56:42 MDT

On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:26:45 GMT, in alt.revisionism “abc”
wrote:

“Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced
that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.

Fred A. Leuchter is America’s leading specialist on the design and
fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers. In
1988, Leuchter scraped samples from the alleged gas chamber walls in
Auschwitz, Birkenau and Lublin. Cyanide residue would be clearly evident on
all these walls if gassings did occur. To his astonishment, Leuchter found
no significant cyanide traces in any one of these rooms.

In 1991, the Polish government repeated these tests to disprove Leuchter’s
findings, but they as well found no evidence of any gassings ever occurring.

The structural integrity of these “gas chambers” is also extremely faulty.
These rooms have ordinary doors and windows which are not hermetically
sealed! There are large gaps between the floors and doors. If the Germans
had attempted to gas anyone in these rooms, they would have died themselves,
as the gas would have leaked and contaminated the entire area. Also, no
equipment exists to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings.
Nothing was made to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chambers.
There are no provisions to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floors
or ceilings. No exhaust stacks have ever existed.

Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body
has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have
been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died
of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were
murdered Germans, not Jews. Roughly the equivalent of ten football fields
should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one
body has ever been discovered.

The Germans documented everything in meticulous detail from shrubbery to
arbors, but no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or
even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide. All documents ever
presented were drawn up AFTER the war.

Even if we threw away all the evidence and accounted for every so-called gas
chamber, it would have taken 68 YEARS to accomplish gassing six million
Jews!

Even The Diary of Anne Frank is a hoax. Portions of the diary were written
with a ball point pen. These pens were not in use at the time Anne Frank
lived.

It is not denied concentration camps existed. Tragically, many died of
typhus or starvation, as often happens in such situations. There is,
however, no evidence that any gassings occurred for the reasons of genocide.

Israel continues to receive trillions of dollars worldwide as retribution
for Holocaust gassings. Our country has donated more money to Israel than to
any other country in the history of the world — over $35 billion per year,
everything included. If not for our extravagantly generous gifts to Israel,
every family in America could afford a brand new Mercedes Benz. Surely the
American people would be outraged if they realized their hard-earned money
is being squandered in these difficult times.

With all this money at stake for Israel, it is easy to comprehend why this
Holocaust hoax is so secretly guarded. The Jewish name for Holocaust is
“Shoah.” In Zionist circles, it is known as “Shoah Business.” If nothing
else, this unbelievable coverup demonstrates the irrepressible Zionist
influence and control of our country. Their only defense against the facts
is to cry out “antisemitic,” “Skinhead” or “Nazi,” whereas the majority of
those who question the Holocaust are ordinary citizens…though you would
never know it from the media.

In whatever way you can, please help shatter this profitable myth. It is
time we stop sacrificing America’s welfare for the sake of Israel and spend
our hard-earned dollars on Americans.

(For more information contact The Institute for Historical Review P.O. Box
2739 Newport Beach, CA 92659 USA).

There are compelling reasons to believe that the so-called holocaust never
existed. Page 223, in The Diary of Anne Frank, (Pan Horizons edition, Pan
Books Ltd., London, 1989), indicates that the size of Auschwitz, the most
notorious of all German work camps, WAS VERY SMALL, with only 11,000 people
(many of whom may not even have been Jews) being evacuated by the Germans at
the time of the Russian advance in 1945. Certainly, compared to Spielberg’s
film, Schindler’s List (which Emilie Schindler, Oskar’s widow, said was full
of lies), and other Jewish propaganda, that millions upon millions of Jews
were systematically exterminated, 11,000 people is a very small number.
Simple arithmetic tells us that the Germans would have had to have had
hundreds of camps, or else they would have had to exterminate 137 people PER
HOUR, in order for six million Jews to have been exterminated at such small
camps as Auschwitz, a feat that would have been humanly impossible
considering that, according to Douglas Reed’s Behind the Scene and The
Controversy of Zion, a mere 850,000 soldiers and others were killed by the
entire German and Japanese war machines combined during WW2 (see p.397-400
of Douglas Reed’s book Controversy of Zion). People who would believe the
Jewish propaganda that six million Jews were exterminated by Hitler must
KEEP IN MIND THE SMALL SCALE CONSTRUCTION OF AUSCHWITZ AND THE VERY FEW
OTHER GERMAN WORK CAMPS THAT EXISTED DURING WW2.
On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh
broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS – KENW-TV) said that when
Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was
told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years. Again, simple arithmetic tells us that
25,000 times a half dozen camps does not equal 6,000,000. In fact, it
doesn’t even equal 600,000. . . .

It is an interesting fact that the number of so-called persecuted Jews KEEPS
INCREASING. Hal Greenwald, program director for the Hillel Foundation at
Duke University, a Jewish student group, has been promoting the idea that
NINE MILLION JEWS WERE EXTERMINATED IN HITLER’S GAS CHAMBERS (New York
Times, Nov. 9, 1991, AP). NOW IT’S 9 MILLION AND GROWING. ..JUST LIKE OUR
DEBT/TAX MONEY SUPPLY…THE NUMBERS JUST KEEP COMING OUT OF THIN AIR. .
.(The Bible Caused Economic and Financial Slavery in the New World Order by
Lee Cheney)”.

Read the entire article online in depth:

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:46 EST 2007
Article: 64845 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.german:374352 soc.culture.swiss:64845 soc.culture.polish:779451 de.soc.politik.misc:865993 soc.culture.europe:581968
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-14!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.polish,de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.europe
Subject: Der Jude ist ein dreckige Hund, Parasit, usw -[Aufloesung]- Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 556
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:56:49 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178125009 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:56:49 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:56:49 MDT

On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:59:13 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc egon-karl ullrich
wrote:

Ein Teil der Auflösung des ‘Rätsel – ja-wie-kann-denn-der-sowas-sagen-?’
ist ja bereits veröffentlicht im Artikelstran “Der Jude ist ein Parasit”
(wer lesen kann und will ist klar im Vorteil, der meist dämliche Spruch
trifft hier mal wirklich zu), dort gibts auch ein zion. Original-Buch
zum runterladen:

Es handelt sich in den “Subjects” um Zitate aus der zionistischen
Literatur von zionistischen Philosophen und zion. Vordenkern bzw. aus
der unangefochtenen Fachliteratur über den Zionismus bzw. über die zion.
Ideologie. Und die zitierten sind noch harmlos, statt “dreckiger Hund”,
kann man auch übersetzen “stinkender Hund”, lt. ‘LEO.dict’

Wer meine Schriften kennt, dem war das auch von Anfang an klar. Anfänger
und Deppen gibts aber auch hier in dieser NG.

Hier der Beweis aus dem marxistischen Bereich (eigentl. jüd.-marx.
Bereich) des Herkunftsjuden Lenni Brenner, Wissenschaftsjournalist:

(aus dem Englischen)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Lenni Brenner

Zionismus im Zeitalter der Diktatoren
(Zionism in the Age of the Dictators)

2. Blut und Boden (Blood and Soil)

Die Wurzeln des zionistischen Rassismus

Es war der Antisemitismus – alleine – welcher den Zionismus begründete.
Herzl konnte seine Bewegung in keiner Weise auf irgendeinem positiven
jüdischen Selbstverständnis aufbauen.

Obwohl er die Unterstützung durch die Rabbiner anstrebte, war er
persönlich nicht gläubig. Er hatte kein besonderes Interesse an
Palästina, dem antiken Heimatland; er war ganz erpicht darauf, daß das
kenianische Hochland akzeptiert wird, zumindest auf einer zeitweiligen
Grundlage. Er hatte kein Interesse an Hebräisch; er betrachtete seinen
jüdischen Staat als ein sprachliches Abbild der Schweiz.

Der Rassengedanke lag für ihn in der Luft; die deutschen Antisemiten
sprachen von den Juden als Rasse, bald jedoch verwarf er diese Doktrin
und nutzte in einer paradoxen Diskussion Israel Zangwill, einen seiner
frühesten Gefolgsleute, als ein Beispiel für seine Ablehnung dieser
Idee. Er beschrieb den englisch-jüdischen Autor so:

“… vom langnasigen Neger-Typ, mit wolligem, tief-schwarzem Haar … er
stützt jedoch den Rassegedanken – manches daran kann ich gelten lassen,
ich muß lediglich ihn und dann wieder mich anschauen. Alles was ich
sagen kann: wir sind eine historische Einheit, eine Nation mit
anthropologischer Vielfalt.” [1]

Unbekümmert von religiösen Überlegungen, schlug er einen Atheisten, den
damals weltberühmten Autor Max Nordau, als seinen Nachfolger als
Präsident der WZO (Zionistische Weltorganisation) vor.

Und wieder waren die Jünger weniger liberal als ihr Herr.

Nordau war mit einer Christin verheiratet und befürchtete, daß sich die
Orthodoxen auf allen Ebenen daran stoßen würden. Er war bereits
verheiratet, als er zum Zionismus konvertierte und wurde bald, trotz
seiner nichtjüdischen Ehefrau, ein anerkannter jüdischer Rassist.

Am 21. Dezember 1903 gab er Eduard Drumonts radikal antisemitischer
Zeitung ‘La Libre Parole’ ein Interview, in welchem er sagte, daß der
Zionismus keine Sache der Religion sondern der Rassen-Exklusivität sei
und “es gibt keinen, mit welchem ich in größerer Übereinstimmung in
diesem Punkt stehe, als M. Drupont”. [3]

Obwohl sich nur ein einziger nationaler Ableger der WZO (der
holländische Verband im Jahr 1913) jemals darum bemühte, die Juden,
welche in gemischten Ehen lebten, auszuschließen, starb der
kosmopolitische Zionismus einen frühen Tod mit Herzl im Jahr 1904. [4]

Die Bewegung in Osteuropa, ihre Massenbasis, teilte die spontanen
volks-religiösen Vorurteile der orthodoxen Gemeinden ihres Umfeldes.

Obwohl die traditionellen Juden Missionierung kannten und Ehen mit
Nicht-Juden als Verstärkung ihrer Glaubenskraft ansahen, brachte später
von der katholischen Kirche ausgehender Druck die Rabbiner dazu,
Konvertierungen als “lästiges Jucken” zu betrachten und sie stellten die
Missionierung ein.

Im Laufe der Jahrhunderte, wurde die Selbst-Abgrenzung zum Kennzeichen
der Juden. Mit der Zeit betrachteten die Massen Mischehen als Verrat an
der Orthodoxie. Obwohl im Westen nur manche Juden die Religion
abwandelten und “Reform”-Sekten bildeten sowie andere sich vom Gott
ihrer Vorväter gänzlich abwandten, ging der Lauf im Wesentlichen weg vom
Judaismus.

Wenige nur stießen zur jüdischen Welt hinzu, entweder durch
Konvertierung oder Heiraten.

Obschon der westliche Zionismus sich in einer mehr säkularen Atmosphäre
entwickelte als jener Ost-Europas, betrachtete die Masse seiner
Mitglieder Misch-Ehen eher als Wegführung der Juden von der Gemeinde
denn als Hinzufügung zu ihr.

Die deutschen Akademiker, welche die zionistische Bewegung nach Herzls
Tod übernahmen, entwickelten die modernistisch-rassistische Ideologie
vom jüdischen Separatismus [Loslösungsstreben].

Sie waren stark beeinflußt von ihren pan-germanischen Studenten-Kollegen
der ‘Wandervögel’ (Zugvögel oder Freigeister), welche den deutschen
Campus vor 1914 dominierten. Diese Chauvinisten wiesen die Juden als
nicht von germanischem Blut zurück; folglich konnten sie niemals Teil
des Deutschen Volkes sein und waren grundsätzlich Fremde auf deutschem
Boden. Alle jüdischen Studenten waren gezwungen, sich mit diesen
Konzepten, welche sie umringten, auseinander zu setzen.

Ein paar bewegten sich nach links und wurden Sozialdemokraten. Für jene
war dies [der Wandervögel-Chauvinismus, Anm. eku] nur ein mehr
bourgeoiser Nationalismus und war als solcher zu bekämpfen.

Die meisten blieben herkömmlich kaisertreu, standhafte Nationalisten,
welche darauf beharrten, daß tausend Jahre auf deutschem Boden aus ihnen
“Deutsche mosaischen Glaubens” gemacht hatten.

Aber ein Anteil der jüdischen Studenten eignete sich die
‘Wandervögel’-Ideologie an und übertrug sie einfach in zionistische
Terminologie.

Sie stimmten mit den Antisemiten in mehreren Punkten überein: die Juden
waren kein Teil des Deutschen Volkes und, natürlich, Juden und Deutsche
sollten sich nicht geschlechtlich vermischen, nicht aus den traditionell
religiösen Gründen, sondern um der Reinheit ihres eigenen einzigartigen
Blutes willen.

Da nicht von deutschem Blut, hätten sie zwangsläufig ihren eigenen Boden
zu bekommen: Palästina.

Auf den ersten Blick schien es befremdlich, daß jüdische Studenten aus
der Mittel-Klasse derart beeinflußt durch antisemitisches Gedankengut
sein sollten, besonders, da zur selben Zeit der Sozialismus mit seiner
assimilationistischen Haltung gegenüber den Juden beträchtliche
Unterstützung in der Gesellschaft um sie herum gewann.

Der Sozialismus appelierte jedoch vorwiegend an die Arbeiter, nicht an
die Mittel-Klasse; in ihrer Umwelt herrschte der Chauvinismus vor,
obwohl intellektuell, lehnten sie ihre Verbindung zum Deutschen Volk ab,
und in der Tat, niemals emanzipierten sie sich von der deutschen
Kapitalistenklasse, den ganzen Ersten Weltkrieg hindurch unterstüzten
sie leidenschaftlich ihre eigene Regierung.

[Anm. eku: s.a. “Max-Bodenheimer-Archiv”. Deutsche Zionisten bilden im
1. WK mittels maßgeblicher Beteiligung der Kölner Fam. Bodenheimer
(=zionistisches Establishment) Unterstützungskommitee, dieses reist an
die Ostfront, bildet Judenräte in den befreiten Gebieten Polens, nennt
die Juden Europas “Deutsche” oder “deutschenfreundlich” und – nicht
zuletzt – sitzt buchstäblich als Ehren-Gast an Kaisers Esstisch!]

In all ihrem grandiosen intellektuellen Anspruch, war ihr völkischer
Zionismus doch nur einfach eine Imitation der deutschen
nationalistischen Ideologie. Deshalb war der junge Philosoph Martin
Buber fähig, während dem Ersten Weltkrieg den Zionismus mit inbrünstigem
deutschen Patriotismus zu verbinden.

In seinem Buch ‘Drei Reden über das Judentum’, veröffentlicht im Jahre
1911, sprach Buber über einen Jugendlichen, der:

“einen Sinn hat für die Unsterblichkeit der Generationen einer
Blutgemeinschaft, welche er als Vorgänger seines Ich empfindet, dessen
Ausdauer wird unendlich währen.

Hinzu kommt die Entdeckung, befördert durch sein Bewußtsein, daß Blut
eine tief verwurzelte, nährende Kraft im Inneren jedes einzelnen
Menschen ist;

daß die tiefsten Schichten unseres Seins vom Blut bestimmt sind;

daß unser innerstes Denken und unser Wille davon gefärbt sind.

Jetzt findet er heraus, daß die Welt um ihn eine Welt der Eindrücke und
Einflüsse ist, wohingegen Blut das Reich einer beeinflußbaren und
beeindruckbaren Substanz ist, einer Sustanz die alles in ihre eigene
Form aufnimmt und anpasst, und, wer auch immer, vor die Wahl, Umgebung
oder Blut gestellt, sich für die Substanz entscheidet, fortan ein wahrer
Jude aus seinem Innersten sein muß, um zu leben als ein Jude mit all den
Widersprüchen, der Tragödie und all der späteren Verheißung seines
Blutes” [5]

[Anm. eku: naturgemäß unvollkommene Rückübersetzung, werde noch
versuchen, den Originaltext Bubers zu bekommen…]

Die Juden leben in Europa seit Jahrtausenden, weit länger, sagen wir
mal, als die Ungarn. Niemand träumte davon, sich auf die Ungarn als
Asiaten zu beziehen, jedoch, so Buber, die Juden Europas wären noch
Asiaten und würden es voraussichtlich immer bleiben.

“Du kannst den Juden aus Palästina rauskriegen, aber niemals Palästina
raus aus dem Juden.”

Im Jahr 1916 schrieb Buber, daß der Jude:

“vertrieben wurde aus seinem Land und über die Länder des Abendlandes
verstreut wurde, jedoch, trotz all dem, blieb er ein Orientale. Man kann
all dies im noch so sehr assimlierten Juden entdecken, wenn man Zugang
zu seiner Seele gewinnt … der unvergängliche, allen Juden gemeinsame
Trieb – dieser wird in das Sein einkehren nach einer Fortdauer des
Lebens in Palästina … Sobald der Trieb mit seiner Mutters Scholle in
Berührung kommt, wird er wieder schöpferisch.” [6]

Bubers völkischer Zionismus, mit seinen ausgesuchten Strängen mystischen
Überschwangs, war jedoch zu vergeistigt um ein breites Publikum
anzusprechen.

Was gebraucht wurde, war eine populäre zionistische Version des
Sozial-Darwinismus, welcher die bourgoise intellektuelle Welt des
aufbrechenden europäischen imperialen Wettbewerbs nach Afrika und nach
Osten überschwemmte.

Die zionistische Version dieser Auffassung wurde von dem
österreichischen Anthropologen Ignatz Zollschan entwickelt. Für ihn war
der verborgene Nutzen des Judaismus, daß jener, obgleich unabsichtlich,
das Wunder der Wunder bewirken würde:

“Eine Nation von reinem Blut, unverdorben von den Krankheiten des
Exzesses oder der Unmoral, von einem hoch entwickelten Sinn für
familiäre Reinheit und von tief verwurzelten tugendhaften Gewohnheiten
würde eine außergewöhnliche geistige Regsamkeit entwickeln.
Darüberhinaus sorgt das Verbot der Mischehen dafür, daß dieser
höchst-ethische Schatz durch reinmixen von weniger umsichtig
hervorgebrachten Rassen nicht verloren geht … daraus resultiert eine
naturgemäße Auswahl, welche keine Parallele in der Geschichte der
menschlichen Rasse findet … Wenn eine Rasse, die so hoch beschenkt
ist, die Gelegenheit bekommt, erneut ihre ursprüngliche Kraft zu
entwickeln, kann dem nichts gleichkommen, soweit es den kulturellen Wert
anbelangt.” [7]

Sogar Albert Einstein unterschrieb die zionistischen Rassenkonzepte,
damit verstärkte er den Rassismus und verlieh ihm das Prestige seiner
Reputation. Seine eigenen Beiträge zur Diskussion klingen entsprechend
tiefsinnig, sie beruhen jedoch auf dem selben Unsinn.

“Nationen mit rassischen Unterschieden scheinen Instinkte zu besitzen,
welche gegen ihre Verschmelzung wirken. Die Assimilation der Juden in
die europäischen Nationen … konnte nicht das Gefühl eines Mangels an
Verwandtschaft zwischen ihnen und jenen, unter denen sie lebten,
beseitigen. Letzten Endes ist das instinktive Gefühl des fehlenden
Verwandschaftsverhältnisses auf das Gesetz der Energieerhaltung
zurückzuführen. Aus diesem Grund kann es [das instinktive Mangelgefühl,
Anm. eku] durch keinen noch so wohlmeinenden Druck ausgerottet werden.” [8]

Buber, Zollschan und Einstein waren nur drei der klassischen Zionisten,
welche hochtrabend gelehrt über Rassen-Reinheit redeten. Jedoch konnte
der schiere Fanatismus Einiger nicht den des Amerikaners Maurice Samuel
einholen.

Als ein gut bekannter Autor jener Zeit – später, in den 1940er Jahren
arbeitete er mit Weizman an dessen Autobiographie – wendete sich Samuel
im Jahre 1927 in seinem Werk, ‘Ich, der Jude’, an die amerikanische
Öffentlichkeit. Er denunzierte mit Horror eine Stadt, der er
bereitwillig zugestand, daß er sie nur vom Hörensagen kannte – und von
der uns die vorgelegten Hinweise nahelegen, daß es sich um die
ungebunden lebende Künstler-Kolonie bei Taos, Neu-Mexiko, handelt:

“Auf diesem kleinen Platz kamen Repräsentanten der afrikanischen Neger,
der Amerikaner und der chinesischen Mongolen zusammen, der Semite und
der Arier … freie Mischehen setzen sich durch … Warum erfüllt mich
dieses Bild, teils wirklich, teils phantastisch, mit einem befremdenden
Abscheu, suggeriert es das Ekelerregende, das düstere Bestialische? …
Wieso ruft dieses Dorf, wie meine Phantasie heraufbeschwört, den
Gedanken an einen Haufen Reptilien hervor, die hässlich in einem
Wasserkübel brüten?” [9]

“Um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit sein”

Obwohl ‘Blut’ ein wiederkehrendes Thema in der zionistischen
vor-Holokaust-Literatur war, war dieses nicht so zentral wie die
Botschaft vom ‘Boden’.

Solange Amerikas Grenzen [relativ, Anm. eku] offen blieben, fragten
Europas Juden: wenn der Antisemitismus nicht in seiner Heimat bekämpft
werden konnte, warum sollten sie nicht einfach der Menge nach Amerika
folgen?

Die zionistische Antwort war doppelt gewappnet: Antisemitismus würde die
Juden begleiten, wohin immer sie auch gingen, und, darüberhinaus, es
waren die Juden selbst, welche den Antisemitismus durch ihre eigene
Charackteristik hervor riefen.

Die Wurzel des Antisemitismus, beharrten die Zionisten, war die jüdische
Exil-Existenz.

Die Juden lebten parasitär von ihren “Wirtsvölkern”. Es gäbe so gut wie
keine jüdischen Bauern in der Diaspora. Die Juden lebten in den Städten,
sie waren der manuellen Arbeit entfremdet, oder, um es unverblümt zu
sagen, sie mieden diese und beschäftigten sich lieber mit
intellektuellen oder kommerziellen Angelegenheiten. Ihre Beanspruchung
des Patriotismus war bestenfalls hohl, da sie ewig von Land zu Land
wanderten. Und als sie selbst sich einbildeten, sie wären Sozialisten
und Internationalisten, waren sie in Wirklichkeit nicht mehr als die
Mittelsmänner der Revolution, welche die “Schlachten anderer Leute”
ausfochten.

Diese zusammengefaßten Lehren waren bekannt als ‘Shelilat Ha’galut’ [Die
Verneinung der Diaspora], an der sich das gesamte Spektrum der Zionisten
festhielt, nur in Details variiert.

Sie wurden in der zionistischen Presse energisch vertreten, in der die
ausgeprägte Qualität vieler Artikel aus der Feindseligkeit gegenüber dem
gesamten jüdischen Volk bestand. Wenn irgendjemand diese Fetzen ohne
Kenntnis der Quellen las, würde er automatisch vermuten, daß sie der
antisemitischen Presse entstammten.

Die ‘Weltanschauung’ der Jugendorganisation ‘Hashomer Hatzair’ [Junge
Wächter], ursprünglich verfaßt im Jahr 1917, allerdings erst 1936 wieder
neu veröffentlicht, war typisch für diese Art Ergüsse:

“Der Jude ist die Karikatur eines normalen, natürlichen Menschen, in
physischer wie spiritueller Hinsicht. Als Einzelwesen in der
Gesellschaft rebelliert er und wirft die gesellschaftlichen Bindungen
ab, er kennt weder Ordnung noch Disziplin.” [10]

Ganz ähnlich konnte so im Jahre 1935 Ben Frommer, ein Autor der
ultra-rechten zionistisch-revisionistischen Bewegung, nicht weniger als
16 Millionen seiner Mit-Juden [offenbar wurde seine Erklärung weltweit
verbreitet, Anm. eku] erklären, daß:

“Die Tatsache ist unabweisbar, daß die Juden kollektiv krank und
neurotisch sind. Jene Berufs-Juden, welche nun erschüttert diese
Wahrheit entrüstet zurückweisen, sind die größten Feinde ihrer Rasse,
denn sie führen sie dadurch auf die Suche nach falschen Lösungen oder
zumeist nur nach Beschönigungen.” [11]

Diese Art des jüdischen Selbsthasses durchsetzte einen großen Teil des
zionistischen Schrifttums.

Im Jahre 1934 erregte Yehezkel Kaufman – damals berühmt als Gelehrter
für biblische Geschichte an der Hebräischen Universität zu Jerusalem,
und obwohl selbst Zionist, dennoch ein Gegner der bizarren Theorie der
Negation der Diaspora – wütende Kontroversen durch eine Auswahl der
hebräischen Literatur mit noch schlimmeren Beispielen.

Auf Hebräisch konnten die pathetischen Schreiber ihre Mit-Juden ohne
Furcht vor dem Vorwurf, den Judenhassern Munition zu liefern, regelrecht
zur Sau machen. Kaufmans ‘Hurban Hanefesh’ (Holokaust der Seele) zitiert
dazu drei der klassisch-zionistischen Vordenker.

Für Micah Yosef Berdichevsky waren die Juden “keine Nation, kein Volk,
keine Menschen”.

Für Yosef Chaim Brenner waren sie nicht mehr als “Zigeuner, dreckige
Hunde, nicht-menschlich, erbärmliche Hunde”.

Für Aaron David Gordon war sein Volk nicht besser als “Parasiten,
grundsätzlich unnütze Leute”. [12]

[Anm. eku: dieses Buch Kaufmans, wohl als eine Kritik an den
zionistischen Pöbeleien gemeint, hatte Julius Streicher lt. Text der
Webseite der frommen, ultra-orthodoxen Juden, JewsAgainstZionism,
gekannt, aus dieser Quell hatte Streicher offenbar eine Reihe seiner
Beschreibungen und Ausdrücke für die Juden gewonnen]

Natürlich mußte Maurice Samuel seine Schönschrift einbringen, um
Verleumdungen gegen seine Mit-Juden zusammen zu brauen.

Im Jahr 1924 fabrizierte er in seinem Werk ‘Ihr Nicht-Juden’ (You
Gentiles) eine von ihrem eigenen bösartigen Schöpfer gegen die
christliche Ordnung angetriebene Judenheit:

“Wir Juden, wir, die Zerstörer, werden für immer die Zerstörer bleiben.
Egal was ihr macht, nie wird es unserem Anspruch genügen. Ewig werden
wir zerstören, denn wir brauchen unsere eigene Welt, eine Gottes-Welt,
zu deren Erschaffung ihr nicht veranlagt seid … jene von uns, welche
diese Wahrheit nicht begreifen, werden sich immer wiederfinden in
Allianz mit euren rebellischen Gruppen, bis die Desillusionierung kommt,
unser elendes Schicksal, welches uns in eurer Mitte verstreute, hat uns
diese unwillkommene Rolle aufgedrängt.” [13]

Der Labour-Zionismus [linke, nicht-marxistische Strömung] brachte seine
eigene einzigartige Sorte des jüdischen Selbsthasses hervor.

Trotz seines Namens und Anspruches, war der Labour-Zionismus niemals
fähig, einen signifikanten Anteil der jüdischen Arbeiterklasse in auch
nur irgendeinem Land der Diaspora für sich einzunehmen.

Seine Mitglieder führten ein selbst-widerlegendes Argument an: sie
behaupteten, daß die jüdischen Arbeiter nur in “marginalen” Industrien
beschäftigt seien, in solchen wie der Nadel-Industrie [Nadeln für
Textilherstellung und Grammophone, Anm. eku], welche keine wesentliche
Bedeutung für die VolksWirtschaften der “Wirts”-Nationen hatten, daher
würden die jüdischen Arbeiter immerwährend marginal für die
Arbeiterbewegung in den Ländern ihres Aufenthalts bleiben.

Jüdische Arbeiter, so wurde behauptet, könnten einen “gesunden”
Klassenkampf nur in ihrem eigenen Land wagen.

Arme Juden zeigten natürlich wenig Interesse an einer sogenannten
Arbeiter-Bewegung, welche ihnen nicht etwa erzählte, mit allem was sie
vermochten für die Verbesserung der gegenwärtigen Bedingungen zu
kämpfen, sondern sich eher um das weit entfernte Palästina zu sorgen.

Der Ruf der zionistischen Arbeiter-Bewegung richtete sich paradoxerweise
primär an jene jungen Mittelklasse-Juden, welche den Bruch zu ihrer
Herkunfts-Klasse suchten, war jedoch nicht bereit, sich dann den
Arbeitern der Länder ihres Aufenthalts zu zuwenden.

Der Labour-Zionismus wurde so eine Art Gegenkultur-Sekte, welche die
jüdischen Marxisten wegen deren Internationalismus und die jüdische
Mittelklasse als parasitische Ausbeuter der “Wirts”völker anprangerte.

Im Endeffekt übertrugen sie den traditionellen Antisemitismus ins
Jiddische: die Juden waren in den falschen Ländern in den falschen
Berufen und machten die falsche Politik.

Es brauchte den Holokaust, um diesem Gejammer einen Sinn zu geben.

Erst dann erkannten sie den gemeinsamen Nenner in ihrer eigenen
Botschaft und der anti-jüdischen Propaganda der Nazis.

Im März 1942 gestand Chaim Greenberg, zu der Zeit Herausgeber des
Labour-zionistischen Presse-Organs ‘Jewish Frontier’ in New York,
schmerzlich ein, daß es tatsächlich

“eine Zeit [gegeben hat,] als es für zionistische Sprecher
(einschließlich den Schreiber) modisch war, von ihrem Standpunkt aus zu
erklären, ‘um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit
sein’. Bis zu diesem Tag stehen die zionistischen Labour-Kreise unter
dem Einfluß der Vorstellung, daß die Rückkehr nach Zion einen Prozeß der
Reinigung von unseren ökonomischen Unsauberkeiten einschließt. Jeden,
der keine sogenannte ‘produktive’ manuelle Arbeit ergreift, hält man für
einen Sünder gegen das Volk Israel und gegen die Menschheit.” [14]

[b]”Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda”[/b]

Wenn irgendjemandem ohne weitere Fakten erzählt würde, daß die ersten
Zionisten Rassisten waren, würde derjenige automatisch vermuten, daß
dies ein Teil der kolonialistischen Seite des Zionismus in Palästina sei.

Tatsächlich ist dem nicht so; Der ‘Blut-Zionismus’ hätte sich auch
entwickelt, wenn Palästina komplett unbewohnt gewesen wäre. Die
Begeisterung für ‘Blut und Boden’ war bereits Teil des Zionismus, bevor
der erste moderne Zionist jemals Europa verließ.

Der Rassen-Zionismus hingegen war ein merkwürdiger Ableger des
Rassen-Antisemitismus.

Gewiß, so argumentierten die Zionisten, die Juden waren eine reine
Rasse, bestimmt reiner als, sagen wir mal, die Deutschen, die einen
großen Zuschlag slawischen Blutes besaßen, wie sogar die All-Deutschen
eingestanden. Für diese Zionisten konnte jedoch noch nicht mal ihr
Glaube an die Rassen-Reinheit den einen Makel der jüdischen Existenz
überspielen: die Juden verfügten nicht über ihren eigenen jüdischen Boden.

Wenn die teutonischen Rassisten sich als ‘Übermenschen’ sehen konnten,
sahen diese hebräischen Rassisten die Juden eben nicht in diesem Licht;
eher war das Gegenteil der Fall.

Sie glaubten, daß wegen des Fehlens eines eigenen Bodens die Juden
“Untermenschen” wären, daher wären diese, aus der Sicht ihrer “Wirte”,
wenig mehr als Blutsauger: die Welt-Pest eben.

Wenn man an den Wahrheitsgehalt der rassischen Exklusivität glaubt,
fällt es schwer, etwas gegen den Rassismus von irgendjemand anderem
einzuwenden.

Wenn man weiters daran glaubt, daß es für ein Volk unmöglich ist, gesund
zu bleiben, außer in seinem eigenen Heimatland, kann man nichts gegen
irgendeinen anderen einwenden, der “Fremde” von seinem Territorium
ausschließt.

Tatsächlich jedoch dachte der Durchschnitts-Zionist selbst niemals
daran, das zivilisierte Europa zu verlassen, um es gegen die Wildnis
Palästinas einzutauschen. In Wirklichkeit ist es offensichtlich, daß ihm
die zionistische ‘Blut und Boden’-Ideologie eine vortreffliche
Begründung lieferte, den Antisemitismus nicht auf dessen Heimatboden zu
bekämpfen: Es war nicht der Fehler der Antisemiten, es kam von dem
eigenen Pech der Juden, ihrem Dasein im Exil.

Die Zionisten konnten tränenreich darlegen, daß in dem Verlust
Palästinas die Wurzel des Antisemitismus lag und die Wiedergewinnung
Palästinas die einzige Lösung der Judenfrage wäre. Alles andere könne
nur Beschönigung sein oder zwecklos.

Walter Laqueur, Wortführer der zionistischen Historiker, fragte in
seinem Buch, ‘A History of Zionism’ [Die Geschichte des Zionismus], ob
das zionistische Beharren auf der Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus
nicht doch das “Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda” war. [15]

Sicher war es das.

Laqueurs Frage kann jedoch am besten mit einer anderen Frage beantwortet
werden: ist es schwierig, den leichtgläubigen Leser einer Nazi-Zeitung
zu verstehen, der daraus schloß, daß das, was die Nazis erklärten und
welchem die Zionisten – Juden – zustimmten, richtig sein müsse?

Und es kam noch schlimmer: jede jüdische Bewegung, welche über die
Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus schwätzte, geradeso, als wäre jener
“natürlich”, strebte nach vertraglichen Übereinkommen mit den Nazis, als
diese an die Macht kamen.

——–

Fußnoten und Quellen:

1. Marvin Lowenthal (ed.), The Diaries of Theodor Herzl, p.78.

2. Amos Elon, Herzl, p.255.

3. Desmond Stewart, Theodor Herzl, p.322.

4. The WZO is structured by national states, and elections are held on a
national basis for the World Zionist Congress; the various ideological
tendencies which are world-wide in their structure, run in the various
national elections for delegates.

5. Martin Buber, On Judaism, pp.15-19.

6. Ibid., pp.75-7.

7. Ignatz Zollschan, Jewish Questions (1914) pp.17-18.

8. Solomon Goldman, Crisis and Decision (1938), p.116.

9. Maurice Samuel, I, the Jew, pp.244-6.

10. Our Shomer “Weltanschauung”, Hashomer Hatzair (December 1936), p.26.

11. Ben Frommer, The Significance of a Jewish State, Jewish Call
(Shanghai, May 1935), p.10.

12. Yehezkel Kaufman, Hurban Hanefesh: A Discussion of Zionism and
Anti-Semitism, Issues (Winter 1967), p.106.

13. Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p.155.

14. Chaim Greenberg, The Myth of Jewish Parasitism, Jewish Frontiers
(March 1942), p.20.

15. Walter Laqueur, A History of Zionism, p.500.

************************************************************************
http://www.marxists.de/middleast/brenner/ch02.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:47 EST 2007
Article: 64846 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.german:374353 soc.culture.swiss:64846 soc.culture.polish:779452 de.soc.politik.misc:865994 soc.culture.europe:581969
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.polish,de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.europe
Subject: Re: Der Jude ist ein dreckige Hund, Parasit, usw -[Aufloesung]- Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 570
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:56:56 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178125016 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:56:56 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:56:56 MDT

Thanks for re-posting the entire article, so that more people can read it,
and discuss the topic.

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:12:46 GMT, “Marek Maciej Ziemba”
wrote:

>snipped

>”ArthurFranks” wrote in message
>news:[email protected]
>> On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:59:13 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc egon-karl
>> ullrich
>> wrote:
>>
>> Ein Teil der Auflösung des ‘Rätsel – ja-wie-kann-denn-der-sowas-sagen-?’
>> ist ja bereits veröffentlicht im Artikelstran “Der Jude ist ein Parasit”
>> (wer lesen kann und will ist klar im Vorteil, der meist dämliche Spruch
>> trifft hier mal wirklich zu), dort gibts auch ein zion. Original-Buch
>> zum runterladen:
>>
>> Es handelt sich in den “Subjects” um Zitate aus der zionistischen
>> Literatur von zionistischen Philosophen und zion. Vordenkern bzw. aus
>> der unangefochtenen Fachliteratur über den Zionismus bzw. über die zion.
>> Ideologie. Und die zitierten sind noch harmlos, statt “dreckiger Hund”,
>> kann man auch übersetzen “stinkender Hund”, lt. ‘LEO.dict’
>>
>> Wer meine Schriften kennt, dem war das auch von Anfang an klar. Anfänger
>> und Deppen gibts aber auch hier in dieser NG.
>>
>>
>> Hier der Beweis aus dem marxistischen Bereich (eigentl. jüd.-marx.
>> Bereich) des Herkunftsjuden Lenni Brenner, Wissenschaftsjournalist:
>>
>> (aus dem Englischen)
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> Lenni Brenner
>>
>> Zionismus im Zeitalter der Diktatoren
>> (Zionism in the Age of the Dictators)
>>
>>
>> 2. Blut und Boden (Blood and Soil)
>>
>>
>> Die Wurzeln des zionistischen Rassismus
>>
>>
>> Es war der Antisemitismus – alleine – welcher den Zionismus begründete.
>> Herzl konnte seine Bewegung in keiner Weise auf irgendeinem positiven
>> jüdischen Selbstverständnis aufbauen.
>>
>> Obwohl er die Unterstützung durch die Rabbiner anstrebte, war er
>> persönlich nicht gläubig. Er hatte kein besonderes Interesse an
>> Palästina, dem antiken Heimatland; er war ganz erpicht darauf, daß das
>> kenianische Hochland akzeptiert wird, zumindest auf einer zeitweiligen
>> Grundlage. Er hatte kein Interesse an Hebräisch; er betrachtete seinen
>> jüdischen Staat als ein sprachliches Abbild der Schweiz.
>>
>> Der Rassengedanke lag für ihn in der Luft; die deutschen Antisemiten
>> sprachen von den Juden als Rasse, bald jedoch verwarf er diese Doktrin
>> und nutzte in einer paradoxen Diskussion Israel Zangwill, einen seiner
>> frühesten Gefolgsleute, als ein Beispiel für seine Ablehnung dieser
>> Idee. Er beschrieb den englisch-jüdischen Autor so:
>>
>> “… vom langnasigen Neger-Typ, mit wolligem, tief-schwarzem Haar … er
>> stützt jedoch den Rassegedanken – manches daran kann ich gelten lassen,
>> ich muß lediglich ihn und dann wieder mich anschauen. Alles was ich
>> sagen kann: wir sind eine historische Einheit, eine Nation mit
>> anthropologischer Vielfalt.” [1]
>>
>>
>> Unbekümmert von religiösen Überlegungen, schlug er einen Atheisten, den
>> damals weltberühmten Autor Max Nordau, als seinen Nachfolger als
>> Präsident der WZO (Zionistische Weltorganisation) vor.
>>
>>
>> Und wieder waren die Jünger weniger liberal als ihr Herr.
>>
>> Nordau war mit einer Christin verheiratet und befürchtete, daß sich die
>> Orthodoxen auf allen Ebenen daran stoßen würden. Er war bereits
>> verheiratet, als er zum Zionismus konvertierte und wurde bald, trotz
>> seiner nichtjüdischen Ehefrau, ein anerkannter jüdischer Rassist.
>>
>> Am 21. Dezember 1903 gab er Eduard Drumonts radikal antisemitischer
>> Zeitung ‘La Libre Parole’ ein Interview, in welchem er sagte, daß der
>> Zionismus keine Sache der Religion sondern der Rassen-Exklusivität sei
>> und “es gibt keinen, mit welchem ich in größerer Übereinstimmung in
>> diesem Punkt stehe, als M. Drupont”. [3]
>>
>> Obwohl sich nur ein einziger nationaler Ableger der WZO (der
>> holländische Verband im Jahr 1913) jemals darum bemühte, die Juden,
>> welche in gemischten Ehen lebten, auszuschließen, starb der
>> kosmopolitische Zionismus einen frühen Tod mit Herzl im Jahr 1904. [4]
>>
>>
>> Die Bewegung in Osteuropa, ihre Massenbasis, teilte die spontanen
>> volks-religiösen Vorurteile der orthodoxen Gemeinden ihres Umfeldes.
>>
>> Obwohl die traditionellen Juden Missionierung kannten und Ehen mit
>> Nicht-Juden als Verstärkung ihrer Glaubenskraft ansahen, brachte später
>> von der katholischen Kirche ausgehender Druck die Rabbiner dazu,
>> Konvertierungen als “lästiges Jucken” zu betrachten und sie stellten die
>> Missionierung ein.
>>
>> Im Laufe der Jahrhunderte, wurde die Selbst-Abgrenzung zum Kennzeichen
>> der Juden. Mit der Zeit betrachteten die Massen Mischehen als Verrat an
>> der Orthodoxie. Obwohl im Westen nur manche Juden die Religion
>> abwandelten und “Reform”-Sekten bildeten sowie andere sich vom Gott
>> ihrer Vorväter gänzlich abwandten, ging der Lauf im Wesentlichen weg vom
>> Judaismus.
>>
>> Wenige nur stießen zur jüdischen Welt hinzu, entweder durch
>> Konvertierung oder Heiraten.
>>
>> Obschon der westliche Zionismus sich in einer mehr säkularen Atmosphäre
>> entwickelte als jener Ost-Europas, betrachtete die Masse seiner
>> Mitglieder Misch-Ehen eher als Wegführung der Juden von der Gemeinde
>> denn als Hinzufügung zu ihr.
>>
>> Die deutschen Akademiker, welche die zionistische Bewegung nach Herzls
>> Tod übernahmen, entwickelten die modernistisch-rassistische Ideologie
>> vom jüdischen Separatismus [Loslösungsstreben].
>>
>> Sie waren stark beeinflußt von ihren pan-germanischen Studenten-Kollegen
>> der ‘Wandervögel’ (Zugvögel oder Freigeister), welche den deutschen
>> Campus vor 1914 dominierten. Diese Chauvinisten wiesen die Juden als
>> nicht von germanischem Blut zurück; folglich konnten sie niemals Teil
>> des Deutschen Volkes sein und waren grundsätzlich Fremde auf deutschem
>> Boden. Alle jüdischen Studenten waren gezwungen, sich mit diesen
>> Konzepten, welche sie umringten, auseinander zu setzen.
>>
>> Ein paar bewegten sich nach links und wurden Sozialdemokraten. Für jene
>> war dies [der Wandervögel-Chauvinismus, Anm. eku] nur ein mehr
>> bourgeoiser Nationalismus und war als solcher zu bekämpfen.
>>
>> Die meisten blieben herkömmlich kaisertreu, standhafte Nationalisten,
>> welche darauf beharrten, daß tausend Jahre auf deutschem Boden aus ihnen
>> “Deutsche mosaischen Glaubens” gemacht hatten.
>>
>> Aber ein Anteil der jüdischen Studenten eignete sich die
>> ‘Wandervögel’-Ideologie an und übertrug sie einfach in zionistische
>> Terminologie.
>>
>> Sie stimmten mit den Antisemiten in mehreren Punkten überein: die Juden
>> waren kein Teil des Deutschen Volkes und, natürlich, Juden und Deutsche
>> sollten sich nicht geschlechtlich vermischen, nicht aus den traditionell
>> religiösen Gründen, sondern um der Reinheit ihres eigenen einzigartigen
>> Blutes willen.
>>
>> Da nicht von deutschem Blut, hätten sie zwangsläufig ihren eigenen Boden
>> zu bekommen: Palästina.
>>
>> Auf den ersten Blick schien es befremdlich, daß jüdische Studenten aus
>> der Mittel-Klasse derart beeinflußt durch antisemitisches Gedankengut
>> sein sollten, besonders, da zur selben Zeit der Sozialismus mit seiner
>> assimilationistischen Haltung gegenüber den Juden beträchtliche
>> Unterstützung in der Gesellschaft um sie herum gewann.
>>
>> Der Sozialismus appelierte jedoch vorwiegend an die Arbeiter, nicht an
>> die Mittel-Klasse; in ihrer Umwelt herrschte der Chauvinismus vor,
>> obwohl intellektuell, lehnten sie ihre Verbindung zum Deutschen Volk ab,
>> und in der Tat, niemals emanzipierten sie sich von der deutschen
>> Kapitalistenklasse, den ganzen Ersten Weltkrieg hindurch unterstüzten
>> sie leidenschaftlich ihre eigene Regierung.
>>
>>
>> [Anm. eku: s.a. “Max-Bodenheimer-Archiv”. Deutsche Zionisten bilden im
>> 1. WK mittels maßgeblicher Beteiligung der Kölner Fam. Bodenheimer
>> (=zionistisches Establishment) Unterstützungskommitee, dieses reist an
>> die Ostfront, bildet Judenräte in den befreiten Gebieten Polens, nennt
>> die Juden Europas “Deutsche” oder “deutschenfreundlich” und – nicht
>> zuletzt – sitzt buchstäblich als Ehren-Gast an Kaisers Esstisch!]
>>
>>
>> In all ihrem grandiosen intellektuellen Anspruch, war ihr völkischer
>> Zionismus doch nur einfach eine Imitation der deutschen
>> nationalistischen Ideologie. Deshalb war der junge Philosoph Martin
>> Buber fähig, während dem Ersten Weltkrieg den Zionismus mit inbrünstigem
>> deutschen Patriotismus zu verbinden.
>>
>> In seinem Buch ‘Drei Reden über das Judentum’, veröffentlicht im Jahre
>> 1911, sprach Buber über einen Jugendlichen, der:
>>
>> “einen Sinn hat für die Unsterblichkeit der Generationen einer
>> Blutgemeinschaft, welche er als Vorgänger seines Ich empfindet, dessen
>> Ausdauer wird unendlich währen.
>>
>> Hinzu kommt die Entdeckung, befördert durch sein Bewußtsein, daß Blut
>> eine tief verwurzelte, nährende Kraft im Inneren jedes einzelnen
>> Menschen ist;
>>
>> daß die tiefsten Schichten unseres Seins vom Blut bestimmt sind;
>>
>> daß unser innerstes Denken und unser Wille davon gefärbt sind.
>>
>> Jetzt findet er heraus, daß die Welt um ihn eine Welt der Eindrücke und
>> Einflüsse ist, wohingegen Blut das Reich einer beeinflußbaren und
>> beeindruckbaren Substanz ist, einer Sustanz die alles in ihre eigene
>> Form aufnimmt und anpasst, und, wer auch immer, vor die Wahl, Umgebung
>> oder Blut gestellt, sich für die Substanz entscheidet, fortan ein wahrer
>> Jude aus seinem Innersten sein muß, um zu leben als ein Jude mit all den
>> Widersprüchen, der Tragödie und all der späteren Verheißung seines
>> Blutes” [5]
>>
>> [Anm. eku: naturgemäß unvollkommene Rückübersetzung, werde noch
>> versuchen, den Originaltext Bubers zu bekommen…]
>>
>> Die Juden leben in Europa seit Jahrtausenden, weit länger, sagen wir
>> mal, als die Ungarn. Niemand träumte davon, sich auf die Ungarn als
>> Asiaten zu beziehen, jedoch, so Buber, die Juden Europas wären noch
>> Asiaten und würden es voraussichtlich immer bleiben.
>>
>> “Du kannst den Juden aus Palästina rauskriegen, aber niemals Palästina
>> raus aus dem Juden.”
>>
>>
>> Im Jahr 1916 schrieb Buber, daß der Jude:
>>
>> “vertrieben wurde aus seinem Land und über die Länder des Abendlandes
>> verstreut wurde, jedoch, trotz all dem, blieb er ein Orientale. Man kann
>> all dies im noch so sehr assimlierten Juden entdecken, wenn man Zugang
>> zu seiner Seele gewinnt … der unvergängliche, allen Juden gemeinsame
>> Trieb – dieser wird in das Sein einkehren nach einer Fortdauer des
>> Lebens in Palästina … Sobald der Trieb mit seiner Mutters Scholle in
>> Berührung kommt, wird er wieder schöpferisch.” [6]
>>
>> Bubers völkischer Zionismus, mit seinen ausgesuchten Strängen mystischen
>> Überschwangs, war jedoch zu vergeistigt um ein breites Publikum
>> anzusprechen.
>>
>> Was gebraucht wurde, war eine populäre zionistische Version des
>> Sozial-Darwinismus, welcher die bourgoise intellektuelle Welt des
>> aufbrechenden europäischen imperialen Wettbewerbs nach Afrika und nach
>> Osten überschwemmte.
>>
>> Die zionistische Version dieser Auffassung wurde von dem
>> österreichischen Anthropologen Ignatz Zollschan entwickelt. Für ihn war
>> der verborgene Nutzen des Judaismus, daß jener, obgleich unabsichtlich,
>> das Wunder der Wunder bewirken würde:
>>
>> “Eine Nation von reinem Blut, unverdorben von den Krankheiten des
>> Exzesses oder der Unmoral, von einem hoch entwickelten Sinn für
>> familiäre Reinheit und von tief verwurzelten tugendhaften Gewohnheiten
>> würde eine außergewöhnliche geistige Regsamkeit entwickeln.
>> Darüberhinaus sorgt das Verbot der Mischehen dafür, daß dieser
>> höchst-ethische Schatz durch reinmixen von weniger umsichtig
>> hervorgebrachten Rassen nicht verloren geht … daraus resultiert eine
>> naturgemäße Auswahl, welche keine Parallele in der Geschichte der
>> menschlichen Rasse findet … Wenn eine Rasse, die so hoch beschenkt
>> ist, die Gelegenheit bekommt, erneut ihre ursprüngliche Kraft zu
>> entwickeln, kann dem nichts gleichkommen, soweit es den kulturellen Wert
>> anbelangt.” [7]
>>
>> Sogar Albert Einstein unterschrieb die zionistischen Rassenkonzepte,
>> damit verstärkte er den Rassismus und verlieh ihm das Prestige seiner
>> Reputation. Seine eigenen Beiträge zur Diskussion klingen entsprechend
>> tiefsinnig, sie beruhen jedoch auf dem selben Unsinn.
>>
>> “Nationen mit rassischen Unterschieden scheinen Instinkte zu besitzen,
>> welche gegen ihre Verschmelzung wirken. Die Assimilation der Juden in
>> die europäischen Nationen … konnte nicht das Gefühl eines Mangels an
>> Verwandtschaft zwischen ihnen und jenen, unter denen sie lebten,
>> beseitigen. Letzten Endes ist das instinktive Gefühl des fehlenden
>> Verwandschaftsverhältnisses auf das Gesetz der Energieerhaltung
>> zurückzuführen. Aus diesem Grund kann es [das instinktive Mangelgefühl,
>> Anm. eku] durch keinen noch so wohlmeinenden Druck ausgerottet werden.”
>> [8]
>>
>> Buber, Zollschan und Einstein waren nur drei der klassischen Zionisten,
>> welche hochtrabend gelehrt über Rassen-Reinheit redeten. Jedoch konnte
>> der schiere Fanatismus Einiger nicht den des Amerikaners Maurice Samuel
>> einholen.
>>
>> Als ein gut bekannter Autor jener Zeit – später, in den 1940er Jahren
>> arbeitete er mit Weizman an dessen Autobiographie – wendete sich Samuel
>> im Jahre 1927 in seinem Werk, ‘Ich, der Jude’, an die amerikanische
>> Öffentlichkeit. Er denunzierte mit Horror eine Stadt, der er
>> bereitwillig zugestand, daß er sie nur vom Hörensagen kannte – und von
>> der uns die vorgelegten Hinweise nahelegen, daß es sich um die
>> ungebunden lebende Künstler-Kolonie bei Taos, Neu-Mexiko, handelt:
>>
>> “Auf diesem kleinen Platz kamen Repräsentanten der afrikanischen Neger,
>> der Amerikaner und der chinesischen Mongolen zusammen, der Semite und
>> der Arier … freie Mischehen setzen sich durch … Warum erfüllt mich
>> dieses Bild, teils wirklich, teils phantastisch, mit einem befremdenden
>> Abscheu, suggeriert es das Ekelerregende, das düstere Bestialische? …
>> Wieso ruft dieses Dorf, wie meine Phantasie heraufbeschwört, den
>> Gedanken an einen Haufen Reptilien hervor, die hässlich in einem
>> Wasserkübel brüten?” [9]
>>
>>
>>
>> “Um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit sein”
>>
>>
>> Obwohl ‘Blut’ ein wiederkehrendes Thema in der zionistischen
>> vor-Holokaust-Literatur war, war dieses nicht so zentral wie die
>> Botschaft vom ‘Boden’.
>>
>> Solange Amerikas Grenzen [relativ, Anm. eku] offen blieben, fragten
>> Europas Juden: wenn der Antisemitismus nicht in seiner Heimat bekämpft
>> werden konnte, warum sollten sie nicht einfach der Menge nach Amerika
>> folgen?
>>
>> Die zionistische Antwort war doppelt gewappnet: Antisemitismus würde die
>> Juden begleiten, wohin immer sie auch gingen, und, darüberhinaus, es
>> waren die Juden selbst, welche den Antisemitismus durch ihre eigene
>> Charackteristik hervor riefen.
>>
>> Die Wurzel des Antisemitismus, beharrten die Zionisten, war die jüdische
>> Exil-Existenz.
>>
>> Die Juden lebten parasitär von ihren “Wirtsvölkern”. Es gäbe so gut wie
>> keine jüdischen Bauern in der Diaspora. Die Juden lebten in den Städten,
>> sie waren der manuellen Arbeit entfremdet, oder, um es unverblümt zu
>> sagen, sie mieden diese und beschäftigten sich lieber mit
>> intellektuellen oder kommerziellen Angelegenheiten. Ihre Beanspruchung
>> des Patriotismus war bestenfalls hohl, da sie ewig von Land zu Land
>> wanderten. Und als sie selbst sich einbildeten, sie wären Sozialisten
>> und Internationalisten, waren sie in Wirklichkeit nicht mehr als die
>> Mittelsmänner der Revolution, welche die “Schlachten anderer Leute”
>> ausfochten.
>>
>> Diese zusammengefaßten Lehren waren bekannt als ‘Shelilat Ha’galut’ [Die
>> Verneinung der Diaspora], an der sich das gesamte Spektrum der Zionisten
>> festhielt, nur in Details variiert.
>>
>> Sie wurden in der zionistischen Presse energisch vertreten, in der die
>> ausgeprägte Qualität vieler Artikel aus der Feindseligkeit gegenüber dem
>> gesamten jüdischen Volk bestand. Wenn irgendjemand diese Fetzen ohne
>> Kenntnis der Quellen las, würde er automatisch vermuten, daß sie der
>> antisemitischen Presse entstammten.
>>
>> Die ‘Weltanschauung’ der Jugendorganisation ‘Hashomer Hatzair’ [Junge
>> Wächter], ursprünglich verfaßt im Jahr 1917, allerdings erst 1936 wieder
>> neu veröffentlicht, war typisch für diese Art Ergüsse:
>>
>> “Der Jude ist die Karikatur eines normalen, natürlichen Menschen, in
>> physischer wie spiritueller Hinsicht. Als Einzelwesen in der
>> Gesellschaft rebelliert er und wirft die gesellschaftlichen Bindungen
>> ab, er kennt weder Ordnung noch Disziplin.” [10]
>>
>>
>> Ganz ähnlich konnte so im Jahre 1935 Ben Frommer, ein Autor der
>> ultra-rechten zionistisch-revisionistischen Bewegung, nicht weniger als
>> 16 Millionen seiner Mit-Juden [offenbar wurde seine Erklärung weltweit
>> verbreitet, Anm. eku] erklären, daß:
>>
>> “Die Tatsache ist unabweisbar, daß die Juden kollektiv krank und
>> neurotisch sind. Jene Berufs-Juden, welche nun erschüttert diese
>> Wahrheit entrüstet zurückweisen, sind die größten Feinde ihrer Rasse,
>> denn sie führen sie dadurch auf die Suche nach falschen Lösungen oder
>> zumeist nur nach Beschönigungen.” [11]
>>
>> Diese Art des jüdischen Selbsthasses durchsetzte einen großen Teil des
>> zionistischen Schrifttums.
>>
>> Im Jahre 1934 erregte Yehezkel Kaufman – damals berühmt als Gelehrter
>> für biblische Geschichte an der Hebräischen Universität zu Jerusalem,
>> und obwohl selbst Zionist, dennoch ein Gegner der bizarren Theorie der
>> Negation der Diaspora – wütende Kontroversen durch eine Auswahl der
>> hebräischen Literatur mit noch schlimmeren Beispielen.
>>
>> Auf Hebräisch konnten die pathetischen Schreiber ihre Mit-Juden ohne
>> Furcht vor dem Vorwurf, den Judenhassern Munition zu liefern, regelrecht
>> zur Sau machen. Kaufmans ‘Hurban Hanefesh’ (Holokaust der Seele) zitiert
>> dazu drei der klassisch-zionistischen Vordenker.
>>
>> Für Micah Yosef Berdichevsky waren die Juden “keine Nation, kein Volk,
>> keine Menschen”.
>>
>> Für Yosef Chaim Brenner waren sie nicht mehr als “Zigeuner, dreckige
>> Hunde, nicht-menschlich, erbärmliche Hunde”.
>>
>> Für Aaron David Gordon war sein Volk nicht besser als “Parasiten,
>> grundsätzlich unnütze Leute”. [12]
>>
>> [Anm. eku: dieses Buch Kaufmans, wohl als eine Kritik an den
>> zionistischen Pöbeleien gemeint, hatte Julius Streicher lt. Text der
>> Webseite der frommen, ultra-orthodoxen Juden, JewsAgainstZionism,
>> gekannt, aus dieser Quell hatte Streicher offenbar eine Reihe seiner
>> Beschreibungen und Ausdrücke für die Juden gewonnen]
>>
>> Natürlich mußte Maurice Samuel seine Schönschrift einbringen, um
>> Verleumdungen gegen seine Mit-Juden zusammen zu brauen.
>>
>> Im Jahr 1924 fabrizierte er in seinem Werk ‘Ihr Nicht-Juden’ (You
>> Gentiles) eine von ihrem eigenen bösartigen Schöpfer gegen die
>> christliche Ordnung angetriebene Judenheit:
>>
>> “Wir Juden, wir, die Zerstörer, werden für immer die Zerstörer bleiben.
>> Egal was ihr macht, nie wird es unserem Anspruch genügen. Ewig werden
>> wir zerstören, denn wir brauchen unsere eigene Welt, eine Gottes-Welt,
>> zu deren Erschaffung ihr nicht veranlagt seid … jene von uns, welche
>> diese Wahrheit nicht begreifen, werden sich immer wiederfinden in
>> Allianz mit euren rebellischen Gruppen, bis die Desillusionierung kommt,
>> unser elendes Schicksal, welches uns in eurer Mitte verstreute, hat uns
>> diese unwillkommene Rolle aufgedrängt.” [13]
>>
>>
>> Der Labour-Zionismus [linke, nicht-marxistische Strömung] brachte seine
>> eigene einzigartige Sorte des jüdischen Selbsthasses hervor.
>>
>> Trotz seines Namens und Anspruches, war der Labour-Zionismus niemals
>> fähig, einen signifikanten Anteil der jüdischen Arbeiterklasse in auch
>> nur irgendeinem Land der Diaspora für sich einzunehmen.
>>
>> Seine Mitglieder führten ein selbst-widerlegendes Argument an: sie
>> behaupteten, daß die jüdischen Arbeiter nur in “marginalen” Industrien
>> beschäftigt seien, in solchen wie der Nadel-Industrie [Nadeln für
>> Textilherstellung und Grammophone, Anm. eku], welche keine wesentliche
>> Bedeutung für die VolksWirtschaften der “Wirts”-Nationen hatten, daher
>> würden die jüdischen Arbeiter immerwährend marginal für die
>> Arbeiterbewegung in den Ländern ihres Aufenthalts bleiben.
>>
>> Jüdische Arbeiter, so wurde behauptet, könnten einen “gesunden”
>> Klassenkampf nur in ihrem eigenen Land wagen.
>>
>> Arme Juden zeigten natürlich wenig Interesse an einer sogenannten
>> Arbeiter-Bewegung, welche ihnen nicht etwa erzählte, mit allem was sie
>> vermochten für die Verbesserung der gegenwärtigen Bedingungen zu
>> kämpfen, sondern sich eher um das weit entfernte Palästina zu sorgen.
>>
>> Der Ruf der zionistischen Arbeiter-Bewegung richtete sich paradoxerweise
>> primär an jene jungen Mittelklasse-Juden, welche den Bruch zu ihrer
>> Herkunfts-Klasse suchten, war jedoch nicht bereit, sich dann den
>> Arbeitern der Länder ihres Aufenthalts zu zuwenden.
>>
>> Der Labour-Zionismus wurde so eine Art Gegenkultur-Sekte, welche die
>> jüdischen Marxisten wegen deren Internationalismus und die jüdische
>> Mittelklasse als parasitische Ausbeuter der “Wirts”völker anprangerte.
>>
>> Im Endeffekt übertrugen sie den traditionellen Antisemitismus ins
>> Jiddische: die Juden waren in den falschen Ländern in den falschen
>> Berufen und machten die falsche Politik.
>>
>> Es brauchte den Holokaust, um diesem Gejammer einen Sinn zu geben.
>>
>> Erst dann erkannten sie den gemeinsamen Nenner in ihrer eigenen
>> Botschaft und der anti-jüdischen Propaganda der Nazis.
>>
>> Im März 1942 gestand Chaim Greenberg, zu der Zeit Herausgeber des
>> Labour-zionistischen Presse-Organs ‘Jewish Frontier’ in New York,
>> schmerzlich ein, daß es tatsächlich
>>
>> “eine Zeit [gegeben hat,] als es für zionistische Sprecher
>> (einschließlich den Schreiber) modisch war, von ihrem Standpunkt aus zu
>> erklären, ‘um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit
>> sein’. Bis zu diesem Tag stehen die zionistischen Labour-Kreise unter
>> dem Einfluß der Vorstellung, daß die Rückkehr nach Zion einen Prozeß der
>> Reinigung von unseren ökonomischen Unsauberkeiten einschließt. Jeden,
>> der keine sogenannte ‘produktive’ manuelle Arbeit ergreift, hält man für
>> einen Sünder gegen das Volk Israel und gegen die Menschheit.” [14]
>>
>>
>>
>> [b]”Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda”[/b]
>>
>> Wenn irgendjemandem ohne weitere Fakten erzählt würde, daß die ersten
>> Zionisten Rassisten waren, würde derjenige automatisch vermuten, daß
>> dies ein Teil der kolonialistischen Seite des Zionismus in Palästina sei.
>>
>> Tatsächlich ist dem nicht so; Der ‘Blut-Zionismus’ hätte sich auch
>> entwickelt, wenn Palästina komplett unbewohnt gewesen wäre. Die
>> Begeisterung für ‘Blut und Boden’ war bereits Teil des Zionismus, bevor
>> der erste moderne Zionist jemals Europa verließ.
>>
>> Der Rassen-Zionismus hingegen war ein merkwürdiger Ableger des
>> Rassen-Antisemitismus.
>>
>> Gewiß, so argumentierten die Zionisten, die Juden waren eine reine
>> Rasse, bestimmt reiner als, sagen wir mal, die Deutschen, die einen
>> großen Zuschlag slawischen Blutes besaßen, wie sogar die All-Deutschen
>> eingestanden. Für diese Zionisten konnte jedoch noch nicht mal ihr
>> Glaube an die Rassen-Reinheit den einen Makel der jüdischen Existenz
>> überspielen: die Juden verfügten nicht über ihren eigenen jüdischen Boden.
>>
>> Wenn die teutonischen Rassisten sich als ‘Übermenschen’ sehen konnten,
>> sahen diese hebräischen Rassisten die Juden eben nicht in diesem Licht;
>> eher war das Gegenteil der Fall.
>>
>> Sie glaubten, daß wegen des Fehlens eines eigenen Bodens die Juden
>> “Untermenschen” wären, daher wären diese, aus der Sicht ihrer “Wirte”,
>> wenig mehr als Blutsauger: die Welt-Pest eben.
>>
>> Wenn man an den Wahrheitsgehalt der rassischen Exklusivität glaubt,
>> fällt es schwer, etwas gegen den Rassismus von irgendjemand anderem
>> einzuwenden.
>>
>> Wenn man weiters daran glaubt, daß es für ein Volk unmöglich ist, gesund
>> zu bleiben, außer in seinem eigenen Heimatland, kann man nichts gegen
>> irgendeinen anderen einwenden, der “Fremde” von seinem Territorium
>> ausschließt.
>>
>> Tatsächlich jedoch dachte der Durchschnitts-Zionist selbst niemals
>> daran, das zivilisierte Europa zu verlassen, um es gegen die Wildnis
>> Palästinas einzutauschen. In Wirklichkeit ist es offensichtlich, daß ihm
>> die zionistische ‘Blut und Boden’-Ideologie eine vortreffliche
>> Begründung lieferte, den Antisemitismus nicht auf dessen Heimatboden zu
>> bekämpfen: Es war nicht der Fehler der Antisemiten, es kam von dem
>> eigenen Pech der Juden, ihrem Dasein im Exil.
>>
>> Die Zionisten konnten tränenreich darlegen, daß in dem Verlust
>> Palästinas die Wurzel des Antisemitismus lag und die Wiedergewinnung
>> Palästinas die einzige Lösung der Judenfrage wäre. Alles andere könne
>> nur Beschönigung sein oder zwecklos.
>>
>> Walter Laqueur, Wortführer der zionistischen Historiker, fragte in
>> seinem Buch, ‘A History of Zionism’ [Die Geschichte des Zionismus], ob
>> das zionistische Beharren auf der Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus
>> nicht doch das “Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda” war. [15]
>>
>> Sicher war es das.
>>
>> Laqueurs Frage kann jedoch am besten mit einer anderen Frage beantwortet
>> werden: ist es schwierig, den leichtgläubigen Leser einer Nazi-Zeitung
>> zu verstehen, der daraus schloß, daß das, was die Nazis erklärten und
>> welchem die Zionisten – Juden – zustimmten, richtig sein müsse?
>>
>> Und es kam noch schlimmer: jede jüdische Bewegung, welche über die
>> Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus schwätzte, geradeso, als wäre jener
>> “natürlich”, strebte nach vertraglichen Übereinkommen mit den Nazis, als
>> diese an die Macht kamen.
>>
>> ——–
>>
>> Fußnoten und Quellen:
>>
>> 1. Marvin Lowenthal (ed.), The Diaries of Theodor Herzl, p.78.
>>
>> 2. Amos Elon, Herzl, p.255.
>>
>> 3. Desmond Stewart, Theodor Herzl, p.322.
>>
>> 4. The WZO is structured by national states, and elections are held on a
>> national basis for the World Zionist Congress; the various ideological
>> tendencies which are world-wide in their structure, run in the various
>> national elections for delegates.
>>
>> 5. Martin Buber, On Judaism, pp.15-19.
>>
>> 6. Ibid., pp.75-7.
>>
>> 7. Ignatz Zollschan, Jewish Questions (1914) pp.17-18.
>>
>> 8. Solomon Goldman, Crisis and Decision (1938), p.116.
>>
>> 9. Maurice Samuel, I, the Jew, pp.244-6.
>>
>> 10. Our Shomer “Weltanschauung”, Hashomer Hatzair (December 1936), p.26.
>>
>> 11. Ben Frommer, The Significance of a Jewish State, Jewish Call
>> (Shanghai, May 1935), p.10.
>>
>> 12. Yehezkel Kaufman, Hurban Hanefesh: A Discussion of Zionism and
>> Anti-Semitism, Issues (Winter 1967), p.106.
>>
>> 13. Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p.155.
>>
>> 14. Chaim Greenberg, The Myth of Jewish Parasitism, Jewish Frontiers
>> (March 1942), p.20.
>>
>> 15. Walter Laqueur, A History of Zionism, p.500.
>>
>> ************************************************************************
>> http://www.marxists.de/middleast/brenner/ch02.htm
>>
>

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:49 EST 2007
Article: 64847 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:581970 soc.culture.german:374354 soc.culture.swiss:64847 alt.politics.europe:64229
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenOyVeigh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,alt.politics.europe
Subject: Ungarn: Die Juden bekommen Angst – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 52
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:57:14 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178125034 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 10:57:14 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:57:14 MDT

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:57:10 +0200, in de.soc.politik.misc Frank Bügel
wrote:

Angst vor dem jahrelang betrogenen, ungarischem Volk:

–snip–
Budapest:
Völkische Revolution?

… Die Demonstranten forderten den Rücktritt der sozialliberalen
Regierungskoalition und skandierten immer wieder ‘Ria-Ria-Hungaria’,
‘Revolution-Revolution’ sowie ‘Sechsundfünfzig-Sechsundfünfzig’. Dies war
eine Anspielung auf den baldigen 50sten Jahrestag der 1956er Revolution am
23sten Oktober, bei der gegen die damalige sowjetische Besatzung
demonstriert worden war. … Im Meer der ungarischen Fahnen fielen auch
diejenigen mit den so genannten Arpadenstreifen auf, die zur Symbolpalette
der faschistischen hungaristischen Bewegung 1944 gehörten. …

…die … Darstellung durch westliche Berichterstatter, in Gyurcsánys Rede
sei es schlicht darum gegangen, dass er die Öffentlichkeit über den Zustand
der Wirtschaft belogen hätte, um seine Wiederwahl zu sichern, und dass die
Unruhen eine Folge dieses Eingeständnisses seien, geht im Grunde an der
Wirklichkeit Ungarns vorbei. …

Auch die heutige ungarische Bewegung ist ethnonationalistisch motiviert,
sie bestimmt also die Identität des Landes als ethnisch homogenes
Magyarentum, ja manchmal sogar als Rasse, und bestimmt die Zugehörigkeit
zur Nation aufgrund des Blutes und der Abstammung, was mit einer Ablehnung
des Westens, des Liberalismus und des Kapitalismus einhergeht. ….

Es ist … der völkisch-patriotische Ethnonationalismus, der dieser
Bewegung die nötige Munition liefert. Sie begann kulturalistisch: Heute
wird selten offen über rassistische Themen gesprochen, statt dessen von
‘kulturell Anderen’ oder auch von der eigenen ‘kulturellen’ oder
‘nationalen Identität’. Doch die Grenzlinien gegenüber den jeweils
‘Anderen’ sind nicht weniger deutlich als früher.

Was sich hier anbahnt, ist eben nicht eine bloße demokratische
Machtübernahme. Es geht um eine andere Wirklichkeit, um eine neue
‘magyarische Landnahme’, um eine völkisch-nationalistische ‘Revolution’ und
damit um den Umsturz des demokratischen Systems.”
http://www.hagalil.com/archiv/2006/09/ungarn.htm

Hoffentlich werden solche sogenannten “Demokratien”, in der Juden und
andere ethnische Minderheiten stets rassistisch bevorteilt und die
staatstragenden Völker zugunsten von Heuschrecken ausgeraubt werden, bald
auf dem Müllhaufen der Geschichte landen!

(f’ up gesetzt)

Frank

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:49 EST 2007
Article: 64851 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.ukrainian:132582 soc.culture.europe:581999 soc.culture.swiss:64851 soc.culture.russian:458244 soc.culture.german:374362 alt.politics.europe:64234 soc.culture.polish:779490
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Art Franks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.german,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.polish
Subject: Re: Ein zweites Katyn – Neue Massengräber polnischer Soldaten bei Kiew
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 32
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 21:27:15 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178141235 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 02 May 2007 15:27:15 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 15:27:15 MDT

On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:25:41 GMT, BenyaminJKramer
wrote:
>On 4 Sep 2006 16:09:27 -0700, in de.soc.politik.misc “Deinos Dionysos”
> wrote:
>Albert Pfündl schrieb:
>> “G.Bartels” schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>> news:[email protected]
>> Ein zweites Katyn

>> > Liegt Babi Yar nicht auch in der Naehe von Kiew?!

>> http://www.lsg.musin.de/gesch/geschichte/natsoz/massaker_von_babi_yar.htm

>Unter Deinem Link lesen wir:

>”Ende 1943 mußten jüdische KZ-Häftlinge die Leichen exhumieren und
>verbrennen, um zu versuchen, die Spur des Massenmordes zu verwischen.”

>Blobel, der für die Beseitigung des Grabes zuständig war, sagte aber:

>”3. During my visits in August I myself observed the burning of bodies
>in a mass grave near Kiev. This grave was about 55 m. long, 3 m. wide
>and 2-1/2 m. deep. After the top had been removed the bodies were
>covered with inflammable material and ignited. It took about two days
>until the grave burned down to the bottom. I myself observed that the
>fire had glowed down to the bottom. After that the grave was filled in
>and the traces practically obliterated.”

>Wie erklären uns die “seriösen Historiker” diesen Widerspruch? Und
>was für ein brennbares Material war das wohl? Scheint ja ein wahres
>Wunderzeug gewesen zu sein.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:49 EST 2007
Article: 64865 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:582042 alt.politics.europe:64239 soc.culture.german:374373 soc.culture.swiss:64865 soc.culture.polish:779595
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Art Franks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish
Subject: Holohoax Videos – repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 15:19:47 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178205587 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 03 May 2007 09:19:47 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 09:19:47 MDT

On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:52:31 -0400, in soc.culture.german “127.0.0.1”
<[email protected]> wrote:

One Third of the Holocaust

Download this video!
http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=692
A 4 hour movie on the subject of Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec.

=======

Judea Declares War on Germany
1 hr 12 min 44 sec – Jul 16, 2006
Download this video!
http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=690
How much of what we know about the holocaust is based on cruel
wartime propaganda?
This fascinating documentary investigates the myths surrounding
the legend.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:50 EST 2007
Article: 64867 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:779641 pl.regionalne.warszawa:434818 soc.culture.baltics:152040 soc.culture.ukrainian:132589 soc.culture.europe:582059 soc.culture.swiss:64867
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Art Franks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: ZHID ORDNUNGSPOLIZEI = ZYDOWSKY KOLABORANCI!!!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 203
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 01:49:09 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178243349 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 03 May 2007 19:49:09 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:49:09 MDT

Those who have failed to learn from the past 2000 years of history,
will be doomed to repeat history.

With now an extra 51 well documented proven cases of ZHID
COLLABORATION WITH NAZIS, besides notorious KASTNER case,
plus RUMKOWSKI, one MUST question the HOLOHOAX figures!!

Now even the notorious Simon WIESENTHAL is proven to be a nazi
GESTAPO COLLABORATOR!!

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:11:30 -0700, Ken Levi
wrote:

>For the past 2000 years, the world has suffered because of the cursed
>Christkiller ZHIDS.

>Not just the Kollaboraci of the ZHIDS with the nazis.

>On 27 Sep 2004 16:03:09 -0000, PhilMathews >wrote:

>>Kenneth McVay,SOBC, the well-known fag in Canada,
>>Fag McVay of Vancouver, convicted of child molesting
>>and car theft in California and Oregon, and still
>>unemployed gas pump boy, mastermind of the
>>Canadian branch of NAMBLA, wants all to know
>>about all his fellow criminals and perverts.

>>Here is a photo of Ken McVay, director of WWW.NIZKOR.ORG–
>>Does he not have the uncouth look as to fit the profile of a
>>person who would say in general regarding child porn:
>>”I am weary of seeing the issue of “child porn” blown out of
>>proportion (I’ve been on and around the Net since 1988, and
>>have yet to come across anything I’d consider “child porn.”
>>I’ve seen photos of naked children, … and fail to see the
>>harm, or any great moral danger to our society).”?
>>http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg
>> Would any of you want to leave this person, Ken McVay,
>> alone with your children?

>>From: [email protected] (JohannSebastianBott)
>>Subject: Re:ZHID ORDNUNGSPOLIZEI = ZYDOWSKY KOLABORANCI!!!
>>Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.krakow,pl.regionalne.wroclaw
>>On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:33:28 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Another significant article that merits discussion!!!

>On Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:15:13 -0400, PAWLIKOWSKI
> wrote:

> > Just a moment ago, on soc.culture.polish,
> > Dr. J. Ilicki, Associate Professor of Sociology
> > and Judaic Studies on Upsalla University raised
> > the question of Polish Polish in the service of
> > Germans during occupation of Poland. The only
> > reason for this question at this time seems to be
> > his need to stir interethnic hatered. Provocatively,
> > Dr. Ilicki asks:
> > 1) who were the members of the
> > police, volunteers or draftees?,
> > 2) what was their social status?
> > 3) what happened to them after the war?
> > Just to play completely innocent (and dumb) he also asks
> > why they were called Granatowa (dark-navy-blue) Police.

> > Only naive will believe that Prof. Ilicki does not
> > know the answers.
> > Also only naive will believe that he is not interested
> > in Pinsk the hometown of his parents and allegedly
> > the site of the burial of his grandparents and over
> > 30,000 pinksers (Jews from Pinsk). He admitte
> > that his mother listed them as killed there with
> > Yad Vashem. However, young (about 40 years old)
> > Julian pretends disintrest, because he is afraid that
> > exhumations might start at the alleged burial site
> > and will find no skeletons as same happened last
> > year at nearby Mariompole, presently in Lithuania.

> > But coming back to Dr Illicki question: Polish Police
> > during German occupation was dramatically reduced
> > in numbers and pre-war policemen were forced to
> > serve as an auxillary force to German Ordnung Polizei.
> > They were ususally not armed,and when armed never
> > given more than five bullets for their long rifles.
> > Moreover, after each use of firearm they
> > (as well as the Ukraininan Police) had to write
> > a report for what target each bullet was used
> > and with what effectivness, hardly an invitation to
> > the genocide.

>>>>>> Hardly truth to Pawlikowski’s story too.

> > On the other hand there was a police force in
> > the Third Reich, in which service was completely
> > voluntary. It was called Ordnungdienst. Their
> > emblem was a light alloy Star of David. The
> > social background of these Jewish collaborators
> > according to Iasaiah Trunk was as follows: 18%
> > with post-graduate degrees, 60% with college degree,
> > 20% with elementary education. These are data
> > from self-serving, post-war questionaries.

> > But even Trunk admits that in Warsaw the
> > requirement was that EACH Jewish policeman
> > has at least matura (two years of college)
> > see page 489 of his book. In practice, the
> > Jewish policemen were all lawyers and
> > journalist who with the day of German
> > occupation immediately were fired from
> > their jobs, like the Polish teachers, because
> > the schools were closed.

> The service was voluntary. Take the job and keep
> your life a little longer or die now!

> Pawlikowski forgot how the Soviets were conscripted.
> Under Stalin they ran to enlist hoping to avoid being
> killed in the next “relocation”!

> > While Polish teachers joined the underground,
> > unemployed Jewish intelligentia clamored for the police work.

> > Some of it was really gruesome as you remember
> > from our previous description of the Feb. 1942
> > execution on Rybna Street market place in Lodz.
> > German newsreel of this horrible hanging is shown
> > endlessly in Wiesenthal Museum in LA. Thousands
> > of Jews standing and watching behind three
> > uniformed Germans with their backs and holstered
> > pistols facing Jewish crowd and about to be hanged
> > women passing out and forced into
> > the noose by Jewish Policemen.
> > ————-
> > Jozef Pawlikowski

> Herman

First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao Tse Dung
Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!!
Me

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
against them — except force.” — John Bryant

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
John Bryant

TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions.
G. K. Chesterton.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur,
or to [email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the
like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:50 EST 2007
Article: 64868 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.swiss:64868 soc.culture.europe:582060 soc.culture.german:374408 soc.culture.polish:779642 soc.culture.ukrainian:132590 alt.politics.europe:64245
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Art Franks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.ukrainian,alt.politics.europe
Subject: WIESENTHAL = ZYD KOLLABORATEUR MIT NAZIS!! WAHR – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 803
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 01:52:13 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178243533 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 03 May 2007 19:52:13 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:52:13 MDT

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:16:48 +0200, in de.soc.politik.misc Sonia
Cabrera wrote:

Weiss jemand genaueres über die Vorwürfe, das Wiesenthal mit der
Gestapo kollaborierte? In der Tagesschau wurde gemeldet, das
Wiesenthal die Kollaboration unterstellt wurde, da es unerklärlich
scheint, das er 12 verschiedene KZs überlebte.
Dazu folgendes im Netz:

Eichmann reiste zusammen mit Hagen. Ihr Unternehmen war in der Ge-
schichte der Kooperation zwischen Zionisten und Nazis gewiß nur eine
Episode. Aber die Tatsache, daß der berüchtigte Judenmörder Eichmann
damals bei den Zionisten sich größter Wertschätzung er- freute, war so
entlarvend, daß man sie tunlichst zu verbergen trachtete. Da die
Tatsache der Reise früher oder später ans Licht kommen mochte, wählte
man das einfachste Verfahren: Man gab den Schwarzen Peter weiter.
Bereits 1947 findet sich in einer Broschüre von Simon Wiesenthal die
Mitteilung, Eichmanns Reise habe dem Ziel gedient, Kontakt zu den
aufständischen Palästinensern aufzunehmen und mit dem Mufti
zu konspirieren.[28] Diese Lüge hat seither immer neue Varianten
erlebt und ist sogar im Eichmann-Prozess in Jerusalem wiederholt
worden.

http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol12.html

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:30:16 -0700, in soc.culture.palestine
[email protected] wrote:

Simon Wiesenthal: Fraudulent ‘Nazi Hunter’

By Mark Weber

For more than 40 years, Simon Wiesenthal has been tracking hundreds of
“Nazi criminals” from his “Jewish Documentation Center” in Vienna. For
his work as the world’s most prominent “Nazi hunter,” he has been
awarded several honorary degrees and numerous medals, including
Germany’s highest decoration. In a formal White House ceremony in
August 1980, a teary-eyed President Carter presented him with a
special gold medal awarded by the US Congress. President Reagan
praised him in November 1988 as one of the “true heroes” of this
century.

This living legend was portrayed in flattering terms by the late
Laurence Oliver in the 1978 film fantasy “The Boys From Brazil,” and
by Ben Kingsley in the 1989 HBO made-for-television movie “Murderers
Among Us: The Simon Wiesenthal Story.” One of world’s most prominent
Holocaust organizations bears his name: the Simon Wiesenthal Center of
Los Angeles.

Wiesenthal’s reputation as a moral authority is undeserved. The man
whom The Washington Post has called the “Holocaust’s Avenging Angel”
[1] has a little known but well-documented record of reckless
disregard for truth. He has lied about his own wartime experiences,
misrepresented his postwar “Nazi-hunting” achievements, and has spread
vile falsehoods about alleged German atrocities.

Different Stories
Szymon (Simon) Wiesenthal was born on December 31, 1908, in Buczacz, a
town in the province of Galicia (now Buchach in Ukraine) in what was
then the eastern fringe of the Austro-Hungarian empire. His father was
a prosperous wholesale sugar merchant.

In spite of all that has been written about him, just what Wiesenthal
did during the war years under German occupation remains unclear. He
has given conflicting stories in three separate accounts of his
wartime activities. The first was given under oath during a two day
interrogation session in May 1948 conducted by an official of the US
Nuremberg war crimes commission. [2] The second is a summary of his
life provided by Wiesenthal as part of a January 1949 “Application for
Assistance” to the International Refugee Committee. [3] And the third
account is given in his autobiography, The Murderers Among Us, first
published in 1967. [4]

Soviet Engineer or Factory Mechanic?
In his 1948 interrogation, Wiesenthal declared that “between 1939 and
1941” he was a “Soviet chief engineer working in Lvov and Odessa.” [5]
Consistent with that, he stated in his 1949 declaration that from
December 1939 to April 1940 he worked as an architect in the Black Sea
port of Odessa. But according to his autobiography, he spent the
period between mid-September 1939 and June 1941 in Soviet-ruled Lvov,
where he worked “as a mechanic in a factory that produced bedsprings.”
[6]

Relative Freedom
After the Germans took control of Galicia province in June 1941,
Wiesenthal was interned for a time in the Janowska concentration camp
near Lvov, from where he was transferred a few months later to a camp
affiliated with the repair works (OAW) in Lvov of the Ostbahn
(“Eastern Railroad”) of German-ruled Poland. Wiesenthal reported in
his autobiography that he worked there “as a technician and
draftsman,” that he was rather well treated, and that his immediate
superior, who was “secretly anti-Nazi,” even permitted him to own two
pistols. He had his own office in a “small wooden hut,” and enjoyed
“relative freedom and was permitted to walk all over the yards.” [7]

Partisan Fighter?
The next segment of Wiesenthal’s life — from October 1943 to June
1944 — is the most obscure, and his accounts of this period are
contradictory. During his 1948 interrogation, Wiesenthal said that he
fled from the Janowska camp in Lvov and joined a “partisan group which
operated in the Tarnopol-Kamenopodolsk area.” [8] He said that “I was
a partisan from October 6, 1943, until the middle of February 1944,”
and declared that his unit fought against Ukrainian forces, both of
the SS “Galicia” division and of the independent UPA partisan force.
[9]

Wiesenthal said that he held the rank of lieutenant and then major,
and was responsible for building bunkers and fortification lines.
Although he was not explicit, he suggested that this (supposed)
partisan unit was part of the Armia Ludowa (“Peoples Army”), the
Polish Communist military force established and controlled by the
Soviets. [10]

He said that he and other partisans slipped into Lvov in February
1944, where they were “hidden by friends of the A.L. [‘People’s Army’]
group.” On June 13, 1944, his group was captured by the German Secret
Field Police. (Although Jewish partisans caught in hiding were often
shot, Wiesenthal reports that he was somehow spared.) Wiesenthal told
much the same story in his 1949 statement. He said that he fled from
internment in early October 1943 and then “fought against the Germans
as a partisan in the forest” for eight months — from October 2, 1943,
to March 1944. After that, he was “in hiding” in Lvov from March to
June 1944.

Wiesenthal tells a totally different story in his 1967 autobiography.
He reports there that after escaping from the Ostbahn Repair Works on
Oct. 2, 1943, he lived in hiding in the houses of various friends
until June 13, 1944, when he was discovered by Polish and German
police and returned to a concentration camp. He makes no mention of
any partisan membership or activity. [11]

According to both his 1948 interrogation and his 1967 autobiography,
he tried to commit suicide on June 15, 1944, by cutting his wrists.
Remarkably, though, he was saved from death by German SS doctors and
recovered in an SS hospital. [12] He remained in the Lvov
concentration camp “with double rations” for a time, and then, he
reports in his autobiography, he was transferred to various work
camps. He spent the remaining chaotic months, until the end of the
war, in different camps until he was liberated from Mauthausen (in
Austria) by American forces on May 5, 1945. [13]

Did Wiesenthal invent a past as a heroic wartime partisan? Or did he
later try to suppress his record as a Communist fighter? Or is the
true story altogether different — and too shameful to admit?

Nazi Agent?
Did Wiesenthal voluntarily work for his wartime oppressors? That’s the
accusation leveled by Austrian Chancellor Bruno Kreisky, himself of
Jewish ancestry and leader for many years of his country’s Socialist
Party. During an interview with foreign journalists in 1975, Kreisky
charged Wiesenthal with using “Mafia methods,” rejected his pretense
of “moral authority,” and suggested that he was an agent for the
German authorities. Some of his more pertinent remarks, which appeared
in Austria’s leading news magazine Profil, include: [14]

I really know Mr. Wiesenthal only from secret reports, and they are
bad, very nasty. I say this as Federal Chancellor … And I say that
Mr. Wiesenthal had a different relationship with the Gestapo than I
did. Yes, and this can be proven. I can’t say more [now]. Everything
else, I’ll say in court.

My relationship with the Gestapo is unambiguous. I was their prisoner,
their inmate, and I was interrogated. His relationship was a different
one, I can say, and this will come out clearly. It’s bad enough what
I’ve already said here. But he can’t clear himself by charging me with
defaming his honor in the press, as he might wish. It’s not that
simple, because that would mean a big court case … A man like this
doesn’t have the right to pretend to be a moral authority. That’s what
I say. He doesn’t have the right …

Whether a man who, in my view, is an agent, yes, that’s right, and who
uses Mafia methods … Such a man has to go …

He is no gentleman, and I would say, to make this clear, so that he
won’t become a moral authority, because he is not … He shouldn’t
pretend to be a moral authority …

I say that Mr. Wiesenthal lived in that time in the Nazi sphere of
influence without being persecuted. Right? And he lived openly without
being persecuted, right? Is that clear? And you perhaps know, if you
know what was going on, that no one could risk that.

He wasn’t a “submarine” … that is, submerged and in hiding, but
instead, he was completely in the open without having to, well, ever
risk persecution. I think that’s enough. There were so many
opportunities to be an agent. He didn’t have to be a Gestapo agent.
There were many other services.

In response to these damning words, Wiesenthal began efforts to bring
a lawsuit against the Chancellor. Eventually, though, both Wiesenthal
and Kreisky backed away from a major legal clash.

Mauthausen Myths
Before he became famous as a “Nazi hunter,” he made a name for himself
as a propagandist. In 1946 Wiesenthal published KZ Mauthausen, an
85-page work that consists mainly of his own amateurish sketches
purporting to represent the horrors of the Mauthausen concentration
camp. One drawing depicts three inmates who had been bound to posts
and brutally put to death by the Germans. [15]

The sketch is completely phony. It was copied — with some minor
alterations — from photographs that appeared in Life magazine in
1945, which graphically record the firing-squad execution in December
1944 of three German soldiers who had been caught operating as spies
behind the lines during the “Battle of the Bulge.” [16] The source of
the Wiesenthal drawing is instantly obvious to anyone who compares it
with the Life photos. [17]

The irresponsible character of this book is also shown by Wiesenthal’s
extensive citation therein of the supposed “death bed confession” of
Mauthausen Commandant Franz Ziereis, according to which four million
were gassed to death with carbon monoxide at the nearby Hartheim
satellite camp. [18] This claim is totally absurd, and no serious
Holocaust historian still accepts it. [19] Also according to the
Ziereis “confession” cited by Wiesenthal, the Germans supposedly
killed another ten million people in Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.
[20] In fact, this fraudulent “confession” was obtained by torture.
[21]

Years later, Wiesenthal was still lying about Mauthausen. In a 1983
interview with the daily newspaper USA Today, he said of his
experience in Mauthausen: “I was one of 34 prisoners alive out of
150,000 who had been put there.” [22] This is a blatant falsehood. The
years have apparently not been kind to Wiesenthal’s memory, because in
his own autobiography he wrote that “almost 3,000 prisoners died in
Mauthausen after the Americans liberated us on May 5, 1945.” [23]
Another former inmate, Evelyn Le Chene, reported in her standard work
about Mauthausen that there were 64,000 inmates in the camp when it
was liberated in May 1945. [24] And according to the Encyclopaedia
Judaica, at least 212,000 inmates survived internment in the
Mauthausen camp complex. [25]

After the war Wiesenthal worked for the US Office of Strategic
Services (the forerunner of the CIA) and the US Army’s
Counter-Intelligence Corps (CIC). He was also vice chairman of the
Jewish Central Committee in the US occupation zone of Austria. [26]

‘Human Soap’
Wiesenthal has given circulation and credence to one of the most
scurrilous Holocaust stories, the charge that the Germans manufactured
soap from the corpses of murdered Jews. According to this tale, the
letters “RIF” in bars of German-made soap allegedly stood for “Pure
Jewish Fat” (“Rein judisches Fett”). In reality, the initials stood
for “National Center for Industrial Fat Provisioning” (“Reichstelle
fur industrielle Fettversorgung”). [27]

Wiesenthal promoted the “human soap” legend in articles published in
1946 in the Austrian Jewish community paper Der Neue Weg (“The New
Path”). In an article entitled “RIF,” he wrote: “The terrible words
‘transport for soap’ were first heard at the end of 1942. It was in
the [Polish] General Government, and the factory was in Galicia, in
Belzec. From April 1942 until May 1943, 900,000 Jews were used as raw
material in this factory.” After the corpses were turned into various
raw materials, Wiesenthal wrote, “The rest, the residual fat stuff,
was used for soap production.”

He continued: “After 1942 people in the General Government knew quite
well what the RIF soap meant. The civilized world may not believe the
joy with which the Nazis and their women in the General Government
thought of this soap. In each piece of soap they saw a Jew who had
been magically put there, and had thus been prevented from growing
into a second Freud, Ehrlich or Einstein.” [28]

In another imaginative article published in 1946 entitled “Belzec Soap
Factory,” Wiesenthal alleged that masses of Jews were exterminated in
electrocution showers: [29]

The people, pressed together and driven on by the SS, Latvians and
Ukrainians, go through the open door into the “bath.” Five hundred
persons could fit at a time. The floor of the “bath chamber” was made
of metal and shower heads hung from the ceiling. When the room was
full, the SS turned on the 5,000 volts of electric current in the
metal plate. At the same time water poured from the shower heads. A
short scream and the execution was over. An SS chief physician named
Schmidt determined through a peep hole that the victims were dead. The
second door was opened and the “corpse commando” came in and quickly
removed the dead. It was ready for the next 500.

Today no serious historian accepts the stories that Jewish corpses
were manufactured into bars of soap or that Jews were electrocuted to
death at Belzec (or anywhere).

Wiesenthal’s imaginative view of history is not limited to the
twentieth century. In his 1973 book Sails of Hope, he argued that
Christopher Columbus was a secret Jew, and that his famous voyage to
the western hemisphere in 1492 was actually a search for a new
homeland for Europe’s Jews. [30]

Wiesenthal is not always wrong, of course. In 1975 and again in 1993
he publicly acknowledged that “there were no extermination camps on
German soil.” [31] He thus implicitly conceded that the claims made at
the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal and elsewhere that Buchenwald, Dachau
and other camps in Germany proper were “extermination camps” are not
true.

‘Fabrications’ About Eichmann
In more than 40 years of “Nazi hunting,” Wiesenthal’s role in locating
and capturing Adolf Eichmann is often considered his greatest
achievement. [32] (Eichmann headed the wartime SS Jewish affairs
department. He was kidnapped by Israeli agents in Argentina in May
1960 and hanged in Jerusalem after a trial that received worldwide
media attention.)

But Isser Harel, the Israeli official who headed the team that seized
Eichmann, has declared unequivocally that Wiesenthal had “absolutely
nothing” to do with the capture. (Harel is a former head of both the
Mossad and Shin Bet, Israel’s foreign and domestic security agencies.)
[33]

Wiesenthal not only “had no role whatsoever” in the apprehension, said
Harel, but in fact he endangered the entire Eichmann operation. In a
278-page manuscript, Harel carefully refuted every claim by Wiesenthal
about his supposed role in identifying and capturing Eichmann. Claims
by Wiesenthal and his many friends about his supposedly crucial role
in capturing the former SS officer, said Harel, have no foundation in
fact. Many specific assertions and incidents described in two books by
Wiesenthal, said the Israeli official, are “complete fabrications.”
[34]

“Wiesenthal’s reports and statements at that period prove beyond any
doubt that he had no notion of Eichmann’s whereabouts,” said Harel.
[35] (For example, just before Eichmann’s capture in Argentina,
Wiesenthal was placing him in Japan and Saudi Arabia.) [36]

Characterizing Wiesenthal as a rank opportunist, Harel summed up: “All
the information supplied by Wiesenthal before and in anticipation of
the [Eichmann] operation was utterly worthless, and sometimes even
misleading and of negative value.” [37]

Reckless Charges in Walus Case
One of Wiesenthal’s most spectacular cases involved a Polish-born
Chicago man named Frank Walus. In a letter dated December 10, 1974, he
charged that Walus “delivered Jews to the Gestapo” in Czestochowa and
Kielce in Poland during the war. This letter prompted a US government
investigation and legal action. [38] The Washington Post dealt with
the case in a 1981 article entitled “The Nazi Who Never Was: How a
witch hunt by judge, press and investigators branded an innocent man a
war criminal.” The lengthy piece, which was copyrighted by the
American Bar Association, reported: [39]

In January 1977, the United States government accused a Chicagoan
named Frank Walus of having committed atrocities in Poland during
World War II.

In the following years, this retired factory worker went into debt in
order to raise more than $60,000 to defend himself. He sat in a
courtroom while eleven Jewish survivors of the Nazi occupation of
Poland testified that they saw him murder children, an old woman, a
young woman, a hunchback and others …

Overwhelming evidence shows that Walus was not a Nazi War criminal,
that he was not even in Poland during World War II.

… In an atmosphere of hatred and loathing verging on hysteria, the
government persecuted an innocent man. In 1974, Simon Wiesenthal, the
famous “Nazi hunter” of Vienna, denounced Walus as “a Pole in Chicago
who performed duties with the Gestapo in the ghettos of Czestochowa
and Kielce and handed over a number of Jews to the Gestapo.”

The Chicago weekly newspaper Reader also reported on the case in a
detailed 1981 article headlined: “The Persecution of Frank Walus: To
Catch a Nazi: The U.S. government wanted a war criminal. So, with the
help of Simon Wiesenthal, the Israeli police, the local press and
Judge Julius Hoffman, they invented one.” [40] The article stated:

… It is logical to assume that the “reports received by Wiesenthal
[against Walus] actually were rumors… In other words, Simon
Wiesenthal had no evidence against Walus. He denounced him anyway.

While [Judge] Hoffman had the Walus case under advisement, Holocaust
aired on television. During the same period, in April 1978, Simon
Wiesenthal came to Chicago, where he gave interviews taking credit for
the Walus case. “How Nazi-Hunter Helped Find Walus,” was the Sun-Times
headline on a story by Bob Olmstead. Wiesenthal told Sun-Times Abe
Peck that he “has never had a case of mistaken identity.” “I know
there are thousands of people who wait for my mistake,” he said.

It was only after an exhausting legal battle that the man who was
vilified and physically attacked as “the butcher of Kielce” was
finally able to prove that he had spent the war years as a peaceful
farm laborer in Germany. Frank Walus died in August 1994, a broken and
bitterly disappointed man, man.

Wiesenthal’s recklessness in the Walus case should have been enough to
permanently discredit him as a reliable investigator. But his Teflon
reputation survived even this.

Wrong about Mengele
Much of the Wiesenthal myth is based on his hunt for Joseph Mengele,
the wartime physician at Auschwitz known as the “Angel of Death.” Time
and time again, Wiesenthal claimed to be close on Mengele’s heels.
Wiesenthal reported that his informants had “seen” or “just missed”
the elusive physician in Peru, Chile, Brazil, Spain, Greece, and half
a dozen locations in Paraguay. [41]

One of the closest shaves came in the summer of 1960. Wiesenthal
reported that Mengele had been hiding out on a small Greek island,
>from where he escaped by just a few hours. Wiesenthal continued to
peddle this story, complete with precise details, even after a
reporter whom he had hired to check it out informed him that the tale
was false from beginning to end. [42]

According to another Wiesenthal report, Mengele arranged for the
murder in 1960 of one of his former victims, a woman he had supposedly
sterilized in Auschwitz. After spotting her, and her distinctive camp
tattoo, at a hotel in Argentina where he was staying, Mengele
allegedly arranged to have her killed because he feared that she would
expose him. It turned out that the woman was never in a concentration
camp, had no tattoo, had never met Mengele, and her death was a simple
mountaineering accident. [43]

Mengele regularly dined at the finest restaurants in Asuncion, the
Paraguayan capital, Wiesenthal said in 1977, and supposedly drove
around the city with a bevy of armed guards in his black Mercedes
Benz. [44]

Wiesenthal announced in 1985 that he was “100 percent sure” that
Mengele had been hiding out in Paraguay until at least June 1984, and
charged that the Mengele family in Germany knew exactly where. As it
turned out, Wiesenthal was completely wrong. It was later definitively
established that Mengele had died in 1979 in Brazil, where he had been
living for years in anonymous poverty. [45]

Israel’s ambassador to Paraguay from 1968 to 1972, Benjamin (Benno)
Varon, remarked in 1983 on the Mengele campaign: “Wiesenthal makes
periodic statements that he is about to catch him, perhaps since
Wiesenthal must raise funds for his activities and the name Mengele is
always good for a plug.” Wiesenthal “failed miserably” in the Mengele
case, the diplomat said on another occasion. [46] In the Mengele case,
former Mossad chief Harel remarked, “Wiesenthal’s folly borders on the
criminal.” [47]

In truth, the bulging Mengele file in Wiesenthal’s Vienna
“Documentation Center” was such a jumble of useless information that,
in the words of the London Times, it “only sustained his
self-confirmatory myths and gave scant satisfaction to those who
apparently needed a definitive answer to Mengele’s fate.” [48]

In the considered view of Gerald Posner and John Ware, coauthors of
Mengele: The Complete Story, Wiesenthal spent years assiduously
cultivating a mythical “self-image of a tireless, dogged sleuth,
pitted against the omnipotent and sinister might of Mengele and a vast
Nazi network.” Because of his “knack of playing to the gallery,”
Posner and Ware concluded, Wiesenthal “ultimately compromised his
credibility.” [49]

‘Incompetence and Arrogance’
Eli Rosenbaum, an official with the US government’s “Nazi hunting”
Office of Special Investigations and an investigator for the World
Jewish Congress, took aim at Wiesenthal’s carefully cultivated “Nazi
hunter” reputation in a detailed 1993 book, Betrayal. [50] For
example, Rosenbaum mentioned, Wiesenthal “had all these reports
placing Mengele in almost every country in Latin America except the
one he was in — namely, Brazil.” [51]

Wiesenthal, wrote Rosenbaum, has been a “pathetically ineffective”
investigator who had “gone far beyond the buffoonery and false boasts
in prior years.” Much of his illustrious career, Rosenbaum said, has
been characterized by “incompetence and arrogance.” [52]

Bruno Kreisky once summed up his attitude towards the “Nazi hunter” in
these words: [53]

The engineer Wiesenthal, or whatever else his title is, hates me
because he knows that I despise his activity. The Wiesenthal group is
a quasi-political Mafia that works against Austria with disgraceful
methods. Wiesenthal is known as someone who isn’t very careful about
the truth, who is not very selective about his methods and who uses
tricks. He pretends to be the “Eichmann hunter,” even though everyone
knows that this was the work of a secret service, and that Wiesenthal
only takes credit for that.

‘Commercializing’ the Holocaust
The Los Angeles Wiesenthal Center pays the Vienna “Nazi Hunter”
$75,000 a year for the use of his name, the director of Israel’s Yad
Vashem Holocaust center said in 1988.

Both the Center and Wiesenthal “commercialize” and “trivialize” the
Holocaust, the director added.

Wiesenthal “threw out” the figure of “11 million who were murdered in
the Holocaust — six million Jews and five million non-Jews,” said the
Yad Vashem official. When asked why he gave these figures, Wiesenthal
replied: “The gentiles will not pay attention if we do not mention
their victims, too.” Wiesenthal “chose ‘five million (gentiles)’
because he wanted a ‘diplomatic’ number, one that told of a large
number of gentile victims but in no way was larger than that of Jews
…” [54]

“What Wiesenthal and the Los Angeles Center that bears his name do is
to trivialize the Holocaust,” commented The Jewish Press, a weekly
that claims to be the largest-circulation English-language Jewish
community paper in America.

In recent years Wiesenthal has been concerned about the growing impact
of Holocaust revisionism. In “A Message from Simon Wiesenthal”
published by the Center that bears his name, he said: “Today, when I
see the rise of antisemitism here in Europe … the popularity of Le
Pen, of David Duke, of the Holocaust revisionists, then I am convinced
more than ever about the need for our new [Wiesenthal Center] Beit
Hashoah-Museum of Tolerance” in Los Angeles. [55]

Wiesenthal is often asked why he does not forgive those who persecuted
Jews half a century ago. His stock answer is that although he has the
right to forgive for himself, he does not have the right to forgive on
behalf of others. [56] On the basis of this sophistical logic, though,
neither does he have the right to accuse and track down anyone in the
name of others. Wiesenthal has never confined his “hunt” to those who
victimized him personally.

‘Driven by Hatred’
It is difficult to say just what drives this remarkable man. Is it a
craving for fame and praise? Or is he trying to live down a shameful
episode from his past?

Wiesenthal clearly enjoys the praise he receives. “He is a man of
considerable ego, proud of testimonials and honorary degrees,” the Los
Angeles Times has reported. [57] Bruno Kreisky has given a simpler
explanation. He said that Wiesenthal is “driven by hatred.” [58]

In light of his well-documented record of deceit, lies and
incompetence, the extravagant praise heaped upon this contemptible man
is a sorry reflection of the venal corruptibility and unprincipled
self-deception of our age.

Notes
Quoted in: M. Weber, “‘Nazi Hunter’ Caught Lying,” The Spotlight
(Washington, DC), Oct. 26, 1981, p. 9.
Interrogation of S. Wiesenthal on May 27 and 28, 1948, conducted by
Curt Ponger of the Interrogation Branch of the Evidence Division of
the Office (U.S.) Chief of Counsel for War Crimes. Interrogation No.
2820. On file at the National Archives (Washington, DC), “Records of
the U.S. Nürnberg War Crimes Trials Interrogations, 1946-49,” Record
Group 238, microfilm M-1019, roll 79, frames 460-469 and 470-476. Also
cited in: “New Documents Raise New Doubts About Simon Wiesenthal’s War
Years,” The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1988-89 (Vol. 8, No.
4), pp. 489-503.
PCIRO (International Refugee Organization, Austria) “Application for
Assistance” filled out and signed by Wiesenthal. Dated Jan. 16,1949.
(This was a trial exhibit in the Walus court case. Photocopy in
author’s possession.)
Simon Wiesenthal, The Murderers Among Us: The Simon Wiesenthal
Memoirs. Edited by Joseph Wechsberg. (New York: McGraw Hill, 1967)
Interrogation of S. Wiesenthal, May 27, 1948, pp. 1-2.
The Murderers Among Us, p. 27.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 29-35. This account is not inconsistent
with his 1948 and 1949 statements; See also: Simon Wiesenthal, Justice
Not Vengeance (New York: Grove Weidenfeld: 1989), pp. 7-9.
Interrogation of May 27, 1948, p. 2. In a signed 1945 statement,
Wiesenthal wrote:
“… I escaped on October 18, 1943, from the Lemberg [Lvov] hard labor
camp where I was kept as a prisoner during my two years of labor at
the railroad works… and went into hiding until joining Jewish
partisans on November 21, 1943, who operated there. It was while
fighting in the partisan ranks against the Nazis that we managed to
collect and bury for safekeeping considerable amount of evidence…
When the partisans were dispersed by the Germans I fled to Lemberg on
February 10, 1944, and again went into hiding. On June 13, 1944, I was
found during a house to house search and was immediately sent to the
famous Lacki camp, near that city …” Source: “Curriculum Vitae of
Ing. Wiesenthal, Szymon.” SHAEF, Subject: War Crimes, July 6, 1945.
Records of USAEUR, War Crimes Branch, National Archives (Suitland,
Maryland), Records Group 338, Box 534, Folder 000-50-59. Wiesenthal’s
alleged partisans activities are also recounted in Alan Levy, The
Wiesenthal File (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1994), pp. 50-53.
Interrogation of May 28, 1948, pp. 1-2.
Interrogation of May 28, 1948, p. 5.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 35-37.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 37-38; Interrogation, May 27, 1948, p. 2,
and May 28, 1948, p. 5; A. Levy, The Wiesenthal File (1994), p. 54.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 39-44; Interrogation, May 27, 1948, pp.
2-3.
Interview with foreign journalists in Vienna, Nov. 10, 1975. Text
published in: “War Wiesenthal ein Gestapo-Kollaborateur?,” Profil
(Vienna), No. 47, Nov. 18, 1975, pp. 16, 22-23; Reprinted in: Robert
H. Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982), pp.
215-218, 222-223; Quoted in part in A. Levy, The Wiesenthal File
(1994), p. 349, and in, S. Wiesenthal, Justice Not Vengeance (New
York: 1989), pp. 7, 299. Kreisky was not alone in charging that
Wiesenthal had collaborated with the German Gestapo. Wim Van Leer,
columnist for the English-language daily Jerusalem Post, stated in May
1986 that a high-level police official in Vienna, citing confidential
police records, had told him during the early 1960s that these and
other charges against Wiesenthal were true. Source: J. Bushinsky,
“Nazi hunter sues over charges of links to Gestapo,” Chicago
Sun-Times, Jan. 31, 1987.
Simon Wiesenthal, KZ Mauthausen (Linz and Vienna: Ibis-Verlag, 1946).
Facsimile reprint in: Robert H. Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal:
Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982), p. 64.
“Firing Squad,” Life magazine, US edition, June 11, 1945, p. 50.
M. Weber and K. Stimely, “The Sleight-of-Hand of Simon Wiesenthal,”
The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1984 (Vol. 5, No. 1), pp.
120-122; D. National-Zeitung (Munich), May 21, 1993, p. 3.
S. Wiesenthal, KZ Mauthausen (1946). See also facsimile reprint in:
Robert H. Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982),
pp. 42, 46. This “confession” is a somewhat altered version of
Nuremberg document NO-1973; A new edition of Wiesenthal’s 1946 book
has been published under the title Denn sie Wussten, was sie tun:
Zeichnungen und Aufzeichnungen aus dem KZ Mauthausen (Vienna: F.
Deuticke, 1995). I am grateful to Robert Faurisson for bringing this
to my attention. He points out in a July 1995 essay that Wiesenthal
has deleted from this new edition both the “death bed confession” of
Ziereis as well as his drawing of the three Mauthausen inmates.
According to the Encyclopaedia Judaica (“Mauthausen,”, Vol. 11, p.
1138), a grand total of 206,000 persons were inmates of Mauthausen and
its satellite camps (including Hartheim) at one time or another.
S. Wiesenthal, KZ Mauthausen (1946). Facsimile reprint in: R.
Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation, p. 47.
R. Faurisson, “The Gas Chambers: Truth or Lie?,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Winter 1981, pp. 330, 361. See also: Hans
Fritzsche, The Sword in the Scales (London: 1953), p. 185; Gerald
Reitlinger, The Final Solution (London: Sphere, pb., 1971), p. 515; M.
Weber, “The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Summer 1992 (Vol. 12, No. 2), p. 182.
USA Today, April 21, 1983, p. 9A.
The Murderers Among Us, p. 44.
Evelyn Le Chene, Mauthausen: The History of a Death Camp (London:
1971), pp. 166-168 and 190-191.
“Mauthausen”, Encyclopaedia Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971),
vol. 11, p. 1138.
C. Moritz, ed., Current Biography 1975 (New York: H.W. Wilson, 1975),
p. 442; Wiesenthal interrogation of May 27, 1948, p. 3.
Mark Weber, “Jewish Soap,” The Journal of Historical Review, Summer
1991 (Vol. 11, No. 2), pp. 217-227; See also: Robert Faurisson, “La
savon juif,” Annales d’Histoire Revisionniste (Paris), No. 1,
Printemps 1987, pp. 153-159.
Der Neue Weg (Vienna), No. 17/18, 1946, pp. 4-5. Article entitled
“RIF” by “Ing. Wiesenth.” (Simon Wiesenthal).
Der Neue Weg (Vienna), Nr. 19/20, 1946, pp. 14-15. Article entitled
“Seifenfabrik Belsetz” (“Belzec Soap Factory”), by “Ing. S.Wiesenth.”
S. Wiesenthal, Sails of Hope (Macmillan, 1973).
Letters by Wiesenthal in Books and Bookmen (London), April 1975, p. 5,
and in Stars and Stripes (European edition), Jan. 24, 1993, p. 14.
Facsimile of Stars and Stripes letter in The Journal of Historical
Review, May-June 1993, p. 10; In 1986 Wiesenthal lied about his 1975
statement. In a letter dated May 12, 1986, to Prof. John George of
Central State University in Edmond, Oklahoma (copy in author’s
possession), Wiesenthal wrote: “I have never stated that ‘there were
no extermination camps on German soil.’ This quote is false, I could
never have said such a thing.”
For example, in a letter (dated Sept. 13, 1993), published in The New
York Times, Sept. 29, 1993, Wiesenthal boasted: “I succeeded in
putting a number of Nazis on trial who had perpetrated horrendous
crimes in the Nazi era, including Adolf Eichmann, Franz Stangl, Gustav
Wagner,…”
S. Birnbaum, “Wiesenthal’s Claim on Eichmann Disputed by Former Mossad
Head,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency Daily News Bulletin (New York), April
4, 1989. (Dispatch dated April 3).
J. Schachter, “Wiesenthal had no role in Eichmann capture,” The
Jerusalem Post, May 18, 1991. Facsimile reprint in Christian News, May
27, 1991, p. 19. See also: Ruth Sinai, “Wiesenthal’s role in
Eichmann’s capture disputed,” Associated Press, The Orange County
Register, Feb. 25, 1990, p. A 26; L. Lagnado, “How Simon Wiesenthal
Helped a Secret Nazi,” Forward (New York), Sept. 24, 1993, pp. 1, 3.
J. Schachter, The Jerusalem Post, May 18, 1991 (cited above).
Facsimile in Christian News, May 27, 1991, p. 19.
Arnold Forster, Square One (New York: 1988), pp. 187-189. (Forster was
general counsel of the Anti-Defamation League, a major Zionist
organization.)
J. Goldberg, “Top Spy Says Wiesenthal Lied About His Exploits,”
Forward (New York), Nov. 12, 1993, pp. 1, 4; R. Sinai, “Wiesenthal’s
role…,” The Orange County Register, Feb. 25, 1990 (cited above).
Michael Arndt, “The Wrong Man,” The Chicago Tribune Magazine, Dec. 2,
1984, pp. 15-35, esp. p. 23; Charles Ashman and Robert J. Wagman, The
Nazi Hunters (New York: Pharos Books, 1988), pp. 193-195.
“The Nazi Who Never Was,” The Washington Post, May 10, 1981, pp. B5,
B8.
“The Persecution of Frank Walus,” Reader (Chicago), Jan. 23, 1981, pp.
19, 30. After Wiesenthal was ultimately proven wrong in a similar case
in Canada, the Toronto Sun newspaper commented in an editorial: “It
seems that material provided by professional Nazi hunter Simon
Wiesenthal is wrong, but repeated anyway [in the media].” (Quoted by
M. Weber in The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1984, pp.
120-122.)
Gerald L. Posner and John Ware, Mengele: The Complete Story (New York:
Dell, 1987), pp. 220-221; Gerald Astor, The ‘Last’ Nazi: The Life and
Times of Dr. Joseph Mengele (Toronto: Paperjacks, 1986), p. 202.
G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele: The Complete Story (cited above), p.
220.
G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele (cited above), pp. 179-180; G. Astor,
The ‘Last’ Nazi (cited above), pp. 178-180.
Time magazine, Sept. 26, 1977, pp. 36-38. Cited in: G. Posner and J.
Ware, Mengele (cited above), p. 219.
“Hunting the ‘Angel of Death’,” Newsweek, May 20, 1985, pp. 36-38. See
also: M. Weber, “Lessons of the Mengele Affair,” Journal of Historical
Review, Fall 1985 (Vol. 6, No. 3), p. 382. On Wiesenthal’s distortion
of truth in the Mermelstein-IHR case, see: M. Weber, “Declaration,”
Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1982 (Vol. 3, No. 1), pp. 42-43;
M. Weber, “Albert Speer and the ‘Holocaust,”‘ Journal of Historical
Review, Winter 1984 (Vol. 5, Nos. 2-4), p. 439.
Midstream, Dec. 1983, p. 24. Quoted in: G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele
(cited above), p. 219; Los Angeles Times, Nov. 15, 1985, p. 2.
J. Schachter, “Wiesenthal had no role in Eichmann capture,” The
Jerusalem Post, May 18, 1991. Facsimile reprint in Christian News, May
27, 1991, p. 19.
Tom Bower in The Times (London), June 14, 1985, p. 14. Quoted in: G.
Posner and J. Ware, Mengele (cited above), pp. 222-223.
G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele (cited above), pp. 222-223.
Betrayal, by Eli M. Rosenbaum, with William Hoffer. Published in 1993
by St. Martin’s Press (New York). Reviewed by Jacob Heilbrunn in The
New York Times Book Review, Oct. 10, 1993, p. 9.
Quoted in L. Lagnado, “How Simon Wiesenthal…,” Forward (New York),
Sept. 24, 1993, p. 3.
The New York Times Book Review, Oct. 10, 1993, p. 9; Forward (New
York), Sept. 24, 1993, p. 3.
“Was hat Wiesenthal zu verbergen?,” D. National-Zeitung (Munich), Nov.
11, 1988, p. 4.
David Sinai, “News We Doubt You’ve Seen,” The Jewish Press (Brooklyn,
NY), Dec. 23, 1988. Based on report in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz,
Dec. 16, 1988.
“A Message from Simon Wiesenthal,” Response: The Wiesenthal Center
World Report, Winter 1992, p. 11.
Charles Ashman and Robert J. Wagman, The Nazi Hunters (New York:
Pharos Books, 1988), p. 286; A. Popkin, “Nazi-Hunter Simon Wiesenthal:
‘Information is Our Best Defense’,” Washington Jewish Week, Oct. 29,
1987, p. 2.
Quoted in: M. Weber, The Spotlight, Oct. 26, 1981, p. 9.
Quoted in D. National-Zeitung (Munich), July 8, 1988, p. 7, and in, R.
Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982), p. 199.
#2009
From The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1995 (Vol. 15, No.
4), pages 8-16. This is a revised and updated version of an article
that first appeared in the Winter 1989-90 issue of The Journal of
Historical Review.
——————————————————————————–
About the author
Mark Weber is director of the Institute for Historical Review. He
studied history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the
University of Munich, Portland State University and Indiana University
(M.A., 1977). For nine years he served as editor of the IHR’s Journal
of Historical Review.
——————————————————————————–
This essay, and others in this series, are available in handy leaflet
format, ideal for wide distribution. They can be ordered, postpaid, at
these prices:
10 copies, $2.00 :: 50 copies, $7.50 :: 100 copies or more, 10 cents
each.

Institute for Historical Review
P.O. Box 2739 — Newport Beach, CA 92659 — USA

[email protected]

************************************************************************
Was this post informative? Consider printing it or emailing it to
someone
you know.
_________________________________________
If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
against them — except force.” — John Bryant

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
–John Bryant

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To:Frank Arthur,
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the
like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:53 EST 2007
Article: 64869 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:779643 soc.culture.europe:582061 soc.culture.ukrainian:132591 soc.culture.baltics:152041 soc.culture.german:374409 soc.culture.swiss:64869
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Art Franks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: NAZI – ZYD KOLLABORATION!! Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 85
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 02:01:32 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178244092 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 03 May 2007 20:01:32 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 20:01:32 MDT

From: “Syja Macohstain”
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish
Subject: Nazi-Zionist collaboration
Date: 10 Feb 2007 11:30:05 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com

EICHMANN IN JERUSALEM
byHannah Arendt

Zionist Emigration and Gestapo Expulsion

(pp. 59-61)

During its first few years, Hitler’s rise to power appeared to the
Zionists chiefly as ‘the decisive defeat of assimilationism’. Hence, the
Zionists could, for a time, at least, engage in a certain amount of non-
criminal cooperation with the Nazi authorities; the Zionists too believed
that “dissimilation,” combined with the emigration to Palestine of Jewish
youngsters and, they hoped, Jewish capitalists, could be a “mutually
fair solution.”

At the time, many German officials held this opinion, and this kind
of seems to have been quite common up to the end. A letter from a
survivor of Theresienstadt, a German Jew, relates that all leading
positions in the Nazi-appointed “Reichsvereiningung” were held by
Zionists (whereas the authentic Jewish “Reichsvereiningung” had
been composed of both Zionists and non-Zionists), because Zionists,
according to the Nazis, were the “decent” Jews since they too thought
in “national terms.” To be sure, no prominent Nazi ever spoke publicly
in this vein; from beginning to end, Nazi propaganda was fiercely,
unequivocally, uncompromisingly anti-Semitic, and eventually nothing
counted but what people who were still without experience in the
mysteries of totalitarian government dismissed as “mere propaganda.”

There existed in those first years a mutually highly satisfactory
agreement between the Nazi authorities and the Jewish Agency for
Palestine – a ‘ Ha’avara’, or Transfer Agreement, which provided that
an emigrant to Palestine could transfer his money there in German
goods and exchange them for pounds upon arrival. It was soon the
only legal way for a Jew to take his money with him (the alternative then
being the establishment of a blocked account, which could be liquidated
abroad only at a loss of between fifty and ninety-five per cent). The result
was that in the thirties, when American Jewry took great pains to organize
a boycott of German merchandise, Palestine, of all places, was swamped
with all kinds of goods “made in Germany.”

Of Greater importance for Eichmann were the emissaries from Palestine,
who would approach the Gestapo and the S.S. on their own initiative,
without taking orders from either the German Zionists or the Jewish Agency
for Palestine. They came in order to enlist the help for the illegal
immigration of Jews into British-ruled Palestine, and both the Gestapo
and the S.S: were helpful. They negotiated with Eichmann in Vienna,
and they reported that he was “polite, not the shouting type,” and that
he even provided them with farms and facilities for setting up vocational
training camps for prospective immigrants. (“On one occasion, he expelled
a group of nuns from a convent to provide a training farm for young Jews”
and on another ‘a special train was made available and Nazi officials
accompanied’ a group of emigrants, ostensibly headed for Zionist training
farms in Yugoslavia, to see them safely across the border).

According to the story told by Jon and David Kimche, with “the full
and generous cooperation of all the chief actors” (THE SECRET ROADS:
THE ILLEGAL MIGRATION OF A PEOPLE, 1938-1948, London, 1954),
these Jews from Palestine spoke a language not totally different from that
of Eichmann. They had been sent to Europe by the communal settlements
in Palestine, and they were not interested in rescue operations: “That was
not their job.” They wanted to select “suitable material,” and their chief
enemy, prior to the extermination program, was not those who made life
impossible for Jews in the old countries, Germany or Austria, but those
who barred access to the new homeland: that enemy was definitely
Britain, not Germany.

Indeed, they were in a position to deal with the Nazi authorities on a
footing amounting to equality, which native Jews were not, since they
enjoyed the protection of the mandatory power. They were probably
among the first Jews to talk openly about mutual interests and were
certainly the first to be given permission “to pick young Jewish pioneers”
>from among the Jews in the concentration camps. Of course, they were
unaware of the sinister implications of this deal, which still lay in the
future; but they too somehow believed that if it was a question of selecting
Jews for survival, the Jews should do the selecting themselves. It was this
fundamental error in judgement that eventually led to a situation in which
the non-selected majority of Jews inevitably found themselves confronted
with two enemies – the Nazi authorities and the Jewish authorities”.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:53 EST 2007
Article: 64880 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.swiss:64880 soc.culture.europe:582200 soc.culture.german:374445 soc.culture.polish:779811 soc.culture.ukrainian:132602 alt.politics.europe:64272
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Art Franks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.ukrainian,alt.politics.europe
Subject: WIESENTHAL = ZYD KOLLABORATEUR MIT NAZIS!! WAHR – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 803
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 17:12:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178385120 64.59.135.176 (Sat, 05 May 2007 11:12:00 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 11:12:00 MDT

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:16:48 +0200, in de.soc.politik.misc Sonia
Cabrera wrote:

Weiss jemand genaueres über die Vorwürfe, das Wiesenthal mit der
Gestapo kollaborierte? In der Tagesschau wurde gemeldet, das
Wiesenthal die Kollaboration unterstellt wurde, da es unerklärlich
scheint, das er 12 verschiedene KZs überlebte.
Dazu folgendes im Netz:

Eichmann reiste zusammen mit Hagen. Ihr Unternehmen war in der Ge-
schichte der Kooperation zwischen Zionisten und Nazis gewiß nur eine
Episode. Aber die Tatsache, daß der berüchtigte Judenmörder Eichmann
damals bei den Zionisten sich größter Wertschätzung er- freute, war so
entlarvend, daß man sie tunlichst zu verbergen trachtete. Da die
Tatsache der Reise früher oder später ans Licht kommen mochte, wählte
man das einfachste Verfahren: Man gab den Schwarzen Peter weiter.
Bereits 1947 findet sich in einer Broschüre von Simon Wiesenthal die
Mitteilung, Eichmanns Reise habe dem Ziel gedient, Kontakt zu den
aufständischen Palästinensern aufzunehmen und mit dem Mufti
zu konspirieren.[28] Diese Lüge hat seither immer neue Varianten
erlebt und ist sogar im Eichmann-Prozess in Jerusalem wiederholt
worden.

http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol12.html

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:30:16 -0700, in soc.culture.palestine
[email protected] wrote:

Simon Wiesenthal: Fraudulent ‘Nazi Hunter’

By Mark Weber

For more than 40 years, Simon Wiesenthal has been tracking hundreds of
“Nazi criminals” from his “Jewish Documentation Center” in Vienna. For
his work as the world’s most prominent “Nazi hunter,” he has been
awarded several honorary degrees and numerous medals, including
Germany’s highest decoration. In a formal White House ceremony in
August 1980, a teary-eyed President Carter presented him with a
special gold medal awarded by the US Congress. President Reagan
praised him in November 1988 as one of the “true heroes” of this
century.

This living legend was portrayed in flattering terms by the late
Laurence Oliver in the 1978 film fantasy “The Boys From Brazil,” and
by Ben Kingsley in the 1989 HBO made-for-television movie “Murderers
Among Us: The Simon Wiesenthal Story.” One of world’s most prominent
Holocaust organizations bears his name: the Simon Wiesenthal Center of
Los Angeles.

Wiesenthal’s reputation as a moral authority is undeserved. The man
whom The Washington Post has called the “Holocaust’s Avenging Angel”
[1] has a little known but well-documented record of reckless
disregard for truth. He has lied about his own wartime experiences,
misrepresented his postwar “Nazi-hunting” achievements, and has spread
vile falsehoods about alleged German atrocities.

Different Stories
Szymon (Simon) Wiesenthal was born on December 31, 1908, in Buczacz, a
town in the province of Galicia (now Buchach in Ukraine) in what was
then the eastern fringe of the Austro-Hungarian empire. His father was
a prosperous wholesale sugar merchant.

In spite of all that has been written about him, just what Wiesenthal
did during the war years under German occupation remains unclear. He
has given conflicting stories in three separate accounts of his
wartime activities. The first was given under oath during a two day
interrogation session in May 1948 conducted by an official of the US
Nuremberg war crimes commission. [2] The second is a summary of his
life provided by Wiesenthal as part of a January 1949 “Application for
Assistance” to the International Refugee Committee. [3] And the third
account is given in his autobiography, The Murderers Among Us, first
published in 1967. [4]

Soviet Engineer or Factory Mechanic?
In his 1948 interrogation, Wiesenthal declared that “between 1939 and
1941” he was a “Soviet chief engineer working in Lvov and Odessa.” [5]
Consistent with that, he stated in his 1949 declaration that from
December 1939 to April 1940 he worked as an architect in the Black Sea
port of Odessa. But according to his autobiography, he spent the
period between mid-September 1939 and June 1941 in Soviet-ruled Lvov,
where he worked “as a mechanic in a factory that produced bedsprings.”
[6]

Relative Freedom
After the Germans took control of Galicia province in June 1941,
Wiesenthal was interned for a time in the Janowska concentration camp
near Lvov, from where he was transferred a few months later to a camp
affiliated with the repair works (OAW) in Lvov of the Ostbahn
(“Eastern Railroad”) of German-ruled Poland. Wiesenthal reported in
his autobiography that he worked there “as a technician and
draftsman,” that he was rather well treated, and that his immediate
superior, who was “secretly anti-Nazi,” even permitted him to own two
pistols. He had his own office in a “small wooden hut,” and enjoyed
“relative freedom and was permitted to walk all over the yards.” [7]

Partisan Fighter?
The next segment of Wiesenthal’s life — from October 1943 to June
1944 — is the most obscure, and his accounts of this period are
contradictory. During his 1948 interrogation, Wiesenthal said that he
fled from the Janowska camp in Lvov and joined a “partisan group which
operated in the Tarnopol-Kamenopodolsk area.” [8] He said that “I was
a partisan from October 6, 1943, until the middle of February 1944,”
and declared that his unit fought against Ukrainian forces, both of
the SS “Galicia” division and of the independent UPA partisan force.
[9]

Wiesenthal said that he held the rank of lieutenant and then major,
and was responsible for building bunkers and fortification lines.
Although he was not explicit, he suggested that this (supposed)
partisan unit was part of the Armia Ludowa (“Peoples Army”), the
Polish Communist military force established and controlled by the
Soviets. [10]

He said that he and other partisans slipped into Lvov in February
1944, where they were “hidden by friends of the A.L. [‘People’s Army’]
group.” On June 13, 1944, his group was captured by the German Secret
Field Police. (Although Jewish partisans caught in hiding were often
shot, Wiesenthal reports that he was somehow spared.) Wiesenthal told
much the same story in his 1949 statement. He said that he fled from
internment in early October 1943 and then “fought against the Germans
as a partisan in the forest” for eight months — from October 2, 1943,
to March 1944. After that, he was “in hiding” in Lvov from March to
June 1944.

Wiesenthal tells a totally different story in his 1967 autobiography.
He reports there that after escaping from the Ostbahn Repair Works on
Oct. 2, 1943, he lived in hiding in the houses of various friends
until June 13, 1944, when he was discovered by Polish and German
police and returned to a concentration camp. He makes no mention of
any partisan membership or activity. [11]

According to both his 1948 interrogation and his 1967 autobiography,
he tried to commit suicide on June 15, 1944, by cutting his wrists.
Remarkably, though, he was saved from death by German SS doctors and
recovered in an SS hospital. [12] He remained in the Lvov
concentration camp “with double rations” for a time, and then, he
reports in his autobiography, he was transferred to various work
camps. He spent the remaining chaotic months, until the end of the
war, in different camps until he was liberated from Mauthausen (in
Austria) by American forces on May 5, 1945. [13]

Did Wiesenthal invent a past as a heroic wartime partisan? Or did he
later try to suppress his record as a Communist fighter? Or is the
true story altogether different — and too shameful to admit?

Nazi Agent?
Did Wiesenthal voluntarily work for his wartime oppressors? That’s the
accusation leveled by Austrian Chancellor Bruno Kreisky, himself of
Jewish ancestry and leader for many years of his country’s Socialist
Party. During an interview with foreign journalists in 1975, Kreisky
charged Wiesenthal with using “Mafia methods,” rejected his pretense
of “moral authority,” and suggested that he was an agent for the
German authorities. Some of his more pertinent remarks, which appeared
in Austria’s leading news magazine Profil, include: [14]

I really know Mr. Wiesenthal only from secret reports, and they are
bad, very nasty. I say this as Federal Chancellor … And I say that
Mr. Wiesenthal had a different relationship with the Gestapo than I
did. Yes, and this can be proven. I can’t say more [now]. Everything
else, I’ll say in court.

My relationship with the Gestapo is unambiguous. I was their prisoner,
their inmate, and I was interrogated. His relationship was a different
one, I can say, and this will come out clearly. It’s bad enough what
I’ve already said here. But he can’t clear himself by charging me with
defaming his honor in the press, as he might wish. It’s not that
simple, because that would mean a big court case … A man like this
doesn’t have the right to pretend to be a moral authority. That’s what
I say. He doesn’t have the right …

Whether a man who, in my view, is an agent, yes, that’s right, and who
uses Mafia methods … Such a man has to go …

He is no gentleman, and I would say, to make this clear, so that he
won’t become a moral authority, because he is not … He shouldn’t
pretend to be a moral authority …

I say that Mr. Wiesenthal lived in that time in the Nazi sphere of
influence without being persecuted. Right? And he lived openly without
being persecuted, right? Is that clear? And you perhaps know, if you
know what was going on, that no one could risk that.

He wasn’t a “submarine” … that is, submerged and in hiding, but
instead, he was completely in the open without having to, well, ever
risk persecution. I think that’s enough. There were so many
opportunities to be an agent. He didn’t have to be a Gestapo agent.
There were many other services.

In response to these damning words, Wiesenthal began efforts to bring
a lawsuit against the Chancellor. Eventually, though, both Wiesenthal
and Kreisky backed away from a major legal clash.

Mauthausen Myths
Before he became famous as a “Nazi hunter,” he made a name for himself
as a propagandist. In 1946 Wiesenthal published KZ Mauthausen, an
85-page work that consists mainly of his own amateurish sketches
purporting to represent the horrors of the Mauthausen concentration
camp. One drawing depicts three inmates who had been bound to posts
and brutally put to death by the Germans. [15]

The sketch is completely phony. It was copied — with some minor
alterations — from photographs that appeared in Life magazine in
1945, which graphically record the firing-squad execution in December
1944 of three German soldiers who had been caught operating as spies
behind the lines during the “Battle of the Bulge.” [16] The source of
the Wiesenthal drawing is instantly obvious to anyone who compares it
with the Life photos. [17]

The irresponsible character of this book is also shown by Wiesenthal’s
extensive citation therein of the supposed “death bed confession” of
Mauthausen Commandant Franz Ziereis, according to which four million
were gassed to death with carbon monoxide at the nearby Hartheim
satellite camp. [18] This claim is totally absurd, and no serious
Holocaust historian still accepts it. [19] Also according to the
Ziereis “confession” cited by Wiesenthal, the Germans supposedly
killed another ten million people in Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.
[20] In fact, this fraudulent “confession” was obtained by torture.
[21]

Years later, Wiesenthal was still lying about Mauthausen. In a 1983
interview with the daily newspaper USA Today, he said of his
experience in Mauthausen: “I was one of 34 prisoners alive out of
150,000 who had been put there.” [22] This is a blatant falsehood. The
years have apparently not been kind to Wiesenthal’s memory, because in
his own autobiography he wrote that “almost 3,000 prisoners died in
Mauthausen after the Americans liberated us on May 5, 1945.” [23]
Another former inmate, Evelyn Le Chene, reported in her standard work
about Mauthausen that there were 64,000 inmates in the camp when it
was liberated in May 1945. [24] And according to the Encyclopaedia
Judaica, at least 212,000 inmates survived internment in the
Mauthausen camp complex. [25]

After the war Wiesenthal worked for the US Office of Strategic
Services (the forerunner of the CIA) and the US Army’s
Counter-Intelligence Corps (CIC). He was also vice chairman of the
Jewish Central Committee in the US occupation zone of Austria. [26]

‘Human Soap’
Wiesenthal has given circulation and credence to one of the most
scurrilous Holocaust stories, the charge that the Germans manufactured
soap from the corpses of murdered Jews. According to this tale, the
letters “RIF” in bars of German-made soap allegedly stood for “Pure
Jewish Fat” (“Rein judisches Fett”). In reality, the initials stood
for “National Center for Industrial Fat Provisioning” (“Reichstelle
fur industrielle Fettversorgung”). [27]

Wiesenthal promoted the “human soap” legend in articles published in
1946 in the Austrian Jewish community paper Der Neue Weg (“The New
Path”). In an article entitled “RIF,” he wrote: “The terrible words
‘transport for soap’ were first heard at the end of 1942. It was in
the [Polish] General Government, and the factory was in Galicia, in
Belzec. From April 1942 until May 1943, 900,000 Jews were used as raw
material in this factory.” After the corpses were turned into various
raw materials, Wiesenthal wrote, “The rest, the residual fat stuff,
was used for soap production.”

He continued: “After 1942 people in the General Government knew quite
well what the RIF soap meant. The civilized world may not believe the
joy with which the Nazis and their women in the General Government
thought of this soap. In each piece of soap they saw a Jew who had
been magically put there, and had thus been prevented from growing
into a second Freud, Ehrlich or Einstein.” [28]

In another imaginative article published in 1946 entitled “Belzec Soap
Factory,” Wiesenthal alleged that masses of Jews were exterminated in
electrocution showers: [29]

The people, pressed together and driven on by the SS, Latvians and
Ukrainians, go through the open door into the “bath.” Five hundred
persons could fit at a time. The floor of the “bath chamber” was made
of metal and shower heads hung from the ceiling. When the room was
full, the SS turned on the 5,000 volts of electric current in the
metal plate. At the same time water poured from the shower heads. A
short scream and the execution was over. An SS chief physician named
Schmidt determined through a peep hole that the victims were dead. The
second door was opened and the “corpse commando” came in and quickly
removed the dead. It was ready for the next 500.

Today no serious historian accepts the stories that Jewish corpses
were manufactured into bars of soap or that Jews were electrocuted to
death at Belzec (or anywhere).

Wiesenthal’s imaginative view of history is not limited to the
twentieth century. In his 1973 book Sails of Hope, he argued that
Christopher Columbus was a secret Jew, and that his famous voyage to
the western hemisphere in 1492 was actually a search for a new
homeland for Europe’s Jews. [30]

Wiesenthal is not always wrong, of course. In 1975 and again in 1993
he publicly acknowledged that “there were no extermination camps on
German soil.” [31] He thus implicitly conceded that the claims made at
the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal and elsewhere that Buchenwald, Dachau
and other camps in Germany proper were “extermination camps” are not
true.

‘Fabrications’ About Eichmann
In more than 40 years of “Nazi hunting,” Wiesenthal’s role in locating
and capturing Adolf Eichmann is often considered his greatest
achievement. [32] (Eichmann headed the wartime SS Jewish affairs
department. He was kidnapped by Israeli agents in Argentina in May
1960 and hanged in Jerusalem after a trial that received worldwide
media attention.)

But Isser Harel, the Israeli official who headed the team that seized
Eichmann, has declared unequivocally that Wiesenthal had “absolutely
nothing” to do with the capture. (Harel is a former head of both the
Mossad and Shin Bet, Israel’s foreign and domestic security agencies.)
[33]

Wiesenthal not only “had no role whatsoever” in the apprehension, said
Harel, but in fact he endangered the entire Eichmann operation. In a
278-page manuscript, Harel carefully refuted every claim by Wiesenthal
about his supposed role in identifying and capturing Eichmann. Claims
by Wiesenthal and his many friends about his supposedly crucial role
in capturing the former SS officer, said Harel, have no foundation in
fact. Many specific assertions and incidents described in two books by
Wiesenthal, said the Israeli official, are “complete fabrications.”
[34]

“Wiesenthal’s reports and statements at that period prove beyond any
doubt that he had no notion of Eichmann’s whereabouts,” said Harel.
[35] (For example, just before Eichmann’s capture in Argentina,
Wiesenthal was placing him in Japan and Saudi Arabia.) [36]

Characterizing Wiesenthal as a rank opportunist, Harel summed up: “All
the information supplied by Wiesenthal before and in anticipation of
the [Eichmann] operation was utterly worthless, and sometimes even
misleading and of negative value.” [37]

Reckless Charges in Walus Case
One of Wiesenthal’s most spectacular cases involved a Polish-born
Chicago man named Frank Walus. In a letter dated December 10, 1974, he
charged that Walus “delivered Jews to the Gestapo” in Czestochowa and
Kielce in Poland during the war. This letter prompted a US government
investigation and legal action. [38] The Washington Post dealt with
the case in a 1981 article entitled “The Nazi Who Never Was: How a
witch hunt by judge, press and investigators branded an innocent man a
war criminal.” The lengthy piece, which was copyrighted by the
American Bar Association, reported: [39]

In January 1977, the United States government accused a Chicagoan
named Frank Walus of having committed atrocities in Poland during
World War II.

In the following years, this retired factory worker went into debt in
order to raise more than $60,000 to defend himself. He sat in a
courtroom while eleven Jewish survivors of the Nazi occupation of
Poland testified that they saw him murder children, an old woman, a
young woman, a hunchback and others …

Overwhelming evidence shows that Walus was not a Nazi War criminal,
that he was not even in Poland during World War II.

… In an atmosphere of hatred and loathing verging on hysteria, the
government persecuted an innocent man. In 1974, Simon Wiesenthal, the
famous “Nazi hunter” of Vienna, denounced Walus as “a Pole in Chicago
who performed duties with the Gestapo in the ghettos of Czestochowa
and Kielce and handed over a number of Jews to the Gestapo.”

The Chicago weekly newspaper Reader also reported on the case in a
detailed 1981 article headlined: “The Persecution of Frank Walus: To
Catch a Nazi: The U.S. government wanted a war criminal. So, with the
help of Simon Wiesenthal, the Israeli police, the local press and
Judge Julius Hoffman, they invented one.” [40] The article stated:

… It is logical to assume that the “reports received by Wiesenthal
[against Walus] actually were rumors… In other words, Simon
Wiesenthal had no evidence against Walus. He denounced him anyway.

While [Judge] Hoffman had the Walus case under advisement, Holocaust
aired on television. During the same period, in April 1978, Simon
Wiesenthal came to Chicago, where he gave interviews taking credit for
the Walus case. “How Nazi-Hunter Helped Find Walus,” was the Sun-Times
headline on a story by Bob Olmstead. Wiesenthal told Sun-Times Abe
Peck that he “has never had a case of mistaken identity.” “I know
there are thousands of people who wait for my mistake,” he said.

It was only after an exhausting legal battle that the man who was
vilified and physically attacked as “the butcher of Kielce” was
finally able to prove that he had spent the war years as a peaceful
farm laborer in Germany. Frank Walus died in August 1994, a broken and
bitterly disappointed man, man.

Wiesenthal’s recklessness in the Walus case should have been enough to
permanently discredit him as a reliable investigator. But his Teflon
reputation survived even this.

Wrong about Mengele
Much of the Wiesenthal myth is based on his hunt for Joseph Mengele,
the wartime physician at Auschwitz known as the “Angel of Death.” Time
and time again, Wiesenthal claimed to be close on Mengele’s heels.
Wiesenthal reported that his informants had “seen” or “just missed”
the elusive physician in Peru, Chile, Brazil, Spain, Greece, and half
a dozen locations in Paraguay. [41]

One of the closest shaves came in the summer of 1960. Wiesenthal
reported that Mengele had been hiding out on a small Greek island,
>from where he escaped by just a few hours. Wiesenthal continued to
peddle this story, complete with precise details, even after a
reporter whom he had hired to check it out informed him that the tale
was false from beginning to end. [42]

According to another Wiesenthal report, Mengele arranged for the
murder in 1960 of one of his former victims, a woman he had supposedly
sterilized in Auschwitz. After spotting her, and her distinctive camp
tattoo, at a hotel in Argentina where he was staying, Mengele
allegedly arranged to have her killed because he feared that she would
expose him. It turned out that the woman was never in a concentration
camp, had no tattoo, had never met Mengele, and her death was a simple
mountaineering accident. [43]

Mengele regularly dined at the finest restaurants in Asuncion, the
Paraguayan capital, Wiesenthal said in 1977, and supposedly drove
around the city with a bevy of armed guards in his black Mercedes
Benz. [44]

Wiesenthal announced in 1985 that he was “100 percent sure” that
Mengele had been hiding out in Paraguay until at least June 1984, and
charged that the Mengele family in Germany knew exactly where. As it
turned out, Wiesenthal was completely wrong. It was later definitively
established that Mengele had died in 1979 in Brazil, where he had been
living for years in anonymous poverty. [45]

Israel’s ambassador to Paraguay from 1968 to 1972, Benjamin (Benno)
Varon, remarked in 1983 on the Mengele campaign: “Wiesenthal makes
periodic statements that he is about to catch him, perhaps since
Wiesenthal must raise funds for his activities and the name Mengele is
always good for a plug.” Wiesenthal “failed miserably” in the Mengele
case, the diplomat said on another occasion. [46] In the Mengele case,
former Mossad chief Harel remarked, “Wiesenthal’s folly borders on the
criminal.” [47]

In truth, the bulging Mengele file in Wiesenthal’s Vienna
“Documentation Center” was such a jumble of useless information that,
in the words of the London Times, it “only sustained his
self-confirmatory myths and gave scant satisfaction to those who
apparently needed a definitive answer to Mengele’s fate.” [48]

In the considered view of Gerald Posner and John Ware, coauthors of
Mengele: The Complete Story, Wiesenthal spent years assiduously
cultivating a mythical “self-image of a tireless, dogged sleuth,
pitted against the omnipotent and sinister might of Mengele and a vast
Nazi network.” Because of his “knack of playing to the gallery,”
Posner and Ware concluded, Wiesenthal “ultimately compromised his
credibility.” [49]

‘Incompetence and Arrogance’
Eli Rosenbaum, an official with the US government’s “Nazi hunting”
Office of Special Investigations and an investigator for the World
Jewish Congress, took aim at Wiesenthal’s carefully cultivated “Nazi
hunter” reputation in a detailed 1993 book, Betrayal. [50] For
example, Rosenbaum mentioned, Wiesenthal “had all these reports
placing Mengele in almost every country in Latin America except the
one he was in — namely, Brazil.” [51]

Wiesenthal, wrote Rosenbaum, has been a “pathetically ineffective”
investigator who had “gone far beyond the buffoonery and false boasts
in prior years.” Much of his illustrious career, Rosenbaum said, has
been characterized by “incompetence and arrogance.” [52]

Bruno Kreisky once summed up his attitude towards the “Nazi hunter” in
these words: [53]

The engineer Wiesenthal, or whatever else his title is, hates me
because he knows that I despise his activity. The Wiesenthal group is
a quasi-political Mafia that works against Austria with disgraceful
methods. Wiesenthal is known as someone who isn’t very careful about
the truth, who is not very selective about his methods and who uses
tricks. He pretends to be the “Eichmann hunter,” even though everyone
knows that this was the work of a secret service, and that Wiesenthal
only takes credit for that.

‘Commercializing’ the Holocaust
The Los Angeles Wiesenthal Center pays the Vienna “Nazi Hunter”
$75,000 a year for the use of his name, the director of Israel’s Yad
Vashem Holocaust center said in 1988.

Both the Center and Wiesenthal “commercialize” and “trivialize” the
Holocaust, the director added.

Wiesenthal “threw out” the figure of “11 million who were murdered in
the Holocaust — six million Jews and five million non-Jews,” said the
Yad Vashem official. When asked why he gave these figures, Wiesenthal
replied: “The gentiles will not pay attention if we do not mention
their victims, too.” Wiesenthal “chose ‘five million (gentiles)’
because he wanted a ‘diplomatic’ number, one that told of a large
number of gentile victims but in no way was larger than that of Jews
…” [54]

“What Wiesenthal and the Los Angeles Center that bears his name do is
to trivialize the Holocaust,” commented The Jewish Press, a weekly
that claims to be the largest-circulation English-language Jewish
community paper in America.

In recent years Wiesenthal has been concerned about the growing impact
of Holocaust revisionism. In “A Message from Simon Wiesenthal”
published by the Center that bears his name, he said: “Today, when I
see the rise of antisemitism here in Europe … the popularity of Le
Pen, of David Duke, of the Holocaust revisionists, then I am convinced
more than ever about the need for our new [Wiesenthal Center] Beit
Hashoah-Museum of Tolerance” in Los Angeles. [55]

Wiesenthal is often asked why he does not forgive those who persecuted
Jews half a century ago. His stock answer is that although he has the
right to forgive for himself, he does not have the right to forgive on
behalf of others. [56] On the basis of this sophistical logic, though,
neither does he have the right to accuse and track down anyone in the
name of others. Wiesenthal has never confined his “hunt” to those who
victimized him personally.

‘Driven by Hatred’
It is difficult to say just what drives this remarkable man. Is it a
craving for fame and praise? Or is he trying to live down a shameful
episode from his past?

Wiesenthal clearly enjoys the praise he receives. “He is a man of
considerable ego, proud of testimonials and honorary degrees,” the Los
Angeles Times has reported. [57] Bruno Kreisky has given a simpler
explanation. He said that Wiesenthal is “driven by hatred.” [58]

In light of his well-documented record of deceit, lies and
incompetence, the extravagant praise heaped upon this contemptible man
is a sorry reflection of the venal corruptibility and unprincipled
self-deception of our age.

Notes
Quoted in: M. Weber, “‘Nazi Hunter’ Caught Lying,” The Spotlight
(Washington, DC), Oct. 26, 1981, p. 9.
Interrogation of S. Wiesenthal on May 27 and 28, 1948, conducted by
Curt Ponger of the Interrogation Branch of the Evidence Division of
the Office (U.S.) Chief of Counsel for War Crimes. Interrogation No.
2820. On file at the National Archives (Washington, DC), “Records of
the U.S. Nürnberg War Crimes Trials Interrogations, 1946-49,” Record
Group 238, microfilm M-1019, roll 79, frames 460-469 and 470-476. Also
cited in: “New Documents Raise New Doubts About Simon Wiesenthal’s War
Years,” The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1988-89 (Vol. 8, No.
4), pp. 489-503.
PCIRO (International Refugee Organization, Austria) “Application for
Assistance” filled out and signed by Wiesenthal. Dated Jan. 16,1949.
(This was a trial exhibit in the Walus court case. Photocopy in
author’s possession.)
Simon Wiesenthal, The Murderers Among Us: The Simon Wiesenthal
Memoirs. Edited by Joseph Wechsberg. (New York: McGraw Hill, 1967)
Interrogation of S. Wiesenthal, May 27, 1948, pp. 1-2.
The Murderers Among Us, p. 27.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 29-35. This account is not inconsistent
with his 1948 and 1949 statements; See also: Simon Wiesenthal, Justice
Not Vengeance (New York: Grove Weidenfeld: 1989), pp. 7-9.
Interrogation of May 27, 1948, p. 2. In a signed 1945 statement,
Wiesenthal wrote:
“… I escaped on October 18, 1943, from the Lemberg [Lvov] hard labor
camp where I was kept as a prisoner during my two years of labor at
the railroad works… and went into hiding until joining Jewish
partisans on November 21, 1943, who operated there. It was while
fighting in the partisan ranks against the Nazis that we managed to
collect and bury for safekeeping considerable amount of evidence…
When the partisans were dispersed by the Germans I fled to Lemberg on
February 10, 1944, and again went into hiding. On June 13, 1944, I was
found during a house to house search and was immediately sent to the
famous Lacki camp, near that city …” Source: “Curriculum Vitae of
Ing. Wiesenthal, Szymon.” SHAEF, Subject: War Crimes, July 6, 1945.
Records of USAEUR, War Crimes Branch, National Archives (Suitland,
Maryland), Records Group 338, Box 534, Folder 000-50-59. Wiesenthal’s
alleged partisans activities are also recounted in Alan Levy, The
Wiesenthal File (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1994), pp. 50-53.
Interrogation of May 28, 1948, pp. 1-2.
Interrogation of May 28, 1948, p. 5.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 35-37.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 37-38; Interrogation, May 27, 1948, p. 2,
and May 28, 1948, p. 5; A. Levy, The Wiesenthal File (1994), p. 54.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 39-44; Interrogation, May 27, 1948, pp.
2-3.
Interview with foreign journalists in Vienna, Nov. 10, 1975. Text
published in: “War Wiesenthal ein Gestapo-Kollaborateur?,” Profil
(Vienna), No. 47, Nov. 18, 1975, pp. 16, 22-23; Reprinted in: Robert
H. Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982), pp.
215-218, 222-223; Quoted in part in A. Levy, The Wiesenthal File
(1994), p. 349, and in, S. Wiesenthal, Justice Not Vengeance (New
York: 1989), pp. 7, 299. Kreisky was not alone in charging that
Wiesenthal had collaborated with the German Gestapo. Wim Van Leer,
columnist for the English-language daily Jerusalem Post, stated in May
1986 that a high-level police official in Vienna, citing confidential
police records, had told him during the early 1960s that these and
other charges against Wiesenthal were true. Source: J. Bushinsky,
“Nazi hunter sues over charges of links to Gestapo,” Chicago
Sun-Times, Jan. 31, 1987.
Simon Wiesenthal, KZ Mauthausen (Linz and Vienna: Ibis-Verlag, 1946).
Facsimile reprint in: Robert H. Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal:
Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982), p. 64.
“Firing Squad,” Life magazine, US edition, June 11, 1945, p. 50.
M. Weber and K. Stimely, “The Sleight-of-Hand of Simon Wiesenthal,”
The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1984 (Vol. 5, No. 1), pp.
120-122; D. National-Zeitung (Munich), May 21, 1993, p. 3.
S. Wiesenthal, KZ Mauthausen (1946). See also facsimile reprint in:
Robert H. Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982),
pp. 42, 46. This “confession” is a somewhat altered version of
Nuremberg document NO-1973; A new edition of Wiesenthal’s 1946 book
has been published under the title Denn sie Wussten, was sie tun:
Zeichnungen und Aufzeichnungen aus dem KZ Mauthausen (Vienna: F.
Deuticke, 1995). I am grateful to Robert Faurisson for bringing this
to my attention. He points out in a July 1995 essay that Wiesenthal
has deleted from this new edition both the “death bed confession” of
Ziereis as well as his drawing of the three Mauthausen inmates.
According to the Encyclopaedia Judaica (“Mauthausen,”, Vol. 11, p.
1138), a grand total of 206,000 persons were inmates of Mauthausen and
its satellite camps (including Hartheim) at one time or another.
S. Wiesenthal, KZ Mauthausen (1946). Facsimile reprint in: R.
Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation, p. 47.
R. Faurisson, “The Gas Chambers: Truth or Lie?,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Winter 1981, pp. 330, 361. See also: Hans
Fritzsche, The Sword in the Scales (London: 1953), p. 185; Gerald
Reitlinger, The Final Solution (London: Sphere, pb., 1971), p. 515; M.
Weber, “The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Summer 1992 (Vol. 12, No. 2), p. 182.
USA Today, April 21, 1983, p. 9A.
The Murderers Among Us, p. 44.
Evelyn Le Chene, Mauthausen: The History of a Death Camp (London:
1971), pp. 166-168 and 190-191.
“Mauthausen”, Encyclopaedia Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971),
vol. 11, p. 1138.
C. Moritz, ed., Current Biography 1975 (New York: H.W. Wilson, 1975),
p. 442; Wiesenthal interrogation of May 27, 1948, p. 3.
Mark Weber, “Jewish Soap,” The Journal of Historical Review, Summer
1991 (Vol. 11, No. 2), pp. 217-227; See also: Robert Faurisson, “La
savon juif,” Annales d’Histoire Revisionniste (Paris), No. 1,
Printemps 1987, pp. 153-159.
Der Neue Weg (Vienna), No. 17/18, 1946, pp. 4-5. Article entitled
“RIF” by “Ing. Wiesenth.” (Simon Wiesenthal).
Der Neue Weg (Vienna), Nr. 19/20, 1946, pp. 14-15. Article entitled
“Seifenfabrik Belsetz” (“Belzec Soap Factory”), by “Ing. S.Wiesenth.”
S. Wiesenthal, Sails of Hope (Macmillan, 1973).
Letters by Wiesenthal in Books and Bookmen (London), April 1975, p. 5,
and in Stars and Stripes (European edition), Jan. 24, 1993, p. 14.
Facsimile of Stars and Stripes letter in The Journal of Historical
Review, May-June 1993, p. 10; In 1986 Wiesenthal lied about his 1975
statement. In a letter dated May 12, 1986, to Prof. John George of
Central State University in Edmond, Oklahoma (copy in author’s
possession), Wiesenthal wrote: “I have never stated that ‘there were
no extermination camps on German soil.’ This quote is false, I could
never have said such a thing.”
For example, in a letter (dated Sept. 13, 1993), published in The New
York Times, Sept. 29, 1993, Wiesenthal boasted: “I succeeded in
putting a number of Nazis on trial who had perpetrated horrendous
crimes in the Nazi era, including Adolf Eichmann, Franz Stangl, Gustav
Wagner,…”
S. Birnbaum, “Wiesenthal’s Claim on Eichmann Disputed by Former Mossad
Head,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency Daily News Bulletin (New York), April
4, 1989. (Dispatch dated April 3).
J. Schachter, “Wiesenthal had no role in Eichmann capture,” The
Jerusalem Post, May 18, 1991. Facsimile reprint in Christian News, May
27, 1991, p. 19. See also: Ruth Sinai, “Wiesenthal’s role in
Eichmann’s capture disputed,” Associated Press, The Orange County
Register, Feb. 25, 1990, p. A 26; L. Lagnado, “How Simon Wiesenthal
Helped a Secret Nazi,” Forward (New York), Sept. 24, 1993, pp. 1, 3.
J. Schachter, The Jerusalem Post, May 18, 1991 (cited above).
Facsimile in Christian News, May 27, 1991, p. 19.
Arnold Forster, Square One (New York: 1988), pp. 187-189. (Forster was
general counsel of the Anti-Defamation League, a major Zionist
organization.)
J. Goldberg, “Top Spy Says Wiesenthal Lied About His Exploits,”
Forward (New York), Nov. 12, 1993, pp. 1, 4; R. Sinai, “Wiesenthal’s
role…,” The Orange County Register, Feb. 25, 1990 (cited above).
Michael Arndt, “The Wrong Man,” The Chicago Tribune Magazine, Dec. 2,
1984, pp. 15-35, esp. p. 23; Charles Ashman and Robert J. Wagman, The
Nazi Hunters (New York: Pharos Books, 1988), pp. 193-195.
“The Nazi Who Never Was,” The Washington Post, May 10, 1981, pp. B5,
B8.
“The Persecution of Frank Walus,” Reader (Chicago), Jan. 23, 1981, pp.
19, 30. After Wiesenthal was ultimately proven wrong in a similar case
in Canada, the Toronto Sun newspaper commented in an editorial: “It
seems that material provided by professional Nazi hunter Simon
Wiesenthal is wrong, but repeated anyway [in the media].” (Quoted by
M. Weber in The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1984, pp.
120-122.)
Gerald L. Posner and John Ware, Mengele: The Complete Story (New York:
Dell, 1987), pp. 220-221; Gerald Astor, The ‘Last’ Nazi: The Life and
Times of Dr. Joseph Mengele (Toronto: Paperjacks, 1986), p. 202.
G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele: The Complete Story (cited above), p.
220.
G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele (cited above), pp. 179-180; G. Astor,
The ‘Last’ Nazi (cited above), pp. 178-180.
Time magazine, Sept. 26, 1977, pp. 36-38. Cited in: G. Posner and J.
Ware, Mengele (cited above), p. 219.
“Hunting the ‘Angel of Death’,” Newsweek, May 20, 1985, pp. 36-38. See
also: M. Weber, “Lessons of the Mengele Affair,” Journal of Historical
Review, Fall 1985 (Vol. 6, No. 3), p. 382. On Wiesenthal’s distortion
of truth in the Mermelstein-IHR case, see: M. Weber, “Declaration,”
Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1982 (Vol. 3, No. 1), pp. 42-43;
M. Weber, “Albert Speer and the ‘Holocaust,”‘ Journal of Historical
Review, Winter 1984 (Vol. 5, Nos. 2-4), p. 439.
Midstream, Dec. 1983, p. 24. Quoted in: G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele
(cited above), p. 219; Los Angeles Times, Nov. 15, 1985, p. 2.
J. Schachter, “Wiesenthal had no role in Eichmann capture,” The
Jerusalem Post, May 18, 1991. Facsimile reprint in Christian News, May
27, 1991, p. 19.
Tom Bower in The Times (London), June 14, 1985, p. 14. Quoted in: G.
Posner and J. Ware, Mengele (cited above), pp. 222-223.
G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele (cited above), pp. 222-223.
Betrayal, by Eli M. Rosenbaum, with William Hoffer. Published in 1993
by St. Martin’s Press (New York). Reviewed by Jacob Heilbrunn in The
New York Times Book Review, Oct. 10, 1993, p. 9.
Quoted in L. Lagnado, “How Simon Wiesenthal…,” Forward (New York),
Sept. 24, 1993, p. 3.
The New York Times Book Review, Oct. 10, 1993, p. 9; Forward (New
York), Sept. 24, 1993, p. 3.
“Was hat Wiesenthal zu verbergen?,” D. National-Zeitung (Munich), Nov.
11, 1988, p. 4.
David Sinai, “News We Doubt You’ve Seen,” The Jewish Press (Brooklyn,
NY), Dec. 23, 1988. Based on report in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz,
Dec. 16, 1988.
“A Message from Simon Wiesenthal,” Response: The Wiesenthal Center
World Report, Winter 1992, p. 11.
Charles Ashman and Robert J. Wagman, The Nazi Hunters (New York:
Pharos Books, 1988), p. 286; A. Popkin, “Nazi-Hunter Simon Wiesenthal:
‘Information is Our Best Defense’,” Washington Jewish Week, Oct. 29,
1987, p. 2.
Quoted in: M. Weber, The Spotlight, Oct. 26, 1981, p. 9.
Quoted in D. National-Zeitung (Munich), July 8, 1988, p. 7, and in, R.
Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982), p. 199.
#2009
From The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1995 (Vol. 15, No.
4), pages 8-16. This is a revised and updated version of an article
that first appeared in the Winter 1989-90 issue of The Journal of
Historical Review.
——————————————————————————–
About the author
Mark Weber is director of the Institute for Historical Review. He
studied history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the
University of Munich, Portland State University and Indiana University
(M.A., 1977). For nine years he served as editor of the IHR’s Journal
of Historical Review.
——————————————————————————–
This essay, and others in this series, are available in handy leaflet
format, ideal for wide distribution. They can be ordered, postpaid, at
these prices:
10 copies, $2.00 :: 50 copies, $7.50 :: 100 copies or more, 10 cents
each.

Institute for Historical Review
P.O. Box 2739 — Newport Beach, CA 92659 — USA

[email protected]

************************************************************************
Was this post informative? Consider printing it or emailing it to
someone
you know.
_________________________________________
If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
against them — except force.” — John Bryant

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
–John Bryant

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To:Frank Arthur,
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the
like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:56 EST 2007
Article: 64882 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:779833 soc.culture.german:374448 soc.culture.ukrainian:132604 soc.culture.russian:458371 soc.culture.palestine:564179 soc.culture.swiss:64882
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Art Franks
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: The Alleged “Holocaust” of the Jews is Proving ever more Dangerous – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 213
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 19:25:49 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178393149 64.59.135.176 (Sat, 05 May 2007 13:25:49 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 13:25:49 MDT

The Alleged “Holocaust” of the Jews is Proving ever more Dangerous

On 8 Aug 2006 22:03:31 -0700, in can.politics “127.0.0.1”
wrote:

http://www.natallnews.com/story.php?id=2695

Current events in the Middle East confirm it: the alleged
“Holocaust” of the Jews is a historical lie that is proving ever
more dangerous. Let us recall that this alleged “Holocaust”, which
is the sword and the shield of the State of Israel, possesses at least
three aberrant features:

1) It has created “survivors” (“miraculous” ones) by the
million. Almost sixty years on from the end of the 1939-1945 war, the
number of “survivors” of that purported undertaking to exterminate
an entire people has been estimated by the specialist in demographics
of Jewish communities Jacob Ukeles at 687,900 (Haaretz, April 18,
2004).

>From that figure it may be deduced that in 1945 the number of European
Jews who had survived the war was most likely in the region of
3,250,000, a statistic that bears out what we already knew from other
information: never did the Germans have a policy of physical
extermination of the Jews and never did they possess any of those
weapons of mass destruction called execution “gas chambers” or
execution “gas vans”.

After the war, many Jews stayed in Europe and many others scattered
throughout the world, settling in nearly sixty countries. So it was
that in the late 1990s the teams put in charge by Steven Spielberg of
gathering survivors’ testimonies had to go to nearly sixty different
countries to record the said testimonies on video (Survivors of the
Shoah Visual Foundation, P.O. Box 3168, Los Angeles, California 90078,
USA; see also a related article in the French daily Libération of
November 3, 1999, p. 36).

Finally, in the present day, the Jewish population of Israel is close
to … seven million (!);

2) It constitutes a daunting weapon with which to stifle, crush and
kill; see the above drawing, recently passed on to me by Ahmed Rami,
depicting a book that, like writings in Hebrew, would be read from
right to left; hence the presentation.

3) It enabled the Zionists to succeed in creating a colony in
1947-1948, the very time when, everywhere else in the world, colonial
possessions were disintegrating. Established in the land of Palestine,
that colony became a “Jewish State”, endowed with a “Jewish
Army”. This State is racialist, domineering and sure of itself. In
accordance with a millennia-old tradition, it has, yet again, let the
Jewish people, – ever prey to the prophet’s anxiety, ever inclined
to groan, to complain, to threaten blackmail, to preach wars and
crusades, – make itself invariably loathsome wherever it passes
through.

Founded on the myth of the “Holocaust”, the State of Israel is
doomed

In a study dated October 8, 2001 and entitled “An Imaginary Holocaust
May Lead to a Real Holocaust” I wrote: “the State of Israel is
henceforth doomed. It will not even have lasted as long as the
ephemeral Christian kingdom of Jerusalem [which, in actual fact, lived
for 89 years]”; then, speaking of the “bad times ahead for the
Jews”, I described already what can be seen befalling that
colonialist State now.

The Zionists will have to leave Palestine. They will be returning to
our climes. In particular, they will invade Germany where the
authorities are already offering a fortune to Jewish immigrants from
anywhere. These wandering Jews will bewail their “Second
Holocaust”.

Again they will be demanding penitence, privileges of all sorts and
“reparations for the irreparable” (a fine Talmudic oxymoron!).
Thus, those settlers of another era will need to quit Jerusalem; but
will they do so in the manner of the Europeans of Algeria in 1962 or in
that of the Americans, in 1975, in Vietnam?

What will the Israelis do with their nuclear arsenal? How high will the
bill for the rest of humanity run to? One can hardly tell.

On the other hand, one may rightly affirm that present events justify
the warnings put out in the past by the revisionists. They had said
that the lie of the magical gas chambers allowed ANYTHING and that,
consequently, the world must be ready for ANYTHING in the way of Jewish
excessiveness. It would have been a good idea to listen to the
revisionists instead of throwing them in prison or trying to gag them.

Jewish neurosis and excessiveness in the Zionist myth and the
“Holocaust” myth

Whether belonging to the State of Israel or the Diaspora, the Jews,
with but too few exceptions like those of Noam Chomsky, Israel Shahak
or Edgar Morin, have acted with callousness and inhumanity. Their
alleged “Holocaust” has permitted them to slander nearly all
non-Jews, including the wartime Allies, the Neutrals, the Papacy, the
International Committee of the Red Cross, all accused of having, it
seems, let the Germans exterminate the European Jews.

They have thus accused whole nations of having committed or allowed to
be committed a gigantic crime which, in reality, was never perpetrated.

>From this slander of huge proportions they have drawn, with the greed
and cruelty of Shylock, an orgy of profits in monetary and political
terms as well as in the spheres of the law and the media. Moreover,
they have not cared to show any respect to either the defeated or the
impoverished. Their excessiveness (the messianic hubris) has made them
lose their heads.

These Jews would be well advised to reflect on what, in 1894, Bernard
Lazare wrote on the first page of his book Antisemitism: its history
and causes and which may be summarised as follows: if, in every era, in
every land, amongst all races, under all kinds of regime and whatever
the prevailing moral standards and customs, the people of Israel have
incited “hostility” and even “repugnance”, it is that “the
general causes of antisemitism [have] always lain in Israel itself and
not in those who have fought it.”

Up to now the revisionists have been treated like Palestinians,
Lebanese or, to talk Jewish, like the “seed of cattle” and for a
long time revisionism has remained beyond the understanding of the
greater part of the world, but now, in the present day, people are
beginning to grasp its message.

Millions, whole nations, witnesses to what is going on in the Middle
East, are becoming aware, in front of their television sets, of Jewish
neurosis and excessiveness.

At the same time they are discovering, or are about to discover, with
stupefaction, that at the root of the lie-laden accounts, full of
extravagance and hatred, that make up what the Jews call their
“Holocaust History”, there already lay that same neurosis, that
same excessiveness.

Jewish fads, extravagances and crazes bound for the rubbish bins of
history

The “mania for lying and believing lies is as catching as the itch”
(Céline). Man, as is known all too well, is subject to some quite
unlikely fancies. He goes so far as to kill or get himself killed for
ideas that he sometimes ends up discovering were false all along. The
business of weapons, wars and crusades, of which mass propaganda is a
central component, takes delight in these false ideas.

In the 19th and 20th centuries the Talmudists took in billions of
people with them. Freudianism, Zionism, Lenin- or Trotsky-style
Communism, Elie Wiesel-style holocaustic religion or Shoah business à
la Claude Lanzmann, all these inventions have been grounded in a
mixture of false ideas, messianic utopias and impostures that were
essentially Jewish. After having known triumph, Freudianism (not to be
confused with psychotherapy and psychiatry) and Leninism (not to be
confused with the communist ideal) are now largely discredited.

As is seen in our present day, Zionism, for its part, leads to
self-destruction and may perhaps bring on a worldwide catastrophe; the
Israelis have killed it. As for the “Holocaust” religion and Shoah
business, they seem to be flourishing, but, as the American revisionist
Arthur Robert Butz has remarked, the giant’s feet are made of clay,
and this fact is starting to be noticed.

These fads, extravagances and crazes, which bear the mark of Jewish
neurosis and excessiveness, look sure to finish one day in the rubbish
bins of history. But, as far as the “Holocaust” is concerned, that
day is still a long way off, so strongly has the Great Lie of the 20th
century pervaded people’s minds, like a lethal drug to which one
sadly ends up becoming addicted.

Fortunately the revisionists are here; good Judeo-therapists that they
are (the term is French revisionist Pierre Guillaume’s), they have no
equal when it comes to treating dependence on holocaustic lie poison.
If, beset with that affliction, one wants to regain reason and health,
there is nothing like a simple cure of revisionism.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur , or to
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:57 EST 2007
Article: 64897 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us uk.politics.misc:1897304 soc.culture.australian:409690 soc.culture.swiss:64897 soc.culture.europe:582243 soc.culture.ukrainian:132607 soc.culture.polish:779915 soc.culture.palestine:564252
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenKnoll
Newsgroups: uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.palestine
Subject: Selling Slave-Sex in Israel- Filthy ZYDS – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 163
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 14:06:19 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178460379 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 06 May 2007 08:06:19 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 08:06:19 MDT

On 27 Nov 2005 16:19:47 -0800, “Ariadne” wrote:
>Jason P wrote:
>> By Paula Amann

>> Washington Jewish Week/Jewsweek – 2001

>> http://www.jewsweek.com/society/059.htm

>> They come to Israel from the Ukraine, Russia, and Moldova looking for
>> freedom. Instead they are sold as sex slaves. And you thought Israel
>> was holy.

>> Jewsweek.com | Their names are Natalya, Oxana or Svetlana. They come to
>> Israel, as immigrants do, for a better life. But their dreams of
>> working as a waitress, nurse, or au pair turn nightmarish upon their
>> arrival.

>> Their fellow countryman who met them at the airport, speaking the
>> language of home, takes them to a locked apartment with barred windows
>> and a phone that only takes incoming calls, where they are forced to
>> provide sexual services to strangers.

>> Those who rebel risk being raped, beaten, or starved. Even those who
>> knew they were going into prostitution are shocked by the stark
>> conditions, the pay of roughly 20 shekalim ($5) a day or less for their
>> labor.

>> This disturbing story unfolds all too often at the hotline for Migrant
>> Workers, a Tel Aviv agency founded in 1998 to protect the human rights
>> of foreign workers, victims of sex trafficking among them. The hotline
>> takes as its motto the familiar line from Exodus 22:20: “You shall not
>> wrong a stranger or oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of
>> Egypt.”

>> Agency director and co-founder Sigal Rozen, along with the group’s
>> counsel, Nomi Levenkron, were in Washington, D.C., last week to give a
>> lecture at the Johns Hopkins Nitze School of Advanced International
>> Studies, to network and to speak with supporters. Among them are the
>> New Israel Fund, which has given the hotline a total of $19,000 during
>> the past year and a half.

>> In an interview, Rozen called sex trafficking an “unorganized crime,”
>> based largely on personal networks of immigrants from the Ukraine,
>> Russia, and Moldova.

>> “… “It’s easier being a trafficker than being a plumber …” –Nomi
>> Levenkron

>> Those three countries alone accounted for 91 percent of the 474 women
>> arrested in brothels and deported from Israel in 2000, according to
>> figures compiled by hotline volunteers during visits to the Neveh
>> Tirzah women’s prison.

>> These statistics represent only a fraction of the problem. Police
>> spokespersons have set the number of women brought into the country to
>> work in the sex industry at 2,000-3,000 annually, the number of
>> brothels at 250, Rozen said.

>> “It’s Misha that knows Sasha that knows Vladimir,” added Levenkron,
>> noting the economic incentive to be a pimp or work with one. “It’s
>> easier being a trafficker than being a plumber.”

>> One day she got a phone call from a rape crisis center where a woman
>> pleaded to be arrested and deported.

>> This young Moldovian had twice tried to escape her pimp and at 18, was
>> burned out on prostitution and just wanted to go home.

>> “She’s so young and sweet,” reflected Levenkron. “She came to Israel to
>> be a waitress.”

>> A year ago this month, Israel passed the Law Against Trafficking Women.
>> Before that time, other laws existed against soliciting, pimping, and
>> running brothels.

>> Yet hotline staff point out that few pimps involved in trafficking ever
>> face a judge, with the majority of prostitutes deported without ever
>> facing a trial that might involve their testimony against their pimps.
>> Out of 459 women deported in 1998, only 35 cases went to trial; out of
>> 253 in 1999, a scant five ended up in the courtroom.

>> Judicial indifference is compounded by police complicity, Levenkron
>> argued.

>> The 18-year-old Moldovian, it turned out, had at one point in her
>> misadventures, found herself in a Tel Aviv police station where some of
>> the officers, who were her clients, recognized her and moved to call
>> her pimp.

>> Overhearing their plans, the woman fled and moved in with a
>> client-turned-boyfriend.

>> But somehow the pimp found her again, threatened the boyfriend. The
>> young woman, with no place to go, went back to the brothel. Now the
>> case hangs in the courts, where Levenkron has faint hopes for a
>> positive outcome.

>> The police role in such trafficking ranges from casual to highly
>> serious, she alleged.

>> “There are police who just come as clients, those who get special
>> discounts because of their good relationships with the owner of the
>> place and those that inform the owner about police operations,”
>> explained Levenkron.

>> One young Beersheva prostitute told the attorney she was forced to work
>> seven days a week unless a police raid was expected.

>> Widespread fear of violence from pimps has muted the public outcry, say
>> hotline staff. When Levenkron filed a suit on behalf of a
>> Beersheva-based woman, a 20-year-old Moldovian who had survived six
>> pimps and multiple rapes, several of the lawyer’s friends came to her
>> home to bid her a final farewell, in anticipation of her imminent
>> death, she said.

>> INTERNATIONAL PROBLEM

>> Worldwide, trafficking in persons for domestic service, forced labor,
>> and prostitution ranks third after drugs and guns among the activities
>> of international crime, according to a congressional service report
>> released May 10, 2000. For comparison, about 50,000 people are brought
>> to the United States annually, the report stated.

>> The rise in trafficking seen over the 1990s was fueled by feeble
>> economies in source countries, such as the former Soviet Union and
>> Southeast Asia, along with weak penalties for traffickers, said a
>> government official familiar with these issues.

>> Last October, the United States passed its own law addressing this
>> problem, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, which
>> calls on the State Department to report annually on the scope of
>> trafficking in various countries and measures taken to combat it. The
>> report was due for release on June 1, but its publication has been
>> delayed.

>> In Israel today, official policy on trafficking is to arrest and deport
>> foreign sex workers. The women are held for an average of 30 days under
>> crowded and sometimes harsh conditions, longer if they testify in court
>> against their pimps, according to hotline data.

>> Rozen and Levenkron take issue with this approach. “Deporting women
>> doesn’t make things better,” said Levenkron. “I’m tired of shouting
>> this all over Israel so I’ve come here [to the United States] to shout
>> about it.”

>> Rozen contends that a one-year work permit in specified fields such as
>> home health care or child care, before their return home, would put the
>> former prostitutes in a stronger position to take care of themselves.

>> Gruesome albeit unsubstantiated stories abound, she says, about revenge
>> attacks on returning women and their families by the original
>> trafficker in the home country.

>> A nest egg from a year’s legitimate work, Rozen suggests, would allow
>> victims to re-establish themselves in a new community and stay out of
>> the clutches of traffickers in the future.

>> Meanwhile, Levenkron is seeking professional back-up in her job
>> representing the victims of trafficking.

>> “I am the [hotline] legal department,” laments Levenkron. “We need
>> lawyers and we need public awareness.”

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:57 EST 2007
Article: 64899 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us alt.politics.europe:64288 soc.culture.austria:53741 soc.culture.german:374456 soc.culture.swiss:64899 soc.culture.polish:779919 soc.culture.russian:458417
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: KenKnoll
Newsgroups: alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.austria,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,de.soc.polityk.misc,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: Ja,HOLOHOAX Ist Bestimmt ZYD SCHWINDEL! – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 118
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 14:20:36 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178461236 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 06 May 2007 08:20:36 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 08:20:36 MDT

On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:37:16 -0700, Frank Arthur wrote:

NOTE: Do not print this out if you reside in Austria;
Belgium; France; Germany; Israel; Spain or Switzerland.

WARNING To People in Austria; Belgium; France; Germany;
Israel; Spain and Switzerland. You can be fined,
imprisoned or both for discussing the topics set
forth in this article.

From: hoaxbuster
Newsgroups: de.soc.politik.misc
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 04:28:15 -0700

Die Holocaust Geschichte ist ein Schwindel weil niemand
vergasst wurde. Von den angeblichen ermordeten 6 millionen
Juden, mehr als zwei millionen wurden angeblich mit
Dieselauspuff umgebracht- -dass ist technisch absurd.

Zur gleichen Zeit hatte man ungefaehr 500,000 Holzgas-lastwagen
auf den Strassen. Holzgas is Giftgas mit mehr as 20%
Kohlenmonoxid–bis auf 35%–und ist sehr toedlich. Es waere
ideal gewesen fuer Massenmord. Aber dieser Mittel wurde
angeblich nie benutzt fuer Mord–nur viele Todesfaelle durch
Unglueck. Diesel Auspuff enthaelt weniger als 0.4% und dass
nur mit hoher Belasting am Diesel–im Leerlauf enthaelt Diesel
Auspuff weniger als 0.1% CO und 18% Sauerstoff.

Um eine schwere Belastung zu erreichen muss mann etwas
ankuppeln zum Diesel–ein grosses Geblaese, oder eine schwere
Pumpe, oder ein Generator, oder etwas. Nur in “Neutral” oder
Leerlauf oder schneller Leerlauf, oder mit nur eine kleine
Belastung waere eine Vegasung in eine halbe Stunde mit
Dieselauspuff voellig unmoeglich.

Kurz gesagt: Obwohl Dieselauspuff ideal zum foltern waere,
es ist Absurd fuer Massenmord–und so ist die Holocaust
Geschichte auch!!

Noch zum Thema in grossen: es gibt heute zwischen eine
halben Million und eine Million juedische Holocaustueberlebende
und das fuenfzig Jahre nach dem Krieg. Die wollen alle natuerlich
viel Geld und ihre Haend kann mann heute gut zaehlen: 300,000
in Israel, 500,000 in Amerika usw. Wem hat Hitler angeblich
umgebracht wenn es so viele Ueberlebende gibt?

FPBerg

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
against them — except force.” — John Bryant

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
–John Bryant

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Ken McVay invites callers to his homosexuals escorts office:
1-250-616-9431
Or, VISIT at:
#5 – 1601 – Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada, or my home at:
Apt. 3108 – 995 Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada

Also,be sure to include me on maillists:
Keith Spencer,5005 Whitemud Road,Edmonton,AB,Canada T6H5L2
I welcome phone calls, late nights:(780)437-1787 or
send lots of emails to: [email protected], or phone to work:(780)492-0473

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the website for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Or, other useful websites include:
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natvan.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

They also are involved in exposing Ken McVay for the crook he is,
and passing on information to the appropriate criminal prosecutors.

As a service to the public, this article is posted worldwide by a
victim of the molester pervert Ken McVay, with the assistance
of a group interested in detailing the depredations of the ZHIDS.
May Ken McVay rot in hell.

In the USA there is Freedom of Speech, guaranteed by the Constitution.
Unlike some countries in Europe, under the ZHID control!!

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:57 EST 2007
Article: 64902 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.usa:1996863 soc.culture.polish:779992 soc.culture.europe:582263 soc.culture.ukrainian:132615 soc.culture.swiss:64902 soc.culture.german:374461
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-14!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matthew Kern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.german
Subject: ZYD Rabbi Gives babies Herpes!!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 36
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 20:35:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178483711 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 06 May 2007 14:35:11 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 14:35:11 MDT

On 9 Sep 2006 03:12:09 -0700, in de.soc.politik.misc “news”
wrote:

An incredible, shocking and horrific report is coming out of New York
City concerning male baby fellatio, genital mutilation and the
infection with “herpes” of three infants by a Jewish Rabbi. City of New
York health officials are investigating the death of a baby boy who was
one of three infants infected with Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 that
exists predominantly in the mouths of homosexuals.

The practice called “metzitzah b’peh” by Jews is routinely practiced
on Jewish baby boys and may explain their sexual dysfunctions later in
adult life. Many adult male Jews are “mother fixated” and exhibit a
preponderance of homosexual and feminine characteristics. They are
being “shocked” out of their masculinity as infants by the ancient and
bizarre practices of Jewish Rabbis. It is not yet known what percentage
of Jewish males go through the horror.

The case was made public after the New York Health Department filed a
complaint in the Manhattan Supreme Court against the Rabbi Yitzhok
Fischer. The rabbi had performed “metzitzah b’peh” on twin baby boys
last October. A few days later one died of herpes and the other tested
positive for the virus. The health department later found a third baby
with the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 that the rabbi had “sucked his
penis”.

This incredible but true report is now casting doubts on the “medical”
practice of circumcision which is unnecessary, Jewish inspired, and
amounts to nothing less than “male genital mutilation.” There are now a
vast number of medical studies that prove that males grow up healthier
and perform better sexually when their penises are left intact. The
“circumcising” of Gentile baby boys is essentially “Judaizing” them for
life.

http://www.aztlan.net/metzitzah_b_peh.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:58 EST 2007
Article: 64903 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:582264 soc.culture.russian:458444 soc.culture.polish:779993 alt.politics.europe:64295 uk.politics.misc:1897462 soc.culture.swiss:64903
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-14!supernews.com!216.151.153.6.MISMATCH!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com!news.astraweb.com!router2.astraweb.com!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matthew Kern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.polish,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Solzhenitsyn Exposes ZYD Crimes In Russia!! Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 108
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 20:35:16 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178483716 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 06 May 2007 14:35:16 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 14:35:16 MDT

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:23:48 -0400, in soc.culture.canada “serwad”
wrote:

Solzhenitsyn breaks last taboo of the revolution

Nobel laureate under fire for new book on the role of Jews in Soviet-era
repression

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who first exposed the horrors of the Stalinist
gulag, is now attempting to tackle one of the most sensitive topics of his
writing career – the role of the Jews in the Bolshevik revolution and Soviet
purges.
In his latest book Solzhenitsyn, 84, deals with one of the last taboos of
the communist revolution: that Jews were as much perpetrators of the
repression as its victims. Two Hundred Years Together – a reference to the
1772 partial annexation of Poland and Russia which greatly increased the
Russian Jewish population – contains three chapters discussing the Jewish
role in the revolutionary genocide and secret police purges of Soviet
Russia.

But Jewish leaders and some historians have reacted furiously to the book,
and questioned Solzhenitsyn’s motives in writing it, accusing him of factual
inaccuracies and of fanning the flames of anti-semitism in Russia.
Solzhenitsyn argues that some Jewish satire of the revolutionary period
“consciously or unconsciously descends on the Russians” as being behind the
genocide. But he states that all the nation’s ethnic groups must share the
blame, and that people shy away from speaking the truth about the Jewish
experience.

In one remark which infuriated Russian Jews, he wrote: “If I would care to
generalise, and to say that the life of the Jews in the camps was especially
hard, I could, and would not face reproach for an unjust national
generalisation. But in the camps where I was kept, it was different. The
Jews whose experience I saw – their life was softer than that of others.”

Yet he added: “But it is impossible to find the answer to the eternal
question: who is to be blamed, who led us to our death? To explain the
actions of the Kiev cheka [secret police] only by the fact that two thirds
were Jews, is certainly incorrect.”

Solzhenitsyn, awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970, spent much of
his life in Soviet prison camps, enduring persecution when he wrote about
his experiences. He is currently in frail health, but in an interview given
last month he said that Russia must come to terms with the Stalinist and
revolutionary genocides – and that its Jewish population should be as
offended at their own role in the purges as they are at the Soviet power
that also persecuted them.

“My book was directed to empathise with the thoughts, feelings and the
psychology of the Jews – their spiritual component,” he said. “I have never
made general conclusions about a people. I will always differentiate between
layers of Jews. One layer rushed headfirst to the revolution. Another, to
the contrary, was trying to stand back. The Jewish subject for a long time
was considered prohibited. Zhabotinsky [a Jewish writer] once said that the
best service our Russian friends give to us is never to speak aloud about
us.”

But Solzhenitsyn’s book has caused controversy in Russia, where one Jewish
leader said it was “not of any merit”.

“This is a mistake, but even geniuses make mistakes,” said Yevgeny
Satanovsky, president of the Russian Jewish Congress. “Richard Wagner did
not like the Jews, but was a great composer. Dostoyevsky was a great Russian
writer, but had a very sceptical attitude towards the Jews.

“This is not a book about how the Jews and Russians lived together for 200
years, but one about how they lived apart after finding themselves on the
same territory. This book is a weak one professionally. Factually, it is so
bad as to be beyond criticism. As literature, it is not of any merit.”

But DM Thomas, one of Solzhenitsyn’s biographers, said that he did not think
the book was fuelled by anti-semitism. “I would not doubt his sincerity. He
says that he firmly supports the state of Israel. In his fiction and factual
writing there are Jewish characters that he writes about who are bright,
decent, anti-Stalinist people.”

Professor Robert Service of Oxford University, an expert on 20th century
Russian history, said that from what he had read about the book,
Solzhenitsyn was “absolutely right”.

Researching a book on Lenin, Prof Service came across details of how
Trotsky, who was of Jewish origin, asked the politburo in 1919 to ensure
that Jews were enrolled in the Red army. Trotsky said that Jews were
disproportionately represented in the Soviet civil bureaucracy, including
the cheka.

“Trotsky’s idea was that the spread of anti-semitism was [partly down to]
objections about their entrance into the civil service. There is something
in this; that they were not just passive spectators of the revolution. They
were part-victims and part-perpetrators.

“It is not a question that anyone can write about without a huge amount of
bravery, and [it] needs doing in Russia because the Jews are quite often
written about by fanatics. Mr Solzhenitsyn’s book seems much more measured
than that.”

Yet others failed to see the need for Solzhenitsyn’s pursuit of this
particular subject at present. Vassili Berezhkov, a retired KGB colonel and
historian of the secret services and the NKVD (the precursor of the KGB),
said: “The question of ethnicity did not have any importance either in the
revolution or the story of the NKVD. This was a social revolution and those
who served in the NKVD and cheka were serving ideas of social change.

“If Solzhenitsyn writes that there were many Jews in the NKVD, it will
increase the passions of anti-semitism, which has deep roots in Russian
history. I think it is better not to discuss such a question now.”

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:58 EST 2007
Article: 64904 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.russian:458445 soc.culture.austria:53743 uk.politics.misc:1897463 soc.culture.swiss:64904 soc.culture.german:374462 de.soc.politik.misc:867226
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-14!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matthew Kern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.austria,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.german,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: Re: “Six Million” Untrue According to Neutral Swiss
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 48
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 20:35:28 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178483728 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 06 May 2007 14:35:28 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 14:35:28 MDT

On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:34:58 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>From: “Salah Jafar” >Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:04:07 GMT

> “Six Million” Untrue According to Neutral Swiss
> It is clear, therefore, that the Germans could not possibly have gained
>control over or exterminated anything like six million Jews.
>Excluding the Soviet Union, the number of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe after
>emigration was scarcely more than 3 million, by no means
>all of whom were interned. To approach the extermination of even half of six
>million would have meant the liquidation of every Jew living
>in Europe.

> Nothing better illustrates the declining plausibility of the Six Million
>legend than the fact that the prosecution at the Eichmann trial
>deliberately avoided mentioning the figure. Moreover, official Jewish
>estimates of the casualties are being quietly revised downwards. Our
>analysis of the population and emigration statistics, as well as the studies
>by the Swiss “Baseler Nachrichten” and Professor Rassinier,
>demonstrate that it would have been simply impossible for the number of Jewish
>casualties to have exceeded a limit of one and a half million.

> Doubtless, several thousand Jewish people did die in the course of the Second
>World War, but this must be seen in the context of a war
>that cost many millions of innocent victims on all sides. To put the matter in
>perspective, for example, we may point out that 700,000 Russian
>civilians died during the siege of Leningrad, and a total of 2,050,000 German
>civilians were killed in Allied air raids and forced repatriation
>after (Operation Keelhaul) after the war.

> The question most pertinent to the extermination legend is, of course: Ho
>many of the 3 million European Jews, under German control,
>survived after 1945? The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee estimated the
>number of survivors in Europe to be only one and half million,
>but such a figure is now totally unacceptable. This is proven by the growing
>number of Jews calming compensation from the West German
>Government for having allegedly suffered between 1939 and 1945. By 1965, the
>number of these claimants registered with the West German
>Government had tripled in ten years and reached 3,375,000. (Aufbau, June 30th,
>1965)

> Nothing could be a more devastating proof of the brazen fantasy of the Six
>Million. Most of these claimants are Jews, so there can be
>no doubt that the majority of the 3 million Jews who experienced the Nazi
>occupation of Europe are, in fact, very much alive. It is a
>resounding confirmation of the fact that Jewish casualties during the Second
>World War can only be estimated at a figure in thousands

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:58 EST 2007
Article: 64905 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:582265 soc.culture.german:374463 soc.culture.swiss:64905 can.general:371204 soc.culture.canada:574517
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matthew Kern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,can.general,soc.culture.canada
Subject: Re: Remembrance Day for All-Why HOLOHOAX DAY FOR ZYDS? Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 249
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 20:36:55 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178483815 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 06 May 2007 14:36:55 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 14:36:55 MDT

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:07:37 -0700, Frank Arthur wrote:

>Remembrance Day for All-Why HOLOHOAX DAY FOR ZYDS?

It seems that with all the scandals involving the crooked CONS,
they DID forgot to schedule a national HOLOHOAX Day for the ZYDS
April 19 or 20 this year!!

Mind you rabbi Harper is going to give the ZYD HOLOHOAX Museum in
Winterpeg, run by the Aspers, $9 MILLION a year of YOUR money,
just so he can stay in power with the ZYDS!!

>On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:52:57 -0700, Felix Dzerzhinsky
>
>wrote:

>Header asks a very relevant question, especially now that there are at
>least 52 well-documented cases of ZHID COLLABORATION WITH NAZIS,
>not forgetting the notorious KASTNER & RUMKOWSKI CASES!!

>Now even the notorious Simon WIESENTHAL is exposed as a Nazi GESTAPO
>COLLABORATOR!!

>Why a special day, paid by taxpayers, just for the Christkiller ZHIDS?

>>On 1 Feb 2005 03:38:19 -0000, Hans Wapnigg wrote:
>>>From: Nemo
>>>Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.british,aus.politics
>>>Subject: Holocaust Memorial Day Should Include Victims Of All Holocausts Of 20th Century–Not Just Jews
>>>Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 05:42:23 MST (pd7tw1no)

>>>This day of commiseration should not be limited only to the victims of
>>>the Jewish Holocaust perpetrated by European socialists (Nazis and
>>>Commies) and their sympathizers during World War II.

>>>It should be in sympathy for the tens of millions of victims of
>>>Lenin and Stalin in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe.
>>>For example,the massacre of the Kulaks in Ukraine and Russia.
>>>The massacre of Polish officers at Katyn by Stalin’s Soviet troops
>>>which the Commies tried to blame this on their socialist cousins, Hitler’s Nazis.

>>>The 1 million Armenians massacred by the Turks is also a holocaust that
>>>should be commemorated.

>>>Then there is the tens of millions of Chinese
>>>murdered by Mao in his “Great Leap Forward” and “Cultural Revolution”.

>>>The genocides by Pol Pot in Cambodia and Mengistu in Ethiopia should
>>>also be remembered. And let us not forget the horrible genocide in
>>>Ruwanda in the the 1990s in which over 900,000 perished.

>>>The fact is that during the 20th century more than 100 million people
>>>were murdered by socialists (Commies, Nazis). The six million Jews allegedly
>>>killed by the Nazis and Communists during WW II are only a fraction
>>>(less than 10%) of the total number of victims of the bloodiest century
>>>in world history.

>>>Notice that disgusting dying AIDS-spreader pervert Ken McVay, refuses to
>>>discuss the SUBJECT of the article, because his JEW masters do not
>>>want all the sheeple in Canada to start to THINK!!

>>>None of the other groups of victims in Canada,or in Europe have received the
>>>same treatment, just the cursed JEWS!!

>>>The Acadians of Canada did not get similar treatment from the Jew-controlled
>>>government.

>>>All the aboriginals murdered by the whites in Canada and USA, and Australia,
>>>get no such treatment.

>>>All the Ukrainians kept in concentration camps IN CANADA got no such
>>>recognition, let alone all the many millions killed by the JEW-controlled Soviets!!

>>>There are many groups of people in Canada, and Australia, New Zealand, and
>>>Europe, who are fed up with the special treatment given to those they blame for
>>> having CHRIST killed!!

>>>[email protected] (LisaMcVay) wrote in message
>>>news:<[email protected]>…
>>>> How can it be hateful, to complain legitimately about the preferential
>>>> treatment given one disgusting group of creatures?

>>>> For 2000 years people worldwide have had to suffer at the hands of
>>>> those who had Christ murdered, because He exposed their scandalous
>>>> conduct in the Jew temples.

>>>> Now, Canadians must continue paying for a special holiday, just to
>>>> commemmorate the HOLOHOAX!!

>>>> No consideration is given to the more than 100 MILLIONS KILLED BY ZHID
>>>> COMMUNISM!!

>>>Now that normal people have celebrated the real Remembrance Day,
>>>supposedly covering ALL victims of all wars, we can now wonder why
>>>should there be another costly day, just for the cursed ZHIDS!!

>>>Why should Canadians have to pay each year, and celebrate
>>>HOLOHOAX Day, just for the nuisance ZHIDS? Is it true that
>>>the filthy ZHIDS, like the BRONFMANs, control Canada?

>>>Why should Canadian businesses have to pay for another
>>>worthless statutory holiday, and pay staff for NOT WORKING,
>>>just to satisfy some ZHIDS?

>>>We already have Remembrance Day, supposedly to remember ALL
>>>who died in ALL WARS.

>>>We do not celebrate the HOLOCAUST of the Armenians by the Turks.
>>>We do not celebrate the NANKING massacre of the Chinese by Japan.
>>>We do not celebrate the genocide of German POWs in concentration
>>>camps by the Allies in 1945-6, detailed well in Baque’s book “Other Losses”.

>>>Canada doesn’t even celebrate the Ukrainian HOLOCAUST/FAMINE murders
>>>of the tens of millions in the 1930’s.
>>>Canada does not celebrate the 100 millions killed by the ZHID Soviets before
>>>and during WW2.
>>>Canada does not celebrate the tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians
>>>murdered by the Israeli occupation forces.Have you forgotten Sabra and Shatilla?

>>>Canada doesn’t celebrate the tens of thousands of natives it killed, so why the
>>>ZHIDS?
>>>Australia does not celebrate all the abos killed since the British occupied
>>>Australia.

>>>So why should we have a ZHID DAY?!!
>>>Is it true that the BRONFMAN ZHIDS – who cheated the Canadian Tax Department
>>>of unpaid $1,500 MILLIONS in taxes – do control the Canadian Government?
>>>The gutless politicians who approved this discrimination should be exterminated!!

>>>Complain to your MPs, and let them know, you are fed up with ZHID control of
>>>Canada, Australia,or wherever you live!!

>>>Why should sovereign countries in Europe have to kowtow to the disgusting
>>>Christkiller ZHIDS,and have a special day, just for them, when they have no
>>>such special day for those of their own people who were killed by, or because of the ZHIDS?

>If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
>then visit www.freedomsite.org

>Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

>”At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
>is a revolutionary act.”
>(George Orwell)

>David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

>”All truth passes through three stages.
>First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
>and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
>(Arthur Schopenhauer)

>”The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
>but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
>falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
>they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
>against them — except force.” — John Bryant
>
>”To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
>acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
>and impossible to ignore.”
>–John Bryant

>Ken McVay invites callers,and visitors,to his homosexuals escorts
>office: VISIT at:
>#5 – 1601 – Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada, or my home at:
>Apt. 3108 – 995 Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada
>or call: 1-250-616-9431

>As everyone can see McVay takes it as a compliment when he is
>called a “confessed child-molester” and the additional material
>should give an indication as to the why.

>”I am weary of seeing the issue of “child porn” blown out of
>proportion (I’ve been on and around the Net since 1988, and have
>yet to come across anything I’d consider “child porn.” I’ve
>seen photos of naked children, but then I’ve got some of those in
>my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or any great
>moral danger to our society).” – Nizkor Director Ken McVay
>http://www.spectacle.org/695/mcvay.html [Many paedophiles
>also have family albums with naked children photos in them.]

>Look at Ken McVay’s photo and ask yourselves; “Does he not look like
>a disheveled unkempt pervert or someone who would molest your child
>even if he or she were not naked”?
>http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg

>For detailed and documented evidence of McVay’s questionable
>background and details of convictions, please refer to Dr.David
>Michael’s detailed expose on McVay. McVay is a distraught paranoid molseter, and
>is known for claiming that anyone who refutes his lies must be a
>grosvenor!!
>It is also suspected that McVay fabricates responses using aliases,
>just to justify his existence to his ZHID masters.

>Since I am a female, I also like to receive many calls, to discuss
>NAMBLA,lesbianism, JEW atrocities and similar.
>Email me, Shiksa Susan Cohen at: [email protected], especially late
>nights.

>Also,be sure to include me on maillists:
>Keith Spencer,5005 Whitemud Road,Edmonton,AB,Canada T6H5L2
>I welcome phone calls, late nights:(780)437-1787 or
>send lots of emails to me.

>For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
>JEW-WATCH:
>http://www.jewwatch.com

>Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
>NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
>people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!
>Even the notorious Simon WIESENTHAL is exposed as a nazi GESTAPO
>COLLABORATOR!

>Or, other useful websites include:
>ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
>IHR – www.ihr.org
>OSTARA – www.ostara.org
>PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
>Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
>AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
>THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
> Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
> Subscribe: [email protected]

>Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
>They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

>They also are involved in exposing Ken McVay for the crook he is,
>and passing on information to the appropriate criminal prosecutors.

>As a service to the public, this article is posted worldwide by a
>victim of the molester pervert Ken McVay, with the assistance
>of a group interested in detailing the depredations of the ZHIDS.
>May Ken McVay and his like,rot in gehenna.

>Reply-To: Frank Arthur ,
>or to [email protected], or [email protected]
>Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the
>like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:59 EST 2007
Article: 64906 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.german:374464 alt.politics.europe:64296 soc.culture.europe:582266 soc.culture.swiss:64906 soc.culture.palestine:564303 uk.politics.misc:1897465
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matthew Kern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.palestine,uk.politics.misc
Subject: German Book Accused ZYD MOSSAD Of Inciting Violence In Europe – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 64
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 20:37:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178483831 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 06 May 2007 14:37:11 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 14:37:11 MDT

On 30 Oct 2006 07:01:42 -0800, in can.politics “[email protected]
wrote:

A new book in Germany is casting light on Israel’s covert program to
provoke violence among Muslims in Western Europe and engage in “false
flag” operations in order for Western governments to blame Muslim
radicals.

The book, Der Krieg im Dunkeln (War in the Dark) by Udo Ulfkotte,
formerly a correspondent for the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,
provides details of the operations of two Israeli intelligence units —
the Metsada, which specializes in sabotage, including “false flag”
terrorist attacks and assassinations; and LAP (Lohamah Psichlogit),
which engages in psychological warfare.

Ulfkotte’s previous book on Islamist extremism, titled The War In Our
Cities, was withdrawn from the German market because of “massive legal
pressures by Islamic plaintiffs.” Ulfkotte claims that British and
German intelligence agents encountered Metsada and LAP agents in France
stirring up violence during the November 2005 riots, blamed on Islamic
extremists.

WMR has also reported that Interior Minister and presidential candidate
Nicolas Sarkozy, who is supported by pro-Israeli factions in France,
coordinated and continues to coordinate the paying of agents
provocateurs to engage in violence in the predominantly Muslim Banlieus
of Paris and other cities.

The November 2005 riots spread from Paris to Rouen, Lille, Nice, Dijon,
Strasbourg, Marseilles (where Mossad’s Brach C, also responsible for
Paris and London, maintains a large station), Bordeaux, Rennes, Pau,
Orleans, Toulouse, Lyon, Roubaix, Avignon, Saint-Dizier, Drancy,
Evreux, Nantes, Dunkirk, Montpellier, Valenciennes, Cannes, and
Tourcoing.

Ulfkotte also quotes a British MI-6 source who reported that Israel’s
goal is to portray Muslims as unpredictable threats who cannot be
integrated into Western society.

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_international&Number=295010237#Post295010237

http://judicial-inc.biz/w.ar_in_the_dark.htm

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH NAZIS –
another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:16:59 EST 2007
Article: 64907 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:582267 soc.culture.polish:779994 soc.culture.ukrainian:132616 soc.culture.swiss:64907 alt.politics.europe:64297 uk.politics.misc:1897466
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matthew Kern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.swiss,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc
Subject: HOLOHOAX IS HOLO-BS – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 652
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 20:37:19 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178483839 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 06 May 2007 14:37:19 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 14:37:19 MDT

On 2 Nov 2006 08:10:23 -0800, in soc.culture.australian “Venceremos”
wrote:

Holocaust is Nothing But A HoloHoax

Every day, in every aspect of the media, you will be reminded of the
holocaust of World War II and the damage it did to one group of people.
You are supposed to feel guilty and excuse away anything these people,
who are portrayed as the only victims, now do to society. You are not
to mention others, such as the Poles, Russians and Gypsies who suffered
equally if not more, for that would detract from the lie with which the
rest of humanity is being burdened. Sure, terribly evil things happen
in war, but it is even more terrible to allow lies to be embellished
and used to promote guilt, misunderstanding, blackmail and more evil.
Sooner or later, there will be a worldwide confrontation arising from
this deceit, and the liars will come off second best. It is for this
reason I have reproduced a section of one of our books here:

Alan Dershowitz believes that all American Jews should think of
themselves as victims of the Holocaust; his rationale is that they were
ultimately targets of the Holocaust. But, the Holocaust is even bigger
than that to the Zionists; they want everyone to believe that all wrong
is done to the Jews, and no wrong is done by the Jews. And, there is a
reason for this.

Robert Faurisson observes,

“Elie Wiesel won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. He is generally
accepted as a witness to the Jewish ‘Holocaust,’ and, more
specifically, as a witness to the legendary Nazi extermination gas
chambers….”

But in what respect is Elie Wiesel a witness to the alleged gas
chambers? By what right does he ask us to believe in that means of
extermination? In an autobiographical book that supposedly describes
his experiences at Auschwitz and Buchenwald, he nowhere mentions the
gas chambers. He does indeed say that the Germans executed Jews,
but…by fire; by throwing them alive into flaming ditches, before the
very eyes of the deportees! No less than that! Here Wiesel the false
witness had some bad luck.

Forced to choose from among several Allied war propaganda lies, he
chose to defend the fire lie instead of the boiling water, gassing, or
electrocution lies. In 1956, when he published his testimony in
Yiddish, the fire lie was still alive in certain circles. This lie is
the origin of the term Holocaust. Today there is no longer a single
historian who believes that Jews were burned alive. The myths of the
boiling water and of electrocution have also disappeared. Only the gas
remains.

* The gassing lie was spread by the Americans.

* The lie that Jews were killed by boiling water or steam (specifically
at Treblinka) was spread by the Poles.

* The electrocution lie was spread by the Soviets.”

Yes, these are all Holocaust lies.

“The fire lie is of undetermined origin. It is in a sense as old as war
propaganda or hate propaganda, just like the false assertion of human
(Jewish) skin being used to make lamp shades. In his memoir, Night,
which is a version of his earlier Yiddish testimony, Wiesel reports
that at Auschwitz there was one flaming ditch for the adults and
another one for babies. He writes: ‘Not far from us, flames were
leaping from a ditch, gigantic flames. They were burning something. A
lorry drew up at the pit and delivered its load – little children.
Babies! Yes, I saw it – saw it with my own eyes…those children in
the flames.'”

None of this ever happened. And, yet, such lies have earned Wiesel the
Nobel Peace Prize, and made it “anti-Semitic” and even illegal to
simply tell the truth about the Holocaust.

Why have lies superseded truth? And, more specifically, who benefits
>from the lie? As we have observed, every lie in the evil
Zionist-controlled system is designed to exploit; every lie keeps
Yahweh’s system of evil securely in place. In this world, everything of
value is offered up to Yahweh by the Zionists, as a “burnt offering.”

“Holocaust” means burnt offering; it is the perpetuation of the
illusion and the elevation of the lie to the level of supreme truth,
religiously.

The fact is, the Holocaust is about money, legitimacy for Israel, and
the total denial of any moral failings (or evilness) in the Jewish
people. Jews are outraged when it is mentioned that many gypsies and
Russians suffered the same fate as Jews, because to compare a
sub-human to a Jew is unspeakable. The Jewish scripture declares that
the life of a Jew is the most priceless thing to “god” and the life of
a non-Jew or “goy” is worthless. The Jews have a history of crying
“holocaust.”

The Talmud cites examples of many billions of Jews being killed
(including children being burned). Needless to say, there have never
been that many Jews on the face of the earth. The same falsification
and embellishment is true with regard to the “holocaust” of World War
II. Many Jews died, but not the six million that is claimed. Perhaps a
million died, none from gas chambers. Red Cross documentation which
Jewish controllers refuse to release, is suspected of suggesting that
some 100,000 were lost.

As historian David Irving and many others have rightly observed, there
never were gas chambers at the concentration camps. And, it would have
been impossible for the Germans to have gassed and then burned 12,000
Jews every day. Reports by concentration camp survivors that tell of
the guards going into “gas chambers” as soon as one batch of Jews had
been killed, clearing out the bodies, and then filling the room again
are patently false – the guards (none of whom was reported to have
worn a mask) would have instantly died, since cyanide does not
dissipate or disappear in a few minutes.

Also, there would have been bones and ashes to show, with cyanide
residue. None of this is found. Even the Auschwitz Memorial which once
stated that six million Jews had died now states that perhaps a million
died. The plaque has been altered from six to one million. That being
said, even a million dead people is a lot.

The degree of suffering they experienced, and the treatment they
received from hateful, evil Nazis was a fact. Yet, that does not excuse
all of the evils and wrongs committed by the victors, who fire-bombed
civilian populations in Germany and Japan, and dropped atomic bombs on
cities in Japan, before ending the war. The intentional massacring of
millions of civilians by the Allied victors was certainly a war crime,
and perhaps of larger impact than what happened to the Jews.

War is a terrible thing, and though it is an unwritten and unspoken
policy, civilian populations are targeted and slaughtered in the worst
way, to weaken the morale of the opposition. War is not just fought by
soldier against soldier, with some kind of boundary against civilians.

Yet, it is always the victors who write the history; they are always in
the right, and the losers are always in the wrong. War is not black and
white, truth is its first casualty, and what is written in history and
in the news has little correlation with the truth.

Jewish bankers funded the Nazis, and the Zionists fiercely pressured
Western nations to keep Jews from being able to leave Germany before
the war began. For perverse political and economic reasons, the
Zionists did not want the Jews to go to free nations, but rather had
the single-minded objective of claiming Palestine as the Jewish
state. Because they could not force the creation of Israel before the
war, they readily sacrificed the lives of their “lesser brethren” for
the “greater cause”: Israel.

There are many people who hold that all major wars in the last few
centuries have been instigated by, funded by, and profited by, the
Zionist international bankers.

* First, they instigate wars.

* Then, during the war, they loan huge sums of money, and make enormous
profits in their military-industrial production.

* After the war, they buy up property and industry at pennies on the
dollar in the loser nations.

This policy of economic conquest is not only a factor in war; it is how
the everyday economy operates, worldwide, today.

* The Zionists control the economies, governments, and
agreements/conflicts between major nations.

* They control the daily economy, inflation, and deflation.

* They engaged in economic war in creating the Great Depression in the
US, in which they obtained vast amounts of property and business by
foreclosing on mortgages and debt.

* And, they have plundered the resources of Third World nations, via
the issuance of debt (loans) which cannot be paid back due to usurious
interest rates.

We need to understand that nothing in this world “just happens,”
especially not global events. Everything has a reason and a purpose
behind it. There are forces that control all that happens in this
world, and there is an unseen “shadow government.” It uses the masses
or “sheep” as cannon fodder during war, and to gain sympathy and
financial aid.

We are told that we cannot forget the Holocaust, though we dismiss all
other genocide that has occurred to all other racial groups throughout
history. Why is that?

* Why is there no public relations action to memorialize the millions
of Whites who were slaughtered in the slave business;

* Wy is there no mention of the millions of Cambodians – nearly half
their population – who were slaughtered by Pol Pot; or the twenty
million Russians killed in World War II?

* Why is it that what happens to these other groups doesn’t seem to
matter? For the answer, we need to only look to Jewish propaganda and
scriptural dogma: the life of a Jew matters, only a Jew is a human
being; the non-Jews do not matter, their lives are worthless. The
media are controlled by the Zionists, and because most of them are
Jewish they are greatly invested in the story of the Jews. They readily
promote fiction over fact, the lie over the truth in all other areas,
so why not in this area – in which they have such strong emotional
and financial interest?

Contradicting the Holocaust lies is illegal in some countries (called
an act of racial hatred and vilification, defaming the dead, and
anti-Semitism). The media quickly label any less than glorifying
truth about the Jews as anti-Semitism. And, this, more than anything,
has given the evil Zionists the greatest cover and freedom from public
scrutiny.

They are able to go about their agenda of world domination and control
with immunity from media attention. If you doubt this, just check to
see the last time the Rothschilds and Rockefellers headed the Forbes
list of richest people in the world. Rather than holding down the top
spots due to their enormous and cunningly concealed wealth, they are
not even on the list.

The media refuse to acknowledge the power, wealth, authority, and
control that the Zionists truly have in this world, because if they
did, then some attention would be directed their way when people
discuss what is wrong with this world – and why. They have set things
up, and controlled things so well, that they never receive this bad
publicity. Instead, they portray themselves as philanthropists and
benefactors of all mankind – whom they think of as animals, and
gladly sacrifice as “burnt offerings” to their blood-thirsty and evil
“god” Yahweh (Jehovah).

The Nazis allowed a ship full of Jews to leave Germany, to see if
another country would be willing to accept Jewish refugees. But, every
country, including the United States, refused to let the passengers
disembark. Because of this worldwide Zionist policy of refusing to
accept Jews anywhere – because of their desire to claim Israel as the
homeland of the Jews – many Jews were sacrificed for the political
Zionist cause. The shipload of Jews was forced to return, sacrificed as
another burnt offering to the greater glory of Yahweh.

H.G. Wells noted,

“Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews
have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen
people.”

The Zionist leaders of the Jewish community have repeatedly,
historically, ensured the suffering of their lesser brethren. It is
they who have sacrificed the good and innocent among the Jews,
willingly, consciously, methodically, so that they could implement
their own, self-serving, evil agenda. (Holocaust Fact and Fiction
Presented by: Annwn Publications P O Box 28 Malanda, QLD, Australia,
4885)

If you want proof that I am right, just watch the jews have a fit about
these posts; because if the lies that they have fostered about the
HoloHoax were true then they would finance any and all reputable
scientists to examine all records and evidence; they would have
absolutely no problem with anyone examining the evidence. But because
it is a lie and a Hoax they deny anyone, if they can, who tries to do
research on the subject. Therefore, by their own denials they prove
that it was a Hoax.

There have been many terrible “Holocausts.” The worst I know of is the
50 million plus Russians murdered by the Communists who ruled Russia
(the Soviet Union).

Forty years previously (to 1917 Bolshevik Revolution) Dostoevsky had
predicted that Socialism would cost Russia one hundred million victims.
At the time it seemed an improbable figure. Let me recommend the
British press to acquaint its readers with the impartial three-page
report of the Russian statistician, Professor Ivan Kurganov. It was
published in the West twelve years ago, but, as is so often the case
with matters of social significance, we only take cognizance of things
that do not run counter to our own feelings.

>From Professor Kurganov’s analysis we learn that if Dostoevsky erred,
he erred on the side of understatement. From 1917 to 1959 Socialism
cost the Soviet Union a hundred and ten million lives! (These “lives”
were for the most part Christians.) (A. Solzhenitsyn, “The West’s
Betrayal of Civilization”, p. 5-6, a B.B.C. address, March 26, 1976)

This is a really big time “Holocaust” if numbers make a difference.
Why is it that we never see anything about this “Holocaust” in any
mainstream media, TV or Hollywood movie?

The next biggest “Holocaust” I know about is the one that occurred in
Mao’s Red China. My 1990 “Guinness Book of World Records” states on p.
367 that during the regime of Mao Tse-tung (1949-1965) between
32.25 and 61.7 were “killed by government forces” according to an
estimate by the US Senate Judiciary Committee. I have seen estimates
much larger than this. “Killed by government forces” must leave out
many millions who starved as a direct result of insane Communist
policies such as the “Great Leap Forward’ during which many skilled
farmers were herded into “steel mills” where they “produced” prodigious
amounts of steel by melting tools, impalements, kettles, pots, pans,
etc. into “steel.” The resulting famine due to a great shortage of
farmers caused the deaths of many millions of Chinese people not
“killed by government forces.” So how many people were murdered by the
Communists in the Red Chinese “Holocaust.” No one knows for sure, but
it was many times 6 million. Again, this is never mentioned in the
mainstream media, or wept over in TV programs or Hollywood movies. The
32.25 to 61.7 million (plus many millions more) are forgotten dead.

It is estimated that over 40,000,000 (that’s FORTY MILLION!) unborn
children have been killed by abortion “Doctors” in the US since Roe v.
Wade. (1973) Now that’s a real HOLOCAUST, but not one wept over by TV,
Hollywood, etc. The media only emphasizes a “woman’s right to choose.”

It horrifies me even to contemplate how many more children have been
killed by abortionists in numerous other countries.

At least 9 million German people died from starvation, exposure, etc.
after the Russian armies drove them out of their homes in Germany’s
eastern provinces at the end of World War II.

After the Germans surrendered to the Allies in May of 1945, millions of
German soldiers were rounded up and enclosed in barbed wire camps.
They were called “disarmed enemy forces.” This meant to Eisenhower and
his bosses (Roosevelt, Morgenthau, and Truman (all jews), etc.) and his
men who imprisoned these DEF’s that they did not have to abide by the
Geneva convention since they were not POW’s. I have pictures of
hundreds of thousands of these men in a barbed wire enclosure, standing
room only. Family members of these men would come with food and water
but were driven away by allied soldiers with machine guns. How long can
human beings live in such unsheltered enclosures in mud up to their
knees with no food, water, shelter, etc?

Of course, not long. Between one and two million German men died in
these vast mud pits. Have you ever seen a story about this real
holocaust on TV, Hollywood movies, etc? No. This holocaust is
forgotten!

Many Germans, Eastern Europeans, self-styled “Jews” and Gypsies were
severely mistreated and died in Nazi Germany. Many inmates in the Nazi
work camps died of starvation, typhus, and other diseases. It is very
difficult to transport food when everything that moves is bombed. It is
difficult to provide clean drinking water when all water purification
plants have been bombed with the idea in mind of causing the very
spread of disease that occurred. Did the greedy industrialists
profiting from these work camps want their labor force to die or be
“gassed.” Not if what I have read about their type has any validity.

However, if numbers make any difference to you in regards to the
“Holocaust” that is “never forgiven” and “never forgotten,” and is
repeatedly shown in detail in countless TV shows and Hollywood movies
and mentioned on at least a weekly basis in mainstream newspapers and
magazines please read on.

Six Million Jews: Ministers often repeat the Jew story that “Hitler
killed six million Jews,” yet the 1939 World Almanac shows
15,688,259 Jews in the world, and nine years later the New York Times
reported there were between 15,600,000 and 18,700,000 Jews! If Hitler
killed 6 million, how come there were no less in 1948 than in 1939? The
same sources report the Jews in Germany in 1938, prior to the supposed
killings, totaled only 550,000 (½ million)!

If Germans killed 38% of all the Jews in the world, does that mean the
9,688,259 left had six to nine million children in the next nine years?
It takes normal populations 100 years to double-how come “Jews” did
it in nine? AND THEN NEVER DID IT AGAIN? (the present world population
of “Jews” is about the same as it was in 1948) Why do ministers
repeat this Jewish propaganda lie to their flocks? [An Open Letter to
Any Minister Who Teaches “the Jews Are Israel.” By Pastor Sheldon
Emery, (written after 1976, © date not given)]

Yes, there have been many Holocausts. I do not deny that. I sorrow over
these holocausts more than most people I know. I work to prevent
current and future holocausts knowing that “those who do not remember
the past are condemned to repeat it.”

(Winston Palmer)

More Jewish Lies Exposed!

For more than fifty years, since the end of World War II, the Talmudic,
Zionist Jews have sought to manipulate through Jewish Socialization,
White Western public opinion by crying, “Poor, persecuted Jew,” while
systematically victimizing White Christian culture.

This constitutes a perfect description of the Jewish Socialization or
Jewish Socialism. Both atheistic, Jewish, Socialism and atheistic,
Communist, Socialism are ideas predicated upon the practice of
engineering society along atheistic and Jewish ideas. This has been the
method of operation of the atheistic, Talmudic, Zionist Jew even before
the first century or the time of Christ.

Truth at Last: Israeli history textbooks are now being rewritten,
reports Ethan Bronner in “The New York Times” (August 14, 1999) as
a new generation of historians are replacing myths with facts about the
nation’s founding.

“Schoolchildren have long been taught that Jews have always been
surrounded by enemies and that their victory over five Arab states in
the 1948 War of Independence was a new miracle of David-and-Goliath
proportions.”

The Times reports.

“But…now officially approved textbooks make plain that many of the
most common Israeli beliefs are as much myth as fact. The new books
say, for example, that it was the Israelis who had the military edge in
the War of Independence.”

They admit that Palestinians did not voluntarily leave their land, as
has been taught, but that they were expelled by Israeli soldiers. One
ninth grade text, “Passage To The Past,” mentions the 1948 massacre
carried out by radical Zionist forces in the village of Deir Yassin.
This is from a report of The American Council for Judaism, December 99.
In the Councils publication, “Issues,” is the surprising admission
that “the rise of the Holocaust to the top of the Jewish agenda was
by no means a spontaneous development” but rather the “consequence
of decisions made by communal leaders in response to their appraisals
of current communal needs” meaning the need for support for Israel,
as pointed out further in the article:

The article states,

“Examples of how the Holocaust has been used as a weapon to promote
policies favorable to Israel are extensive.”

Yet to be published by the Council is the fact that the 6 million
figure is a myth, invented in 1945 by Llya Ehrenburg, Stalins Jewish
propaganda chief during World War II. Since then the figures have been
systematically reduced:

(1) May 7, 1945: The Soviet Jewish anti-Fascist Committee announced
that the number gassed at Auschwitz was 4,00,000;

(2) September 1, 1998: Director of Holocaust studies, Yeduha Bauer of
Yad Vashem, Holocaust Center at Jerusalem, set the number of deaths at
Auschwitz at 1,600,000;

(3) 1989: Professor Raul Hilberg, Professor of Holocaust Studies in Tel
Aviv, Israel, lists the Auschwitz total at 1,250,000;

(4) July, 1990: Polish Historians replaced the plaque at Auschwitz with
a new one stating that those who died of all causes and of all
nationalities is 1,100,000; and

(5) In 1991: Mikhail Gorbachev opened the KBG archives and gave
Elizabeth Dole the complete official German register of all deaths,
which totaled 74,000. No gas chamber for the extermination of humans
has ever been found at any camp.

The Jew Eisenhower’s Holocaust!

“God, I hate the Germans…” (Dwight David Eisenhower in a letter to
his wife in September, 1944)

First, I want you to picture something in your mind. You are a German
soldier who survived through the battles of World II. You were not
really politically involved, and your parents were also indifferent to
politics, but suddenly your education was interrupted and you were
drafted into the German army and told where to fight. Now, in the
Spring of 1945, you see that your country has been demolished by the
Allies, your cities lie in ruins, and half of your family has been
killed or is missing. Now, your unit is being surrounded, and it is
finally time to surrender. The fact is, there is no other choice.

It has been a long, cold winter. The German army rations have not been
all that good, but you managed to survive. Spring came late that year,
with weeks of cold rainy weather in demolished Europe. Your boots are
tattered, your uniform is falling apart, and the stress of surrender
and the confusion that lies ahead for you has your guts being torn out.
Now, it is over, you must surrender or be shot. This is war and the
real world.

You are taken as a German Prisoner of War into American hands. The
Americans had 200 such Prisoner of War camps scattered across Germany.
You are marched to a compound surrounded with barbed wire fences as far
as the eye can see. Thousands upon thousands of your fellow German
soldiers are already in this make-shift corral. You see no evidence
of a latrine and after three hours of marching through the mud of the
spring rain, the comfort of a latrine is upper-most in your mind. You
are driven through the heavily guarded gate and find yourself free to
move about, and you begin the futile search for the latrine. Finally,
you ask for directions, and are informed that no such luxury exists.

No more time. You find a place and squat. First you were exhausted,
then hungry, then fearful, and now; dirty. Hundreds more German
prisoners are behind you, pushing you on, jamming you together and
every one of them searching for the latrine as soon as they could do
so. Now, late in the day, there is no space to even squat, much less
sit down to rest your weary legs. None of the prisoners, you quickly
learn, have had any food that day, in fact there was no food while in
the American hands that any surviving prisoner can testify to. No one
has eaten any food for weeks, and they are slowly starving and dying.
But, they can’t do this to us! There are the Geneva Convention rules
for the treatment of Prisoners of War. There must be some mistake! Hope
continues through the night, with no shelter from the cold, biting
rain.

Your uniform is sopping wet, and formerly brave soldiers are weeping
all around you, as buddy after buddy dies from the lack of food, water,
sleep and shelter from the weather. After weeks of this, your own hope
bleeds off into despair, and finally you actually begin to envy those
who, having surrendered first manhood and then dignity, now also
surrender life itself. More hopeless weeks go by. Finally, the last
thing you remember is falling, unable to get up, and lying face down in
the mud mixed with the excrement of those who have gone before.

Your body will be picked up long after it is cold, and taken to a
special tent where your clothing is stripped off. So that you will be
quickly forgotten, and never again identified, your dog-tag is
snipped in half and your body along with those of your fellow soldiers
are covered with chemicals for rapid decomposition and buried. You were
not one of the exceptions, for more than one million seven hundred
thousand German Prisoners of War died from a deliberate policy of
extermination by starvation, exposure, and disease, under direct orders
of the Jewish General Dwight David Eisenhower.

One month before the end of World War 11, General Eisenhower issued
special orders concerning the treatment of German Prisoners and
specific in the language of those orders was this statement,

“Prison enclosures are to provide no shelter or other comforts.”

Eisenhower biographer Stephen Ambrose, who was given access to the
Eisenhower personal letters, states that he proposed to exterminate the
entire German General Staff, thousands of people, after the war.

Eisenhower, in his personal letters, did not merely hate the Nazi
Regime, and the few who imposed its will down from the top, but that HE
HATED THE GERMAN PEOPLE AS A RACE. It was his personal intent to
destroy as many of them as he could, and one way was to wipe out as
many prisoners of war as possible.

Of course, that was illegal under International law, so he issued an
order on March 10, 1945 and verified by his initials on a cable of that
date, that German Prisoners of War be predesignated as “Disarmed Enemy
Forces” called in these reports as DEF. He ordered that these Germans
did not fall under the Geneva Rules, and were not to be fed or given
any water or medical attention. The Swiss Red Cross was not to inspect
the camps, for under the DEF classification, they had no such authority
or jurisdiction.

Months after the war was officially over, Eisenhower’s special German
DEF camps were still in operation forcing the men into confinement, but
denying that they were prisoners. As soon as the war was over, General
George Patton simply turned his prisoners loose to fend for themselves
and find their way home as best they could. Eisenhower was furious, and
issued a specific order to Patton, to turn these men over to the DEF
camps. Knowing Patton as we do from history, we know that these orders
were largely ignored, and it may well be that Patton’s untimely and
curious death may have been a result of what he knew about these
wretched Eisenhower DEF camps.

The book, OTHER LOSSES, found its way a few months ago into the hands
of a Canadian news reporter, Peter Worthington, of the OTTAWA SUN. He
did his own research through contacts he had in Canada, and reported in
his column on September 12,1989 the following, in part:

“…it is hard to escape the conclusion that Dwight Eisenhower was a
war criminal of epic proportions. His (DEF) policy killed more Germans
in peace than were killed in the European Theater.”

“For years we have blamed the 1.7 million missing German POW’s on the
Russians. Until now, no one dug too deeply … Witnesses and survivors
have been interviewed by the author; one Allied officer compared the
American camps to Buchenwald.”

It is known, that the Allies had sufficient stockpiles of food and
medicine to care for these German soldiers. This was deliberately and
intentionally denied them. Many men died of gangrene from frostbite due
to deliberate exposure. Local German people who offered these men food,
were denied. General Patton’s Third Army was the only command in the
European Theater to release significant numbers of Germans.

Others, such as Omar Bradley and General J.C.H. Lee, Commander of Com
Z, tried, and ordered the release of prisoners within a week of the
war’s end. However, a SHAEF Order, signed by Eisenhower, countermanded
them on May 15th.

Does that make you angry? What will it take to get the average
apathetic American involved in saving his country from such traitors at
the top? Thirty years ago, amid the high popularity of Eisenhower, a
book was written setting out the political and moral philosophy; of
Dwight David Eisenhower called, THE POLITICIAN, by Robert Welch. This
year is the 107th Anniversary of Eisenhower’s birth in Denison, Texas
on October 14, 1890, the son of Jacob David Eisenhower and his wife
Ida. Everyone is all excited about the celebration of this landmark in
the history of “this American patriot.” Senator Robert Dole, in honor
of the Commander of the American Death Camps, proposed that
Washington’s Dulles Airport be renamed the Eisenhower Airport!

The UNITED STATES MINT in Philadelphia, PA is actually issuing a
special Eisenhower Centennial Silver Dollar for only $25 each. They
will only mint 4 million of these collector’s items, and veteran’s
magazines are promoting these coins under the slogan, “Remember the
Man…Remember the Times…” Pardon me if I regurgitate!

There will be some veterans who will not be buying these coins. Two
will be Col. James Mason and Col. Charles Beasley who were in the U.S.
Army Medical Corps who published a paper on the Eisenhower Death Camps
in 1950. They stated in part:

“Huddled close together for warmth, behind the barbed wire was a most
awesome sight; nearly 100,000 haggard, apathetic, dirty, gaunt,
blank-staring men clad in dirty gray uniforms, and standing ankle
deep in mud … water was a major problem, yet only 200 yards away the
River Rhine was running bankfull.”

Another Veteran, who will not be buying any of the Eisenhower Silver
Dollars is Martin Brech of Mahopac, New York, a semi-retired
professor of philosophy at Mercy College in Dobbs Ferry, NY. In 1945,
Brech was an 18 year old Private First Class in Company C of the 14th
Infantry, assigned as a guard and interpreter at the Eisenhower Death
Camp at Andernach, along the Rhine River. He stated for SPOTLIGHT,
February 12, 1990:

“My protests (regarding treatment of the German DEF’S) were met with
hostility or indifference, and when I threw our ample rations to them
over the barbed wire. I was threatened, making it clear that it was our
deliberate policy not to adequately feed them.”

“When they caught me throwing C- Rations over the fence, they
threatened me with imprisonment. One Captain told me that he would
shoot me if he saw me again tossing food to the Germans … Some of the
men were really only boys 13 years of age…Some of the prisoners were
old men drafted by Hitler in his last ditch stand … I understand that
average weight of the prisoners at Andernach was 90 pounds…I have
received threats … Nevertheless, this…has liberated me, for I may
now be heard when I relate the horrible atrocity I witnessed as a
prison guard for one of ‘Ike’s death camps’ along the Rhine.” (Betty
Lou Smith Hanson)

Note: Remember the photo of Ike’s West Point yearbook picture when he
was dubbed “IKE, THE TERRIBLE SWEDISH JEW”? By the way, he was next, or
nearly so, to the last in his class. This article was first printed in
1990, but we thought it was meaningful to reprint it now.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:02 EST 2007
Article: 64916 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us uk.politics.misc:1897806 soc.culture.australian:409745 soc.culture.swiss:64916 soc.culture.europe:582329 soc.culture.ukrainian:132623 soc.culture.polish:780066 soc.culture.russian:458502
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matthew Kern
Newsgroups: uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: Selling Slave-Sex in Israel- WHITE SLAVERY by Filthy ZYDS – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 176
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 15:37:54 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178552274 64.59.135.176 (Mon, 07 May 2007 09:37:54 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 09:37:54 MDT

And reported in a jew newspaper by jews who dislike the ZYD white slavery!!

By Gay McVay, the shabbas-goy dislikes exposes of criminal activities by his
ZYD masters!!

On Sun, 6 May 2007 18:26:53 -0400, “Economic interests”
wrote:

>This is very disgusting

>”KenKnoll” wrote in message
>news:[email protected]
>> On 27 Nov 2005 16:19:47 -0800, “Ariadne” wrote:
>>>Jason P wrote:
>>>> By Paula Amann

>>>> Washington Jewish Week/Jewsweek – 2001

>>>> http://www.jewsweek.com/society/059.htm

>>>> They come to Israel from the Ukraine, Russia, and Moldova looking for
>>>> freedom. Instead they are sold as sex slaves. And you thought Israel
>>>> was holy.
>
>>>> Jewsweek.com | Their names are Natalya, Oxana or Svetlana. They come to
>>>> Israel, as immigrants do, for a better life. But their dreams of
>>>> working as a waitress, nurse, or au pair turn nightmarish upon their
>>>> arrival.

>>>> Their fellow countryman who met them at the airport, speaking the
>>>> language of home, takes them to a locked apartment with barred windows
>>>> and a phone that only takes incoming calls, where they are forced to
>>>> provide sexual services to strangers.

>>>> Those who rebel risk being raped, beaten, or starved. Even those who
>>>> knew they were going into prostitution are shocked by the stark
>>>> conditions, the pay of roughly 20 shekalim ($5) a day or less for their
>>>> labor.

>>>> This disturbing story unfolds all too often at the hotline for Migrant
>>>> Workers, a Tel Aviv agency founded in 1998 to protect the human rights
>>>> of foreign workers, victims of sex trafficking among them. The hotline
>>>> takes as its motto the familiar line from Exodus 22:20: “You shall not
>>>> wrong a stranger or oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of
>>>> Egypt.”

>>>> Agency director and co-founder Sigal Rozen, along with the group’s
>>>> counsel, Nomi Levenkron, were in Washington, D.C., last week to give a
>>>> lecture at the Johns Hopkins Nitze School of Advanced International
>>>> Studies, to network and to speak with supporters. Among them are the
>>>> New Israel Fund, which has given the hotline a total of $19,000 during
>>>> the past year and a half.

>>>> In an interview, Rozen called sex trafficking an “unorganized crime,”
>>>> based largely on personal networks of immigrants from the Ukraine,
>>>> Russia, and Moldova.

>>>> “… “It’s easier being a trafficker than being a plumber …” –Nomi
>>>> Levenkron

>>>> Those three countries alone accounted for 91 percent of the 474 women
>>>> arrested in brothels and deported from Israel in 2000, according to
>>>> figures compiled by hotline volunteers during visits to the Neveh
>>>> Tirzah women’s prison.

>>>> These statistics represent only a fraction of the problem. Police
>>>> spokespersons have set the number of women brought into the country to
>>>> work in the sex industry at 2,000-3,000 annually, the number of
>>>> brothels at 250, Rozen said.

>>>> “It’s Misha that knows Sasha that knows Vladimir,” added Levenkron,
>>>> noting the economic incentive to be a pimp or work with one. “It’s
>>>> easier being a trafficker than being a plumber.”

>>>> One day she got a phone call from a rape crisis center where a woman
>>>> pleaded to be arrested and deported.

>>>> This young Moldovian had twice tried to escape her pimp and at 18, was
>>>> burned out on prostitution and just wanted to go home.

>>>> “She’s so young and sweet,” reflected Levenkron. “She came to Israel to
>>>> be a waitress.”

>>>> A year ago this month, Israel passed the Law Against Trafficking Women.
>>>> Before that time, other laws existed against soliciting, pimping, and
>>>> running brothels.

>>>> Yet hotline staff point out that few pimps involved in trafficking ever
>>>> face a judge, with the majority of prostitutes deported without ever
>>>> facing a trial that might involve their testimony against their pimps.
>>>> Out of 459 women deported in 1998, only 35 cases went to trial; out of
>>>> 253 in 1999, a scant five ended up in the courtroom.

>>>> Judicial indifference is compounded by police complicity, Levenkron
>>>> argued.

>>>> The 18-year-old Moldovian, it turned out, had at one point in her
>>>> misadventures, found herself in a Tel Aviv police station where some of
>>>> the officers, who were her clients, recognized her and moved to call
>>>> her pimp.

>>>> Overhearing their plans, the woman fled and moved in with a
>>>> client-turned-boyfriend.

>>>> But somehow the pimp found her again, threatened the boyfriend. The
>>>> young woman, with no place to go, went back to the brothel. Now the
>>>> case hangs in the courts, where Levenkron has faint hopes for a
>>>> positive outcome.

>>>> The police role in such trafficking ranges from casual to highly
>>>> serious, she alleged.

>>>> “There are police who just come as clients, those who get special
>>>> discounts because of their good relationships with the owner of the
>>>> place and those that inform the owner about police operations,”
>>>> explained Levenkron.

>>>> One young Beersheva prostitute told the attorney she was forced to work
>>>> seven days a week unless a police raid was expected.

>>>> Widespread fear of violence from pimps has muted the public outcry, say
>>>> hotline staff. When Levenkron filed a suit on behalf of a
>>>> Beersheva-based woman, a 20-year-old Moldovian who had survived six
>>>> pimps and multiple rapes, several of the lawyer’s friends came to her
>>>> home to bid her a final farewell, in anticipation of her imminent
>>>> death, she said.

>>>> INTERNATIONAL PROBLEM

>>>> Worldwide, trafficking in persons for domestic service, forced labor,
>>>> and prostitution ranks third after drugs and guns among the activities
>>>> of international crime, according to a congressional service report
>>>> released May 10, 2000. For comparison, about 50,000 people are brought
>>>> to the United States annually, the report stated.

>>>> The rise in trafficking seen over the 1990s was fueled by feeble
>>>> economies in source countries, such as the former Soviet Union and
>>>> Southeast Asia, along with weak penalties for traffickers, said a
>>>> government official familiar with these issues.

>>>> Last October, the United States passed its own law addressing this
>>>> problem, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, which
>>>> calls on the State Department to report annually on the scope of
>>>> trafficking in various countries and measures taken to combat it. The
>>>> report was due for release on June 1, but its publication has been
>>>> delayed.

>>>> In Israel today, official policy on trafficking is to arrest and deport
>>>> foreign sex workers. The women are held for an average of 30 days under
>>>> crowded and sometimes harsh conditions, longer if they testify in court
>>>> against their pimps, according to hotline data.

>>>> Rozen and Levenkron take issue with this approach. “Deporting women
>>>> doesn’t make things better,” said Levenkron. “I’m tired of shouting
>>>> this all over Israel so I’ve come here [to the United States] to shout
>>>> about it.”

>>>> Rozen contends that a one-year work permit in specified fields such as
>>>> home health care or child care, before their return home, would put the
>>>> former prostitutes in a stronger position to take care of themselves.

>>>> Gruesome albeit unsubstantiated stories abound, she says, about revenge
>>>> attacks on returning women and their families by the original
>>>> trafficker in the home country.

>>>> A nest egg from a year’s legitimate work, Rozen suggests, would allow
>>>> victims to re-establish themselves in a new community and stay out of
>>>> the clutches of traffickers in the future.

>>>> Meanwhile, Levenkron is seeking professional back-up in her job
>>>> representing the victims of trafficking.

>>>> “I am the [hotline] legal department,” laments Levenkron. “We need
>>>> lawyers and we need public awareness.”

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:02 EST 2007
Article: 64925 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:780270 pl.regionalne.warszawa:435469 soc.culture.baltics:152344 soc.culture.ukrainian:132635 soc.culture.europe:582466 soc.culture.swiss:64925
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!news.glorb.com!feed.cgocable.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: DaveDean
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: ZHID ORDNUNGSPOLIZEI = ZYDOWSKY KOLABORANCI!!!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 203
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 14:01:35 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178719295 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 09 May 2007 08:01:35 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 08:01:35 MDT

Those who have failed to learn from the past 2000 years of history,
will be doomed to repeat history.

With now an extra 51 well documented proven cases of ZHID
COLLABORATION WITH NAZIS, besides notorious KASTNER case,
plus RUMKOWSKI, one MUST question the HOLOHOAX figures!!

Now even the notorious Simon WIESENTHAL is proven to be a nazi
GESTAPO COLLABORATOR!!

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:11:30 -0700, Ken Levi
wrote:

>For the past 2000 years, the world has suffered because of the cursed
>Christkiller ZHIDS.

>Not just the Kollaboraci of the ZHIDS with the nazis.

>On 27 Sep 2004 16:03:09 -0000, PhilMathews >wrote:

>>Kenneth McVay,SOBC, the well-known fag in Canada,
>>Fag McVay of Vancouver, convicted of child molesting
>>and car theft in California and Oregon, and still
>>unemployed gas pump boy, mastermind of the
>>Canadian branch of NAMBLA, wants all to know
>>about all his fellow criminals and perverts.

>>Here is a photo of Ken McVay, director of WWW.NIZKOR.ORG–
>>Does he not have the uncouth look as to fit the profile of a
>>person who would say in general regarding child porn:
>>”I am weary of seeing the issue of “child porn” blown out of
>>proportion (I’ve been on and around the Net since 1988, and
>>have yet to come across anything I’d consider “child porn.”
>>I’ve seen photos of naked children, … and fail to see the
>>harm, or any great moral danger to our society).”?
>>http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg
>> Would any of you want to leave this person, Ken McVay,
>> alone with your children?

>>From: [email protected] (JohannSebastianBott)
>>Subject: Re:ZHID ORDNUNGSPOLIZEI = ZYDOWSKY KOLABORANCI!!!
>>Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.krakow,pl.regionalne.wroclaw
>>On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:33:28 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Another significant article that merits discussion!!!

>On Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:15:13 -0400, PAWLIKOWSKI
> wrote:

> > Just a moment ago, on soc.culture.polish,
> > Dr. J. Ilicki, Associate Professor of Sociology
> > and Judaic Studies on Upsalla University raised
> > the question of Polish Polish in the service of
> > Germans during occupation of Poland. The only
> > reason for this question at this time seems to be
> > his need to stir interethnic hatered. Provocatively,
> > Dr. Ilicki asks:
> > 1) who were the members of the
> > police, volunteers or draftees?,
> > 2) what was their social status?
> > 3) what happened to them after the war?
> > Just to play completely innocent (and dumb) he also asks
> > why they were called Granatowa (dark-navy-blue) Police.

> > Only naive will believe that Prof. Ilicki does not
> > know the answers.
> > Also only naive will believe that he is not interested
> > in Pinsk the hometown of his parents and allegedly
> > the site of the burial of his grandparents and over
> > 30,000 pinksers (Jews from Pinsk). He admitte
> > that his mother listed them as killed there with
> > Yad Vashem. However, young (about 40 years old)
> > Julian pretends disintrest, because he is afraid that
> > exhumations might start at the alleged burial site
> > and will find no skeletons as same happened last
> > year at nearby Mariompole, presently in Lithuania.

> > But coming back to Dr Illicki question: Polish Police
> > during German occupation was dramatically reduced
> > in numbers and pre-war policemen were forced to
> > serve as an auxillary force to German Ordnung Polizei.
> > They were ususally not armed,and when armed never
> > given more than five bullets for their long rifles.
> > Moreover, after each use of firearm they
> > (as well as the Ukraininan Police) had to write
> > a report for what target each bullet was used
> > and with what effectivness, hardly an invitation to
> > the genocide.

>>>>>> Hardly truth to Pawlikowski’s story too.

> > On the other hand there was a police force in
> > the Third Reich, in which service was completely
> > voluntary. It was called Ordnungdienst. Their
> > emblem was a light alloy Star of David. The
> > social background of these Jewish collaborators
> > according to Iasaiah Trunk was as follows: 18%
> > with post-graduate degrees, 60% with college degree,
> > 20% with elementary education. These are data
> > from self-serving, post-war questionaries.

> > But even Trunk admits that in Warsaw the
> > requirement was that EACH Jewish policeman
> > has at least matura (two years of college)
> > see page 489 of his book. In practice, the
> > Jewish policemen were all lawyers and
> > journalist who with the day of German
> > occupation immediately were fired from
> > their jobs, like the Polish teachers, because
> > the schools were closed.

> The service was voluntary. Take the job and keep
> your life a little longer or die now!

> Pawlikowski forgot how the Soviets were conscripted.
> Under Stalin they ran to enlist hoping to avoid being
> killed in the next “relocation”!

> > While Polish teachers joined the underground,
> > unemployed Jewish intelligentia clamored for the police work.

> > Some of it was really gruesome as you remember
> > from our previous description of the Feb. 1942
> > execution on Rybna Street market place in Lodz.
> > German newsreel of this horrible hanging is shown
> > endlessly in Wiesenthal Museum in LA. Thousands
> > of Jews standing and watching behind three
> > uniformed Germans with their backs and holstered
> > pistols facing Jewish crowd and about to be hanged
> > women passing out and forced into
> > the noose by Jewish Policemen.
> > ————-
> > Jozef Pawlikowski

> Herman

First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao Tse Dung
Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!!
Me

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
against them — except force.” — John Bryant

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
John Bryant

TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions.
G. K. Chesterton.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur,
or to [email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the
like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:03 EST 2007
Article: 64926 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:780271 soc.culture.europe:582467 soc.culture.ukrainian:132636 soc.culture.baltics:152345 soc.culture.german:374586 soc.culture.swiss:64926
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: DaveDean
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: NAZI – ZYD KOLLABORATION!! Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 85
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 14:01:43 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178719303 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 09 May 2007 08:01:43 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 08:01:43 MDT

From: “Syja Macohstain”
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish
Subject: Nazi-Zionist collaboration
Date: 10 Feb 2007 11:30:05 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com

EICHMANN IN JERUSALEM
byHannah Arendt

Zionist Emigration and Gestapo Expulsion

(pp. 59-61)

During its first few years, Hitler’s rise to power appeared to the
Zionists chiefly as ‘the decisive defeat of assimilationism’. Hence, the
Zionists could, for a time, at least, engage in a certain amount of non-
criminal cooperation with the Nazi authorities; the Zionists too believed
that “dissimilation,” combined with the emigration to Palestine of Jewish
youngsters and, they hoped, Jewish capitalists, could be a “mutually
fair solution.”

At the time, many German officials held this opinion, and this kind
of seems to have been quite common up to the end. A letter from a
survivor of Theresienstadt, a German Jew, relates that all leading
positions in the Nazi-appointed “Reichsvereiningung” were held by
Zionists (whereas the authentic Jewish “Reichsvereiningung” had
been composed of both Zionists and non-Zionists), because Zionists,
according to the Nazis, were the “decent” Jews since they too thought
in “national terms.” To be sure, no prominent Nazi ever spoke publicly
in this vein; from beginning to end, Nazi propaganda was fiercely,
unequivocally, uncompromisingly anti-Semitic, and eventually nothing
counted but what people who were still without experience in the
mysteries of totalitarian government dismissed as “mere propaganda.”

There existed in those first years a mutually highly satisfactory
agreement between the Nazi authorities and the Jewish Agency for
Palestine – a ‘ Ha’avara’, or Transfer Agreement, which provided that
an emigrant to Palestine could transfer his money there in German
goods and exchange them for pounds upon arrival. It was soon the
only legal way for a Jew to take his money with him (the alternative then
being the establishment of a blocked account, which could be liquidated
abroad only at a loss of between fifty and ninety-five per cent). The result
was that in the thirties, when American Jewry took great pains to organize
a boycott of German merchandise, Palestine, of all places, was swamped
with all kinds of goods “made in Germany.”

Of Greater importance for Eichmann were the emissaries from Palestine,
who would approach the Gestapo and the S.S. on their own initiative,
without taking orders from either the German Zionists or the Jewish Agency
for Palestine. They came in order to enlist the help for the illegal
immigration of Jews into British-ruled Palestine, and both the Gestapo
and the S.S: were helpful. They negotiated with Eichmann in Vienna,
and they reported that he was “polite, not the shouting type,” and that
he even provided them with farms and facilities for setting up vocational
training camps for prospective immigrants. (“On one occasion, he expelled
a group of nuns from a convent to provide a training farm for young Jews”
and on another ‘a special train was made available and Nazi officials
accompanied’ a group of emigrants, ostensibly headed for Zionist training
farms in Yugoslavia, to see them safely across the border).

According to the story told by Jon and David Kimche, with “the full
and generous cooperation of all the chief actors” (THE SECRET ROADS:
THE ILLEGAL MIGRATION OF A PEOPLE, 1938-1948, London, 1954),
these Jews from Palestine spoke a language not totally different from that
of Eichmann. They had been sent to Europe by the communal settlements
in Palestine, and they were not interested in rescue operations: “That was
not their job.” They wanted to select “suitable material,” and their chief
enemy, prior to the extermination program, was not those who made life
impossible for Jews in the old countries, Germany or Austria, but those
who barred access to the new homeland: that enemy was definitely
Britain, not Germany.

Indeed, they were in a position to deal with the Nazi authorities on a
footing amounting to equality, which native Jews were not, since they
enjoyed the protection of the mandatory power. They were probably
among the first Jews to talk openly about mutual interests and were
certainly the first to be given permission “to pick young Jewish pioneers”
>from among the Jews in the concentration camps. Of course, they were
unaware of the sinister implications of this deal, which still lay in the
future; but they too somehow believed that if it was a question of selecting
Jews for survival, the Jews should do the selecting themselves. It was this
fundamental error in judgement that eventually led to a situation in which
the non-selected majority of Jews inevitably found themselves confronted
with two enemies – the Nazi authorities and the Jewish authorities”.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:03 EST 2007
Article: 64927 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.ukrainian:132637 soc.culture.europe:582479 soc.culture.swiss:64927 soc.culture.russian:458623 soc.culture.german:374596 alt.politics.europe:64344 soc.culture.polish:780287
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Pepsifreak
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.german,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.polish
Subject: Re: Ein zweites Katyn – Neue Massengräber polnischer Soldaten bei Kiew
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 32
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 16:38:06 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178728686 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 09 May 2007 10:38:06 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 10:38:06 MDT

On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:25:41 GMT, BenyaminJKramer
wrote:
>On 4 Sep 2006 16:09:27 -0700, in de.soc.politik.misc “Deinos Dionysos”
> wrote:
>Albert Pfündl schrieb:
>> “G.Bartels” schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>> news:[email protected]
>> Ein zweites Katyn

>> > Liegt Babi Yar nicht auch in der Naehe von Kiew?!

>> http://www.lsg.musin.de/gesch/geschichte/natsoz/massaker_von_babi_yar.htm

>Unter Deinem Link lesen wir:

>”Ende 1943 mußten jüdische KZ-Häftlinge die Leichen exhumieren und
>verbrennen, um zu versuchen, die Spur des Massenmordes zu verwischen.”

>Blobel, der für die Beseitigung des Grabes zuständig war, sagte aber:

>”3. During my visits in August I myself observed the burning of bodies
>in a mass grave near Kiev. This grave was about 55 m. long, 3 m. wide
>and 2-1/2 m. deep. After the top had been removed the bodies were
>covered with inflammable material and ignited. It took about two days
>until the grave burned down to the bottom. I myself observed that the
>fire had glowed down to the bottom. After that the grave was filled in
>and the traces practically obliterated.”

>Wie erklären uns die “seriösen Historiker” diesen Widerspruch? Und
>was für ein brennbares Material war das wohl? Scheint ja ein wahres
>Wunderzeug gewesen zu sein.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:03 EST 2007
Article: 64928 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.swiss:64928 soc.culture.europe:582480 soc.culture.german:374597 soc.culture.polish:780288 soc.culture.ukrainian:132638 alt.politics.europe:64345
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Pepsifreak
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.ukrainian,alt.politics.europe
Subject: WIESENTHAL = ZYD KOLLABORATEUR MIT NAZIS!! WAHR – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 803
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 16:39:15 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178728755 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 09 May 2007 10:39:15 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 10:39:15 MDT

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:16:48 +0200, in de.soc.politik.misc Sonia
Cabrera wrote:

Weiss jemand genaueres über die Vorwürfe, das Wiesenthal mit der
Gestapo kollaborierte? In der Tagesschau wurde gemeldet, das
Wiesenthal die Kollaboration unterstellt wurde, da es unerklärlich
scheint, das er 12 verschiedene KZs überlebte.
Dazu folgendes im Netz:

Eichmann reiste zusammen mit Hagen. Ihr Unternehmen war in der Ge-
schichte der Kooperation zwischen Zionisten und Nazis gewiß nur eine
Episode. Aber die Tatsache, daß der berüchtigte Judenmörder Eichmann
damals bei den Zionisten sich größter Wertschätzung er- freute, war so
entlarvend, daß man sie tunlichst zu verbergen trachtete. Da die
Tatsache der Reise früher oder später ans Licht kommen mochte, wählte
man das einfachste Verfahren: Man gab den Schwarzen Peter weiter.
Bereits 1947 findet sich in einer Broschüre von Simon Wiesenthal die
Mitteilung, Eichmanns Reise habe dem Ziel gedient, Kontakt zu den
aufständischen Palästinensern aufzunehmen und mit dem Mufti
zu konspirieren.[28] Diese Lüge hat seither immer neue Varianten
erlebt und ist sogar im Eichmann-Prozess in Jerusalem wiederholt
worden.

http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol12.html

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:30:16 -0700, in soc.culture.palestine
[email protected] wrote:

Simon Wiesenthal: Fraudulent ‘Nazi Hunter’

By Mark Weber

For more than 40 years, Simon Wiesenthal has been tracking hundreds of
“Nazi criminals” from his “Jewish Documentation Center” in Vienna. For
his work as the world’s most prominent “Nazi hunter,” he has been
awarded several honorary degrees and numerous medals, including
Germany’s highest decoration. In a formal White House ceremony in
August 1980, a teary-eyed President Carter presented him with a
special gold medal awarded by the US Congress. President Reagan
praised him in November 1988 as one of the “true heroes” of this
century.

This living legend was portrayed in flattering terms by the late
Laurence Oliver in the 1978 film fantasy “The Boys From Brazil,” and
by Ben Kingsley in the 1989 HBO made-for-television movie “Murderers
Among Us: The Simon Wiesenthal Story.” One of world’s most prominent
Holocaust organizations bears his name: the Simon Wiesenthal Center of
Los Angeles.

Wiesenthal’s reputation as a moral authority is undeserved. The man
whom The Washington Post has called the “Holocaust’s Avenging Angel”
[1] has a little known but well-documented record of reckless
disregard for truth. He has lied about his own wartime experiences,
misrepresented his postwar “Nazi-hunting” achievements, and has spread
vile falsehoods about alleged German atrocities.

Different Stories
Szymon (Simon) Wiesenthal was born on December 31, 1908, in Buczacz, a
town in the province of Galicia (now Buchach in Ukraine) in what was
then the eastern fringe of the Austro-Hungarian empire. His father was
a prosperous wholesale sugar merchant.

In spite of all that has been written about him, just what Wiesenthal
did during the war years under German occupation remains unclear. He
has given conflicting stories in three separate accounts of his
wartime activities. The first was given under oath during a two day
interrogation session in May 1948 conducted by an official of the US
Nuremberg war crimes commission. [2] The second is a summary of his
life provided by Wiesenthal as part of a January 1949 “Application for
Assistance” to the International Refugee Committee. [3] And the third
account is given in his autobiography, The Murderers Among Us, first
published in 1967. [4]

Soviet Engineer or Factory Mechanic?
In his 1948 interrogation, Wiesenthal declared that “between 1939 and
1941” he was a “Soviet chief engineer working in Lvov and Odessa.” [5]
Consistent with that, he stated in his 1949 declaration that from
December 1939 to April 1940 he worked as an architect in the Black Sea
port of Odessa. But according to his autobiography, he spent the
period between mid-September 1939 and June 1941 in Soviet-ruled Lvov,
where he worked “as a mechanic in a factory that produced bedsprings.”
[6]

Relative Freedom
After the Germans took control of Galicia province in June 1941,
Wiesenthal was interned for a time in the Janowska concentration camp
near Lvov, from where he was transferred a few months later to a camp
affiliated with the repair works (OAW) in Lvov of the Ostbahn
(“Eastern Railroad”) of German-ruled Poland. Wiesenthal reported in
his autobiography that he worked there “as a technician and
draftsman,” that he was rather well treated, and that his immediate
superior, who was “secretly anti-Nazi,” even permitted him to own two
pistols. He had his own office in a “small wooden hut,” and enjoyed
“relative freedom and was permitted to walk all over the yards.” [7]

Partisan Fighter?
The next segment of Wiesenthal’s life — from October 1943 to June
1944 — is the most obscure, and his accounts of this period are
contradictory. During his 1948 interrogation, Wiesenthal said that he
fled from the Janowska camp in Lvov and joined a “partisan group which
operated in the Tarnopol-Kamenopodolsk area.” [8] He said that “I was
a partisan from October 6, 1943, until the middle of February 1944,”
and declared that his unit fought against Ukrainian forces, both of
the SS “Galicia” division and of the independent UPA partisan force.
[9]

Wiesenthal said that he held the rank of lieutenant and then major,
and was responsible for building bunkers and fortification lines.
Although he was not explicit, he suggested that this (supposed)
partisan unit was part of the Armia Ludowa (“Peoples Army”), the
Polish Communist military force established and controlled by the
Soviets. [10]

He said that he and other partisans slipped into Lvov in February
1944, where they were “hidden by friends of the A.L. [‘People’s Army’]
group.” On June 13, 1944, his group was captured by the German Secret
Field Police. (Although Jewish partisans caught in hiding were often
shot, Wiesenthal reports that he was somehow spared.) Wiesenthal told
much the same story in his 1949 statement. He said that he fled from
internment in early October 1943 and then “fought against the Germans
as a partisan in the forest” for eight months — from October 2, 1943,
to March 1944. After that, he was “in hiding” in Lvov from March to
June 1944.

Wiesenthal tells a totally different story in his 1967 autobiography.
He reports there that after escaping from the Ostbahn Repair Works on
Oct. 2, 1943, he lived in hiding in the houses of various friends
until June 13, 1944, when he was discovered by Polish and German
police and returned to a concentration camp. He makes no mention of
any partisan membership or activity. [11]

According to both his 1948 interrogation and his 1967 autobiography,
he tried to commit suicide on June 15, 1944, by cutting his wrists.
Remarkably, though, he was saved from death by German SS doctors and
recovered in an SS hospital. [12] He remained in the Lvov
concentration camp “with double rations” for a time, and then, he
reports in his autobiography, he was transferred to various work
camps. He spent the remaining chaotic months, until the end of the
war, in different camps until he was liberated from Mauthausen (in
Austria) by American forces on May 5, 1945. [13]

Did Wiesenthal invent a past as a heroic wartime partisan? Or did he
later try to suppress his record as a Communist fighter? Or is the
true story altogether different — and too shameful to admit?

Nazi Agent?
Did Wiesenthal voluntarily work for his wartime oppressors? That’s the
accusation leveled by Austrian Chancellor Bruno Kreisky, himself of
Jewish ancestry and leader for many years of his country’s Socialist
Party. During an interview with foreign journalists in 1975, Kreisky
charged Wiesenthal with using “Mafia methods,” rejected his pretense
of “moral authority,” and suggested that he was an agent for the
German authorities. Some of his more pertinent remarks, which appeared
in Austria’s leading news magazine Profil, include: [14]

I really know Mr. Wiesenthal only from secret reports, and they are
bad, very nasty. I say this as Federal Chancellor … And I say that
Mr. Wiesenthal had a different relationship with the Gestapo than I
did. Yes, and this can be proven. I can’t say more [now]. Everything
else, I’ll say in court.

My relationship with the Gestapo is unambiguous. I was their prisoner,
their inmate, and I was interrogated. His relationship was a different
one, I can say, and this will come out clearly. It’s bad enough what
I’ve already said here. But he can’t clear himself by charging me with
defaming his honor in the press, as he might wish. It’s not that
simple, because that would mean a big court case … A man like this
doesn’t have the right to pretend to be a moral authority. That’s what
I say. He doesn’t have the right …

Whether a man who, in my view, is an agent, yes, that’s right, and who
uses Mafia methods … Such a man has to go …

He is no gentleman, and I would say, to make this clear, so that he
won’t become a moral authority, because he is not … He shouldn’t
pretend to be a moral authority …

I say that Mr. Wiesenthal lived in that time in the Nazi sphere of
influence without being persecuted. Right? And he lived openly without
being persecuted, right? Is that clear? And you perhaps know, if you
know what was going on, that no one could risk that.

He wasn’t a “submarine” … that is, submerged and in hiding, but
instead, he was completely in the open without having to, well, ever
risk persecution. I think that’s enough. There were so many
opportunities to be an agent. He didn’t have to be a Gestapo agent.
There were many other services.

In response to these damning words, Wiesenthal began efforts to bring
a lawsuit against the Chancellor. Eventually, though, both Wiesenthal
and Kreisky backed away from a major legal clash.

Mauthausen Myths
Before he became famous as a “Nazi hunter,” he made a name for himself
as a propagandist. In 1946 Wiesenthal published KZ Mauthausen, an
85-page work that consists mainly of his own amateurish sketches
purporting to represent the horrors of the Mauthausen concentration
camp. One drawing depicts three inmates who had been bound to posts
and brutally put to death by the Germans. [15]

The sketch is completely phony. It was copied — with some minor
alterations — from photographs that appeared in Life magazine in
1945, which graphically record the firing-squad execution in December
1944 of three German soldiers who had been caught operating as spies
behind the lines during the “Battle of the Bulge.” [16] The source of
the Wiesenthal drawing is instantly obvious to anyone who compares it
with the Life photos. [17]

The irresponsible character of this book is also shown by Wiesenthal’s
extensive citation therein of the supposed “death bed confession” of
Mauthausen Commandant Franz Ziereis, according to which four million
were gassed to death with carbon monoxide at the nearby Hartheim
satellite camp. [18] This claim is totally absurd, and no serious
Holocaust historian still accepts it. [19] Also according to the
Ziereis “confession” cited by Wiesenthal, the Germans supposedly
killed another ten million people in Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.
[20] In fact, this fraudulent “confession” was obtained by torture.
[21]

Years later, Wiesenthal was still lying about Mauthausen. In a 1983
interview with the daily newspaper USA Today, he said of his
experience in Mauthausen: “I was one of 34 prisoners alive out of
150,000 who had been put there.” [22] This is a blatant falsehood. The
years have apparently not been kind to Wiesenthal’s memory, because in
his own autobiography he wrote that “almost 3,000 prisoners died in
Mauthausen after the Americans liberated us on May 5, 1945.” [23]
Another former inmate, Evelyn Le Chene, reported in her standard work
about Mauthausen that there were 64,000 inmates in the camp when it
was liberated in May 1945. [24] And according to the Encyclopaedia
Judaica, at least 212,000 inmates survived internment in the
Mauthausen camp complex. [25]

After the war Wiesenthal worked for the US Office of Strategic
Services (the forerunner of the CIA) and the US Army’s
Counter-Intelligence Corps (CIC). He was also vice chairman of the
Jewish Central Committee in the US occupation zone of Austria. [26]

‘Human Soap’
Wiesenthal has given circulation and credence to one of the most
scurrilous Holocaust stories, the charge that the Germans manufactured
soap from the corpses of murdered Jews. According to this tale, the
letters “RIF” in bars of German-made soap allegedly stood for “Pure
Jewish Fat” (“Rein judisches Fett”). In reality, the initials stood
for “National Center for Industrial Fat Provisioning” (“Reichstelle
fur industrielle Fettversorgung”). [27]

Wiesenthal promoted the “human soap” legend in articles published in
1946 in the Austrian Jewish community paper Der Neue Weg (“The New
Path”). In an article entitled “RIF,” he wrote: “The terrible words
‘transport for soap’ were first heard at the end of 1942. It was in
the [Polish] General Government, and the factory was in Galicia, in
Belzec. From April 1942 until May 1943, 900,000 Jews were used as raw
material in this factory.” After the corpses were turned into various
raw materials, Wiesenthal wrote, “The rest, the residual fat stuff,
was used for soap production.”

He continued: “After 1942 people in the General Government knew quite
well what the RIF soap meant. The civilized world may not believe the
joy with which the Nazis and their women in the General Government
thought of this soap. In each piece of soap they saw a Jew who had
been magically put there, and had thus been prevented from growing
into a second Freud, Ehrlich or Einstein.” [28]

In another imaginative article published in 1946 entitled “Belzec Soap
Factory,” Wiesenthal alleged that masses of Jews were exterminated in
electrocution showers: [29]

The people, pressed together and driven on by the SS, Latvians and
Ukrainians, go through the open door into the “bath.” Five hundred
persons could fit at a time. The floor of the “bath chamber” was made
of metal and shower heads hung from the ceiling. When the room was
full, the SS turned on the 5,000 volts of electric current in the
metal plate. At the same time water poured from the shower heads. A
short scream and the execution was over. An SS chief physician named
Schmidt determined through a peep hole that the victims were dead. The
second door was opened and the “corpse commando” came in and quickly
removed the dead. It was ready for the next 500.

Today no serious historian accepts the stories that Jewish corpses
were manufactured into bars of soap or that Jews were electrocuted to
death at Belzec (or anywhere).

Wiesenthal’s imaginative view of history is not limited to the
twentieth century. In his 1973 book Sails of Hope, he argued that
Christopher Columbus was a secret Jew, and that his famous voyage to
the western hemisphere in 1492 was actually a search for a new
homeland for Europe’s Jews. [30]

Wiesenthal is not always wrong, of course. In 1975 and again in 1993
he publicly acknowledged that “there were no extermination camps on
German soil.” [31] He thus implicitly conceded that the claims made at
the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal and elsewhere that Buchenwald, Dachau
and other camps in Germany proper were “extermination camps” are not
true.

‘Fabrications’ About Eichmann
In more than 40 years of “Nazi hunting,” Wiesenthal’s role in locating
and capturing Adolf Eichmann is often considered his greatest
achievement. [32] (Eichmann headed the wartime SS Jewish affairs
department. He was kidnapped by Israeli agents in Argentina in May
1960 and hanged in Jerusalem after a trial that received worldwide
media attention.)

But Isser Harel, the Israeli official who headed the team that seized
Eichmann, has declared unequivocally that Wiesenthal had “absolutely
nothing” to do with the capture. (Harel is a former head of both the
Mossad and Shin Bet, Israel’s foreign and domestic security agencies.)
[33]

Wiesenthal not only “had no role whatsoever” in the apprehension, said
Harel, but in fact he endangered the entire Eichmann operation. In a
278-page manuscript, Harel carefully refuted every claim by Wiesenthal
about his supposed role in identifying and capturing Eichmann. Claims
by Wiesenthal and his many friends about his supposedly crucial role
in capturing the former SS officer, said Harel, have no foundation in
fact. Many specific assertions and incidents described in two books by
Wiesenthal, said the Israeli official, are “complete fabrications.”
[34]

“Wiesenthal’s reports and statements at that period prove beyond any
doubt that he had no notion of Eichmann’s whereabouts,” said Harel.
[35] (For example, just before Eichmann’s capture in Argentina,
Wiesenthal was placing him in Japan and Saudi Arabia.) [36]

Characterizing Wiesenthal as a rank opportunist, Harel summed up: “All
the information supplied by Wiesenthal before and in anticipation of
the [Eichmann] operation was utterly worthless, and sometimes even
misleading and of negative value.” [37]

Reckless Charges in Walus Case
One of Wiesenthal’s most spectacular cases involved a Polish-born
Chicago man named Frank Walus. In a letter dated December 10, 1974, he
charged that Walus “delivered Jews to the Gestapo” in Czestochowa and
Kielce in Poland during the war. This letter prompted a US government
investigation and legal action. [38] The Washington Post dealt with
the case in a 1981 article entitled “The Nazi Who Never Was: How a
witch hunt by judge, press and investigators branded an innocent man a
war criminal.” The lengthy piece, which was copyrighted by the
American Bar Association, reported: [39]

In January 1977, the United States government accused a Chicagoan
named Frank Walus of having committed atrocities in Poland during
World War II.

In the following years, this retired factory worker went into debt in
order to raise more than $60,000 to defend himself. He sat in a
courtroom while eleven Jewish survivors of the Nazi occupation of
Poland testified that they saw him murder children, an old woman, a
young woman, a hunchback and others …

Overwhelming evidence shows that Walus was not a Nazi War criminal,
that he was not even in Poland during World War II.

… In an atmosphere of hatred and loathing verging on hysteria, the
government persecuted an innocent man. In 1974, Simon Wiesenthal, the
famous “Nazi hunter” of Vienna, denounced Walus as “a Pole in Chicago
who performed duties with the Gestapo in the ghettos of Czestochowa
and Kielce and handed over a number of Jews to the Gestapo.”

The Chicago weekly newspaper Reader also reported on the case in a
detailed 1981 article headlined: “The Persecution of Frank Walus: To
Catch a Nazi: The U.S. government wanted a war criminal. So, with the
help of Simon Wiesenthal, the Israeli police, the local press and
Judge Julius Hoffman, they invented one.” [40] The article stated:

… It is logical to assume that the “reports received by Wiesenthal
[against Walus] actually were rumors… In other words, Simon
Wiesenthal had no evidence against Walus. He denounced him anyway.

While [Judge] Hoffman had the Walus case under advisement, Holocaust
aired on television. During the same period, in April 1978, Simon
Wiesenthal came to Chicago, where he gave interviews taking credit for
the Walus case. “How Nazi-Hunter Helped Find Walus,” was the Sun-Times
headline on a story by Bob Olmstead. Wiesenthal told Sun-Times Abe
Peck that he “has never had a case of mistaken identity.” “I know
there are thousands of people who wait for my mistake,” he said.

It was only after an exhausting legal battle that the man who was
vilified and physically attacked as “the butcher of Kielce” was
finally able to prove that he had spent the war years as a peaceful
farm laborer in Germany. Frank Walus died in August 1994, a broken and
bitterly disappointed man, man.

Wiesenthal’s recklessness in the Walus case should have been enough to
permanently discredit him as a reliable investigator. But his Teflon
reputation survived even this.

Wrong about Mengele
Much of the Wiesenthal myth is based on his hunt for Joseph Mengele,
the wartime physician at Auschwitz known as the “Angel of Death.” Time
and time again, Wiesenthal claimed to be close on Mengele’s heels.
Wiesenthal reported that his informants had “seen” or “just missed”
the elusive physician in Peru, Chile, Brazil, Spain, Greece, and half
a dozen locations in Paraguay. [41]

One of the closest shaves came in the summer of 1960. Wiesenthal
reported that Mengele had been hiding out on a small Greek island,
>from where he escaped by just a few hours. Wiesenthal continued to
peddle this story, complete with precise details, even after a
reporter whom he had hired to check it out informed him that the tale
was false from beginning to end. [42]

According to another Wiesenthal report, Mengele arranged for the
murder in 1960 of one of his former victims, a woman he had supposedly
sterilized in Auschwitz. After spotting her, and her distinctive camp
tattoo, at a hotel in Argentina where he was staying, Mengele
allegedly arranged to have her killed because he feared that she would
expose him. It turned out that the woman was never in a concentration
camp, had no tattoo, had never met Mengele, and her death was a simple
mountaineering accident. [43]

Mengele regularly dined at the finest restaurants in Asuncion, the
Paraguayan capital, Wiesenthal said in 1977, and supposedly drove
around the city with a bevy of armed guards in his black Mercedes
Benz. [44]

Wiesenthal announced in 1985 that he was “100 percent sure” that
Mengele had been hiding out in Paraguay until at least June 1984, and
charged that the Mengele family in Germany knew exactly where. As it
turned out, Wiesenthal was completely wrong. It was later definitively
established that Mengele had died in 1979 in Brazil, where he had been
living for years in anonymous poverty. [45]

Israel’s ambassador to Paraguay from 1968 to 1972, Benjamin (Benno)
Varon, remarked in 1983 on the Mengele campaign: “Wiesenthal makes
periodic statements that he is about to catch him, perhaps since
Wiesenthal must raise funds for his activities and the name Mengele is
always good for a plug.” Wiesenthal “failed miserably” in the Mengele
case, the diplomat said on another occasion. [46] In the Mengele case,
former Mossad chief Harel remarked, “Wiesenthal’s folly borders on the
criminal.” [47]

In truth, the bulging Mengele file in Wiesenthal’s Vienna
“Documentation Center” was such a jumble of useless information that,
in the words of the London Times, it “only sustained his
self-confirmatory myths and gave scant satisfaction to those who
apparently needed a definitive answer to Mengele’s fate.” [48]

In the considered view of Gerald Posner and John Ware, coauthors of
Mengele: The Complete Story, Wiesenthal spent years assiduously
cultivating a mythical “self-image of a tireless, dogged sleuth,
pitted against the omnipotent and sinister might of Mengele and a vast
Nazi network.” Because of his “knack of playing to the gallery,”
Posner and Ware concluded, Wiesenthal “ultimately compromised his
credibility.” [49]

‘Incompetence and Arrogance’
Eli Rosenbaum, an official with the US government’s “Nazi hunting”
Office of Special Investigations and an investigator for the World
Jewish Congress, took aim at Wiesenthal’s carefully cultivated “Nazi
hunter” reputation in a detailed 1993 book, Betrayal. [50] For
example, Rosenbaum mentioned, Wiesenthal “had all these reports
placing Mengele in almost every country in Latin America except the
one he was in — namely, Brazil.” [51]

Wiesenthal, wrote Rosenbaum, has been a “pathetically ineffective”
investigator who had “gone far beyond the buffoonery and false boasts
in prior years.” Much of his illustrious career, Rosenbaum said, has
been characterized by “incompetence and arrogance.” [52]

Bruno Kreisky once summed up his attitude towards the “Nazi hunter” in
these words: [53]

The engineer Wiesenthal, or whatever else his title is, hates me
because he knows that I despise his activity. The Wiesenthal group is
a quasi-political Mafia that works against Austria with disgraceful
methods. Wiesenthal is known as someone who isn’t very careful about
the truth, who is not very selective about his methods and who uses
tricks. He pretends to be the “Eichmann hunter,” even though everyone
knows that this was the work of a secret service, and that Wiesenthal
only takes credit for that.

‘Commercializing’ the Holocaust
The Los Angeles Wiesenthal Center pays the Vienna “Nazi Hunter”
$75,000 a year for the use of his name, the director of Israel’s Yad
Vashem Holocaust center said in 1988.

Both the Center and Wiesenthal “commercialize” and “trivialize” the
Holocaust, the director added.

Wiesenthal “threw out” the figure of “11 million who were murdered in
the Holocaust — six million Jews and five million non-Jews,” said the
Yad Vashem official. When asked why he gave these figures, Wiesenthal
replied: “The gentiles will not pay attention if we do not mention
their victims, too.” Wiesenthal “chose ‘five million (gentiles)’
because he wanted a ‘diplomatic’ number, one that told of a large
number of gentile victims but in no way was larger than that of Jews
…” [54]

“What Wiesenthal and the Los Angeles Center that bears his name do is
to trivialize the Holocaust,” commented The Jewish Press, a weekly
that claims to be the largest-circulation English-language Jewish
community paper in America.

In recent years Wiesenthal has been concerned about the growing impact
of Holocaust revisionism. In “A Message from Simon Wiesenthal”
published by the Center that bears his name, he said: “Today, when I
see the rise of antisemitism here in Europe … the popularity of Le
Pen, of David Duke, of the Holocaust revisionists, then I am convinced
more than ever about the need for our new [Wiesenthal Center] Beit
Hashoah-Museum of Tolerance” in Los Angeles. [55]

Wiesenthal is often asked why he does not forgive those who persecuted
Jews half a century ago. His stock answer is that although he has the
right to forgive for himself, he does not have the right to forgive on
behalf of others. [56] On the basis of this sophistical logic, though,
neither does he have the right to accuse and track down anyone in the
name of others. Wiesenthal has never confined his “hunt” to those who
victimized him personally.

‘Driven by Hatred’
It is difficult to say just what drives this remarkable man. Is it a
craving for fame and praise? Or is he trying to live down a shameful
episode from his past?

Wiesenthal clearly enjoys the praise he receives. “He is a man of
considerable ego, proud of testimonials and honorary degrees,” the Los
Angeles Times has reported. [57] Bruno Kreisky has given a simpler
explanation. He said that Wiesenthal is “driven by hatred.” [58]

In light of his well-documented record of deceit, lies and
incompetence, the extravagant praise heaped upon this contemptible man
is a sorry reflection of the venal corruptibility and unprincipled
self-deception of our age.

Notes
Quoted in: M. Weber, “‘Nazi Hunter’ Caught Lying,” The Spotlight
(Washington, DC), Oct. 26, 1981, p. 9.
Interrogation of S. Wiesenthal on May 27 and 28, 1948, conducted by
Curt Ponger of the Interrogation Branch of the Evidence Division of
the Office (U.S.) Chief of Counsel for War Crimes. Interrogation No.
2820. On file at the National Archives (Washington, DC), “Records of
the U.S. Nürnberg War Crimes Trials Interrogations, 1946-49,” Record
Group 238, microfilm M-1019, roll 79, frames 460-469 and 470-476. Also
cited in: “New Documents Raise New Doubts About Simon Wiesenthal’s War
Years,” The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1988-89 (Vol. 8, No.
4), pp. 489-503.
PCIRO (International Refugee Organization, Austria) “Application for
Assistance” filled out and signed by Wiesenthal. Dated Jan. 16,1949.
(This was a trial exhibit in the Walus court case. Photocopy in
author’s possession.)
Simon Wiesenthal, The Murderers Among Us: The Simon Wiesenthal
Memoirs. Edited by Joseph Wechsberg. (New York: McGraw Hill, 1967)
Interrogation of S. Wiesenthal, May 27, 1948, pp. 1-2.
The Murderers Among Us, p. 27.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 29-35. This account is not inconsistent
with his 1948 and 1949 statements; See also: Simon Wiesenthal, Justice
Not Vengeance (New York: Grove Weidenfeld: 1989), pp. 7-9.
Interrogation of May 27, 1948, p. 2. In a signed 1945 statement,
Wiesenthal wrote:
“… I escaped on October 18, 1943, from the Lemberg [Lvov] hard labor
camp where I was kept as a prisoner during my two years of labor at
the railroad works… and went into hiding until joining Jewish
partisans on November 21, 1943, who operated there. It was while
fighting in the partisan ranks against the Nazis that we managed to
collect and bury for safekeeping considerable amount of evidence…
When the partisans were dispersed by the Germans I fled to Lemberg on
February 10, 1944, and again went into hiding. On June 13, 1944, I was
found during a house to house search and was immediately sent to the
famous Lacki camp, near that city …” Source: “Curriculum Vitae of
Ing. Wiesenthal, Szymon.” SHAEF, Subject: War Crimes, July 6, 1945.
Records of USAEUR, War Crimes Branch, National Archives (Suitland,
Maryland), Records Group 338, Box 534, Folder 000-50-59. Wiesenthal’s
alleged partisans activities are also recounted in Alan Levy, The
Wiesenthal File (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1994), pp. 50-53.
Interrogation of May 28, 1948, pp. 1-2.
Interrogation of May 28, 1948, p. 5.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 35-37.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 37-38; Interrogation, May 27, 1948, p. 2,
and May 28, 1948, p. 5; A. Levy, The Wiesenthal File (1994), p. 54.
The Murderers Among Us, pp. 39-44; Interrogation, May 27, 1948, pp.
2-3.
Interview with foreign journalists in Vienna, Nov. 10, 1975. Text
published in: “War Wiesenthal ein Gestapo-Kollaborateur?,” Profil
(Vienna), No. 47, Nov. 18, 1975, pp. 16, 22-23; Reprinted in: Robert
H. Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982), pp.
215-218, 222-223; Quoted in part in A. Levy, The Wiesenthal File
(1994), p. 349, and in, S. Wiesenthal, Justice Not Vengeance (New
York: 1989), pp. 7, 299. Kreisky was not alone in charging that
Wiesenthal had collaborated with the German Gestapo. Wim Van Leer,
columnist for the English-language daily Jerusalem Post, stated in May
1986 that a high-level police official in Vienna, citing confidential
police records, had told him during the early 1960s that these and
other charges against Wiesenthal were true. Source: J. Bushinsky,
“Nazi hunter sues over charges of links to Gestapo,” Chicago
Sun-Times, Jan. 31, 1987.
Simon Wiesenthal, KZ Mauthausen (Linz and Vienna: Ibis-Verlag, 1946).
Facsimile reprint in: Robert H. Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal:
Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982), p. 64.
“Firing Squad,” Life magazine, US edition, June 11, 1945, p. 50.
M. Weber and K. Stimely, “The Sleight-of-Hand of Simon Wiesenthal,”
The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1984 (Vol. 5, No. 1), pp.
120-122; D. National-Zeitung (Munich), May 21, 1993, p. 3.
S. Wiesenthal, KZ Mauthausen (1946). See also facsimile reprint in:
Robert H. Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982),
pp. 42, 46. This “confession” is a somewhat altered version of
Nuremberg document NO-1973; A new edition of Wiesenthal’s 1946 book
has been published under the title Denn sie Wussten, was sie tun:
Zeichnungen und Aufzeichnungen aus dem KZ Mauthausen (Vienna: F.
Deuticke, 1995). I am grateful to Robert Faurisson for bringing this
to my attention. He points out in a July 1995 essay that Wiesenthal
has deleted from this new edition both the “death bed confession” of
Ziereis as well as his drawing of the three Mauthausen inmates.
According to the Encyclopaedia Judaica (“Mauthausen,”, Vol. 11, p.
1138), a grand total of 206,000 persons were inmates of Mauthausen and
its satellite camps (including Hartheim) at one time or another.
S. Wiesenthal, KZ Mauthausen (1946). Facsimile reprint in: R.
Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation, p. 47.
R. Faurisson, “The Gas Chambers: Truth or Lie?,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Winter 1981, pp. 330, 361. See also: Hans
Fritzsche, The Sword in the Scales (London: 1953), p. 185; Gerald
Reitlinger, The Final Solution (London: Sphere, pb., 1971), p. 515; M.
Weber, “The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Summer 1992 (Vol. 12, No. 2), p. 182.
USA Today, April 21, 1983, p. 9A.
The Murderers Among Us, p. 44.
Evelyn Le Chene, Mauthausen: The History of a Death Camp (London:
1971), pp. 166-168 and 190-191.
“Mauthausen”, Encyclopaedia Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971),
vol. 11, p. 1138.
C. Moritz, ed., Current Biography 1975 (New York: H.W. Wilson, 1975),
p. 442; Wiesenthal interrogation of May 27, 1948, p. 3.
Mark Weber, “Jewish Soap,” The Journal of Historical Review, Summer
1991 (Vol. 11, No. 2), pp. 217-227; See also: Robert Faurisson, “La
savon juif,” Annales d’Histoire Revisionniste (Paris), No. 1,
Printemps 1987, pp. 153-159.
Der Neue Weg (Vienna), No. 17/18, 1946, pp. 4-5. Article entitled
“RIF” by “Ing. Wiesenth.” (Simon Wiesenthal).
Der Neue Weg (Vienna), Nr. 19/20, 1946, pp. 14-15. Article entitled
“Seifenfabrik Belsetz” (“Belzec Soap Factory”), by “Ing. S.Wiesenth.”
S. Wiesenthal, Sails of Hope (Macmillan, 1973).
Letters by Wiesenthal in Books and Bookmen (London), April 1975, p. 5,
and in Stars and Stripes (European edition), Jan. 24, 1993, p. 14.
Facsimile of Stars and Stripes letter in The Journal of Historical
Review, May-June 1993, p. 10; In 1986 Wiesenthal lied about his 1975
statement. In a letter dated May 12, 1986, to Prof. John George of
Central State University in Edmond, Oklahoma (copy in author’s
possession), Wiesenthal wrote: “I have never stated that ‘there were
no extermination camps on German soil.’ This quote is false, I could
never have said such a thing.”
For example, in a letter (dated Sept. 13, 1993), published in The New
York Times, Sept. 29, 1993, Wiesenthal boasted: “I succeeded in
putting a number of Nazis on trial who had perpetrated horrendous
crimes in the Nazi era, including Adolf Eichmann, Franz Stangl, Gustav
Wagner,…”
S. Birnbaum, “Wiesenthal’s Claim on Eichmann Disputed by Former Mossad
Head,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency Daily News Bulletin (New York), April
4, 1989. (Dispatch dated April 3).
J. Schachter, “Wiesenthal had no role in Eichmann capture,” The
Jerusalem Post, May 18, 1991. Facsimile reprint in Christian News, May
27, 1991, p. 19. See also: Ruth Sinai, “Wiesenthal’s role in
Eichmann’s capture disputed,” Associated Press, The Orange County
Register, Feb. 25, 1990, p. A 26; L. Lagnado, “How Simon Wiesenthal
Helped a Secret Nazi,” Forward (New York), Sept. 24, 1993, pp. 1, 3.
J. Schachter, The Jerusalem Post, May 18, 1991 (cited above).
Facsimile in Christian News, May 27, 1991, p. 19.
Arnold Forster, Square One (New York: 1988), pp. 187-189. (Forster was
general counsel of the Anti-Defamation League, a major Zionist
organization.)
J. Goldberg, “Top Spy Says Wiesenthal Lied About His Exploits,”
Forward (New York), Nov. 12, 1993, pp. 1, 4; R. Sinai, “Wiesenthal’s
role…,” The Orange County Register, Feb. 25, 1990 (cited above).
Michael Arndt, “The Wrong Man,” The Chicago Tribune Magazine, Dec. 2,
1984, pp. 15-35, esp. p. 23; Charles Ashman and Robert J. Wagman, The
Nazi Hunters (New York: Pharos Books, 1988), pp. 193-195.
“The Nazi Who Never Was,” The Washington Post, May 10, 1981, pp. B5,
B8.
“The Persecution of Frank Walus,” Reader (Chicago), Jan. 23, 1981, pp.
19, 30. After Wiesenthal was ultimately proven wrong in a similar case
in Canada, the Toronto Sun newspaper commented in an editorial: “It
seems that material provided by professional Nazi hunter Simon
Wiesenthal is wrong, but repeated anyway [in the media].” (Quoted by
M. Weber in The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1984, pp.
120-122.)
Gerald L. Posner and John Ware, Mengele: The Complete Story (New York:
Dell, 1987), pp. 220-221; Gerald Astor, The ‘Last’ Nazi: The Life and
Times of Dr. Joseph Mengele (Toronto: Paperjacks, 1986), p. 202.
G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele: The Complete Story (cited above), p.
220.
G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele (cited above), pp. 179-180; G. Astor,
The ‘Last’ Nazi (cited above), pp. 178-180.
Time magazine, Sept. 26, 1977, pp. 36-38. Cited in: G. Posner and J.
Ware, Mengele (cited above), p. 219.
“Hunting the ‘Angel of Death’,” Newsweek, May 20, 1985, pp. 36-38. See
also: M. Weber, “Lessons of the Mengele Affair,” Journal of Historical
Review, Fall 1985 (Vol. 6, No. 3), p. 382. On Wiesenthal’s distortion
of truth in the Mermelstein-IHR case, see: M. Weber, “Declaration,”
Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1982 (Vol. 3, No. 1), pp. 42-43;
M. Weber, “Albert Speer and the ‘Holocaust,”‘ Journal of Historical
Review, Winter 1984 (Vol. 5, Nos. 2-4), p. 439.
Midstream, Dec. 1983, p. 24. Quoted in: G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele
(cited above), p. 219; Los Angeles Times, Nov. 15, 1985, p. 2.
J. Schachter, “Wiesenthal had no role in Eichmann capture,” The
Jerusalem Post, May 18, 1991. Facsimile reprint in Christian News, May
27, 1991, p. 19.
Tom Bower in The Times (London), June 14, 1985, p. 14. Quoted in: G.
Posner and J. Ware, Mengele (cited above), pp. 222-223.
G. Posner and J. Ware, Mengele (cited above), pp. 222-223.
Betrayal, by Eli M. Rosenbaum, with William Hoffer. Published in 1993
by St. Martin’s Press (New York). Reviewed by Jacob Heilbrunn in The
New York Times Book Review, Oct. 10, 1993, p. 9.
Quoted in L. Lagnado, “How Simon Wiesenthal…,” Forward (New York),
Sept. 24, 1993, p. 3.
The New York Times Book Review, Oct. 10, 1993, p. 9; Forward (New
York), Sept. 24, 1993, p. 3.
“Was hat Wiesenthal zu verbergen?,” D. National-Zeitung (Munich), Nov.
11, 1988, p. 4.
David Sinai, “News We Doubt You’ve Seen,” The Jewish Press (Brooklyn,
NY), Dec. 23, 1988. Based on report in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz,
Dec. 16, 1988.
“A Message from Simon Wiesenthal,” Response: The Wiesenthal Center
World Report, Winter 1992, p. 11.
Charles Ashman and Robert J. Wagman, The Nazi Hunters (New York:
Pharos Books, 1988), p. 286; A. Popkin, “Nazi-Hunter Simon Wiesenthal:
‘Information is Our Best Defense’,” Washington Jewish Week, Oct. 29,
1987, p. 2.
Quoted in: M. Weber, The Spotlight, Oct. 26, 1981, p. 9.
Quoted in D. National-Zeitung (Munich), July 8, 1988, p. 7, and in, R.
Drechsler, Simon Wiesenthal: Dokumentation (Vienna: 1982), p. 199.
#2009
From The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1995 (Vol. 15, No.
4), pages 8-16. This is a revised and updated version of an article
that first appeared in the Winter 1989-90 issue of The Journal of
Historical Review.
——————————————————————————–
About the author
Mark Weber is director of the Institute for Historical Review. He
studied history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the
University of Munich, Portland State University and Indiana University
(M.A., 1977). For nine years he served as editor of the IHR’s Journal
of Historical Review.
——————————————————————————–
This essay, and others in this series, are available in handy leaflet
format, ideal for wide distribution. They can be ordered, postpaid, at
these prices:
10 copies, $2.00 :: 50 copies, $7.50 :: 100 copies or more, 10 cents
each.

Institute for Historical Review
P.O. Box 2739 — Newport Beach, CA 92659 — USA

[email protected]

************************************************************************
Was this post informative? Consider printing it or emailing it to
someone
you know.
_________________________________________
If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
against them — except force.” — John Bryant

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
–John Bryant

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To:Frank Arthur,
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the
like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:06 EST 2007
Article: 64929 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:780289 soc.culture.german:374598 soc.culture.ukrainian:132639 soc.culture.russian:458624 soc.culture.palestine:564503 soc.culture.swiss:64929
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!news.glorb.com!feed.cgocable.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Pepsifreak
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: The Alleged “Holocaust” of the Jews is Proving ever more Dangerous – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 213
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 16:40:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178728812 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 09 May 2007 10:40:12 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 10:40:12 MDT

The Alleged “Holocaust” of the Jews is Proving ever more Dangerous

On 8 Aug 2006 22:03:31 -0700, in can.politics “127.0.0.1”
wrote:

http://www.natallnews.com/story.php?id=2695

Current events in the Middle East confirm it: the alleged
“Holocaust” of the Jews is a historical lie that is proving ever
more dangerous. Let us recall that this alleged “Holocaust”, which
is the sword and the shield of the State of Israel, possesses at least
three aberrant features:

1) It has created “survivors” (“miraculous” ones) by the
million. Almost sixty years on from the end of the 1939-1945 war, the
number of “survivors” of that purported undertaking to exterminate
an entire people has been estimated by the specialist in demographics
of Jewish communities Jacob Ukeles at 687,900 (Haaretz, April 18,
2004).

>From that figure it may be deduced that in 1945 the number of European
Jews who had survived the war was most likely in the region of
3,250,000, a statistic that bears out what we already knew from other
information: never did the Germans have a policy of physical
extermination of the Jews and never did they possess any of those
weapons of mass destruction called execution “gas chambers” or
execution “gas vans”.

After the war, many Jews stayed in Europe and many others scattered
throughout the world, settling in nearly sixty countries. So it was
that in the late 1990s the teams put in charge by Steven Spielberg of
gathering survivors’ testimonies had to go to nearly sixty different
countries to record the said testimonies on video (Survivors of the
Shoah Visual Foundation, P.O. Box 3168, Los Angeles, California 90078,
USA; see also a related article in the French daily Libération of
November 3, 1999, p. 36).

Finally, in the present day, the Jewish population of Israel is close
to … seven million (!);

2) It constitutes a daunting weapon with which to stifle, crush and
kill; see the above drawing, recently passed on to me by Ahmed Rami,
depicting a book that, like writings in Hebrew, would be read from
right to left; hence the presentation.

3) It enabled the Zionists to succeed in creating a colony in
1947-1948, the very time when, everywhere else in the world, colonial
possessions were disintegrating. Established in the land of Palestine,
that colony became a “Jewish State”, endowed with a “Jewish
Army”. This State is racialist, domineering and sure of itself. In
accordance with a millennia-old tradition, it has, yet again, let the
Jewish people, – ever prey to the prophet’s anxiety, ever inclined
to groan, to complain, to threaten blackmail, to preach wars and
crusades, – make itself invariably loathsome wherever it passes
through.

Founded on the myth of the “Holocaust”, the State of Israel is
doomed

In a study dated October 8, 2001 and entitled “An Imaginary Holocaust
May Lead to a Real Holocaust” I wrote: “the State of Israel is
henceforth doomed. It will not even have lasted as long as the
ephemeral Christian kingdom of Jerusalem [which, in actual fact, lived
for 89 years]”; then, speaking of the “bad times ahead for the
Jews”, I described already what can be seen befalling that
colonialist State now.

The Zionists will have to leave Palestine. They will be returning to
our climes. In particular, they will invade Germany where the
authorities are already offering a fortune to Jewish immigrants from
anywhere. These wandering Jews will bewail their “Second
Holocaust”.

Again they will be demanding penitence, privileges of all sorts and
“reparations for the irreparable” (a fine Talmudic oxymoron!).
Thus, those settlers of another era will need to quit Jerusalem; but
will they do so in the manner of the Europeans of Algeria in 1962 or in
that of the Americans, in 1975, in Vietnam?

What will the Israelis do with their nuclear arsenal? How high will the
bill for the rest of humanity run to? One can hardly tell.

On the other hand, one may rightly affirm that present events justify
the warnings put out in the past by the revisionists. They had said
that the lie of the magical gas chambers allowed ANYTHING and that,
consequently, the world must be ready for ANYTHING in the way of Jewish
excessiveness. It would have been a good idea to listen to the
revisionists instead of throwing them in prison or trying to gag them.

Jewish neurosis and excessiveness in the Zionist myth and the
“Holocaust” myth

Whether belonging to the State of Israel or the Diaspora, the Jews,
with but too few exceptions like those of Noam Chomsky, Israel Shahak
or Edgar Morin, have acted with callousness and inhumanity. Their
alleged “Holocaust” has permitted them to slander nearly all
non-Jews, including the wartime Allies, the Neutrals, the Papacy, the
International Committee of the Red Cross, all accused of having, it
seems, let the Germans exterminate the European Jews.

They have thus accused whole nations of having committed or allowed to
be committed a gigantic crime which, in reality, was never perpetrated.

>From this slander of huge proportions they have drawn, with the greed
and cruelty of Shylock, an orgy of profits in monetary and political
terms as well as in the spheres of the law and the media. Moreover,
they have not cared to show any respect to either the defeated or the
impoverished. Their excessiveness (the messianic hubris) has made them
lose their heads.

These Jews would be well advised to reflect on what, in 1894, Bernard
Lazare wrote on the first page of his book Antisemitism: its history
and causes and which may be summarised as follows: if, in every era, in
every land, amongst all races, under all kinds of regime and whatever
the prevailing moral standards and customs, the people of Israel have
incited “hostility” and even “repugnance”, it is that “the
general causes of antisemitism [have] always lain in Israel itself and
not in those who have fought it.”

Up to now the revisionists have been treated like Palestinians,
Lebanese or, to talk Jewish, like the “seed of cattle” and for a
long time revisionism has remained beyond the understanding of the
greater part of the world, but now, in the present day, people are
beginning to grasp its message.

Millions, whole nations, witnesses to what is going on in the Middle
East, are becoming aware, in front of their television sets, of Jewish
neurosis and excessiveness.

At the same time they are discovering, or are about to discover, with
stupefaction, that at the root of the lie-laden accounts, full of
extravagance and hatred, that make up what the Jews call their
“Holocaust History”, there already lay that same neurosis, that
same excessiveness.

Jewish fads, extravagances and crazes bound for the rubbish bins of
history

The “mania for lying and believing lies is as catching as the itch”
(Céline). Man, as is known all too well, is subject to some quite
unlikely fancies. He goes so far as to kill or get himself killed for
ideas that he sometimes ends up discovering were false all along. The
business of weapons, wars and crusades, of which mass propaganda is a
central component, takes delight in these false ideas.

In the 19th and 20th centuries the Talmudists took in billions of
people with them. Freudianism, Zionism, Lenin- or Trotsky-style
Communism, Elie Wiesel-style holocaustic religion or Shoah business à
la Claude Lanzmann, all these inventions have been grounded in a
mixture of false ideas, messianic utopias and impostures that were
essentially Jewish. After having known triumph, Freudianism (not to be
confused with psychotherapy and psychiatry) and Leninism (not to be
confused with the communist ideal) are now largely discredited.

As is seen in our present day, Zionism, for its part, leads to
self-destruction and may perhaps bring on a worldwide catastrophe; the
Israelis have killed it. As for the “Holocaust” religion and Shoah
business, they seem to be flourishing, but, as the American revisionist
Arthur Robert Butz has remarked, the giant’s feet are made of clay,
and this fact is starting to be noticed.

These fads, extravagances and crazes, which bear the mark of Jewish
neurosis and excessiveness, look sure to finish one day in the rubbish
bins of history. But, as far as the “Holocaust” is concerned, that
day is still a long way off, so strongly has the Great Lie of the 20th
century pervaded people’s minds, like a lethal drug to which one
sadly ends up becoming addicted.

Fortunately the revisionists are here; good Judeo-therapists that they
are (the term is French revisionist Pierre Guillaume’s), they have no
equal when it comes to treating dependence on holocaustic lie poison.
If, beset with that affliction, one wants to regain reason and health,
there is nothing like a simple cure of revisionism.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur , or to
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:07 EST 2007
Article: 64936 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.german:374620 soc.culture.swiss:64936 soc.culture.polish:780462 de.soc.politik.misc:868693 soc.culture.europe:582541
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: GayJamesD
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.polish,de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.europe
Subject: Re: Der Jude ist ein dreckige Hund, Parasit, usw -[Aufloesung]- Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 570
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:36:39 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178814999 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 10 May 2007 10:36:39 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:36:39 MDT

Thanks for re-posting the entire article, so that more people can read it,
and discuss the topic.

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:12:46 GMT, “Marek Maciej Ziemba”
wrote:

>snipped

>”ArthurFranks” wrote in message
>news:[email protected]
>> On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:59:13 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc egon-karl
>> ullrich
>> wrote:
>>
>> Ein Teil der Auflösung des ‘Rätsel – ja-wie-kann-denn-der-sowas-sagen-?’
>> ist ja bereits veröffentlicht im Artikelstran “Der Jude ist ein Parasit”
>> (wer lesen kann und will ist klar im Vorteil, der meist dämliche Spruch
>> trifft hier mal wirklich zu), dort gibts auch ein zion. Original-Buch
>> zum runterladen:
>>
>> Es handelt sich in den “Subjects” um Zitate aus der zionistischen
>> Literatur von zionistischen Philosophen und zion. Vordenkern bzw. aus
>> der unangefochtenen Fachliteratur über den Zionismus bzw. über die zion.
>> Ideologie. Und die zitierten sind noch harmlos, statt “dreckiger Hund”,
>> kann man auch übersetzen “stinkender Hund”, lt. ‘LEO.dict’
>>
>> Wer meine Schriften kennt, dem war das auch von Anfang an klar. Anfänger
>> und Deppen gibts aber auch hier in dieser NG.
>>
>>
>> Hier der Beweis aus dem marxistischen Bereich (eigentl. jüd.-marx.
>> Bereich) des Herkunftsjuden Lenni Brenner, Wissenschaftsjournalist:
>>
>> (aus dem Englischen)
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> Lenni Brenner
>>
>> Zionismus im Zeitalter der Diktatoren
>> (Zionism in the Age of the Dictators)
>>
>>
>> 2. Blut und Boden (Blood and Soil)
>>
>>
>> Die Wurzeln des zionistischen Rassismus
>>
>>
>> Es war der Antisemitismus – alleine – welcher den Zionismus begründete.
>> Herzl konnte seine Bewegung in keiner Weise auf irgendeinem positiven
>> jüdischen Selbstverständnis aufbauen.
>>
>> Obwohl er die Unterstützung durch die Rabbiner anstrebte, war er
>> persönlich nicht gläubig. Er hatte kein besonderes Interesse an
>> Palästina, dem antiken Heimatland; er war ganz erpicht darauf, daß das
>> kenianische Hochland akzeptiert wird, zumindest auf einer zeitweiligen
>> Grundlage. Er hatte kein Interesse an Hebräisch; er betrachtete seinen
>> jüdischen Staat als ein sprachliches Abbild der Schweiz.
>>
>> Der Rassengedanke lag für ihn in der Luft; die deutschen Antisemiten
>> sprachen von den Juden als Rasse, bald jedoch verwarf er diese Doktrin
>> und nutzte in einer paradoxen Diskussion Israel Zangwill, einen seiner
>> frühesten Gefolgsleute, als ein Beispiel für seine Ablehnung dieser
>> Idee. Er beschrieb den englisch-jüdischen Autor so:
>>
>> “… vom langnasigen Neger-Typ, mit wolligem, tief-schwarzem Haar … er
>> stützt jedoch den Rassegedanken – manches daran kann ich gelten lassen,
>> ich muß lediglich ihn und dann wieder mich anschauen. Alles was ich
>> sagen kann: wir sind eine historische Einheit, eine Nation mit
>> anthropologischer Vielfalt.” [1]
>>
>>
>> Unbekümmert von religiösen Überlegungen, schlug er einen Atheisten, den
>> damals weltberühmten Autor Max Nordau, als seinen Nachfolger als
>> Präsident der WZO (Zionistische Weltorganisation) vor.
>>
>>
>> Und wieder waren die Jünger weniger liberal als ihr Herr.
>>
>> Nordau war mit einer Christin verheiratet und befürchtete, daß sich die
>> Orthodoxen auf allen Ebenen daran stoßen würden. Er war bereits
>> verheiratet, als er zum Zionismus konvertierte und wurde bald, trotz
>> seiner nichtjüdischen Ehefrau, ein anerkannter jüdischer Rassist.
>>
>> Am 21. Dezember 1903 gab er Eduard Drumonts radikal antisemitischer
>> Zeitung ‘La Libre Parole’ ein Interview, in welchem er sagte, daß der
>> Zionismus keine Sache der Religion sondern der Rassen-Exklusivität sei
>> und “es gibt keinen, mit welchem ich in größerer Übereinstimmung in
>> diesem Punkt stehe, als M. Drupont”. [3]
>>
>> Obwohl sich nur ein einziger nationaler Ableger der WZO (der
>> holländische Verband im Jahr 1913) jemals darum bemühte, die Juden,
>> welche in gemischten Ehen lebten, auszuschließen, starb der
>> kosmopolitische Zionismus einen frühen Tod mit Herzl im Jahr 1904. [4]
>>
>>
>> Die Bewegung in Osteuropa, ihre Massenbasis, teilte die spontanen
>> volks-religiösen Vorurteile der orthodoxen Gemeinden ihres Umfeldes.
>>
>> Obwohl die traditionellen Juden Missionierung kannten und Ehen mit
>> Nicht-Juden als Verstärkung ihrer Glaubenskraft ansahen, brachte später
>> von der katholischen Kirche ausgehender Druck die Rabbiner dazu,
>> Konvertierungen als “lästiges Jucken” zu betrachten und sie stellten die
>> Missionierung ein.
>>
>> Im Laufe der Jahrhunderte, wurde die Selbst-Abgrenzung zum Kennzeichen
>> der Juden. Mit der Zeit betrachteten die Massen Mischehen als Verrat an
>> der Orthodoxie. Obwohl im Westen nur manche Juden die Religion
>> abwandelten und “Reform”-Sekten bildeten sowie andere sich vom Gott
>> ihrer Vorväter gänzlich abwandten, ging der Lauf im Wesentlichen weg vom
>> Judaismus.
>>
>> Wenige nur stießen zur jüdischen Welt hinzu, entweder durch
>> Konvertierung oder Heiraten.
>>
>> Obschon der westliche Zionismus sich in einer mehr säkularen Atmosphäre
>> entwickelte als jener Ost-Europas, betrachtete die Masse seiner
>> Mitglieder Misch-Ehen eher als Wegführung der Juden von der Gemeinde
>> denn als Hinzufügung zu ihr.
>>
>> Die deutschen Akademiker, welche die zionistische Bewegung nach Herzls
>> Tod übernahmen, entwickelten die modernistisch-rassistische Ideologie
>> vom jüdischen Separatismus [Loslösungsstreben].
>>
>> Sie waren stark beeinflußt von ihren pan-germanischen Studenten-Kollegen
>> der ‘Wandervögel’ (Zugvögel oder Freigeister), welche den deutschen
>> Campus vor 1914 dominierten. Diese Chauvinisten wiesen die Juden als
>> nicht von germanischem Blut zurück; folglich konnten sie niemals Teil
>> des Deutschen Volkes sein und waren grundsätzlich Fremde auf deutschem
>> Boden. Alle jüdischen Studenten waren gezwungen, sich mit diesen
>> Konzepten, welche sie umringten, auseinander zu setzen.
>>
>> Ein paar bewegten sich nach links und wurden Sozialdemokraten. Für jene
>> war dies [der Wandervögel-Chauvinismus, Anm. eku] nur ein mehr
>> bourgeoiser Nationalismus und war als solcher zu bekämpfen.
>>
>> Die meisten blieben herkömmlich kaisertreu, standhafte Nationalisten,
>> welche darauf beharrten, daß tausend Jahre auf deutschem Boden aus ihnen
>> “Deutsche mosaischen Glaubens” gemacht hatten.
>>
>> Aber ein Anteil der jüdischen Studenten eignete sich die
>> ‘Wandervögel’-Ideologie an und übertrug sie einfach in zionistische
>> Terminologie.
>>
>> Sie stimmten mit den Antisemiten in mehreren Punkten überein: die Juden
>> waren kein Teil des Deutschen Volkes und, natürlich, Juden und Deutsche
>> sollten sich nicht geschlechtlich vermischen, nicht aus den traditionell
>> religiösen Gründen, sondern um der Reinheit ihres eigenen einzigartigen
>> Blutes willen.
>>
>> Da nicht von deutschem Blut, hätten sie zwangsläufig ihren eigenen Boden
>> zu bekommen: Palästina.
>>
>> Auf den ersten Blick schien es befremdlich, daß jüdische Studenten aus
>> der Mittel-Klasse derart beeinflußt durch antisemitisches Gedankengut
>> sein sollten, besonders, da zur selben Zeit der Sozialismus mit seiner
>> assimilationistischen Haltung gegenüber den Juden beträchtliche
>> Unterstützung in der Gesellschaft um sie herum gewann.
>>
>> Der Sozialismus appelierte jedoch vorwiegend an die Arbeiter, nicht an
>> die Mittel-Klasse; in ihrer Umwelt herrschte der Chauvinismus vor,
>> obwohl intellektuell, lehnten sie ihre Verbindung zum Deutschen Volk ab,
>> und in der Tat, niemals emanzipierten sie sich von der deutschen
>> Kapitalistenklasse, den ganzen Ersten Weltkrieg hindurch unterstüzten
>> sie leidenschaftlich ihre eigene Regierung.
>>
>>
>> [Anm. eku: s.a. “Max-Bodenheimer-Archiv”. Deutsche Zionisten bilden im
>> 1. WK mittels maßgeblicher Beteiligung der Kölner Fam. Bodenheimer
>> (=zionistisches Establishment) Unterstützungskommitee, dieses reist an
>> die Ostfront, bildet Judenräte in den befreiten Gebieten Polens, nennt
>> die Juden Europas “Deutsche” oder “deutschenfreundlich” und – nicht
>> zuletzt – sitzt buchstäblich als Ehren-Gast an Kaisers Esstisch!]
>>
>>
>> In all ihrem grandiosen intellektuellen Anspruch, war ihr völkischer
>> Zionismus doch nur einfach eine Imitation der deutschen
>> nationalistischen Ideologie. Deshalb war der junge Philosoph Martin
>> Buber fähig, während dem Ersten Weltkrieg den Zionismus mit inbrünstigem
>> deutschen Patriotismus zu verbinden.
>>
>> In seinem Buch ‘Drei Reden über das Judentum’, veröffentlicht im Jahre
>> 1911, sprach Buber über einen Jugendlichen, der:
>>
>> “einen Sinn hat für die Unsterblichkeit der Generationen einer
>> Blutgemeinschaft, welche er als Vorgänger seines Ich empfindet, dessen
>> Ausdauer wird unendlich währen.
>>
>> Hinzu kommt die Entdeckung, befördert durch sein Bewußtsein, daß Blut
>> eine tief verwurzelte, nährende Kraft im Inneren jedes einzelnen
>> Menschen ist;
>>
>> daß die tiefsten Schichten unseres Seins vom Blut bestimmt sind;
>>
>> daß unser innerstes Denken und unser Wille davon gefärbt sind.
>>
>> Jetzt findet er heraus, daß die Welt um ihn eine Welt der Eindrücke und
>> Einflüsse ist, wohingegen Blut das Reich einer beeinflußbaren und
>> beeindruckbaren Substanz ist, einer Sustanz die alles in ihre eigene
>> Form aufnimmt und anpasst, und, wer auch immer, vor die Wahl, Umgebung
>> oder Blut gestellt, sich für die Substanz entscheidet, fortan ein wahrer
>> Jude aus seinem Innersten sein muß, um zu leben als ein Jude mit all den
>> Widersprüchen, der Tragödie und all der späteren Verheißung seines
>> Blutes” [5]
>>
>> [Anm. eku: naturgemäß unvollkommene Rückübersetzung, werde noch
>> versuchen, den Originaltext Bubers zu bekommen…]
>>
>> Die Juden leben in Europa seit Jahrtausenden, weit länger, sagen wir
>> mal, als die Ungarn. Niemand träumte davon, sich auf die Ungarn als
>> Asiaten zu beziehen, jedoch, so Buber, die Juden Europas wären noch
>> Asiaten und würden es voraussichtlich immer bleiben.
>>
>> “Du kannst den Juden aus Palästina rauskriegen, aber niemals Palästina
>> raus aus dem Juden.”
>>
>>
>> Im Jahr 1916 schrieb Buber, daß der Jude:
>>
>> “vertrieben wurde aus seinem Land und über die Länder des Abendlandes
>> verstreut wurde, jedoch, trotz all dem, blieb er ein Orientale. Man kann
>> all dies im noch so sehr assimlierten Juden entdecken, wenn man Zugang
>> zu seiner Seele gewinnt … der unvergängliche, allen Juden gemeinsame
>> Trieb – dieser wird in das Sein einkehren nach einer Fortdauer des
>> Lebens in Palästina … Sobald der Trieb mit seiner Mutters Scholle in
>> Berührung kommt, wird er wieder schöpferisch.” [6]
>>
>> Bubers völkischer Zionismus, mit seinen ausgesuchten Strängen mystischen
>> Überschwangs, war jedoch zu vergeistigt um ein breites Publikum
>> anzusprechen.
>>
>> Was gebraucht wurde, war eine populäre zionistische Version des
>> Sozial-Darwinismus, welcher die bourgoise intellektuelle Welt des
>> aufbrechenden europäischen imperialen Wettbewerbs nach Afrika und nach
>> Osten überschwemmte.
>>
>> Die zionistische Version dieser Auffassung wurde von dem
>> österreichischen Anthropologen Ignatz Zollschan entwickelt. Für ihn war
>> der verborgene Nutzen des Judaismus, daß jener, obgleich unabsichtlich,
>> das Wunder der Wunder bewirken würde:
>>
>> “Eine Nation von reinem Blut, unverdorben von den Krankheiten des
>> Exzesses oder der Unmoral, von einem hoch entwickelten Sinn für
>> familiäre Reinheit und von tief verwurzelten tugendhaften Gewohnheiten
>> würde eine außergewöhnliche geistige Regsamkeit entwickeln.
>> Darüberhinaus sorgt das Verbot der Mischehen dafür, daß dieser
>> höchst-ethische Schatz durch reinmixen von weniger umsichtig
>> hervorgebrachten Rassen nicht verloren geht … daraus resultiert eine
>> naturgemäße Auswahl, welche keine Parallele in der Geschichte der
>> menschlichen Rasse findet … Wenn eine Rasse, die so hoch beschenkt
>> ist, die Gelegenheit bekommt, erneut ihre ursprüngliche Kraft zu
>> entwickeln, kann dem nichts gleichkommen, soweit es den kulturellen Wert
>> anbelangt.” [7]
>>
>> Sogar Albert Einstein unterschrieb die zionistischen Rassenkonzepte,
>> damit verstärkte er den Rassismus und verlieh ihm das Prestige seiner
>> Reputation. Seine eigenen Beiträge zur Diskussion klingen entsprechend
>> tiefsinnig, sie beruhen jedoch auf dem selben Unsinn.
>>
>> “Nationen mit rassischen Unterschieden scheinen Instinkte zu besitzen,
>> welche gegen ihre Verschmelzung wirken. Die Assimilation der Juden in
>> die europäischen Nationen … konnte nicht das Gefühl eines Mangels an
>> Verwandtschaft zwischen ihnen und jenen, unter denen sie lebten,
>> beseitigen. Letzten Endes ist das instinktive Gefühl des fehlenden
>> Verwandschaftsverhältnisses auf das Gesetz der Energieerhaltung
>> zurückzuführen. Aus diesem Grund kann es [das instinktive Mangelgefühl,
>> Anm. eku] durch keinen noch so wohlmeinenden Druck ausgerottet werden.”
>> [8]
>>
>> Buber, Zollschan und Einstein waren nur drei der klassischen Zionisten,
>> welche hochtrabend gelehrt über Rassen-Reinheit redeten. Jedoch konnte
>> der schiere Fanatismus Einiger nicht den des Amerikaners Maurice Samuel
>> einholen.
>>
>> Als ein gut bekannter Autor jener Zeit – später, in den 1940er Jahren
>> arbeitete er mit Weizman an dessen Autobiographie – wendete sich Samuel
>> im Jahre 1927 in seinem Werk, ‘Ich, der Jude’, an die amerikanische
>> Öffentlichkeit. Er denunzierte mit Horror eine Stadt, der er
>> bereitwillig zugestand, daß er sie nur vom Hörensagen kannte – und von
>> der uns die vorgelegten Hinweise nahelegen, daß es sich um die
>> ungebunden lebende Künstler-Kolonie bei Taos, Neu-Mexiko, handelt:
>>
>> “Auf diesem kleinen Platz kamen Repräsentanten der afrikanischen Neger,
>> der Amerikaner und der chinesischen Mongolen zusammen, der Semite und
>> der Arier … freie Mischehen setzen sich durch … Warum erfüllt mich
>> dieses Bild, teils wirklich, teils phantastisch, mit einem befremdenden
>> Abscheu, suggeriert es das Ekelerregende, das düstere Bestialische? …
>> Wieso ruft dieses Dorf, wie meine Phantasie heraufbeschwört, den
>> Gedanken an einen Haufen Reptilien hervor, die hässlich in einem
>> Wasserkübel brüten?” [9]
>>
>>
>>
>> “Um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit sein”
>>
>>
>> Obwohl ‘Blut’ ein wiederkehrendes Thema in der zionistischen
>> vor-Holokaust-Literatur war, war dieses nicht so zentral wie die
>> Botschaft vom ‘Boden’.
>>
>> Solange Amerikas Grenzen [relativ, Anm. eku] offen blieben, fragten
>> Europas Juden: wenn der Antisemitismus nicht in seiner Heimat bekämpft
>> werden konnte, warum sollten sie nicht einfach der Menge nach Amerika
>> folgen?
>>
>> Die zionistische Antwort war doppelt gewappnet: Antisemitismus würde die
>> Juden begleiten, wohin immer sie auch gingen, und, darüberhinaus, es
>> waren die Juden selbst, welche den Antisemitismus durch ihre eigene
>> Charackteristik hervor riefen.
>>
>> Die Wurzel des Antisemitismus, beharrten die Zionisten, war die jüdische
>> Exil-Existenz.
>>
>> Die Juden lebten parasitär von ihren “Wirtsvölkern”. Es gäbe so gut wie
>> keine jüdischen Bauern in der Diaspora. Die Juden lebten in den Städten,
>> sie waren der manuellen Arbeit entfremdet, oder, um es unverblümt zu
>> sagen, sie mieden diese und beschäftigten sich lieber mit
>> intellektuellen oder kommerziellen Angelegenheiten. Ihre Beanspruchung
>> des Patriotismus war bestenfalls hohl, da sie ewig von Land zu Land
>> wanderten. Und als sie selbst sich einbildeten, sie wären Sozialisten
>> und Internationalisten, waren sie in Wirklichkeit nicht mehr als die
>> Mittelsmänner der Revolution, welche die “Schlachten anderer Leute”
>> ausfochten.
>>
>> Diese zusammengefaßten Lehren waren bekannt als ‘Shelilat Ha’galut’ [Die
>> Verneinung der Diaspora], an der sich das gesamte Spektrum der Zionisten
>> festhielt, nur in Details variiert.
>>
>> Sie wurden in der zionistischen Presse energisch vertreten, in der die
>> ausgeprägte Qualität vieler Artikel aus der Feindseligkeit gegenüber dem
>> gesamten jüdischen Volk bestand. Wenn irgendjemand diese Fetzen ohne
>> Kenntnis der Quellen las, würde er automatisch vermuten, daß sie der
>> antisemitischen Presse entstammten.
>>
>> Die ‘Weltanschauung’ der Jugendorganisation ‘Hashomer Hatzair’ [Junge
>> Wächter], ursprünglich verfaßt im Jahr 1917, allerdings erst 1936 wieder
>> neu veröffentlicht, war typisch für diese Art Ergüsse:
>>
>> “Der Jude ist die Karikatur eines normalen, natürlichen Menschen, in
>> physischer wie spiritueller Hinsicht. Als Einzelwesen in der
>> Gesellschaft rebelliert er und wirft die gesellschaftlichen Bindungen
>> ab, er kennt weder Ordnung noch Disziplin.” [10]
>>
>>
>> Ganz ähnlich konnte so im Jahre 1935 Ben Frommer, ein Autor der
>> ultra-rechten zionistisch-revisionistischen Bewegung, nicht weniger als
>> 16 Millionen seiner Mit-Juden [offenbar wurde seine Erklärung weltweit
>> verbreitet, Anm. eku] erklären, daß:
>>
>> “Die Tatsache ist unabweisbar, daß die Juden kollektiv krank und
>> neurotisch sind. Jene Berufs-Juden, welche nun erschüttert diese
>> Wahrheit entrüstet zurückweisen, sind die größten Feinde ihrer Rasse,
>> denn sie führen sie dadurch auf die Suche nach falschen Lösungen oder
>> zumeist nur nach Beschönigungen.” [11]
>>
>> Diese Art des jüdischen Selbsthasses durchsetzte einen großen Teil des
>> zionistischen Schrifttums.
>>
>> Im Jahre 1934 erregte Yehezkel Kaufman – damals berühmt als Gelehrter
>> für biblische Geschichte an der Hebräischen Universität zu Jerusalem,
>> und obwohl selbst Zionist, dennoch ein Gegner der bizarren Theorie der
>> Negation der Diaspora – wütende Kontroversen durch eine Auswahl der
>> hebräischen Literatur mit noch schlimmeren Beispielen.
>>
>> Auf Hebräisch konnten die pathetischen Schreiber ihre Mit-Juden ohne
>> Furcht vor dem Vorwurf, den Judenhassern Munition zu liefern, regelrecht
>> zur Sau machen. Kaufmans ‘Hurban Hanefesh’ (Holokaust der Seele) zitiert
>> dazu drei der klassisch-zionistischen Vordenker.
>>
>> Für Micah Yosef Berdichevsky waren die Juden “keine Nation, kein Volk,
>> keine Menschen”.
>>
>> Für Yosef Chaim Brenner waren sie nicht mehr als “Zigeuner, dreckige
>> Hunde, nicht-menschlich, erbärmliche Hunde”.
>>
>> Für Aaron David Gordon war sein Volk nicht besser als “Parasiten,
>> grundsätzlich unnütze Leute”. [12]
>>
>> [Anm. eku: dieses Buch Kaufmans, wohl als eine Kritik an den
>> zionistischen Pöbeleien gemeint, hatte Julius Streicher lt. Text der
>> Webseite der frommen, ultra-orthodoxen Juden, JewsAgainstZionism,
>> gekannt, aus dieser Quell hatte Streicher offenbar eine Reihe seiner
>> Beschreibungen und Ausdrücke für die Juden gewonnen]
>>
>> Natürlich mußte Maurice Samuel seine Schönschrift einbringen, um
>> Verleumdungen gegen seine Mit-Juden zusammen zu brauen.
>>
>> Im Jahr 1924 fabrizierte er in seinem Werk ‘Ihr Nicht-Juden’ (You
>> Gentiles) eine von ihrem eigenen bösartigen Schöpfer gegen die
>> christliche Ordnung angetriebene Judenheit:
>>
>> “Wir Juden, wir, die Zerstörer, werden für immer die Zerstörer bleiben.
>> Egal was ihr macht, nie wird es unserem Anspruch genügen. Ewig werden
>> wir zerstören, denn wir brauchen unsere eigene Welt, eine Gottes-Welt,
>> zu deren Erschaffung ihr nicht veranlagt seid … jene von uns, welche
>> diese Wahrheit nicht begreifen, werden sich immer wiederfinden in
>> Allianz mit euren rebellischen Gruppen, bis die Desillusionierung kommt,
>> unser elendes Schicksal, welches uns in eurer Mitte verstreute, hat uns
>> diese unwillkommene Rolle aufgedrängt.” [13]
>>
>>
>> Der Labour-Zionismus [linke, nicht-marxistische Strömung] brachte seine
>> eigene einzigartige Sorte des jüdischen Selbsthasses hervor.
>>
>> Trotz seines Namens und Anspruches, war der Labour-Zionismus niemals
>> fähig, einen signifikanten Anteil der jüdischen Arbeiterklasse in auch
>> nur irgendeinem Land der Diaspora für sich einzunehmen.
>>
>> Seine Mitglieder führten ein selbst-widerlegendes Argument an: sie
>> behaupteten, daß die jüdischen Arbeiter nur in “marginalen” Industrien
>> beschäftigt seien, in solchen wie der Nadel-Industrie [Nadeln für
>> Textilherstellung und Grammophone, Anm. eku], welche keine wesentliche
>> Bedeutung für die VolksWirtschaften der “Wirts”-Nationen hatten, daher
>> würden die jüdischen Arbeiter immerwährend marginal für die
>> Arbeiterbewegung in den Ländern ihres Aufenthalts bleiben.
>>
>> Jüdische Arbeiter, so wurde behauptet, könnten einen “gesunden”
>> Klassenkampf nur in ihrem eigenen Land wagen.
>>
>> Arme Juden zeigten natürlich wenig Interesse an einer sogenannten
>> Arbeiter-Bewegung, welche ihnen nicht etwa erzählte, mit allem was sie
>> vermochten für die Verbesserung der gegenwärtigen Bedingungen zu
>> kämpfen, sondern sich eher um das weit entfernte Palästina zu sorgen.
>>
>> Der Ruf der zionistischen Arbeiter-Bewegung richtete sich paradoxerweise
>> primär an jene jungen Mittelklasse-Juden, welche den Bruch zu ihrer
>> Herkunfts-Klasse suchten, war jedoch nicht bereit, sich dann den
>> Arbeitern der Länder ihres Aufenthalts zu zuwenden.
>>
>> Der Labour-Zionismus wurde so eine Art Gegenkultur-Sekte, welche die
>> jüdischen Marxisten wegen deren Internationalismus und die jüdische
>> Mittelklasse als parasitische Ausbeuter der “Wirts”völker anprangerte.
>>
>> Im Endeffekt übertrugen sie den traditionellen Antisemitismus ins
>> Jiddische: die Juden waren in den falschen Ländern in den falschen
>> Berufen und machten die falsche Politik.
>>
>> Es brauchte den Holokaust, um diesem Gejammer einen Sinn zu geben.
>>
>> Erst dann erkannten sie den gemeinsamen Nenner in ihrer eigenen
>> Botschaft und der anti-jüdischen Propaganda der Nazis.
>>
>> Im März 1942 gestand Chaim Greenberg, zu der Zeit Herausgeber des
>> Labour-zionistischen Presse-Organs ‘Jewish Frontier’ in New York,
>> schmerzlich ein, daß es tatsächlich
>>
>> “eine Zeit [gegeben hat,] als es für zionistische Sprecher
>> (einschließlich den Schreiber) modisch war, von ihrem Standpunkt aus zu
>> erklären, ‘um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit
>> sein’. Bis zu diesem Tag stehen die zionistischen Labour-Kreise unter
>> dem Einfluß der Vorstellung, daß die Rückkehr nach Zion einen Prozeß der
>> Reinigung von unseren ökonomischen Unsauberkeiten einschließt. Jeden,
>> der keine sogenannte ‘produktive’ manuelle Arbeit ergreift, hält man für
>> einen Sünder gegen das Volk Israel und gegen die Menschheit.” [14]
>>
>>
>>
>> [b]”Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda”[/b]
>>
>> Wenn irgendjemandem ohne weitere Fakten erzählt würde, daß die ersten
>> Zionisten Rassisten waren, würde derjenige automatisch vermuten, daß
>> dies ein Teil der kolonialistischen Seite des Zionismus in Palästina sei.
>>
>> Tatsächlich ist dem nicht so; Der ‘Blut-Zionismus’ hätte sich auch
>> entwickelt, wenn Palästina komplett unbewohnt gewesen wäre. Die
>> Begeisterung für ‘Blut und Boden’ war bereits Teil des Zionismus, bevor
>> der erste moderne Zionist jemals Europa verließ.
>>
>> Der Rassen-Zionismus hingegen war ein merkwürdiger Ableger des
>> Rassen-Antisemitismus.
>>
>> Gewiß, so argumentierten die Zionisten, die Juden waren eine reine
>> Rasse, bestimmt reiner als, sagen wir mal, die Deutschen, die einen
>> großen Zuschlag slawischen Blutes besaßen, wie sogar die All-Deutschen
>> eingestanden. Für diese Zionisten konnte jedoch noch nicht mal ihr
>> Glaube an die Rassen-Reinheit den einen Makel der jüdischen Existenz
>> überspielen: die Juden verfügten nicht über ihren eigenen jüdischen Boden.
>>
>> Wenn die teutonischen Rassisten sich als ‘Übermenschen’ sehen konnten,
>> sahen diese hebräischen Rassisten die Juden eben nicht in diesem Licht;
>> eher war das Gegenteil der Fall.
>>
>> Sie glaubten, daß wegen des Fehlens eines eigenen Bodens die Juden
>> “Untermenschen” wären, daher wären diese, aus der Sicht ihrer “Wirte”,
>> wenig mehr als Blutsauger: die Welt-Pest eben.
>>
>> Wenn man an den Wahrheitsgehalt der rassischen Exklusivität glaubt,
>> fällt es schwer, etwas gegen den Rassismus von irgendjemand anderem
>> einzuwenden.
>>
>> Wenn man weiters daran glaubt, daß es für ein Volk unmöglich ist, gesund
>> zu bleiben, außer in seinem eigenen Heimatland, kann man nichts gegen
>> irgendeinen anderen einwenden, der “Fremde” von seinem Territorium
>> ausschließt.
>>
>> Tatsächlich jedoch dachte der Durchschnitts-Zionist selbst niemals
>> daran, das zivilisierte Europa zu verlassen, um es gegen die Wildnis
>> Palästinas einzutauschen. In Wirklichkeit ist es offensichtlich, daß ihm
>> die zionistische ‘Blut und Boden’-Ideologie eine vortreffliche
>> Begründung lieferte, den Antisemitismus nicht auf dessen Heimatboden zu
>> bekämpfen: Es war nicht der Fehler der Antisemiten, es kam von dem
>> eigenen Pech der Juden, ihrem Dasein im Exil.
>>
>> Die Zionisten konnten tränenreich darlegen, daß in dem Verlust
>> Palästinas die Wurzel des Antisemitismus lag und die Wiedergewinnung
>> Palästinas die einzige Lösung der Judenfrage wäre. Alles andere könne
>> nur Beschönigung sein oder zwecklos.
>>
>> Walter Laqueur, Wortführer der zionistischen Historiker, fragte in
>> seinem Buch, ‘A History of Zionism’ [Die Geschichte des Zionismus], ob
>> das zionistische Beharren auf der Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus
>> nicht doch das “Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda” war. [15]
>>
>> Sicher war es das.
>>
>> Laqueurs Frage kann jedoch am besten mit einer anderen Frage beantwortet
>> werden: ist es schwierig, den leichtgläubigen Leser einer Nazi-Zeitung
>> zu verstehen, der daraus schloß, daß das, was die Nazis erklärten und
>> welchem die Zionisten – Juden – zustimmten, richtig sein müsse?
>>
>> Und es kam noch schlimmer: jede jüdische Bewegung, welche über die
>> Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus schwätzte, geradeso, als wäre jener
>> “natürlich”, strebte nach vertraglichen Übereinkommen mit den Nazis, als
>> diese an die Macht kamen.
>>
>> ——–
>>
>> Fußnoten und Quellen:
>>
>> 1. Marvin Lowenthal (ed.), The Diaries of Theodor Herzl, p.78.
>>
>> 2. Amos Elon, Herzl, p.255.
>>
>> 3. Desmond Stewart, Theodor Herzl, p.322.
>>
>> 4. The WZO is structured by national states, and elections are held on a
>> national basis for the World Zionist Congress; the various ideological
>> tendencies which are world-wide in their structure, run in the various
>> national elections for delegates.
>>
>> 5. Martin Buber, On Judaism, pp.15-19.
>>
>> 6. Ibid., pp.75-7.
>>
>> 7. Ignatz Zollschan, Jewish Questions (1914) pp.17-18.
>>
>> 8. Solomon Goldman, Crisis and Decision (1938), p.116.
>>
>> 9. Maurice Samuel, I, the Jew, pp.244-6.
>>
>> 10. Our Shomer “Weltanschauung”, Hashomer Hatzair (December 1936), p.26.
>>
>> 11. Ben Frommer, The Significance of a Jewish State, Jewish Call
>> (Shanghai, May 1935), p.10.
>>
>> 12. Yehezkel Kaufman, Hurban Hanefesh: A Discussion of Zionism and
>> Anti-Semitism, Issues (Winter 1967), p.106.
>>
>> 13. Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p.155.
>>
>> 14. Chaim Greenberg, The Myth of Jewish Parasitism, Jewish Frontiers
>> (March 1942), p.20.
>>
>> 15. Walter Laqueur, A History of Zionism, p.500.
>>
>> ************************************************************************
>> http://www.marxists.de/middleast/brenner/ch02.htm
>>
>

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:08 EST 2007
Article: 64937 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.german:374621 soc.culture.swiss:64937 soc.culture.polish:780463 de.soc.politik.misc:868694 soc.culture.europe:582542
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: GayJamesD
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.polish,de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.europe
Subject: Der Jude ist ein dreckige Hund, Parasit, usw -[Aufloesung]- Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 556
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:36:51 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178815011 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 10 May 2007 10:36:51 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:36:51 MDT

On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:59:13 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc egon-karl ullrich
wrote:

Ein Teil der Auflösung des ‘Rätsel – ja-wie-kann-denn-der-sowas-sagen-?’
ist ja bereits veröffentlicht im Artikelstran “Der Jude ist ein Parasit”
(wer lesen kann und will ist klar im Vorteil, der meist dämliche Spruch
trifft hier mal wirklich zu), dort gibts auch ein zion. Original-Buch
zum runterladen:

Es handelt sich in den “Subjects” um Zitate aus der zionistischen
Literatur von zionistischen Philosophen und zion. Vordenkern bzw. aus
der unangefochtenen Fachliteratur über den Zionismus bzw. über die zion.
Ideologie. Und die zitierten sind noch harmlos, statt “dreckiger Hund”,
kann man auch übersetzen “stinkender Hund”, lt. ‘LEO.dict’

Wer meine Schriften kennt, dem war das auch von Anfang an klar. Anfänger
und Deppen gibts aber auch hier in dieser NG.

Hier der Beweis aus dem marxistischen Bereich (eigentl. jüd.-marx.
Bereich) des Herkunftsjuden Lenni Brenner, Wissenschaftsjournalist:

(aus dem Englischen)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Lenni Brenner

Zionismus im Zeitalter der Diktatoren
(Zionism in the Age of the Dictators)

2. Blut und Boden (Blood and Soil)

Die Wurzeln des zionistischen Rassismus

Es war der Antisemitismus – alleine – welcher den Zionismus begründete.
Herzl konnte seine Bewegung in keiner Weise auf irgendeinem positiven
jüdischen Selbstverständnis aufbauen.

Obwohl er die Unterstützung durch die Rabbiner anstrebte, war er
persönlich nicht gläubig. Er hatte kein besonderes Interesse an
Palästina, dem antiken Heimatland; er war ganz erpicht darauf, daß das
kenianische Hochland akzeptiert wird, zumindest auf einer zeitweiligen
Grundlage. Er hatte kein Interesse an Hebräisch; er betrachtete seinen
jüdischen Staat als ein sprachliches Abbild der Schweiz.

Der Rassengedanke lag für ihn in der Luft; die deutschen Antisemiten
sprachen von den Juden als Rasse, bald jedoch verwarf er diese Doktrin
und nutzte in einer paradoxen Diskussion Israel Zangwill, einen seiner
frühesten Gefolgsleute, als ein Beispiel für seine Ablehnung dieser
Idee. Er beschrieb den englisch-jüdischen Autor so:

“… vom langnasigen Neger-Typ, mit wolligem, tief-schwarzem Haar … er
stützt jedoch den Rassegedanken – manches daran kann ich gelten lassen,
ich muß lediglich ihn und dann wieder mich anschauen. Alles was ich
sagen kann: wir sind eine historische Einheit, eine Nation mit
anthropologischer Vielfalt.” [1]

Unbekümmert von religiösen Überlegungen, schlug er einen Atheisten, den
damals weltberühmten Autor Max Nordau, als seinen Nachfolger als
Präsident der WZO (Zionistische Weltorganisation) vor.

Und wieder waren die Jünger weniger liberal als ihr Herr.

Nordau war mit einer Christin verheiratet und befürchtete, daß sich die
Orthodoxen auf allen Ebenen daran stoßen würden. Er war bereits
verheiratet, als er zum Zionismus konvertierte und wurde bald, trotz
seiner nichtjüdischen Ehefrau, ein anerkannter jüdischer Rassist.

Am 21. Dezember 1903 gab er Eduard Drumonts radikal antisemitischer
Zeitung ‘La Libre Parole’ ein Interview, in welchem er sagte, daß der
Zionismus keine Sache der Religion sondern der Rassen-Exklusivität sei
und “es gibt keinen, mit welchem ich in größerer Übereinstimmung in
diesem Punkt stehe, als M. Drupont”. [3]

Obwohl sich nur ein einziger nationaler Ableger der WZO (der
holländische Verband im Jahr 1913) jemals darum bemühte, die Juden,
welche in gemischten Ehen lebten, auszuschließen, starb der
kosmopolitische Zionismus einen frühen Tod mit Herzl im Jahr 1904. [4]

Die Bewegung in Osteuropa, ihre Massenbasis, teilte die spontanen
volks-religiösen Vorurteile der orthodoxen Gemeinden ihres Umfeldes.

Obwohl die traditionellen Juden Missionierung kannten und Ehen mit
Nicht-Juden als Verstärkung ihrer Glaubenskraft ansahen, brachte später
von der katholischen Kirche ausgehender Druck die Rabbiner dazu,
Konvertierungen als “lästiges Jucken” zu betrachten und sie stellten die
Missionierung ein.

Im Laufe der Jahrhunderte, wurde die Selbst-Abgrenzung zum Kennzeichen
der Juden. Mit der Zeit betrachteten die Massen Mischehen als Verrat an
der Orthodoxie. Obwohl im Westen nur manche Juden die Religion
abwandelten und “Reform”-Sekten bildeten sowie andere sich vom Gott
ihrer Vorväter gänzlich abwandten, ging der Lauf im Wesentlichen weg vom
Judaismus.

Wenige nur stießen zur jüdischen Welt hinzu, entweder durch
Konvertierung oder Heiraten.

Obschon der westliche Zionismus sich in einer mehr säkularen Atmosphäre
entwickelte als jener Ost-Europas, betrachtete die Masse seiner
Mitglieder Misch-Ehen eher als Wegführung der Juden von der Gemeinde
denn als Hinzufügung zu ihr.

Die deutschen Akademiker, welche die zionistische Bewegung nach Herzls
Tod übernahmen, entwickelten die modernistisch-rassistische Ideologie
vom jüdischen Separatismus [Loslösungsstreben].

Sie waren stark beeinflußt von ihren pan-germanischen Studenten-Kollegen
der ‘Wandervögel’ (Zugvögel oder Freigeister), welche den deutschen
Campus vor 1914 dominierten. Diese Chauvinisten wiesen die Juden als
nicht von germanischem Blut zurück; folglich konnten sie niemals Teil
des Deutschen Volkes sein und waren grundsätzlich Fremde auf deutschem
Boden. Alle jüdischen Studenten waren gezwungen, sich mit diesen
Konzepten, welche sie umringten, auseinander zu setzen.

Ein paar bewegten sich nach links und wurden Sozialdemokraten. Für jene
war dies [der Wandervögel-Chauvinismus, Anm. eku] nur ein mehr
bourgeoiser Nationalismus und war als solcher zu bekämpfen.

Die meisten blieben herkömmlich kaisertreu, standhafte Nationalisten,
welche darauf beharrten, daß tausend Jahre auf deutschem Boden aus ihnen
“Deutsche mosaischen Glaubens” gemacht hatten.

Aber ein Anteil der jüdischen Studenten eignete sich die
‘Wandervögel’-Ideologie an und übertrug sie einfach in zionistische
Terminologie.

Sie stimmten mit den Antisemiten in mehreren Punkten überein: die Juden
waren kein Teil des Deutschen Volkes und, natürlich, Juden und Deutsche
sollten sich nicht geschlechtlich vermischen, nicht aus den traditionell
religiösen Gründen, sondern um der Reinheit ihres eigenen einzigartigen
Blutes willen.

Da nicht von deutschem Blut, hätten sie zwangsläufig ihren eigenen Boden
zu bekommen: Palästina.

Auf den ersten Blick schien es befremdlich, daß jüdische Studenten aus
der Mittel-Klasse derart beeinflußt durch antisemitisches Gedankengut
sein sollten, besonders, da zur selben Zeit der Sozialismus mit seiner
assimilationistischen Haltung gegenüber den Juden beträchtliche
Unterstützung in der Gesellschaft um sie herum gewann.

Der Sozialismus appelierte jedoch vorwiegend an die Arbeiter, nicht an
die Mittel-Klasse; in ihrer Umwelt herrschte der Chauvinismus vor,
obwohl intellektuell, lehnten sie ihre Verbindung zum Deutschen Volk ab,
und in der Tat, niemals emanzipierten sie sich von der deutschen
Kapitalistenklasse, den ganzen Ersten Weltkrieg hindurch unterstüzten
sie leidenschaftlich ihre eigene Regierung.

[Anm. eku: s.a. “Max-Bodenheimer-Archiv”. Deutsche Zionisten bilden im
1. WK mittels maßgeblicher Beteiligung der Kölner Fam. Bodenheimer
(=zionistisches Establishment) Unterstützungskommitee, dieses reist an
die Ostfront, bildet Judenräte in den befreiten Gebieten Polens, nennt
die Juden Europas “Deutsche” oder “deutschenfreundlich” und – nicht
zuletzt – sitzt buchstäblich als Ehren-Gast an Kaisers Esstisch!]

In all ihrem grandiosen intellektuellen Anspruch, war ihr völkischer
Zionismus doch nur einfach eine Imitation der deutschen
nationalistischen Ideologie. Deshalb war der junge Philosoph Martin
Buber fähig, während dem Ersten Weltkrieg den Zionismus mit inbrünstigem
deutschen Patriotismus zu verbinden.

In seinem Buch ‘Drei Reden über das Judentum’, veröffentlicht im Jahre
1911, sprach Buber über einen Jugendlichen, der:

“einen Sinn hat für die Unsterblichkeit der Generationen einer
Blutgemeinschaft, welche er als Vorgänger seines Ich empfindet, dessen
Ausdauer wird unendlich währen.

Hinzu kommt die Entdeckung, befördert durch sein Bewußtsein, daß Blut
eine tief verwurzelte, nährende Kraft im Inneren jedes einzelnen
Menschen ist;

daß die tiefsten Schichten unseres Seins vom Blut bestimmt sind;

daß unser innerstes Denken und unser Wille davon gefärbt sind.

Jetzt findet er heraus, daß die Welt um ihn eine Welt der Eindrücke und
Einflüsse ist, wohingegen Blut das Reich einer beeinflußbaren und
beeindruckbaren Substanz ist, einer Sustanz die alles in ihre eigene
Form aufnimmt und anpasst, und, wer auch immer, vor die Wahl, Umgebung
oder Blut gestellt, sich für die Substanz entscheidet, fortan ein wahrer
Jude aus seinem Innersten sein muß, um zu leben als ein Jude mit all den
Widersprüchen, der Tragödie und all der späteren Verheißung seines
Blutes” [5]

[Anm. eku: naturgemäß unvollkommene Rückübersetzung, werde noch
versuchen, den Originaltext Bubers zu bekommen…]

Die Juden leben in Europa seit Jahrtausenden, weit länger, sagen wir
mal, als die Ungarn. Niemand träumte davon, sich auf die Ungarn als
Asiaten zu beziehen, jedoch, so Buber, die Juden Europas wären noch
Asiaten und würden es voraussichtlich immer bleiben.

“Du kannst den Juden aus Palästina rauskriegen, aber niemals Palästina
raus aus dem Juden.”

Im Jahr 1916 schrieb Buber, daß der Jude:

“vertrieben wurde aus seinem Land und über die Länder des Abendlandes
verstreut wurde, jedoch, trotz all dem, blieb er ein Orientale. Man kann
all dies im noch so sehr assimlierten Juden entdecken, wenn man Zugang
zu seiner Seele gewinnt … der unvergängliche, allen Juden gemeinsame
Trieb – dieser wird in das Sein einkehren nach einer Fortdauer des
Lebens in Palästina … Sobald der Trieb mit seiner Mutters Scholle in
Berührung kommt, wird er wieder schöpferisch.” [6]

Bubers völkischer Zionismus, mit seinen ausgesuchten Strängen mystischen
Überschwangs, war jedoch zu vergeistigt um ein breites Publikum
anzusprechen.

Was gebraucht wurde, war eine populäre zionistische Version des
Sozial-Darwinismus, welcher die bourgoise intellektuelle Welt des
aufbrechenden europäischen imperialen Wettbewerbs nach Afrika und nach
Osten überschwemmte.

Die zionistische Version dieser Auffassung wurde von dem
österreichischen Anthropologen Ignatz Zollschan entwickelt. Für ihn war
der verborgene Nutzen des Judaismus, daß jener, obgleich unabsichtlich,
das Wunder der Wunder bewirken würde:

“Eine Nation von reinem Blut, unverdorben von den Krankheiten des
Exzesses oder der Unmoral, von einem hoch entwickelten Sinn für
familiäre Reinheit und von tief verwurzelten tugendhaften Gewohnheiten
würde eine außergewöhnliche geistige Regsamkeit entwickeln.
Darüberhinaus sorgt das Verbot der Mischehen dafür, daß dieser
höchst-ethische Schatz durch reinmixen von weniger umsichtig
hervorgebrachten Rassen nicht verloren geht … daraus resultiert eine
naturgemäße Auswahl, welche keine Parallele in der Geschichte der
menschlichen Rasse findet … Wenn eine Rasse, die so hoch beschenkt
ist, die Gelegenheit bekommt, erneut ihre ursprüngliche Kraft zu
entwickeln, kann dem nichts gleichkommen, soweit es den kulturellen Wert
anbelangt.” [7]

Sogar Albert Einstein unterschrieb die zionistischen Rassenkonzepte,
damit verstärkte er den Rassismus und verlieh ihm das Prestige seiner
Reputation. Seine eigenen Beiträge zur Diskussion klingen entsprechend
tiefsinnig, sie beruhen jedoch auf dem selben Unsinn.

“Nationen mit rassischen Unterschieden scheinen Instinkte zu besitzen,
welche gegen ihre Verschmelzung wirken. Die Assimilation der Juden in
die europäischen Nationen … konnte nicht das Gefühl eines Mangels an
Verwandtschaft zwischen ihnen und jenen, unter denen sie lebten,
beseitigen. Letzten Endes ist das instinktive Gefühl des fehlenden
Verwandschaftsverhältnisses auf das Gesetz der Energieerhaltung
zurückzuführen. Aus diesem Grund kann es [das instinktive Mangelgefühl,
Anm. eku] durch keinen noch so wohlmeinenden Druck ausgerottet werden.” [8]

Buber, Zollschan und Einstein waren nur drei der klassischen Zionisten,
welche hochtrabend gelehrt über Rassen-Reinheit redeten. Jedoch konnte
der schiere Fanatismus Einiger nicht den des Amerikaners Maurice Samuel
einholen.

Als ein gut bekannter Autor jener Zeit – später, in den 1940er Jahren
arbeitete er mit Weizman an dessen Autobiographie – wendete sich Samuel
im Jahre 1927 in seinem Werk, ‘Ich, der Jude’, an die amerikanische
Öffentlichkeit. Er denunzierte mit Horror eine Stadt, der er
bereitwillig zugestand, daß er sie nur vom Hörensagen kannte – und von
der uns die vorgelegten Hinweise nahelegen, daß es sich um die
ungebunden lebende Künstler-Kolonie bei Taos, Neu-Mexiko, handelt:

“Auf diesem kleinen Platz kamen Repräsentanten der afrikanischen Neger,
der Amerikaner und der chinesischen Mongolen zusammen, der Semite und
der Arier … freie Mischehen setzen sich durch … Warum erfüllt mich
dieses Bild, teils wirklich, teils phantastisch, mit einem befremdenden
Abscheu, suggeriert es das Ekelerregende, das düstere Bestialische? …
Wieso ruft dieses Dorf, wie meine Phantasie heraufbeschwört, den
Gedanken an einen Haufen Reptilien hervor, die hässlich in einem
Wasserkübel brüten?” [9]

“Um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit sein”

Obwohl ‘Blut’ ein wiederkehrendes Thema in der zionistischen
vor-Holokaust-Literatur war, war dieses nicht so zentral wie die
Botschaft vom ‘Boden’.

Solange Amerikas Grenzen [relativ, Anm. eku] offen blieben, fragten
Europas Juden: wenn der Antisemitismus nicht in seiner Heimat bekämpft
werden konnte, warum sollten sie nicht einfach der Menge nach Amerika
folgen?

Die zionistische Antwort war doppelt gewappnet: Antisemitismus würde die
Juden begleiten, wohin immer sie auch gingen, und, darüberhinaus, es
waren die Juden selbst, welche den Antisemitismus durch ihre eigene
Charackteristik hervor riefen.

Die Wurzel des Antisemitismus, beharrten die Zionisten, war die jüdische
Exil-Existenz.

Die Juden lebten parasitär von ihren “Wirtsvölkern”. Es gäbe so gut wie
keine jüdischen Bauern in der Diaspora. Die Juden lebten in den Städten,
sie waren der manuellen Arbeit entfremdet, oder, um es unverblümt zu
sagen, sie mieden diese und beschäftigten sich lieber mit
intellektuellen oder kommerziellen Angelegenheiten. Ihre Beanspruchung
des Patriotismus war bestenfalls hohl, da sie ewig von Land zu Land
wanderten. Und als sie selbst sich einbildeten, sie wären Sozialisten
und Internationalisten, waren sie in Wirklichkeit nicht mehr als die
Mittelsmänner der Revolution, welche die “Schlachten anderer Leute”
ausfochten.

Diese zusammengefaßten Lehren waren bekannt als ‘Shelilat Ha’galut’ [Die
Verneinung der Diaspora], an der sich das gesamte Spektrum der Zionisten
festhielt, nur in Details variiert.

Sie wurden in der zionistischen Presse energisch vertreten, in der die
ausgeprägte Qualität vieler Artikel aus der Feindseligkeit gegenüber dem
gesamten jüdischen Volk bestand. Wenn irgendjemand diese Fetzen ohne
Kenntnis der Quellen las, würde er automatisch vermuten, daß sie der
antisemitischen Presse entstammten.

Die ‘Weltanschauung’ der Jugendorganisation ‘Hashomer Hatzair’ [Junge
Wächter], ursprünglich verfaßt im Jahr 1917, allerdings erst 1936 wieder
neu veröffentlicht, war typisch für diese Art Ergüsse:

“Der Jude ist die Karikatur eines normalen, natürlichen Menschen, in
physischer wie spiritueller Hinsicht. Als Einzelwesen in der
Gesellschaft rebelliert er und wirft die gesellschaftlichen Bindungen
ab, er kennt weder Ordnung noch Disziplin.” [10]

Ganz ähnlich konnte so im Jahre 1935 Ben Frommer, ein Autor der
ultra-rechten zionistisch-revisionistischen Bewegung, nicht weniger als
16 Millionen seiner Mit-Juden [offenbar wurde seine Erklärung weltweit
verbreitet, Anm. eku] erklären, daß:

“Die Tatsache ist unabweisbar, daß die Juden kollektiv krank und
neurotisch sind. Jene Berufs-Juden, welche nun erschüttert diese
Wahrheit entrüstet zurückweisen, sind die größten Feinde ihrer Rasse,
denn sie führen sie dadurch auf die Suche nach falschen Lösungen oder
zumeist nur nach Beschönigungen.” [11]

Diese Art des jüdischen Selbsthasses durchsetzte einen großen Teil des
zionistischen Schrifttums.

Im Jahre 1934 erregte Yehezkel Kaufman – damals berühmt als Gelehrter
für biblische Geschichte an der Hebräischen Universität zu Jerusalem,
und obwohl selbst Zionist, dennoch ein Gegner der bizarren Theorie der
Negation der Diaspora – wütende Kontroversen durch eine Auswahl der
hebräischen Literatur mit noch schlimmeren Beispielen.

Auf Hebräisch konnten die pathetischen Schreiber ihre Mit-Juden ohne
Furcht vor dem Vorwurf, den Judenhassern Munition zu liefern, regelrecht
zur Sau machen. Kaufmans ‘Hurban Hanefesh’ (Holokaust der Seele) zitiert
dazu drei der klassisch-zionistischen Vordenker.

Für Micah Yosef Berdichevsky waren die Juden “keine Nation, kein Volk,
keine Menschen”.

Für Yosef Chaim Brenner waren sie nicht mehr als “Zigeuner, dreckige
Hunde, nicht-menschlich, erbärmliche Hunde”.

Für Aaron David Gordon war sein Volk nicht besser als “Parasiten,
grundsätzlich unnütze Leute”. [12]

[Anm. eku: dieses Buch Kaufmans, wohl als eine Kritik an den
zionistischen Pöbeleien gemeint, hatte Julius Streicher lt. Text der
Webseite der frommen, ultra-orthodoxen Juden, JewsAgainstZionism,
gekannt, aus dieser Quell hatte Streicher offenbar eine Reihe seiner
Beschreibungen und Ausdrücke für die Juden gewonnen]

Natürlich mußte Maurice Samuel seine Schönschrift einbringen, um
Verleumdungen gegen seine Mit-Juden zusammen zu brauen.

Im Jahr 1924 fabrizierte er in seinem Werk ‘Ihr Nicht-Juden’ (You
Gentiles) eine von ihrem eigenen bösartigen Schöpfer gegen die
christliche Ordnung angetriebene Judenheit:

“Wir Juden, wir, die Zerstörer, werden für immer die Zerstörer bleiben.
Egal was ihr macht, nie wird es unserem Anspruch genügen. Ewig werden
wir zerstören, denn wir brauchen unsere eigene Welt, eine Gottes-Welt,
zu deren Erschaffung ihr nicht veranlagt seid … jene von uns, welche
diese Wahrheit nicht begreifen, werden sich immer wiederfinden in
Allianz mit euren rebellischen Gruppen, bis die Desillusionierung kommt,
unser elendes Schicksal, welches uns in eurer Mitte verstreute, hat uns
diese unwillkommene Rolle aufgedrängt.” [13]

Der Labour-Zionismus [linke, nicht-marxistische Strömung] brachte seine
eigene einzigartige Sorte des jüdischen Selbsthasses hervor.

Trotz seines Namens und Anspruches, war der Labour-Zionismus niemals
fähig, einen signifikanten Anteil der jüdischen Arbeiterklasse in auch
nur irgendeinem Land der Diaspora für sich einzunehmen.

Seine Mitglieder führten ein selbst-widerlegendes Argument an: sie
behaupteten, daß die jüdischen Arbeiter nur in “marginalen” Industrien
beschäftigt seien, in solchen wie der Nadel-Industrie [Nadeln für
Textilherstellung und Grammophone, Anm. eku], welche keine wesentliche
Bedeutung für die VolksWirtschaften der “Wirts”-Nationen hatten, daher
würden die jüdischen Arbeiter immerwährend marginal für die
Arbeiterbewegung in den Ländern ihres Aufenthalts bleiben.

Jüdische Arbeiter, so wurde behauptet, könnten einen “gesunden”
Klassenkampf nur in ihrem eigenen Land wagen.

Arme Juden zeigten natürlich wenig Interesse an einer sogenannten
Arbeiter-Bewegung, welche ihnen nicht etwa erzählte, mit allem was sie
vermochten für die Verbesserung der gegenwärtigen Bedingungen zu
kämpfen, sondern sich eher um das weit entfernte Palästina zu sorgen.

Der Ruf der zionistischen Arbeiter-Bewegung richtete sich paradoxerweise
primär an jene jungen Mittelklasse-Juden, welche den Bruch zu ihrer
Herkunfts-Klasse suchten, war jedoch nicht bereit, sich dann den
Arbeitern der Länder ihres Aufenthalts zu zuwenden.

Der Labour-Zionismus wurde so eine Art Gegenkultur-Sekte, welche die
jüdischen Marxisten wegen deren Internationalismus und die jüdische
Mittelklasse als parasitische Ausbeuter der “Wirts”völker anprangerte.

Im Endeffekt übertrugen sie den traditionellen Antisemitismus ins
Jiddische: die Juden waren in den falschen Ländern in den falschen
Berufen und machten die falsche Politik.

Es brauchte den Holokaust, um diesem Gejammer einen Sinn zu geben.

Erst dann erkannten sie den gemeinsamen Nenner in ihrer eigenen
Botschaft und der anti-jüdischen Propaganda der Nazis.

Im März 1942 gestand Chaim Greenberg, zu der Zeit Herausgeber des
Labour-zionistischen Presse-Organs ‘Jewish Frontier’ in New York,
schmerzlich ein, daß es tatsächlich

“eine Zeit [gegeben hat,] als es für zionistische Sprecher
(einschließlich den Schreiber) modisch war, von ihrem Standpunkt aus zu
erklären, ‘um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit
sein’. Bis zu diesem Tag stehen die zionistischen Labour-Kreise unter
dem Einfluß der Vorstellung, daß die Rückkehr nach Zion einen Prozeß der
Reinigung von unseren ökonomischen Unsauberkeiten einschließt. Jeden,
der keine sogenannte ‘produktive’ manuelle Arbeit ergreift, hält man für
einen Sünder gegen das Volk Israel und gegen die Menschheit.” [14]

[b]”Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda”[/b]

Wenn irgendjemandem ohne weitere Fakten erzählt würde, daß die ersten
Zionisten Rassisten waren, würde derjenige automatisch vermuten, daß
dies ein Teil der kolonialistischen Seite des Zionismus in Palästina sei.

Tatsächlich ist dem nicht so; Der ‘Blut-Zionismus’ hätte sich auch
entwickelt, wenn Palästina komplett unbewohnt gewesen wäre. Die
Begeisterung für ‘Blut und Boden’ war bereits Teil des Zionismus, bevor
der erste moderne Zionist jemals Europa verließ.

Der Rassen-Zionismus hingegen war ein merkwürdiger Ableger des
Rassen-Antisemitismus.

Gewiß, so argumentierten die Zionisten, die Juden waren eine reine
Rasse, bestimmt reiner als, sagen wir mal, die Deutschen, die einen
großen Zuschlag slawischen Blutes besaßen, wie sogar die All-Deutschen
eingestanden. Für diese Zionisten konnte jedoch noch nicht mal ihr
Glaube an die Rassen-Reinheit den einen Makel der jüdischen Existenz
überspielen: die Juden verfügten nicht über ihren eigenen jüdischen Boden.

Wenn die teutonischen Rassisten sich als ‘Übermenschen’ sehen konnten,
sahen diese hebräischen Rassisten die Juden eben nicht in diesem Licht;
eher war das Gegenteil der Fall.

Sie glaubten, daß wegen des Fehlens eines eigenen Bodens die Juden
“Untermenschen” wären, daher wären diese, aus der Sicht ihrer “Wirte”,
wenig mehr als Blutsauger: die Welt-Pest eben.

Wenn man an den Wahrheitsgehalt der rassischen Exklusivität glaubt,
fällt es schwer, etwas gegen den Rassismus von irgendjemand anderem
einzuwenden.

Wenn man weiters daran glaubt, daß es für ein Volk unmöglich ist, gesund
zu bleiben, außer in seinem eigenen Heimatland, kann man nichts gegen
irgendeinen anderen einwenden, der “Fremde” von seinem Territorium
ausschließt.

Tatsächlich jedoch dachte der Durchschnitts-Zionist selbst niemals
daran, das zivilisierte Europa zu verlassen, um es gegen die Wildnis
Palästinas einzutauschen. In Wirklichkeit ist es offensichtlich, daß ihm
die zionistische ‘Blut und Boden’-Ideologie eine vortreffliche
Begründung lieferte, den Antisemitismus nicht auf dessen Heimatboden zu
bekämpfen: Es war nicht der Fehler der Antisemiten, es kam von dem
eigenen Pech der Juden, ihrem Dasein im Exil.

Die Zionisten konnten tränenreich darlegen, daß in dem Verlust
Palästinas die Wurzel des Antisemitismus lag und die Wiedergewinnung
Palästinas die einzige Lösung der Judenfrage wäre. Alles andere könne
nur Beschönigung sein oder zwecklos.

Walter Laqueur, Wortführer der zionistischen Historiker, fragte in
seinem Buch, ‘A History of Zionism’ [Die Geschichte des Zionismus], ob
das zionistische Beharren auf der Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus
nicht doch das “Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda” war. [15]

Sicher war es das.

Laqueurs Frage kann jedoch am besten mit einer anderen Frage beantwortet
werden: ist es schwierig, den leichtgläubigen Leser einer Nazi-Zeitung
zu verstehen, der daraus schloß, daß das, was die Nazis erklärten und
welchem die Zionisten – Juden – zustimmten, richtig sein müsse?

Und es kam noch schlimmer: jede jüdische Bewegung, welche über die
Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus schwätzte, geradeso, als wäre jener
“natürlich”, strebte nach vertraglichen Übereinkommen mit den Nazis, als
diese an die Macht kamen.

——–

Fußnoten und Quellen:

1. Marvin Lowenthal (ed.), The Diaries of Theodor Herzl, p.78.

2. Amos Elon, Herzl, p.255.

3. Desmond Stewart, Theodor Herzl, p.322.

4. The WZO is structured by national states, and elections are held on a
national basis for the World Zionist Congress; the various ideological
tendencies which are world-wide in their structure, run in the various
national elections for delegates.

5. Martin Buber, On Judaism, pp.15-19.

6. Ibid., pp.75-7.

7. Ignatz Zollschan, Jewish Questions (1914) pp.17-18.

8. Solomon Goldman, Crisis and Decision (1938), p.116.

9. Maurice Samuel, I, the Jew, pp.244-6.

10. Our Shomer “Weltanschauung”, Hashomer Hatzair (December 1936), p.26.

11. Ben Frommer, The Significance of a Jewish State, Jewish Call
(Shanghai, May 1935), p.10.

12. Yehezkel Kaufman, Hurban Hanefesh: A Discussion of Zionism and
Anti-Semitism, Issues (Winter 1967), p.106.

13. Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p.155.

14. Chaim Greenberg, The Myth of Jewish Parasitism, Jewish Frontiers
(March 1942), p.20.

15. Walter Laqueur, A History of Zionism, p.500.

************************************************************************
http://www.marxists.de/middleast/brenner/ch02.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:10 EST 2007
Article: 64938 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.usa:1997900 soc.culture.canada:574931 uk.politics.misc:1898861 soc.culture.europe:582543 soc.culture.polish:780464 soc.culture.russian:458695 soc.culture.swiss:64938
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: GayJamesD
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.canada,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: ZYD Holohoax Costs Yanks Over $35 BILLION A Year!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 118
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:36:58 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178815018 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 10 May 2007 10:36:58 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:36:58 MDT

On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:26:45 GMT, in alt.revisionism “abc”
wrote:

“Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced
that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.

Fred A. Leuchter is America’s leading specialist on the design and
fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers. In
1988, Leuchter scraped samples from the alleged gas chamber walls in
Auschwitz, Birkenau and Lublin. Cyanide residue would be clearly evident on
all these walls if gassings did occur. To his astonishment, Leuchter found
no significant cyanide traces in any one of these rooms.

In 1991, the Polish government repeated these tests to disprove Leuchter’s
findings, but they as well found no evidence of any gassings ever occurring.

The structural integrity of these “gas chambers” is also extremely faulty.
These rooms have ordinary doors and windows which are not hermetically
sealed! There are large gaps between the floors and doors. If the Germans
had attempted to gas anyone in these rooms, they would have died themselves,
as the gas would have leaked and contaminated the entire area. Also, no
equipment exists to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings.
Nothing was made to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chambers.
There are no provisions to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floors
or ceilings. No exhaust stacks have ever existed.

Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body
has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have
been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died
of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were
murdered Germans, not Jews. Roughly the equivalent of ten football fields
should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one
body has ever been discovered.

The Germans documented everything in meticulous detail from shrubbery to
arbors, but no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or
even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide. All documents ever
presented were drawn up AFTER the war.

Even if we threw away all the evidence and accounted for every so-called gas
chamber, it would have taken 68 YEARS to accomplish gassing six million
Jews!

Even The Diary of Anne Frank is a hoax. Portions of the diary were written
with a ball point pen. These pens were not in use at the time Anne Frank
lived.

It is not denied concentration camps existed. Tragically, many died of
typhus or starvation, as often happens in such situations. There is,
however, no evidence that any gassings occurred for the reasons of genocide.

Israel continues to receive trillions of dollars worldwide as retribution
for Holocaust gassings. Our country has donated more money to Israel than to
any other country in the history of the world — over $35 billion per year,
everything included. If not for our extravagantly generous gifts to Israel,
every family in America could afford a brand new Mercedes Benz. Surely the
American people would be outraged if they realized their hard-earned money
is being squandered in these difficult times.

With all this money at stake for Israel, it is easy to comprehend why this
Holocaust hoax is so secretly guarded. The Jewish name for Holocaust is
“Shoah.” In Zionist circles, it is known as “Shoah Business.” If nothing
else, this unbelievable coverup demonstrates the irrepressible Zionist
influence and control of our country. Their only defense against the facts
is to cry out “antisemitic,” “Skinhead” or “Nazi,” whereas the majority of
those who question the Holocaust are ordinary citizens…though you would
never know it from the media.

In whatever way you can, please help shatter this profitable myth. It is
time we stop sacrificing America’s welfare for the sake of Israel and spend
our hard-earned dollars on Americans.

(For more information contact The Institute for Historical Review P.O. Box
2739 Newport Beach, CA 92659 USA).

There are compelling reasons to believe that the so-called holocaust never
existed. Page 223, in The Diary of Anne Frank, (Pan Horizons edition, Pan
Books Ltd., London, 1989), indicates that the size of Auschwitz, the most
notorious of all German work camps, WAS VERY SMALL, with only 11,000 people
(many of whom may not even have been Jews) being evacuated by the Germans at
the time of the Russian advance in 1945. Certainly, compared to Spielberg’s
film, Schindler’s List (which Emilie Schindler, Oskar’s widow, said was full
of lies), and other Jewish propaganda, that millions upon millions of Jews
were systematically exterminated, 11,000 people is a very small number.
Simple arithmetic tells us that the Germans would have had to have had
hundreds of camps, or else they would have had to exterminate 137 people PER
HOUR, in order for six million Jews to have been exterminated at such small
camps as Auschwitz, a feat that would have been humanly impossible
considering that, according to Douglas Reed’s Behind the Scene and The
Controversy of Zion, a mere 850,000 soldiers and others were killed by the
entire German and Japanese war machines combined during WW2 (see p.397-400
of Douglas Reed’s book Controversy of Zion). People who would believe the
Jewish propaganda that six million Jews were exterminated by Hitler must
KEEP IN MIND THE SMALL SCALE CONSTRUCTION OF AUSCHWITZ AND THE VERY FEW
OTHER GERMAN WORK CAMPS THAT EXISTED DURING WW2.
On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh
broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS – KENW-TV) said that when
Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was
told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years. Again, simple arithmetic tells us that
25,000 times a half dozen camps does not equal 6,000,000. In fact, it
doesn’t even equal 600,000. . . .

It is an interesting fact that the number of so-called persecuted Jews KEEPS
INCREASING. Hal Greenwald, program director for the Hillel Foundation at
Duke University, a Jewish student group, has been promoting the idea that
NINE MILLION JEWS WERE EXTERMINATED IN HITLER’S GAS CHAMBERS (New York
Times, Nov. 9, 1991, AP). NOW IT’S 9 MILLION AND GROWING. ..JUST LIKE OUR
DEBT/TAX MONEY SUPPLY…THE NUMBERS JUST KEEP COMING OUT OF THIN AIR. .
.(The Bible Caused Economic and Financial Slavery in the New World Order by
Lee Cheney)”.

Read the entire article online in depth:

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:11 EST 2007
Article: 64939 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us pl.regionalne.warszawa:435569 soc.culture.polish:780465 soc.culture.europe:582544 soc.culture.german:374622 soc.culture.swiss:64939
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: GayJamesD
Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: ZYD Kollaboraci With Nazis=KASTNER, RUMKOWSKI, WIESENTHAL + 51 More Documented!!
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 200
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:37:09 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1178815029 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 10 May 2007 10:37:09 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:37:09 MDT

Unfortunately, too true.
Always, the ZYDS do their best to foment wars, and other miseries, everywhere
in the world, just to increase their power and the Jew World Order.

On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:19:19 -0700, FredBurg
wrote:

>Those who have failed to learn from the past 2000 years of history, will be
>doomed to repeat history.

>With now an extra 51 well documented proven cases of ZHID COLLABORATION
>WITH NAZIS, besides notorious KASTNER case, one MUST question the
>HOLOHOAX figures!!

>Now even the notorious Simon WIESENTHAL is proven to be a nazi GESTAPO
>COLLABORATOR!!

>On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:11:30 -0700, Ken Levi wrote:

>>For the past 2000 years, the world has suffered because of the cursed
>>Christkiller ZHIDS.

>>Not just the Kollaboraci of the ZHIDS with the nazis.

>>On 27 Sep 2004 16:03:09 -0000, PhilMathews >>wrote:

>>>Kenneth McVay,SOBC, the well-known fag in Canada,
>>>Fag McVay of Vancouver, convicted of child molesting
>>>and car theft in California and Oregon, and still
>>>unemployed gas pump boy, mastermind of the
>>>Canadian branch of NAMBLA, wants all to know
>>>about all his fellow criminals and perverts.

>>>Here is a photo of Ken McVay, director of WWW.NIZKOR.ORG–
>>>Does he not have the uncouth look as to fit the profile of a
>>>person who would say in general regarding child porn:
>>>”I am weary of seeing the issue of “child porn” blown out of
>>>proportion (I’ve been on and around the Net since 1988, and
>>>have yet to come across anything I’d consider “child porn.”
>>>I’ve seen photos of naked children, … and fail to see the
>>>harm, or any great moral danger to our society).”?
>>>http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg
>>> Would any of you want to leave this person, Ken McVay,
>>> alone with your children?

>>>From: [email protected] (JohannSebastianBott)
>>>Subject: Re:ZHID ORDNUNGSPOLIZEI = ZYDOWSKY KOLABORANCI!!!
>>>Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.krakow,pl.regionalne.wroclaw
>>>On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:33:28 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>>Another significant article that merits discussion!!!

>>On Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:15:13 -0400, PAWLIKOWSKI
>> wrote:
>
>> > Just a moment ago, on soc.culture.polish,
>> > Dr. J. Ilicki, Associate Professor of Sociology
>> > and Judaic Studies on Upsalla University raised
>> > the question of Polish Polish in the service of
>> > Germans during occupation of Poland. The only
>> > reason for this question at this time seems to be
>> > his need to stir interethnic hatered. Provocatively,
>> > Dr. Ilicki asks:
>> > 1) who were the members of the
>> > police, volunteers or draftees?,
>> > 2) what was their social status?
>> > 3) what happened to them after the war?
>> > Just to play completely innocent (and dumb) he also asks
>> > why they were called Granatowa (dark-navy-blue) Police.
>
>> > Only naive will believe that Prof. Ilicki does not
>> > know the answers.
>> > Also only naive will believe that he is not interested
>> > in Pinsk the hometown of his parents and allegedly
>> > the site of the burial of his grandparents and over
>> > 30,000 pinksers (Jews from Pinsk). He admitte
>> > that his mother listed them as killed there with
>> > Yad Vashem. However, young (about 40 years old)
>> > Julian pretends disintrest, because he is afraid that
>> > exhumations might start at the alleged burial site
>> > and will find no skeletons as same happened last
>> > year at nearby Mariompole, presently in Lithuania.
>
>> > But coming back to Dr Illicki question: Polish Police
>> > during German occupation was dramatically reduced
>> > in numbers and pre-war policemen were forced to
>> > serve as an auxillary force to German Ordnung Polizei.
>> > They were ususally not armed,and when armed never
>> > given more than five bullets for their long rifles.
>> > Moreover, after each use of firearm they
>> > (as well as the Ukraininan Police) had to write
>> > a report for what target each bullet was used
>> > and with what effectivness, hardly an invitation to
>> > the genocide.
>
>>>>>>> Hardly truth to Pawlikowski’s story too.
>
>> > On the other hand there was a police force in
>> > the Third Reich, in which service was completely
>> > voluntary. It was called Ordnungdienst. Their
>> > emblem was a light alloy Star of David. The
>> > social background of these Jewish collaborators
>> > according to Iasaiah Trunk was as follows: 18%
>> > with post-graduate degrees, 60% with college degree,
>> > 20% with elementary education. These are data
>> > from self-serving, post-war questionaries.
>
>> > But even Trunk admits that in Warsaw the
>> > requirement was that EACH Jewish policeman
>> > has at least matura (two years of college)
>> > see page 489 of his book. In practice, the
>> > Jewish policemen were all lawyers and
>> > journalist who with the day of German
>> > occupation immediately were fired from
>> > their jobs, like the Polish teachers, because
>> > the schools were closed.
>
>> The service was voluntary. Take the job and keep
>> your life a little longer or die now!
>
>> Pawlikowski forgot how the Soviets were conscripted.
>> Under Stalin they ran to enlist hoping to avoid being
>> killed in the next “relocation”!
>
>> > While Polish teachers joined the underground,
>> > unemployed Jewish intelligentia clamored for the police work.

>> > Some of it was really gruesome as you remember
>> > from our previous description of the Feb. 1942
>> > execution on Rybna Street market place in Lodz.
>> > German newsreel of this horrible hanging is shown
>> > endlessly in Wiesenthal Museum in LA. Thousands
>> > of Jews standing and watching behind three
>> > uniformed Germans with their backs and holstered
>> > pistols facing Jewish crowd and about to be hanged
>> > women passing out and forced into
>> > the noose by Jewish Policemen.
>> > ————-
>> > Jozef Pawlikowski

>> Herman

>First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
>First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao Tse Dung
>Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!! Me

>If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
>then visit www.freedomsite.org

>Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

>”At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
>is a revolutionary act.”
>(George Orwell)

>David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

>”All truth passes through three stages.
>First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
>and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
>(Arthur Schopenhauer)

>”The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
>but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
>falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
>they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
>against them — except force.” — John Bryant

>”To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
>acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
>and impossible to ignore.”
>–John Bryant

>For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
>JEW-WATCH:
>http://www.jewwatch.com

>Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
>NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
>people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

>Or, other useful websites include:
>ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
>IHR – www.ihr.org
>OSTARA – www.ostara.org
>PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
>Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
>AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
>THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
> Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
> Subscribe: [email protected]

>Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
>They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:11 EST 2007
Article: 64941 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:582568 soc.culture.german:374637 soc.culture.swiss:64941 alt.politics.europe:64352
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: GodHatesFAGS
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,alt.politics.europe
Subject: Ungarn: Die Juden bekommen Angst – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 52
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 20:40:24 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1178829624 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 10 May 2007 14:40:24 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:40:24 MDT

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:57:10 +0200, in de.soc.politik.misc Frank Bügel
wrote:

Angst vor dem jahrelang betrogenen, ungarischem Volk:

–snip–
Budapest:
Völkische Revolution?

… Die Demonstranten forderten den Rücktritt der sozialliberalen
Regierungskoalition und skandierten immer wieder ‘Ria-Ria-Hungaria’,
‘Revolution-Revolution’ sowie ‘Sechsundfünfzig-Sechsundfünfzig’. Dies war
eine Anspielung auf den baldigen 50sten Jahrestag der 1956er Revolution am
23sten Oktober, bei der gegen die damalige sowjetische Besatzung
demonstriert worden war. … Im Meer der ungarischen Fahnen fielen auch
diejenigen mit den so genannten Arpadenstreifen auf, die zur Symbolpalette
der faschistischen hungaristischen Bewegung 1944 gehörten. …

…die … Darstellung durch westliche Berichterstatter, in Gyurcsánys Rede
sei es schlicht darum gegangen, dass er die Öffentlichkeit über den Zustand
der Wirtschaft belogen hätte, um seine Wiederwahl zu sichern, und dass die
Unruhen eine Folge dieses Eingeständnisses seien, geht im Grunde an der
Wirklichkeit Ungarns vorbei. …

Auch die heutige ungarische Bewegung ist ethnonationalistisch motiviert,
sie bestimmt also die Identität des Landes als ethnisch homogenes
Magyarentum, ja manchmal sogar als Rasse, und bestimmt die Zugehörigkeit
zur Nation aufgrund des Blutes und der Abstammung, was mit einer Ablehnung
des Westens, des Liberalismus und des Kapitalismus einhergeht. ….

Es ist … der völkisch-patriotische Ethnonationalismus, der dieser
Bewegung die nötige Munition liefert. Sie begann kulturalistisch: Heute
wird selten offen über rassistische Themen gesprochen, statt dessen von
‘kulturell Anderen’ oder auch von der eigenen ‘kulturellen’ oder
‘nationalen Identität’. Doch die Grenzlinien gegenüber den jeweils
‘Anderen’ sind nicht weniger deutlich als früher.

Was sich hier anbahnt, ist eben nicht eine bloße demokratische
Machtübernahme. Es geht um eine andere Wirklichkeit, um eine neue
‘magyarische Landnahme’, um eine völkisch-nationalistische ‘Revolution’ und
damit um den Umsturz des demokratischen Systems.”
http://www.hagalil.com/archiv/2006/09/ungarn.htm

Hoffentlich werden solche sogenannten “Demokratien”, in der Juden und
andere ethnische Minderheiten stets rassistisch bevorteilt und die
staatstragenden Völker zugunsten von Heuschrecken ausgeraubt werden, bald
auf dem Müllhaufen der Geschichte landen!

(f’ up gesetzt)

Frank

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:12 EST 2007
Article: 64946 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us alt.politics.nationalism.white:531003 soc.culture.russian:458742 soc.culture.polish:780682 soc.culture.ukrainian:132657 uk.politics.misc:1899332 soc.culture.europe:582632 soc.culture.swiss:64946
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matt Kern
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.ukrainian,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: ZYD/Jew Jokes
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 278
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:56:37 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1178902597 64.59.135.176 (Fri, 11 May 2007 10:56:37 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:56:37 MDT

Subject: Re: JEWISH JOKES

Glad to see some humour for a change in this ng.

JEW JOKES

How was copper wiring invented?
Two Jews fighting over a penny!

How is Christmas celebrated in a Jewish home?
They put parking meters on the roof!

Why is money green?
Because Jews pick it before it’s ripe!

What candy did Hitler hate more then any other?
Jew Jew Beans… Although I heard he enjoyed them “roasted!”

If Tarzan and Jane were Jewish, what would Cheetah be?
A fur coat!

Why don’t Jews eat pork?
They may be a lot of things, but CANNIBALS they’re not!

Why aren’t Jews attacked by sharks?
Professional courtesy!

Do you know how to keep Jews out of a country club?
Let one in, and he’ll keep the rest out.

What’s the Jewish version of foreplay?
Half an hour of begging.

How can you tell the mother-in-law at a Jewish wedding?
She’s the one on her hands and knees picking up the rice!

Did you hear about the new tires, Firestein?
They not only stop on a dime, they also pick it up!

What’s the difference between a circumcision and crucifixion?
In a crucifixion, they throw the whole Jew out!

Why did the Jews wander in the desert for 40 years?
Someone dropped a quarter!

Why do Jews have such big noses?
Because air is free.

What did the Jewish mother ask her daughter when she learned she had
an affair?
Who catered it?

What happens when a Jew with an erection walks into a wall?
He breaks his nose.

What’s a Jewish dilemma?
Free ham.

What’s the difference between a Jewish bitch and a barracuda?
Nail polish.

What’s the difference between an elephant and a Jew?
An elephant eventually forgets.

A nigger was walking down the street, kicking some rubbish out of his
way, when he spotted something amid the trash that gleamed
strangely. It urned out to be an oddly shaped bottle, and when he
rubbed it, a Jewish genie appeared. “I’ll give you two wishes,” quipped
the genie.
“Far out,” said the black man. “First, I want to be white,
uptight, and out of sight!”
Second, I want to be surrounded by warm, sweet pussy.
So the genie turned him into a TAMPON!
The moral of this story:
You can’t get anything from a Jew without strings attached!

How do you stop a Jewish girl from fucking you?
Marry her!

Why do jewish bitches only sleep with circumcised men?
They want 20% off everything!

What’s the difference between between karate and judo?
Karate is a form of self-defense, and judo is what bagels are made of.

Did you hear that the limbo was invented by the Jews?
Yeah, from sneaking into pay toilets.

What’s the definition of a queer Jew?
Someone that likes girls more then money.

What do you call ten Jewish bitches in a basement?
A WHINE cellar.

Why did the Jewish mother have herself entombed at Bloomingdales?
So her daughter would visit at least twice a week.

What’s the difference between a vulture and a Jew?
A vulture waits until you’re dead to eat your heart out!

you know why jews have big noses?
Because the air is free!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What is the difference between a pizza and a Jew?
A pizza won’t scream when you put it in the oven.

Q: Which is better fertilizer, Palestinian terrorists or manure?
A: You can’t shovel manure with a bayonet.

Q. What does the Jewish Santa Claus say?
A. “Ho! Ho! Ho! Anybody wanna buy some toys?”

Actually, that’s the function of the Gentile Santa Claus in shopping
malls. :^)

After Christmas vacation, an elementary school teacher was asking her
students how they celebrated Christmas. When she got to Sammy, whose father
ran a local toy store, she said, “Sammy, since you’re Jewish, I guess your
family didn’t celebrate Christmas.”
Sammy replied, “Oh yes, we did. We all held hands and danced around the cash
register singing ‘What A Friend We Have In Jesus.’

How was copper wiring invented?
Two Jews fighting over a penny!

How does a jew know his wife is dead?
The sex stays the same, but the dishes pile up in the sink

How is Christmas celebrated in a Jewish home?
They put parking meters on the roof!

What’s the real American dream?
For every black guy to swim back to Africa with a JEW under each arm!

Why is money green?
Because Jews pick it before it’s ripe!

What candy did Hitler hate more then any other?
Jew Jew Beans… Although I heard he enjoyed them “roasted!”

If Tarzan and Jane were Jewish, what would Cheetah be?
A fur coat!

Why don’t Jews eat pork?
They may be a lot of things, but CANNIBALS they’re not!

Why aren’t Jews attacked by sharks?
Professional courtesy!

Do you know how to keep Jews out of a country club?
Let one in, and he’ll keep the rest out.

What’s the Jewish version of foreplay?
Half an hour of begging.

How can you tell the mother-in-law at a Jewish wedding?
She’s the one on her hands and knees picking up the rice!

Did you hear about the new tires, Firestein?
They not only stop on a dime, they also pick it up!

What’s the difference between a circumcision and crucifixion?
In a crucifixion, they throw the whole Jew out!

Why did the Jews wander in the desert for 40 years?
Someone dropped a quarter!

Why do Jews have such big noses?
Because air is free.

What did the Jewish mother ask her daughter when she learned she had an
affair?
Who catered it?

What happens when a Jew with an erection walks into a wall?
He breaks his nose.

What’s a Jewish dilemma?
Free ham.

What’s the difference between a Jewish bitch and a barracuda?
Nail polish.

What’s the difference between an elephant and a Jew?
An elephant eventually forgets.

How do you stop a Jewish girl from fucking you?
Marry her!

Why do Jewish bitches only sleep with circumcised men?
They want 20% off everything!

What’s the difference between karate and judo?
Karate is a form of self-defense, and judo is what bagels are made of.

Did you hear that the limbo was invented by the Jews?
Yeah, from sneaking into pay toilets.

What’s the definition of a queer Jew?
Someone that likes girls more then money.

What do you call ten Jewish bitches in a basement?
A WHINE cellar.

Why did the Jewish mother have herself entombed at Bloomingdales?
So her daughter would visit at least twice a week.

What’s the difference between a vulture and a Jew?
A vulture waits until you’re dead to eat your heart out!

What does an apple and a Jew have in common?
They both look good hanging from a tree!

What’s the difference between a Jew and an apple pie?
An apple pie doesn’t scream when you put it in the oven!

How do you fit 6 million Jews into a car?
Two in the front, three in the back, and the rest in the ashtray!

What’s the Jewish version of foreplay?
Half an hour of begging.

What’s the object of a Jewish football game?
To get the quarter back!

What do you call a Jewish homosexual?
He-blew.

What is the difference between a pizza and a Jew?
A pizza won’t scream when you put it in the oven.

What do you call 5 Jews in the back of a truck going off the edge of a cliff?
A waste, you can fit 12!

How do you lose a Jewish cop?
drive through a toll booth (cheap Jew)

What’s the difference between a Jew and a canoo?
A canoo tips

WHAT’S THE SHORTEST BOOK IN THE WORLD?
THE JEWISH HANDBOOK OF BUSINESS ETHICS

WHAT’S THE BEST THING THAT EVER CAME OUT OF AUSCHWITZ?
An Empty Bus

WHY DO JEWISH GIRLS LIKE PROSTITUTION?
BECAUSE YOU GOT IT YOU SELL IT AND YOU STILL GOT IT

HOW CAN YOU TELL IF YOUR LIMO IS OWNED BY A JEW?
IT HAS A PAY PHONE IN THE BACK SEAT

WHAT DO YOU CALL THE JEWISH MAFIA?
THE KOSHER NOSTRA

WHAT’S THE BEST THING TO DO BEFORE A VISIT TO A JEWISH DENTIST?
COUNT YOUR MONEY BEFORE HE GIVES YOU THE GAS

WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU CROSS A JEW WITH A PUERTO RICAN?
A SUPERINTENDENT WHO THINKS HE OWNS THE BUILDING

WHAT does a JEW mean when he says “TRUST ME”?
Screw You!

WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU CROSS A CHINAMAN WITH A JEWISH MOTHER?
SOMEONE WHO MAKES MISFORTUNE COOKIES

WHY DON’T JEWISH SOLDIERS WEAR BULLET PROOF VESTS?
‘BECAUSE THEY CANT GET A REFUND IF THEY DON’T WORK

WHAT’S A JEWS DEFINITION OF FOREPLAY?
DID YOU HEAR ABOUT THE JEWISH GUY WHO WALKED INTO A WALL WITH AN ERECTION?

Would you classify shindlers list as drama, or war epic?
Neither, it was a comedy!

feel free to add your own jokes to the list, just so all can have a laugh.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:12 EST 2007
Article: 65002 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.palestine:565466 soc.culture.europe:583686 soc.culture.german:374881 soc.culture.swiss:65002 soc.culture.polish:783306 alt.politics.europe:64406
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-14!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: DickWarren
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish,alt.politics.europe
Subject: Zionism & Third Reich = KOLLABORATEURS!! Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 733
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:35:35 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1180020935 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 24 May 2007 09:35:35 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 09:35:35 MDT

And never forget the ZYD prominente Kollaborateurs such as KASTNER,
RUMKOWSKI and WIESENTHAL!!

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:45:26 -0400, in alt.revisionism Gallows Cheater
wrote:

http://www.rense.com/general34/ZAND.HTM

Zionism And The Third Reich
By Mark Weber
Institute for Historical Review
2-8-3

Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German
port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, “Tel
Aviv,” while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the
ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member.
Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic
combination as a “metaphysical absurdity.”1 Absurd or not, this is but one
vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging
collaboration between Zionism and Hitler’s Third Reich.

Common Aims

Over the years, people in many different countries have wrestled with
the “Jewish question”: that is, what is the proper role of Jews in
non-Jewish society? During the 1930s, Jewish Zionists and German National
Socialists shared similar views on how to deal with this perplexing issue.
They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities,
and that Jews did not belong in Germany. Jews living in the Reich were
therefore to be regarded not as “Germans of the Jewish faith,” but rather
as members of a separate national community. Zionism (Jewish nationalism)
also implied an obligation by Zionist Jews to resettle in Palestine,
the “Jewish homeland.” They could hardly regard themselves as sincere
Zionists and simultaneously claim equal rights in Germany or any
other “foreign” country.

Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that
anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely
understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes.
The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in
a separate state of their own. “The Jewish question exists wherever Jews
live in noticeable numbers,” he wrote in his most influential work, The
Jewish State. “Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving
Jews … I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex
phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear.”
The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. “It is a
national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international
political issue …” Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews
constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a
Volk.2 Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome “final solution of
the Jewish question.”3

Six months after Hitler came to power, the Zionist Federation of Germany (by
far the largest Zionist group in the country) submitted a detailed
memorandum to the new government that reviewed German-Jewish relations and
formally offered Zionist support in “solving” the vexing “Jewish question.”
The first step, it suggested, had to be a frank recognition of fundamental
national differences: 4

Zionism has no illusions about the difficulty of the Jewish condition, which
consists above all in an abnormal occupational pattern and in the fault of
an intellectual and moral posture not rooted in one’s own tradition.
Zionism recognized decades ago that as a result of the assimilationist
trend, symptoms of deterioration were bound to appear …

Zionism believes that the rebirth of the national life of a people, which is
now occurring in Germany through the emphasis on its Christian and national
character, must also come about in the Jewish national group. For the
Jewish people, too, national origin, religion, common destiny and a sense
of its uniqueness must be of decisive importance in the shaping of its
existence. This means that the egotistical individualism of the liberal era
must be overcome and replaced with a sense of community and collective
responsibility …

We believe it is precisely the new [National Socialist] Germany that can,
through bold resoluteness in the handling of the Jewish question, take a
decisive step toward overcoming a problem which, in truth, will have to be
dealt with by most European peoples …

Our acknowledgment of Jewish nationality provides for a clear and sincere
relationship to the German people and its national and racial realities.
Precisely because we do not wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we,
too, are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the
Jewish group and reject any trespasses in the cultural domain, we — having
been brought up in the German language and German culture — can show an
interest in the works and values of German culture with admiration and
internal sympathy …

For its practical aims, Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration of
even a government fundamentally hostile to Jews, because in dealing with
the Jewish question not sentimentalities are involved but a real problem
whose solution interests all peoples and at the present moment especially
the German people … Boycott propaganda — such as is currently being
carried on against Germany in many ways — is in essence un-Zionist,
because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to build …

We are not blind to the fact that a Jewish question exists and will continue
to exist. From the abnormal situation of the Jews severe disadvantages
result for them, but also scarcely tolerable conditions for other peoples.
The Federation’s paper, the Jüdische Rundschau (“Jewish Review”),
proclaimed the same message: “Zionism recognizes the existence of a Jewish
problem and desires a far-reaching and constructive solution. For this
purpose Zionism wishes to obtain the assistance of all peoples, whether
pro- or anti-Jewish, because, in its view, we are dealing here with a
concrete rather than a sentimental problem, the solution of which all
peoples are interested.”5 A young Berlin rabbi, Joachim Prinz, who later
settled in the United States and became head of the American Jewish
Congress, wrote in his 1934 book, Wir Juden (“We Jews”), that the National
Socialist revolution in Germany meant “Jewry for the Jews.” He
explained: “No subterfuge can save us now. In place of assimilation we
desire a new concept: recognition of the Jewish nation and Jewish race.” 6

Active Collaboration

On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood,
National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group
believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler
government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine
>from 1933 until 1940-1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive
collaboration.

Even as the Third Reich became more entrenched, many German Jews, probably a
majority, continued to regard themselves, often with considerable pride, as
Germans first. Few were enthusiastic about pulling up roots to begin a new
life in far-away Palestine. Nevertheless, more and more German Jews turned
to Zionism during this period. Until late 1938, the Zionist movement
flourished in Germany under Hitler. The circulation of the Zionist
Federation’s bi-weekly Jüdische Rundschau grew enormously. Numerous Zionist
books were published. “Zionist work was in full swing” in Germany during
those years, the Encyclopaedia Judaica notes. A Zionist convention held in
Berlin in 1936 reflected “in its composition the vigorous party life of
German Zionists.”7

The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal
June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for
Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage
emigration of Germany’s Jews to Palestine. This would require increased
Jewish self-awareness. Jewish schools, Jewish sports leagues, Jewish
cultural organizations — in short, everything that would encourage this
new consciousness and self-awareness – should be promoted, the paper
recommended.8

SS officer Leopold von Mildenstein and Zionist Federation official Kurt
Tuchler toured Palestine together for six months to assess Zionist
development there. Based on his firsthand observations, von Mildenstein
wrote a series of twelve illustrated articles for the important Berlin
daily Der Angriff that appeared in late 1934 under the heading “A Nazi
Travels to Palestine.” The series expressed great admiration for the
pioneering spirit and achievements of the Jewish settlers. Zionist
self-development, von Mildenstein wrote, had produced a new kind of Jew. He
praised Zionism as a great benefit for both the Jewish people and the
entire world. A Jewish homeland in Palestine, he wrote in his concluding
article, “pointed the way to curing a centuries-long wound on the body of
the world: the Jewish question.” Der Angriff issued a special medal, with a
Swastika on one side and a Star of David on the other, to commemorate the
joint SS-Zionist visit. A few months after the articles appeared, von
Mildenstein was promoted to head the Jewish affairs department of the SS
security service in order to support Zionist migration and development more
effectively. 9

The official SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, proclaimed its support for
Zionism in a May 1935 front-page editorial: “The time may not be too far
off when Palestine will again be able to receive its sons who have been
lost to it for more than a thousand years. Our good wishes, together with
official goodwill, go with them.”10 Four months later, a similar article
appeared in the SS paper: 11

The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on
religion leads the German government to guarantee without reservation the
racial separateness of this community. The government finds itself in
complete agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry, the
so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry around
the world and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis,
Germany undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the
future in the handling of the Jewish problem around the world.

A leading German shipping line began direct passenger liner service from
Hamburg to Haifa, Palestine, in October 1933 providing “strictly kosher
food on its ships, under the supervision of the Hamburg rabbinate.” 12 With
official backing, Zionists worked tirelessly to “reeducate” Germany’s Jews.
As American historian Francis Nicosia put it in his 1985 survey, The Third
Reich and the Palestine Question: “Zionists were encouraged to take their
message to the Jewish community, to collect money, to show films on
Palestine and generally to educate German Jews about Palestine. There was
considerable pressure to teach Jews in Germany to cease identifying
themselves as Germans and to awaken a new Jewish national identity in
them.” 13

In an interview after the war, the former head of the Zionist Federation of
Germany, Dr. Hans Friedenthal, summed up the situation: “The Gestapo did
everything in those days to promote emigration, particularly to Palestine.
We often received their help when we required anything from other
authorities regarding preparations for emigration.” 14

At the September 1935 National Socialist Party Congress, the Reichstag
adopted the so-called “Nuremberg laws” that prohibited marriages and sexual
relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect, proclaimed the Jews an
alien minority nationality. A few days later the Zionist Jüdische Rundschau
editorially welcomed the new measures: 15

Germany … is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it
declares the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the
Jews have been stamped a national minority it is again possible to
establish normal relations between the German nation and Jewry. The new
laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own cultural life, its own
national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its own
theatre, and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own
future in all aspects of national life …

Germany has given the Jewish minority the opportunity to live for itself,
and is offering state protection for this separate life of the Jewish
minority: Jewry’s process of growth into a nation will thereby be
encouraged and a contribution will be made to the establishment of more
tolerable relations between the two nations. Georg Kareski, the head of
both the “Revisionist” Zionist State Organization and the Jewish Cultural
League, and former head of the Berlin Jewish Community, declared in an
interview with the Berlin daily Der Angriff at the end of 1935: 16

For many years I have regarded a complete separation of the cultural affairs
of the two peoples [Jews and Germans] as a pre-condition for living
together without conflict… I have long supported such a separation,
provided it is founded on respect for the alien nationality. The Nuremberg
Laws … seem to me, apart from their legal provisions, to conform entirely
with this desire for a separate life based on mutual respect… This
interruption of the process of dissolution in many Jewish communities,
which had been promoted through mixed marriages, is therefore, from a
Jewish point of view, entirely welcome.

Zionist leaders in other countries echoed these views. Stephen S. Wise,
president of the American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress,
told a New York rally in June 1938: “I am not an American citizen of the
Jewish faith, I am a Jew… Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the
Jewish people a race and we are a race.” 17 The Interior Ministry’s Jewish
affairs specialist, Dr. Bernhard Lösener, expressed support for Zionism in
an article that appeared in a November 1935 issue of the official
Reichsverwaltungsblatt: 18

If the Jews already had their own state in which the majority of them were
settled, then the Jewish question could be regarded as completely resolved
today, also for the Jews themselves. The least amount of opposition to the
ideas underlying the Nuremberg Laws have been shown by the Zionists,
because they realize at once that these laws represent the only correct
solution for the Jewish people as well. For each nation must have its own
state as the outward expression of its particular nationhood.

In cooperation with the German authorities, Zionist groups organized a
network of some forty camps and agricultural centers throughout Germany
where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine.
Although the Nuremberg Laws forbid Jews from displaying the German flag,
Jews were specifically guaranteed the right to display the blue and white
Jewish national banner. The flag that would one day be adopted by Israel
was flown at the Zionist camps and centers in Hitler’s Germany. 19

Himmler’s security service cooperated with the Haganah, the Zionist
underground military organization in Palestine. The SS agency paid Haganah
official Feivel Polkes for information about the situation in Palestine and
for help in directing Jewish emigration to that country. Meanwhile, the
Haganah was kept well informed about German plans by a spy it managed to
plant in the Berlin headquarters of the SS.20 Haganah-SS collaboration even
included secret deliveries of German weapons to Jewish settlers for use in
clashes with Palestinian Arabs. 21 In the aftermath of the November
1938 “Kristallnacht” outburst of violence and destruction, the SS quickly
helped the Zionist organization to get back on its feet and continue its
work in Germany, although now under more restricted supervision. 22

Official Reservations

German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials
were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities
in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize “their”
governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry
remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long
as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to
resettle in the Zionist “promised land,” a sovereign Jewish state in
Palestine would not really “solve” the international Jewish question.
Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this
dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore
limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British
control, not a sovereign Jewish state. 23

A Jewish state in Palestine, the Foreign Minister informed diplomats in June
1937, would not be in Germany’s interest because it would not be able to
absorb all Jews around the world, but would only serve as an additional
power base for international Jewry, in much the same way as Moscow served
as a base for international Communism.24 Reflecting something of a shift in
official policy, the German press expressed much greater sympathy in 1937
for Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist ambitions, at a time when
tension and conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine was sharply
increasing. 25

A Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937, cautioned that in spite
of support for Jewish settlement in Palestine, “it would nevertheless be a
mistake to assume that Germany supports the formation of a state structure
in Palestine under some form of Jewish control. In view of the anti-German
agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation
of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the
nations of the world.”26 “The proclamation of a Jewish state or a
Jewish-administrated Palestine,” warned an internal memorandum by the
Jewish affairs section of the SS, “would create for Germany a new enemy,
one that would have a deep influence on developments in the Near East.”
Another SS agency predicted that a Jewish state “would work to bring
special minority protection to Jews in every country, therefore giving
legal protection to the exploitation activity of world Jewry.”27 In January
1939, Hitler’s new Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, likewise
warned in another circular bulletin that “Germany must regard the formation
of a Jewish state as dangerous” because it “would bring an international
increase in power to world Jewry.” 28

Hitler himself personally reviewed this entire issue in early 1938 and, in
spite of his long-standing skepticism of Zionist ambitions and misgivings
that his policies might contribute to the formation of a Jewish state,
decided to support Jewish migration to Palestine even more vigorously. The
prospect of ridding Germany of its Jews, he concluded, outweighed the
possible dangers. 29

Meanwhile, the British government imposed ever more drastic restrictions on
Jewish immigration into Palestine in 1937, 1938 and 1939. In response, the
SS security service concluded a secret alliance with the clandestine
Zionist agency Mossad le-Aliya Bet to smuggle Jews illegally into
Palestine. As a result of this intensive collaboration, several convoys of
ships succeeded in reaching Palestine past British gunboats. Jewish
migration, both legal and illegal, from Germany (including Austria) to
Palestine increased dramatically in 1938 and 1939. Another 10,000 Jews were
scheduled to depart in October 1939, but the outbreak of war in September
brought the effort to an end. All the same, German authorities continued to
promote indirect Jewish emigration to Palestine during 1940 and 1941. 30
Even as late as March 1942, at least one officially authorized
Zionist “kibbutz” training camp for potential emigrants continued to
operate in Hitler’s Germany. 31

The Transfer Agreement

The centerpiece of German-Zionist cooperation during the Hitler era was the
Transfer Agreement, a pact that enabled tens of thousands of German Jews to
migrate to Palestine with their wealth. The Agreement, also known as the
Haavara (Hebrew for “transfer”), was concluded in August 1933 following
talks between German officials and Chaim Arlosoroff, Political Secretary of
the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the World Zionist Organization.
32

Through this unusual arrangement, each Jew bound for Palestine deposited
money in a special account in Germany. The money was used to purchase
German-made agricultural tools, building materials, pumps, fertilizer, and
so forth, which were exported to Palestine and sold there by the
Jewish-owned Haavara company in Tel-Aviv. Money from the sales was given to
the Jewish emigrant upon his arrival in Palestine in an amount
corresponding to his deposit in Germany. German goods poured into Palestine
through the Haavara, which was supplemented a short time later with a
barter agreement by which Palestine oranges were exchanged for German
timber, automobiles, agricultural machinery, and other goods. The Agreement
thus served the Zionist aim of bringing Jewish settlers and development
capital to Palestine, while simultaneously serving the German goal of
freeing the country of an unwanted alien group.

Delegates at the 1933 Zionist Congress in Prague vigorously debated the
merits of the Agreement. Some feared that the pact would undermine the
international Jewish economic boycott against Germany. But Zionist
officials reassured the Congress. Sam Cohen, a key figure behind the
Haavara arrangement, stressed that the Agreement was not economically
advantageous to Germany. Arthur Ruppin, a Zionist Organization emigration
specialist who had helped negotiate the pact, pointed out that “the
Transfer Agreement in no way interfered with the boycott movement, since no
new currency will flow into Germany as a result of the agreement…” 33 The
1935 Zionist Congress, meeting in Switzerland, overwhelmingly endorsed the
pact. In 1936, the Jewish Agency (the Zionist “shadow government” in
Palestine) took over direct control of the Ha’avara, which remained in
effect until the Second World War forced its abandonment.

Some German officials opposed the arrangement. Germany’s Consul General in
Jerusalem, Hans Döhle, for example, sharply criticized the Agreement on
several occasions during 1937. He pointed out that it cost Germany the
foreign exchange that the products exported to Palestine through the pact
would bring if sold elsewhere. The Haavara monopoly sale of German goods to
Palestine through a Jewish agency naturally angered German businessmen and
Arabs there. Official German support for Zionism could lead to a loss of
German markets throughout the Arab world. The British government also
resented the arrangement.34 A June 1937 German Foreign Office internal
bulletin referred to the “foreign exchange sacrifices” that resulted from
the Haavara. 35

A December 1937 internal memorandum by the German Interior Ministry reviewed
the impact of the Transfer Agreement: “There is no doubt that the Haavara
arrangement has contributed most significantly to the very rapid
development of Palestine since 1933. The Agreement provided not only the
largest source of money (from Germany!), but also the most intelligent
group of immigrants, a nd finally it brought to the country the machines
and industrial products essential for development.” The main advantage of
the pact, the memo reported, was the emigration of large numbers of Jews to
Palestine, the most desirable target country as far as Germany was
concerned. But the paper also noted the important drawbacks pointed out by
Consul Döhle and others. The Interior Minister, it went on, had concluded
that the disadvantages of the agreement now outweighed the advantages and
that, therefore, it should be terminated. 36

Only one man could resolve the controversy. Hitler personally reviewed the
policy in July and September 1937, and again in January 1938, and each time
decided to maintain the Haavara arrangement. The goal of removing Jews from
Germany, he concluded, justified the drawbacks. 37

The Reich Economics Ministry helped to organize another transfer company,
the International Trade and Investment Agency, or Intria, through which
Jews in foreign countries could help German Jews emigrate to Palestine.
Almost $900,000 was eventually channeled through the Intria to German Jews
in Palestine.38 Other European countries eager to encourage Jewish
emigration concluded agreements with the Zionists modeled after the
Ha’avara. In 1937 Poland authorized the Halifin (Hebrew for “exchange”)
transfer company. By late summer 1939, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary and
Italy had signed similar arrangements. The outbreak of war in September
1939, however, prevented large-scale implementation of these agreements. 39

Achievements of Haavara

Between 1933 and 1941, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to Palestine
through the Ha’avara and other German-Zionist arrangements, or about ten
percent of Germany’s 1933 Jewish population. (These German Jews made up
about 15 percent of Palestine’s 1939 Jewish population.) Some Ha’avara
emigrants transferred considerable personal wealth from Germany to
Palestine. As Jewish historian Edwin Black has noted: “Many of these
people, especially in the late 1930s, were allowed to transfer actual
replicas of their homes and factories — indeed rough replicas of their
very existence.”40

The total amount transferred from Germany to Palestine through the Ha’avara
between August 1933 and the end of 1939 was 8.1 million pounds or 139.57
million German marks (then equivalent to more than $40 million). This
amount included 33.9 million German marks ($13.8 million) provided by the
Reichsbank in connection with the Agreement.41

Historian Black has estimated that an additional $70 million may have flowed
into Palestine through corollary German commercial agreements and special
international banking transactions. The German funds had a major impact on
a country as underdeveloped as Palestine was in the 1930s, he pointed out.
Several major industrial enterprises were built with the capital from
Germany, including the Mekoroth waterworks and the Lodzia textile firm. The
influx of Ha’avara goods and capital, concluded Black, “produced an
economic explosion in Jewish Palestine” and was “an indispensable factor in
the creation of the State of Israel.”42

The Ha’avara agreement greatly contributed to Jewish development in
Palestine and thus, indirectly, to the foundation of the Israeli state. A
January 1939 German Foreign Office circular bulletin reported, with some
misgiving, that “the transfer of Jewish property out of Germany [through
the Ha’avara agreement] contributed to no small extent to the building of a
Jewish state in Palestine.”43

Former officials of the Ha’avara company in Palestine confirmed this view in
a detailed study of the Transfer Agreement published in 1972: “The economic
activity made possible by the influx German capital and the Haavara
transfers to the private and public sectors were of greatest importance for
the country’s development. Many new industries and commercial enterprises
were established in Jewish Palestine, and numerous companies that are
enormously important even today in the economy of the State of Israel owe
their existence to the Haavara.”44

Dr. Ludwig Pinner, a Ha’avara company official in Tel Aviv during the 1930s,
later commented that the exceptionally competent Ha’avara
immigrants “decisively contributed” to the economic, social, cultural and
educational development of Palestine’s Jewish community.45

The Transfer Agreement was the most far-reaching example of cooperation
between Hitler’s Germany and international Zionism. Through this pact,
Hitler’s Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930s to
support Jewish development in Palestine.

Zionists Offer a Military Alliance With Hitler

In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a
formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political
alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical
underground “Fighters for the Freedom of Israel,” better known as the Lehi
or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the
radical nationalist “National Military Organization” (Irgun Zvai Leumi)
over the group’s attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned
further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main
enemy of Zionism.

This remarkable Zionist proposal “for the solution of the Jewish question in
Europe and the active participation of the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the
side of Germany” is worth quoting at some length:46

In their speeches and statements, the leading statesmen of National
Socialist Germany have often emphasized that a New Order in Europe requires
as a prerequisite a radical solution of the Jewish question by evacuation.
(“Jew-f ree Europe”)

The evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe is a precondition for
solving the Jewish question. However, the only way this can be totally
achieved is through settlement of these masses in the homeland of the
Jewish people, Palestine, and by the establishment of a Jewish state in its
historical boundaries.

The goal of the political activity and the years of struggle by the Israel
Freedom Movement, the National Military Organization in Palestine (Irgun
Zvai Leumi), is to solve the Jewish problem in this way and thus completely
liberate the Jewish people forever.

The NMO, which is very familiar with the good will of the German Reich
government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and
the Zionist emigration program, takes that view that:

1. Common interests can exist between a European New Order based on the
German concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as
embodied by the NMO.

2. Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folk
ish-national Jewry [Hebr_ertum].

3. The establishment of the historical Jewish state on a national and
totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty with the German Reich, would be in
the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of
power in the Near East.

On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German
Reich government recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom
Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part
in the war on the side of Germany.

This offer by the NMO could include military, political and informational
activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational measures,
outside as well. Along with this the Jewish men of Europe would be
militarily trained and organized in military units under the leadership and
command of the NMO. They would take part in combat operations for the
purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front by formed.

The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order
of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with a
positive-radical solution of the European Jewish problem on the basis of
the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would
greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all
humanity.

The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be consistent with
a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed
that he would utilize any combination and coalition in order to isolate and
defeat England.

There is no record of any German response. Acceptance was very unlikely
anyway because by this time German policy was decisively pro-Arab.47
Remarkably, Stern’s group sought to conclude a pact with the Third Reich at
a time when stories that Hitler was bent on exterminating Jews were already
in wide circulation. Stern apparently either did not believe the stories or
he was willing to collaborate with the mortal enemy of his people to help
bring about a Jewish state. 48

An important Lehi member at the time the group made this offer was Yitzhak
Shamir, who later served as Israel’s Foreign Minister and then, during much
of the 1980s and until June 1992, as Prime Minister. As Lehi operations
chief following Stern’s death in 1942, Shamir organized numerous acts of
terror, including the November 1944 assassination of British Middle East
Minister Lord Moyne and the September 1948 slaying of Swedish United
Nations mediator Count Bernadotte. Years later, when Shamir was asked about
the 1941 offer, he confirmed that he was aware of his organization’s
proposed alliance with wartime Germany. 49

Conclusion

In spite of the basic hostility between the Hitler regime and international
Jewry, for several years Jewish Zionist and German National Socialist
interests coincided. In collaborating with the Zionists for a mutually
desirable and humane solution to a complex problem, the Third Reich was
willing to make foreign exchange sacrifices, impair relations with Britain
and anger the Arabs. Indeed, during the 1930s no nation did more to
substantively further Jewish-Zionist goals than Hitler’s Germany.

Notes

1.W. Martini, “Hebr_isch unterm Hakenkreuz,” Die Welt (Hamburg), Jan. 10,
1975. Cited in: Klaus Polken, “The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi
Germany, 1933-1941,” Journal of Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, p.
65. 2.Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen: Die “Reichskristallnacht”
(Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), p. 212. See also: Th. Herzl, The Jewish State
(New York: Herzl Press, 1970), pp. 33, 35, 36, and, Edwin Black, The
Transfer Agreement (New York: Macmillan, 1984), p. 73. 3.Th. Herzl, “Der
Kongress,” Welt, June 4, 1897. Reprinted in: Theodor Herzls zionistische
Schriften (Leon Kellner, ed.), erster Teil, Berlin: Jüdischer Verlag, 1920,
p. 190 (and p. 139). 4.Memo of June 21, 1933, in: L. Dawidowicz, A
Holocaust Reader (New York: Behrman, 1976), pp. 150-155, and (in part) in:
Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin:
Univ. of Texas, 1985), p. 42.; On Zionism in Germany before Hitler’s
assumption of power, see: Donald L. Niewyk, The Jews in Weimar Germany
(Baton Rouge: 1980), pp. 94-95, 126-131, 140-143.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich
(Austin: 1985), pp. 1-15. 5.Jüdische Rundschau (Berlin), June 13, 1933.
Quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (New York:
Ballantine, pb., 1971, 1984), pp. 376-377. 6.Heinz Höhne, The Order of the
Death’s Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 376. 7.”Berlin,” Encyclopaedia
Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971), Vol. 5, p. 648. For a look at one
aspect of this “vigorous life,” see: J.-C. Horak, “Zionist Film Propaganda
in Nazi Germany,” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Vol. 4,
No. 1, 1984, pp. 49-58. 8.Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), pp. 54-55.; Karl A. Schleunes, The Twisted Road
to Auschwitz (Urbana: Univ. of Illinois, 1970, 1990), pp. 178-181. 9.Jacob
Boas, “A Nazi Travels to Palestine,” History Today (London), January 1980,
pp. 33-38. 10.Facsimile reprint of front page of Das Schwarze Korps, May
15, 1935, in: Janusz Piekalkiewicz, Israels Langer Arm (Frankfurt: Goverts,
1975), pp. 66-67. Also quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death’s
Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 377. See also: Erich Kern, ed.,
Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: FZ-Verlag, 1988), p. 184. 11.Das Schwarze
Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), pp. 56-57. 12.Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age
of the Dictators (1983), p. 83. 13.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), p. 60. See also: F. Nicosia, “The Yishuv and the
Holocaust,” The Journal of Modern History (Chicago), Vol. 64, No. 3, Sept.
1992, pp. 533-540. 14.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine
Question (1985), p. 57. 15.Jüdische Rundschau, Sept. 17, 1935. Quoted in:
Yitzhak Arad, with Y. Gutman and A. Margaliot, eds., Documents on the
Holocaust (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1981), pp. 82-83. 16.Der Angriff, Dec.
23, 1935, in: E. Kern, ed., Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: 1988), p.
148.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 56.; L. Brenner, Zionism in the
Age of the Dictators (1983), p. 138.; A. Margaliot, “The Reaction…,” Yad
Vashem Studies (Jerusalem), vol. 12, 1977, pp. 90-91.; On Kareski’s
remarkable career, see: H. Levine, “A Jewish Collaborator in Nazi Germany,”
Central European History (Atlanta), Sept. 1975, pp. 251-281. 17.”Dr. Wise
Urges Jews to Declare Selves as Such,” New York Herald Tribune, June 13,
1938, p. 12. 18.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich (1985), p. 53. 19.Lucy
Dawidowicz, The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (New York: Bantam, pb.,
1976), pp. 253-254.; Max Nussbaum, “Zionism Under Hitler,” Congress Weekly
(New York: American Jewish Congress), Sept. 11, 1942.; F. Nicosia, The
Third Reich (1985), pp. 58-60, 217.; Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement
(1984), p. 175. 20.H. H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (Ballantine,
pb., 1984), pp. 380-382.; K. Schleunes, Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p. 226.;
Secret internal SS intelligence report about F. Polkes, June 17, 1937, in:
John Mendelsohn, ed., The Holocaust (New York: Garland, 1982), vol. 5, pp.
62-64. 21.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 63-64, 105, 219-220. 22.F.
Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 160. 23.This distinction is also implicit
in the “Balfour Declaration” of November 1917, in which the British
government expressed support for “a national home for the Jewish people” in
Palestine, while carefully avoiding any mention of a Jewish state.
Referring to the majority Arab population there, the Declaration went on to
caution, “…it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which
may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish
communities in Palestine.” The complete text of the Declaration is
reproduced in facsimile in: Robert John, Behind the Balfour Declaration
(IHR, 1988), p. 32. 24.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 121. 25.F.
Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 124. 26.David Yisraeli, The Palestine
Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Bar-Ilan University, Israel, 1974),
p. 300.; Also in: Documents on German Foreign Policy, Series D, Vol. 5.
Doc. No. 564 or 567. 27.K. Schleunes, The Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p.
209. 28.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS.
International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before
the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), vol. 32, pp.
242-243. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, DC: 1946-1948), vol.
6, pp. 92-93. 29.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 141-144.; On Hitler’s
critical view of Zionism in Mein Kampf, see esp. Vol. 1, Chap. 11. Quoted
in: Robert Wistrich, Hitler’s Apocalypse (London: 1985), p. 155.; See also:
F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 26-28.; Hitler told his army adjutant
in 1939 and again in 1941 that he had asked the British in 1937 about
transferring all of Germany’s Jews to Palestine or Egypt. The British
rejected the proposal, he said, because it would cause further disorder.
See: H. v. Kotze, ed., Heeresadjutant bei Hitler (Stuttgart: 1974), pp. 65,
95. 30.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 156, 160-164, 166-167.; H.
H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (Ballantine, pb., 1984), pp. 392-394.;
Jon and David Kimche, The Secret Roads (London: Secker and Warburg, 1955),
pp. 39-43. See also: David Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and Palestine,”
Middle Eastern Studies, October 1971, p. 347.; Bernard Wasserstein, Britain
and the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945 (1979), pp. 43, 49, 52, 60.; T.
Kelly, “Man who fooled Nazis,” Washington Times, April 28, 1987, pp. 1B,
4B. Based on interview with Willy Perl, author of The Holocaust Conspiracy.
31.Y. Arad, et al., eds., Documents On the Holocaust (1981), p. 155. (The
training kibbutz was at Neuendorf, and may have functioned even after March
1942.) 32.On the Agreement in general, see: Werner Feilchenfeld, et al.,
Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972).; David
Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and the Transfer Agreement,” Journal of
Contemporary History (London), No. 2, 1971, pp. 129-148.; “Haavara,”
Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 7, pp. 1012-1013.; F. Nicosia, The Third
Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin: 1985), pp. 44-49.; Raul Hilberg,
The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1985),
pp. 140-141.; The Transfer Agreement, by Edwin Black, is detailed and
useful. However, it contains numerous inaccuracies and wildly erroneous
conclusions. See, for example, the review by Richard S. Levy in Commentary,
Sept. 1984, pp. 68-71. 33.E. Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 328,
337. 34.On opposition to the Haavara in official German circles, see: W.
Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972), pp. 31-33.;
D. Yisraeli, “The Third Reich,” Journal of Contemporary History, 1971, pp.
136-139.; F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question, pp.
126-139.; I. Weckert, Feuerzeichen (1981), pp. 226-227.; Rolf Vogel, Ein
Stempel hat gefehlt (Munich: Droemer Knaur, 1977), pp. 110 ff. 35.W.
Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 31. Entire text in: David
Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel:
1974), pp. 298-300. 36.Interior Ministry internal memo (signed by State
Secretary W. Stuckart), Dec. 17, 1937, in: Helmut Eschwege, ed.,
Kennzeichen J (Berlin: 1966), pp. 132-136. 37.W. Feilchenfeld, et al,
Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 32. 38.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp.
376-377. 39.E. Black, Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 376, 378.; F. Nicosia,
Third Reich (1985), pp. 238-239 (n. 91). 40.E. Black, Transfer Agreement,
p. 379.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich, pp. 212, 255 (n. 66). 41.W. Feilchenfeld,
et al., Haavara-Transfer, p. 75.; “Haavara,” Encyclopaedia Judaica, (1971),
Vol. 7, p. 1013. 42.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp. 379, 373, 382.
43.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS. International
Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the
International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), Vol. 32, pp.
242-243. 44.Werner Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina
(Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972). Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen
(Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), pp. 222-223. 45.W. Feilchenfeld, et al.,
Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972). Quoted in: I. Weckert,
Feuerzeichen (1981), p. 224. 46.Original document in German Ausw_rtiges Amt
Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E 224152 and E 234155-58. (Photocopy in author’s
possession).; Complete original German text published in: David Yisraeli,
The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1974), pp.
315-317. See also: Klaus Polkhen, “The Secret Contacts,” Journal of
Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, pp. 78-80.; (At the time this offer
was made, Stern’s Lehi group still regarded itself as the true Irgun/NMO.)
47.Arab nationalists opposed Britain, which then dominated much of the Arab
world, including Egypt, Iraq and Palestine. Because Britain and Germany
were at war, Germany cultivated Arab support. The leader of Palestine’s
Arabs, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el-Husseini, worked closely
with Germany during the war years. After escaping from Palestine, he spoke
to the Arab world over German radio and helped raise Muslim recruits in
Bosnia for the Waffen SS. 48.Israel Shahak, “Yitzhak Shamir, Then and Now,”
Middle East Policy (Washington, DC), Vol. 1, No. 1, (Whole No. 39), 1992,
pp. 27-38.; Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s Fateful Hour (New York: Harper and
Row, 1988), pp. 213-214. Quoted in: Andrew J. Hurley, Israel and the New
World Order (Santa Barbara, Calif.: 1991), pp. 93, 208-209.; Avishai
Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books,
May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986),
pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, “Yitzhak Shamir: On Hitler’s Side,” Arab
Perspectives (League of Arab States), March 1984, pp. 11-13. 49.Avishai
Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books,
May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986),
pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, “Skeletons in Shamir’s Cupboard,” Middle East
International, Sept. 30, 1983, pp. 15-16.; Sol Stern, L.
Rapoport, “Israel’s Man of the Shadows,” Village Voice (New York), July 3,
1984, pp. 13 ff.


SSGG – When somebody talks of shutting them down, you get three hundred
thousand “1st amendment” types jumping to the guy’s defense, giving you a
class on the Bill of Rights – Jacob Baltuch, Brandeis University
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/051115chicago.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:15 EST 2007
Article: 65003 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us alt.barter:6197 soc.culture.europe:583691 soc.culture.swiss:65003 soc.culture.german:374884 soc.culture.usa:2002171
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-14!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: DickWarren
Newsgroups: alt.barter,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Verkauf/Tausch $3 Millionen BiefmarkenSammlungen/FS or TRADE $3 Million CV Stamp Collections-
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 59
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:19:14 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1180023554 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 24 May 2007 10:19:14 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:19:14 MDT

We seek a qualified buyer of all our stock, for cash payable to our bankers.
Approximately $3 million CV, with main areas of interest:
GB
Canada
Germany
Commonwealth
France
USA
Australia
Austria
Switzerland
Israel
etc.

If interested, kindly advise.
The reason for sale, eyesight going blind.
Am NOT interested in consigning, or auction, only full cash sale.

We mean CASH for the buyer to take all, not cheques, drafts, or whatever.

May consider part swap for something significant, such as clear title cottage,
motorhome, or?
Am located in northern Canada.

Reply to: [email protected]

P.S. Nigerian Scam and similar just disregarded as worthless.

Verkauf/Tausch $3 Millionen BiefmarkenSammlungen von
Briefmarken Sammlungen Zu Verfügen

Wir suchen einen Käufer von unserer ganzen Aktie, für Bargeld das zahlbar
ist zu unseren Bankiers.
Ungefähr $3 Millionen KatalogwertF, mit Hauptgebieten
des Interesses:
GB
Kanada
Deutschland
Britische Commonwealth
Frankreich
Vereinigten Staaten
Australien
Österreich
Schweiz
Israel usw.

Wenn interessiert, freundlich rät.
Der Grund zum Verkauf, gehend Sehvermögen
blendet.
Ich verliere meine Sicht, und bekomme Blinde.
Wir bedeuten, dass BARGELD für den Käufer alle nimmt, nicht Schecke,
Kann teils Tausch für etwas bedeutsames, wie
zum Beispiel klares Titellandhaus, motorhome, oder bedenken?
Bin in nördlichem Kanada befunden.
P. S. Nigerianisch Scam und ähnlich hat nur als
wertlos nicht beachtet.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:15 EST 2007
Article: 65005 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us uk.politics.misc:1905171 soc.culture.australian:410495 soc.culture.swiss:65005 soc.culture.europe:583696 soc.culture.ukrainian:132709 soc.culture.polish:783336 soc.culture.russian:459599
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: DickWarren
Newsgroups: uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: Selling Slave-Sex in Israel- WHITE SLAVERY by Filthy ZYDS – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 176
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:50:32 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1180029032 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 24 May 2007 11:50:32 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:50:32 MDT

And reported in a jew newspaper by jews who dislike the ZYD white slavery!!

By Gay McVay, the shabbas-goy dislikes exposes of criminal activities by his
ZYD masters!!

On Sun, 6 May 2007 18:26:53 -0400, “Economic interests”
wrote:

>This is very disgusting

>”KenKnoll” wrote in message
>news:[email protected]
>> On 27 Nov 2005 16:19:47 -0800, “Ariadne” wrote:
>>>Jason P wrote:
>>>> By Paula Amann

>>>> Washington Jewish Week/Jewsweek – 2001

>>>> http://www.jewsweek.com/society/059.htm

>>>> They come to Israel from the Ukraine, Russia, and Moldova looking for
>>>> freedom. Instead they are sold as sex slaves. And you thought Israel
>>>> was holy.
>
>>>> Jewsweek.com | Their names are Natalya, Oxana or Svetlana. They come to
>>>> Israel, as immigrants do, for a better life. But their dreams of
>>>> working as a waitress, nurse, or au pair turn nightmarish upon their
>>>> arrival.

>>>> Their fellow countryman who met them at the airport, speaking the
>>>> language of home, takes them to a locked apartment with barred windows
>>>> and a phone that only takes incoming calls, where they are forced to
>>>> provide sexual services to strangers.

>>>> Those who rebel risk being raped, beaten, or starved. Even those who
>>>> knew they were going into prostitution are shocked by the stark
>>>> conditions, the pay of roughly 20 shekalim ($5) a day or less for their
>>>> labor.

>>>> This disturbing story unfolds all too often at the hotline for Migrant
>>>> Workers, a Tel Aviv agency founded in 1998 to protect the human rights
>>>> of foreign workers, victims of sex trafficking among them. The hotline
>>>> takes as its motto the familiar line from Exodus 22:20: “You shall not
>>>> wrong a stranger or oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of
>>>> Egypt.”

>>>> Agency director and co-founder Sigal Rozen, along with the group’s
>>>> counsel, Nomi Levenkron, were in Washington, D.C., last week to give a
>>>> lecture at the Johns Hopkins Nitze School of Advanced International
>>>> Studies, to network and to speak with supporters. Among them are the
>>>> New Israel Fund, which has given the hotline a total of $19,000 during
>>>> the past year and a half.

>>>> In an interview, Rozen called sex trafficking an “unorganized crime,”
>>>> based largely on personal networks of immigrants from the Ukraine,
>>>> Russia, and Moldova.

>>>> “… “It’s easier being a trafficker than being a plumber …” –Nomi
>>>> Levenkron

>>>> Those three countries alone accounted for 91 percent of the 474 women
>>>> arrested in brothels and deported from Israel in 2000, according to
>>>> figures compiled by hotline volunteers during visits to the Neveh
>>>> Tirzah women’s prison.

>>>> These statistics represent only a fraction of the problem. Police
>>>> spokespersons have set the number of women brought into the country to
>>>> work in the sex industry at 2,000-3,000 annually, the number of
>>>> brothels at 250, Rozen said.

>>>> “It’s Misha that knows Sasha that knows Vladimir,” added Levenkron,
>>>> noting the economic incentive to be a pimp or work with one. “It’s
>>>> easier being a trafficker than being a plumber.”

>>>> One day she got a phone call from a rape crisis center where a woman
>>>> pleaded to be arrested and deported.

>>>> This young Moldovian had twice tried to escape her pimp and at 18, was
>>>> burned out on prostitution and just wanted to go home.

>>>> “She’s so young and sweet,” reflected Levenkron. “She came to Israel to
>>>> be a waitress.”

>>>> A year ago this month, Israel passed the Law Against Trafficking Women.
>>>> Before that time, other laws existed against soliciting, pimping, and
>>>> running brothels.

>>>> Yet hotline staff point out that few pimps involved in trafficking ever
>>>> face a judge, with the majority of prostitutes deported without ever
>>>> facing a trial that might involve their testimony against their pimps.
>>>> Out of 459 women deported in 1998, only 35 cases went to trial; out of
>>>> 253 in 1999, a scant five ended up in the courtroom.

>>>> Judicial indifference is compounded by police complicity, Levenkron
>>>> argued.

>>>> The 18-year-old Moldovian, it turned out, had at one point in her
>>>> misadventures, found herself in a Tel Aviv police station where some of
>>>> the officers, who were her clients, recognized her and moved to call
>>>> her pimp.

>>>> Overhearing their plans, the woman fled and moved in with a
>>>> client-turned-boyfriend.

>>>> But somehow the pimp found her again, threatened the boyfriend. The
>>>> young woman, with no place to go, went back to the brothel. Now the
>>>> case hangs in the courts, where Levenkron has faint hopes for a
>>>> positive outcome.

>>>> The police role in such trafficking ranges from casual to highly
>>>> serious, she alleged.

>>>> “There are police who just come as clients, those who get special
>>>> discounts because of their good relationships with the owner of the
>>>> place and those that inform the owner about police operations,”
>>>> explained Levenkron.

>>>> One young Beersheva prostitute told the attorney she was forced to work
>>>> seven days a week unless a police raid was expected.

>>>> Widespread fear of violence from pimps has muted the public outcry, say
>>>> hotline staff. When Levenkron filed a suit on behalf of a
>>>> Beersheva-based woman, a 20-year-old Moldovian who had survived six
>>>> pimps and multiple rapes, several of the lawyer’s friends came to her
>>>> home to bid her a final farewell, in anticipation of her imminent
>>>> death, she said.

>>>> INTERNATIONAL PROBLEM

>>>> Worldwide, trafficking in persons for domestic service, forced labor,
>>>> and prostitution ranks third after drugs and guns among the activities
>>>> of international crime, according to a congressional service report
>>>> released May 10, 2000. For comparison, about 50,000 people are brought
>>>> to the United States annually, the report stated.

>>>> The rise in trafficking seen over the 1990s was fueled by feeble
>>>> economies in source countries, such as the former Soviet Union and
>>>> Southeast Asia, along with weak penalties for traffickers, said a
>>>> government official familiar with these issues.

>>>> Last October, the United States passed its own law addressing this
>>>> problem, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, which
>>>> calls on the State Department to report annually on the scope of
>>>> trafficking in various countries and measures taken to combat it. The
>>>> report was due for release on June 1, but its publication has been
>>>> delayed.

>>>> In Israel today, official policy on trafficking is to arrest and deport
>>>> foreign sex workers. The women are held for an average of 30 days under
>>>> crowded and sometimes harsh conditions, longer if they testify in court
>>>> against their pimps, according to hotline data.

>>>> Rozen and Levenkron take issue with this approach. “Deporting women
>>>> doesn’t make things better,” said Levenkron. “I’m tired of shouting
>>>> this all over Israel so I’ve come here [to the United States] to shout
>>>> about it.”

>>>> Rozen contends that a one-year work permit in specified fields such as
>>>> home health care or child care, before their return home, would put the
>>>> former prostitutes in a stronger position to take care of themselves.

>>>> Gruesome albeit unsubstantiated stories abound, she says, about revenge
>>>> attacks on returning women and their families by the original
>>>> trafficker in the home country.

>>>> A nest egg from a year’s legitimate work, Rozen suggests, would allow
>>>> victims to re-establish themselves in a new community and stay out of
>>>> the clutches of traffickers in the future.

>>>> Meanwhile, Levenkron is seeking professional back-up in her job
>>>> representing the victims of trafficking.

>>>> “I am the [hotline] legal department,” laments Levenkron. “We need
>>>> lawyers and we need public awareness.”

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:16 EST 2007
Article: 65007 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us alt.barter:6199 soc.culture.europe:583697 soc.culture.swiss:65007 soc.culture.german:374890 soc.culture.usa:2002209
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: DickWarren
Newsgroups: alt.barter,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Re: Like Fraud?Frank Arthur is also known as Edmond Grosvomit the fraud who changes names every 5 minutes.
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:58:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1180029491 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 24 May 2007 11:58:11 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:58:11 MDT

On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:28:25 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>Like Fraud? DickWarren is also known as Edmond Grosvomit the fraud who
>changes names every 5 minutes.
>Quick send him money IF you are stupid!

Frank Arthur, alias Grosvomit,[me] is just another common thief.
Some are pickpockets.
Some steal cars. Some steal groceries.
This human turd steals names.

Here are some of his names-
Arthur Franks,Ernst Zundholz,Yitzak Goldstein,KenOyVeigh,
Frank Arthur,Ariadne,Boris,Bruno,DesiCohen,Flavia13,
[email protected],GeorgesFirestein,HansMueller,
GayMcvay,PanPiotr,RiainBartoski,VictorArcurius,
KenMcvaySOBC Ad infinitum.
All from Frank Arthur alias Edmond Grosvomit the fraud

On Wed, 02 May 2007 17:02:32 GMT, KenOyVeigh
wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:10:00 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>>Edmond Grosvomit still reeks of fraudulent names-Arthur Franks today?
>>Then a continuous list of faked names again.
>>Trust that idiot?

>From all the postings from Frank Arthur, with all the aliases, it seems that
you must be the Grosvomit, nicht wahr?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:45:29 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>The poster using Frank Arthur is a fraud.[me]

>I am the legitimate Frank Arthur and I did not post to this newsgroup.

I am either insane, or just another ZYD liar, since I have constantly
been posting to this, and other newsgroups!!

>The pervert who used my name is a person of no honor.
>He is known as Grosvomit from Canada

There have never been any postings by anyone named Grosvomit,
just piles of articles by me, Frank Arthur.

>The way to know if I am the legitimate Frank Arthur it will show on the gray
>tab:

>Organization: BellSouth Internet Group

There are no gray tabs on newsgroup articles, which proves I am a lunatic

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:17:16 EST 2007
Article: 65010 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.usa:2002297 soc.culture.europe:583738 alt.politics.nationalism.white:531274 soc.culture.german:374901 soc.culture.swiss:65010 de.soc.politik.misc:874676
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-14!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: DickWarren
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: HOLOBULLSHIT – Repost
Organization: JewWatch
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 632
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 01:08:59 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1180055339 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 24 May 2007 19:08:59 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:08:59 MDT

HOLOBULSHIT
From: MBaguette
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:49:41 -0700

On 2 Nov 2006 08:10:23 -0800, in soc.culture.australian “Venceremos”
wrote:

Holocaust is Nothing But A HoloHoax

Every day, in every aspect of the media, you will be reminded of the
holocaust of World War II and the damage it did to one group of people.
You are supposed to feel guilty and excuse away anything these people,
who are portrayed as the only victims, now do to society. You are not
to mention others, such as the Poles, Russians and Gypsies who suffered
equally if not more, for that would detract from the lie with which the
rest of humanity is being burdened. Sure, terribly evil things happen
in war, but it is even more terrible to allow lies to be embellished
and used to promote guilt, misunderstanding, blackmail and more evil.
Sooner or later, there will be a worldwide confrontation arising from
this deceit, and the liars will come off second best. It is for this
reason I have reproduced a section of one of our books here:

Alan Dershowitz believes that all American Jews should think of
themselves as victims of the Holocaust; his rationale is that they were
ultimately targets of the Holocaust. But, the Holocaust is even bigger
than that to the Zionists; they want everyone to believe that all wrong
is done to the Jews, and no wrong is done by the Jews. And, there is a
reason for this.

Robert Faurisson observes,

“Elie Wiesel won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. He is generally
accepted as a witness to the Jewish ‘Holocaust,’ and, more
specifically, as a witness to the legendary Nazi extermination gas
chambers….”

But in what respect is Elie Wiesel a witness to the alleged gas
chambers? By what right does he ask us to believe in that means of
extermination? In an autobiographical book that supposedly describes
his experiences at Auschwitz and Buchenwald, he nowhere mentions the
gas chambers. He does indeed say that the Germans executed Jews,
but…by fire; by throwing them alive into flaming ditches, before the
very eyes of the deportees! No less than that! Here Wiesel the false
witness had some bad luck.

Forced to choose from among several Allied war propaganda lies, he
chose to defend the fire lie instead of the boiling water, gassing, or
electrocution lies. In 1956, when he published his testimony in
Yiddish, the fire lie was still alive in certain circles. This lie is
the origin of the term Holocaust. Today there is no longer a single
historian who believes that Jews were burned alive. The myths of the
boiling water and of electrocution have also disappeared. Only the gas
remains.

* The gassing lie was spread by the Americans.

* The lie that Jews were killed by boiling water or steam (specifically
at Treblinka) was spread by the Poles.

* The electrocution lie was spread by the Soviets.”

Yes, these are all Holocaust lies.

“The fire lie is of undetermined origin. It is in a sense as old as war
propaganda or hate propaganda, just like the false assertion of human
(Jewish) skin being used to make lamp shades. In his memoir, Night,
which is a version of his earlier Yiddish testimony, Wiesel reports
that at Auschwitz there was one flaming ditch for the adults and
another one for babies. He writes: ‘Not far from us, flames were
leaping from a ditch, gigantic flames. They were burning something. A
lorry drew up at the pit and delivered its load – little children.
Babies! Yes, I saw it – saw it with my own eyes…those children in
the flames.'”

None of this ever happened. And, yet, such lies have earned Wiesel the
Nobel Peace Prize, and made it “anti-Semitic” and even illegal to
simply tell the truth about the Holocaust.

Why have lies superseded truth? And, more specifically, who benefits
>from the lie? As we have observed, every lie in the evil
Zionist-controlled system is designed to exploit; every lie keeps
Yahweh’s system of evil securely in place. In this world, everything of
value is offered up to Yahweh by the Zionists, as a “burnt offering.”

“Holocaust” means burnt offering; it is the perpetuation of the
illusion and the elevation of the lie to the level of supreme truth,
religiously.

The fact is, the Holocaust is about money, legitimacy for Israel, and
the total denial of any moral failings (or evilness) in the Jewish
people. Jews are outraged when it is mentioned that many gypsies and
Russians suffered the same fate as Jews, because to compare a
sub-human to a Jew is unspeakable. The Jewish scripture declares that
the life of a Jew is the most priceless thing to “god” and the life of
a non-Jew or “goy” is worthless. The Jews have a history of crying
“holocaust.”

The Talmud cites examples of many billions of Jews being killed
(including children being burned). Needless to say, there have never
been that many Jews on the face of the earth. The same falsification
and embellishment is true with regard to the “holocaust” of World War
II. Many Jews died, but not the six million that is claimed. Perhaps a
million died, none from gas chambers. Red Cross documentation which
Jewish controllers refuse to release, is suspected of suggesting that
some 100,000 were lost.

As historian David Irving and many others have rightly observed, there
never were gas chambers at the concentration camps. And, it would have
been impossible for the Germans to have gassed and then burned 12,000
Jews every day. Reports by concentration camp survivors that tell of
the guards going into “gas chambers” as soon as one batch of Jews had
been killed, clearing out the bodies, and then filling the room again
are patently false – the guards (none of whom was reported to have
worn a mask) would have instantly died, since cyanide does not
dissipate or disappear in a few minutes.

Also, there would have been bones and ashes to show, with cyanide
residue. None of this is found. Even the Auschwitz Memorial which once
stated that six million Jews had died now states that perhaps a million
died. The plaque has been altered from six to one million. That being
said, even a million dead people is a lot.

The degree of suffering they experienced, and the treatment they
received from hateful, evil Nazis was a fact. Yet, that does not excuse
all of the evils and wrongs committed by the victors, who fire-bombed
civilian populations in Germany and Japan, and dropped atomic bombs on
cities in Japan, before ending the war. The intentional massacring of
millions of civilians by the Allied victors was certainly a war crime,
and perhaps of larger impact than what happened to the Jews.

War is a terrible thing, and though it is an unwritten and unspoken
policy, civilian populations are targeted and slaughtered in the worst
way, to weaken the morale of the opposition. War is not just fought by
soldier against soldier, with some kind of boundary against civilians.

Yet, it is always the victors who write the history; they are always in
the right, and the losers are always in the wrong. War is not black and
white, truth is its first casualty, and what is written in history and
in the news has little correlation with the truth.

Jewish bankers funded the Nazis, and the Zionists fiercely pressured
Western nations to keep Jews from being able to leave Germany before
the war began. For perverse political and economic reasons, the
Zionists did not want the Jews to go to free nations, but rather had
the single-minded objective of claiming Palestine as the Jewish
state. Because they could not force the creation of Israel before the
war, they readily sacrificed the lives of their “lesser brethren” for
the “greater cause”: Israel.

There are many people who hold that all major wars in the last few
centuries have been instigated by, funded by, and profited by, the
Zionist international bankers.

* First, they instigate wars.

* Then, during the war, they loan huge sums of money, and make enormous
profits in their military-industrial production.

* After the war, they buy up property and industry at pennies on the
dollar in the loser nations.

This policy of economic conquest is not only a factor in war; it is how
the everyday economy operates, worldwide, today.

* The Zionists control the economies, governments, and
agreements/conflicts between major nations.

* They control the daily economy, inflation, and deflation.

* They engaged in economic war in creating the Great Depression in the
US, in which they obtained vast amounts of property and business by
foreclosing on mortgages and debt.

* And, they have plundered the resources of Third World nations, via
the issuance of debt (loans) which cannot be paid back due to usurious
interest rates.

We need to understand that nothing in this world “just happens,”
especially not global events. Everything has a reason and a purpose
behind it. There are forces that control all that happens in this
world, and there is an unseen “shadow government.” It uses the masses
or “sheep” as cannon fodder during war, and to gain sympathy and
financial aid.

We are told that we cannot forget the Holocaust, though we dismiss all
other genocide that has occurred to all other racial groups throughout
history. Why is that?

* Why is there no public relations action to memorialize the millions
of Whites who were slaughtered in the slave business;

* Wy is there no mention of the millions of Cambodians – nearly half
their population – who were slaughtered by Pol Pot; or the twenty
million Russians killed in World War II?

* Why is it that what happens to these other groups doesn’t seem to
matter? For the answer, we need to only look to Jewish propaganda and
scriptural dogma: the life of a Jew matters, only a Jew is a human
being; the non-Jews do not matter, their lives are worthless. The
media are controlled by the Zionists, and because most of them are
Jewish they are greatly invested in the story of the Jews. They readily
promote fiction over fact, the lie over the truth in all other areas,
so why not in this area – in which they have such strong emotional
and financial interest?

Contradicting the Holocaust lies is illegal in some countries (called
an act of racial hatred and vilification, defaming the dead, and
anti-Semitism). The media quickly label any less than glorifying
truth about the Jews as anti-Semitism. And, this, more than anything,
has given the evil Zionists the greatest cover and freedom from public
scrutiny.

They are able to go about their agenda of world domination and control
with immunity from media attention. If you doubt this, just check to
see the last time the Rothschilds and Rockefellers headed the Forbes
list of richest people in the world. Rather than holding down the top
spots due to their enormous and cunningly concealed wealth, they are
not even on the list.

The media refuse to acknowledge the power, wealth, authority, and
control that the Zionists truly have in this world, because if they
did, then some attention would be directed their way when people
discuss what is wrong with this world – and why. They have set things
up, and controlled things so well, that they never receive this bad
publicity. Instead, they portray themselves as philanthropists and
benefactors of all mankind – whom they think of as animals, and
gladly sacrifice as “burnt offerings” to their blood-thirsty and evil
“god” Yahweh (Jehovah).

The Nazis allowed a ship full of Jews to leave Germany, to see if
another country would be willing to accept Jewish refugees. But, every
country, including the United States, refused to let the passengers
disembark. Because of this worldwide Zionist policy of refusing to
accept Jews anywhere – because of their desire to claim Israel as the
homeland of the Jews – many Jews were sacrificed for the political
Zionist cause. The shipload of Jews was forced to return, sacrificed as
another burnt offering to the greater glory of Yahweh.

H.G. Wells noted,

“Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews
have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen
people.”

The Zionist leaders of the Jewish community have repeatedly,
historically, ensured the suffering of their lesser brethren. It is
they who have sacrificed the good and innocent among the Jews,
willingly, consciously, methodically, so that they could implement
their own, self-serving, evil agenda. (Holocaust Fact and Fiction
Presented by: Annwn Publications P O Box 28 Malanda, QLD, Australia,
4885)

If you want proof that I am right, just watch the jews have a fit about
these posts; because if the lies that they have fostered about the
HoloHoax were true then they would finance any and all reputable
scientists to examine all records and evidence; they would have
absolutely no problem with anyone examining the evidence. But because
it is a lie and a Hoax they deny anyone, if they can, who tries to do
research on the subject. Therefore, by their own denials they prove
that it was a Hoax.

There have been many terrible “Holocausts.” The worst I know of is the
50 million plus Russians murdered by the Communists who ruled Russia
(the Soviet Union).

Forty years previously (to 1917 Bolshevik Revolution) Dostoevsky had
predicted that Socialism would cost Russia one hundred million victims.
At the time it seemed an improbable figure. Let me recommend the
British press to acquaint its readers with the impartial three-page
report of the Russian statistician, Professor Ivan Kurganov. It was
published in the West twelve years ago, but, as is so often the case
with matters of social significance, we only take cognizance of things
that do not run counter to our own feelings.

>From Professor Kurganov’s analysis we learn that if Dostoevsky erred,
he erred on the side of understatement. From 1917 to 1959 Socialism
cost the Soviet Union a hundred and ten million lives! (These “lives”
were for the most part Christians.) (A. Solzhenitsyn, “The West’s
Betrayal of Civilization”, p. 5-6, a B.B.C. address, March 26, 1976)

This is a really big time “Holocaust” if numbers make a difference.
Why is it that we never see anything about this “Holocaust” in any
mainstream media, TV or Hollywood movie?

The next biggest “Holocaust” I know about is the one that occurred in
Mao’s Red China. My 1990 “Guinness Book of World Records” states on p.
367 that during the regime of Mao Tse-tung (1949-1965) between
32.25 and 61.7 were “killed by government forces” according to an
estimate by the US Senate Judiciary Committee. I have seen estimates
much larger than this. “Killed by government forces” must leave out
many millions who starved as a direct result of insane Communist
policies such as the “Great Leap Forward’ during which many skilled
farmers were herded into “steel mills” where they “produced” prodigious
amounts of steel by melting tools, impalements, kettles, pots, pans,
etc. into “steel.” The resulting famine due to a great shortage of
farmers caused the deaths of many millions of Chinese people not
“killed by government forces.” So how many people were murdered by the
Communists in the Red Chinese “Holocaust.” No one knows for sure, but
it was many times 6 million. Again, this is never mentioned in the
mainstream media, or wept over in TV programs or Hollywood movies. The
32.25 to 61.7 million (plus many millions more) are forgotten dead.

It is estimated that over 40,000,000 (that’s FORTY MILLION!) unborn
children have been killed by abortion “Doctors” in the US since Roe v.
Wade. (1973) Now that’s a real HOLOCAUST, but not one wept over by TV,
Hollywood, etc. The media only emphasizes a “woman’s right to choose.”

It horrifies me even to contemplate how many more children have been
killed by abortionists in numerous other countries.

At least 9 million German people died from starvation, exposure, etc.
after the Russian armies drove them out of their homes in Germany’s
eastern provinces at the end of World War II.

After the Germans surrendered to the Allies in May of 1945, millions of
German soldiers were rounded up and enclosed in barbed wire camps.
They were called “disarmed enemy forces.” This meant to Eisenhower and
his bosses (Roosevelt, Morgenthau, and Truman (all jews), etc.) and his
men who imprisoned these DEF’s that they did not have to abide by the
Geneva convention since they were not POW’s. I have pictures of
hundreds of thousands of these men in a barbed wire enclosure, standing
room only. Family members of these men would come with food and water
but were driven away by allied soldiers with machine guns. How long can
human beings live in such unsheltered enclosures in mud up to their
knees with no food, water, shelter, etc?

Of course, not long. Between one and two million German men died in
these vast mud pits. Have you ever seen a story about this real
holocaust on TV, Hollywood movies, etc? No. This holocaust is
forgotten!

Many Germans, Eastern Europeans, self-styled “Jews” and Gypsies were
severely mistreated and died in Nazi Germany. Many inmates in the Nazi
work camps died of starvation, typhus, and other diseases. It is very
difficult to transport food when everything that moves is bombed. It is
difficult to provide clean drinking water when all water purification
plants have been bombed with the idea in mind of causing the very
spread of disease that occurred. Did the greedy industrialists
profiting from these work camps want their labor force to die or be
“gassed.” Not if what I have read about their type has any validity.

However, if numbers make any difference to you in regards to the
“Holocaust” that is “never forgiven” and “never forgotten,” and is
repeatedly shown in detail in countless TV shows and Hollywood movies
and mentioned on at least a weekly basis in mainstream newspapers and
magazines please read on.

Six Million Jews: Ministers often repeat the Jew story that “Hitler
killed six million Jews,” yet the 1939 World Almanac shows
15,688,259 Jews in the world, and nine years later the New York Times
reported there were between 15,600,000 and 18,700,000 Jews! If Hitler
killed 6 million, how come there were no less in 1948 than in 1939? The
same sources report the Jews in Germany in 1938, prior to the supposed
killings, totaled only 550,000 (½ million)!

If Germans killed 38% of all the Jews in the world, does that mean the
9,688,259 left had six to nine million children in the next nine years?
It takes normal populations 100 years to double-how come “Jews” did
it in nine? AND THEN NEVER DID IT AGAIN? (the present world population
of “Jews” is about the same as it was in 1948) Why do ministers
repeat this Jewish propaganda lie to their flocks? [An Open Letter to
Any Minister Who Teaches “the Jews Are Israel.” By Pastor Sheldon
Emery, (written after 1976, © date not given)]

Yes, there have been many Holocausts. I do not deny that. I sorrow over
these holocausts more than most people I know. I work to prevent
current and future holocausts knowing that “those who do not remember
the past are condemned to repeat it.”
(Winston Palmer)