Documents

Via shaw 10, Grosvenor William 2006 – p10

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:35:10 -0700, Ernst Zundholtz
wrote:

Looks like the filthy ZHIDS just do not like this well-documented
expose of their holohoax, and the fact that it documents 52 cases of
ZHID COLLABORATION WITH THE NAZIS!!

>>On 28 Nov 2004 10:59:36 -0800, [email protected]
>>(HeinrichHimmelfarb) wrote:

This article is so important, it needs to be reposted and passed on,
so that more and more people around the world will come to know the
truth about the ZHID COLLABORATION with nazis.
It will not be surprising to find after even more research, that even
more incidents of ZHID/Nazi COLLABORATION happened!!

Even about the HOLOHOAX, based on zhid lies!!

More and more truth is coming out, about the perfidious ZHID
COLLABORATION with the nazis!!

Surely this should cause those countries paying tribute dollars to the
ZHIDS, to consider demanding repayment?

>>>On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:08:44 -0700, Joel Eichmann
>>> wrote:

It will not be surprising for researchers in Poland, Russia and even
Germany and Switzerland, to produce even more evidence of even more
COLLABORATION between the zionists and their colleagues in Germany!!

>>>>On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:41:32 -0700, dandelion
>> wrote:

>>>>Now that more and more research, with supporting documentation, is
>>>>being made public, documenting the collaboration of the ZIONAZIS
with
>>>>the nazis, slime like Shiksa Sueee Cohen do not want this TRUTH
made
>>>>public.

>>>>Even German historians such as C. Lange are now making public
their
>>>>findings, to the chagrin of the ZHID COLLABORATORS.

>>>>It was not only the notorious KASTNER CASE!!

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Posted by:
Steven Horn (KCOM)
1836 NW 11th St
Oklahoma City, OK 73106
(405) 524-0576

together with

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
against them — except force.” — John Bryant

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
–John Bryant

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
John Bryant

TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions.
G. K. Chesterton.

Posted by:
Patrick Lee Humphrey
7500 Bellerive #1807
Houston, Texas 77036-3040
1-713-266-7764

Steven Horn (KCOM)
1836 NW 11th St
Oklahoma City, OK 73106
(405) 524-0576

together with
Boris Dynin = NAMBLA executive &
Henry
CALL late nights to discuss: (408) 773-0984
Email me: [email protected] , [email protected] or even
VISIT me at:
55 Chumasero Drive, Daly City, San Francisco 94132

We all like late night discussions, even from Stormfront,
Christian Identity, Pamyat, Aryan Nations, etc.
We are together with McVay, regional managers for NAMBLA.
We like young children, so that we can train them our way.

Ken McVay invites callers,and visitors,to his homosexuals escorts
office: VISIT at:
#5 – 1601 – Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada, or my home at:
Apt. 3108 – 995 Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada
or call: 1-250-616-9431

As everyone can see McVay takes it as a compliment when he is
called a “confessed child-molester” and the additional material
should give an indication as to the why.

“I am weary of seeing the issue of “child porn” blown out of
proportion (I’ve been on and around the Net since 1988, and have
yet to come across anything I’d consider “child porn.” I’ve
seen photos of naked children, but then I’ve got some of those in
my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or any great
moral danger to our society).” – Nizkor Director Ken McVay
http://www.spectacle.org/695/mcvay.html [Many paedophiles
also have family albums with naked children photos in them.]

Look at Ken McVay’s photo and ask yourselves; “Does he not look like
a disheveled unkempt pervert or someone who would molest your child
even if he or she were not naked”?
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg

For detailed and documented evidence of McVay’s questionable
background and details of convictions, please refer to Dr.David Michael’s
detailed expose on McVay. McVay is a distraught paranoid molseter, and is
known for claiming that anyone who refutes his lies must be a grosvenor!!
It is also suspected that McVay fabricates responses using aliases, just
to justify his existence to his ZHID masters.

Since I am a female, I also like to receive many calls, to discuss
NAMBLA,lesbianism, JEW atrocities and similar.
Email me, Shiksa Susan Cohen at: [email protected], especially late
nights.

Also,be sure to include me on maillists:
Keith Spencer,5005 Whitemud Road,Edmonton,AB,Canada T6H5L2
I welcome phone calls, late nights:(780)437-1787 or
send lots of emails to: [email protected], or phone to
work:(780)492-0473

And also: George Firestone: “George” ,
and [email protected]

Here is Fag Rianin’s own web page: http://gaydar.co.uk/riain_il
Notice he is a self confessed ZionistFagJew!

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

They also are involved in exposing Ken McVay for the crook he is,
and passing on information to the appropriate criminal prosecutors.

As a service to the public, this article is posted worldwide by a
victim of the molester pervert Ken McVay, with the assistance
of a group interested in detailing the depredations of the ZHIDS.
May Ken McVay and his like,rot in gehenna.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:24 EST 2007
Article: 65597 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:592793 soc.culture.polish:814219 soc.culture.russian:467496 soc.culture.ukrainian:133707 uk.politics.misc:1963834 soc.culture.german:377392 soc.culture.swiss:65597
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Mattias Kern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Shock, Horror, As Jewish Academic Writes an Honest Book About Ritual Murder – Repost
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 122
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:42:36 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1191076956 64.59.135.176 (Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:42:36 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:42:36 MDT

On 10 Feb 2007 12:14:16 -0800, in alt.revisionism “thedarkman”
wrote:

I wouldn’t pay much attention to the nutter who appeared on Oprah; I
remember that, it caused eruptions at the time. So what do we have
here then? A Jewish academic who admits that hey, maybe Jews had their
bad guys too, maybe they had their share of bloodthirsty, superstious
bigots. Like I said before, this really is no big deal for me, but
watch the shabbez goyim like Mock scream, watch the ADL shriek.
Don’t these people make you wanna laugh?

http://www.honestmediatoday.com/professor_admits_jewish_ritual_murder.htm

Jewish Professor Admits Jewish Cult Engaged in Past Jewish Ritual
Murders

According to a recent report by the newspaper “The Guardian,” Jewish
Prof. Ariel Toaff, who is a professor at Bar-Ilan University in Israel
of Medieval Jewish history but is currently a visiting professor in
Italy, has written a book,”Pasque di Sangue” (Easter of Blood), which
describes Jewish ritual murder rites of Jews in the past.

Some details of the book were published in the paper “Corriere Della
Sera,” which also has an online section describing the book.

Prof. Toaff’s book reportedly “describes the mutilation and
crucifixion of a two-year-old boy to recreate Christ’s execution at
Pesach, the Jewish Easter. The festival marks the fleeing of the Jews
>from Egypt and Prof Toaff says Christian blood was used for ‘magic and
therapeutic practices,'” noted the Guardian. Further describing the
bizarre and hateful customs of Jewish extremists, Prof. Toaff noted
that Jewish occultists would sometimes mix blood in their matzo balls,
which was eaten during their religious rites.

He also describes many children who were reportedly crucified on the
cross.

Unsurprisingly, many Jewish supremacists quickly denied Prof. Toaff’s
accurate findings in an attempt to hide their ancient, bizarre, and
frightening customs from the general public.

However, Prof. Toaff was hardly the first to acknowledge such crimes
in recent times. Indeed, in more recent times, a Jewish lady had
appeared on the Oprah Winfrey show several years ago and described how
some of her relatives had engaged in similar crimes. The honest and
brave Jewish lady, Vicki Polin (who used the pseudonym of “Rachel” on
the Oprah Winfrey show to avoid reprisals), told of how her family had
engaged in some extremely bizarre Satanic Jewish kabbalistic rites,
including that of infanticide (video of Oprah’s interview with Polin).

In the interview, Oprah asked the young woman, who undoubtedly had
been traumatized by the ordeal, about what exactly had occurred. Oprah
opened the discussion, telling of how the poor girl had grown up in a
family that “participated in human sacrifice,” undoubtedly causing
emotional scars that may never heal.

Here is part of the interview:

OPRAH: …You come from generations of ritualistic abuse?

POLIN: Yes, my family has an extensive family tree, and they keep
track of who’s been involved and who hasn’t been involved, and it’s
gone back to like 1700.

OPRAH: And so you were ritually abused.

POLIN: Right. I was born into a family that believes in this.

OPRAH: Does everyone else think it’s a nice Jewish family? From the
outside, you appear to be a nice Jewish girl?

POLIN: Definitely.

OPRAH: And you all are worshipping the devil inside the home?

POLIN: Right. There’s other Jewish families across the country. It’s
not just my own family.

OPRAH: Really? And so who knows about it? Lots of people now.

POLIN: Well, I talked to a police detective in the Chicago area, and
several of my friends know, and I’ve spoke publicly before, and…

OPRAH: So when you were brought up in this kind of evilness, did you
just think it was normal?

RACHEL: I blocked out a lot of the memories I had because of my
multiple personality disorder, but, yes. I mean, it’s like if you grow
up with something, you think it’s normal. I always thought
something…

OPRAH: So what kinds of things? You don’t have to give us the gory
details, but what kinds of things went on in the family?

POLIN: Well, there would be rituals in which babies would be
sacrificed, and you would have to, you know…

[end of Oprah excerpt]

You can read more about Polin’s ordeal at the website Lukeford.net,
which also describes many exchanges from Jews about this whole ordeal.
No doubt, it has caused a big scandal among them, with one of their
own reportedly acknowledging such grisly crimes.

Polin is now the CEO of the Awareness Center, which honorably works to
prevent ritual abuse and other acts of child cruelty.

In more recent times, the book “Blood Ritual” by Philip DeVier and the
DVD “Jewish Ritual Murder Revisited: The Hidden Cult Revealed,” the
latter having an interview with noted scholar Dr. Harrell Rhome and
also being found online in streamable format, have also covered this
wicked crime committed by Jewish extremists (video).

There is no reason to believe that all Jews commit ritualistic
infanticide. However, there appears to be too much evidence to neglect
such crimes altogether in the past. If committed today, it is mostly
occurring in Israel, where Jewish occults and extremists remain
rampant, and possibly occurring elsewhere in small numbers, often
attributed as Satanic acts.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:25 EST 2007
Article: 65598 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us de.soc.politik.misc:913107 alt.politics.europe:65266 soc.culture.swiss:65598
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Mattias Kern
Newsgroups: de.soc.politik.misc,de.soc.politik.deutschland,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian
Subject: Dieser Krieg ist fuer Israel Nicht zu gewinnen! – Repost
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 74
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:43:23 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1191077003 64.59.135.176 (Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:43:23 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:43:23 MDT

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:12:50 +0000, in de.soc.politik.misc Norman
wrote:

“Dieser Krieg ist für Israel nicht zu gewinnen”

FDP-Außenexperte Wolfgang Gerhardt spricht sich für Einsatz einer
internationalen Friedenstruppe ohne Deutsche aus

Vom 31.07.2006

BERLIN Wolfgang Gerhardt, FDP-Außenexperte und Vorsitzender der
Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung hält einen sofortigen Waffenstillstand für
dringend geboten. Es sei nicht länger zu leugnen, dass der Krieg im
Libanon zu viele zivile Opfer fordere. Herr Gerhardt, beim jüngsten
israelischen Angriff auf das libanesische Dorf Kana wurden auch 27
Kinder getötet. Der Nahost-Krieg eskaliert weiter. Wo bleibt der
internationale Druck in Richtung Waffenstillstand?

Gerhardt: Jeder weitere Kriegstag ist schrecklich. Je früher ein
Waffenstillstand zustande kommt, desto besser. Ohne eine umfassende
internationale Beteiligung werden die beiden Konfliktparteien zu keiner
friedlichen Lösung kommen. Dieser Krieg ist für Israel militärisch nicht
zu gewinnen. Es kann nur eine politische Lösung geben.

Israels Bombardement trifft nicht nur die Hisbollah-Stellungen, sondern
auch die Zivilbevölkerung.

Gerhardt: Israel macht es seinen Freunden manchmal wirklich sehr schwer.
Es lässt sich nicht länger leugnen, dass die zivilen Opfer leider sehr
sehr hoch sind. Jeder Tote ist ein Toter zu viel, egal auf welcher
Seite. Wir brauchen schnell eine internationale Lösung und den Einsatz
einer internationalen Friedenstruppe. Einen anderen Weg zum Frieden sehe
ich nicht.

Wie sollte das Mandat für die Truppe ausgestaltet werden?

Gerhardt: Es geht nur mit einem klaren und robusten Mandat der Vereinten
Nationen, dem die beiden Konfliktparteien zustimmen müssen. Eine
Friedenstruppe muss im Notfall auch militärische Mittel anwenden können.

Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel lehnt eine deutsche Beteiligung an einer
Nahost-Friedenstruppe ab. Sollte sich Deutschland aus historischen
Gründen zurückhalten?

Gerhardt: Wir sollten hier äußerst zurückhaltend sein. Da sind vor allem
die historischen Gründe. Es darf kein deutscher Soldat in die Situation
gebracht werden, dass er mit israelischen Soldaten oder
Hisbollah-Milizen in einen Konflikt kommt. Ich mag mir nicht vorstellen,
was in einem deutschen Soldaten in einer solchen Situation vorgeht.
Israel hätte sicher Verständnis dafür, wenn sich Deutschland nicht an
einer Friedenstruppe beteiligt. Alle Beteiligten müssen verstehen und
akzeptieren, dass deutsche Soldaten nicht entsandt werden sollten. Aber
es gibt viele Alternativen zur Hilfe.

Welchen Beitrag könnte Berlin leisten?

Gerhardt: Der Konflikt ist sehr vielschichtig. Das Leben der
Palästinenser in den Autonomie-Gebieten muss deutlich verbessert werden.
Die Menschen benötigen eine Perspektive. Hier gilt es, die
wirtschaftliche Lage zu verbessern. Auch im Libanon sollten wir beim
Wiederaufbau helfen.

Bisher sind alle Nahost-Friedenspläne gescheitert. Wie sollte ein neuer
Anlauf aussehen?

Gerhardt: Die USA haben offenbar vor dem Hintergrund des Irak-Krieges zu
wenig Aufmerksamkeit auf Israel und den Konflikt mit den Palästinensern
gelegt. Israel kann dauerhaft nur mit einer Zwei-Staaten-Lösung seine
Zukunft und den Frieden in der Region sichern.

Das Gespräch führte Andreas Herholz.

http://www.wiesbadener-kurier.de/politik/objekt.php3?artikel_id=2471045

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:25 EST 2007
Article: 65599 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.europe:592796 soc.culture.russian:467498 soc.culture.polish:814223 alt.politics.europe:65268 uk.politics.misc:1963836 soc.culture.swiss:65599 soc.culture.baltics:158892
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Mattias Kern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.polish,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.baltics
Subject: Solzhenitsyn Exposes ZYD Crimes In Russia!! Repost
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 108
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:44:08 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1191077048 64.59.135.176 (Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:44:08 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:44:08 MDT

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:23:48 -0400, in soc.culture.canada “serwad”
wrote:

Solzhenitsyn breaks last taboo of the revolution

Nobel laureate under fire for new book on the role of Jews in Soviet-era
repression

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who first exposed the horrors of the Stalinist
gulag, is now attempting to tackle one of the most sensitive topics of his
writing career – the role of the Jews in the Bolshevik revolution and Soviet
purges.
In his latest book Solzhenitsyn, 84, deals with one of the last taboos of
the communist revolution: that Jews were as much perpetrators of the
repression as its victims. Two Hundred Years Together – a reference to the
1772 partial annexation of Poland and Russia which greatly increased the
Russian Jewish population – contains three chapters discussing the Jewish
role in the revolutionary genocide and secret police purges of Soviet
Russia.

But Jewish leaders and some historians have reacted furiously to the book,
and questioned Solzhenitsyn’s motives in writing it, accusing him of factual
inaccuracies and of fanning the flames of anti-semitism in Russia.
Solzhenitsyn argues that some Jewish satire of the revolutionary period
“consciously or unconsciously descends on the Russians” as being behind the
genocide. But he states that all the nation’s ethnic groups must share the
blame, and that people shy away from speaking the truth about the Jewish
experience.

In one remark which infuriated Russian Jews, he wrote: “If I would care to
generalise, and to say that the life of the Jews in the camps was especially
hard, I could, and would not face reproach for an unjust national
generalisation. But in the camps where I was kept, it was different. The
Jews whose experience I saw – their life was softer than that of others.”

Yet he added: “But it is impossible to find the answer to the eternal
question: who is to be blamed, who led us to our death? To explain the
actions of the Kiev cheka [secret police] only by the fact that two thirds
were Jews, is certainly incorrect.”

Solzhenitsyn, awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970, spent much of
his life in Soviet prison camps, enduring persecution when he wrote about
his experiences. He is currently in frail health, but in an interview given
last month he said that Russia must come to terms with the Stalinist and
revolutionary genocides – and that its Jewish population should be as
offended at their own role in the purges as they are at the Soviet power
that also persecuted them.

“My book was directed to empathise with the thoughts, feelings and the
psychology of the Jews – their spiritual component,” he said. “I have never
made general conclusions about a people. I will always differentiate between
layers of Jews. One layer rushed headfirst to the revolution. Another, to
the contrary, was trying to stand back. The Jewish subject for a long time
was considered prohibited. Zhabotinsky [a Jewish writer] once said that the
best service our Russian friends give to us is never to speak aloud about
us.”

But Solzhenitsyn’s book has caused controversy in Russia, where one Jewish
leader said it was “not of any merit”.

“This is a mistake, but even geniuses make mistakes,” said Yevgeny
Satanovsky, president of the Russian Jewish Congress. “Richard Wagner did
not like the Jews, but was a great composer. Dostoyevsky was a great Russian
writer, but had a very sceptical attitude towards the Jews.

“This is not a book about how the Jews and Russians lived together for 200
years, but one about how they lived apart after finding themselves on the
same territory. This book is a weak one professionally. Factually, it is so
bad as to be beyond criticism. As literature, it is not of any merit.”

But DM Thomas, one of Solzhenitsyn’s biographers, said that he did not think
the book was fuelled by anti-semitism. “I would not doubt his sincerity. He
says that he firmly supports the state of Israel. In his fiction and factual
writing there are Jewish characters that he writes about who are bright,
decent, anti-Stalinist people.”

Professor Robert Service of Oxford University, an expert on 20th century
Russian history, said that from what he had read about the book,
Solzhenitsyn was “absolutely right”.

Researching a book on Lenin, Prof Service came across details of how
Trotsky, who was of Jewish origin, asked the politburo in 1919 to ensure
that Jews were enrolled in the Red army. Trotsky said that Jews were
disproportionately represented in the Soviet civil bureaucracy, including
the cheka.

“Trotsky’s idea was that the spread of anti-semitism was [partly down to]
objections about their entrance into the civil service. There is something
in this; that they were not just passive spectators of the revolution. They
were part-victims and part-perpetrators.

“It is not a question that anyone can write about without a huge amount of
bravery, and [it] needs doing in Russia because the Jews are quite often
written about by fanatics. Mr Solzhenitsyn’s book seems much more measured
than that.”

Yet others failed to see the need for Solzhenitsyn’s pursuit of this
particular subject at present. Vassili Berezhkov, a retired KGB colonel and
historian of the secret services and the NKVD (the precursor of the KGB),
said: “The question of ethnicity did not have any importance either in the
revolution or the story of the NKVD. This was a social revolution and those
who served in the NKVD and cheka were serving ideas of social change.

“If Solzhenitsyn writes that there were many Jews in the NKVD, it will
increase the passions of anti-semitism, which has deep roots in Russian
history. I think it is better not to discuss such a question now.”

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:25 EST 2007
Article: 65600 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us de.soc.politik.misc:913518 soc.culture.swiss:65600 uk.politics.misc:1964550 soc.culture.russian:467535 soc.culture.polish:814346
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!64.59.134.4.MISMATCH!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Mattias Kern
Newsgroups: de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.swiss,uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.polish,soc.cultuture.palestine
Subject: New Book – KASTNER’S TRAIN – Reopens Wounds of ZYD KOLLABORATION WITH NAZIS!!
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 1230
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:53:44 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1191174824 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:53:44 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:53:44 MDT

Nazi officials under the direction of SS officer Adolf Eichmann
offered to sell the Zionist Aid and Rescue Committee (Vaada), of which
Rudolf Kastner was the de facto leader, exit visas for 600 Jews who
held Palestinian immigration certificates, in exchange for 6.5
million pengö (RM 4,000,000 or $1,600,000).

Rudolf Kastner, who became a government minister in Israel, was
assassinated there in March 1957 following allegations that he had
collaborated with the Nazis.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kastner_train

Mirelle

This article is so important, it needs to be reposted and passed on,so
that more and more people around the world will come to know the truth
about the ZYD COLLABORATION with nazis.
It will not be surprising to find after even more research, that even
more incidents of ZHID/Nazi COLLABORATION happened!!

Even about the HOLOHOAX, based on zyd lies!!

More and more truth is coming out, about the perfidious ZYD
COLLABORATION with the nazis!!

Surely this should cause those countries paying tribute dollars to the
ZYDS, to consider demanding repayment?

>>>>On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:08:44 -0700, Joel Eichmann
>>>> wrote:

>>On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:41:32 -0700, dandelion
>> wrote:

>>Now that more and more research, with supporting documentation, is
>>being made public, documenting the collaboration of the ZIONAZIS
with
>>the nazis, slime like Shiksa Sueee Cohen do not want this TRUTH made
>>public.

>>Even German historians such as C. Lange are now making public their
>>findings, to the chagrin of the ZHID COLLABORATORS.

>>It was not only the notorious KASTNER CASE!!

>>>On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:51:02 -0700, Heinrich Himmelfarb
>>> wrote:
>>>Newsgroups:soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.european,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.germany
>>>On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:25:52 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis
>>>September 2004, page 86
>>>Book Review
>>>51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis
>>>By Lenni Brenner, ed. Barricade Books, 2002, 342 pp. List:$22; AET:
>>>$15.
>>>Reviewed by Sara Powell
>>>It’s no secret that Zionism embraced political expediency to
advance
>>>the cause of carving Eretz-Israel from the land of its native
>>>inhabitants. In his 1983 book, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators,
>>>Lenni Brenner shows that 20th century Zionists observed shockingly
few
>>>limits to that expediency. Not surprisingly, the book received
little
>>>coverage in the American media.

>>>Now, in 51 Documents, Brenner has compiled a wide variety of
letters,
>>>statements, articles, and judgements?some of which appeared in his
>>>earlier book?by a broad array of activists and authors, that
>>>documents Zionist cooperration with the Nazis.

>>>On the face of it, the notion seems absurd. However, Brenner
>>>presents the case?made in many Zionists? own words?that the Nazi
>>>agenda of expelling the Jews from Germany fit nicely with the
>>>Zionist plan for enticing those Jews into settling in Palestine and
>>>creating a new Jewish nation.

>>>In addition to introductory and concluding chapters, the book is
>>>organized into five sections which lead the reader through early,
>>>pre-Zionist documents; pre-Holocaust ideological factions; the
>>>Holocaust era itself; and a chapter on the Stern Gang and the
Nazis.

>>>Readers should note that a few documents are not indicative of
>>>collaboration in and of themselves, but provide the background to
>>>others written in response.

>>>These latter do indicate levels of collaboration between Zionists
and
>>>fascists, both the Nazis in Germany, and those in Mussolini’s
Italy.
>>>Brenner’s brief explanatory notes at the beginning of each document
>>>are helpful, as are the glossary and index.

>>>51 Documents assumes a certain knowledge of Zionist history, and
>>>requires a close reading and some deconstructive efforts on the
part
>>>of the reader. Those willing to commit the time and effort,
however,
>>>are rewarded with some stunning revelations. The reason some
>>>Zionists eschewed the boycott against Hitler?s Germany, for
instance, is
>>>that they had a financial deal?Ha’avara?with Germany allowing Jews
to
>>>exchange their wealth for goods to be exported to Palestine at less
of
>>>a loss, as an incentive to emigrate. Those wondering why Zionists
>>>today are so organized and experienced in their public relations
>>>efforts discover that these battles have been fought before.
>>>Moreover, the section on Nazi and Zionist understandings of
‘nationality’
>>>versus citizenship reveals how German and Israeli practices are
based on
>>>the same concept.

>>>51 Documents also sheds a whole new light on the term Holocaust
>>>guilt, frequently understood to mean Western, non-Jewish guilt for
>>>not acting against the Holocaust earlier. However, these documents
>>>make it clear that Holocaust guilt began with those Zionists who
>>>made the undoubtedly difficult, but politically expedient choice to
>>>place Eretz-Israel at the top of their priorities, above the lives
of
>>>their threatened European brethren.

>>>From a Zionist Executive Meeting speech by Yitzhak Gruenbaum on
>>>Feb. 18, 1943:

>>>And when some asked me: Can’t you give money from Keren Ha Yesod
>>>(Palestine Foundation Fund) to save Jews in the Diaspora? I said:
>>>?No! And again I say no….And, because of these things, people
>>>called me an anti-Semite, and concluded that I’m guilty, for the
fact
>>>that we don’t give ourselves completely to rescue actions.(p. 211)

>>>However difficult it may be, the reader must confront some rather
>>>disturbing conclusions. The most unsettling realization for this
>>>reviewer is that pre-Holocaust Zionists were able to politically
>>>align themselves with the Nazis because both groups fundamentally
saw
>>>race as an important dividing line?and, moreover, were determined
to
>>>keep it that way.

>>>From Vladimir Jabotinsky to Albert Einstein,’assimilation’ of Jews
>>>into the societies in which they lived was not an acceptable
option.
>>>Rather, Jewish nationalism required equality on a national level,
not
>>>a personal one. As Jabotinsky explained, ‘It is impossible for a
man
>>>to become assimilated with people whose blood is different from his
>>>own’
>>>(p. 10); in Einstein?s words, ?Palestine is first and foremost not
a
>>>refuge for East European Jews, but the incarnation of a reawakening
>>>sense of national solidarity? (p. 29).

>>>Finally, David Yisraeli, a member of the STERN GANG, , wrote the
>>>following in late 1940, as part of a proposal to Hitler. It was
>>>delivered in 1941 to two German diplomats in Lebanon.

>>>3. The establishment of the historic Jewish state on a national and
>>>totalitarian basis, bound by a treaty with the German Reich, would
be
>>>in the interest of a maintained and strengthened future German
>>>position of power in the Near East (p. 301).

>>>Such beliefs, of course, were not limited to Nazis and Zionists.
>>>Scientific and philosophical constructs of the day considered such
>>>differentiation legitimate, and ideas of racial difference?and,
>>>therefore, racial supremacy?were practiced around the world.

>>>Another disturbing conclusion a reader must inevitably face is that
>>>Zionists learned both tactical and political lessons from the Nazis
>>>and that, even today, these lessons are applied to further the
>>>Zionist cause. Although most likely known to potential readers of
this
>>>book,another disturbing element is the cover-up of the less than
savory
>>>roles of current Israeli leaders, including former prime ministers,
in
>>>the terrorist Irgun and Stern Gang just before, during, and after
the
>>>Holocaust. Likewise, the succumbing of various U.S. officials to
>>>Zionist pressure is a familiar, but distressing, story.

>>>51 Documents seems to represent a renewed attempt by Brenner to
>>>bring information regarding Zionist collaboration with the Nazis to
U.S.
>>>supporters of Israel, as well as to Jews and Muslims, in order to
>>>expand dialogue with knowledge, and save lives ‘both Palestinian
>>>and Israeli’ in the process. Readers of 51 Documents will find it
>>>difficult not to remove the rose colored glasses that so many seem
to wear
>>>when examining Zionism.

# 5 The Kastner Case
ZHID KOLABORACI WITH EICHMANN & NAZIS!!
Extracted from a pamphlet issued by BAZO-PS – 1981

Introduction

The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is
that involving Rudolf Kastner.

Most Jewish people have never heard of Rudolf Kastner.
Those who have, are generally under the impression that
there is some “controversy” about negotiations he undertook
for “the purchase of Jewish lives for money and military
equipment,” but that he was “fully rehabilitated” by the
Supreme Court of Israel.

The Accusations

Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:

Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the
British Medical Research Council, was one of the few
escapees from Auschwitz. In his memoirs published in
February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he wrote:

I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that –
I accuse certain Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly
deeds of the war.

This small group of quislings knew what was happening to
their brethren in Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their
own lives with the price of silence.

Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke
for all Jews in Hungary.
While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the number is
still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the
exterminations…I took these terrible statistics with me
when I escaped in 1944 and I was able to give Hungarian
Zionist leaders three weeks notice that Eichmann planned
to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…
Kastner went to Eichmann and told him, “I know of your plans;
spare some Jews of my choice and I shall keep quiet.”

Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S.
uniform and took him to Belsen to trace some of his friends.

Nor did the sordid bargaining end there.

Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this
little fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom
when Germany collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…
(Ben Hecht, Perfidy, pp 261-2)

These accusations are confirmed by the “Eichmann Confessions”
published in Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:

This Dr. Kastner was a young man about my age, an ice-cold
lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He agreed to help keep the
Jews from resisting deportation – and even keep order in the
collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let a few
hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to
Palestine. It was a good bargain. For keeping order in the
camps, the price…was not too high for me.

“…We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me,
Kastner smoked cigarets as though he were in a coffeehouse.
While we talked he would smoke one aromatic cigaret after
another, taking them from a silver case and lighting them
with a silver lighter. With his great polish and reserve
he would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.

“Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for
a select group of Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Palestune…

“As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity
between our attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these
immensely idealistic Zionist leaders….I believe that Kastner
would have sacrificed a thousand or a hundred thousand of his
blood to achieve his political goal…
‘You can have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have
this group here’. And because Kastner rendered us a great
service by helping keep the deportation camps peaceful, I
would let his groups escape. After all, I was not
concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews…
That was the ‘gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner.”
(Hecht, Ibid., pp.260-61)

Quite clearly these accusations, whether true or false,
do not relate merely to “the purchase of Jewish lives for
money and military equipment.”

Are the accusations against Kastner true?
According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie.
When Malchiel Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli
citizen published these accusations against Kastner, the
Israeli Government did rather more than demand that his
views should not be broadcast. Because a prominent Zionist
official Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the Ministry of
Trade and Industry) was involved, the Attorney General
of the State of Israel prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.
-88-
———————————————————————–
Posted by Robert E. Nordlander
[email protected]

Subject: Kastner Case=ZHID KOLLABORACI WITH NAZIS!!

From: Elias Davidsson ([email protected])
Subject: Zionism. The Kastner case (1/2)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.israel
Date: 1997/07/12

The Kastner Case

Introduction

Rather than answer every complaint in the same detail, we are taking
up the issue which the VJBD has declared to be the most offensive of
all and will show that on this question ‘The documentation available
is overwhelming and its message is thundering”, just as Palestine
Speaks claimed in one of the extracts complained about by the VJBD.

Since the accusation of direct Zionist cooperation and assistance in
the extermination of hundreds of thousands of Jewish people, and the
accusation that this flowed logically from shared aims, are clearly
the most ‘extreme’ and ‘offensive’ accusations of Nazi-Zionist
collaboration broadcast on 3CR programs, we will deal with this first,
and in greater detail.

Since the ‘Kastner case’ is the subject of most of the broadcasts
concerning collaboration which have been specifically complained
about, we shall go into this in greatest detail, and have put some
books in as evidence about it. Having answered the VJBD where its
case appears strongest, and on the points to which it has given
greatest emphasis,we hope it may become apparent to the Tribunal that
things are not quite what they may have appeared before this inquiry
began.

The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is that
involving Rudolf Kastner.

Most Jewish people in Australia have never heard of Rudolf Kastner.
Those who have, are generally under the impression that there is some
‘controversy’ about negotiations he undertook for ‘the purchase of
Jewish lives for money and military equipment’, but that he was ‘fully
ehabilitated’ by the Supreme Court of Israel.

That is exactly the line taken by Dr. John Foster, the Victorian
Jewish Board of Deputies expert witness, in his evidence condemning
3CR for anti-semitism.

It is quite clear from this evidence, that Dr. Foster does not know
anything at all about the Kastner case, since he does not even know
what Kastner was accused of.

This may not be his fault however, since one cannot read an accurate
account of the Kastner case in any of the widely available works
dealing with the Holocaust, either in bookshops or libraries. Apart
>from 3CR, the suppression of information has been so complete, that
even an expert like Dr. Foster, specifically asked to give evidence on
the matter, has been unable to find out what it is all about.

The Accusations
—————-
Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:

“Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British
Medical Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz.
In his memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily
Herald, he wrote:

‘I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse
certain Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war.

This small group of quislings knew what was happening to their
brethren in Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their their own lives
with the price of silence. Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the
council which spoke for all Jews in Hungary. While I was prisoner
number 44070 at Auschwitz – the number is still on my arm – I compiled
careful statistics of the exterminations…I took these terrible
statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I was able to give
Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that Eichmann planned to
send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner went to
Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my
choice and I shall keep quiet.’

Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and
took him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid
bargaining end there.

Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this little
fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany
collapsed,to set himself up in the Argentine…”(Ben Hecht, op.cit.
pp261-2)

These accusations are confirmed by the ‘Eichmann Confessions’
published in Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:

“I resolved to show how well a job could be done when the commander
stands 100% behind it. By shipping the Jews off in a lightning
operation, I wanted to set an example for future campaigns
elsewhere…In obedience to Himmler’s directive I now concentrated on
negotiations with the Jewish political officials in Budapest…Among
them Dr. Rudolph Kastner, authorized representative of the Zionist
Movement. This Dr. Kastner was a young man about my age, an ice-cold
lawyer and a fanatical Zionist.
He agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation – and even
keep order in the collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let
a few hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to
Palestine.
It was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price…was
not too high for me.

We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me, Kastner smoked
cigarets as though he was in a coffeehouse. While we talked he would
smoke one aromatic cigaret after another, taking them from a silver
case and lighting them with a silver lighter. With his great polish
and reserve he would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.

Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for a select group
of Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel…

As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity between our
attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic
Zionist leaders….I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a
thousand or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political
oal…’You can have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have this
group here’.

And because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping
keep the deportation camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape.
After all, I was not concerned with small groups of a thousand or so
Jews…
That was the ‘gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner” (Hecht, ibid,
p.26ö-61)

Quite clearly these accusations, whether true or false, do not relate
merely to ‘the purchase of Jewish lives for money and military
equipment’, as Dr. Foster imagines, and the term ‘collaboration’ is
the term that would apply. It seems unlikely that if Dr. Foster had
known what the accusation actually was, he would have condemned 3CR
saying ‘In these circumstances, to talk of collaboration is malicious
and absurd’.

Are the accusations against Kastner true?

According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie. When Malchiel
Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli citizen published these
accusations against Kastner, the Israeli Government did rather more
than demand that his views should not be broadcast. Because a
prominent Zionist official (Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the
Ministry of Trade and Industry) was involved, the Attorney General of
the State of Israel prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.

The Verdict
————
Let the verdict of Judge Benjamin Halevi in Israel’s District Court of
Jerusalem speak for itself, given in criminal case No. 124 of 1953.
The Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald. This material should be
studied carefully, since a substantial extract from it, broadcast on
3CR, has been complained about by the VJBD as allegedly offensive to
the Jewish community, likely to promote anti-semitism, likely to
promote racism, in bad taste and contrary to common sense.

It is the actual words used that are the subject of the Board’s
complaint, not the manner of their representation by 3CR. Presumably
the Board itself was not aware just whose words they were when it made
its’ complaint, which shows how complete suppression of information
can backfire on the censors themselves.

Here then are excerpts from the verdict of Judge Halevi, who later
became one of the panel of three judges that tried Eichmann:

“The masses of Jews from Hungary’s ghettos obediently boarded the
deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of
confidence in the false information that they were being transferred
to Kenyermeze.

The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had
they not spread their false information through Jewish channels.

The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and
others used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to
mislead the Jews.
They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help
of Jewish leaders.

The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local
leaders of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were
spreading such false information and did not protest.

Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local ‘rescue work’.

The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of
knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be
deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain
quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or
hampering the deportation orders.

Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few
dozen police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attemptt to
overpower these few guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance
activities to the deportations were organized in these ghettos.

And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the
Jews in the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities.

The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of
Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn
their own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish
leaders who did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of
deportations…these same leaders did not join the people of their
community n their ride to Auschwitz, but were all included in the
Rescue train.

The Nazi organizers of extermination and the perpetrators of
extermination permitted Rudolf Kastner and the members of the Jewish
Council in Budapest to save themselves, their relatives, and friends.
The Nazis did this as a means of making the local Jewish leaders, whom
they favoured, dependent on the Nazi regime, dependent on its good
will during the time of its fatal deportation schedule. In short, the
Nazis succeeded in bringing the Jewish leaders into oollaboration with
the Nazis at the time of the catastrophe.

The Nazi chiefs knew that the Zionists were a most vital element in
Jewry and the most trusted by the Jews.

The Nazis drew a lesson from the Warsaw ghetto and other belligerent
ghettos. They learned that Jews were able to sell their lives very
expensively if honorably guided.

Eichmann did not want a second Warsaw. For this reason, the Nazis
exerted themselves to mislead and bribe the Jewish leaders.

The personality of Rudolph Kastner made him a convenient catspaw for
Eichmann and his clique, to draw into collaboration and make their
task easier.

The question here is not, as stated by the Attorney General in his
summation, whether members of the Jewish Rescue Committee were or were
not capable of fulfilling their duty without the patronage of the S.S.
chiefs.

It is obvious that without such S.S. Nazi patronage the Jewish Rescue
Committee could not have existed, and could have acted only as an
underground.

The question is, as put by the lawyer for the defense, why were the
Nazis interested in the existence of the Rescue Committee? Why did
the S.S. chiefs make every effort to encourage the existence of the
Jewish Rescue Committee? Did the exterminators turn into rescuers?

The same question rises concerning the rescue of prominent Jews by
these German killers of Jews. Was the rescue of such Jews a part of
the extermination plan of the killers ?

The support given by the extermination leaders to Kastner’s Rescue
Committee proves that indeed there was a place for Kastner and his
friends in their Final Solution for the Jews of Hungary – their total
annihilation.

The Nazi’s patronage of Kastner, and their agreement to let him save
six hundred prominent Jews, were part of the plan to exterminate the
Jews.
Kastner was given a chance to add a few more to that number. The bait
attracted him. The opportunity of rescuing prominent people appealed
to him greatly. He considered the rescue of the most important Jews as
a great personal success and a success for Zionism. It was a success
that would also justify his conduct – his political negotiation with
Nazis and the Nazi patronage of his committee.

When Kastner received this present from the Nazis, Kastner sold his
soul to the German Satan. The sacrifice of the vital interests of the
majority of the Jews, in order to rescue the prominents, was the basic
element in the agreement between Kastner and the Nazis. This agreement
fixed the division of the nation into two unequal camps: a small
fragment of prominents, whom the Nazis promised Kastner to save, on
the one hand, and the great majority of Hungarian Jews whom the Nazis
designated for death, on the other hand.
An imperative condition for the rescue of the first camp by the Nazis
was that Kastner will not interfere in the action of the Nazis against
the other camp and will not hamper them in its extermination. Kastner
fulfilled this condition. He concentrated his efforts in the rescue of
the prominents and treated the camp of the doomed as if they had
already been wiped out from the book of the living.

One cannot estimate the damage caused by Kastner’s collaboration and
put down the number of victims which it cost Hungarian Jews. These are
not only the thousands of Jews in Nodvarod or any other community in
the border area, Jews who could escape through the border, had the
chief of their rescue committee fulfilled his duty toward them.

All of Kastner’s answers in his final testimony were a constant effort
to evade this truth.

Kastner has tried to escape through every crack he could find in the
wall of evidence. When one crack was sealed in his face, he drated
quickly to another.”

(Judgement of Judge Benjamin Halevi, Criminal Case 124/53; Attorney
Generalv. Malchiel Greenwald, District Court, Jerusalem, June 22,
1955).

Judge Halevi reverts to the meeting of Kastner with the S.S. officers
Becher and Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz at the time when the
‘new line’ of rescuing Jews was revealed by Hoess. He says:

“From this gathering in Budapest, it is obvious that the ‘new line’
stretched from Himmler to Hoess, from Jutner to Becher and Krumey.

According to Kastner, however, these Nazis were all active in rescuing
Jews.

This meeting of these important German guests in Budapest exposes the
‘rescue’ work of Becher in its true light. It reveals also the extent
of Kastner’s involvement in the inner circle of the chief German war
criminals.

Just as the Nazi war criminals knew they needed an alibi and hoped to
achieve it by the rescue of a few Jews at the eleventh hour, so
Kastner also needed an alibi for himself.

Collaboration between the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee and the
Exterminators of the Jews was solidifed in Budapest and Vienna.
Kastner’s duties were part and parcel of the genral duties of the S.S.

In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department,
the Nazi S.S. opened a Rescue Department headed by Kastner.

All these extermination, robbery and rescue activities of the S.S.
were coordinated under the management of Heinrich Himmler”. (ibid)

Judge Halevi continues:

“Kastner perjured himself knowingly in his testimony before this court
when he denied he had interceded in Becher’s hehalf. Moreover, he
concealed the important fact that he interceded for Becher in the name
of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish World Congress.

As to the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, it was enough for the
defense to prove Becher was a war criminal. It was up to the
prosecution to remove Becher from this status, if they wished to
negate the affidavit.

The Attorney General admitted in his summation that Becher was a war
criminal.

The lies in the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, the lies in his
testimony concerning the document, and Kastner’s knowing participation
in the activities of Nazi war criminals, and his participation in the
last minute fake rescue activities – all these combine to show one
overwhelming truth – that this affidavit was not given in good faith.

Kastner knew well, as he himself testified, that Becher had never
stood up against the stream of Jewish extermination, as Kastner has
declared in the affidavit.

The aims of Becher and his superior, Himmler, were not to save Jews
but to serve the Nazi regime with full compliance. These is not truth
and no good faith in Kastner’s testimony, ‘I never doubted for one
moment the good intention of good Becher’.

It is clear that the positive recommandation by Kastner, not only in
his own name but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish
World Congress was of decisive importance for Becher. Kastner did not
exaggerate when he said that Becher was released by the Allies because
of his personal intervention. The lies in the affidavit of Kastner and
the contradictions and various pretexts, which were proven to be lies,
were sufficient to annul the value of his statements and to prove that
there was no good faith in his testimony in favor of this German war
criminal.
Kastner’s affidavit in favor of Becher was a willfully false affidavit
given in favor of a war criminal to save him from trial and punishment
n Nuremberg.

Therefore, the defendant, Malchiel Greenwald, was correct in his
accusations against Rudolf Kastner in the first, second and fourth of
his statements.” (ibid)

Judge Halevi’s verdict found Malchiel Greenwald generally innocent of
libel against Kastner, but fined him one Israeli pound for the one
unproven accusation – that Kastner had actually collected money from
his Nazi partners for his aide to their slaughter program. The judge
also ordered the Government of Israel to pay Greenwald two hundred
Israeli pounds as court costs.

In fairness to Kastner it should me mentioned that as well as having
been unpaid, it was never established that he ever wore S.S. uniform.

Nevertheless, this verdict, and the evidence on which it was based,
completely establishes the truth of everything said on 3CR about the
matter.

If the story ended there, it would only prove conclusively that the
individual Kastner was a collaborator and the Israeli Government had
attempted to defend him, although facts brought out in the trial
pointed to much more than that.

But the story does not end there.

The Reaction
————-
Public opinion in Israel was almost unanimous in demanding that
Kastner and his associates should be put on trial. Remember that up to
now it was Kastner’s accuser who was on trial.

The Communist Party newspaper Kol Ha’am (Voice of the People) wrote:

“All those whose relatives were butchered by the Germans in Hungary
know now clearly that Jewish hands helped the mass murder” (23 June
1955)

In the authoritative Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, the leading political
journalist, Dr. Moshe Keren wrote:

“Kastner must be brought to trial as a Nazi collaborator. And at this
trial, Kastner should defend himself as a private citizen, and not be
defended by the Israeli Government…” (14 July 1955).

*Haboker*, the pro-Government General Zionist party paper stated:
“The public wants to know the real facts about Kastner, and not about
him alone. The only way to find out the truth is to put all the Rescue
Committee people on trial and give them a chance to offer their
defense.” (23 June 1955)

But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing
Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the
Government of Israel.

As the evening paper *Yedi’ot Aharonot* said:
“If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total
political and national collapse – as a result of what such a trial may
disclose.” (23 June 1955)

Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial,
instead it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for
criminal libel.

As Dr. Karlebach wrote in Israel’s largest evening newspaper,
*Ma’ariv*:
“What is going on here? The Attorney General has to mobilize all the
government power, appear himself in court, to justify and defend
collaboration with Himmler! And in order to defend a quisling, the
government must drag through the streets one of the grimmest stories
of our history!

At 11 P.M. the verdict was given. At 11 A.M. next morning the
government announces the defense of Kastner will be renewed – an
appeal filed.
What exemplary expediency! Since when does this government possess
such lawyer-genius who can weigh in one night the legal chances of an
appeal on a detailed, complex verdict of three hundred pages?! (24
June 1955)

At the appeal hearings before the Supreme Court, the Attorney General
of Israel, Chaim Cohen, explained clearly why the Government of Israel
was defending Kastner so strongly: “The man Kastner does not stand
here as a private individual. He was a recognized representative,
official or non-official of the Jewish National Institutes in
Palestine and of the Zionist Executive; and I come here in this court
to defend the representative of our national institutions.” (Hecht, p.
268)

The truth of this statement cannot be denied. Kastner’s collaboration
was not that of an individual. It was the collaboration of the Zionist
leadership.

So far, it has only been established that the Government of Israel
continued to support a Nazi collaborator after the facts about his
collaboration had been conclusively established in an Israeli court.
But the story gets worse.

The Supreme Court of Israel unanimously found that Becher was indeed a
Nazi war criminal and that Kastner had without justification, and in
the name of the Jewish Agency, helped Becher to escape justice. On
this point Greenwald was acquitted of libel and Kastner was not ‘fully
rehabilitated’.

The Supreme Court also accepted the FACTS established in the lower
court – that Kastner DELIBERATELY concealed the truth about Auschwitz
>from the majority of Hungarian Jews in exchange for Nazi permission to
take a thousand or so to Palestine. Again, Kastner was far from being
‘fully rehabilitated’.

The Majority Judgement
————————-
But now comes the really nasty bit. After unanimously acknowledging
these FACTS, the Supreme Court of Israel, by a majority of three to
two, found that Kastner’s actions were MORALLY JUSTIFIABLE and
convicted Greenwald of criminal libel for calling this
‘collaboration’.

In saying that 3CR broadcasts concealed the fact that Kastner had been
fully rehabilitated by the Israeli Supreme Court, Dr. Foster is
totally missing the point.

Kastner’s actions only proved that HE was a Nazi collaborator. It is
the defense of these actions by the Government and Courts of Israel
that prove conclusively that ZIONISM approves of Nazi collaboration.

The majority of the Supreme Court of Israel did not REHABILITATE
Kastner.
They JOINED him.

Let us read from the majority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Shlomo
Chesin:

“…What point was there in telling the people boarding the trains in
Kluj, people struck by fate and persecuted, as to what awaits them at
the end of their journey…Kastner spoke in detail of the situation,
saying, ‘The Hungarian Jew was a branch which long ago dried up on the
tree’.
This vivid description coincides with the testimony of another witness
about the Hungarian Jews, ‘This was a big Jewish community in Hungary,
without any ideological Jewish backbone’ (Moshe Shweiger, a Kastner
aide in Budapest, protocol 465).

I fully agree with my friend, Judge Agranot, when he states that, ‘The
Jews of Hungary, including those in the countryside, were not capable,
neither physically nor mentally, to carry out resistance operations
with force against the deportation scheme’…From this point of view
no rescue achievement could have resulted by disclosing the Auschwitz
news to the Jewish leaders there, and this…is a consideration which
one can properly conclude that Kastner had in front of his eyes.

.And I take one more step. I am certain that the silence of Kastner
when he arrived in Kluj was premeditated and calculated and did not
result from his great dispair because of the helplessness of the
Jewish community.
Even then, I say, this is still not considered willful collaboration
and assistance in the extermination, because all the signs indicate
that Kastner’s efforts were aimed at rescue and rescue on a big
scale…And towards the end I take one last step. In doing so I go
very far and say that even if Kastner ordered himself to keep silent
knowingly, in submission to the strong will of the Nazis, in order to
save a few Jews from Hell – this is still no proof that he stained his
hands by collaborating with the enemies of his people and carrying out
their plan to exterminate most of the Jewish community in Hungary.

Even if, through these activities of his – or rather, his omission –
the extermination became easier. And as to the moral issue, the
question is not whether a man is allowed to kill many in order to save
a few, or vice-versa. The question is altogether in another sphere and
should be defined as follows: A man is aware that a whole community is
awaiting its doom. He is allowed to make efforts to save a few,
although part of his efforts involve concealment of truth from the
many or should he disclose the truth to many though it is his best
opinion that this way everybody will perish. I think that the answer
is clear. What good will the blood of the few bring if everybody is to
perish?…As I said, I am not arguing with the basic factual findings
of the learned President of the Jewish District Court (Judge Halevi)
but it seems to me, with all due respect, that his findings do not, as
of necessity, demand the conclusion he has arrived at.
That is to say, collaboration on the part of Kastner in the
extermination of the Jews. And that they better coincide with bad
leadership both from a moral and public point of view…

In my opinion, one can say outright that if you find out that Kastner
collaborated with the enemy because he did not disclose to the people
who boarded the trains in Kluj that they were being led to
extermination, one has to put on trial today Danzig, Herman, Hanzi,
Brand, Revis and Marton, and many more leaders and half-leaders who
gagged themselves in an hour of crisis and did not inform others of
what was known to them and did not warn and did not cry out of the
coming danger….

Because of all this I cannot confirm the conclusion of the District
Court with regard to the accusation that Greenwald has thrown on
Kastner of collaboration with the Nazis in exterminating the Jewish
people in Hungary during the last war.” (Hecht, ibid, pp.270-2)

n other words, the Court approved of Kastner’s contempt for the
Hungarian Jews and could not allow him to be condemned for doing
exactly what many other Zionist leaders had half-leaders did –
concealing their knowledge of the Nazi extermination plans so that
Jews would board the trains to Auschwitz peacefully while their
Zionist ‘leaders’ boarded a different train for Palestine.

The Minority Judgement
————————–
It cannot be said that ALL top Zionists leaders actively approved of
Nazi collaboration in this way. Indeed the most precise answer to this
sickening judgement of Judge Chesin is provided in the minority
judgement of S>>>>The declaration of the learned Attorney General
therefore shrinks into Supreme Court Judge Moshe Silberg:

“I do not say that he was the only man who possessed information among
the leaders. It is quite possible that somebody else as well does not
have a clear conscience with regards to this concealment. But we are
dealing here with the guilt of Kastner and we do not have to make
judgements on the guilt of others….

an opinion….’Kastner was convinced and believed that there was no
ray of hope for the Jews of Hungary, almost for none of them, and as
he, as a result of his personal dispair, did not disclose the secret
of the extermination in order not to endanger or frustrate the rescue
of the few – therefore he acted in good faith and should not be
accused of collaborating with the Nazis in expediting the
extermination of the Jews, even though, in fact, he brought about its
result.’

I am compelled to state that it is very difficult for me to conceive
such an intention. Is this good faith? Can a single man, even in
cooperation with some of his friends, yield to despair on behalf and
without the knowledge of 800,000 other people? This is, in my opinion,
the decisive consideration in the problem facing us. The charge
emanating from the testimony of the witnesses against Kastner is that
had they known of the Auschwitz secret, then thousands or tens of
thousands would have been able to save their lives by local, partial,
specific or indirect rescue operations like local revolts, resistance,
escapes, hidings, concealment of children with Gentiles, forging of
documents, ransom money, bribery, etc – and when this is the case and
when one deals with many hundreds of thousands, how does a human
being, a mortal, reject with complete certainty and with an extreme
‘no’ the efficiency of all the many and varied rescue ways? How can he
examine the tens of thousands of possibilities? Does he decide instead
of God? Indeed, he who can act with such a usurpation of the last hope
of hundreds of thousands is not entitled to claim good faith as his
defense. The penetrating question quo warrento is a good answer
to a claim of such good faith…

If the superintendent of a big hospital lets thousands of sick people
die so that he may devote himself to the sure rescue of one soul, he
will come out guilty, at least morally, even if it is proven that he
as an individual erroneously thought that there was no hope of saving
the other patients. He is a collaborator with the angel of death.

Either a complete atrophy of the soul or a blind involvement with
complete loss of senses and proportion in his small but personal
rescue operation could bring a man to such a gigantic, hazardous play.

And if all this is not enough to annul the claim of good faith which
was put before us on behalf of Kastner by the Attorney General, then
Kastner himself comes and annuls it altogether. Not only did he never
make this claim, but his own words prove the contrary. He writes in
his report to the Jewish Agency that the Committee sent emissaries to
many ghettos in the countryside and pleaded with them to organize
escapes and to refuse to board the trains. And though the story of
these pleadings is untrue, and the silence of Kastner in Kluj is
proven, the very uttering of these statements entirely contradicts the
claim that Kastner had concealed the news about the fate of the ghetto
inmates in good faith and only as a result of his complete despairing
of the chances of escaping or resisting the Germans. You can not claim
at the same time helplessness and activity.
Anyway, such a claim is not convincing…

We can sum up with three facts:
A. That the Nazis didn’t want to have a great revolt – ‘Second Warsaw’
– nor small revolts, and their passion was to have the extermination
machine working smoothly without resistance. This fact was known to
Kastner from the best source – from Eichmann himself – And he had
additional proofs of that when he witnessed all the illusionary and
misleading tactics which were being taken by the Nazis from the first
moment of occupation.

B. That the most efficient means to paralyze the resistance with – or
the escape of a victim is to conceal from him the plot of the coming
murder.
This fact is known to every man and one does not need any proof of
evidence for this.

C. That he, Kastner, in order to carry out the rescue plan for the few
prominents, fulfilled knowingly and without good faith the said desire
of the Nazis, thus expediting the work of exterminating the masses.

And also the rescue of Becher by Kastner…He who is capable of
rescuing this Becher from hanging proves that the atrocities of this
great war criminal were not so horryfying or despicable in his
eyes…I couldn’t base the main guilt of Kastner on this fact had it
been alone, but when it is attached even from afar to the whole scene
of events it throws retroactive light on the whole affair and serves
as a dozen proofs of our conclusion.” (Supreme Court Judge, Moshe
Silberg, 1957)

Conclusion
———–
If that had been the majority judgement, one could say that whatever
their attitudes to the Arabs, and whatever their past behaviour might
have been under pressure, the Zionist leadership today did not
advocate collaboration with the Nazis.

One could then at least understand the complaints by Mr. Bloch,
President of the Victorian Jewish Board of Deputies, about the
‘dragging in of alleged episodes in the history of Jewish/Nazi
relationships’.

But Judge Silberg’s judgement was that of a minority.

The Kastner case is therefore not an alleged episode in past history,
being ‘dragged in’ to discredit an opponent.

It is a continuing controversy in which the top Zionist leadership of
Israel stand indicted of continuing to publicly defend collaboration
with the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.

Despite the unanimous finding of the Supreme Court of Israel that Kurt
Becher was a major war criminal, the Jewish Agency (World Zionist
Organization) refused to withdraw the fraudulent certificate Kastner
gave on their behalf, which saved Becher from hanging, and allowed him
to remain a free man in West Germany, the head of several corporations
and with an estimated personal worth of $30 million.

Becher has even used his certification as a ‘good’ SS officer to give
evidence in support of his associates at other war crimes trials in
West Germany.

Since the prosecution, representing the Israeli Government agreed with
the Supreme Court that Becher was a major war criminal, one can only
presure that the Israeli Government did not want him put on trial for
fear of what might come out.

Likewise, none of Kastner’s associates on the Zionist Relief and
Rescue Committee or his bosses in the Jewish Agency have ever been put
on trial as demanded by Israeli public opinion. Let alone the hundreds
of ‘prominents’ who helped Kastner to reassure the Hungarian Jews that
they were going to Kenyermeze and not Auschwitz, in exchange for
tickets on the one train that took them eventually to Palestine.

As for Kastner himself, he will cause no further embarassment to the
Zionist leadership with his undisputed claims that everything he did
was approved by the Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization)
leadership in Palestine. He is, as Dr. Foster so delicately puts it,
‘now dead’.

Or putting it less delicately, on 3 March 1957 he was shot by Zeer
Eckstein – immediately after the appeal hearings were concluded, and
before the judgement ‘rehabilitating’ him was delivered. Eckstein was
not a Hungarian avenger. He was a paid undercover agent of the Israeli
secret service.
(Hecht, ibid., p.208. Another ‘fantastic allegation’ no doubt; but
admitted in court during the murder trial).

Clearly this issue has a major indirect relevance to the Arab-Israeli
dispute. Apart from countering Israel’s cynical use of the holocaust
as a propaganda weapon, it answers a very real concern that many
people have about the State of Israel and the Jews. This concern is
whether, if Jews had a State of their own during the holocaust many
more could have been saved, and whether this is not an essential
future consideration, at least as an insurance policy.

The facts of the Kastner case show that the very existence of the
Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization) was an actual help to the
Nazis and that more could have been saved if the Zionist movement had
not existed.
Having a State that approves of actions like those of Kastner for an
insurance policy, is like using petrol for a fire extinguisher.

Zionism is not the answer to anti-semitism, but a cowardly proposal to
run away from it. The only answer to anti-semitism is to fight back.

We shall go on to prove this in detail.
——————————————————————
Elias Davidsson – Oldugata 50 – 101 Reykjavik – Iceland
Tel. (354)-552-6444 Fax: (354)-552-6579
mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.nyherji.is/~edavid

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:35:10 -0700, Ernst Zundholtz
wrote:

Looks like the filthy ZHIDS just do not like this well-documented
expose of their holohoax, and the fact that it documents 52 cases of
ZHID COLLABORATION WITH THE NAZIS!!

>>On 28 Nov 2004 10:59:36 -0800, [email protected]
>>(HeinrichHimmelfarb) wrote:

Even about the HOLOHOAX, based on zhid lies!!

More and more truth is coming out, about the perfidious ZHID
COLLABORATION with the nazis!!

Surely this should cause those countries paying tribute dollars to the
ZHIDS, to consider demanding repayment?

>>>On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:08:44 -0700, Joel Eichmann
>>> wrote:

>>>>On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:41:32 -0700, dandelion
>> wrote:

>>>>Even German historians such as C. Lange are now making public
their
>>>>findings, to the chagrin of the ZHID COLLABORATORS.

>>>>It was not only the notorious KASTNER CASE!!

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Posted by:
Steven Horn (KCOM)
1836 NW 11th St
Oklahoma City, OK 73106
(405) 524-0576

together with

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
–John Bryant

If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
then visit www.freedomsite.org

Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!

“At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
is a revolutionary act.”
(George Orwell)

David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’

“All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

“To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
and impossible to ignore.”
John Bryant

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Steve Horn ,
Frank Arthur , or to
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:29 EST 2007
Article: 65605 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us alt.barter:6243 soc.culture.europe:593047 soc.culture.usa:2042443 soc.culture.german:377485 soc.culture.swiss:65605
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!news.glorb.com!feed.cgocable.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matt Kaern
Newsgroups: alt.barter,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Wish To Dispose of $3 Million CV Stamp Collections – Verkauf/Tausch $3 Millionen BiefmarkenSammlungen
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 64
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:09:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1191431340 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:09:00 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:09:00 MDT

Subject: Wish To Dispose of $3 Million CV Stamp Collections-
Verkauf/Tausch $3 Millionen BiefmarkenSammlungen

I seek a qualified buyer of all stock, for cash payable to my bankers.
Approximately $3 million CV, with main areas of interest:
GB
Canada
Germany
Commonwealth
France
USA
Australia
Austria
Switzerland
Israel
etc.

If interested, kindly advise.
The reason for sale, eyesight going blind.
Am NOT interested in consigning, or auction, only full cash sale.

I mean CASH for the buyer to take all, not cheques, drafts, or whatever.

May consider part swap for something significant, such as clear title cottage,
motorhome, or?
Am located in northern Canada.

Reply to: [email protected]

P.S. Nigerian Scam and similar just disregarded as worthless.

Verkauf/Tausch $3 Millionen BiefmarkenSammlungen

Wir suchen einen Käufer von unserer ganzen Aktie, für Bargeld
das zahlbar ist zu unseren Bankiers.
Ungefähr $3 Millionen KatalogwertF, mit Hauptgebieten
des Interesses:
GB
Kanada
Deutschland
Britische Commonwealth
Frankreich
Vereinigten Staaten
Australien
Österreich
Schweiz
Israel usw.

Wenn interessiert, freundlich rät.
Der Grund zum Verkauf, gehend Sehvermögen
blendet.
Ich verliere meine Sicht, und gehe Blinde.
Interessiere mich NICHT für Schicken, oder Auktion, nur volles Bargeschäft.

Wir bedeuten, dass BARGELD für den Käufer alle nimmt, nicht Schecke,
Kann teils Tausch für etwas bedeutsames, wie
zum Beispiel klares Titellandhaus, motorhome, oder bedenken?
Bin in nördlichem Kanada befunden.
P. S. Nigerianisch Scam und ähnlich hat nur als
wertlos nicht beachtet.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:29 EST 2007
Article: 65606 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us alt.barter:6244 soc.culture.europe:593049 soc.culture.swiss:65606 soc.culture.german:377486 soc.culture.usa:2042446
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matt Kaern
Newsgroups: alt.barter,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Verkauf/Tausch $3 Millionen BiefmarkenSammlungen/FS or TRADE $3 Million CV Stamp Collections-
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 59
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:09:35 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1191431375 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:09:35 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:09:35 MDT

We seek a qualified buyer of all our stock, for cash payable to our bankers.
Approximately $3 million CV, with main areas of interest:
GB
Canada
Germany
Commonwealth
France
USA
Australia
Austria
Switzerland
Israel
etc.

If interested, kindly advise.
The reason for sale, eyesight going blind.
Am NOT interested in consigning, or auction, only full cash sale.

We mean CASH for the buyer to take all, not cheques, drafts, or whatever.

May consider part swap for something significant, such as clear title cottage,
motorhome, or?
Am located in northern Canada.

Reply to: [email protected]

P.S. Nigerian Scam and similar just disregarded as worthless.

Verkauf/Tausch $3 Millionen BiefmarkenSammlungen von
Briefmarken Sammlungen Zu Verfügen

Wir suchen einen Käufer von unserer ganzen Aktie, für Bargeld das zahlbar
ist zu unseren Bankiers.
Ungefähr $3 Millionen Katalogwert, mit Hauptgebieten
des Interesses:
GB
Kanada
Deutschland
Britische Commonwealth
Frankreich
Vereinigten Staaten
Australien
Österreich
Schweiz
Israel usw.

Wenn interessiert, freundlich rät.
Der Grund zum Verkauf, gehend Sehvermögen
blendet.
Ich verliere meine Sicht, und bekomme Blinde.
Wir bedeuten, dass BARGELD für den Käufer alle nimmt, nicht Schecke,
Kann teils Tausch für etwas bedeutsames, wie
zum Beispiel klares Titellandhaus, motorhome, oder bedenken?
Bin in nördlichem Kanada befunden.
P. S. Nigerianisch Scam und ähnlich hat nur als
wertlos nicht beachtet.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:29 EST 2007
Article: 65607 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.palestine:578134 soc.culture.europe:593050 soc.culture.german:377488 soc.culture.swiss:65607 soc.culture.polish:814678 alt.politics.europe:65306 pl.regionalne.warszawa:453265
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matt Kaern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish,alt.politics.europe,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: Zionism & Third Reich = KOLLABORATEURS!! Repost
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 733
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:10:49 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1191431449 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:10:49 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:10:49 MDT

And never forget the ZYD prominente Kollaborateurs such as KASTNER,
RUMKOWSKI and WIESENTHAL!!

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:45:26 -0400, in alt.revisionism Gallows Cheater
wrote:

http://www.rense.com/general34/ZAND.HTM

Zionism And The Third Reich
By Mark Weber
Institute for Historical Review
2-8-3

Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German
port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, “Tel
Aviv,” while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the
ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member.
Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic
combination as a “metaphysical absurdity.”1 Absurd or not, this is but one
vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging
collaboration between Zionism and Hitler’s Third Reich.

Common Aims

Over the years, people in many different countries have wrestled with
the “Jewish question”: that is, what is the proper role of Jews in
non-Jewish society? During the 1930s, Jewish Zionists and German National
Socialists shared similar views on how to deal with this perplexing issue.
They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities,
and that Jews did not belong in Germany. Jews living in the Reich were
therefore to be regarded not as “Germans of the Jewish faith,” but rather
as members of a separate national community. Zionism (Jewish nationalism)
also implied an obligation by Zionist Jews to resettle in Palestine,
the “Jewish homeland.” They could hardly regard themselves as sincere
Zionists and simultaneously claim equal rights in Germany or any
other “foreign” country.

Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that
anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely
understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes.
The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in
a separate state of their own. “The Jewish question exists wherever Jews
live in noticeable numbers,” he wrote in his most influential work, The
Jewish State. “Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving
Jews … I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex
phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear.”
The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. “It is a
national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international
political issue …” Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews
constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a
Volk.2 Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome “final solution of
the Jewish question.”3

Six months after Hitler came to power, the Zionist Federation of Germany (by
far the largest Zionist group in the country) submitted a detailed
memorandum to the new government that reviewed German-Jewish relations and
formally offered Zionist support in “solving” the vexing “Jewish question.”
The first step, it suggested, had to be a frank recognition of fundamental
national differences: 4

Zionism has no illusions about the difficulty of the Jewish condition, which
consists above all in an abnormal occupational pattern and in the fault of
an intellectual and moral posture not rooted in one’s own tradition.
Zionism recognized decades ago that as a result of the assimilationist
trend, symptoms of deterioration were bound to appear …

Zionism believes that the rebirth of the national life of a people, which is
now occurring in Germany through the emphasis on its Christian and national
character, must also come about in the Jewish national group. For the
Jewish people, too, national origin, religion, common destiny and a sense
of its uniqueness must be of decisive importance in the shaping of its
existence. This means that the egotistical individualism of the liberal era
must be overcome and replaced with a sense of community and collective
responsibility …

We believe it is precisely the new [National Socialist] Germany that can,
through bold resoluteness in the handling of the Jewish question, take a
decisive step toward overcoming a problem which, in truth, will have to be
dealt with by most European peoples …

Our acknowledgment of Jewish nationality provides for a clear and sincere
relationship to the German people and its national and racial realities.
Precisely because we do not wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we,
too, are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the
Jewish group and reject any trespasses in the cultural domain, we — having
been brought up in the German language and German culture — can show an
interest in the works and values of German culture with admiration and
internal sympathy …

For its practical aims, Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration of
even a government fundamentally hostile to Jews, because in dealing with
the Jewish question not sentimentalities are involved but a real problem
whose solution interests all peoples and at the present moment especially
the German people … Boycott propaganda — such as is currently being
carried on against Germany in many ways — is in essence un-Zionist,
because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to build …

We are not blind to the fact that a Jewish question exists and will continue
to exist. From the abnormal situation of the Jews severe disadvantages
result for them, but also scarcely tolerable conditions for other peoples.
The Federation’s paper, the Jüdische Rundschau (“Jewish Review”),
proclaimed the same message: “Zionism recognizes the existence of a Jewish
problem and desires a far-reaching and constructive solution. For this
purpose Zionism wishes to obtain the assistance of all peoples, whether
pro- or anti-Jewish, because, in its view, we are dealing here with a
concrete rather than a sentimental problem, the solution of which all
peoples are interested.”5 A young Berlin rabbi, Joachim Prinz, who later
settled in the United States and became head of the American Jewish
Congress, wrote in his 1934 book, Wir Juden (“We Jews”), that the National
Socialist revolution in Germany meant “Jewry for the Jews.” He
explained: “No subterfuge can save us now. In place of assimilation we
desire a new concept: recognition of the Jewish nation and Jewish race.” 6

Active Collaboration

On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood,
National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group
believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler
government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine
>from 1933 until 1940-1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive
collaboration.

Even as the Third Reich became more entrenched, many German Jews, probably a
majority, continued to regard themselves, often with considerable pride, as
Germans first. Few were enthusiastic about pulling up roots to begin a new
life in far-away Palestine. Nevertheless, more and more German Jews turned
to Zionism during this period. Until late 1938, the Zionist movement
flourished in Germany under Hitler. The circulation of the Zionist
Federation’s bi-weekly Jüdische Rundschau grew enormously. Numerous Zionist
books were published. “Zionist work was in full swing” in Germany during
those years, the Encyclopaedia Judaica notes. A Zionist convention held in
Berlin in 1936 reflected “in its composition the vigorous party life of
German Zionists.”7

The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal
June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for
Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage
emigration of Germany’s Jews to Palestine. This would require increased
Jewish self-awareness. Jewish schools, Jewish sports leagues, Jewish
cultural organizations — in short, everything that would encourage this
new consciousness and self-awareness – should be promoted, the paper
recommended.8

SS officer Leopold von Mildenstein and Zionist Federation official Kurt
Tuchler toured Palestine together for six months to assess Zionist
development there. Based on his firsthand observations, von Mildenstein
wrote a series of twelve illustrated articles for the important Berlin
daily Der Angriff that appeared in late 1934 under the heading “A Nazi
Travels to Palestine.” The series expressed great admiration for the
pioneering spirit and achievements of the Jewish settlers. Zionist
self-development, von Mildenstein wrote, had produced a new kind of Jew. He
praised Zionism as a great benefit for both the Jewish people and the
entire world. A Jewish homeland in Palestine, he wrote in his concluding
article, “pointed the way to curing a centuries-long wound on the body of
the world: the Jewish question.” Der Angriff issued a special medal, with a
Swastika on one side and a Star of David on the other, to commemorate the
joint SS-Zionist visit. A few months after the articles appeared, von
Mildenstein was promoted to head the Jewish affairs department of the SS
security service in order to support Zionist migration and development more
effectively. 9

The official SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, proclaimed its support for
Zionism in a May 1935 front-page editorial: “The time may not be too far
off when Palestine will again be able to receive its sons who have been
lost to it for more than a thousand years. Our good wishes, together with
official goodwill, go with them.”10 Four months later, a similar article
appeared in the SS paper: 11

The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on
religion leads the German government to guarantee without reservation the
racial separateness of this community. The government finds itself in
complete agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry, the
so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry around
the world and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis,
Germany undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the
future in the handling of the Jewish problem around the world.

A leading German shipping line began direct passenger liner service from
Hamburg to Haifa, Palestine, in October 1933 providing “strictly kosher
food on its ships, under the supervision of the Hamburg rabbinate.” 12 With
official backing, Zionists worked tirelessly to “reeducate” Germany’s Jews.
As American historian Francis Nicosia put it in his 1985 survey, The Third
Reich and the Palestine Question: “Zionists were encouraged to take their
message to the Jewish community, to collect money, to show films on
Palestine and generally to educate German Jews about Palestine. There was
considerable pressure to teach Jews in Germany to cease identifying
themselves as Germans and to awaken a new Jewish national identity in
them.” 13

In an interview after the war, the former head of the Zionist Federation of
Germany, Dr. Hans Friedenthal, summed up the situation: “The Gestapo did
everything in those days to promote emigration, particularly to Palestine.
We often received their help when we required anything from other
authorities regarding preparations for emigration.” 14

At the September 1935 National Socialist Party Congress, the Reichstag
adopted the so-called “Nuremberg laws” that prohibited marriages and sexual
relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect, proclaimed the Jews an
alien minority nationality. A few days later the Zionist Jüdische Rundschau
editorially welcomed the new measures: 15

Germany … is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it
declares the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the
Jews have been stamped a national minority it is again possible to
establish normal relations between the German nation and Jewry. The new
laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own cultural life, its own
national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its own
theatre, and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own
future in all aspects of national life …

Germany has given the Jewish minority the opportunity to live for itself,
and is offering state protection for this separate life of the Jewish
minority: Jewry’s process of growth into a nation will thereby be
encouraged and a contribution will be made to the establishment of more
tolerable relations between the two nations. Georg Kareski, the head of
both the “Revisionist” Zionist State Organization and the Jewish Cultural
League, and former head of the Berlin Jewish Community, declared in an
interview with the Berlin daily Der Angriff at the end of 1935: 16

For many years I have regarded a complete separation of the cultural affairs
of the two peoples [Jews and Germans] as a pre-condition for living
together without conflict… I have long supported such a separation,
provided it is founded on respect for the alien nationality. The Nuremberg
Laws … seem to me, apart from their legal provisions, to conform entirely
with this desire for a separate life based on mutual respect… This
interruption of the process of dissolution in many Jewish communities,
which had been promoted through mixed marriages, is therefore, from a
Jewish point of view, entirely welcome.

Zionist leaders in other countries echoed these views. Stephen S. Wise,
president of the American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress,
told a New York rally in June 1938: “I am not an American citizen of the
Jewish faith, I am a Jew… Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the
Jewish people a race and we are a race.” 17 The Interior Ministry’s Jewish
affairs specialist, Dr. Bernhard Lösener, expressed support for Zionism in
an article that appeared in a November 1935 issue of the official
Reichsverwaltungsblatt: 18

If the Jews already had their own state in which the majority of them were
settled, then the Jewish question could be regarded as completely resolved
today, also for the Jews themselves. The least amount of opposition to the
ideas underlying the Nuremberg Laws have been shown by the Zionists,
because they realize at once that these laws represent the only correct
solution for the Jewish people as well. For each nation must have its own
state as the outward expression of its particular nationhood.

In cooperation with the German authorities, Zionist groups organized a
network of some forty camps and agricultural centers throughout Germany
where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine.
Although the Nuremberg Laws forbid Jews from displaying the German flag,
Jews were specifically guaranteed the right to display the blue and white
Jewish national banner. The flag that would one day be adopted by Israel
was flown at the Zionist camps and centers in Hitler’s Germany. 19

Himmler’s security service cooperated with the Haganah, the Zionist
underground military organization in Palestine. The SS agency paid Haganah
official Feivel Polkes for information about the situation in Palestine and
for help in directing Jewish emigration to that country. Meanwhile, the
Haganah was kept well informed about German plans by a spy it managed to
plant in the Berlin headquarters of the SS.20 Haganah-SS collaboration even
included secret deliveries of German weapons to Jewish settlers for use in
clashes with Palestinian Arabs. 21 In the aftermath of the November
1938 “Kristallnacht” outburst of violence and destruction, the SS quickly
helped the Zionist organization to get back on its feet and continue its
work in Germany, although now under more restricted supervision. 22

Official Reservations

German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials
were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities
in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize “their”
governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry
remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long
as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to
resettle in the Zionist “promised land,” a sovereign Jewish state in
Palestine would not really “solve” the international Jewish question.
Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this
dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore
limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British
control, not a sovereign Jewish state. 23

A Jewish state in Palestine, the Foreign Minister informed diplomats in June
1937, would not be in Germany’s interest because it would not be able to
absorb all Jews around the world, but would only serve as an additional
power base for international Jewry, in much the same way as Moscow served
as a base for international Communism.24 Reflecting something of a shift in
official policy, the German press expressed much greater sympathy in 1937
for Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist ambitions, at a time when
tension and conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine was sharply
increasing. 25

A Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937, cautioned that in spite
of support for Jewish settlement in Palestine, “it would nevertheless be a
mistake to assume that Germany supports the formation of a state structure
in Palestine under some form of Jewish control. In view of the anti-German
agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation
of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the
nations of the world.”26 “The proclamation of a Jewish state or a
Jewish-administrated Palestine,” warned an internal memorandum by the
Jewish affairs section of the SS, “would create for Germany a new enemy,
one that would have a deep influence on developments in the Near East.”
Another SS agency predicted that a Jewish state “would work to bring
special minority protection to Jews in every country, therefore giving
legal protection to the exploitation activity of world Jewry.”27 In January
1939, Hitler’s new Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, likewise
warned in another circular bulletin that “Germany must regard the formation
of a Jewish state as dangerous” because it “would bring an international
increase in power to world Jewry.” 28

Hitler himself personally reviewed this entire issue in early 1938 and, in
spite of his long-standing skepticism of Zionist ambitions and misgivings
that his policies might contribute to the formation of a Jewish state,
decided to support Jewish migration to Palestine even more vigorously. The
prospect of ridding Germany of its Jews, he concluded, outweighed the
possible dangers. 29

Meanwhile, the British government imposed ever more drastic restrictions on
Jewish immigration into Palestine in 1937, 1938 and 1939. In response, the
SS security service concluded a secret alliance with the clandestine
Zionist agency Mossad le-Aliya Bet to smuggle Jews illegally into
Palestine. As a result of this intensive collaboration, several convoys of
ships succeeded in reaching Palestine past British gunboats. Jewish
migration, both legal and illegal, from Germany (including Austria) to
Palestine increased dramatically in 1938 and 1939. Another 10,000 Jews were
scheduled to depart in October 1939, but the outbreak of war in September
brought the effort to an end. All the same, German authorities continued to
promote indirect Jewish emigration to Palestine during 1940 and 1941. 30
Even as late as March 1942, at least one officially authorized
Zionist “kibbutz” training camp for potential emigrants continued to
operate in Hitler’s Germany. 31

The Transfer Agreement

The centerpiece of German-Zionist cooperation during the Hitler era was the
Transfer Agreement, a pact that enabled tens of thousands of German Jews to
migrate to Palestine with their wealth. The Agreement, also known as the
Haavara (Hebrew for “transfer”), was concluded in August 1933 following
talks between German officials and Chaim Arlosoroff, Political Secretary of
the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the World Zionist Organization.
32

Through this unusual arrangement, each Jew bound for Palestine deposited
money in a special account in Germany. The money was used to purchase
German-made agricultural tools, building materials, pumps, fertilizer, and
so forth, which were exported to Palestine and sold there by the
Jewish-owned Haavara company in Tel-Aviv. Money from the sales was given to
the Jewish emigrant upon his arrival in Palestine in an amount
corresponding to his deposit in Germany. German goods poured into Palestine
through the Haavara, which was supplemented a short time later with a
barter agreement by which Palestine oranges were exchanged for German
timber, automobiles, agricultural machinery, and other goods. The Agreement
thus served the Zionist aim of bringing Jewish settlers and development
capital to Palestine, while simultaneously serving the German goal of
freeing the country of an unwanted alien group.

Delegates at the 1933 Zionist Congress in Prague vigorously debated the
merits of the Agreement. Some feared that the pact would undermine the
international Jewish economic boycott against Germany. But Zionist
officials reassured the Congress. Sam Cohen, a key figure behind the
Haavara arrangement, stressed that the Agreement was not economically
advantageous to Germany. Arthur Ruppin, a Zionist Organization emigration
specialist who had helped negotiate the pact, pointed out that “the
Transfer Agreement in no way interfered with the boycott movement, since no
new currency will flow into Germany as a result of the agreement…” 33 The
1935 Zionist Congress, meeting in Switzerland, overwhelmingly endorsed the
pact. In 1936, the Jewish Agency (the Zionist “shadow government” in
Palestine) took over direct control of the Ha’avara, which remained in
effect until the Second World War forced its abandonment.

Some German officials opposed the arrangement. Germany’s Consul General in
Jerusalem, Hans Döhle, for example, sharply criticized the Agreement on
several occasions during 1937. He pointed out that it cost Germany the
foreign exchange that the products exported to Palestine through the pact
would bring if sold elsewhere. The Haavara monopoly sale of German goods to
Palestine through a Jewish agency naturally angered German businessmen and
Arabs there. Official German support for Zionism could lead to a loss of
German markets throughout the Arab world. The British government also
resented the arrangement.34 A June 1937 German Foreign Office internal
bulletin referred to the “foreign exchange sacrifices” that resulted from
the Haavara. 35

A December 1937 internal memorandum by the German Interior Ministry reviewed
the impact of the Transfer Agreement: “There is no doubt that the Haavara
arrangement has contributed most significantly to the very rapid
development of Palestine since 1933. The Agreement provided not only the
largest source of money (from Germany!), but also the most intelligent
group of immigrants, a nd finally it brought to the country the machines
and industrial products essential for development.” The main advantage of
the pact, the memo reported, was the emigration of large numbers of Jews to
Palestine, the most desirable target country as far as Germany was
concerned. But the paper also noted the important drawbacks pointed out by
Consul Döhle and others. The Interior Minister, it went on, had concluded
that the disadvantages of the agreement now outweighed the advantages and
that, therefore, it should be terminated. 36

Only one man could resolve the controversy. Hitler personally reviewed the
policy in July and September 1937, and again in January 1938, and each time
decided to maintain the Haavara arrangement. The goal of removing Jews from
Germany, he concluded, justified the drawbacks. 37

The Reich Economics Ministry helped to organize another transfer company,
the International Trade and Investment Agency, or Intria, through which
Jews in foreign countries could help German Jews emigrate to Palestine.
Almost $900,000 was eventually channeled through the Intria to German Jews
in Palestine.38 Other European countries eager to encourage Jewish
emigration concluded agreements with the Zionists modeled after the
Ha’avara. In 1937 Poland authorized the Halifin (Hebrew for “exchange”)
transfer company. By late summer 1939, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary and
Italy had signed similar arrangements. The outbreak of war in September
1939, however, prevented large-scale implementation of these agreements. 39

Achievements of Haavara

Between 1933 and 1941, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to Palestine
through the Ha’avara and other German-Zionist arrangements, or about ten
percent of Germany’s 1933 Jewish population. (These German Jews made up
about 15 percent of Palestine’s 1939 Jewish population.) Some Ha’avara
emigrants transferred considerable personal wealth from Germany to
Palestine. As Jewish historian Edwin Black has noted: “Many of these
people, especially in the late 1930s, were allowed to transfer actual
replicas of their homes and factories — indeed rough replicas of their
very existence.”40

The total amount transferred from Germany to Palestine through the Ha’avara
between August 1933 and the end of 1939 was 8.1 million pounds or 139.57
million German marks (then equivalent to more than $40 million). This
amount included 33.9 million German marks ($13.8 million) provided by the
Reichsbank in connection with the Agreement.41

Historian Black has estimated that an additional $70 million may have flowed
into Palestine through corollary German commercial agreements and special
international banking transactions. The German funds had a major impact on
a country as underdeveloped as Palestine was in the 1930s, he pointed out.
Several major industrial enterprises were built with the capital from
Germany, including the Mekoroth waterworks and the Lodzia textile firm. The
influx of Ha’avara goods and capital, concluded Black, “produced an
economic explosion in Jewish Palestine” and was “an indispensable factor in
the creation of the State of Israel.”42

The Ha’avara agreement greatly contributed to Jewish development in
Palestine and thus, indirectly, to the foundation of the Israeli state. A
January 1939 German Foreign Office circular bulletin reported, with some
misgiving, that “the transfer of Jewish property out of Germany [through
the Ha’avara agreement] contributed to no small extent to the building of a
Jewish state in Palestine.”43

Former officials of the Ha’avara company in Palestine confirmed this view in
a detailed study of the Transfer Agreement published in 1972: “The economic
activity made possible by the influx German capital and the Haavara
transfers to the private and public sectors were of greatest importance for
the country’s development. Many new industries and commercial enterprises
were established in Jewish Palestine, and numerous companies that are
enormously important even today in the economy of the State of Israel owe
their existence to the Haavara.”44

Dr. Ludwig Pinner, a Ha’avara company official in Tel Aviv during the 1930s,
later commented that the exceptionally competent Ha’avara
immigrants “decisively contributed” to the economic, social, cultural and
educational development of Palestine’s Jewish community.45

The Transfer Agreement was the most far-reaching example of cooperation
between Hitler’s Germany and international Zionism. Through this pact,
Hitler’s Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930s to
support Jewish development in Palestine.

Zionists Offer a Military Alliance With Hitler

In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a
formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political
alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical
underground “Fighters for the Freedom of Israel,” better known as the Lehi
or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the
radical nationalist “National Military Organization” (Irgun Zvai Leumi)
over the group’s attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned
further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main
enemy of Zionism.

This remarkable Zionist proposal “for the solution of the Jewish question in
Europe and the active participation of the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the
side of Germany” is worth quoting at some length:46

In their speeches and statements, the leading statesmen of National
Socialist Germany have often emphasized that a New Order in Europe requires
as a prerequisite a radical solution of the Jewish question by evacuation.
(“Jew-f ree Europe”)

The evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe is a precondition for
solving the Jewish question. However, the only way this can be totally
achieved is through settlement of these masses in the homeland of the
Jewish people, Palestine, and by the establishment of a Jewish state in its
historical boundaries.

The goal of the political activity and the years of struggle by the Israel
Freedom Movement, the National Military Organization in Palestine (Irgun
Zvai Leumi), is to solve the Jewish problem in this way and thus completely
liberate the Jewish people forever.

The NMO, which is very familiar with the good will of the German Reich
government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and
the Zionist emigration program, takes that view that:

1. Common interests can exist between a European New Order based on the
German concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as
embodied by the NMO.

2. Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folk
ish-national Jewry [Hebr_ertum].

3. The establishment of the historical Jewish state on a national and
totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty with the German Reich, would be in
the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of
power in the Near East.

On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German
Reich government recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom
Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part
in the war on the side of Germany.

This offer by the NMO could include military, political and informational
activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational measures,
outside as well. Along with this the Jewish men of Europe would be
militarily trained and organized in military units under the leadership and
command of the NMO. They would take part in combat operations for the
purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front by formed.

The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order
of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with a
positive-radical solution of the European Jewish problem on the basis of
the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would
greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all
humanity.

The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be consistent with
a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed
that he would utilize any combination and coalition in order to isolate and
defeat England.

There is no record of any German response. Acceptance was very unlikely
anyway because by this time German policy was decisively pro-Arab.47
Remarkably, Stern’s group sought to conclude a pact with the Third Reich at
a time when stories that Hitler was bent on exterminating Jews were already
in wide circulation. Stern apparently either did not believe the stories or
he was willing to collaborate with the mortal enemy of his people to help
bring about a Jewish state. 48

An important Lehi member at the time the group made this offer was Yitzhak
Shamir, who later served as Israel’s Foreign Minister and then, during much
of the 1980s and until June 1992, as Prime Minister. As Lehi operations
chief following Stern’s death in 1942, Shamir organized numerous acts of
terror, including the November 1944 assassination of British Middle East
Minister Lord Moyne and the September 1948 slaying of Swedish United
Nations mediator Count Bernadotte. Years later, when Shamir was asked about
the 1941 offer, he confirmed that he was aware of his organization’s
proposed alliance with wartime Germany. 49

Conclusion

In spite of the basic hostility between the Hitler regime and international
Jewry, for several years Jewish Zionist and German National Socialist
interests coincided. In collaborating with the Zionists for a mutually
desirable and humane solution to a complex problem, the Third Reich was
willing to make foreign exchange sacrifices, impair relations with Britain
and anger the Arabs. Indeed, during the 1930s no nation did more to
substantively further Jewish-Zionist goals than Hitler’s Germany.

Notes

1.W. Martini, “Hebr_isch unterm Hakenkreuz,” Die Welt (Hamburg), Jan. 10,
1975. Cited in: Klaus Polken, “The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi
Germany, 1933-1941,” Journal of Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, p.
65. 2.Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen: Die “Reichskristallnacht”
(Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), p. 212. See also: Th. Herzl, The Jewish State
(New York: Herzl Press, 1970), pp. 33, 35, 36, and, Edwin Black, The
Transfer Agreement (New York: Macmillan, 1984), p. 73. 3.Th. Herzl, “Der
Kongress,” Welt, June 4, 1897. Reprinted in: Theodor Herzls zionistische
Schriften (Leon Kellner, ed.), erster Teil, Berlin: Jüdischer Verlag, 1920,
p. 190 (and p. 139). 4.Memo of June 21, 1933, in: L. Dawidowicz, A
Holocaust Reader (New York: Behrman, 1976), pp. 150-155, and (in part) in:
Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin:
Univ. of Texas, 1985), p. 42.; On Zionism in Germany before Hitler’s
assumption of power, see: Donald L. Niewyk, The Jews in Weimar Germany
(Baton Rouge: 1980), pp. 94-95, 126-131, 140-143.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich
(Austin: 1985), pp. 1-15. 5.Jüdische Rundschau (Berlin), June 13, 1933.
Quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (New York:
Ballantine, pb., 1971, 1984), pp. 376-377. 6.Heinz Höhne, The Order of the
Death’s Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 376. 7.”Berlin,” Encyclopaedia
Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971), Vol. 5, p. 648. For a look at one
aspect of this “vigorous life,” see: J.-C. Horak, “Zionist Film Propaganda
in Nazi Germany,” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Vol. 4,
No. 1, 1984, pp. 49-58. 8.Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), pp. 54-55.; Karl A. Schleunes, The Twisted Road
to Auschwitz (Urbana: Univ. of Illinois, 1970, 1990), pp. 178-181. 9.Jacob
Boas, “A Nazi Travels to Palestine,” History Today (London), January 1980,
pp. 33-38. 10.Facsimile reprint of front page of Das Schwarze Korps, May
15, 1935, in: Janusz Piekalkiewicz, Israels Langer Arm (Frankfurt: Goverts,
1975), pp. 66-67. Also quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death’s
Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 377. See also: Erich Kern, ed.,
Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: FZ-Verlag, 1988), p. 184. 11.Das Schwarze
Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), pp. 56-57. 12.Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age
of the Dictators (1983), p. 83. 13.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), p. 60. See also: F. Nicosia, “The Yishuv and the
Holocaust,” The Journal of Modern History (Chicago), Vol. 64, No. 3, Sept.
1992, pp. 533-540. 14.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine
Question (1985), p. 57. 15.Jüdische Rundschau, Sept. 17, 1935. Quoted in:
Yitzhak Arad, with Y. Gutman and A. Margaliot, eds., Documents on the
Holocaust (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1981), pp. 82-83. 16.Der Angriff, Dec.
23, 1935, in: E. Kern, ed., Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: 1988), p.
148.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 56.; L. Brenner, Zionism in the
Age of the Dictators (1983), p. 138.; A. Margaliot, “The Reaction…,” Yad
Vashem Studies (Jerusalem), vol. 12, 1977, pp. 90-91.; On Kareski’s
remarkable career, see: H. Levine, “A Jewish Collaborator in Nazi Germany,”
Central European History (Atlanta), Sept. 1975, pp. 251-281. 17.”Dr. Wise
Urges Jews to Declare Selves as Such,” New York Herald Tribune, June 13,
1938, p. 12. 18.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich (1985), p. 53. 19.Lucy
Dawidowicz, The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (New York: Bantam, pb.,
1976), pp. 253-254.; Max Nussbaum, “Zionism Under Hitler,” Congress Weekly
(New York: American Jewish Congress), Sept. 11, 1942.; F. Nicosia, The
Third Reich (1985), pp. 58-60, 217.; Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement
(1984), p. 175. 20.H. H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (Ballantine,
pb., 1984), pp. 380-382.; K. Schleunes, Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p. 226.;
Secret internal SS intelligence report about F. Polkes, June 17, 1937, in:
John Mendelsohn, ed., The Holocaust (New York: Garland, 1982), vol. 5, pp.
62-64. 21.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 63-64, 105, 219-220. 22.F.
Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 160. 23.This distinction is also implicit
in the “Balfour Declaration” of November 1917, in which the British
government expressed support for “a national home for the Jewish people” in
Palestine, while carefully avoiding any mention of a Jewish state.
Referring to the majority Arab population there, the Declaration went on to
caution, “…it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which
may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish
communities in Palestine.” The complete text of the Declaration is
reproduced in facsimile in: Robert John, Behind the Balfour Declaration
(IHR, 1988), p. 32. 24.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 121. 25.F.
Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 124. 26.David Yisraeli, The Palestine
Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Bar-Ilan University, Israel, 1974),
p. 300.; Also in: Documents on German Foreign Policy, Series D, Vol. 5.
Doc. No. 564 or 567. 27.K. Schleunes, The Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p.
209. 28.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS.
International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before
the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), vol. 32, pp.
242-243. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, DC: 1946-1948), vol.
6, pp. 92-93. 29.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 141-144.; On Hitler’s
critical view of Zionism in Mein Kampf, see esp. Vol. 1, Chap. 11. Quoted
in: Robert Wistrich, Hitler’s Apocalypse (London: 1985), p. 155.; See also:
F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 26-28.; Hitler told his army adjutant
in 1939 and again in 1941 that he had asked the British in 1937 about
transferring all of Germany’s Jews to Palestine or Egypt. The British
rejected the proposal, he said, because it would cause further disorder.
See: H. v. Kotze, ed., Heeresadjutant bei Hitler (Stuttgart: 1974), pp. 65,
95. 30.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 156, 160-164, 166-167.; H.
H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (Ballantine, pb., 1984), pp. 392-394.;
Jon and David Kimche, The Secret Roads (London: Secker and Warburg, 1955),
pp. 39-43. See also: David Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and Palestine,”
Middle Eastern Studies, October 1971, p. 347.; Bernard Wasserstein, Britain
and the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945 (1979), pp. 43, 49, 52, 60.; T.
Kelly, “Man who fooled Nazis,” Washington Times, April 28, 1987, pp. 1B,
4B. Based on interview with Willy Perl, author of The Holocaust Conspiracy.
31.Y. Arad, et al., eds., Documents On the Holocaust (1981), p. 155. (The
training kibbutz was at Neuendorf, and may have functioned even after March
1942.) 32.On the Agreement in general, see: Werner Feilchenfeld, et al.,
Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972).; David
Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and the Transfer Agreement,” Journal of
Contemporary History (London), No. 2, 1971, pp. 129-148.; “Haavara,”
Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 7, pp. 1012-1013.; F. Nicosia, The Third
Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin: 1985), pp. 44-49.; Raul Hilberg,
The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1985),
pp. 140-141.; The Transfer Agreement, by Edwin Black, is detailed and
useful. However, it contains numerous inaccuracies and wildly erroneous
conclusions. See, for example, the review by Richard S. Levy in Commentary,
Sept. 1984, pp. 68-71. 33.E. Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 328,
337. 34.On opposition to the Haavara in official German circles, see: W.
Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972), pp. 31-33.;
D. Yisraeli, “The Third Reich,” Journal of Contemporary History, 1971, pp.
136-139.; F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question, pp.
126-139.; I. Weckert, Feuerzeichen (1981), pp. 226-227.; Rolf Vogel, Ein
Stempel hat gefehlt (Munich: Droemer Knaur, 1977), pp. 110 ff. 35.W.
Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 31. Entire text in: David
Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel:
1974), pp. 298-300. 36.Interior Ministry internal memo (signed by State
Secretary W. Stuckart), Dec. 17, 1937, in: Helmut Eschwege, ed.,
Kennzeichen J (Berlin: 1966), pp. 132-136. 37.W. Feilchenfeld, et al,
Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 32. 38.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp.
376-377. 39.E. Black, Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 376, 378.; F. Nicosia,
Third Reich (1985), pp. 238-239 (n. 91). 40.E. Black, Transfer Agreement,
p. 379.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich, pp. 212, 255 (n. 66). 41.W. Feilchenfeld,
et al., Haavara-Transfer, p. 75.; “Haavara,” Encyclopaedia Judaica, (1971),
Vol. 7, p. 1013. 42.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp. 379, 373, 382.
43.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS. International
Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the
International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), Vol. 32, pp.
242-243. 44.Werner Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina
(Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972). Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen
(Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), pp. 222-223. 45.W. Feilchenfeld, et al.,
Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972). Quoted in: I. Weckert,
Feuerzeichen (1981), p. 224. 46.Original document in German Ausw_rtiges Amt
Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E 224152 and E 234155-58. (Photocopy in author’s
possession).; Complete original German text published in: David Yisraeli,
The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1974), pp.
315-317. See also: Klaus Polkhen, “The Secret Contacts,” Journal of
Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, pp. 78-80.; (At the time this offer
was made, Stern’s Lehi group still regarded itself as the true Irgun/NMO.)
47.Arab nationalists opposed Britain, which then dominated much of the Arab
world, including Egypt, Iraq and Palestine. Because Britain and Germany
were at war, Germany cultivated Arab support. The leader of Palestine’s
Arabs, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el-Husseini, worked closely
with Germany during the war years. After escaping from Palestine, he spoke
to the Arab world over German radio and helped raise Muslim recruits in
Bosnia for the Waffen SS. 48.Israel Shahak, “Yitzhak Shamir, Then and Now,”
Middle East Policy (Washington, DC), Vol. 1, No. 1, (Whole No. 39), 1992,
pp. 27-38.; Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s Fateful Hour (New York: Harper and
Row, 1988), pp. 213-214. Quoted in: Andrew J. Hurley, Israel and the New
World Order (Santa Barbara, Calif.: 1991), pp. 93, 208-209.; Avishai
Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books,
May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986),
pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, “Yitzhak Shamir: On Hitler’s Side,” Arab
Perspectives (League of Arab States), March 1984, pp. 11-13. 49.Avishai
Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books,
May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986),
pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, “Skeletons in Shamir’s Cupboard,” Middle East
International, Sept. 30, 1983, pp. 15-16.; Sol Stern, L.
Rapoport, “Israel’s Man of the Shadows,” Village Voice (New York), July 3,
1984, pp. 13 ff.

—
SSGG – When somebody talks of shutting them down, you get three hundred
thousand “1st amendment” types jumping to the guy’s defense, giving you a
class on the Bill of Rights – Jacob Baltuch, Brandeis University
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/051115chicago.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:32 EST 2007
Article: 65608 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.german:377489 soc.culture.swiss:65608 soc.culture.polish:814679 de.soc.politik.misc:914607 soc.culture.europe:593051
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-13!supernews.com!news.glorb.com!feed.cgocable.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matt Kaern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.polish,de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.europe
Subject: Der Jude ist ein dreckige Hund, Parasit, usw -[Aufloesung]- Repost
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 556
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:11:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1191431471 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:11:11 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:11:11 MDT

On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:59:13 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc egon-karl ullrich
wrote:

Ein Teil der Auflösung des ‘Rätsel – ja-wie-kann-denn-der-sowas-sagen-?’
ist ja bereits veröffentlicht im Artikelstran “Der Jude ist ein Parasit”
(wer lesen kann und will ist klar im Vorteil, der meist dämliche Spruch
trifft hier mal wirklich zu), dort gibts auch ein zion. Original-Buch
zum runterladen:

Es handelt sich in den “Subjects” um Zitate aus der zionistischen
Literatur von zionistischen Philosophen und zion. Vordenkern bzw. aus
der unangefochtenen Fachliteratur über den Zionismus bzw. über die zion.
Ideologie. Und die zitierten sind noch harmlos, statt “dreckiger Hund”,
kann man auch übersetzen “stinkender Hund”, lt. ‘LEO.dict’

Wer meine Schriften kennt, dem war das auch von Anfang an klar. Anfänger
und Deppen gibts aber auch hier in dieser NG.

Hier der Beweis aus dem marxistischen Bereich (eigentl. jüd.-marx.
Bereich) des Herkunftsjuden Lenni Brenner, Wissenschaftsjournalist:

(aus dem Englischen)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Lenni Brenner

Zionismus im Zeitalter der Diktatoren
(Zionism in the Age of the Dictators)

2. Blut und Boden (Blood and Soil)

Die Wurzeln des zionistischen Rassismus

Es war der Antisemitismus – alleine – welcher den Zionismus begründete.
Herzl konnte seine Bewegung in keiner Weise auf irgendeinem positiven
jüdischen Selbstverständnis aufbauen.

Obwohl er die Unterstützung durch die Rabbiner anstrebte, war er
persönlich nicht gläubig. Er hatte kein besonderes Interesse an
Palästina, dem antiken Heimatland; er war ganz erpicht darauf, daß das
kenianische Hochland akzeptiert wird, zumindest auf einer zeitweiligen
Grundlage. Er hatte kein Interesse an Hebräisch; er betrachtete seinen
jüdischen Staat als ein sprachliches Abbild der Schweiz.

Der Rassengedanke lag für ihn in der Luft; die deutschen Antisemiten
sprachen von den Juden als Rasse, bald jedoch verwarf er diese Doktrin
und nutzte in einer paradoxen Diskussion Israel Zangwill, einen seiner
frühesten Gefolgsleute, als ein Beispiel für seine Ablehnung dieser
Idee. Er beschrieb den englisch-jüdischen Autor so:

“… vom langnasigen Neger-Typ, mit wolligem, tief-schwarzem Haar … er
stützt jedoch den Rassegedanken – manches daran kann ich gelten lassen,
ich muß lediglich ihn und dann wieder mich anschauen. Alles was ich
sagen kann: wir sind eine historische Einheit, eine Nation mit
anthropologischer Vielfalt.” [1]

Unbekümmert von religiösen Überlegungen, schlug er einen Atheisten, den
damals weltberühmten Autor Max Nordau, als seinen Nachfolger als
Präsident der WZO (Zionistische Weltorganisation) vor.

Und wieder waren die Jünger weniger liberal als ihr Herr.

Nordau war mit einer Christin verheiratet und befürchtete, daß sich die
Orthodoxen auf allen Ebenen daran stoßen würden. Er war bereits
verheiratet, als er zum Zionismus konvertierte und wurde bald, trotz
seiner nichtjüdischen Ehefrau, ein anerkannter jüdischer Rassist.

Am 21. Dezember 1903 gab er Eduard Drumonts radikal antisemitischer
Zeitung ‘La Libre Parole’ ein Interview, in welchem er sagte, daß der
Zionismus keine Sache der Religion sondern der Rassen-Exklusivität sei
und “es gibt keinen, mit welchem ich in größerer Übereinstimmung in
diesem Punkt stehe, als M. Drupont”. [3]

Obwohl sich nur ein einziger nationaler Ableger der WZO (der
holländische Verband im Jahr 1913) jemals darum bemühte, die Juden,
welche in gemischten Ehen lebten, auszuschließen, starb der
kosmopolitische Zionismus einen frühen Tod mit Herzl im Jahr 1904. [4]

Die Bewegung in Osteuropa, ihre Massenbasis, teilte die spontanen
volks-religiösen Vorurteile der orthodoxen Gemeinden ihres Umfeldes.

Obwohl die traditionellen Juden Missionierung kannten und Ehen mit
Nicht-Juden als Verstärkung ihrer Glaubenskraft ansahen, brachte später
von der katholischen Kirche ausgehender Druck die Rabbiner dazu,
Konvertierungen als “lästiges Jucken” zu betrachten und sie stellten die
Missionierung ein.

Im Laufe der Jahrhunderte, wurde die Selbst-Abgrenzung zum Kennzeichen
der Juden. Mit der Zeit betrachteten die Massen Mischehen als Verrat an
der Orthodoxie. Obwohl im Westen nur manche Juden die Religion
abwandelten und “Reform”-Sekten bildeten sowie andere sich vom Gott
ihrer Vorväter gänzlich abwandten, ging der Lauf im Wesentlichen weg vom
Judaismus.

Wenige nur stießen zur jüdischen Welt hinzu, entweder durch
Konvertierung oder Heiraten.

Obschon der westliche Zionismus sich in einer mehr säkularen Atmosphäre
entwickelte als jener Ost-Europas, betrachtete die Masse seiner
Mitglieder Misch-Ehen eher als Wegführung der Juden von der Gemeinde
denn als Hinzufügung zu ihr.

Die deutschen Akademiker, welche die zionistische Bewegung nach Herzls
Tod übernahmen, entwickelten die modernistisch-rassistische Ideologie
vom jüdischen Separatismus [Loslösungsstreben].

Sie waren stark beeinflußt von ihren pan-germanischen Studenten-Kollegen
der ‘Wandervögel’ (Zugvögel oder Freigeister), welche den deutschen
Campus vor 1914 dominierten. Diese Chauvinisten wiesen die Juden als
nicht von germanischem Blut zurück; folglich konnten sie niemals Teil
des Deutschen Volkes sein und waren grundsätzlich Fremde auf deutschem
Boden. Alle jüdischen Studenten waren gezwungen, sich mit diesen
Konzepten, welche sie umringten, auseinander zu setzen.

Ein paar bewegten sich nach links und wurden Sozialdemokraten. Für jene
war dies [der Wandervögel-Chauvinismus, Anm. eku] nur ein mehr
bourgeoiser Nationalismus und war als solcher zu bekämpfen.

Die meisten blieben herkömmlich kaisertreu, standhafte Nationalisten,
welche darauf beharrten, daß tausend Jahre auf deutschem Boden aus ihnen
“Deutsche mosaischen Glaubens” gemacht hatten.

Aber ein Anteil der jüdischen Studenten eignete sich die
‘Wandervögel’-Ideologie an und übertrug sie einfach in zionistische
Terminologie.

Sie stimmten mit den Antisemiten in mehreren Punkten überein: die Juden
waren kein Teil des Deutschen Volkes und, natürlich, Juden und Deutsche
sollten sich nicht geschlechtlich vermischen, nicht aus den traditionell
religiösen Gründen, sondern um der Reinheit ihres eigenen einzigartigen
Blutes willen.

Da nicht von deutschem Blut, hätten sie zwangsläufig ihren eigenen Boden
zu bekommen: Palästina.

Auf den ersten Blick schien es befremdlich, daß jüdische Studenten aus
der Mittel-Klasse derart beeinflußt durch antisemitisches Gedankengut
sein sollten, besonders, da zur selben Zeit der Sozialismus mit seiner
assimilationistischen Haltung gegenüber den Juden beträchtliche
Unterstützung in der Gesellschaft um sie herum gewann.

Der Sozialismus appelierte jedoch vorwiegend an die Arbeiter, nicht an
die Mittel-Klasse; in ihrer Umwelt herrschte der Chauvinismus vor,
obwohl intellektuell, lehnten sie ihre Verbindung zum Deutschen Volk ab,
und in der Tat, niemals emanzipierten sie sich von der deutschen
Kapitalistenklasse, den ganzen Ersten Weltkrieg hindurch unterstüzten
sie leidenschaftlich ihre eigene Regierung.

[Anm. eku: s.a. “Max-Bodenheimer-Archiv”. Deutsche Zionisten bilden im
1. WK mittels maßgeblicher Beteiligung der Kölner Fam. Bodenheimer
(=zionistisches Establishment) Unterstützungskommitee, dieses reist an
die Ostfront, bildet Judenräte in den befreiten Gebieten Polens, nennt
die Juden Europas “Deutsche” oder “deutschenfreundlich” und – nicht
zuletzt – sitzt buchstäblich als Ehren-Gast an Kaisers Esstisch!]

In all ihrem grandiosen intellektuellen Anspruch, war ihr völkischer
Zionismus doch nur einfach eine Imitation der deutschen
nationalistischen Ideologie. Deshalb war der junge Philosoph Martin
Buber fähig, während dem Ersten Weltkrieg den Zionismus mit inbrünstigem
deutschen Patriotismus zu verbinden.

In seinem Buch ‘Drei Reden über das Judentum’, veröffentlicht im Jahre
1911, sprach Buber über einen Jugendlichen, der:

“einen Sinn hat für die Unsterblichkeit der Generationen einer
Blutgemeinschaft, welche er als Vorgänger seines Ich empfindet, dessen
Ausdauer wird unendlich währen.

Hinzu kommt die Entdeckung, befördert durch sein Bewußtsein, daß Blut
eine tief verwurzelte, nährende Kraft im Inneren jedes einzelnen
Menschen ist;

daß die tiefsten Schichten unseres Seins vom Blut bestimmt sind;

daß unser innerstes Denken und unser Wille davon gefärbt sind.

Jetzt findet er heraus, daß die Welt um ihn eine Welt der Eindrücke und
Einflüsse ist, wohingegen Blut das Reich einer beeinflußbaren und
beeindruckbaren Substanz ist, einer Sustanz die alles in ihre eigene
Form aufnimmt und anpasst, und, wer auch immer, vor die Wahl, Umgebung
oder Blut gestellt, sich für die Substanz entscheidet, fortan ein wahrer
Jude aus seinem Innersten sein muß, um zu leben als ein Jude mit all den
Widersprüchen, der Tragödie und all der späteren Verheißung seines
Blutes” [5]

[Anm. eku: naturgemäß unvollkommene Rückübersetzung, werde noch
versuchen, den Originaltext Bubers zu bekommen…]

Die Juden leben in Europa seit Jahrtausenden, weit länger, sagen wir
mal, als die Ungarn. Niemand träumte davon, sich auf die Ungarn als
Asiaten zu beziehen, jedoch, so Buber, die Juden Europas wären noch
Asiaten und würden es voraussichtlich immer bleiben.

“Du kannst den Juden aus Palästina rauskriegen, aber niemals Palästina
raus aus dem Juden.”

Im Jahr 1916 schrieb Buber, daß der Jude:

“vertrieben wurde aus seinem Land und über die Länder des Abendlandes
verstreut wurde, jedoch, trotz all dem, blieb er ein Orientale. Man kann
all dies im noch so sehr assimlierten Juden entdecken, wenn man Zugang
zu seiner Seele gewinnt … der unvergängliche, allen Juden gemeinsame
Trieb – dieser wird in das Sein einkehren nach einer Fortdauer des
Lebens in Palästina … Sobald der Trieb mit seiner Mutters Scholle in
Berührung kommt, wird er wieder schöpferisch.” [6]

Bubers völkischer Zionismus, mit seinen ausgesuchten Strängen mystischen
Überschwangs, war jedoch zu vergeistigt um ein breites Publikum
anzusprechen.

Was gebraucht wurde, war eine populäre zionistische Version des
Sozial-Darwinismus, welcher die bourgoise intellektuelle Welt des
aufbrechenden europäischen imperialen Wettbewerbs nach Afrika und nach
Osten überschwemmte.

Die zionistische Version dieser Auffassung wurde von dem
österreichischen Anthropologen Ignatz Zollschan entwickelt. Für ihn war
der verborgene Nutzen des Judaismus, daß jener, obgleich unabsichtlich,
das Wunder der Wunder bewirken würde:

“Eine Nation von reinem Blut, unverdorben von den Krankheiten des
Exzesses oder der Unmoral, von einem hoch entwickelten Sinn für
familiäre Reinheit und von tief verwurzelten tugendhaften Gewohnheiten
würde eine außergewöhnliche geistige Regsamkeit entwickeln.
Darüberhinaus sorgt das Verbot der Mischehen dafür, daß dieser
höchst-ethische Schatz durch reinmixen von weniger umsichtig
hervorgebrachten Rassen nicht verloren geht … daraus resultiert eine
naturgemäße Auswahl, welche keine Parallele in der Geschichte der
menschlichen Rasse findet … Wenn eine Rasse, die so hoch beschenkt
ist, die Gelegenheit bekommt, erneut ihre ursprüngliche Kraft zu
entwickeln, kann dem nichts gleichkommen, soweit es den kulturellen Wert
anbelangt.” [7]

Sogar Albert Einstein unterschrieb die zionistischen Rassenkonzepte,
damit verstärkte er den Rassismus und verlieh ihm das Prestige seiner
Reputation. Seine eigenen Beiträge zur Diskussion klingen entsprechend
tiefsinnig, sie beruhen jedoch auf dem selben Unsinn.

“Nationen mit rassischen Unterschieden scheinen Instinkte zu besitzen,
welche gegen ihre Verschmelzung wirken. Die Assimilation der Juden in
die europäischen Nationen … konnte nicht das Gefühl eines Mangels an
Verwandtschaft zwischen ihnen und jenen, unter denen sie lebten,
beseitigen. Letzten Endes ist das instinktive Gefühl des fehlenden
Verwandschaftsverhältnisses auf das Gesetz der Energieerhaltung
zurückzuführen. Aus diesem Grund kann es [das instinktive Mangelgefühl,
Anm. eku] durch keinen noch so wohlmeinenden Druck ausgerottet werden.” [8]

Buber, Zollschan und Einstein waren nur drei der klassischen Zionisten,
welche hochtrabend gelehrt über Rassen-Reinheit redeten. Jedoch konnte
der schiere Fanatismus Einiger nicht den des Amerikaners Maurice Samuel
einholen.

Als ein gut bekannter Autor jener Zeit – später, in den 1940er Jahren
arbeitete er mit Weizman an dessen Autobiographie – wendete sich Samuel
im Jahre 1927 in seinem Werk, ‘Ich, der Jude’, an die amerikanische
Öffentlichkeit. Er denunzierte mit Horror eine Stadt, der er
bereitwillig zugestand, daß er sie nur vom Hörensagen kannte – und von
der uns die vorgelegten Hinweise nahelegen, daß es sich um die
ungebunden lebende Künstler-Kolonie bei Taos, Neu-Mexiko, handelt:

“Auf diesem kleinen Platz kamen Repräsentanten der afrikanischen Neger,
der Amerikaner und der chinesischen Mongolen zusammen, der Semite und
der Arier … freie Mischehen setzen sich durch … Warum erfüllt mich
dieses Bild, teils wirklich, teils phantastisch, mit einem befremdenden
Abscheu, suggeriert es das Ekelerregende, das düstere Bestialische? …
Wieso ruft dieses Dorf, wie meine Phantasie heraufbeschwört, den
Gedanken an einen Haufen Reptilien hervor, die hässlich in einem
Wasserkübel brüten?” [9]

“Um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit sein”

Obwohl ‘Blut’ ein wiederkehrendes Thema in der zionistischen
vor-Holokaust-Literatur war, war dieses nicht so zentral wie die
Botschaft vom ‘Boden’.

Solange Amerikas Grenzen [relativ, Anm. eku] offen blieben, fragten
Europas Juden: wenn der Antisemitismus nicht in seiner Heimat bekämpft
werden konnte, warum sollten sie nicht einfach der Menge nach Amerika
folgen?

Die zionistische Antwort war doppelt gewappnet: Antisemitismus würde die
Juden begleiten, wohin immer sie auch gingen, und, darüberhinaus, es
waren die Juden selbst, welche den Antisemitismus durch ihre eigene
Charackteristik hervor riefen.

Die Wurzel des Antisemitismus, beharrten die Zionisten, war die jüdische
Exil-Existenz.

Die Juden lebten parasitär von ihren “Wirtsvölkern”. Es gäbe so gut wie
keine jüdischen Bauern in der Diaspora. Die Juden lebten in den Städten,
sie waren der manuellen Arbeit entfremdet, oder, um es unverblümt zu
sagen, sie mieden diese und beschäftigten sich lieber mit
intellektuellen oder kommerziellen Angelegenheiten. Ihre Beanspruchung
des Patriotismus war bestenfalls hohl, da sie ewig von Land zu Land
wanderten. Und als sie selbst sich einbildeten, sie wären Sozialisten
und Internationalisten, waren sie in Wirklichkeit nicht mehr als die
Mittelsmänner der Revolution, welche die “Schlachten anderer Leute”
ausfochten.

Diese zusammengefaßten Lehren waren bekannt als ‘Shelilat Ha’galut’ [Die
Verneinung der Diaspora], an der sich das gesamte Spektrum der Zionisten
festhielt, nur in Details variiert.

Sie wurden in der zionistischen Presse energisch vertreten, in der die
ausgeprägte Qualität vieler Artikel aus der Feindseligkeit gegenüber dem
gesamten jüdischen Volk bestand. Wenn irgendjemand diese Fetzen ohne
Kenntnis der Quellen las, würde er automatisch vermuten, daß sie der
antisemitischen Presse entstammten.

Die ‘Weltanschauung’ der Jugendorganisation ‘Hashomer Hatzair’ [Junge
Wächter], ursprünglich verfaßt im Jahr 1917, allerdings erst 1936 wieder
neu veröffentlicht, war typisch für diese Art Ergüsse:

“Der Jude ist die Karikatur eines normalen, natürlichen Menschen, in
physischer wie spiritueller Hinsicht. Als Einzelwesen in der
Gesellschaft rebelliert er und wirft die gesellschaftlichen Bindungen
ab, er kennt weder Ordnung noch Disziplin.” [10]

Ganz ähnlich konnte so im Jahre 1935 Ben Frommer, ein Autor der
ultra-rechten zionistisch-revisionistischen Bewegung, nicht weniger als
16 Millionen seiner Mit-Juden [offenbar wurde seine Erklärung weltweit
verbreitet, Anm. eku] erklären, daß:

“Die Tatsache ist unabweisbar, daß die Juden kollektiv krank und
neurotisch sind. Jene Berufs-Juden, welche nun erschüttert diese
Wahrheit entrüstet zurückweisen, sind die größten Feinde ihrer Rasse,
denn sie führen sie dadurch auf die Suche nach falschen Lösungen oder
zumeist nur nach Beschönigungen.” [11]

Diese Art des jüdischen Selbsthasses durchsetzte einen großen Teil des
zionistischen Schrifttums.

Im Jahre 1934 erregte Yehezkel Kaufman – damals berühmt als Gelehrter
für biblische Geschichte an der Hebräischen Universität zu Jerusalem,
und obwohl selbst Zionist, dennoch ein Gegner der bizarren Theorie der
Negation der Diaspora – wütende Kontroversen durch eine Auswahl der
hebräischen Literatur mit noch schlimmeren Beispielen.

Auf Hebräisch konnten die pathetischen Schreiber ihre Mit-Juden ohne
Furcht vor dem Vorwurf, den Judenhassern Munition zu liefern, regelrecht
zur Sau machen. Kaufmans ‘Hurban Hanefesh’ (Holokaust der Seele) zitiert
dazu drei der klassisch-zionistischen Vordenker.

Für Micah Yosef Berdichevsky waren die Juden “keine Nation, kein Volk,
keine Menschen”.

Für Yosef Chaim Brenner waren sie nicht mehr als “Zigeuner, dreckige
Hunde, nicht-menschlich, erbärmliche Hunde”.

Für Aaron David Gordon war sein Volk nicht besser als “Parasiten,
grundsätzlich unnütze Leute”. [12]

[Anm. eku: dieses Buch Kaufmans, wohl als eine Kritik an den
zionistischen Pöbeleien gemeint, hatte Julius Streicher lt. Text der
Webseite der frommen, ultra-orthodoxen Juden, JewsAgainstZionism,
gekannt, aus dieser Quell hatte Streicher offenbar eine Reihe seiner
Beschreibungen und Ausdrücke für die Juden gewonnen]

Natürlich mußte Maurice Samuel seine Schönschrift einbringen, um
Verleumdungen gegen seine Mit-Juden zusammen zu brauen.

Im Jahr 1924 fabrizierte er in seinem Werk ‘Ihr Nicht-Juden’ (You
Gentiles) eine von ihrem eigenen bösartigen Schöpfer gegen die
christliche Ordnung angetriebene Judenheit:

“Wir Juden, wir, die Zerstörer, werden für immer die Zerstörer bleiben.
Egal was ihr macht, nie wird es unserem Anspruch genügen. Ewig werden
wir zerstören, denn wir brauchen unsere eigene Welt, eine Gottes-Welt,
zu deren Erschaffung ihr nicht veranlagt seid … jene von uns, welche
diese Wahrheit nicht begreifen, werden sich immer wiederfinden in
Allianz mit euren rebellischen Gruppen, bis die Desillusionierung kommt,
unser elendes Schicksal, welches uns in eurer Mitte verstreute, hat uns
diese unwillkommene Rolle aufgedrängt.” [13]

Der Labour-Zionismus [linke, nicht-marxistische Strömung] brachte seine
eigene einzigartige Sorte des jüdischen Selbsthasses hervor.

Trotz seines Namens und Anspruches, war der Labour-Zionismus niemals
fähig, einen signifikanten Anteil der jüdischen Arbeiterklasse in auch
nur irgendeinem Land der Diaspora für sich einzunehmen.

Seine Mitglieder führten ein selbst-widerlegendes Argument an: sie
behaupteten, daß die jüdischen Arbeiter nur in “marginalen” Industrien
beschäftigt seien, in solchen wie der Nadel-Industrie [Nadeln für
Textilherstellung und Grammophone, Anm. eku], welche keine wesentliche
Bedeutung für die VolksWirtschaften der “Wirts”-Nationen hatten, daher
würden die jüdischen Arbeiter immerwährend marginal für die
Arbeiterbewegung in den Ländern ihres Aufenthalts bleiben.

Jüdische Arbeiter, so wurde behauptet, könnten einen “gesunden”
Klassenkampf nur in ihrem eigenen Land wagen.

Arme Juden zeigten natürlich wenig Interesse an einer sogenannten
Arbeiter-Bewegung, welche ihnen nicht etwa erzählte, mit allem was sie
vermochten für die Verbesserung der gegenwärtigen Bedingungen zu
kämpfen, sondern sich eher um das weit entfernte Palästina zu sorgen.

Der Ruf der zionistischen Arbeiter-Bewegung richtete sich paradoxerweise
primär an jene jungen Mittelklasse-Juden, welche den Bruch zu ihrer
Herkunfts-Klasse suchten, war jedoch nicht bereit, sich dann den
Arbeitern der Länder ihres Aufenthalts zu zuwenden.

Der Labour-Zionismus wurde so eine Art Gegenkultur-Sekte, welche die
jüdischen Marxisten wegen deren Internationalismus und die jüdische
Mittelklasse als parasitische Ausbeuter der “Wirts”völker anprangerte.

Im Endeffekt übertrugen sie den traditionellen Antisemitismus ins
Jiddische: die Juden waren in den falschen Ländern in den falschen
Berufen und machten die falsche Politik.

Es brauchte den Holokaust, um diesem Gejammer einen Sinn zu geben.

Erst dann erkannten sie den gemeinsamen Nenner in ihrer eigenen
Botschaft und der anti-jüdischen Propaganda der Nazis.

Im März 1942 gestand Chaim Greenberg, zu der Zeit Herausgeber des
Labour-zionistischen Presse-Organs ‘Jewish Frontier’ in New York,
schmerzlich ein, daß es tatsächlich

“eine Zeit [gegeben hat,] als es für zionistische Sprecher
(einschließlich den Schreiber) modisch war, von ihrem Standpunkt aus zu
erklären, ‘um ein guter Zionist zu sein, muß man ein bißchen Antisemit
sein’. Bis zu diesem Tag stehen die zionistischen Labour-Kreise unter
dem Einfluß der Vorstellung, daß die Rückkehr nach Zion einen Prozeß der
Reinigung von unseren ökonomischen Unsauberkeiten einschließt. Jeden,
der keine sogenannte ‘produktive’ manuelle Arbeit ergreift, hält man für
einen Sünder gegen das Volk Israel und gegen die Menschheit.” [14]

[b]”Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda”[/b]

Wenn irgendjemandem ohne weitere Fakten erzählt würde, daß die ersten
Zionisten Rassisten waren, würde derjenige automatisch vermuten, daß
dies ein Teil der kolonialistischen Seite des Zionismus in Palästina sei.

Tatsächlich ist dem nicht so; Der ‘Blut-Zionismus’ hätte sich auch
entwickelt, wenn Palästina komplett unbewohnt gewesen wäre. Die
Begeisterung für ‘Blut und Boden’ war bereits Teil des Zionismus, bevor
der erste moderne Zionist jemals Europa verließ.

Der Rassen-Zionismus hingegen war ein merkwürdiger Ableger des
Rassen-Antisemitismus.

Gewiß, so argumentierten die Zionisten, die Juden waren eine reine
Rasse, bestimmt reiner als, sagen wir mal, die Deutschen, die einen
großen Zuschlag slawischen Blutes besaßen, wie sogar die All-Deutschen
eingestanden. Für diese Zionisten konnte jedoch noch nicht mal ihr
Glaube an die Rassen-Reinheit den einen Makel der jüdischen Existenz
überspielen: die Juden verfügten nicht über ihren eigenen jüdischen Boden.

Wenn die teutonischen Rassisten sich als ‘Übermenschen’ sehen konnten,
sahen diese hebräischen Rassisten die Juden eben nicht in diesem Licht;
eher war das Gegenteil der Fall.

Sie glaubten, daß wegen des Fehlens eines eigenen Bodens die Juden
“Untermenschen” wären, daher wären diese, aus der Sicht ihrer “Wirte”,
wenig mehr als Blutsauger: die Welt-Pest eben.

Wenn man an den Wahrheitsgehalt der rassischen Exklusivität glaubt,
fällt es schwer, etwas gegen den Rassismus von irgendjemand anderem
einzuwenden.

Wenn man weiters daran glaubt, daß es für ein Volk unmöglich ist, gesund
zu bleiben, außer in seinem eigenen Heimatland, kann man nichts gegen
irgendeinen anderen einwenden, der “Fremde” von seinem Territorium
ausschließt.

Tatsächlich jedoch dachte der Durchschnitts-Zionist selbst niemals
daran, das zivilisierte Europa zu verlassen, um es gegen die Wildnis
Palästinas einzutauschen. In Wirklichkeit ist es offensichtlich, daß ihm
die zionistische ‘Blut und Boden’-Ideologie eine vortreffliche
Begründung lieferte, den Antisemitismus nicht auf dessen Heimatboden zu
bekämpfen: Es war nicht der Fehler der Antisemiten, es kam von dem
eigenen Pech der Juden, ihrem Dasein im Exil.

Die Zionisten konnten tränenreich darlegen, daß in dem Verlust
Palästinas die Wurzel des Antisemitismus lag und die Wiedergewinnung
Palästinas die einzige Lösung der Judenfrage wäre. Alles andere könne
nur Beschönigung sein oder zwecklos.

Walter Laqueur, Wortführer der zionistischen Historiker, fragte in
seinem Buch, ‘A History of Zionism’ [Die Geschichte des Zionismus], ob
das zionistische Beharren auf der Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus
nicht doch das “Wasser auf die Mühlen der Nazi-Propaganda” war. [15]

Sicher war es das.

Laqueurs Frage kann jedoch am besten mit einer anderen Frage beantwortet
werden: ist es schwierig, den leichtgläubigen Leser einer Nazi-Zeitung
zu verstehen, der daraus schloß, daß das, was die Nazis erklärten und
welchem die Zionisten – Juden – zustimmten, richtig sein müsse?

Und es kam noch schlimmer: jede jüdische Bewegung, welche über die
Naturgegebenheit des Antisemitismus schwätzte, geradeso, als wäre jener
“natürlich”, strebte nach vertraglichen Übereinkommen mit den Nazis, als
diese an die Macht kamen.

——–

Fußnoten und Quellen:

1. Marvin Lowenthal (ed.), The Diaries of Theodor Herzl, p.78.

2. Amos Elon, Herzl, p.255.

3. Desmond Stewart, Theodor Herzl, p.322.

4. The WZO is structured by national states, and elections are held on a
national basis for the World Zionist Congress; the various ideological
tendencies which are world-wide in their structure, run in the various
national elections for delegates.

5. Martin Buber, On Judaism, pp.15-19.

6. Ibid., pp.75-7.

7. Ignatz Zollschan, Jewish Questions (1914) pp.17-18.

8. Solomon Goldman, Crisis and Decision (1938), p.116.

9. Maurice Samuel, I, the Jew, pp.244-6.

10. Our Shomer “Weltanschauung”, Hashomer Hatzair (December 1936), p.26.

11. Ben Frommer, The Significance of a Jewish State, Jewish Call
(Shanghai, May 1935), p.10.

12. Yehezkel Kaufman, Hurban Hanefesh: A Discussion of Zionism and
Anti-Semitism, Issues (Winter 1967), p.106.

13. Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p.155.

14. Chaim Greenberg, The Myth of Jewish Parasitism, Jewish Frontiers
(March 1942), p.20.

15. Walter Laqueur, A History of Zionism, p.500.

************************************************************************
http://www.marxists.de/middleast/brenner/ch02.htm

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:34 EST 2007
Article: 65609 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:814684 soc.culture.europe:593056 soc.culture.ukrainian:133743 soc.culture.baltics:159038 soc.culture.german:377492 soc.culture.swiss:65609
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-09!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matt Kaern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: NAZI + ZYD KOLLABORATION!! Repost
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 85
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:12:20 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1191431540 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:12:20 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:12:20 MDT

From: “Syja Macohstain”
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish
Subject: Nazi-Zionist collaboration
Date: 10 Feb 2007 11:30:05 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com

EICHMANN IN JERUSALEM
byHannah Arendt

Zionist Emigration and Gestapo Expulsion

(pp. 59-61)

During its first few years, Hitler’s rise to power appeared to the
Zionists chiefly as ‘the decisive defeat of assimilationism’. Hence, the
Zionists could, for a time, at least, engage in a certain amount of non-
criminal cooperation with the Nazi authorities; the Zionists too believed
that “dissimilation,” combined with the emigration to Palestine of Jewish
youngsters and, they hoped, Jewish capitalists, could be a “mutually
fair solution.”

At the time, many German officials held this opinion, and this kind
of seems to have been quite common up to the end. A letter from a
survivor of Theresienstadt, a German Jew, relates that all leading
positions in the Nazi-appointed “Reichsvereiningung” were held by
Zionists (whereas the authentic Jewish “Reichsvereiningung” had
been composed of both Zionists and non-Zionists), because Zionists,
according to the Nazis, were the “decent” Jews since they too thought
in “national terms.” To be sure, no prominent Nazi ever spoke publicly
in this vein; from beginning to end, Nazi propaganda was fiercely,
unequivocally, uncompromisingly anti-Semitic, and eventually nothing
counted but what people who were still without experience in the
mysteries of totalitarian government dismissed as “mere propaganda.”

There existed in those first years a mutually highly satisfactory
agreement between the Nazi authorities and the Jewish Agency for
Palestine – a ‘ Ha’avara’, or Transfer Agreement, which provided that
an emigrant to Palestine could transfer his money there in German
goods and exchange them for pounds upon arrival. It was soon the
only legal way for a Jew to take his money with him (the alternative then
being the establishment of a blocked account, which could be liquidated
abroad only at a loss of between fifty and ninety-five per cent). The result
was that in the thirties, when American Jewry took great pains to organize
a boycott of German merchandise, Palestine, of all places, was swamped
with all kinds of goods “made in Germany.”

Of Greater importance for Eichmann were the emissaries from Palestine,
who would approach the Gestapo and the S.S. on their own initiative,
without taking orders from either the German Zionists or the Jewish Agency
for Palestine. They came in order to enlist the help for the illegal
immigration of Jews into British-ruled Palestine, and both the Gestapo
and the S.S: were helpful. They negotiated with Eichmann in Vienna,
and they reported that he was “polite, not the shouting type,” and that
he even provided them with farms and facilities for setting up vocational
training camps for prospective immigrants. (“On one occasion, he expelled
a group of nuns from a convent to provide a training farm for young Jews”
and on another ‘a special train was made available and Nazi officials
accompanied’ a group of emigrants, ostensibly headed for Zionist training
farms in Yugoslavia, to see them safely across the border).

According to the story told by Jon and David Kimche, with “the full
and generous cooperation of all the chief actors” (THE SECRET ROADS:
THE ILLEGAL MIGRATION OF A PEOPLE, 1938-1948, London, 1954),
these Jews from Palestine spoke a language not totally different from that
of Eichmann. They had been sent to Europe by the communal settlements
in Palestine, and they were not interested in rescue operations: “That was
not their job.” They wanted to select “suitable material,” and their chief
enemy, prior to the extermination program, was not those who made life
impossible for Jews in the old countries, Germany or Austria, but those
who barred access to the new homeland: that enemy was definitely
Britain, not Germany.

Indeed, they were in a position to deal with the Nazi authorities on a
footing amounting to equality, which native Jews were not, since they
enjoyed the protection of the mandatory power. They were probably
among the first Jews to talk openly about mutual interests and were
certainly the first to be given permission “to pick young Jewish pioneers”
>from among the Jews in the concentration camps. Of course, they were
unaware of the sinister implications of this deal, which still lay in the
future; but they too somehow believed that if it was a question of selecting
Jews for survival, the Jews should do the selecting themselves. It was this
fundamental error in judgement that eventually led to a situation in which
the non-selected majority of Jews inevitably found themselves confronted
with two enemies – the Nazi authorities and the Jewish authorities”.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:34 EST 2007
Article: 65610 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.polish:814685 soc.culture.german:377493 soc.culture.ukrainian:133744 soc.culture.russian:467668 soc.culture.palestine:578136 soc.culture.swiss:65610
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-01!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matt Kaern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: The Alleged “Holocaust” of the Jews is Proving ever more Dangerous – Repost
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 213
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:12:32 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1191431552 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:12:32 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:12:32 MDT

The Alleged “Holocaust” of the Jews is Proving ever more Dangerous

On 8 Aug 2006 22:03:31 -0700, in can.politics “127.0.0.1”
wrote:

http://www.natallnews.com/story.php?id=2695

Current events in the Middle East confirm it: the alleged
“Holocaust” of the Jews is a historical lie that is proving ever
more dangerous. Let us recall that this alleged “Holocaust”, which
is the sword and the shield of the State of Israel, possesses at least
three aberrant features:

1) It has created “survivors” (“miraculous” ones) by the
million. Almost sixty years on from the end of the 1939-1945 war, the
number of “survivors” of that purported undertaking to exterminate
an entire people has been estimated by the specialist in demographics
of Jewish communities Jacob Ukeles at 687,900 (Haaretz, April 18,
2004).

>From that figure it may be deduced that in 1945 the number of European
Jews who had survived the war was most likely in the region of
3,250,000, a statistic that bears out what we already knew from other
information: never did the Germans have a policy of physical
extermination of the Jews and never did they possess any of those
weapons of mass destruction called execution “gas chambers” or
execution “gas vans”.

After the war, many Jews stayed in Europe and many others scattered
throughout the world, settling in nearly sixty countries. So it was
that in the late 1990s the teams put in charge by Steven Spielberg of
gathering survivors’ testimonies had to go to nearly sixty different
countries to record the said testimonies on video (Survivors of the
Shoah Visual Foundation, P.O. Box 3168, Los Angeles, California 90078,
USA; see also a related article in the French daily Libération of
November 3, 1999, p. 36).

Finally, in the present day, the Jewish population of Israel is close
to … seven million (!);

2) It constitutes a daunting weapon with which to stifle, crush and
kill; see the above drawing, recently passed on to me by Ahmed Rami,
depicting a book that, like writings in Hebrew, would be read from
right to left; hence the presentation.

3) It enabled the Zionists to succeed in creating a colony in
1947-1948, the very time when, everywhere else in the world, colonial
possessions were disintegrating. Established in the land of Palestine,
that colony became a “Jewish State”, endowed with a “Jewish
Army”. This State is racialist, domineering and sure of itself. In
accordance with a millennia-old tradition, it has, yet again, let the
Jewish people, – ever prey to the prophet’s anxiety, ever inclined
to groan, to complain, to threaten blackmail, to preach wars and
crusades, – make itself invariably loathsome wherever it passes
through.

Founded on the myth of the “Holocaust”, the State of Israel is
doomed

In a study dated October 8, 2001 and entitled “An Imaginary Holocaust
May Lead to a Real Holocaust” I wrote: “the State of Israel is
henceforth doomed. It will not even have lasted as long as the
ephemeral Christian kingdom of Jerusalem [which, in actual fact, lived
for 89 years]”; then, speaking of the “bad times ahead for the
Jews”, I described already what can be seen befalling that
colonialist State now.

The Zionists will have to leave Palestine. They will be returning to
our climes. In particular, they will invade Germany where the
authorities are already offering a fortune to Jewish immigrants from
anywhere. These wandering Jews will bewail their “Second
Holocaust”.

Again they will be demanding penitence, privileges of all sorts and
“reparations for the irreparable” (a fine Talmudic oxymoron!).
Thus, those settlers of another era will need to quit Jerusalem; but
will they do so in the manner of the Europeans of Algeria in 1962 or in
that of the Americans, in 1975, in Vietnam?

What will the Israelis do with their nuclear arsenal? How high will the
bill for the rest of humanity run to? One can hardly tell.

On the other hand, one may rightly affirm that present events justify
the warnings put out in the past by the revisionists. They had said
that the lie of the magical gas chambers allowed ANYTHING and that,
consequently, the world must be ready for ANYTHING in the way of Jewish
excessiveness. It would have been a good idea to listen to the
revisionists instead of throwing them in prison or trying to gag them.

Jewish neurosis and excessiveness in the Zionist myth and the
“Holocaust” myth

Whether belonging to the State of Israel or the Diaspora, the Jews,
with but too few exceptions like those of Noam Chomsky, Israel Shahak
or Edgar Morin, have acted with callousness and inhumanity. Their
alleged “Holocaust” has permitted them to slander nearly all
non-Jews, including the wartime Allies, the Neutrals, the Papacy, the
International Committee of the Red Cross, all accused of having, it
seems, let the Germans exterminate the European Jews.

They have thus accused whole nations of having committed or allowed to
be committed a gigantic crime which, in reality, was never perpetrated.

>From this slander of huge proportions they have drawn, with the greed
and cruelty of Shylock, an orgy of profits in monetary and political
terms as well as in the spheres of the law and the media. Moreover,
they have not cared to show any respect to either the defeated or the
impoverished. Their excessiveness (the messianic hubris) has made them
lose their heads.

These Jews would be well advised to reflect on what, in 1894, Bernard
Lazare wrote on the first page of his book Antisemitism: its history
and causes and which may be summarised as follows: if, in every era, in
every land, amongst all races, under all kinds of regime and whatever
the prevailing moral standards and customs, the people of Israel have
incited “hostility” and even “repugnance”, it is that “the
general causes of antisemitism [have] always lain in Israel itself and
not in those who have fought it.”

Up to now the revisionists have been treated like Palestinians,
Lebanese or, to talk Jewish, like the “seed of cattle” and for a
long time revisionism has remained beyond the understanding of the
greater part of the world, but now, in the present day, people are
beginning to grasp its message.

Millions, whole nations, witnesses to what is going on in the Middle
East, are becoming aware, in front of their television sets, of Jewish
neurosis and excessiveness.

At the same time they are discovering, or are about to discover, with
stupefaction, that at the root of the lie-laden accounts, full of
extravagance and hatred, that make up what the Jews call their
“Holocaust History”, there already lay that same neurosis, that
same excessiveness.

Jewish fads, extravagances and crazes bound for the rubbish bins of
history

The “mania for lying and believing lies is as catching as the itch”
(Céline). Man, as is known all too well, is subject to some quite
unlikely fancies. He goes so far as to kill or get himself killed for
ideas that he sometimes ends up discovering were false all along. The
business of weapons, wars and crusades, of which mass propaganda is a
central component, takes delight in these false ideas.

In the 19th and 20th centuries the Talmudists took in billions of
people with them. Freudianism, Zionism, Lenin- or Trotsky-style
Communism, Elie Wiesel-style holocaustic religion or Shoah business à
la Claude Lanzmann, all these inventions have been grounded in a
mixture of false ideas, messianic utopias and impostures that were
essentially Jewish. After having known triumph, Freudianism (not to be
confused with psychotherapy and psychiatry) and Leninism (not to be
confused with the communist ideal) are now largely discredited.

As is seen in our present day, Zionism, for its part, leads to
self-destruction and may perhaps bring on a worldwide catastrophe; the
Israelis have killed it. As for the “Holocaust” religion and Shoah
business, they seem to be flourishing, but, as the American revisionist
Arthur Robert Butz has remarked, the giant’s feet are made of clay,
and this fact is starting to be noticed.

These fads, extravagances and crazes, which bear the mark of Jewish
neurosis and excessiveness, look sure to finish one day in the rubbish
bins of history. But, as far as the “Holocaust” is concerned, that
day is still a long way off, so strongly has the Great Lie of the 20th
century pervaded people’s minds, like a lethal drug to which one
sadly ends up becoming addicted.

Fortunately the revisionists are here; good Judeo-therapists that they
are (the term is French revisionist Pierre Guillaume’s), they have no
equal when it comes to treating dependence on holocaustic lie poison.
If, beset with that affliction, one wants to regain reason and health,
there is nothing like a simple cure of revisionism.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur , or to
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Thu Dec 20 14:19:35 EST 2007
Article: 65611 of soc.culture.swiss
Xref: sn-us soc.culture.german:377494 soc.culture.swiss:65611 soc.culture.europe:593057 de.soc.politik.misc:914610
Path: sn-us!sn-feed-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-10!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-xt-sjc-12!supernews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: Matt Kaern
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.europe,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: Der Jude ist ein dreckiger Hund, erbärmlich, Parasit usw. (Auflösung) – Repost
Organization: ZYDWATCH
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 558
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:14:01 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1191431641 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:14:01 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:14:01 MDT

Der Jude ist ein dreckiger Hund, erbärmlich, Parasit usw. (Auflösung)