[email protected] (Ken McVay OBC) wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] (Richard Charles Graves) wrote:
>>[email protected] writes:
>>> This one came through five minutes after the post demonstrating
>>>that Greenies bot on the server is supported by Stanford University and
>>>they will do nothing to stop this email harrassment.
>>Translation: Procmail is now refusing Giwer’s mail.
>Nizkor’s Procmail also bounces Mr. Giwer’s mail, and it would
>appear that being ignored is, to Giwer, the ultimate
>humiliation. Being rejected by a few lines of code is
>apparently far worse.
However, as you know, I am not talking about mail. I am talking about
newsgroup posts. That is what the bot is dealing with. It is taking NG
posts and turning them into email to me.
But thank you for taking the time to lie about it.
Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!news.gmi.edu!
zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.
internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!netnews.worldnet.att.net!
ix.netcom.com!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Eureka!
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:11:53 GMT
Organization: images incarnate
Lines: 126
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tam-fl8-02.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Jun 22 5:14:03 AM CDT 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
[email protected] (Hilary Ostrov) wrote:
>In a recent post – sorry, it’s not really worth doing a search to find
>it – but suffice it to say, a certain prolific poster of prattle was
>kind enough to advise us of our failure to recognize his mission
>statement.
>It seems to me, that he has now provided us with an important clue to
>another oversight on our part. He has informed us that the word
>”holohugger” is an acronym. I initially came to the erroneous
>conclusion that while he was able to spell “acronym” correctly, he
>didn’t have a clue as to the meaning of the word. But of course, I
>had forgotten this poster’s omniscience.
>What he didn’t tell us, though, is that the acronym “holohugger” is,
>in fact, an anagram for the acronym HELGOOHURG (Healthy Educated
>Literate Genteel Observer Of History Unravelling “Revisionist”
>Gambits). Recognizing that he is profoundly deficient in _all_ the
>qualities necessary to be a helgoohurg, and perhaps a little jealous,
>he proffers *his* acronym instead.
>There it is, folks! Another gambit unravelled!
>Hilary “helgoohurg and proud!”
>=======================
>Hilary Ostrov
>e-mail: [email protected]
>http://haven.uniserve.com/~hostrov/(page does not exist)
Nice try, fat broad.
Return-Path:
Received: (from smap@localhost) by ixmail3.ix.netcom.com
(8.7.5/SMI-4.1/Netcom)
id CAA26116; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 02:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d31rz0.stanford.edu(36.76.0.151) by ixmail3 via smap
(V1.3)
id sma026113; Sat Jun 22 02:55:16 1996
Received: (from rjg@localhost) by d31rz0.Stanford.EDU (8.6.8/8.6.6) id
CAA00284; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 02:56:35 -0700
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 02:56:35 -0700
From: “Richard J. Green”
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: STANFORD U participating in email harrassment
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
X-from: Rich Green
Precedence: junk
>At 02:11 AM 6/22/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>> This one came through five minutes after the post demonstrating that
>>>Greenies bot on the server is supported by Stanford University and they
>>>will do nothing to stop this email harrassment.
>>
>>> That makes Stanford University the same piece of harrassing shit that is
>>>Greenie is.
>>
>>> Of course copies are being sent to root and if there is no response I
>>>will persue the Stanford web site as far as necessary to to inform them
>>>of his use of their computers for the purpose of email harrassment.
>>
>>> He thinks he is being clever. Rather he is making Stanford U a party to
>>>his harrassment.
> Very clearly here is the problem.
> You have a Richard J. Green who claims to be in your Chemistry
>Department.
> He has a bot set up so that any mention of his posts by me in
>alt.revisionism results in email to me.
> This is a form of harrassment. I expect it to stop immediately.
> I will pursue this as high as possible if it does not cease.
> I hope I am making myself clear. I will go to the accreditation
>board if necessary. I know what I am doing.
> I will send you all of the evidence needed upon request. I have no
>interest in flooding you at this time. But this will stop.
>—————————————————————
> Live fast, love well, and have a glorious Website.
> http://www2.combase.com/~mgiwer/ (page does not exist)
> Commentary from the right side of the curve
>Maintaining http://www2.combase.com/~mgiwer/tech/ (tips and tricks for webs) (page does not exist)
> http://www2.combase.com/~mgiwer/mgiwer4/ (eye candy, blantant advertising) (page does not exist)
> http://www2.combase.com/~matt/ (my son) (page does not exist)
>http://www2.combase.com/~matt/mega/ (for internet advertising) (page does not exist)
========
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: What a clever way to kill people
From: [email protected] (Matt Giwer)
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 21:48:00 GMT
“PAUL WALDMANN: In this small room [at Sachsenhausen] there was a slot
in the wall,
approximately 50 centimeters in length. The prisoner of war stood with
the back of his head
against the slot and a sniper shot at him from behind the slot. In
practice this arrangement did not
prove satisfactory, since the sniper often missed the prisoner. After 8
days a new arrangement
was made. The prisoner, as before, was placed against the wall; an iron
plate was then slowly
lowered onto his head. The prisoner was under the impression that he was
being measured for
height. The iron plate contained a ramrod which shot out suddenly and
poleaxed the prisoner with
a blow on the back of the head. He dropped dead. The iron plate was
operated by a foot lever in
a corner of the room. ”
IMT VII – p. 377.
Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!newsxfer.itd.
umich.edu!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!netnews.worldnet.att.
net!ix.netcom.com!news
From: [email protected] (Matt Giwer)
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.misc,alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Procmail Vrs. Giwer: Procmail 2, Giwer 0
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 20:33:13 GMT
Organization: images incarnate
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tam-fl6-06.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Jun 22 3:35:27 PM CDT 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: news.voyager.net news.admin.net-abuse.misc:55290 alt.revisionism:49760
