Session 067-02, Eichmann Adolf

Presiding Judge: I see only what it says here: “The annexed
copy is well worded to War Times Record selected pages from
Document 1553 PS.” Do you have anything to say about that?

Attorney General: We requested these three interrogations in
which there is some connection with the present trial, and
did not request anything else.

Presiding Judge: But is each one of these documents complete
in itself?

Attorney General: It is absolutely complete. It begins with
a certain date and comes to an end. And now, in the main
French statement (our document No. 185) dated 26 April 1945,
which Gerstein made to the two officers, he relates that on
8 June 1942, Guenther asked him to go to the Lublin zone.

Presiding Judge: But why is it in French? Did he make a
further statement that was recorded in French?

Attorney General: He typed it out on a typewriter. I even
have the confirmation of a priest in Rottweil that at the
time Gerstein used his typewriter, although he does not
identify the typewriter. Gerstein brought this material to
these two officers. He supplemented the statement with
handwritten remarks. The Court will notice that at the end
there appears a written deposition in French and,
thereafter, the last two pages are in English. All this was
handed over by Gerstein to these officers. They spoke with
him and submitted a report with this document annexed.

Presiding Judge: Was the entire statement in French
typewritten – only signed at the end? This is dated 26
April 1945.

Attorney General: It is dated 26 April 1945. It has an
appendix in handwriting.

Presiding Judge: But it is not in the right order here.

Attorney General: There is an invoice in the middle.

Presiding Judge: But this invoice was not submitted by him?

Attorney General: The invoice was made out to him.

Presiding Judge: But how did it get into the middle of the

Attorney General: He attached it to the batch of papers. He
also attached the other invoices to which he refers in his

Presiding Judge: So what does he say there?

Attorney General: He says that Guenther invited him to visit
the extermination camps in the Lublin zone.

Presiding Judge: I see that he mentions the name of Pastor
Niemoeller’s wife as a reference.

Attorney General: Yes, he supplied the names of people such
as Dibelius and Pastor Niemoeller, who would be able to
testify that he was an honest man, that he had always
belonged to the anti-Nazi underground, that his statements
were credible, and that he was not simply fabricating a
story. That was how he introduced himself to these two
officers. He says that Guenther asked him….

Presiding Judge: On what page is that?

Attorney General: It appears at the beginning of the
statement in French, on page 2:

“On 8 June 1942, SS Sturmbannfuehrer Guenther, of the
Head Office for Reich Security, came to my office. He
was in civilian clothes. I did not know him. He
instructed me to obtain one hundred kilograms of cyanic
acid (prussic acid) and to accompany it to a place
known only to the truck driver. We drove to the potash
works near Kolin. After loading the truck, we drove to
Lublin, in Poland.”

And here follows a long description of a visit to the
extermination camps and of conversations with Globocnik, a
description of the extermination at Belzec in the presence
of Gerstein, and in the course of this account it says:

“I must also add that SS Sturmbannfuehrer Guenther, of
the Head Office for Reich Security, asked me, at the
beginning of 1944, to supply a very large quantity of
cyanic acid for an obscure purpose. The acid to be
delivered to Berlin, Kurfuerstenstrasse, to his

Presiding Judge: On what page is that?

Attorney General: It is on page 4, in French.

“Il me faut encore ajouter que le SS Sturmbannfuehrer
Guenther du Reichssicherheitshauptamt demanda de moi,
le commencement 1944, de tres grandes fournitures
d’acide prussique pour un destin obscure.”

Hence, from the point of view of contact with the Accused,
it is clear that the connection existed. The Accused was
questioned about all the Gerstein material, and he answered
on two occasions. One of these appears on page 933, that
Guenther liked to become involved in matters which were not
his concern, and that he went into “some business with gas.”
On that, Eichmann says as follows: “At any rate, that was at
a time when I was not in Berlin – I think that he got
involved in some business with gas.” Less asks him: “You
referred to this, I believe it was when you were in
Hungary.” And he replies: “Yes, the Section was not
entitled to deal with that. How could I now bring this
before my chief? He would tell me to go to the devil.”
This was Eichmann’s answer when told that his Section was
dealing with the supply of gas.

Presiding Judge: Was he shown the documents?

Attorney General: Yes.

Presiding Judge: This reply came after he had been shown the

Attorney General: No. He was interrogated on this point
before he was shown the documents. He was shown the
documents later.

The weight of the verification of the document is very
substantial. We have the confirmation of persons who saw
Gerstein sign, we have the confirmation by his wife, we have
verification, a partial proof of the accuracy of the
contents through the certificate from the Swedish Foreign
Ministry. Having regard to all these, I ask the Court to
determine that the documents originating with Gerstein or
recorded from his oral statements have probative value, and
that the rules of evidence should be departed from, in order
to allow their submission. Perhaps I may add that the
Polish Commission also relied on the Gerstein material.

Judge Raveh: In what language was the original statement?

Attorney General: In French.

Judge Raveh: Here we have a German translation attached
which, in turn, has been translated from the English.

Attorney General: There was a French file of the
interrogation of Gerstein in Paris which has been lost. An
English translation was preserved, and that is the one that
was found in the files of the War Office, in the American
War Archives. They do not have the French original there –
they have the English translation. That is the document
that was preserved. From there, we obtained it in the form
in which it was preserved, namely in English. We re-
translated it into German, of course, for Defence Counsel.

Judge Raveh: No, this is apparently a translation into
German not made by you.

Attorney General: Yes. Apart from that, PS 1553 was already
translated into German at Nuremberg, since it was submitted
as one of the prosecution exhibits in the major trial.

Judge Raveh: And there it was translated from the English.

Attorney General: I believe that it was translated there,
either from the French or the English.

Judge Raveh: It says so, the attestation is by the
translator Leo Ratzersdorfer, dated 14 January 1947.

Attorney General: That is so. I thank Your Honour.

Judge Raveh: He does not state that specifically – he only
says that he knows English and German, but he does not say
from which language he made the translation.

Attorney General: One may assume the intention was to say
that he translated from English into German. To be
absolutely precise: In the major Nuremberg Trial, only the
invoices of the firm “Degesch” were submitted, and the Court
will find them in the 27th volume of the Blue Series, in the
German edition, on p. 340 and following pages. That is PS
1553. The affidavit was submitted in Case 1, the Doctors’

I have to add, further, that at Nuremberg they did not have
the authentications which we have – they did not have the
confirmations by the officers who questioned Gerstein and to
whom he made his statement. They did not have the widow’s
confirmation which we procured, since we attach much
importance to these documents and, therefore, we took the
trouble to secure the necessary verification.

Presiding Judge: Perhaps this affidavit was also printed in
the Green Series?

Attorney General: It was referred to there, Your Honour, but
I think that it was not printed in full. We ascertained
from Reitlinger the history of these documents and the
difficulties that arose at Nuremberg, because there it was
not proved that Gerstein was dead, and there was some doubt
whether it was possible to admit his affidavit. For this
reason, we endeavoured to ensure that when we came to submit
these documents we would have all the accompanying documents
and be able to rely on them.

Judge Raveh: In the German translation, in the concluding
portion there, if you look at the page before the last, page
15 of the sixteen pages, it ends there with the signature,
and that apparently corresponds to page 6 of the declaration
in French. In the German translation, there is an
additional passage which I do not see in French, and that is
where he mentions Guenther.

Attorney General: The Court should kindly note, if the Court
will please skip two pages and glance at the handwritten
part, beginning with the words “L’acide prussique,” the
cyanic acid was ordered – according to the attached note –
by the Head Office for Reich Security. This corresponds
exactly to the German translation which is before the Court.
I would ask you to examine our document No. 185 – and then
it will become clear. There are two separate documents –
the interrogation on the one hand, and the statement on the

Dr. Servatius: Your Honour, the Presiding Judge, I have
misgivings, or an objection, only as regards the so-called
interrogation, document No. 1553, dated 26 April 1945 at
Rottweil – that is in Alsace-Lorraine. In my humble
opinion, this was not the interrogation of a witness, but a
report which was submitted by Dr. Gerstein, a report which
he submitted in order, possibly, to justify himself. It
appears that this is a document where Dr. Gerstein seeks to
justify himself and asks that his actions be taken into
account in his favour. It should be further pointed out
that on page 10, he estimates the number of those
exterminated at twenty-five million.

Presiding Judge: In which paragraph of this statement?

Dr. Servatius: On page 10, in the middle. In fact, the
quotation, or rather the reference, is apparently to twenty-
five million exterminated persons. That is document No.

Presiding Judge: Have we received this, Mr. Hausner?

Attorney General: Yes. It will be found in the part in
French on the printed page 4. I shall, of course, reply
later on the merits of the matter; for the present, I only
wish to draw the Court’s attention to the passage in
question. It is the continuation of our No. 185 which is at
present before you but not yet marked, Gerstein’s French

Presiding Judge: Now let us see where there is mention of
the twenty-five million.

Dr. Servatius: On page 10, in the middle.

Presiding Judge: Dr. Servatius, you are taking this
apparently from the German translation; but is it also in
the French translation which is before us here?

Dr. Servatius: No. I presume that the item does not appear
before you in French, for you have before you only a
translation of the English translation.

Presiding Judge: But we have it here on page 4 of the French
translation as well.

Dr. Servatius: These were my reservations and objections to
this document. Likewise, I express my opposition to the
submission of the invoice of the “Degesch” company.
According to the impression which I have formed, these are
only duplicates of accounts which were supplied on behalf of
the “Degesch” company at Dr. Gerstein’s request.

Last-Modified: 1999/06/07