From [email protected] Thu Aug 1 16:43:18 PDT 1996
Article: 54858 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!newsreader.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: The Holocaust Cult and the EU
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 14:59:47 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 12
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:81313 alt.revisionism:54858 talk.politics.european-union:5176
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Silke-Maria Weineck) says:
>
>Ole Kreiberg ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>: In the USA there has been built a special holocaust museum in
>: spite of the fact that the American Jews have never suffered any
>: particular harm and have always been among the most well educated
>: and affluent.
“It is a shrewd saint who suffers by proxy.”
GFH
From [email protected] Sat Aug 3 07:03:02 PDT 1996
Article: 55078 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.censorship,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.russia,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.ernst-zundel
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.uoregon.edu!hunter.premier.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.ultranet.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!rain.fr!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: An Example Of Censorship By Copyright
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 1996 01:08:53 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <71e7cc$8302d[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.censorship:92826 soc.culture.german:81521 soc.culture.russian:20046 alt.revisionism:55078 alt.fan.ernst-zundel:2292
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (John Mark Ockerbloom) says:
>The fixed time period, though, could be as long as 75 years from
>publication (28 years for the first term, and then, if copyright
>was renewed, the renewal term was extended to last 47 more years).
>It’s been less than 75 years since MK was published, so I can’t say for
>sure whether it’s out of copyright in the US yet.
>
True, but add 28 to the date of publication and see if you think that
the copyright was renewed.
>There were American editions published before and during WW2, apparently
>meant as warnings to Americans of what Hitler’s goals and methods were.
>I suspect those were published on the theory that Hitler wasn’t going to be
>able to sue the US publishers, rather than because the book had landed in
>the public domain or because Hitler had given permission to reprint.
Another problem. I have a number of books published during W.W.II in
violation of German copyrights. “Copyright vested in the Alien Property
Custodian, 1944, pursuant to law.” What happened? Did the US give it
back? Check the National Archives.
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 08:13:03 PDT 1996
Article: 92826 of alt.censorship
Newsgroups: alt.censorship,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.russia,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.ernst-zundel
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.uoregon.edu!hunter.premier.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.ultranet.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!rain.fr!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: An Example Of Censorship By Copyright
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 1996 01:08:53 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <71e7cc$8302d[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.censorship:92826 soc.culture.german:81521 soc.culture.russian:20046 alt.revisionism:55078 alt.fan.ernst-zundel:2292
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (John Mark Ockerbloom) says:
>The fixed time period, though, could be as long as 75 years from
>publication (28 years for the first term, and then, if copyright
>was renewed, the renewal term was extended to last 47 more years).
>It’s been less than 75 years since MK was published, so I can’t say for
>sure whether it’s out of copyright in the US yet.
>
True, but add 28 to the date of publication and see if you think that
the copyright was renewed.
>There were American editions published before and during WW2, apparently
>meant as warnings to Americans of what Hitler’s goals and methods were.
>I suspect those were published on the theory that Hitler wasn’t going to be
>able to sue the US publishers, rather than because the book had landed in
>the public domain or because Hitler had given permission to reprint.
Another problem. I have a number of books published during W.W.II in
violation of German copyrights. “Copyright vested in the Alien Property
Custodian, 1944, pursuant to law.” What happened? Did the US give it
back? Check the National Archives.
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 08:20:16 PDT 1996
Article: 81280 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.british,soc.culture.tamil,soc.culture.french,soc.history.war.misc
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!portc01.blue.aol.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!news-e2a.gnn.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsreader.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-ana-24.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: ATLANTA BOMB
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 22:17:48 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected] <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:81280 soc.culture.usa:89560 soc.culture.british:112382 soc.culture.tamil:38709 soc.culture.french:65205 soc.history.war.misc:16138
In article <31ff93e9[email protected]>, [email protected] (E.F.Schelby) says:
>
>[email protected] (Frank Behrens) wrote:
>
>>McVeigh + Nichols…..
>>Are there any doubts about their guilt?
>
>In this country, individuals are presumed innocent until proven
>guilty. Elsewhere some seem to like it the other way around.
>
I, for one, doubt their guilt. I doubt the FBI physical evidence.
The FBI has a long history of fabricating physiacl evidence, going
back to the Lindberg Kidnapping. It seems that it is OK to admit
fabrication if the case is old. One of the reasons that the FBI lab
director was not a witness at the OJ trial was worries about
questions regarding fabrication of evidence.
It looks to me that the FBI took more volume out of Unibomber
cabin than there was room.
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 08:20:18 PDT 1996
Article: 81313 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!newsreader.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: The Holocaust Cult and the EU
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 14:59:47 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 12
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:81313 alt.revisionism:54858 talk.politics.european-union:5176
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Silke-Maria Weineck) says:
>
>Ole Kreiberg ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>: In the USA there has been built a special holocaust museum in
>: spite of the fact that the American Jews have never suffered any
>: particular harm and have always been among the most well educated
>: and affluent.
“It is a shrewd saint who suffers by proxy.”
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 08:20:18 PDT 1996
Article: 81470 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!noc.van.hookup.net!news.jumppoint.com!n2van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!winternet.com!nntp04.primenet.com!news.shkoo.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.cais.net!hunter.premier.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsfeed.randomc.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: i need a translation
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 1996 14:58:17 GMT
References: <1996Aug1.171740.144237@forest>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 7
In article <1996Aug1.171740.144237@forest>, [email protected] says:
>
>What does “Ein kusschen hat noch keinem geschadet” mean?
A little kiss does no harm.
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 08:20:19 PDT 1996
Article: 81521 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: alt.censorship,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.russia,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.ernst-zundel
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.uoregon.edu!hunter.premier.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.ultranet.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!rain.fr!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: An Example Of Censorship By Copyright
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 1996 01:08:53 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <71e7cc$8302d[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.censorship:92826 soc.culture.german:81521 soc.culture.russian:20046 alt.revisionism:55078 alt.fan.ernst-zundel:2292
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (John Mark Ockerbloom) says:
>The fixed time period, though, could be as long as 75 years from
>publication (28 years for the first term, and then, if copyright
>was renewed, the renewal term was extended to last 47 more years).
>It’s been less than 75 years since MK was published, so I can’t say for
>sure whether it’s out of copyright in the US yet.
>
True, but add 28 to the date of publication and see if you think that
the copyright was renewed.
>There were American editions published before and during WW2, apparently
>meant as warnings to Americans of what Hitler’s goals and methods were.
>I suspect those were published on the theory that Hitler wasn’t going to be
>able to sue the US publishers, rather than because the book had landed in
>the public domain or because Hitler had given permission to reprint.
Another problem. I have a number of books published during W.W.II in
violation of German copyrights. “Copyright vested in the Alien Property
Custodian, 1944, pursuant to law.” What happened? Did the US give it
back? Check the National Archives.
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 08:20:20 PDT 1996
Article: 81574 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!portc01.blue.aol.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Richters Anker Steinbaukasten
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 1996 01:32:28 GMT
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 4
If you are interested in Richter’s Anchor Stone Building Sets
check out the web site http://www.comet.net/personal/Georgeh/
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 22:46:40 PDT 1996
Article: 81667 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsreader.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Priebke
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 1996 13:59:39 GMT
References: <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 7
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Michael Cooperman) says:
>
>Why doesn’t someone just off him..
Priebke, a quite famous name. Well worth a little respect.
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 22:46:43 PDT 1996
Article: 81688 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!newsreader.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: + Heil Hitler +
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 1996 20:30:32 GMT
References: <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 18
In article <[email protected]>, Markus Stenger <[email protected]> says:
You make me sorry I can read German.
GFH
>
>Heil Hitler,
>
>an alle Kameraden in der Welt.
>
>Es gab niemals Konzentrationslager in Deutschland und in Polen.
>Das ist alles eine Erfindung der Englaender, der Amerikaner und
>der Russen.
>
>Nach dem zweiten Weltkrieg haben diese Siegermaechte die
>Konzentrationslager aufgebaut.
> <snip Save yourself the grief.>
From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 22:46:44 PDT 1996
Article: 81689 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!news.sgi.com!enews.sgi.com!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uwm.edu!news.nap.net!nntp04.primenet.com!news.shkoo.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.cais.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Rebuilding Germany after WWII
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 1996 20:41:31 GMT
References: <3202[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 36
>In article <[email protected]>,
> Robert Strauss <[email protected]> writes:
>
>|> My wife and I just returned from Germany and visited 12 of
>|> the major cities. Two things surprised us………….. the
>|> amount of destruction of civilian areas from indescriminant
>|> bombing during WWII, and secondly, how Germany was able to
>|> rebuild itself so quickly. We saw many, many buildings that
>|> had been rebuilt exactly as they had once stood. How did
>|> Germany have the money, manpower and materials to do this
>|> in such a short time?
Surprise yourself a little more. Talk to some of the people about
the years May 15, 1945 until 1949. find out just how *very* hard
the Americans, in particular, made even survival, much less
rebuilding. True, after 1949, we needed a reliable European
ally, and Germany was the only real choice — read French and
British history on that era (would you trust De Gaulle?). The
Marshall Plan was a great help but not one tenth that of German
determination.
If you were surprised that the Allies (British even more than
US) bombed civilians for the “sport of it”, you have even bigger
surprises in store.
And, you know, we are proud of that record. Just two years ago
I read in a major history magazine about how the writer was in
a Nuremberg caffee, looking at the 40 year old waitress and
reflecting (with pleasure, nor sorrow) on how 45 years ago
shw would have been making her living as a prostitute to feed
her family — the US Army (Ike) left no other option.
GFH
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 22:46:44 PDT 1996
Article: 81690 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!newsreader.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Schwabinchen?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 1996 20:44:41 GMT
References: <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 9
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Schmidt116) says:
>
>Can some one tell me the meaning or derivation of the word
>schwabinchen?
Are you sure of the spelling? The word looks to me like it
means a “little girl from the Schwabe section of Germany”.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 5 12:08:03 PDT 1996
Article: 2292 of alt.fan.ernst-zundel
Newsgroups: alt.censorship,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.russia,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.ernst-zundel
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.uoregon.edu!hunter.premier.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.ultranet.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!rain.fr!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: An Example Of Censorship By Copyright
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 1996 01:08:53 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <71e7cc$8302d[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.censorship:92826 soc.culture.german:81521 soc.culture.russian:20046 alt.revisionism:55078 alt.fan.ernst-zundel:2292
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (John Mark Ockerbloom) says:
>The fixed time period, though, could be as long as 75 years from
>publication (28 years for the first term, and then, if copyright
>was renewed, the renewal term was extended to last 47 more years).
>It’s been less than 75 years since MK was published, so I can’t say for
>sure whether it’s out of copyright in the US yet.
>
True, but add 28 to the date of publication and see if you think that
the copyright was renewed.
>There were American editions published before and during WW2, apparently
>meant as warnings to Americans of what Hitler’s goals and methods were.
>I suspect those were published on the theory that Hitler wasn’t going to be
>able to sue the US publishers, rather than because the book had landed in
>the public domain or because Hitler had given permission to reprint.
Another problem. I have a number of books published during W.W.II in
violation of German copyrights. “Copyright vested in the Alien Property
Custodian, 1944, pursuant to law.” What happened? Did the US give it
back? Check the National Archives.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 5 12:13:36 PDT 1996
Article: 81715 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!newsreader.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-10.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: + Heil Hitler +
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 1996 01:06:42 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 17
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Arthur Teschler) says:
>
>On Sun, 04 Aug 1996 16:52:56 +0200 Markus Stenger ([email protected]) wrote:
>: Heil Hitler,
>
>…
>
>Hallo Markus,
>
>bei deiner naechsten Internet Sitzung loggst Du Dich besser
>anschliessend aus. Sonst bist Du Deinen account vielleicht
>schneller los als Dir lieb ist.
I do not approve of censorship. Just let him write his
ridiculous comments. He hurts no one but himself.
GFH
From [email protected] Wed Aug 7 17:46:26 PDT 1996
Article: 81869 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.wildstar.net!news.sdsmt.edu!news.mid.net!newsfeeder.gi.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Rebuilding Germany after WWII
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1996 01:33:45 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <craig.839272370@gonix>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 17
Robert Strauss <[email protected]> writes:
>My wife and I just returned from Germany and visited 12 of the major
>cities. Two things surprised us………….. the amount of destruction
>of civilian areas from indescriminant bombing during WWII, and secondly,
>how Germany was able to rebuild itself so quickly. We saw many, many
>buildings that had been rebuilt exactly as they had once stood. How did
>Germany have the money, manpower and materials to do this in such a
>short time.
I have sat in brick houses which are made of brick from the original
house, which was bombed out. The wife (yes, wife) savaged each brick,
removed the mortar and got them ready for rebuilding. In other
words, a lot of hard work pain and suffering.
GFH
From [email protected] Wed Aug 7 17:46:29 PDT 1996
Article: 81978 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!laslo.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: HELP: Needed German Translation to English
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 1996 04:01:28 GMT
References: <4u7uvs$[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 16
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
(MBorkowski) says:
>
> “Nicht schlect, aber wo ist das ‘ess-zet’ auf dieser americanischen
> Tastatur? Ohne das “Schwanzchen” am B kann man nicht philosophieren!”
>
>Not bad, but where is the ‘ess-zet’ on this American keyboard? Without
>the little tail on the B, one cannot philosophize!
>
OK, now we know that this German sentence is some sort of a school
test. Let’s forget it. OK?
<Alt> 225
GFH
From [email protected] Thu Aug 8 18:53:39 PDT 1996
Article: 82189 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,sci.lang.translation
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!noc.van.hookup.net!news.jumppoint.com!n2van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!n1van.istar!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!info.ucla.edu!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: HELP: Needed German Translation to English
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 22:28:27 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82189 sci.lang.translation:2411
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Robert) says:
>
>[email protected] (Kurt Thomas) wrote:
>>Here’s a suggestion:
>
>>”Not bad, but where’s the ß on this American keyboard ?
>>[You] Can’t philosophize without its little tail.”
>
>not “you” but: ONE can not philosophize without that little tail
>at the B” (meaning the this letter ”
Sadly, it is common American English to use “you” when the
correct word is “one”. My ninth grade teacher cured her
whole class of this bad habit by immediately interrupting
with: “No, I don’t.”
In the sense of common usage, “you” is not wrong.
GFH
From [email protected] Fri Aug 9 08:02:02 PDT 1996
Article: 55972 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!in-news.erinet.com!bug.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!olivea!news.sgi.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: The Holocaust Cult and the EU
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 14:30:46 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 10
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82206 alt.revisionism:55972 talk.politics.european-union:5385
In article <4tr8k4$[email protected]>, [email protected] (Derek Bell) says:
>
> Because art doesn’t neccessarily have to represent the
>truth, while a Holocaust museum displays the truth about
>the Holocaust. (I.e. that it happened.)
The one in the USA leaves out all mention of Russians and Poles,
just covering Jews and gypsies. Yes, history, but edited history.
GFH
From [email protected] Fri Aug 9 10:09:53 PDT 1996
Article: 82230 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: sci.lang.translation,soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Help: What is a Quilting Bee?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 22:37:00 GMT
References: <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 19
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca sci.lang.translation:2414 soc.culture.german:82230
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Gerrit Gohlke) says:
>
>Is anyone here, who can answer a short question?
>
>I try to translate the term “quilting bee” into German. I know
>that a bee is something like a social meeting. The Collins
>Dictionary says about “bee”: “a social gathering for a specific
>purpose, as to carry out a communal task or hold competitions
…” and adds: “quilting bee”. The term “quilting bee” seems to
>be so widespread and famous that it’s suitable as an explanation
>for bee – but I never heard of it.
>
>Can aynone explain the meaning of that “social gathering”?
Yes, women get together to make quilts. Why? A good
opportunity to talk, and to share colored scraps of material
to make the desired patterns.
GFH
From [email protected] Fri Aug 9 10:18:10 PDT 1996
Article: 426064 of talk.politics.misc
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.usa,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.usa
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!gatech!news.atl.bellsouth.net!news.mindlink.net!uniserve!n2van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!winternet.com!mr.net!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Why America is the best!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 03:42:01 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <azzy-0[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:351280 soc.culture.canada:96195 soc.culture.usa:90182 talk.politics.misc:426064 alt.politics.libertarian:193657 alt.politics.democrats.d:104402
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Bill Franke) says:
>
>Azagthoth ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>: No, it’s “there” and it’s “a myriad of” since myriad is an adjective.
>
>”Myriad” is NOT and adjective in the phrase “a myriad of,” it’s a noun.
Like many other words, “myriad” is either a noun or an adjective,
depending on how it is used.
Is “building” a noun? an inflected verb? an adjective?
You guys have too much time on your hands.
GFH
From [email protected] Fri Aug 9 10:45:12 PDT 1996
Article: 96195 of soc.culture.canada
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.usa,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.usa
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!gatech!news.atl.bellsouth.net!news.mindlink.net!uniserve!n2van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!winternet.com!mr.net!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Why America is the best!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 03:42:01 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <azzy-0[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:351280 soc.culture.canada:96195 soc.culture.usa:90182 talk.politics.misc:426064 alt.politics.libertarian:193657 alt.politics.democrats.d:104402
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Bill Franke) says:
>
>Azagthoth ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>: No, it’s “there” and it’s “a myriad of” since myriad is an adjective.
>
>”Myriad” is NOT and adjective in the phrase “a myriad of,” it’s a noun.
Like many other words, “myriad” is either a noun or an adjective,
depending on how it is used.
Is “building” a noun? an inflected verb? an adjective?
You guys have too much time on your hands.
GFH
From [email protected] Fri Aug 9 13:44:26 PDT 1996
Article: 56095 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.internetMCI.com!pull-feed.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: The Holocaust Cult and the EU
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 03:19:59 GMT
References: <skok-170796104[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82257 alt.revisionism:56095 talk.politics.european-union:5396
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (william c anderson) says:
>From the Mission Statement of the United States Holocaust Memorial
>Museum:
>
>” Jews were the primary victims–six million were murdered; Gypsies,
> the handicapped, and Poles were also targeted for destruction
> or decimation for racial, ethnic, or national reasons. Millions more,
> including homosexuals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Soviet prisoners of war,
> and political dissidents also suffered grievous oppression and
> death under Nazi tyranny.”
>
I suggest that you compare the Mission Statement with the numbers:
6,000,000 Jews
5,000,000 Russians (non-Jews)
2,000,000 Poles (non-Jews)
500,000 Gypsies
500,000 Others.
You will see that the numbers reflect many more Poles and Russians
then Gypsies, but Gypsies were mentioned second. And Russians
were not really mentioned at all, considerting, by these numbers
they totaled 35%, plus Russian Jews.
GFH
From [email protected] Sat Aug 10 09:52:53 PDT 1996
Article: 56264 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!noc.van.hookup.net!news.jumppoint.com!n2van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!uniserve!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!info.ucla.edu!agate!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: The Holocaust Cult and the EU
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 03:53:18 GMT
References: <4ufp1m$k2c@lendl.cc.emory.edu> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 23
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82341 alt.revisionism:56264 talk.politics.european-union:5420
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Ehrlich606) says:
>Just curious, but what is the source of your stats? The History
>of the Great Patriotic War (the Soviet version of WW2, out in
>the ’60’s and ’70’s) mentioned in one place *20,000,000 casualties
>of Fascist Agression* or something like that, of which historians
>have usually taken about a third (7.5 million) as battle deaths.
>I don’t think this latter number takes into account the 3.5
>million Soviet POWs who died in German custody, most of them in
>the winter of 1941-42. [BTW, for comparison, I think the Germans
>ended up with cca. 2 million dead, and 1 million missing for the
>entire war — these are military losses only.]
I think that overall the W.W.II losses were about 50 to 55 million.
Roughly 50% were Russians. German losses were about 5 to 6 million,
about somewhat less than 1 million due to Allied bombing, about
2.5 million civilian dead due to the USSR in the east, the rest
military, mostly on the eastern front.
Add the 9 million Holocaust victims (deducting the 5 million
Russians to avoid double counting).
GFH
From [email protected] Sat Aug 10 18:49:27 PDT 1996
Article: 56349 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!noc.van.hookup.net!news.bctel.net!news.internetMCI.com!imci5!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: The Holocaust Cult and the EU
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 14:41:20 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 11
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82385 alt.revisionism:56349 talk.politics.european-union:5436
In article <320B4[email protected]>, Alec Grynspan <[email protected]> says:
>
>The Holocaust Museum is about that – so Gypsies get a second
>position by numbers.
>
You have stumbled on the truth. The Holocaust Museum is not
about Holocaust deaths, but a political agenda.
GFH
From [email protected] Sat Aug 10 23:36:50 PDT 1996
Article: 56406 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!portc01.blue.aol.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Holocaust revisionism
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 21:53:42 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <yUu0oOev1 <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 12
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82411 alt.revisionism:56406
In article <320bd0a3.4659318@news.inetport.com>, [email protected] (Mike Curtis) says:
>
>[email protected] (Ole Kreiberg) wrote:
>
>It really doesn’t matter what you write about the manuals. You must
>realize that the manuals are written for using Zyklon as a fumigant
>and not as a murder weapon aimed at humans. Geeze.
I just looked at the manual with my revolver. It, too, does
not suggest it can be used as a murder weapon.
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 11 08:59:05 PDT 1996
Article: 82393 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: talk.politics.european-union,bit.listserv.slovak-l,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.nordic,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.esperanto,sci.lang
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!portc01.blue.aol.com!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Concerning the number of esperantists
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 21:51:45 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 29
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.european-union:5439 bit.listserv.slovak-l:5279 soc.culture.europe:46979 soc.culture.nordic:46654 soc.culture.german:82393 soc.culture.esperanto:16473 sci.lang:26588
In article <4uifob$d[email protected]>, [email protected] (Simon Buck) says:
>
>Ysgrifennodd Uzulo ([email protected]):
>
> >>
>The purpose of an international language is to enhance
>communication amongst peoples of the world, and to that end, it
>would help for “the” international language to be considerably
>easier than English to learn or understand. Yes, many people
>throughout the world communicate in English now (although many at
>varying degrees of substandard quality), <<snip>>
That is the great advantage of English (or is it English
speakers). No matter how poorly they speak English, or
how poorly they pronounce it or how bad the grammar, it
seems that the English speaker will understand. Just try
to speak French that badly in France!
My German is very bad. It works well in the former DDR, where
it is the only medium of communications. But in the older
Länder, I must speak English, as those Germans expect the
grammar to be accurate, the gender of nouns known, etc.
I have no idea why English has this unique factor, being
useful when very poorly spoken. But I don’t think that
any artificially constructed language will have the same
virtue.
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 11 08:59:09 PDT 1996
Article: 82405 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: talk.politics.european-union,bit.listserv.slovak-l,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.nordic,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.esperanto,sci.lang
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Design of an International Auxillary Language (IAL)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 21:43:43 GMT
References: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960729114728.26456C-100000@rask> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <3204F7F <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 10
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.european-union:5442 bit.listserv.slovak-l:5281 soc.culture.europe:46982 soc.culture.nordic:46657 soc.culture.german:82405 soc.culture.esperanto:16475 sci.lang:26590
But the hard facts are that 1 out of 3 people in the world
speek English or are learning English as a second language.
Yes, there are many things wrong with English. For simplicity
of construction Japanese is better; for spelling and grammar,
German is better. But, like it or not, English is the world’s
language. French could have been, but lost its opportunity.
I am still not sure why.
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 11 11:33:29 PDT 1996
Article: 56485 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: The Holocaust Cult and the EU
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 13:50:27 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82425 alt.revisionism:56485 talk.politics.european-union:5448
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (william c anderson) says:
>
>George F. Hardy ([email protected]) wrote:
>: In article <320B4[email protected]>, Alec Grynspan <[email protected]> says:
>:
>: >
>: >The Holocaust Museum is about that – so Gypsies get a second
>: >position by numbers.
>: >
>:
>: You have stumbled on the truth. The Holocaust Museum is not
>: about Holocaust deaths, but a political agenda.
>
>No–it’s about Holocaust deaths. It’s not about WWII combat deaths
>and civilian casualties of the war. That fact does not disparage
>those deaths–they just aren’t the subject of the museum.
According to German records, slightly more non Jewish Poles died
in Auschwitz than Jewish. The 14 million Holocaust deaths does
not include combat deaths or civilian casualties (collateral
damage).
GFH
From [email protected] Sun Aug 11 21:46:50 PDT 1996
Article: 56714 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!swrinde!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Provide the “records,” Mr. Hardy!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 01:05:23 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]> <8b7cc$8321[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82486 alt.revisionism:56714 talk.politics.european-union:5468
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Ken McVay OBC) says:
>
>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] (George F. Hardy) wrote:
>
>>According to German records, slightly more non Jewish Poles died
>>in Auschwitz than Jewish. The 14 million Holocaust deaths does
>>not include combat deaths or civilian casualties (collateral
>>damage).
>
>I believe the appropriate scholastic response to this assertion is
>”bullshit.”
>
>However, since you have made the claim, it is only reasonable
>to ask you to support it. Please provide these “German
>records” that state that more non-Jewish Poles died at
>Auschwitz than Jewish. First, however, define “Jewish.”
>
>Do you mean “Polish Jews” or “all Jews?”
I’ll look up the numbers. “Poles” are non-Jewish. And Polish
Jew is counted as a Jew, not a pole. As I remember the numbers,
the correct numbers are about 375,000 Jews and 385,000 Poles.
But I’ll find the numbers within two days.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 12 09:58:58 PDT 1996
Article: 82484 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: rec.travel.europe,soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!info.ucla.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!swrinde!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Going to Germany for a year-what clothes to bring?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 01:08:17 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 10
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca rec.travel.europe:29972 soc.culture.german:82484
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Wolfgang Schwanke) says:
>Perhaps you might consider dying your hair purple.
>
Really true. Every time I go to Germany I am impressed with the
hair color. It looks like a very bad lot of dye, sold to
people who want to be “mod”.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 12 09:58:59 PDT 1996
Article: 82486 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!swrinde!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Provide the “records,” Mr. Hardy!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 01:05:23 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]> <8b7cc$8321[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82486 alt.revisionism:56714 talk.politics.european-union:5468
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Ken McVay OBC) says:
>
>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] (George F. Hardy) wrote:
>
>>According to German records, slightly more non Jewish Poles died
>>in Auschwitz than Jewish. The 14 million Holocaust deaths does
>>not include combat deaths or civilian casualties (collateral
>>damage).
>
>I believe the appropriate scholastic response to this assertion is
>”bullshit.”
>
>However, since you have made the claim, it is only reasonable
>to ask you to support it. Please provide these “German
>records” that state that more non-Jewish Poles died at
>Auschwitz than Jewish. First, however, define “Jewish.”
>
>Do you mean “Polish Jews” or “all Jews?”
I’ll look up the numbers. “Poles” are non-Jewish. And Polish
Jew is counted as a Jew, not a pole. As I remember the numbers,
the correct numbers are about 375,000 Jews and 385,000 Poles.
But I’ll find the numbers within two days.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 12 09:59:00 PDT 1996
Article: 82559 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!info.ucla.edu!agate!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Provide the “records,” Mr. Hardy!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:32:03 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]> <8b7cc$8321[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82559 alt.revisionism:56860 talk.politics.european-union:5487
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Ken McVay OBC) says:
>
>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] (George F. Hardy) wrote:
>
>>According to German records, slightly more non Jewish Poles died
>>in Auschwitz than Jewish. The 14 million Holocaust deaths does
>>not include combat deaths or civilian casualties (collateral
>>damage).
>
>I believe the appropriate scholastic response to this assertion is
>”bullshit.”
>
>However, since you have made the claim, it is only reasonable
>to ask you to support it. Please provide these “German
>records” that state that more non-Jewish Poles died at
>Auschwitz than Jewish. First, however, define “Jewish.”
>
>Do you mean “Polish Jews” or “all Jews?”
I have not found Auschwitz yet, but did find Majdanek.
Deaths: 140,000 Jews; 220,000 Christians
274,000 Poles; 86, non-Poles (over 50 countries
represented).
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 12 09:59:01 PDT 1996
Article: 82560 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: talk.politics.european-union,bit.listserv.slovak-l,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.nordic,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.esperanto,sci.lang
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!info.ucla.edu!drivel.ics.uci.edu!csulb.edu!newshub.csu.net!usc!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Concerning the number of esperantists
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:47:56 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected] <[email protected]>
Organization: self
Lines: 42
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.european-union:5488 bit.listserv.slovak-l:5305 soc.culture.europe:47028 soc.culture.nordic:46699 soc.culture.german:82560 soc.culture.esperanto:16501 sci.lang:26622
In article <4ulrdh$[email protected]>, [email protected] (Don HARLOW) says:
>>I remember using the tourist information centre at the Gare de Lyon in
>>Paris about 5 years ago, and the man there made no effort whatsoever to
>>understand my rusty French.
>
>While my own experience with French is a couple of decades out of
>date, I have always had the impression from it that the French (for
>whatever reason) invariably get a bad rap when it comes to language.
>Of the three weeks I spent in France on two different auto trips
>through the country, I _never_ met a Frenchman (or -woman) who failed
>to struggle hard to be helpful, friendly, and to understand my one
>year of high-school French. (This despite the fact that I couldn’t
>understand anything _they_ said, having no ear for the language; my
>wife, who couldn’t speak the language, _did_ have such an ear, so we
>always ended up having three-way conversations.)
>
>I never did visit Paris, however — in fact, I studiously avoided the
>place — so perhaps the generalization about the French people and the
>French language is true within this geographically restricted part of
>France.
You did not have to write this last paragraph. On my last trip
to France I tried my ‘French’ — high school, 40 years ago, no
further use. I did OK outside of Paris, in the south, Jarnac and
Bordeau. I thought I was really doing well. But in Paris they
acted like I was speaking some totally unknown language.
While that may be just Paris, Paris does tend to represent France.
As to English, I often have to take a few minutes to accustom my
ear to odd pronunciations. But these odd pronunciations can be
found in England, among native English speakers. Thus it is
probably reasonable to say that odd pronunciation is part of
English. And yes, I have often found written communications
impossible to understand when I could communicate with the person
himself in English. Trying to be formal and polite in written
correspondence, using a dictionary to find a word, etc., all
results in very odd English. Consider Merriam Webster’s
first definiton of “hide” — 120 acres (50 hectars) of land.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 12 14:02:58 PDT 1996
Article: 82484 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: rec.travel.europe,soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!info.ucla.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!swrinde!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Going to Germany for a year-what clothes to bring?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 01:08:17 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 10
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca rec.travel.europe:29972 soc.culture.german:82484
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Wolfgang Schwanke) says:
>Perhaps you might consider dying your hair purple.
>
Really true. Every time I go to Germany I am impressed with the
hair color. It looks like a very bad lot of dye, sold to
people who want to be “mod”.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 12 14:03:00 PDT 1996
Article: 82560 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: talk.politics.european-union,bit.listserv.slovak-l,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.nordic,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.esperanto,sci.lang
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!info.ucla.edu!drivel.ics.uci.edu!csulb.edu!newshub.csu.net!usc!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Concerning the number of esperantists
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:47:56 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected] <[email protected]>
Organization: self
Lines: 42
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.european-union:5488 bit.listserv.slovak-l:5305 soc.culture.europe:47028 soc.culture.nordic:46699 soc.culture.german:82560 soc.culture.esperanto:16501 sci.lang:26622
In article <4ulrdh$[email protected]>, [email protected] (Don HARLOW) says:
>>I remember using the tourist information centre at the Gare de Lyon in
>>Paris about 5 years ago, and the man there made no effort whatsoever to
>>understand my rusty French.
>
>While my own experience with French is a couple of decades out of
>date, I have always had the impression from it that the French (for
>whatever reason) invariably get a bad rap when it comes to language.
>Of the three weeks I spent in France on two different auto trips
>through the country, I _never_ met a Frenchman (or -woman) who failed
>to struggle hard to be helpful, friendly, and to understand my one
>year of high-school French. (This despite the fact that I couldn’t
>understand anything _they_ said, having no ear for the language; my
>wife, who couldn’t speak the language, _did_ have such an ear, so we
>always ended up having three-way conversations.)
>
>I never did visit Paris, however — in fact, I studiously avoided the
>place — so perhaps the generalization about the French people and the
>French language is true within this geographically restricted part of
>France.
You did not have to write this last paragraph. On my last trip
to France I tried my ‘French’ — high school, 40 years ago, no
further use. I did OK outside of Paris, in the south, Jarnac and
Bordeau. I thought I was really doing well. But in Paris they
acted like I was speaking some totally unknown language.
While that may be just Paris, Paris does tend to represent France.
As to English, I often have to take a few minutes to accustom my
ear to odd pronunciations. But these odd pronunciations can be
found in England, among native English speakers. Thus it is
probably reasonable to say that odd pronunciation is part of
English. And yes, I have often found written communications
impossible to understand when I could communicate with the person
himself in English. Trying to be formal and polite in written
correspondence, using a dictionary to find a word, etc., all
results in very odd English. Consider Merriam Webster’s
first definiton of “hide” — 120 acres (50 hectars) of land.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 12 14:03:00 PDT 1996
Article: 82584 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!portc01.blue.aol.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Provide the “records,” Mr. Hardy!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 19:24:42 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <4ula04$ekg@nizkor. <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 17
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82584 alt.revisionism:56908 talk.politics.european-union:5499
Camp Jews Poles
Auschwitz 205,000 137,000
Majdanek 140,000 220,000
Total 345,000 357,000
Of course the ‘modern’ Auschwitz numbers have increased the Jewish
deaths by a factor of over 400%, and a ‘token’ increase of
Polish deaths of 9%. I do realize that the current claim is that
the Germans were poor (and inaccurate) record keepers.
Please understand my point. I am not challenging 6,000,000 Jews,
I am pointing out the disparity between the attention given one
group of 6,000,000 and a second groups of 500,000, while virtually
ignoring two other groups of 5,000,000 and 2,000,000.
GFH
From [email protected] Tue Aug 13 16:44:05 PDT 1996
Article: 57140 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!nntp.teleport.com!psgrain!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news.sgi.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Holocaust revisionism
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 14:36:14 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <yUu0oOev1 <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 26
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82719 alt.revisionism:57140
In article <320fbf8e.1238523@news.inetport.com>, [email protected] (Mike Curtis) says:
>
>[email protected] (George F. Hardy) wrote:
>
>>In article <320bd0a3.4659318@news.inetport.com>, [email protected] (Mike Curtis) says:
>>>
>>>[email protected] (Ole Kreiberg) wrote:
>>>
>>>It really doesn’t matter what you write about the manuals. You must
>>>realize that the manuals are written for using Zyklon as a fumigant
>>>and not as a murder weapon aimed at humans. Geeze.
>>
>>I just looked at the manual with my revolver. It, too, does
>>not suggest it can be used as a murder weapon.
>>
>
>Ah, but it can. All it takes is a will and a mind to do it. The
>Germans had a will and to mind to use what they obviously used. It
>just goes to show that not many people are concerned with using things
>properly.
That was my point. Just because the manual does not describe
a use, that does not mean that such a use is either unusual or
unanticipated.
GFH
From [email protected] Thu Aug 15 07:49:45 PDT 1996
Article: 57471 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!laslo.netnet.net!en.com!in-news.erinet.com!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!nntp.wwwi.com!nntp04.primenet.com!news.shkoo.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.cais.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!news.sgi.com!news-out.microserve.net!news-in.microserve.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Provide the “records,” Mr. Hardy!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 23:09:50 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <YDY$nO <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <4ula04$ekg@nizkor. <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 17
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82889 alt.revisionism:57471 talk.politics.european-union:5613
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Matt Giwer) says:
>
>On Mon, 12 Aug 1996 19:24:42 GMT, [email protected] (George
>F. Hardy) wrote:
>
>>Camp Jews Poles
>>Auschwitz 205,000 137,000
>>Majdanek 140,000 220,000
>>Total 345,000 357,000
>
> You do realize that if you stick your sources and refuse to accept
>theirs the name called and the harrassment will start.
Which camp are you asking about?
GFH
From [email protected] Thu Aug 15 10:48:45 PDT 1996
Article: 82827 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: sci.lang,soc.culture.french,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.belgium,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.quebec,alt.letzebuerger,fr.misc.droit,talk.po
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.total.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!sunqbc.risq.net!imp.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!warwick!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news.mathworks.com!enews.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!news-out.microserve.net!news-in.microserve.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Why is France systematically excluded?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 14:10:50 GMT
References: <3210EE7F[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 18
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca sci.lang:26734 soc.culture.french:65429 soc.culture.german:82827 soc.culture.belgium:16237 soc.culture.swiss:6142 soc.culture.quebec:20802
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Florent Faessel) says:
>
>Roger Thijs <[email protected]> wrote (écrivait) :
>
>> Newsgroups: de.etc.sprache.deutsch, nl.taal,sci.lang, soc.culture.french,
>> soc.culture.german, soc.culture.belgium, soc.culture.netherlands,
>> soc.culture.swiss, soc.culture.quebec, alt.letzebuerger, fr.misc.droit,
>> talk.politics.european-union,fr.soc.divers
>> Subject: Why is France systematically excluded?
>
> Une fois de plus, le viel adage
>”Plus le message est crossposte, moins le message presente d’interet” se
>verifie, et de facon magistrale encore.
> Comme quoi, quand on n’a rien a dire il faut le faire savoir.
Now you know.
GFH
From [email protected] Thu Aug 15 13:37:12 PDT 1996
Article: 57564 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.european-union
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!inx3.inx.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-fw-12.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Provide the “records,” Mr. Hardy!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 13:58:53 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <4ula04$ekg@nizkor. <[email protected]> <8c7[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.german:82919 alt.revisionism:57564 talk.politics.european-union:5624
In article <Dw1qKz.[email protected]>, [email protected] (Daniel Keren) says:
>
>[Followup = alt.revisionism]
>
>[email protected] (George F. Hardy) writes:
>
># Camp Jews Poles
># Auschwitz 205,000 137,000
>
>Perhaps you’ll explain where you dug these figures from.
Which camp are you asking about? I have posted this question
before, and it seems that posters like you just don’t read.
GFH
From [email protected] Thu Aug 15 22:34:38 PDT 1996
Article: 82923 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!aldehyde.netone.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-fw-12.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Arbeitsdienst
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 14:03:07 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 5
The Arbeitsdienst that I am familiar with was a Nazi era program
not unlike JFK’s Peace Corps or FDR’s CCC. They built public
works, like water distribution, roads and flood control.
GFH
From [email protected] Fri Aug 16 10:16:56 PDT 1996
Article: 82970 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.internetMCI.com!imci5!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!aldehyde.netone.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-fw-12.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Gemeinschafthaus (?)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 19:19:21 GMT
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 8
I am interested in how this name ‘sounds’ to a German ear.
I saw this sign on a house and my wife asked what it meant.
My immediate reaction was ‘whore house’ or ‘sex house’. OK,
I can come up with ‘community house’ or some sort of ‘co-
operative house’, but it seemed to me that there were safer
ways of communicating a non-sexual concept.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 19 18:27:18 PDT 1996
Article: 83112 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!van-bc!n1van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!news-w.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!chi-news.cic.net!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!nntp04.primenet.com!news.shkoo.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.asu.edu!ennfs.eas.asu.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.intercall.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-pen-4.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: The Double “S” character
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 16:18:48 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 25
In article <peter-130896094501000[email protected]>, [email protected] (Peter Alfke) says:
>
>German spelling is far more phonetic than English.
Very true.
>Yes, Finnish and Italian are even more phonetic, but the
>English language “froze” spelling early, then evolved
>pronounciation considerably, so that English and
>American children now have to learn the spelling of most words as a
>separate entity from the pronounciation.
Not exactly. English spelling was frozen in the early 19th
century, primarily due to the efforts of Daniel Webster.
English is hard to spell because 1) foreign words are absorbed
along with their spelling and pronunciation (“Beaufort” may be
bUfort or bOfort) 2) written English is a somewhat separate
language from spoken English (“sign” is spelled the way it is
because it comes from a longer word “signiture”. The written
word has a life of its own). There have been a number of
efforts to simplify English spelling. Only a very few of
the ‘corrections’ have been adopted.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 26 16:11:29 PDT 1996
Article: 83962 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.nordic,soc.culture.german,sci.lang
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!news.miracle.net!newsfeed.randomc.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Phrasal Verbs vs. German verbs with separable prefixes (Was: Esperanto -n ending)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 14:41:26 GMT
References: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960729114728.26456C-100000@rask> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <4v25a7$omt@news <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 15
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.nordic:46915 soc.culture.german:83962 sci.lang:26932
In article <[email protected]>, sebastiano hartviga <[email protected]> says:
>
>
>christian weisgerber:
>
>> “umfahren”
>> -> inseparable “er umfaehrt” to drive around s.th., to bypass
>> -> separable “er faehrt um” to run over with a car
>
>er umfährt die taube. er fährt um die taube. er fährt die taube um. er fährt
>um die taube herum.
These four sentences make an excellent examination question. 🙂
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 26 16:11:31 PDT 1996
Article: 83963 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: de.etc.sprache.deutsch,nl.taal,sci.lang,soc.culture.french,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.belgium,soc.culture.netherlands,soc.culture.swiss,so
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.wat.hookup.net!hookup!news.miracle.net!newsfeed.randomc.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Why is France systematically excluded?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 1996 00:42:59 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <danpop.840199887@news. <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 25
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca sci.lang:26933 soc.culture.french:65571 soc.culture.german:83963 soc.culture.belgium:16357 soc.culture.netherlands:41252 soc.culture.swiss:6255
In article <sourisDwnw[email protected]>, [email protected] (Henry Hillbrath) says:
>
>[email protected] (Murray Kastner) writes:
>
>[snip]
>
>>Some may not be aware of it but we in North America came very close to
>>German as the lingua franca.
>
>There is a very often repeated myth that German was rejected at the
>”official language” of the U. S. by a single vote. But, it is a myth,
>and has been much discussed (beaten to death) in the urban legend group.
Sure, first, there is no “official” language in the USA. There
is much discussion whether there should be one — and a few ‘not
politically correct’ idiots even suggest it should be English.
Second, the major German immigration came after the establishment
of the USA. The major “minority” at the time of the Revolution
was Scotch-Irish (known today as Northern Irish Protestants).
Germans came in the 19th century, except for a few Hessians who
didn’t go home after the Revolution.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 26 16:11:31 PDT 1996
Article: 83964 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: de.etc.sprache.deutsch,nl.taal,sci.lang,soc.culture.french,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.belgium,soc.culture.netherlands,soc.culture.swiss,so
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!loki.tor.hookup.net!nic.ott.hookup.net!hookup!news.miracle.net!newsfeed.randomc.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Why is France systematically excluded?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 1996 00:37:29 GMT
References: <> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> < <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 13
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca sci.lang:26934 soc.culture.french:65572 soc.culture.german:83964 soc.culture.belgium:16358 soc.culture.netherlands:41253 soc.culture.swiss:6256
In article <da[email protected]>, [email protected] (Dan Pop) says:
>
>In <4vk4f6$d[email protected]> [email protected] (Jon Mosar) writes:
>
>>who ever said that the common net-language is english ??????
>
>Please enlighten us, what is the common language on the net?
Common, as in “every day” and “used by most”. Absolutely,
English is the “common” language of the Net, and, in fact,
the world’s international discussions.
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 26 16:11:32 PDT 1996
Article: 83983 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.wat.hookup.net!hookup!jussieu.fr!rain.fr!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: lost friends
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 14:42:43 GMT
References: <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 9
In article <4vlnvh$fna@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, [email protected] (Tina Peace) says:
>
>My mother, who is from Berlin, is in search of one of her best friends
>(also from Berlin) with whom she lost contact with as they moved around
>the U.S. Where would be a good place to search for this person?
Post on bln.misc
GFH
From [email protected] Mon Aug 26 16:11:33 PDT 1996
Article: 83985 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!jussieu.fr!rain.fr!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: Gemeinschafthaus (?)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 1996 14:47:00 GMT
References: <8f7c[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: self
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.4
Lines: 16
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Karlheinz Kobras) says:
>
>It can be a house built by the community for different activities
>of the citizens; the rooms can be rented by chess-clubs for instance.
>
>Theoretically it is also possible that you came across a building
>that is used by a religious community.
It was in western Virginia, USA. And the house is a drug
rehabilitation home, where the people living there form
a co-operative to do the household work.
But the name seemed strange to me.
GFH
From [email protected] Thu Aug 29 00:51:58 PDT 1996
Article: 84219 of soc.culture.german
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.internetMCI.com!pull-feed.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.erols.net!usc!newshub.cts.com!atmnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-ana-7.sprintlink.net!news.comet.net!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (George F. Hardy)
Subject: Re: www.art.sites?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 15:50:37 GMT
References: <[email protected]>
Organization: self
Lines: 8
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] ( Eva Davidson) says:
>
>Does anyone know of any world-wide-web sites for art workes?
http://kalypso.cybercom.net/~jfl/hitler.html
GFH
