Grosvenor William, Telusplanet-com 3 – p1

From [email protected] Thu Oct 1 15:25:35 EDT 1998
Article: 126976 of can.general
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.canada,can.general,bc.general,ns.general,soc.culture.europe,alt.collecting.stamps,rec.collecting.stamps,rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Subject: Re: Canada Post Managers Can STEAL MAIL!!!
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 17:40:13 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <35cc58cc.2424[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx08-port-57.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!newsfeed.direct.ca!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.canada:160513 can.general:126976 bc.general:80428 ns.general:33680 soc.culture.europe:128301 alt.collecting.stamps:5883 rec.collecting.stamps.discuss:1897

On Wed, 30 Sep 1998 19:19:22 GMT, [email protected]_DE_SPAM
(Masataka Noda) wrote:

>De Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:49:09 GMT, [email protected] a écrit
>dans le message:
>
>>Further to the lawsuits against Canada Post, for stealing or losing a
>>full sack of mail, CanPost filed a Statement of defence.
>
>>They claim, even if their managers STEAL or lose a full sack of mail,
>>THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY ONE CENT IN COMPENSATION!!!
>
>>No wonder so many people are having their mail, including registered,
>>STOLEN by managers at Canada Post!!!
>
>Please give us a full detail of statement of defence (?) filed by
>Canada Post. I believe it’s available for public. Stealing one’s
>property is a criminal activity.,,,

Their Statement of defence was as indicated!!!

_Further to the lawsuits against Canada Post, for stealing or losing a
full sack of mail, CanPost filed a Statement of defence.

They claim, even if their managers STEAL or lose a full sack of mail,
THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY ONE CENT IN COMPENSATION!!!
They claim further, that they are immune from any and all lawsuits!!!

No wonder so many people are having their mail, including registered,
STOLEN by managers at Canada Post!!!

__________________________________________________________________
>Masataka Noda (Infinite Communications (TM)), Montréal, Québec, Canada
>N° d’ ICQ: 15115035
>Indicatif d’appel de radioamateur: VA2QRU & VE7JPN
>Pilote Avion Privé(avec la qualification de vol de nuit)
>Étudient @ météorologie, physique et l’environnement d’Université McGill
>CÉ: [email protected]_DE_SPAM
>URL : http://www.radiotelephone.net (Principale/Universel)
> http://www.radiotelephone.net/masataka.htm (Moi !!)
> /amateur/ /no-code/ (Radio)
> /mcgill/ (Université McGill)
> /examiner/ (Examens de U.McGill)
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>ATTENTION: Je n’achèterai pas ou réponse aucun produit des CÉS non sollicités!!
>*** Pour me repondre, enlever .PAS_DE_SPAM de mon adresse ***
>*** To reply to me, remove the .PAS_DE_SPAM from my address ***

From [email protected] Thu Oct 1 15:26:11 EDT 1998
Article: 160513 of soc.culture.canada
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.canada,can.general,bc.general,ns.general,soc.culture.europe,alt.collecting.stamps,rec.collecting.stamps,rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Subject: Re: Canada Post Managers Can STEAL MAIL!!!
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 17:40:13 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx08-port-57.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!newsfeed.direct.ca!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.canada:160513 can.general:126976 bc.general:80428 ns.general:33680 soc.culture.europe:128301 alt.collecting.stamps:5883 rec.collecting.stamps.discuss:1897

On Wed, 30 Sep 1998 19:19:22 GMT, [email protected]_DE_SPAM
(Masataka Noda) wrote:

>De Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:49:09 GMT, [email protected] a écrit
>dans le message:
>
>>Further to the lawsuits against Canada Post, for stealing or losing a
>>full sack of mail, CanPost filed a Statement of defence.
>
>>They claim, even if their managers STEAL or lose a full sack of mail,
>>THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY ONE CENT IN COMPENSATION!!!
>
>>No wonder so many people are having their mail, including registered,
>>STOLEN by managers at Canada Post!!!
>
>Please give us a full detail of statement of defence (?) filed by
>Canada Post. I believe it’s available for public. Stealing one’s
>property is a criminal activity.,,,

Their Statement of defence was as indicated!!!

_Further to the lawsuits against Canada Post, for stealing or losing a
full sack of mail, CanPost filed a Statement of defence.

They claim, even if their managers STEAL or lose a full sack of mail,
THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY ONE CENT IN COMPENSATION!!!
They claim further, that they are immune from any and all lawsuits!!!

No wonder so many people are having their mail, including registered,
STOLEN by managers at Canada Post!!!

__________________________________________________________________
>Masataka Noda (Infinite Communications (TM)), Montréal, Québec, Canada
>N° d’ ICQ: 15115035
>Indicatif d’appel de radioamateur: VA2QRU & VE7JPN
>Pilote Avion Privé(avec la qualification de vol de nuit)
>Étudient @ météorologie, physique et l’environnement d’Université McGill
>CÉ: [email protected]_DE_SPAM
>URL : http://www.radiotelephone.net (Principale/Universel)
> http://www.radiotelephone.net/masataka.htm (Moi !!)
> /amateur/ /no-code/ (Radio)
> /mcgill/ (Université McGill)
> /examiner/ (Examens de U.McGill)
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>ATTENTION: Je n’achèterai pas ou réponse aucun produit des CÉS non sollicités!!
>*** Pour me repondre, enlever .PAS_DE_SPAM de mon adresse ***
>*** To reply to me, remove the .PAS_DE_SPAM from my address ***

From [email protected] Thu Oct 1 15:27:58 EDT 1998
Article: 155177 of soc.culture.cuba
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.cuba,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Re: Sherritt’s Woes-Connected to C$12 Million Ripoff??
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 17:46:36 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 204
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx08-port-57.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.cuba:155177 soc.culture.usa:260479

Will the US now be able to use the payoff to the bankrupt Canadian
insurance company, Confederation Life, as the legal precedent to make
Sherritt pay for the theft of the assets of freeport-McMoran??

>On Sun, 21 Jun 1998 23:27:39 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>>It seems that the payoff to the bankrupt Canuck insurance company, now
>>sets a legal precedent for Freeport McMoran to collect both from
>>Sherritt, and the Cuban government in the World Court.

>>This should create some interesting situations vis a vis the
>>Canadian/US relations, what???

>>On Sat, 13 Jun 1998 12:40:12 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>>>Cubans, and Canadian taxpayers also, want to know why did Fidel Castro
>>>give Jean Cretin the C$12 Million, as settlement for Confederation
>>>Life Insurance??

>>>Did Fidel not know that Confederation Life had been BANKRUPT FOR MANY
>>>YEARS??

>>>Who is actually getting the $12 million – crooks in Canada, or in
>>>Cuba??

>>>Do the people at Freeport-McMoran now know about this deal, which will
>>>now help them when they go to the World Court to collect their
>>>reparations??

>>>After all, if there is a precedent for a Canadian firm, this can then
>>>be used to collect by a US firm!!!!

>>>It seems that the Cubans got swindled by some Canadian crooks????

On 8 Jul 1998 14:46:25 GMT, [email protected] (Ricardoag) wrote:

>
>Wednesday, July 8, 1998
>
>Helms won’t let Sherritt off the hook
>
>By PETER MORTON
>Washington Bureau Chief The Financial Post
> Sherritt International Corp. and other foreign companies now in Cuba are
>playing a pivotal role in whether a U.S.-European Union deal on investment on
>the island will be approved by Congress, industry and government sources say.
> Senator Jesse Helms, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is
>demanding Toronto-based Sherritt and other companies already swept up by the
>Helms-Burton law continue to be punished, sources said yesterday.
> “Sherritt is seen as the poster boy of Helms-Burton and Helms does not want to
>see Sherritt off the hook,” said one industry source close to the U.S.-EU
>negotiations.
> Helms is worried the deal signed by the U.S. and the EU in May would
>essentially “immunize” Sherritt and others operating on expropriated property
>since any new penalties imposed by the U.S. would be only on investment in Cuba
>since then, the source said.
> “In fact, under the final text of the understanding, a current investor would
>even retain the right to pass this property to another EU investor who, in
>turn, could use this stolen property in perpetuity ­ all with the blessing of
>the U.S. government,” Helms and Benjamin Gilman, chairman of the House
>Committee on International Relations, said in a June 17 letter to Secretary of
>State Madeline Albright.
> Sherritt is the largest single foreign investor in property in Cuba
>expropriated by President Fidel Castro in 1959. It is mining nickel on property
>formerly owned by Freeport-McMoRan Inc. of New Orleans.
> So far, Sherritt is the one of two foreign companies to be swept up in
>Helms-Burton. Its executives, along with those from an Israeli fruit company,
>have been barred from entering the U.S. under the Helms-Burton law. No European
>companies have fallen under Helms-Burton.
> EU Trade Commissioner Sir Leon Brittan said yesterday there is no chance the
>deal would be re-negotiated to meet Helms’s concerns.
> “We’re not agreeable to modifying the agreement,” he said.
> The EU is waiting for the U.S. Congress to approve the pact, although Brittan
>said he did not receive any indication on when legislation would even be
>presented to Congress.
> The proposed U.S.-EU deal would give President Bill Clinton the right to waive
>that part of Helms-Burton, called Title III. He has already waived Title IV,
>the section that would allow U.S. companies and citizens to sue foreign
>companies for operating on what was once their property in Cuba. There are
>5,911 U.S.-recognized claims and lawsuits could be expected to reach billions
>of dollars.
> The agreement would also enable European companies to invest in Iran and Libya
>if the EU ensured the two countries’ terrorism campaigns were not being
>supported.
> So far, Ottawa has not signed on to the proposed deal, insisting it is still
>looking into the complex agreement, said Leslie Swartman, a spokeswoman for
>Trade Minister Sergio Marchi.
> But Canadian government sources said what happens to Sherritt is a key
>consideration in whether the federal government would go along with the U.S.-EU
>agreement, try to negotiate a separate deal with the U.S. or simply stay away.
> “There is no doubt Sherritt is one consideration,” an official said.
> The EU agreed not only not to fund any private venture on confiscated property
>in Cuba nor on confiscated property anywhere in the world, something Helms is
>looking for, said Robert Muse, a Washington lawyer specializing in Cuba.
> “Jesse Helms wants to see such an agreement reached,” he said.
>
>
>
>
>BREAKING NEWS
>
>MARKET WATCH
>
>BIZ TICKERS
>MUTUAL FUNDS
>
>MONEY RATES
>
>BIZ SEARCH
>WorldCom/MCI merger cleared
>Ten TV network predicts earnings slowdown<
>Report: Dow Corning to agree to bankruptcy plan
>EU tells airlines to surrender airport slots
>
>
>
>JAM! Showbiz, CNEWS, Money, Newsstand>
>————————————————————————
>
>CANOE home | We welcome your feedback.
>Copyright © 1998, Canoe Limited Partnership.
>All rights reserved. Please click here for full copyright terms and
>restrictions.
>
>—
>
> I
> I
> I
> ricardo a. gonzalez

On 30 Sep 1998 09:53:56 GMT, [email protected] (Sergio
Calderon) wrote:

>Sherritt Shares Fall on Castro’s Nickel Comments
>
> Reuters 29-SEP-98
>
> TORONTO, Sept 29 (Reuters) – Shares in Sherritt
>International Corp. fell more than 5 percent on Tuesday after Cuban
>President Fidel Castro hinted the Caribbean island might halt nickel
>production because of low world prices.
>
> Castro said Cuba’s nickel export revenues, a crucial
>source of foreign income for the struggling communist nation, were
>barely covering production costs due to sluggish metals markets.
>
> He did not give any production or revenue figures.
>
> “The prices for producing countries of basic products
>have collapsed– aluminum, copper and nickel– which affects us a
>bit,” Castro said at a congress of pro-government neighbourhood groups
>in Havana.
>
> “Nickel is half the price of a few years ago, (we are)
>scarcely producing the costs, (we are) producing to recover costs.”
>Nickel traded at $1.82 a pound on the London Metal Exchange on
>Tuesday, down from a 1997-high of $3.72 a pound.
>
> Castro’s remarks added to growing market speculation
>that Cuba nickel sector officials were considering a possible
>temporary scaling-back of output in response to high production costs
>and low export prices.
>
> Shares of Toronto-based Sherritt, which operates a
>joint venture nickel mine at Moa in the northwestern part of the
>island, slipped C$0.21 to close at C$3.49 on the Toronto Stock
>Exchange on Tuesday.
>
> Sherritt produced 13,588 tonnes of contained nickel and
>cobalt in the first half of 1998 at Moa Bay.
>
> The company brushed aside the possibility of a nickel
>shutdown in Cuba, branding the idea “hypothetical”.
>
> “There isn’t anybody who is a producer of commodities
>these days that is not looking at exactly the sort of factors that he
>(Castro) has mentioned whether it is costs or capacity. So I think
>that is just a good market observation,” Sherritt spokeswoman Patrice
>Merrin Best said.
>
> Analysts, however, speculated that the costs of mining
>nickel, even in Cuba, could be too burdensome at current prices.
>
> “The whole nickel market has taken a bath. If Sherritt
>is running a relatively high-cost operation in Cuba, it’s probably
>starting to look a little marginal at these levels. I wouldn’t be
>surprised,” said Conor Bill, director of retail trading at
>ScotiaMcLeod in Toronto.
>
> Sherritt is one of Cuba’s largest foreign investors and
>has drawn the wrath of anti-Castro activists in the United States who
>want to tighten a four-decades-old embargo on trade with the country.
>
> ($1=$1.51 Canadian)
>
> Copyyright 1998 Reuters Limited.All rights reserved.

From [email protected] Thu Oct 1 15:28:22 EDT 1998
Article: 119402 of soc.culture.polish
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe
Subject: JEW Thieves Scream Anti-semitism When Caught!!!
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 17:45:16 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 137
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx08-port-57.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.ukrainian:41725 soc.culture.baltics:15253 soc.culture.polish:119402 soc.culture.australian:77484 soc.culture.swiss:26919 soc.culture.europe:128307

On 30 Sep 1998 13:36:14 -0700, [email protected] (Ken McVay)
wrote:

X-NO-ARCHIVE:YES

On Sun, 06 Sep 1998 06:28:05 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Jun 1998 01:53:37 GMT, NSWPP wrote:
>
>>LARGEST Social Security Fraud in London’s History
>>
>>DAILY MAIL
>>Monday June 15 1998
>>By DAVID WILLIAMS and PETER ALLEN
>>
>>
>>Revealed: The men accused in
>>31.8 million State Benefit Racket
>>
>>THESE are the men being investigated by fraud-busters
>>over an alleged 1.8 million benefits racket. The case was
>>highlighted last month by Welfare Reform Minister Frank
>>Field as part of a crack-down launched by Labour aimed at
>>slashing the £36 billion annual cost of welfare fraud.
>>
>>At the time, no one was named. But the Daily Mail has
>>since tracked down the men at the heart of one of the biggest
>>ever alleged welfare frauds.
>>
>>They are Soloman Kritzler, 39, and Alexander Eichenstein, 38,
>>who are suspected of masterminding the racket from their
>>sprawling homes in a North London suburb.
>>
>>Detectives have questioned the men and four other members of
>>what Mr Field described as ‘an extended family’ about
>>allegations of illegally claiming up to £3,600,000 in housing
>>benefit and income support. They have also been quizzed
>>by officers from a special undercover task force set up by
>>the Department of Social Security (DSS) about a mortgage
>>fraud worth £31.2 million.
>>
>>The investigators are said to be checking on any links with
>>massive welfare rackets in the United States, where members
>>of the family, it has been reported, are alleged to have used
>>fake identities to make bogus benefit claims.
>>
>>Both men hold trusted positions at the centre of the
>>ultra-Orthodox community of Hasidic Jews in Stamford Hill,
>>North London, where details of the unprecedented investigation
>>has caused consider-able anger.
>>
>>At the home he shares with his wife Esther and their daughter,
>>Kritzler protested his innocence and said he would fight
>>to clear his name.
>>
>>’This investigation is without foundation and is a complete
>>waste of taxpayers’ money,’ he insisted. ‘All of our finances
>>are in good order. There has been no fraud.
>>
>>’It may well be that we are the victims of anti-semitism.
>>This seems to be an attack on the law-abiding, decent
>>community which we have here. We just want to be able to
>>get on with our lives in peace.
>>
>>’When we were arrested, a very sick woman was put in a
>>police cell for a night. She was terribly distressed.
>>This should not have been allowed to happen.’
>>
>>Eichenstein was less forthcoming and when approached
>>at his family home, his wife Rivka said: ‘He has no
>>comment to make.’ Eichenstein lists his official home
>>as a rundown flat some three streets from the spacious home
>>where his wife and children live.
>>
>>Partners at the North London chartered accountancy firm
>>which acts as the registered office for the majority of
>>the men’s companies con-firmed that they had been contacted
>>by detectives, and that fraud experts were preparing
>>to examine their records.
>>
>>Fraud investigators are focusing their inquiries on a
>>network of companies and properties associated
>>with the family.
>>
>>All of the properties linked to Kritzler and Eichenstein
>>are within a stone’s throw of each other on the Stamford
>>Hill/Stoke Newington borders. One firm, Acemark Properties
>>Ltd. is listed at Eichenstein’s home.
>>
>>Kritzler has been director of London-based Empire properties
>>since January and Amvex Investments since 1992.
>>
>>The streets of Stamford Hill are an unlikely setting for a
>>major investigation of this kind. The area enjoys a feeling
>>of neighbourly trust long lost in the crime-ridden districts nearby.
>>
>>Police activity is all but non-existent – patrol cars are
>>already overstretched by the criminal activity related
>>to the numerous drug dealers and prostitutes in the
>>southern sector of the Stoke Newington police beat.
>>
>>
>>Both men, together with three women and another man to
>>whom they are related are currently on bail and have to
>>return to Stoke Newington police station at the
>>end of this month.
>>
>>The arrest of the suspects -following simultaneous raids
>>on four houses in April – is seen by Mr Field as the first
>>of a series of high profile swoops by the new DSS team.
>>
>>Ministers have decided that they want to ‘name and shame’
>>convicted benefit cheats in an attempt to foster a
>>’revival of common decencies’.
>>
>>The pilot DSS task force was set up to target organised
>>housing benefit rackets in London – an initiative which
>>the Government now plans to extend right across the country.
>>
>>The team discovered that professional crooks were exploiting
>>loopholes in welfare security to set up fictitious
>>identities and make bogus claims for a wide range of
>>benefit allowances in various parts of London and
>>other cities in Britain.
>>
>>Mr Field is determined to crack down on an area of crime
>>bleeding tens of millions of pounds each week.
>>
>>The Minister said: ‘We are going for the big boys, while
>>at the same time recognising that we have to bring in much
>>tighter controls on what is the single biggest budget in
>>Britain today.’
>>
>>He has admitted that the annual benefits bill of nearly £31
>>billion remains wide open to fraud and corruption despite
>>repeated attempts by Whitehall to crack down on the swindlers.
-88-

From [email protected] Thu Oct 1 15:29:35 EDT 1998
Article: 26919 of soc.culture.swiss
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe
Subject: JEW Thieves Scream Anti-semitism When Caught!!!
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 17:45:16 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 137
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx08-port-57.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.ukrainian:41725 soc.culture.baltics:15253 soc.culture.polish:119402 soc.culture.australian:77484 soc.culture.swiss:26919 soc.culture.europe:128307

On 30 Sep 1998 13:36:14 -0700, [email protected] (Ken McVay)
wrote:

X-NO-ARCHIVE:YES

On Sun, 06 Sep 1998 06:28:05 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Jun 1998 01:53:37 GMT, NSWPP wrote:
>
>>LARGEST Social Security Fraud in London’s History
>>
>>DAILY MAIL
>>Monday June 15 1998
>>By DAVID WILLIAMS and PETER ALLEN
>>
>>
>>Revealed: The men accused in
>>31.8 million State Benefit Racket
>>
>>THESE are the men being investigated by fraud-busters
>>over an alleged 1.8 million benefits racket. The case was
>>highlighted last month by Welfare Reform Minister Frank
>>Field as part of a crack-down launched by Labour aimed at
>>slashing the £36 billion annual cost of welfare fraud.
>>
>>At the time, no one was named. But the Daily Mail has
>>since tracked down the men at the heart of one of the biggest
>>ever alleged welfare frauds.
>>
>>They are Soloman Kritzler, 39, and Alexander Eichenstein, 38,
>>who are suspected of masterminding the racket from their
>>sprawling homes in a North London suburb.
>>
>>Detectives have questioned the men and four other members of
>>what Mr Field described as ‘an extended family’ about
>>allegations of illegally claiming up to £3,600,000 in housing
>>benefit and income support. They have also been quizzed
>>by officers from a special undercover task force set up by
>>the Department of Social Security (DSS) about a mortgage
>>fraud worth £31.2 million.
>>
>>The investigators are said to be checking on any links with
>>massive welfare rackets in the United States, where members
>>of the family, it has been reported, are alleged to have used
>>fake identities to make bogus benefit claims.
>>
>>Both men hold trusted positions at the centre of the
>>ultra-Orthodox community of Hasidic Jews in Stamford Hill,
>>North London, where details of the unprecedented investigation
>>has caused consider-able anger.
>>
>>At the home he shares with his wife Esther and their daughter,
>>Kritzler protested his innocence and said he would fight
>>to clear his name.
>>
>>’This investigation is without foundation and is a complete
>>waste of taxpayers’ money,’ he insisted. ‘All of our finances
>>are in good order. There has been no fraud.
>>
>>’It may well be that we are the victims of anti-semitism.
>>This seems to be an attack on the law-abiding, decent
>>community which we have here. We just want to be able to
>>get on with our lives in peace.
>>
>>’When we were arrested, a very sick woman was put in a
>>police cell for a night. She was terribly distressed.
>>This should not have been allowed to happen.’
>>
>>Eichenstein was less forthcoming and when approached
>>at his family home, his wife Rivka said: ‘He has no
>>comment to make.’ Eichenstein lists his official home
>>as a rundown flat some three streets from the spacious home
>>where his wife and children live.
>>
>>Partners at the North London chartered accountancy firm
>>which acts as the registered office for the majority of
>>the men’s companies con-firmed that they had been contacted
>>by detectives, and that fraud experts were preparing
>>to examine their records.
>>
>>Fraud investigators are focusing their inquiries on a
>>network of companies and properties associated
>>with the family.
>>
>>All of the properties linked to Kritzler and Eichenstein
>>are within a stone’s throw of each other on the Stamford
>>Hill/Stoke Newington borders. One firm, Acemark Properties
>>Ltd. is listed at Eichenstein’s home.
>>
>>Kritzler has been director of London-based Empire properties
>>since January and Amvex Investments since 1992.
>>
>>The streets of Stamford Hill are an unlikely setting for a
>>major investigation of this kind. The area enjoys a feeling
>>of neighbourly trust long lost in the crime-ridden districts nearby.
>>
>>Police activity is all but non-existent – patrol cars are
>>already overstretched by the criminal activity related
>>to the numerous drug dealers and prostitutes in the
>>southern sector of the Stoke Newington police beat.
>>
>>
>>Both men, together with three women and another man to
>>whom they are related are currently on bail and have to
>>return to Stoke Newington police station at the
>>end of this month.
>>
>>The arrest of the suspects -following simultaneous raids
>>on four houses in April – is seen by Mr Field as the first
>>of a series of high profile swoops by the new DSS team.
>>
>>Ministers have decided that they want to ‘name and shame’
>>convicted benefit cheats in an attempt to foster a
>>’revival of common decencies’.
>>
>>The pilot DSS task force was set up to target organised
>>housing benefit rackets in London – an initiative which
>>the Government now plans to extend right across the country.
>>
>>The team discovered that professional crooks were exploiting
>>loopholes in welfare security to set up fictitious
>>identities and make bogus claims for a wide range of
>>benefit allowances in various parts of London and
>>other cities in Britain.
>>
>>Mr Field is determined to crack down on an area of crime
>>bleeding tens of millions of pounds each week.
>>
>>The Minister said: ‘We are going for the big boys, while
>>at the same time recognising that we have to bring in much
>>tighter controls on what is the single biggest budget in
>>Britain today.’
>>
>>He has admitted that the annual benefits bill of nearly £31
>>billion remains wide open to fraud and corruption despite
>>repeated attempts by Whitehall to crack down on the swindlers.
-88-

From [email protected] Thu Oct 1 15:30:03 EDT 1998
Article: 41725 of soc.culture.ukrainian
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe
Subject: JEW Thieves Scream Anti-semitism When Caught!!!
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 17:45:16 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 137
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx08-port-57.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.ukrainian:41725 soc.culture.baltics:15253 soc.culture.polish:119402 soc.culture.australian:77484 soc.culture.swiss:26919 soc.culture.europe:128307

On 30 Sep 1998 13:36:14 -0700, [email protected] (Ken McVay)
wrote:

X-NO-ARCHIVE:YES

On Sun, 06 Sep 1998 06:28:05 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Jun 1998 01:53:37 GMT, NSWPP wrote:
>
>>LARGEST Social Security Fraud in London’s History
>>
>>DAILY MAIL
>>Monday June 15 1998
>>By DAVID WILLIAMS and PETER ALLEN
>>
>>
>>Revealed: The men accused in
>>31.8 million State Benefit Racket
>>
>>THESE are the men being investigated by fraud-busters
>>over an alleged 1.8 million benefits racket. The case was
>>highlighted last month by Welfare Reform Minister Frank
>>Field as part of a crack-down launched by Labour aimed at
>>slashing the £36 billion annual cost of welfare fraud.
>>
>>At the time, no one was named. But the Daily Mail has
>>since tracked down the men at the heart of one of the biggest
>>ever alleged welfare frauds.
>>
>>They are Soloman Kritzler, 39, and Alexander Eichenstein, 38,
>>who are suspected of masterminding the racket from their
>>sprawling homes in a North London suburb.
>>
>>Detectives have questioned the men and four other members of
>>what Mr Field described as ‘an extended family’ about
>>allegations of illegally claiming up to £3,600,000 in housing
>>benefit and income support. They have also been quizzed
>>by officers from a special undercover task force set up by
>>the Department of Social Security (DSS) about a mortgage
>>fraud worth £31.2 million.
>>
>>The investigators are said to be checking on any links with
>>massive welfare rackets in the United States, where members
>>of the family, it has been reported, are alleged to have used
>>fake identities to make bogus benefit claims.
>>
>>Both men hold trusted positions at the centre of the
>>ultra-Orthodox community of Hasidic Jews in Stamford Hill,
>>North London, where details of the unprecedented investigation
>>has caused consider-able anger.
>>
>>At the home he shares with his wife Esther and their daughter,
>>Kritzler protested his innocence and said he would fight
>>to clear his name.
>>
>>’This investigation is without foundation and is a complete
>>waste of taxpayers’ money,’ he insisted. ‘All of our finances
>>are in good order. There has been no fraud.
>>
>>’It may well be that we are the victims of anti-semitism.
>>This seems to be an attack on the law-abiding, decent
>>community which we have here. We just want to be able to
>>get on with our lives in peace.
>>
>>’When we were arrested, a very sick woman was put in a
>>police cell for a night. She was terribly distressed.
>>This should not have been allowed to happen.’
>>
>>Eichenstein was less forthcoming and when approached
>>at his family home, his wife Rivka said: ‘He has no
>>comment to make.’ Eichenstein lists his official home
>>as a rundown flat some three streets from the spacious home
>>where his wife and children live.
>>
>>Partners at the North London chartered accountancy firm
>>which acts as the registered office for the majority of
>>the men’s companies con-firmed that they had been contacted
>>by detectives, and that fraud experts were preparing
>>to examine their records.
>>
>>Fraud investigators are focusing their inquiries on a
>>network of companies and properties associated
>>with the family.
>>
>>All of the properties linked to Kritzler and Eichenstein
>>are within a stone’s throw of each other on the Stamford
>>Hill/Stoke Newington borders. One firm, Acemark Properties
>>Ltd. is listed at Eichenstein’s home.
>>
>>Kritzler has been director of London-based Empire properties
>>since January and Amvex Investments since 1992.
>>
>>The streets of Stamford Hill are an unlikely setting for a
>>major investigation of this kind. The area enjoys a feeling
>>of neighbourly trust long lost in the crime-ridden districts nearby.
>>
>>Police activity is all but non-existent – patrol cars are
>>already overstretched by the criminal activity related
>>to the numerous drug dealers and prostitutes in the
>>southern sector of the Stoke Newington police beat.
>>
>>
>>Both men, together with three women and another man to
>>whom they are related are currently on bail and have to
>>return to Stoke Newington police station at the
>>end of this month.
>>
>>The arrest of the suspects -following simultaneous raids
>>on four houses in April – is seen by Mr Field as the first
>>of a series of high profile swoops by the new DSS team.
>>
>>Ministers have decided that they want to ‘name and shame’
>>convicted benefit cheats in an attempt to foster a
>>’revival of common decencies’.
>>
>>The pilot DSS task force was set up to target organised
>>housing benefit rackets in London – an initiative which
>>the Government now plans to extend right across the country.
>>
>>The team discovered that professional crooks were exploiting
>>loopholes in welfare security to set up fictitious
>>identities and make bogus claims for a wide range of
>>benefit allowances in various parts of London and
>>other cities in Britain.
>>
>>Mr Field is determined to crack down on an area of crime
>>bleeding tens of millions of pounds each week.
>>
>>The Minister said: ‘We are going for the big boys, while
>>at the same time recognising that we have to bring in much
>>tighter controls on what is the single biggest budget in
>>Britain today.’
>>
>>He has admitted that the annual benefits bill of nearly £31
>>billion remains wide open to fraud and corruption despite
>>repeated attempts by Whitehall to crack down on the swindlers.
-88-

From [email protected] Thu Oct 1 15:30:44 EDT 1998
Article: 185725 of soc.culture.malaysia
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.singapore,soc.culture.malaysia,alt.anonymous,alt.2600
Subject: Re: Who dares to use Heatwave will be sued!
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 14:45:31 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-3.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!newsin.pe.net!news.pe.net!news.missouri.edu!uky.edu!stdio!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.news.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.singapore:417486 soc.culture.malaysia:185725 alt.anonymous:27372 alt.2600:309790

On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 02:06:33 +0100, “donoli”
wrote:

>
>Heatwave wrote in message
><[email protected]>…
>>—–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—–
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>That’s right, you arse holes out there I own the nickname Heatwave.
>>Nobody can use this name. I and only I can use it, you hear!! Anybody
>>trying to use this name will get sued.
>>
>>For your information, I have sued two person before for using this
>>name. In both cases I won. If you don’t believe ask anybody in
>>soc.culture.singapore how I smash their arse all over the high court
>>in Singapore.
>>
>>All my postings are PGP Signed and so you know I am the real one. All
>>others with the name Heatwave are fake!
>>—–BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE—–
>>Version: PGPfreeware 5.5.3i for non-commercial use
>>
>>iQA/AwUBNgfAiR4Drt7UcFeHEQKZXwCgtIMLfIdWr/r8XTs3OOqNByGip3UAoKdb
>>jPB7t4hhtNQo5sC7Bw1Ijbv7
>>=+Ogj
>>—–END PGP SIGNATURE—–
>
>Who gives a fuck? It will take you 3 years to sue someone in New York for
>some dumg shit like that. Donoli.

Quite apart from the fact that the USA allows freedom of expression,
and Singapore law does not apply in the freedom-loving USA!!!

Owning a nickname,indeed!!!

Perhaps everyone outside Singapore should use the names heatwave and
blurblur, and then mailbomb the original cretin???

From [email protected] Thu Oct 1 15:30:44 EDT 1998
Article: 185756 of soc.culture.malaysia
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.indonesia,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.asean
Subject: Re: Gays take Malaysian PM to task
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 17:49:27 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx08-port-57.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.malaysia:185756 soc.culture.palestine:52427 soc.culture.indonesia:118581 soc.culture.australian:77483 soc.culture.asean:23158

Muslim nations seem to have more sense and respect for normal humans,
than do the degenerate JEW run countries.

The only good faggot is a cremated one, whether dead or otherwise!!!

Immolate yourself, and then try to talk, if you can comprehend.

On Wed, 30 Sep 1998 16:00:05 +0700, Bigger
wrote:

>Who gives a shite about major religions now? They are expiring in a couple of years
>and already smell.
>
>We got no time to make our way through 640 pages of crap. Check
>http://www.virusmyth.com for the truth about HIV/AIDS! Provided that your English is
>good enough to get beyond the front page.
>
>In the most advanced countries of the world: in Northern Europe, Northern America,
>Australia and NZ homosexuality is largely tolerated and even homosexual marriages,
>children adoption and many other issues are legalised.
>
>How much longer will M’sia and S’pore stick with an obviously outdated British law
>that is renounced and abolished by the British themselves? Scavenging on others’
>legal excrement won’t do you any good!
>
>Knowing a smattering of manufacturing and finance does NOT make you an advanced or
>developed nation. High time to change your obsolete mentality and step forward in
>the human evolution.
>
>
>
>[email protected] wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Sep 1998 13:27:56 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> >[email protected] wrote:
>> >> I respect your opinion but as you see, such act is against our Eastern as
>> >> well as Islamic culture especially in Malaysia which is considered an Islamic
>> >> country. Even other religions like Buddhism, Christianity & others prohibits
>> >> such act of the gays & lesbians.
>> >
>> >> Therefore, it is not appropriate to allow such homosexual conduct to be
>> >> allowed in Malaysia.
>>
>> Not only are the perverted criminal activities of faggots condemned by
>> all major religions, but it is well documented that AIDS was spread
>> worldwide by faggots!!!
>>
>> Read the documentary book of 640 pages entitled “AND THE BAND PLAYED
>> ON”.
>>
>> It gives all the specifics about how AIDS was deliberately spread
>> worldwide by the criminal perverts.
>>
>> The only good faggot is a cremated one!!!
>> >
>> >Well, when I was growing up in my small town, people were much more tolerant
>> >of homosexuals. They were considered more of an oddity, more of a source of
>> >amusamusement, rather than the currently fashionable subject of National
>> >Morality Scrutiny.
>> >
>> >There can be no persecution of homosexuals under the pretext of ‘appropriate
>> >behaviour’.
>> >
>> > Subir De.
>> >
>> >—–== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==—–
>> >http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
>
>

From [email protected] Thu Oct 1 15:40:08 EDT 1998
Article: 15253 of soc.culture.baltics
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe
Subject: JEW Thieves Scream Anti-semitism When Caught!!!
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 17:45:16 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 137
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx08-port-57.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.ukrainian:41725 soc.culture.baltics:15253 soc.culture.polish:119402 soc.culture.australian:77484 soc.culture.swiss:26919 soc.culture.europe:128307

On 30 Sep 1998 13:36:14 -0700, [email protected] (Ken McVay)
wrote:

X-NO-ARCHIVE:YES

On Sun, 06 Sep 1998 06:28:05 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Jun 1998 01:53:37 GMT, NSWPP wrote:
>
>>LARGEST Social Security Fraud in London’s History
>>
>>DAILY MAIL
>>Monday June 15 1998
>>By DAVID WILLIAMS and PETER ALLEN
>>
>>
>>Revealed: The men accused in
>>31.8 million State Benefit Racket
>>
>>THESE are the men being investigated by fraud-busters
>>over an alleged 1.8 million benefits racket. The case was
>>highlighted last month by Welfare Reform Minister Frank
>>Field as part of a crack-down launched by Labour aimed at
>>slashing the £36 billion annual cost of welfare fraud.
>>
>>At the time, no one was named. But the Daily Mail has
>>since tracked down the men at the heart of one of the biggest
>>ever alleged welfare frauds.
>>
>>They are Soloman Kritzler, 39, and Alexander Eichenstein, 38,
>>who are suspected of masterminding the racket from their
>>sprawling homes in a North London suburb.
>>
>>Detectives have questioned the men and four other members of
>>what Mr Field described as ‘an extended family’ about
>>allegations of illegally claiming up to £3,600,000 in housing
>>benefit and income support. They have also been quizzed
>>by officers from a special undercover task force set up by
>>the Department of Social Security (DSS) about a mortgage
>>fraud worth £31.2 million.
>>
>>The investigators are said to be checking on any links with
>>massive welfare rackets in the United States, where members
>>of the family, it has been reported, are alleged to have used
>>fake identities to make bogus benefit claims.
>>
>>Both men hold trusted positions at the centre of the
>>ultra-Orthodox community of Hasidic Jews in Stamford Hill,
>>North London, where details of the unprecedented investigation
>>has caused consider-able anger.
>>
>>At the home he shares with his wife Esther and their daughter,
>>Kritzler protested his innocence and said he would fight
>>to clear his name.
>>
>>’This investigation is without foundation and is a complete
>>waste of taxpayers’ money,’ he insisted. ‘All of our finances
>>are in good order. There has been no fraud.
>>
>>’It may well be that we are the victims of anti-semitism.
>>This seems to be an attack on the law-abiding, decent
>>community which we have here. We just want to be able to
>>get on with our lives in peace.
>>
>>’When we were arrested, a very sick woman was put in a
>>police cell for a night. She was terribly distressed.
>>This should not have been allowed to happen.’
>>
>>Eichenstein was less forthcoming and when approached
>>at his family home, his wife Rivka said: ‘He has no
>>comment to make.’ Eichenstein lists his official home
>>as a rundown flat some three streets from the spacious home
>>where his wife and children live.
>>
>>Partners at the North London chartered accountancy firm
>>which acts as the registered office for the majority of
>>the men’s companies con-firmed that they had been contacted
>>by detectives, and that fraud experts were preparing
>>to examine their records.
>>
>>Fraud investigators are focusing their inquiries on a
>>network of companies and properties associated
>>with the family.
>>
>>All of the properties linked to Kritzler and Eichenstein
>>are within a stone’s throw of each other on the Stamford
>>Hill/Stoke Newington borders. One firm, Acemark Properties
>>Ltd. is listed at Eichenstein’s home.
>>
>>Kritzler has been director of London-based Empire properties
>>since January and Amvex Investments since 1992.
>>
>>The streets of Stamford Hill are an unlikely setting for a
>>major investigation of this kind. The area enjoys a feeling
>>of neighbourly trust long lost in the crime-ridden districts nearby.
>>
>>Police activity is all but non-existent – patrol cars are
>>already overstretched by the criminal activity related
>>to the numerous drug dealers and prostitutes in the
>>southern sector of the Stoke Newington police beat.
>>
>>
>>Both men, together with three women and another man to
>>whom they are related are currently on bail and have to
>>return to Stoke Newington police station at the
>>end of this month.
>>
>>The arrest of the suspects -following simultaneous raids
>>on four houses in April – is seen by Mr Field as the first
>>of a series of high profile swoops by the new DSS team.
>>
>>Ministers have decided that they want to ‘name and shame’
>>convicted benefit cheats in an attempt to foster a
>>’revival of common decencies’.
>>
>>The pilot DSS task force was set up to target organised
>>housing benefit rackets in London – an initiative which
>>the Government now plans to extend right across the country.
>>
>>The team discovered that professional crooks were exploiting
>>loopholes in welfare security to set up fictitious
>>identities and make bogus claims for a wide range of
>>benefit allowances in various parts of London and
>>other cities in Britain.
>>
>>Mr Field is determined to crack down on an area of crime
>>bleeding tens of millions of pounds each week.
>>
>>The Minister said: ‘We are going for the big boys, while
>>at the same time recognising that we have to bring in much
>>tighter controls on what is the single biggest budget in
>>Britain today.’
>>
>>He has admitted that the annual benefits bill of nearly £31
>>billion remains wide open to fraud and corruption despite
>>repeated attempts by Whitehall to crack down on the swindlers.
-88-

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:47:33 EDT 1998
Article: 119615 of soc.culture.polish
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!newsfeed.corridex.com!howland.erols.net!news.idt.net!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: Re: Nazi — Jew Zionist Collaboration
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:01:03 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 836
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org alt.politics.nationalism.white:136385 soc.culture.swiss:26929 soc.culture.palestine:52520 soc.culture.malaysia:186482 soc.culture.polish:119615 soc.culture.russian:93408 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9688

On Fri, 25 Sep 1998 04:29:42 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>>On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 22:56:46 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>trying to stimulate more interest in this topic,
>>
>>On Sat, 15 Aug 1998 18:45:47 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>On 3 Jul 1998 06:38:05 GMT, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Orest Slepokura wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>…fully documented *Perfidy* blatantly exposes the degree to which
>>>>>> Zionists cooperated in the persecution of their fellow Jews…
>>>>
>>>>Her is more evidence of NAZI-ZIONIST JEW COLLABORATION.
>>>>
>>>>The Kastner Case
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is that
>>>>involving
>>>>a Jew – Rudolf Kastner.
>>>>
>>>>Most Jewish people have never heard of Rudolf Kastner. Those who have,
>>>>are
>>>>generally under the impression that there is some ‘controversy’ about
>>>>negotiations he undertook for ‘the purchase of Jewish lives for money
>>>>and
>>>>military equipment’, but that he was ‘fully rehabilitated’ by the
>>>>Supreme
>>>>Court of Israel.
>>>>
>>>> The Accusations
>>>>
>>>>Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:
>>>>
>>>>Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British
>>>>Medical
>>>>Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz. In his
>>>>memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse
>>>>certain
>>>>Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war.
>>>>
>>>>This group of quislings knew what was happening to their brethren in
>>>>Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their own lives with the price of
>>>>silence.
>>>>Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke for all
>>>>Jews
>>>>in Hungary. While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the
>>>>number is
>>>>still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the exterminations.
>>>>I took these terrible statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I
>>>>was
>>>>able to give Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that
>>>>Eichmann
>>>>planned to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner
>>>>went
>>>>to Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my
>>>>choice and I shall keep quiet.’
>>>>
>>>>Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and
>>>>took
>>>>him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid
>>>>bargaining
>>>>end there. Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this
>>>>little
>>>>fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany
>>>>collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…(Ben Hecht, Perfidy,
>>>>pp261-2)
>>>>
>>>>These accusations are confirmed by the ‘Eichmann Confessions’
>>>>published in
>>>>Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:
>>>>
>>>>I resolved to show how well a job could be done when the commander
>>>>stands
>>>>100% behind it. By shipping the Jews off in a lightning operation, I
>>>>wanted
>>>>to set an example for future campaigns elsewhere…In obedience to
>>>>Himmler’s directive I now concentrated on negotiations with the Jewish
>>>>political officials in Budapest…Among them Dr. Rudolph Kastner,
>>>>authorized representative of the Zionist Movement. This Dr. Kastner
>>>>was a
>>>>young man about my age, an ice-cold lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He
>>>>agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation – and even
>>>>keep
>>>>order in the collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let a few
>>>>hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine.
>>>>It
>>>>was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price was not
>>>>too
>>>>high for me.
>>>>
>>>>We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me, Kastner smoke
>>>>cigarets as though he was in a coffeehouse. While we talked he would
>>>>smoke
>>>>one aromatic cigaret after another, taking them from a silver case and
>>>>lighting them with a silver lighter. With his great polish and reserve
>>>>he
>>>>would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.
>>>>
>>>>Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for a select group
>>>>of
>>>>Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel…
>>>>
>>>>As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity between our
>>>>attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic
>>>>Zionist leaders. I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a
>>>>thousand
>>>>or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political goal ‘You
>>>>can
>>>>have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have this group here’. And
>>>>because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping keep the
>>>>deportation
>>>>camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape. After all, I was not
>>>>concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews…That was the
>>>>’gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner (Hecht, ibid., p.260-61)
>>>>
>>>>Quite clearly these accusations, do not relate merely to ‘the purchase
>>>>of
>>>>Jewish lives for money and military equipment’.
>>>>
>>>>Are the accusations against Kastner true?
>>>>
>>>>According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie. When Malchiel
>>>>Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli citizen published these
>>>>accusations against Kastner, the Israeli Government did rather more
>>>>than
>>>>demand that his views should not be broadcast. Because a prominent
>>>>Zionist
>>>>official (Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the Ministry of Trade and
>>>>Industry) was involved, the Attorney General of the State of Israel
>>>>prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.
>>>>
>>>> The Verdict
>>>>
>>>>Let the verdict of Judge Benjamin Halevi (who later became one of the
>>>>panel
>>>>of three judges that tried Eichmann) in Israel’s District Court of
>>>>Jerusalem speak for itself, given in criminal case No. 124 of 1953.
>>>>The
>>>>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald. This material should be
>>>>studied
>>>>carefully.
>>>>
>>>>The masses of Jews from Hungary’s ghettos obediently boarded the
>>>>deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of
>>>>confidence
>>>>in the false information that they were being transferred to
>>>>Kenyermeze.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had
>>>>they
>>>>not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
>>>>
>>>>The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
>>>>rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and
>>>>others
>>>>used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the
>>>>Jews.
>>>>They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help
>>>>of
>>>>Jewish leaders.
>>>>
>>>>The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local
>>>>leaders
>>>>of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were
>>>>spreading
>>>>such false information and did not protest.
>>>>
>>>>Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
>>>>persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local ‘rescue work’.
>>>>
>>>>The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of
>>>>knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be
>>>>deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain
>>>>quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or
>>>>hampering
>>>>the deportation orders.
>>>>
>>>>Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few
>>>>dozen
>>>>police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attempt to overpower
>>>>these few
>>>>guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance activities to the
>>>>deportations were organized in these ghettos.
>>>>
>>>>And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the
>>>>Jews in
>>>>the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities.
>>>>
>>>>The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of
>>>>Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn
>>>>their
>>>>own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish leaders
>>>>who
>>>>did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of
>>>>deportations…these
>>>>same leaders did not join the people of their community in their ride
>>>>to
>>>>Auschwitz, but were all included in the Rescue train.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi organizers of extermination and the perpetrators of
>>>>extermination
>>>>permitted Rudolf Kastner and the members of the Jewish Council in
>>>>Budapest
>>>>to save themselves, their relatives, and friends. The Nazis did this
>>>>as a
>>>>means of making the local Jewish leaders, whom they favoured,
>>>>dependent on
>>>>the Nazi regime, dependent on its good will during the time of its
>>>>fatal
>>>>deportation schedule. In short, the Nazis succeeded in bringing the
>>>>Jewish
>>>>leaders into collaboration with the Nazis at the time of the
>>>>catastrophe.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi chiefs knew that the Zionists were a most vital element in
>>>>Jewry
>>>>and the most trusted by the Jews.
>>>>
>>>>The personality of Rudolph Kastner made him a convenient catspaw for
>>>>Eichmann and his clique, to draw into collaboration and make their
>>>>task
>>>>easier.
>>>>
>>>>The question here is not, as stated by the Attorney General in his
>>>>summation, whether members of the Jewish Rescue Committee were or were
>>>>not capable of fulfilling their duty without the patronage of the S.S.
>>>>
>>>>chiefs.
>>>>It is obvious that without such S.S. Nazi patronage the Jewish Rescue
>>>>Committee could not have existed, and could have acted only as an
>>>>underground.
>>>>
>>>>The question is, as put by the lawyer for the defense, why were the
>>>>Nazis
>>>>interested in the existence of the Rescue Committee? Why did the S.S.
>>>>chiefs make every effort to encourage the existence of the Jewish
>>>>Rescue
>>>>Committee? Did the exterminators turn into rescuers?
>>>>
>>>>The same question rises concerning the rescue of prominent Jews by
>>>>these
>>>>German killers of Jews. Was the rescue of such Jews a part of the
>>>>extermination plan of the killers ?
>>>>
>>>>The support given by the extermination leaders to Kastner’s Rescue
>>>>Committee proves that indeed there was a place for Kastner and his
>>>>friends
>>>>in their Final Solution for the Jews of Hungary – their total
>>>>annihilation.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi’s patronage of Kastner, and their agreement to let him save
>>>>six
>>>>hundred prominent Jews, were part of the plan to exterminate the Jews.
>>>>Kastner was given a chance to add a few more to that number. The bait
>>>>attracted him. The opportunity of rescuing prominent people appealed
>>>>to him
>>>>greatly. He considered the rescue of the most important Jews as a
>>>>great
>>>>personal success and a success for Zionism. It was a success that
>>>>would
>>>>also justify his conduct – his political negotiation with Nazis and
>>>>the
>>>>Nazi patronage of his committee.
>>>>
>>>>When Kastner received this present from the Nazis, Kastner sold his
>>>>soul to
>>>>the German Satan.
>>>>
>>>>The sacrifice of the vital interests of the majority of the Jews, in
>>>>order
>>>>to rescue the prominents, was the basic element in the agreement
>>>>between
>>>>Kastner and the Nazis. This agreement fixed the division of the nation
>>>>into
>>>>two unequal camps: a small fragment of prominents, whom the Nazis
>>>>promised
>>>>Kastner to save, on the one hand, and the great majority or Hungarian
>>>>Jews
>>>>whom the Nazis designated for death, on the other hand. An imperative
>>>>condition for the rescue of the first camp by the Nazis was that
>>>>Kastner
>>>>will not interfere in the action of the Nazis against the other camp
>>>>and
>>>>will not hamper them in its extermination. Kastner fulfilled this
>>>>condition. He concentrated his efforts in the rescue of the prominents
>>>>and
>>>>treated the camp of the doomed as if they had already been wiped out
>>>>from
>>>>the book of the living.
>>>>
>>>>One cannot estimate the damage caused by Kastner’s collaboration and
>>>>put
>>>>down the number of victims which it cost Hungarian Jews. These are not
>>>>only
>>>>the thousands of Jews in Nodvarod or any other community in the border
>>>>area, Jews who could escape through the border, had the chief of their
>>>>rescue committee fulfilled his duty toward them.
>>>>
>>>>All of Kastner’s answers in his final testimony were a constant effort
>>>>to
>>>>evade this truth.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner has tried to escape through every crack he could find in the
>>>>wall
>>>>of evidence. When one crack was sealed in his face, he darted quickly
>>>>to
>>>>another. (Judgement of Judge Benjamin Halevi, Criminal Case 124/53;
>>>>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald, District Court, Jerusalem,
>>>>June 22,
>>>>1955).
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi reverts to the meeting of Kastner with the S.S. officers
>>>>Becher and Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz at the time when the
>>>>’new
>>>>line’ of rescuing Jews was revealed by Hoess. He says:
>>>>
>>>>From this gathering in Budapest, it is obvious that the ‘new line’
>>>>stretched from Himmler to Hoess, from Jutner to Becher and Krumey.
>>>>
>>>>According to Kastner, however, these Nazis were all active in rescuing
>>>>Jews.
>>>>
>>>>This meeting of these important German guests in Budapest exposes the
>>>>’rescue’ work of Becher in its true light. It reveals also the extent
>>>>of
>>>>Kastner’s involvement in the inner circle of the chief German war
>>>>criminals.
>>>>
>>>>Just as the Nazi war criminals knew they needed an alibi and hoped to
>>>>achieve it by the rescue of a few Jews at the eleventh hour, so
>>>>Kastner
>>>>also needed an alibi for himself.
>>>>
>>>>Collaboration between the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee and the
>>>>Exterminators of the Jews was solidified in Budapest and Vienna.
>>>>Kastner’s
>>>>duties were part and parcel of the general duties of the S.S.
>>>>
>>>>In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department,
>>>>the
>>>>Nazi S.S. opened a Rescue Department headed by Kastner.
>>>>
>>>>All these extermination, robbery and rescue activities of the S.S.
>>>>were
>>>>coordinated under the management of Heinrich Himmler”.
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi continues:
>>>>
>>>>Kastner perjured himself knowingly in his testimony before this court
>>>>when
>>>>he denied he had interceded in Becher’s behalf. Moreover, he concealed
>>>>the
>>>>important fact that he interceded for Becher in the name of the Jewish
>>>>Agency and the Jewish World Congress.
>>>>
>>>>As to the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, it was enough for the
>>>>defense to
>>>>provide Becher was a war criminal. It was up to the prosecution to
>>>>remove
>>>>Becher from this status, if they wished to negate the affidavit.
>>>>
>>>>The Attorney General admitted in his summation that Becher was a war
>>>>criminal.
>>>>
>>>>The lies in the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, the lies in his
>>>>testimony
>>>>concerning the document, and Kastner’s knowing participation in the
>>>>activities of Nazi war criminals, and his participation in the last
>>>>minute
>>>>fake rescue activities – all these combine to show one overwhelming
>>>>truth –
>>>>that this affidavit was not given in good faith.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner knew well, as he himself testified, that Becher had never
>>>>stood up
>>>>against the stream of Jewish extermination, as Kastner has declared in
>>>>the
>>>>affidavit.
>>>>
>>>>The aims of Becher and his superior, Himmler, were not to save Jews
>>>>but to
>>>>serve the Nazi regime with full compliance. These is not truth and no
>>>>good
>>>>faith in Kastner’s testimony, ‘I never doubted for one moment the good
>>>>intention of good Becher’.
>>>>
>>>>It is clear that the positive recommendation by Kastner, not only in
>>>>his
>>>>own name but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish
>>>>World
>>>>Congress was of decisive importance for Becher. Kastner did not
>>>>exaggerate
>>>>when he said that Becher was released by the Allies because of his
>>>>personal
>>>>intervention. The lies in the affidavit of Kastner and the
>>>>contradictions
>>>>and various pretexts, which were proven to be lies, were sufficient to
>>>>annul the value of his statements and to prove that there was no good
>>>>faith
>>>>in his testimony in favor of this German war criminal. Kastner’s
>>>>affidavit
>>>>in favor of Becher was a wilfully false affidavit given in favor of a
>>>>war
>>>>criminal to save him from trial and punishment in Nuremberg.
>>>>
>>>>Therefore, the defendant, Malchiel Greenwald, was correct in his
>>>>accusations against Rudolf Kastner in the first, second and fourth of
>>>>his
>>>>statements.”
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi’s verdict found Malchiel Greenwald generally innocent of
>>>>libel
>>>>against Kastner, but fined him one Israeli pound for the one unproved
>>>>accusation – that Kastner had actually collected money from his Nazi
>>>>partners for his aide to their slaughter program. The judge also
>>>>ordered
>>>>the Government of Israel to pay Greenwald two hundred Israeli pounds
>>>>as
>>>>court costs.
>>>>
>>>>If the story ended there, it would only prove conclusively that the
>>>>individual Kastner was a collaborator and the Israeli Government had
>>>>attempted to defend him, although facts brought out in the trial
>>>>pointed to
>>>>much more than that.
>>>>
>>>>But the story does not end there.
>>>>
>>>>The Reaction
>>>>The Communist Party newspaper Kol Ha’am (Voice of the People) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>All those whose relatives were butchered by the Germans in Hungary
>>>>know now
>>>>clearly that Jewish hands helped the mass murder” (23 June 1955)
>>>>
>>>>But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing
>>>>Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the
>>>>Government of Israel.
>>>>
>>>>As the evening paper *Yedi’ot Aharonot* said:
>>>>
>>>>If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total
>>>>political and national collapse – as a result of what such a trial may
>>>>disclose.” (23 June 1955)
>>>>
>>>>Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial,
>>>>instead
>>>>it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for criminal
>>>>libel.
>>>>
>>>>At 11 P.M. the verdict was given. At 11 A.M. next morning the
>>>>government
>>>>announces the defense of Kastner will be renewed – an appeal filed.
>>>>What
>>>>exemplary expediency! Since when does this government possess such
>>>>lawyer-genius who can weigh in one night the legal chances of an
>>>>appeal on
>>>>a detailed, complex verdict of three hundred pages?
>>>>
>>>>At the appeal hearings before the Supreme Court, the Attorney General
>>>>of
>>>>Israel, Chaim Cohen, explained clearly why the Government of Israel
>>>>was
>>>>defending Kastner so strongly:
>>>>
>>>>The man Kastner does not stand here as a private individual. He was a
>>>>recognized representative, official or non-official of the Jewish
>>>>National
>>>>Institutes in Palestine and of the Zionist Executive; and I come here
>>>>in
>>>>this court to defend the representative of our national institutions.”
>>>>(Hecht, p. 268)
>>>>
>>>>The truth of this statement cannot be denied. Kastner’s collaboration
>>>>was
>>>>not that of an individual. It was the collaboration of the Zionist
>>>>leadership.
>>>>
>>>>So far, it has only been established that the Government of Israel
>>>>continued to support a Nazi collaborator after the facts about his
>>>>collaboration had been conclusively established in an Israeli court.
>>>>But
>>>>the story gets worse.
>>>>
>>>>The Supreme Court of Israel unanimously found that Becher was indeed a
>>>>
>>>>Nazi war criminal and that Kastner had without justification, and in
>>>>the
>>>>name
>>>>of the Jewish Agency, helped Becher to escape justice. On this point
>>>>Greenwald was acquitted of libel and Kastner was not ‘fully
>>>>rehabilitated’.
>>>>
>>>>The Supreme Court also accepted the facts established in the lower
>>>>court –
>>>>that Kastner deliberately concealed the truth about Auschwitz from the
>>>>majority of Hungarian Jews in exchange for Nazi permission to take a
>>>>thousand or so to Palestine. Again, Kastner was far from being ‘fully
>>>>rehabilitated’.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>But now comes the really nasty bit. After unanimously acknowledging
>>>>these
>>>>facts, the Supreme Court of Israel, by a majority of three to two,
>>>>found
>>>>that Kastner’s actions were morally justifiable and convicted
>>>>Greenwald of
>>>>criminal libel for calling this ‘collaboration’.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner’s actions only proved that he was a Nazi collaborator. It is
>>>>the
>>>>defense of these actions by the Government and Courts of Israel that
>>>>prove
>>>>conclusively that Zionism approves of Nazi collaboration.
>>>>
>>>>The majority of the Supreme Court of Israel did not rehabilitate
>>>>Kastner.
>>>>They joined him.
>>>>
>>>>Let us read from the majority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Shlomo
>>>>Chesin:
>>>>
>>>>….What point was there in telling the people boarding the trains in
>>>>Kluj,
>>>>people struck by fate and persecuted, as to what awaits them at the
>>>>end of
>>>>their journey…Kastner spoke in detail of the situation, saying, ‘The
>>>>Hungarian Jew was a branch which long ago dried up on the tree’. This
>>>>vivid
>>>>description coincides with the testimony of another witness about the
>>>>Hungarian Jews, ‘This was a big Jewish community in Hungary, without
>>>>any
>>>>ideological Jewish backbone’ (Moshe Shweiger, a Kastner aide in
>>>>Budapest,
>>>>protocol 465).
>>>>
>>>>I fully agree with my friend, Judge Agranot, when he states that, ‘The
>>>>Jews
>>>>of Hungary, including those in the countryside, were not capable,
>>>>neither
>>>>physically nor mentally, to carry out resistance operations with force
>>>>against the deportation scheme’…From this point of view no rescue
>>>>achievement could have resulted by disclosing the Auschwitz news to
>>>>the
>>>>Jewish leaders there, and this is a consideration which on can
>>>>properly
>>>>conclude that Kastner had in front of his eyes.
>>>>
>>>>….And I take one more step. I am certain that the silence of Kastner
>>>>when
>>>>he arrived in Kluj was premeditated and calculated and did not result
>>>>from
>>>>his great despair because of the helplessness of the Jewish community.
>>>>Even
>>>>then, I say, this is still not considered wilful collaboration and
>>>>assistance in the extermination, because all the signs indicate that
>>>>Kastner’s efforts were aimed at rescue and rescue on a big scale…And
>>>>towards the end I take one last step. In doing so I go very far and
>>>>say
>>>>that even if Kastner ordered himself to keep silent knowingly, in
>>>>submission to the strong will of the Nazis, in order to save a few
>>>>Jews
>>>>from Hell – this is still no proof that he stained his hands by
>>>>collaborating with the enemies of his people and carrying out their
>>>>plan to
>>>>exterminate most of the Jewish community in Hungary.
>>>>
>>>>Even if, through these activities of his – or rather, his omission –
>>>>the
>>>>extermination became easier. And as to the moral issue, the question
>>>>is not
>>>>whether a man is allowed to kill many in order to save a few, or
>>>>vice-versa. The question is altogether in another sphere and should be
>>>>defined as follows: A man is aware that a whole community is awaiting
>>>>its
>>>>doom. He is allowed to make efforts to save a few, although part of
>>>>his
>>>>efforts involve concealment of truth from the many or should he
>>>>disclose
>>>>the truth to many though it is his best opinion that this way
>>>>everybody
>>>>will perish. I think that the answer is clear. What good will the
>>>>blood of
>>>>the few bring if everybody is to perish?…As I said, I am not arguing
>>>>with
>>>>the basic factual findings of the learned President of the Jewish
>>>>District
>>>>Court (Judge Halevi) but it seems to me, with all due respect, that
>>>>his
>>>>findings do not, as of necessity, demand the conclusion he has arrived
>>>>at.
>>>>That is to say, collaboration on the part of Kastner in the
>>>>extermination
>>>>of the Jews. And that they better coincide with bad leadership both
>>>>from a
>>>>moral and public point of view…
>>>>
>>>>In my opinion, one can say outright that if you find out that Kastner
>>>>collaborated with the enemy because he did not disclose to the people
>>>>who
>>>>boarded the trains in Kluj that they were being led to extermination,
>>>>one
>>>>has to put on trial today Danzig, Herman, Hanzi, Brand, Revis and
>>>>Marton,
>>>>and many more leaders and half-leaders who gagged themselves in an
>>>>hour of
>>>>crisis and did not inform others of what was known to them and did not
>>>>warn
>>>>and did not cry out of the coming danger….
>>>>
>>>>Because of all this I cannot confirm the conclusion of the District
>>>>Court
>>>>with regard to the accusation that Greenwald has thrown on Kastner of
>>>>collaboration with the Nazis in exterminating the Jewish people in
>>>>Hungary
>>>>during the last war.” (Hecht, ibid., pp.270-2)
>>>>
>>>>In other words, the Court approved of Kastner’s contempt for the
>>>>Hungarian
>>>>Jews and could not allow him to be condemned for doing exactly what
>>>>many
>>>>other Zionist leaders had half-leaders did – concealing their
>>>>knowledge of
>>>>the Nazi extermination plans so that Jews would board the trains to
>>>>Auschwitz peacefully while their Zionist ‘leaders’ boarded a different
>>>>train for Palestine.
>>>>
>>>>The most precise answer to this sickening judgement of Judge Chesin is
>>>>
>>>>provided in the minority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Moshe
>>>>Silberg:
>>>>
>>>>I do not say that he was the only man who possessed information among
>>>>the
>>>>leaders. It is quite possible that somebody else as well does not have
>>>>a
>>>>clear conscience with regards to this concealment. But we are dealing
>>>>here
>>>>with the guilt of Kastner and we do not have to make judgements on the
>>>>guilt of others….
>>>>
>>>>The declaration of the learned Attorney General therefore shrinks into
>>>>an
>>>>opinion….’Kastner was convinced and believed that there was no ray
>>>>of
>>>>hope for the Jews of Hungary, almost for none of them, and as he, as a
>>>>result of his personal despair, did not disclose the secret of the
>>>>extermination in order not to endanger or frustrate the rescue of the
>>>>few –
>>>>therefore he acted in good faith and should not be accused of
>>>>collaborating
>>>>with the Nazis in expediting the extermination of the Jews, even
>>>>though, in
>>>>fact, he brought about its result.’
>>>>
>>>>I am compelled to state that it is very difficult for me to conceive
>>>>such
>>>>an intention. Is this good faith? Can a single man, even in
>>>>cooperation
>>>>with some of his friends, yield to despair on behalf and without the
>>>>knowledge of 800,000 other people? This is, in my opinion, the
>>>>decisive
>>>>consideration in the problem facing us. The charge emanating from the
>>>>testimony of the witnesses against Kastner is that had they known of
>>>>the
>>>>Auschwitz secret, then thousands or tens of thousands would have been
>>>>able
>>>>to save their lives by local, partial, specific or indirect rescue
>>>>operations like local revolts, resistance, escapes, hidings,
>>>>concealment of
>>>>children with Gentiles, forging of documents, ransom money, bribery,
>>>>etc. –
>>>>and when this is the case and when one deals with many hundreds of
>>>>thousands, how does a human being, a mortal, reject with complete
>>>>certainty
>>>>and with an extreme ‘no’ the efficiency of all the many and varied
>>>>rescue
>>>>ways? How can he examine the tens of thousands of possibilities? Does
>>>>he
>>>>decide instead of God? Indeed, he who can act with such a usurpation
>>>>of the
>>>>last hope of hundreds of thousands is not entitled to claim good faith
>>>>as
>>>>his defense. The penetrating question quo warrento is a good answer to
>>>>a
>>>>claim of such good faith…
>>>>
>>>>If the superintendent of a big hospital lets thousands of sick people
>>>>die
>>>>so that he may devote himself to the sure rescue of one soul, he will
>>>>come
>>>>out guilty, at least morally, even if it is proven that he as an
>>>>individual
>>>>erroneously thought that there was no hope of saving the other
>>>>patients. He
>>>>is a collaborator with the angel of death.
>>>>
>>>>Either a complete atrophy of the soul or a blind involvement with
>>>>complete
>>>>loss of senses and proportion in his small but personal rescue
>>>>operation
>>>>could bring a man to such a gigantic, hazardous play.
>>>>
>>>>And if all this is not enough to annul the claim of good faith which
>>>>was
>>>>put before us on behalf of Kastner by the Attorney General, then
>>>>Kastner
>>>>himself comes and annuls it altogether. Not only did he never make
>>>>this
>>>>claim, but his own words prove the contrary. He writes in his report
>>>>to the
>>>>Jewish Agency that the Committee sent emissaries to many ghettos in
>>>>the
>>>>countryside and pleaded with them to organize escapes and to refuse to
>>>>board the trains. And though the story of these pleadings is untrue,
>>>>and
>>>>the silence of Kastner in Kluj is proven, the very uttering of these
>>>>statements entirely contradicts the claim that Kastner had concealed
>>>>the
>>>>news about the fate of the ghetto inmates in good faith and only as a
>>>>result of his complete despairing of the chances of escaping or
>>>>resisting
>>>>the Germans. You can not claim at the same time helplessness and
>>>>activity.
>>>>Anyway, such a claim is not convincing…
>>>>
>>>>We can sum up with three facts:
>>>>
>>>>A. That the Nazis didn’t want to have a great revolt – nor small
>>>>revolts,
>>>>and their passion was to have the extermination machine working
>>>>smoothly without resistance. This fact was known to Kastner from
>>>>the best source – from Eichmann himself – And he had additional proofs
>>>>of
>>>>that when he witnessed all the illusionary and misleading tactics
>>>>which
>>>>were being taken by the Nazis from the first moment of occupation.
>>>>
>>>>B. That the most efficient means to paralyze the resistance with – or
>>>>the
>>>>escape of a victim is to conceal from him the plot of the coming
>>>>murder.
>>>>This fact is known to every man and one does not need any proof of
>>>>evidence for this.
>>>>
>>>>C. That he, Kastner, in order to carry out the rescue plan for the few
>>>>prominents, fulfilled knowingly and without good faith the said desire
>>>>of
>>>>the Nazis, thus expediting the work of exterminating the masses.
>>>>
>>>>And also the rescue of Becher by Kastner…He who is capable of
>>>>rescuing
>>>>this Becher from hanging proves that the atrocities of this great war
>>>>criminal were not so horrifying or despicable in his eyes…I couldn’t
>>>>base
>>>>the main guilt of Kastner on this fact had it been alone, but when it
>>>>is
>>>>attached even from afar to the whole scene of events it throws
>>>>retroactive
>>>>light on the whole affair and serves as a dozen proofs of our
>>>>conclusion.”(Supreme Court Judge, Moshe Silberg, 1957)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If that had been the majority judgement, one could say that whatever
>>>>their
>>>>attitudes to the Arabs, and whatever their past behaviour might have
>>>>been
>>>>under pressure, the Zionist leadership today did not advocate
>>>>collaboration
>>>>with the Nazis.
>>>>
>>>>But Judge Silberg’s judgement was that of a minority.
>>>>
>>>>The Kastner case is therefore not an alleged episode in past history.
>>>>
>>>>It is a continuing controversy in which the top Zionist leadership of
>>>>Israel stand indicted of continuing to publicly defend collaboration
>>>>with
>>>>the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.
>>>>
>>>>Despite the unanimous finding of the Supreme Court of Israel that Kurt
>>>>Becher was a major war criminal, the Jewish Agency (World Zionist
>>>>Organization) refused to withdraw the fraudulent certificate Kastner
>>>>gave
>>>>on their behalf, which saved Becher from hanging, and allowed him to
>>>>remain
>>>>a free man in West Germany, the head of several corporations and with
>>>>an
>>>>estimated personal worth of $30 million.
>>>>
>>>>Becher has even used his certification as a ‘good’ SS officer to give
>>>>evidence in support of his associates at other war crimes trials in
>>>>West
>>>>Germany.
>>>>
>>>>Since the prosecution, representing the Israeli Government agreed with
>>>>the
>>>>Supreme Court that Becher was a major war criminal, one can only
>>>>pressure
>>>>that the Israeli Government did not want him put on trial for fear of
>>>>what
>>>>might come out.
>>>>
>>>>Likewise, none of Kastner’s associates on the Zionist Relief and
>>>>Rescue
>>>>Committee or his bosses in the Jewish Agency have ever been put on
>>>>trial .
>>>>Let alone the hundreds of ‘prominents’ who helped Kastner to reassure
>>>>the
>>>>Hungarian Jews that they were going to Kenyermeze and not Auschwitz,
>>>>in exchange for tickets on the one train that took them eventually to
>>>>Palestine.
>>>>
>>>>As for Kastner himself, he will cause no further embarrassment to the
>>>>Zionist leadership with his undisputed claims that everything he did
>>>>was
>>>>approved by the Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization) leadership
>>>>in
>>>>Palestine. He is ‘now dead’. Or putting it less delicately, on 3 March
>>>>1957
>>>>he was shot by Zeev Eckstein – immediately after the appeal hearings
>>>>were
>>>>concluded, and before the judgement ‘rehabilitating’ him was
>>>>delivered.
>>>>Eckstein was not a Hungarian avenger. He was a paid undercover agent
>>>>of the
>>>>Israeli secret service. (Hecht, ibid., p.208). Another ‘fantastic
>>>>allegation’ no doubt; but admitted in court during the murder trial).
>>
>>

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:47:36 EDT 1998
Article: 119616 of soc.culture.polish
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.malaysian,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.lebanon,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: KHAZIR Stands for Jew swine
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:04:36 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!newsfeed.direct.ca!feed.nntp.acc.ca!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.ukrainian:41747 soc.culture.polish:119616 soc.culture.russian:93409 soc.culture.swiss:26930 soc.culture.palestine:52521 soc.culture.lebanon:59711 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9689

On Mon, 14 Sep 1998 15:26:44 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

On 13 Sep 1998 07:18:24 GMT, “William Hubbard”
wrote:

>Strakitch tye golevo!

Should be shta allah aboukir!!!

>[email protected] wrote in article
><[email protected]>…
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 02:15:29 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> >On 25 Jun 1998 20:41:51 GMT, “Fenian” < [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>[email protected] wrote in article
><[email protected]>…
>> >>> On 24 Jun 1998 23:39:44 GMT, [email protected] (BUSHBADEE) wrote:
>> >
>> >>> >>> Shouldn’t the spelling be KHAZIR, meaning swine???
>> >>> >>> After all, the Christkillers are lower than the feces of the
>swine???
>> >
>> >>> >I have many christian friend and I object to you calling them lower
>than
>> >>> >the feces of swine.

>> >>> It is not the Christians that are the Christkillers.
>> >>> Read your Bible, or have your friend read it to you, about the foul
>> >>> Sanhedrin JEWS, who arranged for the murder of Jesus Christ!!!

>> >>> Christ opposed their usury and other financial crimes, being
>conducted
>> >>> in the Temples.

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:47:37 EDT 1998
Article: 119617 of soc.culture.polish
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Nazi-Zionist collaboration involving Rudolf Kastner
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:02:51 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 577
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!howland.erols.net!newshub.northeast.verio.net!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org alt.politics.nationalism.white:136386 alt.politics.white-power:165346 soc.culture.polish:119617 soc.culture.russian:93410 soc.culture.ukrainian:41748 soc.culture.swiss:26931

On Mon, 03 Nov 1997 15:09:51 -0800, “((((())))))”
wrote:

>The Kastner Case
>
>
>The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is that involving
>a Jew – Rudolf Kastner.
>
>Most Jewish people have never heard of Rudolf Kastner. Those who have, are
>generally under the impression that there is some ‘controversy’ about
>negotiations he undertook for ‘the purchase of Jewish lives for money and
>military equipment’, but that he was ‘fully rehabilitated’ by the Supreme
>Court of Israel.
>
> The Accusations
>
>Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:
>
>Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British Medical
>Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz. In his
>memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he wrote:
>
>I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse certain
>Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war.
>
>This group of quislings knew what was happening to their brethren in
>Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their own lives with the price of silence.
>Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke for all Jews
>in Hungary. While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the number is
>still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the exterminations.
>I took these terrible statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I was
>able to give Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that Eichmann
>planned to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner went
>to Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my
>choice and I shall keep quiet.’
>
>Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and took
>him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid bargaining
>end there. Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this little
>fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany
>collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…(Ben Hecht, Perfidy,
>pp261-2)
>
>These accusations are confirmed by the ‘Eichmann Confessions’ published in
>Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:
>
>I resolved to show how well a job could be done when the commander stands
>100% behind it. By shipping the Jews off in a lightning operation, I wanted
>to set an example for future campaigns elsewhere…In obedience to
>Himmler’s directive I now concentrated on negotiations with the Jewish
>political officials in Budapest…Among them Dr. Rudolph Kastner,
>authorized representative of the Zionist Movement. This Dr. Kastner was a
>young man about my age, an ice-cold lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He
>agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation – and even keep
>order in the collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let a few
>hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine. It
>was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price was not too
>high for me.
>
>We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me, Kastner smoke
>cigarets as though he was in a coffeehouse. While we talked he would smoke
>one aromatic cigaret after another, taking them from a silver case and
>lighting them with a silver lighter. With his great polish and reserve he
>would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.
>
>Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for a select group of
>Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel…
>
>As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity between our
>attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic
>Zionist leaders. I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a thousand
>or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political goal ‘You can
>have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have this group here’. And
>because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping keep the deportation
>camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape. After all, I was not
>concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews…That was the
>’gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner (Hecht, ibid., p.260-61)
>
>Quite clearly these accusations, do not relate merely to ‘the purchase of
>Jewish lives for money and military equipment’.
>
>Are the accusations against Kastner true?
>
>According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie. When Malchiel
>Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli citizen published these
>accusations against Kastner, the Israeli Government did rather more than
>demand that his views should not be broadcast. Because a prominent Zionist
>official (Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the Ministry of Trade and
>Industry) was involved, the Attorney General of the State of Israel
>prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.
>
> The Verdict
>
>Let the verdict of Judge Benjamin Halevi (who later became one of the panel
>of three judges that tried Eichmann) in Israel’s District Court of
>Jerusalem speak for itself, given in criminal case No. 124 of 1953. The
>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald. This material should be studied
>carefully.
>
>The masses of Jews from Hungary’s ghettos obediently boarded the
>deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of confidence
>in the false information that they were being transferred to Kenyermeze.
>
>The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had they
>not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
>
>The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
>rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and others
>used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the Jews.
>They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help of
>Jewish leaders.
>
>The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local leaders
>of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were spreading
>such false information and did not protest.
>
>Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
>persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local ‘rescue work’.
>
>The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of
>knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be
>deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain
>quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or hampering
>the deportation orders.
>
>Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few dozen
>police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attempt to overpower these few
>guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance activities to the
>deportations were organized in these ghettos.
>
>And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the Jews in
>the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities.
>
>The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of
>Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn their
>own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish leaders who
>did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of deportations…these
>same leaders did not join the people of their community in their ride to
>Auschwitz, but were all included in the Rescue train.
>
>The Nazi organizers of extermination and the perpetrators of extermination
>permitted Rudolf Kastner and the members of the Jewish Council in Budapest
>to save themselves, their relatives, and friends. The Nazis did this as a
>means of making the local Jewish leaders, whom they favoured, dependent on
>the Nazi regime, dependent on its good will during the time of its fatal
>deportation schedule. In short, the Nazis succeeded in bringing the Jewish
>leaders into collaboration with the Nazis at the time of the catastrophe.
>
>The Nazi chiefs knew that the Zionists were a most vital element in Jewry
>and the most trusted by the Jews.
>
>The personality of Rudolph Kastner made him a convenient catspaw for
>Eichmann and his clique, to draw into collaboration and make their task
>easier.
>
>The question here is not, as stated by the Attorney General in his
>summation, whether members of the Jewish Rescue Committee were or were
>not capable of fulfilling their duty without the patronage of the S.S.
>chiefs.
>It is obvious that without such S.S. Nazi patronage the Jewish Rescue
>Committee could not have existed, and could have acted only as an
>underground.
>
>The question is, as put by the lawyer for the defense, why were the Nazis
>interested in the existence of the Rescue Committee? Why did the S.S.
>chiefs make every effort to encourage the existence of the Jewish Rescue
>Committee? Did the exterminators turn into rescuers?
>
>The same question rises concerning the rescue of prominent Jews by these
>German killers of Jews. Was the rescue of such Jews a part of the
>extermination plan of the killers ?
>
>The support given by the extermination leaders to Kastner’s Rescue
>Committee proves that indeed there was a place for Kastner and his friends
>in their Final Solution for the Jews of Hungary – their total annihilation.
>
>The Nazi’s patronage of Kastner, and their agreement to let him save six
>hundred prominent Jews, were part of the plan to exterminate the Jews.
>Kastner was given a chance to add a few more to that number. The bait
>attracted him. The opportunity of rescuing prominent people appealed to him
>greatly. He considered the rescue of the most important Jews as a great
>personal success and a success for Zionism. It was a success that would
>also justify his conduct – his political negotiation with Nazis and the
>Nazi patronage of his committee.
>
>When Kastner received this present from the Nazis, Kastner sold his soul to
>the German Satan.
>
>The sacrifice of the vital interests of the majority of the Jews, in order
>to rescue the prominents, was the basic element in the agreement between
>Kastner and the Nazis. This agreement fixed the division of the nation into
>two unequal camps: a small fragment of prominents, whom the Nazis promised
>Kastner to save, on the one hand, and the great majority or Hungarian Jews
>whom the Nazis designated for death, on the other hand. An imperative
>condition for the rescue of the first camp by the Nazis was that Kastner
>will not interfere in the action of the Nazis against the other camp and
>will not hamper them in its extermination. Kastner fulfilled this
>condition. He concentrated his efforts in the rescue of the prominents and
>treated the camp of the doomed as if they had already been wiped out from
>the book of the living.
>
>One cannot estimate the damage caused by Kastner’s collaboration and put
>down the number of victims which it cost Hungarian Jews. These are not only
>the thousands of Jews in Nodvarod or any other community in the border
>area, Jews who could escape through the border, had the chief of their
>rescue committee fulfilled his duty toward them.
>
>All of Kastner’s answers in his final testimony were a constant effort to
>evade this truth.
>
>Kastner has tried to escape through every crack he could find in the wall
>of evidence. When one crack was sealed in his face, he darted quickly to
>another. (Judgement of Judge Benjamin Halevi, Criminal Case 124/53;
>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald, District Court, Jerusalem, June 22,
>1955).
>
>Judge Halevi reverts to the meeting of Kastner with the S.S. officers
>Becher and Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz at the time when the ‘new
>line’ of rescuing Jews was revealed by Hoess. He says:
>
>From this gathering in Budapest, it is obvious that the ‘new line’
>stretched from Himmler to Hoess, from Jutner to Becher and Krumey.
>
>According to Kastner, however, these Nazis were all active in rescuing
>Jews.
>
>This meeting of these important German guests in Budapest exposes the
>’rescue’ work of Becher in its true light. It reveals also the extent of
>Kastner’s involvement in the inner circle of the chief German war
>criminals.
>
>Just as the Nazi war criminals knew they needed an alibi and hoped to
>achieve it by the rescue of a few Jews at the eleventh hour, so Kastner
>also needed an alibi for himself.
>
>Collaboration between the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee and the
>Exterminators of the Jews was solidified in Budapest and Vienna. Kastner’s
>duties were part and parcel of the general duties of the S.S.
>
>In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department, the
>Nazi S.S. opened a Rescue Department headed by Kastner.
>
>All these extermination, robbery and rescue activities of the S.S. were
>coordinated under the management of Heinrich Himmler”.
>
>Judge Halevi continues:
>
>Kastner perjured himself knowingly in his testimony before this court when
>he denied he had interceded in Becher’s behalf. Moreover, he concealed the
>important fact that he interceded for Becher in the name of the Jewish
>Agency and the Jewish World Congress.
>
>As to the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, it was enough for the defense to
>provide Becher was a war criminal. It was up to the prosecution to remove
>Becher from this status, if they wished to negate the affidavit.
>
>The Attorney General admitted in his summation that Becher was a war
>criminal.
>
>The lies in the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, the lies in his testimony
>concerning the document, and Kastner’s knowing participation in the
>activities of Nazi war criminals, and his participation in the last minute
>fake rescue activities – all these combine to show one overwhelming truth –
>that this affidavit was not given in good faith.
>
>Kastner knew well, as he himself testified, that Becher had never stood up
>against the stream of Jewish extermination, as Kastner has declared in the
>affidavit.
>
>The aims of Becher and his superior, Himmler, were not to save Jews but to
>serve the Nazi regime with full compliance. These is not truth and no good
>faith in Kastner’s testimony, ‘I never doubted for one moment the good
>intention of good Becher’.
>
>It is clear that the positive recommendation by Kastner, not only in his
>own name but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish World
>Congress was of decisive importance for Becher. Kastner did not exaggerate
>when he said that Becher was released by the Allies because of his personal
>intervention. The lies in the affidavit of Kastner and the contradictions
>and various pretexts, which were proven to be lies, were sufficient to
>annul the value of his statements and to prove that there was no good faith
>in his testimony in favor of this German war criminal. Kastner’s affidavit
>in favor of Becher was a wilfully false affidavit given in favor of a war
>criminal to save him from trial and punishment in Nuremberg.
>
>Therefore, the defendant, Malchiel Greenwald, was correct in his
>accusations against Rudolf Kastner in the first, second and fourth of his
>statements.”
>
>Judge Halevi’s verdict found Malchiel Greenwald generally innocent of libel
>against Kastner, but fined him one Israeli pound for the one unproved
>accusation – that Kastner had actually collected money from his Nazi
>partners for his aide to their slaughter program. The judge also ordered
>the Government of Israel to pay Greenwald two hundred Israeli pounds as
>court costs.
>
>If the story ended there, it would only prove conclusively that the
>individual Kastner was a collaborator and the Israeli Government had
>attempted to defend him, although facts brought out in the trial pointed to
>much more than that.
>
>But the story does not end there.
>
>The Reaction
>The Communist Party newspaper Kol Ha’am (Voice of the People) wrote:
>
>All those whose relatives were butchered by the Germans in Hungary know now
>clearly that Jewish hands helped the mass murder” (23 June 1955)
>
>But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing
>Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the
>Government of Israel.
>
>As the evening paper *Yedi’ot Aharonot* said:
>
>If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total
>political and national collapse – as a result of what such a trial may
>disclose.” (23 June 1955)
>
>Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial, instead
>it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for criminal libel.
>
>At 11 P.M. the verdict was given. At 11 A.M. next morning the government
>announces the defense of Kastner will be renewed – an appeal filed. What
>exemplary expediency! Since when does this government possess such
>lawyer-genius who can weigh in one night the legal chances of an appeal on
>a detailed, complex verdict of three hundred pages?
>
>At the appeal hearings before the Supreme Court, the Attorney General of
>Israel, Chaim Cohen, explained clearly why the Government of Israel was
>defending Kastner so strongly:
>
>The man Kastner does not stand here as a private individual. He was a
>recognized representative, official or non-official of the Jewish National
>Institutes in Palestine and of the Zionist Executive; and I come here in
>this court to defend the representative of our national institutions.”
>(Hecht, p. 268)
>
>The truth of this statement cannot be denied. Kastner’s collaboration was
>not that of an individual. It was the collaboration of the Zionist
>leadership.
>
>So far, it has only been established that the Government of Israel
>continued to support a Nazi collaborator after the facts about his
>collaboration had been conclusively established in an Israeli court. But
>the story gets worse.
>
>The Supreme Court of Israel unanimously found that Becher was indeed a
>Nazi war criminal and that Kastner had without justification, and in the
>name
>of the Jewish Agency, helped Becher to escape justice. On this point
>Greenwald was acquitted of libel and Kastner was not ‘fully rehabilitated’.
>
>The Supreme Court also accepted the facts established in the lower court –
>that Kastner deliberately concealed the truth about Auschwitz from the
>majority of Hungarian Jews in exchange for Nazi permission to take a
>thousand or so to Palestine. Again, Kastner was far from being ‘fully
>rehabilitated’.
>
>
>But now comes the really nasty bit. After unanimously acknowledging these
>facts, the Supreme Court of Israel, by a majority of three to two, found
>that Kastner’s actions were morally justifiable and convicted Greenwald of
>criminal libel for calling this ‘collaboration’.
>
>Kastner’s actions only proved that he was a Nazi collaborator. It is the
>defense of these actions by the Government and Courts of Israel that prove
>conclusively that Zionism approves of Nazi collaboration.
>
>The majority of the Supreme Court of Israel did not rehabilitate Kastner.
>They joined him.
>
>Let us read from the majority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Shlomo
>Chesin:
>
>….What point was there in telling the people boarding the trains in Kluj,
>people struck by fate and persecuted, as to what awaits them at the end of
>their journey…Kastner spoke in detail of the situation, saying, ‘The
>Hungarian Jew was a branch which long ago dried up on the tree’. This vivid
>description coincides with the testimony of another witness about the
>Hungarian Jews, ‘This was a big Jewish community in Hungary, without any
>ideological Jewish backbone’ (Moshe Shweiger, a Kastner aide in Budapest,
>protocol 465).
>
>I fully agree with my friend, Judge Agranot, when he states that, ‘The Jews
>of Hungary, including those in the countryside, were not capable, neither
>physically nor mentally, to carry out resistance operations with force
>against the deportation scheme’…From this point of view no rescue
>achievement could have resulted by disclosing the Auschwitz news to the
>Jewish leaders there, and this is a consideration which on can properly
>conclude that Kastner had in front of his eyes.
>
>….And I take one more step. I am certain that the silence of Kastner when
>he arrived in Kluj was premeditated and calculated and did not result from
>his great despair because of the helplessness of the Jewish community. Even
>then, I say, this is still not considered wilful collaboration and
>assistance in the extermination, because all the signs indicate that
>Kastner’s efforts were aimed at rescue and rescue on a big scale…And
>towards the end I take one last step. In doing so I go very far and say
>that even if Kastner ordered himself to keep silent knowingly, in
>submission to the strong will of the Nazis, in order to save a few Jews
>from Hell – this is still no proof that he stained his hands by
>collaborating with the enemies of his people and carrying out their plan to
>exterminate most of the Jewish community in Hungary.
>
>Even if, through these activities of his – or rather, his omission – the
>extermination became easier. And as to the moral issue, the question is not
>whether a man is allowed to kill many in order to save a few, or
>vice-versa. The question is altogether in another sphere and should be
>defined as follows: A man is aware that a whole community is awaiting its
>doom. He is allowed to make efforts to save a few, although part of his
>efforts involve concealment of truth from the many or should he disclose
>the truth to many though it is his best opinion that this way everybody
>will perish. I think that the answer is clear. What good will the blood of
>the few bring if everybody is to perish?…As I said, I am not arguing with
>the basic factual findings of the learned President of the Jewish District
>Court (Judge Halevi) but it seems to me, with all due respect, that his
>findings do not, as of necessity, demand the conclusion he has arrived at.
>That is to say, collaboration on the part of Kastner in the extermination
>of the Jews. And that they better coincide with bad leadership both from a
>moral and public point of view…
>
>In my opinion, one can say outright that if you find out that Kastner
>collaborated with the enemy because he did not disclose to the people who
>boarded the trains in Kluj that they were being led to extermination, one
>has to put on trial today Danzig, Herman, Hanzi, Brand, Revis and Marton,
>and many more leaders and half-leaders who gagged themselves in an hour of
>crisis and did not inform others of what was known to them and did not warn
>and did not cry out of the coming danger….
>
>Because of all this I cannot confirm the conclusion of the District Court
>with regard to the accusation that Greenwald has thrown on Kastner of
>collaboration with the Nazis in exterminating the Jewish people in Hungary
>during the last war.” (Hecht, ibid., pp.270-2)
>
>In other words, the Court approved of Kastner’s contempt for the Hungarian
>Jews and could not allow him to be condemned for doing exactly what many
>other Zionist leaders had half-leaders did – concealing their knowledge of
>the Nazi extermination plans so that Jews would board the trains to
>Auschwitz peacefully while their Zionist ‘leaders’ boarded a different
>train for Palestine.
>
>The most precise answer to this sickening judgement of Judge Chesin is
>provided in the minority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Moshe Silberg:
>
>I do not say that he was the only man who possessed information among the
>leaders. It is quite possible that somebody else as well does not have a
>clear conscience with regards to this concealment. But we are dealing here
>with the guilt of Kastner and we do not have to make judgements on the
>guilt of others….
>
>The declaration of the learned Attorney General therefore shrinks into an
>opinion….’Kastner was convinced and believed that there was no ray of
>hope for the Jews of Hungary, almost for none of them, and as he, as a
>result of his personal despair, did not disclose the secret of the
>extermination in order not to endanger or frustrate the rescue of the few –
>therefore he acted in good faith and should not be accused of collaborating
>with the Nazis in expediting the extermination of the Jews, even though, in
>fact, he brought about its result.’
>
>I am compelled to state that it is very difficult for me to conceive such
>an intention. Is this good faith? Can a single man, even in cooperation
>with some of his friends, yield to despair on behalf and without the
>knowledge of 800,000 other people? This is, in my opinion, the decisive
>consideration in the problem facing us. The charge emanating from the
>testimony of the witnesses against Kastner is that had they known of the
>Auschwitz secret, then thousands or tens of thousands would have been able
>to save their lives by local, partial, specific or indirect rescue
>operations like local revolts, resistance, escapes, hidings, concealment of
>children with Gentiles, forging of documents, ransom money, bribery, etc. –
>and when this is the case and when one deals with many hundreds of
>thousands, how does a human being, a mortal, reject with complete certainty
>and with an extreme ‘no’ the efficiency of all the many and varied rescue
>ways? How can he examine the tens of thousands of possibilities? Does he
>decide instead of God? Indeed, he who can act with such a usurpation of the
>last hope of hundreds of thousands is not entitled to claim good faith as
>his defense. The penetrating question quo warrento is a good answer to a
>claim of such good faith…
>
>If the superintendent of a big hospital lets thousands of sick people die
>so that he may devote himself to the sure rescue of one soul, he will come
>out guilty, at least morally, even if it is proven that he as an individual
>erroneously thought that there was no hope of saving the other patients. He
>is a collaborator with the angel of death.
>
>Either a complete atrophy of the soul or a blind involvement with complete
>loss of senses and proportion in his small but personal rescue operation
>could bring a man to such a gigantic, hazardous play.
>
>And if all this is not enough to annul the claim of good faith which was
>put before us on behalf of Kastner by the Attorney General, then Kastner
>himself comes and annuls it altogether. Not only did he never make this
>claim, but his own words prove the contrary. He writes in his report to the
>Jewish Agency that the Committee sent emissaries to many ghettos in the
>countryside and pleaded with them to organize escapes and to refuse to
>board the trains. And though the story of these pleadings is untrue, and
>the silence of Kastner in Kluj is proven, the very uttering of these
>statements entirely contradicts the claim that Kastner had concealed the
>news about the fate of the ghetto inmates in good faith and only as a
>result of his complete despairing of the chances of escaping or resisting
>the Germans. You can not claim at the same time helplessness and activity.
>Anyway, such a claim is not convincing…
>
>We can sum up with three facts:
>
>A. That the Nazis didn’t want to have a great revolt – nor small revolts,
>and their passion was to have the extermination machine working
>smoothly without resistance. This fact was known to Kastner from
>the best source – from Eichmann himself – And he had additional proofs of
>that when he witnessed all the illusionary and misleading tactics which
>were being taken by the Nazis from the first moment of occupation.
>
>B. That the most efficient means to paralyze the resistance with – or the
>escape of a victim is to conceal from him the plot of the coming murder.
>This fact is known to every man and one does not need any proof of
>evidence for this.
>
>C. That he, Kastner, in order to carry out the rescue plan for the few
>prominents, fulfilled knowingly and without good faith the said desire of
>the Nazis, thus expediting the work of exterminating the masses.
>
>And also the rescue of Becher by Kastner…He who is capable of rescuing
>this Becher from hanging proves that the atrocities of this great war
>criminal were not so horrifying or despicable in his eyes…I couldn’t base
>the main guilt of Kastner on this fact had it been alone, but when it is
>attached even from afar to the whole scene of events it throws retroactive
>light on the whole affair and serves as a dozen proofs of our
>conclusion.”(Supreme Court Judge, Moshe Silberg, 1957)
>
>
>If that had been the majority judgement, one could say that whatever their
>attitudes to the Arabs, and whatever their past behaviour might have been
>under pressure, the Zionist leadership today did not advocate collaboration
>with the Nazis.
>
>But Judge Silberg’s judgement was that of a minority.
>
>The Kastner case is therefore not an alleged episode in past history.
>
>It is a continuing controversy in which the top Zionist leadership of
>Israel stand indicted of continuing to publicly defend collaboration with
>the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.
>
>Despite the unanimous finding of the Supreme Court of Israel that Kurt
>Becher was a major war criminal, the Jewish Agency (World Zionist
>Organization) refused to withdraw the fraudulent certificate Kastner gave
>on their behalf, which saved Becher from hanging, and allowed him to remain
>a free man in West Germany, the head of several corporations and with an
>estimated personal worth of $30 million.
>
>Becher has even used his certification as a ‘good’ SS officer to give
>evidence in support of his associates at other war crimes trials in West
>Germany.
>
>Since the prosecution, representing the Israeli Government agreed with the
>Supreme Court that Becher was a major war criminal, one can only pressure
>that the Israeli Government did not want him put on trial for fear of what
>might come out.
>
>Likewise, none of Kastner’s associates on the Zionist Relief and Rescue
>Committee or his bosses in the Jewish Agency have ever been put on trial .
>Let alone the hundreds of ‘prominents’ who helped Kastner to reassure the
>Hungarian Jews that they were going to Kenyermeze and not Auschwitz,
>in exchange for tickets on the one train that took them eventually to
>Palestine.
>
>As for Kastner himself, he will cause no further embarrassment to the
>Zionist leadership with his undisputed claims that everything he did was
>approved by the Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization) leadership in
>Palestine. He is ‘now dead’. Or putting it less delicately, on 3 March 1957
>he was shot by Zeev Eckstein – immediately after the appeal hearings were
>concluded, and before the judgement ‘rehabilitating’ him was delivered.
>Eckstein was not a Hungarian avenger. He was a paid undercover agent of the
>Israeli secret service. (Hecht, ibid., p.208). Another ‘fantastic
>allegation’ no doubt; but admitted in court during the murder trial).

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:47:39 EDT 1998
Article: 119618 of soc.culture.polish
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.warszawa,pl.regionalne.lodz,pl.regionalne.krakow,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian
Subject: Bolsheviks Were Christkiller JEWS, not Russians
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:00:48 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 182
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!news.greennet.net!uunet!uunet!in5.uu.net!newsfeed.xcom.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org pl.regionalne.warszawa:9690 pl.regionalne.lodz:1136 pl.regionalne.krakow:6033 soc.culture.polish:119618 soc.culture.swiss:26932 soc.culture.russian:93411 soc.culture.ukrainian:41749

On Tue, 24 Mar 1998 17:38:00 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Came across the article in deja News, so thought it should be
>reconsidered by thinking readers.

>On Sun, 12 Oct 1997 16:50:37 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>Reply-To: [email protected]

>>Subject: Jews Dominated Bolshevism – Don’t Deny It
>>From: [email protected] (Roger Hughes)
>>Date: 22 Jul 1997 12:32:44 GMT
>>Organization: Anti-Hypocrisy Foundation

>>Patriot Fact Sheet : The Jews and Bolshevism

>> One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called “Russian
>>Revolution” of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority
>>of the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to
>>them, continue to condemn anyone as “anti-Semitic” who brings up these
>>facts, it remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created
>>and lead revolutionary movement.
>
>> First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism, Karl Marx,
>>was a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father’s side.
>>Whether he was a “religous” Jew is of no significant importance, since
>>Jewishness is not defined exclusively by adherance to Judaism. A great
>>bulk of Jews today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but
>>also nonetheless consider themselves Jews.
>
>> While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism, will
>>concede that Marx was indeed Jewish, let’s see the them deny the
>>communist-Jewish connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables that
>>passed between American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C.
>>during the time of the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following
>>quotes are taken directly from documents available from the U.S.
>>Archives:
>
>>State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
>>general in Moscow, Summers: “Jews prominant in local Soviet government,
>>anti-Jewish feeling growing among population….”
>
>>State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on July
>>5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: “Fifty percent of Soviet government in
>>each town consists of Jews of the worst type.”
>
>>>From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
>>March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
>>Montgomey Shuyler: “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
>>United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it’s
>>beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type.”
>
>
>>A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok, reports
>>on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: “…(T)here were 384
>>`commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22
>>Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had come to
>>Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial
>>Government.”
>
>>With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the
>>leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.
>>(Lenin has since been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had
>>access to the KGB archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon
>>Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
>>of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the
>>Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central
>>Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev
>>(Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the
>>central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other
>>prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign
>>affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and
>>Moisei Uritsky.
>
>>David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
>>January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most
>>of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little
>>for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are
>>trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”
>
>>The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
>>”Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
>>spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
>>organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
>>object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”
>
>>In case anyone thinks I’ve taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
>>here’s three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former
>>superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik Propaganda
>>Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary,
>>United States Senate, 65th Congress:
>
>>”We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
>>Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east side
>>of New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American
>>Pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased that
>>there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English
>>showed that they had not qualified as being Americas. A number of these
>>men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element in
>>this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that
>>more than half the agitators in the socalled Bolshevik movement were
>>Jews…I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one
>>of its bases is found in the east side of New York…The latest
>>startling information, given me by someone with good authority,
>>startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in the northern
>>community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of the Soviet
>>regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)
>>out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the
>>exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
>>Gordon.
>
>>I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great
>>revolution of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing on
>>the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I
>>often remarked to my sister, ‘Well, what are we coming to anyway. This
>>all looks so Yiddish.’ Up to that time we had see very few Jews, because
>>there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in Petrograd,
>>but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the agitators
>>were Jews.
>
>>I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
>>Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
>>posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now that
>>was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians
>>did not take kindly to it.”
>
>>Some might automatically assume that the preceeding sources are
>>”anti-Semitic” and therefore unreliable, but they’d be wrong. Here’s a
>>few Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:
>
>>”The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
>>Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
>>new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
>>Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
>>and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
>>physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American
>>Hebrew, September 10, 1920)
>
>>”There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
>>many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
>>many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, London April,
>>4, 1919)
>
>>”Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi
>>S. Wise, May 5, 1935).
>
>>”In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
>>communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
>>the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
>
>>Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
>>so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
>>himself:
>
>>”National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs
>>characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an
>>extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
>>cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death
>>penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
>
>>While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and
>>clergymen murdered by Communist gangs, synogoges and rabbis were left
>>virtually untouched.
>
>>It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
>>conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
>>population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20
>>million Ukranian farmers during the 1920’s in one of the most vile
>>campaigns in history: In (the) Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80 percent
>>of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an
>>American professor of Russian history. . . ”
>
>>Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85 million persons were
>>murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them
>>directly at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish
>>Communist bosses.
>
>>Regards,
>>Roger Hughes

>> http://www.natall.com
>> http://www.natvan.com
sven88

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:48:34 EDT 1998
Article: 41747 of soc.culture.ukrainian
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.malaysian,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.lebanon,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: KHAZIR Stands for Jew swine
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:04:36 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!newsfeed.direct.ca!feed.nntp.acc.ca!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.ukrainian:41747 soc.culture.polish:119616 soc.culture.russian:93409 soc.culture.swiss:26930 soc.culture.palestine:52521 soc.culture.lebanon:59711 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9689

On Mon, 14 Sep 1998 15:26:44 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

On 13 Sep 1998 07:18:24 GMT, “William Hubbard”
wrote:

>Strakitch tye golevo!

Should be shta allah aboukir!!!

>[email protected] wrote in article
><[email protected]>…
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 02:15:29 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> >On 25 Jun 1998 20:41:51 GMT, “Fenian” < [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>[email protected] wrote in article
><[email protected]>…
>> >>> On 24 Jun 1998 23:39:44 GMT, [email protected] (BUSHBADEE) wrote:
>> >
>> >>> >>> Shouldn’t the spelling be KHAZIR, meaning swine???
>> >>> >>> After all, the Christkillers are lower than the feces of the
>swine???
>> >
>> >>> >I have many christian friend and I object to you calling them lower
>than
>> >>> >the feces of swine.

>> >>> It is not the Christians that are the Christkillers.
>> >>> Read your Bible, or have your friend read it to you, about the foul
>> >>> Sanhedrin JEWS, who arranged for the murder of Jesus Christ!!!

>> >>> Christ opposed their usury and other financial crimes, being
>conducted
>> >>> in the Temples.

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:48:35 EDT 1998
Article: 41748 of soc.culture.ukrainian
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Nazi-Zionist collaboration involving Rudolf Kastner
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:02:51 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 577
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!howland.erols.net!newshub.northeast.verio.net!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org alt.politics.nationalism.white:136386 alt.politics.white-power:165346 soc.culture.polish:119617 soc.culture.russian:93410 soc.culture.ukrainian:41748 soc.culture.swiss:26931

On Mon, 03 Nov 1997 15:09:51 -0800, “((((())))))”
wrote:

>The Kastner Case
>
>
>The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is that involving
>a Jew – Rudolf Kastner.
>
>Most Jewish people have never heard of Rudolf Kastner. Those who have, are
>generally under the impression that there is some ‘controversy’ about
>negotiations he undertook for ‘the purchase of Jewish lives for money and
>military equipment’, but that he was ‘fully rehabilitated’ by the Supreme
>Court of Israel.
>
> The Accusations
>
>Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:
>
>Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British Medical
>Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz. In his
>memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he wrote:
>
>I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse certain
>Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war.
>
>This group of quislings knew what was happening to their brethren in
>Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their own lives with the price of silence.
>Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke for all Jews
>in Hungary. While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the number is
>still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the exterminations.
>I took these terrible statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I was
>able to give Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that Eichmann
>planned to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner went
>to Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my
>choice and I shall keep quiet.’
>
>Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and took
>him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid bargaining
>end there. Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this little
>fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany
>collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…(Ben Hecht, Perfidy,
>pp261-2)
>
>These accusations are confirmed by the ‘Eichmann Confessions’ published in
>Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:
>
>I resolved to show how well a job could be done when the commander stands
>100% behind it. By shipping the Jews off in a lightning operation, I wanted
>to set an example for future campaigns elsewhere…In obedience to
>Himmler’s directive I now concentrated on negotiations with the Jewish
>political officials in Budapest…Among them Dr. Rudolph Kastner,
>authorized representative of the Zionist Movement. This Dr. Kastner was a
>young man about my age, an ice-cold lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He
>agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation – and even keep
>order in the collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let a few
>hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine. It
>was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price was not too
>high for me.
>
>We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me, Kastner smoke
>cigarets as though he was in a coffeehouse. While we talked he would smoke
>one aromatic cigaret after another, taking them from a silver case and
>lighting them with a silver lighter. With his great polish and reserve he
>would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.
>
>Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for a select group of
>Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel…
>
>As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity between our
>attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic
>Zionist leaders. I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a thousand
>or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political goal ‘You can
>have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have this group here’. And
>because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping keep the deportation
>camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape. After all, I was not
>concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews…That was the
>’gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner (Hecht, ibid., p.260-61)
>
>Quite clearly these accusations, do not relate merely to ‘the purchase of
>Jewish lives for money and military equipment’.
>
>Are the accusations against Kastner true?
>
>According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie. When Malchiel
>Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli citizen published these
>accusations against Kastner, the Israeli Government did rather more than
>demand that his views should not be broadcast. Because a prominent Zionist
>official (Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the Ministry of Trade and
>Industry) was involved, the Attorney General of the State of Israel
>prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.
>
> The Verdict
>
>Let the verdict of Judge Benjamin Halevi (who later became one of the panel
>of three judges that tried Eichmann) in Israel’s District Court of
>Jerusalem speak for itself, given in criminal case No. 124 of 1953. The
>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald. This material should be studied
>carefully.
>
>The masses of Jews from Hungary’s ghettos obediently boarded the
>deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of confidence
>in the false information that they were being transferred to Kenyermeze.
>
>The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had they
>not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
>
>The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
>rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and others
>used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the Jews.
>They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help of
>Jewish leaders.
>
>The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local leaders
>of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were spreading
>such false information and did not protest.
>
>Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
>persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local ‘rescue work’.
>
>The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of
>knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be
>deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain
>quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or hampering
>the deportation orders.
>
>Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few dozen
>police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attempt to overpower these few
>guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance activities to the
>deportations were organized in these ghettos.
>
>And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the Jews in
>the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities.
>
>The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of
>Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn their
>own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish leaders who
>did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of deportations…these
>same leaders did not join the people of their community in their ride to
>Auschwitz, but were all included in the Rescue train.
>
>The Nazi organizers of extermination and the perpetrators of extermination
>permitted Rudolf Kastner and the members of the Jewish Council in Budapest
>to save themselves, their relatives, and friends. The Nazis did this as a
>means of making the local Jewish leaders, whom they favoured, dependent on
>the Nazi regime, dependent on its good will during the time of its fatal
>deportation schedule. In short, the Nazis succeeded in bringing the Jewish
>leaders into collaboration with the Nazis at the time of the catastrophe.
>
>The Nazi chiefs knew that the Zionists were a most vital element in Jewry
>and the most trusted by the Jews.
>
>The personality of Rudolph Kastner made him a convenient catspaw for
>Eichmann and his clique, to draw into collaboration and make their task
>easier.
>
>The question here is not, as stated by the Attorney General in his
>summation, whether members of the Jewish Rescue Committee were or were
>not capable of fulfilling their duty without the patronage of the S.S.
>chiefs.
>It is obvious that without such S.S. Nazi patronage the Jewish Rescue
>Committee could not have existed, and could have acted only as an
>underground.
>
>The question is, as put by the lawyer for the defense, why were the Nazis
>interested in the existence of the Rescue Committee? Why did the S.S.
>chiefs make every effort to encourage the existence of the Jewish Rescue
>Committee? Did the exterminators turn into rescuers?
>
>The same question rises concerning the rescue of prominent Jews by these
>German killers of Jews. Was the rescue of such Jews a part of the
>extermination plan of the killers ?
>
>The support given by the extermination leaders to Kastner’s Rescue
>Committee proves that indeed there was a place for Kastner and his friends
>in their Final Solution for the Jews of Hungary – their total annihilation.
>
>The Nazi’s patronage of Kastner, and their agreement to let him save six
>hundred prominent Jews, were part of the plan to exterminate the Jews.
>Kastner was given a chance to add a few more to that number. The bait
>attracted him. The opportunity of rescuing prominent people appealed to him
>greatly. He considered the rescue of the most important Jews as a great
>personal success and a success for Zionism. It was a success that would
>also justify his conduct – his political negotiation with Nazis and the
>Nazi patronage of his committee.
>
>When Kastner received this present from the Nazis, Kastner sold his soul to
>the German Satan.
>
>The sacrifice of the vital interests of the majority of the Jews, in order
>to rescue the prominents, was the basic element in the agreement between
>Kastner and the Nazis. This agreement fixed the division of the nation into
>two unequal camps: a small fragment of prominents, whom the Nazis promised
>Kastner to save, on the one hand, and the great majority or Hungarian Jews
>whom the Nazis designated for death, on the other hand. An imperative
>condition for the rescue of the first camp by the Nazis was that Kastner
>will not interfere in the action of the Nazis against the other camp and
>will not hamper them in its extermination. Kastner fulfilled this
>condition. He concentrated his efforts in the rescue of the prominents and
>treated the camp of the doomed as if they had already been wiped out from
>the book of the living.
>
>One cannot estimate the damage caused by Kastner’s collaboration and put
>down the number of victims which it cost Hungarian Jews. These are not only
>the thousands of Jews in Nodvarod or any other community in the border
>area, Jews who could escape through the border, had the chief of their
>rescue committee fulfilled his duty toward them.
>
>All of Kastner’s answers in his final testimony were a constant effort to
>evade this truth.
>
>Kastner has tried to escape through every crack he could find in the wall
>of evidence. When one crack was sealed in his face, he darted quickly to
>another. (Judgement of Judge Benjamin Halevi, Criminal Case 124/53;
>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald, District Court, Jerusalem, June 22,
>1955).
>
>Judge Halevi reverts to the meeting of Kastner with the S.S. officers
>Becher and Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz at the time when the ‘new
>line’ of rescuing Jews was revealed by Hoess. He says:
>
>From this gathering in Budapest, it is obvious that the ‘new line’
>stretched from Himmler to Hoess, from Jutner to Becher and Krumey.
>
>According to Kastner, however, these Nazis were all active in rescuing
>Jews.
>
>This meeting of these important German guests in Budapest exposes the
>’rescue’ work of Becher in its true light. It reveals also the extent of
>Kastner’s involvement in the inner circle of the chief German war
>criminals.
>
>Just as the Nazi war criminals knew they needed an alibi and hoped to
>achieve it by the rescue of a few Jews at the eleventh hour, so Kastner
>also needed an alibi for himself.
>
>Collaboration between the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee and the
>Exterminators of the Jews was solidified in Budapest and Vienna. Kastner’s
>duties were part and parcel of the general duties of the S.S.
>
>In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department, the
>Nazi S.S. opened a Rescue Department headed by Kastner.
>
>All these extermination, robbery and rescue activities of the S.S. were
>coordinated under the management of Heinrich Himmler”.
>
>Judge Halevi continues:
>
>Kastner perjured himself knowingly in his testimony before this court when
>he denied he had interceded in Becher’s behalf. Moreover, he concealed the
>important fact that he interceded for Becher in the name of the Jewish
>Agency and the Jewish World Congress.
>
>As to the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, it was enough for the defense to
>provide Becher was a war criminal. It was up to the prosecution to remove
>Becher from this status, if they wished to negate the affidavit.
>
>The Attorney General admitted in his summation that Becher was a war
>criminal.
>
>The lies in the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, the lies in his testimony
>concerning the document, and Kastner’s knowing participation in the
>activities of Nazi war criminals, and his participation in the last minute
>fake rescue activities – all these combine to show one overwhelming truth –
>that this affidavit was not given in good faith.
>
>Kastner knew well, as he himself testified, that Becher had never stood up
>against the stream of Jewish extermination, as Kastner has declared in the
>affidavit.
>
>The aims of Becher and his superior, Himmler, were not to save Jews but to
>serve the Nazi regime with full compliance. These is not truth and no good
>faith in Kastner’s testimony, ‘I never doubted for one moment the good
>intention of good Becher’.
>
>It is clear that the positive recommendation by Kastner, not only in his
>own name but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish World
>Congress was of decisive importance for Becher. Kastner did not exaggerate
>when he said that Becher was released by the Allies because of his personal
>intervention. The lies in the affidavit of Kastner and the contradictions
>and various pretexts, which were proven to be lies, were sufficient to
>annul the value of his statements and to prove that there was no good faith
>in his testimony in favor of this German war criminal. Kastner’s affidavit
>in favor of Becher was a wilfully false affidavit given in favor of a war
>criminal to save him from trial and punishment in Nuremberg.
>
>Therefore, the defendant, Malchiel Greenwald, was correct in his
>accusations against Rudolf Kastner in the first, second and fourth of his
>statements.”
>
>Judge Halevi’s verdict found Malchiel Greenwald generally innocent of libel
>against Kastner, but fined him one Israeli pound for the one unproved
>accusation – that Kastner had actually collected money from his Nazi
>partners for his aide to their slaughter program. The judge also ordered
>the Government of Israel to pay Greenwald two hundred Israeli pounds as
>court costs.
>
>If the story ended there, it would only prove conclusively that the
>individual Kastner was a collaborator and the Israeli Government had
>attempted to defend him, although facts brought out in the trial pointed to
>much more than that.
>
>But the story does not end there.
>
>The Reaction
>The Communist Party newspaper Kol Ha’am (Voice of the People) wrote:
>
>All those whose relatives were butchered by the Germans in Hungary know now
>clearly that Jewish hands helped the mass murder” (23 June 1955)
>
>But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing
>Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the
>Government of Israel.
>
>As the evening paper *Yedi’ot Aharonot* said:
>
>If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total
>political and national collapse – as a result of what such a trial may
>disclose.” (23 June 1955)
>
>Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial, instead
>it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for criminal libel.
>
>At 11 P.M. the verdict was given. At 11 A.M. next morning the government
>announces the defense of Kastner will be renewed – an appeal filed. What
>exemplary expediency! Since when does this government possess such
>lawyer-genius who can weigh in one night the legal chances of an appeal on
>a detailed, complex verdict of three hundred pages?
>
>At the appeal hearings before the Supreme Court, the Attorney General of
>Israel, Chaim Cohen, explained clearly why the Government of Israel was
>defending Kastner so strongly:
>
>The man Kastner does not stand here as a private individual. He was a
>recognized representative, official or non-official of the Jewish National
>Institutes in Palestine and of the Zionist Executive; and I come here in
>this court to defend the representative of our national institutions.”
>(Hecht, p. 268)
>
>The truth of this statement cannot be denied. Kastner’s collaboration was
>not that of an individual. It was the collaboration of the Zionist
>leadership.
>
>So far, it has only been established that the Government of Israel
>continued to support a Nazi collaborator after the facts about his
>collaboration had been conclusively established in an Israeli court. But
>the story gets worse.
>
>The Supreme Court of Israel unanimously found that Becher was indeed a
>Nazi war criminal and that Kastner had without justification, and in the
>name
>of the Jewish Agency, helped Becher to escape justice. On this point
>Greenwald was acquitted of libel and Kastner was not ‘fully rehabilitated’.
>
>The Supreme Court also accepted the facts established in the lower court –
>that Kastner deliberately concealed the truth about Auschwitz from the
>majority of Hungarian Jews in exchange for Nazi permission to take a
>thousand or so to Palestine. Again, Kastner was far from being ‘fully
>rehabilitated’.
>
>
>But now comes the really nasty bit. After unanimously acknowledging these
>facts, the Supreme Court of Israel, by a majority of three to two, found
>that Kastner’s actions were morally justifiable and convicted Greenwald of
>criminal libel for calling this ‘collaboration’.
>
>Kastner’s actions only proved that he was a Nazi collaborator. It is the
>defense of these actions by the Government and Courts of Israel that prove
>conclusively that Zionism approves of Nazi collaboration.
>
>The majority of the Supreme Court of Israel did not rehabilitate Kastner.
>They joined him.
>
>Let us read from the majority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Shlomo
>Chesin:
>
>….What point was there in telling the people boarding the trains in Kluj,
>people struck by fate and persecuted, as to what awaits them at the end of
>their journey…Kastner spoke in detail of the situation, saying, ‘The
>Hungarian Jew was a branch which long ago dried up on the tree’. This vivid
>description coincides with the testimony of another witness about the
>Hungarian Jews, ‘This was a big Jewish community in Hungary, without any
>ideological Jewish backbone’ (Moshe Shweiger, a Kastner aide in Budapest,
>protocol 465).
>
>I fully agree with my friend, Judge Agranot, when he states that, ‘The Jews
>of Hungary, including those in the countryside, were not capable, neither
>physically nor mentally, to carry out resistance operations with force
>against the deportation scheme’…From this point of view no rescue
>achievement could have resulted by disclosing the Auschwitz news to the
>Jewish leaders there, and this is a consideration which on can properly
>conclude that Kastner had in front of his eyes.
>
>….And I take one more step. I am certain that the silence of Kastner when
>he arrived in Kluj was premeditated and calculated and did not result from
>his great despair because of the helplessness of the Jewish community. Even
>then, I say, this is still not considered wilful collaboration and
>assistance in the extermination, because all the signs indicate that
>Kastner’s efforts were aimed at rescue and rescue on a big scale…And
>towards the end I take one last step. In doing so I go very far and say
>that even if Kastner ordered himself to keep silent knowingly, in
>submission to the strong will of the Nazis, in order to save a few Jews
>from Hell – this is still no proof that he stained his hands by
>collaborating with the enemies of his people and carrying out their plan to
>exterminate most of the Jewish community in Hungary.
>
>Even if, through these activities of his – or rather, his omission – the
>extermination became easier. And as to the moral issue, the question is not
>whether a man is allowed to kill many in order to save a few, or
>vice-versa. The question is altogether in another sphere and should be
>defined as follows: A man is aware that a whole community is awaiting its
>doom. He is allowed to make efforts to save a few, although part of his
>efforts involve concealment of truth from the many or should he disclose
>the truth to many though it is his best opinion that this way everybody
>will perish. I think that the answer is clear. What good will the blood of
>the few bring if everybody is to perish?…As I said, I am not arguing with
>the basic factual findings of the learned President of the Jewish District
>Court (Judge Halevi) but it seems to me, with all due respect, that his
>findings do not, as of necessity, demand the conclusion he has arrived at.
>That is to say, collaboration on the part of Kastner in the extermination
>of the Jews. And that they better coincide with bad leadership both from a
>moral and public point of view…
>
>In my opinion, one can say outright that if you find out that Kastner
>collaborated with the enemy because he did not disclose to the people who
>boarded the trains in Kluj that they were being led to extermination, one
>has to put on trial today Danzig, Herman, Hanzi, Brand, Revis and Marton,
>and many more leaders and half-leaders who gagged themselves in an hour of
>crisis and did not inform others of what was known to them and did not warn
>and did not cry out of the coming danger….
>
>Because of all this I cannot confirm the conclusion of the District Court
>with regard to the accusation that Greenwald has thrown on Kastner of
>collaboration with the Nazis in exterminating the Jewish people in Hungary
>during the last war.” (Hecht, ibid., pp.270-2)
>
>In other words, the Court approved of Kastner’s contempt for the Hungarian
>Jews and could not allow him to be condemned for doing exactly what many
>other Zionist leaders had half-leaders did – concealing their knowledge of
>the Nazi extermination plans so that Jews would board the trains to
>Auschwitz peacefully while their Zionist ‘leaders’ boarded a different
>train for Palestine.
>
>The most precise answer to this sickening judgement of Judge Chesin is
>provided in the minority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Moshe Silberg:
>
>I do not say that he was the only man who possessed information among the
>leaders. It is quite possible that somebody else as well does not have a
>clear conscience with regards to this concealment. But we are dealing here
>with the guilt of Kastner and we do not have to make judgements on the
>guilt of others….
>
>The declaration of the learned Attorney General therefore shrinks into an
>opinion….’Kastner was convinced and believed that there was no ray of
>hope for the Jews of Hungary, almost for none of them, and as he, as a
>result of his personal despair, did not disclose the secret of the
>extermination in order not to endanger or frustrate the rescue of the few –
>therefore he acted in good faith and should not be accused of collaborating
>with the Nazis in expediting the extermination of the Jews, even though, in
>fact, he brought about its result.’
>
>I am compelled to state that it is very difficult for me to conceive such
>an intention. Is this good faith? Can a single man, even in cooperation
>with some of his friends, yield to despair on behalf and without the
>knowledge of 800,000 other people? This is, in my opinion, the decisive
>consideration in the problem facing us. The charge emanating from the
>testimony of the witnesses against Kastner is that had they known of the
>Auschwitz secret, then thousands or tens of thousands would have been able
>to save their lives by local, partial, specific or indirect rescue
>operations like local revolts, resistance, escapes, hidings, concealment of
>children with Gentiles, forging of documents, ransom money, bribery, etc. –
>and when this is the case and when one deals with many hundreds of
>thousands, how does a human being, a mortal, reject with complete certainty
>and with an extreme ‘no’ the efficiency of all the many and varied rescue
>ways? How can he examine the tens of thousands of possibilities? Does he
>decide instead of God? Indeed, he who can act with such a usurpation of the
>last hope of hundreds of thousands is not entitled to claim good faith as
>his defense. The penetrating question quo warrento is a good answer to a
>claim of such good faith…
>
>If the superintendent of a big hospital lets thousands of sick people die
>so that he may devote himself to the sure rescue of one soul, he will come
>out guilty, at least morally, even if it is proven that he as an individual
>erroneously thought that there was no hope of saving the other patients. He
>is a collaborator with the angel of death.
>
>Either a complete atrophy of the soul or a blind involvement with complete
>loss of senses and proportion in his small but personal rescue operation
>could bring a man to such a gigantic, hazardous play.
>
>And if all this is not enough to annul the claim of good faith which was
>put before us on behalf of Kastner by the Attorney General, then Kastner
>himself comes and annuls it altogether. Not only did he never make this
>claim, but his own words prove the contrary. He writes in his report to the
>Jewish Agency that the Committee sent emissaries to many ghettos in the
>countryside and pleaded with them to organize escapes and to refuse to
>board the trains. And though the story of these pleadings is untrue, and
>the silence of Kastner in Kluj is proven, the very uttering of these
>statements entirely contradicts the claim that Kastner had concealed the
>news about the fate of the ghetto inmates in good faith and only as a
>result of his complete despairing of the chances of escaping or resisting
>the Germans. You can not claim at the same time helplessness and activity.
>Anyway, such a claim is not convincing…
>
>We can sum up with three facts:
>
>A. That the Nazis didn’t want to have a great revolt – nor small revolts,
>and their passion was to have the extermination machine working
>smoothly without resistance. This fact was known to Kastner from
>the best source – from Eichmann himself – And he had additional proofs of
>that when he witnessed all the illusionary and misleading tactics which
>were being taken by the Nazis from the first moment of occupation.
>
>B. That the most efficient means to paralyze the resistance with – or the
>escape of a victim is to conceal from him the plot of the coming murder.
>This fact is known to every man and one does not need any proof of
>evidence for this.
>
>C. That he, Kastner, in order to carry out the rescue plan for the few
>prominents, fulfilled knowingly and without good faith the said desire of
>the Nazis, thus expediting the work of exterminating the masses.
>
>And also the rescue of Becher by Kastner…He who is capable of rescuing
>this Becher from hanging proves that the atrocities of this great war
>criminal were not so horrifying or despicable in his eyes…I couldn’t base
>the main guilt of Kastner on this fact had it been alone, but when it is
>attached even from afar to the whole scene of events it throws retroactive
>light on the whole affair and serves as a dozen proofs of our
>conclusion.”(Supreme Court Judge, Moshe Silberg, 1957)
>
>
>If that had been the majority judgement, one could say that whatever their
>attitudes to the Arabs, and whatever their past behaviour might have been
>under pressure, the Zionist leadership today did not advocate collaboration
>with the Nazis.
>
>But Judge Silberg’s judgement was that of a minority.
>
>The Kastner case is therefore not an alleged episode in past history.
>
>It is a continuing controversy in which the top Zionist leadership of
>Israel stand indicted of continuing to publicly defend collaboration with
>the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.
>
>Despite the unanimous finding of the Supreme Court of Israel that Kurt
>Becher was a major war criminal, the Jewish Agency (World Zionist
>Organization) refused to withdraw the fraudulent certificate Kastner gave
>on their behalf, which saved Becher from hanging, and allowed him to remain
>a free man in West Germany, the head of several corporations and with an
>estimated personal worth of $30 million.
>
>Becher has even used his certification as a ‘good’ SS officer to give
>evidence in support of his associates at other war crimes trials in West
>Germany.
>
>Since the prosecution, representing the Israeli Government agreed with the
>Supreme Court that Becher was a major war criminal, one can only pressure
>that the Israeli Government did not want him put on trial for fear of what
>might come out.
>
>Likewise, none of Kastner’s associates on the Zionist Relief and Rescue
>Committee or his bosses in the Jewish Agency have ever been put on trial .
>Let alone the hundreds of ‘prominents’ who helped Kastner to reassure the
>Hungarian Jews that they were going to Kenyermeze and not Auschwitz,
>in exchange for tickets on the one train that took them eventually to
>Palestine.
>
>As for Kastner himself, he will cause no further embarrassment to the
>Zionist leadership with his undisputed claims that everything he did was
>approved by the Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization) leadership in
>Palestine. He is ‘now dead’. Or putting it less delicately, on 3 March 1957
>he was shot by Zeev Eckstein – immediately after the appeal hearings were
>concluded, and before the judgement ‘rehabilitating’ him was delivered.
>Eckstein was not a Hungarian avenger. He was a paid undercover agent of the
>Israeli secret service. (Hecht, ibid., p.208). Another ‘fantastic
>allegation’ no doubt; but admitted in court during the murder trial).

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:48:36 EDT 1998
Article: 41749 of soc.culture.ukrainian
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.warszawa,pl.regionalne.lodz,pl.regionalne.krakow,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian
Subject: Bolsheviks Were Christkiller JEWS, not Russians
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:00:48 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 182
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!news.greennet.net!uunet!uunet!in5.uu.net!newsfeed.xcom.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org pl.regionalne.warszawa:9690 pl.regionalne.lodz:1136 pl.regionalne.krakow:6033 soc.culture.polish:119618 soc.culture.swiss:26932 soc.culture.russian:93411 soc.culture.ukrainian:41749

On Tue, 24 Mar 1998 17:38:00 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Came across the article in deja News, so thought it should be
>reconsidered by thinking readers.

>On Sun, 12 Oct 1997 16:50:37 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>Reply-To: [email protected]

>>Subject: Jews Dominated Bolshevism – Don’t Deny It
>>From: [email protected] (Roger Hughes)
>>Date: 22 Jul 1997 12:32:44 GMT
>>Organization: Anti-Hypocrisy Foundation

>>Patriot Fact Sheet : The Jews and Bolshevism

>> One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called “Russian
>>Revolution” of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority
>>of the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to
>>them, continue to condemn anyone as “anti-Semitic” who brings up these
>>facts, it remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created
>>and lead revolutionary movement.
>
>> First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism, Karl Marx,
>>was a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father’s side.
>>Whether he was a “religous” Jew is of no significant importance, since
>>Jewishness is not defined exclusively by adherance to Judaism. A great
>>bulk of Jews today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but
>>also nonetheless consider themselves Jews.
>
>> While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism, will
>>concede that Marx was indeed Jewish, let’s see the them deny the
>>communist-Jewish connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables that
>>passed between American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C.
>>during the time of the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following
>>quotes are taken directly from documents available from the U.S.
>>Archives:
>
>>State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
>>general in Moscow, Summers: “Jews prominant in local Soviet government,
>>anti-Jewish feeling growing among population….”
>
>>State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on July
>>5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: “Fifty percent of Soviet government in
>>each town consists of Jews of the worst type.”
>
>>>From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
>>March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
>>Montgomey Shuyler: “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
>>United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it’s
>>beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type.”
>
>
>>A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok, reports
>>on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: “…(T)here were 384
>>`commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22
>>Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had come to
>>Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial
>>Government.”
>
>>With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the
>>leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.
>>(Lenin has since been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had
>>access to the KGB archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon
>>Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
>>of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the
>>Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central
>>Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev
>>(Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the
>>central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other
>>prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign
>>affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and
>>Moisei Uritsky.
>
>>David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
>>January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most
>>of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little
>>for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are
>>trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”
>
>>The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
>>”Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
>>spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
>>organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
>>object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”
>
>>In case anyone thinks I’ve taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
>>here’s three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former
>>superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik Propaganda
>>Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary,
>>United States Senate, 65th Congress:
>
>>”We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
>>Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east side
>>of New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American
>>Pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased that
>>there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English
>>showed that they had not qualified as being Americas. A number of these
>>men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element in
>>this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that
>>more than half the agitators in the socalled Bolshevik movement were
>>Jews…I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one
>>of its bases is found in the east side of New York…The latest
>>startling information, given me by someone with good authority,
>>startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in the northern
>>community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of the Soviet
>>regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)
>>out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the
>>exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
>>Gordon.
>
>>I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great
>>revolution of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing on
>>the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I
>>often remarked to my sister, ‘Well, what are we coming to anyway. This
>>all looks so Yiddish.’ Up to that time we had see very few Jews, because
>>there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in Petrograd,
>>but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the agitators
>>were Jews.
>
>>I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
>>Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
>>posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now that
>>was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians
>>did not take kindly to it.”
>
>>Some might automatically assume that the preceeding sources are
>>”anti-Semitic” and therefore unreliable, but they’d be wrong. Here’s a
>>few Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:
>
>>”The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
>>Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
>>new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
>>Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
>>and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
>>physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American
>>Hebrew, September 10, 1920)
>
>>”There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
>>many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
>>many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, London April,
>>4, 1919)
>
>>”Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi
>>S. Wise, May 5, 1935).
>
>>”In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
>>communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
>>the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
>
>>Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
>>so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
>>himself:
>
>>”National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs
>>characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an
>>extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
>>cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death
>>penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
>
>>While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and
>>clergymen murdered by Communist gangs, synogoges and rabbis were left
>>virtually untouched.
>
>>It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
>>conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
>>population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20
>>million Ukranian farmers during the 1920’s in one of the most vile
>>campaigns in history: In (the) Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80 percent
>>of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an
>>American professor of Russian history. . . ”
>
>>Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85 million persons were
>>murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them
>>directly at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish
>>Communist bosses.
>
>>Regards,
>>Roger Hughes

>> http://www.natall.com
>> http://www.natvan.com
sven88

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:49:43 EDT 1998
Article: 186482 of soc.culture.malaysia
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!newsfeed.corridex.com!howland.erols.net!news.idt.net!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: Re: Nazi — Jew Zionist Collaboration
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:01:03 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 836
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]s.edmonton.telusplanet.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org alt.politics.nationalism.white:136385 soc.culture.swiss:26929 soc.culture.palestine:52520 soc.culture.malaysia:186482 soc.culture.polish:119615 soc.culture.russian:93408 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9688

On Fri, 25 Sep 1998 04:29:42 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>>On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 22:56:46 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>trying to stimulate more interest in this topic,
>>
>>On Sat, 15 Aug 1998 18:45:47 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>On 3 Jul 1998 06:38:05 GMT, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Orest Slepokura wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>…fully documented *Perfidy* blatantly exposes the degree to which
>>>>>> Zionists cooperated in the persecution of their fellow Jews…
>>>>
>>>>Her is more evidence of NAZI-ZIONIST JEW COLLABORATION.
>>>>
>>>>The Kastner Case
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is that
>>>>involving
>>>>a Jew – Rudolf Kastner.
>>>>
>>>>Most Jewish people have never heard of Rudolf Kastner. Those who have,
>>>>are
>>>>generally under the impression that there is some ‘controversy’ about
>>>>negotiations he undertook for ‘the purchase of Jewish lives for money
>>>>and
>>>>military equipment’, but that he was ‘fully rehabilitated’ by the
>>>>Supreme
>>>>Court of Israel.
>>>>
>>>> The Accusations
>>>>
>>>>Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:
>>>>
>>>>Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British
>>>>Medical
>>>>Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz. In his
>>>>memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse
>>>>certain
>>>>Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war.
>>>>
>>>>This group of quislings knew what was happening to their brethren in
>>>>Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their own lives with the price of
>>>>silence.
>>>>Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke for all
>>>>Jews
>>>>in Hungary. While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the
>>>>number is
>>>>still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the exterminations.
>>>>I took these terrible statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I
>>>>was
>>>>able to give Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that
>>>>Eichmann
>>>>planned to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner
>>>>went
>>>>to Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my
>>>>choice and I shall keep quiet.’
>>>>
>>>>Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and
>>>>took
>>>>him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid
>>>>bargaining
>>>>end there. Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this
>>>>little
>>>>fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany
>>>>collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…(Ben Hecht, Perfidy,
>>>>pp261-2)
>>>>
>>>>These accusations are confirmed by the ‘Eichmann Confessions’
>>>>published in
>>>>Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:
>>>>
>>>>I resolved to show how well a job could be done when the commander
>>>>stands
>>>>100% behind it. By shipping the Jews off in a lightning operation, I
>>>>wanted
>>>>to set an example for future campaigns elsewhere…In obedience to
>>>>Himmler’s directive I now concentrated on negotiations with the Jewish
>>>>political officials in Budapest…Among them Dr. Rudolph Kastner,
>>>>authorized representative of the Zionist Movement. This Dr. Kastner
>>>>was a
>>>>young man about my age, an ice-cold lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He
>>>>agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation – and even
>>>>keep
>>>>order in the collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let a few
>>>>hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine.
>>>>It
>>>>was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price was not
>>>>too
>>>>high for me.
>>>>
>>>>We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me, Kastner smoke
>>>>cigarets as though he was in a coffeehouse. While we talked he would
>>>>smoke
>>>>one aromatic cigaret after another, taking them from a silver case and
>>>>lighting them with a silver lighter. With his great polish and reserve
>>>>he
>>>>would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.
>>>>
>>>>Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for a select group
>>>>of
>>>>Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel…
>>>>
>>>>As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity between our
>>>>attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic
>>>>Zionist leaders. I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a
>>>>thousand
>>>>or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political goal ‘You
>>>>can
>>>>have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have this group here’. And
>>>>because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping keep the
>>>>deportation
>>>>camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape. After all, I was not
>>>>concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews…That was the
>>>>’gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner (Hecht, ibid., p.260-61)
>>>>
>>>>Quite clearly these accusations, do not relate merely to ‘the purchase
>>>>of
>>>>Jewish lives for money and military equipment’.
>>>>
>>>>Are the accusations against Kastner true?
>>>>
>>>>According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie. When Malchiel
>>>>Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli citizen published these
>>>>accusations against Kastner, the Israeli Government did rather more
>>>>than
>>>>demand that his views should not be broadcast. Because a prominent
>>>>Zionist
>>>>official (Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the Ministry of Trade and
>>>>Industry) was involved, the Attorney General of the State of Israel
>>>>prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.
>>>>
>>>> The Verdict
>>>>
>>>>Let the verdict of Judge Benjamin Halevi (who later became one of the
>>>>panel
>>>>of three judges that tried Eichmann) in Israel’s District Court of
>>>>Jerusalem speak for itself, given in criminal case No. 124 of 1953.
>>>>The
>>>>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald. This material should be
>>>>studied
>>>>carefully.
>>>>
>>>>The masses of Jews from Hungary’s ghettos obediently boarded the
>>>>deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of
>>>>confidence
>>>>in the false information that they were being transferred to
>>>>Kenyermeze.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had
>>>>they
>>>>not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
>>>>
>>>>The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
>>>>rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and
>>>>others
>>>>used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the
>>>>Jews.
>>>>They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help
>>>>of
>>>>Jewish leaders.
>>>>
>>>>The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local
>>>>leaders
>>>>of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were
>>>>spreading
>>>>such false information and did not protest.
>>>>
>>>>Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
>>>>persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local ‘rescue work’.
>>>>
>>>>The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of
>>>>knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be
>>>>deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain
>>>>quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or
>>>>hampering
>>>>the deportation orders.
>>>>
>>>>Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few
>>>>dozen
>>>>police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attempt to overpower
>>>>these few
>>>>guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance activities to the
>>>>deportations were organized in these ghettos.
>>>>
>>>>And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the
>>>>Jews in
>>>>the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities.
>>>>
>>>>The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of
>>>>Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn
>>>>their
>>>>own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish leaders
>>>>who
>>>>did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of
>>>>deportations…these
>>>>same leaders did not join the people of their community in their ride
>>>>to
>>>>Auschwitz, but were all included in the Rescue train.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi organizers of extermination and the perpetrators of
>>>>extermination
>>>>permitted Rudolf Kastner and the members of the Jewish Council in
>>>>Budapest
>>>>to save themselves, their relatives, and friends. The Nazis did this
>>>>as a
>>>>means of making the local Jewish leaders, whom they favoured,
>>>>dependent on
>>>>the Nazi regime, dependent on its good will during the time of its
>>>>fatal
>>>>deportation schedule. In short, the Nazis succeeded in bringing the
>>>>Jewish
>>>>leaders into collaboration with the Nazis at the time of the
>>>>catastrophe.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi chiefs knew that the Zionists were a most vital element in
>>>>Jewry
>>>>and the most trusted by the Jews.
>>>>
>>>>The personality of Rudolph Kastner made him a convenient catspaw for
>>>>Eichmann and his clique, to draw into collaboration and make their
>>>>task
>>>>easier.
>>>>
>>>>The question here is not, as stated by the Attorney General in his
>>>>summation, whether members of the Jewish Rescue Committee were or were
>>>>not capable of fulfilling their duty without the patronage of the S.S.
>>>>
>>>>chiefs.
>>>>It is obvious that without such S.S. Nazi patronage the Jewish Rescue
>>>>Committee could not have existed, and could have acted only as an
>>>>underground.
>>>>
>>>>The question is, as put by the lawyer for the defense, why were the
>>>>Nazis
>>>>interested in the existence of the Rescue Committee? Why did the S.S.
>>>>chiefs make every effort to encourage the existence of the Jewish
>>>>Rescue
>>>>Committee? Did the exterminators turn into rescuers?
>>>>
>>>>The same question rises concerning the rescue of prominent Jews by
>>>>these
>>>>German killers of Jews. Was the rescue of such Jews a part of the
>>>>extermination plan of the killers ?
>>>>
>>>>The support given by the extermination leaders to Kastner’s Rescue
>>>>Committee proves that indeed there was a place for Kastner and his
>>>>friends
>>>>in their Final Solution for the Jews of Hungary – their total
>>>>annihilation.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi’s patronage of Kastner, and their agreement to let him save
>>>>six
>>>>hundred prominent Jews, were part of the plan to exterminate the Jews.
>>>>Kastner was given a chance to add a few more to that number. The bait
>>>>attracted him. The opportunity of rescuing prominent people appealed
>>>>to him
>>>>greatly. He considered the rescue of the most important Jews as a
>>>>great
>>>>personal success and a success for Zionism. It was a success that
>>>>would
>>>>also justify his conduct – his political negotiation with Nazis and
>>>>the
>>>>Nazi patronage of his committee.
>>>>
>>>>When Kastner received this present from the Nazis, Kastner sold his
>>>>soul to
>>>>the German Satan.
>>>>
>>>>The sacrifice of the vital interests of the majority of the Jews, in
>>>>order
>>>>to rescue the prominents, was the basic element in the agreement
>>>>between
>>>>Kastner and the Nazis. This agreement fixed the division of the nation
>>>>into
>>>>two unequal camps: a small fragment of prominents, whom the Nazis
>>>>promised
>>>>Kastner to save, on the one hand, and the great majority or Hungarian
>>>>Jews
>>>>whom the Nazis designated for death, on the other hand. An imperative
>>>>condition for the rescue of the first camp by the Nazis was that
>>>>Kastner
>>>>will not interfere in the action of the Nazis against the other camp
>>>>and
>>>>will not hamper them in its extermination. Kastner fulfilled this
>>>>condition. He concentrated his efforts in the rescue of the prominents
>>>>and
>>>>treated the camp of the doomed as if they had already been wiped out
>>>>from
>>>>the book of the living.
>>>>
>>>>One cannot estimate the damage caused by Kastner’s collaboration and
>>>>put
>>>>down the number of victims which it cost Hungarian Jews. These are not
>>>>only
>>>>the thousands of Jews in Nodvarod or any other community in the border
>>>>area, Jews who could escape through the border, had the chief of their
>>>>rescue committee fulfilled his duty toward them.
>>>>
>>>>All of Kastner’s answers in his final testimony were a constant effort
>>>>to
>>>>evade this truth.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner has tried to escape through every crack he could find in the
>>>>wall
>>>>of evidence. When one crack was sealed in his face, he darted quickly
>>>>to
>>>>another. (Judgement of Judge Benjamin Halevi, Criminal Case 124/53;
>>>>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald, District Court, Jerusalem,
>>>>June 22,
>>>>1955).
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi reverts to the meeting of Kastner with the S.S. officers
>>>>Becher and Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz at the time when the
>>>>’new
>>>>line’ of rescuing Jews was revealed by Hoess. He says:
>>>>
>>>>From this gathering in Budapest, it is obvious that the ‘new line’
>>>>stretched from Himmler to Hoess, from Jutner to Becher and Krumey.
>>>>
>>>>According to Kastner, however, these Nazis were all active in rescuing
>>>>Jews.
>>>>
>>>>This meeting of these important German guests in Budapest exposes the
>>>>’rescue’ work of Becher in its true light. It reveals also the extent
>>>>of
>>>>Kastner’s involvement in the inner circle of the chief German war
>>>>criminals.
>>>>
>>>>Just as the Nazi war criminals knew they needed an alibi and hoped to
>>>>achieve it by the rescue of a few Jews at the eleventh hour, so
>>>>Kastner
>>>>also needed an alibi for himself.
>>>>
>>>>Collaboration between the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee and the
>>>>Exterminators of the Jews was solidified in Budapest and Vienna.
>>>>Kastner’s
>>>>duties were part and parcel of the general duties of the S.S.
>>>>
>>>>In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department,
>>>>the
>>>>Nazi S.S. opened a Rescue Department headed by Kastner.
>>>>
>>>>All these extermination, robbery and rescue activities of the S.S.
>>>>were
>>>>coordinated under the management of Heinrich Himmler”.
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi continues:
>>>>
>>>>Kastner perjured himself knowingly in his testimony before this court
>>>>when
>>>>he denied he had interceded in Becher’s behalf. Moreover, he concealed
>>>>the
>>>>important fact that he interceded for Becher in the name of the Jewish
>>>>Agency and the Jewish World Congress.
>>>>
>>>>As to the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, it was enough for the
>>>>defense to
>>>>provide Becher was a war criminal. It was up to the prosecution to
>>>>remove
>>>>Becher from this status, if they wished to negate the affidavit.
>>>>
>>>>The Attorney General admitted in his summation that Becher was a war
>>>>criminal.
>>>>
>>>>The lies in the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, the lies in his
>>>>testimony
>>>>concerning the document, and Kastner’s knowing participation in the
>>>>activities of Nazi war criminals, and his participation in the last
>>>>minute
>>>>fake rescue activities – all these combine to show one overwhelming
>>>>truth –
>>>>that this affidavit was not given in good faith.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner knew well, as he himself testified, that Becher had never
>>>>stood up
>>>>against the stream of Jewish extermination, as Kastner has declared in
>>>>the
>>>>affidavit.
>>>>
>>>>The aims of Becher and his superior, Himmler, were not to save Jews
>>>>but to
>>>>serve the Nazi regime with full compliance. These is not truth and no
>>>>good
>>>>faith in Kastner’s testimony, ‘I never doubted for one moment the good
>>>>intention of good Becher’.
>>>>
>>>>It is clear that the positive recommendation by Kastner, not only in
>>>>his
>>>>own name but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish
>>>>World
>>>>Congress was of decisive importance for Becher. Kastner did not
>>>>exaggerate
>>>>when he said that Becher was released by the Allies because of his
>>>>personal
>>>>intervention. The lies in the affidavit of Kastner and the
>>>>contradictions
>>>>and various pretexts, which were proven to be lies, were sufficient to
>>>>annul the value of his statements and to prove that there was no good
>>>>faith
>>>>in his testimony in favor of this German war criminal. Kastner’s
>>>>affidavit
>>>>in favor of Becher was a wilfully false affidavit given in favor of a
>>>>war
>>>>criminal to save him from trial and punishment in Nuremberg.
>>>>
>>>>Therefore, the defendant, Malchiel Greenwald, was correct in his
>>>>accusations against Rudolf Kastner in the first, second and fourth of
>>>>his
>>>>statements.”
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi’s verdict found Malchiel Greenwald generally innocent of
>>>>libel
>>>>against Kastner, but fined him one Israeli pound for the one unproved
>>>>accusation – that Kastner had actually collected money from his Nazi
>>>>partners for his aide to their slaughter program. The judge also
>>>>ordered
>>>>the Government of Israel to pay Greenwald two hundred Israeli pounds
>>>>as
>>>>court costs.
>>>>
>>>>If the story ended there, it would only prove conclusively that the
>>>>individual Kastner was a collaborator and the Israeli Government had
>>>>attempted to defend him, although facts brought out in the trial
>>>>pointed to
>>>>much more than that.
>>>>
>>>>But the story does not end there.
>>>>
>>>>The Reaction
>>>>The Communist Party newspaper Kol Ha’am (Voice of the People) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>All those whose relatives were butchered by the Germans in Hungary
>>>>know now
>>>>clearly that Jewish hands helped the mass murder” (23 June 1955)
>>>>
>>>>But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing
>>>>Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the
>>>>Government of Israel.
>>>>
>>>>As the evening paper *Yedi’ot Aharonot* said:
>>>>
>>>>If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total
>>>>political and national collapse – as a result of what such a trial may
>>>>disclose.” (23 June 1955)
>>>>
>>>>Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial,
>>>>instead
>>>>it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for criminal
>>>>libel.
>>>>
>>>>At 11 P.M. the verdict was given. At 11 A.M. next morning the
>>>>government
>>>>announces the defense of Kastner will be renewed – an appeal filed.
>>>>What
>>>>exemplary expediency! Since when does this government possess such
>>>>lawyer-genius who can weigh in one night the legal chances of an
>>>>appeal on
>>>>a detailed, complex verdict of three hundred pages?
>>>>
>>>>At the appeal hearings before the Supreme Court, the Attorney General
>>>>of
>>>>Israel, Chaim Cohen, explained clearly why the Government of Israel
>>>>was
>>>>defending Kastner so strongly:
>>>>
>>>>The man Kastner does not stand here as a private individual. He was a
>>>>recognized representative, official or non-official of the Jewish
>>>>National
>>>>Institutes in Palestine and of the Zionist Executive; and I come here
>>>>in
>>>>this court to defend the representative of our national institutions.”
>>>>(Hecht, p. 268)
>>>>
>>>>The truth of this statement cannot be denied. Kastner’s collaboration
>>>>was
>>>>not that of an individual. It was the collaboration of the Zionist
>>>>leadership.
>>>>
>>>>So far, it has only been established that the Government of Israel
>>>>continued to support a Nazi collaborator after the facts about his
>>>>collaboration had been conclusively established in an Israeli court.
>>>>But
>>>>the story gets worse.
>>>>
>>>>The Supreme Court of Israel unanimously found that Becher was indeed a
>>>>
>>>>Nazi war criminal and that Kastner had without justification, and in
>>>>the
>>>>name
>>>>of the Jewish Agency, helped Becher to escape justice. On this point
>>>>Greenwald was acquitted of libel and Kastner was not ‘fully
>>>>rehabilitated’.
>>>>
>>>>The Supreme Court also accepted the facts established in the lower
>>>>court –
>>>>that Kastner deliberately concealed the truth about Auschwitz from the
>>>>majority of Hungarian Jews in exchange for Nazi permission to take a
>>>>thousand or so to Palestine. Again, Kastner was far from being ‘fully
>>>>rehabilitated’.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>But now comes the really nasty bit. After unanimously acknowledging
>>>>these
>>>>facts, the Supreme Court of Israel, by a majority of three to two,
>>>>found
>>>>that Kastner’s actions were morally justifiable and convicted
>>>>Greenwald of
>>>>criminal libel for calling this ‘collaboration’.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner’s actions only proved that he was a Nazi collaborator. It is
>>>>the
>>>>defense of these actions by the Government and Courts of Israel that
>>>>prove
>>>>conclusively that Zionism approves of Nazi collaboration.
>>>>
>>>>The majority of the Supreme Court of Israel did not rehabilitate
>>>>Kastner.
>>>>They joined him.
>>>>
>>>>Let us read from the majority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Shlomo
>>>>Chesin:
>>>>
>>>>….What point was there in telling the people boarding the trains in
>>>>Kluj,
>>>>people struck by fate and persecuted, as to what awaits them at the
>>>>end of
>>>>their journey…Kastner spoke in detail of the situation, saying, ‘The
>>>>Hungarian Jew was a branch which long ago dried up on the tree’. This
>>>>vivid
>>>>description coincides with the testimony of another witness about the
>>>>Hungarian Jews, ‘This was a big Jewish community in Hungary, without
>>>>any
>>>>ideological Jewish backbone’ (Moshe Shweiger, a Kastner aide in
>>>>Budapest,
>>>>protocol 465).
>>>>
>>>>I fully agree with my friend, Judge Agranot, when he states that, ‘The
>>>>Jews
>>>>of Hungary, including those in the countryside, were not capable,
>>>>neither
>>>>physically nor mentally, to carry out resistance operations with force
>>>>against the deportation scheme’…From this point of view no rescue
>>>>achievement could have resulted by disclosing the Auschwitz news to
>>>>the
>>>>Jewish leaders there, and this is a consideration which on can
>>>>properly
>>>>conclude that Kastner had in front of his eyes.
>>>>
>>>>….And I take one more step. I am certain that the silence of Kastner
>>>>when
>>>>he arrived in Kluj was premeditated and calculated and did not result
>>>>from
>>>>his great despair because of the helplessness of the Jewish community.
>>>>Even
>>>>then, I say, this is still not considered wilful collaboration and
>>>>assistance in the extermination, because all the signs indicate that
>>>>Kastner’s efforts were aimed at rescue and rescue on a big scale…And
>>>>towards the end I take one last step. In doing so I go very far and
>>>>say
>>>>that even if Kastner ordered himself to keep silent knowingly, in
>>>>submission to the strong will of the Nazis, in order to save a few
>>>>Jews
>>>>from Hell – this is still no proof that he stained his hands by
>>>>collaborating with the enemies of his people and carrying out their
>>>>plan to
>>>>exterminate most of the Jewish community in Hungary.
>>>>
>>>>Even if, through these activities of his – or rather, his omission –
>>>>the
>>>>extermination became easier. And as to the moral issue, the question
>>>>is not
>>>>whether a man is allowed to kill many in order to save a few, or
>>>>vice-versa. The question is altogether in another sphere and should be
>>>>defined as follows: A man is aware that a whole community is awaiting
>>>>its
>>>>doom. He is allowed to make efforts to save a few, although part of
>>>>his
>>>>efforts involve concealment of truth from the many or should he
>>>>disclose
>>>>the truth to many though it is his best opinion that this way
>>>>everybody
>>>>will perish. I think that the answer is clear. What good will the
>>>>blood of
>>>>the few bring if everybody is to perish?…As I said, I am not arguing
>>>>with
>>>>the basic factual findings of the learned President of the Jewish
>>>>District
>>>>Court (Judge Halevi) but it seems to me, with all due respect, that
>>>>his
>>>>findings do not, as of necessity, demand the conclusion he has arrived
>>>>at.
>>>>That is to say, collaboration on the part of Kastner in the
>>>>extermination
>>>>of the Jews. And that they better coincide with bad leadership both
>>>>from a
>>>>moral and public point of view…
>>>>
>>>>In my opinion, one can say outright that if you find out that Kastner
>>>>collaborated with the enemy because he did not disclose to the people
>>>>who
>>>>boarded the trains in Kluj that they were being led to extermination,
>>>>one
>>>>has to put on trial today Danzig, Herman, Hanzi, Brand, Revis and
>>>>Marton,
>>>>and many more leaders and half-leaders who gagged themselves in an
>>>>hour of
>>>>crisis and did not inform others of what was known to them and did not
>>>>warn
>>>>and did not cry out of the coming danger….
>>>>
>>>>Because of all this I cannot confirm the conclusion of the District
>>>>Court
>>>>with regard to the accusation that Greenwald has thrown on Kastner of
>>>>collaboration with the Nazis in exterminating the Jewish people in
>>>>Hungary
>>>>during the last war.” (Hecht, ibid., pp.270-2)
>>>>
>>>>In other words, the Court approved of Kastner’s contempt for the
>>>>Hungarian
>>>>Jews and could not allow him to be condemned for doing exactly what
>>>>many
>>>>other Zionist leaders had half-leaders did – concealing their
>>>>knowledge of
>>>>the Nazi extermination plans so that Jews would board the trains to
>>>>Auschwitz peacefully while their Zionist ‘leaders’ boarded a different
>>>>train for Palestine.
>>>>
>>>>The most precise answer to this sickening judgement of Judge Chesin is
>>>>
>>>>provided in the minority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Moshe
>>>>Silberg:
>>>>
>>>>I do not say that he was the only man who possessed information among
>>>>the
>>>>leaders. It is quite possible that somebody else as well does not have
>>>>a
>>>>clear conscience with regards to this concealment. But we are dealing
>>>>here
>>>>with the guilt of Kastner and we do not have to make judgements on the
>>>>guilt of others….
>>>>
>>>>The declaration of the learned Attorney General therefore shrinks into
>>>>an
>>>>opinion….’Kastner was convinced and believed that there was no ray
>>>>of
>>>>hope for the Jews of Hungary, almost for none of them, and as he, as a
>>>>result of his personal despair, did not disclose the secret of the
>>>>extermination in order not to endanger or frustrate the rescue of the
>>>>few –
>>>>therefore he acted in good faith and should not be accused of
>>>>collaborating
>>>>with the Nazis in expediting the extermination of the Jews, even
>>>>though, in
>>>>fact, he brought about its result.’
>>>>
>>>>I am compelled to state that it is very difficult for me to conceive
>>>>such
>>>>an intention. Is this good faith? Can a single man, even in
>>>>cooperation
>>>>with some of his friends, yield to despair on behalf and without the
>>>>knowledge of 800,000 other people? This is, in my opinion, the
>>>>decisive
>>>>consideration in the problem facing us. The charge emanating from the
>>>>testimony of the witnesses against Kastner is that had they known of
>>>>the
>>>>Auschwitz secret, then thousands or tens of thousands would have been
>>>>able
>>>>to save their lives by local, partial, specific or indirect rescue
>>>>operations like local revolts, resistance, escapes, hidings,
>>>>concealment of
>>>>children with Gentiles, forging of documents, ransom money, bribery,
>>>>etc. –
>>>>and when this is the case and when one deals with many hundreds of
>>>>thousands, how does a human being, a mortal, reject with complete
>>>>certainty
>>>>and with an extreme ‘no’ the efficiency of all the many and varied
>>>>rescue
>>>>ways? How can he examine the tens of thousands of possibilities? Does
>>>>he
>>>>decide instead of God? Indeed, he who can act with such a usurpation
>>>>of the
>>>>last hope of hundreds of thousands is not entitled to claim good faith
>>>>as
>>>>his defense. The penetrating question quo warrento is a good answer to
>>>>a
>>>>claim of such good faith…
>>>>
>>>>If the superintendent of a big hospital lets thousands of sick people
>>>>die
>>>>so that he may devote himself to the sure rescue of one soul, he will
>>>>come
>>>>out guilty, at least morally, even if it is proven that he as an
>>>>individual
>>>>erroneously thought that there was no hope of saving the other
>>>>patients. He
>>>>is a collaborator with the angel of death.
>>>>
>>>>Either a complete atrophy of the soul or a blind involvement with
>>>>complete
>>>>loss of senses and proportion in his small but personal rescue
>>>>operation
>>>>could bring a man to such a gigantic, hazardous play.
>>>>
>>>>And if all this is not enough to annul the claim of good faith which
>>>>was
>>>>put before us on behalf of Kastner by the Attorney General, then
>>>>Kastner
>>>>himself comes and annuls it altogether. Not only did he never make
>>>>this
>>>>claim, but his own words prove the contrary. He writes in his report
>>>>to the
>>>>Jewish Agency that the Committee sent emissaries to many ghettos in
>>>>the
>>>>countryside and pleaded with them to organize escapes and to refuse to
>>>>board the trains. And though the story of these pleadings is untrue,
>>>>and
>>>>the silence of Kastner in Kluj is proven, the very uttering of these
>>>>statements entirely contradicts the claim that Kastner had concealed
>>>>the
>>>>news about the fate of the ghetto inmates in good faith and only as a
>>>>result of his complete despairing of the chances of escaping or
>>>>resisting
>>>>the Germans. You can not claim at the same time helplessness and
>>>>activity.
>>>>Anyway, such a claim is not convincing…
>>>>
>>>>We can sum up with three facts:
>>>>
>>>>A. That the Nazis didn’t want to have a great revolt – nor small
>>>>revolts,
>>>>and their passion was to have the extermination machine working
>>>>smoothly without resistance. This fact was known to Kastner from
>>>>the best source – from Eichmann himself – And he had additional proofs
>>>>of
>>>>that when he witnessed all the illusionary and misleading tactics
>>>>which
>>>>were being taken by the Nazis from the first moment of occupation.
>>>>
>>>>B. That the most efficient means to paralyze the resistance with – or
>>>>the
>>>>escape of a victim is to conceal from him the plot of the coming
>>>>murder.
>>>>This fact is known to every man and one does not need any proof of
>>>>evidence for this.
>>>>
>>>>C. That he, Kastner, in order to carry out the rescue plan for the few
>>>>prominents, fulfilled knowingly and without good faith the said desire
>>>>of
>>>>the Nazis, thus expediting the work of exterminating the masses.
>>>>
>>>>And also the rescue of Becher by Kastner…He who is capable of
>>>>rescuing
>>>>this Becher from hanging proves that the atrocities of this great war
>>>>criminal were not so horrifying or despicable in his eyes…I couldn’t
>>>>base
>>>>the main guilt of Kastner on this fact had it been alone, but when it
>>>>is
>>>>attached even from afar to the whole scene of events it throws
>>>>retroactive
>>>>light on the whole affair and serves as a dozen proofs of our
>>>>conclusion.”(Supreme Court Judge, Moshe Silberg, 1957)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If that had been the majority judgement, one could say that whatever
>>>>their
>>>>attitudes to the Arabs, and whatever their past behaviour might have
>>>>been
>>>>under pressure, the Zionist leadership today did not advocate
>>>>collaboration
>>>>with the Nazis.
>>>>
>>>>But Judge Silberg’s judgement was that of a minority.
>>>>
>>>>The Kastner case is therefore not an alleged episode in past history.
>>>>
>>>>It is a continuing controversy in which the top Zionist leadership of
>>>>Israel stand indicted of continuing to publicly defend collaboration
>>>>with
>>>>the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.
>>>>
>>>>Despite the unanimous finding of the Supreme Court of Israel that Kurt
>>>>Becher was a major war criminal, the Jewish Agency (World Zionist
>>>>Organization) refused to withdraw the fraudulent certificate Kastner
>>>>gave
>>>>on their behalf, which saved Becher from hanging, and allowed him to
>>>>remain
>>>>a free man in West Germany, the head of several corporations and with
>>>>an
>>>>estimated personal worth of $30 million.
>>>>
>>>>Becher has even used his certification as a ‘good’ SS officer to give
>>>>evidence in support of his associates at other war crimes trials in
>>>>West
>>>>Germany.
>>>>
>>>>Since the prosecution, representing the Israeli Government agreed with
>>>>the
>>>>Supreme Court that Becher was a major war criminal, one can only
>>>>pressure
>>>>that the Israeli Government did not want him put on trial for fear of
>>>>what
>>>>might come out.
>>>>
>>>>Likewise, none of Kastner’s associates on the Zionist Relief and
>>>>Rescue
>>>>Committee or his bosses in the Jewish Agency have ever been put on
>>>>trial .
>>>>Let alone the hundreds of ‘prominents’ who helped Kastner to reassure
>>>>the
>>>>Hungarian Jews that they were going to Kenyermeze and not Auschwitz,
>>>>in exchange for tickets on the one train that took them eventually to
>>>>Palestine.
>>>>
>>>>As for Kastner himself, he will cause no further embarrassment to the
>>>>Zionist leadership with his undisputed claims that everything he did
>>>>was
>>>>approved by the Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization) leadership
>>>>in
>>>>Palestine. He is ‘now dead’. Or putting it less delicately, on 3 March
>>>>1957
>>>>he was shot by Zeev Eckstein – immediately after the appeal hearings
>>>>were
>>>>concluded, and before the judgement ‘rehabilitating’ him was
>>>>delivered.
>>>>Eckstein was not a Hungarian avenger. He was a paid undercover agent
>>>>of the
>>>>Israeli secret service. (Hecht, ibid., p.208). Another ‘fantastic
>>>>allegation’ no doubt; but admitted in court during the murder trial).
>>
>>

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:52:49 EDT 1998
Article: 6033 of pl.regionalne.krakow
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.warszawa,pl.regionalne.lodz,pl.regionalne.krakow,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian
Subject: Bolsheviks Were Christkiller JEWS, not Russians
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:00:48 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 182
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!news.greennet.net!uunet!uunet!in5.uu.net!newsfeed.xcom.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org pl.regionalne.warszawa:9690 pl.regionalne.lodz:1136 pl.regionalne.krakow:6033 soc.culture.polish:119618 soc.culture.swiss:26932 soc.culture.russian:93411 soc.culture.ukrainian:41749

On Tue, 24 Mar 1998 17:38:00 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Came across the article in deja News, so thought it should be
>reconsidered by thinking readers.

>On Sun, 12 Oct 1997 16:50:37 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>Reply-To: [email protected]

>>Subject: Jews Dominated Bolshevism – Don’t Deny It
>>From: [email protected] (Roger Hughes)
>>Date: 22 Jul 1997 12:32:44 GMT
>>Organization: Anti-Hypocrisy Foundation

>>Patriot Fact Sheet : The Jews and Bolshevism

>> One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called “Russian
>>Revolution” of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority
>>of the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to
>>them, continue to condemn anyone as “anti-Semitic” who brings up these
>>facts, it remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created
>>and lead revolutionary movement.
>
>> First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism, Karl Marx,
>>was a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father’s side.
>>Whether he was a “religous” Jew is of no significant importance, since
>>Jewishness is not defined exclusively by adherance to Judaism. A great
>>bulk of Jews today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but
>>also nonetheless consider themselves Jews.
>
>> While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism, will
>>concede that Marx was indeed Jewish, let’s see the them deny the
>>communist-Jewish connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables that
>>passed between American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C.
>>during the time of the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following
>>quotes are taken directly from documents available from the U.S.
>>Archives:
>
>>State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
>>general in Moscow, Summers: “Jews prominant in local Soviet government,
>>anti-Jewish feeling growing among population….”
>
>>State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on July
>>5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: “Fifty percent of Soviet government in
>>each town consists of Jews of the worst type.”
>
>>>From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
>>March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
>>Montgomey Shuyler: “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
>>United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it’s
>>beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type.”
>
>
>>A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok, reports
>>on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: “…(T)here were 384
>>`commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22
>>Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had come to
>>Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial
>>Government.”
>
>>With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the
>>leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.
>>(Lenin has since been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had
>>access to the KGB archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon
>>Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
>>of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the
>>Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central
>>Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev
>>(Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the
>>central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other
>>prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign
>>affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and
>>Moisei Uritsky.
>
>>David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
>>January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most
>>of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little
>>for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are
>>trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”
>
>>The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
>>”Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
>>spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
>>organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
>>object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”
>
>>In case anyone thinks I’ve taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
>>here’s three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former
>>superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik Propaganda
>>Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary,
>>United States Senate, 65th Congress:
>
>>”We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
>>Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east side
>>of New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American
>>Pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased that
>>there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English
>>showed that they had not qualified as being Americas. A number of these
>>men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element in
>>this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that
>>more than half the agitators in the socalled Bolshevik movement were
>>Jews…I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one
>>of its bases is found in the east side of New York…The latest
>>startling information, given me by someone with good authority,
>>startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in the northern
>>community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of the Soviet
>>regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)
>>out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the
>>exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
>>Gordon.
>
>>I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great
>>revolution of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing on
>>the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I
>>often remarked to my sister, ‘Well, what are we coming to anyway. This
>>all looks so Yiddish.’ Up to that time we had see very few Jews, because
>>there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in Petrograd,
>>but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the agitators
>>were Jews.
>
>>I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
>>Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
>>posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now that
>>was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians
>>did not take kindly to it.”
>
>>Some might automatically assume that the preceeding sources are
>>”anti-Semitic” and therefore unreliable, but they’d be wrong. Here’s a
>>few Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:
>
>>”The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
>>Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
>>new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
>>Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
>>and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
>>physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American
>>Hebrew, September 10, 1920)
>
>>”There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
>>many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
>>many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, London April,
>>4, 1919)
>
>>”Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi
>>S. Wise, May 5, 1935).
>
>>”In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
>>communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
>>the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
>
>>Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
>>so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
>>himself:
>
>>”National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs
>>characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an
>>extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
>>cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death
>>penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
>
>>While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and
>>clergymen murdered by Communist gangs, synogoges and rabbis were left
>>virtually untouched.
>
>>It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
>>conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
>>population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20
>>million Ukranian farmers during the 1920’s in one of the most vile
>>campaigns in history: In (the) Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80 percent
>>of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an
>>American professor of Russian history. . . ”
>
>>Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85 million persons were
>>murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them
>>directly at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish
>>Communist bosses.
>
>>Regards,
>>Roger Hughes

>> http://www.natall.com
>> http://www.natvan.com
sven88

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:53:08 EDT 1998
Article: 1136 of pl.regionalne.lodz
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.warszawa,pl.regionalne.lodz,pl.regionalne.krakow,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian
Subject: Bolsheviks Were Christkiller JEWS, not Russians
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:00:48 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 182
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!news.greennet.net!uunet!uunet!in5.uu.net!newsfeed.xcom.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org pl.regionalne.warszawa:9690 pl.regionalne.lodz:1136 pl.regionalne.krakow:6033 soc.culture.polish:119618 soc.culture.swiss:26932 soc.culture.russian:93411 soc.culture.ukrainian:41749

On Tue, 24 Mar 1998 17:38:00 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Came across the article in deja News, so thought it should be
>reconsidered by thinking readers.

>On Sun, 12 Oct 1997 16:50:37 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>Reply-To: [email protected]

>>Subject: Jews Dominated Bolshevism – Don’t Deny It
>>From: [email protected] (Roger Hughes)
>>Date: 22 Jul 1997 12:32:44 GMT
>>Organization: Anti-Hypocrisy Foundation

>>Patriot Fact Sheet : The Jews and Bolshevism

>> One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called “Russian
>>Revolution” of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority
>>of the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to
>>them, continue to condemn anyone as “anti-Semitic” who brings up these
>>facts, it remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created
>>and lead revolutionary movement.
>
>> First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism, Karl Marx,
>>was a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father’s side.
>>Whether he was a “religous” Jew is of no significant importance, since
>>Jewishness is not defined exclusively by adherance to Judaism. A great
>>bulk of Jews today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but
>>also nonetheless consider themselves Jews.
>
>> While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism, will
>>concede that Marx was indeed Jewish, let’s see the them deny the
>>communist-Jewish connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables that
>>passed between American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C.
>>during the time of the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following
>>quotes are taken directly from documents available from the U.S.
>>Archives:
>
>>State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
>>general in Moscow, Summers: “Jews prominant in local Soviet government,
>>anti-Jewish feeling growing among population….”
>
>>State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on July
>>5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: “Fifty percent of Soviet government in
>>each town consists of Jews of the worst type.”
>
>>>From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
>>March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
>>Montgomey Shuyler: “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
>>United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it’s
>>beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type.”
>
>
>>A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok, reports
>>on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: “…(T)here were 384
>>`commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22
>>Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had come to
>>Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial
>>Government.”
>
>>With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the
>>leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.
>>(Lenin has since been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had
>>access to the KGB archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon
>>Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
>>of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the
>>Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central
>>Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev
>>(Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the
>>central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other
>>prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign
>>affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and
>>Moisei Uritsky.
>
>>David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
>>January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most
>>of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little
>>for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are
>>trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”
>
>>The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
>>”Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
>>spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
>>organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
>>object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”
>
>>In case anyone thinks I’ve taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
>>here’s three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former
>>superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik Propaganda
>>Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary,
>>United States Senate, 65th Congress:
>
>>”We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
>>Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east side
>>of New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American
>>Pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased that
>>there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English
>>showed that they had not qualified as being Americas. A number of these
>>men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element in
>>this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that
>>more than half the agitators in the socalled Bolshevik movement were
>>Jews…I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one
>>of its bases is found in the east side of New York…The latest
>>startling information, given me by someone with good authority,
>>startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in the northern
>>community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of the Soviet
>>regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)
>>out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the
>>exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
>>Gordon.
>
>>I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great
>>revolution of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing on
>>the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I
>>often remarked to my sister, ‘Well, what are we coming to anyway. This
>>all looks so Yiddish.’ Up to that time we had see very few Jews, because
>>there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in Petrograd,
>>but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the agitators
>>were Jews.
>
>>I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
>>Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
>>posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now that
>>was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians
>>did not take kindly to it.”
>
>>Some might automatically assume that the preceeding sources are
>>”anti-Semitic” and therefore unreliable, but they’d be wrong. Here’s a
>>few Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:
>
>>”The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
>>Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
>>new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
>>Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
>>and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
>>physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American
>>Hebrew, September 10, 1920)
>
>>”There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
>>many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
>>many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, London April,
>>4, 1919)
>
>>”Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi
>>S. Wise, May 5, 1935).
>
>>”In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
>>communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
>>the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
>
>>Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
>>so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
>>himself:
>
>>”National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs
>>characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an
>>extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
>>cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death
>>penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
>
>>While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and
>>clergymen murdered by Communist gangs, synogoges and rabbis were left
>>virtually untouched.
>
>>It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
>>conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
>>population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20
>>million Ukranian farmers during the 1920’s in one of the most vile
>>campaigns in history: In (the) Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80 percent
>>of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an
>>American professor of Russian history. . . ”
>
>>Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85 million persons were
>>murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them
>>directly at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish
>>Communist bosses.
>
>>Regards,
>>Roger Hughes

>> http://www.natall.com
>> http://www.natvan.com
sven88

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:53:18 EDT 1998
Article: 9688 of pl.regionalne.warszawa
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!newsfeed.corridex.com!howland.erols.net!news.idt.net!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: Re: Nazi — Jew Zionist Collaboration
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:01:03 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 836
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org alt.politics.nationalism.white:136385 soc.culture.swiss:26929 soc.culture.palestine:52520 soc.culture.malaysia:186482 soc.culture.polish:119615 soc.culture.russian:93408 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9688

On Fri, 25 Sep 1998 04:29:42 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>>On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 22:56:46 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>trying to stimulate more interest in this topic,
>>
>>On Sat, 15 Aug 1998 18:45:47 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>On 3 Jul 1998 06:38:05 GMT, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Orest Slepokura wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>…fully documented *Perfidy* blatantly exposes the degree to which
>>>>>> Zionists cooperated in the persecution of their fellow Jews…
>>>>
>>>>Her is more evidence of NAZI-ZIONIST JEW COLLABORATION.
>>>>
>>>>The Kastner Case
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is that
>>>>involving
>>>>a Jew – Rudolf Kastner.
>>>>
>>>>Most Jewish people have never heard of Rudolf Kastner. Those who have,
>>>>are
>>>>generally under the impression that there is some ‘controversy’ about
>>>>negotiations he undertook for ‘the purchase of Jewish lives for money
>>>>and
>>>>military equipment’, but that he was ‘fully rehabilitated’ by the
>>>>Supreme
>>>>Court of Israel.
>>>>
>>>> The Accusations
>>>>
>>>>Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:
>>>>
>>>>Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British
>>>>Medical
>>>>Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz. In his
>>>>memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse
>>>>certain
>>>>Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war.
>>>>
>>>>This group of quislings knew what was happening to their brethren in
>>>>Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their own lives with the price of
>>>>silence.
>>>>Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke for all
>>>>Jews
>>>>in Hungary. While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the
>>>>number is
>>>>still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the exterminations.
>>>>I took these terrible statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I
>>>>was
>>>>able to give Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that
>>>>Eichmann
>>>>planned to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner
>>>>went
>>>>to Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my
>>>>choice and I shall keep quiet.’
>>>>
>>>>Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and
>>>>took
>>>>him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid
>>>>bargaining
>>>>end there. Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this
>>>>little
>>>>fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany
>>>>collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…(Ben Hecht, Perfidy,
>>>>pp261-2)
>>>>
>>>>These accusations are confirmed by the ‘Eichmann Confessions’
>>>>published in
>>>>Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:
>>>>
>>>>I resolved to show how well a job could be done when the commander
>>>>stands
>>>>100% behind it. By shipping the Jews off in a lightning operation, I
>>>>wanted
>>>>to set an example for future campaigns elsewhere…In obedience to
>>>>Himmler’s directive I now concentrated on negotiations with the Jewish
>>>>political officials in Budapest…Among them Dr. Rudolph Kastner,
>>>>authorized representative of the Zionist Movement. This Dr. Kastner
>>>>was a
>>>>young man about my age, an ice-cold lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He
>>>>agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation – and even
>>>>keep
>>>>order in the collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let a few
>>>>hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine.
>>>>It
>>>>was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price was not
>>>>too
>>>>high for me.
>>>>
>>>>We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me, Kastner smoke
>>>>cigarets as though he was in a coffeehouse. While we talked he would
>>>>smoke
>>>>one aromatic cigaret after another, taking them from a silver case and
>>>>lighting them with a silver lighter. With his great polish and reserve
>>>>he
>>>>would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.
>>>>
>>>>Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for a select group
>>>>of
>>>>Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel…
>>>>
>>>>As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity between our
>>>>attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic
>>>>Zionist leaders. I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a
>>>>thousand
>>>>or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political goal ‘You
>>>>can
>>>>have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have this group here’. And
>>>>because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping keep the
>>>>deportation
>>>>camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape. After all, I was not
>>>>concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews…That was the
>>>>’gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner (Hecht, ibid., p.260-61)
>>>>
>>>>Quite clearly these accusations, do not relate merely to ‘the purchase
>>>>of
>>>>Jewish lives for money and military equipment’.
>>>>
>>>>Are the accusations against Kastner true?
>>>>
>>>>According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie. When Malchiel
>>>>Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli citizen published these
>>>>accusations against Kastner, the Israeli Government did rather more
>>>>than
>>>>demand that his views should not be broadcast. Because a prominent
>>>>Zionist
>>>>official (Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the Ministry of Trade and
>>>>Industry) was involved, the Attorney General of the State of Israel
>>>>prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.
>>>>
>>>> The Verdict
>>>>
>>>>Let the verdict of Judge Benjamin Halevi (who later became one of the
>>>>panel
>>>>of three judges that tried Eichmann) in Israel’s District Court of
>>>>Jerusalem speak for itself, given in criminal case No. 124 of 1953.
>>>>The
>>>>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald. This material should be
>>>>studied
>>>>carefully.
>>>>
>>>>The masses of Jews from Hungary’s ghettos obediently boarded the
>>>>deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of
>>>>confidence
>>>>in the false information that they were being transferred to
>>>>Kenyermeze.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had
>>>>they
>>>>not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
>>>>
>>>>The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
>>>>rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and
>>>>others
>>>>used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the
>>>>Jews.
>>>>They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help
>>>>of
>>>>Jewish leaders.
>>>>
>>>>The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local
>>>>leaders
>>>>of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were
>>>>spreading
>>>>such false information and did not protest.
>>>>
>>>>Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
>>>>persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local ‘rescue work’.
>>>>
>>>>The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of
>>>>knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be
>>>>deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain
>>>>quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or
>>>>hampering
>>>>the deportation orders.
>>>>
>>>>Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few
>>>>dozen
>>>>police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attempt to overpower
>>>>these few
>>>>guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance activities to the
>>>>deportations were organized in these ghettos.
>>>>
>>>>And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the
>>>>Jews in
>>>>the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities.
>>>>
>>>>The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of
>>>>Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn
>>>>their
>>>>own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish leaders
>>>>who
>>>>did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of
>>>>deportations…these
>>>>same leaders did not join the people of their community in their ride
>>>>to
>>>>Auschwitz, but were all included in the Rescue train.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi organizers of extermination and the perpetrators of
>>>>extermination
>>>>permitted Rudolf Kastner and the members of the Jewish Council in
>>>>Budapest
>>>>to save themselves, their relatives, and friends. The Nazis did this
>>>>as a
>>>>means of making the local Jewish leaders, whom they favoured,
>>>>dependent on
>>>>the Nazi regime, dependent on its good will during the time of its
>>>>fatal
>>>>deportation schedule. In short, the Nazis succeeded in bringing the
>>>>Jewish
>>>>leaders into collaboration with the Nazis at the time of the
>>>>catastrophe.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi chiefs knew that the Zionists were a most vital element in
>>>>Jewry
>>>>and the most trusted by the Jews.
>>>>
>>>>The personality of Rudolph Kastner made him a convenient catspaw for
>>>>Eichmann and his clique, to draw into collaboration and make their
>>>>task
>>>>easier.
>>>>
>>>>The question here is not, as stated by the Attorney General in his
>>>>summation, whether members of the Jewish Rescue Committee were or were
>>>>not capable of fulfilling their duty without the patronage of the S.S.
>>>>
>>>>chiefs.
>>>>It is obvious that without such S.S. Nazi patronage the Jewish Rescue
>>>>Committee could not have existed, and could have acted only as an
>>>>underground.
>>>>
>>>>The question is, as put by the lawyer for the defense, why were the
>>>>Nazis
>>>>interested in the existence of the Rescue Committee? Why did the S.S.
>>>>chiefs make every effort to encourage the existence of the Jewish
>>>>Rescue
>>>>Committee? Did the exterminators turn into rescuers?
>>>>
>>>>The same question rises concerning the rescue of prominent Jews by
>>>>these
>>>>German killers of Jews. Was the rescue of such Jews a part of the
>>>>extermination plan of the killers ?
>>>>
>>>>The support given by the extermination leaders to Kastner’s Rescue
>>>>Committee proves that indeed there was a place for Kastner and his
>>>>friends
>>>>in their Final Solution for the Jews of Hungary – their total
>>>>annihilation.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi’s patronage of Kastner, and their agreement to let him save
>>>>six
>>>>hundred prominent Jews, were part of the plan to exterminate the Jews.
>>>>Kastner was given a chance to add a few more to that number. The bait
>>>>attracted him. The opportunity of rescuing prominent people appealed
>>>>to him
>>>>greatly. He considered the rescue of the most important Jews as a
>>>>great
>>>>personal success and a success for Zionism. It was a success that
>>>>would
>>>>also justify his conduct – his political negotiation with Nazis and
>>>>the
>>>>Nazi patronage of his committee.
>>>>
>>>>When Kastner received this present from the Nazis, Kastner sold his
>>>>soul to
>>>>the German Satan.
>>>>
>>>>The sacrifice of the vital interests of the majority of the Jews, in
>>>>order
>>>>to rescue the prominents, was the basic element in the agreement
>>>>between
>>>>Kastner and the Nazis. This agreement fixed the division of the nation
>>>>into
>>>>two unequal camps: a small fragment of prominents, whom the Nazis
>>>>promised
>>>>Kastner to save, on the one hand, and the great majority or Hungarian
>>>>Jews
>>>>whom the Nazis designated for death, on the other hand. An imperative
>>>>condition for the rescue of the first camp by the Nazis was that
>>>>Kastner
>>>>will not interfere in the action of the Nazis against the other camp
>>>>and
>>>>will not hamper them in its extermination. Kastner fulfilled this
>>>>condition. He concentrated his efforts in the rescue of the prominents
>>>>and
>>>>treated the camp of the doomed as if they had already been wiped out
>>>>from
>>>>the book of the living.
>>>>
>>>>One cannot estimate the damage caused by Kastner’s collaboration and
>>>>put
>>>>down the number of victims which it cost Hungarian Jews. These are not
>>>>only
>>>>the thousands of Jews in Nodvarod or any other community in the border
>>>>area, Jews who could escape through the border, had the chief of their
>>>>rescue committee fulfilled his duty toward them.
>>>>
>>>>All of Kastner’s answers in his final testimony were a constant effort
>>>>to
>>>>evade this truth.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner has tried to escape through every crack he could find in the
>>>>wall
>>>>of evidence. When one crack was sealed in his face, he darted quickly
>>>>to
>>>>another. (Judgement of Judge Benjamin Halevi, Criminal Case 124/53;
>>>>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald, District Court, Jerusalem,
>>>>June 22,
>>>>1955).
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi reverts to the meeting of Kastner with the S.S. officers
>>>>Becher and Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz at the time when the
>>>>’new
>>>>line’ of rescuing Jews was revealed by Hoess. He says:
>>>>
>>>>From this gathering in Budapest, it is obvious that the ‘new line’
>>>>stretched from Himmler to Hoess, from Jutner to Becher and Krumey.
>>>>
>>>>According to Kastner, however, these Nazis were all active in rescuing
>>>>Jews.
>>>>
>>>>This meeting of these important German guests in Budapest exposes the
>>>>’rescue’ work of Becher in its true light. It reveals also the extent
>>>>of
>>>>Kastner’s involvement in the inner circle of the chief German war
>>>>criminals.
>>>>
>>>>Just as the Nazi war criminals knew they needed an alibi and hoped to
>>>>achieve it by the rescue of a few Jews at the eleventh hour, so
>>>>Kastner
>>>>also needed an alibi for himself.
>>>>
>>>>Collaboration between the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee and the
>>>>Exterminators of the Jews was solidified in Budapest and Vienna.
>>>>Kastner’s
>>>>duties were part and parcel of the general duties of the S.S.
>>>>
>>>>In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department,
>>>>the
>>>>Nazi S.S. opened a Rescue Department headed by Kastner.
>>>>
>>>>All these extermination, robbery and rescue activities of the S.S.
>>>>were
>>>>coordinated under the management of Heinrich Himmler”.
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi continues:
>>>>
>>>>Kastner perjured himself knowingly in his testimony before this court
>>>>when
>>>>he denied he had interceded in Becher’s behalf. Moreover, he concealed
>>>>the
>>>>important fact that he interceded for Becher in the name of the Jewish
>>>>Agency and the Jewish World Congress.
>>>>
>>>>As to the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, it was enough for the
>>>>defense to
>>>>provide Becher was a war criminal. It was up to the prosecution to
>>>>remove
>>>>Becher from this status, if they wished to negate the affidavit.
>>>>
>>>>The Attorney General admitted in his summation that Becher was a war
>>>>criminal.
>>>>
>>>>The lies in the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, the lies in his
>>>>testimony
>>>>concerning the document, and Kastner’s knowing participation in the
>>>>activities of Nazi war criminals, and his participation in the last
>>>>minute
>>>>fake rescue activities – all these combine to show one overwhelming
>>>>truth –
>>>>that this affidavit was not given in good faith.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner knew well, as he himself testified, that Becher had never
>>>>stood up
>>>>against the stream of Jewish extermination, as Kastner has declared in
>>>>the
>>>>affidavit.
>>>>
>>>>The aims of Becher and his superior, Himmler, were not to save Jews
>>>>but to
>>>>serve the Nazi regime with full compliance. These is not truth and no
>>>>good
>>>>faith in Kastner’s testimony, ‘I never doubted for one moment the good
>>>>intention of good Becher’.
>>>>
>>>>It is clear that the positive recommendation by Kastner, not only in
>>>>his
>>>>own name but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish
>>>>World
>>>>Congress was of decisive importance for Becher. Kastner did not
>>>>exaggerate
>>>>when he said that Becher was released by the Allies because of his
>>>>personal
>>>>intervention. The lies in the affidavit of Kastner and the
>>>>contradictions
>>>>and various pretexts, which were proven to be lies, were sufficient to
>>>>annul the value of his statements and to prove that there was no good
>>>>faith
>>>>in his testimony in favor of this German war criminal. Kastner’s
>>>>affidavit
>>>>in favor of Becher was a wilfully false affidavit given in favor of a
>>>>war
>>>>criminal to save him from trial and punishment in Nuremberg.
>>>>
>>>>Therefore, the defendant, Malchiel Greenwald, was correct in his
>>>>accusations against Rudolf Kastner in the first, second and fourth of
>>>>his
>>>>statements.”
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi’s verdict found Malchiel Greenwald generally innocent of
>>>>libel
>>>>against Kastner, but fined him one Israeli pound for the one unproved
>>>>accusation – that Kastner had actually collected money from his Nazi
>>>>partners for his aide to their slaughter program. The judge also
>>>>ordered
>>>>the Government of Israel to pay Greenwald two hundred Israeli pounds
>>>>as
>>>>court costs.
>>>>
>>>>If the story ended there, it would only prove conclusively that the
>>>>individual Kastner was a collaborator and the Israeli Government had
>>>>attempted to defend him, although facts brought out in the trial
>>>>pointed to
>>>>much more than that.
>>>>
>>>>But the story does not end there.
>>>>
>>>>The Reaction
>>>>The Communist Party newspaper Kol Ha’am (Voice of the People) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>All those whose relatives were butchered by the Germans in Hungary
>>>>know now
>>>>clearly that Jewish hands helped the mass murder” (23 June 1955)
>>>>
>>>>But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing
>>>>Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the
>>>>Government of Israel.
>>>>
>>>>As the evening paper *Yedi’ot Aharonot* said:
>>>>
>>>>If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total
>>>>political and national collapse – as a result of what such a trial may
>>>>disclose.” (23 June 1955)
>>>>
>>>>Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial,
>>>>instead
>>>>it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for criminal
>>>>libel.
>>>>
>>>>At 11 P.M. the verdict was given. At 11 A.M. next morning the
>>>>government
>>>>announces the defense of Kastner will be renewed – an appeal filed.
>>>>What
>>>>exemplary expediency! Since when does this government possess such
>>>>lawyer-genius who can weigh in one night the legal chances of an
>>>>appeal on
>>>>a detailed, complex verdict of three hundred pages?
>>>>
>>>>At the appeal hearings before the Supreme Court, the Attorney General
>>>>of
>>>>Israel, Chaim Cohen, explained clearly why the Government of Israel
>>>>was
>>>>defending Kastner so strongly:
>>>>
>>>>The man Kastner does not stand here as a private individual. He was a
>>>>recognized representative, official or non-official of the Jewish
>>>>National
>>>>Institutes in Palestine and of the Zionist Executive; and I come here
>>>>in
>>>>this court to defend the representative of our national institutions.”
>>>>(Hecht, p. 268)
>>>>
>>>>The truth of this statement cannot be denied. Kastner’s collaboration
>>>>was
>>>>not that of an individual. It was the collaboration of the Zionist
>>>>leadership.
>>>>
>>>>So far, it has only been established that the Government of Israel
>>>>continued to support a Nazi collaborator after the facts about his
>>>>collaboration had been conclusively established in an Israeli court.
>>>>But
>>>>the story gets worse.
>>>>
>>>>The Supreme Court of Israel unanimously found that Becher was indeed a
>>>>
>>>>Nazi war criminal and that Kastner had without justification, and in
>>>>the
>>>>name
>>>>of the Jewish Agency, helped Becher to escape justice. On this point
>>>>Greenwald was acquitted of libel and Kastner was not ‘fully
>>>>rehabilitated’.
>>>>
>>>>The Supreme Court also accepted the facts established in the lower
>>>>court –
>>>>that Kastner deliberately concealed the truth about Auschwitz from the
>>>>majority of Hungarian Jews in exchange for Nazi permission to take a
>>>>thousand or so to Palestine. Again, Kastner was far from being ‘fully
>>>>rehabilitated’.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>But now comes the really nasty bit. After unanimously acknowledging
>>>>these
>>>>facts, the Supreme Court of Israel, by a majority of three to two,
>>>>found
>>>>that Kastner’s actions were morally justifiable and convicted
>>>>Greenwald of
>>>>criminal libel for calling this ‘collaboration’.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner’s actions only proved that he was a Nazi collaborator. It is
>>>>the
>>>>defense of these actions by the Government and Courts of Israel that
>>>>prove
>>>>conclusively that Zionism approves of Nazi collaboration.
>>>>
>>>>The majority of the Supreme Court of Israel did not rehabilitate
>>>>Kastner.
>>>>They joined him.
>>>>
>>>>Let us read from the majority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Shlomo
>>>>Chesin:
>>>>
>>>>….What point was there in telling the people boarding the trains in
>>>>Kluj,
>>>>people struck by fate and persecuted, as to what awaits them at the
>>>>end of
>>>>their journey…Kastner spoke in detail of the situation, saying, ‘The
>>>>Hungarian Jew was a branch which long ago dried up on the tree’. This
>>>>vivid
>>>>description coincides with the testimony of another witness about the
>>>>Hungarian Jews, ‘This was a big Jewish community in Hungary, without
>>>>any
>>>>ideological Jewish backbone’ (Moshe Shweiger, a Kastner aide in
>>>>Budapest,
>>>>protocol 465).
>>>>
>>>>I fully agree with my friend, Judge Agranot, when he states that, ‘The
>>>>Jews
>>>>of Hungary, including those in the countryside, were not capable,
>>>>neither
>>>>physically nor mentally, to carry out resistance operations with force
>>>>against the deportation scheme’…From this point of view no rescue
>>>>achievement could have resulted by disclosing the Auschwitz news to
>>>>the
>>>>Jewish leaders there, and this is a consideration which on can
>>>>properly
>>>>conclude that Kastner had in front of his eyes.
>>>>
>>>>….And I take one more step. I am certain that the silence of Kastner
>>>>when
>>>>he arrived in Kluj was premeditated and calculated and did not result
>>>>from
>>>>his great despair because of the helplessness of the Jewish community.
>>>>Even
>>>>then, I say, this is still not considered wilful collaboration and
>>>>assistance in the extermination, because all the signs indicate that
>>>>Kastner’s efforts were aimed at rescue and rescue on a big scale…And
>>>>towards the end I take one last step. In doing so I go very far and
>>>>say
>>>>that even if Kastner ordered himself to keep silent knowingly, in
>>>>submission to the strong will of the Nazis, in order to save a few
>>>>Jews
>>>>from Hell – this is still no proof that he stained his hands by
>>>>collaborating with the enemies of his people and carrying out their
>>>>plan to
>>>>exterminate most of the Jewish community in Hungary.
>>>>
>>>>Even if, through these activities of his – or rather, his omission –
>>>>the
>>>>extermination became easier. And as to the moral issue, the question
>>>>is not
>>>>whether a man is allowed to kill many in order to save a few, or
>>>>vice-versa. The question is altogether in another sphere and should be
>>>>defined as follows: A man is aware that a whole community is awaiting
>>>>its
>>>>doom. He is allowed to make efforts to save a few, although part of
>>>>his
>>>>efforts involve concealment of truth from the many or should he
>>>>disclose
>>>>the truth to many though it is his best opinion that this way
>>>>everybody
>>>>will perish. I think that the answer is clear. What good will the
>>>>blood of
>>>>the few bring if everybody is to perish?…As I said, I am not arguing
>>>>with
>>>>the basic factual findings of the learned President of the Jewish
>>>>District
>>>>Court (Judge Halevi) but it seems to me, with all due respect, that
>>>>his
>>>>findings do not, as of necessity, demand the conclusion he has arrived
>>>>at.
>>>>That is to say, collaboration on the part of Kastner in the
>>>>extermination
>>>>of the Jews. And that they better coincide with bad leadership both
>>>>from a
>>>>moral and public point of view…
>>>>
>>>>In my opinion, one can say outright that if you find out that Kastner
>>>>collaborated with the enemy because he did not disclose to the people
>>>>who
>>>>boarded the trains in Kluj that they were being led to extermination,
>>>>one
>>>>has to put on trial today Danzig, Herman, Hanzi, Brand, Revis and
>>>>Marton,
>>>>and many more leaders and half-leaders who gagged themselves in an
>>>>hour of
>>>>crisis and did not inform others of what was known to them and did not
>>>>warn
>>>>and did not cry out of the coming danger….
>>>>
>>>>Because of all this I cannot confirm the conclusion of the District
>>>>Court
>>>>with regard to the accusation that Greenwald has thrown on Kastner of
>>>>collaboration with the Nazis in exterminating the Jewish people in
>>>>Hungary
>>>>during the last war.” (Hecht, ibid., pp.270-2)
>>>>
>>>>In other words, the Court approved of Kastner’s contempt for the
>>>>Hungarian
>>>>Jews and could not allow him to be condemned for doing exactly what
>>>>many
>>>>other Zionist leaders had half-leaders did – concealing their
>>>>knowledge of
>>>>the Nazi extermination plans so that Jews would board the trains to
>>>>Auschwitz peacefully while their Zionist ‘leaders’ boarded a different
>>>>train for Palestine.
>>>>
>>>>The most precise answer to this sickening judgement of Judge Chesin is
>>>>
>>>>provided in the minority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Moshe
>>>>Silberg:
>>>>
>>>>I do not say that he was the only man who possessed information among
>>>>the
>>>>leaders. It is quite possible that somebody else as well does not have
>>>>a
>>>>clear conscience with regards to this concealment. But we are dealing
>>>>here
>>>>with the guilt of Kastner and we do not have to make judgements on the
>>>>guilt of others….
>>>>
>>>>The declaration of the learned Attorney General therefore shrinks into
>>>>an
>>>>opinion….’Kastner was convinced and believed that there was no ray
>>>>of
>>>>hope for the Jews of Hungary, almost for none of them, and as he, as a
>>>>result of his personal despair, did not disclose the secret of the
>>>>extermination in order not to endanger or frustrate the rescue of the
>>>>few –
>>>>therefore he acted in good faith and should not be accused of
>>>>collaborating
>>>>with the Nazis in expediting the extermination of the Jews, even
>>>>though, in
>>>>fact, he brought about its result.’
>>>>
>>>>I am compelled to state that it is very difficult for me to conceive
>>>>such
>>>>an intention. Is this good faith? Can a single man, even in
>>>>cooperation
>>>>with some of his friends, yield to despair on behalf and without the
>>>>knowledge of 800,000 other people? This is, in my opinion, the
>>>>decisive
>>>>consideration in the problem facing us. The charge emanating from the
>>>>testimony of the witnesses against Kastner is that had they known of
>>>>the
>>>>Auschwitz secret, then thousands or tens of thousands would have been
>>>>able
>>>>to save their lives by local, partial, specific or indirect rescue
>>>>operations like local revolts, resistance, escapes, hidings,
>>>>concealment of
>>>>children with Gentiles, forging of documents, ransom money, bribery,
>>>>etc. –
>>>>and when this is the case and when one deals with many hundreds of
>>>>thousands, how does a human being, a mortal, reject with complete
>>>>certainty
>>>>and with an extreme ‘no’ the efficiency of all the many and varied
>>>>rescue
>>>>ways? How can he examine the tens of thousands of possibilities? Does
>>>>he
>>>>decide instead of God? Indeed, he who can act with such a usurpation
>>>>of the
>>>>last hope of hundreds of thousands is not entitled to claim good faith
>>>>as
>>>>his defense. The penetrating question quo warrento is a good answer to
>>>>a
>>>>claim of such good faith…
>>>>
>>>>If the superintendent of a big hospital lets thousands of sick people
>>>>die
>>>>so that he may devote himself to the sure rescue of one soul, he will
>>>>come
>>>>out guilty, at least morally, even if it is proven that he as an
>>>>individual
>>>>erroneously thought that there was no hope of saving the other
>>>>patients. He
>>>>is a collaborator with the angel of death.
>>>>
>>>>Either a complete atrophy of the soul or a blind involvement with
>>>>complete
>>>>loss of senses and proportion in his small but personal rescue
>>>>operation
>>>>could bring a man to such a gigantic, hazardous play.
>>>>
>>>>And if all this is not enough to annul the claim of good faith which
>>>>was
>>>>put before us on behalf of Kastner by the Attorney General, then
>>>>Kastner
>>>>himself comes and annuls it altogether. Not only did he never make
>>>>this
>>>>claim, but his own words prove the contrary. He writes in his report
>>>>to the
>>>>Jewish Agency that the Committee sent emissaries to many ghettos in
>>>>the
>>>>countryside and pleaded with them to organize escapes and to refuse to
>>>>board the trains. And though the story of these pleadings is untrue,
>>>>and
>>>>the silence of Kastner in Kluj is proven, the very uttering of these
>>>>statements entirely contradicts the claim that Kastner had concealed
>>>>the
>>>>news about the fate of the ghetto inmates in good faith and only as a
>>>>result of his complete despairing of the chances of escaping or
>>>>resisting
>>>>the Germans. You can not claim at the same time helplessness and
>>>>activity.
>>>>Anyway, such a claim is not convincing…
>>>>
>>>>We can sum up with three facts:
>>>>
>>>>A. That the Nazis didn’t want to have a great revolt – nor small
>>>>revolts,
>>>>and their passion was to have the extermination machine working
>>>>smoothly without resistance. This fact was known to Kastner from
>>>>the best source – from Eichmann himself – And he had additional proofs
>>>>of
>>>>that when he witnessed all the illusionary and misleading tactics
>>>>which
>>>>were being taken by the Nazis from the first moment of occupation.
>>>>
>>>>B. That the most efficient means to paralyze the resistance with – or
>>>>the
>>>>escape of a victim is to conceal from him the plot of the coming
>>>>murder.
>>>>This fact is known to every man and one does not need any proof of
>>>>evidence for this.
>>>>
>>>>C. That he, Kastner, in order to carry out the rescue plan for the few
>>>>prominents, fulfilled knowingly and without good faith the said desire
>>>>of
>>>>the Nazis, thus expediting the work of exterminating the masses.
>>>>
>>>>And also the rescue of Becher by Kastner…He who is capable of
>>>>rescuing
>>>>this Becher from hanging proves that the atrocities of this great war
>>>>criminal were not so horrifying or despicable in his eyes…I couldn’t
>>>>base
>>>>the main guilt of Kastner on this fact had it been alone, but when it
>>>>is
>>>>attached even from afar to the whole scene of events it throws
>>>>retroactive
>>>>light on the whole affair and serves as a dozen proofs of our
>>>>conclusion.”(Supreme Court Judge, Moshe Silberg, 1957)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If that had been the majority judgement, one could say that whatever
>>>>their
>>>>attitudes to the Arabs, and whatever their past behaviour might have
>>>>been
>>>>under pressure, the Zionist leadership today did not advocate
>>>>collaboration
>>>>with the Nazis.
>>>>
>>>>But Judge Silberg’s judgement was that of a minority.
>>>>
>>>>The Kastner case is therefore not an alleged episode in past history.
>>>>
>>>>It is a continuing controversy in which the top Zionist leadership of
>>>>Israel stand indicted of continuing to publicly defend collaboration
>>>>with
>>>>the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.
>>>>
>>>>Despite the unanimous finding of the Supreme Court of Israel that Kurt
>>>>Becher was a major war criminal, the Jewish Agency (World Zionist
>>>>Organization) refused to withdraw the fraudulent certificate Kastner
>>>>gave
>>>>on their behalf, which saved Becher from hanging, and allowed him to
>>>>remain
>>>>a free man in West Germany, the head of several corporations and with
>>>>an
>>>>estimated personal worth of $30 million.
>>>>
>>>>Becher has even used his certification as a ‘good’ SS officer to give
>>>>evidence in support of his associates at other war crimes trials in
>>>>West
>>>>Germany.
>>>>
>>>>Since the prosecution, representing the Israeli Government agreed with
>>>>the
>>>>Supreme Court that Becher was a major war criminal, one can only
>>>>pressure
>>>>that the Israeli Government did not want him put on trial for fear of
>>>>what
>>>>might come out.
>>>>
>>>>Likewise, none of Kastner’s associates on the Zionist Relief and
>>>>Rescue
>>>>Committee or his bosses in the Jewish Agency have ever been put on
>>>>trial .
>>>>Let alone the hundreds of ‘prominents’ who helped Kastner to reassure
>>>>the
>>>>Hungarian Jews that they were going to Kenyermeze and not Auschwitz,
>>>>in exchange for tickets on the one train that took them eventually to
>>>>Palestine.
>>>>
>>>>As for Kastner himself, he will cause no further embarrassment to the
>>>>Zionist leadership with his undisputed claims that everything he did
>>>>was
>>>>approved by the Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization) leadership
>>>>in
>>>>Palestine. He is ‘now dead’. Or putting it less delicately, on 3 March
>>>>1957
>>>>he was shot by Zeev Eckstein – immediately after the appeal hearings
>>>>were
>>>>concluded, and before the judgement ‘rehabilitating’ him was
>>>>delivered.
>>>>Eckstein was not a Hungarian avenger. He was a paid undercover agent
>>>>of the
>>>>Israeli secret service. (Hecht, ibid., p.208). Another ‘fantastic
>>>>allegation’ no doubt; but admitted in court during the murder trial).
>>
>>

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:53:28 EDT 1998
Article: 9689 of pl.regionalne.warszawa
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.malaysian,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.lebanon,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: KHAZIR Stands for Jew swine
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:04:36 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!newsfeed.direct.ca!feed.nntp.acc.ca!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.ukrainian:41747 soc.culture.polish:119616 soc.culture.russian:93409 soc.culture.swiss:26930 soc.culture.palestine:52521 soc.culture.lebanon:59711 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9689

On Mon, 14 Sep 1998 15:26:44 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

On 13 Sep 1998 07:18:24 GMT, “William Hubbard”
wrote:

>Strakitch tye golevo!

Should be shta allah aboukir!!!

>[email protected] wrote in article
><[email protected]>…
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 02:15:29 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> >On 25 Jun 1998 20:41:51 GMT, “Fenian” < [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>[email protected] wrote in article
><[email protected]>…
>> >>> On 24 Jun 1998 23:39:44 GMT, [email protected] (BUSHBADEE) wrote:
>> >
>> >>> >>> Shouldn’t the spelling be KHAZIR, meaning swine???
>> >>> >>> After all, the Christkillers are lower than the feces of the
>swine???
>> >
>> >>> >I have many christian friend and I object to you calling them lower
>than
>> >>> >the feces of swine.

>> >>> It is not the Christians that are the Christkillers.
>> >>> Read your Bible, or have your friend read it to you, about the foul
>> >>> Sanhedrin JEWS, who arranged for the murder of Jesus Christ!!!

>> >>> Christ opposed their usury and other financial crimes, being
>conducted
>> >>> in the Temples.

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 11:53:28 EDT 1998
Article: 9690 of pl.regionalne.warszawa
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.warszawa,pl.regionalne.lodz,pl.regionalne.krakow,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian
Subject: Bolsheviks Were Christkiller JEWS, not Russians
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:00:48 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 182
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!news.greennet.net!uunet!uunet!in5.uu.net!newsfeed.xcom.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org pl.regionalne.warszawa:9690 pl.regionalne.lodz:1136 pl.regionalne.krakow:6033 soc.culture.polish:119618 soc.culture.swiss:26932 soc.culture.russian:93411 soc.culture.ukrainian:41749

On Tue, 24 Mar 1998 17:38:00 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Came across the article in deja News, so thought it should be
>reconsidered by thinking readers.

>On Sun, 12 Oct 1997 16:50:37 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>Reply-To: [email protected]

>>Subject: Jews Dominated Bolshevism – Don’t Deny It
>>From: [email protected] (Roger Hughes)
>>Date: 22 Jul 1997 12:32:44 GMT
>>Organization: Anti-Hypocrisy Foundation

>>Patriot Fact Sheet : The Jews and Bolshevism

>> One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called “Russian
>>Revolution” of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority
>>of the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to
>>them, continue to condemn anyone as “anti-Semitic” who brings up these
>>facts, it remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created
>>and lead revolutionary movement.
>
>> First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism, Karl Marx,
>>was a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father’s side.
>>Whether he was a “religous” Jew is of no significant importance, since
>>Jewishness is not defined exclusively by adherance to Judaism. A great
>>bulk of Jews today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but
>>also nonetheless consider themselves Jews.
>
>> While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism, will
>>concede that Marx was indeed Jewish, let’s see the them deny the
>>communist-Jewish connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables that
>>passed between American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C.
>>during the time of the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following
>>quotes are taken directly from documents available from the U.S.
>>Archives:
>
>>State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
>>general in Moscow, Summers: “Jews prominant in local Soviet government,
>>anti-Jewish feeling growing among population….”
>
>>State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on July
>>5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: “Fifty percent of Soviet government in
>>each town consists of Jews of the worst type.”
>
>>>From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
>>March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
>>Montgomey Shuyler: “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
>>United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it’s
>>beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type.”
>
>
>>A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok, reports
>>on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: “…(T)here were 384
>>`commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22
>>Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had come to
>>Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial
>>Government.”
>
>>With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the
>>leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.
>>(Lenin has since been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had
>>access to the KGB archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon
>>Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
>>of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the
>>Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central
>>Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev
>>(Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the
>>central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other
>>prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign
>>affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and
>>Moisei Uritsky.
>
>>David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
>>January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most
>>of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little
>>for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are
>>trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”
>
>>The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
>>”Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
>>spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
>>organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
>>object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”
>
>>In case anyone thinks I’ve taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
>>here’s three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former
>>superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik Propaganda
>>Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary,
>>United States Senate, 65th Congress:
>
>>”We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
>>Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east side
>>of New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American
>>Pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased that
>>there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English
>>showed that they had not qualified as being Americas. A number of these
>>men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element in
>>this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that
>>more than half the agitators in the socalled Bolshevik movement were
>>Jews…I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one
>>of its bases is found in the east side of New York…The latest
>>startling information, given me by someone with good authority,
>>startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in the northern
>>community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of the Soviet
>>regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)
>>out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the
>>exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
>>Gordon.
>
>>I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great
>>revolution of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing on
>>the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I
>>often remarked to my sister, ‘Well, what are we coming to anyway. This
>>all looks so Yiddish.’ Up to that time we had see very few Jews, because
>>there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in Petrograd,
>>but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the agitators
>>were Jews.
>
>>I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
>>Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
>>posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now that
>>was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians
>>did not take kindly to it.”
>
>>Some might automatically assume that the preceeding sources are
>>”anti-Semitic” and therefore unreliable, but they’d be wrong. Here’s a
>>few Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:
>
>>”The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
>>Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
>>new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
>>Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
>>and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
>>physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American
>>Hebrew, September 10, 1920)
>
>>”There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
>>many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
>>many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, London April,
>>4, 1919)
>
>>”Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi
>>S. Wise, May 5, 1935).
>
>>”In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
>>communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
>>the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
>
>>Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
>>so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
>>himself:
>
>>”National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs
>>characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an
>>extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
>>cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death
>>penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
>
>>While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and
>>clergymen murdered by Communist gangs, synogoges and rabbis were left
>>virtually untouched.
>
>>It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
>>conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
>>population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20
>>million Ukranian farmers during the 1920’s in one of the most vile
>>campaigns in history: In (the) Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80 percent
>>of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an
>>American professor of Russian history. . . ”
>
>>Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85 million persons were
>>murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them
>>directly at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish
>>Communist bosses.
>
>>Regards,
>>Roger Hughes

>> http://www.natall.com
>> http://www.natvan.com
sven88

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 12:09:27 EDT 1998
Article: 26929 of soc.culture.swiss
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!newsfeed.corridex.com!howland.erols.net!news.idt.net!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: Re: Nazi — Jew Zionist Collaboration
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:01:03 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 836
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org alt.politics.nationalism.white:136385 soc.culture.swiss:26929 soc.culture.palestine:52520 soc.culture.malaysia:186482 soc.culture.polish:119615 soc.culture.russian:93408 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9688

On Fri, 25 Sep 1998 04:29:42 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>>On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 22:56:46 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>trying to stimulate more interest in this topic,
>>
>>On Sat, 15 Aug 1998 18:45:47 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>On 3 Jul 1998 06:38:05 GMT, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Orest Slepokura wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>…fully documented *Perfidy* blatantly exposes the degree to which
>>>>>> Zionists cooperated in the persecution of their fellow Jews…
>>>>
>>>>Her is more evidence of NAZI-ZIONIST JEW COLLABORATION.
>>>>
>>>>The Kastner Case
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is that
>>>>involving
>>>>a Jew – Rudolf Kastner.
>>>>
>>>>Most Jewish people have never heard of Rudolf Kastner. Those who have,
>>>>are
>>>>generally under the impression that there is some ‘controversy’ about
>>>>negotiations he undertook for ‘the purchase of Jewish lives for money
>>>>and
>>>>military equipment’, but that he was ‘fully rehabilitated’ by the
>>>>Supreme
>>>>Court of Israel.
>>>>
>>>> The Accusations
>>>>
>>>>Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:
>>>>
>>>>Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British
>>>>Medical
>>>>Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz. In his
>>>>memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse
>>>>certain
>>>>Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war.
>>>>
>>>>This group of quislings knew what was happening to their brethren in
>>>>Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their own lives with the price of
>>>>silence.
>>>>Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke for all
>>>>Jews
>>>>in Hungary. While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the
>>>>number is
>>>>still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the exterminations.
>>>>I took these terrible statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I
>>>>was
>>>>able to give Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that
>>>>Eichmann
>>>>planned to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner
>>>>went
>>>>to Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my
>>>>choice and I shall keep quiet.’
>>>>
>>>>Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and
>>>>took
>>>>him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid
>>>>bargaining
>>>>end there. Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this
>>>>little
>>>>fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany
>>>>collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…(Ben Hecht, Perfidy,
>>>>pp261-2)
>>>>
>>>>These accusations are confirmed by the ‘Eichmann Confessions’
>>>>published in
>>>>Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:
>>>>
>>>>I resolved to show how well a job could be done when the commander
>>>>stands
>>>>100% behind it. By shipping the Jews off in a lightning operation, I
>>>>wanted
>>>>to set an example for future campaigns elsewhere…In obedience to
>>>>Himmler’s directive I now concentrated on negotiations with the Jewish
>>>>political officials in Budapest…Among them Dr. Rudolph Kastner,
>>>>authorized representative of the Zionist Movement. This Dr. Kastner
>>>>was a
>>>>young man about my age, an ice-cold lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He
>>>>agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation – and even
>>>>keep
>>>>order in the collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let a few
>>>>hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine.
>>>>It
>>>>was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price was not
>>>>too
>>>>high for me.
>>>>
>>>>We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me, Kastner smoke
>>>>cigarets as though he was in a coffeehouse. While we talked he would
>>>>smoke
>>>>one aromatic cigaret after another, taking them from a silver case and
>>>>lighting them with a silver lighter. With his great polish and reserve
>>>>he
>>>>would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.
>>>>
>>>>Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for a select group
>>>>of
>>>>Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel…
>>>>
>>>>As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity between our
>>>>attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic
>>>>Zionist leaders. I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a
>>>>thousand
>>>>or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political goal ‘You
>>>>can
>>>>have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have this group here’. And
>>>>because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping keep the
>>>>deportation
>>>>camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape. After all, I was not
>>>>concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews…That was the
>>>>’gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner (Hecht, ibid., p.260-61)
>>>>
>>>>Quite clearly these accusations, do not relate merely to ‘the purchase
>>>>of
>>>>Jewish lives for money and military equipment’.
>>>>
>>>>Are the accusations against Kastner true?
>>>>
>>>>According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie. When Malchiel
>>>>Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli citizen published these
>>>>accusations against Kastner, the Israeli Government did rather more
>>>>than
>>>>demand that his views should not be broadcast. Because a prominent
>>>>Zionist
>>>>official (Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the Ministry of Trade and
>>>>Industry) was involved, the Attorney General of the State of Israel
>>>>prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.
>>>>
>>>> The Verdict
>>>>
>>>>Let the verdict of Judge Benjamin Halevi (who later became one of the
>>>>panel
>>>>of three judges that tried Eichmann) in Israel’s District Court of
>>>>Jerusalem speak for itself, given in criminal case No. 124 of 1953.
>>>>The
>>>>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald. This material should be
>>>>studied
>>>>carefully.
>>>>
>>>>The masses of Jews from Hungary’s ghettos obediently boarded the
>>>>deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of
>>>>confidence
>>>>in the false information that they were being transferred to
>>>>Kenyermeze.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had
>>>>they
>>>>not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
>>>>
>>>>The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
>>>>rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and
>>>>others
>>>>used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the
>>>>Jews.
>>>>They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help
>>>>of
>>>>Jewish leaders.
>>>>
>>>>The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local
>>>>leaders
>>>>of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were
>>>>spreading
>>>>such false information and did not protest.
>>>>
>>>>Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
>>>>persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local ‘rescue work’.
>>>>
>>>>The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of
>>>>knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be
>>>>deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain
>>>>quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or
>>>>hampering
>>>>the deportation orders.
>>>>
>>>>Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few
>>>>dozen
>>>>police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attempt to overpower
>>>>these few
>>>>guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance activities to the
>>>>deportations were organized in these ghettos.
>>>>
>>>>And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the
>>>>Jews in
>>>>the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities.
>>>>
>>>>The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of
>>>>Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn
>>>>their
>>>>own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish leaders
>>>>who
>>>>did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of
>>>>deportations…these
>>>>same leaders did not join the people of their community in their ride
>>>>to
>>>>Auschwitz, but were all included in the Rescue train.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi organizers of extermination and the perpetrators of
>>>>extermination
>>>>permitted Rudolf Kastner and the members of the Jewish Council in
>>>>Budapest
>>>>to save themselves, their relatives, and friends. The Nazis did this
>>>>as a
>>>>means of making the local Jewish leaders, whom they favoured,
>>>>dependent on
>>>>the Nazi regime, dependent on its good will during the time of its
>>>>fatal
>>>>deportation schedule. In short, the Nazis succeeded in bringing the
>>>>Jewish
>>>>leaders into collaboration with the Nazis at the time of the
>>>>catastrophe.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi chiefs knew that the Zionists were a most vital element in
>>>>Jewry
>>>>and the most trusted by the Jews.
>>>>
>>>>The personality of Rudolph Kastner made him a convenient catspaw for
>>>>Eichmann and his clique, to draw into collaboration and make their
>>>>task
>>>>easier.
>>>>
>>>>The question here is not, as stated by the Attorney General in his
>>>>summation, whether members of the Jewish Rescue Committee were or were
>>>>not capable of fulfilling their duty without the patronage of the S.S.
>>>>
>>>>chiefs.
>>>>It is obvious that without such S.S. Nazi patronage the Jewish Rescue
>>>>Committee could not have existed, and could have acted only as an
>>>>underground.
>>>>
>>>>The question is, as put by the lawyer for the defense, why were the
>>>>Nazis
>>>>interested in the existence of the Rescue Committee? Why did the S.S.
>>>>chiefs make every effort to encourage the existence of the Jewish
>>>>Rescue
>>>>Committee? Did the exterminators turn into rescuers?
>>>>
>>>>The same question rises concerning the rescue of prominent Jews by
>>>>these
>>>>German killers of Jews. Was the rescue of such Jews a part of the
>>>>extermination plan of the killers ?
>>>>
>>>>The support given by the extermination leaders to Kastner’s Rescue
>>>>Committee proves that indeed there was a place for Kastner and his
>>>>friends
>>>>in their Final Solution for the Jews of Hungary – their total
>>>>annihilation.
>>>>
>>>>The Nazi’s patronage of Kastner, and their agreement to let him save
>>>>six
>>>>hundred prominent Jews, were part of the plan to exterminate the Jews.
>>>>Kastner was given a chance to add a few more to that number. The bait
>>>>attracted him. The opportunity of rescuing prominent people appealed
>>>>to him
>>>>greatly. He considered the rescue of the most important Jews as a
>>>>great
>>>>personal success and a success for Zionism. It was a success that
>>>>would
>>>>also justify his conduct – his political negotiation with Nazis and
>>>>the
>>>>Nazi patronage of his committee.
>>>>
>>>>When Kastner received this present from the Nazis, Kastner sold his
>>>>soul to
>>>>the German Satan.
>>>>
>>>>The sacrifice of the vital interests of the majority of the Jews, in
>>>>order
>>>>to rescue the prominents, was the basic element in the agreement
>>>>between
>>>>Kastner and the Nazis. This agreement fixed the division of the nation
>>>>into
>>>>two unequal camps: a small fragment of prominents, whom the Nazis
>>>>promised
>>>>Kastner to save, on the one hand, and the great majority or Hungarian
>>>>Jews
>>>>whom the Nazis designated for death, on the other hand. An imperative
>>>>condition for the rescue of the first camp by the Nazis was that
>>>>Kastner
>>>>will not interfere in the action of the Nazis against the other camp
>>>>and
>>>>will not hamper them in its extermination. Kastner fulfilled this
>>>>condition. He concentrated his efforts in the rescue of the prominents
>>>>and
>>>>treated the camp of the doomed as if they had already been wiped out
>>>>from
>>>>the book of the living.
>>>>
>>>>One cannot estimate the damage caused by Kastner’s collaboration and
>>>>put
>>>>down the number of victims which it cost Hungarian Jews. These are not
>>>>only
>>>>the thousands of Jews in Nodvarod or any other community in the border
>>>>area, Jews who could escape through the border, had the chief of their
>>>>rescue committee fulfilled his duty toward them.
>>>>
>>>>All of Kastner’s answers in his final testimony were a constant effort
>>>>to
>>>>evade this truth.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner has tried to escape through every crack he could find in the
>>>>wall
>>>>of evidence. When one crack was sealed in his face, he darted quickly
>>>>to
>>>>another. (Judgement of Judge Benjamin Halevi, Criminal Case 124/53;
>>>>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald, District Court, Jerusalem,
>>>>June 22,
>>>>1955).
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi reverts to the meeting of Kastner with the S.S. officers
>>>>Becher and Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz at the time when the
>>>>’new
>>>>line’ of rescuing Jews was revealed by Hoess. He says:
>>>>
>>>>From this gathering in Budapest, it is obvious that the ‘new line’
>>>>stretched from Himmler to Hoess, from Jutner to Becher and Krumey.
>>>>
>>>>According to Kastner, however, these Nazis were all active in rescuing
>>>>Jews.
>>>>
>>>>This meeting of these important German guests in Budapest exposes the
>>>>’rescue’ work of Becher in its true light. It reveals also the extent
>>>>of
>>>>Kastner’s involvement in the inner circle of the chief German war
>>>>criminals.
>>>>
>>>>Just as the Nazi war criminals knew they needed an alibi and hoped to
>>>>achieve it by the rescue of a few Jews at the eleventh hour, so
>>>>Kastner
>>>>also needed an alibi for himself.
>>>>
>>>>Collaboration between the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee and the
>>>>Exterminators of the Jews was solidified in Budapest and Vienna.
>>>>Kastner’s
>>>>duties were part and parcel of the general duties of the S.S.
>>>>
>>>>In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department,
>>>>the
>>>>Nazi S.S. opened a Rescue Department headed by Kastner.
>>>>
>>>>All these extermination, robbery and rescue activities of the S.S.
>>>>were
>>>>coordinated under the management of Heinrich Himmler”.
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi continues:
>>>>
>>>>Kastner perjured himself knowingly in his testimony before this court
>>>>when
>>>>he denied he had interceded in Becher’s behalf. Moreover, he concealed
>>>>the
>>>>important fact that he interceded for Becher in the name of the Jewish
>>>>Agency and the Jewish World Congress.
>>>>
>>>>As to the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, it was enough for the
>>>>defense to
>>>>provide Becher was a war criminal. It was up to the prosecution to
>>>>remove
>>>>Becher from this status, if they wished to negate the affidavit.
>>>>
>>>>The Attorney General admitted in his summation that Becher was a war
>>>>criminal.
>>>>
>>>>The lies in the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, the lies in his
>>>>testimony
>>>>concerning the document, and Kastner’s knowing participation in the
>>>>activities of Nazi war criminals, and his participation in the last
>>>>minute
>>>>fake rescue activities – all these combine to show one overwhelming
>>>>truth –
>>>>that this affidavit was not given in good faith.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner knew well, as he himself testified, that Becher had never
>>>>stood up
>>>>against the stream of Jewish extermination, as Kastner has declared in
>>>>the
>>>>affidavit.
>>>>
>>>>The aims of Becher and his superior, Himmler, were not to save Jews
>>>>but to
>>>>serve the Nazi regime with full compliance. These is not truth and no
>>>>good
>>>>faith in Kastner’s testimony, ‘I never doubted for one moment the good
>>>>intention of good Becher’.
>>>>
>>>>It is clear that the positive recommendation by Kastner, not only in
>>>>his
>>>>own name but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish
>>>>World
>>>>Congress was of decisive importance for Becher. Kastner did not
>>>>exaggerate
>>>>when he said that Becher was released by the Allies because of his
>>>>personal
>>>>intervention. The lies in the affidavit of Kastner and the
>>>>contradictions
>>>>and various pretexts, which were proven to be lies, were sufficient to
>>>>annul the value of his statements and to prove that there was no good
>>>>faith
>>>>in his testimony in favor of this German war criminal. Kastner’s
>>>>affidavit
>>>>in favor of Becher was a wilfully false affidavit given in favor of a
>>>>war
>>>>criminal to save him from trial and punishment in Nuremberg.
>>>>
>>>>Therefore, the defendant, Malchiel Greenwald, was correct in his
>>>>accusations against Rudolf Kastner in the first, second and fourth of
>>>>his
>>>>statements.”
>>>>
>>>>Judge Halevi’s verdict found Malchiel Greenwald generally innocent of
>>>>libel
>>>>against Kastner, but fined him one Israeli pound for the one unproved
>>>>accusation – that Kastner had actually collected money from his Nazi
>>>>partners for his aide to their slaughter program. The judge also
>>>>ordered
>>>>the Government of Israel to pay Greenwald two hundred Israeli pounds
>>>>as
>>>>court costs.
>>>>
>>>>If the story ended there, it would only prove conclusively that the
>>>>individual Kastner was a collaborator and the Israeli Government had
>>>>attempted to defend him, although facts brought out in the trial
>>>>pointed to
>>>>much more than that.
>>>>
>>>>But the story does not end there.
>>>>
>>>>The Reaction
>>>>The Communist Party newspaper Kol Ha’am (Voice of the People) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>All those whose relatives were butchered by the Germans in Hungary
>>>>know now
>>>>clearly that Jewish hands helped the mass murder” (23 June 1955)
>>>>
>>>>But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing
>>>>Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the
>>>>Government of Israel.
>>>>
>>>>As the evening paper *Yedi’ot Aharonot* said:
>>>>
>>>>If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total
>>>>political and national collapse – as a result of what such a trial may
>>>>disclose.” (23 June 1955)
>>>>
>>>>Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial,
>>>>instead
>>>>it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for criminal
>>>>libel.
>>>>
>>>>At 11 P.M. the verdict was given. At 11 A.M. next morning the
>>>>government
>>>>announces the defense of Kastner will be renewed – an appeal filed.
>>>>What
>>>>exemplary expediency! Since when does this government possess such
>>>>lawyer-genius who can weigh in one night the legal chances of an
>>>>appeal on
>>>>a detailed, complex verdict of three hundred pages?
>>>>
>>>>At the appeal hearings before the Supreme Court, the Attorney General
>>>>of
>>>>Israel, Chaim Cohen, explained clearly why the Government of Israel
>>>>was
>>>>defending Kastner so strongly:
>>>>
>>>>The man Kastner does not stand here as a private individual. He was a
>>>>recognized representative, official or non-official of the Jewish
>>>>National
>>>>Institutes in Palestine and of the Zionist Executive; and I come here
>>>>in
>>>>this court to defend the representative of our national institutions.”
>>>>(Hecht, p. 268)
>>>>
>>>>The truth of this statement cannot be denied. Kastner’s collaboration
>>>>was
>>>>not that of an individual. It was the collaboration of the Zionist
>>>>leadership.
>>>>
>>>>So far, it has only been established that the Government of Israel
>>>>continued to support a Nazi collaborator after the facts about his
>>>>collaboration had been conclusively established in an Israeli court.
>>>>But
>>>>the story gets worse.
>>>>
>>>>The Supreme Court of Israel unanimously found that Becher was indeed a
>>>>
>>>>Nazi war criminal and that Kastner had without justification, and in
>>>>the
>>>>name
>>>>of the Jewish Agency, helped Becher to escape justice. On this point
>>>>Greenwald was acquitted of libel and Kastner was not ‘fully
>>>>rehabilitated’.
>>>>
>>>>The Supreme Court also accepted the facts established in the lower
>>>>court –
>>>>that Kastner deliberately concealed the truth about Auschwitz from the
>>>>majority of Hungarian Jews in exchange for Nazi permission to take a
>>>>thousand or so to Palestine. Again, Kastner was far from being ‘fully
>>>>rehabilitated’.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>But now comes the really nasty bit. After unanimously acknowledging
>>>>these
>>>>facts, the Supreme Court of Israel, by a majority of three to two,
>>>>found
>>>>that Kastner’s actions were morally justifiable and convicted
>>>>Greenwald of
>>>>criminal libel for calling this ‘collaboration’.
>>>>
>>>>Kastner’s actions only proved that he was a Nazi collaborator. It is
>>>>the
>>>>defense of these actions by the Government and Courts of Israel that
>>>>prove
>>>>conclusively that Zionism approves of Nazi collaboration.
>>>>
>>>>The majority of the Supreme Court of Israel did not rehabilitate
>>>>Kastner.
>>>>They joined him.
>>>>
>>>>Let us read from the majority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Shlomo
>>>>Chesin:
>>>>
>>>>….What point was there in telling the people boarding the trains in
>>>>Kluj,
>>>>people struck by fate and persecuted, as to what awaits them at the
>>>>end of
>>>>their journey…Kastner spoke in detail of the situation, saying, ‘The
>>>>Hungarian Jew was a branch which long ago dried up on the tree’. This
>>>>vivid
>>>>description coincides with the testimony of another witness about the
>>>>Hungarian Jews, ‘This was a big Jewish community in Hungary, without
>>>>any
>>>>ideological Jewish backbone’ (Moshe Shweiger, a Kastner aide in
>>>>Budapest,
>>>>protocol 465).
>>>>
>>>>I fully agree with my friend, Judge Agranot, when he states that, ‘The
>>>>Jews
>>>>of Hungary, including those in the countryside, were not capable,
>>>>neither
>>>>physically nor mentally, to carry out resistance operations with force
>>>>against the deportation scheme’…From this point of view no rescue
>>>>achievement could have resulted by disclosing the Auschwitz news to
>>>>the
>>>>Jewish leaders there, and this is a consideration which on can
>>>>properly
>>>>conclude that Kastner had in front of his eyes.
>>>>
>>>>….And I take one more step. I am certain that the silence of Kastner
>>>>when
>>>>he arrived in Kluj was premeditated and calculated and did not result
>>>>from
>>>>his great despair because of the helplessness of the Jewish community.
>>>>Even
>>>>then, I say, this is still not considered wilful collaboration and
>>>>assistance in the extermination, because all the signs indicate that
>>>>Kastner’s efforts were aimed at rescue and rescue on a big scale…And
>>>>towards the end I take one last step. In doing so I go very far and
>>>>say
>>>>that even if Kastner ordered himself to keep silent knowingly, in
>>>>submission to the strong will of the Nazis, in order to save a few
>>>>Jews
>>>>from Hell – this is still no proof that he stained his hands by
>>>>collaborating with the enemies of his people and carrying out their
>>>>plan to
>>>>exterminate most of the Jewish community in Hungary.
>>>>
>>>>Even if, through these activities of his – or rather, his omission –
>>>>the
>>>>extermination became easier. And as to the moral issue, the question
>>>>is not
>>>>whether a man is allowed to kill many in order to save a few, or
>>>>vice-versa. The question is altogether in another sphere and should be
>>>>defined as follows: A man is aware that a whole community is awaiting
>>>>its
>>>>doom. He is allowed to make efforts to save a few, although part of
>>>>his
>>>>efforts involve concealment of truth from the many or should he
>>>>disclose
>>>>the truth to many though it is his best opinion that this way
>>>>everybody
>>>>will perish. I think that the answer is clear. What good will the
>>>>blood of
>>>>the few bring if everybody is to perish?…As I said, I am not arguing
>>>>with
>>>>the basic factual findings of the learned President of the Jewish
>>>>District
>>>>Court (Judge Halevi) but it seems to me, with all due respect, that
>>>>his
>>>>findings do not, as of necessity, demand the conclusion he has arrived
>>>>at.
>>>>That is to say, collaboration on the part of Kastner in the
>>>>extermination
>>>>of the Jews. And that they better coincide with bad leadership both
>>>>from a
>>>>moral and public point of view…
>>>>
>>>>In my opinion, one can say outright that if you find out that Kastner
>>>>collaborated with the enemy because he did not disclose to the people
>>>>who
>>>>boarded the trains in Kluj that they were being led to extermination,
>>>>one
>>>>has to put on trial today Danzig, Herman, Hanzi, Brand, Revis and
>>>>Marton,
>>>>and many more leaders and half-leaders who gagged themselves in an
>>>>hour of
>>>>crisis and did not inform others of what was known to them and did not
>>>>warn
>>>>and did not cry out of the coming danger….
>>>>
>>>>Because of all this I cannot confirm the conclusion of the District
>>>>Court
>>>>with regard to the accusation that Greenwald has thrown on Kastner of
>>>>collaboration with the Nazis in exterminating the Jewish people in
>>>>Hungary
>>>>during the last war.” (Hecht, ibid., pp.270-2)
>>>>
>>>>In other words, the Court approved of Kastner’s contempt for the
>>>>Hungarian
>>>>Jews and could not allow him to be condemned for doing exactly what
>>>>many
>>>>other Zionist leaders had half-leaders did – concealing their
>>>>knowledge of
>>>>the Nazi extermination plans so that Jews would board the trains to
>>>>Auschwitz peacefully while their Zionist ‘leaders’ boarded a different
>>>>train for Palestine.
>>>>
>>>>The most precise answer to this sickening judgement of Judge Chesin is
>>>>
>>>>provided in the minority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Moshe
>>>>Silberg:
>>>>
>>>>I do not say that he was the only man who possessed information among
>>>>the
>>>>leaders. It is quite possible that somebody else as well does not have
>>>>a
>>>>clear conscience with regards to this concealment. But we are dealing
>>>>here
>>>>with the guilt of Kastner and we do not have to make judgements on the
>>>>guilt of others….
>>>>
>>>>The declaration of the learned Attorney General therefore shrinks into
>>>>an
>>>>opinion….’Kastner was convinced and believed that there was no ray
>>>>of
>>>>hope for the Jews of Hungary, almost for none of them, and as he, as a
>>>>result of his personal despair, did not disclose the secret of the
>>>>extermination in order not to endanger or frustrate the rescue of the
>>>>few –
>>>>therefore he acted in good faith and should not be accused of
>>>>collaborating
>>>>with the Nazis in expediting the extermination of the Jews, even
>>>>though, in
>>>>fact, he brought about its result.’
>>>>
>>>>I am compelled to state that it is very difficult for me to conceive
>>>>such
>>>>an intention. Is this good faith? Can a single man, even in
>>>>cooperation
>>>>with some of his friends, yield to despair on behalf and without the
>>>>knowledge of 800,000 other people? This is, in my opinion, the
>>>>decisive
>>>>consideration in the problem facing us. The charge emanating from the
>>>>testimony of the witnesses against Kastner is that had they known of
>>>>the
>>>>Auschwitz secret, then thousands or tens of thousands would have been
>>>>able
>>>>to save their lives by local, partial, specific or indirect rescue
>>>>operations like local revolts, resistance, escapes, hidings,
>>>>concealment of
>>>>children with Gentiles, forging of documents, ransom money, bribery,
>>>>etc. –
>>>>and when this is the case and when one deals with many hundreds of
>>>>thousands, how does a human being, a mortal, reject with complete
>>>>certainty
>>>>and with an extreme ‘no’ the efficiency of all the many and varied
>>>>rescue
>>>>ways? How can he examine the tens of thousands of possibilities? Does
>>>>he
>>>>decide instead of God? Indeed, he who can act with such a usurpation
>>>>of the
>>>>last hope of hundreds of thousands is not entitled to claim good faith
>>>>as
>>>>his defense. The penetrating question quo warrento is a good answer to
>>>>a
>>>>claim of such good faith…
>>>>
>>>>If the superintendent of a big hospital lets thousands of sick people
>>>>die
>>>>so that he may devote himself to the sure rescue of one soul, he will
>>>>come
>>>>out guilty, at least morally, even if it is proven that he as an
>>>>individual
>>>>erroneously thought that there was no hope of saving the other
>>>>patients. He
>>>>is a collaborator with the angel of death.
>>>>
>>>>Either a complete atrophy of the soul or a blind involvement with
>>>>complete
>>>>loss of senses and proportion in his small but personal rescue
>>>>operation
>>>>could bring a man to such a gigantic, hazardous play.
>>>>
>>>>And if all this is not enough to annul the claim of good faith which
>>>>was
>>>>put before us on behalf of Kastner by the Attorney General, then
>>>>Kastner
>>>>himself comes and annuls it altogether. Not only did he never make
>>>>this
>>>>claim, but his own words prove the contrary. He writes in his report
>>>>to the
>>>>Jewish Agency that the Committee sent emissaries to many ghettos in
>>>>the
>>>>countryside and pleaded with them to organize escapes and to refuse to
>>>>board the trains. And though the story of these pleadings is untrue,
>>>>and
>>>>the silence of Kastner in Kluj is proven, the very uttering of these
>>>>statements entirely contradicts the claim that Kastner had concealed
>>>>the
>>>>news about the fate of the ghetto inmates in good faith and only as a
>>>>result of his complete despairing of the chances of escaping or
>>>>resisting
>>>>the Germans. You can not claim at the same time helplessness and
>>>>activity.
>>>>Anyway, such a claim is not convincing…
>>>>
>>>>We can sum up with three facts:
>>>>
>>>>A. That the Nazis didn’t want to have a great revolt – nor small
>>>>revolts,
>>>>and their passion was to have the extermination machine working
>>>>smoothly without resistance. This fact was known to Kastner from
>>>>the best source – from Eichmann himself – And he had additional proofs
>>>>of
>>>>that when he witnessed all the illusionary and misleading tactics
>>>>which
>>>>were being taken by the Nazis from the first moment of occupation.
>>>>
>>>>B. That the most efficient means to paralyze the resistance with – or
>>>>the
>>>>escape of a victim is to conceal from him the plot of the coming
>>>>murder.
>>>>This fact is known to every man and one does not need any proof of
>>>>evidence for this.
>>>>
>>>>C. That he, Kastner, in order to carry out the rescue plan for the few
>>>>prominents, fulfilled knowingly and without good faith the said desire
>>>>of
>>>>the Nazis, thus expediting the work of exterminating the masses.
>>>>
>>>>And also the rescue of Becher by Kastner…He who is capable of
>>>>rescuing
>>>>this Becher from hanging proves that the atrocities of this great war
>>>>criminal were not so horrifying or despicable in his eyes…I couldn’t
>>>>base
>>>>the main guilt of Kastner on this fact had it been alone, but when it
>>>>is
>>>>attached even from afar to the whole scene of events it throws
>>>>retroactive
>>>>light on the whole affair and serves as a dozen proofs of our
>>>>conclusion.”(Supreme Court Judge, Moshe Silberg, 1957)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If that had been the majority judgement, one could say that whatever
>>>>their
>>>>attitudes to the Arabs, and whatever their past behaviour might have
>>>>been
>>>>under pressure, the Zionist leadership today did not advocate
>>>>collaboration
>>>>with the Nazis.
>>>>
>>>>But Judge Silberg’s judgement was that of a minority.
>>>>
>>>>The Kastner case is therefore not an alleged episode in past history.
>>>>
>>>>It is a continuing controversy in which the top Zionist leadership of
>>>>Israel stand indicted of continuing to publicly defend collaboration
>>>>with
>>>>the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.
>>>>
>>>>Despite the unanimous finding of the Supreme Court of Israel that Kurt
>>>>Becher was a major war criminal, the Jewish Agency (World Zionist
>>>>Organization) refused to withdraw the fraudulent certificate Kastner
>>>>gave
>>>>on their behalf, which saved Becher from hanging, and allowed him to
>>>>remain
>>>>a free man in West Germany, the head of several corporations and with
>>>>an
>>>>estimated personal worth of $30 million.
>>>>
>>>>Becher has even used his certification as a ‘good’ SS officer to give
>>>>evidence in support of his associates at other war crimes trials in
>>>>West
>>>>Germany.
>>>>
>>>>Since the prosecution, representing the Israeli Government agreed with
>>>>the
>>>>Supreme Court that Becher was a major war criminal, one can only
>>>>pressure
>>>>that the Israeli Government did not want him put on trial for fear of
>>>>what
>>>>might come out.
>>>>
>>>>Likewise, none of Kastner’s associates on the Zionist Relief and
>>>>Rescue
>>>>Committee or his bosses in the Jewish Agency have ever been put on
>>>>trial .
>>>>Let alone the hundreds of ‘prominents’ who helped Kastner to reassure
>>>>the
>>>>Hungarian Jews that they were going to Kenyermeze and not Auschwitz,
>>>>in exchange for tickets on the one train that took them eventually to
>>>>Palestine.
>>>>
>>>>As for Kastner himself, he will cause no further embarrassment to the
>>>>Zionist leadership with his undisputed claims that everything he did
>>>>was
>>>>approved by the Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization) leadership
>>>>in
>>>>Palestine. He is ‘now dead’. Or putting it less delicately, on 3 March
>>>>1957
>>>>he was shot by Zeev Eckstein – immediately after the appeal hearings
>>>>were
>>>>concluded, and before the judgement ‘rehabilitating’ him was
>>>>delivered.
>>>>Eckstein was not a Hungarian avenger. He was a paid undercover agent
>>>>of the
>>>>Israeli secret service. (Hecht, ibid., p.208). Another ‘fantastic
>>>>allegation’ no doubt; but admitted in court during the murder trial).
>>
>>

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 12:09:30 EDT 1998
Article: 26930 of soc.culture.swiss
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.malaysian,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.lebanon,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: KHAZIR Stands for Jew swine
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:04:36 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!newsfeed.direct.ca!feed.nntp.acc.ca!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.ukrainian:41747 soc.culture.polish:119616 soc.culture.russian:93409 soc.culture.swiss:26930 soc.culture.palestine:52521 soc.culture.lebanon:59711 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9689

On Mon, 14 Sep 1998 15:26:44 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

On 13 Sep 1998 07:18:24 GMT, “William Hubbard”
wrote:

>Strakitch tye golevo!

Should be shta allah aboukir!!!

>[email protected] wrote in article
><[email protected]>…
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 02:15:29 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> >On 25 Jun 1998 20:41:51 GMT, “Fenian” < [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>[email protected] wrote in article
><[email protected]>…
>> >>> On 24 Jun 1998 23:39:44 GMT, [email protected] (BUSHBADEE) wrote:
>> >
>> >>> >>> Shouldn’t the spelling be KHAZIR, meaning swine???
>> >>> >>> After all, the Christkillers are lower than the feces of the
>swine???
>> >
>> >>> >I have many christian friend and I object to you calling them lower
>than
>> >>> >the feces of swine.

>> >>> It is not the Christians that are the Christkillers.
>> >>> Read your Bible, or have your friend read it to you, about the foul
>> >>> Sanhedrin JEWS, who arranged for the murder of Jesus Christ!!!

>> >>> Christ opposed their usury and other financial crimes, being
>conducted
>> >>> in the Temples.

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 12:09:32 EDT 1998
Article: 26931 of soc.culture.swiss
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Nazi-Zionist collaboration involving Rudolf Kastner
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:02:51 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 577
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!howland.erols.net!newshub.northeast.verio.net!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org alt.politics.nationalism.white:136386 alt.politics.white-power:165346 soc.culture.polish:119617 soc.culture.russian:93410 soc.culture.ukrainian:41748 soc.culture.swiss:26931

On Mon, 03 Nov 1997 15:09:51 -0800, “((((())))))”
wrote:

>The Kastner Case
>
>
>The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is that involving
>a Jew – Rudolf Kastner.
>
>Most Jewish people have never heard of Rudolf Kastner. Those who have, are
>generally under the impression that there is some ‘controversy’ about
>negotiations he undertook for ‘the purchase of Jewish lives for money and
>military equipment’, but that he was ‘fully rehabilitated’ by the Supreme
>Court of Israel.
>
> The Accusations
>
>Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:
>
>Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British Medical
>Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz. In his
>memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he wrote:
>
>I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse certain
>Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war.
>
>This group of quislings knew what was happening to their brethren in
>Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their own lives with the price of silence.
>Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke for all Jews
>in Hungary. While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the number is
>still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the exterminations.
>I took these terrible statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I was
>able to give Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that Eichmann
>planned to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner went
>to Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my
>choice and I shall keep quiet.’
>
>Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and took
>him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid bargaining
>end there. Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this little
>fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany
>collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…(Ben Hecht, Perfidy,
>pp261-2)
>
>These accusations are confirmed by the ‘Eichmann Confessions’ published in
>Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:
>
>I resolved to show how well a job could be done when the commander stands
>100% behind it. By shipping the Jews off in a lightning operation, I wanted
>to set an example for future campaigns elsewhere…In obedience to
>Himmler’s directive I now concentrated on negotiations with the Jewish
>political officials in Budapest…Among them Dr. Rudolph Kastner,
>authorized representative of the Zionist Movement. This Dr. Kastner was a
>young man about my age, an ice-cold lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He
>agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation – and even keep
>order in the collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let a few
>hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine. It
>was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price was not too
>high for me.
>
>We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me, Kastner smoke
>cigarets as though he was in a coffeehouse. While we talked he would smoke
>one aromatic cigaret after another, taking them from a silver case and
>lighting them with a silver lighter. With his great polish and reserve he
>would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.
>
>Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for a select group of
>Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel…
>
>As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity between our
>attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic
>Zionist leaders. I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a thousand
>or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political goal ‘You can
>have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have this group here’. And
>because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping keep the deportation
>camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape. After all, I was not
>concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews…That was the
>’gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner (Hecht, ibid., p.260-61)
>
>Quite clearly these accusations, do not relate merely to ‘the purchase of
>Jewish lives for money and military equipment’.
>
>Are the accusations against Kastner true?
>
>According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie. When Malchiel
>Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli citizen published these
>accusations against Kastner, the Israeli Government did rather more than
>demand that his views should not be broadcast. Because a prominent Zionist
>official (Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the Ministry of Trade and
>Industry) was involved, the Attorney General of the State of Israel
>prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.
>
> The Verdict
>
>Let the verdict of Judge Benjamin Halevi (who later became one of the panel
>of three judges that tried Eichmann) in Israel’s District Court of
>Jerusalem speak for itself, given in criminal case No. 124 of 1953. The
>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald. This material should be studied
>carefully.
>
>The masses of Jews from Hungary’s ghettos obediently boarded the
>deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of confidence
>in the false information that they were being transferred to Kenyermeze.
>
>The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had they
>not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
>
>The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
>rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and others
>used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the Jews.
>They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help of
>Jewish leaders.
>
>The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local leaders
>of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were spreading
>such false information and did not protest.
>
>Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
>persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local ‘rescue work’.
>
>The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of
>knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be
>deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain
>quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or hampering
>the deportation orders.
>
>Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few dozen
>police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attempt to overpower these few
>guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance activities to the
>deportations were organized in these ghettos.
>
>And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the Jews in
>the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities.
>
>The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of
>Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn their
>own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish leaders who
>did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of deportations…these
>same leaders did not join the people of their community in their ride to
>Auschwitz, but were all included in the Rescue train.
>
>The Nazi organizers of extermination and the perpetrators of extermination
>permitted Rudolf Kastner and the members of the Jewish Council in Budapest
>to save themselves, their relatives, and friends. The Nazis did this as a
>means of making the local Jewish leaders, whom they favoured, dependent on
>the Nazi regime, dependent on its good will during the time of its fatal
>deportation schedule. In short, the Nazis succeeded in bringing the Jewish
>leaders into collaboration with the Nazis at the time of the catastrophe.
>
>The Nazi chiefs knew that the Zionists were a most vital element in Jewry
>and the most trusted by the Jews.
>
>The personality of Rudolph Kastner made him a convenient catspaw for
>Eichmann and his clique, to draw into collaboration and make their task
>easier.
>
>The question here is not, as stated by the Attorney General in his
>summation, whether members of the Jewish Rescue Committee were or were
>not capable of fulfilling their duty without the patronage of the S.S.
>chiefs.
>It is obvious that without such S.S. Nazi patronage the Jewish Rescue
>Committee could not have existed, and could have acted only as an
>underground.
>
>The question is, as put by the lawyer for the defense, why were the Nazis
>interested in the existence of the Rescue Committee? Why did the S.S.
>chiefs make every effort to encourage the existence of the Jewish Rescue
>Committee? Did the exterminators turn into rescuers?
>
>The same question rises concerning the rescue of prominent Jews by these
>German killers of Jews. Was the rescue of such Jews a part of the
>extermination plan of the killers ?
>
>The support given by the extermination leaders to Kastner’s Rescue
>Committee proves that indeed there was a place for Kastner and his friends
>in their Final Solution for the Jews of Hungary – their total annihilation.
>
>The Nazi’s patronage of Kastner, and their agreement to let him save six
>hundred prominent Jews, were part of the plan to exterminate the Jews.
>Kastner was given a chance to add a few more to that number. The bait
>attracted him. The opportunity of rescuing prominent people appealed to him
>greatly. He considered the rescue of the most important Jews as a great
>personal success and a success for Zionism. It was a success that would
>also justify his conduct – his political negotiation with Nazis and the
>Nazi patronage of his committee.
>
>When Kastner received this present from the Nazis, Kastner sold his soul to
>the German Satan.
>
>The sacrifice of the vital interests of the majority of the Jews, in order
>to rescue the prominents, was the basic element in the agreement between
>Kastner and the Nazis. This agreement fixed the division of the nation into
>two unequal camps: a small fragment of prominents, whom the Nazis promised
>Kastner to save, on the one hand, and the great majority or Hungarian Jews
>whom the Nazis designated for death, on the other hand. An imperative
>condition for the rescue of the first camp by the Nazis was that Kastner
>will not interfere in the action of the Nazis against the other camp and
>will not hamper them in its extermination. Kastner fulfilled this
>condition. He concentrated his efforts in the rescue of the prominents and
>treated the camp of the doomed as if they had already been wiped out from
>the book of the living.
>
>One cannot estimate the damage caused by Kastner’s collaboration and put
>down the number of victims which it cost Hungarian Jews. These are not only
>the thousands of Jews in Nodvarod or any other community in the border
>area, Jews who could escape through the border, had the chief of their
>rescue committee fulfilled his duty toward them.
>
>All of Kastner’s answers in his final testimony were a constant effort to
>evade this truth.
>
>Kastner has tried to escape through every crack he could find in the wall
>of evidence. When one crack was sealed in his face, he darted quickly to
>another. (Judgement of Judge Benjamin Halevi, Criminal Case 124/53;
>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald, District Court, Jerusalem, June 22,
>1955).
>
>Judge Halevi reverts to the meeting of Kastner with the S.S. officers
>Becher and Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz at the time when the ‘new
>line’ of rescuing Jews was revealed by Hoess. He says:
>
>From this gathering in Budapest, it is obvious that the ‘new line’
>stretched from Himmler to Hoess, from Jutner to Becher and Krumey.
>
>According to Kastner, however, these Nazis were all active in rescuing
>Jews.
>
>This meeting of these important German guests in Budapest exposes the
>’rescue’ work of Becher in its true light. It reveals also the extent of
>Kastner’s involvement in the inner circle of the chief German war
>criminals.
>
>Just as the Nazi war criminals knew they needed an alibi and hoped to
>achieve it by the rescue of a few Jews at the eleventh hour, so Kastner
>also needed an alibi for himself.
>
>Collaboration between the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee and the
>Exterminators of the Jews was solidified in Budapest and Vienna. Kastner’s
>duties were part and parcel of the general duties of the S.S.
>
>In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department, the
>Nazi S.S. opened a Rescue Department headed by Kastner.
>
>All these extermination, robbery and rescue activities of the S.S. were
>coordinated under the management of Heinrich Himmler”.
>
>Judge Halevi continues:
>
>Kastner perjured himself knowingly in his testimony before this court when
>he denied he had interceded in Becher’s behalf. Moreover, he concealed the
>important fact that he interceded for Becher in the name of the Jewish
>Agency and the Jewish World Congress.
>
>As to the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, it was enough for the defense to
>provide Becher was a war criminal. It was up to the prosecution to remove
>Becher from this status, if they wished to negate the affidavit.
>
>The Attorney General admitted in his summation that Becher was a war
>criminal.
>
>The lies in the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, the lies in his testimony
>concerning the document, and Kastner’s knowing participation in the
>activities of Nazi war criminals, and his participation in the last minute
>fake rescue activities – all these combine to show one overwhelming truth –
>that this affidavit was not given in good faith.
>
>Kastner knew well, as he himself testified, that Becher had never stood up
>against the stream of Jewish extermination, as Kastner has declared in the
>affidavit.
>
>The aims of Becher and his superior, Himmler, were not to save Jews but to
>serve the Nazi regime with full compliance. These is not truth and no good
>faith in Kastner’s testimony, ‘I never doubted for one moment the good
>intention of good Becher’.
>
>It is clear that the positive recommendation by Kastner, not only in his
>own name but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish World
>Congress was of decisive importance for Becher. Kastner did not exaggerate
>when he said that Becher was released by the Allies because of his personal
>intervention. The lies in the affidavit of Kastner and the contradictions
>and various pretexts, which were proven to be lies, were sufficient to
>annul the value of his statements and to prove that there was no good faith
>in his testimony in favor of this German war criminal. Kastner’s affidavit
>in favor of Becher was a wilfully false affidavit given in favor of a war
>criminal to save him from trial and punishment in Nuremberg.
>
>Therefore, the defendant, Malchiel Greenwald, was correct in his
>accusations against Rudolf Kastner in the first, second and fourth of his
>statements.”
>
>Judge Halevi’s verdict found Malchiel Greenwald generally innocent of libel
>against Kastner, but fined him one Israeli pound for the one unproved
>accusation – that Kastner had actually collected money from his Nazi
>partners for his aide to their slaughter program. The judge also ordered
>the Government of Israel to pay Greenwald two hundred Israeli pounds as
>court costs.
>
>If the story ended there, it would only prove conclusively that the
>individual Kastner was a collaborator and the Israeli Government had
>attempted to defend him, although facts brought out in the trial pointed to
>much more than that.
>
>But the story does not end there.
>
>The Reaction
>The Communist Party newspaper Kol Ha’am (Voice of the People) wrote:
>
>All those whose relatives were butchered by the Germans in Hungary know now
>clearly that Jewish hands helped the mass murder” (23 June 1955)
>
>But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing
>Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the
>Government of Israel.
>
>As the evening paper *Yedi’ot Aharonot* said:
>
>If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total
>political and national collapse – as a result of what such a trial may
>disclose.” (23 June 1955)
>
>Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial, instead
>it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for criminal libel.
>
>At 11 P.M. the verdict was given. At 11 A.M. next morning the government
>announces the defense of Kastner will be renewed – an appeal filed. What
>exemplary expediency! Since when does this government possess such
>lawyer-genius who can weigh in one night the legal chances of an appeal on
>a detailed, complex verdict of three hundred pages?
>
>At the appeal hearings before the Supreme Court, the Attorney General of
>Israel, Chaim Cohen, explained clearly why the Government of Israel was
>defending Kastner so strongly:
>
>The man Kastner does not stand here as a private individual. He was a
>recognized representative, official or non-official of the Jewish National
>Institutes in Palestine and of the Zionist Executive; and I come here in
>this court to defend the representative of our national institutions.”
>(Hecht, p. 268)
>
>The truth of this statement cannot be denied. Kastner’s collaboration was
>not that of an individual. It was the collaboration of the Zionist
>leadership.
>
>So far, it has only been established that the Government of Israel
>continued to support a Nazi collaborator after the facts about his
>collaboration had been conclusively established in an Israeli court. But
>the story gets worse.
>
>The Supreme Court of Israel unanimously found that Becher was indeed a
>Nazi war criminal and that Kastner had without justification, and in the
>name
>of the Jewish Agency, helped Becher to escape justice. On this point
>Greenwald was acquitted of libel and Kastner was not ‘fully rehabilitated’.
>
>The Supreme Court also accepted the facts established in the lower court –
>that Kastner deliberately concealed the truth about Auschwitz from the
>majority of Hungarian Jews in exchange for Nazi permission to take a
>thousand or so to Palestine. Again, Kastner was far from being ‘fully
>rehabilitated’.
>
>
>But now comes the really nasty bit. After unanimously acknowledging these
>facts, the Supreme Court of Israel, by a majority of three to two, found
>that Kastner’s actions were morally justifiable and convicted Greenwald of
>criminal libel for calling this ‘collaboration’.
>
>Kastner’s actions only proved that he was a Nazi collaborator. It is the
>defense of these actions by the Government and Courts of Israel that prove
>conclusively that Zionism approves of Nazi collaboration.
>
>The majority of the Supreme Court of Israel did not rehabilitate Kastner.
>They joined him.
>
>Let us read from the majority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Shlomo
>Chesin:
>
>….What point was there in telling the people boarding the trains in Kluj,
>people struck by fate and persecuted, as to what awaits them at the end of
>their journey…Kastner spoke in detail of the situation, saying, ‘The
>Hungarian Jew was a branch which long ago dried up on the tree’. This vivid
>description coincides with the testimony of another witness about the
>Hungarian Jews, ‘This was a big Jewish community in Hungary, without any
>ideological Jewish backbone’ (Moshe Shweiger, a Kastner aide in Budapest,
>protocol 465).
>
>I fully agree with my friend, Judge Agranot, when he states that, ‘The Jews
>of Hungary, including those in the countryside, were not capable, neither
>physically nor mentally, to carry out resistance operations with force
>against the deportation scheme’…From this point of view no rescue
>achievement could have resulted by disclosing the Auschwitz news to the
>Jewish leaders there, and this is a consideration which on can properly
>conclude that Kastner had in front of his eyes.
>
>….And I take one more step. I am certain that the silence of Kastner when
>he arrived in Kluj was premeditated and calculated and did not result from
>his great despair because of the helplessness of the Jewish community. Even
>then, I say, this is still not considered wilful collaboration and
>assistance in the extermination, because all the signs indicate that
>Kastner’s efforts were aimed at rescue and rescue on a big scale…And
>towards the end I take one last step. In doing so I go very far and say
>that even if Kastner ordered himself to keep silent knowingly, in
>submission to the strong will of the Nazis, in order to save a few Jews
>from Hell – this is still no proof that he stained his hands by
>collaborating with the enemies of his people and carrying out their plan to
>exterminate most of the Jewish community in Hungary.
>
>Even if, through these activities of his – or rather, his omission – the
>extermination became easier. And as to the moral issue, the question is not
>whether a man is allowed to kill many in order to save a few, or
>vice-versa. The question is altogether in another sphere and should be
>defined as follows: A man is aware that a whole community is awaiting its
>doom. He is allowed to make efforts to save a few, although part of his
>efforts involve concealment of truth from the many or should he disclose
>the truth to many though it is his best opinion that this way everybody
>will perish. I think that the answer is clear. What good will the blood of
>the few bring if everybody is to perish?…As I said, I am not arguing with
>the basic factual findings of the learned President of the Jewish District
>Court (Judge Halevi) but it seems to me, with all due respect, that his
>findings do not, as of necessity, demand the conclusion he has arrived at.
>That is to say, collaboration on the part of Kastner in the extermination
>of the Jews. And that they better coincide with bad leadership both from a
>moral and public point of view…
>
>In my opinion, one can say outright that if you find out that Kastner
>collaborated with the enemy because he did not disclose to the people who
>boarded the trains in Kluj that they were being led to extermination, one
>has to put on trial today Danzig, Herman, Hanzi, Brand, Revis and Marton,
>and many more leaders and half-leaders who gagged themselves in an hour of
>crisis and did not inform others of what was known to them and did not warn
>and did not cry out of the coming danger….
>
>Because of all this I cannot confirm the conclusion of the District Court
>with regard to the accusation that Greenwald has thrown on Kastner of
>collaboration with the Nazis in exterminating the Jewish people in Hungary
>during the last war.” (Hecht, ibid., pp.270-2)
>
>In other words, the Court approved of Kastner’s contempt for the Hungarian
>Jews and could not allow him to be condemned for doing exactly what many
>other Zionist leaders had half-leaders did – concealing their knowledge of
>the Nazi extermination plans so that Jews would board the trains to
>Auschwitz peacefully while their Zionist ‘leaders’ boarded a different
>train for Palestine.
>
>The most precise answer to this sickening judgement of Judge Chesin is
>provided in the minority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Moshe Silberg:
>
>I do not say that he was the only man who possessed information among the
>leaders. It is quite possible that somebody else as well does not have a
>clear conscience with regards to this concealment. But we are dealing here
>with the guilt of Kastner and we do not have to make judgements on the
>guilt of others….
>
>The declaration of the learned Attorney General therefore shrinks into an
>opinion….’Kastner was convinced and believed that there was no ray of
>hope for the Jews of Hungary, almost for none of them, and as he, as a
>result of his personal despair, did not disclose the secret of the
>extermination in order not to endanger or frustrate the rescue of the few –
>therefore he acted in good faith and should not be accused of collaborating
>with the Nazis in expediting the extermination of the Jews, even though, in
>fact, he brought about its result.’
>
>I am compelled to state that it is very difficult for me to conceive such
>an intention. Is this good faith? Can a single man, even in cooperation
>with some of his friends, yield to despair on behalf and without the
>knowledge of 800,000 other people? This is, in my opinion, the decisive
>consideration in the problem facing us. The charge emanating from the
>testimony of the witnesses against Kastner is that had they known of the
>Auschwitz secret, then thousands or tens of thousands would have been able
>to save their lives by local, partial, specific or indirect rescue
>operations like local revolts, resistance, escapes, hidings, concealment of
>children with Gentiles, forging of documents, ransom money, bribery, etc. –
>and when this is the case and when one deals with many hundreds of
>thousands, how does a human being, a mortal, reject with complete certainty
>and with an extreme ‘no’ the efficiency of all the many and varied rescue
>ways? How can he examine the tens of thousands of possibilities? Does he
>decide instead of God? Indeed, he who can act with such a usurpation of the
>last hope of hundreds of thousands is not entitled to claim good faith as
>his defense. The penetrating question quo warrento is a good answer to a
>claim of such good faith…
>
>If the superintendent of a big hospital lets thousands of sick people die
>so that he may devote himself to the sure rescue of one soul, he will come
>out guilty, at least morally, even if it is proven that he as an individual
>erroneously thought that there was no hope of saving the other patients. He
>is a collaborator with the angel of death.
>
>Either a complete atrophy of the soul or a blind involvement with complete
>loss of senses and proportion in his small but personal rescue operation
>could bring a man to such a gigantic, hazardous play.
>
>And if all this is not enough to annul the claim of good faith which was
>put before us on behalf of Kastner by the Attorney General, then Kastner
>himself comes and annuls it altogether. Not only did he never make this
>claim, but his own words prove the contrary. He writes in his report to the
>Jewish Agency that the Committee sent emissaries to many ghettos in the
>countryside and pleaded with them to organize escapes and to refuse to
>board the trains. And though the story of these pleadings is untrue, and
>the silence of Kastner in Kluj is proven, the very uttering of these
>statements entirely contradicts the claim that Kastner had concealed the
>news about the fate of the ghetto inmates in good faith and only as a
>result of his complete despairing of the chances of escaping or resisting
>the Germans. You can not claim at the same time helplessness and activity.
>Anyway, such a claim is not convincing…
>
>We can sum up with three facts:
>
>A. That the Nazis didn’t want to have a great revolt – nor small revolts,
>and their passion was to have the extermination machine working
>smoothly without resistance. This fact was known to Kastner from
>the best source – from Eichmann himself – And he had additional proofs of
>that when he witnessed all the illusionary and misleading tactics which
>were being taken by the Nazis from the first moment of occupation.
>
>B. That the most efficient means to paralyze the resistance with – or the
>escape of a victim is to conceal from him the plot of the coming murder.
>This fact is known to every man and one does not need any proof of
>evidence for this.
>
>C. That he, Kastner, in order to carry out the rescue plan for the few
>prominents, fulfilled knowingly and without good faith the said desire of
>the Nazis, thus expediting the work of exterminating the masses.
>
>And also the rescue of Becher by Kastner…He who is capable of rescuing
>this Becher from hanging proves that the atrocities of this great war
>criminal were not so horrifying or despicable in his eyes…I couldn’t base
>the main guilt of Kastner on this fact had it been alone, but when it is
>attached even from afar to the whole scene of events it throws retroactive
>light on the whole affair and serves as a dozen proofs of our
>conclusion.”(Supreme Court Judge, Moshe Silberg, 1957)
>
>
>If that had been the majority judgement, one could say that whatever their
>attitudes to the Arabs, and whatever their past behaviour might have been
>under pressure, the Zionist leadership today did not advocate collaboration
>with the Nazis.
>
>But Judge Silberg’s judgement was that of a minority.
>
>The Kastner case is therefore not an alleged episode in past history.
>
>It is a continuing controversy in which the top Zionist leadership of
>Israel stand indicted of continuing to publicly defend collaboration with
>the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.
>
>Despite the unanimous finding of the Supreme Court of Israel that Kurt
>Becher was a major war criminal, the Jewish Agency (World Zionist
>Organization) refused to withdraw the fraudulent certificate Kastner gave
>on their behalf, which saved Becher from hanging, and allowed him to remain
>a free man in West Germany, the head of several corporations and with an
>estimated personal worth of $30 million.
>
>Becher has even used his certification as a ‘good’ SS officer to give
>evidence in support of his associates at other war crimes trials in West
>Germany.
>
>Since the prosecution, representing the Israeli Government agreed with the
>Supreme Court that Becher was a major war criminal, one can only pressure
>that the Israeli Government did not want him put on trial for fear of what
>might come out.
>
>Likewise, none of Kastner’s associates on the Zionist Relief and Rescue
>Committee or his bosses in the Jewish Agency have ever been put on trial .
>Let alone the hundreds of ‘prominents’ who helped Kastner to reassure the
>Hungarian Jews that they were going to Kenyermeze and not Auschwitz,
>in exchange for tickets on the one train that took them eventually to
>Palestine.
>
>As for Kastner himself, he will cause no further embarrassment to the
>Zionist leadership with his undisputed claims that everything he did was
>approved by the Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization) leadership in
>Palestine. He is ‘now dead’. Or putting it less delicately, on 3 March 1957
>he was shot by Zeev Eckstein – immediately after the appeal hearings were
>concluded, and before the judgement ‘rehabilitating’ him was delivered.
>Eckstein was not a Hungarian avenger. He was a paid undercover agent of the
>Israeli secret service. (Hecht, ibid., p.208). Another ‘fantastic
>allegation’ no doubt; but admitted in court during the murder trial).

From [email protected] Fri Oct 2 12:09:33 EDT 1998
Article: 26932 of soc.culture.swiss
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.warszawa,pl.regionalne.lodz,pl.regionalne.krakow,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian
Subject: Bolsheviks Were Christkiller JEWS, not Russians
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 13:00:48 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 182
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx03-port-11.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!news.greennet.net!uunet!uunet!in5.uu.net!newsfeed.xcom.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org pl.regionalne.warszawa:9690 pl.regionalne.lodz:1136 pl.regionalne.krakow:6033 soc.culture.polish:119618 soc.culture.swiss:26932 soc.culture.russian:93411 soc.culture.ukrainian:41749

On Tue, 24 Mar 1998 17:38:00 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Came across the article in deja News, so thought it should be
>reconsidered by thinking readers.

>On Sun, 12 Oct 1997 16:50:37 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>Reply-To: [email protected]

>>Subject: Jews Dominated Bolshevism – Don’t Deny It
>>From: [email protected] (Roger Hughes)
>>Date: 22 Jul 1997 12:32:44 GMT
>>Organization: Anti-Hypocrisy Foundation

>>Patriot Fact Sheet : The Jews and Bolshevism

>> One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called “Russian
>>Revolution” of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority
>>of the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to
>>them, continue to condemn anyone as “anti-Semitic” who brings up these
>>facts, it remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created
>>and lead revolutionary movement.
>
>> First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism, Karl Marx,
>>was a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father’s side.
>>Whether he was a “religous” Jew is of no significant importance, since
>>Jewishness is not defined exclusively by adherance to Judaism. A great
>>bulk of Jews today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but
>>also nonetheless consider themselves Jews.
>
>> While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism, will
>>concede that Marx was indeed Jewish, let’s see the them deny the
>>communist-Jewish connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables that
>>passed between American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C.
>>during the time of the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following
>>quotes are taken directly from documents available from the U.S.
>>Archives:
>
>>State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
>>general in Moscow, Summers: “Jews prominant in local Soviet government,
>>anti-Jewish feeling growing among population….”
>
>>State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on July
>>5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: “Fifty percent of Soviet government in
>>each town consists of Jews of the worst type.”
>
>>>From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
>>March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
>>Montgomey Shuyler: “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
>>United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it’s
>>beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type.”
>
>
>>A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok, reports
>>on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: “…(T)here were 384
>>`commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22
>>Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had come to
>>Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial
>>Government.”
>
>>With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the
>>leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.
>>(Lenin has since been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had
>>access to the KGB archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon
>>Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
>>of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the
>>Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central
>>Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev
>>(Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the
>>central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other
>>prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign
>>affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and
>>Moisei Uritsky.
>
>>David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
>>January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most
>>of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little
>>for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are
>>trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”
>
>>The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
>>”Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
>>spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
>>organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
>>object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”
>
>>In case anyone thinks I’ve taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
>>here’s three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former
>>superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik Propaganda
>>Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary,
>>United States Senate, 65th Congress:
>
>>”We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
>>Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east side
>>of New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American
>>Pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased that
>>there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English
>>showed that they had not qualified as being Americas. A number of these
>>men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element in
>>this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that
>>more than half the agitators in the socalled Bolshevik movement were
>>Jews…I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one
>>of its bases is found in the east side of New York…The latest
>>startling information, given me by someone with good authority,
>>startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in the northern
>>community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of the Soviet
>>regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)
>>out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the
>>exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
>>Gordon.
>
>>I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great
>>revolution of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing on
>>the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I
>>often remarked to my sister, ‘Well, what are we coming to anyway. This
>>all looks so Yiddish.’ Up to that time we had see very few Jews, because
>>there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in Petrograd,
>>but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the agitators
>>were Jews.
>
>>I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
>>Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
>>posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now that
>>was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians
>>did not take kindly to it.”
>
>>Some might automatically assume that the preceeding sources are
>>”anti-Semitic” and therefore unreliable, but they’d be wrong. Here’s a
>>few Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:
>
>>”The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
>>Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
>>new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
>>Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
>>and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
>>physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American
>>Hebrew, September 10, 1920)
>
>>”There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
>>many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
>>many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, London April,
>>4, 1919)
>
>>”Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi
>>S. Wise, May 5, 1935).
>
>>”In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
>>communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
>>the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
>
>>Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
>>so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
>>himself:
>
>>”National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs
>>characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an
>>extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
>>cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death
>>penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
>
>>While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and
>>clergymen murdered by Communist gangs, synogoges and rabbis were left
>>virtually untouched.
>
>>It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
>>conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
>>population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20
>>million Ukranian farmers during the 1920’s in one of the most vile
>>campaigns in history: In (the) Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80 percent
>>of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an
>>American professor of Russian history. . . ”
>
>>Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85 million persons were
>>murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them
>>directly at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish
>>Communist bosses.
>
>>Regards,
>>Roger Hughes

>> http://www.natall.com
>> http://www.natvan.com
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:48:11 EDT 1998
Article: 127092 of can.general
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.collecting.stamps,soc.culture.canada,rec.collecting.stamps,soc.culture.europe,can.general,usa.general,rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Subject: Re: Canada Post Managers Can STEAL MAIL!!!
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:50:02 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 195
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!feed1.news.luth.se!luth.se!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org alt.collecting.stamps:5920 soc.culture.canada:160672 rec.collecting.stamps:6 soc.culture.europe:128585 can.general:127092 rec.collecting.stamps.discuss:1949

On 1 Oct 1998 20:07:20 GMT, (Kenneth McVay SOB) wrote:

Further to the lawsuits against Canada Post, for stealing or losing a
full sack of mail, CanPost filed a Statement of defence.

They claim, even if their managers STEAL or lose a full sack of mail,
THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY ONE CENT IN COMPENSATION!!!
They claim further, that they are immune from any and all lawsuits!!!

No wonder so many people are having their mail, including registered,
STOLEN by managers at Canada Post!!!

On Sat, 08 Aug 1998 14:03:13 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Following all the recent news stories about thefts of mail by Canada
>Post, today (7 August 1998) Canada Post is being sued, in two separate lawsuits!!!
>
>The most damaging one relates to the disappearance of AN ENTIRE SACK
>OF MAIL consisting of approximately 52 pounds of computer programs,
>worth more than $4,000.– in a PO sealed sack, destined for a
>foreign government department. The sackful was delivered and sealed on
>10th June. According to written admissions from Canada Post, it
>somehow “DISAPPEARED” the same day.Alberta Court Docket #P9890306082.
>
>Mind you, the criminals running Canada Post did not bother to advise
>the victim for one month, until 9th July!! It is now 2 months, Canada
>Post say they have no idea how the full mail sack disappeared, and
>they refuse to pay compensation for their thieves!!!
>
>Since normal workers/staff can no longer steal because they are
>constantly videotaped, one must assume that managers in canada Post
>are somehow involved in the disappearance.
>
>At the same time, another lawsuit was filed against Canada Post, in
>connection with a “security registered” item, with $3000.– worth of
>stamps sent to a representative of a European government, which
>”disappeared” last year!!!Alberta Court Docket# p9890306081.
>
>Victims are now getting together to organise a major international
>campaign.
>
>If you have had mail “disappear”, whether ‘lost’ or stolen – SUE
>THEM!!!
>
>Some of the contact names and phone numbers of the big sh*ts
>at Canada Post include:
>
>Alfonso Galiano,MP – Minister for Canada Post – 819-997-5421
> Jonathan Moser is his gofer – same number
>
>Georges Clermont – President of Canada Post – phone 613-734-8440
> Sebastian Barnard is his gofer – same number
>
>Stewart Bacon – VP Canada Post – phone 613-734-8440
>
>Also be sure to send copies of your charges to the Deputy Leader of
>the Opposition in the Canadian Parliament, Deborah Grey, MP.
>
>In addition to the foregoing, notify all media in your area to run
>this story, together with your complaints.
>
>Further, foreign postal administrations including USPS are also being
>contacted. Perhaps they can be convinced, to again place an EMBARGO on
>mail to and from canada, until such time as Canada Post can ensure the
>safety, and reliability of delivery of mail, without it
>disappearing!!!
>
>The original article documenting the problems experience by Carl kane,
>as documented with APS, are but the tips of the problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>It seems that dealers in Canada, and also now in UK, are filing their
>complaints about thefts from Canada mails, with the MP D.Grey in
>Ottawa, and also with media all over the world.
>
>
>
>>Read all the articles below!!!
>
>>It is not only in Toronto that Registered Mail is being regularly
>>stolen.
>
>
>>On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 04:19:49 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>>Western Canada, especially Edmonton, is being reported in the media as
>>>the latest crisis area for thefts, particularly of Registered Mail.
>
>>>Apparently, senior staff in the main post office have been helping
>>>themselves to mail of value, even including Registered mail.
>
>>>So far, only one person has been charged, and convicted in Court.
>
>>>Even the media have had to admit, that the thefts are still
>>>continuing, so it is obvious that the senior thieves have still not
>>>been arrested.
>
>>>Governments overseas have been forced to intervene in connection with
>>>the ongoing thefts from and to Edmonton, Canada.
>
>>>Coming on the heels of the stupid mail strike just before Christmas,
>>>it seems Canada Post just does not give a damn about delivering the
>>>mail.
>
>>>That only a few of the staff, probably management types, are the
>>>culprits makes it difficult for those who are really honest workers in
>>>Canada Post. It seems further, that management of Canada Post just
>>>want to hush up, and cover up, the ongoing thefts.
>
>
>>If you also are a victim of theft from the mails through western
>>Canada, you should be contacting the following:
>
>>Also, be sure to send copies of your complaint to the following;
>>Ms.D.Gray – Deputy Leader of the Reform Party of Canada
>>HOUSE OF COMMONS,
>>OTTAWA – CANADA
>
>>She is handling many complaints of thefts from the mail, even of
>>Registered items!!!!
>
>>No postage is needed if mailed in Canada
>
>>Send your complaints of theft from the mails in Canada, in addition to
>>D.Grey,MP, to your local media – radio,tv and newspapers.
>
>
>>On 11 Jun 1998 18:34:27 GMT, [email protected] (Jay T. Carrigan)
>>wrote:
>
>>>Rainer,
>
>>>Sorry to hear about your had problems with registered mail.
>
>Here’s a very relevant “letter to the editor” published in the June
>1998 issue of the American Philatelist:
>
>”Canadian Mail Warning
>
>”Philatelists should be aware of a string of registered mail losses of
>letters and packages destined for or originating from Toronto, Canada,
>in the last two years. Despite the fact that twenty-three Canadian
>Postal Corp (CPC) employees were arrested for mail theft in 1997, the
>losses continue, indicating that the arrests may have touched only the
>tip of the iceberg.
>
>”The arrests occurred in June 1997 at the Toronto’s Gateway Postal
>Terminal, the largest mail sorting facility in Canada. Unfortunately,
>
>to date there are no reports that any of those arrested have been
>charged or prosecuted, material reported missing by thousands of
>customers remains missing, and CPC users continue to suffer sometimes
>substantial losses.
>
>”Also unfortunately, there have been no stories in the American press
>about these increasingly frequent losses. Collectors must be warned
>of the high risk of using the Canadian mail service. Registered mail
>is no protection against loss, and in fact may flag the mail to the
>attention of the mail handlers who prey on the public. If you must
>send material to Canada, or if you need to receive items from the
>country, you will be more successful if you use Federal Express and
>pay the higher cost.
>
> Carl E. Kane
> East Dennis, Massachusetts”
>
>>> Jay Carrigan [email protected]
>
>>>In article <[email protected]>, Rainer Fuchs
>>> writes
>>>>How does the Canadian Post handles registered letters?
>>>>Does the receiver need to sign a receive note?
>
>>>>It seems that some of my registered letters to Canada have not reached the
>>>>receiver. For the first letter a inquiry was made… and the addressee just
>>>>needed to sign on a paper form from the Canadian Post that he has not
>>>>received the letter. Does the Canadian Post is not able to track the
>>>>letters?
>
>>>>Rainer Fuchs
>>>>Email: [email protected]
>>>>Web Site: http://fuchs-online.com
>
>
>
>>If the thefts are in Canada, there is little point complaining to
>>USPS.
>>Complain to APS, and then the Canadian MP who is interested, as well
>>as other media.
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:48:12 EDT 1998
Article: 127093 of can.general
Path: hub.org!hub.org!newsin.pe.net!news.pe.net!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.canada,can.general,bc.general,ns.general,usa.general,rec.collecting.stamps
Subject: Re: Canada Post Managers Can STEAL MAIL!!!
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:51:39 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 196
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.canada:160673 can.general:127093 bc.general:80484 ns.general:33730 rec.collecting.stamps:7

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 20:21:50 GMT, [email protected]
trying to get more people angry with thefts by Canada Post wrote:

Further to the lawsuits against Canada Post, for stealing or losing a
full sack of mail, CanPost filed a Statement of defence.

They claim, even if their managers STEAL or lose a full sack of mail,
THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY ONE CENT IN COMPENSATION!!!
They claim further, that they are immune from any and all lawsuits!!!

No wonder so many people are having their mail, including registered,
STOLEN by managers at Canada Post!!!

On Sat, 08 Aug 1998 14:03:13 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Following all the recent news stories about thefts of mail by Canada
>Post, today (7 August 1998) Canada Post is being sued, in two separate lawsuits!!!
>
>The most damaging one relates to the disappearance of AN ENTIRE SACK
>OF MAIL consisting of approximately 52 pounds of computer programs,
>worth more than $4,000.– in a PO sealed sack, destined for a
>foreign government department. The sackful was delivered and sealed on
>10th June. According to written admissions from Canada Post, it
>somehow “DISAPPEARED” the same day.Alberta Court Docket #P9890306082.
>
>Mind you, the criminals running Canada Post did not bother to advise
>the victim for one month, until 9th July!! It is now 2 months, Canada
>Post say they have no idea how the full mail sack disappeared, and
>they refuse to pay compensation for their thieves!!!
>
>Since normal workers/staff can no longer steal because they are
>constantly videotaped, one must assume that managers in canada Post
>are somehow involved in the disappearance.
>
>At the same time, another lawsuit was filed against Canada Post, in
>connection with a “security registered” item, with $3000.– worth of
>stamps sent to a representative of a European government, which
>”disappeared” last year!!!Alberta Court Docket# p9890306081.
>
>Victims are now getting together to organise a major international
>campaign.
>
>If you have had mail “disappear”, whether ‘lost’ or stolen – SUE
>THEM!!!
>
>Some of the contact names and phone numbers of the big sh*ts
>at Canada Post include:
>
>Alfonso Galiano,MP – Minister for Canada Post – 819-997-5421
> Jonathan Moser is his gofer – same number
>
>Georges Clermont – President of Canada Post – phone 613-734-8440
> Sebastian Barnard is his gofer – same number
>
>Stewart Bacon – VP Canada Post – phone 613-734-8440
>
>Also be sure to send copies of your charges to the Deputy Leader of
>the Opposition in the Canadian Parliament, Deborah Grey, MP.
>
>In addition to the foregoing, notify all media in your area to run
>this story, together with your complaints.
>
>Further, foreign postal administrations including USPS are also being
>contacted. Perhaps they can be convinced, to again place an EMBARGO on
>mail to and from canada, until such time as Canada Post can ensure the
>safety, and reliability of delivery of mail, without it
>disappearing!!!
>
>The original article documenting the problems experience by Carl kane,
>as documented with APS, are but the tips of the problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>It seems that dealers in Canada, and also now in UK, are filing their
>complaints about thefts from Canada mails, with the MP D.Grey in
>Ottawa, and also with media all over the world.
>
>
>
>>Read all the articles below!!!
>
>>It is not only in Toronto that Registered Mail is being regularly
>>stolen.
>
>
>>On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 04:19:49 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>>Western Canada, especially Edmonton, is being reported in the media as
>>>the latest crisis area for thefts, particularly of Registered Mail.
>
>>>Apparently, senior staff in the main post office have been helping
>>>themselves to mail of value, even including Registered mail.
>
>>>So far, only one person has been charged, and convicted in Court.
>
>>>Even the media have had to admit, that the thefts are still
>>>continuing, so it is obvious that the senior thieves have still not
>>>been arrested.
>
>>>Governments overseas have been forced to intervene in connection with
>>>the ongoing thefts from and to Edmonton, Canada.
>
>>>Coming on the heels of the stupid mail strike just before Christmas,
>>>it seems Canada Post just does not give a damn about delivering the
>>>mail.
>
>>>That only a few of the staff, probably management types, are the
>>>culprits makes it difficult for those who are really honest workers in
>>>Canada Post. It seems further, that management of Canada Post just
>>>want to hush up, and cover up, the ongoing thefts.
>
>
>>If you also are a victim of theft from the mails through western
>>Canada, you should be contacting the following:
>
>>Also, be sure to send copies of your complaint to the following;
>>Ms.D.Gray – Deputy Leader of the Reform Party of Canada
>>HOUSE OF COMMONS,
>>OTTAWA – CANADA
>
>>She is handling many complaints of thefts from the mail, even of
>>Registered items!!!!
>
>>No postage is needed if mailed in Canada
>
>>Send your complaints of theft from the mails in Canada, in addition to
>>D.Grey,MP, to your local media – radio,tv and newspapers.
>
>
>>On 11 Jun 1998 18:34:27 GMT, [email protected] (Jay T. Carrigan)
>>wrote:
>
>>>Rainer,
>
>>>Sorry to hear about your had problems with registered mail.
>
>Here’s a very relevant “letter to the editor” published in the June
>1998 issue of the American Philatelist:
>
>”Canadian Mail Warning
>
>”Philatelists should be aware of a string of registered mail losses of
>letters and packages destined for or originating from Toronto, Canada,
>in the last two years. Despite the fact that twenty-three Canadian
>Postal Corp (CPC) employees were arrested for mail theft in 1997, the
>losses continue, indicating that the arrests may have touched only the
>tip of the iceberg.
>
>”The arrests occurred in June 1997 at the Toronto’s Gateway Postal
>Terminal, the largest mail sorting facility in Canada. Unfortunately,
>
>to date there are no reports that any of those arrested have been
>charged or prosecuted, material reported missing by thousands of
>customers remains missing, and CPC users continue to suffer sometimes
>substantial losses.
>
>”Also unfortunately, there have been no stories in the American press
>about these increasingly frequent losses. Collectors must be warned
>of the high risk of using the Canadian mail service. Registered mail
>is no protection against loss, and in fact may flag the mail to the
>attention of the mail handlers who prey on the public. If you must
>send material to Canada, or if you need to receive items from the
>country, you will be more successful if you use Federal Express and
>pay the higher cost.
>
> Carl E. Kane
> East Dennis, Massachusetts”
>
>>> Jay Carrigan [email protected]
>
>>>In article <[email protected]>, Rainer Fuchs
>>> writes
>>>>How does the Canadian Post handles registered letters?
>>>>Does the receiver need to sign a receive note?
>
>>>>It seems that some of my registered letters to Canada have not reached the
>>>>receiver. For the first letter a inquiry was made… and the addressee just
>>>>needed to sign on a paper form from the Canadian Post that he has not
>>>>received the letter. Does the Canadian Post is not able to track the
>>>>letters?
>
>>>>Rainer Fuchs
>>>>Email: [email protected]
>>>>Web Site: http://fuchs-online.com
>
>
>
>>If the thefts are in Canada, there is little point complaining to
>>USPS.
>>Complain to APS, and then the Canadian MP who is interested, as well
>>as other media.
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:48:27 EDT 1998
Article: 160672 of soc.culture.canada
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.collecting.stamps,soc.culture.canada,rec.collecting.stamps,soc.culture.europe,can.general,usa.general,rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Subject: Re: Canada Post Managers Can STEAL MAIL!!!
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:50:02 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 195
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!feed1.news.luth.se!luth.se!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org alt.collecting.stamps:5920 soc.culture.canada:160672 rec.collecting.stamps:6 soc.culture.europe:128585 can.general:127092 rec.collecting.stamps.discuss:1949

On 1 Oct 1998 20:07:20 GMT, (Kenneth McVay SOB) wrote:

Further to the lawsuits against Canada Post, for stealing or losing a
full sack of mail, CanPost filed a Statement of defence.

They claim, even if their managers STEAL or lose a full sack of mail,
THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY ONE CENT IN COMPENSATION!!!
They claim further, that they are immune from any and all lawsuits!!!

No wonder so many people are having their mail, including registered,
STOLEN by managers at Canada Post!!!

On Sat, 08 Aug 1998 14:03:13 GMT, [email protected]com wrote:

>Following all the recent news stories about thefts of mail by Canada
>Post, today (7 August 1998) Canada Post is being sued, in two separate lawsuits!!!
>
>The most damaging one relates to the disappearance of AN ENTIRE SACK
>OF MAIL consisting of approximately 52 pounds of computer programs,
>worth more than $4,000.– in a PO sealed sack, destined for a
>foreign government department. The sackful was delivered and sealed on
>10th June. According to written admissions from Canada Post, it
>somehow “DISAPPEARED” the same day.Alberta Court Docket #P9890306082.
>
>Mind you, the criminals running Canada Post did not bother to advise
>the victim for one month, until 9th July!! It is now 2 months, Canada
>Post say they have no idea how the full mail sack disappeared, and
>they refuse to pay compensation for their thieves!!!
>
>Since normal workers/staff can no longer steal because they are
>constantly videotaped, one must assume that managers in canada Post
>are somehow involved in the disappearance.
>
>At the same time, another lawsuit was filed against Canada Post, in
>connection with a “security registered” item, with $3000.– worth of
>stamps sent to a representative of a European government, which
>”disappeared” last year!!!Alberta Court Docket# p9890306081.
>
>Victims are now getting together to organise a major international
>campaign.
>
>If you have had mail “disappear”, whether ‘lost’ or stolen – SUE
>THEM!!!
>
>Some of the contact names and phone numbers of the big sh*ts
>at Canada Post include:
>
>Alfonso Galiano,MP – Minister for Canada Post – 819-997-5421
> Jonathan Moser is his gofer – same number
>
>Georges Clermont – President of Canada Post – phone 613-734-8440
> Sebastian Barnard is his gofer – same number
>
>Stewart Bacon – VP Canada Post – phone 613-734-8440
>
>Also be sure to send copies of your charges to the Deputy Leader of
>the Opposition in the Canadian Parliament, Deborah Grey, MP.
>
>In addition to the foregoing, notify all media in your area to run
>this story, together with your complaints.
>
>Further, foreign postal administrations including USPS are also being
>contacted. Perhaps they can be convinced, to again place an EMBARGO on
>mail to and from canada, until such time as Canada Post can ensure the
>safety, and reliability of delivery of mail, without it
>disappearing!!!
>
>The original article documenting the problems experience by Carl kane,
>as documented with APS, are but the tips of the problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>It seems that dealers in Canada, and also now in UK, are filing their
>complaints about thefts from Canada mails, with the MP D.Grey in
>Ottawa, and also with media all over the world.
>
>
>
>>Read all the articles below!!!
>
>>It is not only in Toronto that Registered Mail is being regularly
>>stolen.
>
>
>>On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 04:19:49 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>>Western Canada, especially Edmonton, is being reported in the media as
>>>the latest crisis area for thefts, particularly of Registered Mail.
>
>>>Apparently, senior staff in the main post office have been helping
>>>themselves to mail of value, even including Registered mail.
>
>>>So far, only one person has been charged, and convicted in Court.
>
>>>Even the media have had to admit, that the thefts are still
>>>continuing, so it is obvious that the senior thieves have still not
>>>been arrested.
>
>>>Governments overseas have been forced to intervene in connection with
>>>the ongoing thefts from and to Edmonton, Canada.
>
>>>Coming on the heels of the stupid mail strike just before Christmas,
>>>it seems Canada Post just does not give a damn about delivering the
>>>mail.
>
>>>That only a few of the staff, probably management types, are the
>>>culprits makes it difficult for those who are really honest workers in
>>>Canada Post. It seems further, that management of Canada Post just
>>>want to hush up, and cover up, the ongoing thefts.
>
>
>>If you also are a victim of theft from the mails through western
>>Canada, you should be contacting the following:
>
>>Also, be sure to send copies of your complaint to the following;
>>Ms.D.Gray – Deputy Leader of the Reform Party of Canada
>>HOUSE OF COMMONS,
>>OTTAWA – CANADA
>
>>She is handling many complaints of thefts from the mail, even of
>>Registered items!!!!
>
>>No postage is needed if mailed in Canada
>
>>Send your complaints of theft from the mails in Canada, in addition to
>>D.Grey,MP, to your local media – radio,tv and newspapers.
>
>
>>On 11 Jun 1998 18:34:27 GMT, [email protected] (Jay T. Carrigan)
>>wrote:
>
>>>Rainer,
>
>>>Sorry to hear about your had problems with registered mail.
>
>Here’s a very relevant “letter to the editor” published in the June
>1998 issue of the American Philatelist:
>
>”Canadian Mail Warning
>
>”Philatelists should be aware of a string of registered mail losses of
>letters and packages destined for or originating from Toronto, Canada,
>in the last two years. Despite the fact that twenty-three Canadian
>Postal Corp (CPC) employees were arrested for mail theft in 1997, the
>losses continue, indicating that the arrests may have touched only the
>tip of the iceberg.
>
>”The arrests occurred in June 1997 at the Toronto’s Gateway Postal
>Terminal, the largest mail sorting facility in Canada. Unfortunately,
>
>to date there are no reports that any of those arrested have been
>charged or prosecuted, material reported missing by thousands of
>customers remains missing, and CPC users continue to suffer sometimes
>substantial losses.
>
>”Also unfortunately, there have been no stories in the American press
>about these increasingly frequent losses. Collectors must be warned
>of the high risk of using the Canadian mail service. Registered mail
>is no protection against loss, and in fact may flag the mail to the
>attention of the mail handlers who prey on the public. If you must
>send material to Canada, or if you need to receive items from the
>country, you will be more successful if you use Federal Express and
>pay the higher cost.
>
> Carl E. Kane
> East Dennis, Massachusetts”
>
>>> Jay Carrigan [email protected]
>
>>>In article <[email protected]>, Rainer Fuchs
>>> writes
>>>>How does the Canadian Post handles registered letters?
>>>>Does the receiver need to sign a receive note?
>
>>>>It seems that some of my registered letters to Canada have not reached the
>>>>receiver. For the first letter a inquiry was made… and the addressee just
>>>>needed to sign on a paper form from the Canadian Post that he has not
>>>>received the letter. Does the Canadian Post is not able to track the
>>>>letters?
>
>>>>Rainer Fuchs
>>>>Email: [email protected]
>>>>Web Site: http://fuchs-online.com
>
>
>
>>If the thefts are in Canada, there is little point complaining to
>>USPS.
>>Complain to APS, and then the Canadian MP who is interested, as well
>>as other media.
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:48:28 EDT 1998
Article: 160673 of soc.culture.canada
Path: hub.org!hub.org!newsin.pe.net!news.pe.net!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.canada,can.general,bc.general,ns.general,usa.general,rec.collecting.stamps
Subject: Re: Canada Post Managers Can STEAL MAIL!!!
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:51:39 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 196
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.canada:160673 can.general:127093 bc.general:80484 ns.general:33730 rec.collecting.stamps:7

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 20:21:50 GMT, [email protected]
trying to get more people angry with thefts by Canada Post wrote:

Further to the lawsuits against Canada Post, for stealing or losing a
full sack of mail, CanPost filed a Statement of defence.

They claim, even if their managers STEAL or lose a full sack of mail,
THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY ONE CENT IN COMPENSATION!!!
They claim further, that they are immune from any and all lawsuits!!!

No wonder so many people are having their mail, including registered,
STOLEN by managers at Canada Post!!!

On Sat, 08 Aug 1998 14:03:13 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Following all the recent news stories about thefts of mail by Canada
>Post, today (7 August 1998) Canada Post is being sued, in two separate lawsuits!!!
>
>The most damaging one relates to the disappearance of AN ENTIRE SACK
>OF MAIL consisting of approximately 52 pounds of computer programs,
>worth more than $4,000.– in a PO sealed sack, destined for a
>foreign government department. The sackful was delivered and sealed on
>10th June. According to written admissions from Canada Post, it
>somehow “DISAPPEARED” the same day.Alberta Court Docket #P9890306082.
>
>Mind you, the criminals running Canada Post did not bother to advise
>the victim for one month, until 9th July!! It is now 2 months, Canada
>Post say they have no idea how the full mail sack disappeared, and
>they refuse to pay compensation for their thieves!!!
>
>Since normal workers/staff can no longer steal because they are
>constantly videotaped, one must assume that managers in canada Post
>are somehow involved in the disappearance.
>
>At the same time, another lawsuit was filed against Canada Post, in
>connection with a “security registered” item, with $3000.– worth of
>stamps sent to a representative of a European government, which
>”disappeared” last year!!!Alberta Court Docket# p9890306081.
>
>Victims are now getting together to organise a major international
>campaign.
>
>If you have had mail “disappear”, whether ‘lost’ or stolen – SUE
>THEM!!!
>
>Some of the contact names and phone numbers of the big sh*ts
>at Canada Post include:
>
>Alfonso Galiano,MP – Minister for Canada Post – 819-997-5421
> Jonathan Moser is his gofer – same number
>
>Georges Clermont – President of Canada Post – phone 613-734-8440
> Sebastian Barnard is his gofer – same number
>
>Stewart Bacon – VP Canada Post – phone 613-734-8440
>
>Also be sure to send copies of your charges to the Deputy Leader of
>the Opposition in the Canadian Parliament, Deborah Grey, MP.
>
>In addition to the foregoing, notify all media in your area to run
>this story, together with your complaints.
>
>Further, foreign postal administrations including USPS are also being
>contacted. Perhaps they can be convinced, to again place an EMBARGO on
>mail to and from canada, until such time as Canada Post can ensure the
>safety, and reliability of delivery of mail, without it
>disappearing!!!
>
>The original article documenting the problems experience by Carl kane,
>as documented with APS, are but the tips of the problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>It seems that dealers in Canada, and also now in UK, are filing their
>complaints about thefts from Canada mails, with the MP D.Grey in
>Ottawa, and also with media all over the world.
>
>
>
>>Read all the articles below!!!
>
>>It is not only in Toronto that Registered Mail is being regularly
>>stolen.
>
>
>>On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 04:19:49 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>>Western Canada, especially Edmonton, is being reported in the media as
>>>the latest crisis area for thefts, particularly of Registered Mail.
>
>>>Apparently, senior staff in the main post office have been helping
>>>themselves to mail of value, even including Registered mail.
>
>>>So far, only one person has been charged, and convicted in Court.
>
>>>Even the media have had to admit, that the thefts are still
>>>continuing, so it is obvious that the senior thieves have still not
>>>been arrested.
>
>>>Governments overseas have been forced to intervene in connection with
>>>the ongoing thefts from and to Edmonton, Canada.
>
>>>Coming on the heels of the stupid mail strike just before Christmas,
>>>it seems Canada Post just does not give a damn about delivering the
>>>mail.
>
>>>That only a few of the staff, probably management types, are the
>>>culprits makes it difficult for those who are really honest workers in
>>>Canada Post. It seems further, that management of Canada Post just
>>>want to hush up, and cover up, the ongoing thefts.
>
>
>>If you also are a victim of theft from the mails through western
>>Canada, you should be contacting the following:
>
>>Also, be sure to send copies of your complaint to the following;
>>Ms.D.Gray – Deputy Leader of the Reform Party of Canada
>>HOUSE OF COMMONS,
>>OTTAWA – CANADA
>
>>She is handling many complaints of thefts from the mail, even of
>>Registered items!!!!
>
>>No postage is needed if mailed in Canada
>
>>Send your complaints of theft from the mails in Canada, in addition to
>>D.Grey,MP, to your local media – radio,tv and newspapers.
>
>
>>On 11 Jun 1998 18:34:27 GMT, [email protected] (Jay T. Carrigan)
>>wrote:
>
>>>Rainer,
>
>>>Sorry to hear about your had problems with registered mail.
>
>Here’s a very relevant “letter to the editor” published in the June
>1998 issue of the American Philatelist:
>
>”Canadian Mail Warning
>
>”Philatelists should be aware of a string of registered mail losses of
>letters and packages destined for or originating from Toronto, Canada,
>in the last two years. Despite the fact that twenty-three Canadian
>Postal Corp (CPC) employees were arrested for mail theft in 1997, the
>losses continue, indicating that the arrests may have touched only the
>tip of the iceberg.
>
>”The arrests occurred in June 1997 at the Toronto’s Gateway Postal
>Terminal, the largest mail sorting facility in Canada. Unfortunately,
>
>to date there are no reports that any of those arrested have been
>charged or prosecuted, material reported missing by thousands of
>customers remains missing, and CPC users continue to suffer sometimes
>substantial losses.
>
>”Also unfortunately, there have been no stories in the American press
>about these increasingly frequent losses. Collectors must be warned
>of the high risk of using the Canadian mail service. Registered mail
>is no protection against loss, and in fact may flag the mail to the
>attention of the mail handlers who prey on the public. If you must
>send material to Canada, or if you need to receive items from the
>country, you will be more successful if you use Federal Express and
>pay the higher cost.
>
> Carl E. Kane
> East Dennis, Massachusetts”
>
>>> Jay Carrigan [email protected]
>
>>>In article <[email protected]>, Rainer Fuchs
>>> writes
>>>>How does the Canadian Post handles registered letters?
>>>>Does the receiver need to sign a receive note?
>
>>>>It seems that some of my registered letters to Canada have not reached the
>>>>receiver. For the first letter a inquiry was made… and the addressee just
>>>>needed to sign on a paper form from the Canadian Post that he has not
>>>>received the letter. Does the Canadian Post is not able to track the
>>>>letters?
>
>>>>Rainer Fuchs
>>>>Email: [email protected]
>>>>Web Site: http://fuchs-online.com
>
>
>
>>If the thefts are in Canada, there is little point complaining to
>>USPS.
>>Complain to APS, and then the Canadian MP who is interested, as well
>>as other media.
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:51:05 EDT 1998
Article: 119709 of soc.culture.polish
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Re: Jews DID CONTROL Communism – documented by them…
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:56:08 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 241
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:119709 soc.culture.australian:77561 soc.culture.russian:93485 soc.culture.ukrainian:41761 soc.culture.baltics:15282 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9717 soc.culture.swiss:26936

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 18:22:38 GMT, sbjarnason trying desperately to
stimule more discussion wrote:

On 23 Jun 1998 00:27:52 GMT, [email protected] (Daniel Swan)
wrote:

>steve mock ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>: What you constantly fail to grasp, Tavish, is that no one is denying that there were people of Jewish ancestry among
>: the Bolsheviks, or even that there weren’t quite a few people of Jewish ancestry among the Bolsheviks. What you
>: completely and utterly fail to understand is how collossal the leap of logic is which you ask us to make from that fact
>: to the conclusion that Bolshevism is some kind of a Jewish plot for which Jews bear collective responsibility.
>
>Logical leap or not, this raises an interesting question: How
>can the overproportionate Jewish representation among the
>Bolsheviks be accounted for?

Perhaps the following text may help answer your rhetorical question…

Subject: Jews Dominated Bolshevism – Don’t Deny It
From: [email protected] (Roger Hughes)
Date: 22 Jul 1997 12:32:44 GMT
Organization: Anti-Hypocrisy Foundation

Patriot Fact Sheet : The Jews and Bolshevism

One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called
“Russian
Revolution” of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority
of the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to
them, continue to condemn anyone as “anti-Semitic” who brings up these
facts, it remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created
and lead revolutionary movement.

First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism,
Karl Marx,
was a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father’s side.
Whether he was a “religous” Jew is of no significant importance, since
Jewishness is not defined exclusively by adherance to Judaism. A great
bulk of Jews today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but
also nonetheless consider themselves Jews.

While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism,
will
concede that Marx was indeed Jewish, let’s see the them deny the
communist-Jewish connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables
that
passed between American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C.
during the time of the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following
quotes are taken directly from documents available from the U.S.
Archives:

State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: “Jews prominant in local Soviet
government,
anti-Jewish feeling growing among population….”

State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July
5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: “Fifty percent of Soviet government
in
each town consists of Jews of the worst type.”

>From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomey Shuyler: “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it’s
beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type.”

A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports
on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: “…(T)here were
384
`commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22
Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had come
to
Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial
Government.”

With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the
leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.
(Lenin has since been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had
access to the KGB archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon
Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the
Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central
Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev
(Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the
central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other
prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn),
foreign
affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld)
and
Moisei Uritsky.

David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most
of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care
little
for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are
trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”

The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
“Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”

In case anyone thinks I’ve taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
here’s three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former
superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik
Propaganda
Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary,
United States Senate, 65th Congress:

“We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east
side
of New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American
Pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased
that
there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English
showed that they had not qualified as being Americas. A number of
these
men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element
in
this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that
more than half the agitators in the socalled Bolshevik movement were
Jews…I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that
one
of its bases is found in the east side of New York…The latest
startling information, given me by someone with good authority,
startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in the
northern
community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of the
Soviet
regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)
out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the
exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
Gordon.

I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great
revolution of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing
on
the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I
often remarked to my sister, ‘Well, what are we coming to anyway. This
all looks so Yiddish.’ Up to that time we had see very few Jews,
because
there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in
Petrograd,
but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the
agitators
were Jews.

I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now
that
was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians
did not take kindly to it.”

Some might automatically assume that the preceeding sources are
“anti-Semitic” and therefore unreliable, but they’d be wrong. Here’s a
few Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:

“The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920)

“There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, London
April,
4, 1919)

“Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin,
Rabbi
S. Wise, May 5, 1935).

“In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)

Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:

“National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs
characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an
extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death
penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).

While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and
clergymen murdered by Communist gangs, synogoges and rabbis were left
virtually untouched.

It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20
million Ukranian farmers during the 1920’s in one of the most vile
campaigns in history: In (the) Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80
percent
of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an
American professor of Russian history. . . ”

Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85 million persons
were
murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them
directly at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish
Communist bosses.

Regards,
Roger Hughes

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Towards a New Consciousness; a New Order; a New People
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Home


http://www.natvan.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Roger’s Page http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm/
Keep It White Because You Know It’s Right!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Abusive emails will be posted to the Usenet and ridiculed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:51:06 EDT 1998
Article: 119710 of soc.culture.polish
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.lebanon,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: JEWS = NAZIS
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 20:02:36 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.arabic:35936 soc.culture.polish:119710 soc.culture.lebanon:59735 soc.culture.australian:77563 soc.culture.swiss:26938 soc.culture.russian:93487

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 20:09:51 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> “David S. M. Ng” wrote:
>> i beg to differ… just because soros is a jew and a currency speculator
>> DOES NOT mean that all currency speculators are JEWS!!
>>
>> anyway, please keep your nazi statements to yourself.
>
>
>You have to understand the source of this material. This is the work of Bill
>Grosvenor of Edmonton Canada hiding behind various fake names. Currently he
>is using the fake name “[email protected]”. (I guess he must be
>mad at me… 🙁
>
>Learn more about Bill Grosvenor, convicted criminal, former mental institution
>inmate and Barbie Doll collector in the Grosvenor FAQs:
>
>https://nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/
>http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=251280192
>
>(Grosvenor is posting from an account at Telusplanet.net in Canada. You tell
>by looking at the Message-ID line in the headers. Any anti-Semitic or racist
>material you see posted here with “
>as the Message-ID is from Grosvenor. You can let Telusplanet know what
>Grosvenor is doing my mailing his articles, complete with headers, to
>[email protected] )
>
>Cheers,
>
>Sven
>
>
>
>> [email protected] wrote in article
>> <[email protected]>…
>> > On 29 Sep 1998 22:05:48 +0800, “David S. M. Ng” >> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >HELLO??!!! Vhat rr uu saying? please keep your racist comments to your
>> side
>> > >of the world…. we don’t need another vhite man’s opinion over here
>> thank
>> > >you very much.
>> >
>> > Since these newsgroups are mainly for people in Islamic countries, the
>> > problems associated with the christkiller JEWS is extremely relevant.
>> >
>> > Are you not concerned about money speculators such as the JEW SOROS?
>> > >
>
>
>P.S.: Bill, could you tell us some more about your Barbie dolls?
>
>(see http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=120435350 )
>
>Subject:
> TRADE for Peppermint Princess
> Date:
> 29 Nov 1995 00:00:00 GMT
> From:
> [email protected] ()
> Organization:
> Edmonton Freenet, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
> Newsgroups:
> rec.collecting.dolls
>
>
>
>
>Want to trade for Peppermint Princess NRFB.Can offer NRFB Limited Edition
>1995 Governors Ball Barbie.
>
>Let us know if you’re interested.

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:51:06 EDT 1998
Article: 119711 of soc.culture.polish
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.cmc.net!syix.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Re: JEW RABBIS LAUNDER DRUG MONEY IN NY!!!!
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 20:07:32 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 147
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:119711 soc.culture.russian:93488 soc.culture.ukrainian:41762 soc.culture.usa:260945

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 19:57:57 GMT, sbjarnason trying to stimulate more
anti-JEW comments wrote:

On Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:20:12 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>It seems that JEWS are not satisfied with having murdered Jesus
>Christ.
>
>Now some of them are involved, even from synagogues, in the DRUGS
>business.
>On Tue, 17 Jun 1997 07:10:26 -0800, in alt.revisionism
>[email protected] (Michael A. Hoffman II) wrote:
>
>>Michael A. Hoffman II comments: Why didn’t these two Orthodox Hasidic
>>(Bobover sect) rabbis enjoy the usual rabbinic immunity from arrest for
>>their crimes? Could it be that their mantle of protection was removed by
>>the more powerful Reform and Conservative Jews in America with whom they
>>are at war in occupied Palestine over issues pertaining to modernity and
>>conversion? Is this a warning to the Orthodox to back off from their
>>assaults on Reform and Orthodox Jews? For more go to:
>>http://www.hoffman-info.com
>>——————————————————————————
>>2 Rabbis Charged With Money Laundering
>>
>>By ROBERT D. McFADDEN NY Times June 17, 1997
>>
>>NEW YORK — A dozen men, including two identified as Orthodox Jewish
>> rabbis, were charged by federal authorities Monday with conspiring to launder
>> and hide $1.75 million in drug profits for Colombian narcotics dealers by
>> routing the cash through the bank accounts of a synagogue and a yeshiva
>>in Brooklyn.
>>
>> The bizarre case, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn said, brought together
>>a collection of strange bedfellows — five New York representatives of
>>Colombian drug traffickers, three go-betweens who purportedly transported
>>cash in suitcase quantities, and four men with ties to a close-knit Jewish
>>community.
>>
>> At one point, the officials charged, the rabbis ran tens of millions of
>>dollars in drug profits through the bank accounts of a relatively modest
>>Borough Park synagogue and provided nearly $3.5 million from American and
>>Swiss accounts for the purchase of an aircraft for the Colombian drug
>>lords.
>>
>> “Money launderers are the indispensable partners of major drug
>>traffickers, and the cynical act of using religious institutions to
>>conceal drug proceeds is particularly reprehensible,” said Zachary Carter,
>>the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, in announcing the
>>charges.
>>
>> Seven defendants, including Rabbi Mahir Reiss, 47, of 3543 Bedford Ave.,
>>and Rabbi Bernard Grunfeld, 64, of 1417 46th St., both in Brooklyn, were
>>arrested Monday and were arraigned late in the day before U.S. Magistrate
>>Judge Roanne L. Mann, charged with conspiracy to launder money. Two
>>suspects, Grunfeld and Israel Knobloch, 24, of 5200 15th Ave., Brooklyn,
>>also were charged with conspiring to avoid federal cash-transaction
>>reporting requirements.
>>
>>Six defendants were held without bail, and one, Abraham Reiss, 48, of 320
>>Riverside Drive in Manhattan, a brother of Mahir Reiss, was released on
>>$750,000 bail. Three other men named in the federal complaint were listed
>>as fugitives, and two more were being held in custody elsewhere in New
>>York in other cases, according to Lee Dunst, the assistant federal
>>attorney prosecuting the case.
>>
>>Unveiling a three-year undercover investigation that used court-authorized
>>wiretaps and other surveillance, the federal complaint charged that the
>>two rabbis and Abraham Reiss laundered $750,000 by taking cash from
>>go-betweens, depositing it in the bank accounts of a synagogue-based
>>organization and, after subtracting commissions, writing checks to drug
>>traffickers.
>>
>>Investigators said the bank accounts used in the scheme, held in the name
>>of Chaim Shel Shulem, which shares quarters with Congregation Eitz Chaim
>>at 1577 48th St. in Borough Park, held deposits of more than $19 million
>>during the 10-month period when the laundering transactions occurred,
>>between August 1995 and May 1996.
>>
>>Grunfeld, listed as the president of Chaim Shel Shulem, was said to have
>>written all the checks that went to the drug traffickers. He and Knobloch
>>were also accused of concealing the movement of $1 million in drug money
>>by making 95 deposits and withdrawals of just under $10,000 — the amount
>>that triggers a government cash-transaction reporting requirement —
>>through the bank accounts of Congregation Eitz Chaim and Bobover Yeshiva,
>>at the same location.
>>
>>The defendants made no statements in court Monday. While Grunfeld was listed by
>> prosecutors as the head of Chaim Shel Shulem, dozens of people at
>>Congregation Eitz Chaim late Monday declined to say anything about him or
>>the case. Some seemed not to recognize the name Chaim Shel Shulem.
>>
>>The synagogue and yeshiva are in a five-story building with a brick front
>>and a small awning imprinted with the institution’s name in Hebrew. The
>>only words in English on the facade call it “the Katz Family of Mexico
>>Building.”
>>
>>In a ground-floor, two-room school lined with books, about 100 people were
>>studying at tables. A man who appeared to be in charge, but who would not
>>give his name, said he knew nothing about the two rabbis named in the
>>federal complaint.
>>
>> The federal investigation — an undertaking of the U.S. Attorney’s
>>Office, the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Internal Revenue Service —
>>began in 1994, when agents detected a pattern of cash deposits and
>>withdrawals intended to circumvent the government’s reporting rules in
>>various bank accounts held in the name of the synagogue and yeshiva,
>>officials said.
>>
>>With court-authorized telephone wiretaps, surveillance and other techniques, the
>>investigators said they uncovered a conspiracy in which Grunfeld and Knobloch
>>eventually made more than $1 million in deposits and withdrawals —
>>transactions, they said, that let the conspirators move large sums of
>>illicit drug profits.
>>
>> Later, in 1995 and 1996, investigators said, the 12 men named in Monday’s
>>complaint conducted a full money-laundering operation. Five of them —
>>Lisandro Montes De Oca, 29; Francisco Gil, 30; Estenio Rodriguez, 30; Juan
>>Suarez, 39, and Alvaro Duque, 36 –were said to have brought in large sums
>>that Colombian drug dealers wanted to launder.
>>
>>The money was given to three men described as intermediaries — Jack
>>Pinski, 35, a Colombian who is a fugitive, and Roberto Buendia, 40, and
>>Fabio Arana, both of
>>Medford, N.Y. They were said to have counted and stashed the money at an
>>apartment at 243 West 75th St.
>>
>>There, prosecutors said, Abraham Reiss picked up the money. It was later
>>deposited in various accounts held in the name of Chaim Shel Shulem.
>>Grunfeld, the organization’s president, signed checks that were made out
>>to “entities in accordance with drug traffickers’ instructions,” the
>>federal complaint said.
>>
>>Those instructions were communicated through Rabbi Reiss, who had no formal
>>connections to Chaim Shel Shulem, investigators said. Commissions of 13
>>percent to 15 percent were deducted from the laundered money and divided
>>among the intermediaries.
>>
>> Prosecutors said they did not know how members of a deeply religious
>>community came into contact with professional money launderers and drug
>>traffickers. But they charged that in 1994, Rabbis Reiss and Grunfeld, and
>>Abraham Reiss arranged $3.4 million in financing to buy a Beech Super King
>>aircraft, a type commonly used by drug smugglers.
>>================================================================================
>> The Campaign for Radical Truth in History: http://www.hoffman-info.com
>>——————————————————————————–
>> News Bureau and Archives Online
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:51:07 EDT 1998
Article: 119712 of soc.culture.polish
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.lebanon,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: JEWS = NAZIS
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 20:03:43 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 205
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <360f0ab5.3[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.ssi1.com!uunet!in5.uu.net!news.new-york.net!newshub.northeast.verio.net!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.arabic:35937 soc.culture.polish:119712 soc.culture.lebanon:59736 soc.culture.australian:77564 soc.culture.swiss:26939 soc.culture.russian:93489

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 20:09:51 GMT, sbjarnason a JEW maggot wrote:

On Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:03:42 GMT, [email protected] decided
to say, in soc.culture.malaysia, using 202 valuable lines of text:

>On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 22:27:32 -0600, [email protected] wrote:
>>In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>writes:

>>>n the Nazi military is well documented, both from records of the
>>>Germans, together with documents from the JEWS themselves!!!

>>>After all, the JEWS worship mammon, so why not make money??

>>And you ass hole worship a Jew, so what does that make you.

>Actually Christ was murdered by the JEWs, because he exposed their
>criminal activities, even the money-changing in the temples!!!

Christ was legally executed by the Romans at the instigation of some
Jews, if the NT is to be believed. Christ himself was a Jew. The
activities of the money changers, while perhaps in bad taste, clearly
weren’t illegal.

>As for the JEWs active in the Nazi military, there are many documented
>reports to prove this!!!

but quite by chance you forgot to post a reference.

If you know how to read, then READ the report by Professor Rigg, and
other references below, cited.

>The TRUTH about the many hundreds of thousands of JEWS who were active
>in the Nazi military is well documented, both from records of the
>Germans, together with documents from the JEWS themselves!!!

>After all, the JEWS worship mammon, so why not make money??

>On Fri, 17 Apr 1998 07:37:49 -0700, [email protected] wrote:

>>Sir,
>> You shame yourself and your Japanese nation by spreading such lies.
>> If you’re saying that a few Jews tried to escape being killed by
>>pretending to be Germans in the Nazi army, that could be possible. What
>>you are saying is that Jews in great numbers willingly fought with those
>>who were killing them. That is a lie and you know it. Do you enjoy being
>>an open liar?
>> irgun43

>>> On Wed, 15 Apr 1998 01:38:19 +0700, “Hasan” wrote:
>>> >Yesss!

>>> >They killed Jesus and now killing many Palestinian BOYS (once again BOYS)
>>> >and reporters who try to record their barbarity, and like Nazi’s who feel
>>> >superior by saying “DEUTSCHE UBER ALLES”, the Jews claim themselves as
>>> >“CHOSEN PEOPLE.”

>>> >So, the Jews are nothing but a bunch of racists or fascists.

>>> From [email protected] Sun Jan 25 17:14:46 1998
>>> Based on previous post from DejaNews archives:

>>> http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=315100303&CONTEXT=885769316.1533018197&hitnum=0

>>> On 11 Jan 1998 04:22:13 GMT, [email protected] (BillBrtn) wrote:

>>> >> Adolf Hitler had some Jews in his inner circle

>>> http://www.viamall.com/ihf/653.html

>>> This is the extraordinary story of Henry (Heinz) von Javorsky, a man
>>> who has survived and thrived in many lands and under many regimes
>>> because of his skill with a camera. In Nazi Germany he was able to
>>> make a living–and live–despite having a Jewish grandmother, because
>>> he was a specialist in aerial photography–

>>> >>: Jews that had Iron Crosses and/or had proven their
>>> >>loyalty to Germany were not harassed by the Gestapo, the SS or the SA.

>>> You need to read about the Hindenburg exemption in Lucy Dawidowicz’s
>>> book The War Against The Jews.

>>> Lucy S. Dawidowicz’s book titled THE WAR AGAINST THE JEWS1933-1945 by
>>> Bantam Books Incorporated [#13084-6, 1979 ed].

>>> * April 7, 1933 Hitler’s letter to Hindenburg gave exemptions to
>>> the “Jewish Problem.” “Officials who were already employed as civil
>>> servants on or before August 1, 1914, or who during the World War,
>>> fought at the front for Germany or her allies, or whose fathers or
>>> sons were killed in action in the World War.” (pg 77)
>>> * [“Starting May 4, 1942, the Jews from Germany, Luxembourg, Vienna,
>>> and Prague would be deported, except for the employed among them
>>> and the holders of the Iron Cross or other World War I decorations.
>>> Hitherto, those Jews as a group had been exempt from the
>>> deportations.”]

____________________________

>>> Or how about this?

>>> Hitler’s Jewish Army

>>> “If there were Jews in (Hitler’s) armed forces…who served knowing
>>> what was going on and made no attempt to save (lives), well then that
>>> is unacceptable and dishonorable.” –Rabbi Marvin Hier, director of
>>> the Simon Wiesenthal Institute.

>>> Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis
>>> called ‘full Jews’ served in the German military with Adolf Hitler’s
>>> knowledge and approval.

>>> Cambridge University researcher Bryan Rigg has traced the Jewish
>>> ancestry of more than 1,200 of Hitler’s soldiers, including two field
>>> marshals and fifteen generals (two full generals, eight lieutenant
>>> generals, five major generals), “men commanding up to 100,000 troops.”

>>> [ http://infoukes.com/lists/history/1997/08/0004.html ]

>>> In approximately 20 cases, Jewish soldiers in the Nazi army were
>>> awarded Germany’s highest military honor, the Knight’s Cross.

>>> One of these Jewish veterans is today an 82 year old resident of
>>> northern Germany, an observant Jew who served as a captain and
>>> practiced his religion within the Wehrmacht throughout the war.

>>> One of the Jewish field marshals was Erhard Milch, deputy to Luftwaffe
>>> Chief Hermann Goering. Rumors of Milch’s Jewish identity circulated
>>> widely in Germany in the 1930s.

>>> In one of the famous anecdotes of the time, Goering falsified Milch’s
>>> birth record and when met with protests about having a Jew in the Nazi
>>> high command, Goering replied, “I decide who is a Jew and who is an
>>> Aryan.”

>>> Rigg’s research also shed light on stories surrounding the rescue by
>>> German soldiers of the Lubavitcher grand rabbi of that time, who was
>>> in Warsaw when the war broke out in 1939.

>>> Joseph Isaac Schneerson was spirited to safety after an appeal to
>>> Germany from the United States. Schneerson was assisted by a German
>>> officer Rigg has identified as the highly decorated Maj. Ernst Bloch,
>>> whose father was a Jew.

>>> Jews also served in the Nazi police and security forces as ghetto
>>> police (Ordnungdienst) and concentration camp guards (kapos).

>>> So what happens to the claim that Hitler sought to exterminate all
>>> Jews, when he allowed some of them to join in his struggle against
>>> Bolshevism and International finance capitalism?

>>> Sources:

>>> William D. Montalbano, “The Jews in Hitler’s Military,” Los Angeles
>>> Times, Dec. 24, 1996.

>>> Tom Tugend, “Grad student uncovers Jews who fought for Adolf Hitler,”
>>> Jewish Telegraph Agency, Dec. 26, 1996.

>>> Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators.
>>> http://www.abbc.com/aaargh/engl/zad/zad13.html

>>> Article ” Hitler’s Jewish Army” from:
>>> http://www.hoffman-info.com/jewishnazi.html

>>> http://www.seattletimes.com/extra/browse/html97/altnazi_040397.html
>>> Copyright © 1997 The Seattle Times Company

>>> Thursday, April 3, 1997

>>> Hitler let `Aryanized’ Jews serve in Nazi armed forces
>>> by Reuters

>>> BONN – Adolf Hitler personally allowed at least 77 army officers of
>>> Jewish descent, including 25 generals, to fight for the Nazi cause in
>>> the German Wehrmacht during World War II, an American historian said
>>> yesterday…… [Click the above link to see all of the story.]

>>> See also:
>>> http://www.seattletimes.com/extra/browse/html/holo_122696.html
>>> Copyright © 1996 The Seattle Times Company

>>> Dec. 26, 1996

>>> An eerie part of Holocaust history: Researcher talks to Jews who
>>> served in Nazi army

>>> by William D. Montalbano
>>> Los Angeles Times

>>> LONDON – Sustained by scholarship, peanut butter and a sense of
>>> mission, Bryan Rigg is exploring an eerie and uncharted no man’s land
>>> of Holocaust history.

>>> Rigg interviews former German soldiers of Jewish heritage, some of
>>> them high-ranking officers, who fought for Nazi Germany in World War
>>> II – during the Holocaust, when Germans killed 6 million Jews.

>>> “Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis
>>> called `full Jews’ served in the military with Adolf Hitler’s
>>> knowledge. The Nazis allowed these men to serve but at the same time
>>> exterminated their families,” Rigg said. [Click link above to read the
>>> whole story.]
>>>
>>> http://infoukes.com/lists/history/1997/08/0004.html
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:51:08 EDT 1998
Article: 119960 of soc.culture.polish
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!netnews.com!feed.nntp.acc.ca!cyclone!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: WAS THERE REALLY A HOLOCAUST, or just Holohoax?
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:39:30 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 265
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.europe:128741 soc.culture.polish:119960 soc.culture.swiss:26948

On Mon, 24 Aug 1998 20:24:36 -0600, Ed Kadach
wrote:

>WAS THERE REALLY A HOLOCAUST?
> By Dr. E. R. Fields
>
> The Holocaust has become the greatest instrument of sympathy
>which any nation has ever been able to use to gain support for
>wars, expansion and foreign-aid: This has made Israel the
>world’s sixth strongest military power. The gravest threat to
>all this wealth and influence is the growing doubt over the
>question of whether or not a real holocaust of 6 million Jews
>actual took place.
>
> NUMBERS OF VICTIMS DON’T ADD UP
>
> The World Almanac for 1947 states that back in 1939 the world
>Jewish population was 15,688,259. The Almanacs figures were
>supplied by the American Jewish Committee. Nest the Jewish owned
>New York Times of Feb. 22, 1948 stated the world Jewish
>population for that year amounted “to 15,600,000 to 18,700,000
>in the addition to the 600,000 to 700,000 living in Palestine.”
>How could the Jewish population increase so rapidly over the war
>years if they had lost 6,000,000 people?
> With the rise of Hitler to power there were no more than 4
>million Jews at the most living in areas occupied by the Third
>Reich at the height of its power. On June 30, 1965, the
>West German government announced that some 3,375,000 Jewish
>holocaust “survivors” had applied for reparations money. The Red
>Cross reported in 1946 that of registered Jewish camp inmates no
>more than 300,000 could have died. It is interesting to note
>that in the Jews real “bible”, The Talmud, it is claimed that
>800,000 Jews were slaughtered by the Romans in Hadrians era. Yet
>there is no historical evidence supporting this claim.
> The Jewish owned New York Times, in 1945 carried an article
>by the well known Jewish writer C.L. Sulzberger. It openly
>stated Soviet Russia supplied the figure of 4 million Jews
>having been put to death “in the gas chambers of Auschwitz.”
>Thus it was the communists and the Jews who initially originated
>these figures which today are accepted as “gospel truth”.
> It is claimed that from 1934 to 1945 some 50,000 people died
>in the huge Bergen-Belsen camp. This count is considered
>exaggerated, still Time Magazine reports that of this figure
>20,000 died of typhus during the single month of March, 1945! If
>nearly half died of this plague in just one month at the end of
>the war there is no way Bergen-Belsen could have been an
>”extermination camp”.
>
> HIMMLER-“REDUCE DEATHS AT ALL COSTS”
>
> Heinrich Himmler, chief of the Concentration Camps issued
>orders on Dec. 28, 1942, that “The death rate in the
>concentration camps must be reduced at all costs.” (Source,
>Reitlinger’s book, “The Final Solution.”)
> The camps had been hit with a deadly typhus epidemic that
>spread by fleas and body lice. Stomach pain, high fever,
>emaciation and death can quickly follow. All of the camps were
>factories and the loss of workers was hurting war production.
>Inspector of the camps, Richard Glucks responded to Himmler’s
>order on Jan 20, 1943, “Every means will be used to lower the
>death rates.” (Source, Nuremberg Tribunal Document No. 1523.)
> On April 10, 1943, Oswald Pohl, head of the Economic
>Administration Office of the camps issued a letter stating that
>persons with tuberculosis were being sent to the camps resulting
>in the “shockingly high mortality figures.” (Source: Nuremberg
>Documents.) Later on Sept. 30, 1943, Pohl was able to show that
>the camp death rate had been reduced from 8.5% in July, 1942 to
>2.8% in June 1943.
> The German SS arrested Buchenwald Commandant, Karl Koch in
>1943 for mistreating and even executing some prisoners. After an
>investigation Koch was found guilty by SS Judge Konrad Morgen
>and shot. Does this sound like a policy of “extermination?”
> With suspicion rapidly rising about the holocaust claim a
>committee of Jewish leaders from New York and Paris met with
>communist leaders in Warsaw. There they established the
>”Committee for the Investigation of War Crimes and War
>Criminals”. It was after this meeting that the announcement
>was made that all gas chambers were located in Poland.
>
> THE PROBLEMS OF MASS GASSING
>
> In 1945 it was announced that gas death chambers existed in
>all concentration camps in Poland, Germany, Austria and Alsace.
>Some 15 years later, in 1960, this was revised to the new claim
>that gas chambers existed only in camps located in Soviet held
>Poland. Simon Weisenthal of the Los Angeles Holocaust center
>states in the paper, “Books and Bookmen”, April 1975, page 5,
>”No gassing took place in any camp on German soil.”
> The pressure had been growing since The Vatican, Red Cross,
>English Intelligence and German Intelligence chiefs Canaris and
>Oster (who collaborated with the British) either did not know or
>believe in rumors of gassings.
>
> This brings up the following questions.
> 1) Germans are meticulous record keepers but there is not one
>order for the construction of any gas chamber, no blueprint, no
>photo of any gas chamber or gassed victims.
> 2) There have been thousands on investigations of alleged
>Nazi war criminals, hundreds of trials, yet not one person was
>ever accused of being involved with actual gassings! No reliable
>witness on either side has ever come forward who saw a single
>person gassed-AND THERE ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN OVER 10,000
>MASS GASSINGS!
> 3) Photos of bodies at Dachau and Belsen camps are of
>prisoners who died of typhus and malnutrition. Many Germans also
>died from typhus.
> 4) The Vatican and Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed
>camp inmates at the end of the war about alleged gas chambers.
>the response was always the same, “The detainees themselves have
>not spoken of them.” (From the Red Cross document No. 9925, June
>1946.)
>
> FORCED CONFESSIONS OF GASSINGS
>
> Rudoft Hoess was the commandant of Auschwitz from 1940 to
>1943. captured by the Soviets they extracted a confession to
>mass gassings using Zyclon-B gas. Such “confessions” are about
>as reliable as any forced by Stalin from victims tortured before
>taking the stand to confess during the Moscow show trials of
>1936. The communists wrote the “Confession’ and Hoess signed it.
>Later he was hanged. An assistant commandant refused to sign-he
>died in his cell.
> Hoess statement read, “half an hour after having released the
>gas, they opened the door and started the ventilation machines.
>They began immediately to extract the bodies while eating and
>smoking.”
> Was Hoess trying to get a message across that there were no
>gassing? Zyclon-B is not “ventable”. The manufacturers state
>Zyclon-B adheres to surface clothing and skin. They say that
>only after a 24 hour period, wearing a gas mask with the
>strongest filter, could any bodies be removed without killing
>such workers. If we believe the Hoess confession that the
>workers ran into the gas chamber “eating and smoking” – without
>gas masks – only minutes after the gassing – IF THIS OCCURRED
>ALL WOULD HAVE DIED!
>
> GAS STORIES NOT POSSIBLE
>
> The Jew Mosche Pearlmann in his book, “The Capture and Trial
>of Adolph Eichmann” pages 375 and 385 states Zyclon-B crystals
>were introduced from the ceilings of the gas chambers and
>”became immediately gaseous.”
> The American Cyanamid Co. of Linden N.J. states: “We know of
>no chemical process whereby HCN (Zyclon-B) may be made to become
>instantly gaseous upon exposure to air.”
>
> CLAIMS OF WILLIAM SHIRER
>
> Shirer claims the gas was released from overhead through fake
>shower outlets, (page 970) and quickly killed its victims. The
>truth is that Zyclon-B gas is lighter than air and would rise to
>the ceiling so that anyone throwing themselves to the floor
>would be saved. Shirer also quotes the Soviet written confession
>signed by Hoess as stating (page 968), “We knew when the people
>were dead because their screaming stopped.” If anyone were
>actually killed with a cyanide type gas they would die instantly
>thus there would be no screaming at all. The truth is that
>Zyclon-B was used to delouse inmates clothing of lice and fleas
>which carry typhus.
>
> THE PROBLEM OF THE CREMATORIUMS
>
> At the Auschwitz I camp there were only 6 crematory ovens. At
>the hospital in Auschwitz II there are 46 single cremators. In
>the Lubin camp there were only 6. THAT’S ALL! In these three
>camps 3 to 4 million Jews were supposed to have been
>exterminated and their bodies cremated. Also, these cremation
>ovens were very small with only 18′ doors and a time period of
>from 4 to 6 hours burning for each body using a large amount of
>coal. Cremation for those who passed away was used in the camps
>to prevent epidemics. Also, no large supplies of coal were ever
>stored at the camps for cremations.
> A VERY INTERESTING NOTE appears only in the German edition of
>William L. Shirer’s book, “The Rise and Fall of the Third
>Reich.” It seems the Didler-Werke Company, which built the
>crematory ovens, sued Shirer who previously wrote that millions
>of people were gassed and then burned in this company’s ovens.
>In an out-of-court settlement of the suit Shirer agreed to add
>the following footnote on page 972 of the German edition:
> “The Didler-Werke have raised objection to the name of their
>firm appearing in the chapter concerning the extermination
>camps. Dr. S. Trastel, a professor of engineering in a statement
>of Aug. 1961 established that the measurements are those which
>are standard for a crematory oven of not very modern design
>intended for small cemeteries and would be unsuitable for mass
>burning.”
> WHY IS THIS DELETED FROM THE ENGLISH EDITION???
> On the question of cremating 6,000,000 people – this would
>leave 15,000 tons of ashes! Such gigantic piles of ashes created
>over the short 2 1/2 year period the holocaust supposedly took
>place would have been very difficult to dispose of. No one has
>ever come forward to report seeing such huge piles of tons of
>ashes.
> It was not until 1960 that the Soviets opened the Auschwitz
>camp to tourists and independent investigators. No gas chamber
>could be found. The official answer was that it was “taken to
>another camp for gassings and then later went into oblivion!”
>
> WHAT EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST
>
> Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes, eminent historian, author of 40
>books, many standard college texts, noted in Rampart Journal,
>1967. “It has been demonstrated that there had been no
>systematic extermination in those camps.”
> Thies Christopherden, a German soldier and author: “I was at
>Auschwitz! There was no gas chamber there.”
> Paul Rassiner, historian and anti-Nazi activist, who served a
>prison sentence in Buchenwald and the Dora camps stated in 1962.
>”The claim that a holocaust took place is an historic lie – the
>most tragic and most macabre imposture of all time.”
> Prof. Robert Faurisson, a specialist in Document Analysis at
>the University of Lyon. France, stated on April 25, 1979. “The
>holocaust lie, which is largely of Zionist origin, has made an
>enormous political and financial fraud possible, whose
>principal beneficiary is the state of Israel.”
>
> WHY THE HOLOCAUST CAMPAIGN
>
> Hardly a week goes by when there are not stories in the
>press, on TV-News or movies about the alleged holocaust. What is
>the long range design for this constant attempt to fill Germans
>and indeed all Christians with a feeling of guilt over a
>holocaust which never occurred?
> Bernard Postal wrote in the Jewish Week, July 14, 1979, “Not
>until after the holocaust, did anti-Semitism become taboo. There
>was a time when anti-Semitic speeches were an open factor in
>national campaigns. The holocaust put a taboo on overt anti-
>Semitism among upper-level statesmen and publicists.”
> S.E.D. Brown of South Africa, a noted journalist writes, “The
>holocaust instills a guilt complex in those said to be guilty
>and spreads the demoralization, degeneration, and eventually the
>destruction of the natural racial elite among a people. This
>transfers effective political control to the lowest elements who
>will cowtow to the Jews.”
> Zionist spokesmen often boast of: “The shattering effect of
>the holocaust on the Christian conscience resulting in a feeling
>of collective indebtedness to the Jews.”
> Massive unending U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel in made possible
>because anyone who dares to oppose these outrageous giveaways is
>condemned as being “anti-Semitic” and “insensitive” to holocaust
>victims.
> The Jews hold an unnatural violent hatred for the German
>people. Jews seek to turn all other peoples of the world against
>the Germans and keep that nation divided for all time to come.
>That is why no peace treaty has ever been signed as yet with
>Germany and they still live under Allied military occupation
>laws.
>
> A QUESTION OF FUND RAISING
>
> The Wall Street Journal quotes Jewish professional fund-
>raising consultant firm of Milton Goldin Co., as saying the main
>theme of Jewish fund-raising is the holocaust and has been for
>38 years. When they don’t use the holocaust the money collection
>sharply drops off. Thus the more the Press, TV and Hollywood
>promotes the holocaust the more money the United Jewish Appeal
>and other Zionist funds can extract from gullible people.
>
> HOLOCAUST SILENCES OPPOSITION
>
> Jewish leaders have discovered that by repeating holocaust
>stories over and over again they can instill a guilt complex
>within all Gentiles. This effectively silences most critics of
>Zionist political goals.

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:51:10 EDT 1998
Article: 119962 of soc.culture.polish
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!netnews.com!feed.nntp.acc.ca!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.australian,aus.general,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish
Subject: Re: JEW NAZIS!
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:42:55 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.australian:77617 aus.general:35521 soc.culture.swiss:26949 soc.culture.polish:119962

On Wed, 16 Sep 1998 14:53:17 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On Wed, 08 Jul 1998 11:27:17 GMT, [email protected] (Harold
>Wood) wrote:
>
>>JEWISH NAZIS!
>>
>>How dare those cynical pernicious professional
>>peddlers of guilt, those ‘oonga boonga’ mere
>>superstition driven ‘religionist’ rubbish behave
>>HERE in the very same manner as those once dreaded
>>Nazi Germans! How dare those anti-social paranoid
>>nuisances who constantly carp and whine in the
>>ears of Australia’s innocent tolerant and too long
>>suffering of them about the treatment mostly only
>>their relatives years ago received at the hands of
>>but one group of the world’s still common stream
>>of ‘monsters’, behave that way here! I.e. import
>>that despicable behaviour to their host country.
>>
>>The ‘religionist’ Australia Israel Review
>>obviously has not been influenced by
>>’Schindler'(sp?) in their act of constructing and
>>publishing their ‘list’ of One Nation members, but
>>by the likes of Adolf Hitler! The neo-nazi style
>>acting Jews of that socially dangerous rag, as
>>distinct from a likely majority of other Jews,
>>need to have a class action taken out against them
>>for the crime (among others) of ‘common assault’.
>>
>>
>>And that very same not worthy of being even a fish
>>and chip wrapper 🙂 rag, deserves to be put to
>>flight and ultimately closed down, for the
>>cessation of the dividing of Australia by our
>>enemies various must soon become a priority for
>>Australia’s intending survivor class.
>>
>>Harold.

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:51:11 EDT 1998
Article: 119974 of soc.culture.polish
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.australian,aus.general
Subject: Jew Question=Jew Problem
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:48:37 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.cmc.net!syix.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!207.136.66.98!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.en.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.russian:93621 soc.culture.polish:119974 soc.culture.ukrainian:41792 soc.culture.palestine:52600 soc.culture.australian:77621 aus.general:35523

It appears that the Jew retard Yehudah Yeraslasky, who may be related
to former Soviet KGB staff, just can not read, or write in English,
even though he was at one time a student at Simon Fraser University in
canada, according to prior articles exposing him…
That is why is no longer posting from the school, since they took care
of it…

On Tue, 28 Apr 1998 15:09:42 -0600, [email protected] wrote:

>[email protected] reported::

>: You are too polite. The liar Igal just wants to malign the good people
>: of Poland, which is typical of disinformation by the KGB!!!

>: What can one expect from Yehudah Yeraslavsky, a student at Simon
>: Fraser U, allegedly from former Soviet KGB Jews???

>: To tell the truth?? LOFL

On 22 Jul 1998 20:05:46 GMT, [email protected] (Piotr Trela)
wrote:

>[email protected] wrote:
>
>: Dear Leszek, you position is exactly “my position”. Unfortunately, the
>: position of Mr. Miroslav Goldberg is very close to old and mistaken behaviour
>: of so-call “galut Jews”. We – modern Jewish warriors decent of David and
>: “Shlomo Melech” are very different from so-call “galut Jews” representative
>: here by Mr. Goldberg.
>
>I must agree – Mr Goldberg IS very different from the person who
>deliberately falsifies a “Daily Telegraph” article so he can insinuate
>Polish origin of an anti-Jewish terrorist; who, when caught red-handed
>on the forgery, never apologizes; and who signs his posts as I=P.
>
>:I=P
>
>——————–
>Piotr Trela

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:51:11 EDT 1998
Article: 119985 of soc.culture.polish
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.cmc.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!192.26.210.166!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!feed.nntp.acc.ca!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.lebanon
Subject: INTERPOL wants Jewish war criminal.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:44:12 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:119985 soc.culture.russian:93625 soc.culture.malaysia:187990 soc.culture.palestine:52605 soc.culture.swiss:26951 soc.culture.lebanon:59823

On Wed, 12 Aug 1998 16:13:12 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On 02 May 1998 16:44:09 GMT, [email protected] (Pan Janusz) wrote:
>
>>Translated from Polish:
>
>>Reprinted from “Polish Weekly” published in Australia.
>
>>Office of the Provincial Prosecutor in Katowice issued the extradition papers
>>for war criminal Samuel Morel. Polish authorities will ask authorities in
>>Israel to extradite Morel.
>>Morel is accused of “cruel treatment and tortures of prisoners and jeopardizing
>>their safety and health.” Using common language, between years 1945-1950 he was
>>beating prisoners, torturing and killing them.
>
>>Morel was born in 1919, from 1940 was a member of Jewish band which was
>>assaulting Polish villages in province of Kielce and robbing Polish farmers. In
>>December of 1942 during one of their assaults the band was destroyed by a
>>detachment of People’s Army ( communist guerillas in nazi occupied Poland).
>>Father and brother of Morel were executed, he alone became a member of the
>>People’s Army. He defected from the group when Red Army was inching toward
>>province of Kielce and became a member of Soviet guerillas.
>>Soon he became an officer of UB (communist Security Office in Soviet occupied
>>Poland).
>>In the beginning of 1945 he was sent to the region of Silesia and received the
>>nomination on the camp commandant for Germans in Swietochlowice.
>> About his crime committed in this camp wrote, among others, an American
>>journalist John Sack in his book “Eye for an eye” ( for this book John Sack who
>>is a Jew was decalred an antisemite).
>>In the end of December of 1945 Morel had been transferred and became a warden
>>of the UB prison in Opole. There he tortured Poles and Germans. He also
>>tortured minors in the labor camp in Jaworzno which he was a commandant between
>>1946-1950. He was fired from this post, for mortality among prisoners was too
>>big.
>
>>In 1991 he was interviewed by a prosecutor, panicked and fled to Israel.
>>After spending all his money, within few months he returned to Poland, but soon
>>he surfaced in Sweden where he demanded political asylum argumenting that he
>>was persecuted in Poland because he was a Jew. His plea was rejected and Morel
>>again came back to Poland.
>>On 10th of July Office of the Provincial Prosecutor in Katowice issued arrest
>>warrant. They were late. Morel again fled to Israel.
>>His retirement pention is being picked up by the wife of the criminal.
>>Since 1996 Morel is on the most wanted list of the INTERPOL.
>>According to international law he should be arrested by Israeli police and
>>charged by Israel with war crimes.
>>He should…..
>
>>Translated by Janusz Styber
>

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:51:54 EDT 1998
Article: 185468 of aus.politics
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: usa.general,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.australian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australia
Subject: Re: JEW RABBIS LAUNDER DRUG MONEY IN NY!!!!
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:53:58 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 148
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.swiss:26937 soc.culture.australian:77562 aus.politics:185468 soc.culture.australia:12113

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 19:59:08 GMT, sbjarnason trying to stimulate more
discussion of the problems of JEWS wrote:

On Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:20:12 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>It seems that JEWS are not satisfied with having murdered Jesus
>Christ.
>
>Now some of them are involved, even from synagogues, in the DRUGS
>business.
>On Tue, 17 Jun 1997 07:10:26 -0800, in alt.revisionism
>[email protected] (Michael A. Hoffman II) wrote:
>
>>Michael A. Hoffman II comments: Why didn’t these two Orthodox Hasidic
>>(Bobover sect) rabbis enjoy the usual rabbinic immunity from arrest for
>>their crimes? Could it be that their mantle of protection was removed by
>>the more powerful Reform and Conservative Jews in America with whom they
>>are at war in occupied Palestine over issues pertaining to modernity and
>>conversion? Is this a warning to the Orthodox to back off from their
>>assaults on Reform and Orthodox Jews? For more go to:
>>http://www.hoffman-info.com
>>——————————————————————————
>>2 Rabbis Charged With Money Laundering
>>
>>By ROBERT D. McFADDEN NY Times June 17, 1997
>>
>>NEW YORK — A dozen men, including two identified as Orthodox Jewish
>> rabbis, were charged by federal authorities Monday with conspiring to launder
>> and hide $1.75 million in drug profits for Colombian narcotics dealers by
>> routing the cash through the bank accounts of a synagogue and a yeshiva
>>in Brooklyn.
>>
>> The bizarre case, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn said, brought together
>>a collection of strange bedfellows — five New York representatives of
>>Colombian drug traffickers, three go-betweens who purportedly transported
>>cash in suitcase quantities, and four men with ties to a close-knit Jewish
>>community.
>>
>> At one point, the officials charged, the rabbis ran tens of millions of
>>dollars in drug profits through the bank accounts of a relatively modest
>>Borough Park synagogue and provided nearly $3.5 million from American and
>>Swiss accounts for the purchase of an aircraft for the Colombian drug
>>lords.
>>
>> “Money launderers are the indispensable partners of major drug
>>traffickers, and the cynical act of using religious institutions to
>>conceal drug proceeds is particularly reprehensible,” said Zachary Carter,
>>the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, in announcing the
>>charges.
>>
>> Seven defendants, including Rabbi Mahir Reiss, 47, of 3543 Bedford Ave.,
>>and Rabbi Bernard Grunfeld, 64, of 1417 46th St., both in Brooklyn, were
>>arrested Monday and were arraigned late in the day before U.S. Magistrate
>>Judge Roanne L. Mann, charged with conspiracy to launder money. Two
>>suspects, Grunfeld and Israel Knobloch, 24, of 5200 15th Ave., Brooklyn,
>>also were charged with conspiring to avoid federal cash-transaction
>>reporting requirements.
>>
>>Six defendants were held without bail, and one, Abraham Reiss, 48, of 320
>>Riverside Drive in Manhattan, a brother of Mahir Reiss, was released on
>>$750,000 bail. Three other men named in the federal complaint were listed
>>as fugitives, and two more were being held in custody elsewhere in New
>>York in other cases, according to Lee Dunst, the assistant federal
>>attorney prosecuting the case.
>>
>>Unveiling a three-year undercover investigation that used court-authorized
>>wiretaps and other surveillance, the federal complaint charged that the
>>two rabbis and Abraham Reiss laundered $750,000 by taking cash from
>>go-betweens, depositing it in the bank accounts of a synagogue-based
>>organization and, after subtracting commissions, writing checks to drug
>>traffickers.
>>
>>Investigators said the bank accounts used in the scheme, held in the name
>>of Chaim Shel Shulem, which shares quarters with Congregation Eitz Chaim
>>at 1577 48th St. in Borough Park, held deposits of more than $19 million
>>during the 10-month period when the laundering transactions occurred,
>>between August 1995 and May 1996.
>>
>>Grunfeld, listed as the president of Chaim Shel Shulem, was said to have
>>written all the checks that went to the drug traffickers. He and Knobloch
>>were also accused of concealing the movement of $1 million in drug money
>>by making 95 deposits and withdrawals of just under $10,000 — the amount
>>that triggers a government cash-transaction reporting requirement —
>>through the bank accounts of Congregation Eitz Chaim and Bobover Yeshiva,
>>at the same location.
>>
>>The defendants made no statements in court Monday. While Grunfeld was listed by
>> prosecutors as the head of Chaim Shel Shulem, dozens of people at
>>Congregation Eitz Chaim late Monday declined to say anything about him or
>>the case. Some seemed not to recognize the name Chaim Shel Shulem.
>>
>>The synagogue and yeshiva are in a five-story building with a brick front
>>and a small awning imprinted with the institution’s name in Hebrew. The
>>only words in English on the facade call it “the Katz Family of Mexico
>>Building.”
>>
>>In a ground-floor, two-room school lined with books, about 100 people were
>>studying at tables. A man who appeared to be in charge, but who would not
>>give his name, said he knew nothing about the two rabbis named in the
>>federal complaint.
>>
>> The federal investigation — an undertaking of the U.S. Attorney’s
>>Office, the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Internal Revenue Service —
>>began in 1994, when agents detected a pattern of cash deposits and
>>withdrawals intended to circumvent the government’s reporting rules in
>>various bank accounts held in the name of the synagogue and yeshiva,
>>officials said.
>>
>>With court-authorized telephone wiretaps, surveillance and other techniques, the
>>investigators said they uncovered a conspiracy in which Grunfeld and Knobloch
>>eventually made more than $1 million in deposits and withdrawals —
>>transactions, they said, that let the conspirators move large sums of
>>illicit drug profits.
>>
>> Later, in 1995 and 1996, investigators said, the 12 men named in Monday’s
>>complaint conducted a full money-laundering operation. Five of them —
>>Lisandro Montes De Oca, 29; Francisco Gil, 30; Estenio Rodriguez, 30; Juan
>>Suarez, 39, and Alvaro Duque, 36 –were said to have brought in large sums
>>that Colombian drug dealers wanted to launder.
>>
>>The money was given to three men described as intermediaries — Jack
>>Pinski, 35, a Colombian who is a fugitive, and Roberto Buendia, 40, and
>>Fabio Arana, both of
>>Medford, N.Y. They were said to have counted and stashed the money at an
>>apartment at 243 West 75th St.
>>
>>There, prosecutors said, Abraham Reiss picked up the money. It was later
>>deposited in various accounts held in the name of Chaim Shel Shulem.
>>Grunfeld, the organization’s president, signed checks that were made out
>>to “entities in accordance with drug traffickers’ instructions,” the
>>federal complaint said.
>>
>>Those instructions were communicated through Rabbi Reiss, who had no formal
>>connections to Chaim Shel Shulem, investigators said. Commissions of 13
>>percent to 15 percent were deducted from the laundered money and divided
>>among the intermediaries.
>>
>> Prosecutors said they did not know how members of a deeply religious
>>community came into contact with professional money launderers and drug
>>traffickers. But they charged that in 1994, Rabbis Reiss and Grunfeld, and
>>Abraham Reiss arranged $3.4 million in financing to buy a Beech Super King
>>aircraft, a type commonly used by drug smugglers.
>>================================================================================
>> The Campaign for Radical Truth in History: http://www.hoffman-info.com
>>——————————————————————————–
>> News Bureau and Archives Online
sven 88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:09 EDT 1998
Article: 26936 of soc.culture.swiss
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Re: Jews DID CONTROL Communism – documented by them…
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:56:08 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 241
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:119709 soc.culture.australian:77561 soc.culture.russian:93485 soc.culture.ukrainian:41761 soc.culture.baltics:15282 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9717 soc.culture.swiss:26936

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 18:22:38 GMT, sbjarnason trying desperately to
stimule more discussion wrote:

On 23 Jun 1998 00:27:52 GMT, [email protected] (Daniel Swan)
wrote:

>steve mock ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>: What you constantly fail to grasp, Tavish, is that no one is denying that there were people of Jewish ancestry among
>: the Bolsheviks, or even that there weren’t quite a few people of Jewish ancestry among the Bolsheviks. What you
>: completely and utterly fail to understand is how collossal the leap of logic is which you ask us to make from that fact
>: to the conclusion that Bolshevism is some kind of a Jewish plot for which Jews bear collective responsibility.
>
>Logical leap or not, this raises an interesting question: How
>can the overproportionate Jewish representation among the
>Bolsheviks be accounted for?

Perhaps the following text may help answer your rhetorical question…

Subject: Jews Dominated Bolshevism – Don’t Deny It
From: [email protected] (Roger Hughes)
Date: 22 Jul 1997 12:32:44 GMT
Organization: Anti-Hypocrisy Foundation

Patriot Fact Sheet : The Jews and Bolshevism

One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called
“Russian
Revolution” of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority
of the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to
them, continue to condemn anyone as “anti-Semitic” who brings up these
facts, it remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created
and lead revolutionary movement.

First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism,
Karl Marx,
was a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father’s side.
Whether he was a “religous” Jew is of no significant importance, since
Jewishness is not defined exclusively by adherance to Judaism. A great
bulk of Jews today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but
also nonetheless consider themselves Jews.

While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism,
will
concede that Marx was indeed Jewish, let’s see the them deny the
communist-Jewish connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables
that
passed between American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C.
during the time of the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following
quotes are taken directly from documents available from the U.S.
Archives:

State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: “Jews prominant in local Soviet
government,
anti-Jewish feeling growing among population….”

State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July
5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: “Fifty percent of Soviet government
in
each town consists of Jews of the worst type.”

>From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomey Shuyler: “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it’s
beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type.”

A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports
on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: “…(T)here were
384
`commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22
Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had come
to
Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial
Government.”

With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the
leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.
(Lenin has since been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had
access to the KGB archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon
Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the
Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central
Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev
(Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the
central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other
prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn),
foreign
affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld)
and
Moisei Uritsky.

David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most
of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care
little
for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are
trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”

The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
“Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”

In case anyone thinks I’ve taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
here’s three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former
superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik
Propaganda
Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary,
United States Senate, 65th Congress:

“We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east
side
of New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American
Pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased
that
there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English
showed that they had not qualified as being Americas. A number of
these
men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element
in
this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that
more than half the agitators in the socalled Bolshevik movement were
Jews…I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that
one
of its bases is found in the east side of New York…The latest
startling information, given me by someone with good authority,
startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in the
northern
community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of the
Soviet
regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)
out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the
exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
Gordon.

I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great
revolution of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing
on
the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I
often remarked to my sister, ‘Well, what are we coming to anyway. This
all looks so Yiddish.’ Up to that time we had see very few Jews,
because
there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in
Petrograd,
but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the
agitators
were Jews.

I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now
that
was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians
did not take kindly to it.”

Some might automatically assume that the preceeding sources are
“anti-Semitic” and therefore unreliable, but they’d be wrong. Here’s a
few Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:

“The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920)

“There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, London
April,
4, 1919)

“Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin,
Rabbi
S. Wise, May 5, 1935).

“In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)

Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:

“National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs
characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an
extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death
penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).

While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and
clergymen murdered by Communist gangs, synogoges and rabbis were left
virtually untouched.

It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20
million Ukranian farmers during the 1920’s in one of the most vile
campaigns in history: In (the) Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80
percent
of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an
American professor of Russian history. . . ”

Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85 million persons
were
murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them
directly at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish
Communist bosses.

Regards,
Roger Hughes

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Towards a New Consciousness; a New Order; a New People
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Home


http://www.natvan.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Roger’s Page http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm/
Keep It White Because You Know It’s Right!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Abusive emails will be posted to the Usenet and ridiculed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:10 EDT 1998
Article: 26937 of soc.culture.swiss
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: usa.general,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.australian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australia
Subject: Re: JEW RABBIS LAUNDER DRUG MONEY IN NY!!!!
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:53:58 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 148
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.swiss:26937 soc.culture.australian:77562 aus.politics:185468 soc.culture.australia:12113

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 19:59:08 GMT, sbjarnason trying to stimulate more
discussion of the problems of JEWS wrote:

On Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:20:12 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>It seems that JEWS are not satisfied with having murdered Jesus
>Christ.
>
>Now some of them are involved, even from synagogues, in the DRUGS
>business.
>On Tue, 17 Jun 1997 07:10:26 -0800, in alt.revisionism
>[email protected] (Michael A. Hoffman II) wrote:
>
>>Michael A. Hoffman II comments: Why didn’t these two Orthodox Hasidic
>>(Bobover sect) rabbis enjoy the usual rabbinic immunity from arrest for
>>their crimes? Could it be that their mantle of protection was removed by
>>the more powerful Reform and Conservative Jews in America with whom they
>>are at war in occupied Palestine over issues pertaining to modernity and
>>conversion? Is this a warning to the Orthodox to back off from their
>>assaults on Reform and Orthodox Jews? For more go to:
>>http://www.hoffman-info.com
>>——————————————————————————
>>2 Rabbis Charged With Money Laundering
>>
>>By ROBERT D. McFADDEN NY Times June 17, 1997
>>
>>NEW YORK — A dozen men, including two identified as Orthodox Jewish
>> rabbis, were charged by federal authorities Monday with conspiring to launder
>> and hide $1.75 million in drug profits for Colombian narcotics dealers by
>> routing the cash through the bank accounts of a synagogue and a yeshiva
>>in Brooklyn.
>>
>> The bizarre case, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn said, brought together
>>a collection of strange bedfellows — five New York representatives of
>>Colombian drug traffickers, three go-betweens who purportedly transported
>>cash in suitcase quantities, and four men with ties to a close-knit Jewish
>>community.
>>
>> At one point, the officials charged, the rabbis ran tens of millions of
>>dollars in drug profits through the bank accounts of a relatively modest
>>Borough Park synagogue and provided nearly $3.5 million from American and
>>Swiss accounts for the purchase of an aircraft for the Colombian drug
>>lords.
>>
>> “Money launderers are the indispensable partners of major drug
>>traffickers, and the cynical act of using religious institutions to
>>conceal drug proceeds is particularly reprehensible,” said Zachary Carter,
>>the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, in announcing the
>>charges.
>>
>> Seven defendants, including Rabbi Mahir Reiss, 47, of 3543 Bedford Ave.,
>>and Rabbi Bernard Grunfeld, 64, of 1417 46th St., both in Brooklyn, were
>>arrested Monday and were arraigned late in the day before U.S. Magistrate
>>Judge Roanne L. Mann, charged with conspiracy to launder money. Two
>>suspects, Grunfeld and Israel Knobloch, 24, of 5200 15th Ave., Brooklyn,
>>also were charged with conspiring to avoid federal cash-transaction
>>reporting requirements.
>>
>>Six defendants were held without bail, and one, Abraham Reiss, 48, of 320
>>Riverside Drive in Manhattan, a brother of Mahir Reiss, was released on
>>$750,000 bail. Three other men named in the federal complaint were listed
>>as fugitives, and two more were being held in custody elsewhere in New
>>York in other cases, according to Lee Dunst, the assistant federal
>>attorney prosecuting the case.
>>
>>Unveiling a three-year undercover investigation that used court-authorized
>>wiretaps and other surveillance, the federal complaint charged that the
>>two rabbis and Abraham Reiss laundered $750,000 by taking cash from
>>go-betweens, depositing it in the bank accounts of a synagogue-based
>>organization and, after subtracting commissions, writing checks to drug
>>traffickers.
>>
>>Investigators said the bank accounts used in the scheme, held in the name
>>of Chaim Shel Shulem, which shares quarters with Congregation Eitz Chaim
>>at 1577 48th St. in Borough Park, held deposits of more than $19 million
>>during the 10-month period when the laundering transactions occurred,
>>between August 1995 and May 1996.
>>
>>Grunfeld, listed as the president of Chaim Shel Shulem, was said to have
>>written all the checks that went to the drug traffickers. He and Knobloch
>>were also accused of concealing the movement of $1 million in drug money
>>by making 95 deposits and withdrawals of just under $10,000 — the amount
>>that triggers a government cash-transaction reporting requirement —
>>through the bank accounts of Congregation Eitz Chaim and Bobover Yeshiva,
>>at the same location.
>>
>>The defendants made no statements in court Monday. While Grunfeld was listed by
>> prosecutors as the head of Chaim Shel Shulem, dozens of people at
>>Congregation Eitz Chaim late Monday declined to say anything about him or
>>the case. Some seemed not to recognize the name Chaim Shel Shulem.
>>
>>The synagogue and yeshiva are in a five-story building with a brick front
>>and a small awning imprinted with the institution’s name in Hebrew. The
>>only words in English on the facade call it “the Katz Family of Mexico
>>Building.”
>>
>>In a ground-floor, two-room school lined with books, about 100 people were
>>studying at tables. A man who appeared to be in charge, but who would not
>>give his name, said he knew nothing about the two rabbis named in the
>>federal complaint.
>>
>> The federal investigation — an undertaking of the U.S. Attorney’s
>>Office, the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Internal Revenue Service —
>>began in 1994, when agents detected a pattern of cash deposits and
>>withdrawals intended to circumvent the government’s reporting rules in
>>various bank accounts held in the name of the synagogue and yeshiva,
>>officials said.
>>
>>With court-authorized telephone wiretaps, surveillance and other techniques, the
>>investigators said they uncovered a conspiracy in which Grunfeld and Knobloch
>>eventually made more than $1 million in deposits and withdrawals —
>>transactions, they said, that let the conspirators move large sums of
>>illicit drug profits.
>>
>> Later, in 1995 and 1996, investigators said, the 12 men named in Monday’s
>>complaint conducted a full money-laundering operation. Five of them —
>>Lisandro Montes De Oca, 29; Francisco Gil, 30; Estenio Rodriguez, 30; Juan
>>Suarez, 39, and Alvaro Duque, 36 –were said to have brought in large sums
>>that Colombian drug dealers wanted to launder.
>>
>>The money was given to three men described as intermediaries — Jack
>>Pinski, 35, a Colombian who is a fugitive, and Roberto Buendia, 40, and
>>Fabio Arana, both of
>>Medford, N.Y. They were said to have counted and stashed the money at an
>>apartment at 243 West 75th St.
>>
>>There, prosecutors said, Abraham Reiss picked up the money. It was later
>>deposited in various accounts held in the name of Chaim Shel Shulem.
>>Grunfeld, the organization’s president, signed checks that were made out
>>to “entities in accordance with drug traffickers’ instructions,” the
>>federal complaint said.
>>
>>Those instructions were communicated through Rabbi Reiss, who had no formal
>>connections to Chaim Shel Shulem, investigators said. Commissions of 13
>>percent to 15 percent were deducted from the laundered money and divided
>>among the intermediaries.
>>
>> Prosecutors said they did not know how members of a deeply religious
>>community came into contact with professional money launderers and drug
>>traffickers. But they charged that in 1994, Rabbis Reiss and Grunfeld, and
>>Abraham Reiss arranged $3.4 million in financing to buy a Beech Super King
>>aircraft, a type commonly used by drug smugglers.
>>================================================================================
>> The Campaign for Radical Truth in History: http://www.hoffman-info.com
>>——————————————————————————–
>> News Bureau and Archives Online
sven 88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:12 EDT 1998
Article: 26938 of soc.culture.swiss
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.lebanon,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: JEWS = NAZIS
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 20:02:36 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.arabic:35936 soc.culture.polish:119710 soc.culture.lebanon:59735 soc.culture.australian:77563 soc.culture.swiss:26938 soc.culture.russian:93487

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 20:09:51 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> “David S. M. Ng” wrote:
>> i beg to differ… just because soros is a jew and a currency speculator
>> DOES NOT mean that all currency speculators are JEWS!!
>>
>> anyway, please keep your nazi statements to yourself.
>
>
>You have to understand the source of this material. This is the work of Bill
>Grosvenor of Edmonton Canada hiding behind various fake names. Currently he
>is using the fake name “[email protected]”. (I guess he must be
>mad at me… 🙁
>
>Learn more about Bill Grosvenor, convicted criminal, former mental institution
>inmate and Barbie Doll collector in the Grosvenor FAQs:
>
>https://nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/
>http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=251280192
>
>(Grosvenor is posting from an account at Telusplanet.net in Canada. You tell
>by looking at the Message-ID line in the headers. Any anti-Semitic or racist
>material you see posted here with “
>as the Message-ID is from Grosvenor. You can let Telusplanet know what
>Grosvenor is doing my mailing his articles, complete with headers, to
>[email protected] )
>
>Cheers,
>
>Sven
>
>
>
>> [email protected] wrote in article
>> <[email protected]>…
>> > On 29 Sep 1998 22:05:48 +0800, “David S. M. Ng” >> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >HELLO??!!! Vhat rr uu saying? please keep your racist comments to your
>> side
>> > >of the world…. we don’t need another vhite man’s opinion over here
>> thank
>> > >you very much.
>> >
>> > Since these newsgroups are mainly for people in Islamic countries, the
>> > problems associated with the christkiller JEWS is extremely relevant.
>> >
>> > Are you not concerned about money speculators such as the JEW SOROS?
>> > >
>
>
>P.S.: Bill, could you tell us some more about your Barbie dolls?
>
>(see http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=120435350 )
>
>Subject:
> TRADE for Peppermint Princess
> Date:
> 29 Nov 1995 00:00:00 GMT
> From:
> [email protected] ()
> Organization:
> Edmonton Freenet, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
> Newsgroups:
> rec.collecting.dolls
>
>
>
>
>Want to trade for Peppermint Princess NRFB.Can offer NRFB Limited Edition
>1995 Governors Ball Barbie.
>
>Let us know if you’re interested.

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:13 EDT 1998
Article: 26939 of soc.culture.swiss
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.lebanon,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: JEWS = NAZIS
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 20:03:43 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 205
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.ssi1.com!uunet!in5.uu.net!news.new-york.net!newshub.northeast.verio.net!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.arabic:35937 soc.culture.polish:119712 soc.culture.lebanon:59736 soc.culture.australian:77564 soc.culture.swiss:26939 soc.culture.russian:93489

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 20:09:51 GMT, sbjarnason a JEW maggot wrote:

On Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:03:42 GMT, [email protected] decided
to say, in soc.culture.malaysia, using 202 valuable lines of text:

>On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 22:27:32 -0600, [email protected] wrote:
>>In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>writes:

>>>n the Nazi military is well documented, both from records of the
>>>Germans, together with documents from the JEWS themselves!!!

>>>After all, the JEWS worship mammon, so why not make money??

>>And you ass hole worship a Jew, so what does that make you.

>Actually Christ was murdered by the JEWs, because he exposed their
>criminal activities, even the money-changing in the temples!!!

Christ was legally executed by the Romans at the instigation of some
Jews, if the NT is to be believed. Christ himself was a Jew. The
activities of the money changers, while perhaps in bad taste, clearly
weren’t illegal.

>As for the JEWs active in the Nazi military, there are many documented
>reports to prove this!!!

but quite by chance you forgot to post a reference.

If you know how to read, then READ the report by Professor Rigg, and
other references below, cited.

>The TRUTH about the many hundreds of thousands of JEWS who were active
>in the Nazi military is well documented, both from records of the
>Germans, together with documents from the JEWS themselves!!!

>After all, the JEWS worship mammon, so why not make money??

>On Fri, 17 Apr 1998 07:37:49 -0700, [email protected] wrote:

>>Sir,
>> You shame yourself and your Japanese nation by spreading such lies.
>> If you’re saying that a few Jews tried to escape being killed by
>>pretending to be Germans in the Nazi army, that could be possible. What
>>you are saying is that Jews in great numbers willingly fought with those
>>who were killing them. That is a lie and you know it. Do you enjoy being
>>an open liar?
>> irgun43

>>> On Wed, 15 Apr 1998 01:38:19 +0700, “Hasan” wrote:
>>> >Yesss!

>>> >They killed Jesus and now killing many Palestinian BOYS (once again BOYS)
>>> >and reporters who try to record their barbarity, and like Nazi’s who feel
>>> >superior by saying “DEUTSCHE UBER ALLES”, the Jews claim themselves as
>>> >“CHOSEN PEOPLE.”

>>> >So, the Jews are nothing but a bunch of racists or fascists.

>>> From [email protected] Sun Jan 25 17:14:46 1998
>>> Based on previous post from DejaNews archives:

>>> http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=315100303&CONTEXT=885769316.1533018197&hitnum=0

>>> On 11 Jan 1998 04:22:13 GMT, [email protected] (BillBrtn) wrote:

>>> >> Adolf Hitler had some Jews in his inner circle

>>> http://www.viamall.com/ihf/653.html

>>> This is the extraordinary story of Henry (Heinz) von Javorsky, a man
>>> who has survived and thrived in many lands and under many regimes
>>> because of his skill with a camera. In Nazi Germany he was able to
>>> make a living–and live–despite having a Jewish grandmother, because
>>> he was a specialist in aerial photography–

>>> >>: Jews that had Iron Crosses and/or had proven their
>>> >>loyalty to Germany were not harassed by the Gestapo, the SS or the SA.

>>> You need to read about the Hindenburg exemption in Lucy Dawidowicz’s
>>> book The War Against The Jews.

>>> Lucy S. Dawidowicz’s book titled THE WAR AGAINST THE JEWS1933-1945 by
>>> Bantam Books Incorporated [#13084-6, 1979 ed].

>>> * April 7, 1933 Hitler’s letter to Hindenburg gave exemptions to
>>> the “Jewish Problem.” “Officials who were already employed as civil
>>> servants on or before August 1, 1914, or who during the World War,
>>> fought at the front for Germany or her allies, or whose fathers or
>>> sons were killed in action in the World War.” (pg 77)
>>> * [“Starting May 4, 1942, the Jews from Germany, Luxembourg, Vienna,
>>> and Prague would be deported, except for the employed among them
>>> and the holders of the Iron Cross or other World War I decorations.
>>> Hitherto, those Jews as a group had been exempt from the
>>> deportations.”]

____________________________

>>> Or how about this?

>>> Hitler’s Jewish Army

>>> “If there were Jews in (Hitler’s) armed forces…who served knowing
>>> what was going on and made no attempt to save (lives), well then that
>>> is unacceptable and dishonorable.” –Rabbi Marvin Hier, director of
>>> the Simon Wiesenthal Institute.

>>> Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis
>>> called ‘full Jews’ served in the German military with Adolf Hitler’s
>>> knowledge and approval.

>>> Cambridge University researcher Bryan Rigg has traced the Jewish
>>> ancestry of more than 1,200 of Hitler’s soldiers, including two field
>>> marshals and fifteen generals (two full generals, eight lieutenant
>>> generals, five major generals), “men commanding up to 100,000 troops.”

>>> [ http://infoukes.com/lists/history/1997/08/0004.html ]

>>> In approximately 20 cases, Jewish soldiers in the Nazi army were
>>> awarded Germany’s highest military honor, the Knight’s Cross.

>>> One of these Jewish veterans is today an 82 year old resident of
>>> northern Germany, an observant Jew who served as a captain and
>>> practiced his religion within the Wehrmacht throughout the war.

>>> One of the Jewish field marshals was Erhard Milch, deputy to Luftwaffe
>>> Chief Hermann Goering. Rumors of Milch’s Jewish identity circulated
>>> widely in Germany in the 1930s.

>>> In one of the famous anecdotes of the time, Goering falsified Milch’s
>>> birth record and when met with protests about having a Jew in the Nazi
>>> high command, Goering replied, “I decide who is a Jew and who is an
>>> Aryan.”

>>> Rigg’s research also shed light on stories surrounding the rescue by
>>> German soldiers of the Lubavitcher grand rabbi of that time, who was
>>> in Warsaw when the war broke out in 1939.

>>> Joseph Isaac Schneerson was spirited to safety after an appeal to
>>> Germany from the United States. Schneerson was assisted by a German
>>> officer Rigg has identified as the highly decorated Maj. Ernst Bloch,
>>> whose father was a Jew.

>>> Jews also served in the Nazi police and security forces as ghetto
>>> police (Ordnungdienst) and concentration camp guards (kapos).

>>> So what happens to the claim that Hitler sought to exterminate all
>>> Jews, when he allowed some of them to join in his struggle against
>>> Bolshevism and International finance capitalism?

>>> Sources:

>>> William D. Montalbano, “The Jews in Hitler’s Military,” Los Angeles
>>> Times, Dec. 24, 1996.

>>> Tom Tugend, “Grad student uncovers Jews who fought for Adolf Hitler,”
>>> Jewish Telegraph Agency, Dec. 26, 1996.

>>> Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators.
>>> http://www.abbc.com/aaargh/engl/zad/zad13.html

>>> Article ” Hitler’s Jewish Army” from:
>>> http://www.hoffman-info.com/jewishnazi.html

>>> http://www.seattletimes.com/extra/browse/html97/altnazi_040397.html
>>> Copyright © 1997 The Seattle Times Company

>>> Thursday, April 3, 1997

>>> Hitler let `Aryanized’ Jews serve in Nazi armed forces
>>> by Reuters

>>> BONN – Adolf Hitler personally allowed at least 77 army officers of
>>> Jewish descent, including 25 generals, to fight for the Nazi cause in
>>> the German Wehrmacht during World War II, an American historian said
>>> yesterday…… [Click the above link to see all of the story.]

>>> See also:
>>> http://www.seattletimes.com/extra/browse/html/holo_122696.html
>>> Copyright © 1996 The Seattle Times Company

>>> Dec. 26, 1996

>>> An eerie part of Holocaust history: Researcher talks to Jews who
>>> served in Nazi army

>>> by William D. Montalbano
>>> Los Angeles Times

>>> LONDON – Sustained by scholarship, peanut butter and a sense of
>>> mission, Bryan Rigg is exploring an eerie and uncharted no man’s land
>>> of Holocaust history.

>>> Rigg interviews former German soldiers of Jewish heritage, some of
>>> them high-ranking officers, who fought for Nazi Germany in World War
>>> II – during the Holocaust, when Germans killed 6 million Jews.

>>> “Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis
>>> called `full Jews’ served in the military with Adolf Hitler’s
>>> knowledge. The Nazis allowed these men to serve but at the same time
>>> exterminated their families,” Rigg said. [Click link above to read the
>>> whole story.]
>>>
>>> http://infoukes.com/lists/history/1997/08/0004.html
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:16 EDT 1998
Article: 26940 of soc.culture.swiss
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.nswpp,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.malaysian,soc.culture.swiss,usa.general
Subject: Re: Jews Launder Drug Money
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 20:00:57 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 147
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!chippy.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.en.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org alt.nswpp:22547 soc.culture.russian:93492 soc.culture.australian:77566 soc.culture.europe:128591 soc.culture.swiss:26940

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 19:53:14 GMT, sbjarnason a defender of JEW
criminals wrote:

On Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:20:12 GMT, odes[email protected] wrote:

>It seems that JEWS are not satisfied with having murdered Jesus
>Christ.
>
>Now some of them are involved, even from synagogues, in the DRUGS
>business.
>On Tue, 17 Jun 1997 07:10:26 -0800, in alt.revisionism
>[email protected] (Michael A. Hoffman II) wrote:
>
>>Michael A. Hoffman II comments: Why didn’t these two Orthodox Hasidic
>>(Bobover sect) rabbis enjoy the usual rabbinic immunity from arrest for
>>their crimes? Could it be that their mantle of protection was removed by
>>the more powerful Reform and Conservative Jews in America with whom they
>>are at war in occupied Palestine over issues pertaining to modernity and
>>conversion? Is this a warning to the Orthodox to back off from their
>>assaults on Reform and Orthodox Jews? For more go to:
>>http://www.hoffman-info.com
>>——————————————————————————
>>2 Rabbis Charged With Money Laundering
>>
>>By ROBERT D. McFADDEN NY Times June 17, 1997
>>
>>NEW YORK — A dozen men, including two identified as Orthodox Jewish
>> rabbis, were charged by federal authorities Monday with conspiring to launder
>> and hide $1.75 million in drug profits for Colombian narcotics dealers by
>> routing the cash through the bank accounts of a synagogue and a yeshiva
>>in Brooklyn.
>>
>> The bizarre case, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn said, brought together
>>a collection of strange bedfellows — five New York representatives of
>>Colombian drug traffickers, three go-betweens who purportedly transported
>>cash in suitcase quantities, and four men with ties to a close-knit Jewish
>>community.
>>
>> At one point, the officials charged, the rabbis ran tens of millions of
>>dollars in drug profits through the bank accounts of a relatively modest
>>Borough Park synagogue and provided nearly $3.5 million from American and
>>Swiss accounts for the purchase of an aircraft for the Colombian drug
>>lords.
>>
>> “Money launderers are the indispensable partners of major drug
>>traffickers, and the cynical act of using religious institutions to
>>conceal drug proceeds is particularly reprehensible,” said Zachary Carter,
>>the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, in announcing the
>>charges.
>>
>> Seven defendants, including Rabbi Mahir Reiss, 47, of 3543 Bedford Ave.,
>>and Rabbi Bernard Grunfeld, 64, of 1417 46th St., both in Brooklyn, were
>>arrested Monday and were arraigned late in the day before U.S. Magistrate
>>Judge Roanne L. Mann, charged with conspiracy to launder money. Two
>>suspects, Grunfeld and Israel Knobloch, 24, of 5200 15th Ave., Brooklyn,
>>also were charged with conspiring to avoid federal cash-transaction
>>reporting requirements.
>>
>>Six defendants were held without bail, and one, Abraham Reiss, 48, of 320
>>Riverside Drive in Manhattan, a brother of Mahir Reiss, was released on
>>$750,000 bail. Three other men named in the federal complaint were listed
>>as fugitives, and two more were being held in custody elsewhere in New
>>York in other cases, according to Lee Dunst, the assistant federal
>>attorney prosecuting the case.
>>
>>Unveiling a three-year undercover investigation that used court-authorized
>>wiretaps and other surveillance, the federal complaint charged that the
>>two rabbis and Abraham Reiss laundered $750,000 by taking cash from
>>go-betweens, depositing it in the bank accounts of a synagogue-based
>>organization and, after subtracting commissions, writing checks to drug
>>traffickers.
>>
>>Investigators said the bank accounts used in the scheme, held in the name
>>of Chaim Shel Shulem, which shares quarters with Congregation Eitz Chaim
>>at 1577 48th St. in Borough Park, held deposits of more than $19 million
>>during the 10-month period when the laundering transactions occurred,
>>between August 1995 and May 1996.
>>
>>Grunfeld, listed as the president of Chaim Shel Shulem, was said to have
>>written all the checks that went to the drug traffickers. He and Knobloch
>>were also accused of concealing the movement of $1 million in drug money
>>by making 95 deposits and withdrawals of just under $10,000 — the amount
>>that triggers a government cash-transaction reporting requirement —
>>through the bank accounts of Congregation Eitz Chaim and Bobover Yeshiva,
>>at the same location.
>>
>>The defendants made no statements in court Monday. While Grunfeld was listed by
>> prosecutors as the head of Chaim Shel Shulem, dozens of people at
>>Congregation Eitz Chaim late Monday declined to say anything about him or
>>the case. Some seemed not to recognize the name Chaim Shel Shulem.
>>
>>The synagogue and yeshiva are in a five-story building with a brick front
>>and a small awning imprinted with the institution’s name in Hebrew. The
>>only words in English on the facade call it “the Katz Family of Mexico
>>Building.”
>>
>>In a ground-floor, two-room school lined with books, about 100 people were
>>studying at tables. A man who appeared to be in charge, but who would not
>>give his name, said he knew nothing about the two rabbis named in the
>>federal complaint.
>>
>> The federal investigation — an undertaking of the U.S. Attorney’s
>>Office, the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Internal Revenue Service —
>>began in 1994, when agents detected a pattern of cash deposits and
>>withdrawals intended to circumvent the government’s reporting rules in
>>various bank accounts held in the name of the synagogue and yeshiva,
>>officials said.
>>
>>With court-authorized telephone wiretaps, surveillance and other techniques, the
>>investigators said they uncovered a conspiracy in which Grunfeld and Knobloch
>>eventually made more than $1 million in deposits and withdrawals —
>>transactions, they said, that let the conspirators move large sums of
>>illicit drug profits.
>>
>> Later, in 1995 and 1996, investigators said, the 12 men named in Monday’s
>>complaint conducted a full money-laundering operation. Five of them —
>>Lisandro Montes De Oca, 29; Francisco Gil, 30; Estenio Rodriguez, 30; Juan
>>Suarez, 39, and Alvaro Duque, 36 –were said to have brought in large sums
>>that Colombian drug dealers wanted to launder.
>>
>>The money was given to three men described as intermediaries — Jack
>>Pinski, 35, a Colombian who is a fugitive, and Roberto Buendia, 40, and
>>Fabio Arana, both of
>>Medford, N.Y. They were said to have counted and stashed the money at an
>>apartment at 243 West 75th St.
>>
>>There, prosecutors said, Abraham Reiss picked up the money. It was later
>>deposited in various accounts held in the name of Chaim Shel Shulem.
>>Grunfeld, the organization’s president, signed checks that were made out
>>to “entities in accordance with drug traffickers’ instructions,” the
>>federal complaint said.
>>
>>Those instructions were communicated through Rabbi Reiss, who had no formal
>>connections to Chaim Shel Shulem, investigators said. Commissions of 13
>>percent to 15 percent were deducted from the laundered money and divided
>>among the intermediaries.
>>
>> Prosecutors said they did not know how members of a deeply religious
>>community came into contact with professional money launderers and drug
>>traffickers. But they charged that in 1994, Rabbis Reiss and Grunfeld, and
>>Abraham Reiss arranged $3.4 million in financing to buy a Beech Super King
>>aircraft, a type commonly used by drug smugglers.
>>================================================================================
>> The Campaign for Radical Truth in History: http://www.hoffman-info.com
>>——————————————————————————–
>> News Bureau and Archives Online
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:17 EDT 1998
Article: 26948 of soc.culture.swiss
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!netnews.com!feed.nntp.acc.ca!cyclone!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: WAS THERE REALLY A HOLOCAUST, or just Holohoax?
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:39:30 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 265
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.europe:128741 soc.culture.polish:119960 soc.culture.swiss:26948

On Mon, 24 Aug 1998 20:24:36 -0600, Ed Kadach
wrote:

>WAS THERE REALLY A HOLOCAUST?
> By Dr. E. R. Fields
>
> The Holocaust has become the greatest instrument of sympathy
>which any nation has ever been able to use to gain support for
>wars, expansion and foreign-aid: This has made Israel the
>world’s sixth strongest military power. The gravest threat to
>all this wealth and influence is the growing doubt over the
>question of whether or not a real holocaust of 6 million Jews
>actual took place.
>
> NUMBERS OF VICTIMS DON’T ADD UP
>
> The World Almanac for 1947 states that back in 1939 the world
>Jewish population was 15,688,259. The Almanacs figures were
>supplied by the American Jewish Committee. Nest the Jewish owned
>New York Times of Feb. 22, 1948 stated the world Jewish
>population for that year amounted “to 15,600,000 to 18,700,000
>in the addition to the 600,000 to 700,000 living in Palestine.”
>How could the Jewish population increase so rapidly over the war
>years if they had lost 6,000,000 people?
> With the rise of Hitler to power there were no more than 4
>million Jews at the most living in areas occupied by the Third
>Reich at the height of its power. On June 30, 1965, the
>West German government announced that some 3,375,000 Jewish
>holocaust “survivors” had applied for reparations money. The Red
>Cross reported in 1946 that of registered Jewish camp inmates no
>more than 300,000 could have died. It is interesting to note
>that in the Jews real “bible”, The Talmud, it is claimed that
>800,000 Jews were slaughtered by the Romans in Hadrians era. Yet
>there is no historical evidence supporting this claim.
> The Jewish owned New York Times, in 1945 carried an article
>by the well known Jewish writer C.L. Sulzberger. It openly
>stated Soviet Russia supplied the figure of 4 million Jews
>having been put to death “in the gas chambers of Auschwitz.”
>Thus it was the communists and the Jews who initially originated
>these figures which today are accepted as “gospel truth”.
> It is claimed that from 1934 to 1945 some 50,000 people died
>in the huge Bergen-Belsen camp. This count is considered
>exaggerated, still Time Magazine reports that of this figure
>20,000 died of typhus during the single month of March, 1945! If
>nearly half died of this plague in just one month at the end of
>the war there is no way Bergen-Belsen could have been an
>”extermination camp”.
>
> HIMMLER-“REDUCE DEATHS AT ALL COSTS”
>
> Heinrich Himmler, chief of the Concentration Camps issued
>orders on Dec. 28, 1942, that “The death rate in the
>concentration camps must be reduced at all costs.” (Source,
>Reitlinger’s book, “The Final Solution.”)
> The camps had been hit with a deadly typhus epidemic that
>spread by fleas and body lice. Stomach pain, high fever,
>emaciation and death can quickly follow. All of the camps were
>factories and the loss of workers was hurting war production.
>Inspector of the camps, Richard Glucks responded to Himmler’s
>order on Jan 20, 1943, “Every means will be used to lower the
>death rates.” (Source, Nuremberg Tribunal Document No. 1523.)
> On April 10, 1943, Oswald Pohl, head of the Economic
>Administration Office of the camps issued a letter stating that
>persons with tuberculosis were being sent to the camps resulting
>in the “shockingly high mortality figures.” (Source: Nuremberg
>Documents.) Later on Sept. 30, 1943, Pohl was able to show that
>the camp death rate had been reduced from 8.5% in July, 1942 to
>2.8% in June 1943.
> The German SS arrested Buchenwald Commandant, Karl Koch in
>1943 for mistreating and even executing some prisoners. After an
>investigation Koch was found guilty by SS Judge Konrad Morgen
>and shot. Does this sound like a policy of “extermination?”
> With suspicion rapidly rising about the holocaust claim a
>committee of Jewish leaders from New York and Paris met with
>communist leaders in Warsaw. There they established the
>”Committee for the Investigation of War Crimes and War
>Criminals”. It was after this meeting that the announcement
>was made that all gas chambers were located in Poland.
>
> THE PROBLEMS OF MASS GASSING
>
> In 1945 it was announced that gas death chambers existed in
>all concentration camps in Poland, Germany, Austria and Alsace.
>Some 15 years later, in 1960, this was revised to the new claim
>that gas chambers existed only in camps located in Soviet held
>Poland. Simon Weisenthal of the Los Angeles Holocaust center
>states in the paper, “Books and Bookmen”, April 1975, page 5,
>”No gassing took place in any camp on German soil.”
> The pressure had been growing since The Vatican, Red Cross,
>English Intelligence and German Intelligence chiefs Canaris and
>Oster (who collaborated with the British) either did not know or
>believe in rumors of gassings.
>
> This brings up the following questions.
> 1) Germans are meticulous record keepers but there is not one
>order for the construction of any gas chamber, no blueprint, no
>photo of any gas chamber or gassed victims.
> 2) There have been thousands on investigations of alleged
>Nazi war criminals, hundreds of trials, yet not one person was
>ever accused of being involved with actual gassings! No reliable
>witness on either side has ever come forward who saw a single
>person gassed-AND THERE ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN OVER 10,000
>MASS GASSINGS!
> 3) Photos of bodies at Dachau and Belsen camps are of
>prisoners who died of typhus and malnutrition. Many Germans also
>died from typhus.
> 4) The Vatican and Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed
>camp inmates at the end of the war about alleged gas chambers.
>the response was always the same, “The detainees themselves have
>not spoken of them.” (From the Red Cross document No. 9925, June
>1946.)
>
> FORCED CONFESSIONS OF GASSINGS
>
> Rudoft Hoess was the commandant of Auschwitz from 1940 to
>1943. captured by the Soviets they extracted a confession to
>mass gassings using Zyclon-B gas. Such “confessions” are about
>as reliable as any forced by Stalin from victims tortured before
>taking the stand to confess during the Moscow show trials of
>1936. The communists wrote the “Confession’ and Hoess signed it.
>Later he was hanged. An assistant commandant refused to sign-he
>died in his cell.
> Hoess statement read, “half an hour after having released the
>gas, they opened the door and started the ventilation machines.
>They began immediately to extract the bodies while eating and
>smoking.”
> Was Hoess trying to get a message across that there were no
>gassing? Zyclon-B is not “ventable”. The manufacturers state
>Zyclon-B adheres to surface clothing and skin. They say that
>only after a 24 hour period, wearing a gas mask with the
>strongest filter, could any bodies be removed without killing
>such workers. If we believe the Hoess confession that the
>workers ran into the gas chamber “eating and smoking” – without
>gas masks – only minutes after the gassing – IF THIS OCCURRED
>ALL WOULD HAVE DIED!
>
> GAS STORIES NOT POSSIBLE
>
> The Jew Mosche Pearlmann in his book, “The Capture and Trial
>of Adolph Eichmann” pages 375 and 385 states Zyclon-B crystals
>were introduced from the ceilings of the gas chambers and
>”became immediately gaseous.”
> The American Cyanamid Co. of Linden N.J. states: “We know of
>no chemical process whereby HCN (Zyclon-B) may be made to become
>instantly gaseous upon exposure to air.”
>
> CLAIMS OF WILLIAM SHIRER
>
> Shirer claims the gas was released from overhead through fake
>shower outlets, (page 970) and quickly killed its victims. The
>truth is that Zyclon-B gas is lighter than air and would rise to
>the ceiling so that anyone throwing themselves to the floor
>would be saved. Shirer also quotes the Soviet written confession
>signed by Hoess as stating (page 968), “We knew when the people
>were dead because their screaming stopped.” If anyone were
>actually killed with a cyanide type gas they would die instantly
>thus there would be no screaming at all. The truth is that
>Zyclon-B was used to delouse inmates clothing of lice and fleas
>which carry typhus.
>
> THE PROBLEM OF THE CREMATORIUMS
>
> At the Auschwitz I camp there were only 6 crematory ovens. At
>the hospital in Auschwitz II there are 46 single cremators. In
>the Lubin camp there were only 6. THAT’S ALL! In these three
>camps 3 to 4 million Jews were supposed to have been
>exterminated and their bodies cremated. Also, these cremation
>ovens were very small with only 18′ doors and a time period of
>from 4 to 6 hours burning for each body using a large amount of
>coal. Cremation for those who passed away was used in the camps
>to prevent epidemics. Also, no large supplies of coal were ever
>stored at the camps for cremations.
> A VERY INTERESTING NOTE appears only in the German edition of
>William L. Shirer’s book, “The Rise and Fall of the Third
>Reich.” It seems the Didler-Werke Company, which built the
>crematory ovens, sued Shirer who previously wrote that millions
>of people were gassed and then burned in this company’s ovens.
>In an out-of-court settlement of the suit Shirer agreed to add
>the following footnote on page 972 of the German edition:
> “The Didler-Werke have raised objection to the name of their
>firm appearing in the chapter concerning the extermination
>camps. Dr. S. Trastel, a professor of engineering in a statement
>of Aug. 1961 established that the measurements are those which
>are standard for a crematory oven of not very modern design
>intended for small cemeteries and would be unsuitable for mass
>burning.”
> WHY IS THIS DELETED FROM THE ENGLISH EDITION???
> On the question of cremating 6,000,000 people – this would
>leave 15,000 tons of ashes! Such gigantic piles of ashes created
>over the short 2 1/2 year period the holocaust supposedly took
>place would have been very difficult to dispose of. No one has
>ever come forward to report seeing such huge piles of tons of
>ashes.
> It was not until 1960 that the Soviets opened the Auschwitz
>camp to tourists and independent investigators. No gas chamber
>could be found. The official answer was that it was “taken to
>another camp for gassings and then later went into oblivion!”
>
> WHAT EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST
>
> Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes, eminent historian, author of 40
>books, many standard college texts, noted in Rampart Journal,
>1967. “It has been demonstrated that there had been no
>systematic extermination in those camps.”
> Thies Christopherden, a German soldier and author: “I was at
>Auschwitz! There was no gas chamber there.”
> Paul Rassiner, historian and anti-Nazi activist, who served a
>prison sentence in Buchenwald and the Dora camps stated in 1962.
>”The claim that a holocaust took place is an historic lie – the
>most tragic and most macabre imposture of all time.”
> Prof. Robert Faurisson, a specialist in Document Analysis at
>the University of Lyon. France, stated on April 25, 1979. “The
>holocaust lie, which is largely of Zionist origin, has made an
>enormous political and financial fraud possible, whose
>principal beneficiary is the state of Israel.”
>
> WHY THE HOLOCAUST CAMPAIGN
>
> Hardly a week goes by when there are not stories in the
>press, on TV-News or movies about the alleged holocaust. What is
>the long range design for this constant attempt to fill Germans
>and indeed all Christians with a feeling of guilt over a
>holocaust which never occurred?
> Bernard Postal wrote in the Jewish Week, July 14, 1979, “Not
>until after the holocaust, did anti-Semitism become taboo. There
>was a time when anti-Semitic speeches were an open factor in
>national campaigns. The holocaust put a taboo on overt anti-
>Semitism among upper-level statesmen and publicists.”
> S.E.D. Brown of South Africa, a noted journalist writes, “The
>holocaust instills a guilt complex in those said to be guilty
>and spreads the demoralization, degeneration, and eventually the
>destruction of the natural racial elite among a people. This
>transfers effective political control to the lowest elements who
>will cowtow to the Jews.”
> Zionist spokesmen often boast of: “The shattering effect of
>the holocaust on the Christian conscience resulting in a feeling
>of collective indebtedness to the Jews.”
> Massive unending U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel in made possible
>because anyone who dares to oppose these outrageous giveaways is
>condemned as being “anti-Semitic” and “insensitive” to holocaust
>victims.
> The Jews hold an unnatural violent hatred for the German
>people. Jews seek to turn all other peoples of the world against
>the Germans and keep that nation divided for all time to come.
>That is why no peace treaty has ever been signed as yet with
>Germany and they still live under Allied military occupation
>laws.
>
> A QUESTION OF FUND RAISING
>
> The Wall Street Journal quotes Jewish professional fund-
>raising consultant firm of Milton Goldin Co., as saying the main
>theme of Jewish fund-raising is the holocaust and has been for
>38 years. When they don’t use the holocaust the money collection
>sharply drops off. Thus the more the Press, TV and Hollywood
>promotes the holocaust the more money the United Jewish Appeal
>and other Zionist funds can extract from gullible people.
>
> HOLOCAUST SILENCES OPPOSITION
>
> Jewish leaders have discovered that by repeating holocaust
>stories over and over again they can instill a guilt complex
>within all Gentiles. This effectively silences most critics of
>Zionist political goals.

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:18 EDT 1998
Article: 26949 of soc.culture.swiss
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!netnews.com!feed.nntp.acc.ca!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.australian,aus.general,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.polish
Subject: Re: JEW NAZIS!
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:42:55 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.australian:77617 aus.general:35521 soc.culture.swiss:26949 soc.culture.polish:119962

On Wed, 16 Sep 1998 14:53:17 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On Wed, 08 Jul 1998 11:27:17 GMT, [email protected] (Harold
>Wood) wrote:
>
>>JEWISH NAZIS!
>>
>>How dare those cynical pernicious professional
>>peddlers of guilt, those ‘oonga boonga’ mere
>>superstition driven ‘religionist’ rubbish behave
>>HERE in the very same manner as those once dreaded
>>Nazi Germans! How dare those anti-social paranoid
>>nuisances who constantly carp and whine in the
>>ears of Australia’s innocent tolerant and too long
>>suffering of them about the treatment mostly only
>>their relatives years ago received at the hands of
>>but one group of the world’s still common stream
>>of ‘monsters’, behave that way here! I.e. import
>>that despicable behaviour to their host country.
>>
>>The ‘religionist’ Australia Israel Review
>>obviously has not been influenced by
>>’Schindler'(sp?) in their act of constructing and
>>publishing their ‘list’ of One Nation members, but
>>by the likes of Adolf Hitler! The neo-nazi style
>>acting Jews of that socially dangerous rag, as
>>distinct from a likely majority of other Jews,
>>need to have a class action taken out against them
>>for the crime (among others) of ‘common assault’.
>>
>>
>>And that very same not worthy of being even a fish
>>and chip wrapper 🙂 rag, deserves to be put to
>>flight and ultimately closed down, for the
>>cessation of the dividing of Australia by our
>>enemies various must soon become a priority for
>>Australia’s intending survivor class.
>>
>>Harold.

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:18 EDT 1998
Article: 26951 of soc.culture.swiss
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.cmc.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!192.26.210.166!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!feed.nntp.acc.ca!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.lebanon
Subject: INTERPOL wants Jewish war criminal.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:44:12 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:119985 soc.culture.russian:93625 soc.culture.malaysia:187990 soc.culture.palestine:52605 soc.culture.swiss:26951 soc.culture.lebanon:59823

On Wed, 12 Aug 1998 16:13:12 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On 02 May 1998 16:44:09 GMT, [email protected] (Pan Janusz) wrote:
>
>>Translated from Polish:
>
>>Reprinted from “Polish Weekly” published in Australia.
>
>>Office of the Provincial Prosecutor in Katowice issued the extradition papers
>>for war criminal Samuel Morel. Polish authorities will ask authorities in
>>Israel to extradite Morel.
>>Morel is accused of “cruel treatment and tortures of prisoners and jeopardizing
>>their safety and health.” Using common language, between years 1945-1950 he was
>>beating prisoners, torturing and killing them.
>
>>Morel was born in 1919, from 1940 was a member of Jewish band which was
>>assaulting Polish villages in province of Kielce and robbing Polish farmers. In
>>December of 1942 during one of their assaults the band was destroyed by a
>>detachment of People’s Army ( communist guerillas in nazi occupied Poland).
>>Father and brother of Morel were executed, he alone became a member of the
>>People’s Army. He defected from the group when Red Army was inching toward
>>province of Kielce and became a member of Soviet guerillas.
>>Soon he became an officer of UB (communist Security Office in Soviet occupied
>>Poland).
>>In the beginning of 1945 he was sent to the region of Silesia and received the
>>nomination on the camp commandant for Germans in Swietochlowice.
>> About his crime committed in this camp wrote, among others, an American
>>journalist John Sack in his book “Eye for an eye” ( for this book John Sack who
>>is a Jew was decalred an antisemite).
>>In the end of December of 1945 Morel had been transferred and became a warden
>>of the UB prison in Opole. There he tortured Poles and Germans. He also
>>tortured minors in the labor camp in Jaworzno which he was a commandant between
>>1946-1950. He was fired from this post, for mortality among prisoners was too
>>big.
>
>>In 1991 he was interviewed by a prosecutor, panicked and fled to Israel.
>>After spending all his money, within few months he returned to Poland, but soon
>>he surfaced in Sweden where he demanded political asylum argumenting that he
>>was persecuted in Poland because he was a Jew. His plea was rejected and Morel
>>again came back to Poland.
>>On 10th of July Office of the Provincial Prosecutor in Katowice issued arrest
>>warrant. They were late. Morel again fled to Israel.
>>His retirement pention is being picked up by the wife of the criminal.
>>Since 1996 Morel is on the most wanted list of the INTERPOL.
>>According to international law he should be arrested by Israeli police and
>>charged by Israel with war crimes.
>>He should…..
>
>>Translated by Janusz Styber
>

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:32 EDT 1998
Article: 41761 of soc.culture.ukrainian
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Re: Jews DID CONTROL Communism – documented by them…
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:56:08 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 241
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:119709 soc.culture.australian:77561 soc.culture.russian:93485 soc.culture.ukrainian:41761 soc.culture.baltics:15282 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9717 soc.culture.swiss:26936

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 18:22:38 GMT, sbjarnason trying desperately to
stimule more discussion wrote:

On 23 Jun 1998 00:27:52 GMT, [email protected] (Daniel Swan)
wrote:

>steve mock ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>: What you constantly fail to grasp, Tavish, is that no one is denying that there were people of Jewish ancestry among
>: the Bolsheviks, or even that there weren’t quite a few people of Jewish ancestry among the Bolsheviks. What you
>: completely and utterly fail to understand is how collossal the leap of logic is which you ask us to make from that fact
>: to the conclusion that Bolshevism is some kind of a Jewish plot for which Jews bear collective responsibility.
>
>Logical leap or not, this raises an interesting question: How
>can the overproportionate Jewish representation among the
>Bolsheviks be accounted for?

Perhaps the following text may help answer your rhetorical question…

Subject: Jews Dominated Bolshevism – Don’t Deny It
From: [email protected] (Roger Hughes)
Date: 22 Jul 1997 12:32:44 GMT
Organization: Anti-Hypocrisy Foundation

Patriot Fact Sheet : The Jews and Bolshevism

One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called
“Russian
Revolution” of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority
of the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to
them, continue to condemn anyone as “anti-Semitic” who brings up these
facts, it remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created
and lead revolutionary movement.

First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism,
Karl Marx,
was a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father’s side.
Whether he was a “religous” Jew is of no significant importance, since
Jewishness is not defined exclusively by adherance to Judaism. A great
bulk of Jews today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but
also nonetheless consider themselves Jews.

While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism,
will
concede that Marx was indeed Jewish, let’s see the them deny the
communist-Jewish connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables
that
passed between American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C.
during the time of the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following
quotes are taken directly from documents available from the U.S.
Archives:

State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: “Jews prominant in local Soviet
government,
anti-Jewish feeling growing among population….”

State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July
5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: “Fifty percent of Soviet government
in
each town consists of Jews of the worst type.”

>From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomey Shuyler: “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it’s
beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type.”

A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports
on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: “…(T)here were
384
`commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22
Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had come
to
Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial
Government.”

With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the
leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.
(Lenin has since been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had
access to the KGB archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon
Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the
Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central
Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev
(Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the
central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other
prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn),
foreign
affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld)
and
Moisei Uritsky.

David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most
of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care
little
for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are
trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”

The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
“Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”

In case anyone thinks I’ve taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
here’s three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former
superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik
Propaganda
Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary,
United States Senate, 65th Congress:

“We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east
side
of New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American
Pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased
that
there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English
showed that they had not qualified as being Americas. A number of
these
men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element
in
this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that
more than half the agitators in the socalled Bolshevik movement were
Jews…I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that
one
of its bases is found in the east side of New York…The latest
startling information, given me by someone with good authority,
startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in the
northern
community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of the
Soviet
regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)
out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the
exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
Gordon.

I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great
revolution of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing
on
the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I
often remarked to my sister, ‘Well, what are we coming to anyway. This
all looks so Yiddish.’ Up to that time we had see very few Jews,
because
there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in
Petrograd,
but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the
agitators
were Jews.

I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now
that
was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians
did not take kindly to it.”

Some might automatically assume that the preceeding sources are
“anti-Semitic” and therefore unreliable, but they’d be wrong. Here’s a
few Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:

“The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920)

“There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, London
April,
4, 1919)

“Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin,
Rabbi
S. Wise, May 5, 1935).

“In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)

Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:

“National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs
characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an
extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death
penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).

While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and
clergymen murdered by Communist gangs, synogoges and rabbis were left
virtually untouched.

It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20
million Ukranian farmers during the 1920’s in one of the most vile
campaigns in history: In (the) Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80
percent
of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an
American professor of Russian history. . . ”

Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85 million persons
were
murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them
directly at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish
Communist bosses.

Regards,
Roger Hughes

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Towards a New Consciousness; a New Order; a New People
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Home


http://www.natvan.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Roger’s Page http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm/
Keep It White Because You Know It’s Right!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Abusive emails will be posted to the Usenet and ridiculed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:32 EDT 1998
Article: 41762 of soc.culture.ukrainian
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.cmc.net!syix.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Re: JEW RABBIS LAUNDER DRUG MONEY IN NY!!!!
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 20:07:32 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 147
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:119711 soc.culture.russian:93488 soc.culture.ukrainian:41762 soc.culture.usa:260945

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 19:57:57 GMT, sbjarnason trying to stimulate more
anti-JEW comments wrote:

On Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:20:12 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>It seems that JEWS are not satisfied with having murdered Jesus
>Christ.
>
>Now some of them are involved, even from synagogues, in the DRUGS
>business.
>On Tue, 17 Jun 1997 07:10:26 -0800, in alt.revisionism
>[email protected] (Michael A. Hoffman II) wrote:
>
>>Michael A. Hoffman II comments: Why didn’t these two Orthodox Hasidic
>>(Bobover sect) rabbis enjoy the usual rabbinic immunity from arrest for
>>their crimes? Could it be that their mantle of protection was removed by
>>the more powerful Reform and Conservative Jews in America with whom they
>>are at war in occupied Palestine over issues pertaining to modernity and
>>conversion? Is this a warning to the Orthodox to back off from their
>>assaults on Reform and Orthodox Jews? For more go to:
>>http://www.hoffman-info.com
>>——————————————————————————
>>2 Rabbis Charged With Money Laundering
>>
>>By ROBERT D. McFADDEN NY Times June 17, 1997
>>
>>NEW YORK — A dozen men, including two identified as Orthodox Jewish
>> rabbis, were charged by federal authorities Monday with conspiring to launder
>> and hide $1.75 million in drug profits for Colombian narcotics dealers by
>> routing the cash through the bank accounts of a synagogue and a yeshiva
>>in Brooklyn.
>>
>> The bizarre case, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn said, brought together
>>a collection of strange bedfellows — five New York representatives of
>>Colombian drug traffickers, three go-betweens who purportedly transported
>>cash in suitcase quantities, and four men with ties to a close-knit Jewish
>>community.
>>
>> At one point, the officials charged, the rabbis ran tens of millions of
>>dollars in drug profits through the bank accounts of a relatively modest
>>Borough Park synagogue and provided nearly $3.5 million from American and
>>Swiss accounts for the purchase of an aircraft for the Colombian drug
>>lords.
>>
>> “Money launderers are the indispensable partners of major drug
>>traffickers, and the cynical act of using religious institutions to
>>conceal drug proceeds is particularly reprehensible,” said Zachary Carter,
>>the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, in announcing the
>>charges.
>>
>> Seven defendants, including Rabbi Mahir Reiss, 47, of 3543 Bedford Ave.,
>>and Rabbi Bernard Grunfeld, 64, of 1417 46th St., both in Brooklyn, were
>>arrested Monday and were arraigned late in the day before U.S. Magistrate
>>Judge Roanne L. Mann, charged with conspiracy to launder money. Two
>>suspects, Grunfeld and Israel Knobloch, 24, of 5200 15th Ave., Brooklyn,
>>also were charged with conspiring to avoid federal cash-transaction
>>reporting requirements.
>>
>>Six defendants were held without bail, and one, Abraham Reiss, 48, of 320
>>Riverside Drive in Manhattan, a brother of Mahir Reiss, was released on
>>$750,000 bail. Three other men named in the federal complaint were listed
>>as fugitives, and two more were being held in custody elsewhere in New
>>York in other cases, according to Lee Dunst, the assistant federal
>>attorney prosecuting the case.
>>
>>Unveiling a three-year undercover investigation that used court-authorized
>>wiretaps and other surveillance, the federal complaint charged that the
>>two rabbis and Abraham Reiss laundered $750,000 by taking cash from
>>go-betweens, depositing it in the bank accounts of a synagogue-based
>>organization and, after subtracting commissions, writing checks to drug
>>traffickers.
>>
>>Investigators said the bank accounts used in the scheme, held in the name
>>of Chaim Shel Shulem, which shares quarters with Congregation Eitz Chaim
>>at 1577 48th St. in Borough Park, held deposits of more than $19 million
>>during the 10-month period when the laundering transactions occurred,
>>between August 1995 and May 1996.
>>
>>Grunfeld, listed as the president of Chaim Shel Shulem, was said to have
>>written all the checks that went to the drug traffickers. He and Knobloch
>>were also accused of concealing the movement of $1 million in drug money
>>by making 95 deposits and withdrawals of just under $10,000 — the amount
>>that triggers a government cash-transaction reporting requirement —
>>through the bank accounts of Congregation Eitz Chaim and Bobover Yeshiva,
>>at the same location.
>>
>>The defendants made no statements in court Monday. While Grunfeld was listed by
>> prosecutors as the head of Chaim Shel Shulem, dozens of people at
>>Congregation Eitz Chaim late Monday declined to say anything about him or
>>the case. Some seemed not to recognize the name Chaim Shel Shulem.
>>
>>The synagogue and yeshiva are in a five-story building with a brick front
>>and a small awning imprinted with the institution’s name in Hebrew. The
>>only words in English on the facade call it “the Katz Family of Mexico
>>Building.”
>>
>>In a ground-floor, two-room school lined with books, about 100 people were
>>studying at tables. A man who appeared to be in charge, but who would not
>>give his name, said he knew nothing about the two rabbis named in the
>>federal complaint.
>>
>> The federal investigation — an undertaking of the U.S. Attorney’s
>>Office, the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Internal Revenue Service —
>>began in 1994, when agents detected a pattern of cash deposits and
>>withdrawals intended to circumvent the government’s reporting rules in
>>various bank accounts held in the name of the synagogue and yeshiva,
>>officials said.
>>
>>With court-authorized telephone wiretaps, surveillance and other techniques, the
>>investigators said they uncovered a conspiracy in which Grunfeld and Knobloch
>>eventually made more than $1 million in deposits and withdrawals —
>>transactions, they said, that let the conspirators move large sums of
>>illicit drug profits.
>>
>> Later, in 1995 and 1996, investigators said, the 12 men named in Monday’s
>>complaint conducted a full money-laundering operation. Five of them —
>>Lisandro Montes De Oca, 29; Francisco Gil, 30; Estenio Rodriguez, 30; Juan
>>Suarez, 39, and Alvaro Duque, 36 –were said to have brought in large sums
>>that Colombian drug dealers wanted to launder.
>>
>>The money was given to three men described as intermediaries — Jack
>>Pinski, 35, a Colombian who is a fugitive, and Roberto Buendia, 40, and
>>Fabio Arana, both of
>>Medford, N.Y. They were said to have counted and stashed the money at an
>>apartment at 243 West 75th St.
>>
>>There, prosecutors said, Abraham Reiss picked up the money. It was later
>>deposited in various accounts held in the name of Chaim Shel Shulem.
>>Grunfeld, the organization’s president, signed checks that were made out
>>to “entities in accordance with drug traffickers’ instructions,” the
>>federal complaint said.
>>
>>Those instructions were communicated through Rabbi Reiss, who had no formal
>>connections to Chaim Shel Shulem, investigators said. Commissions of 13
>>percent to 15 percent were deducted from the laundered money and divided
>>among the intermediaries.
>>
>> Prosecutors said they did not know how members of a deeply religious
>>community came into contact with professional money launderers and drug
>>traffickers. But they charged that in 1994, Rabbis Reiss and Grunfeld, and
>>Abraham Reiss arranged $3.4 million in financing to buy a Beech Super King
>>aircraft, a type commonly used by drug smugglers.
>>================================================================================
>> The Campaign for Radical Truth in History: http://www.hoffman-info.com
>>——————————————————————————–
>> News Bureau and Archives Online
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:34 EDT 1998
Article: 41790 of soc.culture.ukrainian
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!netnews.com!feed.nntp.acc.ca!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.australia,aus.general
Subject: Re: Jew Thieves Scream Anti-Semitism!
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:41:45 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 136
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.ukrainian:41790 soc.culture.baltics:15305 soc.culture.australia:12137 aus.general:35520

On Tue, 29 Sep 1998 14:02:32 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

X-NO-ARCHIVE:YES

On Sun, 06 Sep 1998 06:28:05 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Jun 1998 01:53:37 GMT, NSWPP wrote:
>
>>LARGEST Social Security Fraud in London’s History
>>
>>DAILY MAIL
>>Monday June 15 1998
>>By DAVID WILLIAMS and PETER ALLEN
>>
>>
>>Revealed: The men accused in
>>31.8 million State Benefit Racket
>>
>>THESE are the men being investigated by fraud-busters
>>over an alleged 1.8 million benefits racket. The case was
>>highlighted last month by Welfare Reform Minister Frank
>>Field as part of a crack-down launched by Labour aimed at
>>slashing the £36 billion annual cost of welfare fraud.
>>
>>At the time, no one was named. But the Daily Mail has
>>since tracked down the men at the heart of one of the biggest
>>ever alleged welfare frauds.
>>
>>They are Soloman Kritzler, 39, and Alexander Eichenstein, 38,
>>who are suspected of masterminding the racket from their
>>sprawling homes in a North London suburb.
>>
>>Detectives have questioned the men and four other members of
>>what Mr Field described as ‘an extended family’ about
>>allegations of illegally claiming up to £3,600,000 in housing
>>benefit and income support. They have also been quizzed
>>by officers from a special undercover task force set up by
>>the Department of Social Security (DSS) about a mortgage
>>fraud worth £31.2 million.
>>
>>The investigators are said to be checking on any links with
>>massive welfare rackets in the United States, where members
>>of the family, it has been reported, are alleged to have used
>>fake identities to make bogus benefit claims.
>>
>>Both men hold trusted positions at the centre of the
>>ultra-Orthodox community of Hasidic Jews in Stamford Hill,
>>North London, where details of the unprecedented investigation
>>has caused consider-able anger.
>>
>>At the home he shares with his wife Esther and their daughter,
>>Kritzler protested his innocence and said he would fight
>>to clear his name.
>>
>>’This investigation is without foundation and is a complete
>>waste of taxpayers’ money,’ he insisted. ‘All of our finances
>>are in good order. There has been no fraud.
>>
>>’It may well be that we are the victims of anti-semitism.
>>This seems to be an attack on the law-abiding, decent
>>community which we have here. We just want to be able to
>>get on with our lives in peace.
>>
>>’When we were arrested, a very sick woman was put in a
>>police cell for a night. She was terribly distressed.
>>This should not have been allowed to happen.’
>>
>>Eichenstein was less forthcoming and when approached
>>at his family home, his wife Rivka said: ‘He has no
>>comment to make.’ Eichenstein lists his official home
>>as a rundown flat some three streets from the spacious home
>>where his wife and children live.
>>
>>Partners at the North London chartered accountancy firm
>>which acts as the registered office for the majority of
>>the men’s companies con-firmed that they had been contacted
>>by detectives, and that fraud experts were preparing
>>to examine their records.
>>
>>Fraud investigators are focusing their inquiries on a
>>network of companies and properties associated
>>with the family.
>>
>>All of the properties linked to Kritzler and Eichenstein
>>are within a stone’s throw of each other on the Stamford
>>Hill/Stoke Newington borders. One firm, Acemark Properties
>>Ltd. is listed at Eichenstein’s home.
>>
>>Kritzler has been director of London-based Empire properties
>>since January and Amvex Investments since 1992.
>>
>>The streets of Stamford Hill are an unlikely setting for a
>>major investigation of this kind. The area enjoys a feeling
>>of neighbourly trust long lost in the crime-ridden districts nearby.
>>
>>Police activity is all but non-existent – patrol cars are
>>already overstretched by the criminal activity related
>>to the numerous drug dealers and prostitutes in the
>>southern sector of the Stoke Newington police beat.
>>
>>
>>Both men, together with three women and another man to
>>whom they are related are currently on bail and have to
>>return to Stoke Newington police station at the
>>end of this month.
>>
>>The arrest of the suspects -following simultaneous raids
>>on four houses in April – is seen by Mr Field as the first
>>of a series of high profile swoops by the new DSS team.
>>
>>Ministers have decided that they want to ‘name and shame’
>>convicted benefit cheats in an attempt to foster a
>>’revival of common decencies’.
>>
>>The pilot DSS task force was set up to target organised
>>housing benefit rackets in London – an initiative which
>>the Government now plans to extend right across the country.
>>
>>The team discovered that professional crooks were exploiting
>>loopholes in welfare security to set up fictitious
>>identities and make bogus claims for a wide range of
>>benefit allowances in various parts of London and
>>other cities in Britain.
>>
>>Mr Field is determined to crack down on an area of crime
>>bleeding tens of millions of pounds each week.
>>
>>The Minister said: ‘We are going for the big boys, while
>>at the same time recognising that we have to bring in much
>>tighter controls on what is the single biggest budget in
>>Britain today.’
>>
>>He has admitted that the annual benefits bill of nearly £31
>>billion remains wide open to fraud and corruption despite
>>repeated attempts by Whitehall to crack down on the swindlers.
-88-

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:52:34 EDT 1998
Article: 41792 of soc.culture.ukrainian
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.australian,aus.general
Subject: Jew Question=Jew Problem
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:48:37 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.cmc.net!syix.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!207.136.66.98!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.en.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.russian:93621 soc.culture.polish:119974 soc.culture.ukrainian:41792 soc.culture.palestine:52600 soc.culture.australian:77621 aus.general:35523

It appears that the Jew retard Yehudah Yeraslasky, who may be related
to former Soviet KGB staff, just can not read, or write in English,
even though he was at one time a student at Simon Fraser University in
canada, according to prior articles exposing him…
That is why is no longer posting from the school, since they took care
of it…

On Tue, 28 Apr 1998 15:09:42 -0600, [email protected] wrote:

>[email protected] reported::

>: You are too polite. The liar Igal just wants to malign the good people
>: of Poland, which is typical of disinformation by the KGB!!!

>: What can one expect from Yehudah Yeraslavsky, a student at Simon
>: Fraser U, allegedly from former Soviet KGB Jews???

>: To tell the truth?? LOFL

On 22 Jul 1998 20:05:46 GMT, [email protected] (Piotr Trela)
wrote:

>[email protected] wrote:
>
>: Dear Leszek, you position is exactly “my position”. Unfortunately, the
>: position of Mr. Miroslav Goldberg is very close to old and mistaken behaviour
>: of so-call “galut Jews”. We – modern Jewish warriors decent of David and
>: “Shlomo Melech” are very different from so-call “galut Jews” representative
>: here by Mr. Goldberg.
>
>I must agree – Mr Goldberg IS very different from the person who
>deliberately falsifies a “Daily Telegraph” article so he can insinuate
>Polish origin of an anti-Jewish terrorist; who, when caught red-handed
>on the forgery, never apologizes; and who signs his posts as I=P.
>
>:I=P
>
>——————–
>Piotr Trela

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:54:01 EDT 1998
Article: 186816 of soc.culture.malaysia
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.indonesia,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.asean,soc.culture.arab-league
Subject: Re: Gays take Malaysian PM to task
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:58:45 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 74
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.malaysia:186816 soc.culture.palestine:52548 soc.culture.indonesia:118818 soc.culture.australian:77560 soc.culture.asean:23187

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 18:12:42 GMT, sbjarnason who prefers faggots
wrote:

Muslim nations seem to have more sense and respect for normal humans,
than do the degenerate JEW run countries.

The only good faggot is a cremated one, whether dead or otherwise!!!

Immolate yourself, and then try to talk, if you can comprehend.

On Wed, 30 Sep 1998 16:00:05 +0700, Bigger
wrote:

>Who gives a shite about major religions now? They are expiring in a couple of years
>and already smell.
>
>We got no time to make our way through 640 pages of crap. Check
>http://www.virusmyth.com for the truth about HIV/AIDS! Provided that your English is
>good enough to get beyond the front page.
>
>In the most advanced countries of the world: in Northern Europe, Northern America,
>Australia and NZ homosexuality is largely tolerated and even homosexual marriages,
>children adoption and many other issues are legalised.
>
>How much longer will M’sia and S’pore stick with an obviously outdated British law
>that is renounced and abolished by the British themselves? Scavenging on others’
>legal excrement won’t do you any good!
>
>Knowing a smattering of manufacturing and finance does NOT make you an advanced or
>developed nation. High time to change your obsolete mentality and step forward in
>the human evolution.
>
>
>
>[email protected] wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Sep 1998 13:27:56 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> >[email protected] wrote:
>> >> I respect your opinion but as you see, such act is against our Eastern as
>> >> well as Islamic culture especially in Malaysia which is considered an Islamic
>> >> country. Even other religions like Buddhism, Christianity & others prohibits
>> >> such act of the gays & lesbians.
>> >
>> >> Therefore, it is not appropriate to allow such homosexual conduct to be
>> >> allowed in Malaysia.
>>
>> Not only are the perverted criminal activities of faggots condemned by
>> all major religions, but it is well documented that AIDS was spread
>> worldwide by faggots!!!
>>
>> Read the documentary book of 640 pages entitled “AND THE BAND PLAYED
>> ON”.
>>
>> It gives all the specifics about how AIDS was deliberately spread
>> worldwide by the criminal perverts.
>>
>> The only good faggot is a cremated one!!!
>> >
>> >Well, when I was growing up in my small town, people were much more tolerant
>> >of homosexuals. They were considered more of an oddity, more of a source of
>> >amusamusement, rather than the currently fashionable subject of National
>> >Morality Scrutiny.
>> >
>> >There can be no persecution of homosexuals under the pretext of ‘appropriate
>> >behaviour’.
>> >
>> > Subir De.
>> >
>> >—–== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==—–
>> >http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:54:01 EDT 1998
Article: 187884 of soc.culture.malaysia
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.lebanon,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.malaysia
Subject: Nazi — Jew Zionist Collaboration
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:09:52 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 846
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!netnews.com!feed.nntp.acc.ca!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.lebanon:59819 soc.culture.palestine:52599 soc.culture.malaysia:187884

On Wed, 16 Sep 1998 07:08:13 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
in between cheating JEWS and non-Jews with a tax fraud in Canada and
the USA, as mentioned by others who documented this:

On 13 Sep 1998 16:52:11 GMT, [email protected] (BUSHBADEE) wrote:
>What is really almost as unbelieveable is the documented fact by a Brazilian
>Professor, that I am a kleptomaniacal
>child molester and I’m serving a 99 year to life sentence in a Romanian prison
>for jerking myself into insenility.
>The professor writes that the above has a IQ of 35 and is barely able to
>communicat

On Sat, 15 Aug 1998 18:45:47 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On Fri, 03 Jul 1998 15:00:35 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>On 3 Jul 1998 06:38:05 GMT, wrote:
>>
>>>Orest Slepokura wrote:
>>
>>>>…fully documented *Perfidy* blatantly exposes the degree to which
>>>> Zionists cooperated in the persecution of their fellow Jews…
>>
>>Her is more evidence of NAZI-ZIONIST JEW COLLABORATION.
>>
>>The Kastner Case
>>
>>
>>The most notorious case of Nazi-Zionist collaboration is that
>>involving
>>a Jew – Rudolf Kastner.
>>
>>Most Jewish people have never heard of Rudolf Kastner. Those who have,
>>are
>>generally under the impression that there is some ‘controversy’ about
>>negotiations he undertook for ‘the purchase of Jewish lives for money
>>and
>>military equipment’, but that he was ‘fully rehabilitated’ by the
>>Supreme
>>Court of Israel.
>>
>> The Accusations
>>
>>Briefly, the accusations against Kastner are as follows:
>>
>>Dr. Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British
>>Medical
>>Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz. In his
>>memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he
>>wrote:
>>
>>I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse
>>certain
>>Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war.
>>
>>This group of quislings knew what was happening to their brethren in
>>Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their own lives with the price of
>>silence.
>>Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke for all
>>Jews
>>in Hungary. While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the
>>number is
>>still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the exterminations.
>>I took these terrible statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I
>>was
>>able to give Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that
>>Eichmann
>>planned to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner
>>went
>>to Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my
>>choice and I shall keep quiet.’
>>
>>Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and
>>took
>>him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid
>>bargaining
>>end there. Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this
>>little
>>fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany
>>collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…(Ben Hecht, Perfidy,
>>pp261-2)
>>
>>These accusations are confirmed by the ‘Eichmann Confessions’
>>published in
>>Life magazine, 28 November and 5 December 1960:
>>
>>I resolved to show how well a job could be done when the commander
>>stands
>>100% behind it. By shipping the Jews off in a lightning operation, I
>>wanted
>>to set an example for future campaigns elsewhere…In obedience to
>>Himmler’s directive I now concentrated on negotiations with the Jewish
>>political officials in Budapest…Among them Dr. Rudolph Kastner,
>>authorized representative of the Zionist Movement. This Dr. Kastner
>>was a
>>young man about my age, an ice-cold lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He
>>agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation – and even
>>keep
>>order in the collection camps – if I could close my eyes and let a few
>>hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine.
>>It
>>was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price was not
>>too
>>high for me.
>>
>>We trusted each other perfectly. When he was with me, Kastner smoke
>>cigarets as though he was in a coffeehouse. While we talked he would
>>smoke
>>one aromatic cigaret after another, taking them from a silver case and
>>lighting them with a silver lighter. With his great polish and reserve
>>he
>>would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.
>>
>>Dr. Kastner’s main concern was to make it possible for a select group
>>of
>>Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel…
>>
>>As a matter of fact, there was a very strong similarity between our
>>attitudes in the S.S. and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic
>>Zionist leaders. I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a
>>thousand
>>or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political goal ‘You
>>can
>>have the others’, he would say, ‘but let me have this group here’. And
>>because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping keep the
>>deportation
>>camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape. After all, I was not
>>concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews…That was the
>>’gentleman’s agreement’ I had with Kastner (Hecht, ibid., p.260-61)
>>
>>Quite clearly these accusations, do not relate merely to ‘the purchase
>>of
>>Jewish lives for money and military equipment’.
>>
>>Are the accusations against Kastner true?
>>
>>According to the Government of Israel, they are a lie. When Malchiel
>>Greenwald, a strongly pro-Zionist Israeli citizen published these
>>accusations against Kastner, the Israeli Government did rather more
>>than
>>demand that his views should not be broadcast. Because a prominent
>>Zionist
>>official (Dr. Kastner was a spokesman for the Ministry of Trade and
>>Industry) was involved, the Attorney General of the State of Israel
>>prosecuted Greenwald for criminal libel.
>>
>> The Verdict
>>
>>Let the verdict of Judge Benjamin Halevi (who later became one of the
>>panel
>>of three judges that tried Eichmann) in Israel’s District Court of
>>Jerusalem speak for itself, given in criminal case No. 124 of 1953.
>>The
>>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald. This material should be
>>studied
>>carefully.
>>
>>The masses of Jews from Hungary’s ghettos obediently boarded the
>>deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of
>>confidence
>>in the false information that they were being transferred to
>>Kenyermeze.
>>
>>The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had
>>they
>>not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
>>
>>The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
>>rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and
>>others
>>used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the
>>Jews.
>>They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help
>>of
>>Jewish leaders.
>>
>>The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local
>>leaders
>>of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were
>>spreading
>>such false information and did not protest.
>>
>>Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
>>persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local ‘rescue work’.
>>
>>The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of
>>knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be
>>deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain
>>quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or
>>hampering
>>the deportation orders.
>>
>>Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few
>>dozen
>>police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attempt to overpower
>>these few
>>guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance activities to the
>>deportations were organized in these ghettos.
>>
>>And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the
>>Jews in
>>the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities.
>>
>>The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of
>>Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn
>>their
>>own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish leaders
>>who
>>did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of
>>deportations…these
>>same leaders did not join the people of their community in their ride
>>to
>>Auschwitz, but were all included in the Rescue train.
>>
>>The Nazi organizers of extermination and the perpetrators of
>>extermination
>>permitted Rudolf Kastner and the members of the Jewish Council in
>>Budapest
>>to save themselves, their relatives, and friends. The Nazis did this
>>as a
>>means of making the local Jewish leaders, whom they favoured,
>>dependent on
>>the Nazi regime, dependent on its good will during the time of its
>>fatal
>>deportation schedule. In short, the Nazis succeeded in bringing the
>>Jewish
>>leaders into collaboration with the Nazis at the time of the
>>catastrophe.
>>
>>The Nazi chiefs knew that the Zionists were a most vital element in
>>Jewry
>>and the most trusted by the Jews.
>>
>>The personality of Rudolph Kastner made him a convenient catspaw for
>>Eichmann and his clique, to draw into collaboration and make their
>>task
>>easier.
>>
>>The question here is not, as stated by the Attorney General in his
>>summation, whether members of the Jewish Rescue Committee were or were
>>not capable of fulfilling their duty without the patronage of the S.S.
>>
>>chiefs.
>>It is obvious that without such S.S. Nazi patronage the Jewish Rescue
>>Committee could not have existed, and could have acted only as an
>>underground.
>>
>>The question is, as put by the lawyer for the defense, why were the
>>Nazis
>>interested in the existence of the Rescue Committee? Why did the S.S.
>>chiefs make every effort to encourage the existence of the Jewish
>>Rescue
>>Committee? Did the exterminators turn into rescuers?
>>
>>The same question rises concerning the rescue of prominent Jews by
>>these
>>German killers of Jews. Was the rescue of such Jews a part of the
>>extermination plan of the killers ?
>>
>>The support given by the extermination leaders to Kastner’s Rescue
>>Committee proves that indeed there was a place for Kastner and his
>>friends
>>in their Final Solution for the Jews of Hungary – their total
>>annihilation.
>>
>>The Nazi’s patronage of Kastner, and their agreement to let him save
>>six
>>hundred prominent Jews, were part of the plan to exterminate the Jews.
>>Kastner was given a chance to add a few more to that number. The bait
>>attracted him. The opportunity of rescuing prominent people appealed
>>to him
>>greatly. He considered the rescue of the most important Jews as a
>>great
>>personal success and a success for Zionism. It was a success that
>>would
>>also justify his conduct – his political negotiation with Nazis and
>>the
>>Nazi patronage of his committee.
>>
>>When Kastner received this present from the Nazis, Kastner sold his
>>soul to
>>the German Satan.
>>
>>The sacrifice of the vital interests of the majority of the Jews, in
>>order
>>to rescue the prominents, was the basic element in the agreement
>>between
>>Kastner and the Nazis. This agreement fixed the division of the nation
>>into
>>two unequal camps: a small fragment of prominents, whom the Nazis
>>promised
>>Kastner to save, on the one hand, and the great majority or Hungarian
>>Jews
>>whom the Nazis designated for death, on the other hand. An imperative
>>condition for the rescue of the first camp by the Nazis was that
>>Kastner
>>will not interfere in the action of the Nazis against the other camp
>>and
>>will not hamper them in its extermination. Kastner fulfilled this
>>condition. He concentrated his efforts in the rescue of the prominents
>>and
>>treated the camp of the doomed as if they had already been wiped out
>>from
>>the book of the living.
>>
>>One cannot estimate the damage caused by Kastner’s collaboration and
>>put
>>down the number of victims which it cost Hungarian Jews. These are not
>>only
>>the thousands of Jews in Nodvarod or any other community in the border
>>area, Jews who could escape through the border, had the chief of their
>>rescue committee fulfilled his duty toward them.
>>
>>All of Kastner’s answers in his final testimony were a constant effort
>>to
>>evade this truth.
>>
>>Kastner has tried to escape through every crack he could find in the
>>wall
>>of evidence. When one crack was sealed in his face, he darted quickly
>>to
>>another. (Judgement of Judge Benjamin Halevi, Criminal Case 124/53;
>>Attorney General v. Malchiel Greenwald, District Court, Jerusalem,
>>June 22,
>>1955).
>>
>>Judge Halevi reverts to the meeting of Kastner with the S.S. officers
>>Becher and Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz at the time when the
>>’new
>>line’ of rescuing Jews was revealed by Hoess. He says:
>>
>>From this gathering in Budapest, it is obvious that the ‘new line’
>>stretched from Himmler to Hoess, from Jutner to Becher and Krumey.
>>
>>According to Kastner, however, these Nazis were all active in rescuing
>>Jews.
>>
>>This meeting of these important German guests in Budapest exposes the
>>’rescue’ work of Becher in its true light. It reveals also the extent
>>of
>>Kastner’s involvement in the inner circle of the chief German war
>>criminals.
>>
>>Just as the Nazi war criminals knew they needed an alibi and hoped to
>>achieve it by the rescue of a few Jews at the eleventh hour, so
>>Kastner
>>also needed an alibi for himself.
>>
>>Collaboration between the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee and the
>>Exterminators of the Jews was solidified in Budapest and Vienna.
>>Kastner’s
>>duties were part and parcel of the general duties of the S.S.
>>
>>In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department,
>>the
>>Nazi S.S. opened a Rescue Department headed by Kastner.
>>
>>All these extermination, robbery and rescue activities of the S.S.
>>were
>>coordinated under the management of Heinrich Himmler”.
>>
>>Judge Halevi continues:
>>
>>Kastner perjured himself knowingly in his testimony before this court
>>when
>>he denied he had interceded in Becher’s behalf. Moreover, he concealed
>>the
>>important fact that he interceded for Becher in the name of the Jewish
>>Agency and the Jewish World Congress.
>>
>>As to the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, it was enough for the
>>defense to
>>provide Becher was a war criminal. It was up to the prosecution to
>>remove
>>Becher from this status, if they wished to negate the affidavit.
>>
>>The Attorney General admitted in his summation that Becher was a war
>>criminal.
>>
>>The lies in the contents of Kastner’s affidavit, the lies in his
>>testimony
>>concerning the document, and Kastner’s knowing participation in the
>>activities of Nazi war criminals, and his participation in the last
>>minute
>>fake rescue activities – all these combine to show one overwhelming
>>truth –
>>that this affidavit was not given in good faith.
>>
>>Kastner knew well, as he himself testified, that Becher had never
>>stood up
>>against the stream of Jewish extermination, as Kastner has declared in
>>the
>>affidavit.
>>
>>The aims of Becher and his superior, Himmler, were not to save Jews
>>but to
>>serve the Nazi regime with full compliance. These is not truth and no
>>good
>>faith in Kastner’s testimony, ‘I never doubted for one moment the good
>>intention of good Becher’.
>>
>>It is clear that the positive recommendation by Kastner, not only in
>>his
>>own name but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish
>>World
>>Congress was of decisive importance for Becher. Kastner did not
>>exaggerate
>>when he said that Becher was released by the Allies because of his
>>personal
>>intervention. The lies in the affidavit of Kastner and the
>>contradictions
>>and various pretexts, which were proven to be lies, were sufficient to
>>annul the value of his statements and to prove that there was no good
>>faith
>>in his testimony in favor of this German war criminal. Kastner’s
>>affidavit
>>in favor of Becher was a wilfully false affidavit given in favor of a
>>war
>>criminal to save him from trial and punishment in Nuremberg.
>>
>>Therefore, the defendant, Malchiel Greenwald, was correct in his
>>accusations against Rudolf Kastner in the first, second and fourth of
>>his
>>statements.”
>>
>>Judge Halevi’s verdict found Malchiel Greenwald generally innocent of
>>libel
>>against Kastner, but fined him one Israeli pound for the one unproved
>>accusation – that Kastner had actually collected money from his Nazi
>>partners for his aide to their slaughter program. The judge also
>>ordered
>>the Government of Israel to pay Greenwald two hundred Israeli pounds
>>as
>>court costs.
>>
>>If the story ended there, it would only prove conclusively that the
>>individual Kastner was a collaborator and the Israeli Government had
>>attempted to defend him, although facts brought out in the trial
>>pointed to
>>much more than that.
>>
>>But the story does not end there.
>>
>>The Reaction
>>The Communist Party newspaper Kol Ha’am (Voice of the People) wrote:
>>
>>All those whose relatives were butchered by the Germans in Hungary
>>know now
>>clearly that Jewish hands helped the mass murder” (23 June 1955)
>>
>>But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing
>>Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the
>>Government of Israel.
>>
>>As the evening paper *Yedi’ot Aharonot* said:
>>
>>If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total
>>political and national collapse – as a result of what such a trial may
>>disclose.” (23 June 1955)
>>
>>Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial,
>>instead
>>it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for criminal
>>libel.
>>
>>At 11 P.M. the verdict was given. At 11 A.M. next morning the
>>government
>>announces the defense of Kastner will be renewed – an appeal filed.
>>What
>>exemplary expediency! Since when does this government possess such
>>lawyer-genius who can weigh in one night the legal chances of an
>>appeal on
>>a detailed, complex verdict of three hundred pages?
>>
>>At the appeal hearings before the Supreme Court, the Attorney General
>>of
>>Israel, Chaim Cohen, explained clearly why the Government of Israel
>>was
>>defending Kastner so strongly:
>>
>>The man Kastner does not stand here as a private individual. He was a
>>recognized representative, official or non-official of the Jewish
>>National
>>Institutes in Palestine and of the Zionist Executive; and I come here
>>in
>>this court to defend the representative of our national institutions.”
>>(Hecht, p. 268)
>>
>>The truth of this statement cannot be denied. Kastner’s collaboration
>>was
>>not that of an individual. It was the collaboration of the Zionist
>>leadership.
>>
>>So far, it has only been established that the Government of Israel
>>continued to support a Nazi collaborator after the facts about his
>>collaboration had been conclusively established in an Israeli court.
>>But
>>the story gets worse.
>>
>>The Supreme Court of Israel unanimously found that Becher was indeed a
>>
>>Nazi war criminal and that Kastner had without justification, and in
>>the
>>name
>>of the Jewish Agency, helped Becher to escape justice. On this point
>>Greenwald was acquitted of libel and Kastner was not ‘fully
>>rehabilitated’.
>>
>>The Supreme Court also accepted the facts established in the lower
>>court –
>>that Kastner deliberately concealed the truth about Auschwitz from the
>>majority of Hungarian Jews in exchange for Nazi permission to take a
>>thousand or so to Palestine. Again, Kastner was far from being ‘fully
>>rehabilitated’.
>>
>>
>>But now comes the really nasty bit. After unanimously acknowledging
>>these
>>facts, the Supreme Court of Israel, by a majority of three to two,
>>found
>>that Kastner’s actions were morally justifiable and convicted
>>Greenwald of
>>criminal libel for calling this ‘collaboration’.
>>
>>Kastner’s actions only proved that he was a Nazi collaborator. It is
>>the
>>defense of these actions by the Government and Courts of Israel that
>>prove
>>conclusively that Zionism approves of Nazi collaboration.
>>
>>The majority of the Supreme Court of Israel did not rehabilitate
>>Kastner.
>>They joined him.
>>
>>Let us read from the majority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Shlomo
>>Chesin:
>>
>>….What point was there in telling the people boarding the trains in
>>Kluj,
>>people struck by fate and persecuted, as to what awaits them at the
>>end of
>>their journey…Kastner spoke in detail of the situation, saying, ‘The
>>Hungarian Jew was a branch which long ago dried up on the tree’. This
>>vivid
>>description coincides with the testimony of another witness about the
>>Hungarian Jews, ‘This was a big Jewish community in Hungary, without
>>any
>>ideological Jewish backbone’ (Moshe Shweiger, a Kastner aide in
>>Budapest,
>>protocol 465).
>>
>>I fully agree with my friend, Judge Agranot, when he states that, ‘The
>>Jews
>>of Hungary, including those in the countryside, were not capable,
>>neither
>>physically nor mentally, to carry out resistance operations with force
>>against the deportation scheme’…From this point of view no rescue
>>achievement could have resulted by disclosing the Auschwitz news to
>>the
>>Jewish leaders there, and this is a consideration which on can
>>properly
>>conclude that Kastner had in front of his eyes.
>>
>>….And I take one more step. I am certain that the silence of Kastner
>>when
>>he arrived in Kluj was premeditated and calculated and did not result
>>from
>>his great despair because of the helplessness of the Jewish community.
>>Even
>>then, I say, this is still not considered wilful collaboration and
>>assistance in the extermination, because all the signs indicate that
>>Kastner’s efforts were aimed at rescue and rescue on a big scale…And
>>towards the end I take one last step. In doing so I go very far and
>>say
>>that even if Kastner ordered himself to keep silent knowingly, in
>>submission to the strong will of the Nazis, in order to save a few
>>Jews
>>from Hell – this is still no proof that he stained his hands by
>>collaborating with the enemies of his people and carrying out their
>>plan to
>>exterminate most of the Jewish community in Hungary.
>>
>>Even if, through these activities of his – or rather, his omission –
>>the
>>extermination became easier. And as to the moral issue, the question
>>is not
>>whether a man is allowed to kill many in order to save a few, or
>>vice-versa. The question is altogether in another sphere and should be
>>defined as follows: A man is aware that a whole community is awaiting
>>its
>>doom. He is allowed to make efforts to save a few, although part of
>>his
>>efforts involve concealment of truth from the many or should he
>>disclose
>>the truth to many though it is his best opinion that this way
>>everybody
>>will perish. I think that the answer is clear. What good will the
>>blood of
>>the few bring if everybody is to perish?…As I said, I am not arguing
>>with
>>the basic factual findings of the learned President of the Jewish
>>District
>>Court (Judge Halevi) but it seems to me, with all due respect, that
>>his
>>findings do not, as of necessity, demand the conclusion he has arrived
>>at.
>>That is to say, collaboration on the part of Kastner in the
>>extermination
>>of the Jews. And that they better coincide with bad leadership both
>>from a
>>moral and public point of view…
>>
>>In my opinion, one can say outright that if you find out that Kastner
>>collaborated with the enemy because he did not disclose to the people
>>who
>>boarded the trains in Kluj that they were being led to extermination,
>>one
>>has to put on trial today Danzig, Herman, Hanzi, Brand, Revis and
>>Marton,
>>and many more leaders and half-leaders who gagged themselves in an
>>hour of
>>crisis and did not inform others of what was known to them and did not
>>warn
>>and did not cry out of the coming danger….
>>
>>Because of all this I cannot confirm the conclusion of the District
>>Court
>>with regard to the accusation that Greenwald has thrown on Kastner of
>>collaboration with the Nazis in exterminating the Jewish people in
>>Hungary
>>during the last war.” (Hecht, ibid., pp.270-2)
>>
>>In other words, the Court approved of Kastner’s contempt for the
>>Hungarian
>>Jews and could not allow him to be condemned for doing exactly what
>>many
>>other Zionist leaders had half-leaders did – concealing their
>>knowledge of
>>the Nazi extermination plans so that Jews would board the trains to
>>Auschwitz peacefully while their Zionist ‘leaders’ boarded a different
>>train for Palestine.
>>
>>The most precise answer to this sickening judgement of Judge Chesin is
>>
>>provided in the minority judgement of Supreme Court Judge Moshe
>>Silberg:
>>
>>I do not say that he was the only man who possessed information among
>>the
>>leaders. It is quite possible that somebody else as well does not have
>>a
>>clear conscience with regards to this concealment. But we are dealing
>>here
>>with the guilt of Kastner and we do not have to make judgements on the
>>guilt of others….
>>
>>The declaration of the learned Attorney General therefore shrinks into
>>an
>>opinion….’Kastner was convinced and believed that there was no ray
>>of
>>hope for the Jews of Hungary, almost for none of them, and as he, as a
>>result of his personal despair, did not disclose the secret of the
>>extermination in order not to endanger or frustrate the rescue of the
>>few –
>>therefore he acted in good faith and should not be accused of
>>collaborating
>>with the Nazis in expediting the extermination of the Jews, even
>>though, in
>>fact, he brought about its result.’
>>
>>I am compelled to state that it is very difficult for me to conceive
>>such
>>an intention. Is this good faith? Can a single man, even in
>>cooperation
>>with some of his friends, yield to despair on behalf and without the
>>knowledge of 800,000 other people? This is, in my opinion, the
>>decisive
>>consideration in the problem facing us. The charge emanating from the
>>testimony of the witnesses against Kastner is that had they known of
>>the
>>Auschwitz secret, then thousands or tens of thousands would have been
>>able
>>to save their lives by local, partial, specific or indirect rescue
>>operations like local revolts, resistance, escapes, hidings,
>>concealment of
>>children with Gentiles, forging of documents, ransom money, bribery,
>>etc. –
>>and when this is the case and when one deals with many hundreds of
>>thousands, how does a human being, a mortal, reject with complete
>>certainty
>>and with an extreme ‘no’ the efficiency of all the many and varied
>>rescue
>>ways? How can he examine the tens of thousands of possibilities? Does
>>he
>>decide instead of God? Indeed, he who can act with such a usurpation
>>of the
>>last hope of hundreds of thousands is not entitled to claim good faith
>>as
>>his defense. The penetrating question quo warrento is a good answer to
>>a
>>claim of such good faith…
>>
>>If the superintendent of a big hospital lets thousands of sick people
>>die
>>so that he may devote himself to the sure rescue of one soul, he will
>>come
>>out guilty, at least morally, even if it is proven that he as an
>>individual
>>erroneously thought that there was no hope of saving the other
>>patients. He
>>is a collaborator with the angel of death.
>>
>>Either a complete atrophy of the soul or a blind involvement with
>>complete
>>loss of senses and proportion in his small but personal rescue
>>operation
>>could bring a man to such a gigantic, hazardous play.
>>
>>And if all this is not enough to annul the claim of good faith which
>>was
>>put before us on behalf of Kastner by the Attorney General, then
>>Kastner
>>himself comes and annuls it altogether. Not only did he never make
>>this
>>claim, but his own words prove the contrary. He writes in his report
>>to the
>>Jewish Agency that the Committee sent emissaries to many ghettos in
>>the
>>countryside and pleaded with them to organize escapes and to refuse to
>>board the trains. And though the story of these pleadings is untrue,
>>and
>>the silence of Kastner in Kluj is proven, the very uttering of these
>>statements entirely contradicts the claim that Kastner had concealed
>>the
>>news about the fate of the ghetto inmates in good faith and only as a
>>result of his complete despairing of the chances of escaping or
>>resisting
>>the Germans. You can not claim at the same time helplessness and
>>activity.
>>Anyway, such a claim is not convincing…
>>
>>We can sum up with three facts:
>>
>>A. That the Nazis didn’t want to have a great revolt – nor small
>>revolts,
>>and their passion was to have the extermination machine working
>>smoothly without resistance. This fact was known to Kastner from
>>the best source – from Eichmann himself – And he had additional proofs
>>of
>>that when he witnessed all the illusionary and misleading tactics
>>which
>>were being taken by the Nazis from the first moment of occupation.
>>
>>B. That the most efficient means to paralyze the resistance with – or
>>the
>>escape of a victim is to conceal from him the plot of the coming
>>murder.
>>This fact is known to every man and one does not need any proof of
>>evidence for this.
>>
>>C. That he, Kastner, in order to carry out the rescue plan for the few
>>prominents, fulfilled knowingly and without good faith the said desire
>>of
>>the Nazis, thus expediting the work of exterminating the masses.
>>
>>And also the rescue of Becher by Kastner…He who is capable of
>>rescuing
>>this Becher from hanging proves that the atrocities of this great war
>>criminal were not so horrifying or despicable in his eyes…I couldn’t
>>base
>>the main guilt of Kastner on this fact had it been alone, but when it
>>is
>>attached even from afar to the whole scene of events it throws
>>retroactive
>>light on the whole affair and serves as a dozen proofs of our
>>conclusion.”(Supreme Court Judge, Moshe Silberg, 1957)
>>
>>
>>If that had been the majority judgement, one could say that whatever
>>their
>>attitudes to the Arabs, and whatever their past behaviour might have
>>been
>>under pressure, the Zionist leadership today did not advocate
>>collaboration
>>with the Nazis.
>>
>>But Judge Silberg’s judgement was that of a minority.
>>
>>The Kastner case is therefore not an alleged episode in past history.
>>
>>It is a continuing controversy in which the top Zionist leadership of
>>Israel stand indicted of continuing to publicly defend collaboration
>>with
>>the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.
>>
>>Despite the unanimous finding of the Supreme Court of Israel that Kurt
>>Becher was a major war criminal, the Jewish Agency (World Zionist
>>Organization) refused to withdraw the fraudulent certificate Kastner
>>gave
>>on their behalf, which saved Becher from hanging, and allowed him to
>>remain
>>a free man in West Germany, the head of several corporations and with
>>an
>>estimated personal worth of $30 million.
>>
>>Becher has even used his certification as a ‘good’ SS officer to give
>>evidence in support of his associates at other war crimes trials in
>>West
>>Germany.
>>
>>Since the prosecution, representing the Israeli Government agreed with
>>the
>>Supreme Court that Becher was a major war criminal, one can only
>>pressure
>>that the Israeli Government did not want him put on trial for fear of
>>what
>>might come out.
>>
>>Likewise, none of Kastner’s associates on the Zionist Relief and
>>Rescue
>>Committee or his bosses in the Jewish Agency have ever been put on
>>trial .
>>Let alone the hundreds of ‘prominents’ who helped Kastner to reassure
>>the
>>Hungarian Jews that they were going to Kenyermeze and not Auschwitz,
>>in exchange for tickets on the one train that took them eventually to
>>Palestine.
>>
>>As for Kastner himself, he will cause no further embarrassment to the
>>Zionist leadership with his undisputed claims that everything he did
>>was
>>approved by the Jewish Agency (World Zionist Organization) leadership
>>in
>>Palestine. He is ‘now dead’. Or putting it less delicately, on 3 March
>>1957
>>he was shot by Zeev Eckstein – immediately after the appeal hearings
>>were
>>concluded, and before the judgement ‘rehabilitating’ him was
>>delivered.
>>Eckstein was not a Hungarian avenger. He was a paid undercover agent
>>of the
>>Israeli secret service. (Hecht, ibid., p.208). Another ‘fantastic
>>allegation’ no doubt; but admitted in court during the murder trial).

sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:54:02 EDT 1998
Article: 187990 of soc.culture.malaysia
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.cmc.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!192.26.210.166!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!feed.nntp.acc.ca!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.lebanon
Subject: INTERPOL wants Jewish war criminal.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:44:12 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:119985 soc.culture.russian:93625 soc.culture.malaysia:187990 soc.culture.palestine:52605 soc.culture.swiss:26951 soc.culture.lebanon:59823

On Wed, 12 Aug 1998 16:13:12 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On 02 May 1998 16:44:09 GMT, [email protected] (Pan Janusz) wrote:
>
>>Translated from Polish:
>
>>Reprinted from “Polish Weekly” published in Australia.
>
>>Office of the Provincial Prosecutor in Katowice issued the extradition papers
>>for war criminal Samuel Morel. Polish authorities will ask authorities in
>>Israel to extradite Morel.
>>Morel is accused of “cruel treatment and tortures of prisoners and jeopardizing
>>their safety and health.” Using common language, between years 1945-1950 he was
>>beating prisoners, torturing and killing them.
>
>>Morel was born in 1919, from 1940 was a member of Jewish band which was
>>assaulting Polish villages in province of Kielce and robbing Polish farmers. In
>>December of 1942 during one of their assaults the band was destroyed by a
>>detachment of People’s Army ( communist guerillas in nazi occupied Poland).
>>Father and brother of Morel were executed, he alone became a member of the
>>People’s Army. He defected from the group when Red Army was inching toward
>>province of Kielce and became a member of Soviet guerillas.
>>Soon he became an officer of UB (communist Security Office in Soviet occupied
>>Poland).
>>In the beginning of 1945 he was sent to the region of Silesia and received the
>>nomination on the camp commandant for Germans in Swietochlowice.
>> About his crime committed in this camp wrote, among others, an American
>>journalist John Sack in his book “Eye for an eye” ( for this book John Sack who
>>is a Jew was decalred an antisemite).
>>In the end of December of 1945 Morel had been transferred and became a warden
>>of the UB prison in Opole. There he tortured Poles and Germans. He also
>>tortured minors in the labor camp in Jaworzno which he was a commandant between
>>1946-1950. He was fired from this post, for mortality among prisoners was too
>>big.
>
>>In 1991 he was interviewed by a prosecutor, panicked and fled to Israel.
>>After spending all his money, within few months he returned to Poland, but soon
>>he surfaced in Sweden where he demanded political asylum argumenting that he
>>was persecuted in Poland because he was a Jew. His plea was rejected and Morel
>>again came back to Poland.
>>On 10th of July Office of the Provincial Prosecutor in Katowice issued arrest
>>warrant. They were late. Morel again fled to Israel.
>>His retirement pention is being picked up by the wife of the criminal.
>>Since 1996 Morel is on the most wanted list of the INTERPOL.
>>According to international law he should be arrested by Israeli police and
>>charged by Israel with war crimes.
>>He should…..
>
>>Translated by Janusz Styber
>

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 14:56:53 EDT 1998
Article: 9717 of pl.regionalne.warszawa
Path: hub.org!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.swiss
Subject: Re: Jews DID CONTROL Communism – documented by them…
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 19:56:08 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 241
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx02-port-58.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:119709 soc.culture.australian:77561 soc.culture.russian:93485 soc.culture.ukrainian:41761 soc.culture.baltics:15282 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9717 soc.culture.swiss:26936

On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 18:22:38 GMT, sbjarnason trying desperately to
stimule more discussion wrote:

On 23 Jun 1998 00:27:52 GMT, [email protected] (Daniel Swan)
wrote:

>steve mock ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>: What you constantly fail to grasp, Tavish, is that no one is denying that there were people of Jewish ancestry among
>: the Bolsheviks, or even that there weren’t quite a few people of Jewish ancestry among the Bolsheviks. What you
>: completely and utterly fail to understand is how collossal the leap of logic is which you ask us to make from that fact
>: to the conclusion that Bolshevism is some kind of a Jewish plot for which Jews bear collective responsibility.
>
>Logical leap or not, this raises an interesting question: How
>can the overproportionate Jewish representation among the
>Bolsheviks be accounted for?

Perhaps the following text may help answer your rhetorical question…

Subject: Jews Dominated Bolshevism – Don’t Deny It
From: [email protected] (Roger Hughes)
Date: 22 Jul 1997 12:32:44 GMT
Organization: Anti-Hypocrisy Foundation

Patriot Fact Sheet : The Jews and Bolshevism

One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called
“Russian
Revolution” of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority
of the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to
them, continue to condemn anyone as “anti-Semitic” who brings up these
facts, it remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created
and lead revolutionary movement.

First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism,
Karl Marx,
was a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father’s side.
Whether he was a “religous” Jew is of no significant importance, since
Jewishness is not defined exclusively by adherance to Judaism. A great
bulk of Jews today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but
also nonetheless consider themselves Jews.

While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism,
will
concede that Marx was indeed Jewish, let’s see the them deny the
communist-Jewish connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables
that
passed between American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C.
during the time of the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following
quotes are taken directly from documents available from the U.S.
Archives:

State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: “Jews prominant in local Soviet
government,
anti-Jewish feeling growing among population….”

State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July
5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: “Fifty percent of Soviet government
in
each town consists of Jews of the worst type.”

>From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomey Shuyler: “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it’s
beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type.”

A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports
on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: “…(T)here were
384
`commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22
Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had come
to
Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial
Government.”

With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the
leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.
(Lenin has since been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had
access to the KGB archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon
Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief
of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the
Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central
Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev
(Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the
central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other
prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn),
foreign
affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld)
and
Moisei Uritsky.

David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most
of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care
little
for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are
trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”

The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
“Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”

In case anyone thinks I’ve taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
here’s three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former
superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik
Propaganda
Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary,
United States Senate, 65th Congress:

“We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east
side
of New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American
Pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased
that
there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English
showed that they had not qualified as being Americas. A number of
these
men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element
in
this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that
more than half the agitators in the socalled Bolshevik movement were
Jews…I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that
one
of its bases is found in the east side of New York…The latest
startling information, given me by someone with good authority,
startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in the
northern
community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of the
Soviet
regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)
out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the
exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
Gordon.

I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great
revolution of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing
on
the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I
often remarked to my sister, ‘Well, what are we coming to anyway. This
all looks so Yiddish.’ Up to that time we had see very few Jews,
because
there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in
Petrograd,
but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the
agitators
were Jews.

I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now
that
was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians
did not take kindly to it.”

Some might automatically assume that the preceeding sources are
“anti-Semitic” and therefore unreliable, but they’d be wrong. Here’s a
few Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:

“The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920)

“There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” (Jewish Chronicle, London
April,
4, 1919)

“Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin,
Rabbi
S. Wise, May 5, 1935).

“In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)

Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:

“National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs
characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an
extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death
penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).

While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and
clergymen murdered by Communist gangs, synogoges and rabbis were left
virtually untouched.

It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20
million Ukranian farmers during the 1920’s in one of the most vile
campaigns in history: In (the) Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80
percent
of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an
American professor of Russian history. . . ”

Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85 million persons
were
murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them
directly at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish
Communist bosses.

Regards,
Roger Hughes

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Towards a New Consciousness; a New Order; a New People
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Home


http://www.natvan.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Roger’s Page http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm/
Keep It White Because You Know It’s Right!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Abusive emails will be posted to the Usenet and ridiculed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

sven88

From [email protected] Sat Oct 3 15:00:15 EDT 1998
Article: 15305 of soc.culture.baltics
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!netnews.com!feed.nntp.acc.ca!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.australia,aus.general
Subject: Re: Jew Thieves Scream Anti-Semitism!
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:41:45 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 136
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.ukrainian:41790 soc.culture.baltics:15305 soc.culture.australia:12137 aus.general:35520

On Tue, 29 Sep 1998 14:02:32 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

X-NO-ARCHIVE:YES

On Sun, 06 Sep 1998 06:28:05 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Jun 1998 01:53:37 GMT, NSWPP wrote:
>
>>LARGEST Social Security Fraud in London’s History
>>
>>DAILY MAIL
>>Monday June 15 1998
>>By DAVID WILLIAMS and PETER ALLEN
>>
>>
>>Revealed: The men accused in
>>31.8 million State Benefit Racket
>>
>>THESE are the men being investigated by fraud-busters
>>over an alleged 1.8 million benefits racket. The case was
>>highlighted last month by Welfare Reform Minister Frank
>>Field as part of a crack-down launched by Labour aimed at
>>slashing the £36 billion annual cost of welfare fraud.
>>
>>At the time, no one was named. But the Daily Mail has
>>since tracked down the men at the heart of one of the biggest
>>ever alleged welfare frauds.
>>
>>They are Soloman Kritzler, 39, and Alexander Eichenstein, 38,
>>who are suspected of masterminding the racket from their
>>sprawling homes in a North London suburb.
>>
>>Detectives have questioned the men and four other members of
>>what Mr Field described as ‘an extended family’ about
>>allegations of illegally claiming up to £3,600,000 in housing
>>benefit and income support. They have also been quizzed
>>by officers from a special undercover task force set up by
>>the Department of Social Security (DSS) about a mortgage
>>fraud worth £31.2 million.
>>
>>The investigators are said to be checking on any links with
>>massive welfare rackets in the United States, where members
>>of the family, it has been reported, are alleged to have used
>>fake identities to make bogus benefit claims.
>>
>>Both men hold trusted positions at the centre of the
>>ultra-Orthodox community of Hasidic Jews in Stamford Hill,
>>North London, where details of the unprecedented investigation
>>has caused consider-able anger.
>>
>>At the home he shares with his wife Esther and their daughter,
>>Kritzler protested his innocence and said he would fight
>>to clear his name.
>>
>>’This investigation is without foundation and is a complete
>>waste of taxpayers’ money,’ he insisted. ‘All of our finances
>>are in good order. There has been no fraud.
>>
>>’It may well be that we are the victims of anti-semitism.
>>This seems to be an attack on the law-abiding, decent
>>community which we have here. We just want to be able to
>>get on with our lives in peace.
>>
>>’When we were arrested, a very sick woman was put in a
>>police cell for a night. She was terribly distressed.
>>This should not have been allowed to happen.’
>>
>>Eichenstein was less forthcoming and when approached
>>at his family home, his wife Rivka said: ‘He has no
>>comment to make.’ Eichenstein lists his official home
>>as a rundown flat some three streets from the spacious home
>>where his wife and children live.
>>
>>Partners at the North London chartered accountancy firm
>>which acts as the registered office for the majority of
>>the men’s companies con-firmed that they had been contacted
>>by detectives, and that fraud experts were preparing
>>to examine their records.
>>
>>Fraud investigators are focusing their inquiries on a
>>network of companies and properties associated
>>with the family.
>>
>>All of the properties linked to Kritzler and Eichenstein
>>are within a stone’s throw of each other on the Stamford
>>Hill/Stoke Newington borders. One firm, Acemark Properties
>>Ltd. is listed at Eichenstein’s home.
>>
>>Kritzler has been director of London-based Empire properties
>>since January and Amvex Investments since 1992.
>>
>>The streets of Stamford Hill are an unlikely setting for a
>>major investigation of this kind. The area enjoys a feeling
>>of neighbourly trust long lost in the crime-ridden districts nearby.
>>
>>Police activity is all but non-existent – patrol cars are
>>already overstretched by the criminal activity related
>>to the numerous drug dealers and prostitutes in the
>>southern sector of the Stoke Newington police beat.
>>
>>
>>Both men, together with three women and another man to
>>whom they are related are currently on bail and have to
>>return to Stoke Newington police station at the
>>end of this month.
>>
>>The arrest of the suspects -following simultaneous raids
>>on four houses in April – is seen by Mr Field as the first
>>of a series of high profile swoops by the new DSS team.
>>
>>Ministers have decided that they want to ‘name and shame’
>>convicted benefit cheats in an attempt to foster a
>>’revival of common decencies’.
>>
>>The pilot DSS task force was set up to target organised
>>housing benefit rackets in London – an initiative which
>>the Government now plans to extend right across the country.
>>
>>The team discovered that professional crooks were exploiting
>>loopholes in welfare security to set up fictitious
>>identities and make bogus claims for a wide range of
>>benefit allowances in various parts of London and
>>other cities in Britain.
>>
>>Mr Field is determined to crack down on an area of crime
>>bleeding tens of millions of pounds each week.
>>
>>The Minister said: ‘We are going for the big boys, while
>>at the same time recognising that we have to bring in much
>>tighter controls on what is the single biggest budget in
>>Britain today.’
>>
>>He has admitted that the annual benefits bill of nearly £31
>>billion remains wide open to fraud and corruption despite
>>repeated attempts by Whitehall to crack down on the swindlers.
-88-

From [email protected] Mon Oct 5 03:07:13 EDT 1998
Article: 120254 of soc.culture.polish
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.ukrainian,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: Re: Igal is Polish ! NOT – just another KGB JEW…
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1998 21:06:33 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtntnt4-port-227.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:120254 soc.culture.russian:93759 soc.culture.baltics:15338 soc.culture.ukrainian:41808 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9846

It appears that the Jew retard Yehudah Yeraslasky, who may be related
to former Soviet KGB staff, just can not read, or write in English,
even though he was at one time a student at Simon Fraser University in
canada, according to prior articles exposing him…
That is why is no longer posting from the school, since they took care
of it…

On Tue, 28 Apr 1998 15:09:42 -0600, [email protected] wrote:

>[email protected] reported::

>: You are too polite. The liar Igal just wants to malign the good people
>: of Poland, which is typical of disinformation by the KGB!!!

>: What can one expect from Yehudah Yeraslavsky, a student at Simon
>: Fraser U, allegedly from former Soviet KGB Jews???

>: To tell the truth?? LOFL

>The truth is that it is not CASAnostra which mean “our building”, but if you
>aping the mafia it should be COSAnostra “our business”.

The retard is complaining about someone using the CASANOSTRA sig,
which stands for our house?? What a doofus!!!

>Understand, shmack?
sven88

On Sat, 3 Oct 1998 22:14:35 -0700 (PDT), [email protected] (beachboy)
wrote:

>Expelled Jews from Spain in Middle Ages moved to Poland. Few hundreds
>years later Russia invaded Poland, and take over half of the Poland. All
>polish Jews from this part of Poland become automatic russian Jews until
>today. So, Igal your roots are in Poland and you Polish too!
>
> beachboy~~~~~califusa
>I may be fat, but you`re ugly and I can diet! (from car bumper-sticker)

From [email protected] Mon Oct 5 03:07:13 EDT 1998
Article: 120257 of soc.culture.polish
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: Jews Launder Drug Money
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:22:13 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 177
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]_spam.ic.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!awabi.library.ucla.edu!208.134.241.18!newsfeed.internetmci.com!207.136.66.98!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:120257 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9847 soc.culture.swiss:26988 soc.culture.europe:129057 soc.culture.australian:77710 soc.culture.usa:261644 soc.culture.british:281478

On Tue, 29 Sep 1998 16:17:36 +0100, “T. Stadler”
some maggot supporting jew criminals,
while living in the uk wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>[email protected] wrote:
>
>[blah blah blah…]
On Tue, 17 Jun 1997 07:10:26 -0800, in alt.revisionism
[email protected] (Michael A. Hoffman II) wrote:

>Michael A. Hoffman II comments: Why didn’t these two Orthodox Hasidic
>(Bobover sect) rabbis enjoy the usual rabbinic immunity from arrest for
>their crimes? Could it be that their mantle of protection was removed by
>the more powerful Reform and Conservative Jews in America with whom they
>are at war in occupied Palestine over issues pertaining to modernity and
>conversion? Is this a warning to the Orthodox to back off from their
>assaults on Reform and Orthodox Jews? For more go to:
>http://www.hoffman-info.com
>——————————————————————————
2 Rabbis Charged With Money Laundering

By ROBERT D. McFADDEN NY Times June 17, 1997

NEW YORK — A dozen men, including two identified as Orthodox Jewish
rabbis, were charged by federal authorities Monday with conspiring to
launder and hide $1.75 million in drug profits for Colombian narcotics
dealers by routing the cash through the bank accounts of a synagogue
and a yeshiva in Brooklyn.

The bizarre case, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn said, brought
togethera collection of strange bedfellows — five New York
representatives of Colombian drug traffickers, three go-betweens who
purportedly transported cash in suitcase quantities, and four men with
ties to a close-knit Jewish community.

At one point, the officials charged, the rabbis ran tens of millions
of dollars in drug profits through the bank accounts of a relatively
modest Borough Park synagogue and provided nearly $3.5 million from
American and Swiss accounts for the purchase of an aircraft for the
Colombian drug lords.

“Money launderers are the indispensable partners of major drug
traffickers, and the cynical act of using religious institutions to
conceal drug proceeds is particularly reprehensible,” said Zachary
Carter, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, in
announcing the charges.

Seven defendants, including Rabbi Mahir Reiss, 47, of 3543 Bedford
Ave., and Rabbi Bernard Grunfeld, 64, of 1417 46th St., both in
Brooklyn, were arrested Monday and were arraigned late in the day
before U.S. Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann, charged with conspiracy
to launder money. Two suspects, Grunfeld and Israel Knobloch, 24, of
5200 15th Ave., Brooklyn, also were charged with conspiring to avoid
federal cash-transaction reporting requirements.

Six defendants were held without bail, and one, Abraham Reiss, 48, of
320 Riverside Drive in Manhattan, a brother of Mahir Reiss, was
released on $750,000 bail. Three other men named in the federal
complaint were listed as fugitives, and two more were being held in
custody elsewhere in New York in other cases, according to Lee Dunst,
the assistant federal attorney prosecuting the case.

Unveiling a three-year undercover investigation that used
court-authorized wiretaps and other surveillance, the federal
complaint charged that the two rabbis and Abraham Reiss laundered
$750,000 by taking cash from go-betweens, depositing it in the bank
accounts of a synagogue-based organization and, after subtracting
commissions, writing checks to drug traffickers.

Investigators said the bank accounts used in the scheme, held in the
name of Chaim Shel Shulem, which shares quarters with Congregation
Eitz Chaim at 1577 48th St. in Borough Park, held deposits of more
than $19 million during the 10-month period when the laundering
transactions occurred, between August 1995 and May 1996.

Grunfeld, listed as the president of Chaim Shel Shulem, was said to
have written all the checks that went to the drug traffickers. He and
Knobloch were also accused of concealing the movement of $1 million in
drug money by making 95 deposits and withdrawals of just under $10,000
— the amount that triggers a government cash-transaction reporting
requirement — through the bank accounts of Congregation Eitz Chaim
and Bobover Yeshiva, at the same location.

The defendants made no statements in court Monday. While Grunfeld was
listed by prosecutors as the head of Chaim Shel Shulem, dozens of
people at Congregation Eitz Chaim late Monday declined to say anything
about him or the case. Some seemed not to recognize the name Chaim
Shel Shulem.

The synagogue and yeshiva are in a five-story building with a brick
front and a small awning imprinted with the institution’s name in
Hebrew. The only words in English on the facade call it “the Katz
Family of Mexico Building.”

In a ground-floor, two-room school lined with books, about 100 people
were studying at tables. A man who appeared to be in charge, but who
would not give his name, said he knew nothing about the two rabbis
named in the federal complaint.

The federal investigation — an undertaking of the U.S. Attorney’s
Office, the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Internal Revenue Service
— began in 1994, when agents detected a pattern of cash deposits and
withdrawals intended to circumvent the government’s reporting rules in
various bank accounts held in the name of the synagogue and yeshiva,
officials said.

With court-authorized telephone wiretaps, surveillance and other
techniques, the investigators said they uncovered a conspiracy in
which Grunfeld and Knobloch eventually made more than $1 million in
deposits and withdrawals — transactions, they said, that let the
conspirators move large sums of illicit drug profits.

Later, in 1995 and 1996, investigators said, the 12 men named in
Monday’s complaint conducted a full money-laundering operation. Five
of them — Lisandro Montes De Oca, 29; Francisco Gil, 30; Estenio
Rodriguez, 30; Juan Suarez, 39, and Alvaro Duque, 36 –were said to
have brought in large sums that Colombian drug dealers wanted to
launder.

The money was given to three men described as intermediaries — Jack
Pinski, 35, a Colombian who is a fugitive, and Roberto Buendia, 40,
and Fabio Arana, both of Medford, N.Y. They were said to have counted
and stashed the money at an apartment at 243 West 75th St.

There, prosecutors said, Abraham Reiss picked up the money. It was
later deposited in various accounts held in the name of Chaim Shel
Shulem.

Grunfeld, the organization’s president, signed checks that were made
out to “entities in accordance with drug traffickers’ instructions,”
the federal complaint said.

Those instructions were communicated through Rabbi Reiss, who had no
formal connections to Chaim Shel Shulem, investigators said.
Commissions of 13 percent to 15 percent were deducted from the
laundered money and divided among the intermediaries.

Prosecutors said they did not know how members of a deeply religious
community came into contact with professional money launderers and
drug traffickers. But they charged that in 1994, Rabbis Reiss and
Grunfeld, and Abraham Reiss arranged $3.4 million in financing to buy
a Beech Super King aircraft, a type commonly used by drug smugglers.
=================================================================
The Campaign for Radical Truth in History: http://www.hoffman-info.com
News Bureau and Archives Online

On Tue, 14 Jul 1998 07:27:33 GMT, [email protected]
(polis-etica) wrote:

>One of the most popular and successful ways to launder money is
>through Jewish religious institutions, such as yeshivas and
>synagogues. One reason for the growing power of the Jews in the
>laundering drug money business is the Law of Return with its easy
>possibility of escape to Israel. The Jewish religious institutions
>badly need funds. The Colombians drug traders can be generous. They
>transfer their drug money “which go to the Jewish religious
>institutions one way and come out by the other way back to the donors.
>The synagogue or yeshiva obtain a respectable percentage for its pious
>uses. Everyone is happy: the drug barons who launder their money
>quickly and efficiently and the synagogue or yeshiva which makes easy
>money. In May 1993, five members of Jewish international laundering
>which had worked with the Kali cartel were arrested. The ring was
>exposed following an FBI ‘sting’ operation, in the framework of which
>it established a dummy corporation called Prism, which served the gang
>for laundering money. The head of the ring was an Israeli named Zion
>Ya’akov Evenheim, known as ‘Zero’ Evenheim who had a dual Israeli and
>Colombian citizenship, stayed in Kali, from where he coordinated the
>activity and supervised the transfers of money. Evenheim was arrested
>by Interpol in Switzerland and extradited to the U.S..

sven88

From [email protected] Mon Oct 5 03:08:10 EDT 1998
Article: 26988 of soc.culture.swiss
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: Jews Launder Drug Money
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:22:13 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 177
Message-ID: <[email protected].telusplanet.net>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]_spam.ic.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!awabi.library.ucla.edu!208.134.241.18!newsfeed.internetmci.com!207.136.66.98!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:120257 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9847 soc.culture.swiss:26988 soc.culture.europe:129057 soc.culture.australian:77710 soc.culture.usa:261644 soc.culture.british:281478

On Tue, 29 Sep 1998 16:17:36 +0100, “T. Stadler”
some maggot supporting jew criminals,
while living in the uk wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>[email protected] wrote:
>
>[blah blah blah…]
On Tue, 17 Jun 1997 07:10:26 -0800, in alt.revisionism
[email protected] (Michael A. Hoffman II) wrote:

>Michael A. Hoffman II comments: Why didn’t these two Orthodox Hasidic
>(Bobover sect) rabbis enjoy the usual rabbinic immunity from arrest for
>their crimes? Could it be that their mantle of protection was removed by
>the more powerful Reform and Conservative Jews in America with whom they
>are at war in occupied Palestine over issues pertaining to modernity and
>conversion? Is this a warning to the Orthodox to back off from their
>assaults on Reform and Orthodox Jews? For more go to:
>http://www.hoffman-info.com
>——————————————————————————
2 Rabbis Charged With Money Laundering

By ROBERT D. McFADDEN NY Times June 17, 1997

NEW YORK — A dozen men, including two identified as Orthodox Jewish
rabbis, were charged by federal authorities Monday with conspiring to
launder and hide $1.75 million in drug profits for Colombian narcotics
dealers by routing the cash through the bank accounts of a synagogue
and a yeshiva in Brooklyn.

The bizarre case, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn said, brought
togethera collection of strange bedfellows — five New York
representatives of Colombian drug traffickers, three go-betweens who
purportedly transported cash in suitcase quantities, and four men with
ties to a close-knit Jewish community.

At one point, the officials charged, the rabbis ran tens of millions
of dollars in drug profits through the bank accounts of a relatively
modest Borough Park synagogue and provided nearly $3.5 million from
American and Swiss accounts for the purchase of an aircraft for the
Colombian drug lords.

“Money launderers are the indispensable partners of major drug
traffickers, and the cynical act of using religious institutions to
conceal drug proceeds is particularly reprehensible,” said Zachary
Carter, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, in
announcing the charges.

Seven defendants, including Rabbi Mahir Reiss, 47, of 3543 Bedford
Ave., and Rabbi Bernard Grunfeld, 64, of 1417 46th St., both in
Brooklyn, were arrested Monday and were arraigned late in the day
before U.S. Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann, charged with conspiracy
to launder money. Two suspects, Grunfeld and Israel Knobloch, 24, of
5200 15th Ave., Brooklyn, also were charged with conspiring to avoid
federal cash-transaction reporting requirements.

Six defendants were held without bail, and one, Abraham Reiss, 48, of
320 Riverside Drive in Manhattan, a brother of Mahir Reiss, was
released on $750,000 bail. Three other men named in the federal
complaint were listed as fugitives, and two more were being held in
custody elsewhere in New York in other cases, according to Lee Dunst,
the assistant federal attorney prosecuting the case.

Unveiling a three-year undercover investigation that used
court-authorized wiretaps and other surveillance, the federal
complaint charged that the two rabbis and Abraham Reiss laundered
$750,000 by taking cash from go-betweens, depositing it in the bank
accounts of a synagogue-based organization and, after subtracting
commissions, writing checks to drug traffickers.

Investigators said the bank accounts used in the scheme, held in the
name of Chaim Shel Shulem, which shares quarters with Congregation
Eitz Chaim at 1577 48th St. in Borough Park, held deposits of more
than $19 million during the 10-month period when the laundering
transactions occurred, between August 1995 and May 1996.

Grunfeld, listed as the president of Chaim Shel Shulem, was said to
have written all the checks that went to the drug traffickers. He and
Knobloch were also accused of concealing the movement of $1 million in
drug money by making 95 deposits and withdrawals of just under $10,000
— the amount that triggers a government cash-transaction reporting
requirement — through the bank accounts of Congregation Eitz Chaim
and Bobover Yeshiva, at the same location.

The defendants made no statements in court Monday. While Grunfeld was
listed by prosecutors as the head of Chaim Shel Shulem, dozens of
people at Congregation Eitz Chaim late Monday declined to say anything
about him or the case. Some seemed not to recognize the name Chaim
Shel Shulem.

The synagogue and yeshiva are in a five-story building with a brick
front and a small awning imprinted with the institution’s name in
Hebrew. The only words in English on the facade call it “the Katz
Family of Mexico Building.”

In a ground-floor, two-room school lined with books, about 100 people
were studying at tables. A man who appeared to be in charge, but who
would not give his name, said he knew nothing about the two rabbis
named in the federal complaint.

The federal investigation — an undertaking of the U.S. Attorney’s
Office, the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Internal Revenue Service
— began in 1994, when agents detected a pattern of cash deposits and
withdrawals intended to circumvent the government’s reporting rules in
various bank accounts held in the name of the synagogue and yeshiva,
officials said.

With court-authorized telephone wiretaps, surveillance and other
techniques, the investigators said they uncovered a conspiracy in
which Grunfeld and Knobloch eventually made more than $1 million in
deposits and withdrawals — transactions, they said, that let the
conspirators move large sums of illicit drug profits.

Later, in 1995 and 1996, investigators said, the 12 men named in
Monday’s complaint conducted a full money-laundering operation. Five
of them — Lisandro Montes De Oca, 29; Francisco Gil, 30; Estenio
Rodriguez, 30; Juan Suarez, 39, and Alvaro Duque, 36 –were said to
have brought in large sums that Colombian drug dealers wanted to
launder.

The money was given to three men described as intermediaries — Jack
Pinski, 35, a Colombian who is a fugitive, and Roberto Buendia, 40,
and Fabio Arana, both of Medford, N.Y. They were said to have counted
and stashed the money at an apartment at 243 West 75th St.

There, prosecutors said, Abraham Reiss picked up the money. It was
later deposited in various accounts held in the name of Chaim Shel
Shulem.

Grunfeld, the organization’s president, signed checks that were made
out to “entities in accordance with drug traffickers’ instructions,”
the federal complaint said.

Those instructions were communicated through Rabbi Reiss, who had no
formal connections to Chaim Shel Shulem, investigators said.
Commissions of 13 percent to 15 percent were deducted from the
laundered money and divided among the intermediaries.

Prosecutors said they did not know how members of a deeply religious
community came into contact with professional money launderers and
drug traffickers. But they charged that in 1994, Rabbis Reiss and
Grunfeld, and Abraham Reiss arranged $3.4 million in financing to buy
a Beech Super King aircraft, a type commonly used by drug smugglers.
=================================================================
The Campaign for Radical Truth in History: http://www.hoffman-info.com
News Bureau and Archives Online

On Tue, 14 Jul 1998 07:27:33 GMT, [email protected]
(polis-etica) wrote:

>One of the most popular and successful ways to launder money is
>through Jewish religious institutions, such as yeshivas and
>synagogues. One reason for the growing power of the Jews in the
>laundering drug money business is the Law of Return with its easy
>possibility of escape to Israel. The Jewish religious institutions
>badly need funds. The Colombians drug traders can be generous. They
>transfer their drug money “which go to the Jewish religious
>institutions one way and come out by the other way back to the donors.
>The synagogue or yeshiva obtain a respectable percentage for its pious
>uses. Everyone is happy: the drug barons who launder their money
>quickly and efficiently and the synagogue or yeshiva which makes easy
>money. In May 1993, five members of Jewish international laundering
>which had worked with the Kali cartel were arrested. The ring was
>exposed following an FBI ‘sting’ operation, in the framework of which
>it established a dummy corporation called Prism, which served the gang
>for laundering money. The head of the ring was an Israeli named Zion
>Ya’akov Evenheim, known as ‘Zero’ Evenheim who had a dual Israeli and
>Colombian citizenship, stayed in Kali, from where he coordinated the
>activity and supervised the transfers of money. Evenheim was arrested
>by Interpol in Switzerland and extradited to the U.S..

sven88

From [email protected] Mon Oct 5 03:08:10 EDT 1998
Article: 26990 of soc.culture.swiss
Path: hub.org!hub.org!chippy.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!newshub.northeast.verio.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.olish,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Hitler’s Jews (Some Jews Were Condoned and Did Participate In Nazi Society!)
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1998 21:23:33 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtntnt4-port-227.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.swiss:26990 soc.culture.europe:129058 soc.culture.german:88045 soc.culture.ukrainian:41809 soc.culture.baltics:15339 soc.culture.russian:93762

On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:14:46 GMT, [email protected]
(Gunther Schiller) wrote:

>Based on previous post from DejaNews archives:

>http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=315100303&CONTEXT=885769316.1533018197&hitnum=0

>From: [email protected] (BillBrtn)
>Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
>References: <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: An observation

>On 11 Jan 1998 04:22:13 GMT, [email protected] (BillBrtn) wrote:

>Dear Gunther, Mr. Schiller, Droogie, Jerry, A White, etc etc…

>>>. I am actually a Jew named Saul Rabinowicz
>>>and I run Champions Bagelry in Rosenberg, Texas.

>>Checked the phone book. No such person, place. Therefore, for starters,
>>you are a liar.

>Look at the above Bill! Who’s the liar? You don’t know me too well to
>not know when I am speaking tongue in cheek to a person such as you!
>So now you are stalking me too? Shame on you naughty anti-Arab bigot.

>>> You don’t have to
>>>be a Gentile to dislike the majority of Jews

>>You don’t know the majority of Jews. In fact you may not know any.
>
>I know the ones on USENET and most of them I wouldn’t fart in their
>face if they were in need of artificial respiration.
>
>>> Adolf Hitler had some Jews in his inner circle
>
>>Amazing. Blame Hitler on the Jews? What a laugh. And I thought Stalin was a
>>reach.
>>No, there were no Jews in Hitler’s inner circle. Pure non-sense.
>
>Wanna bet o’ clueless one? You are damned good at running your mouth
>and offering your opinion, along with your undocumented uses of the
>telephone BUT I have my facts together!
>
>http://www.viamall.com/ihf/653.html
>
>This is the extraordinary story of Henry (Heinz) von Javorsky, a man
>who has survived and thrived in many lands and under many regimes
>because of his skill with a camera. In Nazi Germany he was able to
>make a living–and live–despite having a Jewish grandmother, because
>he was a specialist in aerial photography–
>
>>>: Jews that had Iron Crosses and/or had proven their
>>>loyalty to Germany were not harassed by the Gestapo, the SS or the SA.
>
>>Specific example. Pure fantasy. Please make something up
>
>You need to read about the Hindenburg exemption in Lucy Dawidowicz’s
>book The War Against The Jews.
>
>Lucy S. Dawidowicz’s book titled THE WAR AGAINST THE JEWS1933-1945 by
>Bantam Books Incorporated [#13084-6, 1979 ed].
>
>* April 7, 1933 Hitler’s letter to Hindenburg gave exemptions to
>the “Jewish Problem.” “Officials who were already employed as civil
>servants on or before August 1, 1914, or who during the World War,
>fought at the front for Germany or her allies, or whose fathers or
>sons were killed in action in the World War.” (pg 77)
>* [“Starting May 4, 1942, the Jews from Germany, Luxembourg, Vienna,
>and Prague would be deported, except for the employed among them
>and the holders of the Iron Cross or other World War I decorations.
>Hitherto, those Jews as a group had been exempt from the
>deportations.”]
>
> ____________________________
>
>Or how about this?
>
> Hitler’s Jewish Army
>
>”Not every victim was a Jew but every Jew was a victim.” –Elie Wiesel
>speaking of World War Two.
>
>”If there were Jews in (Hitler’s) armed forces…who served knowing
>what was going on and made no attempt to save (lives), well then that
>is unacceptable and dishonorable.” –Rabbi Marvin Hier, director of
>the Simon Wiesenthal Institute.
>
>Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis
>called ‘full Jews’ served in the German military with Adolf Hitler’s
>knowledge and approval.
>
>Cambridge University researcher Bryan Rigg has traced the Jewish
>ancestry of more than 1,200 of Hitler’s soldiers, including two field
>marshals and fifteen generals (two full generals, eight lieutenant
>generals, five major generals), “men commanding up to 100,000 troops.”
>
>[ http://infoukes.com/lists/history/1997/08/0004.html ]
>
>In approximately 20 cases, Jewish soldiers in the Nazi army were
>awarded Germany’s highest military honor, the Knight’s Cross.
>
>One of these Jewish veterans is today an 82 year old resident of
>northern Germany, an observant Jew who served as a captain and
>practiced his religion within the Wehrmacht throughout the war.
>
>One of the Jewish field marshals was Erhard Milch, deputy to Luftwaffe
>Chief Hermann Goering. Rumors of Milch’s Jewish identity circulated
>widely in Germany in the 1930s.
>
>In one of the famous anecdotes of the time, Goering falsified Milch’s
>birth record and when met with protests about having a Jew in the Nazi
>high command, Goering replied, “I decide who is a Jew and who is an
>Aryan.”
>
>Rigg’s research also shed light on stories surrounding the rescue by
>German soldiers of the Lubavitcher grand rabbi of that time, who was
>in Warsaw when the war broke out in 1939.
>
>Joseph Isaac Schneerson was spirited to safety after an appeal to
>Germany from the United States. Schneerson was assisted by a German
>officer Rigg has identified as the highly decorated Maj. Ernst Bloch,
>whose father was a Jew.
>
>Jews also served in the Nazi police and security forces as ghetto
>police (Ordnungdienst) and concentration camp guards (kapos).
>
>So what happens to the claim that Hitler sought to exterminate all
>Jews, when he allowed some of them to join in his struggle against
>Bolshevism and International finance capitalism?
>
>Sources:
>
>William D. Montalbano, “The Jews in Hitler’s Military,” Los Angeles
>Times, Dec. 24, 1996.
>
>Tom Tugend, “Grad student uncovers Jews who fought for Adolf Hitler,”
>Jewish Telegraph Agency, Dec. 26, 1996.
>
>Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators.
>http://www.abbc.com/aaargh/engl/zad/zad13.html
>
>Article ” Hitler’s Jewish Army” from:
>http://www.hoffman-info.com/jewishnazi.html
>
> ———————————-
>
>http://www.seattletimes.com/extra/browse/html97/altnazi_040397.html
>
>Copyright © 1997 The Seattle Times Company
>
>Thursday, April 3, 1997
>
>Hitler let `Aryanized’ Jews serve in Nazi armed forces
>
>by Reuters
>
>BONN – Adolf Hitler personally allowed at least 77 army officers of
>Jewish descent, including 25 generals, to fight for the Nazi cause in
>the German Wehrmacht during World War II, an American historian said
>yesterday…… [Click the above link to see all of the story.]
>
>See also:
>
>http://www.seattletimes.com/extra/browse/html/holo_122696.html
>
>Copyright © 1996 The Seattle Times Company
>
>Dec. 26, 1996
>
>An eerie part of Holocaust history: Researcher talks to Jews who
>served in Nazi army
>
>by William D. Montalbano
>Los Angeles Times
>
>LONDON – Sustained by scholarship, peanut butter and a sense of
>mission, Bryan Rigg is exploring an eerie and uncharted no man’s land
>of Holocaust history.
>
>Rigg interviews former German soldiers of Jewish heritage, some of
>them high-ranking officers, who fought for Nazi Germany in World War
>II – during the Holocaust, when Germans killed 6 million Jews.
>
>”Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis
>called `full Jews’ served in the military with Adolf Hitler’s
>knowledge. The Nazis allowed these men to serve but at the same time
>exterminated their families,” Rigg said. [Click link above to read the
>whole story.]
>
> http://infoukes.com/lists/history/1997/08/0004.html
>
> ———————————-
>
>>.>Did the Bolsheviks give exemptions?
>
>>You tell me.
>
>No, they did not!

From [email protected] Mon Oct 5 03:08:25 EDT 1998
Article: 189206 of soc.culture.malaysia
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.indonesia,soc.culture.australian
Subject: Re: Gays take Malaysian PM to task
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1998 21:18:05 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtntnt4-port-227.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!tor-nx1.netcom.ca!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.malaysia:189206 soc.culture.palestine:52633 soc.culture.indonesia:119142 soc.culture.australian:77711

On Fri, 02 Oct 1998 20:37:18 +1000, [email protected] the
wellknown JEW faggot wrote:

Muslim nations seem to have more sense and respect for normal humans,
than do the degenerate JEW run countries.

The only good faggot is a cremated one, whether dead or otherwise!!!

Immolate yourself, and then try to talk, if you can comprehend.
sven88

From [email protected] Mon Oct 5 03:08:57 EDT 1998
Article: 281478 of soc.culture.british
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: Jews Launder Drug Money
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:22:13 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 177
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]_spam.ic.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtnpx06-port-37.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!awabi.library.ucla.edu!208.134.241.18!newsfeed.internetmci.com!207.136.66.98!cyclone.news.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:120257 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9847 soc.culture.swiss:26988 soc.culture.europe:129057 soc.culture.australian:77710 soc.culture.usa:261644 soc.culture.british:281478

On Tue, 29 Sep 1998 16:17:36 +0100, “T. Stadler”
some maggot supporting jew criminals,
while living in the uk wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>[email protected] wrote:
>
>[blah blah blah…]
On Tue, 17 Jun 1997 07:10:26 -0800, in alt.revisionism
[email protected] (Michael A. Hoffman II) wrote:

>Michael A. Hoffman II comments: Why didn’t these two Orthodox Hasidic
>(Bobover sect) rabbis enjoy the usual rabbinic immunity from arrest for
>their crimes? Could it be that their mantle of protection was removed by
>the more powerful Reform and Conservative Jews in America with whom they
>are at war in occupied Palestine over issues pertaining to modernity and
>conversion? Is this a warning to the Orthodox to back off from their
>assaults on Reform and Orthodox Jews? For more go to:
>http://www.hoffman-info.com
>——————————————————————————
2 Rabbis Charged With Money Laundering

By ROBERT D. McFADDEN NY Times June 17, 1997

NEW YORK — A dozen men, including two identified as Orthodox Jewish
rabbis, were charged by federal authorities Monday with conspiring to
launder and hide $1.75 million in drug profits for Colombian narcotics
dealers by routing the cash through the bank accounts of a synagogue
and a yeshiva in Brooklyn.

The bizarre case, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn said, brought
togethera collection of strange bedfellows — five New York
representatives of Colombian drug traffickers, three go-betweens who
purportedly transported cash in suitcase quantities, and four men with
ties to a close-knit Jewish community.

At one point, the officials charged, the rabbis ran tens of millions
of dollars in drug profits through the bank accounts of a relatively
modest Borough Park synagogue and provided nearly $3.5 million from
American and Swiss accounts for the purchase of an aircraft for the
Colombian drug lords.

“Money launderers are the indispensable partners of major drug
traffickers, and the cynical act of using religious institutions to
conceal drug proceeds is particularly reprehensible,” said Zachary
Carter, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, in
announcing the charges.

Seven defendants, including Rabbi Mahir Reiss, 47, of 3543 Bedford
Ave., and Rabbi Bernard Grunfeld, 64, of 1417 46th St., both in
Brooklyn, were arrested Monday and were arraigned late in the day
before U.S. Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann, charged with conspiracy
to launder money. Two suspects, Grunfeld and Israel Knobloch, 24, of
5200 15th Ave., Brooklyn, also were charged with conspiring to avoid
federal cash-transaction reporting requirements.

Six defendants were held without bail, and one, Abraham Reiss, 48, of
320 Riverside Drive in Manhattan, a brother of Mahir Reiss, was
released on $750,000 bail. Three other men named in the federal
complaint were listed as fugitives, and two more were being held in
custody elsewhere in New York in other cases, according to Lee Dunst,
the assistant federal attorney prosecuting the case.

Unveiling a three-year undercover investigation that used
court-authorized wiretaps and other surveillance, the federal
complaint charged that the two rabbis and Abraham Reiss laundered
$750,000 by taking cash from go-betweens, depositing it in the bank
accounts of a synagogue-based organization and, after subtracting
commissions, writing checks to drug traffickers.

Investigators said the bank accounts used in the scheme, held in the
name of Chaim Shel Shulem, which shares quarters with Congregation
Eitz Chaim at 1577 48th St. in Borough Park, held deposits of more
than $19 million during the 10-month period when the laundering
transactions occurred, between August 1995 and May 1996.

Grunfeld, listed as the president of Chaim Shel Shulem, was said to
have written all the checks that went to the drug traffickers. He and
Knobloch were also accused of concealing the movement of $1 million in
drug money by making 95 deposits and withdrawals of just under $10,000
— the amount that triggers a government cash-transaction reporting
requirement — through the bank accounts of Congregation Eitz Chaim
and Bobover Yeshiva, at the same location.

The defendants made no statements in court Monday. While Grunfeld was
listed by prosecutors as the head of Chaim Shel Shulem, dozens of
people at Congregation Eitz Chaim late Monday declined to say anything
about him or the case. Some seemed not to recognize the name Chaim
Shel Shulem.

The synagogue and yeshiva are in a five-story building with a brick
front and a small awning imprinted with the institution’s name in
Hebrew. The only words in English on the facade call it “the Katz
Family of Mexico Building.”

In a ground-floor, two-room school lined with books, about 100 people
were studying at tables. A man who appeared to be in charge, but who
would not give his name, said he knew nothing about the two rabbis
named in the federal complaint.

The federal investigation — an undertaking of the U.S. Attorney’s
Office, the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Internal Revenue Service
— began in 1994, when agents detected a pattern of cash deposits and
withdrawals intended to circumvent the government’s reporting rules in
various bank accounts held in the name of the synagogue and yeshiva,
officials said.

With court-authorized telephone wiretaps, surveillance and other
techniques, the investigators said they uncovered a conspiracy in
which Grunfeld and Knobloch eventually made more than $1 million in
deposits and withdrawals — transactions, they said, that let the
conspirators move large sums of illicit drug profits.

Later, in 1995 and 1996, investigators said, the 12 men named in
Monday’s complaint conducted a full money-laundering operation. Five
of them — Lisandro Montes De Oca, 29; Francisco Gil, 30; Estenio
Rodriguez, 30; Juan Suarez, 39, and Alvaro Duque, 36 –were said to
have brought in large sums that Colombian drug dealers wanted to
launder.

The money was given to three men described as intermediaries — Jack
Pinski, 35, a Colombian who is a fugitive, and Roberto Buendia, 40,
and Fabio Arana, both of Medford, N.Y. They were said to have counted
and stashed the money at an apartment at 243 West 75th St.

There, prosecutors said, Abraham Reiss picked up the money. It was
later deposited in various accounts held in the name of Chaim Shel
Shulem.

Grunfeld, the organization’s president, signed checks that were made
out to “entities in accordance with drug traffickers’ instructions,”
the federal complaint said.

Those instructions were communicated through Rabbi Reiss, who had no
formal connections to Chaim Shel Shulem, investigators said.
Commissions of 13 percent to 15 percent were deducted from the
laundered money and divided among the intermediaries.

Prosecutors said they did not know how members of a deeply religious
community came into contact with professional money launderers and
drug traffickers. But they charged that in 1994, Rabbis Reiss and
Grunfeld, and Abraham Reiss arranged $3.4 million in financing to buy
a Beech Super King aircraft, a type commonly used by drug smugglers.
=================================================================
The Campaign for Radical Truth in History: http://www.hoffman-info.com
News Bureau and Archives Online

On Tue, 14 Jul 1998 07:27:33 GMT, [email protected]
(polis-etica) wrote:

>One of the most popular and successful ways to launder money is
>through Jewish religious institutions, such as yeshivas and
>synagogues. One reason for the growing power of the Jews in the
>laundering drug money business is the Law of Return with its easy
>possibility of escape to Israel. The Jewish religious institutions
>badly need funds. The Colombians drug traders can be generous. They
>transfer their drug money “which go to the Jewish religious
>institutions one way and come out by the other way back to the donors.
>The synagogue or yeshiva obtain a respectable percentage for its pious
>uses. Everyone is happy: the drug barons who launder their money
>quickly and efficiently and the synagogue or yeshiva which makes easy
>money. In May 1993, five members of Jewish international laundering
>which had worked with the Kali cartel were arrested. The ring was
>exposed following an FBI ‘sting’ operation, in the framework of which
>it established a dummy corporation called Prism, which served the gang
>for laundering money. The head of the ring was an Israeli named Zion
>Ya’akov Evenheim, known as ‘Zero’ Evenheim who had a dual Israeli and
>Colombian citizenship, stayed in Kali, from where he coordinated the
>activity and supervised the transfers of money. Evenheim was arrested
>by Interpol in Switzerland and extradited to the U.S..

sven88

From [email protected] Mon Oct 5 03:09:28 EDT 1998
Article: 15338 of soc.culture.baltics
Path: hub.org!hub.org!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.ukrainian,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: Re: Igal is Polish ! NOT – just another KGB JEW…
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1998 21:06:33 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtntnt4-port-227.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.polish:120254 soc.culture.russian:93759 soc.culture.baltics:15338 soc.culture.ukrainian:41808 pl.regionalne.warszawa:9846

It appears that the Jew retard Yehudah Yeraslasky, who may be related
to former Soviet KGB staff, just can not read, or write in English,
even though he was at one time a student at Simon Fraser University in
canada, according to prior articles exposing him…
That is why is no longer posting from the school, since they took care
of it…

On Tue, 28 Apr 1998 15:09:42 -0600, [email protected] wrote:

>[email protected] reported::

>: You are too polite. The liar Igal just wants to malign the good people
>: of Poland, which is typical of disinformation by the KGB!!!

>: What can one expect from Yehudah Yeraslavsky, a student at Simon
>: Fraser U, allegedly from former Soviet KGB Jews???

>: To tell the truth?? LOFL

>The truth is that it is not CASAnostra which mean “our building”, but if you
>aping the mafia it should be COSAnostra “our business”.

The retard is complaining about someone using the CASANOSTRA sig,
which stands for our house?? What a doofus!!!

>Understand, shmack?
sven88

On Sat, 3 Oct 1998 22:14:35 -0700 (PDT), [email protected] (beachboy)
wrote:

>Expelled Jews from Spain in Middle Ages moved to Poland. Few hundreds
>years later Russia invaded Poland, and take over half of the Poland. All
>polish Jews from this part of Poland become automatic russian Jews until
>today. So, Igal your roots are in Poland and you Polish too!
>
> beachboy~~~~~califusa
>I may be fat, but you`re ugly and I can diet! (from car bumper-sticker)

From [email protected] Mon Oct 5 03:09:28 EDT 1998
Article: 15339 of soc.culture.baltics
Path: hub.org!hub.org!chippy.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!newshub.northeast.verio.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.olish,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Hitler’s Jews (Some Jews Were Condoned and Did Participate In Nazi Society!)
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1998 21:23:33 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtntnt4-port-227.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.swiss:26990 soc.culture.europe:129058 soc.culture.german:88045 soc.culture.ukrainian:41809 soc.culture.baltics:15339 soc.culture.russian:93762

On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:14:46 GMT, [email protected]
(Gunther Schiller) wrote:

>Based on previous post from DejaNews archives:

>http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=315100303&CONTEXT=885769316.1533018197&hitnum=0

>From: [email protected] (BillBrtn)
>Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
>References: <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: An observation

>On 11 Jan 1998 04:22:13 GMT, [email protected] (BillBrtn) wrote:

>Dear Gunther, Mr. Schiller, Droogie, Jerry, A White, etc etc…

>>>. I am actually a Jew named Saul Rabinowicz
>>>and I run Champions Bagelry in Rosenberg, Texas.

>>Checked the phone book. No such person, place. Therefore, for starters,
>>you are a liar.

>Look at the above Bill! Who’s the liar? You don’t know me too well to
>not know when I am speaking tongue in cheek to a person such as you!
>So now you are stalking me too? Shame on you naughty anti-Arab bigot.

>>> You don’t have to
>>>be a Gentile to dislike the majority of Jews

>>You don’t know the majority of Jews. In fact you may not know any.
>
>I know the ones on USENET and most of them I wouldn’t fart in their
>face if they were in need of artificial respiration.
>
>>> Adolf Hitler had some Jews in his inner circle
>
>>Amazing. Blame Hitler on the Jews? What a laugh. And I thought Stalin was a
>>reach.
>>No, there were no Jews in Hitler’s inner circle. Pure non-sense.
>
>Wanna bet o’ clueless one? You are damned good at running your mouth
>and offering your opinion, along with your undocumented uses of the
>telephone BUT I have my facts together!
>
>http://www.viamall.com/ihf/653.html
>
>This is the extraordinary story of Henry (Heinz) von Javorsky, a man
>who has survived and thrived in many lands and under many regimes
>because of his skill with a camera. In Nazi Germany he was able to
>make a living–and live–despite having a Jewish grandmother, because
>he was a specialist in aerial photography–
>
>>>: Jews that had Iron Crosses and/or had proven their
>>>loyalty to Germany were not harassed by the Gestapo, the SS or the SA.
>
>>Specific example. Pure fantasy. Please make something up
>
>You need to read about the Hindenburg exemption in Lucy Dawidowicz’s
>book The War Against The Jews.
>
>Lucy S. Dawidowicz’s book titled THE WAR AGAINST THE JEWS1933-1945 by
>Bantam Books Incorporated [#13084-6, 1979 ed].
>
>* April 7, 1933 Hitler’s letter to Hindenburg gave exemptions to
>the “Jewish Problem.” “Officials who were already employed as civil
>servants on or before August 1, 1914, or who during the World War,
>fought at the front for Germany or her allies, or whose fathers or
>sons were killed in action in the World War.” (pg 77)
>* [“Starting May 4, 1942, the Jews from Germany, Luxembourg, Vienna,
>and Prague would be deported, except for the employed among them
>and the holders of the Iron Cross or other World War I decorations.
>Hitherto, those Jews as a group had been exempt from the
>deportations.”]
>
> ____________________________
>
>Or how about this?
>
> Hitler’s Jewish Army
>
>”Not every victim was a Jew but every Jew was a victim.” –Elie Wiesel
>speaking of World War Two.
>
>”If there were Jews in (Hitler’s) armed forces…who served knowing
>what was going on and made no attempt to save (lives), well then that
>is unacceptable and dishonorable.” –Rabbi Marvin Hier, director of
>the Simon Wiesenthal Institute.
>
>Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis
>called ‘full Jews’ served in the German military with Adolf Hitler’s
>knowledge and approval.
>
>Cambridge University researcher Bryan Rigg has traced the Jewish
>ancestry of more than 1,200 of Hitler’s soldiers, including two field
>marshals and fifteen generals (two full generals, eight lieutenant
>generals, five major generals), “men commanding up to 100,000 troops.”
>
>[ http://infoukes.com/lists/history/1997/08/0004.html ]
>
>In approximately 20 cases, Jewish soldiers in the Nazi army were
>awarded Germany’s highest military honor, the Knight’s Cross.
>
>One of these Jewish veterans is today an 82 year old resident of
>northern Germany, an observant Jew who served as a captain and
>practiced his religion within the Wehrmacht throughout the war.
>
>One of the Jewish field marshals was Erhard Milch, deputy to Luftwaffe
>Chief Hermann Goering. Rumors of Milch’s Jewish identity circulated
>widely in Germany in the 1930s.
>
>In one of the famous anecdotes of the time, Goering falsified Milch’s
>birth record and when met with protests about having a Jew in the Nazi
>high command, Goering replied, “I decide who is a Jew and who is an
>Aryan.”
>
>Rigg’s research also shed light on stories surrounding the rescue by
>German soldiers of the Lubavitcher grand rabbi of that time, who was
>in Warsaw when the war broke out in 1939.
>
>Joseph Isaac Schneerson was spirited to safety after an appeal to
>Germany from the United States. Schneerson was assisted by a German
>officer Rigg has identified as the highly decorated Maj. Ernst Bloch,
>whose father was a Jew.
>
>Jews also served in the Nazi police and security forces as ghetto
>police (Ordnungdienst) and concentration camp guards (kapos).
>
>So what happens to the claim that Hitler sought to exterminate all
>Jews, when he allowed some of them to join in his struggle against
>Bolshevism and International finance capitalism?
>
>Sources:
>
>William D. Montalbano, “The Jews in Hitler’s Military,” Los Angeles
>Times, Dec. 24, 1996.
>
>Tom Tugend, “Grad student uncovers Jews who fought for Adolf Hitler,”
>Jewish Telegraph Agency, Dec. 26, 1996.
>
>Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators.
>http://www.abbc.com/aaargh/engl/zad/zad13.html
>
>Article ” Hitler’s Jewish Army” from:
>http://www.hoffman-info.com/jewishnazi.html
>
> ———————————-
>
>http://www.seattletimes.com/extra/browse/html97/altnazi_040397.html
>
>Copyright © 1997 The Seattle Times Company
>
>Thursday, April 3, 1997
>
>Hitler let `Aryanized’ Jews serve in Nazi armed forces
>
>by Reuters
>
>BONN – Adolf Hitler personally allowed at least 77 army officers of
>Jewish descent, including 25 generals, to fight for the Nazi cause in
>the German Wehrmacht during World War II, an American historian said
>yesterday…… [Click the above link to see all of the story.]
>
>See also:
>
>http://www.seattletimes.com/extra/browse/html/holo_122696.html
>
>Copyright © 1996 The Seattle Times Company
>
>Dec. 26, 1996
>
>An eerie part of Holocaust history: Researcher talks to Jews who
>served in Nazi army
>
>by William D. Montalbano
>Los Angeles Times
>
>LONDON – Sustained by scholarship, peanut butter and a sense of
>mission, Bryan Rigg is exploring an eerie and uncharted no man’s land
>of Holocaust history.
>
>Rigg interviews former German soldiers of Jewish heritage, some of
>them high-ranking officers, who fought for Nazi Germany in World War
>II – during the Holocaust, when Germans killed 6 million Jews.
>
>”Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis
>called `full Jews’ served in the military with Adolf Hitler’s
>knowledge. The Nazis allowed these men to serve but at the same time
>exterminated their families,” Rigg said. [Click link above to read the
>whole story.]
>
> http://infoukes.com/lists/history/1997/08/0004.html
>
> ———————————-
>
>>.>Did the Bolsheviks give exemptions?
>
>>You tell me.
>
>No, they did not!

From [email protected] Mon Oct 5 13:37:50 EDT 1998
Article: 88045 of soc.culture.german
Path: hub.org!hub.org!chippy.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!newshub.northeast.verio.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.telusplanet.net!news
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.olish,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.baltics,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Hitler’s Jews (Some Jews Were Condoned and Did Participate In Nazi Society!)
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1998 21:23:33 GMT
Organization: TELUS Communications Inc.
Lines: 200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edtntnt4-port-227.agt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: hub.org soc.culture.swiss:26990 soc.culture.europe:129058 soc.culture.german:88045 soc.culture.ukrainian:41809 soc.culture.baltics:15339 soc.culture.russian:93762

On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:14:46 GMT, [email protected]
(Gunther Schiller) wrote:

>Based on previous post from DejaNews archives:

>http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=315100303&CONTEXT=885769316.1533018197&hitnum=0

>From: [email protected] (BillBrtn)
>Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
>References: <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: An observation

>On 11 Jan 1998 04:22:13 GMT, [email protected] (BillBrtn) wrote:

>Dear Gunther, Mr. Schiller, Droogie, Jerry, A White, etc etc…

>>>. I am actually a Jew named Saul Rabinowicz
>>>and I run Champions Bagelry in Rosenberg, Texas.

>>Checked the phone book. No such person, place. Therefore, for starters,
>>you are a liar.

>Look at the above Bill! Who’s the liar? You don’t know me too well to
>not know when I am speaking tongue in cheek to a person such as you!
>So now you are stalking me too? Shame on you naughty anti-Arab bigot.

>>> You don’t have to
>>>be a Gentile to dislike the majority of Jews

>>You don’t know the majority of Jews. In fact you may not know any.
>
>I know the ones on USENET and most of them I wouldn’t fart in their
>face if they were in need of artificial respiration.
>
>>> Adolf Hitler had some Jews in his inner circle
>
>>Amazing. Blame Hitler on the Jews? What a laugh. And I thought Stalin was a
>>reach.
>>No, there were no Jews in Hitler’s inner circle. Pure non-sense.
>
>Wanna bet o’ clueless one? You are damned good at running your mouth
>and offering your opinion, along with your undocumented uses of the
>telephone BUT I have my facts together!
>
>http://www.viamall.com/ihf/653.html
>
>This is the extraordinary story of Henry (Heinz) von Javorsky, a man
>who has survived and thrived in many lands and under many regimes
>because of his skill with a camera. In Nazi Germany he was able to
>make a living–and live–despite having a Jewish grandmother, because
>he was a specialist in aerial photography–
>
>>>: Jews that had Iron Crosses and/or had proven their
>>>loyalty to Germany were not harassed by the Gestapo, the SS or the SA.
>
>>Specific example. Pure fantasy. Please make something up
>
>You need to read about the Hindenburg exemption in Lucy Dawidowicz’s
>book The War Against The Jews.
>
>Lucy S. Dawidowicz’s book titled THE WAR AGAINST THE JEWS1933-1945 by
>Bantam Books Incorporated [#13084-6, 1979 ed].
>
>* April 7, 1933 Hitler’s letter to Hindenburg gave exemptions to
>the “Jewish Problem.” “Officials who were already employed as civil
>servants on or before August 1, 1914, or who during the World War,
>fought at the front for Germany or her allies, or whose fathers or
>sons were killed in action in the World War.” (pg 77)
>* [“Starting May 4, 1942, the Jews from Germany, Luxembourg, Vienna,
>and Prague would be deported, except for the employed among them
>and the holders of the Iron Cross or other World War I decorations.
>Hitherto, those Jews as a group had been exempt from the
>deportations.”]
>
> ____________________________
>
>Or how about this?
>
> Hitler’s Jewish Army
>
>”Not every victim was a Jew but every Jew was a victim.” –Elie Wiesel
>speaking of World War Two.
>
>”If there were Jews in (Hitler’s) armed forces…who served knowing
>what was going on and made no attempt to save (lives), well then that
>is unacceptable and dishonorable.” –Rabbi Marvin Hier, director of
>the Simon Wiesenthal Institute.
>
>Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis
>called ‘full Jews’ served in the German military with Adolf Hitler’s
>knowledge and approval.
>
>Cambridge University researcher Bryan Rigg has traced the Jewish
>ancestry of more than 1,200 of Hitler’s soldiers, including two field
>marshals and fifteen generals (two full generals, eight lieutenant
>generals, five major generals), “men commanding up to 100,000 troops.”
>
>[ http://infoukes.com/lists/history/1997/08/0004.html ]
>
>In approximately 20 cases, Jewish soldiers in the Nazi army were
>awarded Germany’s highest military honor, the Knight’s Cross.
>
>One of these Jewish veterans is today an 82 year old resident of
>northern Germany, an observant Jew who served as a captain and
>practiced his religion within the Wehrmacht throughout the war.
>
>One of the Jewish field marshals was Erhard Milch, deputy to Luftwaffe
>Chief Hermann Goering. Rumors of Milch’s Jewish identity circulated
>widely in Germany in the 1930s.
>
>In one of the famous anecdotes of the time, Goering falsified Milch’s
>birth record and when met with protests about having a Jew in the Nazi
>high command, Goering replied, “I decide who is a Jew and who is an
>Aryan.”
>
>Rigg’s research also shed light on stories surrounding the rescue by
>German soldiers of the Lubavitcher grand rabbi of that time, who was
>in Warsaw when the war broke out in 1939.
>
>Joseph Isaac Schneerson was spirited to safety after an appeal to
>Germany from the United States. Schneerson was assisted by a German
>officer Rigg has identified as the highly decorated Maj. Ernst Bloch,
>whose father was a Jew.
>
>Jews also served in the Nazi police and security forces as ghetto
>police (Ordnungdienst) and concentration camp guards (kapos).
>
>So what happens to the claim that Hitler sought to exterminate all
>Jews, when he allowed some of them to join in his struggle against
>Bolshevism and International finance capitalism?
>
>Sources:
>
>William D. Montalbano, “The Jews in Hitler’s Military,” Los Angeles
>Times, Dec. 24, 1996.
>
>Tom Tugend, “Grad student uncovers Jews who fought for Adolf Hitler,”
>Jewish Telegraph Agency, Dec. 26, 1996.
>
>Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators.
>http://www.abbc.com/aaargh/engl/zad/zad13.html
>
>Article ” Hitler’s Jewish Army” from:
>http://www.hoffman-info.com/jewishnazi.html
>
> ———————————-
>
>http://www.seattletimes.com/extra/browse/html97/altnazi_040397.html
>
>Copyright © 1997 The Seattle Times Company
>
>Thursday, April 3, 1997
>
>Hitler let `Aryanized’ Jews serve in Nazi armed forces
>
>by Reuters
>
>BONN – Adolf Hitler personally allowed at least 77 army officers of
>Jewish descent, including 25 generals, to fight for the Nazi cause in
>the German Wehrmacht during World War II, an American historian said
>yesterday…… [Click the above link to see all of the story.]
>
>See also:
>
>http://www.seattletimes.com/extra/browse/html/holo_122696.html
>
>Copyright © 1996 The Seattle Times Company
>
>Dec. 26, 1996
>
>An eerie part of Holocaust history: Researcher talks to Jews who
>served in Nazi army
>
>by William D. Montalbano
>Los Angeles Times
>
>LONDON – Sustained by scholarship, peanut butter and a sense of
>mission, Bryan Rigg is exploring an eerie and uncharted no man’s land
>of Holocaust history.
>
>Rigg interviews former German soldiers of Jewish heritage, some of
>them high-ranking officers, who fought for Nazi Germany in World War
>II – during the Holocaust, when Germans killed 6 million Jews.
>
>”Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis
>called `full Jews’ served in the military with Adolf Hitler’s
>knowledge. The Nazis allowed these men to serve but at the same time
>exterminated their families,” Rigg said. [Click link above to read the
>whole story.]
>
> http://infoukes.com/lists/history/1997/08/0004.html
>
> ———————————-
>
>>.>Did the Bolsheviks give exemptions?
>
>>You tell me.
>
>No, they did not!

From