Why should an employer not have the right to pick the most suitable
candidate for any job, based on HIS requirements??
To hell with being politically correct.
Since it is his capital at risk in a business, he, and only he should
have the right to decide whom he wishes to employ.
On Tue, 25 Aug 1998 03:03:10 +1000, “Robert Crew”
wrote:
>Taken from Pauline Hanson’s small business policy statement
>(http://www.gwb.com.au/onenation/policy/business.html)
>
>”Employment Advertising. Employers have the right to advertise specifically
>for the person they wish to employ. Racial discrimination will not be
>tolerated. ”
>
>This statement indicates that employers will be allowed to discriminate on
>the basis of gender, age, sexual preference, disability, pregnancy, etc. but
>not race.
>
>How come the media hasn’t picked up on this?
From [email protected] Tue Aug 25 15:35:30 EDT 1998
Article: 172520 of aus.politics
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: aus.politics,alt.fan.pauline.hanson,soc.
culture.australian,aus.politics
Subject: Re: pauline plans to allow business to discriminate!
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 14:08:51 GMT
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.45.65.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Path: trends.ca!hub.org!chippy.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnp
lanet.com!cyclone.news
.idirect.com!island.idirect.com!news.oanet.com!news.agtac.ne
t!news.nucleus.com!pm1-edm-21.nucleus.com
Xref: trends.ca aus.politics:172520 alt.fan.pauline.hanson:4542 soc.culture.australian:74767
From [email protected] Tue Aug 25 15:36:47 EDT 1998
Article: 156974 of soc.culture.canada
Path: trends.ca!hub.org!data.pa.vix.com!news1.digital.com!decwrl!
nntpX.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.nucleus.com!pm1-edm
-9.nucleus.com
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.quebec,soc.culture
.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.british,soc.culture.french,soc.
culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: The Bronfmans Family Takes Out $2.2 Billion Without Paying Tax
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 17:42:10 GMT
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <01bdc984$d6f9c0c0$dc0f35c6@compukat> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.45.65.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: trends.ca soc.culture.canada:156974 soc.culture.usa:249788 soc.culture.quebec:116587 soc.culture.europe:124496 soc.culture.swiss:26205 soc.culture.british:271168 soc.culture.french:111529 soc.culture.russian:90020
Since the case is currently before the Federal Court in Canada, it
most certainly is current news.
If you were a taxpayer in Canada, you would definitely be interested.
On Sun, 23 Aug 1998 10:30:56 GMT, [email protected] (E. Barry Bruyea)
wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Aug 1998 02:15:17 GMT, “Mercy” wrote:
>
>>[email protected] wrote in article <[email protected]>…
>>> The 700 millions NOT PAID BY THE BRONFMAN JEWS, means that others,
>>> such as the Chinese immigrants, have to make up the shortfall!!!
>>
>>Why do I get the feeling that you are not defending Chinese immigrants, but
>>an obvious racist propagandist?
>>
>
>Notwithstanding the fact that several idiots have been posting this
>anti-semitic crap for well over a year after the Bronfman’s quite
>legally moved money from point a to point b as were free to do under
>Canadian Tax law. I guess reading yesterdays newspapers is their way
>of keeping up with current events.
From [email protected] Tue Aug 25 15:41:53 EDT 1998
Article: 26205 of soc.culture.swiss
Path: trends.ca!hub.org!data.pa.vix.com!news1.digital.com!decwrl!nntpX.
primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!2
06.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.nucleus.com!pm1-edm-9.nucleus.com
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.quebec,soc.culture.eu
rope,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.british,soc.culture.french,so
c.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: The Bronfmans Family Takes Out $2.2 Billion Without Paying Tax
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 17:42:10 GMT
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <6o5bp8$d2g
@ds2.acs.ucalgary.ca> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <01bdc984$d6f9c0c0$dc0f35c6@compukat> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.45.65.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: trends.ca soc.culture.canada:156974 soc.culture.usa:249788 soc.culture.quebec:116587 soc.culture.europe:124496 soc.culture.swiss:26205 soc.culture.british:271168 soc.culture.french:111529 soc.culture.russian:90020
Since the case is currently before the Federal Court in Canada, it
most certainly is current news.
If you were a taxpayer in Canada, you would definitely be interested.
On Sun, 23 Aug 1998 10:30:56 GMT, [email protected] (E. Barry Bruyea)
wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Aug 1998 02:15:17 GMT, “Mercy” wrote:
>
>>[email protected] wrote in article <[email protected]>…
>>> The 700 millions NOT PAID BY THE BRONFMAN JEWS, means that others,
>>> such as the Chinese immigrants, have to make up the shortfall!!!
>>
>>Why do I get the feeling that you are not defending Chinese immigrants, but
>>an obvious racist propagandist?
>>
>
>Notwithstanding the fact that several idiots have been posting this
>anti-semitic crap for well over a year after the Bronfman’s quite
>legally moved money from point a to point b as were free to do under
>Canadian Tax law. I guess reading yesterdays newspapers is their way
>of keeping up with current events.
From [email protected] Tue Aug 25 15:46:25 EDT 1998
Article: 109152 of rec.travel.air
Path: trends.ca!hub.org!newsfeed.direct.ca!cyclone.news.idirect.
com!island.idirect.com!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net
!news.nucleus.com!pm1-edm-21.nucleus.com
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: rec.travel.air,alt.travel.air
Subject: Re: DO NOT FLY Air Transat
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 14:35:25 GMT
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <364b3666.25197987@news>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.45.65.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: trends.ca rec.travel.air:109152
This complaint was posted earlier this year.
Subject: SAFETY PROBLEMS WITH AIR TRANSAT
This is a formal COMPLAINT REGARDING UNSAFE FLIGHT PRACTICES OF AIR
TRANSAT.
The incident occurred:
Flight 513 – Holguin Cuba to Toronto
Saturday 6th June 1998
In this flight, even though the cockpit door is clearly signposted –
CREW ONLY with the same in French,
the male flight steward deliberately took 4 females (attractive), as
well as 2 male passengers into the cockpit!!!
To add insult to injury, even after being advised of ther safety
infringments, he deliberately took 2 of the females,
as well as one male into the cockpit during the last 30 minutes
before landing, while the plane was in the landing approach at
Toronto International Airport!!!
In view of the many recent accidents in final approaches, I consider
the cavalier attitude of Air Transat
a threat to the safety of everyone involved.
Many of the other prominent passengers are so concerned, that
they mentioned switching airlines for their bulk group flights from
Cuba!!!
P.S. I tried advising the Montreal office of Philippe Sureau of Air
Transat, but was shrugged off by his secretary!!!
On Sat, 22 Aug 1998 03:10:44 GMT, [email protected] (Millennium
Bios Solutions Corporation) wrote:
>THIS AIRLINE HATE TO CARRY PASSENGERS !!!!!!!
>
>Air Transat Complains
>I would like to meet other people who have had a bad experience with the Airline
> Called “AIR TRANSAT”
>It does fly between Canada and Holland and Germany
>This is the air line where people get treated like ANIMALS….
>Please send me some e-mail if you had bad experience.
From [email protected] Tue Aug 25 17:08:02 EDT 1998
Article: 116587 of soc.culture.quebec
Path: trends.ca!hub.org!data.pa.vix.com!news1.digital.com!decwrl!
nntpX.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.nucleus.com!pm1-edm-9.nucleus.com
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.quebec,soc
.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.british,soc.culture.french,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: The Bronfmans Family Takes Out $2.2 Billion Without Paying Tax
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 17:42:10 GMT
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <01bdc984$d6f9c0c0$dc0f35c6@compukat> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.45.65.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: trends.ca soc.culture.canada:156974 soc.culture.usa:249788 soc.culture.quebec:116587 soc.culture.europe:124496 soc.culture.swiss:26205 soc.culture.british:271168 soc.culture.french:111529 soc.culture.russian:90020
Since the case is currently before the Federal Court in Canada, it
most certainly is current news.
If you were a taxpayer in Canada, you would definitely be interested.
On Sun, 23 Aug 1998 10:30:56 GMT, [email protected] (E. Barry Bruyea)
wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Aug 1998 02:15:17 GMT, “Mercy” wrote:
>
>>[email protected] wrote in article <[email protected]>…
>>> The 700 millions NOT PAID BY THE BRONFMAN JEWS, means that others,
>>> such as the Chinese immigrants, have to make up the shortfall!!!
>>
>>Why do I get the feeling that you are not defending Chinese immigrants, but
>>an obvious racist propagandist?
>>
>
>Notwithstanding the fact that several idiots have been posting this
>anti-semitic crap for well over a year after the Bronfman’s quite
>legally moved money from point a to point b as were free to do under
>Canadian Tax law. I guess reading yesterdays newspapers is their way
>of keeping up with current events.
From [email protected] Fri Aug 28 12:07:05 EDT 1998
Article: 110483 of rec.travel.air
Path: trends.ca!hub.org!newsfeed.iae.nl!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!news.cs.utwente.nl!newshunter.cosy.sbg.ac.at!wuff.mayn.de!nntp.abs.net!nntp.cadvision.com!news.agtac.net!news.nucleus.com!pm1-edm-21.nucleus.com
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: rec.travel.air,alt.travel.air
Subject: Re: DO NOT FLY Air Transat
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 14:35:25 GMT
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <364b3666.25197987@news>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.45.65.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: trends.ca rec.travel.air:110483
This complaint was posted earlier this year.
Subject: SAFETY PROBLEMS WITH AIR TRANSAT
This is a formal COMPLAINT REGARDING UNSAFE FLIGHT PRACTICES OF AIR
TRANSAT.
The incident occurred:
Flight 513 – Holguin Cuba to Toronto
Saturday 6th June 1998
In this flight, even though the cockpit door is clearly signposted –
CREW ONLY with the same in French,
the male flight steward deliberately took 4 females (attractive), as
well as 2 male passengers into the cockpit!!!
To add insult to injury, even after being advised of ther safety
infringments, he deliberately took 2 of the females,
as well as one male into the cockpit during the last 30 minutes
before landing, while the plane was in the landing approach at
Toronto International Airport!!!
In view of the many recent accidents in final approaches, I consider
the cavalier attitude of Air Transat
a threat to the safety of everyone involved.
Many of the other prominent passengers are so concerned, that
they mentioned switching airlines for their bulk group flights from
Cuba!!!
P.S. I tried advising the Montreal office of Philippe Sureau of Air
Transat, but was shrugged off by his secretary!!!
On Sat, 22 Aug 1998 03:10:44 GMT, [email protected] (Millennium
Bios Solutions Corporation) wrote:
>THIS AIRLINE HATE TO CARRY PASSENGERS !!!!!!!
>
>Air Transat Complains
>I would like to meet other people who have had a bad experience with the Airline
> Called “AIR TRANSAT”
>It does fly between Canada and Holland and Germany
>This is the air line where people get treated like ANIMALS….
>Please send me some e-mail if you had bad experience.
From [email protected] Wed Sep 2 17:04:05 EDT 1998
Article: 271168 of soc.culture.british
Path: trends.ca!hub.org!data.pa.vix.com!news1.digital.com!decwrl!nntpX.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!206.172.150.11!news1.bellglobal.com!news.agtac.net!news.nucleus.com!pm1-edm-9.nucleus.com
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.quebec,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.british,soc.culture.french,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Re: The Bronfmans Family Takes Out $2.2 Billion Without Paying Tax
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 17:42:10 GMT
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <01bdc984$d6f9c0c0$dc0f35c6@compukat> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.45.65.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
Xref: trends.ca soc.culture.canada:156974 soc.culture.usa:249788 soc.culture.quebec:116587 soc.culture.europe:124496 soc.culture.swiss:26205 soc.culture.british:271168 soc.culture.french:111529 soc.culture.russian:90020
Since the case is currently before the Federal Court in Canada, it
most certainly is current news.
If you were a taxpayer in Canada, you would definitely be interested.
On Sun, 23 Aug 1998 10:30:56 GMT, [email protected] (E. Barry Bruyea)
wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Aug 1998 02:15:17 GMT, “Mercy” wrote:
>
>>[email protected] wrote in article <[email protected]>…
>>> The 700 millions NOT PAID BY THE BRONFMAN JEWS, means that others,
>>> such as the Chinese immigrants, have to make up the shortfall!!!
>>
>>Why do I get the feeling that you are not defending Chinese immigrants, but
>>an obvious racist propagandist?
>>
>
>Notwithstanding the fact that several idiots have been posting this
>anti-semitic crap for well over a year after the Bronfman’s quite
>legally moved money from point a to point b as were free to do under
>Canadian Tax law. I guess reading yesterdays newspapers is their way
>of keeping up with current events.
