Griswold Leslie Article 7-1995

From [email protected] Sun Oct 1 12:33:32 PDT 1995
Article: 10092 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.
politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.
net!news.cyberstore.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!van-bc!
news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.
carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: “All Creatures Great and Small” (was: JEW ROSENBURG WINS AGAIN…HANDS
DOWN (his pants, that is)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<44jfa
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 1995 01:58:10 GMT
Lines: 34
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5006
alt.politics.nationalism.white:3563 alt.discrimination:36368 alt.revisionism:10092

Joel Rosenberg ([email protected]) writes:
> In article <[email protected]> [email protected] (william c anderson) writes:
>
>>Ronald Schoedel ([email protected]) wrote:
>>: [email protected] (Joel Rosenberg) wrote:
>>: >In article <[email protected]> Ronald Schoedel writes:
>
>>: >>Arrogant? Joel the jew? Les, buddy, you get the award for UNDERSTATE-
>>: >>MENT OF THE YEAR. jew-boy Joel gets the award for arrogant hymie of the
>>: >>year.
>>: >
>>: >You still haven’t answered the question, Ronzo — Have you stopped fucking
>>: >your dog yet?
>
>>: BUT WAIT! There’s more….announcing,the award for JEW WITH THE MOST
>>: DEMENTED ONE-TRACK MIND……(envelope rips open)…….
>
>>: JEW-EL ROSENBURG!!!!! (thunderous boos and rotten tomatoes thrown)
>
>>
>
>>Uh…Rev? You still didn’t answer the question…
>
> Shhh. I think he’s hoping nobody notices that he won’t answer the question.

Joel, you sure seem to be preoccupied with this human/animal thing. Are
you trying to tell us something?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sun Oct 1 12:56:33 PDT 1995
Article: 4997 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.
ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!spool.
mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Mixed race children
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:

Date: Sun, 1 Oct 1995 13:58:48 GMT
Lines: 29

Jew Rosenberg ([email protected]) writes:
> In article [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
>>Sherwin Cho ([email protected]) writes:
>>> If you look at portraits, in your yearbook for instance, you’ll notice in
>>> many portraits that one eye is slightly shut than the other. Everyone
>>> seems to have a “dominant” eye. Most of the time it is the right eye for
>>> right-handed people and the left eye for southpaws.
>
>>But she wasn’t talking about portraits in a yearbook, or dominant eyes.
>>She was talking about a god-awful looking little hybrid.
>
> Why it’s of any importance what your right hand, Sylvie, was “talking about”,
> is not entirely clear.
>
> In any case, as anybody with an IQ above room temperature has noted — I know,
> Les; this excuses you; you may leave the class now — biracial kids are
> typically very, very cute.

Yeah, sure. Cute like my puppy’s first outdoor B.M. Really, Rosie, if
biracial kids are so cute, why are Orthodox jews so opposed to exogamy?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sun Oct 1 12:56:34 PDT 1995
Article: 5009 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!
nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.
ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Week In Review, 9/23 to 9/30
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 1995 02:26:58 GMT
Lines: 44

Racial Theorist ([email protected]) writes:
> folks:
>
> it has been an excellent week for the white race on apw-p. again, all
> flame wars were won by the white race, and this week out newsgroup
> president, les griswold, gets most of the credit for making idjits and
> monkeys out of the multicultural libs, with the good rev ron, chaplain
> of the newsgroup, lending a lot of support.

Thanks, R.T., but I can’t take all of the credit. After all, debating
with multicult libs is like discussing non-Euclidean geometry with
mongoloid retards: they just haven’t got the equipment upstairs to make
the discussion interesting.

> most of the time i stay out of flame wars–there are so many good
> flamers on the ng there’s little need for my help–but about midway
> through the week i noticed that we had a few blacks getting out of
> line on the newsgroup and with great pleasure i gave them a few good
> swift kicks in their sorry black ass.
> basically we have not determined whether these blacks are real blacks
> or whether they’re liberals in disguise trying to make blacks look
> bad.

Trust me, negroes don’t need ANYONE’S help to look bad!

> several of us have discussed it, and we ain’t never known any
> real life blacks as dumb as the ones we got here on the newsgroup.
> the new supporters of the white race who showed up this week were
> eddie and big daddy. welcome aboard!!! and we look forward to them
> having a long stay on apw-p.
> And—-> if you want to see a nice looking and well worked out
> homepage, check out reuben’s.
>
> in loyal service to the white race,
>
> r.c. richards, racial theorist

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sun Oct 1 14:34:24 PDT 1995
Article: 208701 of talk.politics.guns
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!
math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!
FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Jews and guns in 1938 Germany (was: Evelyn Hill Is A Fucking Nazi!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 14:11:27 GMT
Lines: 25

Michael McGowran ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

>> The original German documents are clear enough for the honest person to read
>> and make their own judgment. I ask them to do so.
>>
>> The simple fact is that the Reich government ENCOURAGED German citizens to
>> possess firearms for the defense of the Nation.
> Just as long as they were’t Jewish German citizens, huh?

EVERY government has the right to protect itself from its enemies, and
Hitler rightly identified the jews as enemies of his government. Also,
you might want to remember that Hitler did NOT come to power in a bloody
coup, or by pulling the wool over anyone’s eyes). In any event, even a
jew who could prove a pressing need for a firearm was allowed to own one
in Germany after Hitler’s acension to power. That the Nazis reserved for
themselves the right to determine what constitued “pressing need” in no
way lessens the truth of this fact.

Les

It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sun Oct 1 14:34:25 PDT 1995
Article: 208981 of talk.politics.guns
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!
math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!
FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The ONLY reason for the JPFO…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 1995 09:25:27 GMT
Lines: 37
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.guns:208981 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3429 alt.discrimination:36243

Bite Me ATF ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes…
>>…. is so that the jews can say, “Look! See? Not all jews are for
>>stricter gun control!” They’re embarrassed by the preponderance of jewish
>>names in the gun-grabbing lobby, like Schumaker and Metzenbaum, and so
>>they’ve formed a kosher pro-gun group.
>
> what A BUNCH OF FREAKEN CRAP,
>
> and the group is not pro-gun, they are pro freedom/liberty. The rkba is only
> a means to insure that
>
>>
>>It also allows them to play the “Hitler was a gun-grabber!” card. This
>>simply isn’t true.
>>
>
> please enlighten me, what is the “truth”?
> one of the best things about jpfo is that they document everything extremmely
> well. so lets see your documentation.

Well, the truth, which you probably won’t want to see, can be found on the
National Alliance’s webpage, at http://www.natvan.com. I get the distinct
impression, however, that you won’t take me up on it. You talk a good
game, but from your reaction, anything that doesn’t take a worshipful
attitude towards jews is automatically “anti-semitic crap”.

Has anyone ever noticed that the worth of a group is determined SOLELY by
that group’s attitude towards jews?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sun Oct 1 14:34:26 PDT 1995
Article: 208982 of talk.politics.guns
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!
swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.sprintlink.net!
howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Gun laws in 1938 Germany…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 1995 11:15:44 GMT
Lines: 36

Unfortunately for all of you “Hitler was the granddaddy gun-grabber of all
times!” loons, I happen to have a copy of the gun laws in 1938 Germany.
The ONLY time the jews are mentioned specifically are under the section on
“Manufacture of Firearms and Ammunition”. In other words, they were kept
>from becoming involved in the arms trade.

Further on, in the section dealing with the Purchase, Carrying, Ownership
and Import of Weapons and Ammunition, the Act quite specifically lists
people whom are to be denied W.A.P.s, and thus kept from legally buying
handguns:

1) persons under the age of 18 years;
2) legally incapacitated or mentally inferior person;
3) Gypsies or vagabond persons;
4) persons under mandatory police supervision or who have been relieved
of their civil rights – for as long as these remain under mandatory police
supervision or remain stripped of their civil rights;
5) persons convicted of treason or high treason, or with respect to whom
known facts justify the assumption that they are engaged in activities
hostile to the state;
6) persons who, for a deliberate assault on the life or well-being of
others, for breach of the peace or for trespass, for resistance to the
authority of the state, for a criminal offense or misdemeanor, for a
criminal offence against property, for a hunting violation, or for a
fishing violation, were legally sentenced to a term of imprisonment of
more than two weeks, if three years have not yet passed since the term of
imprisonment.

That’s IT. No mention of jews THERE.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sun Oct 1 14:34:27 PDT 1995
Article: 209151 of talk.politics.guns
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!
howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Gun laws in 1938 Germany…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 1995 01:21:46 GMT
Lines: 78

James F. Mayer ([email protected]) writes:
> In [email protected] (Les
> Griswold) writes:
>>
>>Unfortunately for all of you “Hitler was the granddaddy gun-grabber of
> all
>>times!” loons, I happen to have a copy of the gun laws in 1938
> Germany.
>>The ONLY time the jews are mentioned specifically are under the
> section on
>>”Manufacture of Firearms and Ammunition”. In other words, they were
> kept
>>from becoming involved in the arms trade.
>>
>>Further on, in the section dealing with the Purchase, Carrying,
> Ownership
>>and Import of Weapons and Ammunition, the Act quite specifically lists
>>people whom are to be denied W.A.P.s, and thus kept from legally
> buying
>>handguns:
>>
>>1) persons under the age of 18 years;
>>2) legally incapacitated or mentally inferior person;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Read Jews! The Aryans were considered superior to all other persons,
> thus they could under this provision disarm any group they considered
> inferior which would have been _everyone_ else.
>
>>3) Gypsies or vagabond persons;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Read Jews after they were denied employment!
>
>>4) persons under mandatory police supervision or who have been
>>relieved of their civil rights – for as long as these remain under
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> mandatory police supervision or remain stripped of their civil rights;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Read Jews!
>
>>5) persons convicted of treason or high treason, or with respect to
>>whom known facts justify the assumption that they are engaged in
>>activities hostile to the state;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Read Jews!
>
>>6) persons who, for a deliberate assault on the life or well-being of
>>others, for breach of the peace or for trespass, for resistance to the
>>authority of the state, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Read Jews!
>
> for a criminal offense or misdemeanor, for a
>>criminal offence against property, for a hunting violation, or for a
>>fishing violation, were legally sentenced to a term of imprisonment of
>>more than two weeks, if three years have not yet passed since the term
> of
>>imprisonment.
>>
>>That’s IT. No mention of jews THERE.

(snip)

> It didn’t necessarilly have to mention Jews specifically but by
> including them in particular groups they were denied the right to self
> defense or weapons of any sort.

This is pathetic. Is it the best you can do? I’m sure that if Hitler
MEANT jews, he would have SAID jews, quite specifically. But now we’re
supposed to believe that he engaged in the same sort of obfuscation and
double-talk that is normal among politicians today?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sun Oct 1 17:42:24 PDT 1995
Article: 10131 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.
discrimination,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!
nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!
freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les and Schoedel: What do they see in each other, hmm????
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <44jfa
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 1995 11:41:20 GMT
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5026 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3577
alt.discrimination:36379 alt.revisionism:10131

Joel Rosenberg ([email protected]) writes:
> In article [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
>>>
>>>>Uh…Rev? You still didn’t answer the question…
>>>
>>> Shhh. I think he’s hoping nobody notices that he won’t answer the question.
>
>>Joel, you sure seem to be preoccupied with this human/animal thing. Are
>>you trying to tell us something?
>
> Yeah, I think your Schoedel buddy has something to hide. You know, like your
> marriage to your right hand?

Wow, first he goes on and on and on about bestiality, now he’w dropping
hints about homosexuality and masturbating! What IS he trying to tell us?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sun Oct 1 17:42:25 PDT 1995
Article: 10133 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.
politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.
cyberstore.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!
pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: GREAT reasoning powers!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 1995 12:14:23 GMT
Lines: 13
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:10133 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3579 alt.politics.white-power:5028 alt.discrimination:36381

I really get a belly-laugh out of all the junior Sherlock Holmeses here,
who are whining and kvetching about the mass-mailing of “The Long March”.
The “reasoning” goes something like this:

“Duh, the NAME National Alliance appears in the “From” line, therefore it
REALLY IS from the National Alliance!”

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 2 07:37:24 PDT 1995
Article: 3609 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.
ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!
torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: You guys are way behind the times…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 1995 09:56:18 GMT
Lines: 12
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:36424 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3609

It’s already common knowledge that “[email protected]” is
NOT, repeat NOT, from the actual Head Office, but somebody from sfsu.
However, like good little automatons, you all choose to ignore it and keep
up with the “National Alliance is in the NAME, so it MUST BE the real
National Alliance!” Geez, no wonder people dislike the thought of guns
in your hands…

Les

It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 2 07:49:45 PDT 1995
Article: 209451 of talk.politics.guns
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!
howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: You guys are way behind the times…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 1995 09:25:32 GMT
Lines: 13

It’s already common knowledge that “[email protected]l-Alliance.org” is
NOT, repeat NOT, from the actual Head Office, but somebody from sfsu.
However, like good little automatons, you all choose to ignore it and keep
up with the “National Alliance is in the NAME, so it MUST BE the real
National Alliance!” Geez, no wonder people dislike the thought of guns
in your hands…

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 2 09:33:30 PDT 1995
Article: 3623 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.
discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!
howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!
cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: EVERYONE hates negroes! (was: Why negroes cry racism…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 1995 15:08:01 GMT
Lines: 17
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:3623 alt.politics.white-power:5071 alt.discrimination:36439

aria ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> “white” people are not the only racists. many asians are very
> prejudiced against “blacks” as well. hell, many “blacks” are prejdiced
> against “blacks”.

This widespread dislike of negroes should tell you something…

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 2 10:45:46 PDT 1995
Article: 10209 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy Jeannie likes bestiality too, it seems! (was: JEW ROSENBURG
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 1995 15:00:58 GMT
Lines: 39
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:3627 alt.politics.white-power:5074 alt.discrimination:36446 alt.revisionism:10209

WINS AGAIN…HANDS DOWN (his pants, that is)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet

Crazy Jeannie “I like animals” Kowalewski ([email protected])
writes:

(snip)

Rev. Ron:
> * Yes yes yes…Jew-el Rosenburg seems to have this pre-occupation with
> * bestial sex. You guys ever notice it’s ALL this pervo ever thinks
> * about or writes in his weenie posts.

> Maybe Joel and I will get together and write a book or a screenplay about
> you! The “Doogie Hauser” actor is still in the business . . .

I’m sure that you wanna “get together” with Jew Rosenboig, but I doubt
that it’s to write a book…

> Wassamatta, Rhonda? Are your black lacy panties getting all bunched up
> again? Are you having trouble squeezing your hairy toes into the 5″
> stiletto heels that your boyfriend likes so well? Which do you prefer,
> Rhonda? Playing the passive role for your boyfriend or getting your
> doggies to perform on command? Have you been vaccinated for Kennel Cough?

Is this preoccupation with animals endemic among liberals? Also, Crazy,
you might wanna take notes: the above is a classic example of the “I know
you are, but what am I?” retort. Surely, even YOU can do better.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 2 13:21:54 PDT 1995
Article: 3631 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Aria: one mad negro! (was: Why negroes cry racism…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 1995 15:18:28 GMT
Lines: 69
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:3631 alt.politics.white-power:5077 alt.discrimination:36449

aria ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> you say that “blacks” have received restitution? in what way?
> so-called “emancipation?” emancipation to do what? become paid, rather
> than free-labor slaves? make clear for me where “whites” have WILLINGLY
> given blacks (pre-civil rights) anything of value in this country without
> some sort of a fight.

“Fight”. Ha. A bunch of recalcitrant negroes organizing “Freedom
Marches” is not fighting, boy. Get real.

> i laid SOME blame on the white community; are you
> now saying that “whites” are not in any way responsible for their “black”
> brethren?

And you’re saying that we ARE responsible for ALL negroes, including the
lazy, unproductive, thieves and criminals?

> must have mistaken you for a someone else!
>
> STOP STEREOTYPING ALL MINORITIES BASED ON WHAT YOU READ AND SEE ON
> TV. not all asians are rocket-scientists, not all jews are misers, not
> all hispanics are gangbangers or migrant workers who don’t speak english.
> (and i’ll bet you don’t even have a sterotype for the native-americans,
> because they have yet to be considered enough of a threat to “white”
> america to be featured). alcoholism, perhaps; that’s the one i’ve heard
> of…
>
> and who the fuck said i wanted to earn the respect of america? did
> martin luther king earn the respect of america?

Holy fuck. I can’t BELIEVE that you’re so ignorant of basic facts. King
is ADORED by the government. If the U.S.A. was a theocracy, you can bet
that they’d saint him.

(snip)

> so fuck you if you are to ignorant to see the truth. “whites males”
> are predominately (note that i said “predominately, and not wholly)
> responsible for the destitution of the “black” (and almost all other
> minority) community in modern society;

No, laziness and an unwillingness to take responsibility are the problems
facing the negro community.

> do not lie to wash your hands of
> your fellow man’s ills. i stand firm on this now (thanks in part, i
> suppose, to you). this does not mean that i hold “whites” responsible for
> MY life, but since 9 out of 10 of my relatives live in the ghetto, pardon
> me if i assert that there seems to be some sort of bias in the system.
>
> the “white male” sytem…i might add.
>
> (ask yourself “shawn”: how many of your relatives live in the ghetto?
> and if so, do they do so by choice…or were they born into such poverty
> and hopelessness?)

Blah, blah, blah… because your relatives are too lazy and/or stupid to
better themselves is proof of NOTHING.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Tue Oct 3 08:57:43 PDT 1995
Article: 10282 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.skinheads,alt.discrimination,talk.politics.guns,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 13:46:42 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5106 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3679 alt.skinheads:4076 alt.discrimination:36498 talk.politics.guns:209850 alt.revisionism:10282

Chris Morton ([email protected]) writes:
> In [email protected] (Sylvie
> Charbonneau) wrote:
>
>>I know that there has been a lot of noise about a mailing sent by someone
>>at “national-alliance.org”, that turned out to be a hoax by someone at
>>sfu. For the real story on the National Alliance, call the answering
>>service nearest you.
>
> I would no more call this shambling mob of anencephalic stooges than I would
> call NAMBLA… of course I’m sure their membership roles have considerable
> overlap….

So, I take it that means that we should be expecting your call anytime now?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Tue Oct 3 13:53:34 PDT 1995
Article: 10299 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy Jeannie likes bestiality too, it seems! (was: JEW ROSENBURG
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 13:26:39 GMT
Lines: 59
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5123 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3700 alt.discrimination:36515 alt.revisionism:10299

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
> Yeah, I confess. I like animals. Rob and I were spotted at the grocery
> store buying a jumbo sized bag of Atta Cat catfood and a box of Vitabone
> dog biscuits today. We not only feed our own pets, but we also feed a
> family of outdoor cats whose owners dumped them by our property. We have
> birdhouses and feeders, too. A family of racoons occasionally stops by for
> a snack and to climb our trees. We once had some squirrels on our
> property, but our cats killed them.
>
> What’s your fucking point, Les?

Same as always: you’re a fucking idiot, and you think
“alt.politics.white-power” is another way of saying
“alt.share.your.miscegenation.fantasies”.

(snip)

Crazy:
> * > Wassamatta, Rhonda? Are your black lacy panties getting all bunched up
> * > again? Are you having trouble squeezing your hairy toes into the 5″
> * > stiletto heels that your boyfriend likes so well? Which do you prefer,
> * > Rhonda? Playing the passive role for your boyfriend or getting your
> * > doggies to perform on command? Have you been vaccinated for Kennel Cough?
> *
> * Is this preoccupation with animals endemic among liberals? Also, Crazy,
> * you might wanna take notes: the above is a classic example of the “I know
> * you are, but what am I?” retort. Surely, even YOU can do better.
>
> FOAD, cockroach-boy. Actually, I just wrote about a few things that he
> probably had to have explained to him by a grownup. You must feel pretty
> good being the rolemodel for these ignorant redneck kids, doncha? You are
> running around wiping Ronnie’s nose and heinie everytime he writes
> something stupid, and you think of it as your profession. Speaking of
> profession, why don’t you tell us about your dayjob, or are you still a
> bottom-feeding social parasite of the Canadian welfare system?

Whatever turns you on, Crazy. Unlike you, I don’t believe in coming on
these NGs and boo-hooing about how rotten my life is, which I couldn’t do
anyway, because my life is pretty good.

> BTW, cockroach-boy — why are you once again butting your fat head (proof
> of Aryan intelligence, heh) into something that was not written to or
> about you? Are you now the official spokesperson for Brother Blasphemy?
> Did he send you an e-mail saying, “Boo-hoo-hoo. Protect me from that mean
> ol’ Jeanne, ‘cos I’m such a sniveling little wimp that I can’t speak up
> for myself anymore.”?

Wouldn’t you like to know?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Tue Oct 3 13:54:51 PDT 1995
Article: 3701 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Aria: one mad negro! (was: Why negroes cry racism…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 13:34:44 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5124 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3701 alt.discrimination:36516

Mark Staloff ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
> : > you say that “blacks” have received restitution? in what way?
> : > so-called “emancipation?” emancipation to do what? become paid, rather
> : > than free-labor slaves? make clear for me where “whites” have WILLINGLY
> : > given blacks (pre-civil rights) anything of value in this country without
> : > some sort of a fight.
>
> : “Fight”. Ha. A bunch of recalcitrant negroes organizing “Freedom
> : Marches” is not fighting, boy. Get real.
>
> Les, have you ever seen photos of Birmingham, 1965? Fire hoses and
> attack dogs unleashed upon peaceful protesters of all ages, including
> many women? How about the hundreds, maybe thousands (I don’t have
> numbers offhand) of lynchings which occurred in the South between the
> Civil War and LBJ?

And how about the hundreds, maybe thousands, of White people who have been
killed in slave revolts, and negro violence SINCE Emancipation?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Wed Oct 4 06:50:21 PDT 1995
Article: 3725 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy Jeannie: what a hoot!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 09:51:27 GMT
Lines: 39
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5139 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3725 alt.discrimination:36548

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:

(snip – Crazy telling us what a kind, loving person she is because she
loves animals, and hates her own race)

> * > What’s your fucking point, Les?
> *
> * Same as always: you’re a fucking idiot, and you think
> * “alt.politics.white-power” is another way of saying
> * “alt.share.your.miscegenation.fantasies”.
>
> That’s quite a statement coming from an self-aggrandized piece of trash,
> who fancies himself to be part of the master race.

Crazy, all this billing and cooing isn’t going to work, I know deep down
you really like me…

(snip again – Crazy speculating about my employment)

> * Whatever turns you on, Crazy. Unlike you, I don’t believe in coming on
> * these NGs and boo-hooing about how rotten my life is, which I couldn’t do
> * anyway, because my life is pretty good.
>
> Yeah, between living off the government and collecting money from other
> insecure white trash assholes, you can just sit around and spew garbage
> all day. I’ll bet you make your family proud. Not every family can claim a
> running sore on the buttocks of humanity as one of their own kin.

But enough about me, let’s talk about you… the fact remains, you have an
alarming tendency to think that people actually CARE about your personal
life, and that therefore EVERYONE wants to be as tedious as you.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Wed Oct 4 06:50:36 PDT 1995
Article: 5139 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy Jeannie: what a hoot!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 09:51:27 GMT
Lines: 39
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5139 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3725 alt.discrimination:36548

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:

(snip – Crazy telling us what a kind, loving person she is because she
loves animals, and hates her own race)

> * > What’s your fucking point, Les?
> *
> * Same as always: you’re a fucking idiot, and you think
> * “alt.politics.white-power” is another way of saying
> * “alt.share.your.miscegenation.fantasies”.
>
> That’s quite a statement coming from an self-aggrandized piece of trash,
> who fancies himself to be part of the master race.

Crazy, all this billing and cooing isn’t going to work, I know deep down
you really like me…

(snip again – Crazy speculating about my employment)

> * Whatever turns you on, Crazy. Unlike you, I don’t believe in coming on
> * these NGs and boo-hooing about how rotten my life is, which I couldn’t do
> * anyway, because my life is pretty good.
>
> Yeah, between living off the government and collecting money from other
> insecure white trash assholes, you can just sit around and spew garbage
> all day. I’ll bet you make your family proud. Not every family can claim a
> running sore on the buttocks of humanity as one of their own kin.

But enough about me, let’s talk about you… the fact remains, you have an
alarming tendency to think that people actually CARE about your personal
life, and that therefore EVERYONE wants to be as tedious as you.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Wed Oct 4 07:38:31 PDT 1995
Article: 3735 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Million man march? Ha!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 12:52:21 GMT
Lines: 12
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:36554 alt.politics.white-power:5148 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3735 soc.culture.african.american:105290

I think the best thing to counter the Million Man March would be a
50-million White Man March, to show the country how much the economy
depends on WHITES. Of course, this would be decried left, right and
center by the media, but who cares?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Wed Oct 4 07:38:32 PDT 1995
Article: 3737 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Fun games you can play!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 12:55:03 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5150 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3737 alt.discrimination:36556

1) Go into your cupboards, and count how many of the items are kosher.

2) Pay “Spot the Minority” while watching television.

3) When a “person of colour” (snicker) asks you for directions, put on a
happy face and send him on a wild goose chase.

That’s just for starters. Anyone else got any ideas for how a White
Nationalist can pass the time in our happy multicultural society?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Thu Oct 5 16:17:35 PDT 1995
Article: 3758 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 19:52:42 GMT
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5169 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3758 alt.discrimination:36579 alt.skinheads:4144

Jew Rosenboig ([email protected]) writes:
> In article [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>>>
>>> I would no more call this shambling mob of anencephalic stooges than I would
>>> call NAMBLA… of course I’m sure their membership roles have considerable
>>> overlap….
>
>>So, I take it that means that we should be expecting your call anytime now?
>
> You recruiting for NAMBLA again, Lester?

Jojo, where ya been?!? We’ve missed your insightful, witty commentary!

It’s reassuring to know that you’ve always got an opinion on something,
even if it’s pedophilia, bestiality or homosexuality, and even if it’s to
seek out fellow-practitioners of the finer arts.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Thu Oct 5 16:17:37 PDT 1995
Article: 3759 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 19:56:25 GMT
Lines: 13
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5170 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3759 alt.discrimination:36580

There’s been an awful lot of hand-wringing and moaning about “the race
card” in the O.J. fiasco, but no-one asks if we’ve lost anything because a
big black buck offed his renegadish, slutty wife. To my mind, a white
slut who gives herself to a negro (even a mulatto like O.J.) and bears his
pickaninnies (hi, Crazy!) deserves whatever she gets when the nigger goes
berserk, which is inevitable.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Fri Oct 6 09:51:07 PDT 1995
Article: 10439 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.skinheads,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Mortie…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 12:43:25 GMT
Lines: 29
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:3831 alt.politics.white-power:5247 alt.skinheads:4194 alt.discrimination:36656 alt.revisionism:10439 talk.politics.guns:210576

(snip)

Chris Morton writes:

(snip)

> What’s the matter, Nazi-wannabe, did someone send email to
> [email protected] complaining about your stupid
> spam?

:And I have ABSOLUTELY no idea who would have done THAT…! 🙂

… and in another message, wrote:

(snip – Mortie comparing the National Alliance with NAMBLA)

>So, I take it that means that we should be expecting your call anytime now?

:My call to the FBI and RCMP about the above mentioned activities?

Cripes, Mortie, you sound like Mike Beebe, with all this sneaking-about
behaviour. Gee, don’t you have egg on your face now, eh boy?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Fri Oct 6 09:51:08 PDT 1995
Article: 10444 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.skinheads,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 13:34:39 GMT
Lines: 29
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:36660 alt.skinheads:4199 alt.politics.white-power:5249 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3834 alt.revisionism:10444 talk.politics.guns:210593

Jew Rosenboig ([email protected]) writes:
> In article [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
>>Chris Morton ([email protected]) writes:
>
>>(snip – Mortie comparing the National Alliance to NAMBLA)
>
>>Moi:
>>>>So, I take it that means that we should be expecting your call anytime now?
>
>>> So then by the above, you admit that the National Alliance is a collection of
>>> pedophiles?
>
>>Nope. I’ve just long ago realized the futility of arguing
>
> Apparently; you long ago shifted over to impotent raging, Leshole.

Nice edit, jew, but you may want to avoid the practice of cutting people
off in mid-sentence: it might give the impression that jews are less than
completely honest in their dealings with people who disagree with them.
Of course, we KNOW that’s not true, don’t we?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Fri Oct 6 10:02:48 PDT 1995
Article: 3783 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Fun games you can play!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 10:14:23 GMT
Lines: 45
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5198 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3783 alt.discrimination:36608

Racial Theorist ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>>1) Go into your cupboards, and count how many of the items are kosher.
>
>>2) Pay “Spot the Minority” while watching television.
>
>>3) When a “person of colour” (snicker) asks you for directions, put on a
>>happy face and send him on a wild goose chase.
>
>>That’s just for starters. Anyone else got any ideas for how a White
>>Nationalist can pass the time in our happy multicultural society?
>
> this sounds like this can be a fun game. around here we’re always
> coming up with some kind of a trickery on the blacks. such as
> whenever i knock on a black person’s door and they ask who it is
> through the door, i yell, “it’s the po-lice!” and that always pretty
> much scares the hell out of them and you can get a good laugh out of
> it. one time a couple years ago me and ted were taking a break from
> studying and we came up with the idea of calling up some black people
> and telling them there had been a train wreck in their area and some
> gorillas on their way to the zoo had got loose and they needed to stay
> inside and get their kids inside, and we told them what radio they had
> to stay tuned in to–we picked a country music station–that would
> tell them when the gorillas were caught, and that they needed to stay
> inside until they heard the gorillas were caught on the radio or until
> we called them back.
> there’s other tricks we’ve played on nigras, but that’s all i can
> remember right now.
>
> in loyal service to the white race,
>
> r.c. richards, racial theorist

It’s sorta like shooting fish in a barrel, though, to take advantage of
the negro “intelligence”. The negro is not our main problem, anyway; the
main problem is the jew. The negro is just one of the weapons the jew is
using to attempt to destroy the White race.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Fri Oct 6 10:02:49 PDT 1995
Article: 3793 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Fun games you can play!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 12:59:22 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5209 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3793 alt.discrimination:36619

Rob “I’m a man, honest!” Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> 1) Go into your cupboards, and count how many of the items are kosher.
>>
>> 2) Pay “Spot the Minority” while watching television.
>>
>> 3) When a “person of colour” (snicker) asks you for directions, put on a
>> happy face and send him on a wild goose chase.
>>
>> That’s just for starters. Anyone else got any ideas for how a White
>> Nationalist can pass the time in our happy multicultural society?
>
> Yeah! You can come forth with the “Rob’s pussywhipped” evidence. Or you
> could admit that it was a lie, and stated without you knowing anything
> about me, or anything else, for that matter.

That really got under your skin, eh, Rob?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Fri Oct 6 10:02:50 PDT 1995
Article: 3794 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Slimy positions… (was: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 13:06:52 GMT
Lines: 23
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:36620 alt.politics.white-power:5210 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3794

Jew Rosenboig ([email protected]) writes:
> In article [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
>>There’s been an awful lot of hand-wringing and moaning about “the race
>>card” in the O.J. fiasco, but no-one asks if we’ve lost anything because a
>>big black buck offed his renegadish, slutty wife. To my mind, a white
>>slut who gives herself to a negro (even a mulatto like O.J.) and bears his
>>pickaninnies (hi, Crazy!) deserves whatever she gets when the nigger goes
>>berserk, which is inevitable.
>
> You know, Les, you can always be counted on to take the slimiest possible
> position whenever you poke your snout out from under your rock.

Slimy positions, Jojo? Naw, I leave those to your ambulance-chasing,
Talmud reading brethren.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Fri Oct 6 10:02:51 PDT 1995
Article: 3800 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Got this stupid e-mail today…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 13:15:16 GMT
Lines: 58
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:36624 alt.politics.white-power:5215 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3800

Normally, I just delete stupid e-mail, and don’t think that I’m
changing my habits, but this one was such a gem, and so indicative of
liberal thinking, that I HAD to save it and post it here. Gee, I hope
Adamski (who’s apparently too stupid to tell the difference between
posting a reply, and e-mailing one) doesn’t mind too much!

>[email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>>There’s a big to-do about O.J. getting off because he was rich, as if
>>everyone is afraid to accept the fact that he walked because he was BLACK.
>
>Let’s take a look at the facts here. There were two white women on the
>jury: one was a college graduate who felt that DNA testing was “somewhat
>reliable” and that it would “hold some value” while the other was a juror on another murder case. The initial vote was 11-1 for acq=
>uittal; she was the lone holdout. The final vote got a CONVICTION.

Have you ever heard of intimidation? There were TWO White WOMEN on the
jury, and NINE blacks, at least some of whom were male.

>If race was such a defining factor, why didn’t these two press for conviction, or, at the very least, a hung jury? They don’t seem =
>to be the type of people who would be easily swayed by popular opinion.

And you know these women well, do you?

>Another fact: cities with majority black populations such as Washington, D.C., routinely have cases with majority black juries deci=
>ding on a black defendant. Race usually plays little or no role in their decision as these juries DO send their “brothers” and “sis=
>ters” to prison when the evidednce deems it so. Conversely, it is usually the ALL-WHITE juries that tend to acquit a white defendan=
>t who has committed a crime against a non-White. (Remember Mississippi and Alabama in the 50’s and 60’s? Remember the Rodney King =
>trial?)

The ’50s and ’60s were a long time ago, but it seems to me that you really
look forward to a return to the racial turmoil that characterized those years.

As for the Rodney King fiasco, the same argument applies there that we are
beginning to see with the O.J. Simpson trial: the jury reached a
conclusion BASED ON THE EVIDENCE THEY SAW, and it shouldn’t be questioned.
Yes, I remember the first Rodney King trial, and the damage that
followed: a BILLION dollars worth of property damage, and FIFTY-THREE
dead, all over one drunk negro motorist getting whacked too much.

>One last point. It is far more compelling to me that a jury of 10 women freed O.J., an acknowledged wife-beater. It would seem to =
>me that if the evidence were there, that a majority of women would have voted to convict such a man.

You apparently seem to think that all women think alike, and that no woman
can be intimidated by anyone else. Well, I’ve got some news for you,
Adamski: women DO make mistakes in judging situations, sometimes fatal
ones. The fact that Nicole stuck around as long as she did obviously
means nothing to you, does it?

As a final note, please post these messages on public boards, and do not
send them via e-mail. Normally, I don’t respond to such crap in e-mail,
but in this case I thought I’d make an exception.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Fri Oct 6 10:03:25 PDT 1995
Article: 5198 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Fun games you can play!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 10:14:23 GMT
Lines: 45
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5198 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3783 alt.discrimination:36608

Racial Theorist ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>>1) Go into your cupboards, and count how many of the items are kosher.
>
>>2) Pay “Spot the Minority” while watching television.
>
>>3) When a “person of colour” (snicker) asks you for directions, put on a
>>happy face and send him on a wild goose chase.
>
>>That’s just for starters. Anyone else got any ideas for how a White
>>Nationalist can pass the time in our happy multicultural society?
>
> this sounds like this can be a fun game. around here we’re always
> coming up with some kind of a trickery on the blacks. such as
> whenever i knock on a black person’s door and they ask who it is
> through the door, i yell, “it’s the po-lice!” and that always pretty
> much scares the hell out of them and you can get a good laugh out of
> it. one time a couple years ago me and ted were taking a break from
> studying and we came up with the idea of calling up some black people
> and telling them there had been a train wreck in their area and some
> gorillas on their way to the zoo had got loose and they needed to stay
> inside and get their kids inside, and we told them what radio they had
> to stay tuned in to–we picked a country music station–that would
> tell them when the gorillas were caught, and that they needed to stay
> inside until they heard the gorillas were caught on the radio or until
> we called them back.
> there’s other tricks we’ve played on nigras, but that’s all i can
> remember right now.
>
> in loyal service to the white race,
>
> r.c. richards, racial theorist

It’s sorta like shooting fish in a barrel, though, to take advantage of
the negro “intelligence”. The negro is not our main problem, anyway; the
main problem is the jew. The negro is just one of the weapons the jew is
using to attempt to destroy the White race.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Fri Oct 6 10:03:26 PDT 1995
Article: 5209 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Fun games you can play!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 12:59:22 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5209 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3793 alt.discrimination:36619

Rob “I’m a man, honest!” Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> 1) Go into your cupboards, and count how many of the items are kosher.
>>
>> 2) Pay “Spot the Minority” while watching television.
>>
>> 3) When a “person of colour” (snicker) asks you for directions, put on a
>> happy face and send him on a wild goose chase.
>>
>> That’s just for starters. Anyone else got any ideas for how a White
>> Nationalist can pass the time in our happy multicultural society?
>
> Yeah! You can come forth with the “Rob’s pussywhipped” evidence. Or you
> could admit that it was a lie, and stated without you knowing anything
> about me, or anything else, for that matter.

That really got under your skin, eh, Rob?

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Fri Oct 6 10:03:27 PDT 1995
Article: 5215 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Got this stupid e-mail today…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 13:15:16 GMT
Lines: 58
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:36624 alt.politics.white-power:5215 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3800

Normally, I just delete stupid e-mail, and don’t think that I’m
changing my habits, but this one was such a gem, and so indicative of
liberal thinking, that I HAD to save it and post it here. Gee, I hope
Adamski (who’s apparently too stupid to tell the difference between
posting a reply, and e-mailing one) doesn’t mind too much!

>[email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>>There’s a big to-do about O.J. getting off because he was rich, as if
>>everyone is afraid to accept the fact that he walked because he was BLACK.
>
>Let’s take a look at the facts here. There were two white women on the
>jury: one was a college graduate who felt that DNA testing was “somewhat
>reliable” and that it would “hold some value” while the other was a juror on another murder case. The initial vote was 11-1 for acq=
>uittal; she was the lone holdout. The final vote got a CONVICTION.

Have you ever heard of intimidation? There were TWO White WOMEN on the
jury, and NINE blacks, at least some of whom were male.

>If race was such a defining factor, why didn’t these two press for conviction, or, at the very least, a hung jury? They don’t seem =
>to be the type of people who would be easily swayed by popular opinion.

And you know these women well, do you?

>Another fact: cities with majority black populations such as Washington, D.C., routinely have cases with majority black juries deci=
>ding on a black defendant. Race usually plays little or no role in their decision as these juries DO send their “brothers” and “sis=
>ters” to prison when the evidednce deems it so. Conversely, it is usually the ALL-WHITE juries that tend to acquit a white defendan=
>t who has committed a crime against a non-White. (Remember Mississippi and Alabama in the 50’s and 60’s? Remember the Rodney King =
>trial?)

The ’50s and ’60s were a long time ago, but it seems to me that you really
look forward to a return to the racial turmoil that characterized those years.

As for the Rodney King fiasco, the same argument applies there that we are
beginning to see with the O.J. Simpson trial: the jury reached a
conclusion BASED ON THE EVIDENCE THEY SAW, and it shouldn’t be questioned.
Yes, I remember the first Rodney King trial, and the damage that
followed: a BILLION dollars worth of property damage, and FIFTY-THREE
dead, all over one drunk negro motorist getting whacked too much.

>One last point. It is far more compelling to me that a jury of 10 women freed O.J., an acknowledged wife-beater. It would seem to =
>me that if the evidence were there, that a majority of women would have voted to convict such a man.

You apparently seem to think that all women think alike, and that no woman
can be intimidated by anyone else. Well, I’ve got some news for you,
Adamski: women DO make mistakes in judging situations, sometimes fatal
ones. The fact that Nicole stuck around as long as she did obviously
means nothing to you, does it?

As a final note, please post these messages on public boards, and do not
send them via e-mail. Normally, I don’t respond to such crap in e-mail,
but in this case I thought I’d make an exception.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Fri Oct 6 18:06:29 PDT 1995
Article: 3856 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!news.kraft.com!kraft.com!gfimda!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million man march? Ha!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 00:57:06 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5269 alt.discrimination:36686 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3856 soc.culture.african.american:105390

“Spesnaz 2.1” ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>>
>>I think the best thing to counter the Million Man March would be a
>>50-million White Man March, to show the country how much the economy
>>depends on WHITES. Of course, this would be decried left, right and
>>center by the media, but who cares?
>>
>>You are dreaming fool…the most popular export to the entire world is American popular culture, meaning music,entertainment,style,=
> etc..those things are usually black authored…what cultural item worth considering is being sent to the world expect your worthless=
> and silly racist ideas?

Wow! Guess he told ME, huh?!? But he can’t spell or string a coherent
sentence!

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sat Oct 7 08:32:11 PDT 1995
Article: 3888 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 12:14:40 GMT
Lines: 97
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5298 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3888 alt.discrimination:36731

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> * WHAT WHITE WOMEN WHO MARRY WHITE-SUPREMACIST MEN CAN EXPECT:
> *
> * 1) A man who loves them and reveres them.
>
> Of course he will, as long as she does not:
>
> * disagree with anything that he says,
> * show any sign that she may have more intelligence or knowledge,
> * want any autonomy in her beliefs and activities,
> * want to be considered and respected as an equal, or
> * forget to stay in her “place” at all times.

Crazy, Crazy, Crazy…

You really MUST stop this equating of your ex with REAL White
Supremacists, you realize this, don’t you? I mean, besides making you
look like a complete fool because you blow on here with “I know what WS
types are REALLY like, ’cause I was married to a knuckle-dragger for two years
before I got up the gumption to leave him, even though he beat me!”, and
it just shows your ignorance in ever and ever greater clarity.

> * 2) A man who will NOT put up with any kind of liberal crap.

> Your definition of liberal is anyone who disagrees with you.

Is not. My defeinition of liberal is anyone who is too stupid or cowardly
to face reality. I can see, though, where it makes you feel better to
pretend that I just call ANYONE I don’t like a “liberal”. Tain’t so.

> What is the
> definition of “NOT PUT UP WITH”? You think it’s okay for a man to hit ME.
> What about other women, Les? What is a WS man entitled to do to his woman?

Not a whole hell of a lot. It’s boorish to hit women in general, but I
would be more upset about my friend smacking his wife than I would be
about YOU getting a whallop or two. See, you’re a provacative bitch, and
while I won’t go the “if a woman gets hit, she deserves it” route, I WILL
admit that men can sometimes be pushed into things that they normally
wouldn’t do.

> * 3) A MAN, period.
>
> I don’t know if you judge masculinity by your propensity to order people
> around or by the size of your dick. In any case, I am not impressed by
> you, cockroach-boy. You’re just a pathetic and insecure little bigot, who
> stomps around the internet trying to prove that you’re a man.

Nope, I judge masculinity by some criteria that you wouldn’t understand.
Anyway, I don’t believe in blowing my own horn too much, so why don’t you
ask SYLVIE what sort of husband she has? That is, if you can stand the
comparison with the limp-noodle you have.

> * You shouldn’t have asked, Crazy, ’cause now you’re gonna get all jealous
> * and start ranting again. I actually feel sorry for Rob, who’s gonna have
> * to put up with your bitchiness for the next little while.
>
> PULEEZE — the person we should feel sorry for here is Sylvie (if she even
> exists). After all, you get slapped around by me every stinkin’ day in the
> newsgroups, and everyone is laughing at you.

Yeah, you just slap me around SO MUCH.

> If a woman is causing you
> this much public embarassment, then you would naturally vent any
> frustrations on the ones closest to you.

So, by your own admission, Sylvie takes the brunt of my frustration, yet
you STILL keep on provoking me, knowing full well that I probably smack my
wife around? You’re a cruel, cold-hearted bitch, Crazy.

> * BTW, the only one who bore any “squalling infants” to “knuckle-draggers”
> * is YOU, by your own admission. So who’s crying now, asshole?
>
> Ah, they may have been spawned by a knuckle-dragger, but Rob has been
> their daddy most of their lives. Both of my kids learned to walk upright
> and think for themselves under the loving care of their “liberal” parents.
> BTW, on Fathers Day, Rob received a card and gift from them, and the
> knuckle-dragger didn’t even receive a second thought.

*yawn* Crazy, this is the sort of thing I’ve been talking about: we
don’t CARE about your personal life. You know, I’m beginning to doubt
you, your life reads too much like one of those little homilies one can
pick up in any book store.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sat Oct 7 08:32:12 PDT 1995
Article: 3889 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy Jeannie: what a hoot!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 12:21:14 GMT
Lines: 39
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5299 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3889 alt.discrimination:36732

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
> * Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
>
> [snip]
>
> * > That’s quite a statement coming from an self-aggrandized piece of trash,
> * > who fancies himself to be part of the master race.
> *
> * Crazy, all this billing and cooing isn’t going to work, I know deep down
> * you really like me…
>
> FOAD, cockroach-boy. I’d like you to dress up in brown and go skulking
> around in the woods in my state for the next few weeks. Do you know how to
> make deer sounds, Les? (Hunting season just opened last weekend.) Many of
> my family members would love to get a White Tail this year, and would be
> happy to have your fat head stuffed and mounted on their wall beside their
> other trophies.

Sure, sure, Crazy, you may TALK like you want me to be shot, but I’m
familiar with the psychology of pre-teens. See, when I taught children, a
LOT of the pre-teen girls would develop a crush on me, and I’ve also seen
OTHER guys have pre-teen girls swooning over them. Of course, when they
were ASKED about it, they’d pretend that they really HATED the person that
they loved. Which brings me to my next point…

I’m really starting to doubt the veracity of Crazy’s claims as to her age,
marital status, etc., in sort, everything she says here. I really think
that she’s a 12- or 13-year-old girl, probably not too attractive, hoping
to get the love and attention that she so desperately craves here.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sat Oct 7 08:32:13 PDT 1995
Article: 3891 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 12:25:10 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5300 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3891 alt.discrimination:36734

bw ([email protected]) writes:
> In article ,
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>>pickaninnies (hi, Crazy!) deserves whatever she gets when the
>>nigger goes berserk, which is inevitable.
>
> How do you feel about the murder of Ron Goldman?

He was a jew. Take it from there.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sat Oct 7 08:33:17 PDT 1995
Article: 5298 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 12:14:40 GMT
Lines: 97
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5298 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3888 alt.discrimination:36731

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> * WHAT WHITE WOMEN WHO MARRY WHITE-SUPREMACIST MEN CAN EXPECT:
> *
> * 1) A man who loves them and reveres them.
>
> Of course he will, as long as she does not:
>
> * disagree with anything that he says,
> * show any sign that she may have more intelligence or knowledge,
> * want any autonomy in her beliefs and activities,
> * want to be considered and respected as an equal, or
> * forget to stay in her “place” at all times.

Crazy, Crazy, Crazy…

You really MUST stop this equating of your ex with REAL White
Supremacists, you realize this, don’t you? I mean, besides making you
look like a complete fool because you blow on here with “I know what WS
types are REALLY like, ’cause I was married to a knuckle-dragger for two years
before I got up the gumption to leave him, even though he beat me!”, and
it just shows your ignorance in ever and ever greater clarity.

> * 2) A man who will NOT put up with any kind of liberal crap.

> Your definition of liberal is anyone who disagrees with you.

Is not. My defeinition of liberal is anyone who is too stupid or cowardly
to face reality. I can see, though, where it makes you feel better to
pretend that I just call ANYONE I don’t like a “liberal”. Tain’t so.

> What is the
> definition of “NOT PUT UP WITH”? You think it’s okay for a man to hit ME.
> What about other women, Les? What is a WS man entitled to do to his woman?

Not a whole hell of a lot. It’s boorish to hit women in general, but I
would be more upset about my friend smacking his wife than I would be
about YOU getting a whallop or two. See, you’re a provacative bitch, and
while I won’t go the “if a woman gets hit, she deserves it” route, I WILL
admit that men can sometimes be pushed into things that they normally
wouldn’t do.

> * 3) A MAN, period.
>
> I don’t know if you judge masculinity by your propensity to order people
> around or by the size of your dick. In any case, I am not impressed by
> you, cockroach-boy. You’re just a pathetic and insecure little bigot, who
> stomps around the internet trying to prove that you’re a man.

Nope, I judge masculinity by some criteria that you wouldn’t understand.
Anyway, I don’t believe in blowing my own horn too much, so why don’t you
ask SYLVIE what sort of husband she has? That is, if you can stand the
comparison with the limp-noodle you have.

> * You shouldn’t have asked, Crazy, ’cause now you’re gonna get all jealous
> * and start ranting again. I actually feel sorry for Rob, who’s gonna have
> * to put up with your bitchiness for the next little while.
>
> PULEEZE — the person we should feel sorry for here is Sylvie (if she even
> exists). After all, you get slapped around by me every stinkin’ day in the
> newsgroups, and everyone is laughing at you.

Yeah, you just slap me around SO MUCH.

> If a woman is causing you
> this much public embarassment, then you would naturally vent any
> frustrations on the ones closest to you.

So, by your own admission, Sylvie takes the brunt of my frustration, yet
you STILL keep on provoking me, knowing full well that I probably smack my
wife around? You’re a cruel, cold-hearted bitch, Crazy.

> * BTW, the only one who bore any “squalling infants” to “knuckle-draggers”
> * is YOU, by your own admission. So who’s crying now, asshole?
>
> Ah, they may have been spawned by a knuckle-dragger, but Rob has been
> their daddy most of their lives. Both of my kids learned to walk upright
> and think for themselves under the loving care of their “liberal” parents.
> BTW, on Fathers Day, Rob received a card and gift from them, and the
> knuckle-dragger didn’t even receive a second thought.

*yawn* Crazy, this is the sort of thing I’ve been talking about: we
don’t CARE about your personal life. You know, I’m beginning to doubt
you, your life reads too much like one of those little homilies one can
pick up in any book store.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sat Oct 7 08:33:18 PDT 1995
Article: 5299 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy Jeannie: what a hoot!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 12:21:14 GMT
Lines: 39
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5299 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3889 alt.discrimination:36732

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
> * Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
>
> [snip]
>
> * > That’s quite a statement coming from an self-aggrandized piece of trash,
> * > who fancies himself to be part of the master race.
> *
> * Crazy, all this billing and cooing isn’t going to work, I know deep down
> * you really like me…
>
> FOAD, cockroach-boy. I’d like you to dress up in brown and go skulking
> around in the woods in my state for the next few weeks. Do you know how to
> make deer sounds, Les? (Hunting season just opened last weekend.) Many of
> my family members would love to get a White Tail this year, and would be
> happy to have your fat head stuffed and mounted on their wall beside their
> other trophies.

Sure, sure, Crazy, you may TALK like you want me to be shot, but I’m
familiar with the psychology of pre-teens. See, when I taught children, a
LOT of the pre-teen girls would develop a crush on me, and I’ve also seen
OTHER guys have pre-teen girls swooning over them. Of course, when they
were ASKED about it, they’d pretend that they really HATED the person that
they loved. Which brings me to my next point…

I’m really starting to doubt the veracity of Crazy’s claims as to her age,
marital status, etc., in sort, everything she says here. I really think
that she’s a 12- or 13-year-old girl, probably not too attractive, hoping
to get the love and attention that she so desperately craves here.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Sat Oct 7 08:33:19 PDT 1995
Article: 5300 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 12:25:10 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5300 alt.politics.nationalism.white:3891 alt.discrimination:36734

bw ([email protected]) writes:
> In article ,
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>>pickaninnies (hi, Crazy!) deserves whatever she gets when the
>>nigger goes berserk, which is inevitable.
>
> How do you feel about the murder of Ron Goldman?

He was a jew. Take it from there.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 9 06:22:18 PDT 1995
Article: 10629 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.skinheads,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 1995 07:14:39 GMT
Lines: 21
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5436 alt.skinheads:4340 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4031 alt.discrimination:36926 alt.revisionism:10629 talk.politics.guns:211390

Ronald Schoedel ([email protected]) writes:
> Crazy Jeannie you boob. You quoted 3 messages and 27 lines for that
> stupid childish 2 line remark? Hey Les, didn’t you mention something
> about finding the little gal some help with her editor? Her mommy
> apparently doesn’t it either. Oh well, I guess the good thing is if she
> keeps this up we don’t have to hear about her boring dreadful personal
> “life” so much.
>
> Rev. Ron

Well, I suppose I really shouldn’t encourage her, but the truth is, I feel
kinda sorry for Crazy Jeannie. See, I know she really likes me, and all
this hissing and spitting that she does for my benefit is really just
theatrics.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 9 06:27:22 PDT 1995
Article: 4032 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 1995 07:02:36 GMT
Lines: 127
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5437 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4032 alt.discrimination:36927

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) whimpers for
attention:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip – Crazy going on and on and ON about how WS men abuse their wives,
drawing on her bottomless experience with one abusive husband who happened
to dislike dusky folk)

> * Crazy, Crazy, Crazy…
> *
> * You really MUST stop this equating of your ex with REAL White
> * Supremacists, you realize this, don’t you? I mean, besides making you
> * look like a complete fool because you blow on here with “I know what WS
> * types are REALLY like, ’cause I was married to a knuckle-dragger for two years
> * before I got up the gumption to leave him, even though he beat me!”, and
> * it just shows your ignorance in ever and ever greater clarity.
>
> Les, unlike like you, who still lives in the good ol’ days of the Third
> Reich, I have moved on from what happened to me in my youth. I made my
> statement about the WS woman’s role based on the things that you and your
> buddies wrote in these newsgroups.

“MOVED ON”?!? Like HELL you have! Why, then, do you keep regaling us
with your crummy first marriage? And WHY did you have not one, but TWO,
kids, with this winner? You thought that maybe bringing a couple of
helpless, innocent babes into the world would improve things, maybe?

(snip)

> * > What is the
> * > definition of “NOT PUT UP WITH”? You think it’s okay for a man to hit ME.
> * > What about other women, Les? What is a WS man entitled to do to his woman?
> *
> * Not a whole hell of a lot.
>
> What a dull, dull relationship. Oh well, you probably spend most of your
> time huddled with the boys planning how you’re going to come to power, eh?

Funny. I don’t take the position that it’s OKAY to smack one’s wife
around, and Crazy implies that “excitement” comes from physical (or any?)
abuse.

> * It’s boorish to hit women in general, but I
> * would be more upset about my friend smacking his wife than I would be
> * about YOU getting a whallop or two.
>
> You misspelled “wallop”, Les. I realize that you may be making mistakes
> because the thought of smacking around a woman makes it mandatory for you
> to type with one hand.
>
> * See, you’re a provacative bitch, and
>
> Again, you misspelled “provocative”, Les.

I’m glad that you’re reading my messages closely enough to catch all the
spelling errors. I feel a lot better knowing that the ex-proofreader of a
newsletter is able to watch over me like this. Perhaps I’ll get down on
my knees and thank my “diety”.

> You used a pretty nebulous term in describing me.

Nope. Pretty accurate, I’d say.

> A provocative woman can be quite a match for someone
> with the intelligence, confidence and creativity to appreciate her.

Or she can just be a general nuisance to live with. See, you made TWO
mistakes:

1) You married an abusive husband;

2) You decided to be an in-your-face type, knowing full well that being
like that would earn you nothing more than physical beating (too stupid to
adapt to a situation)

Actually, you made THREE mistakes:

3) You STAYED with this winner for TWO YEARS. What, did you think it was
gonna get better?

Actually, you fucked up FOUR times:

4) You had TWO (count ’em, two) kids with Mr. Wonderful. What, did you
think it would be nice to have some time off as he beat the kids?

(snipola grande – Crazy trying to show how brainy she is by cribbing the
American Heritage Dictionary def. of “provoke”)

> * while I won’t go the “if a woman gets hit, she deserves it” route, I WILL
> * admit that men can sometimes be pushed into things that they normally
> * wouldn’t do.
>
> Sure, men (and women) can be pushed into things that they wouldn’t
> normally do. For most people, that’s called personal growth, deepening a
> relationship, pursuing a new career, getting a college degree, etc.
> Insecure and ignorant people react with violence, because they don’t have
> the patience or the ability to deal any other way to a perceived threat.

Having kids, sticking with an abusive husband for two years, etc. Oh,
yeah, REAL personal growth, I see now.

(snip)

> * So, by your own admission, Sylvie takes the brunt of my frustration, yet
> * you STILL keep on provoking me, knowing full well that I probably smack my
> * wife around? You’re a cruel, cold-hearted bitch, Crazy.
>
> Sylvie does whatever she does in service to the master race, right?

To which you are an accessory. So I guess that makes you an auxilliary-WSer.

(snip)

> BTW, cockroach-boy, you always spell “wimp” incorrectly, too. HONK, HONK!

Nope. “Whimp” is how it’s spelt up here in Canada. Sorry if that
confuses you.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 9 06:27:23 PDT 1995
Article: 4033 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!tcsi.tcs.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!newshost.marcam.com!usc!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946[email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy Jeannie wants me! (was: Crazy Jeannie: what a hoot!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 1995 07:10:11 GMT
Lines: 57
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5438 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4033 alt.discrimination:36928

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> * > * Crazy, all this billing and cooing isn’t going to work, I know deep down
> * > * you really like me…
> * >
> * > FOAD, cockroach-boy. I’d like you to dress up in brown and go skulking
> * > around in the woods in my state for the next few weeks. Do you know how to
> * > make deer sounds, Les? (Hunting season just opened last weekend.) Many of
> * > my family members would love to get a White Tail this year, and would be
> * > happy to have your fat head stuffed and mounted on their wall beside their
> * > other trophies.
> *
> * Sure, sure, Crazy, you may TALK like you want me to be shot, but I’m
> * familiar with the psychology of pre-teens. See, when I taught children, a
> * LOT of the pre-teen girls would develop a crush on me, and I’ve also seen
> * OTHER guys have pre-teen girls swooning over them. Of course, when they
> * were ASKED about it, they’d pretend that they really HATED the person that
> * they loved. Which brings me to my next point…
>
> So the pedophile rumor about you is true, eh? Maybe you were out trolling
> for a young’un to marry up with Rhonda or is Sylvie getting a little long
> in the tooth? I know that you guys don’t like venturing beyond your blood
> kin for a mate, but next time, try hooking up with a sibling or a cousin
> instead of your mom.

Sadly for you, Crazy, I’m not in to kiddies. Guess that kind of takes the
wind out of your sails, eh? Am I still invited to your sweet-16?

> * I’m really starting to doubt the veracity of Crazy’s claims as to her age,
> * marital status, etc., in sort, everything she says here. I really think
> * that she’s a 12- or 13-year-old girl, probably not too attractive, hoping
> * to get the love and attention that she so desperately craves here.

(snip)

> You wanna hear how many hours I spent in labor with my two kids and other
> stuff that only women know about, cockroach-boy? You are a pathetic little
> man. Now, go blow your own horn.

Not really, but I suppose you’re gonna tell us anyway.

Actually, only women who have actually GONE THROUGH labor and REALLY had
kids know what it’s like. I don’t particularly want to hear something
that you can copy from a Harlequin Romance to “prove” that you actually
are a 40-something old bag, and are thus entitled to some sort of “respect”.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 9 06:27:24 PDT 1995
Article: 4036 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Aria: one mad negro! (was: Why negroes cry racism…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 1995 11:56:49 GMT
Lines: 36
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5441 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4036 alt.discrimination:36935

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Fragano
> Ledgister) wrote:
>
> * Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
> *
> * : And how about the hundreds, maybe thousands, of White people who have been
> * : killed in slave revolts, and negro violence SINCE Emancipation?

> * Just how many whites were killed in slave revolts? And, by the bye,
> * exactly what is wrong with slaves revolting?

Uh, murder and rape, for two. Want more?

> Well, Les likes to fantasize about the good ol’ days when slaves were
> “justifiably” lynched for revolting, while saying that they were inferior
> because they could not free themselves. Welcome to Leslogic 101 ™!

How is this paradoxical, Crazy? The negro slaves were unable to free
themselves, and they deserved to be punished for the outrages they
committed when revolting (which they were pretty much all the time!). But
seriously, do you HONESTLY believe that all the excesses to which negroes,
then and now, were given, were NECESSARY to gain their freedom? Rape and
torture of White women? Mutilation and murder of White children? Tell
me, Crazy, how either of those things (or anything else, if you’re too
embarrassed to address them) would contribute one IOTA to a negro gaining
his freedom.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 9 06:27:53 PDT 1995
Article: 5437 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 1995 07:02:36 GMT
Lines: 127
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5437 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4032 alt.discrimination:36927

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) whimpers for
attention:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip – Crazy going on and on and ON about how WS men abuse their wives,
drawing on her bottomless experience with one abusive husband who happened
to dislike dusky folk)

> * Crazy, Crazy, Crazy…
> *
> * You really MUST stop this equating of your ex with REAL White
> * Supremacists, you realize this, don’t you? I mean, besides making you
> * look like a complete fool because you blow on here with “I know what WS
> * types are REALLY like, ’cause I was married to a knuckle-dragger for two years
> * before I got up the gumption to leave him, even though he beat me!”, and
> * it just shows your ignorance in ever and ever greater clarity.
>
> Les, unlike like you, who still lives in the good ol’ days of the Third
> Reich, I have moved on from what happened to me in my youth. I made my
> statement about the WS woman’s role based on the things that you and your
> buddies wrote in these newsgroups.

“MOVED ON”?!? Like HELL you have! Why, then, do you keep regaling us
with your crummy first marriage? And WHY did you have not one, but TWO,
kids, with this winner? You thought that maybe bringing a couple of
helpless, innocent babes into the world would improve things, maybe?

(snip)

> * > What is the
> * > definition of “NOT PUT UP WITH”? You think it’s okay for a man to hit ME.
> * > What about other women, Les? What is a WS man entitled to do to his woman?
> *
> * Not a whole hell of a lot.
>
> What a dull, dull relationship. Oh well, you probably spend most of your
> time huddled with the boys planning how you’re going to come to power, eh?

Funny. I don’t take the position that it’s OKAY to smack one’s wife
around, and Crazy implies that “excitement” comes from physical (or any?)
abuse.

> * It’s boorish to hit women in general, but I
> * would be more upset about my friend smacking his wife than I would be
> * about YOU getting a whallop or two.
>
> You misspelled “wallop”, Les. I realize that you may be making mistakes
> because the thought of smacking around a woman makes it mandatory for you
> to type with one hand.
>
> * See, you’re a provacative bitch, and
>
> Again, you misspelled “provocative”, Les.

I’m glad that you’re reading my messages closely enough to catch all the
spelling errors. I feel a lot better knowing that the ex-proofreader of a
newsletter is able to watch over me like this. Perhaps I’ll get down on
my knees and thank my “diety”.

> You used a pretty nebulous term in describing me.

Nope. Pretty accurate, I’d say.

> A provocative woman can be quite a match for someone
> with the intelligence, confidence and creativity to appreciate her.

Or she can just be a general nuisance to live with. See, you made TWO
mistakes:

1) You married an abusive husband;

2) You decided to be an in-your-face type, knowing full well that being
like that would earn you nothing more than physical beating (too stupid to
adapt to a situation)

Actually, you made THREE mistakes:

3) You STAYED with this winner for TWO YEARS. What, did you think it was
gonna get better?

Actually, you fucked up FOUR times:

4) You had TWO (count ’em, two) kids with Mr. Wonderful. What, did you
think it would be nice to have some time off as he beat the kids?

(snipola grande – Crazy trying to show how brainy she is by cribbing the
American Heritage Dictionary def. of “provoke”)

> * while I won’t go the “if a woman gets hit, she deserves it” route, I WILL
> * admit that men can sometimes be pushed into things that they normally
> * wouldn’t do.
>
> Sure, men (and women) can be pushed into things that they wouldn’t
> normally do. For most people, that’s called personal growth, deepening a
> relationship, pursuing a new career, getting a college degree, etc.
> Insecure and ignorant people react with violence, because they don’t have
> the patience or the ability to deal any other way to a perceived threat.

Having kids, sticking with an abusive husband for two years, etc. Oh,
yeah, REAL personal growth, I see now.

(snip)

> * So, by your own admission, Sylvie takes the brunt of my frustration, yet
> * you STILL keep on provoking me, knowing full well that I probably smack my
> * wife around? You’re a cruel, cold-hearted bitch, Crazy.
>
> Sylvie does whatever she does in service to the master race, right?

To which you are an accessory. So I guess that makes you an auxilliary-WSer.

(snip)

> BTW, cockroach-boy, you always spell “wimp” incorrectly, too. HONK, HONK!

Nope. “Whimp” is how it’s spelt up here in Canada. Sorry if that
confuses you.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected]leton.CA Mon Oct 9 06:27:54 PDT 1995
Article: 5438 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!tcsi.tcs.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!newshost.marcam.com!usc!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy Jeannie wants me! (was: Crazy Jeannie: what a hoot!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 1995 07:10:11 GMT
Lines: 57
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5438 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4033 alt.discrimination:36928

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> * > * Crazy, all this billing and cooing isn’t going to work, I know deep down
> * > * you really like me…
> * >
> * > FOAD, cockroach-boy. I’d like you to dress up in brown and go skulking
> * > around in the woods in my state for the next few weeks. Do you know how to
> * > make deer sounds, Les? (Hunting season just opened last weekend.) Many of
> * > my family members would love to get a White Tail this year, and would be
> * > happy to have your fat head stuffed and mounted on their wall beside their
> * > other trophies.
> *
> * Sure, sure, Crazy, you may TALK like you want me to be shot, but I’m
> * familiar with the psychology of pre-teens. See, when I taught children, a
> * LOT of the pre-teen girls would develop a crush on me, and I’ve also seen
> * OTHER guys have pre-teen girls swooning over them. Of course, when they
> * were ASKED about it, they’d pretend that they really HATED the person that
> * they loved. Which brings me to my next point…
>
> So the pedophile rumor about you is true, eh? Maybe you were out trolling
> for a young’un to marry up with Rhonda or is Sylvie getting a little long
> in the tooth? I know that you guys don’t like venturing beyond your blood
> kin for a mate, but next time, try hooking up with a sibling or a cousin
> instead of your mom.

Sadly for you, Crazy, I’m not in to kiddies. Guess that kind of takes the
wind out of your sails, eh? Am I still invited to your sweet-16?

> * I’m really starting to doubt the veracity of Crazy’s claims as to her age,
> * marital status, etc., in sort, everything she says here. I really think
> * that she’s a 12- or 13-year-old girl, probably not too attractive, hoping
> * to get the love and attention that she so desperately craves here.

(snip)

> You wanna hear how many hours I spent in labor with my two kids and other
> stuff that only women know about, cockroach-boy? You are a pathetic little
> man. Now, go blow your own horn.

Not really, but I suppose you’re gonna tell us anyway.

Actually, only women who have actually GONE THROUGH labor and REALLY had
kids know what it’s like. I don’t particularly want to hear something
that you can copy from a Harlequin Romance to “prove” that you actually
are a 40-something old bag, and are thus entitled to some sort of “respect”.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Mon Oct 9 06:27:56 PDT 1995
Article: 5441 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Aria: one mad negro! (was: Why negroes cry racism…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 1995 11:56:49 GMT
Lines: 36
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5441 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4036 alt.discrimination:36935

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Fragano
> Ledgister) wrote:
>
> * Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
> *
> * : And how about the hundreds, maybe thousands, of White people who have been
> * : killed in slave revolts, and negro violence SINCE Emancipation?

> * Just how many whites were killed in slave revolts? And, by the bye,
> * exactly what is wrong with slaves revolting?

Uh, murder and rape, for two. Want more?

> Well, Les likes to fantasize about the good ol’ days when slaves were
> “justifiably” lynched for revolting, while saying that they were inferior
> because they could not free themselves. Welcome to Leslogic 101 ™!

How is this paradoxical, Crazy? The negro slaves were unable to free
themselves, and they deserved to be punished for the outrages they
committed when revolting (which they were pretty much all the time!). But
seriously, do you HONESTLY believe that all the excesses to which negroes,
then and now, were given, were NECESSARY to gain their freedom? Rape and
torture of White women? Mutilation and murder of White children? Tell
me, Crazy, how either of those things (or anything else, if you’re too
embarrassed to address them) would contribute one IOTA to a negro gaining
his freedom.

Les


It is thought that justice is equality, and so it is, but not for all
persons, only those who are equal.
– Aristotle

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 06:50:01 PDT 1995
Article: 4086 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Aria: one mad negro! (was: Why negroes cry racism…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 10:48:18 GMT
Lines: 34
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5491 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4086 alt.discrimination:36982

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

> * > * : And how about the hundreds, maybe thousands, of White people who have
> * > * : been killed in slave revolts, and negro violence SINCE Emancipation?
> *
> * > * Just how many whites were killed in slave revolts? And, by the bye,
> * > * exactly what is wrong with slaves revolting?
> *
> * Uh, murder and rape, for two. Want more?
> *
> * > Well, Les likes to fantasize about the good ol’ days when slaves were
> * > “justifiably” lynched for revolting, while saying that they were inferior
> * > because they could not free themselves. Welcome to Leslogic 101 ™!
> *
> * How is this paradoxical, Crazy? The negro slaves were unable to free
> * themselves, and they deserved to be punished for the outrages they
> * committed when revolting (which they were pretty much all the time!). But
> * seriously, do you HONESTLY believe that all the excesses to which negroes,
> * then and now, were given, were NECESSARY to gain their freedom? Rape and
> * torture of White women? Mutilation and murder of White children? Tell
> * me, Crazy, how either of those things (or anything else, if you’re too
> * embarrassed to address them) would contribute one IOTA to a negro gaining
> * his freedom.
>
> You really believe this crap, don’t you? I’m absolutely stunned.

Nice dodge, Crazy, but it hasn’t gotten past me (or anyone else) that
you’ve avoided answering the question. Gee, why am I not surprised?

Les

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 06:57:38 PDT 1995
Article: 5491 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Aria: one mad negro! (was: Why negroes cry racism…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 10:48:18 GMT
Lines: 34
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5491 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4086 alt.discrimination:36982

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

> * > * : And how about the hundreds, maybe thousands, of White people who have
> * > * : been killed in slave revolts, and negro violence SINCE Emancipation?
> *
> * > * Just how many whites were killed in slave revolts? And, by the bye,
> * > * exactly what is wrong with slaves revolting?
> *
> * Uh, murder and rape, for two. Want more?
> *
> * > Well, Les likes to fantasize about the good ol’ days when slaves were
> * > “justifiably” lynched for revolting, while saying that they were inferior
> * > because they could not free themselves. Welcome to Leslogic 101 ™!
> *
> * How is this paradoxical, Crazy? The negro slaves were unable to free
> * themselves, and they deserved to be punished for the outrages they
> * committed when revolting (which they were pretty much all the time!). But
> * seriously, do you HONESTLY believe that all the excesses to which negroes,
> * then and now, were given, were NECESSARY to gain their freedom? Rape and
> * torture of White women? Mutilation and murder of White children? Tell
> * me, Crazy, how either of those things (or anything else, if you’re too
> * embarrassed to address them) would contribute one IOTA to a negro gaining
> * his freedom.
>
> You really believe this crap, don’t you? I’m absolutely stunned.

Nice dodge, Crazy, but it hasn’t gotten past me (or anyone else) that
you’ve avoided answering the question. Gee, why am I not surprised?

Les

From [email protected] Wed Oct 11 06:51:05 PDT 1995
Article: 4163 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Aria: one mad negro! (was: Why negroes cry racism…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 09:29:37 GMT
Lines: 36
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5574 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4163 alt.discrimination:37049

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip – Crazy arguing by innuendo that slave revolts, and the attendant
massacre of the “massuh’s wimmin and chilun” are A-OK in her books. When
called on it, she resorts to name-calling, rather than addressing the issue).

> * > You really believe this crap, don’t you? I’m absolutely stunned.
> *
> * Nice dodge, Crazy, but it hasn’t gotten past me (or anyone else) that
> * you’ve avoided answering the question. Gee, why am I not surprised?
>
> Well, I am operating from the moral perspective that the slaves and
> progeny of slaves are all human beings.

What else does this “moral perspective” tell you? That it’s okay for
slaves to massacre White women and children? That WAS what we were
talking about, not present-day “racism”, so try to wrap your little mind
around that.

> The whole idea of constantly
> knocking people down and then claiming that they’re inferior because
> they’re on the ground really shows how distorted your claims of racial
> superiority are to the public.

But, how does slavery justify the murder of White women and children, Crazy?

> You are probably scared to death that “payback time” is coming, eh?

Funny, isn’t it usually liberals who ca-ca their pants at the thought of
having to pay for their ideas?

Les

From [email protected] Wed Oct 11 06:51:06 PDT 1995
Article: 4164 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 09:33:22 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5575 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4164 alt.discrimination:37050

Jew Rosenbeoig ([email protected]) writes:
> In article [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
>>Well, I can’t speak for Dr. Pierce, but my opinion on abortion is that
>>it’s wrong, unless it’s for eugenic purposes, ie if the pregnancy will
>>bring an inferior baby into the world.
>
> Too bad your mother didn’t feel that way. Or didn’t she know?

Another funny thing is that abortionists are jews WAY out of proportion to
their representation in the general population. I’ll bet they’re
over-represented among the ranks of abortionists, as opposed to real doctors.

Les

From [email protected] Wed Oct 11 06:51:07 PDT 1995
Article: 4166 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy’s first hubbie! (was: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 09:45:53 GMT
Lines: 72
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5577 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4166 alt.discrimination:37051

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip – Crazy now sticking up for her first hubby, whom she had previously
claimed was such a beast, and typical of WS types)

> * So you were young and stupid. Do you think that that gives you some sort
> * of moral superiority?
>
> I never claimed that it did.

Bull da-da. You come on here preaching about how you “know” all about us,
’cause your first husband was an alcoholic wife-beater, who happened to
dislike folks darker than he.

> You are condemning me for having the qualities that you WS men demand in a
> woman today.

No, I’m condemning you for being an asshole.

> * > I’d had him arrested twice, and he was on a year’s probation for
> * > domestic violence. My gun-totin’ brothers told Hoosier-boy that they’d
> * > kill him if he hurt their baby sister again.
> *
> * Typical liberal: all for violence, as long as a) someone else does it,
> * and b) it’s for YOUR benefit.
>
> HORSESHIT. Nobody laid a hand on him. You were the one raising hell about
> the white women and children being raped, beaten and murdered (as long as
> it’s at the hands of a Black man), but you object to me wanting to defend
> myself and my children from a white man? Your idealogy is fucked, Les.

And you’re the one who thinks negro slaves massacring White women and
children will somehow improve their lot in life.

> BTW, you may want to know that this “typical liberal” would have shot him
> if he’d touched me again. We had several guns in our house, and I used to
> enjoy shooting targets with him.

More liberal hypocrisy. “Guns are bad, but I would have willingly shot my
abusive first husband!” And then we’re subjected to liberal screeching
about domestic homicides…

(snip)

> You’re not always worth the effort. Why do you feel the need to comment on
> my education, when anyone can look at the header and see that I’m posting
> from a university? I am listed in the university directory, and my bio is
> in the 1992 edition of Who’s Who Among Students in American Universities
> and Colleges. Anyone can easily verify that I am exactly who I represent
> myself to be.

As if anyone would CARE that you’re a 40-something loser, who still thinks
that liberal ideas have any currency today.

(snip)

> * Well, I can’t speak for Dr. Pierce, but my opinion on abortion is that
> * it’s wrong, unless it’s for eugenic purposes, ie if the pregnancy will
> * bring an inferior baby into the world. You, for example, should be the
> * poster-child for coat-hangers. The best part of YOU obviously ran down
> * your mother’s legs.
>
> Well, if the dregs created me, and your daddy’s best created you . . .
> what a bitter disappoint you must be, Les!

Actually, my father was quite proud of me, and my mother is, too.

Les

From [email protected] Wed Oct 11 06:54:10 PDT 1995
Article: 5574 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Aria: one mad negro! (was: Why negroes cry racism…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 09:29:37 GMT
Lines: 36
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5574 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4163 alt.discrimination:37049

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip – Crazy arguing by innuendo that slave revolts, and the attendant
massacre of the “massuh’s wimmin and chilun” are A-OK in her books. When
called on it, she resorts to name-calling, rather than addressing the issue).

> * > You really believe this crap, don’t you? I’m absolutely stunned.
> *
> * Nice dodge, Crazy, but it hasn’t gotten past me (or anyone else) that
> * you’ve avoided answering the question. Gee, why am I not surprised?
>
> Well, I am operating from the moral perspective that the slaves and
> progeny of slaves are all human beings.

What else does this “moral perspective” tell you? That it’s okay for
slaves to massacre White women and children? That WAS what we were
talking about, not present-day “racism”, so try to wrap your little mind
around that.

> The whole idea of constantly
> knocking people down and then claiming that they’re inferior because
> they’re on the ground really shows how distorted your claims of racial
> superiority are to the public.

But, how does slavery justify the murder of White women and children, Crazy?

> You are probably scared to death that “payback time” is coming, eh?

Funny, isn’t it usually liberals who ca-ca their pants at the thought of
having to pay for their ideas?

Les

From [email protected] Wed Oct 11 06:54:11 PDT 1995
Article: 5575 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 09:33:22 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5575 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4164 alt.discrimination:37050

Jew Rosenbeoig ([email protected]) writes:
> In article [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
>>Well, I can’t speak for Dr. Pierce, but my opinion on abortion is that
>>it’s wrong, unless it’s for eugenic purposes, ie if the pregnancy will
>>bring an inferior baby into the world.
>
> Too bad your mother didn’t feel that way. Or didn’t she know?

Another funny thing is that abortionists are jews WAY out of proportion to
their representation in the general population. I’ll bet they’re
over-represented among the ranks of abortionists, as opposed to real doctors.

Les

From [email protected] Wed Oct 11 06:54:11 PDT 1995
Article: 5577 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy’s first hubbie! (was: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 09:45:53 GMT
Lines: 72
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5577 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4166 alt.discrimination:37051

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip – Crazy now sticking up for her first hubby, whom she had previously
claimed was such a beast, and typical of WS types)

> * So you were young and stupid. Do you think that that gives you some sort
> * of moral superiority?
>
> I never claimed that it did.

Bull da-da. You come on here preaching about how you “know” all about us,
’cause your first husband was an alcoholic wife-beater, who happened to
dislike folks darker than he.

> You are condemning me for having the qualities that you WS men demand in a
> woman today.

No, I’m condemning you for being an asshole.

> * > I’d had him arrested twice, and he was on a year’s probation for
> * > domestic violence. My gun-totin’ brothers told Hoosier-boy that they’d
> * > kill him if he hurt their baby sister again.
> *
> * Typical liberal: all for violence, as long as a) someone else does it,
> * and b) it’s for YOUR benefit.
>
> HORSESHIT. Nobody laid a hand on him. You were the one raising hell about
> the white women and children being raped, beaten and murdered (as long as
> it’s at the hands of a Black man), but you object to me wanting to defend
> myself and my children from a white man? Your idealogy is fucked, Les.

And you’re the one who thinks negro slaves massacring White women and
children will somehow improve their lot in life.

> BTW, you may want to know that this “typical liberal” would have shot him
> if he’d touched me again. We had several guns in our house, and I used to
> enjoy shooting targets with him.

More liberal hypocrisy. “Guns are bad, but I would have willingly shot my
abusive first husband!” And then we’re subjected to liberal screeching
about domestic homicides…

(snip)

> You’re not always worth the effort. Why do you feel the need to comment on
> my education, when anyone can look at the header and see that I’m posting
> from a university? I am listed in the university directory, and my bio is
> in the 1992 edition of Who’s Who Among Students in American Universities
> and Colleges. Anyone can easily verify that I am exactly who I represent
> myself to be.

As if anyone would CARE that you’re a 40-something loser, who still thinks
that liberal ideas have any currency today.

(snip)

> * Well, I can’t speak for Dr. Pierce, but my opinion on abortion is that
> * it’s wrong, unless it’s for eugenic purposes, ie if the pregnancy will
> * bring an inferior baby into the world. You, for example, should be the
> * poster-child for coat-hangers. The best part of YOU obviously ran down
> * your mother’s legs.
>
> Well, if the dregs created me, and your daddy’s best created you . . .
> what a bitter disappoint you must be, Les!

Actually, my father was quite proud of me, and my mother is, too.

Les

From [email protected] Wed Oct 11 06:54:30 PDT 1995
Article: 13909 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,can.politics,talk.politics.misc,alt.conspiracy,alt.fan.oj-simpson,soc.rights.human,soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.african.american,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!hookup!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Bill can’t count (was: Nazis on the Net)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 03:18:09 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.guns:211885 can.politics:7523 talk.politics.misc:280355 alt.conspiracy:13909 alt.fan.oj-simpson:44529 soc.rights.human:25213 soc.culture.jewish:9962 soc.culture.african.american:105741 alt.discrimination:37038

William R. Discipio Jr ([email protected]) writes:
> Evelyn Hill ([email protected]) wrote:
> : Chris Morton ([email protected]) wrote:
> : : What if instead of “joining” the National Alliance, they just adopt, even if
> : : unconsciously, some of their assumption?
>
> : Oh, no! White people who might, for a fleeting second, think that White
> : communities are more pleasant than “racially diverse” communities!!!
>
> : AND NOT EVEN NAZIS !!!!
>
> : It just can’t be permitted! Call the thought police!
>
> Think it all you want. Do you forget that people like you murdered 12
> million in Germany and lynched countless blacks in the US?

That’s supposed to be 13 million, you piker. And the “countless” blacks
lynched in the US is around 3500. The number of Whites lynched is about
2500.

Les

From [email protected] Wed Oct 11 06:58:39 PDT 1995
Article: 7523 of can.politics
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,can.politics,talk.politics.misc,alt.conspiracy,alt.fan.oj-simpson,soc.rights.human,soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.african.american,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!hookup!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Bill can’t count (was: Nazis on the Net)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 03:18:09 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.guns:211885 can.politics:7523 talk.politics.misc:280355 alt.conspiracy:13909 alt.fan.oj-simpson:44529 soc.rights.human:25213 soc.culture.jewish:9962 soc.culture.african.american:105741 alt.discrimination:37038

William R. Discipio Jr ([email protected]) writes:
> Evelyn Hill ([email protected]) wrote:
> : Chris Morton ([email protected]) wrote:
> : : What if instead of “joining” the National Alliance, they just adopt, even if
> : : unconsciously, some of their assumption?
>
> : Oh, no! White people who might, for a fleeting second, think that White
> : communities are more pleasant than “racially diverse” communities!!!
>
> : AND NOT EVEN NAZIS !!!!
>
> : It just can’t be permitted! Call the thought police!
>
> Think it all you want. Do you forget that people like you murdered 12
> million in Germany and lynched countless blacks in the US?

That’s supposed to be 13 million, you piker. And the “countless” blacks
lynched in the US is around 3500. The number of Whites lynched is about
2500.

Les

From [email protected] Sun Oct 15 17:46:24 PDT 1995
Article: 11098 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.politics.white-power,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 13:19:17 GMT
Lines: 50
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4423 alt.revisionism:11098 alt.politics.white-power:6007 talk.politics.guns:213122

Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Milton Kleim) writes:
>
> # Don’t speak for me, Mr. McCarthy. I have never advocated
> # censoring anyone, including you.
>
> Contrast this with the text below:
>
> From: [email protected] (Milton Kleim)
> Message-ID:
>
> # Well, it’s quite simple. We will establish an investigative
> # service, which will review claims against Jews. If there is
> # evidence for charges, a trial will be set for the individual in
> # question. A special tribunal will be created to try those
> # charged with “Crimes Against the Aryan Race,” “Crimes Against
> # Peace,” genocide, and profiteering. Conviction on offense
> # number one and number three will carry a mandatory death penalty.
>
>
>
> # I invite the reader to investigate Mr. McCarthy, to see which of
> # us, he or I, am the REAL “Nazi.”
>
> I invite the reader to look at the following piece, also written
> by Kleim; he’s posting from his account at STCLOUD.MSUS.EDU.
>
> Subject: Peace…or Utter Destruction
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> From: [email protected]
>
> # I am an admirer of Adolf Hitler. I embrace National Socialism.
> # I would do so even if the Holocaust *were* fact, which I honestly
> # believe it is not. I would do so even if Hitler and his system
> # had killed *60* million Jews.
>
>

And where, EXACTLY, in all of this, is Milton’s endorsement of censorship?

Another example of the screechy, mindless rantings of pro-censorship jews
who can’t stand to have an “anti-semite” deny their slimy charges. Are
you next gonna tell us that the first thing Hitler did when he came to
power was snatch all the guns?

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 07:04:52 PDT 1995
Article: 11098 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.politics.white-power,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 13:19:17 GMT
Lines: 50
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4423 alt.revisionism:11098 alt.politics.white-power:6007 talk.politics.guns:213122

Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Milton Kleim) writes:
>
> # Don’t speak for me, Mr. McCarthy. I have never advocated
> # censoring anyone, including you.
>
> Contrast this with the text below:
>
> From: [email protected] (Milton Kleim)
> Message-ID:
>
> # Well, it’s quite simple. We will establish an investigative
> # service, which will review claims against Jews. If there is
> # evidence for charges, a trial will be set for the individual in
> # question. A special tribunal will be created to try those
> # charged with “Crimes Against the Aryan Race,” “Crimes Against
> # Peace,” genocide, and profiteering. Conviction on offense
> # number one and number three will carry a mandatory death penalty.
>
>
>
> # I invite the reader to investigate Mr. McCarthy, to see which of
> # us, he or I, am the REAL “Nazi.”
>
> I invite the reader to look at the following piece, also written
> by Kleim; he’s posting from his account at STCLOUD.MSUS.EDU.
>
> Subject: Peace…or Utter Destruction
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> From: [email protected]
>
> # I am an admirer of Adolf Hitler. I embrace National Socialism.
> # I would do so even if the Holocaust *were* fact, which I honestly
> # believe it is not. I would do so even if Hitler and his system
> # had killed *60* million Jews.
>
>

And where, EXACTLY, in all of this, is Milton’s endorsement of censorship?

Another example of the screechy, mindless rantings of pro-censorship jews
who can’t stand to have an “anti-semite” deny their slimy charges. Are
you next gonna tell us that the first thing Hitler did when he came to
power was snatch all the guns?

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:08 PDT 1995
Article: 4287 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: The same old shit…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 00:31:13 GMT
Lines: 7
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5689 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4287 alt.discrimination:37157

Seems some of the liberal brains are up to their old games of “You Nazis
aren’t a majority of people, so you’re powerless!” Can’t seem to get it
across to them that we aren’t interested in a large number of sheep, like
they are, but that the only majority that appeals to us is a majority of will.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:09 PDT 1995
Article: 4288 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Another fun game!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 00:34:11 GMT
Lines: 14
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5690 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4288 alt.discrimination:37158

1) Take a Star of David.

2) Count the number of points.

3) Count the number of sides.

4) Count the number of interstices (where the lines meet).

5) Write ’em all down.

6) By gum if you don’t get 6-6-6!

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:09 PDT 1995
Article: 4310 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The same old shit…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: erences: erences: erences: erenc <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 09:19:26 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5714 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4310 alt.discrimination:37184

Ash ([email protected]) writes:
>>
>>Seems some of the liberal brains are up to their old games of “You Nazis
>>aren’t a majority of people, so you’re powerless!” Can’t seem to get it
>>across to them that we aren’t interested in a large number of sheep, like
>>they are, but that the only majority that appeals to us is a majority of will.
>>
>>Les
>>
> We didn’t say you aren’t the majority thus have no powere. What we do say
> is that your ideas are so outrageously silly that they would not be accepted
> by the majority. You can’t have a majority of will if your ideas aren’t
> shared by the majority.

Sure we can. What planet are you living on?

> You seem to think differently. Please explain this to the rest of us.

Although you guys are generally unable to comprehend that not everyone is
a mindless cypher, just WAITING to happily take orders from you liberals,
and joyfully make mud-patties with every featherless biped, I have some
hope that some of you CAN be reached. See, some people are more willful
than others, and one person can have more force of will than ten liberal
sheep.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:10 PDT 1995
Article: 4311 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy’s first hubbie! (was: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 09:39:29 GMT
Lines: 89
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5715 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4311 alt.discrimination:37185

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip – Crazy’s lame flame attempts, and pathetic attempts at
self-aggrandizement, deleted)

> * You come on here preaching about how you “know” all about us,
> * ’cause your first husband was an alcoholic wife-beater, who happened to
> * dislike folks darker than he.
>
> If I recall correctly, my first marriage came up during a discussion about
> women’s roles in WS society and whether women would be considered equal to
> men. None of you WS adherents have written anything that would convince me
> that women would have equivalent privileges and protections intrinsic to
> WS men.

And WHERE did we say that we CARE what a liberal shit like you thinks?
No-one could care less how threatened you feel by WS people being in
charge, and your pathetic attempts to portray us as something we’re not
(ie, misogynists) is laughable.

> In today’s big push to jumpstart your race war, women would be
> allowed to have more options as the ‘Rosie the Riveters’ for short term
> gains, but how about after your all-whitey homeland is established? You
> wouldn’t have all of the ‘liberals’, ‘race-traitors’ and ‘mudpeople’ to
> talk down to and blame your failures on, so women would be the logical
> group to put in their place. As long as the women want to crank out babies
> and stand by their men, they would probably be safe, but they would still
> be subject to the treatment that their hausfuehrers dish out.

What you don’t seem to understand (I suspect that you do, but the idea of
responsibility scares the willies out of you) is that if ANYONE’S
self-interest collides with the survival and advancement of the White
race, then the survival of the White race can and will take precedence.
Right now, one of the biggest threat to the White race is abortion, which
is why (I suppose) that liberal twits like you think we’re gung-ho to
deprive a woman of her “rights”. Tell me, Crazy, WHAT rights, EXACTLY, is
a woman losing when she can’t abort her unborn child, and how does that
compare to protecting the White race with respect to the set of values I
outlined above? See, I (and most WS people) have a different “moral
perspective” than mindless automatons like you.

(snip)

> * > BTW, you may want to know that this “typical liberal” would have shot him
> * > if he’d touched me again. We had several guns in our house, and I used to
> * > enjoy shooting targets with him.
> *
> * More liberal hypocrisy. “Guns are bad, but I would have willingly shot my
> * abusive first husband!” And then we’re subjected to liberal screeching
> * about domestic homicides…
>
> Just because you have labeled me a liberal doesn’t mean it’s true,
> cockroach-boy. At that time, I was apolitical — hell, I wasn’t even old
> enough to vote! I was, however, willing to protect myself and my children
> from abuse. That was human instinct and had nothing to do with politics.
> Your idealogy is still fucked.

Human instinct. Interesting to hear you refering to something that you
obviously have NO regard for anymore. Let me fill you in on something
that may not have filtered through to your little pea-brain yet: my
idealogy (SIC!) is not fucked. National Socialism is much more in tune
with human instincts than liberalism, but we also recognize that humans
are NOT animals. You prattle on about “human dignity”, but really, you
think that the majority of people are going to embrace your rotten ideas
because you cloak them in meaningless words like “love”.

(snip)

> * > * Well, I can’t speak for Dr. Pierce, but my opinion on abortion is that
> * > * it’s wrong, unless it’s for eugenic purposes, ie if the pregnancy will
> * > * bring an inferior baby into the world. You, for example, should be the
> * > * poster-child for coat-hangers. The best part of YOU obviously ran down
> * > * your mother’s legs.
>
> You have the audacity to to say that I should be a poster-child for coat
> hangers? I was the twelfth child in my family, born to a 44 year old
> mother and 54 year old father, both having less than an 8th grade
> education. I was a breach baby, conceived after my mother’s onset of
> menopause, with her almost dying to bring me into the world. I am a
> survivor, Les. Everything that I’ve gone though has made me stronger, and
> I don’t back down or run away from anything or anyone.

My, I’m just shitting my pants that you’re so “tough”. You must have some
major insecurities if you have to constantly blow your own trumpet.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:11 PDT 1995
Article: 4312 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. a racist? You decide!!!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected]FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 09:43:02 GMT
Lines: 15
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5716 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4312 alt.discrimination:37186

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> : Nicole Brown… well, what the hell did we lose with her? She may have
> : had white skin, but she wasn’t White.
>
> ok, i can’t resist. les, tell me: how can you say that nicole brown
> wasn’t white?

Simple, Lane “the Romans were brown-skinned” Singer: Nicole expressed
values that NO White man or woman would have held, and she bore O.J. TWO
pickaninnies.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:12 PDT 1995
Article: 4358 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The same old shit…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 10:25:19 GMT
Lines: 26
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5836 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4358 alt.discrimination:37226

Andy “Big cloth doll guy” Walton ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
> :Seems some of the liberal brains are up to their old games of “You Nazis
> :aren’t a majority of people, so you’re powerless!” Can’t seem to get it
> :across to them that we aren’t interested in a large number of sheep, like
> :they are, but that the only majority that appeals to us is a majority of
> :will.
>
> A “majority of will,” whatever the hell that means, is insufficient.
> Minorities can, do, and have made policy–but they need intelligence,
> dilligence, and fairly large numbers. A driven 1% can’t change policy. A
> determined 25% can.

Thanks for the info, but I get the DISTINCT impression that your numbers
are more a reflection of your own wishful thinking (and fear) than a
statement of observation. Besides, what makes you think that we don’t
HAVE the support of 25% of the population? Just because 1 in 4 people
aren’t hanging swastika flags out their windows AT THIS TIME, is not proof
positive that they are HOSTILE to us.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:13 PDT 1995
Article: 4362 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: White vs. white (was: O.J. a racist? You decide!!!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 10:35:20 GMT
Lines: 33
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5838 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4362 alt.discrimination:37227

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:

(snip)

> : Nicole (brown Simpson) expressed values that NO White man or woman would
> : have held
>
> so this made her not-white? this is a new wrinkle on your ever
> more convoluted definition of who’s white and who’s not. a
> very interesting one, as well.

Pay attention, scum. I said that Nicole was not White. I never denied
the reality of her complexion, like some people around here do with the
Romans, whom I won’t name, but whose initials are Lane Singer.

> does this mean that if an intelligent or humane thought somehow
> manages to flit across the screen of your mind, you’ll all
> of a sudden become not-white too?

You have a rather interesting definition of “intelligent or humane
thoughts”. Obviously, miscegenation is “intelligent” and “humane” in your
world, as is participating in drug-soaked lesbian orgies (read Faye
Resnick’s autobiography, in which Nicole features prominently).

> also, what about if nicole had recanted her “ways” and joined WAR — would
> she have turned white again?

Nope. WAR, in the first place, wouldn’t have touched that race-traitorous
slut with a ten-foot pole. Nor would have any dedicated pro-White group.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:14 PDT 1995
Article: 4365 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Liberal motivations…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 10:42:53 GMT
Lines: 13
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5842 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4365 alt.discrimination:37228

It’s interesting, and quite helpful, when liberals tell us why they
believe the way they do. Evil Beavis, for example, has told us that he
has a negress girlfriend in the States, so one can understand his
commitment to advocating racial equality. William R. Discipio, too, has
admitted that he is in a mixed-race marriage, so one can understand HIS
fascination with “Nazis”, and the wild abandon with which he flings the
term at ANYONE who has the SLIGHTEST reservations about miscegenation.
But that leaves a rather large contingent of liberals without the
necessary background information for us to come to the proper conclusions
about their motivations.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:14 PDT 1995
Article: 4371 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Liberal motivations…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected]ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:01:16 GMT
Lines: 43
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5854 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4371 alt.discrimination:37236

Racial Theorist ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>>It’s interesting, and quite helpful, when liberals tell us why they
>>believe the way they do. Evil Beavis, for example, has told us that he
>>has a negress girlfriend in the States, so one can understand his
>>commitment to advocating racial equality. William R. Discipio, too, has
>>admitted that he is in a mixed-race marriage, so one can understand HIS
>>fascination with “Nazis”, and the wild abandon with which he flings the
>>term at ANYONE who has the SLIGHTEST reservations about miscegenation.
>>But that leaves a rather large contingent of liberals without the
>>necessary background information for us to come to the proper conclusions
>>about their motivations.
>
> what the deal is, is that most all of these libs on this ng are just
> as racists as we are. they’re like this guy i know in real life who
> claims to be a multiculturalist lib. he claims not to be prejudice.
> i was telling him the other day, “maybe you ain’t prejudice, but why
> don’t i ever see you hanging around with a bunch of stinking nigras?”
> of course he didn’t have an answer to that question.

True enough. Liberals are liberal in inverse proportion to the amount
that their liberalism affects them directly. They don’t mind putting
OTHERS at risk through their bizarre theories, and they have no qualms
about putting the children of “racists” at risk, but heaven forbid that
they actually have to face the same consequences themselves!

> aside from evil–who’s probably lying about his aunt jemima
> girlfriend–and this other guy–i doubt very seriously that the
> motivation of any of thse libs could be that they have a nigress
> girlfriend because most all the nigresses i ever known wouldn’t have
> nothing to do with these wimps. so they must have some other
> motivation.

That’s possibly true, but I cannot for the life of me imagine what it
could be. I can’t imagine what could possibly be the motivation of most
of them. I mean, I know that a few libs are truly whacko, and actually
WANT to be abased before negroes and other non-whites, but the vast
majority aren’t that pathetic.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:16 PDT 1995
Article: 4410 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy’s first hubbie! (was: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 10:37:34 GMT
Lines: 71
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5984 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4410 alt.discrimination:37271

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected] (Les
> Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> * And WHERE did we say that we CARE what a liberal shit like you thinks?
> * No-one could care less how threatened you feel by WS people being in
> * charge, and your pathetic attempts to portray us as something we’re not
> * (ie, misogynists) is laughable.
>
> Your own words are exposing you for who you are.

Which is…?

> I don’t believe that you
> hate all women, but you certainly are threatened by women who don’t
> readily feed into your political philosophy. BTW, who appointed you
> spokesman for everyone who is subscribed to these newsgroups, Les?

The same person who told you to come on here and whine and complain, and
flame WS people with stereotypes just like the ones that you freak out
about when we say them about non-white folk.

> You come on here and fart and belch and thump your chest on behalf of of
> your knuckle-dragging fraternity and, while your stench is strong enough
> to make decent people want to puke, you are still only one person. What IS
> laughable here is your piss-poor Tarzan impersonations that you’re trying
> to pass off as white supremacist science, history, and morality. You spend
> your time yodeling about being king of the jungle and bitching about
> Cheetah trying to nuzzle up to Jane and pilfer food from your treehouse.
> (That was a metaphor, mighty-whities, so don’t start claiming I was
> referring to anyone as apes.)

Crazy, you’re truly bizarre. If anyone here is piss-poor, it’s you, with
your hackneyed, cliched statements about warm-fuzzies. Don’t you get it?
Your ideas just aren’t relevant anymore, and it scares the HELL out of you
to realize that you’re being thrown to the side, doesn’t it?

(snip)

> * What you don’t seem to understand (I suspect that you do, but the idea of
> * responsibility scares the willies out of you) is that if ANYONE’S
> * self-interest collides with the survival and advancement of the White
> * race, then the survival of the White race can and will take precedence.
>
> Please. Rob and I raised two kids, and I always put the needs of my
> husband and children first.

How typically liberal: now that YOU will be safe from the consequences of
the foolishness that you seek to impose on others, you’re all gung-ho for
them.

> You have no idea of how conservative I was
> during the late 1970s through the mid 1980s. I was a full-time mom, doing
> some community volunteer work, and did not enter college until my youngest
> child started high school. I know all about responsibility and setting
> aside my own interests for a higher goal.

Crazy, I really could care less if you were a con-artist-servative during
any time in your life, or a flaming pinko carrying protest signs every
week. What you were at some time in the past has little bearing on the
damage you’re doing NOW.

Why do you feel the need to justify yourself with constant references to
your past? Are you so unsure of yourself that you have to keep flapping
your gums about how far you’ve come?

(snip)

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:17 PDT 1995
Article: 4411 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy on anything! (was: Crazy’s first hubbie!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 10:59:21 GMT
Lines: 116
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5986 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4411 alt.discrimination:37272

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

Moi:
> * Right now, one of the biggest threat to the White race is abortion, which
> * is why (I suppose) that liberal twits like you think we’re gung-ho to
> * deprive a woman of her “rights”. Tell me, Crazy, WHAT rights, EXACTLY, is
> * a woman losing when she can’t abort her unborn child, and how does that
> * compare to protecting the White race with respect to the set of values I
> * outlined above?
>
> You are either misunderstanding or deliberately distorting what I wrote:
>
> As long as the women want to crank out babies and stand by
> their men, they would probably be safe, but they would still
> be subject to the treatment that their hausfuehrers dish out.

No, one cannot distort a deliberate falsehood. See, Crazy, my
“misunderstanding” of your original statement was just another way of
saying that you’re full of shit. You don’t know ANYTHING about White
Supremacist doctrine, but that ignorance doesn’t stop, or even slow you
down, in your stereotyping.

> I was not talking about abortion, Les. If you want to talk about that, you
> should start another thread, because it has nothing to do with me. My
> point was that women would be valued only for their childbearing
> capability and their willingness to bolster the egos and reputations of
> their men. While they will never have the respect or importance of Aryan
> men, they can always be grateful that, at least, they weren’t born a
> ni**er or a Jew.
>
> See, I (and most WS people) have a different “moral
> * perspective” than mindless automatons like you.
>
> Ah, you have just tripped over your dick again, Les. How many times did
> you recently berate me for bringing my kids into the world?

Not often. If I recall, I mentioned it once in passing, then I made a lot
of remarks about how the world would have been better off if YOU had been
aborted.

> It seems that
> you have two sets of values: one that applies to the hordes of “white”
> women in a parallel universe and me, a real “white” woman during the
> 1970s, who made tremendous sacrifices to carry, bear, and nurture her
> children to adulthood. You are a hypocrite and a liar.

Please. You, a REAL white woman? Just because you have a pale
complexion, don’t fool yourself for a minute into thinking that that
makes you “White”.

(snip)

> You prattle on about “human dignity”, but really, you
> * think that the majority of people are going to embrace your rotten ideas
>
> You don’t know me, Les. People who do know me think that my “rotten ideas”
> are pragmatic and honest.

Then the people who know you are just as loopy as you are.

> Everyone who has been reading our interchanges
> here have witnessed you try to twist my words, throw in red herring
> issues, and make statements about me that totally conflict with “the set
> of values” that you claim to espouse concerning “white” women.

Really? Just who is this semi-legendary “everyone” that you refer to?
Your liberal fellow-travellers, who bark in approval and clap their flippers
in approval when you give hell to us “Natsees”? My, I’m just shaking in
my jackboots, that you can muster such FORMIDABLE allies.

> * because you cloak them in meaningless words like “love”.
>
> Well, besides idle speculation about the emptiness of your personal life,
> I don’t recall talking about ‘luv’ around here, especially the meaningless
> kind. When I talk about politics and the human condition, I use terms like
> justice, freedom, dignity, ethics, responsibility, commitment, and
> stewardship. I believe that humans have a duty to care for each other and
> to tread gently upon the earth.

So you haven’t used the word “love”, exactly. It just proves my point,
though, seeing you rant on with words like “justice, freedom, dignity,
ethics (ha!), responsibility (double ha!), commitment, and stewardship”.
It shows how you twist the meanings of those particular words to give some
sort of currency and relevance to your whacko ideas.

(snip)

> You just cannot create enough stereotypes to throw in my direction, can
> you? I don’t think that I’m all that special. After all, I’m not one of
> these silver spooned, high on theory but low on life experience, “liberal”
> academians that you like to chastise for not living in the real world.
> I’ve already earned my “been there, did that, bought the stinkin’
> tee-shirt” diploma from the School of Hard Knocks in Real Life University
> ™.

Gee, for someone who’s had so much like experience, you’re still pretty
stupid. Wonder why that is.

> You hawk your white supremacist philosophy to people who come from similar
> life experiences as mine, trying to get those who are disgruntled and/or
> down on their luck to join with you to undermine and overthrow a political
> system that is no longer responsive to the great white race. Les, why am I
> not on your side? How did I slip through the cracks if your cause is based
> on truth and a set of values that, according to you, are in my best
> interests?

That’s easy. You “slipped through the cracks” because you’re too (stupid,
ignorant) to recognize truth and reality when it’s presented to you. We
don’t seek out losers – if we did, we’d obviously be spending more time
trying to get YOU on side.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:17 PDT 1995
Article: 4424 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: New Jew boy Jokes
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 13:22:30 GMT
Lines: 19

TonyCapone ([email protected]) wrote:
> Here is another jew joke that I heard recently. remember, if you kow any
> good ones, please post them….. I want this thread to keep going.

> One day, this rich jew named Moshie decided to write his will. He was
> near death, and he wanted to leave his riches to others. So he was
> talking to his lawyer Herb. “Herb” he says, “I want you to leave 3
> million to the Negro College Fund, 4 million for the B’Nai B’Rith society,
> and 5 million for the Nazi Party.”
> “What?” exclaimed Herb, “the Nazi Party?, Are you sure you know what your
> doing? I thought you were a good Jew.”
> “Ah, Herb,” says Moishe, while he is rolling up his sleeve, “if it weren’t
> for them, I would not have my lucky Lotto numbers”

This one is REMARKABLY funny!

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:18 PDT 1995
Article: 4425 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: White vs. white (was: O.J. a racist? You decide!!!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 13:37:49 GMT
Lines: 48
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4425 alt.politics.white-power:6016 alt.discrimination:37280

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:

(snip)

> : I said that Nicole (Brown Simpson) was not White. I never denied
> : the reality of her complexion, like some people around here do with the
> : Romans, whom I won’t name, but whose initials are Lane Singer.
>
> you know you really shouldn’t keep bringing that thread up,
> les. you copped out without ever really explaining why the
> Romans wrote voluminously about the strange coloring of the
> northern, skin-wearing barbarians you like to call “aryans.”

I didn’t “cop out”. I had made my point, which was that you were (and
are) so far out in left field, that you were allowing your desires to come
before facts. Hey, you *WANT* to believe that the Romans were wogs, so
you will. To hell with what *anyone*, Tacitus or other, wrote, right?

> if the white, white skin, the blond hair and blue eyes were
> so unsual to the Romans, it logically follows that the Romans
> weren’t aryans. but don’t muss your little head up about logic,
> les. we all know that it’s verboten in your ranks.
>
> of course you tried to change the subject completely by pointing
> to one writer whom you interpreted to have been impressed with
> the “homogeneity” of the barbarians, but even this goes against
> your own assertions that the Romans were the self-same aryans
> as you claim the barbarians were.
>
> you know how people one race think everyone in another looks
> the same. so it would follow that tacitus was of a different
> race altogether than these strange, ghostlike apparitions from
> the north.

Not at all. I love the way you leftists slaughter logic like this; it
shows to the ‘Net that you’re all a bunch of dogmatic, zealous freaks far
better than I ever could.

Your “reasoning”, such as it was, went like this: the Romans wrote about
the fair complexions and hair of the Germans, because they themselves
weren’t fair of colour. By that reasoning, am I to understand that
Tacitus ALSO wrote about the ferocity and love of war of the Germans
because the Romans themselves were a bunch of pacifists?

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:19 PDT 1995
Article: 4443 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 18:20:21 GMT
Lines: 21
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6071 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4443 alt.discrimination:37302 talk.politics.guns:213233

“John Q. Public” ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:

>>Are
>>you next gonna tell us that the first thing Hitler did when he came to
>>power was snatch all the guns?
>
> Irrelevant. I’ve got mine, and you won’t get them without taking
> losses. Got that, Les?

Irrelevant? No. While you’re posturing with your chest out about
“Natsees” coming to snatch your guns away, the liberals are the ones who
are going to do it.

Les

P.S.: It’s usually the tough talkers like you who are the first to
surrender.

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:20 PDT 1995
Article: 4491 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: White vs. white (was: O.J. a racist? You decide!!!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 09:41:17 GMT
Lines: 33
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:37355 alt.politics.white-power:6180 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4491

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> : Your “reasoning”, such as it was, went like this: the Romans wrote about
> : the fair complexions and hair of the Germans, because they themselves
> : weren’t fair of colour. By that reasoning, am I to understand that
> : Tacitus ALSO wrote about the ferocity and love of war of the Germans
> : because the Romans themselves were a bunch of pacifists?
>
> les, you just cannot comprehend the simplest fact. Roman testimony
> made it very clear that they thought the blond hair, etc., to be
> quite unusual.
>
> this is what they wrote, this is what they meant, and this is
> what i reported, although you just can’t, as i said, comprehend
> much of anything.

Yes, that is what you reported. Then you went off on a tangent about how
this “proved” that the Romans were short, squat darkies. The Romans in
Tacitus’ time had LOTS of exposure to non-Romans, and were mildly
surprised at the physical homogeneity of the Germans. They weren’t
jaw-dropping stunned by it.

> you wrote that the Romans were aryans, just like the barbarians.
> you are wrong.

Because you say so? Sorry, you’ll understand, I hope, when I say that I
need a little more authority than a dogmatic zealout like you to confirm
that for me.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 10:59:21 PDT 1995
Article: 4493 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy’s first hubbie! (was: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 10:01:51 GMT
Lines: 91
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6183 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4493 alt.discrimination:37357

Raggedy ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected] (Les
> Griswold) wrote:
>
> :Human instinct. Interesting to hear you refering to something that you
> :obviously have NO regard for anymore. Let me fill you in on something
> :that may not have filtered through to your little pea-brain yet: my
> :idealogy (SIC!) is not fucked. National Socialism is much more in tune
> :with human instincts than liberalism,
>
> Rape, cannibalism, and tribal warfare are much more in tune with human
> instincts than their opposites.

In your world, maybe.

> The history of human civilization ofer the
> last few thousand years has been one of subordinating instinct to reason.

Subordinating is considerably different than ignoring outright.

> Nation-states and treaties are less instinctually easy than tribes and
> constant warfare. National Socialism is inherently hostile to this trend
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> toward reason.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It is? Well, gosh-golly-darn, learn something new every day!

> In its rhetoric, philosophy, and symbols, the Nazis managed an odd
> ideological marriage–a fundamentally anti-rational romanticism, but
> aggressively technologically modern. It is a marriage that has not been
> seen in any sizeable way before or since, a dissonant ideology which one
> author has labelled “reactionary modernism”.

Raggedy, this sort of stuff belongs in alt.satanism, not here.

> The whole anti-western legacy of German nationalism suggested that
> such a reconciliation between soul and technology was out of the
> question, for nothing could be more at odds with German culture.
> But the reactionary modernists recognized that antitechnological
> views were formulas for national impotence. […] As Joseph Goebbels
> repeatedly insisted, this was to be the century of /stählernde Romantik/,
> steellike romanticism. [p. 3]
>
> From Neitzsche through Junger and then Goebbels, the the modernist
> credo was the triumph of spirit and will over reason and the
> subsequent fusion of this will to an aesthetic mode. If aesthetic
> experience alone justifies life, morality is suspended and desire
> knows no limits.[…]As aesthetic standards replaced moral norms,
> modernism indulged a fascination for horror and violence as a welcome
> relief to bourgeois boredom and decadence. […] When modernists turned
> to politics, they sought engagement, commitment, and authenticity,
> experiences the Fascists and Nazis promised to provide. [p. 13]
>
> The reactionary modernists were /irrationalists/. They simply despised
> reason and denigrated its role in political and social affairs. […]
> the reactionary modernists spoke spoke what Adorno labeled the “jargon
> of authenticity” in which certain absolutes such as blood, race, and
> soil were placed beyond rational justification. In their view reason
> itself was /lebensfiendlich/, or “hostile to life”. [p. 14]
>
> Herf, Jeffrey. Reactionary Modernism. New York: Cambridge University
> Press, 1984. All emphasis as in the original. Any typos mine.
>
> That, Les, is a citation.

And it is also, Raggedy, a load of psycho-babble.

> :but we also recognize that humans are NOT animals.
>
> Oh, really? Your ideology defines human life and individual freedom as
> valuable only if, and to the extent that, they further your ends.

But at least we’re HONEST about it. Liberals are the ones you’re most
likely to hear cracking jokes (behind their hands, of course), about
“mongoloids” and “sub-standard intelligence”.

> :You prattle on about “human dignity”, but really, you think that the
> majority
> :of people are going to embrace your rotten ideas because you cloak them in
> :meaningless words like “love”.
>
> “Race” is an absolute object of reverence, so manifest that it needs not
> be rationally defined. “Love” is a meaningless word. There, in a nutshell,
> we have the essence of Naziism.

Meaningless only when you guys are called on it. Otherwise, it’s the
force animating your ideals

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:16 PDT 1995
Article: 5689 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: The same old shit…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 00:31:13 GMT
Lines: 7
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5689 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4287 alt.discrimination:37157

Seems some of the liberal brains are up to their old games of “You Nazis
aren’t a majority of people, so you’re powerless!” Can’t seem to get it
across to them that we aren’t interested in a large number of sheep, like
they are, but that the only majority that appeals to us is a majority of will.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:17 PDT 1995
Article: 5690 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Another fun game!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 00:34:11 GMT
Lines: 14
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5690 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4288 alt.discrimination:37158

1) Take a Star of David.

2) Count the number of points.

3) Count the number of sides.

4) Count the number of interstices (where the lines meet).

5) Write ’em all down.

6) By gum if you don’t get 6-6-6!

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:18 PDT 1995
Article: 5714 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The same old shit…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: erences: erences: erences: erenc <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 09:19:26 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5714 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4310 alt.discrimination:37184

Ash ([email protected]) writes:
>>
>>Seems some of the liberal brains are up to their old games of “You Nazis
>>aren’t a majority of people, so you’re powerless!” Can’t seem to get it
>>across to them that we aren’t interested in a large number of sheep, like
>>they are, but that the only majority that appeals to us is a majority of will.
>>
>>Les
>>
> We didn’t say you aren’t the majority thus have no powere. What we do say
> is that your ideas are so outrageously silly that they would not be accepted
> by the majority. You can’t have a majority of will if your ideas aren’t
> shared by the majority.

Sure we can. What planet are you living on?

> You seem to think differently. Please explain this to the rest of us.

Although you guys are generally unable to comprehend that not everyone is
a mindless cypher, just WAITING to happily take orders from you liberals,
and joyfully make mud-patties with every featherless biped, I have some
hope that some of you CAN be reached. See, some people are more willful
than others, and one person can have more force of will than ten liberal
sheep.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:19 PDT 1995
Article: 5715 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy’s first hubbie! (was: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 09:39:29 GMT
Lines: 89
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5715 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4311 alt.discrimination:37185

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip – Crazy’s lame flame attempts, and pathetic attempts at
self-aggrandizement, deleted)

> * You come on here preaching about how you “know” all about us,
> * ’cause your first husband was an alcoholic wife-beater, who happened to
> * dislike folks darker than he.
>
> If I recall correctly, my first marriage came up during a discussion about
> women’s roles in WS society and whether women would be considered equal to
> men. None of you WS adherents have written anything that would convince me
> that women would have equivalent privileges and protections intrinsic to
> WS men.

And WHERE did we say that we CARE what a liberal shit like you thinks?
No-one could care less how threatened you feel by WS people being in
charge, and your pathetic attempts to portray us as something we’re not
(ie, misogynists) is laughable.

> In today’s big push to jumpstart your race war, women would be
> allowed to have more options as the ‘Rosie the Riveters’ for short term
> gains, but how about after your all-whitey homeland is established? You
> wouldn’t have all of the ‘liberals’, ‘race-traitors’ and ‘mudpeople’ to
> talk down to and blame your failures on, so women would be the logical
> group to put in their place. As long as the women want to crank out babies
> and stand by their men, they would probably be safe, but they would still
> be subject to the treatment that their hausfuehrers dish out.

What you don’t seem to understand (I suspect that you do, but the idea of
responsibility scares the willies out of you) is that if ANYONE’S
self-interest collides with the survival and advancement of the White
race, then the survival of the White race can and will take precedence.
Right now, one of the biggest threat to the White race is abortion, which
is why (I suppose) that liberal twits like you think we’re gung-ho to
deprive a woman of her “rights”. Tell me, Crazy, WHAT rights, EXACTLY, is
a woman losing when she can’t abort her unborn child, and how does that
compare to protecting the White race with respect to the set of values I
outlined above? See, I (and most WS people) have a different “moral
perspective” than mindless automatons like you.

(snip)

> * > BTW, you may want to know that this “typical liberal” would have shot him
> * > if he’d touched me again. We had several guns in our house, and I used to
> * > enjoy shooting targets with him.
> *
> * More liberal hypocrisy. “Guns are bad, but I would have willingly shot my
> * abusive first husband!” And then we’re subjected to liberal screeching
> * about domestic homicides…
>
> Just because you have labeled me a liberal doesn’t mean it’s true,
> cockroach-boy. At that time, I was apolitical — hell, I wasn’t even old
> enough to vote! I was, however, willing to protect myself and my children
> from abuse. That was human instinct and had nothing to do with politics.
> Your idealogy is still fucked.

Human instinct. Interesting to hear you refering to something that you
obviously have NO regard for anymore. Let me fill you in on something
that may not have filtered through to your little pea-brain yet: my
idealogy (SIC!) is not fucked. National Socialism is much more in tune
with human instincts than liberalism, but we also recognize that humans
are NOT animals. You prattle on about “human dignity”, but really, you
think that the majority of people are going to embrace your rotten ideas
because you cloak them in meaningless words like “love”.

(snip)

> * > * Well, I can’t speak for Dr. Pierce, but my opinion on abortion is that
> * > * it’s wrong, unless it’s for eugenic purposes, ie if the pregnancy will
> * > * bring an inferior baby into the world. You, for example, should be the
> * > * poster-child for coat-hangers. The best part of YOU obviously ran down
> * > * your mother’s legs.
>
> You have the audacity to to say that I should be a poster-child for coat
> hangers? I was the twelfth child in my family, born to a 44 year old
> mother and 54 year old father, both having less than an 8th grade
> education. I was a breach baby, conceived after my mother’s onset of
> menopause, with her almost dying to bring me into the world. I am a
> survivor, Les. Everything that I’ve gone though has made me stronger, and
> I don’t back down or run away from anything or anyone.

My, I’m just shitting my pants that you’re so “tough”. You must have some
major insecurities if you have to constantly blow your own trumpet.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:19 PDT 1995
Article: 5716 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. a racist? You decide!!!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 09:43:02 GMT
Lines: 15
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5716 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4312 alt.discrimination:37186

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> : Nicole Brown… well, what the hell did we lose with her? She may have
> : had white skin, but she wasn’t White.
>
> ok, i can’t resist. les, tell me: how can you say that nicole brown
> wasn’t white?

Simple, Lane “the Romans were brown-skinned” Singer: Nicole expressed
values that NO White man or woman would have held, and she bore O.J. TWO
pickaninnies.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:20 PDT 1995
Article: 5835 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. a racist? You decide!!!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 10:20:09 GMT
Lines: 29

(Rick Jones) writes:

(snip – Rick telling me more than I’d ever want to know about liberal
mating rituals)

> If O.J. Simpson is going out with Paula Barbieri, it seems pretty obvious to
> me and anyone else with a working brain that he’s doing so because of
> his own motivations. If Paula Barbieri’s going out with O.J. Simpson, (I
> don’t know if she is anymore) then that’s because of HER motivations.
> Why else would you go out with someone? The days of arranged
> marriages are fast dying.

Fame? Notoriety? She somehow thinks that she’s immune to being a)
abused, and b) killed, by the savage O.J.

(snip)

> By the way, Les, why do you refuse to address the issue of your claiming
> Hitler was blond?

Because (for the umpteenth time) I never DID claim that Hitler was blond.
Of course, I can’t expect anything more from someone who gets his
information from Moffit the Frog’s sig. Second of all, I HAVE explained
to all you late-comers what I DID say, and from where I got my
information, and thirdly, you’re an asshole.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:21 PDT 1995
Article: 5836 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The same old shit…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 10:25:19 GMT
Lines: 26
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5836 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4358 alt.discrimination:37226

Andy “Big cloth doll guy” Walton ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
> :Seems some of the liberal brains are up to their old games of “You Nazis
> :aren’t a majority of people, so you’re powerless!” Can’t seem to get it
> :across to them that we aren’t interested in a large number of sheep, like
> :they are, but that the only majority that appeals to us is a majority of
> :will.
>
> A “majority of will,” whatever the hell that means, is insufficient.
> Minorities can, do, and have made policy–but they need intelligence,
> dilligence, and fairly large numbers. A driven 1% can’t change policy. A
> determined 25% can.

Thanks for the info, but I get the DISTINCT impression that your numbers
are more a reflection of your own wishful thinking (and fear) than a
statement of observation. Besides, what makes you think that we don’t
HAVE the support of 25% of the population? Just because 1 in 4 people
aren’t hanging swastika flags out their windows AT THIS TIME, is not proof
positive that they are HOSTILE to us.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:22 PDT 1995
Article: 5838 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: White vs. white (was: O.J. a racist? You decide!!!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 10:35:20 GMT
Lines: 33
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5838 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4362 alt.discrimination:37227

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:

(snip)

> : Nicole (brown Simpson) expressed values that NO White man or woman would
> : have held
>
> so this made her not-white? this is a new wrinkle on your ever
> more convoluted definition of who’s white and who’s not. a
> very interesting one, as well.

Pay attention, scum. I said that Nicole was not White. I never denied
the reality of her complexion, like some people around here do with the
Romans, whom I won’t name, but whose initials are Lane Singer.

> does this mean that if an intelligent or humane thought somehow
> manages to flit across the screen of your mind, you’ll all
> of a sudden become not-white too?

You have a rather interesting definition of “intelligent or humane
thoughts”. Obviously, miscegenation is “intelligent” and “humane” in your
world, as is participating in drug-soaked lesbian orgies (read Faye
Resnick’s autobiography, in which Nicole features prominently).

> also, what about if nicole had recanted her “ways” and joined WAR — would
> she have turned white again?

Nope. WAR, in the first place, wouldn’t have touched that race-traitorous
slut with a ten-foot pole. Nor would have any dedicated pro-White group.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:23 PDT 1995
Article: 5842 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Liberal motivations…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 10:42:53 GMT
Lines: 13
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5842 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4365 alt.discrimination:37228

It’s interesting, and quite helpful, when liberals tell us why they
believe the way they do. Evil Beavis, for example, has told us that he
has a negress girlfriend in the States, so one can understand his
commitment to advocating racial equality. William R. Discipio, too, has
admitted that he is in a mixed-race marriage, so one can understand HIS
fascination with “Nazis”, and the wild abandon with which he flings the
term at ANYONE who has the SLIGHTEST reservations about miscegenation.
But that leaves a rather large contingent of liberals without the
necessary background information for us to come to the proper conclusions
about their motivations.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:23 PDT 1995
Article: 5843 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Nigger-made metalwork? HAHAHAHAHA…you niggers are real jokers.
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 10:47:14 GMT
Lines: 19

Foot-boy evil Beavis ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> All you have proved, KT, is that you’re adept at name calling. If you had an
> education and read history you would know that Africans were very skillful in the
> art of metallurgy in their days…

“… in their days”. Amazing. Liberals like you are going on and on and
ON about how the negroes had an amazing civilization IN THE PAST, and that
we should accept this as having some sort of relevance to their current
status as mill-stones about our necks, yet you freak out when WHITES start
talking about the accomplishments of THEIR ancestors, saying that it
didn’t happen that way, or else that we can’t take the credit for what our
ancestors did. Strange in the extreme.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:24 PDT 1995
Article: 5845 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!esol.intermedia.com!emi.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.ultranet.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!simtel!col.hp.com!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Hitler:Tall and Blonde?!? (wasRe: Les Griswold: We Need Answers!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 02:55:17 GMT
Lines: 33

Lester Toews ([email protected]) writes:
> On 6 Oct 1995, J. E. Cowen wrote:
>
>> In alt.politics.white-power Rick Jones said:
>> >
>> >Les Griswold! There you are. Still made no headway on proving your
>> bizarre
>> >claim that Adolf Hitler was blonde and tall, I see. Where is it? Or are
>> you
>
> I must have missed this.

You couldn’t have, since I never said it.

> Did Griswold actually post that Adolf Hitler was blonde and tall?

Nope. I posted that, according to an aquaintance of mine, who knew a
former member of the SA, Hitler was about 6 feet tall, had light brown
(note: NOT blond!) hair, and blue eyes. Of course, “light brown” is too
long for the towering intellects of semitophiles to remember, so they
shortened it to “blond”, and to hell with the accuracy.

> Did anyone save that post?
>
> Could they re-send it to the newsgroup?

I’m sure someone saved it, but don’t hold your breath waiting for it to be
reposted, for it would show, once and for all, what sort of lying little
jerks the jews and their admirers are.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:25 PDT 1995
Article: 5854 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Liberal motivations…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:01:16 GMT
Lines: 43
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5854 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4371 alt.discrimination:37236

Racial Theorist ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>>It’s interesting, and quite helpful, when liberals tell us why they
>>believe the way they do. Evil Beavis, for example, has told us that he
>>has a negress girlfriend in the States, so one can understand his
>>commitment to advocating racial equality. William R. Discipio, too, has
>>admitted that he is in a mixed-race marriage, so one can understand HIS
>>fascination with “Nazis”, and the wild abandon with which he flings the
>>term at ANYONE who has the SLIGHTEST reservations about miscegenation.
>>But that leaves a rather large contingent of liberals without the
>>necessary background information for us to come to the proper conclusions
>>about their motivations.
>
> what the deal is, is that most all of these libs on this ng are just
> as racists as we are. they’re like this guy i know in real life who
> claims to be a multiculturalist lib. he claims not to be prejudice.
> i was telling him the other day, “maybe you ain’t prejudice, but why
> don’t i ever see you hanging around with a bunch of stinking nigras?”
> of course he didn’t have an answer to that question.

True enough. Liberals are liberal in inverse proportion to the amount
that their liberalism affects them directly. They don’t mind putting
OTHERS at risk through their bizarre theories, and they have no qualms
about putting the children of “racists” at risk, but heaven forbid that
they actually have to face the same consequences themselves!

> aside from evil–who’s probably lying about his aunt jemima
> girlfriend–and this other guy–i doubt very seriously that the
> motivation of any of thse libs could be that they have a nigress
> girlfriend because most all the nigresses i ever known wouldn’t have
> nothing to do with these wimps. so they must have some other
> motivation.

That’s possibly true, but I cannot for the life of me imagine what it
could be. I can’t imagine what could possibly be the motivation of most
of them. I mean, I know that a few libs are truly whacko, and actually
WANT to be abased before negroes and other non-whites, but the vast
majority aren’t that pathetic.

Les

From [email protected]on.CA Mon Oct 16 11:03:26 PDT 1995
Article: 5913 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Rick Jones is an idiot! (was: Les Griswold is Jewish!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 00:14:47 GMT
Lines: 23

(Rick Jones) writes:
> ver said he was blond. But then again, it’s not surprising that you’ve
>> taken up the misquote from some jew or other, and are running around like
>> a goon, with a big sappy grin on your face. Well, keep it up.
>
> I didn’t know you were Jewish.
>
> You quite specifically stated that he was, and that you
> got this information from some guy whose father was in the SA.
>
> Thanks for backing down, Les. One more lie you’ve been caught
> in. I win.

Sorry, even your jewish buddies won’t back you up on this one. I quite
specifically said that I had hear that Hitler was about 6 feet tall, had
light brown hair, and blue eyes. I also reported that I had heard it from
an aquaintance of mine, who knew a former memeber of the SA. I never said
anything about anyone’s father in the SA; why not ask Jimmie McCarthy
about it, I’m sure he’s archived it. Or you can bother Ken McOyVay for it.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:27 PDT 1995
Article: 5983 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Liberal motivations…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 10:18:07 GMT
Lines: 22

Foot-boy evil Beavis ([email protected]) writes:
>> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>> It’s interesting, and quite helpful, when liberals tell us why they
>> believe the way they do. Evil Beavis, for example, has told us that he
>> has a negress girlfriend in the States, so one can understand his
>> commitment to advocating racial equality. William R. Discipio, too, has
>> admitted that he is in a mixed-race marriage, so one can understand HIS
>> fascination with “Nazis”, and the wild abandon with which he flings the
>> term at ANYONE who has the SLIGHTEST reservations about miscegenation.
>> But that leaves a rather large contingent of liberals without the
>> necessary background information for us to come to the proper conclusions
>> about their motivations.

> I advocate equality because it’s right. Oh yeah, and because it pisses you
> off too…!

Gee, Beaver, is it ever nice to know that you have your opinions just to
piss me off! Boy, bet that makes your negress girlfriend feel real
special.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:28 PDT 1995
Article: 5984 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy’s first hubbie! (was: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 10:37:34 GMT
Lines: 71
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5984 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4410 alt.discrimination:37271

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected] (Les
> Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> * And WHERE did we say that we CARE what a liberal shit like you thinks?
> * No-one could care less how threatened you feel by WS people being in
> * charge, and your pathetic attempts to portray us as something we’re not
> * (ie, misogynists) is laughable.
>
> Your own words are exposing you for who you are.

Which is…?

> I don’t believe that you
> hate all women, but you certainly are threatened by women who don’t
> readily feed into your political philosophy. BTW, who appointed you
> spokesman for everyone who is subscribed to these newsgroups, Les?

The same person who told you to come on here and whine and complain, and
flame WS people with stereotypes just like the ones that you freak out
about when we say them about non-white folk.

> You come on here and fart and belch and thump your chest on behalf of of
> your knuckle-dragging fraternity and, while your stench is strong enough
> to make decent people want to puke, you are still only one person. What IS
> laughable here is your piss-poor Tarzan impersonations that you’re trying
> to pass off as white supremacist science, history, and morality. You spend
> your time yodeling about being king of the jungle and bitching about
> Cheetah trying to nuzzle up to Jane and pilfer food from your treehouse.
> (That was a metaphor, mighty-whities, so don’t start claiming I was
> referring to anyone as apes.)

Crazy, you’re truly bizarre. If anyone here is piss-poor, it’s you, with
your hackneyed, cliched statements about warm-fuzzies. Don’t you get it?
Your ideas just aren’t relevant anymore, and it scares the HELL out of you
to realize that you’re being thrown to the side, doesn’t it?

(snip)

> * What you don’t seem to understand (I suspect that you do, but the idea of
> * responsibility scares the willies out of you) is that if ANYONE’S
> * self-interest collides with the survival and advancement of the White
> * race, then the survival of the White race can and will take precedence.
>
> Please. Rob and I raised two kids, and I always put the needs of my
> husband and children first.

How typically liberal: now that YOU will be safe from the consequences of
the foolishness that you seek to impose on others, you’re all gung-ho for
them.

> You have no idea of how conservative I was
> during the late 1970s through the mid 1980s. I was a full-time mom, doing
> some community volunteer work, and did not enter college until my youngest
> child started high school. I know all about responsibility and setting
> aside my own interests for a higher goal.

Crazy, I really could care less if you were a con-artist-servative during
any time in your life, or a flaming pinko carrying protest signs every
week. What you were at some time in the past has little bearing on the
damage you’re doing NOW.

Why do you feel the need to justify yourself with constant references to
your past? Are you so unsure of yourself that you have to keep flapping
your gums about how far you’ve come?

(snip)

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:29 PDT 1995
Article: 5986 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy on anything! (was: Crazy’s first hubbie!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 10:59:21 GMT
Lines: 116
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:5986 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4411 alt.discrimination:37272

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

Moi:
> * Right now, one of the biggest threat to the White race is abortion, which
> * is why (I suppose) that liberal twits like you think we’re gung-ho to
> * deprive a woman of her “rights”. Tell me, Crazy, WHAT rights, EXACTLY, is
> * a woman losing when she can’t abort her unborn child, and how does that
> * compare to protecting the White race with respect to the set of values I
> * outlined above?
>
> You are either misunderstanding or deliberately distorting what I wrote:
>
> As long as the women want to crank out babies and stand by
> their men, they would probably be safe, but they would still
> be subject to the treatment that their hausfuehrers dish out.

No, one cannot distort a deliberate falsehood. See, Crazy, my
“misunderstanding” of your original statement was just another way of
saying that you’re full of shit. You don’t know ANYTHING about White
Supremacist doctrine, but that ignorance doesn’t stop, or even slow you
down, in your stereotyping.

> I was not talking about abortion, Les. If you want to talk about that, you
> should start another thread, because it has nothing to do with me. My
> point was that women would be valued only for their childbearing
> capability and their willingness to bolster the egos and reputations of
> their men. While they will never have the respect or importance of Aryan
> men, they can always be grateful that, at least, they weren’t born a
> ni**er or a Jew.
>
> See, I (and most WS people) have a different “moral
> * perspective” than mindless automatons like you.
>
> Ah, you have just tripped over your dick again, Les. How many times did
> you recently berate me for bringing my kids into the world?

Not often. If I recall, I mentioned it once in passing, then I made a lot
of remarks about how the world would have been better off if YOU had been
aborted.

> It seems that
> you have two sets of values: one that applies to the hordes of “white”
> women in a parallel universe and me, a real “white” woman during the
> 1970s, who made tremendous sacrifices to carry, bear, and nurture her
> children to adulthood. You are a hypocrite and a liar.

Please. You, a REAL white woman? Just because you have a pale
complexion, don’t fool yourself for a minute into thinking that that
makes you “White”.

(snip)

> You prattle on about “human dignity”, but really, you
> * think that the majority of people are going to embrace your rotten ideas
>
> You don’t know me, Les. People who do know me think that my “rotten ideas”
> are pragmatic and honest.

Then the people who know you are just as loopy as you are.

> Everyone who has been reading our interchanges
> here have witnessed you try to twist my words, throw in red herring
> issues, and make statements about me that totally conflict with “the set
> of values” that you claim to espouse concerning “white” women.

Really? Just who is this semi-legendary “everyone” that you refer to?
Your liberal fellow-travellers, who bark in approval and clap their flippers
in approval when you give hell to us “Natsees”? My, I’m just shaking in
my jackboots, that you can muster such FORMIDABLE allies.

> * because you cloak them in meaningless words like “love”.
>
> Well, besides idle speculation about the emptiness of your personal life,
> I don’t recall talking about ‘luv’ around here, especially the meaningless
> kind. When I talk about politics and the human condition, I use terms like
> justice, freedom, dignity, ethics, responsibility, commitment, and
> stewardship. I believe that humans have a duty to care for each other and
> to tread gently upon the earth.

So you haven’t used the word “love”, exactly. It just proves my point,
though, seeing you rant on with words like “justice, freedom, dignity,
ethics (ha!), responsibility (double ha!), commitment, and stewardship”.
It shows how you twist the meanings of those particular words to give some
sort of currency and relevance to your whacko ideas.

(snip)

> You just cannot create enough stereotypes to throw in my direction, can
> you? I don’t think that I’m all that special. After all, I’m not one of
> these silver spooned, high on theory but low on life experience, “liberal”
> academians that you like to chastise for not living in the real world.
> I’ve already earned my “been there, did that, bought the stinkin’
> tee-shirt” diploma from the School of Hard Knocks in Real Life University
> ™.

Gee, for someone who’s had so much like experience, you’re still pretty
stupid. Wonder why that is.

> You hawk your white supremacist philosophy to people who come from similar
> life experiences as mine, trying to get those who are disgruntled and/or
> down on their luck to join with you to undermine and overthrow a political
> system that is no longer responsive to the great white race. Les, why am I
> not on your side? How did I slip through the cracks if your cause is based
> on truth and a set of values that, according to you, are in my best
> interests?

That’s easy. You “slipped through the cracks” because you’re too (stupid,
ignorant) to recognize truth and reality when it’s presented to you. We
don’t seek out losers – if we did, we’d obviously be spending more time
trying to get YOU on side.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:30 PDT 1995
Article: 6016 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: White vs. white (was: O.J. a racist? You decide!!!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 13:37:49 GMT
Lines: 48
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4425 alt.politics.white-power:6016 alt.discrimination:37280

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:

(snip)

> : I said that Nicole (Brown Simpson) was not White. I never denied
> : the reality of her complexion, like some people around here do with the
> : Romans, whom I won’t name, but whose initials are Lane Singer.
>
> you know you really shouldn’t keep bringing that thread up,
> les. you copped out without ever really explaining why the
> Romans wrote voluminously about the strange coloring of the
> northern, skin-wearing barbarians you like to call “aryans.”

I didn’t “cop out”. I had made my point, which was that you were (and
are) so far out in left field, that you were allowing your desires to come
before facts. Hey, you *WANT* to believe that the Romans were wogs, so
you will. To hell with what *anyone*, Tacitus or other, wrote, right?

> if the white, white skin, the blond hair and blue eyes were
> so unsual to the Romans, it logically follows that the Romans
> weren’t aryans. but don’t muss your little head up about logic,
> les. we all know that it’s verboten in your ranks.
>
> of course you tried to change the subject completely by pointing
> to one writer whom you interpreted to have been impressed with
> the “homogeneity” of the barbarians, but even this goes against
> your own assertions that the Romans were the self-same aryans
> as you claim the barbarians were.
>
> you know how people one race think everyone in another looks
> the same. so it would follow that tacitus was of a different
> race altogether than these strange, ghostlike apparitions from
> the north.

Not at all. I love the way you leftists slaughter logic like this; it
shows to the ‘Net that you’re all a bunch of dogmatic, zealous freaks far
better than I ever could.

Your “reasoning”, such as it was, went like this: the Romans wrote about
the fair complexions and hair of the Germans, because they themselves
weren’t fair of colour. By that reasoning, am I to understand that
Tacitus ALSO wrote about the ferocity and love of war of the Germans
because the Romans themselves were a bunch of pacifists?

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:30 PDT 1995
Article: 6063 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Hey niggers! Want your own country?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 23:27:36 GMT
Lines: 13

Foot-boy evil Beavis ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> Well, like I said earlier – let’s put them (ie, Whites) in the Sahara or
>Kalahari deserts and see what kind of beautiful civilization they will
>develop!

GUARANTEED that it would be better than any garbage-dump “nation” in black
Africa.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:31 PDT 1995
Article: 6071 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 18:20:21 GMT
Lines: 21
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6071 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4443 alt.discrimination:37302 talk.politics.guns:213233

“John Q. Public” ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:

>>Are
>>you next gonna tell us that the first thing Hitler did when he came to
>>power was snatch all the guns?
>
> Irrelevant. I’ve got mine, and you won’t get them without taking
> losses. Got that, Les?

Irrelevant? No. While you’re posturing with your chest out about
“Natsees” coming to snatch your guns away, the liberals are the ones who
are going to do it.

Les

P.S.: It’s usually the tough talkers like you who are the first to
surrender.

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:32 PDT 1995
Article: 6075 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 00:06:27 GMT
Lines: 13

(Rick Jones) writes:
>> [email protected] (Eric J. Wheelock) writes:
>> Exactly. The “Civilized Man” (and I use that word sparingly even in quotes)
>> dismisses things he cannot argue with. My post contained FACTS. Facts that
>> the black community has regularly embraced convicted criminals as hero’s.
>
> Of course, whites NEVER do this, rwe’re to believe?

The difference is the frequency with which Whites do it, compared to how
often negroes do it.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:33 PDT 1995
Article: 6180 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: White vs. white (was: O.J. a racist? You decide!!!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 09:41:17 GMT
Lines: 33
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:37355 alt.politics.white-power:6180 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4491

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> : Your “reasoning”, such as it was, went like this: the Romans wrote about
> : the fair complexions and hair of the Germans, because they themselves
> : weren’t fair of colour. By that reasoning, am I to understand that
> : Tacitus ALSO wrote about the ferocity and love of war of the Germans
> : because the Romans themselves were a bunch of pacifists?
>
> les, you just cannot comprehend the simplest fact. Roman testimony
> made it very clear that they thought the blond hair, etc., to be
> quite unusual.
>
> this is what they wrote, this is what they meant, and this is
> what i reported, although you just can’t, as i said, comprehend
> much of anything.

Yes, that is what you reported. Then you went off on a tangent about how
this “proved” that the Romans were short, squat darkies. The Romans in
Tacitus’ time had LOTS of exposure to non-Romans, and were mildly
surprised at the physical homogeneity of the Germans. They weren’t
jaw-dropping stunned by it.

> you wrote that the Romans were aryans, just like the barbarians.
> you are wrong.

Because you say so? Sorry, you’ll understand, I hope, when I say that I
need a little more authority than a dogmatic zealout like you to confirm
that for me.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:34 PDT 1995
Article: 6183 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy’s first hubbie! (was: O.J. offed Nicole… so what?)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 10:01:51 GMT
Lines: 91
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6183 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4493 alt.discrimination:37357

Raggedy ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected] (Les
> Griswold) wrote:
>
> :Human instinct. Interesting to hear you refering to something that you
> :obviously have NO regard for anymore. Let me fill you in on something
> :that may not have filtered through to your little pea-brain yet: my
> :idealogy (SIC!) is not fucked. National Socialism is much more in tune
> :with human instincts than liberalism,
>
> Rape, cannibalism, and tribal warfare are much more in tune with human
> instincts than their opposites.

In your world, maybe.

> The history of human civilization ofer the
> last few thousand years has been one of subordinating instinct to reason.

Subordinating is considerably different than ignoring outright.

> Nation-states and treaties are less instinctually easy than tribes and
> constant warfare. National Socialism is inherently hostile to this trend
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> toward reason.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It is? Well, gosh-golly-darn, learn something new every day!

> In its rhetoric, philosophy, and symbols, the Nazis managed an odd
> ideological marriage–a fundamentally anti-rational romanticism, but
> aggressively technologically modern. It is a marriage that has not been
> seen in any sizeable way before or since, a dissonant ideology which one
> author has labelled “reactionary modernism”.

Raggedy, this sort of stuff belongs in alt.satanism, not here.

> The whole anti-western legacy of German nationalism suggested that
> such a reconciliation between soul and technology was out of the
> question, for nothing could be more at odds with German culture.
> But the reactionary modernists recognized that antitechnological
> views were formulas for national impotence. […] As Joseph Goebbels
> repeatedly insisted, this was to be the century of /stählernde Romantik/,
> steellike romanticism. [p. 3]
>
> From Neitzsche through Junger and then Goebbels, the the modernist
> credo was the triumph of spirit and will over reason and the
> subsequent fusion of this will to an aesthetic mode. If aesthetic
> experience alone justifies life, morality is suspended and desire
> knows no limits.[…]As aesthetic standards replaced moral norms,
> modernism indulged a fascination for horror and violence as a welcome
> relief to bourgeois boredom and decadence. […] When modernists turned
> to politics, they sought engagement, commitment, and authenticity,
> experiences the Fascists and Nazis promised to provide. [p. 13]
>
> The reactionary modernists were /irrationalists/. They simply despised
> reason and denigrated its role in political and social affairs. […]
> the reactionary modernists spoke spoke what Adorno labeled the “jargon
> of authenticity” in which certain absolutes such as blood, race, and
> soil were placed beyond rational justification. In their view reason
> itself was /lebensfiendlich/, or “hostile to life”. [p. 14]
>
> Herf, Jeffrey. Reactionary Modernism. New York: Cambridge University
> Press, 1984. All emphasis as in the original. Any typos mine.
>
> That, Les, is a citation.

And it is also, Raggedy, a load of psycho-babble.

> :but we also recognize that humans are NOT animals.
>
> Oh, really? Your ideology defines human life and individual freedom as
> valuable only if, and to the extent that, they further your ends.

But at least we’re HONEST about it. Liberals are the ones you’re most
likely to hear cracking jokes (behind their hands, of course), about
“mongoloids” and “sub-standard intelligence”.

> :You prattle on about “human dignity”, but really, you think that the
> majority
> :of people are going to embrace your rotten ideas because you cloak them in
> :meaningless words like “love”.
>
> “Race” is an absolute object of reverence, so manifest that it needs not
> be rationally defined. “Love” is a meaningless word. There, in a nutshell,
> we have the essence of Naziism.

Meaningless only when you guys are called on it. Otherwise, it’s the
force animating your ideals

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:34 PDT 1995
Article: 6184 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les’ relationships?? (was: Liberal motivations…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 10:06:29 GMT
Lines: 19

Sherwin ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> Our media culture and childhood experiences probably have just as much
> impact on our criteria for choosing our mates as “genetic programming” (or
> even Oedipus complex?) if it even exists. One of the most important
> criterion in selecting a mate is not race-related, as many of us would
> believe, but health-related. In short, we tend to date and eventually wed
> those who appear healthy (and have a good sense of humor, blah blah
> blah).

Read the _Mahabharata_, you’d see some really nifty advice on the
selection of a mate. You’d also see how people defined “health”, and
you’d see that the American cult of the mongrel is a recent aberation.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:35 PDT 1995
Article: 6220 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!pagesat.net!netserv.com!news2.aimnet.com!aimnet.com!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: O.J. a racist? You decide!!!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 17:24:25 GMT
Lines: 15

(Rick Jones) writes:
>> >Why is O.J. going out with/marrying/shacking up with a White woman again,
>>
>> If you’ve seen a picture of Paula Barbieri, you might find a clue, Les.
>
> Les thinks Hitler was BLOND, for God’s sake. How do you expect him
> to figure out Paula Barieri’s pulchritude? The guy’s either blind as a bat
> or just as stupid as hell.

Strange, Rickie. You make it sound as if only O.J.’s thought processes
(such as they are) should be taken into consideration. That sounds
suspiciously like male chauvinism to me. Where’s Crazy when you need her?

Les

From b[email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:03:36 PDT 1995
Article: 6230 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!news.inc.net!news.moneng.mei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.ultranet.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!simtel!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy Jeannie again!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 02:43:37 GMT
Lines: 9

You know, Crazy, I was hurt when it looked like you weren’t putting me in
your sig.file anymore, but now that I see how hard you work to cook up
original statements about me with every message, why, it just makes my
heart melt…

You really DO have a thing for me, don’t you?

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:42:11 PDT 1995
Article: 212875 of talk.politics.guns
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: A funny joke! (was: Got this stupid e-mail today…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 11:09:52 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:37229 talk.politics.guns:212875

Nosy ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Jeanne Kowalewski) writes:

(snip)

> < I'm crossposting this over to talk.politics.guns. They'll like this one, too. >
> No, I’m afraid that Griswold’s garbage isn’t too popular
> here.
>
> Neither is the National Front.
>
> Kowaleski might want to make a note of it.

She won’t, though. See, Crazy Jeannie has to EXPOSE my hidden agenda to
everyone on the ‘Net, and she won’t pay any attention to any requests,
courteous or otherwise, that she put courtesy ahead of her “idealogy”
(heh!), and not post where she’s not welcome. Typical liberal.

Les

From [email protected] Mon Oct 16 11:42:12 PDT 1995
Article: 213233 of talk.politics.guns
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 18:20:21 GMT
Lines: 21
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6071 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4443 alt.discrimination:37302 talk.politics.guns:213233

“John Q. Public” ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:

>>Are
>>you next gonna tell us that the first thing Hitler did when he came to
>>power was snatch all the guns?
>
> Irrelevant. I’ve got mine, and you won’t get them without taking
> losses. Got that, Les?

Irrelevant? No. While you’re posturing with your chest out about
“Natsees” coming to snatch your guns away, the liberals are the ones who
are going to do it.

Les

P.S.: It’s usually the tough talkers like you who are the first to
surrender.

From [email protected] Tue Oct 17 07:19:50 PDT 1995
Article: 11338 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.skinheads,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 03:17:03 GMT
Lines: 41
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4544 alt.discrimination:37391 alt.politics.white-power:6302 alt.skinheads:4732 alt.revisionism:11338 talk.politics.guns:213685

Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] wrote:

>>… Jews like:
>>
>> Madeliene Albright, UN Ambassador
>> Stuart Eisenstat, Asst. Secretary of State
>> Hershel Gober, Asst. Sec. of Veterans Affairs
>> Mort Halperin, Former Asst. Sec. of Defense
>> Mickey Kantor, US Trade Representative
>> Steve Kessler, FDA Director
>> Madeleine Kunin, Asst. Sec. of Education
>> Eugene Ludwig, Director of the Mint
>> Zoe Baird, Asst. National Security Advisor
>> Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor
>> And many more in positions of little publicity and great power
>
> As opposed to the thousands of people in positions of publicity and great
> power who are NOT Jewish, I guess. You’ve named 10 people in government,
> some of whom I have serious doubts ARE ACTUALLY JEWISH.

Oh, yes? Which ones, doubting-Sarah? Please, share your omniscience with
us.

(snip)

>> Normal white people are pretty poor at
>> producing and distributing pornography, encouraging immigration of
>> third-worlder and subsequent intermarriage (with whites, thank you, not
>> jews), and generally selling this country down the river.
>
> Really? Here’s one hot tip for you: Jews ARE WHITE PEOPLE. Sorry to break
> it to ya, but we are. And most of us look just like you, whether our names
> “sound” Jewish, or not.

Amazing. We apparently have so much trouble defining “White”, but some
jew can come along and tell us all about it.

Les

From [email protected] Tue Oct 17 07:19:51 PDT 1995
Article: 11339 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.skinheads,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 03:07:33 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4546 alt.discrimination:37393 alt.politics.white-power:6304 alt.skinheads:4733 alt.revisionism:11339 talk.politics.guns:213690

Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> GEE… I guess this PROVES that Jews are qualified to hold positions of
> authority in our government, right?

Sara, you are missing the point, deliberately, I suspect. The point is,
ONE jew in government is too many.

(snip)

> I mean, I’m just a 38-year single old mother of two. I work a 9-5 job,
> spend extra time working with a disabled kid, cook, clean, hang out on the
> Internet, and STILL seem to have time to intimidate a pathetic coward like
> you? Wow, you’re right. We Jooos ARE pretty impressive.

So, do you want a medal, or a chest to pin it on?

Les

From [email protected] Tue Oct 17 07:19:52 PDT 1995
Article: 11366 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 09:58:36 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6445 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4574 alt.discrimination:37408 alt.revisionism:11366 alt.skinheads:4746 talk.politics.guns:213761

“John Q. Public” ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>>Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

>>> I mean, I’m just a 38-year single old mother of two. I work a 9-5 job,
>>> spend extra time working with a disabled kid, cook, clean, hang out on the
>>> Internet, and STILL seem to have time to intimidate a pathetic coward like
>>> you? Wow, you’re right. We Jooos ARE pretty impressive.
>>
>>So, do you want a medal, or a chest to pin it on?
>
> I want firearms and ammo, Les. I’ve got ’em, too.
>
> Have a nice day.

And I assume that there was a POINT to this?

Les

From [email protected] Tue Oct 17 08:11:33 PDT 1995
Article: 6446 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les Griswold is Jewish!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 09:54:44 GMT
Lines: 19

(Rick Jones) writes:
>> >I didn’t know you were Jewish.

>> What an insult to the Jews, Rick! Less is neither smart enough, nor
>> successful enough to be Jewish.
>
> But of course, those traits are BAD in Jews in Les’ “mind.” What amuses
> me about Griswold and his ilk are that they use the inferior economic performance
> of blacks in America to justify racism, but the relatively impressive level of
> success by Jews – which, using their logic against blacks, should justify
> viewing Jews as superior – garners criticism and accusations of a nonexistent
> conspiracy from the Griswolds of the world. More of the same vis-a-vis
> Asians, I might add.

Very interesting! So, you’re saying that jews are no better than negroes?

Les

From [email protected] Tue Oct 17 08:11:34 PDT 1995
Article: 6448 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les in the Kalahari…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 10:05:08 GMT
Lines: 32

evil Beavis ([email protected]) writes:
> Imagine Les and a few of his booger eatin’, beer drinking buddies packing up
> with nothing but their clothes on their body and equipped only with their
> “superior” intellects heading for that new civilization they clim would be no
> problem to create in the Kalahari desert!!

I never said that it would be “no problem” to create a civilization in the
Kalahari (or any other) desert. What I DID say is that anything built in
the desert by White men would be GUARANTEED to be better by FAR than any
of those dumpster-nations in Africa.

> It would be funny to see ol’ Les
> running across the Okovango with a trail of Lions on his ass!! Think about it
> Les, you’d do us all a favor, besides, you would help those poor “savages”
> over there create another great civilization just like your ancestors did here.
> Problem is your ancestors were probably freed criminals from Europe brought
> over on conditions of indentured servitude…

Cripes, now you’re starting to sound like those European net-loons
Heerdink and Co.

> You’d find many black women that could treat you right too, unless of course
> you’re impotent or prefer sheep like your buddy Ron…
> Heh he he…!!

What is the qualitative difference between negresses and sheep, Foot-boy?
I expect that YOU can provide me with the answer. But if you have to
confer with Rosenboig, I’ll understand…

Les

From [email protected] Tue Oct 17 08:11:35 PDT 1995
Article: 6450 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: A challenge for the geneologically inclined
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 02:47:16 GMT
Lines: 33

Bryan Cowan ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

>> > How odd. I was always told that they were Catholics. George Mutschler,
>> > John’s son, married a Catholic named Isabella Hayward. Their children,
>> > while not exactly Catholics, were always Christians. My grandparents are
>> > Christians, although admittedly not of the regular churchgoing type.
>> > Grandfather told me that 50% of Germans have brown hair and brown eyes,
>> > like me. Hmmm…
>>
>> Here we go again, with the “Jews are just like everyone else, ‘ceptin’
>> that they go to church on Saturday instead of Sunday!” When will you
>> retards learn that the essence of jewishness is also RACIAL and GENETIC.
>> Big Poo-Bah jews have said so themselves.
>
> As I said in another post, extant photographs of Nellie Mutschler show
> that she has no obvious Semitic features. This is the same for her
> descendants, Vernon Rittscher, his daughter Mary Ann, and myself. I’ll
> send a photo of myself to anybody who asks. If I’m a Jew and I don’t know
> about it, I’d be interested for somebody to point it out. I sure don’t
> look like a Jew.

Well, now, if you’re going to talk about LOOKING like a jew, or not,
that’s considerably different than what you were going on about above,
about Catholicism. Jews change their religion like we change our
underwear, but they’re still the same jews as before.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 10:40:05 PDT 1995
Article: 11453 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 21:51:54 GMT
Lines: 46
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6547 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4642 alt.revisionism:11453 talk.politics.guns:213970

Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
> [An excerpt from a previous article by Milton Kleim deleted]
>
> # And where, EXACTLY, in all of this, is Milton’s endorsement
> # of censorship?
>
> Kleim wrote that Jews who will be found guilty with various “crimes
> against the Aryan Race” will be executed.

Tell me, Danny, in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “trying jews” is
synonymous with “censorship”.

> I am quite sure every sane
> person will realize that this is an attempt to intimidate Jews, and
> possibly others, from committing such “crimes”.

Well, if the people being tried are not guilty, what have they got to
worry about?

> Now, what are these
> “crimes” baby-nazi is talking about? Is expressing one’s opinion one
> of them?

I dunno. Why don’t you ask him?

> Yes or no? Kleim refuses to elaborate on what these crimes
> are, who *exactly* will be executed, and by what means. Isn’t
> Griswold curious as to what Kleim has in mind?

Not particularly.

> # Another example of the screechy, mindless rantings of
> # pro-censorship jews
>
> I am not “pro-censorship”. Have I ever called for silencing the
> Nazi maniacs who post here?

Not directly in those words. But you HAVE made it clear that you’d like
to do to us what Hitler SUPPOSEDLY did to six million of your countrymen
during WWII (well, now the story is, the Shoah started in 1933).

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 10:40:06 PDT 1995
Article: 11469 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!gatech!stallion.jsums.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 02:52:56 GMT
Lines: 56
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:11469 talk.politics.guns:214029 alt.politics.white-power:6569 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4656

William R. Discipio Jr ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
> : Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> : > [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
> : >
> : > [An excerpt from a previous article by Milton Kleim deleted]
> : >
> : > # And where, EXACTLY, in all of this, is Milton’s endorsement
> : > # of censorship?
> : >
> : > Kleim wrote that Jews who will be found guilty with various “crimes
> : > against the Aryan Race” will be executed.
>
> : Tell me, Danny, in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “trying jews” is
> : synonymous with “censorship”.
>
> Tell me “Les” in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “executing jews” is
> synonymous with “trying Jews”?

Nowhere. The only people who have made that miserable failure of a smear
have been the hysterical Danny Keren, and YOU.
>
> : > I am quite sure every sane
> : > person will realize that this is an attempt to intimidate Jews, and
> : > possibly others, from committing such “crimes”.
>
> : Well, if the people being tried are not guilty, what have they got to
> : worry about?
>
> What are they being “tried” for, being Jewish? Mixed-race?

Crimes against the Aryan race. Weren’t you paying attention?

> : > Now, what are these
> : > “crimes” baby-nazi is talking about? Is expressing one’s opinion one
> : > of them?
>
> : I dunno. Why don’t you ask him?
>
> She just did, klan-man.

Is Keren now undergoing a sex change, too?

> : > Yes or no? Kleim refuses to elaborate on what these crimes
> : > are, who *exactly* will be executed, and by what means. Isn’t
> : > Griswold curious as to what Kleim has in mind?
>
> : Not particularly.
>
> Curiosity is unique to sentient beings; not knuckle-dragging troglodytes.

Nosiness isn’t curiousity, tool.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 10:40:07 PDT 1995
Article: 11597 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!news.uoregon.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:40:47 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6676 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4725 alt.revisionism:11597 talk.politics.guns:214252

Little Miss Moffitt ([email protected]) writes:
> On Oct 17, 1995 21:51:54 in article Racist Nazis conspire…)>, ‘[email protected] (Les Griswold)’
> wrote:

> Heheheheh! One can imagine Grosswald, charged with crimes against the
> white race, declining to ask what those crimes are because that would be
> “nosiness.” Oh yes, Grosswald is a man of taste and discretion, isn’t he?

I would never be charged with crimes against the White race, for the
simple fact that I am not a race traitor. More likely, I would be hauled
up for some sort of bullshit, made-up “hate” crime.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 10:40:08 PDT 1995
Article: 11784 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.politics.white-power,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 09:44:08 GMT
Lines: 48
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4886 alt.revisionism:11784 alt.politics.white-power:6867 talk.politics.guns:214669

Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
> # Tell me, Danny, in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “trying
> # jews” is synonymous with “censorship”.
>
> Stating that Jews guilty of “crimes against the Aryan Race”
> will be executed is, IMHO, an obvious attempt to intimidate
> and silence the opposition.

And this is different from the jailing of hollow-cause deniers in WHAT
way, exactly? I know: the jailing of hollow-cause deniers ACTUALLY
HAPPENS, whereas the punishment of jews for crimes against the Aryan race
doesn’t yet.

> # Well, if the people being tried are not guilty, what have
> # they got to worry about?
>
> It’s all a question of what Kleim means by “guilty”, now
> isn’t it?
>
> ## Now, what are these
> ## “crimes” baby-nazi is talking about? Is expressing one’s
> ## opinion one of them?
>
> # I dunno. Why don’t you ask him?
>
> John Morris asked him this, many times. Kleim didn’t answer.

So, now Milton is to be at your beck and call, providing whatever
information your over-heated little brain claims it needs?

(snip)

> # (well, now the story is, the Shoah started in 1933).
>
> Ideologically, yes; no one claimed the mass murders started
> in 1933. Most genocides are preceded by an ideological
> preparation – in this case, an intense propaganda campaign
> against Jews and other, dehumanizing and demonizing them. This
> can be seen as part of the Holocaust, yes.

Cripes, why not reach back into the 19th century, then, when Pan-Germanism
was extant?

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 10:40:08 PDT 1995
Article: 11785 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 09:49:21 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4888 alt.revisionism:11785 talk.politics.guns:214673

Moffitt the Frog ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> As opposed to some sort of bullshit made-up crime as a “crime against the
> white race,” which nowhere in existing jurisprudence can be found, and
> which exists only in the minds of white trash. :>)

Laws are changing all the time, Muffy. Just ask the pro-RKBA people about
that. Ask Canadians about various laws (recently passed) against
“hate-crimes”, which could be found nowhere in existing jurisprudence
until some bureaucratic flunkie cooked ’em up.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:10:50 PDT 1995
Article: 4642 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 21:51:54 GMT
Lines: 46
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6547 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4642 alt.revisionism:11453 talk.politics.guns:213970

Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
> [An excerpt from a previous article by Milton Kleim deleted]
>
> # And where, EXACTLY, in all of this, is Milton’s endorsement
> # of censorship?
>
> Kleim wrote that Jews who will be found guilty with various “crimes
> against the Aryan Race” will be executed.

Tell me, Danny, in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “trying jews” is
synonymous with “censorship”.

> I am quite sure every sane
> person will realize that this is an attempt to intimidate Jews, and
> possibly others, from committing such “crimes”.

Well, if the people being tried are not guilty, what have they got to
worry about?

> Now, what are these
> “crimes” baby-nazi is talking about? Is expressing one’s opinion one
> of them?

I dunno. Why don’t you ask him?

> Yes or no? Kleim refuses to elaborate on what these crimes
> are, who *exactly* will be executed, and by what means. Isn’t
> Griswold curious as to what Kleim has in mind?

Not particularly.

> # Another example of the screechy, mindless rantings of
> # pro-censorship jews
>
> I am not “pro-censorship”. Have I ever called for silencing the
> Nazi maniacs who post here?

Not directly in those words. But you HAVE made it clear that you’d like
to do to us what Hitler SUPPOSEDLY did to six million of your countrymen
during WWII (well, now the story is, the Shoah started in 1933).

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:10:52 PDT 1995
Article: 4652 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy the spam queen! (was: Crazy on anything!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 02:28:53 GMT
Lines: 87
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6564 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4652 alt.discrimination:37458

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> You don’t know ANYTHING about White
> * Supremacist doctrine, but that ignorance doesn’t stop, or even slow you
> * down, in your stereotyping.
>
> You don’t have a clue about what I do know, Les.

I can make pretty good guesses, based on the amount of crap you post here.
Do you realize that the message I’m replying to was ONE-HUNDRED AND
NINETY-THREE lines of pure unadulterated Crazy Crap(tm), before I trimmed
it? This tells me that you have an AWFUL LOT of time on your hands.

You also seem to care a great deal about what we think of you, since you
keep telling us EVERYTHING about yourself.

(snip)

> * > You don’t know me, Les. People who do know me think that my “rotten ideas”
> * > are pragmatic and honest.
> *
> * Then the people who know you are just as loopy as you are.
>
> Mind if I show this around the university, Les? My “loopy” multicultural
> friends haven’t laughed at your boneheaded comments lately.

Be my guest. Tell me, do you use me to illustrate that us’n “Natsees” are
harmless cranks, or very, very dangerous people?

(snip)

> * Really? Just who is this semi-legendary “everyone” that you refer to?
>
> Presumably, the people who are literate and reading the messages in these
> newsgroups. We have a potential audience of millions, you know.

Knowing that, why do you insist on making such a jackass out of yourself?

> * > Well, besides idle speculation about the emptiness of your personal life,
> * > I don’t recall talking about ‘luv’ around here, especially the meaningless
> * > kind. When I talk about politics and the human condition, I use terms like
> * > justice, freedom, dignity, ethics, responsibility, commitment, and
> * > stewardship. I believe that humans have a duty to care for each other and
> * > to tread gently upon the earth.
> *
> * So you haven’t used the word “love”, exactly. It just proves my point,
> * though, seeing you rant on with words like “justice, freedom, dignity,
> * ethics (ha!), responsibility (double ha!), commitment, and stewardship”.
> * It shows how you twist the meanings of those particular words to give some
> * sort of currency and relevance to your whacko ideas.
>
> Ooh! You backed down, didn’t you?

Where?

> BTW, mentioning a set of terms that I
> use is not a rant. You also have no idea of the context in how and where I
> apply these words in my life.

Yet again, Crazy: we don’t CARE about your life, so please spare us all
the gruesome details. B’sides, we ALSO don’t care about your “context” in
the real world: we’re talking on the ‘Net.

> I have a real life in the real world where my words are acknowledged and
> respected.

Then you should stay there. On the ‘Net, you’re just a two-bit liberal
asshole, who won’t be missed by anyone should you suddenly croak.

> * You “slipped through the cracks” because you’re too (stupid,
> * ignorant) to recognize truth and reality when it’s presented to you.
>
> When you start telling the truth about anything, I’m sure that CNN will
> break into their regular programming to inform the world of the momentous
> occasion. If you want to keep saying that I’m stupid and ignorant, then
> I’ll have you remind you about my education background.

Oh, gawd, here we go again. All that would be proved by that, Crazy, is
that ANYONE can get a piece of paper from a university these days.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:10:53 PDT 1995
Article: 4656 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!gatech!stallion.jsums.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 02:52:56 GMT
Lines: 56
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:11469 talk.politics.guns:214029 alt.politics.white-power:6569 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4656

William R. Discipio Jr ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
> : Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> : > [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
> : >
> : > [An excerpt from a previous article by Milton Kleim deleted]
> : >
> : > # And where, EXACTLY, in all of this, is Milton’s endorsement
> : > # of censorship?
> : >
> : > Kleim wrote that Jews who will be found guilty with various “crimes
> : > against the Aryan Race” will be executed.
>
> : Tell me, Danny, in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “trying jews” is
> : synonymous with “censorship”.
>
> Tell me “Les” in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “executing jews” is
> synonymous with “trying Jews”?

Nowhere. The only people who have made that miserable failure of a smear
have been the hysterical Danny Keren, and YOU.
>
> : > I am quite sure every sane
> : > person will realize that this is an attempt to intimidate Jews, and
> : > possibly others, from committing such “crimes”.
>
> : Well, if the people being tried are not guilty, what have they got to
> : worry about?
>
> What are they being “tried” for, being Jewish? Mixed-race?

Crimes against the Aryan race. Weren’t you paying attention?

> : > Now, what are these
> : > “crimes” baby-nazi is talking about? Is expressing one’s opinion one
> : > of them?
>
> : I dunno. Why don’t you ask him?
>
> She just did, klan-man.

Is Keren now undergoing a sex change, too?

> : > Yes or no? Kleim refuses to elaborate on what these crimes
> : > are, who *exactly* will be executed, and by what means. Isn’t
> : > Griswold curious as to what Kleim has in mind?
>
> : Not particularly.
>
> Curiosity is unique to sentient beings; not knuckle-dragging troglodytes.

Nosiness isn’t curiousity, tool.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:10:53 PDT 1995
Article: 4663 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Let’s stay on top of the subjects. people! (was: O.J. offed
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 03:23:52 GMT
Lines: 52
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:37466 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4663 alt.politics.white-power:6588

Nicole… so what?
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
References: <[email protected]>
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet

swan ([email protected]) writes:
> Some interesting thoughts oh men, women and the so-called “Aryans”.
>
> I notice that many White Affirmative males tend to dislike strong women
> or women with strong feminist ideals. Why is that?
>
> Note that I qualify my statements with ‘many’ ‘tend to’ and other words.
> By no means do all feel this way, but a prevalent attitude seems to be
> ‘siddown and shaddup!’ toward feminists.
>
> Comment here… A baby is the product of two people. 50% of its racial
> heritage comes from the father and 50% from its mother. Not only that,
> but the environment the child is raised in is the same. Can a good
> strong, vigorous, aggressive person be raised if HALF his/her parentage
> is meek and compliant? If it is harmful to a child to be raised by a
> dominant, aggressive and strong willed mother and a weak, gentle, timid
> father, can the reverse also be said to be true? I was raised by a strong
> mother who taught me to stand on my own two feet and take pain and
> adversity with courage and fire!
>
> My mother awoke on the operating table with her abdomen wide open and the
> surgeon elbow deep in her innards. she later described the sheer agony of
> the pain as literally blinding, but she didn’t scream or even flinch.
> Instead, she informed the horrified surgical crew “Doctor, I’m awake!”.
> When I asked her later “Why didn’t you scream?” She answered “Because I
> KNEW if I did that, he’d jump… and I didn’t want that to happen!”
>
> My mother is a woman who, if my father had laid down the law to her,
> would have laid a law or two upside his head! They were not a Strong man
> with dutiful wife following, they were a TEAM! She pulled the harness on
> her side as he pulled on his, two draft horses in unison.
>
> She gave me that legacy. If that makes me a feminist (I believe that
> women are different from men but still equals!) then so be it. To me,
> that is more “racially” productive than anything else. If I were to have
> a boy child and a girl child, I would raise them BOTH to be opinionated,
> strong and free.
>
> Anything less is a disservice to our kindred!
>
> Comments?

Yes. You’re a fruit-loop.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:10:54 PDT 1995
Article: 4664 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million man march? Ha!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 09:40:50 GMT
Lines: 35
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6592 alt.discrimination:37467 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4664 soc.culture.african.american:106176

Chaka-Khan Abdullah ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> this is in regard to the realist’s comment:
>
> first of all, to imply that African-American’s have not contributed
> anything of significance to this United Snakes of America is ignorance at
> it’s finest. We invented that streetlight you use everyday to make sure
> your butt doesn’t have too many accidents on your way home, we invented
> refrigerated cars(on trains)so that you could lower your salt intake when
> eating your steaks, we invented all those marvelous ways to use
> peanuts–ask Tide how we’ve helped their business,

You seem to be overlooking one important fact: even assuming that your
negrophile rantings are true, which they aren’t, how many things would
negroes have invented if they had been left in Africa? NONE.

Besides, according to aria, inventions don’t mean much. So why are you
going on about them?

> the toilet system was invented in Africa, that phone you like to talk on so
> much was via the African-American, and the electricity you need to use this
> computer would not exist if not for the descendants of Africa. So don’t tell
> me that we have not contributed to this country, because even if you’d like
> to disregard all of that information, you cannot disregard the fact that
> this country would not exist today without the blood and sweat of the
> AFRICAN slave.

Yes, folks: America and the White Westen world is in the shape it is
because of the contributions of African negroes. Any questions?

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:10:55 PDT 1995
Article: 4722 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy the spam queen! (was: Crazy on anything!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:34:25 GMT
Lines: 53
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6669 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4722 alt.discrimination:37508

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> * I can make pretty good guesses, based on the amount of crap you post here.
> * Do you realize that the message I’m replying to was ONE-HUNDRED AND
> * NINETY-THREE lines of pure unadulterated Crazy Crap(tm), before I trimmed
> * it? This tells me that you have an AWFUL LOT of time on your hands.
>
> Les, you are speculating about how much free time I have, not about what I
> know.

Free time: you have too much.
What you know: next to nothing.

(snip)

> * > * Really? Just who is this semi-legendary “everyone” that you refer to?
> * >
> * > Presumably, the people who are literate and reading the messages in these
> * > newsgroups. We have a potential audience of millions, you know.
> *
> * Knowing that, why do you insist on making such a jackass out of yourself?
>
> Les, Les, Les . . . do you wonder how many people now picture you with a
> sagging loincloth everytime they see your name?

Really, Crazy, you think quite highly of yourself, doncha? Well, lurkers
here can either read your enormous flap-doodle, or they can read my
replies to your rambling rants, where I’ve parsed out the extraneous crap.

(snip)

> * > I have a real life in the real world where my words are acknowledged and
> * > respected.
> *
> * Then you should stay there. On the ‘Net, you’re just a two-bit liberal
> * asshole, who won’t be missed by anyone should you suddenly croak.
>
> Well, there are certainly enough people here to fill my shoes, but I think
> that I would be missed.

And your shit doesn’t stink, does it?

> BTW, you didn’t mean that as a threat, did you?

Why, you feel threatened by me?

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:10:56 PDT 1995
Article: 4725 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!news.uoregon.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:40:47 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6676 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4725 alt.revisionism:11597 talk.politics.guns:214252

Little Miss Moffitt ([email protected]) writes:
> On Oct 17, 1995 21:51:54 in article Racist Nazis conspire…)>, ‘[email protected] (Les Griswold)’
> wrote:

> Heheheheh! One can imagine Grosswald, charged with crimes against the
> white race, declining to ask what those crimes are because that would be
> “nosiness.” Oh yes, Grosswald is a man of taste and discretion, isn’t he?

I would never be charged with crimes against the White race, for the
simple fact that I am not a race traitor. More likely, I would be hauled
up for some sort of bullshit, made-up “hate” crime.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:10:57 PDT 1995
Article: 4757 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million man march? Ha!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 09:57:17 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6711 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4757 alt.discrimination:37535 soc.culture.african.american:106274

Peter Allan Bucy ([email protected]) writes:
>>Smallpox Man, Africans, via the lost wax process were creating fine
>>metal art in copper, iron and gold across Africa, they developed
>>complicated philosophical cosmologies (Coversations with Olgatameli),
>>cities, in Benin, Timbucktu (prominent learning center), Kumasi and
>>Jenne (all west Africa). Africans were sea fearers on the east, north
>>and west coasts. They created great monoliths across the continent
>>and were giving civilization to Europeans in Spain for seven centuries,
>>much of this knowledge was dessiminated to your ancestors in the
>>northern reaches of the continent. The Muslim traditions of bathing
>>and cleanliness influenced your lice-eating and filthy ancestors
>>who slept with tick-infested pigs and sheep for warmth to clean
>>themselves and practice better hygine.
>
> How does any of this explain the abject desolation that is now the
> continent of Africa? What happened to these great Africans that their
> descendants live like animals in squalor. How is it that when the rest
> of the world evolved that Africa returned to the stone age? Is there
> any place on this earth where white men are running around in animal
> skins, living in mud huts, and smearing animal excrement in their hair
> and on their bodies?

This is something that negrophiles always overlook: when Whites talk
about the accomplishments of their ancestors, it’s not relevant to the
modern day. When NEGROES talk about the past, that’s the final word.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:10:58 PDT 1995
Article: 4884 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination,alt.feminism,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million man march? Ha!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 09:20:07 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6866 alt.discrimination:37633 alt.feminism:108346 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4884 soc.culture.african.american:106374

Mr. Equality ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

>>3. To a Hell’s Angel, all brothers look alike; and they all look like
>>Mike Tyson. Can’t take a chance on THAT shit.

> I disagree, to the Hells Angels, brothers look like the little wimps
> that they are unless of course there are 20 other brothers to back the
> one up.

A freind of mine once told me that he saw the way indians fought (he lived
in Cornwall, Ontario, where there was an indian reservation). He said
that you never fought ONE indian; you always fought ALL the indians that
were nearby, so if there were ten indians and one of them started
something, you had to fight ten of them.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:10:59 PDT 1995
Article: 4886 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.politics.white-power,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 09:44:08 GMT
Lines: 48
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4886 alt.revisionism:11784 alt.politics.white-power:6867 talk.politics.guns:214669

Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
> # Tell me, Danny, in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “trying
> # jews” is synonymous with “censorship”.
>
> Stating that Jews guilty of “crimes against the Aryan Race”
> will be executed is, IMHO, an obvious attempt to intimidate
> and silence the opposition.

And this is different from the jailing of hollow-cause deniers in WHAT
way, exactly? I know: the jailing of hollow-cause deniers ACTUALLY
HAPPENS, whereas the punishment of jews for crimes against the Aryan race
doesn’t yet.

> # Well, if the people being tried are not guilty, what have
> # they got to worry about?
>
> It’s all a question of what Kleim means by “guilty”, now
> isn’t it?
>
> ## Now, what are these
> ## “crimes” baby-nazi is talking about? Is expressing one’s
> ## opinion one of them?
>
> # I dunno. Why don’t you ask him?
>
> John Morris asked him this, many times. Kleim didn’t answer.

So, now Milton is to be at your beck and call, providing whatever
information your over-heated little brain claims it needs?

(snip)

> # (well, now the story is, the Shoah started in 1933).
>
> Ideologically, yes; no one claimed the mass murders started
> in 1933. Most genocides are preceded by an ideological
> preparation – in this case, an intense propaganda campaign
> against Jews and other, dehumanizing and demonizing them. This
> can be seen as part of the Holocaust, yes.

Cripes, why not reach back into the 19th century, then, when Pan-Germanism
was extant?

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:11:00 PDT 1995
Article: 4888 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 09:49:21 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4888 alt.revisionism:11785 talk.politics.guns:214673

Moffitt the Frog ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> As opposed to some sort of bullshit made-up crime as a “crime against the
> white race,” which nowhere in existing jurisprudence can be found, and
> which exists only in the minds of white trash. :>)

Laws are changing all the time, Muffy. Just ask the pro-RKBA people about
that. Ask Canadians about various laws (recently passed) against
“hate-crimes”, which could be found nowhere in existing jurisprudence
until some bureaucratic flunkie cooked ’em up.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:10 PDT 1995
Article: 6546 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Jewish looks (was: A challenge for the geneologically inclined)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 21:45:33 GMT
Lines: 31

Bryan Cowan ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

>> > How odd. I was always told that they were Catholics. George Mutschler,
>> > John’s son, married a Catholic named Isabella Hayward. Their children,
>> > while not exactly Catholics, were always Christians. My grandparents are
>> > Christians, although admittedly not of the regular churchgoing type.
>> > Grandfather told me that 50% of Germans have brown hair and brown eyes,
>> > like me. Hmmm…
>>
>> Here we go again, with the “Jews are just like everyone else, ‘ceptin’
>> that they go to church on Saturday instead of Sunday!” When will you
>> retards learn that the essence of jewishness is also RACIAL and GENETIC.
>> Big Poo-Bah jews have said so themselves.
>
> As I said in another post, extant photographs of Nellie Mutschler show
> that she has no obvious Semitic features. This is the same for her
> descendants, Vernon Rittscher, his daughter Mary Ann, and myself. I’ll
> send a photo of myself to anybody who asks. If I’m a Jew and I don’t know
> about it, I’d be interested for somebody to point it out. I sure don’t
> look like a Jew.

Incredible. So now you’re telling us that there are “jewish looks”? What
ARE these “jewish looks”?

I’m just dying to see how you back out of this one.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:11 PDT 1995
Article: 6547 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 21:51:54 GMT
Lines: 46
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6547 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4642 alt.revisionism:11453 talk.politics.guns:213970

Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
> [An excerpt from a previous article by Milton Kleim deleted]
>
> # And where, EXACTLY, in all of this, is Milton’s endorsement
> # of censorship?
>
> Kleim wrote that Jews who will be found guilty with various “crimes
> against the Aryan Race” will be executed.

Tell me, Danny, in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “trying jews” is
synonymous with “censorship”.

> I am quite sure every sane
> person will realize that this is an attempt to intimidate Jews, and
> possibly others, from committing such “crimes”.

Well, if the people being tried are not guilty, what have they got to
worry about?

> Now, what are these
> “crimes” baby-nazi is talking about? Is expressing one’s opinion one
> of them?

I dunno. Why don’t you ask him?

> Yes or no? Kleim refuses to elaborate on what these crimes
> are, who *exactly* will be executed, and by what means. Isn’t
> Griswold curious as to what Kleim has in mind?

Not particularly.

> # Another example of the screechy, mindless rantings of
> # pro-censorship jews
>
> I am not “pro-censorship”. Have I ever called for silencing the
> Nazi maniacs who post here?

Not directly in those words. But you HAVE made it clear that you’d like
to do to us what Hitler SUPPOSEDLY did to six million of your countrymen
during WWII (well, now the story is, the Shoah started in 1933).

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:12 PDT 1995
Article: 6564 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy the spam queen! (was: Crazy on anything!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 02:28:53 GMT
Lines: 87
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6564 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4652 alt.discrimination:37458

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> You don’t know ANYTHING about White
> * Supremacist doctrine, but that ignorance doesn’t stop, or even slow you
> * down, in your stereotyping.
>
> You don’t have a clue about what I do know, Les.

I can make pretty good guesses, based on the amount of crap you post here.
Do you realize that the message I’m replying to was ONE-HUNDRED AND
NINETY-THREE lines of pure unadulterated Crazy Crap(tm), before I trimmed
it? This tells me that you have an AWFUL LOT of time on your hands.

You also seem to care a great deal about what we think of you, since you
keep telling us EVERYTHING about yourself.

(snip)

> * > You don’t know me, Les. People who do know me think that my “rotten ideas”
> * > are pragmatic and honest.
> *
> * Then the people who know you are just as loopy as you are.
>
> Mind if I show this around the university, Les? My “loopy” multicultural
> friends haven’t laughed at your boneheaded comments lately.

Be my guest. Tell me, do you use me to illustrate that us’n “Natsees” are
harmless cranks, or very, very dangerous people?

(snip)

> * Really? Just who is this semi-legendary “everyone” that you refer to?
>
> Presumably, the people who are literate and reading the messages in these
> newsgroups. We have a potential audience of millions, you know.

Knowing that, why do you insist on making such a jackass out of yourself?

> * > Well, besides idle speculation about the emptiness of your personal life,
> * > I don’t recall talking about ‘luv’ around here, especially the meaningless
> * > kind. When I talk about politics and the human condition, I use terms like
> * > justice, freedom, dignity, ethics, responsibility, commitment, and
> * > stewardship. I believe that humans have a duty to care for each other and
> * > to tread gently upon the earth.
> *
> * So you haven’t used the word “love”, exactly. It just proves my point,
> * though, seeing you rant on with words like “justice, freedom, dignity,
> * ethics (ha!), responsibility (double ha!), commitment, and stewardship”.
> * It shows how you twist the meanings of those particular words to give some
> * sort of currency and relevance to your whacko ideas.
>
> Ooh! You backed down, didn’t you?

Where?

> BTW, mentioning a set of terms that I
> use is not a rant. You also have no idea of the context in how and where I
> apply these words in my life.

Yet again, Crazy: we don’t CARE about your life, so please spare us all
the gruesome details. B’sides, we ALSO don’t care about your “context” in
the real world: we’re talking on the ‘Net.

> I have a real life in the real world where my words are acknowledged and
> respected.

Then you should stay there. On the ‘Net, you’re just a two-bit liberal
asshole, who won’t be missed by anyone should you suddenly croak.

> * You “slipped through the cracks” because you’re too (stupid,
> * ignorant) to recognize truth and reality when it’s presented to you.
>
> When you start telling the truth about anything, I’m sure that CNN will
> break into their regular programming to inform the world of the momentous
> occasion. If you want to keep saying that I’m stupid and ignorant, then
> I’ll have you remind you about my education background.

Oh, gawd, here we go again. All that would be proved by that, Crazy, is
that ANYONE can get a piece of paper from a university these days.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:13 PDT 1995
Article: 6569 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!gatech!stallion.jsums.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 02:52:56 GMT
Lines: 56
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:11469 talk.politics.guns:214029 alt.politics.white-power:6569 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4656

William R. Discipio Jr ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
> : Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> : > [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
> : >
> : > [An excerpt from a previous article by Milton Kleim deleted]
> : >
> : > # And where, EXACTLY, in all of this, is Milton’s endorsement
> : > # of censorship?
> : >
> : > Kleim wrote that Jews who will be found guilty with various “crimes
> : > against the Aryan Race” will be executed.
>
> : Tell me, Danny, in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “trying jews” is
> : synonymous with “censorship”.
>
> Tell me “Les” in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “executing jews” is
> synonymous with “trying Jews”?

Nowhere. The only people who have made that miserable failure of a smear
have been the hysterical Danny Keren, and YOU.
>
> : > I am quite sure every sane
> : > person will realize that this is an attempt to intimidate Jews, and
> : > possibly others, from committing such “crimes”.
>
> : Well, if the people being tried are not guilty, what have they got to
> : worry about?
>
> What are they being “tried” for, being Jewish? Mixed-race?

Crimes against the Aryan race. Weren’t you paying attention?

> : > Now, what are these
> : > “crimes” baby-nazi is talking about? Is expressing one’s opinion one
> : > of them?
>
> : I dunno. Why don’t you ask him?
>
> She just did, klan-man.

Is Keren now undergoing a sex change, too?

> : > Yes or no? Kleim refuses to elaborate on what these crimes
> : > are, who *exactly* will be executed, and by what means. Isn’t
> : > Griswold curious as to what Kleim has in mind?
>
> : Not particularly.
>
> Curiosity is unique to sentient beings; not knuckle-dragging troglodytes.

Nosiness isn’t curiousity, tool.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:14 PDT 1995
Article: 6588 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Let’s stay on top of the subjects. people! (was: O.J. offed
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 03:23:52 GMT
Lines: 52
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:37466 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4663 alt.politics.white-power:6588

Nicole… so what?
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
References: <[email protected]>
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet

swan ([email protected]) writes:
> Some interesting thoughts oh men, women and the so-called “Aryans”.
>
> I notice that many White Affirmative males tend to dislike strong women
> or women with strong feminist ideals. Why is that?
>
> Note that I qualify my statements with ‘many’ ‘tend to’ and other words.
> By no means do all feel this way, but a prevalent attitude seems to be
> ‘siddown and shaddup!’ toward feminists.
>
> Comment here… A baby is the product of two people. 50% of its racial
> heritage comes from the father and 50% from its mother. Not only that,
> but the environment the child is raised in is the same. Can a good
> strong, vigorous, aggressive person be raised if HALF his/her parentage
> is meek and compliant? If it is harmful to a child to be raised by a
> dominant, aggressive and strong willed mother and a weak, gentle, timid
> father, can the reverse also be said to be true? I was raised by a strong
> mother who taught me to stand on my own two feet and take pain and
> adversity with courage and fire!
>
> My mother awoke on the operating table with her abdomen wide open and the
> surgeon elbow deep in her innards. she later described the sheer agony of
> the pain as literally blinding, but she didn’t scream or even flinch.
> Instead, she informed the horrified surgical crew “Doctor, I’m awake!”.
> When I asked her later “Why didn’t you scream?” She answered “Because I
> KNEW if I did that, he’d jump… and I didn’t want that to happen!”
>
> My mother is a woman who, if my father had laid down the law to her,
> would have laid a law or two upside his head! They were not a Strong man
> with dutiful wife following, they were a TEAM! She pulled the harness on
> her side as he pulled on his, two draft horses in unison.
>
> She gave me that legacy. If that makes me a feminist (I believe that
> women are different from men but still equals!) then so be it. To me,
> that is more “racially” productive than anything else. If I were to have
> a boy child and a girl child, I would raise them BOTH to be opinionated,
> strong and free.
>
> Anything less is a disservice to our kindred!
>
> Comments?

Yes. You’re a fruit-loop.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:15 PDT 1995
Article: 6592 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million man march? Ha!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 09:40:50 GMT
Lines: 35
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6592 alt.discrimination:37467 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4664 soc.culture.african.american:106176

Chaka-Khan Abdullah ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> this is in regard to the realist’s comment:
>
> first of all, to imply that African-American’s have not contributed
> anything of significance to this United Snakes of America is ignorance at
> it’s finest. We invented that streetlight you use everyday to make sure
> your butt doesn’t have too many accidents on your way home, we invented
> refrigerated cars(on trains)so that you could lower your salt intake when
> eating your steaks, we invented all those marvelous ways to use
> peanuts–ask Tide how we’ve helped their business,

You seem to be overlooking one important fact: even assuming that your
negrophile rantings are true, which they aren’t, how many things would
negroes have invented if they had been left in Africa? NONE.

Besides, according to aria, inventions don’t mean much. So why are you
going on about them?

> the toilet system was invented in Africa, that phone you like to talk on so
> much was via the African-American, and the electricity you need to use this
> computer would not exist if not for the descendants of Africa. So don’t tell
> me that we have not contributed to this country, because even if you’d like
> to disregard all of that information, you cannot disregard the fact that
> this country would not exist today without the blood and sweat of the
> AFRICAN slave.

Yes, folks: America and the White Westen world is in the shape it is
because of the contributions of African negroes. Any questions?

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:15 PDT 1995
Article: 6593 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: A challenge for the geneologically inclined
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 09:27:36 GMT
Lines: 18

B. A. Mylite ([email protected]) writes:
> In alt.politics.white-power [email protected] (Les Griswold) said:

>>Here we go again, with the “Jews are just like everyone else, ‘ceptin’
>>that they go to church on Saturday instead of Sunday!” When will you retards
>>learn that the essence of jewishness is also RACIAL and GENETIC. Big Poo-Bah
>>jews have said so themselves.

> Gee, I’ve heard of Sephardic Jews and Ashkenazi Jews, but what is a Big
> Poo-Bah Jew?

Rabbi Stephen K. Wise, for one. More interesting is Bryan Cowan’s
suggestion that there are “jewish looks”, whereby one can determine the
degree of one’s jewishness. Aren’t you intrigued by how he defines
“jewish looks”?

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:16 PDT 1995
Article: 6615 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!watnews.watson.ibm.com!bocanews.bocaraton.ibm.com!ausnews.austin.ibm.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les in the Kalahari…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 09:33:23 GMT
Lines: 26

Sherwin ([email protected]) writes:

>> Yes, the White man can take credit for elevating those Stone Age savages
>> out of their perpetual backwardness, and introducing them to civilization.
>> Get it straight, Foot-boy: whatever is good in African nations (and
>> that’s a rarity, but still…) was introduced by the White man. Left to
>> their own, negroes would still be tribal nomads.

> Interesting. The African nations elevated the once, barbaric European
> civilization ages ago.

Like hell they did. You been listening to too many of Fairy-Khan’s
bedtime stories.

> They can very well do it again one of these days.

ROTFL!!!

> In fact, isn’t it written in the Bible somewhere that Africans will reign
> supreme someday?

Don’t tell me Salman Rushdie’s now writing _The Satanic Psalms_.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:17 PDT 1995
Article: 6669 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy the spam queen! (was: Crazy on anything!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:34:25 GMT
Lines: 53
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6669 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4722 alt.discrimination:37508

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> * I can make pretty good guesses, based on the amount of crap you post here.
> * Do you realize that the message I’m replying to was ONE-HUNDRED AND
> * NINETY-THREE lines of pure unadulterated Crazy Crap(tm), before I trimmed
> * it? This tells me that you have an AWFUL LOT of time on your hands.
>
> Les, you are speculating about how much free time I have, not about what I
> know.

Free time: you have too much.
What you know: next to nothing.

(snip)

> * > * Really? Just who is this semi-legendary “everyone” that you refer to?
> * >
> * > Presumably, the people who are literate and reading the messages in these
> * > newsgroups. We have a potential audience of millions, you know.
> *
> * Knowing that, why do you insist on making such a jackass out of yourself?
>
> Les, Les, Les . . . do you wonder how many people now picture you with a
> sagging loincloth everytime they see your name?

Really, Crazy, you think quite highly of yourself, doncha? Well, lurkers
here can either read your enormous flap-doodle, or they can read my
replies to your rambling rants, where I’ve parsed out the extraneous crap.

(snip)

> * > I have a real life in the real world where my words are acknowledged and
> * > respected.
> *
> * Then you should stay there. On the ‘Net, you’re just a two-bit liberal
> * asshole, who won’t be missed by anyone should you suddenly croak.
>
> Well, there are certainly enough people here to fill my shoes, but I think
> that I would be missed.

And your shit doesn’t stink, does it?

> BTW, you didn’t mean that as a threat, did you?

Why, you feel threatened by me?

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:18 PDT 1995
Article: 6676 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!news.uoregon.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected]n.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:40:47 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6676 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4725 alt.revisionism:11597 talk.politics.guns:214252

Little Miss Moffitt ([email protected]) writes:
> On Oct 17, 1995 21:51:54 in article Racist Nazis conspire…)>, ‘[email protected] (Les Griswold)’
> wrote:

> Heheheheh! One can imagine Grosswald, charged with crimes against the
> white race, declining to ask what those crimes are because that would be
> “nosiness.” Oh yes, Grosswald is a man of taste and discretion, isn’t he?

I would never be charged with crimes against the White race, for the
simple fact that I am not a race traitor. More likely, I would be hauled
up for some sort of bullshit, made-up “hate” crime.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:19 PDT 1995
Article: 6711 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million man march? Ha!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 09:57:17 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6711 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4757 alt.discrimination:37535 soc.culture.african.american:106274

Peter Allan Bucy ([email protected]) writes:
>>Smallpox Man, Africans, via the lost wax process were creating fine
>>metal art in copper, iron and gold across Africa, they developed
>>complicated philosophical cosmologies (Coversations with Olgatameli),
>>cities, in Benin, Timbucktu (prominent learning center), Kumasi and
>>Jenne (all west Africa). Africans were sea fearers on the east, north
>>and west coasts. They created great monoliths across the continent
>>and were giving civilization to Europeans in Spain for seven centuries,
>>much of this knowledge was dessiminated to your ancestors in the
>>northern reaches of the continent. The Muslim traditions of bathing
>>and cleanliness influenced your lice-eating and filthy ancestors
>>who slept with tick-infested pigs and sheep for warmth to clean
>>themselves and practice better hygine.
>
> How does any of this explain the abject desolation that is now the
> continent of Africa? What happened to these great Africans that their
> descendants live like animals in squalor. How is it that when the rest
> of the world evolved that Africa returned to the stone age? Is there
> any place on this earth where white men are running around in animal
> skins, living in mud huts, and smearing animal excrement in their hair
> and on their bodies?

This is something that negrophiles always overlook: when Whites talk
about the accomplishments of their ancestors, it’s not relevant to the
modern day. When NEGROES talk about the past, that’s the final word.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:20 PDT 1995
Article: 6715 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Liberal motivations…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 09:51:13 GMT
Lines: 14

(Rick Jones) writes:

(snip)

> The kicker, of course, is that NO conservative who understands true
> conservatism is a racist.

No, I don’t bother myself over-much about con-artist-servatives, for the
simple fact that you guys do an admirable job, all by yourselves, of
shooting down your ideas.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:20 PDT 1995
Article: 6716 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Pornographic???? I think not, Bam bam.
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 09:59:38 GMT
Lines: 26

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article <[email protected]>, Reverend Ron
> wrote:
>
> * [email protected] (Jeanne Kowalewski) wrote:
> *
> * >That’s “nekkid”, Doogie.
> *
> * >* young Aryan boys reasons not to look at necked anthropoids.
> * > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> * >That’s “nekkid wimmen”, pinhead.
> * >
> * >* Rev. Ron
> *
> * Crazy, all you can ever do is correct spelling…you know nothing else
> * do you? besides, there is no correct spelling to a slang word like
> * nekked or neckid or nekkid, or any other way it could be spelled.
>
> Just a little tutoring in Redneck 101.

And remember, Crazy is EMINENTLY qualified to teach this! Why, she had a
redneck husband almost twenty years ago!

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:21 PDT 1995
Article: 6764 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!en.com!op.net!news.tcst.com!news.onramp.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: McKinstry’s Silence
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 10:01:24 GMT
Lines: 47

ibokor ([email protected]) writes:
> or “Discretion is the Better Part of Valour”
>
> For some reason unknown to me, each of my recent postings
> which have contained the results of checking Mckinstry’s
> claims against his own references, have expired (at least at
> this site) after two days. It may be a mere coincidence,
> but these postings have *all* contained information which
> would embarrass any rational, sentient member of the
> biological species Homo sapiens sapiens.
>
> Other postings of mine seem to have fared better.
>
> To overcome this unexplained diffculty, I have taken to reposting
> the articles as soon as I have noticed their expiry without
> response from McKinstry.
>
> As these postings explicitly asked McKinstry to respond, I
> also sent an e-mail copy of one in particular — the one
> reporting G. Knuckey’s assertion that Rex Gilroy (whom McKinstry
> attributed with a PhD in archaeology “probably from thee University
> of Australia”) has *NO* (formal) qualifications in archaeology —
> and added a clear statement, namnely that if I did not receive a
> response within four days, I would take that to be an admission of
> fraud. Well, two weeks have passed since I sent McKinstry the e-mail
> and still no response, either in public or here. No have I received
> any indication that the message was not delivered.
>
> So, does anybody have information about McKinstry’s silence?
> Is it, as it is difficult to avoid presuming, a case of
> disappearing rather than facing the music and trying to avoid
> the public disgrace that sent Brother Johnson packing, or
> does the Missing Link in the Chain of Evolution have some
> problem which prevents him from responding?
>
> I’s like to know, because I would like to bring the matter to
> a close.
>
> d.A.

Has it ever occurred to you that McKinstry may have other things to do
besides respond to the rantings of a little worm on the ‘Net? Didn’t
think so…

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:22 PDT 1995
Article: 6866 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination,alt.feminism,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million man march? Ha!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 09:20:07 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6866 alt.discrimination:37633 alt.feminism:108346 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4884 soc.culture.african.american:106374

Mr. Equality ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

>>3. To a Hell’s Angel, all brothers look alike; and they all look like
>>Mike Tyson. Can’t take a chance on THAT shit.

> I disagree, to the Hells Angels, brothers look like the little wimps
> that they are unless of course there are 20 other brothers to back the
> one up.

A freind of mine once told me that he saw the way indians fought (he lived
in Cornwall, Ontario, where there was an indian reservation). He said
that you never fought ONE indian; you always fought ALL the indians that
were nearby, so if there were ten indians and one of them started
something, you had to fight ten of them.

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 11:12:23 PDT 1995
Article: 6867 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.politics.white-power,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 09:44:08 GMT
Lines: 48
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4886 alt.revisionism:11784 alt.politics.white-power:6867 talk.politics.guns:214669

Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
> # Tell me, Danny, in WHICH thesauraus did you find that “trying
> # jews” is synonymous with “censorship”.
>
> Stating that Jews guilty of “crimes against the Aryan Race”
> will be executed is, IMHO, an obvious attempt to intimidate
> and silence the opposition.

And this is different from the jailing of hollow-cause deniers in WHAT
way, exactly? I know: the jailing of hollow-cause deniers ACTUALLY
HAPPENS, whereas the punishment of jews for crimes against the Aryan race
doesn’t yet.

> # Well, if the people being tried are not guilty, what have
> # they got to worry about?
>
> It’s all a question of what Kleim means by “guilty”, now
> isn’t it?
>
> ## Now, what are these
> ## “crimes” baby-nazi is talking about? Is expressing one’s
> ## opinion one of them?
>
> # I dunno. Why don’t you ask him?
>
> John Morris asked him this, many times. Kleim didn’t answer.

So, now Milton is to be at your beck and call, providing whatever
information your over-heated little brain claims it needs?

(snip)

> # (well, now the story is, the Shoah started in 1933).
>
> Ideologically, yes; no one claimed the mass murders started
> in 1933. Most genocides are preceded by an ideological
> preparation – in this case, an intense propaganda campaign
> against Jews and other, dehumanizing and demonizing them. This
> can be seen as part of the Holocaust, yes.

Cripes, why not reach back into the 19th century, then, when Pan-Germanism
was extant?

Les

From [email protected] Fri Oct 20 12:58:32 PDT 1995
Article: 4892 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.kei.com!simtel!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy the spam queen! (was: Crazy on anything!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 09:31:31 GMT
Lines: 51
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6875 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4892 alt.discrimination:37638

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> * > Les, you are speculating about how much free time I have, not about what I
> * > know.
> *
> * Free time: you have too much.
> * What you know: next to nothing.
>
> You are still speculating, but this is a step up from your usual blatent
> lies.

So, are you admitting that I’m RIGHT?

(snip)

> * > Les, Les, Les . . . do you wonder how many people now picture you with a
> * > sagging loincloth everytime they see your name?
> *
> * Really, Crazy, you think quite highly of yourself, doncha?
>
> Not particularly. I’m sure that you were a laughingstock before I arrived,
> and I’ve just helped expose you for the bumbling jackass that you are.

The only thing you’re helping is Rob into an ulcer attack with your
bitchiness.

(snip)

> * Well, lurkers here can either read your enormous flap-doodle, or they can
> * read my replies to your rambling rants, where I’ve parsed out the
> * extraneous crap.
>
> Yeah, they can also write to me. I get lots of e-mail about my posts, Les.

Well, isn’t that just DUCKY? Do you think that I’m losing sleep, thinking
about how much e-mail you get? Hint, Crazy: all the liberal whimps can
write to you for all I care.

> BTW, I just answer each one of your remarks, and you immediately chop out
> the parts that embarrass you.

No, I just chop out the irrelevant parts.

(snip – Crazy’s little story about her bro-in-law deleted)

Les

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:51:50 PDT 1995
Article: 11912 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 11:28:06 GMT
Lines: 55
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6982 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4969 alt.revisionism:11912 talk.politics.guns:214953

william c anderson ([email protected]) writes:
> Evelyn Hill ([email protected]) wrote:
> : william c anderson ([email protected]) wrote:
> : : I live in a predominantly black, working-class neighborhood now.
> : : Differences? Sure. You got some problem with difference?
>
> : None whatsoever. But I would prefer living in a White neighborhood to
> : living in a Black neighborhood. Do you have a problem with that?
>
> : I would also prefer living in a White nation to a multi-racial nation.
> : No doubt, you DO have a problem with that. (Correct me if I am wrong.)
> : Do you think that no racially homogeneous nations should exist – or just
> : no White nations?
>
> I don’t care if “racially homogeneous nations” exist. Go buy an
> island and start one. I don’t want to live in one, however, and
> neither does most of the rest of the US citizenry, so don’t try
> to foist your own insecurities on the rest of us.

You sound pretty sure of yourself there, but I wonder if reality supports
your assertion.

(snip)

> : Race isn’t a fiction; it is an important human difference. It is
> : entirely possible to feel more comfortable with people of your own race
> : than you do with people of other races, (and I believe *most* people do).
> : It is also possible to like and value your own race more than other races-
> : just as parents value their own children over other peoples children.
>
> I addressed this above. Again, I think a desire to associate only with
> people like oneself is a sign of insecurity.

And I think that wanting to mix it up, like a big Coca-Cola commercial, is
a sign of insecurity. So?

> : And this is healthy – not evil.
>
> Doesn’t strike me as particularly healthy–a bit sickly and weak, in
> fact. I don’t know if I’d call it evil, though–until you go trying
> to force it on the rest of it. Find an area with no black people in
> it, Mr. Hill. Have a good time there. Just don’t afflict the rest
> of us.

Yet, somehow, it’s okay to inflict multi-racialism on “the rest of us”, as
if multi-racialism is somehow “normal”, and racial homogeneity is a
departure from it?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:51:52 PDT 1995
Article: 11919 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Caring for children… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 12:08:15 GMT
Lines: 31
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4977 alt.politics.white-power:6990 alt.revisionism:11919 talk.politics.guns:214958

Marty Kelley ([email protected]) writes:
> On 19 Oct 1995, Evelyn Hill wrote:
>
>> william c anderson ([email protected]) wrote:
>> : I care no more for my own “race” than I do for any other, and I
>> : don’t particularly give a shit if the white “race” becomes extinct.
>> : In fact, I don’t even recognize the validity of the term outside a
>> : narrow scientific concept. …
>> : Whatcha gonna do about it, shithead?
>>
>> Ask you to live for a year in non-White neighborhood, and see if you
>> notice any differences between it and a White neighborhood?
>
>> Would you say, “I care no more about my country than I do about any other
>> country”? Well, quite possibly you would. How about, “I care no more
>> about my children than I do any other children”?
>
> How about this, instead–I care no LESS for others’ children than I do
> for my own–and I care a great deal for my own.

Then, you’re lying. It is impossible to care for other children as much
as you care for your own. Do you regularly sweep the bus terminals and
train stations, taking home every urchin that you find?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:51:52 PDT 1995
Article: 11920 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Intimidation by jews (was: Genocidal Threats from Nazis)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 12:19:25 GMT
Lines: 41
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:11920 talk.politics.guns:214960

Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>
> # Daniel Keren ([email protected]) writes:
>
> ## [Kleim’s] Stating that Jews guilty of “crimes against the Aryan
> ## Race” will be executed is, IMHO, an obvious attempt to intimidate
> ## and silence the opposition.
>
> # And this is different from the jailing of hollow-cause deniers in
> # WHAT way, exactly?
>
> In a few ways,

So please specify.

> but that is not the issue here – this is a silly attempt
> to divert the discussion. It is true that in some countries (Germany,
> France, Austria), Holocaust-deniers are legally prosecuted. As I
> noted a few times, I oppose this; let the Nazi loonies speak as
> much as they want, that’s my opinion.

Your opinion carries no weight.

> Anyway, the matter here was Kleim’s statement about Jews who
> will be executed after being convicted with “crimes against the
> Aryan Race”. It should be clear to everyone that this is a genocidal
> threat with which Kleim means to intimidate the opposition, as
> well as to outline his future plans. The writing is on the wall.

It’s incredible: you can infer so much out of what a “Natsee” says, but
when anyone comes to a conclusion based on what you say, you get all
indignant and self-righteous, demanding to see “where” you said something
in EXACTLY those words.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:51:53 PDT 1995
Article: 11990 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:30:45 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7025 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5017 alt.revisionism:11990 talk.politics.guns:215113

william c anderson ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> : Yet, somehow, it’s okay to inflict multi-racialism on “the rest of us”, as
> : if multi-racialism is somehow “normal”, and racial homogeneity is a
> : departure from it?
>
> “Multi-racialism” is the way it is, was, and shall be, Les baby.

Really, Billy baby? Wanna cite ANY evidence to support that?

> You
> and your tiny band of knuckledraggers are the ones who have a problem
> with reality. You want “racial homogeneity,” then go for it–there are
> quite a few uninhabited islands in the South Pacific, I believe. You
> want “racial homogeneity” in the United States, then you’re going to
> have to shoot an awful lot of people–and this time, there are a lot
> more of us than there are of you. And this time, we’re going to shoot
> back, sweetheart.

Oh, there was a racist uprising sometime in the past, in the United
States? Wanna let me in on this?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:51:54 PDT 1995
Article: 11992 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:33:34 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7026 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5019 alt.revisionism:11992 talk.politics.guns:215116

JS ([email protected]) writes:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Evelyn Hill) wrote:
>
>> william c anderson ([email protected]) wrote:
>> : I live in a predominantly black, working-class neighborhood now.
>> : Differences? Sure. You got some problem with difference?
>>
>> None whatsoever. But I would prefer living in a White neighborhood to
>> living in a Black neighborhood. Do you have a problem with that?
>>
>> I would also prefer living in a White nation to a multi-racial nation.
>> No doubt, you DO have a problem with that. (Correct me if I am wrong.)
>> Do you think that no racially homogeneous nations should exist – or just
>> no White nations?
>
> Since, in the US at any rate, living in a “White nation” would involve the
> forcible dispossion and possible extermination of large segments of the
> population, I think most decent people would have a “problem” with that.
> How else do you plan to attain racial uniformity? Gentle persuasion?

Are you suggesting that non-whites can’t be reasoned with, but that they
only understand violence?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:51:55 PDT 1995
Article: 11993 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: WHAT “reasoning”? (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:38:23 GMT
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7027 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5020 alt.revisionism:11993 talk.politics.guns:215117

Keith Morrison ([email protected]) writes:
> From: Marty Kelley
> Message-ID:
>>
>>For what it’s worth, Keith, it was actually Milton Kleim who said
>>that–in the attempt to argue that when Jefferson wrote “all men are
>>created equal,” he meant “humans” (white men, or as Kleim said, Homo
>>sapiens sapiens) as opposed to “other hominids.” You did a nice job of
>>demolishing Kleim’s rant on that, by the way. A couple of my students
>>said nice things about your reasoning.

WHAT “reasoning” would that be? Semantic tricks ala Johnnie Cochrane,
whereby the fact that Jefferson and his compatriots didn’t free their
slaves at the very moment that they signed the DoI would be glossed over?
If you’re so impressed with Keith “not the T.V. guy” Morrison’s reasoning,
why not ask him that?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:51:56 PDT 1995
Article: 11994 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:49:45 GMT
Lines: 39
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5023 alt.politics.white-power:7029 alt.revisionism:11994 talk.politics.guns:215118

Elias Hall-Door Agustsson ([email protected]) writes:
> In [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:

(snip)

>>Yet, somehow, it’s okay to inflict multi-racialism on “the rest of us”, as
>>if multi-racialism is somehow “normal”, and racial homogeneity is a
>>departure from it?
>
> Les, no-one is trying to impose multi-racialism on you. In fact, such a
> manoeuvre is impossible, the concept is ludicrous and completely idiotic.

Really? Hell, maybe someone should inform the government of Canada that
they’re accomplishing the impossible, then. Maybe, while they’re
performing miracles, they can solve the debt problem, too.

> Les, has it ever occurred to you that you can choose where you live

Limited only by money, day-dreamer.

> and with whom you breed?

I should frigging well hope so!

> And that other people can make such decisions as well?

Ah, an anarchist. Really, Elly, save your hyper-individualism. It’ll
make NO headway here.

You know, it always boggles the mind to see these hyper-individualists,
with their egotistical garbage. I’d like to see how long they would have
lasted at the “Million Man March”, with their “Racism is DUMB!” message.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:51:57 PDT 1995
Article: 12067 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected] <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:20:30 GMT
Lines: 50
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7096 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5069 alt.revisionism:12067 talk.politics.guns:215255

Keith Morrison ([email protected]) writes:
> In article [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>>>
>>> Les, no-one is trying to impose multi-racialism on you. In fact, such a
>>> manoeuvre is impossible, the concept is ludicrous and completely idiotic.
>>
>>Really? Hell, maybe someone should inform the government of Canada that
>>they’re accomplishing the impossible, then. Maybe, while they’re
>>performing miracles, they can solve the debt problem, too.
>
> Mayhaps you could tell us when multiCULTURISM became multi-
> RACIALISM because I’m really kind of foggy on when that change
> occurred.

That doesn’t surprise me, since you seem to be kind of foggy on most things.

Try 1965, when the nice government decided that we’d, henceforth, have
more immigration from non-white countries, and less from Europe.

> Does this mean you think the French, Spanish, Germans,
> Norwegians and Swedish are not in the same racial category as
> English-speaking Canadians because they recieve money from the
> Multiculturalism, have their activities supported and promoted, etc
> etc?

Keith, receiving a little money to celebrate one’s heritage is
CONSIDERABLY different than being actively encouraged to come here in the
first place, and rapidly ghettoize sections of (mainly) three cities.

> Come to think of it, there’s an Irish festival in Miramichi
> and the Highland festival in Cape Breton that also have recieved
> some support from that department. Does this mean the Irish and
> Scottish are also seperate races?

Gee, Keithy, for someone who just lectured me on jumping to conclusions
when people make statements, you sure seem to be doing it just fine yourself.

FYI, I do NOT consider receiving government money indicative of racial
uniquness. But to suggest that Irish, Scottish, Germans, etc., are in the
same category as East Indians, Asians, Somalians, etc., is pure nonsense,
although about what can be expected from someone like you who thinks that
multi-racialism is just hunky-dory, as long as it favours non-whites.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:51:58 PDT 1995
Article: 12068 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:25:34 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7097 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5070 alt.revisionism:12068 talk.politics.guns:215256

Nosy ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:

(snip)

> < You sound pretty sure of yourself there, but I wonder if reality supports > < your assertion. >
> Well, Japan exists, and could be called “racially homogeneous”.

Nosy, Nosy, Nosy…

Japan is full of Japanese. More, the Japanese have a STRONG dislike of
anyone NOT Japanese, especially _gaijin_, (er, that’s us).

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:51:59 PDT 1995
Article: 12071 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Killing fast, or killing slow… (was: Where we choose to live…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:33:20 GMT
Lines: 25
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7099 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5072 alt.revisionism:12071 talk.politics.guns:215257

Nosy ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
> < william c anderson ([email protected]) writes: (snip) > < > I addressed this above. Again, I think a desire to associate only with
> < > people like oneself is a sign of insecurity.
>
> < And I think that wanting to mix it up, like a big Coca-Cola commercial, is > < a sign of insecurity. So? >
> So Anderson isn’t advocating killing to advance his point of view.
>
Sure he is. Maybe he just doesn’t realize it. Check out the UN
Declaration on Genocide. Inhibiting another group’s reproduction is
considered genocide. To put it into reality for you, non-whites
populating the earth with THEIR offspring, so that responsible Whites say,
“I don’t want to bring children into this world.”, is a form of genocide.

Les

“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:52:00 PDT 1995
Article: 12072 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les’s history lesson for the day
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:43:10 GMT
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7100 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5073 alt.revisionism:12072 talk.politics.guns:215258

Michael P. Stein ([email protected]) writes:
> In article ,
> Les Griswold wrote:
>>Oh, there was a racist uprising sometime in the past, in the United
>>States? Wanna let me in on this?
>
> I know how much you would want to be let in on it, but unfortunately
> the Civil War ended some one hundred thirty years ago. I know you live in
> the past, but it’s _still_ too late for you to enlist.
>
> For your information, the racists lost.

For YOUR information, Beer-Stein, the War Between the States wasn’t about
race, or anything like that. It was about the Southern states CEDING from
the United States, and the Federalists saying “No way!” Also, it wasn’t a
“civil” war, because the Confederate States and the Union were NOT the
same country during the conflict. Get it?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:52:01 PDT 1995
Article: 12073 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 12:04:18 GMT
Lines: 28
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5074 alt.revisionism:12073 talk.politics.guns:215259

JS ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> JS ([email protected]) writes:
>
>> > Since, in the US at any rate, living in a “White nation” would involve the
>> > forcible dispossion and possible extermination of large segments of the
>> > population, I think most decent people would have a “problem” with that.
>> > How else do you plan to attain racial uniformity? Gentle persuasion?
>>
>> Are you suggesting that non-whites can’t be reasoned with, but that they
>> only understand violence?
>
> Clever little evasion, but you neatly sidestep the issue. If the US isn’t
> a “racially homogenous” nation now, how do you propose to make it one?
> (Not as if we all don’t know what you’d -like- to do, of course)

Really? What is it I’d “like” to do? Where, EXACTLY, did I say what I
would like to do? Maybe you should confer with Danny Keren about this
one, he’ll tell you about the importance of not jumping to conclusions.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 11:52:01 PDT 1995
Article: 12081 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 13:39:04 GMT
Lines: 53
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.guns:215275 alt.politics.white-power:7113 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5080 alt.discrimination:37743 alt.revisionism:12081 alt.skinheads:5123

Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
>
>> > As opposed to the thousands of people in positions of publicity and great
>> > power who are NOT Jewish, I guess. You’ve named 10 people in government,
>> > some of whom I have serious doubts ARE ACTUALLY JEWISH.
>>
>> Oh, yes? Which ones, doubting-Sarah? Please, share your omniscience with
>> us.
>
> Omniscience? Read again, Les. I said I HAVE DOUBTS. That doesn’t make me
> omniscient. It makes me QUESTION the above list. And since there was not
> one iota of proof that any of the above ARE Jewish, I believe I am
> entitled to have doubts until evidence is produced.

So, tell us what your doubts are.

Of course, you won’t. Leaving us all hanging gives you an easy out,
because you can say, “I doubt it!” whenever someone makes a claim with
which you disagree.

(snip)

>> > Really? Here’s one hot tip for you: Jews ARE WHITE PEOPLE. Sorry to break
>> > it to ya, but we are. And most of us look just like you, whether our names
>> > “sound” Jewish, or not.
>>
>> Amazing. We apparently have so much trouble defining “White”, but some
>> jew can come along and tell us all about it.
>
> That’s right, Les. YOU have trouble defining “White,” I don’t.

True enough. Your definition of “white” appears to be “anyone I like”.

> And by the
> way, the first paragraph in the above was NOT written by me. If you’re
> going to quote, please make certain you attribute things to the right
> people. You’ve placed two paragraphs out of context together, and that’s
> despicable. It’s even beneath a piece of slime like you.

Poor baby. Blame the newsreader for attributing your drivel to the name
that appears above it. Stop whining and moaning like a wounded diva.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:42 PDT 1995
Article: 4969 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 11:28:06 GMT
Lines: 55
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6982 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4969 alt.revisionism:11912 talk.politics.guns:214953

william c anderson ([email protected]) writes:
> Evelyn Hill ([email protected]) wrote:
> : william c anderson ([email protected]) wrote:
> : : I live in a predominantly black, working-class neighborhood now.
> : : Differences? Sure. You got some problem with difference?
>
> : None whatsoever. But I would prefer living in a White neighborhood to
> : living in a Black neighborhood. Do you have a problem with that?
>
> : I would also prefer living in a White nation to a multi-racial nation.
> : No doubt, you DO have a problem with that. (Correct me if I am wrong.)
> : Do you think that no racially homogeneous nations should exist – or just
> : no White nations?
>
> I don’t care if “racially homogeneous nations” exist. Go buy an
> island and start one. I don’t want to live in one, however, and
> neither does most of the rest of the US citizenry, so don’t try
> to foist your own insecurities on the rest of us.

You sound pretty sure of yourself there, but I wonder if reality supports
your assertion.

(snip)

> : Race isn’t a fiction; it is an important human difference. It is
> : entirely possible to feel more comfortable with people of your own race
> : than you do with people of other races, (and I believe *most* people do).
> : It is also possible to like and value your own race more than other races-
> : just as parents value their own children over other peoples children.
>
> I addressed this above. Again, I think a desire to associate only with
> people like oneself is a sign of insecurity.

And I think that wanting to mix it up, like a big Coca-Cola commercial, is
a sign of insecurity. So?

> : And this is healthy – not evil.
>
> Doesn’t strike me as particularly healthy–a bit sickly and weak, in
> fact. I don’t know if I’d call it evil, though–until you go trying
> to force it on the rest of it. Find an area with no black people in
> it, Mr. Hill. Have a good time there. Just don’t afflict the rest
> of us.

Yet, somehow, it’s okay to inflict multi-racialism on “the rest of us”, as
if multi-racialism is somehow “normal”, and racial homogeneity is a
departure from it?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:43 PDT 1995
Article: 4970 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million man march? Ha!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 11:40:23 GMT
Lines: 32
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6984 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4970 alt.discrimination:37681

Smokin’ ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) sez:
>
>>Actually, I read in _The Dispossesed Majority_, that one can sue another
>>for slander over the accusation that one has negro ancestry.
>
> Is that still in print!?

Yes, it is. It’s in its second edition now, and it’s available from:

National Vanguard Books
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro WV
24946 U.S.A.

> I remember reading that book about 10 (maybe even more) years ago.
> One of the most infomative and eye-opening books I’ve read. As I
> recall it was chock full of hard facts and figures that even the most
> liberal pinko couldn’t deny. That’s something a lot of these empty
> barrels I see shooting their mouths off in this ng could sure use!
>
> Of course like I said before, they know they can’t refute the message
> so instead they attack the messenger. What else can you expect, huh?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:44 PDT 1995
Article: 4977 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Caring for children… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 12:08:15 GMT
Lines: 31
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4977 alt.politics.white-power:6990 alt.revisionism:11919 talk.politics.guns:214958

Marty Kelley ([email protected]) writes:
> On 19 Oct 1995, Evelyn Hill wrote:
>
>> william c anderson ([email protected]) wrote:
>> : I care no more for my own “race” than I do for any other, and I
>> : don’t particularly give a shit if the white “race” becomes extinct.
>> : In fact, I don’t even recognize the validity of the term outside a
>> : narrow scientific concept. …
>> : Whatcha gonna do about it, shithead?
>>
>> Ask you to live for a year in non-White neighborhood, and see if you
>> notice any differences between it and a White neighborhood?
>
>> Would you say, “I care no more about my country than I do about any other
>> country”? Well, quite possibly you would. How about, “I care no more
>> about my children than I do any other children”?
>
> How about this, instead–I care no LESS for others’ children than I do
> for my own–and I care a great deal for my own.

Then, you’re lying. It is impossible to care for other children as much
as you care for your own. Do you regularly sweep the bus terminals and
train stations, taking home every urchin that you find?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:45 PDT 1995
Article: 5017 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:30:45 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7025 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5017 alt.revisionism:11990 talk.politics.guns:215113

william c anderson ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> : Yet, somehow, it’s okay to inflict multi-racialism on “the rest of us”, as
> : if multi-racialism is somehow “normal”, and racial homogeneity is a
> : departure from it?
>
> “Multi-racialism” is the way it is, was, and shall be, Les baby.

Really, Billy baby? Wanna cite ANY evidence to support that?

> You
> and your tiny band of knuckledraggers are the ones who have a problem
> with reality. You want “racial homogeneity,” then go for it–there are
> quite a few uninhabited islands in the South Pacific, I believe. You
> want “racial homogeneity” in the United States, then you’re going to
> have to shoot an awful lot of people–and this time, there are a lot
> more of us than there are of you. And this time, we’re going to shoot
> back, sweetheart.

Oh, there was a racist uprising sometime in the past, in the United
States? Wanna let me in on this?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:46 PDT 1995
Article: 5019 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:33:34 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7026 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5019 alt.revisionism:11992 talk.politics.guns:215116

JS ([email protected]) writes:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Evelyn Hill) wrote:
>
>> william c anderson ([email protected]) wrote:
>> : I live in a predominantly black, working-class neighborhood now.
>> : Differences? Sure. You got some problem with difference?
>>
>> None whatsoever. But I would prefer living in a White neighborhood to
>> living in a Black neighborhood. Do you have a problem with that?
>>
>> I would also prefer living in a White nation to a multi-racial nation.
>> No doubt, you DO have a problem with that. (Correct me if I am wrong.)
>> Do you think that no racially homogeneous nations should exist – or just
>> no White nations?
>
> Since, in the US at any rate, living in a “White nation” would involve the
> forcible dispossion and possible extermination of large segments of the
> population, I think most decent people would have a “problem” with that.
> How else do you plan to attain racial uniformity? Gentle persuasion?

Are you suggesting that non-whites can’t be reasoned with, but that they
only understand violence?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:47 PDT 1995
Article: 5020 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: WHAT “reasoning”? (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:38:23 GMT
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7027 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5020 alt.revisionism:11993 talk.politics.guns:215117

Keith Morrison ([email protected]) writes:
> From: Marty Kelley
> Message-ID:
>>
>>For what it’s worth, Keith, it was actually Milton Kleim who said
>>that–in the attempt to argue that when Jefferson wrote “all men are
>>created equal,” he meant “humans” (white men, or as Kleim said, Homo
>>sapiens sapiens) as opposed to “other hominids.” You did a nice job of
>>demolishing Kleim’s rant on that, by the way. A couple of my students
>>said nice things about your reasoning.

WHAT “reasoning” would that be? Semantic tricks ala Johnnie Cochrane,
whereby the fact that Jefferson and his compatriots didn’t free their
slaves at the very moment that they signed the DoI would be glossed over?
If you’re so impressed with Keith “not the T.V. guy” Morrison’s reasoning,
why not ask him that?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:48 PDT 1995
Article: 5022 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Please, leave Africa out of this ( was Re: BLACK CRIME STATS)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:42:42 GMT
Lines: 28
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5022 soc.culture.african.american:106479

David Waters ([email protected]) writes:
> WARNING: Retained cross-post to alt.politics.nationalism.white and SCAfAm

(snip)

> The Master ([email protected]) wrote:
> : And while you were on your soap boxes crying, bitching, and moaning,
> : other minorities such as the Koreans, Japanese, etc. have become
> : substantially more productive minorities.
>
> Compare the percentage of high-skilled professionals among these and other
> Asians living in the USA to each of their home countries. What you will
> find is that the USA has 50% more high-skilled professionals among its
> Asian immigrants than the corresponding populations in Asian countries.
>
> Also, consider how difficult (or IMPOSSIBLE) it would be for a poor Asian
> criminal to immigrate to the USA (via the INS) than it would be for a
> wealthy Asian professional.

So, are you therefore saying that “African-Americans” should be compared
with Asian criminals?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:49 PDT 1995
Article: 5023 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:49:45 GMT
Lines: 39
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5023 alt.politics.white-power:7029 alt.revisionism:11994 talk.politics.guns:215118

Elias Hall-Door Agustsson ([email protected]) writes:
> In [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:

(snip)

>>Yet, somehow, it’s okay to inflict multi-racialism on “the rest of us”, as
>>if multi-racialism is somehow “normal”, and racial homogeneity is a
>>departure from it?
>
> Les, no-one is trying to impose multi-racialism on you. In fact, such a
> manoeuvre is impossible, the concept is ludicrous and completely idiotic.

Really? Hell, maybe someone should inform the government of Canada that
they’re accomplishing the impossible, then. Maybe, while they’re
performing miracles, they can solve the debt problem, too.

> Les, has it ever occurred to you that you can choose where you live

Limited only by money, day-dreamer.

> and with whom you breed?

I should frigging well hope so!

> And that other people can make such decisions as well?

Ah, an anarchist. Really, Elly, save your hyper-individualism. It’ll
make NO headway here.

You know, it always boggles the mind to see these hyper-individualists,
with their egotistical garbage. I’d like to see how long they would have
lasted at the “Million Man March”, with their “Racism is DUMB!” message.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:50 PDT 1995
Article: 5067 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy the spam queen! (was: Crazy on anything!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:11:15 GMT
Lines: 45
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7094 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5067 alt.discrimination:37739

Crazy Jeanine Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

> * > * Free time: you have too much.
> * > * What you know: next to nothing.
> * >
> * > You are still speculating, but this is a step up from your usual blatent
> * > lies.
> *
> * So, are you admitting that I’m RIGHT?
>
> Not at all. You are wrong on both counts. Now, if you said that you got
> this information about me from the Hiddenbrooke Historical Society, we’d
> know that it is a factoid that you pulled out of your ass. Since you
> merely guessing about how I spend my time and what I know, we know that
> you’re just blowing brown smoke.

No, I think I’m right… closer to home than you’d like to admit.

(snip)

> * > * Well, lurkers here can either read your enormous flap-doodle, or they can
> * > * read my replies to your rambling rants, where I’ve parsed out the
> * > * extraneous crap.
> * >
> * > Yeah, they can also write to me. I get lots of e-mail about my posts, Les.
> *
> * Well, isn’t that just DUCKY? Do you think that I’m losing sleep, thinking
> * about how much e-mail you get? Hint, Crazy: all the liberal whimps can
> * write to you for all I care.
>
> Ah, but what if they’re not all libs, Les? I correspond with many people.

“… but what if…?” Typical liberal response. Well, I can guarantee
you one thing, Crazy: they’re NOT people that I care about.

Les

who can’t believe that out of millions of sperm, Crazy was the fastest


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:51 PDT 1995
Article: 5069 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected] <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:20:30 GMT
Lines: 50
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7096 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5069 alt.revisionism:12067 talk.politics.guns:215255

Keith Morrison ([email protected]) writes:
> In article [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>>>
>>> Les, no-one is trying to impose multi-racialism on you. In fact, such a
>>> manoeuvre is impossible, the concept is ludicrous and completely idiotic.
>>
>>Really? Hell, maybe someone should inform the government of Canada that
>>they’re accomplishing the impossible, then. Maybe, while they’re
>>performing miracles, they can solve the debt problem, too.
>
> Mayhaps you could tell us when multiCULTURISM became multi-
> RACIALISM because I’m really kind of foggy on when that change
> occurred.

That doesn’t surprise me, since you seem to be kind of foggy on most things.

Try 1965, when the nice government decided that we’d, henceforth, have
more immigration from non-white countries, and less from Europe.

> Does this mean you think the French, Spanish, Germans,
> Norwegians and Swedish are not in the same racial category as
> English-speaking Canadians because they recieve money from the
> Multiculturalism, have their activities supported and promoted, etc
> etc?

Keith, receiving a little money to celebrate one’s heritage is
CONSIDERABLY different than being actively encouraged to come here in the
first place, and rapidly ghettoize sections of (mainly) three cities.

> Come to think of it, there’s an Irish festival in Miramichi
> and the Highland festival in Cape Breton that also have recieved
> some support from that department. Does this mean the Irish and
> Scottish are also seperate races?

Gee, Keithy, for someone who just lectured me on jumping to conclusions
when people make statements, you sure seem to be doing it just fine yourself.

FYI, I do NOT consider receiving government money indicative of racial
uniquness. But to suggest that Irish, Scottish, Germans, etc., are in the
same category as East Indians, Asians, Somalians, etc., is pure nonsense,
although about what can be expected from someone like you who thinks that
multi-racialism is just hunky-dory, as long as it favours non-whites.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:52 PDT 1995
Article: 5070 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:25:34 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7097 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5070 alt.revisionism:12068 talk.politics.guns:215256

Nosy ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:

(snip)

> < You sound pretty sure of yourself there, but I wonder if reality supports > < your assertion. >
> Well, Japan exists, and could be called “racially homogeneous”.

Nosy, Nosy, Nosy…

Japan is full of Japanese. More, the Japanese have a STRONG dislike of
anyone NOT Japanese, especially _gaijin_, (er, that’s us).

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:53 PDT 1995
Article: 5072 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Killing fast, or killing slow… (was: Where we choose to live…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:33:20 GMT
Lines: 25
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7099 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5072 alt.revisionism:12071 talk.politics.guns:215257

Nosy ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
> < william c anderson ([email protected]) writes: (snip) > < > I addressed this above. Again, I think a desire to associate only with
> < > people like oneself is a sign of insecurity.
>
> < And I think that wanting to mix it up, like a big Coca-Cola commercial, is > < a sign of insecurity. So? >
> So Anderson isn’t advocating killing to advance his point of view.
>
Sure he is. Maybe he just doesn’t realize it. Check out the UN
Declaration on Genocide. Inhibiting another group’s reproduction is
considered genocide. To put it into reality for you, non-whites
populating the earth with THEIR offspring, so that responsible Whites say,
“I don’t want to bring children into this world.”, is a form of genocide.

Les

“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:53 PDT 1995
Article: 5073 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les’s history lesson for the day
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:43:10 GMT
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7100 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5073 alt.revisionism:12072 talk.politics.guns:215258

Michael P. Stein ([email protected]) writes:
> In article ,
> Les Griswold wrote:
>>Oh, there was a racist uprising sometime in the past, in the United
>>States? Wanna let me in on this?
>
> I know how much you would want to be let in on it, but unfortunately
> the Civil War ended some one hundred thirty years ago. I know you live in
> the past, but it’s _still_ too late for you to enlist.
>
> For your information, the racists lost.

For YOUR information, Beer-Stein, the War Between the States wasn’t about
race, or anything like that. It was about the Southern states CEDING from
the United States, and the Federalists saying “No way!” Also, it wasn’t a
“civil” war, because the Confederate States and the Union were NOT the
same country during the conflict. Get it?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:54 PDT 1995
Article: 5074 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 12:04:18 GMT
Lines: 28
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5074 alt.revisionism:12073 talk.politics.guns:215259

JS ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> JS ([email protected]) writes:
>
>> > Since, in the US at any rate, living in a “White nation” would involve the
>> > forcible dispossion and possible extermination of large segments of the
>> > population, I think most decent people would have a “problem” with that.
>> > How else do you plan to attain racial uniformity? Gentle persuasion?
>>
>> Are you suggesting that non-whites can’t be reasoned with, but that they
>> only understand violence?
>
> Clever little evasion, but you neatly sidestep the issue. If the US isn’t
> a “racially homogenous” nation now, how do you propose to make it one?
> (Not as if we all don’t know what you’d -like- to do, of course)

Really? What is it I’d “like” to do? Where, EXACTLY, did I say what I
would like to do? Maybe you should confer with Danny Keren about this
one, he’ll tell you about the importance of not jumping to conclusions.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:20:55 PDT 1995
Article: 5080 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected].fi>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 13:39:04 GMT
Lines: 53
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.guns:215275 alt.politics.white-power:7113 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5080 alt.discrimination:37743 alt.revisionism:12081 alt.skinheads:5123

Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
>
>> > As opposed to the thousands of people in positions of publicity and great
>> > power who are NOT Jewish, I guess. You’ve named 10 people in government,
>> > some of whom I have serious doubts ARE ACTUALLY JEWISH.
>>
>> Oh, yes? Which ones, doubting-Sarah? Please, share your omniscience with
>> us.
>
> Omniscience? Read again, Les. I said I HAVE DOUBTS. That doesn’t make me
> omniscient. It makes me QUESTION the above list. And since there was not
> one iota of proof that any of the above ARE Jewish, I believe I am
> entitled to have doubts until evidence is produced.

So, tell us what your doubts are.

Of course, you won’t. Leaving us all hanging gives you an easy out,
because you can say, “I doubt it!” whenever someone makes a claim with
which you disagree.

(snip)

>> > Really? Here’s one hot tip for you: Jews ARE WHITE PEOPLE. Sorry to break
>> > it to ya, but we are. And most of us look just like you, whether our names
>> > “sound” Jewish, or not.
>>
>> Amazing. We apparently have so much trouble defining “White”, but some
>> jew can come along and tell us all about it.
>
> That’s right, Les. YOU have trouble defining “White,” I don’t.

True enough. Your definition of “white” appears to be “anyone I like”.

> And by the
> way, the first paragraph in the above was NOT written by me. If you’re
> going to quote, please make certain you attribute things to the right
> people. You’ve placed two paragraphs out of context together, and that’s
> despicable. It’s even beneath a piece of slime like you.

Poor baby. Blame the newsreader for attributing your drivel to the name
that appears above it. Stop whining and moaning like a wounded diva.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:30 PDT 1995
Article: 6875 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.kei.com!simtel!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy the spam queen! (was: Crazy on anything!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 09:31:31 GMT
Lines: 51
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6875 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4892 alt.discrimination:37638

Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

(snip)

> * > Les, you are speculating about how much free time I have, not about what I
> * > know.
> *
> * Free time: you have too much.
> * What you know: next to nothing.
>
> You are still speculating, but this is a step up from your usual blatent
> lies.

So, are you admitting that I’m RIGHT?

(snip)

> * > Les, Les, Les . . . do you wonder how many people now picture you with a
> * > sagging loincloth everytime they see your name?
> *
> * Really, Crazy, you think quite highly of yourself, doncha?
>
> Not particularly. I’m sure that you were a laughingstock before I arrived,
> and I’ve just helped expose you for the bumbling jackass that you are.

The only thing you’re helping is Rob into an ulcer attack with your
bitchiness.

(snip)

> * Well, lurkers here can either read your enormous flap-doodle, or they can
> * read my replies to your rambling rants, where I’ve parsed out the
> * extraneous crap.
>
> Yeah, they can also write to me. I get lots of e-mail about my posts, Les.

Well, isn’t that just DUCKY? Do you think that I’m losing sleep, thinking
about how much e-mail you get? Hint, Crazy: all the liberal whimps can
write to you for all I care.

> BTW, I just answer each one of your remarks, and you immediately chop out
> the parts that embarrass you.

No, I just chop out the irrelevant parts.

(snip – Crazy’s little story about her bro-in-law deleted)

Les

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:31 PDT 1995
Article: 6968 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Jewish looks (was: A challenge for the geneologically inclined)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 00:50:56 GMT
Lines: 55

Puff-Adder (—) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>
>
>> > As I said in another post, extant photographs of Nellie Mutschler show
>> > that she has no obvious Semitic features. This is the same for her
>> > descendants, Vernon Rittscher, his daughter Mary Ann, and myself. I’ll
>> > send a photo of myself to anybody who asks. If I’m a Jew and I don’t know
>> > about it, I’d be interested for somebody to point it out. I sure don’t
>> > look like a Jew.
>>
>> Incredible. So now you’re telling us that there are “jewish looks”? What
>> ARE these “jewish looks”?
>>
>> I’m just dying to see how you back out of this one.

> Hey Les, just because someone has a “hooked nose” does not make them
> Jewish and just because a Jew doesn’t have a “hooked nose” does not make
> him less Jewish. Being Jewish is about believing in God and having a
> certain culture. And it’s not surprising that some Jews should have
> “hooked noses” considering their ancestors came out of the Middle East
> where that kind of nose predominates.

But I was asking about “jewish looks”, not the morality of ascribing a
certain cast of features to a given race. The line is that jews aren’t a
distiguishable race ANYWAY (until the time comes for AA handouts), so how can
there be a “jewish look”, whether it’s an “aunty-seemyte” saying it, or a
race-mixer like you?

> And I know you’ll spout some things of greasy skin, thick lips, being
> aggressive, loud, cheap, etc, etc, but do Jews really conform to these
> stereotypes? I mean, if I go to Saudi Arabia and find people that conform
> to these stereotypes am I to conclude that they are Jews?

No, they’re Semites. The jews are one sub-branch of the Semitic race.
The Arabs are another.

> To put it plainly so that you’ll understand: “Jewish” features preceded
> the Jews. Calling “Jewish looking” people Jewish is like calling all blue
> eyed people German. Blue eyes probably evolved tens of thousands of years
> ago before any modern European nation arose.

We’re not talking about blue eyes, or ANY eyes. We WERE talking about
“jewish looks”.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:32 PDT 1995
Article: 6982 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 11:28:06 GMT
Lines: 55
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6982 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4969 alt.revisionism:11912 talk.politics.guns:214953

william c anderson ([email protected]) writes:
> Evelyn Hill ([email protected]) wrote:
> : william c anderson ([email protected]) wrote:
> : : I live in a predominantly black, working-class neighborhood now.
> : : Differences? Sure. You got some problem with difference?
>
> : None whatsoever. But I would prefer living in a White neighborhood to
> : living in a Black neighborhood. Do you have a problem with that?
>
> : I would also prefer living in a White nation to a multi-racial nation.
> : No doubt, you DO have a problem with that. (Correct me if I am wrong.)
> : Do you think that no racially homogeneous nations should exist – or just
> : no White nations?
>
> I don’t care if “racially homogeneous nations” exist. Go buy an
> island and start one. I don’t want to live in one, however, and
> neither does most of the rest of the US citizenry, so don’t try
> to foist your own insecurities on the rest of us.

You sound pretty sure of yourself there, but I wonder if reality supports
your assertion.

(snip)

> : Race isn’t a fiction; it is an important human difference. It is
> : entirely possible to feel more comfortable with people of your own race
> : than you do with people of other races, (and I believe *most* people do).
> : It is also possible to like and value your own race more than other races-
> : just as parents value their own children over other peoples children.
>
> I addressed this above. Again, I think a desire to associate only with
> people like oneself is a sign of insecurity.

And I think that wanting to mix it up, like a big Coca-Cola commercial, is
a sign of insecurity. So?

> : And this is healthy – not evil.
>
> Doesn’t strike me as particularly healthy–a bit sickly and weak, in
> fact. I don’t know if I’d call it evil, though–until you go trying
> to force it on the rest of it. Find an area with no black people in
> it, Mr. Hill. Have a good time there. Just don’t afflict the rest
> of us.

Yet, somehow, it’s okay to inflict multi-racialism on “the rest of us”, as
if multi-racialism is somehow “normal”, and racial homogeneity is a
departure from it?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:33 PDT 1995
Article: 6984 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million man march? Ha!
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 11:40:23 GMT
Lines: 32
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:6984 alt.politics.nationalism.white:4970 alt.discrimination:37681

Smokin’ ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) sez:
>
>>Actually, I read in _The Dispossesed Majority_, that one can sue another
>>for slander over the accusation that one has negro ancestry.
>
> Is that still in print!?

Yes, it is. It’s in its second edition now, and it’s available from:

National Vanguard Books
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro WV
24946 U.S.A.

> I remember reading that book about 10 (maybe even more) years ago.
> One of the most infomative and eye-opening books I’ve read. As I
> recall it was chock full of hard facts and figures that even the most
> liberal pinko couldn’t deny. That’s something a lot of these empty
> barrels I see shooting their mouths off in this ng could sure use!
>
> Of course like I said before, they know they can’t refute the message
> so instead they attack the messenger. What else can you expect, huh?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:34 PDT 1995
Article: 6990 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Caring for children… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 12:08:15 GMT
Lines: 31
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:4977 alt.politics.white-power:6990 alt.revisionism:11919 talk.politics.guns:214958

Marty Kelley ([email protected]) writes:
> On 19 Oct 1995, Evelyn Hill wrote:
>
>> william c anderson ([email protected]) wrote:
>> : I care no more for my own “race” than I do for any other, and I
>> : don’t particularly give a shit if the white “race” becomes extinct.
>> : In fact, I don’t even recognize the validity of the term outside a
>> : narrow scientific concept. …
>> : Whatcha gonna do about it, shithead?
>>
>> Ask you to live for a year in non-White neighborhood, and see if you
>> notice any differences between it and a White neighborhood?
>
>> Would you say, “I care no more about my country than I do about any other
>> country”? Well, quite possibly you would. How about, “I care no more
>> about my children than I do any other children”?
>
> How about this, instead–I care no LESS for others’ children than I do
> for my own–and I care a great deal for my own.

Then, you’re lying. It is impossible to care for other children as much
as you care for your own. Do you regularly sweep the bus terminals and
train stations, taking home every urchin that you find?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:35 PDT 1995
Article: 7025 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:30:45 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7025 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5017 alt.revisionism:11990 talk.politics.guns:215113

william c anderson ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> : Yet, somehow, it’s okay to inflict multi-racialism on “the rest of us”, as
> : if multi-racialism is somehow “normal”, and racial homogeneity is a
> : departure from it?
>
> “Multi-racialism” is the way it is, was, and shall be, Les baby.

Really, Billy baby? Wanna cite ANY evidence to support that?

> You
> and your tiny band of knuckledraggers are the ones who have a problem
> with reality. You want “racial homogeneity,” then go for it–there are
> quite a few uninhabited islands in the South Pacific, I believe. You
> want “racial homogeneity” in the United States, then you’re going to
> have to shoot an awful lot of people–and this time, there are a lot
> more of us than there are of you. And this time, we’re going to shoot
> back, sweetheart.

Oh, there was a racist uprising sometime in the past, in the United
States? Wanna let me in on this?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:36 PDT 1995
Article: 7026 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:33:34 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7026 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5019 alt.revisionism:11992 talk.politics.guns:215116

JS ([email protected]) writes:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Evelyn Hill) wrote:
>
>> william c anderson ([email protected]) wrote:
>> : I live in a predominantly black, working-class neighborhood now.
>> : Differences? Sure. You got some problem with difference?
>>
>> None whatsoever. But I would prefer living in a White neighborhood to
>> living in a Black neighborhood. Do you have a problem with that?
>>
>> I would also prefer living in a White nation to a multi-racial nation.
>> No doubt, you DO have a problem with that. (Correct me if I am wrong.)
>> Do you think that no racially homogeneous nations should exist – or just
>> no White nations?
>
> Since, in the US at any rate, living in a “White nation” would involve the
> forcible dispossion and possible extermination of large segments of the
> population, I think most decent people would have a “problem” with that.
> How else do you plan to attain racial uniformity? Gentle persuasion?

Are you suggesting that non-whites can’t be reasoned with, but that they
only understand violence?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:37 PDT 1995
Article: 7027 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: WHAT “reasoning”? (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:38:23 GMT
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7027 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5020 alt.revisionism:11993 talk.politics.guns:215117

Keith Morrison ([email protected]) writes:
> From: Marty Kelley
> Message-ID:
>>
>>For what it’s worth, Keith, it was actually Milton Kleim who said
>>that–in the attempt to argue that when Jefferson wrote “all men are
>>created equal,” he meant “humans” (white men, or as Kleim said, Homo
>>sapiens sapiens) as opposed to “other hominids.” You did a nice job of
>>demolishing Kleim’s rant on that, by the way. A couple of my students
>>said nice things about your reasoning.

WHAT “reasoning” would that be? Semantic tricks ala Johnnie Cochrane,
whereby the fact that Jefferson and his compatriots didn’t free their
slaves at the very moment that they signed the DoI would be glossed over?
If you’re so impressed with Keith “not the T.V. guy” Morrison’s reasoning,
why not ask him that?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:38 PDT 1995
Article: 7029 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:49:45 GMT
Lines: 39
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5023 alt.politics.white-power:7029 alt.revisionism:11994 talk.politics.guns:215118

Elias Hall-Door Agustsson ([email protected]) writes:
> In [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:

(snip)

>>Yet, somehow, it’s okay to inflict multi-racialism on “the rest of us”, as
>>if multi-racialism is somehow “normal”, and racial homogeneity is a
>>departure from it?
>
> Les, no-one is trying to impose multi-racialism on you. In fact, such a
> manoeuvre is impossible, the concept is ludicrous and completely idiotic.

Really? Hell, maybe someone should inform the government of Canada that
they’re accomplishing the impossible, then. Maybe, while they’re
performing miracles, they can solve the debt problem, too.

> Les, has it ever occurred to you that you can choose where you live

Limited only by money, day-dreamer.

> and with whom you breed?

I should frigging well hope so!

> And that other people can make such decisions as well?

Ah, an anarchist. Really, Elly, save your hyper-individualism. It’ll
make NO headway here.

You know, it always boggles the mind to see these hyper-individualists,
with their egotistical garbage. I’d like to see how long they would have
lasted at the “Million Man March”, with their “Racism is DUMB!” message.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:39 PDT 1995
Article: 7094 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy the spam queen! (was: Crazy on anything!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:11:15 GMT
Lines: 45
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7094 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5067 alt.discrimination:37739

Crazy Jeanine Kowalewski ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:

> * > * Free time: you have too much.
> * > * What you know: next to nothing.
> * >
> * > You are still speculating, but this is a step up from your usual blatent
> * > lies.
> *
> * So, are you admitting that I’m RIGHT?
>
> Not at all. You are wrong on both counts. Now, if you said that you got
> this information about me from the Hiddenbrooke Historical Society, we’d
> know that it is a factoid that you pulled out of your ass. Since you
> merely guessing about how I spend my time and what I know, we know that
> you’re just blowing brown smoke.

No, I think I’m right… closer to home than you’d like to admit.

(snip)

> * > * Well, lurkers here can either read your enormous flap-doodle, or they can
> * > * read my replies to your rambling rants, where I’ve parsed out the
> * > * extraneous crap.
> * >
> * > Yeah, they can also write to me. I get lots of e-mail about my posts, Les.
> *
> * Well, isn’t that just DUCKY? Do you think that I’m losing sleep, thinking
> * about how much e-mail you get? Hint, Crazy: all the liberal whimps can
> * write to you for all I care.
>
> Ah, but what if they’re not all libs, Les? I correspond with many people.

“… but what if…?” Typical liberal response. Well, I can guarantee
you one thing, Crazy: they’re NOT people that I care about.

Les

who can’t believe that out of millions of sperm, Crazy was the fastest


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:40 PDT 1995
Article: 7096 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected] <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:20:30 GMT
Lines: 50
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7096 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5069 alt.revisionism:12067 talk.politics.guns:215255

Keith Morrison ([email protected]) writes:
> In article [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>>>
>>> Les, no-one is trying to impose multi-racialism on you. In fact, such a
>>> manoeuvre is impossible, the concept is ludicrous and completely idiotic.
>>
>>Really? Hell, maybe someone should inform the government of Canada that
>>they’re accomplishing the impossible, then. Maybe, while they’re
>>performing miracles, they can solve the debt problem, too.
>
> Mayhaps you could tell us when multiCULTURISM became multi-
> RACIALISM because I’m really kind of foggy on when that change
> occurred.

That doesn’t surprise me, since you seem to be kind of foggy on most things.

Try 1965, when the nice government decided that we’d, henceforth, have
more immigration from non-white countries, and less from Europe.

> Does this mean you think the French, Spanish, Germans,
> Norwegians and Swedish are not in the same racial category as
> English-speaking Canadians because they recieve money from the
> Multiculturalism, have their activities supported and promoted, etc
> etc?

Keith, receiving a little money to celebrate one’s heritage is
CONSIDERABLY different than being actively encouraged to come here in the
first place, and rapidly ghettoize sections of (mainly) three cities.

> Come to think of it, there’s an Irish festival in Miramichi
> and the Highland festival in Cape Breton that also have recieved
> some support from that department. Does this mean the Irish and
> Scottish are also seperate races?

Gee, Keithy, for someone who just lectured me on jumping to conclusions
when people make statements, you sure seem to be doing it just fine yourself.

FYI, I do NOT consider receiving government money indicative of racial
uniquness. But to suggest that Irish, Scottish, Germans, etc., are in the
same category as East Indians, Asians, Somalians, etc., is pure nonsense,
although about what can be expected from someone like you who thinks that
multi-racialism is just hunky-dory, as long as it favours non-whites.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:41 PDT 1995
Article: 7097 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Where we choose to live… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:25:34 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7097 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5070 alt.revisionism:12068 talk.politics.guns:215256

Nosy ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:

(snip)

> < You sound pretty sure of yourself there, but I wonder if reality supports > < your assertion. >
> Well, Japan exists, and could be called “racially homogeneous”.

Nosy, Nosy, Nosy…

Japan is full of Japanese. More, the Japanese have a STRONG dislike of
anyone NOT Japanese, especially _gaijin_, (er, that’s us).

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:41 PDT 1995
Article: 7099 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Killing fast, or killing slow… (was: Where we choose to live…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:33:20 GMT
Lines: 25
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7099 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5072 alt.revisionism:12071 talk.politics.guns:215257

Nosy ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
> < william c anderson ([email protected]) writes: (snip) > < > I addressed this above. Again, I think a desire to associate only with
> < > people like oneself is a sign of insecurity.
>
> < And I think that wanting to mix it up, like a big Coca-Cola commercial, is > < a sign of insecurity. So? >
> So Anderson isn’t advocating killing to advance his point of view.
>
Sure he is. Maybe he just doesn’t realize it. Check out the UN
Declaration on Genocide. Inhibiting another group’s reproduction is
considered genocide. To put it into reality for you, non-whites
populating the earth with THEIR offspring, so that responsible Whites say,
“I don’t want to bring children into this world.”, is a form of genocide.

Les

“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:42 PDT 1995
Article: 7100 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les’s history lesson for the day
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:43:10 GMT
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7100 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5073 alt.revisionism:12072 talk.politics.guns:215258

Michael P. Stein ([email protected]) writes:
> In article ,
> Les Griswold wrote:
>>Oh, there was a racist uprising sometime in the past, in the United
>>States? Wanna let me in on this?
>
> I know how much you would want to be let in on it, but unfortunately
> the Civil War ended some one hundred thirty years ago. I know you live in
> the past, but it’s _still_ too late for you to enlist.
>
> For your information, the racists lost.

For YOUR information, Beer-Stein, the War Between the States wasn’t about
race, or anything like that. It was about the Southern states CEDING from
the United States, and the Federalists saying “No way!” Also, it wasn’t a
“civil” war, because the Confederate States and the Union were NOT the
same country during the conflict. Get it?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:21:43 PDT 1995
Article: 7113 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 13:39:04 GMT
Lines: 53
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.guns:215275 alt.politics.white-power:7113 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5080 alt.discrimination:37743 alt.revisionism:12081 alt.skinheads:5123

Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
>
>> > As opposed to the thousands of people in positions of publicity and great
>> > power who are NOT Jewish, I guess. You’ve named 10 people in government,
>> > some of whom I have serious doubts ARE ACTUALLY JEWISH.
>>
>> Oh, yes? Which ones, doubting-Sarah? Please, share your omniscience with
>> us.
>
> Omniscience? Read again, Les. I said I HAVE DOUBTS. That doesn’t make me
> omniscient. It makes me QUESTION the above list. And since there was not
> one iota of proof that any of the above ARE Jewish, I believe I am
> entitled to have doubts until evidence is produced.

So, tell us what your doubts are.

Of course, you won’t. Leaving us all hanging gives you an easy out,
because you can say, “I doubt it!” whenever someone makes a claim with
which you disagree.

(snip)

>> > Really? Here’s one hot tip for you: Jews ARE WHITE PEOPLE. Sorry to break
>> > it to ya, but we are. And most of us look just like you, whether our names
>> > “sound” Jewish, or not.
>>
>> Amazing. We apparently have so much trouble defining “White”, but some
>> jew can come along and tell us all about it.
>
> That’s right, Les. YOU have trouble defining “White,” I don’t.

True enough. Your definition of “white” appears to be “anyone I like”.

> And by the
> way, the first paragraph in the above was NOT written by me. If you’re
> going to quote, please make certain you attribute things to the right
> people. You’ve placed two paragraphs out of context together, and that’s
> despicable. It’s even beneath a piece of slime like you.

Poor baby. Blame the newsreader for attributing your drivel to the name
that appears above it. Stop whining and moaning like a wounded diva.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Sun Oct 22 12:25:11 PDT 1995
Article: 5123 of alt.skinheads
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 13:39:04 GMT
Lines: 53
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.guns:215275 alt.politics.white-power:7113 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5080 alt.discrimination:37743 alt.revisionism:12081 alt.skinheads:5123

Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
>
>> > As opposed to the thousands of people in positions of publicity and great
>> > power who are NOT Jewish, I guess. You’ve named 10 people in government,
>> > some of whom I have serious doubts ARE ACTUALLY JEWISH.
>>
>> Oh, yes? Which ones, doubting-Sarah? Please, share your omniscience with
>> us.
>
> Omniscience? Read again, Les. I said I HAVE DOUBTS. That doesn’t make me
> omniscient. It makes me QUESTION the above list. And since there was not
> one iota of proof that any of the above ARE Jewish, I believe I am
> entitled to have doubts until evidence is produced.

So, tell us what your doubts are.

Of course, you won’t. Leaving us all hanging gives you an easy out,
because you can say, “I doubt it!” whenever someone makes a claim with
which you disagree.

(snip)

>> > Really? Here’s one hot tip for you: Jews ARE WHITE PEOPLE. Sorry to break
>> > it to ya, but we are. And most of us look just like you, whether our names
>> > “sound” Jewish, or not.
>>
>> Amazing. We apparently have so much trouble defining “White”, but some
>> jew can come along and tell us all about it.
>
> That’s right, Les. YOU have trouble defining “White,” I don’t.

True enough. Your definition of “white” appears to be “anyone I like”.

> And by the
> way, the first paragraph in the above was NOT written by me. If you’re
> going to quote, please make certain you attribute things to the right
> people. You’ve placed two paragraphs out of context together, and that’s
> despicable. It’s even beneath a piece of slime like you.

Poor baby. Blame the newsreader for attributing your drivel to the name
that appears above it. Stop whining and moaning like a wounded diva.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Tue Oct 24 08:14:38 PDT 1995
Article: 12209 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Caring for children… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 09:41:34 GMT
Lines: 49
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7252 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5194 alt.revisionism:12209

Marty Kelley ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

>> > How about this, instead–I care no LESS for others’ children than I do
>> > for my own–and I care a great deal for my own.

Moi:
>> Then, you’re lying. It is impossible to care for other children as much
>> as you care for your own. Do you regularly sweep the bus terminals and
>> train stations, taking home every urchin that you find?
>>
> Actually, Mr. Griswold, I meant my answer in the same metaphorical,
> political sense that Evelyn Hill brought up the analogy (And it’s
> pretty metaphorical, really–I don’t even HAVE kids, yet–if you want to
> call that a lie, too, go ahead…). In other words, I don’t think that other
> people’s children should have any fewer political or social rights than my
> own would.

“Political or social rights”. Ha. What use have starving urchins for
“political or social rights”? Call me a dreamer, but I would think that
malnourished, exploited , abused children wouldn’t give a rat’s ass about
“political or social rights”, but would care a great deal about feeding
themselves, or stopping their maltreatment. So the question remains: do
you live up to your high ideals?

> In the most literal sense, of
> course, it is impossible to treat everyone the same–Nobody can care for
> everyone’s children, but we can damn sure make sure that racist bastards
> don’t try and undercut the rights and dignity of children who racists
> like you consider “inferior.”

It’s funny, it really is. You use “racists” as a convenient excuse for
backing out of what you say.

Pah. You remind me of those three-sprinkle Christians who drop some spare
change into a UNICEF box and think that they’re making a difference. Your
starry-eyed talk is nothing more than a palliative for your apathy.

> Gee, and I just remarked to Keith Morrison how you’d never responded to
> any of my posts–how very ironic.

Yep, that’s me. Ironic as hell.

Les

“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Tue Oct 24 08:14:39 PDT 1995
Article: 12390 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!soap.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 01:51:23 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7359 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5295 alt.discrimination:37849 alt.revisionism:12390 talk.politics.guns:215820

Jamie McCarthy ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> See my earlier post, also emailed to Ms. Hill, on love, responsibility,
> parental bonds, skin color, and sanity.

What is it with you self-important little turds, that you have to e-mail
your posts, as well as spamming them publicly? If someone is ignoring
you, do you really think that sending them e-mail is going to make them
reply to you? C’mon, tell us, guys, the suspense is KILLING us!

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Tue Oct 24 08:14:40 PDT 1995
Article: 12401 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Caring for children… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:10:10 GMT
Lines: 45
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5303 alt.politics.white-power:7371 alt.revisionism:12401

Marty Kelley ([email protected]) writes:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, Les Griswold wrote:

(snip)

>> > Actually, Mr. Griswold, I meant my answer in the same metaphorical,
>> > political sense that Evelyn Hill brought up the analogy (And it’s
>> > pretty metaphorical, really–I don’t even HAVE kids, yet–if you want to
>> > call that a lie, too, go ahead…). In other words, I don’t think that other
>> > people’s children should have any fewer political or social rights than my
>> > own would.
>>
>> “Political or social rights”. Ha. What use have starving urchins for
>> “political or social rights”? Call me a dreamer, but I would think that
>> malnourished, exploited , abused children wouldn’t give a rat’s ass about
>> “political or social rights”, but would care a great deal about feeding
>> themselves, or stopping their maltreatment. So the question remains: do
>> you live up to your high ideals?
>
> As best I can, given limited resources–I support Tucson’s shelter for
> abused children (Casa de los Ninos), did some volunteer work remodeling
> the children’s shelter in Flagstaff, and have done a lot of free
> babysitting for friends. Moreover, every other month, I donate blood
> specifically for pediatric surgery–my blood happens to lack an antibody
> that most adults’ blood has, and so it’s in high demand for transfusions
> for infants. I’m nearing my fourth gallon.
>
> On a more political front, I make regular donations to Amnesty
> International, which fights human rights abuses, Child Labor among them.

And I make regular donations to the National Alliance. So?

> Have I given everything I have to the poor? No. But that wasn’t
> the question that Evelyn Hill raised–

Hey, Marty: I’M NOT EVELYN! *I* am raising the question NOW: WHY
HAVEN’T you given everything you own to the poor?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Tue Oct 24 08:14:41 PDT 1995
Article: 12408 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les’s history lesson for the day
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 09:43:37 GMT
Lines: 33
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7382 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5312 alt.revisionism:12408 talk.politics.guns:215884

Sarah Flemming ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Michael P. Stein) wrote:
>
>>In article ,
>>Les Griswold wrote:
>>>Oh, there was a racist uprising sometime in the past, in the United
>>>States? Wanna let me in on this?
>
>> I know how much you would want to be let in on it, but unfortunately
>>the Civil War ended some one hundred thirty years ago. I know you live in
>>the past, but it’s _still_ too late for you to enlist.
>
>> For your information, the racists lost.
>
> Excuse me, Mike, I think that you and I read a differant version of US
> History. Mine made it clear the Civil War was about State’s Rights
> and the fact that the federal government was trying make the States
> give up thier rights. Racism wasn’t a reason for the war.
>
> Sarah Flemming

What you have to understand, Sarah, is that Mikey and his ilk feel more at
home arguing about the SEMANTICS of the War of Secession, 1861-1865, than
they do addressing the fact that it was a fratricidal war.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:10:59 PDT 1995
Article: 12549 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!en.com!news.his.com!news.cais.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:28:18 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:37923 alt.politics.white-power:7481 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5422 alt.revisionism:12549

Jeffrey G. Brown ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> Posted and emailed (though Griswold seems to be avoiding answering my
> posts, likely because he has trouble refuting the facts concerning his
> utterences)

No, I ignore your e-mail because you’re an ignorant little slob who
apparently doesn’t get the message, after all these months, that his
pomposity is not well-received.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:11:00 PDT 1995
Article: 12567 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!news.kei.com!news.ece.uc.edu!babbage.ece.uc.edu!news.gryffin.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Caring for children… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:45:12 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5439 alt.politics.white-power:7498 alt.revisionism:12567

Mark Van Alstine ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> Then, you’re lying. It is impossible to care for other children as much
>> as you care for your own.
>
> Why is this impossible? Do you perhaps have clinical evidence of this?
> (Something preferebley not dredged up from a nea-Nazi tract. Or statists
> taken from a non-existant report.) Or is this yet another one of your
> pompous opinions?

Ah, yes, the “I don’t believe it unless it comes from a source *I* will
approve of!” argument. It’s simple, Saltine, just ask anyone with kids
whether it’s possible to care for other kids as much as you care for your own.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:39 PDT 1995
Article: 5174 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <46e[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 09:23:13 GMT
Lines: 34
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7227 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5174 alt.discrimination:37784 alt.activism:9834 soc.culture.african.american:106589

Emma Tafoya ([email protected]) writes:
> First of all, I believe the MMM was a very powerful statement that did
> scare many white people–they literally shut down Washington for a day.

So what’s your point? Who in their right minds WOULDN’T be scared of a
million negroes in one place? Bill Clinton, strangely, was in Texas the
day of the MMM. Neat how your own president didn’t want to be in the
neighbourhood.

> Also, it was mentioned that these black men should get a job and stop
> whining. Well perhaps they would if the white men and their institutions
> of racism would stop taking from our communities, what little assistance
> we have. I’m talking specifically about programs like Affirmative
> Action. Furthermore, in response to someone who had said that people
> should be judged on their actions and not on race, I can only say you
> need to wake up. The fact remains that the people of color in our
> society have a unique experience that a white person can neither
> understand or relate to. Sure it would be nice if we saw each other as
> equals, but I’m tired of being pressured to lose my identity and
> assimilate in order to be your equal amd live comfortably in white
> America. Yo soy Chicana and shall continue to be, until the day I die
> and there’s no force in this world that can make me deny that.

Whatever. This is truly incoherent babble, but I guess what you’re saying
is, you’re not going to give up your cherished victim status?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:40 PDT 1995
Article: 5175 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Political prisoners… (was: Million Man March)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 09:26:29 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7228 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5175 alt.discrimination:37785 alt.activism:9835 soc.culture.african.american:106590

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:
> Brian & Lori Henderson ([email protected]) wrote:
> : [email protected] (Fragano Ledgister) wrote:
>
> : >: We have no political prisoners in America.
>
> : >Your evidence for this assertion?
>
> : We do not take political prisoners in this country. Please name one
> : person in prison who is there for the crime of disagreeing with the
> : government.
>
> : I thought so.
>
> please name one government that admits to putting people in
> prison for political differences.

Tell us, Lane, what difference does it make that China ADMITS to putting
people in prison for political differences, or not? They still do it.
Same with most governments in Africa – who CARES whether they ADMIT it or not?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:41 PDT 1995
Article: 5176 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Black pride? Where?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 10:02:42 GMT
Lines: 19
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:37786 alt.politics.white-power:7232 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5176

This really cracks me up. WHAT, EXACTLY, do negroes have to be proud of?
“Well, there were Great Civilizations ™ in Africa before you WHITE
DEVILS came along and wiped ’em out!” the wackiest negroes will say. “So
where’s the evidence?” we ask, to which negroes respond with either total
silence, or even loopier claims. So, having demolished that myth, we next
hear, “Well, um, er, African Americans invented MANY THINGS that you WHITE
DEVILS never could have!” Again, when asked to back up their
way-out-there claims, they answer with either total silence, or really
retarded crap like “An Af-Am invented the telephone!” (gawd, did I laugh
when I saw THAT one!) So, negroes didn’t create, or even live in, Great
Civilizations ™ in pre-Whitey Africa, and they didn’t invent diddley
(well, except for peanut butter). So what’s left?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:42 PDT 1995
Article: 5194 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Caring for children… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 09:41:34 GMT
Lines: 49
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7252 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5194 alt.revisionism:12209

Marty Kelley ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

>> > How about this, instead–I care no LESS for others’ children than I do
>> > for my own–and I care a great deal for my own.

Moi:
>> Then, you’re lying. It is impossible to care for other children as much
>> as you care for your own. Do you regularly sweep the bus terminals and
>> train stations, taking home every urchin that you find?
>>
> Actually, Mr. Griswold, I meant my answer in the same metaphorical,
> political sense that Evelyn Hill brought up the analogy (And it’s
> pretty metaphorical, really–I don’t even HAVE kids, yet–if you want to
> call that a lie, too, go ahead…). In other words, I don’t think that other
> people’s children should have any fewer political or social rights than my
> own would.

“Political or social rights”. Ha. What use have starving urchins for
“political or social rights”? Call me a dreamer, but I would think that
malnourished, exploited , abused children wouldn’t give a rat’s ass about
“political or social rights”, but would care a great deal about feeding
themselves, or stopping their maltreatment. So the question remains: do
you live up to your high ideals?

> In the most literal sense, of
> course, it is impossible to treat everyone the same–Nobody can care for
> everyone’s children, but we can damn sure make sure that racist bastards
> don’t try and undercut the rights and dignity of children who racists
> like you consider “inferior.”

It’s funny, it really is. You use “racists” as a convenient excuse for
backing out of what you say.

Pah. You remind me of those three-sprinkle Christians who drop some spare
change into a UNICEF box and think that they’re making a difference. Your
starry-eyed talk is nothing more than a palliative for your apathy.

> Gee, and I just remarked to Keith Morrison how you’d never responded to
> any of my posts–how very ironic.

Yep, that’s me. Ironic as hell.

Les

“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:43 PDT 1995
Article: 5295 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!soap.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 01:51:23 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7359 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5295 alt.discrimination:37849 alt.revisionism:12390 talk.politics.guns:215820

Jamie McCarthy ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> See my earlier post, also emailed to Ms. Hill, on love, responsibility,
> parental bonds, skin color, and sanity.

What is it with you self-important little turds, that you have to e-mail
your posts, as well as spamming them publicly? If someone is ignoring
you, do you really think that sending them e-mail is going to make them
reply to you? C’mon, tell us, guys, the suspense is KILLING us!

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:43 PDT 1995
Article: 5298 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!news.uoregon.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!tube.news.pipex.net!pipex!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!sgigate.sgi.com!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: 3rd World “qualifications”
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:02:58 GMT
Lines: 12
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5298 alt.politics.white-power:7364 alt.discrimination:37851

3rd World immigrants bitch and moan that their “qualifications” aren’t
“raspected” here in Canada (I’ll bet that much the same goes on in the
U.S.), and that they must therefore get service-sector jobs. Well,
considering that eye surgery is done with RAZOR BLADES in India, is it any
wonder that their “qualifications” aren’t “recognized”?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:44 PDT 1995
Article: 5302 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.activism,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:16:57 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:37856 alt.activism:10043 alt.politics.white-power:7370 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5302 soc.culture.african.american:106648

Brian & Lori Henderson ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Fragano Ledgister) wrote:
>
>>Peter Allan Bucy ([email protected]) wrote:
>>: d
>>: >> Louis Farrakhan said today that he wants all blacks to be released
>>: >>from prison.
>
>>: >And this is also wrong. He stated he wanted all *POLITICAL PRISONERS*
>>: >released from jail. The rest, out when time for them to come out.
>
>>: We have no political prisoners in America.
>
>>Your evidence for this assertion?
>
> We do not take political prisoners in this country. Please name one
> person in prison who is there for the crime of disagreeing with the
> government.

David Lane, Gary Lee Yarbrough, Bruce Carrol Pierce, Richard
Scutari… oh, but I guess they don’t count, because they’re WHITE guys…

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:45 PDT 1995
Article: 5303 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Caring for children… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:10:10 GMT
Lines: 45
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5303 alt.politics.white-power:7371 alt.revisionism:12401

Marty Kelley ([email protected]) writes:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, Les Griswold wrote:

(snip)

>> > Actually, Mr. Griswold, I meant my answer in the same metaphorical,
>> > political sense that Evelyn Hill brought up the analogy (And it’s
>> > pretty metaphorical, really–I don’t even HAVE kids, yet–if you want to
>> > call that a lie, too, go ahead…). In other words, I don’t think that other
>> > people’s children should have any fewer political or social rights than my
>> > own would.
>>
>> “Political or social rights”. Ha. What use have starving urchins for
>> “political or social rights”? Call me a dreamer, but I would think that
>> malnourished, exploited , abused children wouldn’t give a rat’s ass about
>> “political or social rights”, but would care a great deal about feeding
>> themselves, or stopping their maltreatment. So the question remains: do
>> you live up to your high ideals?
>
> As best I can, given limited resources–I support Tucson’s shelter for
> abused children (Casa de los Ninos), did some volunteer work remodeling
> the children’s shelter in Flagstaff, and have done a lot of free
> babysitting for friends. Moreover, every other month, I donate blood
> specifically for pediatric surgery–my blood happens to lack an antibody
> that most adults’ blood has, and so it’s in high demand for transfusions
> for infants. I’m nearing my fourth gallon.
>
> On a more political front, I make regular donations to Amnesty
> International, which fights human rights abuses, Child Labor among them.

And I make regular donations to the National Alliance. So?

> Have I given everything I have to the poor? No. But that wasn’t
> the question that Evelyn Hill raised–

Hey, Marty: I’M NOT EVELYN! *I* am raising the question NOW: WHY
HAVEN’T you given everything you own to the poor?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:46 PDT 1995
Article: 5304 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Black pride? Where?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:11:56 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5304 alt.politics.white-power:7372

aria ([email protected]) writes:
> So what’s left?
>>
>> Les
>>
>
> michael jordan, bryant gumbel, and ru paul.

You were doing O.K. until you mentioned that faggot ru paul.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:47 PDT 1995
Article: 5312 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les’s history lesson for the day
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 09:43:37 GMT
Lines: 33
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7382 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5312 alt.revisionism:12408 talk.politics.guns:215884

Sarah Flemming ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Michael P. Stein) wrote:
>
>>In article ,
>>Les Griswold wrote:
>>>Oh, there was a racist uprising sometime in the past, in the United
>>>States? Wanna let me in on this?
>
>> I know how much you would want to be let in on it, but unfortunately
>>the Civil War ended some one hundred thirty years ago. I know you live in
>>the past, but it’s _still_ too late for you to enlist.
>
>> For your information, the racists lost.
>
> Excuse me, Mike, I think that you and I read a differant version of US
> History. Mine made it clear the Civil War was about State’s Rights
> and the fact that the federal government was trying make the States
> give up thier rights. Racism wasn’t a reason for the war.
>
> Sarah Flemming

What you have to understand, Sarah, is that Mikey and his ilk feel more at
home arguing about the SEMANTICS of the War of Secession, 1861-1865, than
they do addressing the fact that it was a fratricidal war.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:48 PDT 1995
Article: 5315 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 09:47:24 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7383 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5315 alt.discrimination:37860 alt.activism:10072 soc.culture.african.american:106652

Dowdy Jackson ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> And who ASKED YOU to support the cause(s) of black people ? This is one reason
> why the MMM was so powerful. The pre-approval of whites was a non issue. It
> was black people doing for black people without looking to the white community
> for approval on ANY level.

“… black people doing for black people without looking to the white
community…”.

For a change.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:48 PDT 1995
Article: 5316 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 10:09:42 GMT
Lines: 21
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7384 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5316 alt.discrimination:37861 alt.activism:10073 soc.culture.african.american:106653

WAYNE JOHNSON ([email protected]) writes:
> Bruce Forest writes:
>
>>Explain to me how someone like myself, the grandson of Polish Jewish
>>Holocaust survivors is responsible for the crimes of slave-owners from
>>Mississippi 150 years ago?
>
> You walk in a garden, tilled by slaves, and fertilized with their
> blood.

Wow!

So now the blood of “Af-Ams” made good fertilizer? Far out!

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:49 PDT 1995
Article: 5317 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Damn I wish Abdrool would shut up! (was: Damn I wish I had A scanner!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 09:58:23 GMT
Lines: 59
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7385 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5317 alt.discrimination:37862

Abdrool Kama ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (NutLess Griswold) wrote:

>>This really cracks me up. WHAT, EXACTLY, do negroes have to be proud of?
>>”Well, there were Great Civilizations ™ in Africa before you WHITE
>>DEVILS came along and wiped ’em out!” the wackiest negroes will say. “So
>>where’s the evidence?” we ask, to which negroes respond with either total
>>silence, or even loopier claims. So, having demolished that myth, we next
>>hear, “Well, um, er, African Americans invented MANY THINGS that you WHITE
>>DEVILS never could have!” Again, when asked to back up their
>>way-out-there claims, they answer with either total silence, or really
>>retarded crap like “An Af-Am invented the telephone!” (gawd, did I laugh
>>when I saw THAT one!) So, negroes didn’t create, or even live in, Great
>>Civilizations ™ in pre-Whitey Africa, and they didn’t invent diddley
>>(well, except for peanut butter). So what’s left?
>
> Yeah.. a bunch of red devils gnawing on each other bones before the Romans
> brought civilization to their frozen ass.

That’s “assES”, jackanape. Cripes, for a university student (snicker) you
don’t know shit about grammar.

> When will you cave bitch ever learn? I would like to scan and post the
> pictures of the Jenne great mosque, Kano, Zimbabwe,

I would like you to, as well, so that we could SEE the Arab-built marvels
that you claim were built by the negroes.

> ethiopian alphabet,

We’re not talking about Ethiopians, who are a Hamitic race from EASTERN
Africa. We’re talking about Gold-Coast blue-gums.

> Songhai imperial dresses,

ROTFL!!! You would compare that to the wonderful and intricate jewelry
and personal adornments made by the Celts?

> Egyptian irrigation accomplishments etc…

Hoo, boy… the Egyptians weren’t negroes, arsewipe, so anything they
accomplished CANNOT be claimed as “negro achievements”.

> … Too bad you’re more interested in rhetoric than constructive debate.

WHAT?!? This from the biggest goof on the ‘Net? The one who calls White
people “devils”, who SERIOUSLY thinks that some wretched nigger kingdom
can compare to ANYTHING that the White race has ever built?
Pot-kettle-black, boy.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:50 PDT 1995
Article: 5428 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: 3rd World “qualifications”
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 01:27:31 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7488 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5428 alt.discrimination:37929

Mark Staloff ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
> : 3rd World immigrants bitch and moan that their “qualifications” aren’t
> : “raspected” here in Canada (I’ll bet that much the same goes on in the
> : U.S.), and that they must therefore get service-sector jobs. Well,
> : considering that eye surgery is done with RAZOR BLADES in India, is it any
> : wonder that their “qualifications” aren’t “recognized”?
>
> Hmm… well, American hospitals would be in real trouble if all of our
> foreign nurses decided to pack it up and take their skills back to the
> Philippines or the Caribbean. Just an observation.

Really? Wouldn’t it be nice to see if that would be so?

> Mark
> Not to mention Jewish doctors… did I mention Jewish doctors? Well,
> then don’t forget Jewish doctors…

Jew doctors seem to concentrate in two areas: abortion, and cosmetic
surgery (so they can give nose jobs to other jews on the cheap).

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:51 PDT 1995
Article: 5432 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Last posting
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 01:51:47 GMT
Lines: 55

swan ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> But who is to say that if I stay, my account won’t be hacked again? That
> damage will be done in my name? I am a warrior and I guard my weapons
> carefully. Someone took MY sword and used it in a vicious and
> DISHONORABLE way! Someone who identified as a White racist! I am angry
> and I feel violated!

So you deal with it by coming on here and whining about it? Some warrior.

(snip)

> If you are proud of your race (and you SHOULD be!), then ACT like a
> MEMBER of it! You cannot just SAY “I am a great and worthy person.” and
> have people believe it. It is like a five-year-old saying “I’m all grown
> up!”. It’s just not true. And people can SEE that. If you BEHAVE in a
> manner WORTHY of your heritage, you will be SEEN as such!

… or someone claiming to be a warrior, when they’re patently not.

> Whites. You are honorable. You have a racial identity that carries years
> of progress, triumph and success. Behave like the noble people you ARE!
> If you stoop to the degrading shrill tactics of the brainless ranter, you
> will be seen as idiots and a**holes. And you will deserve it. Such people
> are the REAL “race traitors”! They shamew the rest of us!
>
> Blacks. Your heritage goes back to proud civilizations! You created the
> first universities and you carry the pride and dignity of people who have
> had to bear great loads. Do not demean the dignity of the Masai, the
> courage of the Zulu and the honor of the enslaved men and women who
> refused to break! Stand tall and be an exemplar of all that is good and
> true in your heritage. All HUMANITY traces its roots back to YOU! Do not
> show yourselves as no better than the racist loudmouths who taunt you!

Here’s where you’re making a big mistake. By buying into all of this
negrophile crap, you’re entering the fight with both hands tied behind
your back, and both feet hobbled.

(snip)

> Goodbye.

Ta-ta.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:52 PDT 1995
Article: 5438 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!news.kei.com!news.ece.uc.edu!babbage.ece.uc.edu!news.gryffin.com!chi-news.cic.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: 3rd World “qualifications”
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:18:04 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7497 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5438 alt.discrimination:37934

Jeffrey G. Brown ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> 3rd World immigrants bitch and moan that their “qualifications” aren’t
>> “raspected” here in Canada (I’ll bet that much the same goes on in the
>> U.S.), and that they must therefore get service-sector jobs. Well,
>> considering that eye surgery is done with RAZOR BLADES in India, is it any
>> wonder that their “qualifications” aren’t “recognized”?
>
> You are well known for making up your “facts”, Griswold. Have you _any_
> documentation of this claim?
>
> For that matter, how do the tools used by doctors in any third world
> country equate to a thorough assessment of their qualifications?

Leave it to Jeffrey, folks, to defend the indefensible. If I was anyone
else, I WOULDN’T go to Mr. Braun for advice on whether to get that
operation or not…

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:53 PDT 1995
Article: 5445 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Political prisoners… (was: Million Man March)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:42:07 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5445 alt.politics.white-power:7503 alt.discrimination:37938 alt.activism:10372 soc.culture.african.american:106721

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> : > please name one government that *-admits-* to putting people in
> : > prison for political differences.
>
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
> : Tell us, Lane, what difference does it make that China ADMITS to putting
> : people in prison for political differences, or not? They still do it.
> : Same with most governments in Africa – who CARES whether they
> : ADMIT it or not?
>
> don’t you worry your little head about it, les. if you really
> want to understand the conversation, try re-reading it about 600
> times.

Typical Lane Singer response: “I just got my ass burned, BIG TIME, on the
debate about politcal prisoners, so I’ll switch to dumb-ass statements to
try and throw him off the scent!” And cross-posted to FIVE boards, no
less! Are you sure you wanna do stuff like that, Lane? I mean, your
reputation is already low.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:37:54 PDT 1995
Article: 5467 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:35:24 GMT
Lines: 45
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7526 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5467 alt.discrimination:37952 alt.activism:10418 soc.culture.african.american:106732

WAYNE JOHNSON ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold writes:
>>
>>WAYNE JOHNSON ([email protected]) writes:
>>> Bruce Forest writes:
>>>
>>>>Explain to me how someone like myself, the grandson of Polish Jewish
>>>>Holocaust survivors is responsible for the crimes of slave-owners
> from
>>>>Mississippi 150 years ago?
>>>
>>> You walk in a garden, tilled by slaves, and fertilized with their
>>> blood.
>>
>>Wow!
>>
>>So now the blood of “Af-Ams” made good fertilizer? Far out!
>>–
>>”The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready
>>for battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
>> — Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer
>
> Hey, turkey! Bruce was trying to cop out. When his ancestors showed
> up in 1939, they could eat, sleep go to school, pee, and get a job
> where black people couldn’t, and black people built America with their
> blood – as did a whole lot of white people who were here before, too.

Black labour, White intelligence. It’s as simple as that.

> You’re an ignorant schmuck, and this ain’t Strabo’s best quote – it’s
> just one that makes you think a bunch of Scots savages were interesting
> to a sophisticated Roman who had kicked ass all the way across Europe,
> and was standing on the north shore of Scotland as he wrote.

Scottish “savages” are a lot more interesting than African savages.

(snip)

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:38:52 PDT 1995
Article: 7227 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 09:23:13 GMT
Lines: 34
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7227 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5174 alt.discrimination:37784 alt.activism:9834 soc.culture.african.american:106589

Emma Tafoya ([email protected]) writes:
> First of all, I believe the MMM was a very powerful statement that did
> scare many white people–they literally shut down Washington for a day.

So what’s your point? Who in their right minds WOULDN’T be scared of a
million negroes in one place? Bill Clinton, strangely, was in Texas the
day of the MMM. Neat how your own president didn’t want to be in the
neighbourhood.

> Also, it was mentioned that these black men should get a job and stop
> whining. Well perhaps they would if the white men and their institutions
> of racism would stop taking from our communities, what little assistance
> we have. I’m talking specifically about programs like Affirmative
> Action. Furthermore, in response to someone who had said that people
> should be judged on their actions and not on race, I can only say you
> need to wake up. The fact remains that the people of color in our
> society have a unique experience that a white person can neither
> understand or relate to. Sure it would be nice if we saw each other as
> equals, but I’m tired of being pressured to lose my identity and
> assimilate in order to be your equal amd live comfortably in white
> America. Yo soy Chicana and shall continue to be, until the day I die
> and there’s no force in this world that can make me deny that.

Whatever. This is truly incoherent babble, but I guess what you’re saying
is, you’re not going to give up your cherished victim status?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:38:53 PDT 1995
Article: 7228 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Political prisoners… (was: Million Man March)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 09:26:29 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7228 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5175 alt.discrimination:37785 alt.activism:9835 soc.culture.african.american:106590

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:
> Brian & Lori Henderson ([email protected]) wrote:
> : [email protected] (Fragano Ledgister) wrote:
>
> : >: We have no political prisoners in America.
>
> : >Your evidence for this assertion?
>
> : We do not take political prisoners in this country. Please name one
> : person in prison who is there for the crime of disagreeing with the
> : government.
>
> : I thought so.
>
> please name one government that admits to putting people in
> prison for political differences.

Tell us, Lane, what difference does it make that China ADMITS to putting
people in prison for political differences, or not? They still do it.
Same with most governments in Africa – who CARES whether they ADMIT it or not?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:38:54 PDT 1995
Article: 7232 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Black pride? Where?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 10:02:42 GMT
Lines: 19
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:37786 alt.politics.white-power:7232 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5176

This really cracks me up. WHAT, EXACTLY, do negroes have to be proud of?
“Well, there were Great Civilizations ™ in Africa before you WHITE
DEVILS came along and wiped ’em out!” the wackiest negroes will say. “So
where’s the evidence?” we ask, to which negroes respond with either total
silence, or even loopier claims. So, having demolished that myth, we next
hear, “Well, um, er, African Americans invented MANY THINGS that you WHITE
DEVILS never could have!” Again, when asked to back up their
way-out-there claims, they answer with either total silence, or really
retarded crap like “An Af-Am invented the telephone!” (gawd, did I laugh
when I saw THAT one!) So, negroes didn’t create, or even live in, Great
Civilizations ™ in pre-Whitey Africa, and they didn’t invent diddley
(well, except for peanut butter). So what’s left?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:38:54 PDT 1995
Article: 7252 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Caring for children… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 09:41:34 GMT
Lines: 49
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7252 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5194 alt.revisionism:12209

Marty Kelley ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

>> > How about this, instead–I care no LESS for others’ children than I do
>> > for my own–and I care a great deal for my own.

Moi:
>> Then, you’re lying. It is impossible to care for other children as much
>> as you care for your own. Do you regularly sweep the bus terminals and
>> train stations, taking home every urchin that you find?
>>
> Actually, Mr. Griswold, I meant my answer in the same metaphorical,
> political sense that Evelyn Hill brought up the analogy (And it’s
> pretty metaphorical, really–I don’t even HAVE kids, yet–if you want to
> call that a lie, too, go ahead…). In other words, I don’t think that other
> people’s children should have any fewer political or social rights than my
> own would.

“Political or social rights”. Ha. What use have starving urchins for
“political or social rights”? Call me a dreamer, but I would think that
malnourished, exploited , abused children wouldn’t give a rat’s ass about
“political or social rights”, but would care a great deal about feeding
themselves, or stopping their maltreatment. So the question remains: do
you live up to your high ideals?

> In the most literal sense, of
> course, it is impossible to treat everyone the same–Nobody can care for
> everyone’s children, but we can damn sure make sure that racist bastards
> don’t try and undercut the rights and dignity of children who racists
> like you consider “inferior.”

It’s funny, it really is. You use “racists” as a convenient excuse for
backing out of what you say.

Pah. You remind me of those three-sprinkle Christians who drop some spare
change into a UNICEF box and think that they’re making a difference. Your
starry-eyed talk is nothing more than a palliative for your apathy.

> Gee, and I just remarked to Keith Morrison how you’d never responded to
> any of my posts–how very ironic.

Yep, that’s me. Ironic as hell.

Les

“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:38:55 PDT 1995
Article: 7253 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: George Graves and His ilk
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 09:48:00 GMT
Lines: 48

Darkjedi ([email protected]) writes:
> George:
>
> Savage primitive, perhaps, but my little admonition of you certainly got
> your attention didn’t it? My style of writing doesn’t normally include
> savagery but at least I admit it.

Pathetic. George notices your savagery and implied violence, and you snap
back with “I meant to do that!”

> Your kind has done much worse than this in its past so don’t condescend me.

Such as…? Dragging the savages out of the jungles of Africa and
teaching civilization to them? We’re seeing how much (or little) effect
that’s had in changing the essential nature of negroes now.

> Bigotry such as what I’ve seen you spew has done nothing but divide
> mankind and cause needless bloodshed.
> Also if you notice I did not threaten you directly but there are those
> out there both Black and White that would probably do this to you after
> hearing the “vomit that you spewed.”

Can you say “Cover your ass”?

> Is this necessary? I think not so
> you’d best honor your First Amendment right to free speech but be aware
> that everything that you say can and does have serious consequences.

This cuts both ways, smarty.

(snip)

> P.S. The Term “White Power” is just as much an Oxymoron to Blacks as
> “Black Power” is to Whites. Be proud of your race but keep in mind that
> I’m just as proud of mine and will fight just as vehemently for the
> Honor of my race as you do yours.

There’s nothing wrong with pride, be it White or black. However, when you
sorts exercise “Black Pride” by trying to pass off your fantasies as
reality, and darkening our names in the process, THAT’S where we draw
the line.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:38:56 PDT 1995
Article: 7359 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!soap.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 01:51:23 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7359 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5295 alt.discrimination:37849 alt.revisionism:12390 talk.politics.guns:215820

Jamie McCarthy ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> See my earlier post, also emailed to Ms. Hill, on love, responsibility,
> parental bonds, skin color, and sanity.

What is it with you self-important little turds, that you have to e-mail
your posts, as well as spamming them publicly? If someone is ignoring
you, do you really think that sending them e-mail is going to make them
reply to you? C’mon, tell us, guys, the suspense is KILLING us!

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:38:57 PDT 1995
Article: 7364 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!news.uoregon.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!tube.news.pipex.net!pipex!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!sgigate.sgi.com!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: 3rd World “qualifications”
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:02:58 GMT
Lines: 12
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5298 alt.politics.white-power:7364 alt.discrimination:37851

3rd World immigrants bitch and moan that their “qualifications” aren’t
“raspected” here in Canada (I’ll bet that much the same goes on in the
U.S.), and that they must therefore get service-sector jobs. Well,
considering that eye surgery is done with RAZOR BLADES in India, is it any
wonder that their “qualifications” aren’t “recognized”?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:38:58 PDT 1995
Article: 7370 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.activism,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:16:57 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:37856 alt.activism:10043 alt.politics.white-power:7370 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5302 soc.culture.african.american:106648

Brian & Lori Henderson ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Fragano Ledgister) wrote:
>
>>Peter Allan Bucy ([email protected]) wrote:
>>: d
>>: >> Louis Farrakhan said today that he wants all blacks to be released
>>: >>from prison.
>
>>: >And this is also wrong. He stated he wanted all *POLITICAL PRISONERS*
>>: >released from jail. The rest, out when time for them to come out.
>
>>: We have no political prisoners in America.
>
>>Your evidence for this assertion?
>
> We do not take political prisoners in this country. Please name one
> person in prison who is there for the crime of disagreeing with the
> government.

David Lane, Gary Lee Yarbrough, Bruce Carrol Pierce, Richard
Scutari… oh, but I guess they don’t count, because they’re WHITE guys…

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:38:58 PDT 1995
Article: 7371 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Caring for children… (was: The Spectre of McCarthyism)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:10:10 GMT
Lines: 45
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5303 alt.politics.white-power:7371 alt.revisionism:12401

Marty Kelley ([email protected]) writes:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, Les Griswold wrote:

(snip)

>> > Actually, Mr. Griswold, I meant my answer in the same metaphorical,
>> > political sense that Evelyn Hill brought up the analogy (And it’s
>> > pretty metaphorical, really–I don’t even HAVE kids, yet–if you want to
>> > call that a lie, too, go ahead…). In other words, I don’t think that other
>> > people’s children should have any fewer political or social rights than my
>> > own would.
>>
>> “Political or social rights”. Ha. What use have starving urchins for
>> “political or social rights”? Call me a dreamer, but I would think that
>> malnourished, exploited , abused children wouldn’t give a rat’s ass about
>> “political or social rights”, but would care a great deal about feeding
>> themselves, or stopping their maltreatment. So the question remains: do
>> you live up to your high ideals?
>
> As best I can, given limited resources–I support Tucson’s shelter for
> abused children (Casa de los Ninos), did some volunteer work remodeling
> the children’s shelter in Flagstaff, and have done a lot of free
> babysitting for friends. Moreover, every other month, I donate blood
> specifically for pediatric surgery–my blood happens to lack an antibody
> that most adults’ blood has, and so it’s in high demand for transfusions
> for infants. I’m nearing my fourth gallon.
>
> On a more political front, I make regular donations to Amnesty
> International, which fights human rights abuses, Child Labor among them.

And I make regular donations to the National Alliance. So?

> Have I given everything I have to the poor? No. But that wasn’t
> the question that Evelyn Hill raised–

Hey, Marty: I’M NOT EVELYN! *I* am raising the question NOW: WHY
HAVEN’T you given everything you own to the poor?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:38:59 PDT 1995
Article: 7372 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Black pride? Where?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:11:56 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5304 alt.politics.white-power:7372

aria ([email protected]) writes:
> So what’s left?
>>
>> Les
>>
>
> michael jordan, bryant gumbel, and ru paul.

You were doing O.K. until you mentioned that faggot ru paul.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:39:00 PDT 1995
Article: 7382 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les’s history lesson for the day
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 09:43:37 GMT
Lines: 33
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7382 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5312 alt.revisionism:12408 talk.politics.guns:215884

Sarah Flemming ([email protected]net.net) writes:
> [email protected] (Michael P. Stein) wrote:
>
>>In article ,
>>Les Griswold wrote:
>>>Oh, there was a racist uprising sometime in the past, in the United
>>>States? Wanna let me in on this?
>
>> I know how much you would want to be let in on it, but unfortunately
>>the Civil War ended some one hundred thirty years ago. I know you live in
>>the past, but it’s _still_ too late for you to enlist.
>
>> For your information, the racists lost.
>
> Excuse me, Mike, I think that you and I read a differant version of US
> History. Mine made it clear the Civil War was about State’s Rights
> and the fact that the federal government was trying make the States
> give up thier rights. Racism wasn’t a reason for the war.
>
> Sarah Flemming

What you have to understand, Sarah, is that Mikey and his ilk feel more at
home arguing about the SEMANTICS of the War of Secession, 1861-1865, than
they do addressing the fact that it was a fratricidal war.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:39:01 PDT 1995
Article: 7383 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 09:47:24 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7383 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5315 alt.discrimination:37860 alt.activism:10072 soc.culture.african.american:106652

Dowdy Jackson ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> And who ASKED YOU to support the cause(s) of black people ? This is one reason
> why the MMM was so powerful. The pre-approval of whites was a non issue. It
> was black people doing for black people without looking to the white community
> for approval on ANY level.

“… black people doing for black people without looking to the white
community…”.

For a change.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:39:02 PDT 1995
Article: 7384 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]t.ucs.indiana.edu> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 10:09:42 GMT
Lines: 21
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7384 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5316 alt.discrimination:37861 alt.activism:10073 soc.culture.african.american:106653

WAYNE JOHNSON ([email protected]) writes:
> Bruce Forest writes:
>
>>Explain to me how someone like myself, the grandson of Polish Jewish
>>Holocaust survivors is responsible for the crimes of slave-owners from
>>Mississippi 150 years ago?
>
> You walk in a garden, tilled by slaves, and fertilized with their
> blood.

Wow!

So now the blood of “Af-Ams” made good fertilizer? Far out!

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:39:03 PDT 1995
Article: 7385 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Damn I wish Abdrool would shut up! (was: Damn I wish I had A scanner!)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 09:58:23 GMT
Lines: 59
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7385 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5317 alt.discrimination:37862

Abdrool Kama ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (NutLess Griswold) wrote:

>>This really cracks me up. WHAT, EXACTLY, do negroes have to be proud of?
>>”Well, there were Great Civilizations ™ in Africa before you WHITE
>>DEVILS came along and wiped ’em out!” the wackiest negroes will say. “So
>>where’s the evidence?” we ask, to which negroes respond with either total
>>silence, or even loopier claims. So, having demolished that myth, we next
>>hear, “Well, um, er, African Americans invented MANY THINGS that you WHITE
>>DEVILS never could have!” Again, when asked to back up their
>>way-out-there claims, they answer with either total silence, or really
>>retarded crap like “An Af-Am invented the telephone!” (gawd, did I laugh
>>when I saw THAT one!) So, negroes didn’t create, or even live in, Great
>>Civilizations ™ in pre-Whitey Africa, and they didn’t invent diddley
>>(well, except for peanut butter). So what’s left?
>
> Yeah.. a bunch of red devils gnawing on each other bones before the Romans
> brought civilization to their frozen ass.

That’s “assES”, jackanape. Cripes, for a university student (snicker) you
don’t know shit about grammar.

> When will you cave bitch ever learn? I would like to scan and post the
> pictures of the Jenne great mosque, Kano, Zimbabwe,

I would like you to, as well, so that we could SEE the Arab-built marvels
that you claim were built by the negroes.

> ethiopian alphabet,

We’re not talking about Ethiopians, who are a Hamitic race from EASTERN
Africa. We’re talking about Gold-Coast blue-gums.

> Songhai imperial dresses,

ROTFL!!! You would compare that to the wonderful and intricate jewelry
and personal adornments made by the Celts?

> Egyptian irrigation accomplishments etc…

Hoo, boy… the Egyptians weren’t negroes, arsewipe, so anything they
accomplished CANNOT be claimed as “negro achievements”.

> … Too bad you’re more interested in rhetoric than constructive debate.

WHAT?!? This from the biggest goof on the ‘Net? The one who calls White
people “devils”, who SERIOUSLY thinks that some wretched nigger kingdom
can compare to ANYTHING that the White race has ever built?
Pot-kettle-black, boy.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:39:03 PDT 1995
Article: 7488 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: 3rd World “qualifications”
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 01:27:31 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7488 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5428 alt.discrimination:37929

Mark Staloff ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
> : 3rd World immigrants bitch and moan that their “qualifications” aren’t
> : “raspected” here in Canada (I’ll bet that much the same goes on in the
> : U.S.), and that they must therefore get service-sector jobs. Well,
> : considering that eye surgery is done with RAZOR BLADES in India, is it any
> : wonder that their “qualifications” aren’t “recognized”?
>
> Hmm… well, American hospitals would be in real trouble if all of our
> foreign nurses decided to pack it up and take their skills back to the
> Philippines or the Caribbean. Just an observation.

Really? Wouldn’t it be nice to see if that would be so?

> Mark
> Not to mention Jewish doctors… did I mention Jewish doctors? Well,
> then don’t forget Jewish doctors…

Jew doctors seem to concentrate in two areas: abortion, and cosmetic
surgery (so they can give nose jobs to other jews on the cheap).

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:39:04 PDT 1995
Article: 7497 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!news.kei.com!news.ece.uc.edu!babbage.ece.uc.edu!news.gryffin.com!chi-news.cic.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: 3rd World “qualifications”
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected]a (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:18:04 GMT
Lines: 27
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7497 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5438 alt.discrimination:37934

Jeffrey G. Brown ([email protected]) writes:
> In article , [email protected]
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> 3rd World immigrants bitch and moan that their “qualifications” aren’t
>> “raspected” here in Canada (I’ll bet that much the same goes on in the
>> U.S.), and that they must therefore get service-sector jobs. Well,
>> considering that eye surgery is done with RAZOR BLADES in India, is it any
>> wonder that their “qualifications” aren’t “recognized”?
>
> You are well known for making up your “facts”, Griswold. Have you _any_
> documentation of this claim?
>
> For that matter, how do the tools used by doctors in any third world
> country equate to a thorough assessment of their qualifications?

Leave it to Jeffrey, folks, to defend the indefensible. If I was anyone
else, I WOULDN’T go to Mr. Braun for advice on whether to get that
operation or not…

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:39:05 PDT 1995
Article: 7503 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Political prisoners… (was: Million Man March)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:42:07 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:5445 alt.politics.white-power:7503 alt.discrimination:37938 alt.activism:10372 soc.culture.african.american:106721

Lane Singer ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> : > please name one government that *-admits-* to putting people in
> : > prison for political differences.
>
> Les Griswold ([email protected]) wrote:
> : Tell us, Lane, what difference does it make that China ADMITS to putting
> : people in prison for political differences, or not? They still do it.
> : Same with most governments in Africa – who CARES whether they
> : ADMIT it or not?
>
> don’t you worry your little head about it, les. if you really
> want to understand the conversation, try re-reading it about 600
> times.

Typical Lane Singer response: “I just got my ass burned, BIG TIME, on the
debate about politcal prisoners, so I’ll switch to dumb-ass statements to
try and throw him off the scent!” And cross-posted to FIVE boards, no
less! Are you sure you wanna do stuff like that, Lane? I mean, your
reputation is already low.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:39:06 PDT 1995
Article: 7526 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Million Man March
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:35:24 GMT
Lines: 45
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7526 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5467 alt.discrimination:37952 alt.activism:10418 soc.culture.african.american:106732

WAYNE JOHNSON ([email protected]) writes:
> Les Griswold writes:
>>
>>WAYNE JOHNSON ([email protected]) writes:
>>> Bruce Forest writes:
>>>
>>>>Explain to me how someone like myself, the grandson of Polish Jewish
>>>>Holocaust survivors is responsible for the crimes of slave-owners
> from
>>>>Mississippi 150 years ago?
>>>
>>> You walk in a garden, tilled by slaves, and fertilized with their
>>> blood.
>>
>>Wow!
>>
>>So now the blood of “Af-Ams” made good fertilizer? Far out!
>>–
>>”The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready
>>for battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
>> — Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer
>
> Hey, turkey! Bruce was trying to cop out. When his ancestors showed
> up in 1939, they could eat, sleep go to school, pee, and get a job
> where black people couldn’t, and black people built America with their
> blood – as did a whole lot of white people who were here before, too.

Black labour, White intelligence. It’s as simple as that.

> You’re an ignorant schmuck, and this ain’t Strabo’s best quote – it’s
> just one that makes you think a bunch of Scots savages were interesting
> to a sophisticated Roman who had kicked ass all the way across Europe,
> and was standing on the north shore of Scotland as he wrote.

Scottish “savages” are a lot more interesting than African savages.

(snip)

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:39:07 PDT 1995
Article: 7527 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Black pride? Where?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:28:05 GMT
Lines: 34

evil Beavis ([email protected]) writes:
>> [email protected] (Les Griswold) writes:
>> evil Beavis ([email protected]) writes:
>
>> > Obviously people like you, with such an extreme need to tarnish other
>> > people’s pride, accomplishments etc., have nothing at all to be proud of…
>>
>> And what does your stunning psychoanalysis tell you about yourself, who
>> only goes out with negresses for the shock value?
>
> How do you know I go out with someone for shock value?

Because you said so, Foot-boy.

> You may not know what it is to actually like someone for whom they are, but
> some people actually do…

Come again? I don’t court negresses, therefore you’re somehow superior to me?

>> > Most people of “your own” race shun mean people like you
>>
>> No, most people of my race shun race-traitorous scum like you.
>
> How does one “betray” his race by being a productive member of society ??

I dunno. Become one (a productive member of society) and get back to us.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 22:39:08 PDT 1995
Article: 7528 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Logical dislike of race-traitors…
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:32:09 GMT
Lines: 18

Evil Beavis is starting to ask WHY people dislike race-traitors, and I can
see other libs also asking that. So, to forestall some of the dumber
questions and personal testimonials ala Crazy Jeannie(“I’m married to/shacked up
with a negress, and my family thinks it’s just WONDERFUL!!!”), I’d like to
address it:

Dislike of whites who cross the colour line may not be logical, but it
happens nonetheless. Why, for example, eB, do you think SO MANY people
stare when they see you with your dusky Dulcinea? Has it ever crossed
your little rodent-like mind that some of them are taking STRONG offence
at what you do?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 23:09:12 PDT 1995
Article: 215820 of talk.politics.guns
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!news.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!soap.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: The Spectre of McCarthyism (was: Racist Nazis conspire…)
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 01:51:23 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7359 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5295 alt.discrimination:37849 alt.revisionism:12390 talk.politics.guns:215820

Jamie McCarthy ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> See my earlier post, also emailed to Ms. Hill, on love, responsibility,
> parental bonds, skin color, and sanity.

What is it with you self-important little turds, that you have to e-mail
your posts, as well as spamming them publicly? If someone is ignoring
you, do you really think that sending them e-mail is going to make them
reply to you? C’mon, tell us, guys, the suspense is KILLING us!

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Wed Oct 25 23:09:14 PDT 1995
Article: 215884 of talk.politics.guns
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les’s history lesson for the day
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 09:43:37 GMT
Lines: 33
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7382 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5312 alt.revisionism:12408 talk.politics.guns:215884

Sarah Flemming ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Michael P. Stein) wrote:
>
>>In article ,
>>Les Griswold wrote:
>>>Oh, there was a racist uprising sometime in the past, in the United
>>>States? Wanna let me in on this?
>
>> I know how much you would want to be let in on it, but unfortunately
>>the Civil War ended some one hundred thirty years ago. I know you live in
>>the past, but it’s _still_ too late for you to enlist.
>
>> For your information, the racists lost.
>
> Excuse me, Mike, I think that you and I read a differant version of US
> History. Mine made it clear the Civil War was about State’s Rights
> and the fact that the federal government was trying make the States
> give up thier rights. Racism wasn’t a reason for the war.
>
> Sarah Flemming

What you have to understand, Sarah, is that Mikey and his ilk feel more at
home arguing about the SEMANTICS of the War of Secession, 1861-1865, than
they do addressing the fact that it was a fratricidal war.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Thu Oct 26 05:57:28 PDT 1995
Article: 12703 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 03:28:45 GMT
Lines: 36
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7597 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5524 alt.revisionism:12703 talk.politics.guns:216523 alt.skinheads:5452

Jamie McCarthy ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
>> > Omniscience? Read again, Les. I said I HAVE DOUBTS.
>>
>> So, tell us what your doubts are.
>>
>> Of course, you won’t. Leaving us all hanging gives you an easy out,
>> because you can say, “I doubt it!” whenever someone makes a claim with
>> which you disagree.
>
> This is too much.
>
> Les, why don’t you tell us all why you doubt that Hitler was really
> a short, swarthy man with black hair. Tell us all why you think he
> was six feet tall, with light brown hair.
>
> We’d love to hear why you “doubt” the reality of the many films and
> photographs taken of the man.
>
> But then, leaving us all hanging gives you an easy out, etc., etc.
>
> Your blatant hypocrisy makes you way too easy a target, Les.
>
> Posted, followups to a.r, emailed to Les.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yes, it certainly was! I can vouch for that!

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Thu Oct 26 06:04:43 PDT 1995
Article: 12703 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,talk.politics.guns,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: National Alliance info
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 03:28:45 GMT
Lines: 36
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7597 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5524 alt.revisionism:12703 talk.politics.guns:216523 alt.skinheads:5452

Jamie McCarthy ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> Sara aka Perrrfect ([email protected]) writes:
>> > Omniscience? Read again, Les. I said I HAVE DOUBTS.
>>
>> So, tell us what your doubts are.
>>
>> Of course, you won’t. Leaving us all hanging gives you an easy out,
>> because you can say, “I doubt it!” whenever someone makes a claim with
>> which you disagree.
>
> This is too much.
>
> Les, why don’t you tell us all why you doubt that Hitler was really
> a short, swarthy man with black hair. Tell us all why you think he
> was six feet tall, with light brown hair.
>
> We’d love to hear why you “doubt” the reality of the many films and
> photographs taken of the man.
>
> But then, leaving us all hanging gives you an easy out, etc., etc.
>
> Your blatant hypocrisy makes you way too easy a target, Les.
>
> Posted, followups to a.r, emailed to Les.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yes, it certainly was! I can vouch for that!

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Thu Oct 26 06:08:37 PDT 1995
Article: 5518 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: 3rd World “qualifications”
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 03:03:28 GMT
Lines: 46
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7592 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5518 alt.discrimination:37986

Andy “Cloth for brains” Walton ([email protected]) writes:

(snip)

> He raises a good point. Your assertion, which you apparently meant to
> prove that Indian doctors are not fit to practice medicine, was that “they
> perform eye surgery with razor blades.”

Now you’re starting to get it. See? That wasn’t so hard, now, was it?

> 1) Razor blades are essentially scalpels without handles. Why os their use
> proof of a lack of qualifications?

BWAHAHAHA!!! Would you care to explain that “essential” difference to
someone who’s going to get a radical keratotamy (sp?)? Hell, why don’t we
just go and tell opthamologists that they can save a bundle by buying
Gillette and Schick razor blades, instead of all that high-falutin’ and
expensive surgical equipment?

> 2) How successful are these eye operations?

They’re abysmal.

> If Indian doctors, with
> inferior equipment, are getting comparable results to Western physicians
> with superior equipment, I think that speaks well of their skill and
> training.

And if they aren’t…?

> 3) Do you have any documentation of “eye surgery with razor blades,” or
> are you spreading yet another urban legend that helps (or at least you
> think so) your cause?

Raggedy’s paradigm: if it’s BAD, and it’s about the White race, it’s
probably true. If it’s bad and it’s about NON-WHITES, then it’s an
“urban legend”.

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Thu Oct 26 06:08:38 PDT 1995
Article: 5519 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: 3rd World “qualifications”
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 03:06:45 GMT
Lines: 23
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7593 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5519 alt.discrimination:37987

Abdrool Kama ([email protected]) writes:
> [email protected] (Les Griswold) wrote:
>>3rd World immigrants bitch and moan that their “qualifications” aren’t
>>”raspected” here in Canada (I’ll bet that much the same goes on in the
>>U.S.), and that they must therefore get service-sector jobs. Well,
>>considering that eye surgery is done with RAZOR BLADES in India, is it any
>>wonder that their “qualifications” aren’t “recognized”?
>
> You’re just amazing. Most people I know from the “3rd world” breeze through
> your educational system.

Most 3rd World people here on scholarships are skimmed off the TOP of
their academic groups, so OF COURSE they’re going to perform well.

(snip – the rest of Abdrool’s day-dreaming deleted)

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”
— Strabo, 1st century A.D. geographer

From [email protected] Thu Oct 26 06:08:39 PDT 1995
Article: 5520 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Black pride? Where?
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: [email protected] (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 03:11:32 GMT
Lines: 34
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:7594 alt.politics.nationalism.white:5520 alt.discrimination:37988 soc.culture.african.american:106770

Chuck ([email protected]) writes:
> In [email protected] (Les
> Griswold) writes:
>>
>>This really cracks me up. WHAT, EXACTLY, do negroes have to be proud
>>of? “Well, there were Great Civilizations ™ in Africa before you WHITE
>>DEVILS came along and wiped ’em out!” the wackiest negroes will say. “So
>>where’s the evidence?” we ask, to which negroes respond with either total
>>silence, or even loopier claims.
>
> Well, I invite you to investigate the following ancient cultures:
>
> 1) Kemet
> 2) Egypt

But… but weren’t Kemet and Egypt the same? Gawd, you guys, keep your
stories straight, would ya?

> 3) Ethiopia

When Ethiopians are West Africans, get back to me. Until then, shut yer gob.

> 4) South American

So, now South American Indians are negroes?

Les


“The whole [Celtic] nation is war-mad, both high-spirited and ready for
battle, but otherwise simple, though not uncultured.”