Fleisher 0896-1, Fleisher Bud

Michael Swihart wrote:
> =

> tom moran wrote:
> >
> > [email protected](Annie Alpert) wrote:
> >
> > >In <[email protected]> bud writes:
> >
> > >Classic straw man — an attempt to set up a flawed argument that
> > >can easily be struck down. Look up anti-Semite in the dictionary
> > >– not ANTI + SEMITE, mind you. Anti-Semite has a specific
> > >meaning. it was, in fact coined in England in the late 1800’s by
> > >a self-professed Jew-hater to describe his feelings. Webster: a
> > >person who is hostile to Jews.
> >
> > “Anti-Semite” Anyone hostile to Jews, might be a dictionary
> > definition, but going by other definitions of Semite, we could say it
> > is also one who is hostile to Arabs.
> =

> By similar reasoning, one could also say that the “Big Ten” has ten
> universities and the “Midwest” is in the western part of the USA.
> =

> (For those who are unaware, the Big Ten has 11 universities,
> and the Midwest is in the eastern half the USA.)
> =

> As it turns out, the dictionary is merely recording how people actually
> use the word. If the word is a poor fit, blame the Jew-hater that
> invented the misnomer.
> =

> M.Swihart
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Note: I do not speak for my company, nor they for me.

Here’s the Webster definition of Semite. Anyone want to dispute with =

them send them a letter!

Sem-ite (sem’iet; esp. Brit. see’miet) n. =

1. a member of a people speaking a Semitic =

language.
2. a member of any of the peoples descended =

from Shem, the eldest son of Noah.
[1870-75; < NL semita < LL Sem (< Gk S=E9m < Heb =

Shem SHEM) + -ita – ITE 1]
— =

“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Thu Aug 1 06:10:21 PDT 1996
Article: 54759 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!nntp.teleport.com!news.serv.net!
news.alt.net!news1.alt.net!news.u.washington.edu!news.uoregon.edu!hunter.premier.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!
nntp.coast.net!zombie.ncsc.mil!newsgate.duke.edu!interpath!news.sprintlink.net!news-fw-22.sprintlink.net!
news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: definition of Semitic
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:38:25 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97039.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:54759 alt.christnet:86992 alt.religion.christian:106818
alt.bible.prophecy:2473

Michael Swihart wrote:
>
> tom moran wrote:
> >
> > [email protected](Annie Alpert) wrote:
> >
> > >In <[email protected]> bud writes:
> >
> > >Classic straw man — an attempt to set up a flawed argument that
> > >can easily be struck down. Look up anti-Semite in the dictionary
> > >– not ANTI + SEMITE, mind you. Anti-Semite has a specific
> > >meaning. it was, in fact coined in England in the late 1800’s by
> > >a self-professed Jew-hater to describe his feelings. Webster: a
> > >person who is hostile to Jews.
> >
> > “Anti-Semite” Anyone hostile to Jews, might be a dictionary
> > definition, but going by other definitions of Semite, we could say it
> > is also one who is hostile to Arabs.
>
> By similar reasoning, one could also say that the “Big Ten” has ten
> universities and the “Midwest” is in the western part of the USA.
>
> (For those who are unaware, the Big Ten has 11 universities,
> and the Midwest is in the eastern half the USA.)
>
> As it turns out, the dictionary is merely recording how people actually
> use the word. If the word is a poor fit, blame the Jew-hater that
> invented the misnomer.
>
> M.Swihart
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Note: I do not speak for my company, nor they for me.

Webster’s definition. Want to dispute this, send them a letter!
Se-mit-ic (suh mit’ik) n.
1. a family of languages, a branch of the
Afroasiatic family, comprising a number
of ancient and modern languages of SW
Asia and Africa, as Akkadian, Aramaic,
Hebrew, Arabic, and Amharic.
adj.
2. of or pertaining to the Semitic languages
or their speakers.
[< NL semiticus = semit (a) SEMITE + -icus – IC]

“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Thu Aug 1 06:10:22 PDT 1996
Article: 54794 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!apollo.isisnet.com!eru.mt.luth.se!news.kth.se!
nntp.uio.no!Norway.EU.net!EU.net!enews.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in3.uu.net!
news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: finally…!
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:45:32 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97039.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:54794 alt.christnet:87047 alt.religion.christian:106887
alt.bible.prophecy:2492

Michael Swihart wrote:
>
> tom moran wrote:
> >
> > [email protected](Annie Alpert) wrote:
> >
> > >In <[email protected]> bud writes:
> >
> > >Classic straw man — an attempt to set up a flawed argument that
> > >can easily be struck down. Look up anti-Semite in the dictionary
> > >– not ANTI + SEMITE, mind you. Anti-Semite has a specific
> > >meaning. it was, in fact coined in England in the late 1800’s by
> > >a self-professed Jew-hater to describe his feelings. Webster: a
> > >person who is hostile to Jews.
> >
> > “Anti-Semite” Anyone hostile to Jews, might be a dictionary
> > definition, but going by other definitions of Semite, we could say it
> > is also one who is hostile to Arabs.
>
> By similar reasoning, one could also say that the “Big Ten” has ten
> universities and the “Midwest” is in the western part of the USA.
>
> (For those who are unaware, the Big Ten has 11 universities,
> and the Midwest is in the eastern half the USA.)
>
> As it turns out, the dictionary is merely recording how people actually
> use the word. If the word is a poor fit, blame the Jew-hater that
> invented the misnomer.

If you don’t know who “invented” this “misnomer” how do you know
he/she/it/they were/are “Jew-hater’s?” Get real and drop the persecution
complex everytime somebody tells some truth in relation to you or your
selction religion. Christians have to deal with it all the time.

> M.Swihart
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Note: I do not speak for my company, nor they for me.

“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Thu Aug 1 06:10:23 PDT 1996
Article: 54802 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!
rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!mongol.sasknet.sk.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.nstn.ca!
ott.istar!istar.net!tor.istar!east.istar!news1.istar.ca!winternet.com!mr.net!news.sgi.com!nntp.coast.net!
zombie.ncsc.mil!newsgate.duke.edu!interpath!news.sprintlink.net!news-fw-22.sprintlink.net!news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: definition of anti-semite
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:41:22 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97039.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:54802 alt.christnet:87069 alt.religion.christian:106913
alt.bible.prophecy:2497

Michael Swihart wrote:
>
> tom moran wrote:
> >
> > [email protected](Annie Alpert) wrote:
> >
> > >In <[email protected]> bud writes:
> >
> > >Classic straw man — an attempt to set up a flawed argument that
> > >can easily be struck down. Look up anti-Semite in the dictionary
> > >– not ANTI + SEMITE, mind you. Anti-Semite has a specific
> > >meaning. it was, in fact coined in England in the late 1800’s by
> > >a self-professed Jew-hater to describe his feelings. Webster: a
> > >person who is hostile to Jews.
> >
> > “Anti-Semite” Anyone hostile to Jews, might be a dictionary
> > definition, but going by other definitions of Semite, we could say it
> > is also one who is hostile to Arabs.
>
> By similar reasoning, one could also say that the “Big Ten” has ten
> universities and the “Midwest” is in the western part of the USA.
>
> (For those who are unaware, the Big Ten has 11 universities,
> and the Midwest is in the eastern half the USA.)
>
> As it turns out, the dictionary is merely recording how people actually
> use the word. If the word is a poor fit, blame the Jew-hater that
> invented the misnomer.
>
> M.Swihart
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Note: I do not speak for my company, nor they for me.

Here’s Webster’s definition of the term. Problems with it, send them a
letter!

“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Thu Aug 1 16:43:22 PDT 1996
Article: 54874 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news1.wtn.mci.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!
news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: was Jesus a Bigot?
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 15:12:07 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 149
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97091.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:54874 alt.christnet:87203 alt.religion.christian:107077
alt.bible.prophecy:2546

Jay McCullough wrote:
>
> >I think we can solve all your problems
> with the (mis???) usage of the word anti-semite Bud.
> How about we just settle for bigot?
>
> Webster
>
> Bigot
> 1. one who is unreasonably and blindly attached
> to a particular creed, church church party or opinion.
>
> 2. one who is bitterly intolerant of the opinions of others

13 “But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you shut
off the kingdom of heaven from men; for you do not enter in yourselves,
nor do you allow those who are entering to go in.
14 <“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you devour
widows’ houses, even while for a pretense you make long prayers;
therefore you shall receive greater condemnation.>
15 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you travel
about on sea and land to make one proselyte; and when he becomes one, you
make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.
16 “Woe to you, blind guides, who say, ‘Whoever swears by the temple,
that is nothing; but whoever swears by the gold of the temple, he is
obligated.’
17 “You fools and blind men; which is more important, the gold, or the
temple that sanctified the gold?
18 “And, ‘Whoever swears by the altar, that is nothing, but whoever
swears by the offering upon it, he is obligated.’
19 “You blind men, which is more important, the offering or the altar
that sanctifies the offering?
20 “Therefore he who swears by the altar, swears both by the altar and
by everything on it.
21 “And he who swears by the temple, swears both by the temple and by
Him who dwells within it.
22 “And he who swears by heaven, swears both by the throne of God and by
Him who sits upon it.
23 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint
and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the
law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you
should have done without neglecting the others.
24 “You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!
25 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the
outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery
and self-indulgence.
26 “You blind Pharisee, first clean the inside of the cup and of the
dish, so that the outside of it may become clean also.
27 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like
whitewashed tombs which on the outside appear beautiful, but inside they
are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness.
28 “Even so you too outwardly appear righteous to men, but inwardly you
are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.
29 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you build the
tombs of the prophets and adorn the monuments of the righteous,
30 and say, ‘If we had been living in the days of our fathers, we would
not have been partners with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’
31 “Consequently you bear witness against yourselves, that you are sons
of those who murdered the prophets.
32 “Fill up then the measure of the guilt of your fathers.
33 “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how shall you escape the sentence
of hell?
34 “Therefore, behold, I am sending you prophets and wise men and
scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you
will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city,
35 that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on
earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the
son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar.
36 “Truly I say to you, all these things shall come upon this
generation.

sound familiar? Sound “bigotted? Not very tolerant, is it?

>
> 3 (pay special attention here Bud) one who is odiously hostile
> to people of a different race religion etc.

You pay attention, Jay.

13 “But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you shut
off the kingdom of heaven from men; for you do not enter in yourselves,
nor do you allow those who are entering to go in.
14 <“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you devour
widows’ houses, even while for a pretense you make long prayers;
therefore you shall receive greater condemnation.>
15 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you travel
about on sea and land to make one proselyte; and when he becomes one, you
make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.
16 “Woe to you, blind guides, who say, ‘Whoever swears by the temple,
that is nothing; but whoever swears by the gold of the temple, he is
obligated.’
17 “You fools and blind men; which is more important, the gold, or the
temple that sanctified the gold?
18 “And, ‘Whoever swears by the altar, that is nothing, but whoever
swears by the offering upon it, he is obligated.’
19 “You blind men, which is more important, the offering or the altar
that sanctifies the offering?
20 “Therefore he who swears by the altar, swears both by the altar and
by everything on it.
21 “And he who swears by the temple, swears both by the temple and by
Him who dwells within it.
22 “And he who swears by heaven, swears both by the throne of God and by
Him who sits upon it.
23 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint
and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the
law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you
should have done without neglecting the others.
24 “You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!
25 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the
outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery
and self-indulgence.
26 “You blind Pharisee, first clean the inside of the cup and of the
dish, so that the outside of it may become clean also.
27 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like
whitewashed tombs which on the outside appear beautiful, but inside they
are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness.
28 “Even so you too outwardly appear righteous to men, but inwardly you
are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.
29 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you build the
tombs of the prophets and adorn the monuments of the righteous,
30 and say, ‘If we had been living in the days of our fathers, we would
not have been partners with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’
31 “Consequently you bear witness against yourselves, that you are sons
of those who murdered the prophets.
32 “Fill up then the measure of the guilt of your fathers.
33 “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how shall you escape the sentence
of hell?
34 “Therefore, behold, I am sending you prophets and wise men and
scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you
will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city,
35 that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on
earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the
son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar.
36 “Truly I say to you, all these things shall come upon this
generation.

Sound familiar again? Sounds to me like the Lord wasn’t very “tolerant”

> usage- Bud is a bigot.
>
> Bigot Bud carries water for the bigoted Rev.
>
> See how easy that was?
>
> In Christ
> Jay


“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Sat Aug 3 07:03:13 PDT 1996
Article: 54943 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!freenet.unbc.edu!news.scn.org!
news.abs.net!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!nntp04.primenet.com!news.shkoo.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.cais.net!
hunter.premier.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp.coast.net!zombie.ncsc.mil!newsgate.duke.edu!agate!
ames!enews.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in3.uu.net!news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: herre it is again…?
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 20:51:14 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97077.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:54943 alt.christnet:87344 alt.religion.christian:107264
alt.bible.prophecy:2586

bud wrote:
>
> Michael Swihart wrote:
> >
> > tom moran wrote:
> > >
> > > [email protected]etcom.com(Annie Alpert) wrote:
> > >
> > > >In <[email protected]> bud writes:
> > >
> > > >Classic straw man — an attempt to set up a flawed argument that
> > > >can easily be struck down. Look up anti-Semite in the dictionary
> > > >– not ANTI + SEMITE, mind you. Anti-Semite has a specific
> > > >meaning. it was, in fact coined in England in the late 1800’s by
> > > >a self-professed Jew-hater to describe his feelings. Webster: a
> > > >person who is hostile to Jews.
> > >
> > > “Anti-Semite” Anyone hostile to Jews, might be a dictionary
> > > definition, but going by other definitions of Semite, we could say it
> > > is also one who is hostile to Arabs.
> >
> > By similar reasoning, one could also say that the “Big Ten” has ten
> > universities and the “Midwest” is in the western part of the USA.
> >
> > (For those who are unaware, the Big Ten has 11 universities,
> > and the Midwest is in the eastern half the USA.)
> >
> > As it turns out, the dictionary is merely recording how people actually
> > use the word. If the word is a poor fit, blame the Jew-hater that
> > invented the misnomer.
> >
> > M.Swihart
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Note: I do not speak for my company, nor they for me.
>
> Here’s Webster’s definition of the term. Problems with it, send them a
> letter!
> —
> “The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

an-ti-Sem-ite (an tee sem’iet, an tie-; esp. Brit. -see’miet)
n.
1. a person who discriminates against or is
prejudiced or hostile toward Jews.
[1880-85]

“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Sat Aug 3 07:03:14 PDT 1996
Article: 55023 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news1.wtn.mci.net!news.internetMCI.com!
newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: not in Christ, and Jay’s the bigot
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 14:59:44 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97091.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:55023 alt.christnet:87515 alt.religion.christian:107455
alt.bible.prophecy:2630

Jay McCullough wrote:
>
> >I think we can solve all your problems
> with the (mis???) usage of the word anti-semite Bud.
> How about we just settle for bigot?
>
> Webster definition of bigot
>
> Bigot
> 1. one who is unreasonably and blindly attached
> to a particular creed, church church party or opinion.
>
> 2. one who is bitterly intolerant of the opinions of others
>
> 3 (pay special attention here Bud) one who is odiously hostile
> to people of a different race religion etc.
>
> usage- Bud is a bigot.

definition of bigot from Webster’s: (which one are you using, Jay?)
big-ot (big’uht) n.
1. a person who is extremely intolerant of
another’s creed, belief, or opinion.
[1590-1600; < MF (OF: derogatory name applied by
the French to the Normans), perh. < OE bi God by
God]

Jay… that sound familar? Anyone reading your posting knows who’s the
bigot now, don’t we?
>
> Bigot Bud carries water for the bigoted Rev.
>
> See how easy that was?

Yes, I imagine you find it much harder to address the issues
and the information.
>
> In Christ
> Jay

not in Christ, Jay. just incensed with nonsense. Try to relax and
address the issues and avoid the adhomenims.

“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Sat Aug 3 07:03:15 PDT 1996
Article: 55029 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!freenet.unbc.edu!news.scn.org!
news.abs.net!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!nntp04.primenet.com!news.shkoo.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.cais.net!
hunter.premier.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: some quotes that need consideration…
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 1996 11:08:29 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 180
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97063.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:55029 alt.christnet:87597 alt.religion.christian:107588
alt.bible.prophecy:2657

tom moran wrote:
>
> [email protected](Annie Alpert) wrote:
>
> >In <[email protected]> bud writes:
> >>
> >>The following is an article that appeared in “The Christian
> >>News”.
>
> >Classic straw man — an attempt to set up a flawed argument that
> >can easily be struck down. Look up anti-Semite in the dictionary
> >– not ANTI + SEMITE, mind you. Anti-Semite has a specific
> >meaning. it was, in fact coined in England in the late 1800’s by
> >a self-professed Jew-hater to describe his feelings. Webster: a
> >person who is hostile to Jews.
>
> “Anti-Semite” Anyone hostile to Jews, might be a dictionary
> definition, but going by other definitions of Semite, we could say it
> is also one who is hostile to Arabs.
> Annie if you can’t accept this, maybe you can give us the term
> for hostility to Arabs. “Semite” is a genetic/racial designation, like
> Oriental, Caucasian, Amerind – etc. One dictionary definition states
> for “Semite” – a person descended from Shem.
> >
> >> TALMUDIC JEWS KHAZARS NOT SEMITES
> >>The term anti-Semite when applied to opposition to Jews is also
> >>a misnomer because the vast majority of Talmudic Jews today are
> >>not Semites. There are many Khazar (Chazar or Khozer) Jews,
> >>Black Jews, Chinese Jews, East Indian Jews, Mexican, Japanese
> >>Jews, etc. According to some authorities the Khazar Jews alone
> >>make up over 90% of the Jewish population of the world. Only
> >>the Sephardic Jews are considered to be the descendants of Shem.
> >>According to Benjamin Freedman, a converted Jew, the Khazar Jews
> >>are not Semites. Mr. Freedman in his book, FACTS ARE FACTS on
> >>p. 42 quotes the JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA in part as follows:
> >
> >See above. Pointless argument. Judaism is a religion, not a
> >race.
>
> In addition to the above evidence that Semite is a racial
> designation, we have to consider why Jews while charging anti-Semitism
> will also use the word “racist”.
> There are also terms like ‘He looks Jewish, or ‘He is half
> Jewish. There are also certain genetic diseases that Jews can have.
> There is also things like the Jew is a Jew if the mother was a
> Jew.
> This is just a small portion of the evidence that could be put
> forth to show that Judaism is a racial movement.
>
> >
> >Also, Ben Freedman may have been born of parents who came from
> >parents who believed in Judaism, he himself and his parents were
> >secular Jews to say the least. Who was Ben Freedman?
>
> “Secular” Jews is a term that has been used with great frequency
> in recent years. Look up “Jew” – “Jewish” in the dictionary, Annie.
> How can you be Jewish and “secular” at the same time?
>
> >
> >Benjamin Harrison Freedman was the originator of the
> >”Khazar Canard”–a theory that today’s Jews are not the
> >descendants of the Jews mentioned in the Bible, but rather
> >descendants of the Khazars, an Asiatic people who occupied
> >Southern Russia during the seventh century, who had
> >converted to Judaism. Ironically, he was born a Jew in New
> >York in 1890, but openly revealed himself to be a fascist
> >and an “honorary Aryan”. When WWII broke out he declared
> >himself a supporter of Hitler and predicted Hitler would
> >win the war.
> >
> >Over the years, Freedman has been a prolific producer
> >of anti-Semitic tracts, statements and pamphlets. Many of
> >them have been used by most of the most well-known
> >anti-Semite. I’m sure you’ve seen them in one form or
> >another. He considered himself a martyr and bragged “Since
> >the death of Hitler, I am the most hated man in the world.”
> >
> > The May 1, 1959 issue of “Common Sense” (“The Nation’s
> > Anti-Communist Newspaper”) has four tabloid-size pages
> > filled with Freedman’s story of the “discovery” of the
> > canard. (Headline: Christians duped by unholiest hoax in
> > al The Khazar story was the grand passion of his life for
> > many years. Morris Kominsky (Hoaxers, Branden Press) says
> > he could go on for hours on the subject without time out
> > for a breath of fresh air. “Freedman expatiated on his
> > Khazar delusion to a group of seven or eight Congressmen
> > for five hours without surcease.”
> > l history “Big Lie” technique pushing USA to the brink of
> > World War III”). This so-called “Anti-Communist” paper
> > consisted for years mainly of anti-Jewish and anti-black
> > diatribes as well as anti-welfare tirades.
> > From Mr Freedman’s article:
> > “The U.S.A. Christians continue being brainwashed by
> > the U.S.A. media of mass-communication that so-called “Jews”
> > of throughout the world today are the actual historic
> > descendants of the so-called “Jews” of the Holy Land in Old
> > Testament history. The U.S.A. Christians have been
> > brainwashed by so-called Jews of historic Khazar ancestry,
> > and by their servile Christian stooges, as they have been
> > brainwashed by them for many years with the unholiest hoax
> > in all recorded history of mankind, betraying the
> > confidence of Christians.
> > “Incontestable facts supply the unchallengable proof of
> > the historic accuracy that so-called “Jews” throughout the
> > world today of eastern European origin are unquestionably
> > the historic descendants of the Khazars, a pagan Turco-Finn
> > ancient Mongoloid nation deep in the heart of Asia, who
> > battled their way into bloody wars about the 1st B.C.
> > century into eastern Europe where they set up their Khazar
> > kingdom…
> > “The “big lie” technique of the unholiest hoax in all
> > the recorded history of mankind brainwashed U.S.A.
> > Christians into believing that Jesus Christ was actually a
> > Jew in the sense that so-called Jews call themselves Jews
> > now to bamboozle Christians.”
> > A very good debunking of the canard that 92% of
> > today’s Jews are made up of descendants of a Mongolian
> > tribe comes from the pen of Dr. V. Orval Watts, a
> > Holocaust denier with John Birch Society connections. In
> > the ultra-right wing “Santa Ana Register” November 6,
> > 1963, Watts says: “There is no more reason for assuming
> > that a Russian Jew is a Khazar than to assume that an
> > American Episcopalian is a Celtic descendant of King
> > Arthur’s Knights.”
> > >
> >–
> >Annie Alpert
> >
> >”All would be well,
> > All would be heavenly–
> > If the damned would only stay damned.”–Charles Fort, 1919

“And are not they [today’s “Jews”] the inventors of the Chosen People
myth?” — [Dr. Oscar Levy, preface, “The World Significance of the
Russian Revolution,” George Pitt Rivers (Oxford, England: Basil
Blackwell, 1920) vi

Professor of Medieval Jewish History, Abraham N. Poliak of Tel Aviv
University, has stated “The large majority of world Jewry is descended
>from the Jews of Khazaria.” (“The Thirteenth Tribe” by Arthur Koestler
(New York: Random House, 1976) p.226)

The American People’s Encyclopedia for 1964 at 15-292 records the
following reference to Khazars:
“In the year 740 the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism. A
century later they were cursed by the in-coming Slavic-speaking people
and were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews. It
is from this grouping that most German and Polish Jews are descended, and
they likewise make up a considerable part of that population now found in
America. The term Aschenazim is now applied to this….division.”
Alfred Lilienthal writes, in What Price Israel (Henry Regenery Co., 1953)
“Perhaps the most significant mass conversion to the Judaic Faith
occurred in Europe, in the 8th century A.D., and that story of the
Khazars (Turko-Finnish people) is quite pertinent to the establishment of
the modern state of Israel.” Again, “That the Khazars are the lineal
ancestors of Eastern European Jewry is a historical fact. Jewish
historians and religious textbooks acknowledge the fact, though the
propagandists of Jewish nationalism belittle it as pro-Arab propaganda.”

The Jews fully understand their Khazarian heritage as the third edition
of the Jewish Encyclopedia for 1925 records:
“Chazars: a people of Turkish origin whose life and history are
interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of
Russia.” The Jewish Encyclopedia, Third Edition, 1925

The World Book Encyclopedia states: “The Jews were once a sub-type of
the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the
name Jew has lost all racial meaning.”

Albert Einstein said: “Anti-Semitism is nothing but the antagonistic
attitude produced in the non-Jew by the Jewish group. The Jewish group
has thrived on oppression and on the antagonism it has forever met in the
world.” (Collier’s Magazine, Nov. 26, 1938) Einstein was describing
their common use of “chutzpah” for their own gain and profit while crying
“persecution.”

 


“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Sun Aug 4 21:50:53 PDT 1996
Article: 55372 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!
rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!
howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!hunter.premier.net!news.cais.net!
news.abs.net!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: are you a bigot?
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 1996 14:59:34 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97011.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:55372 alt.christnet:88464 alt.religion.christian:108391
alt.bible.prophecy:3004

Matt Giwer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:30:26 GMT, [email protected] (pgroff) wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:45:32 -0700, bud wrote:
>
> >>If you don’t know who “invented” this “misnomer” how do you know
> >>he/she/it/they were/are “Jew-hater’s?” Get real and drop the persecution
> >>complex everytime somebody tells some truth in relation to you or your
> >>selction religion. Christians have to deal with it all the time.
> >The Term “AntiSemite was coined by Wilhelm Marr, and if you had read
> >anything about him you would have known that, but you didn’t
> >dudrite, what a maroon.
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
> >Mr. Giwer is, as far as I can determine, a troller whose only
> >interest is in causing fights. While he can sound superficially
> >plausible, he has lied about what has been said in exchanges (while
> >accusing others of lying), refused to document claims, pretended not to
> >see posts which contain documented refutation of his claims (even when
> >they have been emailed to him), engaged in actual libel, and generally
> >conducted himself with such complete lack of intellectual and factual
> >integrity that there seems to be no point in taking the time to read and
> >respond. For detailed and documented evidence of this, please refer to
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
> >URL http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/g/giwer.matt
>
> >P. GROFF
> ========
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Ooooo, those nasty SS
> From: [email protected] (Matt Giwer)
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 21:53:37 GMT
>
> ” The SS forced [women] to wash the stairs leading from the seven
> entrances to the four-story
> house, with their tongues and lips. After those stairways were wased,
> the same people were
> forced to collect garbage in the courtyard with their lips. All garbage
> had to be transferred to one
> place in the courtyard. ”
> IMT VII – p.491.

Hey…! Are you disagreeing with me?! Are you a bigot? Are you one of
those “Christian-hating” anti-Christianists?

“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Mon Aug 5 15:22:29 PDT 1996
Article: 1881 of alt.bible.prophecy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!newsfeed.internetmci.com!
news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!newsreader.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!
news-fw-12.sprintlink.net!news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.bible.prophecy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Subject: Mr. Keren also ignores this aspect
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 14:06:38 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 117
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97080.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:53766 alt.bible.prophecy:1881 alt.christnet:84924
alt.religion.christian:104650

Daniel Keren wrote:
>
> [Followup, yet again, set to alt.revisionism]
>
> [email protected] (paul goddard) writes:
>
> # That’s true. I found Danny’s lies about Fred Leuchter to
> # be the most deplorable part of his message. Fred Leuchter
> # was the top expert in charge of executions in the U.S.
> # including gas chamber exections.
>
> Name one gas chamber he built. No “revisionist” has been
> able to provide one. Maybe you can?
>
> He lied about being an engineer. He has a BA in the arts,
> and he ended up in court for this.
>
> It’s a fact. Easy to verify. I have the excerpt from the
> so-called “Zundel trial” in which Leuchter himself admits
> to these facts. See the end of my article.
>
> # One of the important findings he made in the
> # alleged gas chambers of the Germans was that there was
> # no cyanide residue.
>
> This is an outright lie on your part. Leuchter himself
> states very clearly that there are cyanide residues in the
> gas chambers; you obviously have not read his report.
>
> He claims that there are not “enough” residues to prove
> that mass homicidal gassing took place in them, but this
> is totally false. I can elaborate, if there’s interest.
>
> You’re writing about something which you obviously know
> nothing about. Your motivation is hate, not finding the
> truth.
>
> # Danny’s remarks are complete and utter falsehoods.
>
> Everything I wrote about Leuchter is true. It’s a matter
> of record.
>
> This is a verbatim quote from the cross-examination of Fred
> Leuchter, “revisionist scholar, engineer and scientist”:
>
> [Pages 9196-9198 of the transcript in Zundel’s trial.
> Cross-examination conducted by Mr. Pearson]:
>
> Q: Now, Mr. Leuchter, Mr. Christie, when he was reviewing your
> qualifications, said that, if my note is correct, you graduated
> from university in a field that entitles you to function as as
> engineer and you responded in the affirmative to that question?
>
> A: Yes. I have a Bachelor of Arts degree.
>
> Q: You graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree?
>
> A: Right.
>
> Q: When?
>
> A: You mean what year?
>
> Q: What year?
>
> A: 1964.
>
> Q: 1964. And that’s the only University degree you have?
>
> A: That’s correct.
>
> Q: You don’t have a Bachelor of Science degree?
>
> A: No.
>
> Q: You don’t have a Master of Science degree; you don’t have a
> Ph.D in science?
>
> A: Correct.
>
> Q: You don’t have a degree in engineering?
>
> A: That’s correct.
>
> Q: Do you belong to any supervising disciplinary professional body?
>
> A: I don’t understand the question, counselor.
>
> Q: Well, do you belong to a governing body of engineers?
>
> A: I — governing body? I do not understand. Are you saying do I
> belong to any scientific societies?
>
> Q: No, is there any body of engineers that supervises you and
> disciplines you in your engineering function?
>
> A: No.
>
>
>
> -Danny Keren.
>
> —
> Lies written in ink can never disguise facts written in blood.
>
> -Lu Xun.

After the trial, and in response to Fred A. Leuchter’s report, in 1990
the Auschwitz State Museum commissioned the Krakow Forensic Institute to
carry out an investigation of the alleged gassing sites at the camp. The
results of the testing of brick and mortar samples fully corroborated
Leuchter’s findings: they found either no or very small traces of
cyanide in its samples. However, the institute stated that it could not
be assumed whether or not cyanide traces can be detected after 45 years
of being subjected to the weather and the elements.

“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Mon Aug 5 15:22:30 PDT 1996
Article: 1884 of alt.bible.prophecy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!freenet.unbc.edu!news.scn.org!
news.abs.net!cs.umd.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!newsgate.duke.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!
arclight.uoregon.edu!news.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsreader.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!
news-fw-12.sprintlink.net!news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: Luther and the Jews Part 1
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 13:55:53 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 427
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97080.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:53772 alt.christnet:84931 alt.religion.christian:104659
alt.bible.prophecy:1884

Daniel Keren wrote:
>
> [Followup, yet again, set to alt.revisionism]
>
> [email protected] (paul goddard) writes:
>
> # That’s true. I found Danny’s lies about Fred Leuchter to
> # be the most deplorable part of his message. Fred Leuchter
> # was the top expert in charge of executions in the U.S.
> # including gas chamber exections.
>
> Name one gas chamber he built. No “revisionist” has been
> able to provide one. Maybe you can?
>
> He lied about being an engineer. He has a BA in the arts,
> and he ended up in court for this.
>
> It’s a fact. Easy to verify. I have the excerpt from the
> so-called “Zundel trial” in which Leuchter himself admits
> to these facts. See the end of my article.
>
> # One of the important findings he made in the
> # alleged gas chambers of the Germans was that there was
> # no cyanide residue.
>
> This is an outright lie on your part. Leuchter himself
> states very clearly that there are cyanide residues in the
> gas chambers; you obviously have not read his report.
>
> He claims that there are not “enough” residues to prove
> that mass homicidal gassing took place in them, but this
> is totally false. I can elaborate, if there’s interest.
>
> You’re writing about something which you obviously know
> nothing about. Your motivation is hate, not finding the
> truth.
>
> # Danny’s remarks are complete and utter falsehoods.
>
> Everything I wrote about Leuchter is true. It’s a matter
> of record.
>
> This is a verbatim quote from the cross-examination of Fred
> Leuchter, “revisionist scholar, engineer and scientist”:
>
> [Pages 9196-9198 of the transcript in Zundel’s trial.
> Cross-examination conducted by Mr. Pearson]:
>
> Q: Now, Mr. Leuchter, Mr. Christie, when he was reviewing your
> qualifications, said that, if my note is correct, you graduated
> from university in a field that entitles you to function as as
> engineer and you responded in the affirmative to that question?
>
> A: Yes. I have a Bachelor of Arts degree.
>
> Q: You graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree?
>
> A: Right.
>
> Q: When?
>
> A: You mean what year?
>
> Q: What year?
>
> A: 1964.
>
> Q: 1964. And that’s the only University degree you have?
>
> A: That’s correct.
>
> Q: You don’t have a Bachelor of Science degree?
>
> A: No.
>
> Q: You don’t have a Master of Science degree; you don’t have a
> Ph.D in science?
>
> A: Correct.
>
> Q: You don’t have a degree in engineering?
>
> A: That’s correct.
>
> Q: Do you belong to any supervising disciplinary professional body?
>
> A: I don’t understand the question, counselor.
>
> Q: Well, do you belong to a governing body of engineers?
>
> A: I — governing body? I do not understand. Are you saying do I
> belong to any scientific societies?
>
> Q: No, is there any body of engineers that supervises you and
> disciplines you in your engineering function?
>
> A: No.
>
>
>
> -Danny Keren.
>
> —
> Lies written in ink can never disguise facts written in blood.
>
> -Lu Xun.

Understand that I wanted to avoid beginning this, but since Mr. Keren and
others are now obviously beginning to attempt to bring this issue into
the Christian Newsgroup I sincerely believe it is time to have a balance
in this regard, especially since I have alse been noticing some postings
about Hitler being a Christian, etc. I believe it is time and I hope all
or most of the sincere Christians will understand why this should be
done… And, I also hope that this can cease somewhere along the line…

The following is an article that appeared in “The Christian News”. It
was entitled “Luther and the Jews” and written by Pastor R. H. Goetjen.
There are some striking samples of information that would seem
particularly relevant to the alt.revisionism newsgroup. Because of the
length of the article, It is presented here in Three parts. This is part
number one. It begins… You can contact “The Christian News” at: 3277
Boeuf Lutheran Road, New Haven, MO 63069; or, you can email them at:
[email protected]

Luther has been accused of anti-Semitism. Was Luther really an
anti-Semite? That depends on you definition of anti-Semitism.
When some people hear the term anti-Semitism, they immediately
think of racism. By racism they mean that a person is opposed to and
prejudiced against a certain person or persons for no other reason that
they belong to a certain race. In other words, such a racist anti-Semite
is opposed to any descendant of Shem because he is prejudiced against all
Semites.
If the above is the definition of anti-Semitism, then Luther
certainly was not and could not have been an anti-Semite, for then he of
necessity would also have been opposed to an prejudiced against Jesus of
Nazareth and all the apostles and the entire Holy Bible since it was
written almost, if not entirely, by the descendants of Shem. Luther so
loved his Lord Jesus Christ and His Holy Bible that he was prepared to
die for Jesus Christ and His Holy Word. This he could not have done if
he were opposed to an prejudiced against the Semitic race as such.
TALMUDIC JEWS KHAZARS NOT SEMITES
The term anti-Semite when applied to opposition to Jews is also a
misnomer because the vast majority of Talmudic Jews today are not
Semites. There are many Khazar (Chazar or Khozer) Jews, Black Jews,
Chinese Jews, East Indian Jews, Mexican, Japanese Jews, etc. According
to some authorities the Khazar Jews alone make up over 90% of the Jewish
population of the world. Only the Sephardic Jews are considered to be
the descendants of Shem. According to Benjamin Freedman, a converted
Jew, the Khazar Jews are not Semites. Mr. Freedman in his book, FACTS
ARE FACTS on p. 42 quotes the JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA in part as follows:
“At the end of the eighth century… the chagan (king) of the Chazars and
his grandees together were a large number of his heathen people embraced
the Jewish religion … about the ninth century, it appears as if all the
Chazars were Jews and they had converted to Judaism only a short time
before … after a hard fight the Russians conquered the Chazars.”
Freedman further states: “Yiddish is the modern name for the
ancient mother tongue of the Khazars with added German, Slavonic and
Baltic adopted and adapted words (p.44).
“The large number of Jews in Russian and eastern Europe after the
destruction of the Khazar kingdom were therefore no longer known as
Khazars but at the ‘Yiddish’ populations of these countries. they so
refer to themselves today (p.45).
“The so-called or self-styled ‘Jews’ throughout the world today
of eastern European origin make up at least 90% of the world’s population
of so-called or self-styled ‘Jews’ … ‘Talmudism’, or ‘Judaism’, as
Talmudism is known today, was given its greatest stimulus in all its
history with the conversion of the large pagan Khazar population.
Without the conversion of the Khazar population it is doubtful if
Talmudism, or Judaism, could have survived. ‘Talmudism,’ the civil and
religious code of the Pharisees, most likely would have passed out of
existence.” (p. 46).
“THE KHAZARS WERE NOT ‘SEMITES’. THEY WERE AN ASIATIC MONGOLOID
NATION. THEY ARE CLASSIFIED BY MODERN ANTHROPOLOGIST AS TURCO-FINNS
RACIALLY” (p 45-emphasis added).
Douglas reed puts it this way: The destructive achievement; in
both the Zionist and Communist aspect, came from the Jews in Russia and
the Romanoff; that is the key to the understanding of the present and the
future. THE JEWS WHO MADE THOSE TWO MOVEMENTS WERE NOT SEMITES; on that
all qualified authorities agree; … They are descendants of a Russian,
Mongol Tartar race converted to Judaism in the 7th century whose remote
forbears never trod the Palestinian soil” (FAR AND WIDE, p. 276- Emphasis
added).
“IN PART II, CH, V-VII, I HAVE COMPILED THE HISTORICAL EVIDENCE
WHICH INDICATES THAT THE BULK OF EASTERN JEWRY – AND HENCE THE WORLD
JEWRY — IS OF KHAZAR-TURKISH, RATHER THAN SEMITIC, ORIGIN. IN THIS LAST
CHAPTER I HAVE TRIED TO SHOW THAT THE EVIDENCE FROM ANTHROPOLOGY CONCURS
WITH HISTORY IN REFUTING THE POPULAR BELIEF IN A JEWISH RACE DESCENDED
FROM A BIBLICAL TRIBE” (THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE, by Arthur Koestler, a Jew.
p. 199 – Emphasis added).
Thus if over 90% of modern day followers of Judaism, which is
Talmudism or Pharisaism, are not Semites, what is the sense of calling
those anti-Semitic who oppose those who follow the religion of the
Talmud, i.e., the religion of the Pharisees? When Luther was opposing
the Jews in his day, he was not opposing Semites. He was opposing
Pharisees because they were Pharisees, not Semites.
To define “anti-Semitism” as meaning being opposed to someone
just because he belongs to a certain race is faulty also since it is
based on the root meaning of the word and not on the USUS LOQUENDI, i.e.,
the use of the word in common speech. Quite often the real meaning is
different from that which the root meaning suggests. Dictionaries
attempt to give us the proper meaning of words. FUNK & WAGNALLS STANDARD
DICTIONARY, INTERNATIONAL EDITION gives this definition of anti-Semitism:
“Opposition to, prejudice or discrimination against, or intolerance of
Jews, Jewish culture, etc.” We will all have to agree that Luther was
opposed to Jews and Jewish culture. According to the dictionary
definition of anti-Semitism we would all have to agree that Luther was
indeed anti-Semitic. However, not only Luther but Jesus Christ Himself
was anti-Pharisee Jew. This is likewise true of every follower of Jesus
Christ. So the question is, “Were Jesus, Luther and their followers
justified in being anti-Pharisee Jew?”
THE TALMUD
What is Jewish culture? According to a Rabbi, to know Jewish
culture one must be acquainted with the Talmud. The Rev. Dr. Isaac Wise
who edited and corrected the first edition of Michael Rodkinson’s English
translation of the Talmud states on page XI: ‘The modern Jew is the
product of the Talmud” (Freedman p. 35). He also stated: “It (the
Talmud) still dominates a whole people who venerate its contents as
divine truth … The colleges for the study of the Talmud are increasing
in almost every place where Israel dwells, especially in this country
where millions are gathered for the funds of the two colleges, The Hebrew
Union College of Cincinnati and the Jewish Theological Seminary of
American in New York, IN WHICH THE CHIEF STUDY IS THE TALMUD” (emphasis
added – ibidem p.25).
LADIES HOME JOURNAL BOOK BONUS may 1967 gives part of a novel
entitle THE CHOSEN by Chaim Potok. The author, speaking of the Yeshiva,
the Jewish parochial school, states in part, “The test of intellectual
excellence, however, had been reduced by tradition to a single area of
study: Talmud, Virtuosity in Talmud guaranteed a reputation for
brilliance.”
The Talmud is therefore the chief book which is taught in Jewish
parochial schools, colleges and seminaries. What sort of book(s) of
instruction is the Talmud? Permit us to quote Jewish sources for the
answer:
“The Talmud, then, is the written form of that which, in the time
of Jesus, was called the Tradition of the Elders, and to which he makes
frequent allusions” (THE HISTORY OF THE TALMUD, by M. L. Rodkinson, p.
70).
The Tradition of the Elders contained the doctrines, beliefs, and
practices of the sect of the Pharisees. “Pharisaism became Talmudism,
Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism and Medieval Rabbinism became modern
Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name, inevitable adoption of
custom, and adjustment of law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee
survives unaltered. Then the Jew … studies the Talmud, he is actually
repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies (THE PHARISEES
by Louis Finkelstein, Provost and Solomon Schechter Professor of Theology
at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America — THE PLOT AGAINST
CHRISTIANITY by E. Dilling, Exhibit 1 a photostatically reproduced page
>from the above book). In other words, the modern day followers of the
Talmud are Pharisees.
“THE UNIVERSAL JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA p. 474 also states: “the
Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break,
through all the centuries from the Pharisees. their leading ideas and
methods found in literature of enormous extent … The Talmud is the
largest and most important single member of that literature, … and the
studying of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.”
CHRIST OPPOSED PHARISEE JEWS
Dr. Martin Luther was a sincere follower of Jesus Christ. Jesus
Christ in His day also opposed the Pharisee Jews with great vehemence.
In Matthew 23 Jesus Christ castigates the Pharisee Jews in no uncertain
terms. No less than eight times he places His “Woe” upon them. Six
times He calls them “hypocrites”. Twice He calls them “blind guides” and
“fools and blind.” He calls them “Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers”.
He also states, “Ye are like whited sepulchres, which indeed appear
beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and all
uncleanness.” Finally He pronounces His judgment upon them, “Wherefore,
I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of they ye
shall kill and crucify, and some of them ye shall scourge in your
synagogues, and persecute them from city to city: That upon you may come
all the righteous blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son
of Barachias whom ye show between the temple and the altar… Behold your
house is left unto you desolate” (v 34, 35, 38).
Jesus also revealed His vehement opposition to the Pharisee Jews
in John 8:44: “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your
father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not
in the truth, because there is no truth in him. when he speaketh as lie,
he speaketh of his own for he is a liar and the father of it.” Here
Jesus not only calls the Pharisee Jews the sons of the devil, but also
implies that they are liars and murderers.
Jesus, speaking of the Pharisee Jew Traditions of the Elders,
charges, “Thus ye make the commandment of God of none effect by your
tradition” (Mt. 15:6). “Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that
ye may keep your tradition … making the Word of God of none effect
through your tradition” (Mk 7:13).
Do the Pharisee Jew followers of the Babylonian Talmud really
“reject” and “make of none effect” the commandments of God by their
Tradition of the Elders? Permit us to quote from the Talmud so that you
can judge for yourselves:
QUOTATIONS FROM THE TALMUD
“Every goy (non-Jew) who studies the Talmud and every Jew who
helps him in it, ought to die” (Sanhedren, 59a; ABODA ZORA, 8-6, SZAGIGA,
13). The Jews want to censor what Christian Publishing Houses publish
before they publish it to see if there is anything against the Jews in
what is being published. Will they permit Christians to censor what they
publish or have published to see if there is anything anti-Christian in
their publications?
“If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the Rabbinical
books, he ought to give a false explanation. Whoever will violate this
order shall be put to death (LIBBRE DAVID 37).
“The Jew should and must make a false oath when the goyim
(non-Jew) ask if our books contain anything against them” (SZAALOTH
UTSZABOTG, the BOOK OF JORE DIA 17).
“To communicate anything to a goy (non-Jew) about our religious
relations would be equal to killing all Jews, for it the goyim knew what
we teach about they would kill us openly’ (LIBBRE DAVID 37).
“A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her
as he treats a piece of meat” (NADARINE, 20, B; SCHUDCHAN ARUCH, CHOSZEN
HAMISZPAT 348). We see a modern interpretation of this text in the
following quote: “Jews believe that when it comes to sex, Gentile girls
are more willing, more able, and ABOVE ALL MORE AVAILABLE… and because,
after all, they are Gentiles, sex, pure physical sex WITHOUT
ENCUMBRANCES, IS A LICENSE ONE CAN TAKE WITH THEM” (THE JEWISH MYSTIQUE
by Ernest Van Den Haag, p. 214. Emphasis added).
“A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat, and perjure himself; but he
must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel does not suffer”
((SCHULCHAN ARUCH. CHOSZEN HAMISZPAT 348)
“All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation,
which, consequently is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples.
An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality toward
people of other tribes. he may act contrary to morality, if profitable
to himself or to Jews in general” (SCHULCHAN ARUCH, CHOSZEN HAMISZPAT
348).
“In Volume III of the JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA on p. 539 will be found
the official translation into English of the prayer known as the ‘Kol
Nidre’ (all vows) prayer. It is the prologue of the Day of Atonement
services in the synagogues… The official translation into English of
the ‘Kol Nidre’ (all vows) prayer follows: “All voes, obligations oaths,
anathema’s, whether called ‘konan’, ‘konas’, or by any other name, which
we may vow, or sear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this day
of Atonement unto the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent.
May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annuled, and void and made of no
effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall
not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the
oaths, (Quoted by Benjamin Freedman in FACTS ARE FACTS p. 35).
Although the Kol Nidre (All Vows) is later than the Talmud gets
its implications, inferences and innuendoes are found in the Talmud in
the BOOK OF NEDARIM 23a-23b as follows: “And he who desires that none of
his vows made during the year shall be valid, let him stand at the
beginning of the year and declare, ‘Every vow which I shall make in the
future shall be null.’ (His vows are then invalid) providing that he
remembers this at the time of the vow.” (OP,.CIT. p. 36. See also
Dilling Exh. 171.).
Professor Theodor Reik’s analysis of the Kol Nidre was as
follows: “The text was to the effect that all oaths which believers take
between one Day of Atonement and the next Day of Atonement are declared
invalid” (Freedman p. 36).
Who reading these facts taken from Jewish “Culture” isn’t
reminded of the statement of the Kremlin boss who said: “Treaties are
like pie crusts, made to be broken”?
According to the Talmud sodomy with a child under the age of nine
is no sin: “Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is
not deemed as pederasty with a child above that… (Footnote — Rab makes
nine years the minimum, but if one committed sodomy with a child of
lesser age, no guilt is incurred” (Sanhedrin 54b 55a — Dilling Exh. 54).
“Raba said, It means this: When a grown up man has intercourse
with a little girl is it nothing, for when a girl is less than this
(footnote: less than three years old)it is as if one puts the finger into
(footnote: tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come
back to the little girl under three years); but when a small boy has
intercourse with a grown woman he makes her as ‘a girl that is injured by
a piece of wood.'” (KETHUBOTH 11b — Dilling Exh. 54).
“”For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an
Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an
Israelite, there is no death penalty’ (SANHEDRIN p. 57a Dilling Exh 147).

THE TALMUD TEACHES THAT THE JEWISH PEOPLE ARE THE MESSIAH:
“These are the throes of mother Zion which is in labor to bring
forth the Messiah — without metaphor, the Jewish people” (KETHOBOTH p.
11a – Dilling Exh 147). The “without metaphor” means that the Jewish
people are LITERALLY the “Messiah”.
In fact according to the Talmud an Israelite is a divine being:
“R. Hanna said: If a heathen smites an Israelite on the jaw, it as if he
had assaulted the Divine Presence; for it is written, ONE THAT SMITETH A
MAN (i.e. Israelite) ATTACKETH THE HOLY ONE” ( SANHEDRIN 58B – Dilling
Exh. 59).
In 1924 the noted Jewish writer and editor Maurice Samuel
published a book entitled, YOU GENTILES, in which is stated ” In the
heart of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. (VERITAS VINCIT WAR! WAR! WAR! by
Cincinnatus, p. 142).
Jews are people, God’s people, but non-Jews are beasts, animals:
“Abide ye here with the ass (which may be rendered) people that are like
an ass” (KETHUBOTH 111a — Dilling Exh. 148; TALMUD UNMASKED p. 51).
“A Jewish mid-wife … is forbidden to help a non Jewish woman
even if be possible to help her without desecrating the Sabbath, because
she is to be considered only as an animal” (SCHULCHAN ARUCH, ORACH CHAIM
330 — quoted in JUDAISM IN ACTION p. 200).
“The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not
human being just beasts: (BABA MECA 11,6 — code of the Jews).
“Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted
to manufacture, but only a Jew because this must be manufactured by human
beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human beings
” (SCHUDCHAN ARUCH, ORACH CHAIM 14, 20, 33, 39. TALMUD JEBOMOTH 61 —
IBIDEM).
“On the house of the goy one looks as upon the fold of cattle”
(TOSEFTA, ERUBIN VII,2 — IBIDEM).
“The souls of the non-Jewish people come from the devil such as
the cattle and animals have. The seed of the stranger is also cattle
seed” (SCHELA TAL. 4.2, MEMCHEM P. 53 f. 221-JUDAISM IN ACTION p. 197).
This means that killing a Christian is no different than killing a cow
as far as the Pharisee Jew is concerned.
“Marriages taking place among Gentiles have no binding strength:
their cohabitation us just as the coupling of horses, therefore their
children do not stand as humanly related to their parents” (SCHULCHAN
ARUCH — IBIDEM). This means Christian children may be killed and used
for whatever purposes they may choose as in ritual murder and medical
experiments.
“Although the people of the world outwardly resemble Jews, they
are actually only as apes din comparison with men” (Schene Lucohoth
Ha’berith — ibidem).
“When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2,800 slaves: (SIMEON
HADDARSEN fol. 56-d — The Code of the Jews).
“God created them in the form of men for the glory of Israel.
But Akum (Christians) were created for the sole end of ministering unto
them (the Jews) day and night. Nor can they ever be relieved of this
service. It is becoming to the son of a king (an Israelite) that animals
in their natural form, and animals in the form of human beings (i.e.,
non-Jews, Christians, R.G.) should minister unto him” (MIDRASCH, TALPIOTH
FOL 225d — THE TALMUD UNMASKED p.50)
“The Jews were created to be served by the non-Jews. The latter
must plow, sow, seed, dig, mow, bind, sieve and grind. The Jews were
created to find all this in readiness (BERCHOTH — JUDAISM IN ACTION 201)

END OF PART ONE. PART TWO WILL INCLUDE TOPICS SUCH AS
‘THE TALMUD AND KILLING CHRISTIANS”, ” RENOUNCING THE NEW TESTAMENT?” AND
“MODERN DAY JEWS AND JESUS”.


“The judgement of history depends on who writes it” (Richard Nixon)

From [email protected] Mon Aug 5 15:22:31 PDT 1996
Article: 1917 of alt.bible.prophecy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!freenet.unbc.edu!news.scn.org!
news.abs.net!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!in-news.erinet.com!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!
in2.uu.net!news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: Luther and the Jews Pt 3
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 19:18:26 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 334
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97170.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:53832 alt.christnet:85042 alt.religion.christian:104792
alt.bible.prophecy:1917

bud wrote:
>
> >
> > Understand that I wanted to avoid beginning this, but since Mr. Keren and
> > others are now obviously beginning to attempt to bring this issue into
> > the Christian Newsgroup I sincerely believe it is time to have a balance
> > in this regard, especially since I have alse been noticing some postings
> > about Hitler being a Christian, etc. I believe it is time and I hope all
> > or most of the sincere Christians will understand why this should be
> > done… And, I also hope that this can cease somewhere along the line…

Part 3 begins:
The following is an article that appeared in “The Christian News”. It
was entitled “Luther and the Jews” and written by Pastor R. H. Goetjen.
There are some striking samples of information that would seem
particularly relevant to the alt.revisionism newsgroup. Because of the
length of the article, It is presented here in Three parts. This is part
number three. You can contact “The Christian News” at: 3277 Boeuf
Lutheran Road, New Haven, MO 63069; or, you can email them at:
[email protected]

HOLOCAUST PROPAGANDA
The men who are spreading the Holocaust propaganda are Pharisee
Jews. they have already prayed for forgiveness in advance for breaking
their vows and oaths. It their oaths are not to be trusted, can we trust
anything they say, especially when the can reap millions, yea, billions
of dollars from making people believe their propaganda? Or, shall we
believe historical researchers who are known for their integrity and have
nothing materially to gain for standing up for the truth but have to face
persecution at the hand of the Jews and government officials who are
under Jewish influence?
Douglas Reed in his book FAR AND WIDE gives us the following
information: “Thus the WORLD ALMANAC for 1947 (two years after the war’s
end) printed such Jewish supplied ‘estimates’, which gave the world’s
population of Jews in 1939, when the war began, at 15,688,259…
“In 1948 the New Your Times (a Jewish owned newspaper) published
what was offered as authoritative, statistical article, which stated that
the figure of Jewish world population for the year 1948 was between
15,700,000 and 18,600,000” (p. 310 & 312).
We naturally ask, How could that be, if the Germans killed
6,000,000 Jews? It would appear that the Pharisee Jews forgot that
Christians can also figure. Thus by 1950 and 1951 the estimates were
changed to allow for Hitler’s alleged “Holocaust.” The 1939 estimated
figure was beefed up about a million and the figure for 1951 was cut down
to 11,303,350. Apparently Hitler and the Germans killed the 6,000.000
Jews somewhere between 1948 and 1950 or 1951, some three to five years
after Hitler was dead and the Allies were occupying Germany.
“Doubtless, several thousand Jewish persons did die in the course
of the Second ‘World War, but this must be seen in the context of a war
that cost many millions of innocent victims on all sides. To put the
matter into perspective, for example, we may point out that 700,000
Russian civilians died during the siege of Leningrad, and a total of
2,050,000 German civilians were killed by Allied air raids and forced
repatriation after the war. In 1955, another neutral Swiss source, DIE
TAT of Zurich (January 19, 1955), in a survey of all Second World War
casualties based on figures on the International Red Cross put the ‘Loss
of victims of persecution because of politics, race or religions who died
in prisons and concentration camps between 1939 and 1945’ at 300,000, not
all of whom were Jews and this figure seems the most accurate assessment”
(DID SIX MILLION REALLY DIE by Richard Harwood, p. 28). Note the report
said “died” not “were killed”. Many thousands of inmates died toward the
end of the war because of typhus which was caused in part by lack of
food.
The World Center of Contemporary Jewish documentation puts the
number of Jews under German control when German occupied territory was at
its widest at 5,294,000. This figure, however, includes the 2,000,000
Jews which were in western Russia and the Baltic States, the majority of
which were evacuated east of the Ural mountains. This it is unlikely
that more than 4,000,000 Jews ever were under Hitler’s control. How many
of these 4,000,000 Jews survived after 1945? By 1965 there were
3,375,000 persons who claimed compensation from the West German
government for having suffered under the Nazis between 1939 and 1945.
Most of these claimants were Jews.
There is in existence an order by Himmler dated Dec. 28, 1942:
“The death rate in the concentration camps must be reduced at all costs.”
Too many were dying of disease and thus cutting down the labor force.
On Sept. 30, 1943 Himmler was informed that the death rate had been
reduced from 8.5% to 2.8% (see Holocaust News 1982)
$50,000 REWARD
The Institute For Historical Review offered $50,000 to anyone who
could prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Nazis exterminated
millions of Jews during World War II in gas chambers, primarily at
Auschwitz. Only three people filled out the claim form in an attempt to
prove the case and win the money. It turned out that none of the three
had any real evidence to present. See special Report published by the
Institute For Historical Review entitled NAZI GASSING A MYTH? A NEW LOOK
AT THE HOLOCAUST.
But let us digress a minute. Why all this concern about the
“alleged” six million Jews supposedly killed and little and/or no concern
about the sixty million and more non-Jews that were slain by the Soviets
behind the iron curtain? Are six million Jews somehow worth much more
than sixty million non-Jews? Or do we perhaps subscribe to the principle
that Jews alone are human beings and the goyim are beasts, and therefore
killing sixty million non-Jews is no more than killing so many cattle?
The Pharisee Jews who engineered and financed the Russian
Revolution followed the Talmudic principle: “Even the best of the goyim
should be killed.” All the non-Jewish intelligentsia were put to death
for no other reason than that they were “the best of the goyim” and might
become leaders against them. Thus essentially only the non-leader class
of the goyim were permitted to live.
Donald Day in his book ONWARD CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS when speaking of
the Cheka (no K.G.B) states: “it was this organization which
systematically massacred all members: men, women, children, of the upper
and middle classes in Russia. The Jews applied terror to all classes of
the population. It was used to enable them to obtain complete control
over the people living in Russia” (p. 94).
Donald Day calls the liberal clique in this country which
defended the Bolshevist atrocities and held protest meetings, collected
funds, employed lawyers to defend communists and revolutionaries the
“unintelligentsia.” He said that they have become senile and raving
lunatics. They defend the communists but brand the person who condemns
the Jew, the Communist, the Communist International, or the Soviet
government as a traitor to society. Mr. Day, who was a foreign
correspondent in Europe before and during the World War II for the
Chicago Tribune, points out:
“The unintelligentsia was one of the first classes to be
thoroughly and systematically liquidated by the Jewish terror. All
Russian liberal leaders, and this included the Social Democratic Party,
were exterminated. The portent of this action was never grasped by the
unintelligentsia abroad. That is, if with the assistance of their
efforts a communist regime should be established in their own country
THEY WOULD BE ONE OF THE FIRST CLASSES TO BE PURGED FROM THE RANKS OF
SOCIETY. THIS SEEMINGLY HAS NEVER ENTERED THEIR THOUGHTS” (p. 96)
(emphasis added).
When it comes to atrocities, reports by men of honesty and
integrity reveal the horrible and incredible cruelties which were
inflicted on the Russians who were unwilling to bow to the Pharisee Jew
communist tyranny. Mr. Zinovieff (Jew name — Apfelbaum) in a speech
reported in the NORTHERN COMMUNE, published in Petrograd on September 19,
1918, No. 109, made this statement: “To overcome our enemies we must
have our own socialist militarism. We must win over to our side
90,000,000 of the 100,000,000 of the population of Russia under the
soviets. S FOR THE REST, WE HAVE NOTING TO SAY TO THEM, THEY MUST BE
ANNIHILATED” (quoted in JUDAISM IN ACTION p. 90 — third book). In other
words, from the beginning it was planned to kill 10,000,000 Russians who
would not go along with Bolshevism.
THE LONDON TIMES, Nov. 14, 1919, printed a letter written by a
British officer from Russia to his wife. Here are a few quotes: “The
Bolshevists are devils. I hope to send you copies of 64 official photos
taken by British officers at Odessa when the town was retaken from the
Bolshevists … As no paper will publish them I suggest that you should
have copies made … They show men who’ve been crucified with the torture
of the human glove. the victim gets crucified, nails through his elbows.
The hands are treated with a solution which shrivels the skin. the skin
is cut our with a razor, round the wrist, and peeled off, till it hangs
by the fingernails — the ‘human skin glove’ … Most of the photos are
of women. Women with their breasts cut off to the bone … We have here
at headquarters passes issued to Bolshevists by commissaries on occupying
Ekaterinodar. These passes authorize the holders to arrest for use of
the soldiery. Sixty-two girls were arrested like this and thrown to the
Bolshevist troops. Those who struggled were killed quite early on. The
rest, when used and finished, were mutilated and thrown dead or dying, in
the two small rivers flowing through Ekaterinodar. (This reminds one of
the quotation previously cited from the TALMUD: “A Jew may do to a
non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as a piece of meat.” R.H.G.)
In all towns occupied by Bolshevists and reoccupied by us ‘slaughter
houses’ are found choked with corpses. Hundred of ‘suspects” men, women
and children were herded in these — doors and windows manned and the
struggling mass fired until most of them were dead or dying. The doors
were then locked and left. The stench in these places, I am told, is
hair-raising. These ‘slaughter houses’ are veritable plague spots and
have caused widespread epidemics…
“Unless beaten by us, the Bolshies will beat us… They have
declared war on Christianity. The Bible to them is a
counter-revolutionary book, and to be stamped out. They are aiming at
raising all non-Christian countries against the Christian countries. The
Bolshevists form about 5% of the population of Russia. — Jews (80 to 90
per cent of the commissaries are Jews), Chinese, Letts, Germans, and
certain of the skilled labor artisans … Ref. Jews — In town captured
by the Bolshevists the only unviolated buildings are the synagogues,
while churches are used for anything from movie shows to ‘slaughter
houses’. The Poles, Galacians, and Petlura have committed ‘pograms
(slaughter of Jews). Not the Russian Volunteer Armies under Denikin.
Denikin has, in fact, been so strict in protecting the Jews that he has
been accused by his sympathizers of favoring them. If, however, a
commissary, steeped in murder, with torture and rape, with mutilation,
happens to be a Jew, as most of them are, should he receive exceptional
treatment??” (Quoted from JUDAISM IN ACTION p. 91 & 92 — third book).
KILLING THE GERMANS
“The Germans are not human beings. From now on the word German
means to us the most terrible death. — if you have not killed at least
one German a day, you have wasted the day — if you kill one German, kill
another. There is nothing so amusing to us than a heap of German
corpses…”
Kill, nothing in Germany is guiltless, neither the living nor the
yet unborn. Follow the words of Comrad Stalin and crush forever the
fascist beast in its den. BREAK THE PRIDE OF THE GERMAN WOMAN. Take her
as you legitimate booty. Kill, you brace soldiers of the victorious
Soviet Army.”
The above quotations are the words of Ilja Ehrenburg, a follower
of the Talmudic faith and propaganda minister of the Soviet Union during
World War II. These words were taken quite literally by the Red hordes
of the Soviet army as they invaded Germany toward the close of the war as
the following quotations of an eye witness reveals:
“We were about 500 girls (Maidens of the Reichsarbeitsdienst —
German Labour Service)…
“Suddenly I heard loud screams and promptly five girls were
brought in by two Red Armists. the Commissar ordered them to undress..
“Now two Poles, clad in trousers only, entered the room. At
their sight the girls cried out. Briskly they seized the first of the
girls and bent her over with her back over the edge of the table until
her joints cracked. I almost fainted when one of the men pulled his
knife and cut off her right breast in the presence of the other girls. I
have never heard a woman scream as desperately as this young woman.
After this ‘operation’ both men stabbed her several times in the abdomen,
accompanied again by the howling of the Russians…
“One girl had not undressed completely, she may also have been
somewhat older than the rest of the girls who were about 17 years old.
One of the torturers soaked her bra with oil and ignited it and, while
she cried out, another drove a thin rod into her vagina until it emerged
at her navel…
“As I learned later on, approximately 2,000 girls were murdered
during the first three days of the first round of Russian occupation.”
The author of this eye witness report was and is a citizen of Brazil.
The Germans briefly retook the town where these horrors took place and
thus her life was spared. The above quotation is taken from a pamphlet,
COLD BLOODED MURDER A.D. 1945, and eye witness report by Leonora Giere —
available from LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, box 21, Reedy, W. VA. 25270
PHARISEE JEWS FINANCE COMMUNIST REVOLUTIONS
That the Bolshevists and/or Communist revolutions of Eastern
Europe were revolutions instigated, engineered and financed by
anti-Christ Pharisee Jews is not commonly known. This, of course,
reveals the control that the Pharisee Jews and their sympathizers and
dupes have over the mass media and our educational and Christian
institutions. Many books have been written about this subject but these
are ignored by the mass media, and most of these books are not allowed in
public libraries, nor in the libraries of our educational Church
institutions. One of the biggest problems is that many of those who know
these things lack the courage to do anything about it, so the Christians
are in danger of losing by default to the anti-Christian forces.
In his little book, USSR UNDER JEWISH RULE, Petrov, one who
escaped from behind the iron Curtain, maintained that the Pharisee Jew
rulers of Russia tried to hide the fact that they were Jews (e.g., by
taking on Russian names) not only form the outside world but even from
the Russian people. We asked a Christian who had escaped from Russia if
the people in the Soviet Union knew who their rulers were. he answered,
“In Russia the people say, ‘The Jews are the rulers.'”
Books which reveal that the Pharisee Jews are in control in the
Soviet Union are really available. BEHIND COMMUNISM by Frank Britton, 96
pages, is easy to read and gives background history for the Russian
Revolution. THE RULERS OF RUSSIA by Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp, D.D.,
D.Ph.,B.A., 100 pages, gives the names of the Jewish rulers of the Soviet
Union in its early years. In 1935 “The Central Committed of the
Communist party in Moscow, the very center of international communism,
consisted of 59 members, of whom 56 were Jews, and the other three were
married to Jewesses.” (p. 35).
Then there is the book THE PLOT AGAINST THE CHURCH by Maurice
Pinay, 710 pages. Part 1 (60 pages) has been reprinted separately — THE
SECRET DRIVING FORCE BEHIND COMMUNISM — and contains the information
about who is ruling the Soviet Union. The authors list all the officials
of Lenin’s government giving each man’s pedigree. here are a few summary
quotes:
“At present according to confirmed data 80% to d90% of the key
positions in all ministries in Moscow and in the remaining Soviet
Republics are occupied by Jews…
“As in Russia the countries in Europe where Bolshevism has
gained control, are also ruled by Jewish minority; the latter always
appears in the direction of the Communist government with iron criminal
and merciless hand, so as to attain the utter enslaving of the native
citizens through an insignificant group of Jews’ (pg. 70 & 71).
As the Pharisee Jew Bolshevists planned and executed the most
horrible holocaust in Russian and in other countries taken over by them,
so they have something similar planned for America…
ANNE FRANK’S DIARY — A FAKE
ANNE FRANK’S DIARY has proven to be a fake. “Court appointed
technical examiners found that parts of the Diary manuscript — accepted
as being in the same handwriting as the rest by a court in 1960 — were
written in a ball point pen ink not available until 1951. So clearly
since the 1951 additions are in the same handwriting as the rest of the
DIARY, it is evident that the DIARY wasn’t written by Anne Frank but by
someone else after the war. It is a FAKE.” (See Holocaust News 1982).
“There is no documentary evidence of the ‘Holocaust’, as Dr.
Aryeh Leon Kubovy, Director of the World Center of Contemporary Jewish
Documentation Tel Aviv admitted in La Terre Retrouvee (16 Dec. 1960):
“There exists no document signed by Hitler, Himmler or Heydrich
speaking of exterminating the Jews.'”
“In the hundreds of tons of German documents that fell into
Allied hands including the most secret records there is not one mention
of any ‘extermination plan’ for the Jews or any other ethnic group.
“There are no eye witness accounts which would stand up in any
British or American Court of Law. Most ‘eye-witness’ accounts are mere
hearsay” (ibidem).
QUESTIONING HOLOCAUST
Permit us to list a few who question the Holocaust story:
“Jewish publisher Bezalel Chaim of New York, Editor of
REVISIONIST PRESS, which circulates literature questioning the Holocaust
story.
“Jewish writer Josef Ginsburg who under the pseudonym ‘J.G. Burg’
wrote of his experiences as a deportee in Nazi custody from Rumania to
Russia. Because, as an eyewitness and a concentration inmate, he denied
that the Holocaust had happened, he was savagely beaten by Zionist thugs
whilst visiting his wife grave in a Jewish cemetery in Munich.
“Jewish writer Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal, a former U.S. State
Department official and now editor of the anti-Zionist magazine MIDDLE
EAST PERSPECTIVE. Dr. Lilienthal is the author of the classic best
seller THE ZIONIST CONNECTION (1978) which exposed Zionist power in
America. he has exposed the DIARY OF ANNE FRANK as a forgery.
“French resistance hero, Professor Paul Rassinier, a Socialist
and a former inmate of Buchenwald. he was awarded the French Resistance
Medal and was post-war Socialist Deputy in the French parliament.
Professor Rassinier was one of the first academics to publicly challenge
the ‘holocaust’ story in a series of scholarly works. He died in 1967”
(ibidem).
Many other distinguished men could be listed.
THE SALVATION OF THE JEWS
Can the Pharisee Jews be saved without believing in Jesus Christ?
Are they saved because they hold to the Old Testament Covenant? Are
they God’s chosen people? One glance at the quotations from the Talmud
quoted earlier should convince the most skeptical that the followers of
the Talmud do not hold to the Old Testament Covenant. Jesus Himself
pointed out that the Traditions of the Elders nullified the Commandments
of God. See Mt. 15: 1-9 and Mark 7: 1-13. Jesus also denied that the
Pharisees, the followers of the Traditions of the Elders (now known as
the Talmud), were Abraham’s children and called them “of your father, the
devil”. See John 8:39-44.
Can those be saved who live by the moral standard set forth in
the Talmud? Jesus said, ‘But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and
idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone: which is the second death” (Rev. 21:8)
Like all the rest of us, unless the Pharisees repent and believe
the Gospel there is no room in heaven for them. this is why we
Christians should also work and pray for the conversion and salvation of
the Pharisee Jews. Let us remember that the Lord converted the Pharisee
Saul and made of him the Apostle Paul, who no doubt was the greatest
Christian missionary of all time. With God all things are possible.

(Note: There was more continuance of the Christian evangelical message
and a warning to this nation before the article posted came to a
conclusion. While I think there was much validity to the evanglical
message, etc., and something to pray for, I think that for this newsgroup
the entire preceding parts 1,2, and 3 are EXTREMELY relevant to this
group and present some genuine challenges to those “out there”. Let he
who has an ear hear…)

From [email protected] Mon Aug 5 15:22:32 PDT 1996
Article: 1927 of alt.bible.prophecy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!freenet.unbc.edu!news.scn.org!
news.abs.net!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!in-news.erinet.com!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!
in2.uu.net!news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: Luther and the Jews pt 2
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 19:14:05 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 260
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97170.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:53841 alt.christnet:85070 alt.religion.christian:104819
alt.bible.prophecy:1927

>
> Understand that I wanted to avoid beginning this, but since Mr. Keren and
> others are now obviously beginning to attempt to bring this issue into
> the Christian Newsgroup I sincerely believe it is time to have a balance
> in this regard, especially since I have alse been noticing some postings
> about Hitler being a Christian, etc. I believe it is time and I hope all
> or most of the sincere Christians will understand why this should be
> done… And, I also hope that this can cease somewhere along the line…

Part two begins:
The following is an article that appeared in “The Christian News”. It
was entitled “Luther and the Jews” and written by Pastor R. H. Goetjen.
There are some striking samples of information that would seem
particularly relevant to the alt.revisionism newsgroup. Because of the
length of the article, It is presented here in Three parts. This is part
number two. You can contact “The Christian News” at: 3277 Boeuf Lutheran
Road, New Haven, MO 63069; or, you can email them at: [email protected]

Do the Jews today still hope to enslave the Gentile population?
Rabbi Emmanuel Rabinovich in a speech before the Emergency Council of
European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, Jan. 12, 1952 made the following
statement: “I can safely promise you that before ten years have passed,
our race will take its rightful place in the world, with every Jew a
king, and every Christian a slave” (MULLIN’S HISTORY OF THE JEWS BY
Eustace Mullins p. 128). A copy of this speech in Yiddish fell into the
hands of a Jewish Lawyer by the name of Henry Klein, who being horrified
at what he read translated the speech and made copies and spread them
abroad. This reportedly caused them to postpone their plans.
“As soon as the King Messiah will declare himself, he will
destroy Rome and make it a wilderness… Then he will start a merciless
war on non-Jews and will overpower them. He will slay them in masses,
kill their kings and lay waste the whole Roman land. He will say to the
Jews: ‘I am the Kind Messiah for whom you have been waiting. Take the
silver and the gold from the goyim'” (JOSIAH 60,6. Rabbi Abtrabanel to
Daniel, 7,13–The code of the Jews).
“even the best of the Goim (non-Jews) should be killed” (ABHODAH
ZARAH 26B TOSEPHOTH — THE TALMUD UNMASKED p. 82). This means that
Christians and other non-Jews who have leadership ability should be
killed when the Jew Pharisees take over the country by way of a communist
revolution.
“Take the life of the Kliphoth and kill them, and you will please
God the same as if he offers incense to Him” (SEPHER or ISRAEL (117b) —
ibidem).
“Extermination of Christians is a necessary sacrifice” (ZOHAR II,
43a — JUDAISM IN ACTION p. 198f.).
“:The Christian birthrate must be materially diminished” (ZOHAR
II 64b — ibidem).
“Every foreigner (non-Jew) who glorifies Sunday must be killed
without asking him” (SANHEDRIN — ibidem).
“It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is
permitted to kill him even before he was denounced” (SCHULCHAN ARUCH,
CHOSCHEN HAMISCHPATH 338 — ibidem).
“He who sheds the blood of the goyim is offering a sacrifice to
God” (TALMUD, Jaiqut Simeoni — ibidem).
TALMUD AND KILLING CHRISTIANS
The Talmud recommends that Christians should be killed and
exterminated. Neither Luther nor this write have ever recommended that
any Jews should be killed because he is a Jew. We rather desire their
repentance and salvation.
Elizabeth Dilling in her commentary on the photostatic
reproductions from the Talmud as it deals with Christ and Christians
states in the following on p. 50: “The ultimate infamy in Talmudic
Judaism is Christ, and the target of all Talmudic hatred is not just ‘the
people who are line and ass — slaves who are considered the property of
the master’ (KETH. IIIa). The docile ‘asses’ willing to be saddled and
used will be used as burden bearers for the masters. But of all the
recalcitrant ‘asses’ the Christians are the most insanely hated and
loathed because their doctrines are the reverse of every Talmud doctrine.
They rank not just animals like the rest of the non-Talmudic humanity,
but as vermin to be eradicated. Language is exhausted to find foul and
hated names for Christians in the Talmud.
“Under the name of ‘Balaam’ the most lewd passages concerning
Jesus appear. PROOF THAT JESUS IS CALLED ‘BALAAM’ is found in the JEWISH
ENCYCLOPEDIA (Balaam) which, after enumerating loathsome qualities,
states; ‘Hence . . . the pseudonym ‘Balaam’ given to Jesus in Sanhedrin
106b and Gitten 57a'” (p. 50). Mrs Dilling provides the Photostat of the
pages from the JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA where the above quotation is found.
According to the book SANHEDRIN Jesus’ (Balaam’s) mother is “she
who. . . played the harlot with carpenters. . .They subjected him to four
deaths, stoning, burning, decapitation and strangulation. . .he was
thirty-three or thirty-four years old’. . . The footnote explains:
‘Balaam is frequently used in the Talmud as a type of Jesus'” (OP.CIT.,
p. 51)
“JESUS IN HELL where his punishment is “boiling hot semen'”
(GITTEN 57a, Exh. 202-Dilling p. 51).
“CHRISTIANS IN HELL in above passages punish by ‘boiling ‘hot
excrement’ which is the punishment of all who mock ‘at the words of the
sages'” (ibidem).
“Jesus in INDEX OS SANHEDRIN, ‘chief depository of the criminal
law of the Talmud (see Dilling Exh. 43), showing page numbers where He is
denounced. Check with reproductions Exhib. 118′” (ibidem). A check with
Exh. 118 reveals that Jesus is referred to eight times in this one book
of the Talmud.
the JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA (p. 170) also treats of Jesus, calls
Jesus illegitimate and a bastard. “Rabbinical sources regard Jesus as
the ‘son of Pandera’ …although it is also noteworthy that he is also
called Ben Strada” (Dilling – Exh. 277 and 278). Jesus is repeatedly
accused of practicing magic or witchcraft.
MODERN DAY JEWS AND JESUS
Do modern day Jews still hold to such views of Jesus Christ?
Here is what one of them has written: “One of the finest things ever
done by the mob was the crucifixion of Christ. Intellectually it was a
splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle. If I’d had charge of the
executing Christ I’d have handled him differently. You see, what I’d
have done was had him shipped to Rome and fed him to the lions. They
never could have made a Savior out of excrement” (A JEW IN LOVE by Ben
Hecht, quoted in JUDAISM IN ACTION p. 114)
The JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA p. 281 furnishes evidence that Jews in
their synagogues do indeed curse the Christians in their “petition
against enemies”, also called “imprecatory appeal”, a curse which is
directed among others against the “mimim” which the encyclopedia
identifies as the “Judeo-Christian” (i.e., Jews who converted to
Christianity — ibidem, EXH. 284)
Elizabeth Dilling summarizes these cursings thus: “The
‘religious’ Jew recites the ‘Eighteen Benedictions’ or ‘Shemonoeth
Esreh’, three times weekdays, four times on holidays and Sabbaths, the
7th and the 12th of which curse Christians and non-Jews to hell and
perdition. This the ‘good orthodox Jew’ gives us Christiand 6 cursings
on ordinary days, 8 on specials” (ibidem, p. 60). Here we see why Luther
deplored the Jewish cursing of Christians and Christ.
RENOUNCE THE NEW TESTAMENT?
Now we ask our readers, is there anyone of you who is not opposed
to such “Jewish Culture’? Is it wrong to be “anti-” i.e. against the
Pharisee Jews who hold to such devilish religious principles? Remember,
if you want to condemn Luther for his anti-Pharisee Jew remarks and
treatises, then you must also condemn Jesus Christ for His anti-Pharisee
Jew stance too. If you believe we mist apologize for Luther’s
anti-Pharisaim, we will also have to apologize and renounce Christ’s
condemnation of the Pharisees. They you must also renounce the New
Testament. A certain Jewish Rabbi by the name of Coffee declared that
the NEW TESTAMENT is the most anti-Semitic book ever written (THE
INTERNATIONAL JEW, VOL II, JEWISH ACTIVITIES IN THE UNITED STATES by
Henry Ford, p. 181).
Other rabbis have also with impunity made similar statements.
The London Free Press stated Feb. 17, 1964, “‘The Christian Gospels do
much to encourage anti-Semitism,’ Rabbi Feinberg said here yesterday.”
And the Oregonian of April 1, 1956 reported” “Rabbi Juliou J. Nodel in
the role of defense attorney for the Jews of the world Friday night
branded the New Testament a work of malicious libel.”
Actually, to try to insult a Christian by calling him
anti-Semitic would be like a person during World War II trying to insult
a patriotic American by calling him anti-Fascist or anti-Nazi. And
anyone who would have tried such a stunt would have been judged as being
out of his right mind, and rightly so. Likewise those who try to smear
and insult true Christians who wish to maintain that they are not
anti-Semitic. The Pharisee Jews are not so foolish as to maintain that
they are not anti-Christian.
Maj.-Gen, Count Cherep-Spiridovich expresses his opinion this:
“Whoever forgets or omits the Jewish question, be it through ignorance,
or fear, is unfit to be a preacher, teacher or official” (THE SECRET
WORLD GOVERNMENT or THE HIDDEN HAND), Dr. Martin Luther passed this test.
Did Jesus say too much when he denounced the Pharisees as
hypocrites, whited sepulchers, as of their father the devil, etc.? Jesus
is our example that we should walk in his steps (1 Pet. 2:21). Can we
be followers of Jesus Christ without opposing the enemies of God even as
Jesus did? We note that King David also hated God’s enemies with a
perfect hatred (Ps. 139: 21,22). The seer Jehu announced that God’s
wrath was up King Jehoshaphat because the king helped the ungodly and
loved them that hate the LORD (2 Chron. 19:2).
Jesus said, “He that is not with Me, is against Me.” If we are
not with Christ in condemning the Pharisee Jews, then we are against
Christ, i.e., anti-Christ. The choice is between being anti-Pharisee or
being anti-Christ. We cannot be both for God and for the devil. So we
also cannot be both for the Son of God and for the sons of the devil.
LUTHER DENOUNCING PHARISEE JEWS
Luther made his choice. Like King David he chose to be against
God’s enemies. He, like Jesus Christ, denounced the Pharisee Jews in no
uncertain terms. he followed in the footsteps of his Saviour. As Christ
denounced the Pharisees in the hearing of His disciples to protect them
>from “the leaven of the Pharisees” (MT. 16:6-12), so Luther also preached
and wrote against the Pharisee Jews of his day to protect his followers
>from such liars, deceivers, blasphemers and cursers of Christ and
Christians.
To my knowledge, no one has ever attempted to prove that Luther
was guilty of making false charges against the Jews. On the contrary,
the only charge that his accusers try to make about Luther is that of
opposing or “hating” the Jews, even though Luther always indicated his
desire to see the Jews converted and saved. The problem today seems to
be that all too many Christians have lost the virtue of righteous
indignation as this is taught in Holy Scripture and which Jesus Christ
“Who did no sin” practised in His ministry. In fact, many “Christians”
consider righteous indignation a sin. This makes Jesus Christ a sinner.
All that Christian need to protect their good name is laws
against slander and libel. Slander is oral false witness or lies. Libel
is written false witness or lies. A criminal’s good name cannot be
protected by laws against slander and libel. His opponents by telling
the truth about him either orally or in writing can take away his good
name. Criminals need laws against “hate” and/or “racism”, or
“anti-Semitism”, then the law abiding citizen goes to jail and the
criminal or criminal group can go free. In the Soviet Union the law
abiding citizen does not just go to jail but is put to death, if he is
found guilty of “anti-Semitism” before a secret court.
Donald Day in his book, ONWARD CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS states: “From
all over the world Jewish revolutionaries poured into Russia to take
vengeance upon the Russian people and to help the erection of a new
imperialist Jewish power, one of whose first decrees was TO MAKE
ANTI-SEMITISM A CRIME PUNISHABLE BY DEATH” (p. 95. Emphasis added).
A prominent Pharisee Jew wrote: “With the rise of the Soviet
regime, the Jews have been granted rights not accorded even the most
advanced countries. The state which grievously did not employ the Jews,
now employs in White Russia 61% Jewish officials. A Jew is the president
of the state bank; Jews occupy almost all important ambassadorial
positions; universities, professions, judiciary and administration now
have a greater percentage of Jews than any other nationality.
Anti-Semitism has been declared a state offense, and is punished as
counter-revolution” (Rabbi Stephen Wise, in JEWISH OPINION, December
1933).
“HATE” LAWS
“Hate” laws have been passed in some western countries. Canada passed a
“Hate” law about 14 years ago. Recently a high school teacher was
arrested because he taught his pupils to look at both sides of the
question of the “Holocaust”. Because he questioned the alleged fact that
six million Jews were killed by the Germans in World War II, he may spend
two years behind iron bars.
Strangely enough there have been many Christians and so many
so-called Christians who have been deluded into believing that it is a
sin for Christians to hate the Pharisee Jews but is no sin for the
Pharisee Jews to hate Christians, Luther and the Germans. why is it so
much more vile to be anti-Pharisee Jew than to be anti-Christ,
anti-Christian, anti-Luther and/or anti-German?
Luther never advocated the killing of a single Jew, just as he
never advocate the killing of a single heretic. It is true that Luther
did advise the expulsion of the Jews from the country. This was not
something new. England, for example, had exiled them for 400 years and
at the time of Luther the Jews were not allowed in England. Spain had
exiled the Jews in 1492. Nearly every country in Europe had expelled the
Jews at one time or another. They were not citizens but resident aliens,
guests. Because of their wicked Pharisee “culture”, the made themselves
unwelcome guests wherever they went. We should remember that the U.S.A.
also reserves the right to expel aliens if they do not live by the laws
of the land. Since the Jews did not live by the laws of the land, the
German prince had every right to expel them, these ungrateful guests,
>from his lands.
“We believe we have shown the immense chasm which separates the
Jew and the Christian. Judaism is directly opposed to Christianity. We
repeat, then, that in a Christian country the Jew is a danger which must
be fought, since his religion makes it imperative for him to do things
prejudicial to the Christian spirit which should dominate our country.
“Not to want to fight the Jew on religious grounds seems to us a
serious mistake. Because, if we do not oppose him on such a ground, we
acknowledge his right to laws prescribed by his religion … Consequently
if we acknowledge his right to be a robber according to his religion, we
give him the right to rob us. You may see where such a theory leads us’
(quoted in WHY WE CHRISTIANS SHOULD OPPOSE JEWS by Dr. P.E. Lalane, M.D.,
Montreal, Canada, p. 10). We may add that this theory may lead also to
having them rape our children and women and slaughtering us like cattle.
RELIGION AND RACE
This we see that Luther was not alone in seeing the damage that
is done to a country by the Pharisee Jew and his Babylonian Talmud. It
must be remembered that Jews who are sincerely converted to Christianity
are not responsible for this evil. then there are also Jews who have
drifted away from Pharisee Jew Talmudic religion and have absorbed the
Christian values and morals of their Christian neighbors. They also must
not be classified with the Pharisee Talmudic Jew. IT IS NOT THEIR RACIAL
STOCK BUT THEIR RELIGION WHICH MAKES THE PHARISEE TALMUDIC JEW WHAT HE
IS. Some of the bravest opponents to the evils of Zionism and Talmudism
have come from non-Talmudic Jews.

End of part two. Part three, the final part, goes into
the “Holocaust”

Article: 54758 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!nntp.teleport.com!
news.serv.net!news.alt.net!news1.alt.net!news.u.washington.edu!news.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!
chi-news.cic.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!zombie.ncsc.mil!newsgate.duke.edu!
interpath!news.sprintlink.net!news-fw-22.sprintlink.net!news.gte.net!usenet
From: bud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.bible.prophecy
Subject: webster definitifon of Semite
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:36:50 -0700
Organization: home
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tpm97039.gte.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01E-GTE (Win16; I)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:54758 alt.christnet:86991 alt.religion.christian:106817
alt.bible.prophecy:2472