Ellis 0201, Ellis Don

From [email protected] Sat Jan 19 13:18:29 EST 2002
Article: 1342059 of alt.revisionism
Path: hub.org!hub.org!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!feed.centurytel.net!not-for-mail
From: “Randy Burton” <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <ik3h4uc56hvjoi2tlo2jakrc767m3ffc[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 100% of Brian Blank’s Phone Number – Give it
Lines: 148
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:08:50 -0600
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.142.170.104
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: feed.centurytel.net 1011452572 209.142.170.104 (Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:02:52 CST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:02:52 CST
Organization: CenturyTel.Net
Xref: hub.org alt.revisionism:1342059

“Brian Blank” <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 08:19:32 -0600, “Mike Goodman”
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >”Brian Blank” <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]
> >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 04:53:59 -0600, “Mike Goodman”
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >”Brian Blank” <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >news:[email protected]
> >> >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:20:12 -0600, “Kelton Speers”
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >”Brian Blank” <[email protected]> wrote in
message
> >> >> >news:[email protected]
> >> >> >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 07:19:17 -0600, “Ali Goldberg”
> >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >”Brian Blank” <[email protected]> wrote in
> >message
> >> >> >> >news:[email protected]
> >> >> >> >> “Dr. Ewan Jackson” <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >> news:[email protected]
> >> >> >> >> > Brian Blank <[email protected]> wrote in
> >message
> >> >> >> >> news:<[email protected]>…
> >> >> >> >> > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 06:26:28 +0100 (CET),
> >> >> >> >> > > [email protected] wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> > > >From: [email protected] (Dr. Ewan Jackson)
> >> >> >> >> > > >Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> >> >> >> >> > > >Subject: 100% of Brian Blank’s phone number
> >> >> >> >> > > >Date: 14 Jan 2002 00:11:36 -0800
> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > >Ewan – Kindly give us the rest of the numbers.
> >> >> >> >> > > >Presumably it relates to an address in
> >Portland/Salem,Oregon?
> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> > > And the reason that you would want the rest of the numbers
is
> >> >what
> >> >> >> >> > > exactly?
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > It is perfectly legimitate to resolve arguments over the
> >> >telephone.
> >> >> >> >> > Usenet is so impersonal and slow. Much better to phone
someone
> >up
> >> >> >> >> > and discuss your differences like a mature adult.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> And the differences that Ellis would have with this person who
is
> >> >> >> >> unknown to him would be what exactly?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Brian Blank
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Why don’t you ask Ellis? You seem to know him so well.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I don’t know you at all. I assumed that when Jerome said ” It is
> >> >> >> perfectly legitimate to resolve arguments over the telephone.
> >> >> >> Usenet is so impersonal and slow. Much better to phone someone
up
> >> >> >> and discuss your differences like a mature adult” that he
actually
> >> >> >> knew what these differences were.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> By the way, for you to pretend that you are not Don Ellis is
totally
> >> >> >> laughable. Your postings have a certain style (simplistic, void
of
> >> >> >> argument, aggressive and hateful) that make identification so
easy.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >What changed your mind? Went I called you last night (mr. please
don’t
> >> >call
> >> >> >me any more), you wasn’t so damn sure.
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh, so you now agree that you are Don Ellis and that you were
talking
> >> >> about yourself in the third person.
> >> >>
> >> >> But you did not phone me last night, you are simply lying.
> >> >>
> >> Restoration of line snipped by Don Ellis:
> >> Incidentally the word “when” is not spelt “went.”
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >>
> >> >> Brian Blank
> >> >
> >> >LOL, acting big and brave now? Want me to call you again? LOL
> >>
> >> You didn’t phone me, Don. You are a liar.
> >> You won’t phone me, Don. You are a coward.
> >> You can’t phone me, Don. You don’t have my telephone number.
> >
> >LOL, stop acting silly, you little sissy. You know damn well I called you
> >and you almost started crying because you thought your daddy was going to
> >get mad. Did you know the call was recorded by me? Oh yes, so stop
> >whining…baby boo. LOL
>
> What time was this mythical call? We were all out from 5.30 pm to
> Midnight.
>
> The call was recorded by you? That must have been a one sided
> conversation, just the voice mail message which does not have my voice
> on it.
>
> Oh, by the way, my father died in 1968 so I doubt that he would be in
> a position to get mad or to take my computers away.
>
> Perhaps you should check with Ewan as he seems to know so much about
> me? Except of course, my wife’s name, the town I live in and my
> telephone number.
>
LOL. trying to cover your ass? LOL

‘I am weary of seeing the issue of “child porn” blown out of
proportion (I’ve been on and around the Net since 1988, and have
yet to come across anything I’d consider “child porn.” I’ve
seen photos of naked children, but then I’ve got some of those in
my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or
any great moral danger to our society).’ – Ken McVay OBC
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian Blank

From [email protected] Sat Jan 19 13:18:29 EST 2002
Article: 1342061 of alt.revisionism
Path: hub.org!hub.org!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!64.245.249.27.MISMATCH!jfk3-feed1.news.digex.net!dca6-feed2.news.digex.net!intermedia!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!feed.centurytel.net!not-for-mail
From: “Hank Harrison” <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Knock, Knock Donnie
Lines: 44
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:11:28 -0600
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.142.170.104
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: feed.centurytel.net 1011452806 209.142.170.104 (Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:06:46 CST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:06:46 CST
Organization: CenturyTel.Net
Xref: hub.org alt.revisionism:1342061