In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] Mike Curtis writes:
>>If you think the Giwer-Troll has _opinions_ worth spit, considering the
>>absolute bullshit and lies he blows from his lips, whatever benifit of
the
>>doubt I had about your idoeological bent just went right out the window.
>>
>>PUBLIC APOLOGY ALERT: I, Mark Van Alstine, do publicly and humbly
>>apologize to Mr. Curtis for doubting his obviously warranted warnings
>>about Ehrlich606. He was right and I was wrong. I humbly beg Mr.
Curtis’s
>>forgiveness.
>>
>
>Accepted. Now it is time to start a real discussion here. It does seem
>that Ehrlich might be the best game in town at the moment so let’s
>keep him honest. 🙂
Matt Giwer deserves a lot of respect. He is not trained in history, he
does not have a large historical library, a scanner, or access to primary
materials. And yet he still scores points, gives as good as he gets, and
takes the heat, mostly alone.
His lack of accuracy is more than compensated by his refusal to accept
counter arguments that are frequently little more than appeals to
authority. I don’t always agree with the language he uses, but his
general dynamism, and skepticism, are eminently praiseworthy. If I had to
endorse an approach to life, I would much rather endorse an approach that
was skeptical and questioning, than one which was defensive and
harrassing.
Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!imci3!
newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (Ehrlich606)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Baron exposes shameless Jewish Holocaust liars
Date: 28 Jun 1996 19:20:54 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 22
Sender: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
writes:
>
>>I wonder about you, Mr. Ehrlich. Does calling a fellow poster a “cunt”
not
>>imply a little hate? Does making sexist, racist remarks not imply a
little
>>hate? Does making anti-semitic remarks not imply a little hate? Does
doing
>>*all* of the above, in the last week alone, not imply a *lot* of hate?
>>Giwer has done all that.
>
>>–
>>Gord McFee
Well, since you are in the mood for questions, what about these? Do the
expressions *String him up!*, *String up that puppy, twice!*, and *Hang
them all!* imply hate? Do you think it odd that such expressions of hate
be directed at individuals who have already been dead for 50 years? And
since those remarks emanated from your side of the aisle, what does that
say about the hate fighters on your side?
Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!
news.gmi.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!
howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!
newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.
news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (Ehrlich606)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: The Return of the Prodigal Poster – Faustian Follies?
Date: 28 Jun 1996 17:11:44 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 31
Sender: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader
