To whom it may concern,
I am tired of being defamed by a web site operator who receives
funding through B’nai Brith. The web site is Nizkor and it alone is not
entitled to receive exempt donations directly seeing how Nizkor is not a
registered charity or a non-profit organization. Nizkor has arranged for
B’nail Brith to funnel exempt donations to him so he can among other things,
smear people and tell outright lies about them. I will attach an archival
link and the very bottom of this communique which documents in full Ken
McVay’s phoney endowment and trusts funds for purposes of being
investigated.
I want action taken as soon as possible against this person because
it really grates me that he does his dirty work at the behest of B’nai
Brith!
Here is what I just posted:
Path: mindspring!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail
From: InfoTrust
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,can.general,soc.culture.canada
Subject: Is B’nai Brith Canada Civilly Liable For NIZKOR’S Defamation of
Private Citizens? aka Re: Historical Accuracy
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 21:31:26 -0600
Message-ID:
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Historical Accuracy
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID:
CC: B’nai Brith Canada
B’nai Brith Canada
15 Hove Street
Downsview, Ontario
M3H 4Y8
Tel.: (416) 633-6224
Fax : (416) 630-2159
e-mail:
[email protected]
Regional Offices:
Quebec Region:
Robert Libman
Regional Director
B’nai Brith Montreal
6900, Decarie Blvd, Suite 219
Montreal, Quebec
H3X 2T8
Tel.: (514) 733-5377
Fax: (514) 342-9632
e-mail: [email protected]
Ontario Region:
Arieh Rosenblum – Regional Director
15 Hove Street
Toronto, Ontario
M3H 4Y8
Tel.: (416) 633-6224 ext.132
Fax: (416) 630-2159
e-mail: [email protected]
Ottawa Region:
Centretown Corporate Services
130 Slater St. Suite 750
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6E2
Fax: (613) 594-8705
Halton/Peel Region:
Joyce Aster
Ontario Regional Director
B’nai Brith Halton/Peel
7330 Goreway Drive, Unit 01
Mississauga, Ontario
L4T 4J2
Tel.: (905) 678-9691
e-mail: Joyce Aster at [email protected]
Midwest Region:
Alan Yusim – Director, Midwest Region
123 Doncaster St., Suite C403
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3N 2B2
Tel.: (204) 487-9623
Fax: (204) 487-9648
e-mail: [email protected]
Western Region:
Western Regional Director
1607 90 Ave. S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2V 4V7
Tel.: (403) 258-1848
Fax: (403)-255-6548
e-mail: [email protected]
Auditor General of CCRA:
[email protected], [email protected]
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC),
[email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
>Ken Lewis wrote:
>
>[Brunoblather flushed down the old Bradbury]
How many times has Ken McVay referred to me in such a manner?
Using GOOGLE USENET search:
http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search (Page doesn`t exist)
Author: [email protected]
Keywords: flushed down the old Bradbury
I get this result:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=flushed%20down%20the%20old%20Bradbury&a
[email protected]&as_umsgid=%20&num=20&hl=en (Page doesn`t exist)
Searched Groups for flushed down the old Bradbury
author:[email protected] Results 1 – 13 of about 14
Is this the sort of public conduct funded through B’nai Brith which is to be
tolerated? There are many, many more examples I can provide for myself and
many
other people too! Does B’nai Brith know the civil liability they incur for
funding your libel and smearing of private citizens? You do remember what
happened to ADL for defaming private citizens in Colorado don’t you? They
had to
shell out $10.5 million in
a settlement and punitive damages and I have much libel by you against me on
record such as:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3bbf01e7.154718421%40news.abccom.bc.
ca&rnum=10 (Page doesn`t exist)
From: [email protected] (Ken Lewis)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Will Ken Lewis Name Just One Recipient to the Nizkor Endowment
Fund
Other Than Ken McVay? aka Re: suggestion on how to shut up loud lout paul
kneisel
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 18:55:25 GMT
Organization: Electric Zen
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References:
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Fri, 05 Oct 2001 08:44:18 -0500, Doc Tavish
wrote:
>*** post for FREE via your newsreader at post.newsfeeds.com ***
>
>On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:38:21 +0000 (UTC), <[email protected]>
>[email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>
>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>Ken Lewis wrote:
>>
>>[BlubberWhining excised]
>>
>>>How many times has it have to be asked and answered before you take
>>>your head out of your ass?
:
>>It think it’s stuck, Ken.
:
>>>Ken has already answered this. Unfortuanatly. I would have left you
>>>swinging in your own ignorance for a few more days.
:
>>Ken, this stupid lout will swing in his own ignorance for his entire
>>lifetime. I rather enjoy that thought 🙂
>>
>>>Now. Do you want to take the bet or not?
(Ken McVay’s one example of (many) public libel and smear funded through
B’nai
Brith):
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=%20&as_umsgid=9pidrd%24272q%[email protected]
t.net&num=20&hl=en (Page doesn`t exist)
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Re: Will Ken Lewis Name Just One Recipient to the Nizkor Endowment
Fund
Other Than Ken McVay?
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Exact quote: “He won’t – no balls, no bet. (Besides, he’s, er,
“impoverished,”
you know… your basic welfare bum.)”
<>
:
>Personal attack won’t be a defense when CCRA gets around to investigating
an
>endowment fund which does not make grants!
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
More examples of Nizkor’s Ken McVay’s public slanders funded through B’nai
Brith:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=a0bactklf2uar6u25j6e29phs85v92h7sg%4
04ax.com&rnum=6 (Page doesn`t exist)
Subject: Just For The Sake of Conjecture – Is B’nai Brith Civilly Liable for
Nizkor Ken McVay’s Defaming Private Citizens?
Organization: Ken McVay’s WWW.NIZKOR.ORG Smears Private Citizens
Message-ID:
(EXCERPTS)
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Question for Hilary Ostrov
Date: 5 Jan 2001 19:07:34 GMT
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
On 5 Jan 2001 19:07:34 GMT, [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
>Buck Turgidson wrote:
>
>>”Jeff F. Davis” wrote:
>[…]
>>> I am not sure but the B’nai Brith (which controls Nizkor by the way
>>> rather Ken admits this or not) is so powerful in Canada they had the
>>> nerve in a Canadian court that they should be able to illegally harass
>>> people because of the nature of the holocaust and all the good they have
>>> done to fight racism.
:
>>Looks like Li’l Tommy doesn’t bogart HIS joints!
(Ken McVay’s own documented smears):
I’d have guessed Mid-Hootch Giwerundean, actually. We used to see a
lot more of it here, but I gather the Sterno shortage of ’98 led to a
steep decline.
Of course, Donnie could simply have been sniffing gasoline.
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Just In to the Tavish Hotline!…
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:37:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:37:02 +0000 (UTC), <[email protected]>
[email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
[…]
I understand that Bradbury may need money to buy an old trailer after
his house is turned into a Jewish daycare center….
I guess there’s no way it’ll ever be kosher, tho, what with all that
lard…
—
“…I note that on the few occasions of which I am aware where purveyors of
anti-Semitic propaganda have endeavoured to justify their materials in
court on the facts and the merits, they have been singularly
unsuccessful…”
(http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/hweb/people/s/scully-olga/reason.html) Broken link
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC ([email protected])
Subject: Re: The wacky adventures of Matt Giwer
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic, soc.history.ancient, alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-01-24 09:47:43 PST
Of course. That’s what Mr. Giwer does. (With any luck at all, we may
be entertained with Full-Hootch Giwerundean during this thread, if the
Sterno holds out.)
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC ([email protected])
Subject: Re: Gourd McFee
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2000-10-09 19:03:24 PST
In article ,
Sara Salzman wrote:
[…]
[Some drunk wrote]
[ What’s more incredible is that this Susie thinks you have to count
whatever Gourd types have spent time at when all you have to do is
type in its name and there the number is. We can do the same thing
with “Susie” and get thousands and they would all be just like what
he/she/it has put out here. ]
[an understandably perplexed human with a working mind asked…]
I know the words are English, but what language is this?!
>I believe it is Full-Hooch Giwerundian. Ask Ken McVay, I believe he
>studied it a few years ago.
I must agree… the cited text has every appearance of being a sample
of Full-Hootch Giwerundean. That is quite beyond dispute.
Whether this suggests that the Moron has further degenerated to the
Full Pits or has simply begun the endless Sterno Cycle is not known.
Additional samples will, as always, provide scientists with valuable
clues.
Perhaps the real question for research scientists is this: If a Moron
ingests several gallons of Sterno, would anyone notice?
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC ([email protected])
Subject: Re: I can’t believe this
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-02-22 17:20:07 PST
But then, as the Tampa drunk would say, you knew that.
The above was in reference to Mr. Matt Giwer.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Are the above examples acceptable speech toward private citizens in public
forum
by Ken McVay, sole operator of the WWW.NIZKOR.ORG website, and funded
through
B’nai Brith with “exempt donations’?
Here is ADL getting a much deserved drubbing:
http://www.jewishsf.com/bk000512/usadlsuit.shtml (Page doesn`t exist)
Jewish Bulletin News
Judge fines ADL $10.5 million in Colorado defamation suit
CHRIS LEPPEK
Intermountain Jewish News
DENVER — A civil lawsuit that began with a neighbors’ dispute over garden
plants and fighting dogs has ended in a judgment against the Denver-based
chapter of the Anti-Defamation League — and what is believed to be the
largest defamation judgment ever awarded in a Colorado trial.
On April 28, a 12-member jury in U.S. District Court here sided with the
plaintiffs, William and Dorothy Quigley of Evergreen. The Quigleys had sued
the Mountain States chapter of the ADL and that chapter’s director, Saul
Rosenthal.
The jury awarded the Quigleys damages, mostly punitive, of $10.5 million —
a figure that astonished defendants and plaintiffs alike in the drawn-out
and complex case.
The jury found that several public statements made in 1994 by Rosenthal on
behalf of the ADL defamed the Quigleys and resulted in actual and punitive
damages.
Rosenthal said the ADL would appeal the decision.
“We were shocked and very surprised at the result,” Rosenthal said. “We’re
very surprised at the way the jury saw the evidence they did. I think the
overall reaction within ADL and, from what I’m hearing, in the community, is
complete disbelief that this kind of result has taken place.”
Jay Horowitz, the Quigleys’ attorney, said his clients were pleased with the
outcome of the litigation.
“We did not expect a verdict of this size,” Horowitz said.
The dispute began in late 1994 when the Quigleys, residents of Jefferson
County near Evergreen, were accused by their Jewish neighbors, Mitchell and
Candace Aronson, of plotting against their family for anti-Semitic reasons.
The dispute apparently began over such trivial matters as fights between
their dogs and allegations of stolen ornamental plants. It intensified into
an incident in which Candace Aronson believed that William Quigley intended
to run over her with his car.
As the dispute grew more heated, the Aronsons began listening to cordless
telephone conversations of the Quigleys, which they managed to overhear with
a police scanner and later recorded.
After consulting with the ADL, the Aronsons later told area media of
overhearing their neighbors tell crude anti-Semitic jokes and make comments
that the Aronsons took to be threats against their family.
The Quigleys denied that the threats were ever meant to be serious.
Rosenthal’s comments about the Quigleys, made on behalf of the Aronsons
after the Denver ADL agreed to state their case publicly, formed the basis
of the Quigleys’ defamation lawsuit.
Some of the comments, repeated over and over in numerous media accounts,
shocked members of the Colorado Jewish community. In various conversations,
the Quigleys refer to attaching images of oven doors to the Aronsons’ house,
of burning their children and of wishing their Jewish neighbors had been
blown up in a terrorist attack in Israel.
Throughout the various twists and turns of the case, the Quigleys insisted
that such comments were made in jest and never constituted genuine threats.
Over the next five years, the case would become a labyrinth of criminal
charges filed and later withdrawn, civil lawsuits and counter- suits.
Other developments in various stages of the case:
*It was determined that the electronic eavesdropping used by the Aronsons
was legal at the time, although soon afterward outlawed by both federal and
state statutes. The only charges that the April 28 verdict did not support
were those related to the ADL’s alleged violation of the Federal Wiretap
Act.
*William Quigley pleaded no contest to a reckless driving charge after
driving his car in an allegedly menacing manner in Candace Aronson’s
direction.
*Jefferson County District Attorney Dave Thomas withdrew the ethnic
intimidation charges he initially filed against the Quigleys and paid them
an out-of-court settlement of $75,000.
*The Quigleys sued the Aronsons and the ADL for depriving them of their
civil rights. The Aronsons settled for a non-cash settlement, but the ADL
and the Quigleys were unable to reach an out-of-court settlement, leading to
the most recent trial.
On April 28, the jury found most of the charges leveled by the ADL, based on
the tapes, to be “not substantially true.”
Now I ask if the sentence: “the jury found most of the charges leveled by
the ADL, based on the tapes, to be “not substantially true.”” has any
relevance to the false charges against me?
This is from Jewish News:
http://www.jewishaz.com/jewishnews/000519/row.shtml (Page doesn`t exist)
May 19, 2000/14 Iyar 5760, Vol. 52, No.37
Defamation row
Hefty verdict sends message of responsibility
J.J. GOLDBERG
Special to Jewish News
Anti-Defamation League director Abe Foxman likes to tell stories about
people he meets while traveling. They ask him what he does. He says he runs
an agency that defends Jews. Their response, typically, is astonishment:
“Really? Jews need defending?”
Foxman’s point is that Jews are losing their underdog image as they win
increasing acceptance in America.
This is one of those good news-bad news messages, particularly for the folks
charged with wielding the machinery of Jewish power. It’s easier than ever
to throw your weight around, but harder to elicit sympathy.
That lesson came back to bite Foxman with a vengeance last month, when a
federal jury in Denver delivered an unprecedented $10.5 million verdict
against the Anti-Defamation League for, of all things, defamation.
The jury found that ADL’s Mountain States chapter had defamed a non-Jewish
couple, William and Dorothy Quigley, by unjustly accusing them of
anti-Semitism.
The Quigleys were caught up in a backyard feud with Jewish neighbors,
Mitchell and Candace Aronson, in the affluent Denver suburb of Evergreen.
The Aronsons produced tapes of the Quigleys’ private conversations, picked
off a cordless phone by police scanner, containing what they called
anti-Semitic threats. The ADL backed them up.
The jury decided the alleged threats sounded more like private venting.
Thanks to the tapes, though, the ADL was also found guilty of violating the
Quigleys’ privacy.
Altogether, the jury levied $1.5 million in compensatory damages against the
ADL – $1 million for William Quigley’s suffering, $500,000 for Dorothy’s –
plus a whopping $9 million in punitive damages, to teach the league a
lesson.
Curiously, no fines were levied against the Aronsons, who initiated the
anti-Semitism charges and taped the conversations, nor against the Jefferson
County district attorney, who charged the Quigleys with criminal ethnic
intimidation before backing down and apologizing.
Both the Aronsons and the D.A.’s office, it seems, had long since settled
with the Quigleys – the D.A. for $75,000, the Aronsons for a handshake.
ADL officials say they tried to settle too, but were rebuffed.
The Aronsons first approached the ADL in October 1994, complaining of
anti-Semitic harassment. They had moved to Evergreen that summer and been
befriended by the Quigleys. But the friendship soured fast, going from
complaints about dogs to shouting matches over who trod on whose lawn.
In October things turned ugly when Candace Aronson claimed William Quigley
tried to run her over. Soon after, Mitchell Aronson picked up the Quigleys’
cordless phone on his police scanner, and overheard Dorothy Quigley
complaining to a friend about Aronson’s wife in language he considered
anti-Semitic.
In late October the Aronsons brought their fears to ADL regional director
Saul Rosenthal. They also went to District Attorney David Thomas, claiming
they were victims of ethnic intimidation, a felony in Colorado.
In consultation with prosecutors, sheriff’s deputies and ADL lawyers, the
Aronsons proceeded to tape another 100 hours of phone calls. Nobody – not
the Aronsons, not the ADL, not the sheriff’s deputies nor the prosecutors –
realized a new federal wiretap law had just taken effect, outlawing such
surveillance.
In December the Aronsons filed a federal civil suit against the Quigleys.
Three days later, Thomas filed criminal charges. In between the Aronsons
appeared at a press conference with ADL’s Rosenthal. He accused the Quigleys
of waging “a vicious anti-Semitic campaign.”
Then the case began to collapse. When the district attorney learned the
tapes were illegal, he dropped his intimidation charges. In a public
apology, he admitted the tapes showed no evidence of “anti-Semitic conduct
or harassment.”
Soon after, the Quigleys sued everyone involved for ruining their
reputations.
A native New Yorker, Quigley had been chief financial officer at Paramount
Pictures and president of Vestron Pictures, producing such movies as “Dirty
Dancing” and John Huston’s “The Dead.” He moved to Denver in 1993 to head up
United Artists’ theater chain.
After the ADL called him an anti-Semite, Quigley alleged, he found himself
shunned by his mostly Jewish friends and colleagues.
ADL officials insist they did nothing wrong. They’re asking the judge to set
aside the jury’s verdict.
Privately, some ADL officials say they were hung out to dry when the
Quigleys settled with everyone but them. Their accusations of anti-Semitism
simply followed the district attorney’s lead. They didn’t listen to the
tapes first, but neither did the D.A.
A few ADL staffers suggest they’ve been singled out because the league’s
deep pockets make it an irresistible target.
ADL officials don’t say so, but there’s something unsettling about the
relish with which the jury punished the ADL, awarding triple the damages the
Quigleys had asked. The judgment carries echoes of past crusades against the
ADL, which often seemed less about correcting wrongdoing and more about
cutting ADL – and the Jews – down to size.
In the end, though, the ADL rebroadcast an accusation of anti-Semitism
before investigating. That’s foolish. More disturbing, it attacked private
citizens for opinions voiced at home among friends. That’s chilling.
The case’s most important lesson, though, is precisely the lesson the jury
intended. The accusation of anti-Semitism is an awesome weapon, because of
the public revulsion it generates. The power to lodge that accusation
carries grave responsibilities.
In a world where Jews are as powerful as their enemies, the Jewish community
is accountable for its actions. We’re all on notice.
J.J. Goldberg is a free-lance writer in New York.
Care to deny that you defame people on a daily basis Ken McVay, director of
NIZKOR.ORG? Care to deny that your web site receives “exempt donations”
which
you are NOT entitled to receive directly but are funneled through B’nai
Brith?
Does anyone wish to deny that B’nai Brith is liable in a civil suit for
their
funding a person who regularly tells defamatory lies against people?
How does one view this in light that NIZKOR defames private citizens in a
public
forum using “exempt donations” funneled through B’nai Brith.
https://nizkor.org/funding.shtml Broken link
Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation (Canadian receipt)
https://nizkor.org/league-donation.html Broken link
The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its cooperative affiliation
with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada. The League is a
national volunteer organization dedicated to combatting antisemitism,
racism and bigotry, and to promoting human rights for all Canadians.
Donors wishing to use their VISA or MASTER CARD for their donation may
call B’nai Brith directly, at 1-416-633-6224, and advise the receptionist
that they wish to make a donation to the Nizkor Project; If you prefer,
you can print this form and send to:
The Nizkor Project
c/o The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada
15 Hove Street
Toronto, Ontario M3H 4Y8
Name:________________________________________
Street Address:________________________________________________
City_________________State/Province__________Postal Code_______
E-Mail Address:_________________________________
Amount Enclosed: $___________
Please make your donations payable to “The League for Human Rights of
B’nai Brith Canada,” and add the words “Nizkor Trust Fund” to the cheque’s
memo section. A portion of amounts donated to the Trust Fund is used to
build the Nizkor Endowment Fund. If you prefer that all of your donation
be invested for Nizkor’s future needs, please earmark your cheque or draft
with the notation ‘For The Nizkor Endowment Fund Only. (All bequests
should be to the ‘Nizkor Endowment Fund, Care of The League for Human
Rights of B’nai Brith Canada’.)
Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt.
[#0235903-43-13]
———————–
Compare the arrangement Ken McVay’s Nizkor has with B’nai Brith and the
following scam to cheat CCRA and tax payers:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=i40bntkq8652svuum6s5i4gd4dpfl
j0qtd%404ax.com (Page doesn`t exist)
From: Doc Tavish ([email protected])
Subject: JAIL DEAL FOR RABBIS IN HOLOCAUST $CAM and HASIDIC GROUP CHARGED
WITH
$60 MILLION FRAUD
Message-ID:
Date: 2001-08-11 12:16:55 PST
(EXCERPT)
<<>>
http://www.usajewish.com/scripts/usaj/paper/Article.asp?ArticleID=932
(Link active October 7, 2001 for verification.) (Page doesn`t exist)
HASIDIC GROUP CHARGED WITH $60 MILLION FRAUD
The Tash folks, who may or may not have invited neo-Nazi Haider to their
wedding, now have worse headaches to worry about.
Huge tax scam exposed
Religious group issued phony receipts for tens of millions
Hundreds of people and businesses in Montreal’s Jewish community are to face
criminal charges or be required to pay tens of millions of dollars in evaded
taxes as a result of a guilty plea yesterday in a Saint-Jerome court. The
guilty
plea by a religious group connected to the Hasidic community in suburban
Boisbriand capped a two-year investigation of what federal tax auditors say
is
the largest-ever tax fraud involving a religious organization in Quebec.
The religious group, which is known as Construit Toujours Avec Bonte and has
links to the Montreal Rabbinical College, pleaded guilty to issuing tax
receipts
for charitable donations that overstated the amount of the donation.
A senior Montreal construction executive blew the whistle on the scam when
he
approached Revenue Canada, now part of the Canadian Customs and Revenue
Agency,
with taped information in 1997. The resulting investigation saw federal tax
sleuths seize about $60 million in phony receipts from individuals and
businesses in the Jewish community, court documents say.
Joseph Gutstadt, president of Magil Construction International, the
whistle-blower who exposed the fraud, said in a telephone interview last
night
from Israel: “I’m happy that, at the end of the day, justice has prevailed.”
But Gutstadt said he was disappointed that Construit Toujours was fined only
$400,000, and that none of the administrators of the organization or the
rabbinical college were charged.
(Montreal Gazette, sent in by R. Shultz)
In pursuit of donors linked to tax evasion Hundreds in Jewish community
under
scrutiny by federal officials. Federal tax investigators insisted yesterday
that
they will continue an investigation involving hundreds of people and
businesses
in the Jewish community suspected of participating in a charitable-donation
tax
fraud. The case involves about $60 million in claimed donations, federal tax
officials said, making it Quebec’s largest-ever tax fraud involving a
religious
organization.
On Wednesday, a religious group connected to the Hasidic community of Tash,
in
suburban Boisbriand, pleaded guilty to issuing charitable-donation tax
receipts
which overstated the amounts actually given.
Yesterday, the community, through a public-relations firm, asserted that
government officials had agreed not to go after donors who participated in
the
scam. The same statement said the community’s Montreal Rabbinical College
would
retain the right to issue charitable-donation receipts that can be used to
reduce donors’ tax liabilities. (Montreal Gazette, sent in by R. Shultz)
I, for one am sick and tired of being smeared by B’nai Brith’s smear agent
Ken
McVay. I don’t see any real difference in what Ken McVay does as compared to
what ADL was litigated for. Canadian revenue payers subsidize a web site
through
exempt donations which is allegedly a holocaust information clearing house
BUT
the real truth is– Nizkor smears private citizens. We don’t see the Simon
Wiesenthal Center engaging in cheap shots and lies and I thoroughly resents
B’nai Brith’s attack dog, Ken McVay, saying among other things against me:
“He won’t – no balls, no bet. (Besides, he’s, er, “impoverished,” you
know…
your basic welfare bum.)”
Need I say more?
Scott Bradbury aka Doc Tavish
Here is the archival evidence that McVay’s funding is not necessarily on the
up and up:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=icu03ukfg65i3rrq5fj7m8dpma74l9k3r6%4
04ax.com&rnum=4 http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
Subject: Updated WWW.NIZKOR.ORG’s Fully Documented Blatant Dishonesty About
its Funding Made Public (For Submission to CCRA) R 31
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 08:43:44 -0600
Message-ID:
The above documented information should be more than significant to warrant
an investigation of Nizkor’s funding.
——_=_NextPart_001_01C19920.E0BCD740
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=”iso-8859-1″
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
—–Original Message—–
From: Scott Bradbury [mailto:[email protected]=
]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:46 PM
To: [email protected]; =
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; =
[email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; =
[email protected]
Subject: Why is WWW.NIZKOR.ORG Allowed to Receive =
Exempt Donations and
the Defame People?
To whom it may concern,
I am =
tired of being defamed by a web site operator who receives funding =
through B’nai Brith. The web site is Nizkor and it alone is not =
entitled to receive exempt donations directly seeing how Nizkor is not =
a registered charity or a non-profit organization. Nizkor has arranged =
for B’nail Brith to funnel exempt donations to him so he can among =
other things, smear people and tell outright lies about them. I will =
attach an archival link and the very bottom of this communique which =
documents in full Ken McVay’s phoney endowment and trusts funds for =
purposes of being investigated.
I want =
action taken as soon as possible against this person because it really =
grates me that he does his dirty work at the behest of B’nai =
Brith!
Here is what I just posted:
Path: =
mindspring!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail
From: InfoTrust =
<t—[email protected]–x.-n-e-t-c-o-m.-c-o-mRemove-Hyphens-2-Mail><=
/FONT>
Newsgroups: =
alt.revisionism,can.general,soc.culture.canada
Subject: Is B’nai Brith Canada Civilly Liable For =
NIZKOR’S Defamation of Private Citizens? aka Re: Historical =
Accuracy
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 21:31:26 -0600
Message-ID: =
<[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> =
<[email protected]> =
<[email protected]> =
<[email protected]> =
<[email protected]>
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, =
OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Historical Accuracy
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID: =
<[email protected]>
CC: B’nai Brith Canada
B’nai Brith Canada
15 Hove Street
Downsview, Ontario
M3H 4Y8
Tel.: (416) 633-6224
Fax : (416) 630-2159
e-mail:
Regional Offices:
Quebec Region:
Robert Libman
Regional Director
B’nai Brith Montreal
6900, Decarie Blvd, Suite 219
Montreal, Quebec
H3X 2T8
Tel.: (514) 733-5377
Fax: (514) 342-9632
e-mail: [email protected]
Ontario Region:
Arieh Rosenblum – Regional Director
15 Hove Street
Toronto, Ontario
M3H 4Y8
Tel.: (416) 633-6224 ext.132
Fax: (416) 630-2159
e-mail: [email protected]
Ottawa Region:
Centretown Corporate Services
130 Slater St. Suite 750
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6E2
Fax: (613) 594-8705
Halton/Peel Region:
Joyce Aster
Ontario Regional Director
B’nai Brith Halton/Peel
7330 Goreway Drive, Unit 01
Mississauga, Ontario
L4T 4J2
Tel.: (905) 678-9691
e-mail: Joyce Aster at [email protected]
Midwest Region:
Alan Yusim – Director, Midwest Region
123 Doncaster St., Suite C403
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3N 2B2
Tel.: (204) 487-9623
Fax: (204) 487-9648
e-mail: [email protected]
Western Region:
Western Regional Director
1607 90 Ave. S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2V 4V7
Tel.: (403) 258-1848
Fax: (403)-255-6548
e-mail: [email protected]
Auditor General of CCRA:
[email protected], =
[email protected]
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC), =
<[email protected]>
[email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC) =
wrote:
>In article =
<[email protected]>,
>Ken Lewis <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>
>[Brunoblather flushed down the old =
Bradbury]
How many times has Ken McVay referred to me in such a =
manner?
Using GOOGLE USENET search:
http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search (Page doesn`t exist)
Author: [email protected]
Keywords: flushed down the old Bradbury
I get this result:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=3Dflushed%20down%=
20the%20old%20Bradbury&[email protected]&as_umsgid=
=3D%20&num=3D20&hl=3Den (Page doesn`t exist)
Searched Groups for flushed down the old =
Bradbury
author:[email protected] =
Results 1 – 13 of about 14
Is this the sort of public conduct funded through =
B’nai Brith which is to be
tolerated? There are many, many more examples I can =
provide for myself and many
other people too! Does B’nai Brith know the civil =
liability they incur for
funding your libel and smearing of private citizens? =
You do remember what
happened to ADL for defaming private citizens in =
Colorado don’t you? They had to
shell out $10.5 million in
a settlement and punitive damages and I have much =
libel by you against me on
record such as:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=3D&selm=3D3bbf01e7.1=
54718421%40news.abccom.bc.ca&rnum=3D10 (Page doesn`t exist)
From: [email protected] (Ken Lewis)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Will Ken Lewis Name Just One Recipient =
to the Nizkor Endowment Fund
Other Than Ken McVay? aka Re: suggestion on how to =
shut up loud lout paul
kneisel
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 18:55:25 GMT
Organization: Electric Zen
Message-ID: =
<[email protected]>
References: =
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]> =
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Fri, 05 Oct 2001 08:44:18 -0500, Doc Tavish
<[email protected]> =
wrote:
>*** post for FREE via your newsreader at =
post.newsfeeds.com ***
>
>On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:38:21 +0000 (UTC), =
<[email protected]>
>[email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC) =
wrote:
>
>>In article =
<[email protected]>,
>>Ken Lewis <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>>
>>[BlubberWhining excised]
>>
>>>How many times has it have to be asked =
and answered before you take
>>>your head out of your ass?
:
>>It think it’s stuck, Ken.
:
>>>Ken has already answered this. =
Unfortuanatly. I would have left you
>>>swinging in your own ignorance for a few =
more days.
:
>>Ken, this stupid lout will swing in his own =
ignorance for his entire
>>lifetime. I rather enjoy that thought =
🙂
>>
>>>Now. Do you want to take the bet or =
not?
(Ken McVay’s one example of (many) public libel and =
smear funded through B’nai
Brith):
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=3D%20&as_umsgid=3D=
9pidrd%24272q%[email protected]&num=3D20&hl=3Den (Page doesn`t exist)
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, =
OBC)
Subject: Re: Will Ken Lewis Name Just One Recipient =
to the Nizkor Endowment Fund
Other Than Ken McVay?
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID: =
<[email protected]>
Exact quote: “He won’t – no balls, no bet. =
(Besides, he’s, er, “impoverished,”
you know… your basic welfare bum.)”
<<Doc Tavish comment January 8, 2002: I am not =
on welfare and I am not a bum. I
resent such lies and libel which McVay is famous for =
doing on a daily basis. For
a fact, as I show further down, this sort of =
behavior is funded through B’nai
Brith!>>
>Personal attack won’t be a defense when CCRA =
gets around to investigating an
>endowment fund which does not make =
grants!
~~End =
of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
More examples of Nizkor’s Ken McVay’s public slanders =
funded through B’nai
Brith:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=3D&selm=3Da0bactklf2=
uar6u25j6e29phs85v92h7sg%404ax.com&rnum=3D6 (Page doesn`t exist)
Subject: Just For The Sake of Conjecture – Is B’nai =
Brith Civilly Liable for
Nizkor Ken McVay’s Defaming Private Citizens?
Organization: Ken McVay’s WWW.NIZKOR.ORG Smears =
Private Citizens
Message-ID: =
<[email protected]>
(EXCERPTS)
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, =
OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Question for Hilary Ostrov
Date: 5 Jan 2001 19:07:34 GMT
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
On 5 Jan 2001 19:07:34 GMT, [email protected] =
(Kenneth McVay, OBC)
wrote:
>In article =
<[email protected]>,
>Buck Turgidson =
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>”Jeff F. Davis” wrote:
>[…]
>>> I am not sure but the B’nai Brith =
(which controls Nizkor by the way
>>> rather Ken admits this or not) is so =
powerful in Canada they had the
>>> nerve in a Canadian court that they =
should be able to illegally harass
>>> people because of the nature of the =
holocaust and all the good they have
>>> done to fight racism.
:
>>Looks like Li’l Tommy doesn’t bogart HIS =
joints!
(Ken McVay’s own documented smears):
I’d have guessed Mid-Hootch Giwerundean, actually. =
We used to see a
lot more of it here, but I gather the Sterno =
shortage of ’98 led to a
steep decline.
Of course, Donnie could simply have been sniffing =
gasoline.
<end>
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, =
OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Just In to the Tavish =
Hotline!…
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:37:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID: =
<[email protected]>
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:37:02 +0000 (UTC), =
<[email protected]>
[email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC) =
wrote:
[…]
I understand that Bradbury may need money to buy an =
old trailer after
his house is turned into a Jewish daycare =
center….
I guess there’s no way it’ll ever be kosher, tho, =
what with all that
lard..
—
“…I note that on the few occasions of which I =
am aware where purveyors of
anti-Semitic propaganda have endeavoured to justify =
their materials in
court on the facts and the merits, they have been =
singularly unsuccessful…”
(http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/hweb/people/s/scully-olga/re=
ason.html) Broken link
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC =
([email protected])
Subject: Re: The wacky adventures of Matt =
Giwer
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic, soc.history.ancient, =
alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-01-24 09:47:43 PST
Of course. That’s what Mr. Giwer does. (With any luck =
at all, we may
be entertained with Full-Hootch Giwerundean during =
this thread, if the
Sterno holds out.)
<end>
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC =
([email protected])
Subject: Re: Gourd McFee
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2000-10-09 19:03:24 PST
In article =
<[email protected]>,
Sara Salzman <[email protected]> =
wrote:
[…]
[Some drunk wrote]
[ What’s more incredible is that this Susie =
thinks you have to count
whatever Gourd types have spent time at when =
all you have to do is
type in its name and there the number is. We =
can do the same thing
with “Susie” and get thousands and =
they would all be just like what
he/she/it has put out here. ]
[an understandably perplexed human with a working =
mind asked…]
I know the words are English, but what language is =
this?!
>I believe it is Full-Hooch Giwerundian. Ask Ken =
McVay, I believe he
>studied it a few years ago.
I must agree… the cited text has every appearance =
of being a sample
of Full-Hootch Giwerundean. That is quite beyond =
dispute.
Whether this suggests that the Moron has further =
degenerated to the
Full Pits or has simply begun the endless Sterno =
Cycle is not known.
Additional samples will, as always, provide =
scientists with valuable
clues.
Perhaps the real question for research scientists is =
this: If a Moron
ingests several gallons of Sterno, would anyone =
notice?
<end>
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC =
([email protected])
Subject: Re: I can’t believe this
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-02-22 17:20:07 PST
But then, as the Tampa drunk would say, you knew =
that.
<end>
The above was in reference to Mr. Matt Giwer.
~~End of =
GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Are the above examples acceptable speech toward =
private citizens in public forum
by Ken McVay, sole operator of the WWW.NIZKOR.ORG =
website, and funded through
B’nai Brith with “exempt donations’?
Here is ADL getting a much deserved drubbing:
http://www.jewishsf.com/bk000512/usadlsuit.shtml (Page doesn`t exist)
Jewish Bulletin News
<FAIR USE INTENDED — NON-PROFIT>
Judge fines ADL $10.5 million in Colorado defamation =
suit
CHRIS LEPPEK
Intermountain Jewish News
DENVER — A civil lawsuit that began with a =
neighbors’ dispute over garden
plants and fighting dogs has ended in a judgment =
against the Denver-based
chapter of the Anti-Defamation League — and what is =
believed to be the
largest defamation judgment ever awarded in a =
Colorado trial.
On April 28, a 12-member jury in U.S. District Court =
here sided with the
plaintiffs, William and Dorothy Quigley of =
Evergreen. The Quigleys had sued
the Mountain States chapter of the ADL and that =
chapter’s director, Saul
Rosenthal.
The jury awarded the Quigleys damages, mostly =
punitive, of $10.5 million —
a figure that astonished defendants and plaintiffs =
alike in the drawn-out
and complex case.
The jury found that several public statements made in =
1994 by Rosenthal on
behalf of the ADL defamed the Quigleys and resulted =
in actual and punitive
damages.
Rosenthal said the ADL would appeal the =
decision.
“We were shocked and very surprised at the =
result,” Rosenthal said. “We’re
very surprised at the way the jury saw the evidence =
they did. I think the
overall reaction within ADL and, from what I’m =
hearing, in the community, is
complete disbelief that this kind of result has =
taken place.”
Jay Horowitz, the Quigleys’ attorney, said his =
clients were pleased with the
outcome of the litigation.
“We did not expect a verdict of this size,” =
Horowitz said.
The dispute began in late 1994 when the Quigleys, =
residents of Jefferson
County near Evergreen, were accused by their Jewish =
neighbors, Mitchell and
Candace Aronson, of plotting against their family =
for anti-Semitic reasons.
The dispute apparently began over such trivial =
matters as fights between
their dogs and allegations of stolen ornamental =
plants. It intensified into
an incident in which Candace Aronson believed that =
William Quigley intended
to run over her with his car.
As the dispute grew more heated, the Aronsons began =
listening to cordless
telephone conversations of the Quigleys, which they =
managed to overhear with
a police scanner and later recorded.
After consulting with the ADL, the Aronsons later =
told area media of
overhearing their neighbors tell crude anti-Semitic =
jokes and make comments
that the Aronsons took to be threats against their =
family.
The Quigleys denied that the threats were ever meant =
to be serious.
Rosenthal’s comments about the Quigleys, made on =
behalf of the Aronsons
after the Denver ADL agreed to state their case =
publicly, formed the basis
of the Quigleys’ defamation lawsuit.
Some of the comments, repeated over and over in =
numerous media accounts,
shocked members of the Colorado Jewish community. In =
various conversations,
the Quigleys refer to attaching images of oven doors =
to the Aronsons’ house,
of burning their children and of wishing their =
Jewish neighbors had been
blown up in a terrorist attack in Israel.
Throughout the various twists and turns of the case, =
the Quigleys insisted
that such comments were made in jest and never =
constituted genuine threats.
Over the next five years, the case would become a =
labyrinth of criminal
charges filed and later withdrawn, civil lawsuits =
and counter- suits.
Other developments in various stages of the =
case:
*It was determined that the electronic eavesdropping =
used by the Aronsons
was legal at the time, although soon afterward =
outlawed by both federal and
state statutes. The only charges that the April 28 =
verdict did not support
were those related to the ADL’s alleged violation of =
the Federal Wiretap
Act.
*William Quigley pleaded no contest to a reckless =
driving charge after
driving his car in an allegedly menacing manner in =
Candace Aronson’s
direction.
*Jefferson County District Attorney Dave Thomas =
withdrew the ethnic
intimidation charges he initially filed against the =
Quigleys and paid them
an out-of-court settlement of $75,000.
*The Quigleys sued the Aronsons and the ADL for =
depriving them of their
civil rights. The Aronsons settled for a non-cash =
settlement, but the ADL
and the Quigleys were unable to reach an =
out-of-court settlement, leading to
the most recent trial.
On April 28, the jury found most of the charges =
leveled by the ADL, based on
the tapes, to be “not substantially =
true.”
<end>
Now I ask if the sentence: “the jury found most =
of the charges leveled by
the ADL, based on the tapes, to be “not =
substantially true.”” has any
relevance to the false charges against me?
This is from Jewish News:
http://www.jewishaz.com/jewishnews/000519/row.shtml
<FAIR USE INTENDED — NON-PROFIT>
May 19, 2000/14 Iyar 5760, Vol. 52, No.37
Defamation row
Hefty verdict sends message of responsibility
J.J. GOLDBERG
Special to Jewish News
Anti-Defamation League director Abe Foxman likes to =
tell stories about
people he meets while traveling. They ask him what =
he does. He says he runs
an agency that defends Jews. Their response, =
typically, is astonishment:
“Really? Jews need defending?”
Foxman’s point is that Jews are losing their underdog =
image as they win
increasing acceptance in America.
This is one of those good news-bad news messages, =
particularly for the folks
charged with wielding the machinery of Jewish power. =
It’s easier than ever
to throw your weight around, but harder to elicit =
sympathy.
That lesson came back to bite Foxman with a vengeance =
last month, when a
federal jury in Denver delivered an unprecedented =
$10.5 million verdict
against the Anti-Defamation League for, of all =
things, defamation.
The jury found that ADL’s Mountain States chapter had =
defamed a non-Jewish
couple, William and Dorothy Quigley, by unjustly =
accusing them of
anti-Semitism.
The Quigleys were caught up in a backyard feud with =
Jewish neighbors,
Mitchell and Candace Aronson, in the affluent Denver =
suburb of Evergreen.
The Aronsons produced tapes of the Quigleys’ private =
conversations, picked
off a cordless phone by police scanner, containing =
what they called
anti-Semitic threats. The ADL backed them up.
The jury decided the alleged threats sounded more =
like private venting.
Thanks to the tapes, though, the ADL was also found =
guilty of violating the
Quigleys’ privacy.
Altogether, the jury levied $1.5 million in =
compensatory damages against the
ADL – $1 million for William Quigley’s suffering, =
$500,000 for Dorothy’s –
plus a whopping $9 million in punitive damages, to =
teach the league a
lesson.
Curiously, no fines were levied against the Aronsons, =
who initiated the
anti-Semitism charges and taped the conversations, =
nor against the Jefferson
County district attorney, who charged the Quigleys =
with criminal ethnic
intimidation before backing down and =
apologizing.
Both the Aronsons and the D.A.’s office, it seems, =
had long since settled
with the Quigleys – the D.A. for $75,000, the =
Aronsons for a handshake.
ADL officials say they tried to settle too, but were =
rebuffed.
The Aronsons first approached the ADL in October =
1994, complaining of
anti-Semitic harassment. They had moved to Evergreen =
that summer and been
befriended by the Quigleys. But the friendship =
soured fast, going from
complaints about dogs to shouting matches over who =
trod on whose lawn.
In October things turned ugly when Candace Aronson =
claimed William Quigley
tried to run her over. Soon after, Mitchell Aronson =
picked up the Quigleys’
cordless phone on his police scanner, and overheard =
Dorothy Quigley
complaining to a friend about Aronson’s wife in =
language he considered
anti-Semitic.
In late October the Aronsons brought their fears to =
ADL regional director
Saul Rosenthal. They also went to District Attorney =
David Thomas, claiming
they were victims of ethnic intimidation, a felony =
in Colorado.
In consultation with prosecutors, sheriff’s deputies =
and ADL lawyers, the
Aronsons proceeded to tape another 100 hours of =
phone calls. Nobody – not
the Aronsons, not the ADL, not the sheriff’s =
deputies nor the prosecutors –
realized a new federal wiretap law had just taken =
effect, outlawing such
surveillance.
In December the Aronsons filed a federal civil suit =
against the Quigleys.
Three days later, Thomas filed criminal charges. In =
between the Aronsons
appeared at a press conference with ADL’s Rosenthal. =
He accused the Quigleys
of waging “a vicious anti-Semitic =
campaign.”
Then the case began to collapse. When the district =
attorney learned the
tapes were illegal, he dropped his intimidation =
charges. In a public
apology, he admitted the tapes showed no evidence of =
“anti-Semitic conduct
or harassment.”
Soon after, the Quigleys sued everyone involved for =
ruining their
reputations.
A native New Yorker, Quigley had been chief financial =
officer at Paramount
Pictures and president of Vestron Pictures, =
producing such movies as “Dirty
Dancing” and John Huston’s “The =
Dead.” He moved to Denver in 1993 to head up
United Artists’ theater chain.
After the ADL called him an anti-Semite, Quigley =
alleged, he found himself
shunned by his mostly Jewish friends and =
colleagues.
ADL officials insist they did nothing wrong. They’re =
asking the judge to set
aside the jury’s verdict.
Privately, some ADL officials say they were hung out =
to dry when the
Quigleys settled with everyone but them. Their =
accusations of anti-Semitism
simply followed the district attorney’s lead. They =
didn’t listen to the
tapes first, but neither did the D.A.
A few ADL staffers suggest they’ve been singled out =
because the league’s
deep pockets make it an irresistible target.
ADL officials don’t say so, but there’s something =
unsettling about the
relish with which the jury punished the ADL, =
awarding triple the damages the
Quigleys had asked. The judgment carries echoes of =
past crusades against the
ADL, which often seemed less about correcting =
wrongdoing and more about
cutting ADL – and the Jews – down to size.
In the end, though, the ADL rebroadcast an accusation =
of anti-Semitism
before investigating. That’s foolish. More =
disturbing, it attacked private
citizens for opinions voiced at home among friends. =
That’s chilling.
The case’s most important lesson, though, is =
precisely the lesson the jury
intended. The accusation of anti-Semitism is an =
awesome weapon, because of
the public revulsion it generates. The power to =
lodge that accusation
carries grave responsibilities.
In a world where Jews are as powerful as their =
enemies, the Jewish community
is accountable for its actions. We’re all on =
notice.
J.J. Goldberg is a free-lance writer in New =
York.
<end>
Care to deny that you defame people on a daily basis =
Ken McVay, director of
NIZKOR.ORG? Care to deny that your web site receives =
“exempt donations” which
you are NOT entitled to receive directly but are =
funneled through B’nai Brith?
Does anyone wish to deny that B’nai Brith is liable =
in a civil suit for their
funding a person who regularly tells defamatory lies =
against people?
How does one view this in light that NIZKOR defames =
private citizens in a public
forum using “exempt donations” funneled =
through B’nai Brith.
<FAIR USE INTENDED — NON-PROFIT>
https://nizkor.org/funding.shtml Broken link
Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation =
(Canadian receipt)
https://nizkor.org/league-donation.html Broken link
The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its =
cooperative affiliation
with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith =
Canada. The League is a
national volunteer organization dedicated to =
combatting antisemitism,
racism and bigotry, and to promoting human rights =
for all Canadians.
Donors wishing to use their VISA or MASTER =
CARD for their donation may
call B’nai Brith directly, at 1-416-633-6224, and =
advise the receptionist
that they wish to make a donation to the Nizkor =
Project; If you prefer,
you can print this form and send to:
The Nizkor Project
c/o The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith =
Canada
15 Hove Street
Toronto, Ontario M3H 4Y8
Name:________________________________________
Street =
Address:________________________________________________
City_________________State/Province__________Postal =
Code_______
E-Mail =
Address:_________________________________
Amount Enclosed: $___________
Please make your donations payable to “The =
League for Human Rights of
B’nai Brith Canada,” and add the words =
“Nizkor Trust Fund” to the cheque’s
memo section. A portion of amounts donated to the =
Trust Fund is used to
build the Nizkor Endowment Fund. If you prefer that =
all of your donation
be invested for Nizkor’s future needs, please =
earmark your cheque or draft
with the notation ‘For The Nizkor Endowment Fund =
Only. (All bequests
should be to the ‘Nizkor Endowment Fund, Care of The =
League for Human
Rights of B’nai Brith Canada’.)
Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax =
receipt.
[#0235903-43-13]
———————–
Compare the arrangement Ken McVay’s Nizkor has with =
B’nai Brith and the
following scam to cheat CCRA and tax payers:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=3D&rnum=3D1&selm=3Di=
40bntkq8652svuum6s5i4gd4dpflj0qtd%404ax.com (Page doesn`t exist)
From: Doc Tavish =
([email protected])
Subject: JAIL DEAL FOR RABBIS IN HOLOCAUST $CAM and =
HASIDIC GROUP CHARGED WITH
$60 MILLION FRAUD
Message-ID: =
<[email protected]>
Date: 2001-08-11 12:16:55 PST
(EXCERPT)
<<<In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. =
section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who =
have expressed
a prior interest in receiving this information for =
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. – FAIR USE =
INTENDED>>>
http://www.usajewish.com/scripts/usaj/paper/Article.as=
p?ArticleID=3D932 (Page doesn`t exist)
(Link active October 7, 2001 for =
verification.)
HASIDIC GROUP CHARGED WITH $60 MILLION FRAUD
The Tash folks, who may or may not have invited =
neo-Nazi Haider to their
wedding, now have worse headaches to worry =
about.
Huge tax scam exposed
Religious group issued phony receipts for tens of =
millions
Hundreds of people and businesses in Montreal’s =
Jewish community are to face
criminal charges or be required to pay tens of =
millions of dollars in evaded
taxes as a result of a guilty plea yesterday in a =
Saint-Jerome court. The guilty
plea by a religious group connected to the Hasidic =
community in suburban
Boisbriand capped a two-year investigation of what =
federal tax auditors say is
the largest-ever tax fraud involving a religious =
organization in Quebec.
The religious group, which is known as Construit =
Toujours Avec Bonte and has
links to the Montreal Rabbinical College, pleaded =
guilty to issuing tax receipts
for charitable donations that overstated the amount =
of the donation.
A senior Montreal construction executive blew the =
whistle on the scam when he
approached Revenue Canada, now part of the Canadian =
Customs and Revenue Agency,
with taped information in 1997. The resulting =
investigation saw federal tax
sleuths seize about $60 million in phony receipts =
from individuals and
businesses in the Jewish community, court documents =
say.
Joseph Gutstadt, president of Magil Construction =
International, the
whistle-blower who exposed the fraud, said in a =
telephone interview last night
from Israel: “I’m happy that, at the end of the =
day, justice has prevailed.”
But Gutstadt said he was disappointed that Construit =
Toujours was fined only
$400,000, and that none of the administrators of the =
organization or the
rabbinical college were charged.
(Montreal Gazette, sent in by R. Shultz)
In pursuit of donors linked to tax evasion Hundreds =
in Jewish community under
scrutiny by federal officials. Federal tax =
investigators insisted yesterday that
they will continue an investigation involving =
hundreds of people and businesses
in the Jewish community suspected of participating =
in a charitable-donation tax
fraud. The case involves about $60 million in =
claimed donations, federal tax
officials said, making it Quebec’s largest-ever tax =
fraud involving a religious
organization.
On Wednesday, a religious group connected to the =
Hasidic community of Tash, in
suburban Boisbriand, pleaded guilty to issuing =
charitable-donation tax receipts
which overstated the amounts actually given.
Yesterday, the community, through a public-relations =
firm, asserted that
government officials had agreed not to go after =
donors who participated in the
scam. The same statement said the community’s =
Montreal Rabbinical College would
retain the right to issue charitable-donation =
receipts that can be used to
reduce donors’ tax liabilities. (Montreal Gazette, =
sent in by R. Shultz)
<end>
I, for one am sick and tired of being smeared by =
B’nai Brith’s smear agent Ken
McVay. I don’t see any real difference in what Ken =
McVay does as compared to
what ADL was litigated for. Canadian revenue payers =
subsidize a web site through
exempt donations which is allegedly a holocaust =
information clearing house BUT
the real truth is– Nizkor smears private citizens. =
We don’t see the Simon
Wiesenthal Center engaging in cheap shots and lies =
and I thoroughly resents
B’nai Brith’s attack dog, Ken McVay, saying among =
other things against me:
“He won’t – no balls, no bet. (Besides, he’s, =
er, “impoverished,” you know…
your basic welfare bum.)”
Need I say more?
Scott =
Bradbury aka Doc Tavish
<END>
Here is the archival evidence that McVay’s funding is =
not necessarily on the up and up:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=3D&selm=3Dicu03ukfg6=
5i3rrq5fj7m8dpma74l9k3r6%404ax.com&rnum=3D4 (Page doesn`t exist)
Subject: Updated WWW.NIZKOR.ORG’s Fully Documented =
Blatant Dishonesty About its Funding Made Public (For Submission to =
CCRA) R 31
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 08:43:44 -0600
Message-ID: =
<[email protected]>
The above documented information should be more than =
significant to warrant an investigation of Nizkor’s funding.
——_=_NextPart_001_01C19920.E0BCD740–
From: Scott Bradbury [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:46 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Why is WWW.NIZKOR.ORG Allowed to Receive Exempt Donations and
the Defame People?
