Anon probable 5, Grosvenor William 2008 – p5

Article: 613060 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: FrankArthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german
Subject: Wiesel & Wiesenthal – Dynamic Duo Of Liars!
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 18:06:34 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 342
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 18213
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.swiss:58695 soc.culture.europe:613060 soc.culture.german:343914

But the filthy Christkiller ZYDS are still demanding billions from Christians
everywhere for the so-called HOLOHOAX!!

This, even though prominent ZYDs COLLABORATED with Nazis!

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:22:13 -0400, in soc.culture.jewish “ElParedon”
wrote:
“Daniel Bernard” wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> The Dynamic Duo Of Lies

> Written by Jayne Gardner

> Part of what helped me to finally understand that I had been lied to
> about the Holocaust was the very testimony of some of the more famous
> survivors. Reading what happened to them during the war made
> absolutely no sense when stacked up against what we were being told
> about the horrors endured by the Jews in Europe’s concentration camps.
> For instance, Elie Wiesel, a man who has come to personify the
> Holocaust, told of Jews being thrown into open pits of fire at
> Auschwitz, a fate that he only managed to escape by sheer chance.
> Here he differs from the majority of survivors who told of gas
> chambers being the instrument of death for the majority of camp
> inmates:

> “Forced to choose from among several Allied war propaganda lies, he
> chose to defend the fire lie instead of the boiling water, gassing, or
> electrocution lies. In 1956, when he published his testimony in
> Yiddish, the fire lie was still alive in certain circles. This lie is
> the origin of the term Holocaust. Today there is no longer a single
> historian who believes that Jews were burned alive. The myths of the
> boiling water and of electrocution have also disappeared. Only the gas
> remains.”

> “In his autobiography, Wiesel writes:

> “Not far from us, flames were leaping up from a ditch, gigantic
> flames. They were burning something there. A lorry drew up at the pit
> and delivered its load – little children. Babies! Yes, I saw it – saw
> it with my own eyes. those children in the flames. (Is it surprising
> that I could not sleep after that? Sleep had fled from my eyes.) So
> this is where we were going. A little farther on was another and
> larger ditch for adults. [.] ‘Father,’ I said, ‘if that is so, I don’t
> want to wait here. I’m going to run to the electric wire. That would
> be better than slow agony in the flames.'”

> Compare this with the explanation given by Thies Christopherson in his
> article entitled Reflection On Auschwitz And West German Justice:

> “At first, those who died at Auschwitz were buried, but because of the
> high ground water level (one meter) in this area between the Vistula
> and Sola rivers, that practice couldn’t be continued. A labor team
> headed by SS Staff Sergeant Moll (who had been in charge of the
> agricultural nursery at Raisko) was assigned to dig up the buried
> corpses and burn them. This was done on an open fire. The most
> unbelievable stories were told about this procedure. West German
> television even broadcast a film of this which was supposedly made in
> secret by an SS man.”

> As Wiesel continues his story, he is saved by nothing short of a
> miracle:

> “Our line had now only fifteen paces to go. I bit my lips so that my
> father would not hear my teeth chattering. Ten steps still. Eight.
> Seven. We marched slowly on as though following a hearse at our own
> funeral. Four more steps. Three steps. There it was now, right in
> front of us, the pit and its flames. I gathered all that was left of
> my strength, so that I could break the ranks and throw myself upon the
> barbed wire. In the depth of my heart I bade farewell to my father, to
> the whole universe; and, in spite of myself, the words formed
> themselves and issued a whisper from my lips: Yitgadal veyitkadach
> shmé raba. May His name be blessed and magnified.. My heart was
> bursting. The moment had come. I was face to face with the Angel of
> Death. No. Two steps from the pit we were ordered to turn to the left
> and made to go into our barracks.”

> Mr. Wiesel’s lies are many and varied. When writing about the
> slaughter at Babi Yar, he wrote:

> “Later, I learn from a witness that, for month after month, the ground
> never stopped trembling; and that, from time to time, geysers of blood
> spurted from it.”

> He claimed that they killed 10,000 Jews a day at Buchenwald but some
> how, miraculously, he was always spared. Is it likely that one 15 year
> old boy could survive not one, but three concentration camps whose
> entire raison d’etre was to kill as many Jews as possible?

> It has been said that Elie Wiesel “is the Holocaust,” and yet when he
> wrote his autobiographical novel, Night there is no mention of gas
> chambers. He has been caught in lie after lie and yet to this day he
> holds to his story in spite of a great deal of evidence that he has
> been less than truthful.

> In an account of Wiesel’s time at Auschwitz, he claims that, while
> working, he injured his foot and had to spend some time in the camp
> infirmary. Of course, this begs the question as to why a camp which
> was built, ostensibly, to annihilate Jews would even have an
> infirmary. Does it make any sense that a place built for the sole
> purpose of killing Jews on a large scale would bother having an
> infirmary staffed with doctors and nurses? And if Wiesel, then a 15
> year old boy with an injured foot, could not even work, why would they
> not just kill him on the spot?

> What really convinced me that Wiesel is a liar is that, as the Russian
> army approached Auschwitz and liberation was on the horizon, why, when
> given the chance of remaining in the camp to be freed by the Soviets
> or to evacuate with the Germans, Wiesel decided, along with about
> 20,000 other survivors, to leave with the Germans? In light of what we
> have been taught about the Holocaust, why would someone leave with his
> tormentors, who, he claimed, were depraved mass murderers, instead of
> waiting for his liberators?

> It makes no sense whatsoever to rational people and it is to his
> eternal shame that Wiesel has been one of the worst offenders when it
> comes to selling Holocaust lies to an unsuspecting public, even
> winning the Nobel Peace Prize in the process. When President Jimmy
> Carter needed to choose someone to take charge of the President’s
> Commission on the Holocaust he chose an unapologetic liar, Elie
> Wiesel.

> A few weeks back, I watched the Oprah Winfrey show in which she
> escorted Mr. Wiesel around the grounds of Auschwitz. He showed great
> humility as he walked with Ms. Winfrey through the camp where he had
> been interned as a child, a performance which should be considered for
> an Academy Award in the category of keeping a poker face while
> continuing to recite the same old lies.

> Mr. Wiesel should be ashamed of himself.

> Our second liar is none other than Nazi-hunter extraordinaire, Simon
> Wiesenthal, who devoted his post war life to hunting down Nazi war
> criminals. According to Mark Webber, of the Institute For Historical
> Review:

> “Wiesenthal’s reputation as a moral authority is undeserved. The man
> whom The Washington Post has called the “Holocaust’s Avenging Angel”
> has a little known but well-documented record of reckless disregard
> for truth. He has lied about his own wartime experiences,
> misrepresented his postwar “Nazi-hunting” achievements, and has spread
> vile falsehoods about alleged German atrocities.”

> It is unclear what exactly happened during Wiesenthal’s war years,
> since he has said various things at various times that are completely
> at odds with one another. There were accusations that he was, at one
> time, a Communist fighter, and still others that he was a Nazi
> collaborator, an accusation leveled against him by Austrian Chancellor
> Bruno Kreisky, who said:

> “I really know Mr. Wiesenthal only from secret reports, and they are
> bad, very nasty. I say this as Federal Chancellor … And I say that
> Mr. Wiesenthal had a different relationship with the Gestapo than I
> did. Yes, and this can be proven. I can’t say more [now]. Everything
> else, I’ll say in court.

> My relationship with the Gestapo is unambiguous. I was their prisoner,
> their inmate, and I was interrogated. His relationship was a different
> one, I can say, and this will come out clearly. It’s bad enough what
> I’ve already said here. But he can’t clear himself by charging me with
> defaming his honor in the press, as he might wish. It’s not that
> simple, because that would mean a big court case … A man like this
> doesn’t have the right to pretend to be a moral authority. That’s what
> I say. He doesn’t have the right …

> Whether a man who, in my view, is an agent, yes, that’s right, and who
> uses Mafia methods …

> Such a man has to go….

> He is no gentleman, and I would say, to make this clear, so that he
> won’t become a moral authority, because he is not … He shouldn’t
> pretend to be a moral authority …

> I say that Mr. Wiesenthal lived in that time in the Nazi sphere of
> influence without being persecuted. Right? And he lived openly without
> being persecuted, right? Is that clear? And you perhaps know, if you
> know what was going on, that no one could risk that.

> He wasn’t a “submarine” … that is, submerged and in hiding, but
> instead, he was completely in the open without having to, well, ever
> risk persecution. I think that’s enough. There were so many
> opportunities to be an agent. He didn’t have to be a Gestapo agent.
> There were many other services.”

> Before Wiesenthal became famous for being a “Nazi hunter,” he had
> already made a name for himself spreading Holocaust propaganda,
> including the famous claim of Jewish fat being rendered and made into
> soap which was later proven to be a complete fabrication.

> In 1946, he published a book in which he included what he purported to
> be his own original sketches of the horrors going on in Mauthausen
> concentration camp. One of the drawings was of three inmates, tied to
> a post who had been murdered by the Germans. Unfortunately for Mr.
> Wiesenthal, this was soon exposed as a fraud, since the original
> drawing was an actual photograph of three German soldiers who had been
> executed by firing squad for spying and was found in a 1945 edition of
> Life Magazine.

> “The irresponsible character of this book is also shown by
> Wiesenthal’s extensive citation therein of the supposed “death bed
> confession” of Mauthausen Commandant Franz Ziereis, according to which
> four million were gassed to death with carbon monoxide at the nearby
> Hartheim satellite camp. This claim is totally absurd, and no serious
> Holocaust historian still accepts it. Also according to the Ziereis
> “confession” cited by Wiesenthal, the Germans supposedly killed
> another ten million people in Poland, Lithuania and Latvia. In fact,
> this fraudulent “confession” was obtained by torture.

> Years later, Wiesenthal was still lying about Mauthausen. In a 1983
> interview with the daily newspaper USA Today, he said of his
> experience in Mauthausen: “I was one of 34 prisoners alive out of
> 150,000 who had been put there. “This is a blatant falsehood. The
> years have apparently not been kind to Wiesenthal’s memory, because in
> his own autobiography he wrote that “almost 3,000 prisoners died in
> Mauthausen after the Americans liberated us on May 5, 1945.”

> Another former inmate, Evelyn Le Chene, reported in her standard work
> about Mauthausen that there were 64,000 inmates in the camp when it
> was liberated in May 1945. And according to the Encyclopaedia Judaica,
> at least 212,000 inmates survived internment in the Mauthausen camp
> complex.”

> Wiesenthal’s lies continued with his outrageous claims that millions
> of Jews were killed in “electrocution showers,” something that has
> since been completely debunked by historians. In 1975 and again in
> 1993, Weisenthal confessed that there were no extermination camps on
> German soil.

> “He thus implicitly conceded that the claims made at the postwar
> Nuremberg Tribunal and elsewhere that Buchenwald, Dachau and other
> camps in Germany proper were “extermination camps” are not true.”

> Wiesenthal lied yet again when he claimed that he was responsible for
> the capture and trial of Adolph Eichmann and because of his
> machinations, an innocent man by the name of Frank Walus was smeared
> and denounced (falsely) by Wiesenthal as being a Nazi war criminal.

> “It was only after an exhausting legal battle that the man who was
> vilified and physically attacked as “the butcher of Kielce” was
> finally able to prove that he had spent the war years as a peaceful
> farm laborer in Germany. Frank Walus died in August 1994, a broken and
> bitterly disappointed man. Wiesenthal’s recklessness in the Walus case
> should have been enough to permanently discredit him as a reliable
> investigator. But his Teflon reputation survived even this.”

> Wiesenthal kept the world enthralled with his hunt for the infamous
> “Angel of Death,” Dr. Josef Mengele who Weisenthal claimed had been
> sighted in various Latin-American countries. He played the role of
> “Nazi crime sleuth” with a vengeance, ultimately damaging his
> credibility with his outrageous claims.

> Wiesenthal was paid $75,000 annually for the use of his name at the
> Los Angeles Wiesenthal Centre and has been criticized widely for the
> commercializtion of the Holocaust. The director of Israels Yad Vashem
> Holocaust Centre said that: “Both the Center and Wiesenthal
> “commercialize” and “trivialize” the Holocaust.”

> It was Simon Wiesenthal who gave us the 11 million figure for the
> Holocaust, comprising 6 million Jews and another 5 million non-Jews.

> “Wiesenthal “threw out” the figure of “11 million who were murdered in
> the Holocaust — six million Jews and five million non-Jews,” said the
> Yad Vashem official. When asked why he gave these figures, Wiesenthal
> replied: “The gentiles will not pay attention if we do not mention
> their victims, too.” Wiesenthal “chose ‘five million (gentiles)’
> because he wanted a ‘diplomatic’ number, one that told of a large
> number of gentile victims but in no way was larger than that of Jews

> Towards the end of his life, Wiesenthal became disturbed by the claims
> made by “historical revisionists” and was particularly incensed by the
> work of David Duke. I’m sure that’s understandable in light of the
> fact that Wiesenthal was an adept and convincing liar and greatly
> feared having those lies exposed.

> What is particularly telling is that Simon Wiesenthal attempted
> suicide twice while in a concentration camp and both times he was
> taken to the infirmary to be nursed back to health. Surely such a
> thing would never happen in a place dedicated to exterminating every
> Jew in Europe.

> These two men, Wiesel and Wiesenthal, have come to represent the
> Holocaust. Mr. Wiesel is the consummate victim, the self-appointed
> guru of pathos and martyrdom, telling lies and fabricating aspects of
> the Holocaust in order to garner sympathy. Mr. Wiesenthal devoted his
> life to tracking down Nazi war criminals, seeking self-aggrandizement
> in the process, perhaps also trying to run from his troubling and
> largely fabricated past.

> These two men will go down in history as heroes, most likely, unless
> they are exposed, and rightly so, as charlatans and liars.

> Because that’s what they are.

ELIE WIESENTHAL was a Gestapo agent who sent dozens of Bukovina partizans
to the gallows. If he ever crossed the border into the Soviet Union he would
have been hung on the spot!

> Daniel
> http://toutsaufsarkozy.com/

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur ,
And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

or to Steve Horn ,
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

Article: 503542 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: ZYDS Didn’t Want Us to Know/Ne Znaio
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:27:52 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 119
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5769
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.europe:612990 soc.culture.russian:503542 pl.regionalne.warszawa:507246

ZYDS!! Verfluechte Juden

“Wielu ZYDs by³o euphoric przez ich wysok¹ reprezentacjê w
nowy rz¹d. Pierwszy Politburo Lenin zosta³o dominowane przez ludzi z
¯ydowskie pocz¹tki…

Pod Lenin, ZYDs stali siê w³¹czony w wszystkich jêz aspekt czasownika
Revolution, zawieraj¹c jego najbrudniejsz¹ pracê. Œluby wbrew Communists do
wykorzeñ Anti Semitism, to rozci¹gnê³o siê szybko po rewolucji –
czêœciowo z powodu wa¿noœci tak du¿o Jews w Soviet
administracja, jak równie¿ w urazowym, nieludzkim Sovietization
jazdy, które nast¹pi³y. Historyk Salo Baron zauwa¿y³ ¿e ogromnie
nieproporcjonalny numer ZYDs do³¹czy³ do nowego Soviet
tajne policje, Cheka…. I du¿o tego, który da³ siê nabraæ afoul
Cheka by³by zastrzelony przez ZYD oficerów œledczych.

Collective przywództwo, które pojawi³o siê w dniach œmierci Lenin by³o
zd¹¿y³ przez ZYD Zinoviev, loquacious, faluj¹cy – ow³osiony…”

Rapoport, Louis. (1990). War Stalin Against Jews. Wolny Press / Simon &
Schuster.

Dla prawdziwej PRAWDY o ZHIDS, odwiedŸ œwiatow¹ najlepszy ocenion¹ stronê
internetow¹
dla ZYD – WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Teraz z wiêcej dowodem wychodz¹cym udowadniaj¹cym KOLABORACJI ZHID
Z NAZISTAMI – innych 51 przypadków oprócz s³awnego przypadku Kastner –
ludzie niczego dziwnego dooko³a œwiata naprawdê nie lubi¹
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Albo, inne przydatne strony internetowe zawieraj¹:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J. Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
JAZEERA AL – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
DRUT HOFFMAN – Dedicated do Freedom Press,
Dochodzeniowy Reporting i Revisionist History
Poprzyj: [email protected]
White Nationalist Library Yggdrasil – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
Amerykañski Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Kampania dla Radical Truth w History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Albo, odwiedŸ stronê internetow¹ dla NARODOWEGO PRZYMIERZA :

Home


Oni maj¹ du¿o informacji, jak równie¿ ksi¹¿ki i zapisy.

Odpowiedz -: Frank Arthur < [email protected] >,
albo do Steve Horn < [email protected] >,
[email protected], albo [email protected]
Czuæ siê swobodnie , by zaprenumerowaæ nas do maillists dla p³ci,
homoseksualiœci i podobne.

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:55:17 -0600, FrankArthur wrote:

>”Many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the
>new government. Lenin’s first Politburo was dominated by men of
>Jewish origins…

>Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution,
>including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists’ vows to
>eradicate Anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the revolution –
>partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet
>administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization
>drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely
>disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Soviet
>secret police, the Cheka…. And many of those who fell afoul of the
>Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.

>The Collective leadership that emerged in Lenin’s dying days was
>headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, curly-haired…”

>Rapoport, Louis. (1990). Stalin’s War Against The Jews. Free Press/Simon &
>Schuster.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur ,
And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508
or to Steve Horn ,
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

Article: 503579 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,pl.regionalne.krakow,pl.regionalne.warszawa
Subject: ZHID ORDNUNGSPOLIZEI = ZYDOWSKY KOLABORANCI!!!
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 15:58:03 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 228
Message-ID:
References:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 10408
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.russian:503579 pl.regionalne.krakow:442322 pl.regionalne.warszawa:507322

Those who have failed to learn from the past 2000 years of history, are
doomed to repeat history.
Always the cursed Christkillers/ZYDS cause problems!

With now an extra 51 well documented proven cases of ZYD COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS, besides notorious KASTNER case, one MUST question the
HOLOHOAX figures!!

Now even the notorious Simon WIESENTHAL is proven to be a nazi GESTAPO
KOLLABORATEUR!!

>On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:11:30 -0700, Ken Levi wrote:
>
>>For the past 2000 years, the world has suffered because of the cursed
>>Christkiller ZHIDS.
>
>>Not just the Kollaboraci of the ZHIDS with the nazis.

>>On 27 Sep 2004 16:03:09 -0000, PhilMathews >>wrote:
>>>From: [email protected] (JohannSebastianBott)
>>>Subject: Re:ZHID ORDNUNGSPOLIZEI = ZYDOWSKY KOLABORANCI!!!
>>>Newsgroups: pl.regionalne.krakow,pl.regionalne.wroclaw
>>>On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:33:28 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>>Another significant article that merits discussion!!!

>>On Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:15:13 -0400, PAWLIKOWSKI
>> wrote:

>> > Just a moment ago, on soc.culture.polish,
>> > Dr. J. Ilicki, Associate Professor of Sociology
>> > and Judaic Studies on Upsalla University raised
>> > the question of Polish Polish in the service of
>> > Germans during occupation of Poland. The only
>> > reason for this question at this time seems to be
>> > his need to stir interethnic hatered. Provocatively,
>> > Dr. Ilicki asks:
>> > 1) who were the members of the
>> > police, volunteers or draftees?,
>> > 2) what was their social status?
>> > 3) what happened to them after the war?
>> > Just to play completely innocent (and dumb) he also asks
>> > why they were called Granatowa (dark-navy-blue) Police.
>
>> > Only naive will believe that Prof. Ilicki does not
>> > know the answers.
>> > Also only naive will believe that he is not interested
>> > in Pinsk the hometown of his parents and allegedly
>> > the site of the burial of his grandparents and over
>> > 30,000 pinksers (Jews from Pinsk). He admitte
>> > that his mother listed them as killed there with
>> > Yad Vashem. However, young (about 40 years old)
>> > Julian pretends disintrest, because he is afraid that
>> > exhumations might start at the alleged burial site
>> > and will find no skeletons as same happened last
>> > year at nearby Mariompole, presently in Lithuania.
>
>> > But coming back to Dr Illicki question: Polish Police
>> > during German occupation was dramatically reduced
>> > in numbers and pre-war policemen were forced to
>> > serve as an auxillary force to German Ordnung Polizei.
>> > They were ususally not armed,and when armed never
>> > given more than five bullets for their long rifles.
>> > Moreover, after each use of firearm they
>> > (as well as the Ukraininan Police) had to write
>> > a report for what target each bullet was used
>> > and with what effectivness, hardly an invitation to
>> > the genocide.
>
>>>>>>> Hardly truth to Pawlikowski’s story too.
>
>> > On the other hand there was a police force in
>> > the Third Reich, in which service was completely
>> > voluntary. It was called Ordnungdienst. Their
>> > emblem was a light alloy Star of David. The
>> > social background of these Jewish collaborators
>> > according to Iasaiah Trunk was as follows: 18%
>> > with post-graduate degrees, 60% with college degree,
>> > 20% with elementary education. These are data
>> > from self-serving, post-war questionaries.
>
>> > But even Trunk admits that in Warsaw the
>> > requirement was that EACH Jewish policeman
>> > has at least matura (two years of college)
>> > see page 489 of his book. In practice, the
>> > Jewish policemen were all lawyers and
>> > journalist who with the day of German
>> > occupation immediately were fired from
>> > their jobs, like the Polish teachers, because
>> > the schools were closed.
>
>> The service was voluntary. Take the job and keep
>> your life a little longer or die now!
>
>> Pawlikowski forgot how the Soviets were conscripted.
>> Under Stalin they ran to enlist hoping to avoid being
>> killed in the next “relocation”!
>
>> > While Polish teachers joined the underground,
>> > unemployed Jewish intelligentia clamored for the police work.
>
>> > Some of it was really gruesome as you remember
>> > from our previous description of the Feb. 1942
>> > execution on Rybna Street market place in Lodz.
>> > German newsreel of this horrible hanging is shown
>> > endlessly in Wiesenthal Museum in LA. Thousands
>> > of Jews standing and watching behind three
>> > uniformed Germans with their backs and holstered
>> > pistols facing Jewish crowd and about to be hanged
>> > women passing out and forced into
>> > the noose by Jewish Policemen.
>> > ————-
>> > Jozef Pawlikowski
>
>> Herman
>
>
>First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
>First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao Tse Dung
>Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!! Me
>
>If you believe in the TRUTH and the RIGHT,
>then visit www.freedomsite.org
>
>Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled – as fertiliser!!
>
>”At a time of universal deceit – telling the truth
>is a revolutionary act.”
>(George Orwell)
>
>David Icke – ‘…and the truth shall set you free’
>
>”All truth passes through three stages.
>First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
>and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
>(Arthur Schopenhauer)
>
>”The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely,
>but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak
>falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if
>they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used
>against them — except force.” — John Bryant
>
>”To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an
>acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer
>and impossible to ignore.”
>John Bryant
>
>TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions.
>G. K. Chesterton.

>We all like late night discussions, even from Stormfront,
>Christian Identity, Pamyat, Aryan Nations, etc.
>We are together with McVay, regional managers for NAMBLA.
>We like young children, so that we can train them our way.

>Ken McVay invites callers,and visitors,to his homosexuals escorts
>office: VISIT at:
>#5 – 1601 – Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada, or my home at:
>Apt. 3108 – 995 Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada
>or call: 1-250-616-9431

>As everyone can see McVay takes it as a compliment when he is
>called a “confessed child-molester” and the additional material
>should give an indication as to the why.

>”I am weary of seeing the issue of “child porn” blown out of
>proportion (I’ve been on and around the Net since 1988, and have
>yet to come across anything I’d consider “child porn.” I’ve
>seen photos of naked children, but then I’ve got some of those in
>my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or any great
>moral danger to our society).” – Nizkor Director Ken McVay
>http://www.spectacle.org/695/mcvay.html [Many paedophiles
>also have family albums with naked children photos in them.]

>Look at Ken McVay’s photo and ask yourselves; “Does he not look like
>a disheveled unkempt pervert or someone who would molest your child
>even if he or she were not naked”?
>http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg

>For detailed and documented evidence of McVay’s questionable
>background and details of convictions, please refer to Dr.David Michael’s
>detailed expose on McVay. McVay is a distraught paranoid molseter, and is
>known for claiming that anyone who refutes his lies must be a grosvenor!!
>It is also suspected that McVay fabricates responses using aliases, just
>to justify his existence to his ZHID masters.

And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

>For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
>JEW-WATCH:
>http://www.jewwatch.com

>Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
>NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
>people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

>Or, other useful websites include:
>ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
>IHR – www.ihr.org
>OSTARA – www.ostara.org
>PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
>Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
>AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
>THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
> Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
> Subscribe: [email protected]
>
>Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
>They have lots of information, as well as books and records.
>
>They also are involved in exposing Ken McVay for the crook he is,
>and passing on information to the appropriate criminal prosecutors.
>
>As a service to the public, this article is posted worldwide by a
>victim of the molester pervert Ken McVay, with the assistance
>of a group interested in detailing the depredations of the ZHIDS.
>May Ken McVay and his like,rot in gehenna.

>Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the like.

Article: 701076 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.palestine
Subject: CANADIAN PASSPORTS USED BY ZIONIST KILLERS -Repost from Zyd-Owned Newspaper – Repost
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:07:56 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 4182
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.usa:2339058 soc.culture.canada:595420 soc.culture.palestine:701076

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:04:49 -0400, “El Conquistador”
wrote:

>’Misuse of Canada’s identity’ questioned in Israeli spy operation

>Stewart Bell
>National Post

>A SENIOR Cabinet official questioned the head of Israel’s security service
>about allegations Israeli undercover agents posed as Canadians during an
>operation to assassinate a Palestinian terrorist leader, newly released
>documents show.

>Although Ottawa has said publicly it was convinced all along the spy claims
>were false, internal documents obtained yesterday show the matter has
>continued to concern the government and has been the subject of
>behind-the-scenes diplomacy.

>In a confidential report, officials said they were concerned about “other
>countries’ intelligence services misusing Canada’s identity” and that “such
>misuse endangers Canadians travelling around the world and undermines the
>integrity of Canadian passports.”

>Ronald Bilodeau, the Privy Council Office security and intelligence
>co-ordinator and Cabinet assistant secretary, met on Oct. 1 with the head of
>the Israeli Security Agency, whose spies allegedly used false Canadian
>identities during the operation in Gaza.

>”The ISA is reported to have recently had its agents pose as Canadians to
>lure a Palestinian, 22-year-old Akram Zatmeh, into informing on Intifada
>leaders in return for promises of resettlement in Canada,” according to a
>”Secret: Canadian Eyes Only” memo prepared for the meeting.

> The documents do not describe the response of the ISA chief, who reports
>directly to Ariel Sharon, the Israeli Prime Minister. Israel has denied the
>claims. But the papers show Ottawa was worried about being linked to a spy
>operation and a botched assassination that killed 14 bystanders, nine of
>them children.

>The allegations surfaced in August, when Mr. Zatmeh publicly detailed how he
>was lured into becoming an Israeli informant by agents who told him they
>were Canadians and could help him immigrate. Mr. Zatmeh said he was
>recruited by three “Canadian” agents who brought him to the Canadian embassy
>in Tel Aviv before coercing him into helping them, with doctored photos that
>showed him with naked women.

>On July 23, Mr. Zatmeh helped Israeli agents pinpoint the location of Sheik
>Salah Shehadeh, a Hamas leader. Twenty minutes later, an Israeli F-16 fired
>a one-tonne missile at the building, killing not only the sheik but also
>more than a dozen bystanders.

>Mr. Zatmeh was later arrested as a collaborator and is facing a possible
>death sentence.

>”Our initial concern … was that the press articles could be seen by some
>as alleging Canadian involvement with Israel in the assassination of Sheik
>Salah Shehadeh,” according to an Aug. 29 internal government memo. “Canada
>has nothing to do with this or with any other purported Israeli operation.”

>After the Post learned of the informant’s allegations, officials told the
>newspaper on Sept. 4 they were satisfied the claims were false. However,
>hours after the Post report on Sept. 5, John McNee, assistant deputy
>minister for Africa and the Mideast, discussed the matter with Haim Divon,
>Israel’s ambassador to Canada.

Article: 701077 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish
Subject: Canadian Postal Union Backs Anti-Israel Boycott!
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 18:08:06 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 72
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 3296
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.palestine:701077 soc.culture.europe:612992 soc.culture.polish:873080

National Canadian Postal Union Backs Anti-Israel Boycott!

Canadian Jew News have a banner-headlined story on page 3 of their issue for
May 1 2008.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers[CUPW] is the first national union in
North America
to pass a resolution supporting a boycott of Israel, divestment of investing
as well as
sanctions campaign against Israel.

CUPW represents more than 50,000 postal workers.

The resolution also calls on the government of Canada to increase aid to the
Palestinians.

On the union website is an anti-Israel resolution:
The union calls on Israel to immediately withdraw from the occupied
terriroroes in
accordance with UN Resolution 242 and to tear down the Israeli-West Bak
barrier.

The national CUPW Reolution is similar to that passed by the Canadian Union of
Public Employees
{CUPE] in 2006

CJC CEO Bernie Farber is annoyed that this resolution was passed at the
national level of CUPW.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

Article: 701130 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.palestine
Subject: Canadian Postal Union Backs Anti-Israel Boycott!
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 15:11:41 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 3219
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com uk.politics.misc:2364646 soc.culture.europe:613055 soc.culture.palestine:701130

National Canadian Postal Union Backs Anti-Israel Boycott & Divestment!

Canadian Jew News have a banner-headlined story on page 3
of their issue for May 1 2008.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers[CUPW] is the first national union
in North America to pass a resolution supporting a boycott of Israel,
divestment of investing as well as sanctions campaign against Israel.

CUPW represents more than 50,000 postal workers.

The resolution also calls on the government of Canada to increase aid
to the Palestinians.

On the union website is an anti-Israel resolution:
The union calls on Israel to immediately withdraw from the occupied
terriroroes in accordance with UN Resolution 242 and to tear down
the Israeli-West Bak barrier.

The national CUPW Reolution is similar to that passed by the
Canadian Union of Public Employees {CUPE] in 2006

CJC CEO Bernie Farber is annoyed that this resolution was passed
at the national level of CUPW.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

Article: 701138 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.palestine
Subject: Why the World Hates the Jews/ZYDs
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 18:07:45 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 303
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 19137
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.swiss:58696 soc.culture.australian:461743 soc.culture.palestine:701138

Why still after more than 2000 years does the World Still Hate the
Christkiller ZYDS/Jews!

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:18:34 -0500, in soc.culture.usa “DoD” wrote:

[Interesting, and probably true for most people outside the U.S. and a few
inside the U.S., but I dont think it tells the whole story]

Many of the bitter controversies in every corner of the globe inevitably
raise the same ancient question: why does the world hate the Jews?
Whether it’s the angry international reaction to Israel’s efforts to defend
itself in Lebanon, or Mel Gibson’s drunken rant in Malibu, the age-old
specter of anti-Semitism refuses to disappear. With only 13 million Jews in
the world – less than one fourth of one percent of the earth’s population –
why does this tiny group inspire such bitter, widespread and often violent
animosity?

The answer is obvious to anyone who monitors anti-Semitic propaganda from
all its multifarious sources. People who express hatred, resentment or fear
regarding the Jews almost always focus on charges of Jewish arrogance,
elitism, aggressiveness and lust for power.

According to the logic of anti-Semites everywhere, Jews deserve harsher
treatment than anyone else because they work harder than anyone else to
enshrine their own superior status. This argument suggests that the only way
to answer constant Jewish demands for special treatment and privilege is to
impose special limitations and restrictions on their instinctive will to
dominate.

According to such logic, the rest of the world must work together to cut
Jews down to size; only then will they function on the same plane as
everyone else. As Hutton Gibson (Holocaust-denying father of the
scandal-tarnished star, Mel) revealingly declared to interviewer Steve
Feuerstein: “I don’t know what the Jewish agenda is except that it’s all
about control. They’re after one world religion and one world government.”

This central, primeval charge that arrogant Jews seek global dominance
originates from three distinct historical factors:

1- The emphasis on the “Chosen People” concept in the Bible

2- The prominence and prosperity of Jews in most nations in which they’ve
established significant communities, and

3- The startling successes of the State of Israel in the mere 60 years of
its existence.

These circumstances sometimes perplex even people of good will and therefore
deserve deeper consideration and explanation.

I. CHOSEN PEOPLE CONCEPT

While it’s true that the Bible speaks repeatedly of a special relationship
between God and the Jews, anti-Semitic agitators have always misunderstood
or distorted the essential nature of that connection. According to
Scripture, the Jews have been chosen for distinct responsibilities, not for
unique privileges: we accept special obligations, rather than claiming
special power. In Jewish tradition, non-Jews are expected to follow just
seven commandments-the Noahide laws of basic morality. According to
mainstream Torah teaching, gentiles who follow these rules (don’t murder,
don’t steal, don’t commit gross sexual immorality, and so forth) should be
judged as righteous and assumed to earn their share in the World to Come
(the afterlife). God, however, expects his covenantal people to apply far
more numerous and stringent commandments to their behavior – 613
commandments, to be exact – regarding everything from food, to business
ethics, marital relations, and Sabbath observance.

The concept of chosen-ness, in other words, involves a significant burden
rather than privileged status -a burden reflected in the common phrase, “Ohl
Malchus Shamayim” or “The Yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven,” to describe the
commitment of every Jew who accepts the covenant of Abraham. Moreover, Jews
remain more a “choosing people” than a “chosen people” because so many
non-Jews over the centuries (and particularly in recent years) have selected
Jewish identity and converted to our faith. In the US, nearly 10% of today’s
Jewish population of 5.2 million counts as converts to Judaism. Though we
don’t emphasize proselytizing efforts in the style of Evangelical
Christians, many of the leaders of the Jewish people (including hugely
significant rabbis in nearly every era for the last 2000 years) have been
“Jews by Choice” — those who weren’t born Jewish, but chose to join our
people through an ancient, well-established process of conversion.

Finally, the whole idea of the “Chosen People” has never brought the
assumption that God selected us for unusual political, military or even
economic authority. The Bible suggests that the Jews will be “a nation of
priests and a holy nation” — not some sort of all-conquering superpower
within the Middle East or the world at large. Our tradition has always
defined Jewish power as spiritual, rather than practical and worldly. No
Jewish leader, going all the way back to Moses and Abraham, has ever
suggested that our people should dominate the world and control other
nations. The Bible specifies relatively modest borders for the Holy Land,
and repeatedly mentions the much larger, far more formidable empires to the
south (Egypt) and to the East (Babylonia, Assyria, Persia). Even during the
glory days of ancient Israel under David and Solomon the Jewish state never
achieved full control of that promised territory-let alone a world-girdling
empire. At that time, as with Israel today, the Jewish people sought only to
live unmolested within the confines of their own cherished land, each man
“beneath his own vine and own fig tree.”

II. JEWISH PROMINENCE AND SUCCESS IN THE LANDS OF THE DIASPORA

No one can deny that Jews in the United States and in many other nations
recently have achieved surprising levels of prosperity and influence but any
talk of Jewish “dominance” or “control” in those societies remains the
province of neo-Nazi propagandists. There is no significant industry or
arena of endeavor – no, not one–in any nation in the world (outside of
Israel) in which Jews outnumber or rule over non-Jews. Even the famous
Jewish command of Hollywood is an ignorant myth concerning an increasingly
international industry in which the prominence of influential Jews has
actually decreased in the last seventy years. Most of the pioneering movie
studios founded and owned by immigrant Jewish families have either gone out
of the movie production business altogether (M-G-M) or else sold out to
strikingly non-Jewish corporations (Columbia to the Japanese Sony
Corporation, and 20th Century Fox to an Australian descendant of
Presbyterian clergy, Rupert Murdoch). The two largest entertainment
conglomerates in the world boast board chairmen who are African-American
(Richard Parsons at Time Warner) and Arab American (George Mitchell at
Disney) neither of whom are remotely Jewish. The yearly lists of Hollywood’s
most influential power players, as identified by Premiere Magazine and other
sources, regularly show that close to one-fourth of the movers-and-shakers
are Jews-a disproportionate showing, to be sure, but hardly an indication of
Jewish dominance. Similarly, the Fortune 500 list of the nation’s largest
corporations features a top ten ranking that includes three oil companies
with strong Arab ties and no affection whatever for Israel, as well as a car
company (Ford) founded by one of history’s most outspoken anti-Semites, and
a retailer run by conservative Christians from Arkansas (Wal-Mart)-but not a
single corporation that was founded, run, or owned by Jews. Among the top
100, at most six (including Home Depot, Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers)
could classify in any way as “Jewish companies.” With these incontrovertible
facts easy to verify for anyone with access to the internet or a library, it
becomes even more difficult to explain the persistent, pernicious and
utterly false belief that Jews “own” or “control” most of the world’s banks,
newspapers, media companies and other important instiutions. Part of the
confusion involves appalling lies and misinformation: many callers to my
radio show somehow believe that the Rockefellers are Jewish (they were
actually German Christians who arrived in Philadelphia in 1723) or that the
Rothschild family-a favorite target of anti-Semites for more than 200
years– still dominates world banking (the family’s power actually peaked in
the Napoleonic era and their influence on the global economy today is either
invisible or non-existent).

There is also a tendency on the part of paranoid anti-Semites to search out
a few Jewish names even in areas in which Jews play minor roles in order to
triumphantly affirm the myth of “Jewish control.” Consider the case of the
Bush administration and the frequent, laughably absurd charge that it’s
somehow dominated by Jewish “neo-conservatives” who forced the President to
make war on Iraq for the sake of Israel. In truth, Jews remained
conspicuously absent from positions of authority during the first Bush term:
for the first time in more than 65 years (since the Presidency of FDR!) the
President’s Cabinet (15 department heads in all) included not a single Jew.
The true believers in a Neo-Con cabal invariably cite just two names who
held sub-cabinet posts (Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense and
Douglas Feith, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy) and a single civilian
advisor to the Defense Department (Richard Perle, of the Defense Policy
Board) who doesn’t even count as an administration employee. The
anti-Semites focus on these names not because of their importance (anyone
who believes that Wolfowitz and Feith secretly controlled their imperious,
tough-as-nails boss, Don Rumsfeld, knows nothing about Rummy) but because
they happen to be Jewish. Similarly, conspiracists like to blame Jews in the
Senate for pushing us into war with Iraq, while ignoring the fact that a
bare majority of the eleven Jewish Senators at the time (including such
fierce anti-war advocates as Russ Feingold and Barbara Boxer) actually voted
against the resolution authorizing war -at a time when nearly 80% of their
gentile colleagues lined up on the other side to support the President in
deposing Saddam Hussein.

To me, one of the most mystifying aspects of the stubborn belief in Jewish
influence and power is the notion that our fractious, deeply divided,
largely disaffiliated people somehow manages to get together to exert that
authority. I’m a Jewish radio talk show host, and so is the appalling (and
unfunny) Al Franken of Air America. We agree on nothing, and we’ve both
managed to survive several very angry, bitter, public confrontations. Do
Jew-haters believe that behind the scenes we receive the same secret memos
from Jewish Conspiracy Central, or else get together in dank, shadowy rooms
to study the one-hundred-year-old hoax, “The Protocols of the Elders of
Zion”? Less than half of the U.S. Jewish population (alas!) gives to any
Jewish charity, or holds membership in any synagogue, Temple, pro-Israel
lobbying group, B’nai B’rith lodge, or other Jewish organization.

In this context, the almost mystical, profoundly illogical belief in “Jewish
power” based on our over-representation among accountants and dentists
amounts to more than a delusion; it is, in fact, a sickness.

III: ISRAEL’S SUCCESS – AND ALLEGEDLY “EXPANSIONIST” AND “IMPERIALIST”
NATURE

In order to credit Islamist denunciations of an “Israeli Empire,” or worry
that the perennially embattled Jewish state might indeed count as uniquely
aggressive and power hungry, one must remain incurably ignorant not only of
contemporary history but of rudimentary geography. The merest glance at a
map reveals the incontrovertible fact that Israel remains, in every sense, a
tiny nation. Egypt alone – representing only one of Israel’s twenty hostile
Arab neighbors-is more than 48 times the land area of Israel. Adding
together only the various Arab nations (without including other vast Islamic
homelands like Iran and Afghanistan and Pakistan), the Arabs control well
over 300 times the area of the New Jersey-sized Jewish state. In other
words, even before President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran succeeds (God
forbid) in his plan to “wipe Israel from the map,” 99.7% of the Arab lands
are already free of Jews.

Moreover, for nearly thirty years, Israel has been shrinking and
retreating – not expanding – hardly the behavior of an aggressive empire
bent on world domination. After capturing the Sinai Peninsula, Gaza and the
West Bank in a defensive war in 1967, Israel returned the vast Sinai to
Egypt in 1978, agreed to the establishment of a Palestinian State on most of
the West Bank and Gaza in 1993, vacated its security zone in Lebanon in
2000, abandoned Gaza entirely in 2005 and, under the current Prime Minister,
committed to moving out of nearly all territory in the West Bank in the near
future. In retrospect, some of these moves look like horrible policy
mistakes, but they unequivocally indicate that there is no basis at all to
suggest that Israeli aggression accounts for contemporary anti-Semitism.

The establishment of the modern Jewish state wasn’t a cause of Jew hatred,
but a response to Jew hatred-not only in Europe, but throughout the Islamic
world where some 800,000 Middle Eastern and North African Jews were driven
from their ancient communities and found new homes in Israel. None of Israel
‘s eight major wars has been about a Jewish lust for new territory. All of
them have been about a beleaguered nation’s ceaseless attempts to make its
citizens secure from murderous attack in the distinctly limited area of
their ancestral homeland. Every Arab child in Lebanon, in Gaza, and in the
West Bank could sleep sweet, undisturbed slumber as soon as tomorrow night
if the adults once-and-for-all gave up their long-standing project of
driving the Jews out of the Middle East.

Contrary to anti-Semitic presumptions, Israel has never demanded special
privileges of any kind, but yearns (and bleeds) only for the same rights
other nations enjoy: to live undisturbed beside its neighbors without
unceasing attack by terrorists, militias and, occasionally, major armies.
Montenegro, the newest member of the family of nations after a referendum
this year, won independence and worldwide recognition despite the fact that
more than 45% of the electorate opposed bringing the nation into existence,
and only a bare majority claims Montenegran (as opposed to Serbian)
nationality. More than 80% of the residents of Israel are Jewish, and they
have fought tenaciously for their nationhood for nearly sixty years. The
desire for peaceful borders and acceptance from fanatical neighbors hardly
amounts to an Israeli demand of privileged status, but the refusal to grant
that recognition reflects the classical attitude of the anti-Semite: that
Jews indeed deserve different treatment from all other nations on earth but
in a negative, hostile and, ultimately murderous sense.

In conclusion, none of the three obsessive fears of Jew haters-the “Chosen
People” concept, Jewish prosperity in the Diaspora, and Israel’s success (so
far) in nation-building and self-defense -demonstrates in any way a push for
world conquest or superior standing for the children of Abraham. How, then,
can we understand the imperishable belief that Jews function as an arrogant,
imperious, overbearing people? In a few words, that resentment stems in
truth from the age-old Jewish refusal to abandon our separate identity, our
irreducible distinctiveness through the millennia. My friends Dennis Prager
and Joseph Telushkin provide the most compelling exposition on this dynamic
in their invaluable book, Why the Jews?, recently reissued.

In any event, the logic becomes most accessible when considered in personal,
intimate terms. If a small group among your neighbors refuses invitations to
worship in your churches and mosques, to eat the food you prepare in your
homes, to marry your daughters, to embrace your nationalisms, or to share
your enthusiasm for the ultimate, universally applicable perfection of your
Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Byzantine, Catholic, Islamic, Nazi or Communist
worldview, then it’s all but certain you will resent the members of that
stubborn group – and assume that they exclude themselves from elements of
your society due to an innate, obnoxious sense of superiority.

For Jews who try to remain faithful to the old covenant, there’s no choice
about the unyielding refusal to assimilate and disappear-and no surprise at
the angry reaction in much of the world. After all, the Bible repeatedly
predicts that response. This realization doesn’t make it any easier to cope
with anti-Semitism, but it does make the eternal hatred comprehensible. No
matter how inconvenient or unpopular, we get our marching orders from the
commandments–including the crucial and celebrated injunction to choose
life, for ourselves and our people.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23787

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur ,
And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR

or to [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:14:09 EDT 2008
Article: 1715167 of can.politics
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!64.59.134.4.MISMATCH!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality,can.politics,tor.general,soc.culture.canada,ca.politics,alt.activism.death-penalty,soc.culture.polish
Subject: Re: Homophobic African tyrant vows to kill “every single homosexual”
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 40
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 01:14:56 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1211418896 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 21 May 2008 19:14:56 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:14:56 MDT
Bytes: 2570
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.politics.homosexuality:1108216 can.politics:1715167 tor.general:345419 soc.culture.canada:596137 ca.politics:480196 alt.activism.death-penalty:480458 soc.culture.polish:873475

At least this leader knows what to do with AIDS-spreaders!
When executed, these vermin will never again contaminate people.

On Wed, 21 May 2008 17:33:41 -0700 (PDT), Sunny B
wrote:

>Canada should immediately stop all foreign aid to and cut diplomatic
>links with this hateful, homophobic dictator!!!!

>http://en.afrik.com/article13630.html

>President plans to kill off every single homosexual

>Gambian President Yahya Jammeh says he will “cut off the head” of any
>homosexual caught in his country.
>——————————————————————————–
>Monday 19 May 2008

>Addressing supporters at the end of his meet the farmers tour here
>Sunday,

>Jammeh also ordered any hotel or motel housing homosexuals to close
>down, adding that owners of such facilities would also be in trouble.

>He said the Gambia was a country of believers, indicating that no
>sinful and immoral act as homosexual would be tolerated in the
>country.

>He warned all homosexuals in the country to leave, noting that a
>legislation “stricter than those in Iran ” concerning the vice would
>be introduced soon.

>President Jammeh said he was bent on making the Gambia one of the best
>countries to live in, adding that his government had spent over US$
>100 million towards the development of the country since 1994.

>He said, however, that almost 98 per cent of the amount had gone to
>foreigners. Panapress .

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:19:51 EDT 2008
Article: 613081 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!64.59.134.4.MISMATCH!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.baltics
Subject: HOLODOMOR = REAL HOLOCAUST na Ukrainie – BY ZYDS/OGPU ON UKRAINIANS: Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 1048
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 18:11:56 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1211134316 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 18 May 2008 12:11:56 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 12:11:56 MDT
Bytes: 54352
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.ukrainian:116256 soc.culture.europe:613081 soc.culture.russian:503615 alt.politics.europe:78782 soc.culture.polish:873204 soc.culture.baltics:162082

HOLODOMOR = ZYD/NKVD HOLOCAUST ON UKRAINIANS! Message:
Probably the best analysis of what happened that I have read to date.

Trident

IS THERE A “SMOKING GUN” FOR THE HOLODOMOR?

PRESENTATION: By Professor Roman Serbyn Universit=E9 du Qu=E9bec =E0
Montr=E9al, Canada
The Ukrainian Holodomor and the Denial of Genocides
International Conference, Federigo Argentieri, Ph.D., Organizer
Guarini Institute, John Cabot University
Rome, Italy, Friday, November 09, 2007
Published by the Action Ukraine Report #889, Article 5
Kyiv, Ukraine, Monday, November 19, 2007

In his seminal study on genocide, Leo Kuper observed that “governments
hardly declare and document genocidal plans in the manner of the
Nazis”
[1]. Nevertheless, since modern states cannot function without large
bureaucracies and elaborate communication systems, tell-tale records
inevitably survive.

When the CPSU lost power and the Soviet empire fell apart, it was
Revealed that an elaborate paper trail of the 1932-33 famine and the Soviet
authorities’ involvement in it had been preserved in party and state
archives. These documents are being slowly declassified, examined and
published[2]. Historians can now give us a fairly accurate account of
the catastrophe and ascertain the responsibility of Stalin and his
collaborators.

As a result, scholars who previously hesitated to recognize the
Genocidal character of Stalin’s forced starvation of Ukrainian farmers, have
reexamined the question and readjusted their interpretations. In his
latest book, Nicolas Werth comes to the conclusion that thanks to recent
studies based on the new documents, it is now “legitimate to qualify as
genocide the cluster of actions undertaken by the Stalinist regime to punish
the
Ukrainian peasantry by famine and terror”[3].

In this paper I analyze some of the main documents that provide
smoking-gun evidence of genocide, in line with the definition of the crime
given
in the UN Convention of 1948: “acts committed with intent to destroy, in
whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”.

The key criteria in the Convention are proof of “intent” and
Identification eligible “groups”. Soviet documents corroborate the accusation
against
Stalin and his closest collaborators for deliberately exterminating
Millions of Ukrainian farmers, and show that the perpetrators targeted them as
Ukrainians.

Furthermore these and other documents reveal that the genocide was not
Just against Ukrainian farmers, the focus of the attack was the Ukrainian
Nation in all its component parts and on all its territories within the
Soviet Union.

The locus of this crime was thus the Ukrainian SSR, the predominantly
Ukrainian Kuban, and the other regions of the RSFSR with sizeable
Ukrainian populations. The simultaneous decimation of Ukrainian national
elites,
especially academic, cultural and political leaders, was an integral part of
the destruction of the Ukrainian nation.

Stalin did not intend to kill all Ukrainians (nor is such an intent
Required by the Convention); his motive was to break the backbone of the
nation
By executing a sizeable percentage of the people and reducing the rest to
servile obedience, to transform them into manageable cogs of the state
mechanism. Stalin’s means of destruction were varied: famine, shootings,
exhausting forced labor.

The UN Convention does not require the establishment of motives for
genocide, but determining the reasons for the act gives an insight
into the rationale which led to crime and thus help us comprehend the
perpetrator’s intent. Stalin’s measures against the Ukrainians were predicated
on
his political ambitions, two of which provided the motives for the
eventual genocide[4].

The first was to extend socialism beyond the borders of the USSR. He
realized that the Bolsheviks’ initial attempt to export their revolution
into Europe failed primarily because of the weakness of the Red Army.
To resume Lenin’s unfinished task, Stalin needed a powerful armed force,
Backed by modern heavy industry. Industrialization had to be financed by
Exporting natural resources, especially grain, which had to be extorted from
the
farmers at the lowest cost to the state.

War communism had shown that door-to-door requisition was costly,
inefficient and politically dangerous. After the revolution, poor
farmers appropriated and divided up the land of rich landlords. As a result,
farmers lived better, ate more but sold less to the state. Marketable grain
(sold outside the village) in tsarist times was provided by the large farms
Owned by landlords and kulaks. Now new large estates had to be set up in the
Form of sovkhozy and kolkhozy. These would give the state easy access to
grain, produced by the newly enslaved peasants.

The immediate goal was not the increase of grain production (which
could be expected to fall as a result of peasant opposition), but of the
“marketable grain” to be delivered to the state. Since the main producers of
grain
Were Ukrainians farmers, who had no tradition of the Russian semi-communal
obshchina organization, they could be expected to offer stiff resistance to
forced collectivization and confiscation of the fruits of their labor.

Stalin’s second ambition was to bring a permanent solution to the
National question, especially its crucial Ukrainian component. The 1926 census
Pegged the Ukrainian population at 31 million, of the Union’s 147 million: 23
million in Ukraine, and 8 million in the rest of the USSR, mainly along the
Ukrainian border.

Ukrainian national revival triggered by the Russian revolution forced
Lenin to give the reconquered republic nominal autonomy in the form of a
“sovereign” republic within a Potemkin-style Soviet federation.
Subsequent policy of Ukrainization, or the local application of a general
principle of korenizatsiia (nativization), allowed Ukrainians to add real
national
content to the pretentiously misleading form of “soviet republic”[5].

The Ukrainization of education, communications and administration, not
Only in Ukraine but also in the Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR, the
de-Russification of urban centers by the influx of Ukrainian farmers,
the demands on Moscow to transfer to the republic adjacent territories
with Ukrainian population, the shifting of cultural orientation from Moscow
and to the West – all these pressures on the imperial centre could not be
ignored by the Kremlin.

Stalin, Lenin’s “magnificent Georgian” and foremost expert on the
nationalities question, understood the dangers of active nation-
building in Ukraine, in the best of times. Collectivization would only
aggravate
the situation. Over 85 % of ethnic Ukrainians were farmers and their
sudden disenfranchisement could throw the countryside into such turmoil that
not only grain production would be catastrophically reduced, but also
farmers could gain the support of the national elites in a united rebellion of
the whole republic to the spoliation of their country by Moscow.

Similar, if smaller, unrest could be expected in the Kuban’ and other
ethnically Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR. In the mid-1920s Stalin had
written that the peasant question was “the basis, the quintessence, of
the national question”, that “the peasantry constitutes the main army of
the national movement” and that “there is no powerful national movement
without the peasant army”[6]. The stability and even the integrity of the
Soviet empire would be threatened.

Genocide does not happen spontaneously. The targeted group is first
identified, vilified and intimidated, then it is discredited in the
eyes of the rest of the population, and only when it has been sufficiently
isolated, is it submitted to total or partial extermination. In the summer of
1929 the GPU (political police) “uncovered” a nationalist conspiracy, headed
by
prominent Ukrainian intellectuals and conducting anti-Soviet work in
villages and regional centers.

Over 700 people were arrested for, among other things, “anti-Soviet
Activity in the villages and district centers” and a show trial was held in
March 1930, appropriately staged in a Kharkiv theatre. 45 members of this
Mythical Association for the Liberation of Ukraine (SVU) were sentenced to
death or long prison terms.

Arrests and trials of other mostly fictitious groups followed:
Ukrainian National Center, Ukrainian Military Organization, etc.[7] The
condemned were former members of the former Ukrainian national governments,
Ukrainian armed forces, Ukrainian political parties, and prominent people in
fields of education, culture and the arts.

The purpose was to terrorize the Ukrainian elites into submission and
lethargy, and thus deprive the peasants of leadership on the national
level.
It should be noted that, in connection with the less severe famine in
Russia, no parallel attack took place against Russian national elites
or the Russian culture.

Stalin’s war against the peasants began in earnest towards the end of
1929.
In a two-pronged attack he ordered to “eliminate the dekulakization as a
class” and to collectivize the middle and poor peasants. Divided into
three categories, the kulaks were dispossessed and the most dangerous were
shot.

The others were deported to the wilds of northern RSFSR, transferred
To distant regions in Ukraine, or given strips of poor land outside the
Kolkhoz near which they lived. The intention was not only to provide kolkhozes
With the confiscated land, cattle and machinery, but also to deprive the
Peasants of the more qualified leadership for their opposition to the
authorities.

During the winter of 1929-1930, 90 thousand Ukrainian households were
dekulakized, and a smaller wave more or less finished the job a year
later.
In 1934 Kossior, party boss of Ukraine, reported that 200 thousand
farms had been dekulakized in Ukraine. Out of this number of about one million
(5 members per family), several thousand were deported to the northern
parts of the RSFSR and lost to the Ukrainian nation.

Collectivization went in unison with dekulakization: a major push was
Given in early 1930. By 10 March 1930 Ukrainian kolhosps integrated 64.4% of
farmsteads with 70.9% of arable land. The operation was accomplished
with the help of some 50,000 activists, sent from Russian and Ukrainian
urban centers, with special powers to organize, punish, and terrorize.

Many poor peasants, paid for the service with confiscated goods,
participated in expropriating their richer neighbors, but many others
sympathized with the victims. Peasant rebellion swept Ukraine: in
January-March 1930, 3,190 uprisings with over 950 thousand
Participants confronted the authorities.[8]

Hundreds of fliers were picked up by the authorities with such slogans
As “Free Ukraine from Moscow rule”, “Time to rise against Moscow yoke”
And others. National and peasant factors were coming together. Stalin
sounded a temporary retreat and in October of that year collectivization was
down to 29 % of households and 34 % of arable land. But the reprieve was brief
and a year later (October 1931) the figures rose to 68 % (for households)
and 72 % for arable land, with a much higher percentage in the grain-producing
steppe regions.

The effect of Stalin’s revolution on the countryside was disastrous,
especially in Ukraine and the Kuban. From 1929 to 1932 the evolution
can be summarized in these four curt phrases: production down; state
procurement up; grain export up; peasant food consumption down.

Farmers’ opposition to collectivization, mismanagement of collective
Farms by incompetent administrators, neglect and slaughter of farm animals
seriously hindered farming and brought down its production. Yet,
enforced obligatory state procurement increased, and in 1931, 42 % of
Ukraine’s
grain harvest was turned over to the state.[9]

Kolhosps delayed or completely failed to pay out stipends for
“workday” (trudodni), and the their members had to rely on their meager and
insufficient individual plots of land and a few domestic animals for
subsistence. Undernourishment became generalized. But Stalin had
reached his goal.

Grain exports rose from below one million tons in 1929, to: 5,832,000
Tons in 1930/31 and 4,786,000 tons in 1931/32. It should be kept in mind
that one million tons could feed four to five million people for one year.
After two years of resistance and unequal struggle with the Communist
authorities, the Ukrainian elites were cowed and most of the collective and
independent farms despoiled of all their reserves. The republic was on the
brink of a major catastrophe.

On 26 April 1932, Stanislav Kossior, the General secretary of the
Communist Party of Ukraine, informed Stalin about “individual
Cases and even individual villages that are starving” but blamed it on
“local bungling, errors, particularly in the case of kolkhozes.” And,
Lest he displease his Kremlin masters, their lieutenant in Ukraine
dismissed the tragedy with the affirmation that “all talk of famine must be
categorically discarded.”[10]

Yet famine there was and on 10 June H. Petrovsky, the head of the
Ukrainian state and V. Chubar, the head of the Ukrainian government, sent
Separate letters to notify Molotov and Stalin of the appalling conditions in
the Ukrainian countryside, and to ask for help.

Chubar admitted that cases of starvation among independent and
Collective farmers had already been signaled in December and January and
that by “March-April there were dozens and hundreds of malnourished, starving,
and swollen people and people starving to death accumulate in every
village; children and orphans abandoned by their parents appeared”.

Raions and oblasts organized aid from internal resources, but were
Obliged to do this “under conditions of acute food shortage, especially
bread”.
[11]
Noteworthy additional remark: “Petliurite and other anti-Soviet moods
increased.”

Petrovsky’s letter was even more to the point. Having just returned
>from an inspection of the countryside, he realized the catastrophic situation
of the farming population. He visited many villages and everywhere saw
multitudes of people, mainly poor and middle peasants, starving, subsisting on
surrogates.

Peasants scolded him, posed embarrassing question, reproached him,
Saying “why did you create an artificial famine, […] why did you take away
The seed material – this did not happen even under the old regime, why is
It necessary for Ukrainians to travel for bread […] to non-grain
Producing territories?”.

Echoing Chubar, Petrovsky reported that “because of the famine, mass
Thefts are taking place in the villages.” Pointing out that grain harvest is
Still six week off, and famine will only intensify, Petrovsky ask:
“shouldn’t assistance be rendered to the Ukrainian countryside in the amount
of
two or, at the very least, one and a half million poods of grain?” And he
predicted that if help is not given starvation would drive peasants to pick
unripe grain and destroy much of it.

Petrovsky’s letter paints a bleak picture of the forthcoming harvest.
Since the better grain had been seized by the state, seeds of poorer quality
Were sown and scattered mores thinly. The young crops are good and the
Fields well weeded but the grain is sparse. Petrovsky was also struck by the
Large amount of unsown land. Aware of all these problems, the farmers
Complained to Petrovsky that the new grain procurements would be even more
difficult to meet than last year’s. “And this may very well be so”, agrees
Petrovsky.

Finally Petrovsky draws attention to the exodus of Ukrainian farmers.
They are forced to seek food beyond the republic’s borders, at “the Dno
station, in the Central-Black Earth Oblast’, in Belarus, and in Northern
Caucasus”, where grain is more readily available, and at much lower prices.

When Petrovsky suggested that farmers band together for these
purchases, he learned that the Commissariat of Transport has drastically
reduced
the sale of train tickets to peasants. Bewildered Ukrainian peasants needled
Petrovsky: “Why are they banning trips for grain?”

If the two Ukrainian leaders believed their pleas and warnings of
turmoil in the Ukrainian countryside would soften Moscow’s position, they were
mistaken. Their effect on Stalin, Kaganovich and Molotov was just the
opposite. Writing from Moscow to Sochi, where Stalin was vacationing,
Kaganovich criticized both Ukrainian leaders, even though he admitted
That some aid would have to be given to Ukraine, and asked Stalin to decide
On the amount. Stalin’s response was more brutal and more ominous of
things to come.

He condemned the hypocrisy of the two leaders, who only wanted to get
“new millions of poods[12] of grain from Moscow” and “a reduction in the
plan for grain procurement”. Ukrainians must mobilize their own forces and
resources for already “Ukraine has been given more than she should get”.[13]
Nevertheless, on 16 June the Politburo considered Ukraine’s plea and
Granted about 8,500 tons[14], a paltry amount in comparison with the million
and a half poods requested by Petrovsky.

Politburo’s niggardly “largesse” must have provoked Stalin’s ire, for
in a letter to Kaganovich, Molotov and the Politburo he came back with
harsh criticism of past errors and new instructions for the coming harvest.
The Gensec blamed “mechanical equalization”, which did not take into
account the ability of the kolkhozes to deliver grain, and as a result of
which,
“fertile districts in Ukraine found themselves in a state of
Impoverishment and famine, despite a fairly good harvest.”[15]

This is the only known acknowledgement of the Ukrainian famine by
Stalin. He blamed regional authorities for being out of touch with the
countryside and allowing kolkhozniks to travel around the entire European
part of the USSR demoralize “our farms with their complaints and whining.”[16]

Stalin proposed the calling of a top level conference on the
organization of grain procurement and its unconditional fulfillment, and
insisted
that personal responsibility for grain procurement be delegated to the
first secretaries of the Ukraine, the Northern Caucasus, and the other grain
producing regions. “Personal responsibility” for “unconditional fulfillment”
imposed from the top along the administrative vertikal became the
watchwords of the 1932/33 grain procurement campaign, which would result in
the
genocidal famine.

On 21 June a telegram signed by Stalin and Molotov instructed Kharkiv to
carry out “at any cost” the July-September plan for grain delivery.
Two days later, Moscow answered Ukrainian Politburo’s plea for 600,000
poods of grain with a terse resolution: “bar any additional grain deliveries
to
Ukraine.”[17]

The III Conference of KP(b)U (6-10 July 1932) was devoted to the
Upcoming harvest and grain procurement. Stalin sent Molotov and Kaganovich to
The meeting “to ensure genuinely Bolshevik decisions”. Molotov informed
The audience that Moscow had lowered Ukraine’s quota but was adamant that
The plan be carried out in full.[18]

Declarations from regional leaders that the farmers were starving, that much
land lay fallow, and that 100 to 200 m.poods of grain would be lost during
harvesting did not bend the resolve of Moscow’s envoys.[19] The conference
adopted a resolution to carry out the plan of grain delivery “in full
and unconditionally”.[20]

It was largely in response to the tense situation in Ukraine[21], and in
anticipation of new troubles in that republic that Stalin came up with
his infamous decree, dubbed by the farmers “the 5 ears of corn law”.
Writing on 20 July to Kaganovich and Molotov, the Gensec complains of
Widespread theft by “dekulakized kulaks” and others, and proposes to write
a law, which would make theft of property belonging to collective farms equal
to similar crimes against state property, and “punishable by a minimum of ten
years’
imprisonment, and as a rule, by death”.

“All active agitators against the new collective-farm system” and
“profiteers and resellers of goods” writes Stalin, should be removed
And sent to concentration camps.[22] He also wants stricter controls over
The limited kolkhoz trade allowed by a 6 May 1932 law (kolkhozes allowed
Sell their surplus after 15 January 1933, after fulfilling the state
Procurement plan), made more liberal on 20 May 1932.[23]

A follow-up letter provides ideological explanation: in the same way
That capitalism could not triumph without first making “private property
Sacred property”, socialism will not finish off capitalism “unless it
Declares public property (belonging to cooperatives, collective farms or the
state) to be sacred and inviolable”.[24]

Returning to the topic on 26 July, Stalin insists on formal legality
of the proposed operations: “we must act on the basis of law (‘the peasant
loves legality’), and not merely in accordance with the practice of the
OGPU, although it is clear that the OGPU’s role here will not only not
Diminish but, on the contrary, will be strengthened and ‘ennobled’ (the OGPU
Agencies will operate ‘on a lawful basis’ rather than ‘high-handedly’)”.[25]

The joint Party-State decree “On the Protection of the Property of
State Enterprises, Collective Farms and Cooperatives, and on the
Consolidation of Public (Socialist) Property” was issued on 7 August 1932.
It became the main legal instrument used by the Soviet authorities to condemn
millions of farmers to slow death by starvation. It repeated Stalin’s
declarations
that all public property is “sacred and inviolable” and that individuals
attempting to take possession of public property should be considered
“enemies of the people”.[26]

All collective farm property, whether in the field or in storage was
Decreed equal to that of state property and theft was made punishable by
execution, which could be reduced to 10-year imprisonment only under
mitigating circumstances. Advocating withdrawal from the kolkhoz became
tantamount to treason and was punished with three to five years imprisonment
in concentration camps. No amnesty could be applied in any of these
cases.

The decree on State property was applicable on the whole Soviet
Territory but, as Stalin’s letter to Kaganovich shows, it was primarily meant
For Ukraine. Stalin thought the law was “good” and would “soon have an
impact”, and ordered a draft of directives from the C.C to the party, judicial
and punitive organizations.[27] The Gensec then addressed the Ukrainian
problem.
The passage is highly revealing:

“The most important thing right now is Ukraine. Ukrainian affairs have hit
rock bottom. Things are bad with regard to the party. There is talk
that in two regions of Ukraine (it seems in the Kiev and Dnepropetrovsk
regions) about 50 raion party committees have spoken out against the
grain-procurements plan, deeming it unrealistic. It is said that the
situation in other raion party committees is no better. […] This is
not a party but a parliament, […]

Instead of leading the raions, Kossior kept maneuvering between the
directives of the CC VKP and the demands of the raion party committees
[…]
Things are bad with the soviets. Chubar is no leader. Things are bad
With the GPU. Redens is not up to leading the fight against the
counterrevolution
[…]. [underlined and doubly underlined in original – R.S.]”

Then Stalin brandishes the specter of Ukrainian separatism: “If we don’t
undertake at once to straighten out the situation in Ukraine, we may
lose Ukraine.” He reminds Kaganovich that Pilsudski and his agents are
underestimated by Redens, and Kossior. He expressed utter contempt for
the whole KP(b)U, composed of 500,000 members (“ha-ha”, snickers Stalin),
harboring Pilsudski’s agents and “quite a lot (yes a lot!) of rotten
elements, conscious and unconscious Petliurists”.

Thinking undoubtedly of Ukraine’s negative reaction to the destructive
impact the just-passed property laws will have, Stalin warns: “The
moment things get worse, these [party] elements will waste no time opening a
front inside (and outside) the party, against the party.”

Frustrated by the fact that “the Ukrainian leadership does not see
These dangers”, Stalin proposes to replace Kossior with Kaganovich and
Redens with Balitsky, and eventually Chubar with Kaganovich. In this way
Stalin
Intends to transform “Ukraine as quickly as possible into a real fortress of
The USSR, a genuinely exemplary republic.”

The task is urgent and calls for immediate action, for without “these and
similar measures (the economic and political strengthening of Ukraine,
above all its border raions, etc.), I repeat, we may lose Ukraine.”[28]
Kaganovich agrees, of course, and accuses Ukrainian party of creating a
certain
solidarity and “a rotten sense of mutual responsibility”, not only in the
middle echelons of the party, but also among its leadership.[29]

Stalin’s exchange of letters with Kaganovich reveals the ambiance in
Which the policy of starvation will be implemented. The overall objective
was to maintain a high level of grain procurement. To assure this, all
challenge outside and inside the republic had to be eliminated, regardless of
the cost. Stalin’s raising of the specter of Pilsudski and Petliura agents
running loose in Ukraine and infiltrating the Soviet party and state
machinery was nothing more than a scare tactic and a rallying call.

He was well aware that by the summer of 1932, the weak Polish network
And the few local collaborators had been rounded up by the GPU, which also
arrested real and imaginary followers of Petliura whom Stalin had
eliminated by assassination in 1926. Poland may have had some illusions about
a
Ukrainian insurrection in 1929-1930, but by 1932, the Poles realized
That the starving population was in no shape to revolt.

The Soviet-Polish nonaggression treaty signed on 25 July 1932 was
Ample proof of the changing relations between the two neighbors.[30] The
Pilsudski-Petliura scarecrow will continue to enjoy popularity in
Soviet propaganda. While there was no serious threat from the Poles or the
Ukrainian nationalists, a national insurrection could become a reality if
the expected famine (implied in Stalin’s phrase “the moment things get
worse”) could bind together the threatened middle cadres of the KP(b)U
with the surviving peasantry. To prevent this eventuality the KP(b)U had to
be purged and kept under close Moscow surveillance.

Stalin maintained that the 1932 harvest was good; historians today are
More skeptical but consider it adequate to cover Soviet Union’s internal
needs.
With the state reserves from previous year, there were enough supplies
To feed every citizen of the Soviet Union.

Famine was brought about by the exorbitant amount of grain and other
agricultural products taken from the Ukrainian peasants, and the way
they were extracted. Ukraine’s plan was excessive, and in spite of the
protests from Kharkiv and three successive reductions, it remained so to the
end.

Still, Ukraine delivered about a quarter of a billion poods of grain, or
over 90% of its procurement quota. [31] In addition it handed over
large quantities of meat, vegetables and other produce. Stalin insisted that
state procurement have absolute priority. Following a CC VKP(b) directive, a
KP(b)U resolution of 18 November reminded that “complete fulfillment
of the procurement plan by collective farms and the MTS constitutes their
primary obligation […], to which all the other duties of the collective farm
must be subordinated, including the duty to set up all sorts of funds: seed
fund, forage and food supplies”.[32]

Stalin was satisfied that he was achieving his goal. At a high-level
Party meeting, held on 27 November 1932, he gloated: “The party has
succeeded in replacing the 500-600 million poods of marketable grain, procured
during the period of individual peasant holdings by our present ability to
collect 1,200-1,400 m.p. of grain. It is hardly necessary to prove that
without this leap forward the country would have a famine [sic-RS], we would
not be
able to support our industry, we would not be able to feed the workers and
the Red Army.”[33]

The allusion to the famine, or rather to freedom from one, was an
Obvious lie, and the reference to the feeding of the workers and the Red Army
– an overstatement; but then, Stalin’s concern was not the feeding his
Subjectsb but the financing of Soviet industrialization with grain exports.

Obedience to Moscow’s orders was assured in two ways: a) frequently
Repeated delegations to Ukraine and the North Caucasus Territory of Molotov
Kaganovich and other high-ranking leaders to supervise the local
authorities, and b) party discipline enforced from Moscow down the
administrative structure. At the end of October 1932, two commissions
were sent, one to Ukraine headed by Molotov, and the other to North
Caucasus Territory headed by Kaganovich.

Stalin’s emissaries supervised party meetings and forced them to pass
resolutions on grain procurements, party discipline, stricter
application of the 7 August property laws, the establishment of “black lists”
of collective farms in arrears with grain deliveries, imposition of fines,
etc.
They also instigated purges in party organizations and administrative
structures.
Kuban’ was particularly hit with the expulsion of 43 % of the 25,000
Party members, including 358 out of 716 party secretaries.[34]

In Ukraine, during November and first five days of December, the OGPU
arrested 1,230 people, including 340 heads of kolhospy while 327
Communists were brought before the courts for sabotaging state
procurements.[35]
In the 18 November resolution quoted above, the Ukrainian CC reminded the
directors
of sovkhoz of their “personal responsibility as party members and civil
servants for the fulfillment of the grain procurement”.

“Personal responsibility” for the execution of instructions was a
Constant refrain in messages coming from above and became an important
Means for forcing recalcitrant cadres to carry out the Ukrainian genocide.

Dekulakization and deportation continued, on a smaller scale and were
Mostly of political and punitive nature. Arrests, beatings, and cruelty of
All sorts abounded as before, only now the victims were weaker and less
Capable of resistance. Kolkhozes, villages and individual farmers in arrears
On state procurement were put on “black lists”, lost access to state-run
stores, and could not buy such essentials as matches, kerosene, salt.

Fines amounted to a year and a quarter’s worth of meat tax, without
Freeing the debtor from the unfulfilled grain procurement. “Activists” – the
City workers and their komnezam helpers searched farmers’ houses and yards,
looking for the hidden grain.

There is no way of knowing what portion of the hidden grain was found
by the flying brigades of activists, but official reports state that in Kuban
they found 345,000 poods of grain in November, while searches in Ukraine
>from 1 December 1932 to 25 January 1933 yielded 1.7 million poods, in 17,000
hiding places.[36] What grain was found, was confiscated; if nothing was
discovered, they took whatever edibles were seen, leaving the family
to starve.

Peasants who could find some old religious medals or other mementos
Made of precious metals could trek to the city and exchange them at the
Torgsins (stores for foreigners) for vouchers, and then exchange them for
food.

Hardier peasants would flee their villages and seek salvation in urban
centers or in neighboring Belarus and RSFSR, where food was available.
Accounts of Ukrainian peasants overloading trains, filling stations
And wandering about Russian and Belarusian towns and countryside abound.

National and peasant questions became inextricably intertwined in
Stalin’s decree of 14 December 1932, issued under the banal title “On Grain
Procurement in Ukraine, Northern Caucasus and the Western Oblast”[37].

Ukrainization was blamed for problems in grain deliveries and
Exemplary punishment was prescribed for sabotage in grain procurement: 5-10
years of concentration camp for a number of “party traitors” arrested in the
Orikhiv raion of Dnipropetrovs’k oblast of Ukraine, and deportation to the
North of the Poltavska stanytsia of Kuban in the RSFSR.

The decree made the party and government chiefs in the three grain
Producing areas personally responsible for the completion of grain procurement
By January 1933. Ukrainianization presently is carried out in Ukraine,
“without meticulous selection of the Bolshevik cadre”, had allowed
bourgeois-nationalists and Petliurites to join party and state
institutions and set up their cells and organizations.

Absence of “revolutionary vigilance” by local party organizations let
“counterrevolutionary elements” become directors, accountants,
storekeepers, foremen in collective farms, members of village soviets. Similar
accusation was brought against Northern Caucasus, with supporters of the
Kuban’
Rada figuring in place of Petliurites. This gave nationalists the
opportunity to sabotage harvest and sowing campaigns and organize other
counterrevolutionary activities.

Party and Soviet authorities in Ukraine and Northern Caucasus were
Ordered to extirpate these counterrevolutionary elements, execute them or
Deport them to concentration camps, including “saboteurs with party
Membership cards in their pockets”.

The verdict against Ukrainization came in two parts. In Ukraine it was
Not formally prohibited, but Stalin insisted that it resume its primary
vocation, that of promoting “correct Bolshevik implementation of
Lenin’s national policy”, which in fact meant integration and assimilation.

Ukrainian authorities were instructed to “expel Petliurite and other
bourgeois-nationalist elements from party and government
organizations”, and “meticulously select and recruit Ukrainian Bolshevik
cadre”. The
signal was thus given for rapid curtailment of Ukrainization and return to a
more
sophisticated policy of Russification.[38]

Ukrainians of Northern Caucasus fared worse. “Non-Bolshevik
‘Ukrainianization’, which affected nearly half of the raions in the
Northern Caucasus,” and which was declared to be “at variance with the
cultural
interests of the population”, was totally discontinued and replaced
with Russification.

The use of the Ukrainian language was banned in public offices of
Local administration, cooperative societies, and schools. The printing of
newspapers and magazines in the Ukrainized raions of Northern Caucasus
was to switch immediately to Russian, and preparation were to begin
immediately for the transfer in the fall of all Ukrainian schools into
Russian.

The whole Poltava stanytsia was ordered to be deported and resettled
With demobilized Russian Red Army soldiers, who would receive the abandoned
land, buildings, equipment, and cattle. In fact, 2,158 families with 9,187
members were sent out before 27 December[39] and resettled a month later with
1,826 demobilized soldiers.[40]

Together with Medvedivs’ka and Umans’ka, the three Cossack stanytsias
Saw 45,000 persons deported to the North. On 15 December, Molotov and
Stalin signed a similar ban on Ukrainization, for the rest of the previously
Ukrainized Soviet regions in the RSFSR.

Stalin’s anti-Ukrainization decree reveals the extent to which the dictator
was ready to go, in sacrificing the Ukrainian nation on the altar of
great-power ambitions. There is little doubt that the ban on Ukrainization
was a sop to Russian chauvinism, especially in ethnically mixed
regions outside the Ukrainian SSR. National and social repressions reinforced
one another, even if neither was acknowledged openly.

For the next several months after the condemnation of the abuses of
Ukrainization and the Ukrainian sabotage of grain procurements, the
Ukrainian countryside passed through some of the worst moments in its
history. The litany of repressive measures is endless. 82 raions were
deprived of manufactured goods for not fulfilling their quotas of
grain deliveries.

On 19 December, Stalin orders Kaganovich and Postishev back to Ukraine
To help Kosior, Chubar and Khataevich carry out the procurement plan. On
24 December, collective farms are ordered to deliver all grain in
Fulfillment of the plan, including grain put aside for seed and food. Direct
orders to increase repressive measures, arrests and deportations increase. A
real reign of terror seizes the republic and the Kuban.

On 22 January 1933 Stalin struck another crippling blow against the
Starving Ukrainian grain growers. The new secret decree, drafted by the Gensec
himself, is perhaps the best available proof of the dictator’s
genocidal intent against the Ukrainian nation. Sent to Ukraine, Belarus and
the
neighboring regions of RSFSR[41], the document calls attention to the
unrestrained exodus of peasants from the Kuban’ and Ukraine to the
near-by regions of Russia and Belarus.

Central authorities are said to have no doubt that these migrants, who
pretend to search for food, are, in fact, Socialist-Revolutionaries and
agents of Poland, sent to agitate, “through the peasants”, in the
northern parts of the USSR, against the kolkhoz system and the Soviet power.
Addressees are reminded that a similar movement took place the
Previous year, but the party, soviet and police authorities of Ukraine did
nothing to stop it. It must not be allowed to happen this year.

Stalin then orders the party, soviet and the repressive organs of the
Northern Caucasus and Ukraine to prevent the exodus of their peasants
To other regions of the USSR and directs them to close border crossings
between Ukraine and the Northern Caucasus.

The GPU of the Russian oblast’s adjacent to the quarantined Ukrainian
And Northern Caucasus regions, and the transport section of the OGPU, are
instructed to arrest all peasants from Ukraine and North Caucasus, who
have managed to leave their territory, and, after segregating the
counter-revolutionary elements, return the others to their villages.

The next day, the Politburo of the CC KP(b)U adopted a resolution to
Carry out Moscow’s orders and forwarded the directive, along with addition
instructions, for implementation by the appropriate Ukrainian
authorities.[42]

The Ukrainian branch of the OGPU was ordered to instruct all railway
stations not to sell tickets to peasants with destinations beyond the
Ukrainian borders, without formal travel permission from the raion executive
Committee or a certificate of employment from construction or industrial
enterprises.

Oblasts were told to take “resolute measures” to prevent massive
Departure of their peasants, carefully check the work of agents recruiting
Peasants for work outside Ukraine, and to urge kolhospnyky and individual
farmers not to depart without permission for other raions because they would
be
arrested there.

On 25 January, B. Sheboldaev, the party boss of the North Caucasus
Territory, issued a similar order, adding instructions on the
employment of internal forces and border troupes and the setting up of
filtration
points.[43]

Like the anti-Ukrainization decree of 14 December 1932, the 22 January
1933 directive, which closed the borders to the famished Ukrainian peasants
Was not the beginning but the culmination of processes that had started
Many moths before. Petrovsky had complained to Stalin, back in June 1932,
About the ban on train ticket for Ukrainian peasants who wanted to obtain
provisions in Russia.

Evdokimov’s telegram from Rostov-on-Don, which Iagoda prepared for
Stalin’s attention on 23 January 1933, details the elaborate measures taken
Since November to prevent the flight of farmers from the Northern Caucasus
Territory. Among these were roadblocks set up on the main arteries of
peasant migration.

Transport authorities had arrested 11,774 persons and another 7,534
Were incarcerated by other organs. In the same dossier, Balitsky’s report
>from 22 January informed of massive exodus of peasants from Ukraine since
December.[44]

Departures were registered in 74 raions, 721 villages and 228
kolhosps. In all, 31,693 persons left: 20,129 from Kharkiv oblast’, 6,576 from
the
Kyiv oblast, 3,447 from Odessa oblast, and 1,541 from Chernihiv. Of these
migrants about one third were collective farmers and two thirds
individual farmers; 128 were activists. A check at the railway junction
stations
in the Kharkiv oblast revealed a great demand for long-distance tickets: in
January 1933 16,500 such tickets were sold in Lozova station and 15,000 – in
Sumy.

In the beginning of January 1933, the GPU began to apprehend agitators
And organizers of these migrations and arrested over 500 of them. [45] As
A direct result of Stalin’s borders decree of 22 January 1933, 219,460
Persons were arrested in the first six weeks of its application; some were
sent to the Goulag, others punished in other ways, while 186,588 were sent
back to their villages to face the famine.[46]

In the middle of March 1933, Kosior wrote unperturbedly to the Kremlin
That “the famine still hasn’t taught many kolhospnyky a lesson”.[47] In his
report from Kharkiv, dated 31 May 1933, the Italian consul general
prognosticated on the devastation of the country: “The current
disaster will bring about a preponderantly Russian colonization of Ukraine. In
a
future time, perhaps very soon, one will no longer be able to speak of a
Ukraine, or of a Ukrainian people, and thus not even of a Ukrainian problem,
Because Ukraine will have become a de facto Russian region.”[48]

There can be little doubt today that the famine was not only used by the
Communist party for political purposes, but that it was actually created and
directed by Stalin and his henchmen for that purpose. The regime’s
ultimate objective was to transform the backward empire into an industrial
giant and a military superpower that could export socialism abroad.

To achieve this, Stalin needed great quantities of marketable grain,
Which was to be extracted from the peasants “at any price” to the producers
but at minimal price to the state. The most expedient way was to herd the
peasants into collective farms, subject them to a direct control from the
Kremlin, and in this way ensure maximum grain deliveries to the state.

The Kremlin knew that the peasants would resist and that the
imposition of its will would result in the loss of millions of human lives,
but that
was of no concern for masters of a well-populated empire. Stalin’s project
required a homogenous and docile population. Revived Ukrainian
particularism, taking advantage of the indigenization program,
reinforced national unity at the expense of cohesion of the new “fatherland of
world proletariat”.

The two sources of resistance to Stalin’s plans (national and social)
Became embodied in the same group – the Ukrainian farmers. Stalin decided to
sacrifice a considerable part of this group in order to eliminate the
opposition to his projects and to frighten the rest of the Ukrainian
nation into accepting the role of cogs (as he liked to call them) of the
great socialist mechanism.

The Stalin-Kaganovich discussion of the Petrovsy and Chubar letters
(June-July 1932), the “five ears of corn” law (7 August, 1932), the
condemnation of Ukrainization (14 December 1932), and the closing of
internal Soviet borders on starving Ukrainian peasants, each provide
smoking gun revelations about the genocide against the Ukrainian nation. But a
multitude of other documents now emerging from the secret archives
help us get a rounded understanding of the gigantic crime and the immeasurable
suffering of its victims.
—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Leo Kuper, Genocide. Its Politic Use in the Twentieth Century.
(Penguin,
1981), p. 35.
[2] Valerii Vasiliev & Yuri Shapoval (eds.), Komandyry velykoho
holodu.
Poizdky V. Molotova i L. Kahanovycha v Ukrainu i na Pivnichnyi Kavkaz
1932-1933 rr. Kyiv, 2001; I. Zelenin et al (eds.), Tragediia sovetskoi
derevni. Kollektivizatsiia i rasskulachivanie. Tom 3. Moskva, 2001;
Stalin I Kaganovich Perepiska 1931-1936 gg. Moskva, 2001;
Rozsekrechena pam’iat’: Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini v dokumentakh
GPU-NKVD. Kyiv,
2007;
Ruslan Pyrih (ed.), Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini: dokumenty i
materialy. Kyiv, 2007.

[3] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007.

[4] Discussed more fully in my article, “The Ukrainian Famine of
1932-1933 and the United Nations Convention on Genocide”, in Taras Hunczak &
Roman Serbyn. Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933: Genocide by Other Means.
(Forthcoming.)

[5] For a thorough discussion of Ukrainization and its problems see
James Mace, Communism and the dilemmas of national liberation: national
Communism in Soviet Ukraine, 1918-1933. Cambride, Mass., 1983.
See also Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action Empire. Nations and Nationalism
in the Soviet Union, 1929-1939. Ithaca & London, 2001.

[6] J. V. Stalin, “Concerning the National Question in Yugoslavia”
Works.
Vol. 7. Moscow, 1954. Pp. 71-72.

[7] Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. Pp. 75-81.

[8] Valerii Vasil’ev & Linn Viola. Kolektyvizatsiia i selians’kyi opir
Na Ukraini (lystopad 1929-berezen’ 1930). Vinnytsia, 1997. P. 91.

[9] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007. P. 118.

[10] Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini:ochyma istorykiv, movoiu
dokumentiv. Kyiv, 1990. P. 148.

[11] All quotations and references to the two letters are taken from
Komandyry velykoho holodu. Pp.206-215.

[12] One pood =3D 16.36 kg; 1 ton – 61.36 poods.

[13] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence 1931-1936. New Haven&
London, 2003. P. 136.

[14] For the allocation of the food aid, see Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na
Ukraini. Kyiv, 1990. P. 183, 187-188.

[15] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138 (Underlined by
Stalin).

[16] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138-139..

[17] Holod. 1990. P. 183 (doc. 63), P. 190 (doc. 68).

[18] The original plan of 410 million poods (6.7 m.t.) was lowered
twice to 356 and 274.8 million poods (5.8 m.t.; 4.5 m.t. ) but 16 November was
raised to 5.8 m.t. Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. p. 84.

[19] For a detailed account of the deliberations see Komandyry
Velykoho holodu. Pp. 152-164

[20] See part of the resolution in Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Kyiv, 1990. P. 194-198

[21] A secret OGPU report from around 20 July 1932 stated that “as for
anti-Soviet manifestations, Ukraine occupies first place”. “From 1
January to 1 July 1932, 118 counterrevolutionary kulak organizations were
discovered, counting 2.479 members. In addition, along the lines of
national counterrevolution we have unmasked 35 groups with 562 members.”
Tragedia, p.

421. Another secret OGPU report, dated 5 August, contains a section
“National counterrevolution (U[krainian]SSR)” which relates the
Liquidation of 8 nationalist groups, two of which consisted of former members
Of the outlawed UKP (Ukrainian Communist Party). These people are said to
have a leftist program and conduct systematic activity among members of the
KP(b)U, arguing that the Soviet authorities are suppressing the Ukrainian
culture. In their platform, claims the report, they declare war on the Soviet
regime and Polish fascism, while in fact keeping links abroad and carrying
out directives of the Second Department of of the Polish General Staff in
Ukraine. Ibid. p. 443.

[22] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 164-165.

[23] S. Kulchytsky, Tsina “Velykoho perelomu”. Kyiv, 1990. P. 296. On
23 July Stalin sent a telegram to Kaganovich demanding the restoration
And enforcement of last year’s ban on transporting private bread supplies
By rail or water. Tragedia, p. 428.

[24] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 166.

[25] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 169.

[26] Tragedia, p. 453-454.

[27] Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. Pp. 273-275; The Stalin-Kaganovich
Correspondence. P. 179-181. A follow-up secret “Instruction on the
Application of the TsIK and SNK SSSR of 7 August 1932 About the
Safeguarding of State Property”, signed by the Chairman and the Prosecutor of
the
Supreme Court of the USSR and the Vice-Charman of the OGPU, was sent out on 16
September to all republican and oblast authorities. Tragedia. P.
477-479.

[28] On 12 August Stalin sends a note to Kaganovich asking him to keep
secret for the moment the plan regarding Ukraine sent in the preceding
letter. Tragedia. P. 276. To stiffen Kosior’s resolve, in January
1933, Stalin sent him the more resolute Postyshev as his second in command;
Redens was replaced Balitsky in February 1933.

[29] Letter of 16 Augus 1932. Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. P.
283-284;
Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 183-184.

[30] Timoty Snyder, Sketches from a Secret War. New Haven, Yale
University Press. P. 104.

[31] Kosior spoke of 255 m.p. at the January plenum of the CC KP(b)U.
Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 352.
Davies and Wheatcroft give
3,584,000 tons, or 219 millon poods, P. 478.
Other authors give similar figures.

[32] Holod 1932-1932 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 253.

[33] Tragedia. P. 559.

[34] Davies & Wheatcroft, The Years of Hunger. P. 178.

[35] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 50.

[36] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 49; Kulchytsky, Holod 1932-1933 v
Ukraini iak henotsyd. Kyiv, 2005. P. 98

[37] Tragedia, Pp. 575-577; also in Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Pp 291-194.

[38] The Russification of Ukraine attracted the attention of the
Italian consulate in Kharkiv. “In government offices the Russian language is
Once again being used, in correspondence as well as in verbal dealings
Between employees.” See the “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches”,
Report to Congress. Commission on the Ukraine Famine. Washington, 1988. P.
446.

[39] G.G. Iagoda report to Stalin, 29 December 1932. Lubianka. Stalin
I VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003. P. 386.

[40] Nicolaas Werth, Le pouvoir sovi=E9tique et la paysannerie dans les
rapports de la police politique (1930-1934). Rapport du 27 f=E9vrier
1933.
/http:/www.ihtp.cnrs.fr/dossier_soviet_paysans/sommaire.html/

[41] Tragedia sovetskoi derevni. P. 634-635. The first English
Translation of the document appeared in Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action
Empire. Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923-1939. Ithaca and
London, 2001. P.p. 306-307.

[42] Volodymyr Serhiichuk. Iak nas moryly holodom. Kyiv, 2003. PP
156-158.

[43] Tragedia, p. 636-637.Sheboldaev added more precisions on the
Filtration points three days later. Ibid. P. 638.

[44] Lubianka. Stalin i VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003.P. 394.

[45] Lubianka. P. 392-393.

[46] N.A. Ivnitskii, Kollektivizatsiia i raskulachivanie (nachala 30-
Kh godov). Moscow, 1994. P. 204.

[47] Tragedia. P. 657.

[48] “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches. Op. cit. P. 427.

—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTE: Article published by the Action Ukraine Report (AUR) with
permission from Professor Federigo Argentieri, John Cabot University,
Rome, Italy.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:19:55 EDT 2008
Article: 613082 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!feed.cgocable.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.russian,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: Re: KATYN=MURDERS OF POLISH BY ZYDS/SOVIET NKVD!!! Like Vinnitsa!! NEVER FORGET! Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 501
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 18:12:03 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1211134323 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 18 May 2008 12:12:03 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 12:12:03 MDT
Bytes: 29260
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.polish:873205 pl.regionalne.warszawa:507394 soc.culture.europe:613082 soc.culture.german:343927 soc.culture.russian:503616 alt.politics.europe:78783 de.soc.politik.misc:1085939

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:00:05 GMT, Proposition 88
wrote:

>With even the Soviets forced to admit that it was their ZYD NKVD who did the
>murders at KATYN, why are you apologising for them?

>Historians and experts proved it was NOT the Germans!

>Were you one of the killers, or perhaps your father, uncle or?

>On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:54:59 -0700, “Peter Wielki” wrote:

>>Actually, in Katyn there were Russians and Ukraninians that did the crime,
>>as far as I know.

>>But yeah, let’s blame it on JEWS!!! Germans did it too, right Frankie?

>>”Frank Arthur” wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]
>>> True,Just Like Vinnitsa!!

>>> The filthy ZYDS can no longer lie about KATYN and try to blame the
>>> Germans.

>>> Even the Soviets had to admit the truth, and also about Vinnitsa.

>>> No wonder around the world more and more people are starting to really
>>> dislike the filthy ZHIDS!!

>>> Latest update follows:
>>> From: “Strider”
>>> Newsgroups:soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.yugoslavia
>>> Subject: Jewish Copmmissars murdered these Poles

>>> Our shame still lies in the Katyn forest
>>> By Kevin Myers
>>> (Filed: 27/04/2003)

>>> Today Poles all over the world will commemorate the 60th anniversary of
>>> the discovery of the war crime which didn’t occur. And the
>>> non-existence of this atrocity constituted democracy’s most sordid
>>> exercise in realpolitik of the entire 20th century. The Soviet Union captured 180,000
>>> Polish soldiers during its invasion of Poland in 1939. Most were herded
>>> off to slave-camps in Siberia, but 22,000 officers were not. In April 1940, on
>>> Stalin’s orders, each was bound with barbed wire and executed with a
>>> single shot to the head.

>>> This was a colossal undertaking: the death toll was greater than that
>>> on the most calamitous day in British military history – the Somme, July
>>> 1, 1916.

>>> More importantly, the massacres occurred before the German invasions
>>> of France and the Low Countries. And although hundreds of Jews in Poland
>>> had been murdered, these were improvised butcheries, essentially unrelated to
>>> The Final Solution, which had not yet begun.

>>> So the first systematic mass murder of defenceless innocents in the
>>> Second World War was not by the Nazis, but by the Soviet Union, just over
>>> a year before the USSR became Britain’s official best friend. This shouldn’t
>>> surprise us: after all, it had been the Soviets, and not the Nazis, who
>>> invented industrialised murder. From the revolution on, they freely used
>>> the word “exterminate” of their enemies. Hitler listened; and Hitler learned,
>>> as dictators do. Moreover, the careful murder of so many officers from a
>>> single narrow stratum of Polish society was truly proto-genocide: its intent was
>>> to eliminate Polish identity by the extermination of all its perceived
>>> guardians.

>>> In 1943, via two sources – through a population census within the
>>> exiled Polish community living in the USSR, and from the Germans, who had
>>> discovered the site of one of the massacres, in the woods of Katyn,
>>> outside Smolensk – the British discovered the fate of the Polish officers. A
>>> devastating report from the British ambassador to the Polish
>>> government-in-exile, Owen O’Malley, left no doubt about the matter.

>>> The British Government’s public response was to dismiss the Nazi
>>> discoveries as propaganda and tell the Polish government-in-exile to
>>> forget Katyn and to proceed with beating the real enemy, Germany.

>>> War is war, and in peace it is impossible to replicate the fevers and
>>> the terrors it induces. So no useful moral judgment can be made about
>>> those who decided in 1943 publicly to accept lies as fact, and to conceal
>>> the truth as regrettable but necessary strategy. But it was statecraft at its
>>> most pusillanimous to allow those lies to become a cornerstone of the
>>> relationship between the Western allies and the Soviet Union.

>>> That is what happened when the three leaders – Churchill, Roosevelt
>>> and Stalin – met at Teheran in November 1943. Far from berating the Soviet
>>> Leader for the massacres, the two democratic leaders propitiated him,
>>> awarding him the Polish land he had stolen even as he seized his future murder
>>> victims.

>>> And when Stalin jested that they should settle the German problem once and
>>> for all by killing 50,000 German officers, Churchill merely protested sulkily,
>>> and Roosevelt light-heartedly suggested killing only 49,000.

>>> But nobody mentioned Katyn. How was this possible? For the massacre of
>>> the Poles was surely the secret subtext to this grisly exchange, and one
>>> by which Stalin was taking the measure of his two confreres. All three knew
>>> of the murders, and the bodyguard of lies around them: and silently, all
>>> three – two of them abjectly, the third triumphantly – assented to those lies.

>>> Teheran was the true nadir of international diplomacy, morally far
>>> more ignoble and strategically far more catastrophic than either Munich
>>> five years before or Yalta a year later. And the key to Teheran was Katyn: once
>>> Stalin had got away with that, he realised he could get away with almost
>>> anything.

>>> Moreover, the fiction of Katyn took root within the Foreign Office.
>>> There, nourished on complicit cowardice and malformed in the darkness of
>>> pathological guilt, the temporary tactic of 1943 was in time to turn into
>>> the diseased plant of enduring policy. It even caused the Callaghan Government
>>> in the 1970s vehemently to oppose the erection of a memorial in London to the
>>> victims of Katyn.

>>> Denial, in its purest psychiatric sense, of Katyn also infused much
>>> consideration of the 20th century: how else could Roy Jenkins have
>>> written a life of Churchill without once referring to Katyn, the Great Lie
>>> of which the prime minister was prime mover? How else could so many
>>> historians.

>>> Norman Davies aside – simply ignore the extraordinary Western
>>> collusion in covering up communist atrocities, and the profound impact
>>> this must have had on Kremlin thinking?

>>> On Thursday the FCO publishes a report, British reactions to the Katyn
>>> Massacre, in a belated attempt at expiation for Britain’s repeated
>>> cover-ups of this terrible affair. But it cannot undo the evil of the
>>> extermination of the Polish officer corps which, far from being the
>>> subject of a war-crimes trial, was embraced and rewarded at Teheran;
>>> and from that city, the communism of Katyn was soon to march forth
>>> and conquer half the world.

>>> My thanks to you for reposting this article.
>>> A brilliant truthful piece.
>>> Ed Kadach

>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:06:50 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On 1 May 1998 13:08:00 +0200, [email protected] wrote:

>>>>>American Dissident Voices Broadcast of April 25, 1998

>>>>>Katyn
>>>>>by Dr. William Pierce

>>>>>A background noise that seems never to go away is the constant
>>>>>whining and yammering of the Jews about how the world owes them a
>>>>>living because of their losses during the so-called “Holocaust.”
>>>>>They do it, of course, because they make such a big profit on it.
>>>>>The latest flare-up of this Jewish play for a handout came more
>>>>>than a year ago when they began demanding that the Swiss pay them
>>>>>$7 billion, which “Holocaust” victims allegedly had stashed in
>>>>>numbered Swiss accounts before being hauled off to gas chambers
>>>>>during the Second World War.

>>>>>With a few “bought” Gentile politicians fronting for them, the
>>>>>foremost among these being New York’s Senator Alphonse D’Amato,
>>>>>the Jews threatened Switzerland with a boycott by the U.S.
>>>>>government if their demands were not met. Instead of laughing in
>>>>>their faces, telling the Jews to go to hell, and gearing up for
>>>>>countermeasures against Israel and other Jewish interests if the
>>>>>Jews tried to proceed with a boycott, the Swiss politicians tried
>>>>>to placate the Jews by offering to buy themoff. The Jews took the
>>>>>Swiss response as a sign of weakness and escalated their demands.

>>>>>The average Swiss citizen seems to have a little more pride than
>>>>>Switzerland’s elected officials, however, and resentment against
>>>>>the Jews’ extortion efforts is building in Switzerland now to the
>>>>>point that some of that country’s richest Jews are wearing
>>>>>bulletproof vests whenever they must go out in public.

>>>>>In general, however, this “Holocaust”-based extortion racket
>>>>>works quite well for the Jews, and they have expanded their
>>>>>demands for World War Two reparations to include a number of
>>>>>other countries besides Switzerland. They are even whining that
>>>>>the Vatican owes them because Pope Pius XII didn’t do enough to
>>>>>save them from the Germans during the war. The Jews’ brazenness
>>>>>in this whole business is quite breathtaking.

>>>>>Their brazenness, of course, is justified, because by and large
>>>>>they have been getting away with it. And they have been getting
>>>>>away with it because with their media control they have been able
>>>>>to distort the general public’s whole perception of what happened
>>>>>during the Second World War. They have been able to portray
>>>>>themselves as innocent victims and just about everyone else as
>>>>>persecutors and aggressors, even the people who were fighting on
>>>>>the Jewish side against the Germans during the war. For example,
>>>>>they have done quite a bit of whining that after the Red Army
>>>>>drove the Germans from Poland, the Poles took the opportunity to
>>>>>lynch hundreds of Jews in 1945 and 1946: Jews whom the Germans
>>>>>somehow had failed to get rid of during their wartime occupation
>>>>>of Poland.

>>>>>Now, why would the Poles do something like that? Why would they
>>>>>lynch the poor Jews, who had been on their side during the war?
>>>>>If you learned about the war from watching Steven Spielberg
>>>>>propaganda films and other mass-media sources, you probably
>>>>>believe that it was because of religious anti-Semitism on the
>>>>>part of the Catholic Poles. Let me tell you the real reason why
>>>>>so many Poles hated Jews after the war. It’s something the
>>>>>Jew-controlled media in America have tried hard to keep covered
>>>>>up. Let me tell you about what happened in the Katyn forest
>>>>>in 1940.

>>>>>In September 1939 Poland was invaded from the west by Germany and
>>>>>from the east by the Soviet Union. The Germans wanted back the
>>>>>territory in western Poland, including the city of Danzig, which
>>>>>had been taken from them at the end of the First World War. The
>>>>>Soviets wanted eastern Poland. The Germans and the Soviets
>>>>>divided Poland between them, with the boundary running roughly
>>>>>along the River Bug.

>>>>>Britain and France, both under strong Jewish pressure, declared
>>>>>war on Germany in September 1939, ostensibly because of Germany’s
>>>>>invasion of Poland. They did not declare war on the Soviet Union,
>>>>>which also had invaded Poland. In the United States and in
>>>>>western Europe, where the Jews held a deathgrip on the mass
>>>>>media, a great deal of anti-German propaganda was based on the
>>>>>German grab for Polish territory — much of which, of course,
>>>>>actually was historically German territory — and nothing was
>>>>>said of the Soviet occupation and annexation of eastern Poland.

>>>>>The reason for this anti-German and pro-Soviet bias by the Jewish
>>>>>media was that the Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union as
>>>>>commissars and communist party bosses under Stalin, while in
>>>>>Germany Hitler had undertaken a program since 1933 of freeing
>>>>>Germany from all Jewish influence. Jews had been weeded out of
>>>>>the media, the law, the schools, and other areas of economic and
>>>>>cultural life in Germany. Before Hitler became chancellor in 1933
>>>>>the Jews had done in Germany what they do in every country where
>>>>>they gain a foothold: they had monopolized large sections of the
>>>>>mass media and certain professions and were doing their best to
>>>>>distort German culture, German society, and the German economy
>>>>>to suit themselves. Hitler put a stop to that, and two-thirds of
>>>>>the 1933 Jewish population of Germany had emigrated by the
>>>>>invasion of Poland in September 1939. So the Jews hated Germany
>>>>>and were determined to do whatever they could to destroy her.

>>>>>For his part, Hitler hoped to avoid war with Britain and France.
>>>>>He hoped that after his quick victory in western Poland he could
>>>>>make peace with Britain and France. He was determined, however,
>>>>>to stamp out communism wherever he encountered it. Not only did
>>>>>he hate communism on ideological grounds, but he had sworn to
>>>>>fight communism when the communists in Germany betrayed his
>>>>>country at the end of the First World War. Hitler also saw the
>>>>>Soviet Union as a threat to all of Europe, and he was determined
>>>>>to break the power of that country when he could, even though
>>>>>there was an uneasy non-aggression pact between Germany and the
>>>>>Soviet Union in 1939, at the time of their partition of Poland.

>>>>>In the spring of 1941 massive troop movements and other
>>>>>developments inside the Soviet Union convinced Hitler that Stalin
>>>>>was preparing to invade the west with the Red Army, and so in
>>>>>June 1941 Hitler made a preemptive strike. German forces smashed
>>>>>through the Red Army and made rapid advances, first through
>>>>>Soviet-occupied eastern Poland and then through Ukraine and into
>>>>>Russia.

>>>>>A year and a half later, in February 1943, German forces near
>>>>>Smolensk, in western Russia, investigated reports they heard from
>>>>>Russian civilians to the effect that a large number of prisoners
>>>>>had been murdered by the Soviet secret police in the area nearly
>>>>>three years earlier. The German investigators were led by local
>>>>>Russians to a series of mounds in a wooded area known locally as
>>>>>Katyn Forest, about 10 miles west of Smolensk. The forest is
>>>>>named for a village, Katyn, which it surrounds. The forest had
>>>>>been privately owned prior to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917,
>>>>>but after the communist takeover of Russia the area had been
>>>>>confiscated by the government and part of the forest had been
>>>>>turned over to the NKVD, the Soviet equivalent of the American
>>>>>FBI.

>>>>>The Germans began digging in the mounds in the Katyn forest and
>>>>>made a horrible discovery. They found corpse after corpse, each
>>>>>with its hands bound behind its back and a bullet hole in the
>>>>>base of its skull. They continued their excavations for more than
>>>>>a month, and eventually uncovered more than 4,000 corpses. Other
>>>>>bodies may have remained buried in other mounds, but the Germans
>>>>>had no time to dig up the whole forest. Instead they called in
>>>>>the International Red Cross and representatives of various
>>>>>neutral countries to examine their findings. They also brought in
>>>>>groups of Allied prisoners of war, including Americans, from
>>>>>prison camps in Germany to view the graves in the Katyn forest.
>>>>>They gave these international inspectors complete freedom to
>>>>>examine the exhumed bodies, permitted doctors among them to
>>>>>conduct autopsies, even allowed them to dig up other bodies from
>>>>>one of the mounds which had not been completely excavated. The
>>>>>Germans asked only that the inspectors report back truthfully to
>>>>>their own governments about their observations. And in fact, most
>>>>>of them did.

>>>>>What they reported was that the bodies were those of Polish
>>>>>military officers, along with a number of civilian cultural and
>>>>>business leaders and intellectuals — scientists, writers, poets
>>>>>– who had been in the portion of Poland occupied by the Soviet
>>>>>Union in September 1939. Altogether the Soviet secret police had
>>>>>rounded up some 15,000 Polish leaders in 1939 — including nearly
>>>>>half of the entire Polish officer’s corps, the half that had had
>>>>>the misfortune of being in eastern Poland at the time — and put
>>>>>them in three concentration camps in Russia: at Starobelsk,
>>>>>Kozelsk, and Ostashkov. All of the bodies unearthed in the
>>>>>Katyn forest were of Polish leaders who had been confined at one
>>>>>of these camps: Starobelsk.

>>>>>Rounding up a country’s leaders and killing them was standard
>>>>>practice for the communists. The theory was that the leaders were
>>>>>bourgeois oppressors of the working class and deserved to die. As
>>>>>egalitarians the communists did not regard the Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals as inherently better or more valuable human
>>>>>material than the average Polish criminal or welfare bum; the
>>>>>officers had simply used their class advantage to gain a better
>>>>>life-style for themselves. Of course, no one really believed that
>>>>>theory except the criminals and welfare bums and other resentful
>>>>>losers and ne’er-do-wells who made up the natural communist
>>>>>constituency. As a practical matter, however, killing all the
>>>>>leaders and potential leaders of a conquered people made them
>>>>>easier to govern. That’s what the Marxists had done in Russia,
>>>>>Ukraine, and the Baltic countries.

>>>>>In the case of the Poles there was a bit of a diplomatic problem,
>>>>>though. The Poles supported the war Britain and France had
>>>>>declared against Germany, purportedly on their behalf, because
>>>>>they viewed that as their one hope for getting back at least the
>>>>>western part of their country. They were not happy about the
>>>>>Russians taking the eastern part of Poland, but the Russians at
>>>>>least were fellow Slavs. The thing to do was get rid of the
>>>>>Germans first and then worry about the Russians. This Polish
>>>>>strategy suited Stalin fine. But it made it desirable for him to
>>>>>avoid alienating the Poles any more than necessary. When Polish
>>>>>exiles asked about their imprisoned leaders in late 1939 and
>>>>>early 1940, the Soviet government promised that they would be
>>>>>released shortly. Meanwhile, the decision had been made to kill
>>>>>all of them. And so in April 1940 the Polish leaders were taken
>>>>>from the three camps where they had been imprisoned, trucked off
>>>>>to various liquidation sites, and murdered. The ones who had been
>>>>>imprisoned at Starobelsk all went to the NKVD area of the Katyn
>>>>>forest. After the war some of the NKVD executioners were
>>>>>interviewed in Israel and described how they had carried out the
>>>>>killings.

>>> ISRAEL REFUSED TO PROSECUTE THESE ZHID MURDERERS!!

>>>>>The Poles were driven up to the burial pits in long NKVD prison
>>>>>trucks known as “black ravens.” They were pulled from the trucks
>>>>>one at a time by NKVD guards. Each Polish prisoner had his hands
>>>>>bound behind his back and then was dragged to the edge of a pit.
>>>>>There he was held by two NKVD men while a third fired a pistol
>>>>>bullet into the back of his head. Some of the officers had had
>>>>>their coats pulled over their heads to keep them from seeing what
>>>>>was happening before they were shot. Some struggled and were
>>>>>bayonetted by NKVD guards before being shot and thrown into the
>>>>>pit. When all of the officers from Starobelsk had been killed,
>>>>>some 4,400 of them, the Katyn forest burial pits were covered
>>>>>with dirt and pine trees were planted on them. The locations of
>>>>>the mass graves of the prisoners from the camps at Kozelsk and
>>>>>Ostashkov remain unknown, but none of the 15,000 Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals rounded up by the NKVD in September 1939 was
>>>>>seen alive after April 1940.

>>>>>The Red Cross representatives and the Allied prisoners the
>>>>>Germans brought in to examine the mass graves in the Katyn forest
>>>>>understood after their examination not only who had been killed;
>>>>>they also understood who had killed them. This was apparent not
>>>>>only from the medical estimates of the length of time the bodies
>>>>>had been buried, but also from documentary evidence on the
>>>>>bodies. Diaries, news clippings, letters, and other personal
>>>>>papers removed from the clothing of the victims all told the same
>>>>>story: the latest dates on any of these papers were from
>>>>>mid-April 1940. The Polish leaders had been killed in April 1940,
>>>>>when they were prisoners of the Soviet Union and when the Katyn
>>>>>region was under Soviet control. And this is what they reported
>>>>>back to their governments.

>>>>>So what do you think happened? Were the British and American
>>>>>governments horrified to discover that their “gallant Soviet
>>>>>ally,” as the Soviet Union was referred to by the mass media, was
>>>>>a mass murderer? Did the British government, which had gone to
>>>>>war against Germany under the pretext of defending Poland, decide
>>>>>that it had made a mistake? Did anyone condemn the Soviet Union
>>>>>for this act of genocide against the Poles?

>>>>>Of course not! The Allied governments ordered their people who
>>>>>had inspected the Katyn site to keep their mouths shut, and the
>>>>>Jewish media immediately began announcing that the Germans had
>>>>>done it. A mass murder of Polish officers and intellectuals by
>>>>>the Nazis had been discovered in the Katyn forest, the New York
>>>>>Times and the rest of the Jewish media shrieked. Poor Poles!
>>>>>Wicked Germans! The war must go on to free the poor Poles and
>>>>>punish the wicked Germans. And the war did go on, killing
>>>>>millions of more Germans, British, Americans, and other
>>>>>Europeans. And the Germans were indeed punished. The Poles, of
>>>>>course, were not freed. Instead they were turned over to the
>>>>>Reds, who had butchered their leaders in the Katyn forest, and
>>>>>made to suffer under communist rule for half a century.

>>>>>The war went on after the German discovery of the mass graves in
>>>>>the Katyn forest, because its purpose from the beginning was not
>>>>>to free Poland but to destroy Germany, which had dared to free
>>>>>itself from the Jews. Roosevelt understood this. Churchill
>>>>>understood this. But the American and British people didn’t
>>>>>understand it, of course, because they were lied to by the Jewish
>>>>>media and by their own governments, who in 1943 as in 1998 have
>>>>>done whatever has been politically expedient. And what has been
>>>>>politically expedient has been what the Jewish media bosses have
>>>>>decided.

>>>>>The lies about Katyn were maintained by the media for some years
>>>>>after the end of the war, because these lies meshed nicely with
>>>>>the “Holocaust” story which was making so much money for the
>>>>>Jews. Nowadays, of course, the truth about the Katyn murders is
>>>>>generally accepted by historians everywhere. You can go into
>>>>>almost any large library and read about it and even see the
>>>>>gruesome photographs that the Germans took of the Polish bodies
>>>>>they dug up. One of several authoritative books on the subject is
>>>>>J.K. Zawodny’s Death in the Forest: the Story of the Katyn
>>>>>Forest Massacre, published in 1962 by the University of Notre
>>>>>Dame Press. None of this is publicized a la Steven Spielberg, of
>>>>>course, for the illumination of American television audiences. It
>>>>>still might undermine the Jews’ “Holocaust” racket.

>>>>>In 1945 and 1946, although the deceived citizens of the western
>>>>>world didn’t know the truth about Katyn, Polish patriots did. The
>>>>>word had gotten back to the Polish prisoners in German camps from
>>>>>the Poles the Germans had taken to examine the graves. After the
>>>>>war, when these Polish prisoners were freed, the word spread to
>>>>>other Poles. They knew that it was the communists, not the Nazis,
>>>>>who had murdered their leaders, who had beheaded their nation.

>>>>>And they knew who was behind communism, from the Jew Karl Marx,
>>>>>who had started the whole business, up to the Jewish commissars
>>>>>who lorded it over them in Soviet-occupied Poland. They knew who
>>>>>had welcomed their Soviet conquerors and then collaborated with
>>>>>those conquerors. And so it is hardly surprising that in 1945 and
>>>>>1946 a few Polish patriots organized lynchings of Jews in Poland,
>>>>>before the Reds had a chance to clamp down on all of Poland and
>>>>>suppress any further expressions of anti-communist or anti-Jewish
>>>>>feeling.

>>>>>No, the Polish dislike of Jews/ZHIDS isn’t surprising. What is
>>>>>surprising is that so few patriots in America and Britain have
>>>>>expressed their outrage against the Jews, not only for what they
>>>>>did to the Poles during and after the war, but for what they have
>>>>>done to us: lying to us and using us to wage their wars for them.
>>>>>If patriots study the Katyn story and take its lesson to heart,
>>>>>they will understand why they cannot trust either the mass media
>>>>>or any government which dances to the tune played by the media.
>>>>>Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill were as much liars and
>>>>>traitors as Bill Clinton and Tony Blair.

>>>>>Anyway, you might remember Katyn the next time you hear the Jews
>>>>>or some of their bought politicians whining about how much gold
>>>>>was stolen from them by the Swiss or how badly the Poles and the
>>>>>Germans treated them during the Second World War.

>>>>>The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
>>>>>Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books. To
>>>>>receive weekly ADV transcripts, mail: [email protected]
>>>>>Write “subscribe” as the subject of your message.

First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao tse Dung
Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!!
Me
For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:19:57 EDT 2008
Article: 613206 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.russian,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: Re: KATYN=MURDERS OF POLISH BY ZYDS/SOVIET NKVD!!! Like Vinnitsa!! NEVER FORGET! Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 501
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:05:16 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1211389516 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 21 May 2008 11:05:16 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:05:16 MDT
Bytes: 29241
X-Original-Bytes: 29197
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.polish:873455 pl.regionalne.warszawa:507755 soc.culture.europe:613206 soc.culture.german:344011 soc.culture.russian:503821 alt.politics.europe:78806 de.soc.politik.misc:1086759

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:00:05 GMT, Proposition 88
wrote:

>With even the Soviets forced to admit that it was their ZYD NKVD who did the
>murders at KATYN, why are you apologising for them?

>Historians and experts proved it was NOT the Germans!

>Were you one of the killers, or perhaps your father, uncle or?

>On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:54:59 -0700, “Peter Wielki” wrote:

>>Actually, in Katyn there were Russians and Ukraninians that did the crime,
>>as far as I know.

>>But yeah, let’s blame it on JEWS!!! Germans did it too, right Frankie?

>>”Frank Arthur” wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]
>>> True,Just Like Vinnitsa!!

>>> The filthy ZYDS can no longer lie about KATYN and try to blame the
>>> Germans.

>>> Even the Soviets had to admit the truth, and also about Vinnitsa.

>>> No wonder around the world more and more people are starting to really
>>> dislike the filthy ZHIDS!!

>>> Latest update follows:
>>> From: “Strider”
>>> Newsgroups:soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.yugoslavia
>>> Subject: Jewish Copmmissars murdered these Poles

>>> Our shame still lies in the Katyn forest
>>> By Kevin Myers
>>> (Filed: 27/04/2003)

>>> Today Poles all over the world will commemorate the 60th anniversary of
>>> the discovery of the war crime which didn’t occur. And the
>>> non-existence of this atrocity constituted democracy’s most sordid
>>> exercise in realpolitik of the entire 20th century. The Soviet Union captured 180,000
>>> Polish soldiers during its invasion of Poland in 1939. Most were herded
>>> off to slave-camps in Siberia, but 22,000 officers were not. In April 1940, on
>>> Stalin’s orders, each was bound with barbed wire and executed with a
>>> single shot to the head.

>>> This was a colossal undertaking: the death toll was greater than that
>>> on the most calamitous day in British military history – the Somme, July
>>> 1, 1916.

>>> More importantly, the massacres occurred before the German invasions
>>> of France and the Low Countries. And although hundreds of Jews in Poland
>>> had been murdered, these were improvised butcheries, essentially unrelated to
>>> The Final Solution, which had not yet begun.

>>> So the first systematic mass murder of defenceless innocents in the
>>> Second World War was not by the Nazis, but by the Soviet Union, just over
>>> a year before the USSR became Britain’s official best friend. This shouldn’t
>>> surprise us: after all, it had been the Soviets, and not the Nazis, who
>>> invented industrialised murder. From the revolution on, they freely used
>>> the word “exterminate” of their enemies. Hitler listened; and Hitler learned,
>>> as dictators do. Moreover, the careful murder of so many officers from a
>>> single narrow stratum of Polish society was truly proto-genocide: its intent was
>>> to eliminate Polish identity by the extermination of all its perceived
>>> guardians.

>>> In 1943, via two sources – through a population census within the
>>> exiled Polish community living in the USSR, and from the Germans, who had
>>> discovered the site of one of the massacres, in the woods of Katyn,
>>> outside Smolensk – the British discovered the fate of the Polish officers. A
>>> devastating report from the British ambassador to the Polish
>>> government-in-exile, Owen O’Malley, left no doubt about the matter.

>>> The British Government’s public response was to dismiss the Nazi
>>> discoveries as propaganda and tell the Polish government-in-exile to
>>> forget Katyn and to proceed with beating the real enemy, Germany.

>>> War is war, and in peace it is impossible to replicate the fevers and
>>> the terrors it induces. So no useful moral judgment can be made about
>>> those who decided in 1943 publicly to accept lies as fact, and to conceal
>>> the truth as regrettable but necessary strategy. But it was statecraft at its
>>> most pusillanimous to allow those lies to become a cornerstone of the
>>> relationship between the Western allies and the Soviet Union.

>>> That is what happened when the three leaders – Churchill, Roosevelt
>>> and Stalin – met at Teheran in November 1943. Far from berating the Soviet
>>> Leader for the massacres, the two democratic leaders propitiated him,
>>> awarding him the Polish land he had stolen even as he seized his future murder
>>> victims.

>>> And when Stalin jested that they should settle the German problem once and
>>> for all by killing 50,000 German officers, Churchill merely protested sulkily,
>>> and Roosevelt light-heartedly suggested killing only 49,000.

>>> But nobody mentioned Katyn. How was this possible? For the massacre of
>>> the Poles was surely the secret subtext to this grisly exchange, and one
>>> by which Stalin was taking the measure of his two confreres. All three knew
>>> of the murders, and the bodyguard of lies around them: and silently, all
>>> three – two of them abjectly, the third triumphantly – assented to those lies.

>>> Teheran was the true nadir of international diplomacy, morally far
>>> more ignoble and strategically far more catastrophic than either Munich
>>> five years before or Yalta a year later. And the key to Teheran was Katyn: once
>>> Stalin had got away with that, he realised he could get away with almost
>>> anything.

>>> Moreover, the fiction of Katyn took root within the Foreign Office.
>>> There, nourished on complicit cowardice and malformed in the darkness of
>>> pathological guilt, the temporary tactic of 1943 was in time to turn into
>>> the diseased plant of enduring policy. It even caused the Callaghan Government
>>> in the 1970s vehemently to oppose the erection of a memorial in London to the
>>> victims of Katyn.

>>> Denial, in its purest psychiatric sense, of Katyn also infused much
>>> consideration of the 20th century: how else could Roy Jenkins have
>>> written a life of Churchill without once referring to Katyn, the Great Lie
>>> of which the prime minister was prime mover? How else could so many
>>> historians.

>>> Norman Davies aside – simply ignore the extraordinary Western
>>> collusion in covering up communist atrocities, and the profound impact
>>> this must have had on Kremlin thinking?

>>> On Thursday the FCO publishes a report, British reactions to the Katyn
>>> Massacre, in a belated attempt at expiation for Britain’s repeated
>>> cover-ups of this terrible affair. But it cannot undo the evil of the
>>> extermination of the Polish officer corps which, far from being the
>>> subject of a war-crimes trial, was embraced and rewarded at Teheran;
>>> and from that city, the communism of Katyn was soon to march forth
>>> and conquer half the world.

>>> My thanks to you for reposting this article.
>>> A brilliant truthful piece.
>>> Ed Kadach

>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:06:50 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On 1 May 1998 13:08:00 +0200, [email protected] wrote:

>>>>>American Dissident Voices Broadcast of April 25, 1998

>>>>>Katyn
>>>>>by Dr. William Pierce

>>>>>A background noise that seems never to go away is the constant
>>>>>whining and yammering of the Jews about how the world owes them a
>>>>>living because of their losses during the so-called “Holocaust.”
>>>>>They do it, of course, because they make such a big profit on it.
>>>>>The latest flare-up of this Jewish play for a handout came more
>>>>>than a year ago when they began demanding that the Swiss pay them
>>>>>$7 billion, which “Holocaust” victims allegedly had stashed in
>>>>>numbered Swiss accounts before being hauled off to gas chambers
>>>>>during the Second World War.

>>>>>With a few “bought” Gentile politicians fronting for them, the
>>>>>foremost among these being New York’s Senator Alphonse D’Amato,
>>>>>the Jews threatened Switzerland with a boycott by the U.S.
>>>>>government if their demands were not met. Instead of laughing in
>>>>>their faces, telling the Jews to go to hell, and gearing up for
>>>>>countermeasures against Israel and other Jewish interests if the
>>>>>Jews tried to proceed with a boycott, the Swiss politicians tried
>>>>>to placate the Jews by offering to buy themoff. The Jews took the
>>>>>Swiss response as a sign of weakness and escalated their demands.

>>>>>The average Swiss citizen seems to have a little more pride than
>>>>>Switzerland’s elected officials, however, and resentment against
>>>>>the Jews’ extortion efforts is building in Switzerland now to the
>>>>>point that some of that country’s richest Jews are wearing
>>>>>bulletproof vests whenever they must go out in public.

>>>>>In general, however, this “Holocaust”-based extortion racket
>>>>>works quite well for the Jews, and they have expanded their
>>>>>demands for World War Two reparations to include a number of
>>>>>other countries besides Switzerland. They are even whining that
>>>>>the Vatican owes them because Pope Pius XII didn’t do enough to
>>>>>save them from the Germans during the war. The Jews’ brazenness
>>>>>in this whole business is quite breathtaking.

>>>>>Their brazenness, of course, is justified, because by and large
>>>>>they have been getting away with it. And they have been getting
>>>>>away with it because with their media control they have been able
>>>>>to distort the general public’s whole perception of what happened
>>>>>during the Second World War. They have been able to portray
>>>>>themselves as innocent victims and just about everyone else as
>>>>>persecutors and aggressors, even the people who were fighting on
>>>>>the Jewish side against the Germans during the war. For example,
>>>>>they have done quite a bit of whining that after the Red Army
>>>>>drove the Germans from Poland, the Poles took the opportunity to
>>>>>lynch hundreds of Jews in 1945 and 1946: Jews whom the Germans
>>>>>somehow had failed to get rid of during their wartime occupation
>>>>>of Poland.

>>>>>Now, why would the Poles do something like that? Why would they
>>>>>lynch the poor Jews, who had been on their side during the war?
>>>>>If you learned about the war from watching Steven Spielberg
>>>>>propaganda films and other mass-media sources, you probably
>>>>>believe that it was because of religious anti-Semitism on the
>>>>>part of the Catholic Poles. Let me tell you the real reason why
>>>>>so many Poles hated Jews after the war. It’s something the
>>>>>Jew-controlled media in America have tried hard to keep covered
>>>>>up. Let me tell you about what happened in the Katyn forest
>>>>>in 1940.

>>>>>In September 1939 Poland was invaded from the west by Germany and
>>>>>from the east by the Soviet Union. The Germans wanted back the
>>>>>territory in western Poland, including the city of Danzig, which
>>>>>had been taken from them at the end of the First World War. The
>>>>>Soviets wanted eastern Poland. The Germans and the Soviets
>>>>>divided Poland between them, with the boundary running roughly
>>>>>along the River Bug.

>>>>>Britain and France, both under strong Jewish pressure, declared
>>>>>war on Germany in September 1939, ostensibly because of Germany’s
>>>>>invasion of Poland. They did not declare war on the Soviet Union,
>>>>>which also had invaded Poland. In the United States and in
>>>>>western Europe, where the Jews held a deathgrip on the mass
>>>>>media, a great deal of anti-German propaganda was based on the
>>>>>German grab for Polish territory — much of which, of course,
>>>>>actually was historically German territory — and nothing was
>>>>>said of the Soviet occupation and annexation of eastern Poland.

>>>>>The reason for this anti-German and pro-Soviet bias by the Jewish
>>>>>media was that the Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union as
>>>>>commissars and communist party bosses under Stalin, while in
>>>>>Germany Hitler had undertaken a program since 1933 of freeing
>>>>>Germany from all Jewish influence. Jews had been weeded out of
>>>>>the media, the law, the schools, and other areas of economic and
>>>>>cultural life in Germany. Before Hitler became chancellor in 1933
>>>>>the Jews had done in Germany what they do in every country where
>>>>>they gain a foothold: they had monopolized large sections of the
>>>>>mass media and certain professions and were doing their best to
>>>>>distort German culture, German society, and the German economy
>>>>>to suit themselves. Hitler put a stop to that, and two-thirds of
>>>>>the 1933 Jewish population of Germany had emigrated by the
>>>>>invasion of Poland in September 1939. So the Jews hated Germany
>>>>>and were determined to do whatever they could to destroy her.

>>>>>For his part, Hitler hoped to avoid war with Britain and France.
>>>>>He hoped that after his quick victory in western Poland he could
>>>>>make peace with Britain and France. He was determined, however,
>>>>>to stamp out communism wherever he encountered it. Not only did
>>>>>he hate communism on ideological grounds, but he had sworn to
>>>>>fight communism when the communists in Germany betrayed his
>>>>>country at the end of the First World War. Hitler also saw the
>>>>>Soviet Union as a threat to all of Europe, and he was determined
>>>>>to break the power of that country when he could, even though
>>>>>there was an uneasy non-aggression pact between Germany and the
>>>>>Soviet Union in 1939, at the time of their partition of Poland.

>>>>>In the spring of 1941 massive troop movements and other
>>>>>developments inside the Soviet Union convinced Hitler that Stalin
>>>>>was preparing to invade the west with the Red Army, and so in
>>>>>June 1941 Hitler made a preemptive strike. German forces smashed
>>>>>through the Red Army and made rapid advances, first through
>>>>>Soviet-occupied eastern Poland and then through Ukraine and into
>>>>>Russia.

>>>>>A year and a half later, in February 1943, German forces near
>>>>>Smolensk, in western Russia, investigated reports they heard from
>>>>>Russian civilians to the effect that a large number of prisoners
>>>>>had been murdered by the Soviet secret police in the area nearly
>>>>>three years earlier. The German investigators were led by local
>>>>>Russians to a series of mounds in a wooded area known locally as
>>>>>Katyn Forest, about 10 miles west of Smolensk. The forest is
>>>>>named for a village, Katyn, which it surrounds. The forest had
>>>>>been privately owned prior to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917,
>>>>>but after the communist takeover of Russia the area had been
>>>>>confiscated by the government and part of the forest had been
>>>>>turned over to the NKVD, the Soviet equivalent of the American
>>>>>FBI.

>>>>>The Germans began digging in the mounds in the Katyn forest and
>>>>>made a horrible discovery. They found corpse after corpse, each
>>>>>with its hands bound behind its back and a bullet hole in the
>>>>>base of its skull. They continued their excavations for more than
>>>>>a month, and eventually uncovered more than 4,000 corpses. Other
>>>>>bodies may have remained buried in other mounds, but the Germans
>>>>>had no time to dig up the whole forest. Instead they called in
>>>>>the International Red Cross and representatives of various
>>>>>neutral countries to examine their findings. They also brought in
>>>>>groups of Allied prisoners of war, including Americans, from
>>>>>prison camps in Germany to view the graves in the Katyn forest.
>>>>>They gave these international inspectors complete freedom to
>>>>>examine the exhumed bodies, permitted doctors among them to
>>>>>conduct autopsies, even allowed them to dig up other bodies from
>>>>>one of the mounds which had not been completely excavated. The
>>>>>Germans asked only that the inspectors report back truthfully to
>>>>>their own governments about their observations. And in fact, most
>>>>>of them did.

>>>>>What they reported was that the bodies were those of Polish
>>>>>military officers, along with a number of civilian cultural and
>>>>>business leaders and intellectuals — scientists, writers, poets
>>>>>– who had been in the portion of Poland occupied by the Soviet
>>>>>Union in September 1939. Altogether the Soviet secret police had
>>>>>rounded up some 15,000 Polish leaders in 1939 — including nearly
>>>>>half of the entire Polish officer’s corps, the half that had had
>>>>>the misfortune of being in eastern Poland at the time — and put
>>>>>them in three concentration camps in Russia: at Starobelsk,
>>>>>Kozelsk, and Ostashkov. All of the bodies unearthed in the
>>>>>Katyn forest were of Polish leaders who had been confined at one
>>>>>of these camps: Starobelsk.

>>>>>Rounding up a country’s leaders and killing them was standard
>>>>>practice for the communists. The theory was that the leaders were
>>>>>bourgeois oppressors of the working class and deserved to die. As
>>>>>egalitarians the communists did not regard the Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals as inherently better or more valuable human
>>>>>material than the average Polish criminal or welfare bum; the
>>>>>officers had simply used their class advantage to gain a better
>>>>>life-style for themselves. Of course, no one really believed that
>>>>>theory except the criminals and welfare bums and other resentful
>>>>>losers and ne’er-do-wells who made up the natural communist
>>>>>constituency. As a practical matter, however, killing all the
>>>>>leaders and potential leaders of a conquered people made them
>>>>>easier to govern. That’s what the Marxists had done in Russia,
>>>>>Ukraine, and the Baltic countries.

>>>>>In the case of the Poles there was a bit of a diplomatic problem,
>>>>>though. The Poles supported the war Britain and France had
>>>>>declared against Germany, purportedly on their behalf, because
>>>>>they viewed that as their one hope for getting back at least the
>>>>>western part of their country. They were not happy about the
>>>>>Russians taking the eastern part of Poland, but the Russians at
>>>>>least were fellow Slavs. The thing to do was get rid of the
>>>>>Germans first and then worry about the Russians. This Polish
>>>>>strategy suited Stalin fine. But it made it desirable for him to
>>>>>avoid alienating the Poles any more than necessary. When Polish
>>>>>exiles asked about their imprisoned leaders in late 1939 and
>>>>>early 1940, the Soviet government promised that they would be
>>>>>released shortly. Meanwhile, the decision had been made to kill
>>>>>all of them. And so in April 1940 the Polish leaders were taken
>>>>>from the three camps where they had been imprisoned, trucked off
>>>>>to various liquidation sites, and murdered. The ones who had been
>>>>>imprisoned at Starobelsk all went to the NKVD area of the Katyn
>>>>>forest. After the war some of the NKVD executioners were
>>>>>interviewed in Israel and described how they had carried out the
>>>>>killings.

>>> ISRAEL REFUSED TO PROSECUTE THESE ZHID MURDERERS!!

>>>>>The Poles were driven up to the burial pits in long NKVD prison
>>>>>trucks known as “black ravens.” They were pulled from the trucks
>>>>>one at a time by NKVD guards. Each Polish prisoner had his hands
>>>>>bound behind his back and then was dragged to the edge of a pit.
>>>>>There he was held by two NKVD men while a third fired a pistol
>>>>>bullet into the back of his head. Some of the officers had had
>>>>>their coats pulled over their heads to keep them from seeing what
>>>>>was happening before they were shot. Some struggled and were
>>>>>bayonetted by NKVD guards before being shot and thrown into the
>>>>>pit. When all of the officers from Starobelsk had been killed,
>>>>>some 4,400 of them, the Katyn forest burial pits were covered
>>>>>with dirt and pine trees were planted on them. The locations of
>>>>>the mass graves of the prisoners from the camps at Kozelsk and
>>>>>Ostashkov remain unknown, but none of the 15,000 Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals rounded up by the NKVD in September 1939 was
>>>>>seen alive after April 1940.

>>>>>The Red Cross representatives and the Allied prisoners the
>>>>>Germans brought in to examine the mass graves in the Katyn forest
>>>>>understood after their examination not only who had been killed;
>>>>>they also understood who had killed them. This was apparent not
>>>>>only from the medical estimates of the length of time the bodies
>>>>>had been buried, but also from documentary evidence on the
>>>>>bodies. Diaries, news clippings, letters, and other personal
>>>>>papers removed from the clothing of the victims all told the same
>>>>>story: the latest dates on any of these papers were from
>>>>>mid-April 1940. The Polish leaders had been killed in April 1940,
>>>>>when they were prisoners of the Soviet Union and when the Katyn
>>>>>region was under Soviet control. And this is what they reported
>>>>>back to their governments.

>>>>>So what do you think happened? Were the British and American
>>>>>governments horrified to discover that their “gallant Soviet
>>>>>ally,” as the Soviet Union was referred to by the mass media, was
>>>>>a mass murderer? Did the British government, which had gone to
>>>>>war against Germany under the pretext of defending Poland, decide
>>>>>that it had made a mistake? Did anyone condemn the Soviet Union
>>>>>for this act of genocide against the Poles?

>>>>>Of course not! The Allied governments ordered their people who
>>>>>had inspected the Katyn site to keep their mouths shut, and the
>>>>>Jewish media immediately began announcing that the Germans had
>>>>>done it. A mass murder of Polish officers and intellectuals by
>>>>>the Nazis had been discovered in the Katyn forest, the New York
>>>>>Times and the rest of the Jewish media shrieked. Poor Poles!
>>>>>Wicked Germans! The war must go on to free the poor Poles and
>>>>>punish the wicked Germans. And the war did go on, killing
>>>>>millions of more Germans, British, Americans, and other
>>>>>Europeans. And the Germans were indeed punished. The Poles, of
>>>>>course, were not freed. Instead they were turned over to the
>>>>>Reds, who had butchered their leaders in the Katyn forest, and
>>>>>made to suffer under communist rule for half a century.

>>>>>The war went on after the German discovery of the mass graves in
>>>>>the Katyn forest, because its purpose from the beginning was not
>>>>>to free Poland but to destroy Germany, which had dared to free
>>>>>itself from the Jews. Roosevelt understood this. Churchill
>>>>>understood this. But the American and British people didn’t
>>>>>understand it, of course, because they were lied to by the Jewish
>>>>>media and by their own governments, who in 1943 as in 1998 have
>>>>>done whatever has been politically expedient. And what has been
>>>>>politically expedient has been what the Jewish media bosses have
>>>>>decided.

>>>>>The lies about Katyn were maintained by the media for some years
>>>>>after the end of the war, because these lies meshed nicely with
>>>>>the “Holocaust” story which was making so much money for the
>>>>>Jews. Nowadays, of course, the truth about the Katyn murders is
>>>>>generally accepted by historians everywhere. You can go into
>>>>>almost any large library and read about it and even see the
>>>>>gruesome photographs that the Germans took of the Polish bodies
>>>>>they dug up. One of several authoritative books on the subject is
>>>>>J.K. Zawodny’s Death in the Forest: the Story of the Katyn
>>>>>Forest Massacre, published in 1962 by the University of Notre
>>>>>Dame Press. None of this is publicized a la Steven Spielberg, of
>>>>>course, for the illumination of American television audiences. It
>>>>>still might undermine the Jews’ “Holocaust” racket.

>>>>>In 1945 and 1946, although the deceived citizens of the western
>>>>>world didn’t know the truth about Katyn, Polish patriots did. The
>>>>>word had gotten back to the Polish prisoners in German camps from
>>>>>the Poles the Germans had taken to examine the graves. After the
>>>>>war, when these Polish prisoners were freed, the word spread to
>>>>>other Poles. They knew that it was the communists, not the Nazis,
>>>>>who had murdered their leaders, who had beheaded their nation.

>>>>>And they knew who was behind communism, from the Jew Karl Marx,
>>>>>who had started the whole business, up to the Jewish commissars
>>>>>who lorded it over them in Soviet-occupied Poland. They knew who
>>>>>had welcomed their Soviet conquerors and then collaborated with
>>>>>those conquerors. And so it is hardly surprising that in 1945 and
>>>>>1946 a few Polish patriots organized lynchings of Jews in Poland,
>>>>>before the Reds had a chance to clamp down on all of Poland and
>>>>>suppress any further expressions of anti-communist or anti-Jewish
>>>>>feeling.

>>>>>No, the Polish dislike of Jews/ZHIDS isn’t surprising. What is
>>>>>surprising is that so few patriots in America and Britain have
>>>>>expressed their outrage against the Jews, not only for what they
>>>>>did to the Poles during and after the war, but for what they have
>>>>>done to us: lying to us and using us to wage their wars for them.
>>>>>If patriots study the Katyn story and take its lesson to heart,
>>>>>they will understand why they cannot trust either the mass media
>>>>>or any government which dances to the tune played by the media.
>>>>>Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill were as much liars and
>>>>>traitors as Bill Clinton and Tony Blair.

>>>>>Anyway, you might remember Katyn the next time you hear the Jews
>>>>>or some of their bought politicians whining about how much gold
>>>>>was stolen from them by the Swiss or how badly the Poles and the
>>>>>Germans treated them during the Second World War.

>>>>>The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
>>>>>Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books. To
>>>>>receive weekly ADV transcripts, mail: [email protected]
>>>>>Write “subscribe” as the subject of your message.

First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao tse Dung
Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!!
Me
For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:19:58 EDT 2008
Article: 613207 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.baltics
Subject: HOLODOMOR = REAL HOLOCAUST na Ukrainie – BY ZYDS/OGPU ON UKRAINIANS: Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 1048
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:05:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1211389527 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 21 May 2008 11:05:27 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:05:27 MDT
Bytes: 54522
X-Original-Bytes: 54478
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.ukrainian:116268 soc.culture.europe:613207 soc.culture.russian:503822 alt.politics.europe:78807 soc.culture.polish:873456 soc.culture.baltics:162160

HOLODOMOR = ZYD/NKVD HOLOCAUST ON UKRAINIANS! Message:
Probably the best analysis of what happened that I have read to date.

Trident

IS THERE A “SMOKING GUN” FOR THE HOLODOMOR?

PRESENTATION: By Professor Roman Serbyn Universit=E9 du Qu=E9bec =E0
Montr=E9al, Canada
The Ukrainian Holodomor and the Denial of Genocides
International Conference, Federigo Argentieri, Ph.D., Organizer
Guarini Institute, John Cabot University
Rome, Italy, Friday, November 09, 2007
Published by the Action Ukraine Report #889, Article 5
Kyiv, Ukraine, Monday, November 19, 2007

In his seminal study on genocide, Leo Kuper observed that “governments
hardly declare and document genocidal plans in the manner of the
Nazis”
[1]. Nevertheless, since modern states cannot function without large
bureaucracies and elaborate communication systems, tell-tale records
inevitably survive.

When the CPSU lost power and the Soviet empire fell apart, it was
Revealed that an elaborate paper trail of the 1932-33 famine and the Soviet
authorities’ involvement in it had been preserved in party and state
archives. These documents are being slowly declassified, examined and
published[2]. Historians can now give us a fairly accurate account of
the catastrophe and ascertain the responsibility of Stalin and his
collaborators.

As a result, scholars who previously hesitated to recognize the
Genocidal character of Stalin’s forced starvation of Ukrainian farmers, have
reexamined the question and readjusted their interpretations. In his
latest book, Nicolas Werth comes to the conclusion that thanks to recent
studies based on the new documents, it is now “legitimate to qualify as
genocide the cluster of actions undertaken by the Stalinist regime to punish
the
Ukrainian peasantry by famine and terror”[3].

In this paper I analyze some of the main documents that provide
smoking-gun evidence of genocide, in line with the definition of the crime
given
in the UN Convention of 1948: “acts committed with intent to destroy, in
whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”.

The key criteria in the Convention are proof of “intent” and
Identification eligible “groups”. Soviet documents corroborate the accusation
against
Stalin and his closest collaborators for deliberately exterminating
Millions of Ukrainian farmers, and show that the perpetrators targeted them as
Ukrainians.

Furthermore these and other documents reveal that the genocide was not
Just against Ukrainian farmers, the focus of the attack was the Ukrainian
Nation in all its component parts and on all its territories within the
Soviet Union.

The locus of this crime was thus the Ukrainian SSR, the predominantly
Ukrainian Kuban, and the other regions of the RSFSR with sizeable
Ukrainian populations. The simultaneous decimation of Ukrainian national
elites,
especially academic, cultural and political leaders, was an integral part of
the destruction of the Ukrainian nation.

Stalin did not intend to kill all Ukrainians (nor is such an intent
Required by the Convention); his motive was to break the backbone of the
nation
By executing a sizeable percentage of the people and reducing the rest to
servile obedience, to transform them into manageable cogs of the state
mechanism. Stalin’s means of destruction were varied: famine, shootings,
exhausting forced labor.

The UN Convention does not require the establishment of motives for
genocide, but determining the reasons for the act gives an insight
into the rationale which led to crime and thus help us comprehend the
perpetrator’s intent. Stalin’s measures against the Ukrainians were predicated
on
his political ambitions, two of which provided the motives for the
eventual genocide[4].

The first was to extend socialism beyond the borders of the USSR. He
realized that the Bolsheviks’ initial attempt to export their revolution
into Europe failed primarily because of the weakness of the Red Army.
To resume Lenin’s unfinished task, Stalin needed a powerful armed force,
Backed by modern heavy industry. Industrialization had to be financed by
Exporting natural resources, especially grain, which had to be extorted from
the
farmers at the lowest cost to the state.

War communism had shown that door-to-door requisition was costly,
inefficient and politically dangerous. After the revolution, poor
farmers appropriated and divided up the land of rich landlords. As a result,
farmers lived better, ate more but sold less to the state. Marketable grain
(sold outside the village) in tsarist times was provided by the large farms
Owned by landlords and kulaks. Now new large estates had to be set up in the
Form of sovkhozy and kolkhozy. These would give the state easy access to
grain, produced by the newly enslaved peasants.

The immediate goal was not the increase of grain production (which
could be expected to fall as a result of peasant opposition), but of the
“marketable grain” to be delivered to the state. Since the main producers of
grain
Were Ukrainians farmers, who had no tradition of the Russian semi-communal
obshchina organization, they could be expected to offer stiff resistance to
forced collectivization and confiscation of the fruits of their labor.

Stalin’s second ambition was to bring a permanent solution to the
National question, especially its crucial Ukrainian component. The 1926 census
Pegged the Ukrainian population at 31 million, of the Union’s 147 million: 23
million in Ukraine, and 8 million in the rest of the USSR, mainly along the
Ukrainian border.

Ukrainian national revival triggered by the Russian revolution forced
Lenin to give the reconquered republic nominal autonomy in the form of a
“sovereign” republic within a Potemkin-style Soviet federation.
Subsequent policy of Ukrainization, or the local application of a general
principle of korenizatsiia (nativization), allowed Ukrainians to add real
national
content to the pretentiously misleading form of “soviet republic”[5].

The Ukrainization of education, communications and administration, not
Only in Ukraine but also in the Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR, the
de-Russification of urban centers by the influx of Ukrainian farmers,
the demands on Moscow to transfer to the republic adjacent territories
with Ukrainian population, the shifting of cultural orientation from Moscow
and to the West – all these pressures on the imperial centre could not be
ignored by the Kremlin.

Stalin, Lenin’s “magnificent Georgian” and foremost expert on the
nationalities question, understood the dangers of active nation-
building in Ukraine, in the best of times. Collectivization would only
aggravate
the situation. Over 85 % of ethnic Ukrainians were farmers and their
sudden disenfranchisement could throw the countryside into such turmoil that
not only grain production would be catastrophically reduced, but also
farmers could gain the support of the national elites in a united rebellion of
the whole republic to the spoliation of their country by Moscow.

Similar, if smaller, unrest could be expected in the Kuban’ and other
ethnically Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR. In the mid-1920s Stalin had
written that the peasant question was “the basis, the quintessence, of
the national question”, that “the peasantry constitutes the main army of
the national movement” and that “there is no powerful national movement
without the peasant army”[6]. The stability and even the integrity of the
Soviet empire would be threatened.

Genocide does not happen spontaneously. The targeted group is first
identified, vilified and intimidated, then it is discredited in the
eyes of the rest of the population, and only when it has been sufficiently
isolated, is it submitted to total or partial extermination. In the summer of
1929 the GPU (political police) “uncovered” a nationalist conspiracy, headed
by
prominent Ukrainian intellectuals and conducting anti-Soviet work in
villages and regional centers.

Over 700 people were arrested for, among other things, “anti-Soviet
Activity in the villages and district centers” and a show trial was held in
March 1930, appropriately staged in a Kharkiv theatre. 45 members of this
Mythical Association for the Liberation of Ukraine (SVU) were sentenced to
death or long prison terms.

Arrests and trials of other mostly fictitious groups followed:
Ukrainian National Center, Ukrainian Military Organization, etc.[7] The
condemned were former members of the former Ukrainian national governments,
Ukrainian armed forces, Ukrainian political parties, and prominent people in
fields of education, culture and the arts.

The purpose was to terrorize the Ukrainian elites into submission and
lethargy, and thus deprive the peasants of leadership on the national
level.
It should be noted that, in connection with the less severe famine in
Russia, no parallel attack took place against Russian national elites
or the Russian culture.

Stalin’s war against the peasants began in earnest towards the end of
1929.
In a two-pronged attack he ordered to “eliminate the dekulakization as a
class” and to collectivize the middle and poor peasants. Divided into
three categories, the kulaks were dispossessed and the most dangerous were
shot.

The others were deported to the wilds of northern RSFSR, transferred
To distant regions in Ukraine, or given strips of poor land outside the
Kolkhoz near which they lived. The intention was not only to provide kolkhozes
With the confiscated land, cattle and machinery, but also to deprive the
Peasants of the more qualified leadership for their opposition to the
authorities.

During the winter of 1929-1930, 90 thousand Ukrainian households were
dekulakized, and a smaller wave more or less finished the job a year
later.
In 1934 Kossior, party boss of Ukraine, reported that 200 thousand
farms had been dekulakized in Ukraine. Out of this number of about one million
(5 members per family), several thousand were deported to the northern
parts of the RSFSR and lost to the Ukrainian nation.

Collectivization went in unison with dekulakization: a major push was
Given in early 1930. By 10 March 1930 Ukrainian kolhosps integrated 64.4% of
farmsteads with 70.9% of arable land. The operation was accomplished
with the help of some 50,000 activists, sent from Russian and Ukrainian
urban centers, with special powers to organize, punish, and terrorize.

Many poor peasants, paid for the service with confiscated goods,
participated in expropriating their richer neighbors, but many others
sympathized with the victims. Peasant rebellion swept Ukraine: in
January-March 1930, 3,190 uprisings with over 950 thousand
Participants confronted the authorities.[8]

Hundreds of fliers were picked up by the authorities with such slogans
As “Free Ukraine from Moscow rule”, “Time to rise against Moscow yoke”
And others. National and peasant factors were coming together. Stalin
sounded a temporary retreat and in October of that year collectivization was
down to 29 % of households and 34 % of arable land. But the reprieve was brief
and a year later (October 1931) the figures rose to 68 % (for households)
and 72 % for arable land, with a much higher percentage in the grain-producing
steppe regions.

The effect of Stalin’s revolution on the countryside was disastrous,
especially in Ukraine and the Kuban. From 1929 to 1932 the evolution
can be summarized in these four curt phrases: production down; state
procurement up; grain export up; peasant food consumption down.

Farmers’ opposition to collectivization, mismanagement of collective
Farms by incompetent administrators, neglect and slaughter of farm animals
seriously hindered farming and brought down its production. Yet,
enforced obligatory state procurement increased, and in 1931, 42 % of
Ukraine’s
grain harvest was turned over to the state.[9]

Kolhosps delayed or completely failed to pay out stipends for
“workday” (trudodni), and the their members had to rely on their meager and
insufficient individual plots of land and a few domestic animals for
subsistence. Undernourishment became generalized. But Stalin had
reached his goal.

Grain exports rose from below one million tons in 1929, to: 5,832,000
Tons in 1930/31 and 4,786,000 tons in 1931/32. It should be kept in mind
that one million tons could feed four to five million people for one year.
After two years of resistance and unequal struggle with the Communist
authorities, the Ukrainian elites were cowed and most of the collective and
independent farms despoiled of all their reserves. The republic was on the
brink of a major catastrophe.

On 26 April 1932, Stanislav Kossior, the General secretary of the
Communist Party of Ukraine, informed Stalin about “individual
Cases and even individual villages that are starving” but blamed it on
“local bungling, errors, particularly in the case of kolkhozes.” And,
Lest he displease his Kremlin masters, their lieutenant in Ukraine
dismissed the tragedy with the affirmation that “all talk of famine must be
categorically discarded.”[10]

Yet famine there was and on 10 June H. Petrovsky, the head of the
Ukrainian state and V. Chubar, the head of the Ukrainian government, sent
Separate letters to notify Molotov and Stalin of the appalling conditions in
the Ukrainian countryside, and to ask for help.

Chubar admitted that cases of starvation among independent and
Collective farmers had already been signaled in December and January and
that by “March-April there were dozens and hundreds of malnourished, starving,
and swollen people and people starving to death accumulate in every
village; children and orphans abandoned by their parents appeared”.

Raions and oblasts organized aid from internal resources, but were
Obliged to do this “under conditions of acute food shortage, especially
bread”.
[11]
Noteworthy additional remark: “Petliurite and other anti-Soviet moods
increased.”

Petrovsky’s letter was even more to the point. Having just returned
>from an inspection of the countryside, he realized the catastrophic situation
of the farming population. He visited many villages and everywhere saw
multitudes of people, mainly poor and middle peasants, starving, subsisting on
surrogates.

Peasants scolded him, posed embarrassing question, reproached him,
Saying “why did you create an artificial famine, […] why did you take away
The seed material – this did not happen even under the old regime, why is
It necessary for Ukrainians to travel for bread […] to non-grain
Producing territories?”.

Echoing Chubar, Petrovsky reported that “because of the famine, mass
Thefts are taking place in the villages.” Pointing out that grain harvest is
Still six week off, and famine will only intensify, Petrovsky ask:
“shouldn’t assistance be rendered to the Ukrainian countryside in the amount
of
two or, at the very least, one and a half million poods of grain?” And he
predicted that if help is not given starvation would drive peasants to pick
unripe grain and destroy much of it.

Petrovsky’s letter paints a bleak picture of the forthcoming harvest.
Since the better grain had been seized by the state, seeds of poorer quality
Were sown and scattered mores thinly. The young crops are good and the
Fields well weeded but the grain is sparse. Petrovsky was also struck by the
Large amount of unsown land. Aware of all these problems, the farmers
Complained to Petrovsky that the new grain procurements would be even more
difficult to meet than last year’s. “And this may very well be so”, agrees
Petrovsky.

Finally Petrovsky draws attention to the exodus of Ukrainian farmers.
They are forced to seek food beyond the republic’s borders, at “the Dno
station, in the Central-Black Earth Oblast’, in Belarus, and in Northern
Caucasus”, where grain is more readily available, and at much lower prices.

When Petrovsky suggested that farmers band together for these
purchases, he learned that the Commissariat of Transport has drastically
reduced
the sale of train tickets to peasants. Bewildered Ukrainian peasants needled
Petrovsky: “Why are they banning trips for grain?”

If the two Ukrainian leaders believed their pleas and warnings of
turmoil in the Ukrainian countryside would soften Moscow’s position, they were
mistaken. Their effect on Stalin, Kaganovich and Molotov was just the
opposite. Writing from Moscow to Sochi, where Stalin was vacationing,
Kaganovich criticized both Ukrainian leaders, even though he admitted
That some aid would have to be given to Ukraine, and asked Stalin to decide
On the amount. Stalin’s response was more brutal and more ominous of
things to come.

He condemned the hypocrisy of the two leaders, who only wanted to get
“new millions of poods[12] of grain from Moscow” and “a reduction in the
plan for grain procurement”. Ukrainians must mobilize their own forces and
resources for already “Ukraine has been given more than she should get”.[13]
Nevertheless, on 16 June the Politburo considered Ukraine’s plea and
Granted about 8,500 tons[14], a paltry amount in comparison with the million
and a half poods requested by Petrovsky.

Politburo’s niggardly “largesse” must have provoked Stalin’s ire, for
in a letter to Kaganovich, Molotov and the Politburo he came back with
harsh criticism of past errors and new instructions for the coming harvest.
The Gensec blamed “mechanical equalization”, which did not take into
account the ability of the kolkhozes to deliver grain, and as a result of
which,
“fertile districts in Ukraine found themselves in a state of
Impoverishment and famine, despite a fairly good harvest.”[15]

This is the only known acknowledgement of the Ukrainian famine by
Stalin. He blamed regional authorities for being out of touch with the
countryside and allowing kolkhozniks to travel around the entire European
part of the USSR demoralize “our farms with their complaints and whining.”[16]

Stalin proposed the calling of a top level conference on the
organization of grain procurement and its unconditional fulfillment, and
insisted
that personal responsibility for grain procurement be delegated to the
first secretaries of the Ukraine, the Northern Caucasus, and the other grain
producing regions. “Personal responsibility” for “unconditional fulfillment”
imposed from the top along the administrative vertikal became the
watchwords of the 1932/33 grain procurement campaign, which would result in
the
genocidal famine.

On 21 June a telegram signed by Stalin and Molotov instructed Kharkiv to
carry out “at any cost” the July-September plan for grain delivery.
Two days later, Moscow answered Ukrainian Politburo’s plea for 600,000
poods of grain with a terse resolution: “bar any additional grain deliveries
to
Ukraine.”[17]

The III Conference of KP(b)U (6-10 July 1932) was devoted to the
Upcoming harvest and grain procurement. Stalin sent Molotov and Kaganovich to
The meeting “to ensure genuinely Bolshevik decisions”. Molotov informed
The audience that Moscow had lowered Ukraine’s quota but was adamant that
The plan be carried out in full.[18]

Declarations from regional leaders that the farmers were starving, that much
land lay fallow, and that 100 to 200 m.poods of grain would be lost during
harvesting did not bend the resolve of Moscow’s envoys.[19] The conference
adopted a resolution to carry out the plan of grain delivery “in full
and unconditionally”.[20]

It was largely in response to the tense situation in Ukraine[21], and in
anticipation of new troubles in that republic that Stalin came up with
his infamous decree, dubbed by the farmers “the 5 ears of corn law”.
Writing on 20 July to Kaganovich and Molotov, the Gensec complains of
Widespread theft by “dekulakized kulaks” and others, and proposes to write
a law, which would make theft of property belonging to collective farms equal
to similar crimes against state property, and “punishable by a minimum of ten
years’
imprisonment, and as a rule, by death”.

“All active agitators against the new collective-farm system” and
“profiteers and resellers of goods” writes Stalin, should be removed
And sent to concentration camps.[22] He also wants stricter controls over
The limited kolkhoz trade allowed by a 6 May 1932 law (kolkhozes allowed
Sell their surplus after 15 January 1933, after fulfilling the state
Procurement plan), made more liberal on 20 May 1932.[23]

A follow-up letter provides ideological explanation: in the same way
That capitalism could not triumph without first making “private property
Sacred property”, socialism will not finish off capitalism “unless it
Declares public property (belonging to cooperatives, collective farms or the
state) to be sacred and inviolable”.[24]

Returning to the topic on 26 July, Stalin insists on formal legality
of the proposed operations: “we must act on the basis of law (‘the peasant
loves legality’), and not merely in accordance with the practice of the
OGPU, although it is clear that the OGPU’s role here will not only not
Diminish but, on the contrary, will be strengthened and ‘ennobled’ (the OGPU
Agencies will operate ‘on a lawful basis’ rather than ‘high-handedly’)”.[25]

The joint Party-State decree “On the Protection of the Property of
State Enterprises, Collective Farms and Cooperatives, and on the
Consolidation of Public (Socialist) Property” was issued on 7 August 1932.
It became the main legal instrument used by the Soviet authorities to condemn
millions of farmers to slow death by starvation. It repeated Stalin’s
declarations
that all public property is “sacred and inviolable” and that individuals
attempting to take possession of public property should be considered
“enemies of the people”.[26]

All collective farm property, whether in the field or in storage was
Decreed equal to that of state property and theft was made punishable by
execution, which could be reduced to 10-year imprisonment only under
mitigating circumstances. Advocating withdrawal from the kolkhoz became
tantamount to treason and was punished with three to five years imprisonment
in concentration camps. No amnesty could be applied in any of these
cases.

The decree on State property was applicable on the whole Soviet
Territory but, as Stalin’s letter to Kaganovich shows, it was primarily meant
For Ukraine. Stalin thought the law was “good” and would “soon have an
impact”, and ordered a draft of directives from the C.C to the party, judicial
and punitive organizations.[27] The Gensec then addressed the Ukrainian
problem.
The passage is highly revealing:

“The most important thing right now is Ukraine. Ukrainian affairs have hit
rock bottom. Things are bad with regard to the party. There is talk
that in two regions of Ukraine (it seems in the Kiev and Dnepropetrovsk
regions) about 50 raion party committees have spoken out against the
grain-procurements plan, deeming it unrealistic. It is said that the
situation in other raion party committees is no better. […] This is
not a party but a parliament, […]

Instead of leading the raions, Kossior kept maneuvering between the
directives of the CC VKP and the demands of the raion party committees
[…]
Things are bad with the soviets. Chubar is no leader. Things are bad
With the GPU. Redens is not up to leading the fight against the
counterrevolution
[…]. [underlined and doubly underlined in original – R.S.]”

Then Stalin brandishes the specter of Ukrainian separatism: “If we don’t
undertake at once to straighten out the situation in Ukraine, we may
lose Ukraine.” He reminds Kaganovich that Pilsudski and his agents are
underestimated by Redens, and Kossior. He expressed utter contempt for
the whole KP(b)U, composed of 500,000 members (“ha-ha”, snickers Stalin),
harboring Pilsudski’s agents and “quite a lot (yes a lot!) of rotten
elements, conscious and unconscious Petliurists”.

Thinking undoubtedly of Ukraine’s negative reaction to the destructive
impact the just-passed property laws will have, Stalin warns: “The
moment things get worse, these [party] elements will waste no time opening a
front inside (and outside) the party, against the party.”

Frustrated by the fact that “the Ukrainian leadership does not see
These dangers”, Stalin proposes to replace Kossior with Kaganovich and
Redens with Balitsky, and eventually Chubar with Kaganovich. In this way
Stalin
Intends to transform “Ukraine as quickly as possible into a real fortress of
The USSR, a genuinely exemplary republic.”

The task is urgent and calls for immediate action, for without “these and
similar measures (the economic and political strengthening of Ukraine,
above all its border raions, etc.), I repeat, we may lose Ukraine.”[28]
Kaganovich agrees, of course, and accuses Ukrainian party of creating a
certain
solidarity and “a rotten sense of mutual responsibility”, not only in the
middle echelons of the party, but also among its leadership.[29]

Stalin’s exchange of letters with Kaganovich reveals the ambiance in
Which the policy of starvation will be implemented. The overall objective
was to maintain a high level of grain procurement. To assure this, all
challenge outside and inside the republic had to be eliminated, regardless of
the cost. Stalin’s raising of the specter of Pilsudski and Petliura agents
running loose in Ukraine and infiltrating the Soviet party and state
machinery was nothing more than a scare tactic and a rallying call.

He was well aware that by the summer of 1932, the weak Polish network
And the few local collaborators had been rounded up by the GPU, which also
arrested real and imaginary followers of Petliura whom Stalin had
eliminated by assassination in 1926. Poland may have had some illusions about
a
Ukrainian insurrection in 1929-1930, but by 1932, the Poles realized
That the starving population was in no shape to revolt.

The Soviet-Polish nonaggression treaty signed on 25 July 1932 was
Ample proof of the changing relations between the two neighbors.[30] The
Pilsudski-Petliura scarecrow will continue to enjoy popularity in
Soviet propaganda. While there was no serious threat from the Poles or the
Ukrainian nationalists, a national insurrection could become a reality if
the expected famine (implied in Stalin’s phrase “the moment things get
worse”) could bind together the threatened middle cadres of the KP(b)U
with the surviving peasantry. To prevent this eventuality the KP(b)U had to
be purged and kept under close Moscow surveillance.

Stalin maintained that the 1932 harvest was good; historians today are
More skeptical but consider it adequate to cover Soviet Union’s internal
needs.
With the state reserves from previous year, there were enough supplies
To feed every citizen of the Soviet Union.

Famine was brought about by the exorbitant amount of grain and other
agricultural products taken from the Ukrainian peasants, and the way
they were extracted. Ukraine’s plan was excessive, and in spite of the
protests from Kharkiv and three successive reductions, it remained so to the
end.

Still, Ukraine delivered about a quarter of a billion poods of grain, or
over 90% of its procurement quota. [31] In addition it handed over
large quantities of meat, vegetables and other produce. Stalin insisted that
state procurement have absolute priority. Following a CC VKP(b) directive, a
KP(b)U resolution of 18 November reminded that “complete fulfillment
of the procurement plan by collective farms and the MTS constitutes their
primary obligation […], to which all the other duties of the collective farm
must be subordinated, including the duty to set up all sorts of funds: seed
fund, forage and food supplies”.[32]

Stalin was satisfied that he was achieving his goal. At a high-level
Party meeting, held on 27 November 1932, he gloated: “The party has
succeeded in replacing the 500-600 million poods of marketable grain, procured
during the period of individual peasant holdings by our present ability to
collect 1,200-1,400 m.p. of grain. It is hardly necessary to prove that
without this leap forward the country would have a famine [sic-RS], we would
not be
able to support our industry, we would not be able to feed the workers and
the Red Army.”[33]

The allusion to the famine, or rather to freedom from one, was an
Obvious lie, and the reference to the feeding of the workers and the Red Army
– an overstatement; but then, Stalin’s concern was not the feeding his
Subjectsb but the financing of Soviet industrialization with grain exports.

Obedience to Moscow’s orders was assured in two ways: a) frequently
Repeated delegations to Ukraine and the North Caucasus Territory of Molotov
Kaganovich and other high-ranking leaders to supervise the local
authorities, and b) party discipline enforced from Moscow down the
administrative structure. At the end of October 1932, two commissions
were sent, one to Ukraine headed by Molotov, and the other to North
Caucasus Territory headed by Kaganovich.

Stalin’s emissaries supervised party meetings and forced them to pass
resolutions on grain procurements, party discipline, stricter
application of the 7 August property laws, the establishment of “black lists”
of collective farms in arrears with grain deliveries, imposition of fines,
etc.
They also instigated purges in party organizations and administrative
structures.
Kuban’ was particularly hit with the expulsion of 43 % of the 25,000
Party members, including 358 out of 716 party secretaries.[34]

In Ukraine, during November and first five days of December, the OGPU
arrested 1,230 people, including 340 heads of kolhospy while 327
Communists were brought before the courts for sabotaging state
procurements.[35]
In the 18 November resolution quoted above, the Ukrainian CC reminded the
directors
of sovkhoz of their “personal responsibility as party members and civil
servants for the fulfillment of the grain procurement”.

“Personal responsibility” for the execution of instructions was a
Constant refrain in messages coming from above and became an important
Means for forcing recalcitrant cadres to carry out the Ukrainian genocide.

Dekulakization and deportation continued, on a smaller scale and were
Mostly of political and punitive nature. Arrests, beatings, and cruelty of
All sorts abounded as before, only now the victims were weaker and less
Capable of resistance. Kolkhozes, villages and individual farmers in arrears
On state procurement were put on “black lists”, lost access to state-run
stores, and could not buy such essentials as matches, kerosene, salt.

Fines amounted to a year and a quarter’s worth of meat tax, without
Freeing the debtor from the unfulfilled grain procurement. “Activists” – the
City workers and their komnezam helpers searched farmers’ houses and yards,
looking for the hidden grain.

There is no way of knowing what portion of the hidden grain was found
by the flying brigades of activists, but official reports state that in Kuban
they found 345,000 poods of grain in November, while searches in Ukraine
>from 1 December 1932 to 25 January 1933 yielded 1.7 million poods, in 17,000
hiding places.[36] What grain was found, was confiscated; if nothing was
discovered, they took whatever edibles were seen, leaving the family
to starve.

Peasants who could find some old religious medals or other mementos
Made of precious metals could trek to the city and exchange them at the
Torgsins (stores for foreigners) for vouchers, and then exchange them for
food.

Hardier peasants would flee their villages and seek salvation in urban
centers or in neighboring Belarus and RSFSR, where food was available.
Accounts of Ukrainian peasants overloading trains, filling stations
And wandering about Russian and Belarusian towns and countryside abound.

National and peasant questions became inextricably intertwined in
Stalin’s decree of 14 December 1932, issued under the banal title “On Grain
Procurement in Ukraine, Northern Caucasus and the Western Oblast”[37].

Ukrainization was blamed for problems in grain deliveries and
Exemplary punishment was prescribed for sabotage in grain procurement: 5-10
years of concentration camp for a number of “party traitors” arrested in the
Orikhiv raion of Dnipropetrovs’k oblast of Ukraine, and deportation to the
North of the Poltavska stanytsia of Kuban in the RSFSR.

The decree made the party and government chiefs in the three grain
Producing areas personally responsible for the completion of grain procurement
By January 1933. Ukrainianization presently is carried out in Ukraine,
“without meticulous selection of the Bolshevik cadre”, had allowed
bourgeois-nationalists and Petliurites to join party and state
institutions and set up their cells and organizations.

Absence of “revolutionary vigilance” by local party organizations let
“counterrevolutionary elements” become directors, accountants,
storekeepers, foremen in collective farms, members of village soviets. Similar
accusation was brought against Northern Caucasus, with supporters of the
Kuban’
Rada figuring in place of Petliurites. This gave nationalists the
opportunity to sabotage harvest and sowing campaigns and organize other
counterrevolutionary activities.

Party and Soviet authorities in Ukraine and Northern Caucasus were
Ordered to extirpate these counterrevolutionary elements, execute them or
Deport them to concentration camps, including “saboteurs with party
Membership cards in their pockets”.

The verdict against Ukrainization came in two parts. In Ukraine it was
Not formally prohibited, but Stalin insisted that it resume its primary
vocation, that of promoting “correct Bolshevik implementation of
Lenin’s national policy”, which in fact meant integration and assimilation.

Ukrainian authorities were instructed to “expel Petliurite and other
bourgeois-nationalist elements from party and government
organizations”, and “meticulously select and recruit Ukrainian Bolshevik
cadre”. The
signal was thus given for rapid curtailment of Ukrainization and return to a
more
sophisticated policy of Russification.[38]

Ukrainians of Northern Caucasus fared worse. “Non-Bolshevik
‘Ukrainianization’, which affected nearly half of the raions in the
Northern Caucasus,” and which was declared to be “at variance with the
cultural
interests of the population”, was totally discontinued and replaced
with Russification.

The use of the Ukrainian language was banned in public offices of
Local administration, cooperative societies, and schools. The printing of
newspapers and magazines in the Ukrainized raions of Northern Caucasus
was to switch immediately to Russian, and preparation were to begin
immediately for the transfer in the fall of all Ukrainian schools into
Russian.

The whole Poltava stanytsia was ordered to be deported and resettled
With demobilized Russian Red Army soldiers, who would receive the abandoned
land, buildings, equipment, and cattle. In fact, 2,158 families with 9,187
members were sent out before 27 December[39] and resettled a month later with
1,826 demobilized soldiers.[40]

Together with Medvedivs’ka and Umans’ka, the three Cossack stanytsias
Saw 45,000 persons deported to the North. On 15 December, Molotov and
Stalin signed a similar ban on Ukrainization, for the rest of the previously
Ukrainized Soviet regions in the RSFSR.

Stalin’s anti-Ukrainization decree reveals the extent to which the dictator
was ready to go, in sacrificing the Ukrainian nation on the altar of
great-power ambitions. There is little doubt that the ban on Ukrainization
was a sop to Russian chauvinism, especially in ethnically mixed
regions outside the Ukrainian SSR. National and social repressions reinforced
one another, even if neither was acknowledged openly.

For the next several months after the condemnation of the abuses of
Ukrainization and the Ukrainian sabotage of grain procurements, the
Ukrainian countryside passed through some of the worst moments in its
history. The litany of repressive measures is endless. 82 raions were
deprived of manufactured goods for not fulfilling their quotas of
grain deliveries.

On 19 December, Stalin orders Kaganovich and Postishev back to Ukraine
To help Kosior, Chubar and Khataevich carry out the procurement plan. On
24 December, collective farms are ordered to deliver all grain in
Fulfillment of the plan, including grain put aside for seed and food. Direct
orders to increase repressive measures, arrests and deportations increase. A
real reign of terror seizes the republic and the Kuban.

On 22 January 1933 Stalin struck another crippling blow against the
Starving Ukrainian grain growers. The new secret decree, drafted by the Gensec
himself, is perhaps the best available proof of the dictator’s
genocidal intent against the Ukrainian nation. Sent to Ukraine, Belarus and
the
neighboring regions of RSFSR[41], the document calls attention to the
unrestrained exodus of peasants from the Kuban’ and Ukraine to the
near-by regions of Russia and Belarus.

Central authorities are said to have no doubt that these migrants, who
pretend to search for food, are, in fact, Socialist-Revolutionaries and
agents of Poland, sent to agitate, “through the peasants”, in the
northern parts of the USSR, against the kolkhoz system and the Soviet power.
Addressees are reminded that a similar movement took place the
Previous year, but the party, soviet and police authorities of Ukraine did
nothing to stop it. It must not be allowed to happen this year.

Stalin then orders the party, soviet and the repressive organs of the
Northern Caucasus and Ukraine to prevent the exodus of their peasants
To other regions of the USSR and directs them to close border crossings
between Ukraine and the Northern Caucasus.

The GPU of the Russian oblast’s adjacent to the quarantined Ukrainian
And Northern Caucasus regions, and the transport section of the OGPU, are
instructed to arrest all peasants from Ukraine and North Caucasus, who
have managed to leave their territory, and, after segregating the
counter-revolutionary elements, return the others to their villages.

The next day, the Politburo of the CC KP(b)U adopted a resolution to
Carry out Moscow’s orders and forwarded the directive, along with addition
instructions, for implementation by the appropriate Ukrainian
authorities.[42]

The Ukrainian branch of the OGPU was ordered to instruct all railway
stations not to sell tickets to peasants with destinations beyond the
Ukrainian borders, without formal travel permission from the raion executive
Committee or a certificate of employment from construction or industrial
enterprises.

Oblasts were told to take “resolute measures” to prevent massive
Departure of their peasants, carefully check the work of agents recruiting
Peasants for work outside Ukraine, and to urge kolhospnyky and individual
farmers not to depart without permission for other raions because they would
be
arrested there.

On 25 January, B. Sheboldaev, the party boss of the North Caucasus
Territory, issued a similar order, adding instructions on the
employment of internal forces and border troupes and the setting up of
filtration
points.[43]

Like the anti-Ukrainization decree of 14 December 1932, the 22 January
1933 directive, which closed the borders to the famished Ukrainian peasants
Was not the beginning but the culmination of processes that had started
Many moths before. Petrovsky had complained to Stalin, back in June 1932,
About the ban on train ticket for Ukrainian peasants who wanted to obtain
provisions in Russia.

Evdokimov’s telegram from Rostov-on-Don, which Iagoda prepared for
Stalin’s attention on 23 January 1933, details the elaborate measures taken
Since November to prevent the flight of farmers from the Northern Caucasus
Territory. Among these were roadblocks set up on the main arteries of
peasant migration.

Transport authorities had arrested 11,774 persons and another 7,534
Were incarcerated by other organs. In the same dossier, Balitsky’s report
>from 22 January informed of massive exodus of peasants from Ukraine since
December.[44]

Departures were registered in 74 raions, 721 villages and 228
kolhosps. In all, 31,693 persons left: 20,129 from Kharkiv oblast’, 6,576 from
the
Kyiv oblast, 3,447 from Odessa oblast, and 1,541 from Chernihiv. Of these
migrants about one third were collective farmers and two thirds
individual farmers; 128 were activists. A check at the railway junction
stations
in the Kharkiv oblast revealed a great demand for long-distance tickets: in
January 1933 16,500 such tickets were sold in Lozova station and 15,000 – in
Sumy.

In the beginning of January 1933, the GPU began to apprehend agitators
And organizers of these migrations and arrested over 500 of them. [45] As
A direct result of Stalin’s borders decree of 22 January 1933, 219,460
Persons were arrested in the first six weeks of its application; some were
sent to the Goulag, others punished in other ways, while 186,588 were sent
back to their villages to face the famine.[46]

In the middle of March 1933, Kosior wrote unperturbedly to the Kremlin
That “the famine still hasn’t taught many kolhospnyky a lesson”.[47] In his
report from Kharkiv, dated 31 May 1933, the Italian consul general
prognosticated on the devastation of the country: “The current
disaster will bring about a preponderantly Russian colonization of Ukraine. In
a
future time, perhaps very soon, one will no longer be able to speak of a
Ukraine, or of a Ukrainian people, and thus not even of a Ukrainian problem,
Because Ukraine will have become a de facto Russian region.”[48]

There can be little doubt today that the famine was not only used by the
Communist party for political purposes, but that it was actually created and
directed by Stalin and his henchmen for that purpose. The regime’s
ultimate objective was to transform the backward empire into an industrial
giant and a military superpower that could export socialism abroad.

To achieve this, Stalin needed great quantities of marketable grain,
Which was to be extracted from the peasants “at any price” to the producers
but at minimal price to the state. The most expedient way was to herd the
peasants into collective farms, subject them to a direct control from the
Kremlin, and in this way ensure maximum grain deliveries to the state.

The Kremlin knew that the peasants would resist and that the
imposition of its will would result in the loss of millions of human lives,
but that
was of no concern for masters of a well-populated empire. Stalin’s project
required a homogenous and docile population. Revived Ukrainian
particularism, taking advantage of the indigenization program,
reinforced national unity at the expense of cohesion of the new “fatherland of
world proletariat”.

The two sources of resistance to Stalin’s plans (national and social)
Became embodied in the same group – the Ukrainian farmers. Stalin decided to
sacrifice a considerable part of this group in order to eliminate the
opposition to his projects and to frighten the rest of the Ukrainian
nation into accepting the role of cogs (as he liked to call them) of the
great socialist mechanism.

The Stalin-Kaganovich discussion of the Petrovsy and Chubar letters
(June-July 1932), the “five ears of corn” law (7 August, 1932), the
condemnation of Ukrainization (14 December 1932), and the closing of
internal Soviet borders on starving Ukrainian peasants, each provide
smoking gun revelations about the genocide against the Ukrainian nation. But a
multitude of other documents now emerging from the secret archives
help us get a rounded understanding of the gigantic crime and the immeasurable
suffering of its victims.
—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Leo Kuper, Genocide. Its Politic Use in the Twentieth Century.
(Penguin,
1981), p. 35.
[2] Valerii Vasiliev & Yuri Shapoval (eds.), Komandyry velykoho
holodu.
Poizdky V. Molotova i L. Kahanovycha v Ukrainu i na Pivnichnyi Kavkaz
1932-1933 rr. Kyiv, 2001; I. Zelenin et al (eds.), Tragediia sovetskoi
derevni. Kollektivizatsiia i rasskulachivanie. Tom 3. Moskva, 2001;
Stalin I Kaganovich Perepiska 1931-1936 gg. Moskva, 2001;
Rozsekrechena pam’iat’: Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini v dokumentakh
GPU-NKVD. Kyiv,
2007;
Ruslan Pyrih (ed.), Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini: dokumenty i
materialy. Kyiv, 2007.

[3] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007.

[4] Discussed more fully in my article, “The Ukrainian Famine of
1932-1933 and the United Nations Convention on Genocide”, in Taras Hunczak &
Roman Serbyn. Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933: Genocide by Other Means.
(Forthcoming.)

[5] For a thorough discussion of Ukrainization and its problems see
James Mace, Communism and the dilemmas of national liberation: national
Communism in Soviet Ukraine, 1918-1933. Cambride, Mass., 1983.
See also Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action Empire. Nations and Nationalism
in the Soviet Union, 1929-1939. Ithaca & London, 2001.

[6] J. V. Stalin, “Concerning the National Question in Yugoslavia”
Works.
Vol. 7. Moscow, 1954. Pp. 71-72.

[7] Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. Pp. 75-81.

[8] Valerii Vasil’ev & Linn Viola. Kolektyvizatsiia i selians’kyi opir
Na Ukraini (lystopad 1929-berezen’ 1930). Vinnytsia, 1997. P. 91.

[9] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007. P. 118.

[10] Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini:ochyma istorykiv, movoiu
dokumentiv. Kyiv, 1990. P. 148.

[11] All quotations and references to the two letters are taken from
Komandyry velykoho holodu. Pp.206-215.

[12] One pood =3D 16.36 kg; 1 ton – 61.36 poods.

[13] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence 1931-1936. New Haven&
London, 2003. P. 136.

[14] For the allocation of the food aid, see Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na
Ukraini. Kyiv, 1990. P. 183, 187-188.

[15] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138 (Underlined by
Stalin).

[16] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138-139..

[17] Holod. 1990. P. 183 (doc. 63), P. 190 (doc. 68).

[18] The original plan of 410 million poods (6.7 m.t.) was lowered
twice to 356 and 274.8 million poods (5.8 m.t.; 4.5 m.t. ) but 16 November was
raised to 5.8 m.t. Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. p. 84.

[19] For a detailed account of the deliberations see Komandyry
Velykoho holodu. Pp. 152-164

[20] See part of the resolution in Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Kyiv, 1990. P. 194-198

[21] A secret OGPU report from around 20 July 1932 stated that “as for
anti-Soviet manifestations, Ukraine occupies first place”. “From 1
January to 1 July 1932, 118 counterrevolutionary kulak organizations were
discovered, counting 2.479 members. In addition, along the lines of
national counterrevolution we have unmasked 35 groups with 562 members.”
Tragedia, p.

421. Another secret OGPU report, dated 5 August, contains a section
“National counterrevolution (U[krainian]SSR)” which relates the
Liquidation of 8 nationalist groups, two of which consisted of former members
Of the outlawed UKP (Ukrainian Communist Party). These people are said to
have a leftist program and conduct systematic activity among members of the
KP(b)U, arguing that the Soviet authorities are suppressing the Ukrainian
culture. In their platform, claims the report, they declare war on the Soviet
regime and Polish fascism, while in fact keeping links abroad and carrying
out directives of the Second Department of of the Polish General Staff in
Ukraine. Ibid. p. 443.

[22] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 164-165.

[23] S. Kulchytsky, Tsina “Velykoho perelomu”. Kyiv, 1990. P. 296. On
23 July Stalin sent a telegram to Kaganovich demanding the restoration
And enforcement of last year’s ban on transporting private bread supplies
By rail or water. Tragedia, p. 428.

[24] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 166.

[25] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 169.

[26] Tragedia, p. 453-454.

[27] Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. Pp. 273-275; The Stalin-Kaganovich
Correspondence. P. 179-181. A follow-up secret “Instruction on the
Application of the TsIK and SNK SSSR of 7 August 1932 About the
Safeguarding of State Property”, signed by the Chairman and the Prosecutor of
the
Supreme Court of the USSR and the Vice-Charman of the OGPU, was sent out on 16
September to all republican and oblast authorities. Tragedia. P.
477-479.

[28] On 12 August Stalin sends a note to Kaganovich asking him to keep
secret for the moment the plan regarding Ukraine sent in the preceding
letter. Tragedia. P. 276. To stiffen Kosior’s resolve, in January
1933, Stalin sent him the more resolute Postyshev as his second in command;
Redens was replaced Balitsky in February 1933.

[29] Letter of 16 Augus 1932. Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. P.
283-284;
Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 183-184.

[30] Timoty Snyder, Sketches from a Secret War. New Haven, Yale
University Press. P. 104.

[31] Kosior spoke of 255 m.p. at the January plenum of the CC KP(b)U.
Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 352.
Davies and Wheatcroft give
3,584,000 tons, or 219 millon poods, P. 478.
Other authors give similar figures.

[32] Holod 1932-1932 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 253.

[33] Tragedia. P. 559.

[34] Davies & Wheatcroft, The Years of Hunger. P. 178.

[35] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 50.

[36] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 49; Kulchytsky, Holod 1932-1933 v
Ukraini iak henotsyd. Kyiv, 2005. P. 98

[37] Tragedia, Pp. 575-577; also in Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Pp 291-194.

[38] The Russification of Ukraine attracted the attention of the
Italian consulate in Kharkiv. “In government offices the Russian language is
Once again being used, in correspondence as well as in verbal dealings
Between employees.” See the “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches”,
Report to Congress. Commission on the Ukraine Famine. Washington, 1988. P.
446.

[39] G.G. Iagoda report to Stalin, 29 December 1932. Lubianka. Stalin
I VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003. P. 386.

[40] Nicolaas Werth, Le pouvoir sovi=E9tique et la paysannerie dans les
rapports de la police politique (1930-1934). Rapport du 27 f=E9vrier
1933.
/http:/www.ihtp.cnrs.fr/dossier_soviet_paysans/sommaire.html/

[41] Tragedia sovetskoi derevni. P. 634-635. The first English
Translation of the document appeared in Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action
Empire. Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923-1939. Ithaca and
London, 2001. P.p. 306-307.

[42] Volodymyr Serhiichuk. Iak nas moryly holodom. Kyiv, 2003. PP
156-158.

[43] Tragedia, p. 636-637.Sheboldaev added more precisions on the
Filtration points three days later. Ibid. P. 638.

[44] Lubianka. Stalin i VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003.P. 394.

[45] Lubianka. P. 392-393.

[46] N.A. Ivnitskii, Kollektivizatsiia i raskulachivanie (nachala 30-
Kh godov). Moscow, 1994. P. 204.

[47] Tragedia. P. 657.

[48] “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches. Op. cit. P. 427.

—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTE: Article published by the Action Ukraine Report (AUR) with
permission from Professor Federigo Argentieri, John Cabot University,
Rome, Italy.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:20:02 EDT 2008
Article: 613258 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!64.59.134.4.MISMATCH!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.baltics
Subject: HOLODOMOR = REAL HOLOCAUST na Ukrainie – BY ZYDS/OGPU ON UKRAINIANS: Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 1048
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 14:57:52 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1211468272 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 22 May 2008 08:57:52 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 08:57:52 MDT
Bytes: 54352
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.ukrainian:116272 soc.culture.europe:613258 soc.culture.russian:503884 alt.politics.europe:78812 soc.culture.polish:873580 soc.culture.baltics:162189

HOLODOMOR = ZYD/NKVD HOLOCAUST ON UKRAINIANS! Message:
Probably the best analysis of what happened that I have read to date.

Trident

IS THERE A “SMOKING GUN” FOR THE HOLODOMOR?

PRESENTATION: By Professor Roman Serbyn Universit=E9 du Qu=E9bec =E0
Montr=E9al, Canada
The Ukrainian Holodomor and the Denial of Genocides
International Conference, Federigo Argentieri, Ph.D., Organizer
Guarini Institute, John Cabot University
Rome, Italy, Friday, November 09, 2007
Published by the Action Ukraine Report #889, Article 5
Kyiv, Ukraine, Monday, November 19, 2007

In his seminal study on genocide, Leo Kuper observed that “governments
hardly declare and document genocidal plans in the manner of the
Nazis”
[1]. Nevertheless, since modern states cannot function without large
bureaucracies and elaborate communication systems, tell-tale records
inevitably survive.

When the CPSU lost power and the Soviet empire fell apart, it was
Revealed that an elaborate paper trail of the 1932-33 famine and the Soviet
authorities’ involvement in it had been preserved in party and state
archives. These documents are being slowly declassified, examined and
published[2]. Historians can now give us a fairly accurate account of
the catastrophe and ascertain the responsibility of Stalin and his
collaborators.

As a result, scholars who previously hesitated to recognize the
Genocidal character of Stalin’s forced starvation of Ukrainian farmers, have
reexamined the question and readjusted their interpretations. In his
latest book, Nicolas Werth comes to the conclusion that thanks to recent
studies based on the new documents, it is now “legitimate to qualify as
genocide the cluster of actions undertaken by the Stalinist regime to punish
the
Ukrainian peasantry by famine and terror”[3].

In this paper I analyze some of the main documents that provide
smoking-gun evidence of genocide, in line with the definition of the crime
given
in the UN Convention of 1948: “acts committed with intent to destroy, in
whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”.

The key criteria in the Convention are proof of “intent” and
Identification eligible “groups”. Soviet documents corroborate the accusation
against
Stalin and his closest collaborators for deliberately exterminating
Millions of Ukrainian farmers, and show that the perpetrators targeted them as
Ukrainians.

Furthermore these and other documents reveal that the genocide was not
Just against Ukrainian farmers, the focus of the attack was the Ukrainian
Nation in all its component parts and on all its territories within the
Soviet Union.

The locus of this crime was thus the Ukrainian SSR, the predominantly
Ukrainian Kuban, and the other regions of the RSFSR with sizeable
Ukrainian populations. The simultaneous decimation of Ukrainian national
elites,
especially academic, cultural and political leaders, was an integral part of
the destruction of the Ukrainian nation.

Stalin did not intend to kill all Ukrainians (nor is such an intent
Required by the Convention); his motive was to break the backbone of the
nation
By executing a sizeable percentage of the people and reducing the rest to
servile obedience, to transform them into manageable cogs of the state
mechanism. Stalin’s means of destruction were varied: famine, shootings,
exhausting forced labor.

The UN Convention does not require the establishment of motives for
genocide, but determining the reasons for the act gives an insight
into the rationale which led to crime and thus help us comprehend the
perpetrator’s intent. Stalin’s measures against the Ukrainians were predicated
on
his political ambitions, two of which provided the motives for the
eventual genocide[4].

The first was to extend socialism beyond the borders of the USSR. He
realized that the Bolsheviks’ initial attempt to export their revolution
into Europe failed primarily because of the weakness of the Red Army.
To resume Lenin’s unfinished task, Stalin needed a powerful armed force,
Backed by modern heavy industry. Industrialization had to be financed by
Exporting natural resources, especially grain, which had to be extorted from
the
farmers at the lowest cost to the state.

War communism had shown that door-to-door requisition was costly,
inefficient and politically dangerous. After the revolution, poor
farmers appropriated and divided up the land of rich landlords. As a result,
farmers lived better, ate more but sold less to the state. Marketable grain
(sold outside the village) in tsarist times was provided by the large farms
Owned by landlords and kulaks. Now new large estates had to be set up in the
Form of sovkhozy and kolkhozy. These would give the state easy access to
grain, produced by the newly enslaved peasants.

The immediate goal was not the increase of grain production (which
could be expected to fall as a result of peasant opposition), but of the
“marketable grain” to be delivered to the state. Since the main producers of
grain
Were Ukrainians farmers, who had no tradition of the Russian semi-communal
obshchina organization, they could be expected to offer stiff resistance to
forced collectivization and confiscation of the fruits of their labor.

Stalin’s second ambition was to bring a permanent solution to the
National question, especially its crucial Ukrainian component. The 1926 census
Pegged the Ukrainian population at 31 million, of the Union’s 147 million: 23
million in Ukraine, and 8 million in the rest of the USSR, mainly along the
Ukrainian border.

Ukrainian national revival triggered by the Russian revolution forced
Lenin to give the reconquered republic nominal autonomy in the form of a
“sovereign” republic within a Potemkin-style Soviet federation.
Subsequent policy of Ukrainization, or the local application of a general
principle of korenizatsiia (nativization), allowed Ukrainians to add real
national
content to the pretentiously misleading form of “soviet republic”[5].

The Ukrainization of education, communications and administration, not
Only in Ukraine but also in the Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR, the
de-Russification of urban centers by the influx of Ukrainian farmers,
the demands on Moscow to transfer to the republic adjacent territories
with Ukrainian population, the shifting of cultural orientation from Moscow
and to the West – all these pressures on the imperial centre could not be
ignored by the Kremlin.

Stalin, Lenin’s “magnificent Georgian” and foremost expert on the
nationalities question, understood the dangers of active nation-
building in Ukraine, in the best of times. Collectivization would only
aggravate
the situation. Over 85 % of ethnic Ukrainians were farmers and their
sudden disenfranchisement could throw the countryside into such turmoil that
not only grain production would be catastrophically reduced, but also
farmers could gain the support of the national elites in a united rebellion of
the whole republic to the spoliation of their country by Moscow.

Similar, if smaller, unrest could be expected in the Kuban’ and other
ethnically Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR. In the mid-1920s Stalin had
written that the peasant question was “the basis, the quintessence, of
the national question”, that “the peasantry constitutes the main army of
the national movement” and that “there is no powerful national movement
without the peasant army”[6]. The stability and even the integrity of the
Soviet empire would be threatened.

Genocide does not happen spontaneously. The targeted group is first
identified, vilified and intimidated, then it is discredited in the
eyes of the rest of the population, and only when it has been sufficiently
isolated, is it submitted to total or partial extermination. In the summer of
1929 the GPU (political police) “uncovered” a nationalist conspiracy, headed
by
prominent Ukrainian intellectuals and conducting anti-Soviet work in
villages and regional centers.

Over 700 people were arrested for, among other things, “anti-Soviet
Activity in the villages and district centers” and a show trial was held in
March 1930, appropriately staged in a Kharkiv theatre. 45 members of this
Mythical Association for the Liberation of Ukraine (SVU) were sentenced to
death or long prison terms.

Arrests and trials of other mostly fictitious groups followed:
Ukrainian National Center, Ukrainian Military Organization, etc.[7] The
condemned were former members of the former Ukrainian national governments,
Ukrainian armed forces, Ukrainian political parties, and prominent people in
fields of education, culture and the arts.

The purpose was to terrorize the Ukrainian elites into submission and
lethargy, and thus deprive the peasants of leadership on the national
level.
It should be noted that, in connection with the less severe famine in
Russia, no parallel attack took place against Russian national elites
or the Russian culture.

Stalin’s war against the peasants began in earnest towards the end of
1929.
In a two-pronged attack he ordered to “eliminate the dekulakization as a
class” and to collectivize the middle and poor peasants. Divided into
three categories, the kulaks were dispossessed and the most dangerous were
shot.

The others were deported to the wilds of northern RSFSR, transferred
To distant regions in Ukraine, or given strips of poor land outside the
Kolkhoz near which they lived. The intention was not only to provide kolkhozes
With the confiscated land, cattle and machinery, but also to deprive the
Peasants of the more qualified leadership for their opposition to the
authorities.

During the winter of 1929-1930, 90 thousand Ukrainian households were
dekulakized, and a smaller wave more or less finished the job a year
later.
In 1934 Kossior, party boss of Ukraine, reported that 200 thousand
farms had been dekulakized in Ukraine. Out of this number of about one million
(5 members per family), several thousand were deported to the northern
parts of the RSFSR and lost to the Ukrainian nation.

Collectivization went in unison with dekulakization: a major push was
Given in early 1930. By 10 March 1930 Ukrainian kolhosps integrated 64.4% of
farmsteads with 70.9% of arable land. The operation was accomplished
with the help of some 50,000 activists, sent from Russian and Ukrainian
urban centers, with special powers to organize, punish, and terrorize.

Many poor peasants, paid for the service with confiscated goods,
participated in expropriating their richer neighbors, but many others
sympathized with the victims. Peasant rebellion swept Ukraine: in
January-March 1930, 3,190 uprisings with over 950 thousand
Participants confronted the authorities.[8]

Hundreds of fliers were picked up by the authorities with such slogans
As “Free Ukraine from Moscow rule”, “Time to rise against Moscow yoke”
And others. National and peasant factors were coming together. Stalin
sounded a temporary retreat and in October of that year collectivization was
down to 29 % of households and 34 % of arable land. But the reprieve was brief
and a year later (October 1931) the figures rose to 68 % (for households)
and 72 % for arable land, with a much higher percentage in the grain-producing
steppe regions.

The effect of Stalin’s revolution on the countryside was disastrous,
especially in Ukraine and the Kuban. From 1929 to 1932 the evolution
can be summarized in these four curt phrases: production down; state
procurement up; grain export up; peasant food consumption down.

Farmers’ opposition to collectivization, mismanagement of collective
Farms by incompetent administrators, neglect and slaughter of farm animals
seriously hindered farming and brought down its production. Yet,
enforced obligatory state procurement increased, and in 1931, 42 % of
Ukraine’s
grain harvest was turned over to the state.[9]

Kolhosps delayed or completely failed to pay out stipends for
“workday” (trudodni), and the their members had to rely on their meager and
insufficient individual plots of land and a few domestic animals for
subsistence. Undernourishment became generalized. But Stalin had
reached his goal.

Grain exports rose from below one million tons in 1929, to: 5,832,000
Tons in 1930/31 and 4,786,000 tons in 1931/32. It should be kept in mind
that one million tons could feed four to five million people for one year.
After two years of resistance and unequal struggle with the Communist
authorities, the Ukrainian elites were cowed and most of the collective and
independent farms despoiled of all their reserves. The republic was on the
brink of a major catastrophe.

On 26 April 1932, Stanislav Kossior, the General secretary of the
Communist Party of Ukraine, informed Stalin about “individual
Cases and even individual villages that are starving” but blamed it on
“local bungling, errors, particularly in the case of kolkhozes.” And,
Lest he displease his Kremlin masters, their lieutenant in Ukraine
dismissed the tragedy with the affirmation that “all talk of famine must be
categorically discarded.”[10]

Yet famine there was and on 10 June H. Petrovsky, the head of the
Ukrainian state and V. Chubar, the head of the Ukrainian government, sent
Separate letters to notify Molotov and Stalin of the appalling conditions in
the Ukrainian countryside, and to ask for help.

Chubar admitted that cases of starvation among independent and
Collective farmers had already been signaled in December and January and
that by “March-April there were dozens and hundreds of malnourished, starving,
and swollen people and people starving to death accumulate in every
village; children and orphans abandoned by their parents appeared”.

Raions and oblasts organized aid from internal resources, but were
Obliged to do this “under conditions of acute food shortage, especially
bread”.
[11]
Noteworthy additional remark: “Petliurite and other anti-Soviet moods
increased.”

Petrovsky’s letter was even more to the point. Having just returned
>from an inspection of the countryside, he realized the catastrophic situation
of the farming population. He visited many villages and everywhere saw
multitudes of people, mainly poor and middle peasants, starving, subsisting on
surrogates.

Peasants scolded him, posed embarrassing question, reproached him,
Saying “why did you create an artificial famine, […] why did you take away
The seed material – this did not happen even under the old regime, why is
It necessary for Ukrainians to travel for bread […] to non-grain
Producing territories?”.

Echoing Chubar, Petrovsky reported that “because of the famine, mass
Thefts are taking place in the villages.” Pointing out that grain harvest is
Still six week off, and famine will only intensify, Petrovsky ask:
“shouldn’t assistance be rendered to the Ukrainian countryside in the amount
of
two or, at the very least, one and a half million poods of grain?” And he
predicted that if help is not given starvation would drive peasants to pick
unripe grain and destroy much of it.

Petrovsky’s letter paints a bleak picture of the forthcoming harvest.
Since the better grain had been seized by the state, seeds of poorer quality
Were sown and scattered mores thinly. The young crops are good and the
Fields well weeded but the grain is sparse. Petrovsky was also struck by the
Large amount of unsown land. Aware of all these problems, the farmers
Complained to Petrovsky that the new grain procurements would be even more
difficult to meet than last year’s. “And this may very well be so”, agrees
Petrovsky.

Finally Petrovsky draws attention to the exodus of Ukrainian farmers.
They are forced to seek food beyond the republic’s borders, at “the Dno
station, in the Central-Black Earth Oblast’, in Belarus, and in Northern
Caucasus”, where grain is more readily available, and at much lower prices.

When Petrovsky suggested that farmers band together for these
purchases, he learned that the Commissariat of Transport has drastically
reduced
the sale of train tickets to peasants. Bewildered Ukrainian peasants needled
Petrovsky: “Why are they banning trips for grain?”

If the two Ukrainian leaders believed their pleas and warnings of
turmoil in the Ukrainian countryside would soften Moscow’s position, they were
mistaken. Their effect on Stalin, Kaganovich and Molotov was just the
opposite. Writing from Moscow to Sochi, where Stalin was vacationing,
Kaganovich criticized both Ukrainian leaders, even though he admitted
That some aid would have to be given to Ukraine, and asked Stalin to decide
On the amount. Stalin’s response was more brutal and more ominous of
things to come.

He condemned the hypocrisy of the two leaders, who only wanted to get
“new millions of poods[12] of grain from Moscow” and “a reduction in the
plan for grain procurement”. Ukrainians must mobilize their own forces and
resources for already “Ukraine has been given more than she should get”.[13]
Nevertheless, on 16 June the Politburo considered Ukraine’s plea and
Granted about 8,500 tons[14], a paltry amount in comparison with the million
and a half poods requested by Petrovsky.

Politburo’s niggardly “largesse” must have provoked Stalin’s ire, for
in a letter to Kaganovich, Molotov and the Politburo he came back with
harsh criticism of past errors and new instructions for the coming harvest.
The Gensec blamed “mechanical equalization”, which did not take into
account the ability of the kolkhozes to deliver grain, and as a result of
which,
“fertile districts in Ukraine found themselves in a state of
Impoverishment and famine, despite a fairly good harvest.”[15]

This is the only known acknowledgement of the Ukrainian famine by
Stalin. He blamed regional authorities for being out of touch with the
countryside and allowing kolkhozniks to travel around the entire European
part of the USSR demoralize “our farms with their complaints and whining.”[16]

Stalin proposed the calling of a top level conference on the
organization of grain procurement and its unconditional fulfillment, and
insisted
that personal responsibility for grain procurement be delegated to the
first secretaries of the Ukraine, the Northern Caucasus, and the other grain
producing regions. “Personal responsibility” for “unconditional fulfillment”
imposed from the top along the administrative vertikal became the
watchwords of the 1932/33 grain procurement campaign, which would result in
the
genocidal famine.

On 21 June a telegram signed by Stalin and Molotov instructed Kharkiv to
carry out “at any cost” the July-September plan for grain delivery.
Two days later, Moscow answered Ukrainian Politburo’s plea for 600,000
poods of grain with a terse resolution: “bar any additional grain deliveries
to
Ukraine.”[17]

The III Conference of KP(b)U (6-10 July 1932) was devoted to the
Upcoming harvest and grain procurement. Stalin sent Molotov and Kaganovich to
The meeting “to ensure genuinely Bolshevik decisions”. Molotov informed
The audience that Moscow had lowered Ukraine’s quota but was adamant that
The plan be carried out in full.[18]

Declarations from regional leaders that the farmers were starving, that much
land lay fallow, and that 100 to 200 m.poods of grain would be lost during
harvesting did not bend the resolve of Moscow’s envoys.[19] The conference
adopted a resolution to carry out the plan of grain delivery “in full
and unconditionally”.[20]

It was largely in response to the tense situation in Ukraine[21], and in
anticipation of new troubles in that republic that Stalin came up with
his infamous decree, dubbed by the farmers “the 5 ears of corn law”.
Writing on 20 July to Kaganovich and Molotov, the Gensec complains of
Widespread theft by “dekulakized kulaks” and others, and proposes to write
a law, which would make theft of property belonging to collective farms equal
to similar crimes against state property, and “punishable by a minimum of ten
years’
imprisonment, and as a rule, by death”.

“All active agitators against the new collective-farm system” and
“profiteers and resellers of goods” writes Stalin, should be removed
And sent to concentration camps.[22] He also wants stricter controls over
The limited kolkhoz trade allowed by a 6 May 1932 law (kolkhozes allowed
Sell their surplus after 15 January 1933, after fulfilling the state
Procurement plan), made more liberal on 20 May 1932.[23]

A follow-up letter provides ideological explanation: in the same way
That capitalism could not triumph without first making “private property
Sacred property”, socialism will not finish off capitalism “unless it
Declares public property (belonging to cooperatives, collective farms or the
state) to be sacred and inviolable”.[24]

Returning to the topic on 26 July, Stalin insists on formal legality
of the proposed operations: “we must act on the basis of law (‘the peasant
loves legality’), and not merely in accordance with the practice of the
OGPU, although it is clear that the OGPU’s role here will not only not
Diminish but, on the contrary, will be strengthened and ‘ennobled’ (the OGPU
Agencies will operate ‘on a lawful basis’ rather than ‘high-handedly’)”.[25]

The joint Party-State decree “On the Protection of the Property of
State Enterprises, Collective Farms and Cooperatives, and on the
Consolidation of Public (Socialist) Property” was issued on 7 August 1932.
It became the main legal instrument used by the Soviet authorities to condemn
millions of farmers to slow death by starvation. It repeated Stalin’s
declarations
that all public property is “sacred and inviolable” and that individuals
attempting to take possession of public property should be considered
“enemies of the people”.[26]

All collective farm property, whether in the field or in storage was
Decreed equal to that of state property and theft was made punishable by
execution, which could be reduced to 10-year imprisonment only under
mitigating circumstances. Advocating withdrawal from the kolkhoz became
tantamount to treason and was punished with three to five years imprisonment
in concentration camps. No amnesty could be applied in any of these
cases.

The decree on State property was applicable on the whole Soviet
Territory but, as Stalin’s letter to Kaganovich shows, it was primarily meant
For Ukraine. Stalin thought the law was “good” and would “soon have an
impact”, and ordered a draft of directives from the C.C to the party, judicial
and punitive organizations.[27] The Gensec then addressed the Ukrainian
problem.
The passage is highly revealing:

“The most important thing right now is Ukraine. Ukrainian affairs have hit
rock bottom. Things are bad with regard to the party. There is talk
that in two regions of Ukraine (it seems in the Kiev and Dnepropetrovsk
regions) about 50 raion party committees have spoken out against the
grain-procurements plan, deeming it unrealistic. It is said that the
situation in other raion party committees is no better. […] This is
not a party but a parliament, […]

Instead of leading the raions, Kossior kept maneuvering between the
directives of the CC VKP and the demands of the raion party committees
[…]
Things are bad with the soviets. Chubar is no leader. Things are bad
With the GPU. Redens is not up to leading the fight against the
counterrevolution
[…]. [underlined and doubly underlined in original – R.S.]”

Then Stalin brandishes the specter of Ukrainian separatism: “If we don’t
undertake at once to straighten out the situation in Ukraine, we may
lose Ukraine.” He reminds Kaganovich that Pilsudski and his agents are
underestimated by Redens, and Kossior. He expressed utter contempt for
the whole KP(b)U, composed of 500,000 members (“ha-ha”, snickers Stalin),
harboring Pilsudski’s agents and “quite a lot (yes a lot!) of rotten
elements, conscious and unconscious Petliurists”.

Thinking undoubtedly of Ukraine’s negative reaction to the destructive
impact the just-passed property laws will have, Stalin warns: “The
moment things get worse, these [party] elements will waste no time opening a
front inside (and outside) the party, against the party.”

Frustrated by the fact that “the Ukrainian leadership does not see
These dangers”, Stalin proposes to replace Kossior with Kaganovich and
Redens with Balitsky, and eventually Chubar with Kaganovich. In this way
Stalin
Intends to transform “Ukraine as quickly as possible into a real fortress of
The USSR, a genuinely exemplary republic.”

The task is urgent and calls for immediate action, for without “these and
similar measures (the economic and political strengthening of Ukraine,
above all its border raions, etc.), I repeat, we may lose Ukraine.”[28]
Kaganovich agrees, of course, and accuses Ukrainian party of creating a
certain
solidarity and “a rotten sense of mutual responsibility”, not only in the
middle echelons of the party, but also among its leadership.[29]

Stalin’s exchange of letters with Kaganovich reveals the ambiance in
Which the policy of starvation will be implemented. The overall objective
was to maintain a high level of grain procurement. To assure this, all
challenge outside and inside the republic had to be eliminated, regardless of
the cost. Stalin’s raising of the specter of Pilsudski and Petliura agents
running loose in Ukraine and infiltrating the Soviet party and state
machinery was nothing more than a scare tactic and a rallying call.

He was well aware that by the summer of 1932, the weak Polish network
And the few local collaborators had been rounded up by the GPU, which also
arrested real and imaginary followers of Petliura whom Stalin had
eliminated by assassination in 1926. Poland may have had some illusions about
a
Ukrainian insurrection in 1929-1930, but by 1932, the Poles realized
That the starving population was in no shape to revolt.

The Soviet-Polish nonaggression treaty signed on 25 July 1932 was
Ample proof of the changing relations between the two neighbors.[30] The
Pilsudski-Petliura scarecrow will continue to enjoy popularity in
Soviet propaganda. While there was no serious threat from the Poles or the
Ukrainian nationalists, a national insurrection could become a reality if
the expected famine (implied in Stalin’s phrase “the moment things get
worse”) could bind together the threatened middle cadres of the KP(b)U
with the surviving peasantry. To prevent this eventuality the KP(b)U had to
be purged and kept under close Moscow surveillance.

Stalin maintained that the 1932 harvest was good; historians today are
More skeptical but consider it adequate to cover Soviet Union’s internal
needs.
With the state reserves from previous year, there were enough supplies
To feed every citizen of the Soviet Union.

Famine was brought about by the exorbitant amount of grain and other
agricultural products taken from the Ukrainian peasants, and the way
they were extracted. Ukraine’s plan was excessive, and in spite of the
protests from Kharkiv and three successive reductions, it remained so to the
end.

Still, Ukraine delivered about a quarter of a billion poods of grain, or
over 90% of its procurement quota. [31] In addition it handed over
large quantities of meat, vegetables and other produce. Stalin insisted that
state procurement have absolute priority. Following a CC VKP(b) directive, a
KP(b)U resolution of 18 November reminded that “complete fulfillment
of the procurement plan by collective farms and the MTS constitutes their
primary obligation […], to which all the other duties of the collective farm
must be subordinated, including the duty to set up all sorts of funds: seed
fund, forage and food supplies”.[32]

Stalin was satisfied that he was achieving his goal. At a high-level
Party meeting, held on 27 November 1932, he gloated: “The party has
succeeded in replacing the 500-600 million poods of marketable grain, procured
during the period of individual peasant holdings by our present ability to
collect 1,200-1,400 m.p. of grain. It is hardly necessary to prove that
without this leap forward the country would have a famine [sic-RS], we would
not be
able to support our industry, we would not be able to feed the workers and
the Red Army.”[33]

The allusion to the famine, or rather to freedom from one, was an
Obvious lie, and the reference to the feeding of the workers and the Red Army
– an overstatement; but then, Stalin’s concern was not the feeding his
Subjectsb but the financing of Soviet industrialization with grain exports.

Obedience to Moscow’s orders was assured in two ways: a) frequently
Repeated delegations to Ukraine and the North Caucasus Territory of Molotov
Kaganovich and other high-ranking leaders to supervise the local
authorities, and b) party discipline enforced from Moscow down the
administrative structure. At the end of October 1932, two commissions
were sent, one to Ukraine headed by Molotov, and the other to North
Caucasus Territory headed by Kaganovich.

Stalin’s emissaries supervised party meetings and forced them to pass
resolutions on grain procurements, party discipline, stricter
application of the 7 August property laws, the establishment of “black lists”
of collective farms in arrears with grain deliveries, imposition of fines,
etc.
They also instigated purges in party organizations and administrative
structures.
Kuban’ was particularly hit with the expulsion of 43 % of the 25,000
Party members, including 358 out of 716 party secretaries.[34]

In Ukraine, during November and first five days of December, the OGPU
arrested 1,230 people, including 340 heads of kolhospy while 327
Communists were brought before the courts for sabotaging state
procurements.[35]
In the 18 November resolution quoted above, the Ukrainian CC reminded the
directors
of sovkhoz of their “personal responsibility as party members and civil
servants for the fulfillment of the grain procurement”.

“Personal responsibility” for the execution of instructions was a
Constant refrain in messages coming from above and became an important
Means for forcing recalcitrant cadres to carry out the Ukrainian genocide.

Dekulakization and deportation continued, on a smaller scale and were
Mostly of political and punitive nature. Arrests, beatings, and cruelty of
All sorts abounded as before, only now the victims were weaker and less
Capable of resistance. Kolkhozes, villages and individual farmers in arrears
On state procurement were put on “black lists”, lost access to state-run
stores, and could not buy such essentials as matches, kerosene, salt.

Fines amounted to a year and a quarter’s worth of meat tax, without
Freeing the debtor from the unfulfilled grain procurement. “Activists” – the
City workers and their komnezam helpers searched farmers’ houses and yards,
looking for the hidden grain.

There is no way of knowing what portion of the hidden grain was found
by the flying brigades of activists, but official reports state that in Kuban
they found 345,000 poods of grain in November, while searches in Ukraine
>from 1 December 1932 to 25 January 1933 yielded 1.7 million poods, in 17,000
hiding places.[36] What grain was found, was confiscated; if nothing was
discovered, they took whatever edibles were seen, leaving the family
to starve.

Peasants who could find some old religious medals or other mementos
Made of precious metals could trek to the city and exchange them at the
Torgsins (stores for foreigners) for vouchers, and then exchange them for
food.

Hardier peasants would flee their villages and seek salvation in urban
centers or in neighboring Belarus and RSFSR, where food was available.
Accounts of Ukrainian peasants overloading trains, filling stations
And wandering about Russian and Belarusian towns and countryside abound.

National and peasant questions became inextricably intertwined in
Stalin’s decree of 14 December 1932, issued under the banal title “On Grain
Procurement in Ukraine, Northern Caucasus and the Western Oblast”[37].

Ukrainization was blamed for problems in grain deliveries and
Exemplary punishment was prescribed for sabotage in grain procurement: 5-10
years of concentration camp for a number of “party traitors” arrested in the
Orikhiv raion of Dnipropetrovs’k oblast of Ukraine, and deportation to the
North of the Poltavska stanytsia of Kuban in the RSFSR.

The decree made the party and government chiefs in the three grain
Producing areas personally responsible for the completion of grain procurement
By January 1933. Ukrainianization presently is carried out in Ukraine,
“without meticulous selection of the Bolshevik cadre”, had allowed
bourgeois-nationalists and Petliurites to join party and state
institutions and set up their cells and organizations.

Absence of “revolutionary vigilance” by local party organizations let
“counterrevolutionary elements” become directors, accountants,
storekeepers, foremen in collective farms, members of village soviets. Similar
accusation was brought against Northern Caucasus, with supporters of the
Kuban’
Rada figuring in place of Petliurites. This gave nationalists the
opportunity to sabotage harvest and sowing campaigns and organize other
counterrevolutionary activities.

Party and Soviet authorities in Ukraine and Northern Caucasus were
Ordered to extirpate these counterrevolutionary elements, execute them or
Deport them to concentration camps, including “saboteurs with party
Membership cards in their pockets”.

The verdict against Ukrainization came in two parts. In Ukraine it was
Not formally prohibited, but Stalin insisted that it resume its primary
vocation, that of promoting “correct Bolshevik implementation of
Lenin’s national policy”, which in fact meant integration and assimilation.

Ukrainian authorities were instructed to “expel Petliurite and other
bourgeois-nationalist elements from party and government
organizations”, and “meticulously select and recruit Ukrainian Bolshevik
cadre”. The
signal was thus given for rapid curtailment of Ukrainization and return to a
more
sophisticated policy of Russification.[38]

Ukrainians of Northern Caucasus fared worse. “Non-Bolshevik
‘Ukrainianization’, which affected nearly half of the raions in the
Northern Caucasus,” and which was declared to be “at variance with the
cultural
interests of the population”, was totally discontinued and replaced
with Russification.

The use of the Ukrainian language was banned in public offices of
Local administration, cooperative societies, and schools. The printing of
newspapers and magazines in the Ukrainized raions of Northern Caucasus
was to switch immediately to Russian, and preparation were to begin
immediately for the transfer in the fall of all Ukrainian schools into
Russian.

The whole Poltava stanytsia was ordered to be deported and resettled
With demobilized Russian Red Army soldiers, who would receive the abandoned
land, buildings, equipment, and cattle. In fact, 2,158 families with 9,187
members were sent out before 27 December[39] and resettled a month later with
1,826 demobilized soldiers.[40]

Together with Medvedivs’ka and Umans’ka, the three Cossack stanytsias
Saw 45,000 persons deported to the North. On 15 December, Molotov and
Stalin signed a similar ban on Ukrainization, for the rest of the previously
Ukrainized Soviet regions in the RSFSR.

Stalin’s anti-Ukrainization decree reveals the extent to which the dictator
was ready to go, in sacrificing the Ukrainian nation on the altar of
great-power ambitions. There is little doubt that the ban on Ukrainization
was a sop to Russian chauvinism, especially in ethnically mixed
regions outside the Ukrainian SSR. National and social repressions reinforced
one another, even if neither was acknowledged openly.

For the next several months after the condemnation of the abuses of
Ukrainization and the Ukrainian sabotage of grain procurements, the
Ukrainian countryside passed through some of the worst moments in its
history. The litany of repressive measures is endless. 82 raions were
deprived of manufactured goods for not fulfilling their quotas of
grain deliveries.

On 19 December, Stalin orders Kaganovich and Postishev back to Ukraine
To help Kosior, Chubar and Khataevich carry out the procurement plan. On
24 December, collective farms are ordered to deliver all grain in
Fulfillment of the plan, including grain put aside for seed and food. Direct
orders to increase repressive measures, arrests and deportations increase. A
real reign of terror seizes the republic and the Kuban.

On 22 January 1933 Stalin struck another crippling blow against the
Starving Ukrainian grain growers. The new secret decree, drafted by the Gensec
himself, is perhaps the best available proof of the dictator’s
genocidal intent against the Ukrainian nation. Sent to Ukraine, Belarus and
the
neighboring regions of RSFSR[41], the document calls attention to the
unrestrained exodus of peasants from the Kuban’ and Ukraine to the
near-by regions of Russia and Belarus.

Central authorities are said to have no doubt that these migrants, who
pretend to search for food, are, in fact, Socialist-Revolutionaries and
agents of Poland, sent to agitate, “through the peasants”, in the
northern parts of the USSR, against the kolkhoz system and the Soviet power.
Addressees are reminded that a similar movement took place the
Previous year, but the party, soviet and police authorities of Ukraine did
nothing to stop it. It must not be allowed to happen this year.

Stalin then orders the party, soviet and the repressive organs of the
Northern Caucasus and Ukraine to prevent the exodus of their peasants
To other regions of the USSR and directs them to close border crossings
between Ukraine and the Northern Caucasus.

The GPU of the Russian oblast’s adjacent to the quarantined Ukrainian
And Northern Caucasus regions, and the transport section of the OGPU, are
instructed to arrest all peasants from Ukraine and North Caucasus, who
have managed to leave their territory, and, after segregating the
counter-revolutionary elements, return the others to their villages.

The next day, the Politburo of the CC KP(b)U adopted a resolution to
Carry out Moscow’s orders and forwarded the directive, along with addition
instructions, for implementation by the appropriate Ukrainian
authorities.[42]

The Ukrainian branch of the OGPU was ordered to instruct all railway
stations not to sell tickets to peasants with destinations beyond the
Ukrainian borders, without formal travel permission from the raion executive
Committee or a certificate of employment from construction or industrial
enterprises.

Oblasts were told to take “resolute measures” to prevent massive
Departure of their peasants, carefully check the work of agents recruiting
Peasants for work outside Ukraine, and to urge kolhospnyky and individual
farmers not to depart without permission for other raions because they would
be
arrested there.

On 25 January, B. Sheboldaev, the party boss of the North Caucasus
Territory, issued a similar order, adding instructions on the
employment of internal forces and border troupes and the setting up of
filtration
points.[43]

Like the anti-Ukrainization decree of 14 December 1932, the 22 January
1933 directive, which closed the borders to the famished Ukrainian peasants
Was not the beginning but the culmination of processes that had started
Many moths before. Petrovsky had complained to Stalin, back in June 1932,
About the ban on train ticket for Ukrainian peasants who wanted to obtain
provisions in Russia.

Evdokimov’s telegram from Rostov-on-Don, which Iagoda prepared for
Stalin’s attention on 23 January 1933, details the elaborate measures taken
Since November to prevent the flight of farmers from the Northern Caucasus
Territory. Among these were roadblocks set up on the main arteries of
peasant migration.

Transport authorities had arrested 11,774 persons and another 7,534
Were incarcerated by other organs. In the same dossier, Balitsky’s report
>from 22 January informed of massive exodus of peasants from Ukraine since
December.[44]

Departures were registered in 74 raions, 721 villages and 228
kolhosps. In all, 31,693 persons left: 20,129 from Kharkiv oblast’, 6,576 from
the
Kyiv oblast, 3,447 from Odessa oblast, and 1,541 from Chernihiv. Of these
migrants about one third were collective farmers and two thirds
individual farmers; 128 were activists. A check at the railway junction
stations
in the Kharkiv oblast revealed a great demand for long-distance tickets: in
January 1933 16,500 such tickets were sold in Lozova station and 15,000 – in
Sumy.

In the beginning of January 1933, the GPU began to apprehend agitators
And organizers of these migrations and arrested over 500 of them. [45] As
A direct result of Stalin’s borders decree of 22 January 1933, 219,460
Persons were arrested in the first six weeks of its application; some were
sent to the Goulag, others punished in other ways, while 186,588 were sent
back to their villages to face the famine.[46]

In the middle of March 1933, Kosior wrote unperturbedly to the Kremlin
That “the famine still hasn’t taught many kolhospnyky a lesson”.[47] In his
report from Kharkiv, dated 31 May 1933, the Italian consul general
prognosticated on the devastation of the country: “The current
disaster will bring about a preponderantly Russian colonization of Ukraine. In
a
future time, perhaps very soon, one will no longer be able to speak of a
Ukraine, or of a Ukrainian people, and thus not even of a Ukrainian problem,
Because Ukraine will have become a de facto Russian region.”[48]

There can be little doubt today that the famine was not only used by the
Communist party for political purposes, but that it was actually created and
directed by Stalin and his henchmen for that purpose. The regime’s
ultimate objective was to transform the backward empire into an industrial
giant and a military superpower that could export socialism abroad.

To achieve this, Stalin needed great quantities of marketable grain,
Which was to be extracted from the peasants “at any price” to the producers
but at minimal price to the state. The most expedient way was to herd the
peasants into collective farms, subject them to a direct control from the
Kremlin, and in this way ensure maximum grain deliveries to the state.

The Kremlin knew that the peasants would resist and that the
imposition of its will would result in the loss of millions of human lives,
but that
was of no concern for masters of a well-populated empire. Stalin’s project
required a homogenous and docile population. Revived Ukrainian
particularism, taking advantage of the indigenization program,
reinforced national unity at the expense of cohesion of the new “fatherland of
world proletariat”.

The two sources of resistance to Stalin’s plans (national and social)
Became embodied in the same group – the Ukrainian farmers. Stalin decided to
sacrifice a considerable part of this group in order to eliminate the
opposition to his projects and to frighten the rest of the Ukrainian
nation into accepting the role of cogs (as he liked to call them) of the
great socialist mechanism.

The Stalin-Kaganovich discussion of the Petrovsy and Chubar letters
(June-July 1932), the “five ears of corn” law (7 August, 1932), the
condemnation of Ukrainization (14 December 1932), and the closing of
internal Soviet borders on starving Ukrainian peasants, each provide
smoking gun revelations about the genocide against the Ukrainian nation. But a
multitude of other documents now emerging from the secret archives
help us get a rounded understanding of the gigantic crime and the immeasurable
suffering of its victims.
—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Leo Kuper, Genocide. Its Politic Use in the Twentieth Century.
(Penguin,
1981), p. 35.
[2] Valerii Vasiliev & Yuri Shapoval (eds.), Komandyry velykoho
holodu.
Poizdky V. Molotova i L. Kahanovycha v Ukrainu i na Pivnichnyi Kavkaz
1932-1933 rr. Kyiv, 2001; I. Zelenin et al (eds.), Tragediia sovetskoi
derevni. Kollektivizatsiia i rasskulachivanie. Tom 3. Moskva, 2001;
Stalin I Kaganovich Perepiska 1931-1936 gg. Moskva, 2001;
Rozsekrechena pam’iat’: Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini v dokumentakh
GPU-NKVD. Kyiv,
2007;
Ruslan Pyrih (ed.), Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini: dokumenty i
materialy. Kyiv, 2007.

[3] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007.

[4] Discussed more fully in my article, “The Ukrainian Famine of
1932-1933 and the United Nations Convention on Genocide”, in Taras Hunczak &
Roman Serbyn. Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933: Genocide by Other Means.
(Forthcoming.)

[5] For a thorough discussion of Ukrainization and its problems see
James Mace, Communism and the dilemmas of national liberation: national
Communism in Soviet Ukraine, 1918-1933. Cambride, Mass., 1983.
See also Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action Empire. Nations and Nationalism
in the Soviet Union, 1929-1939. Ithaca & London, 2001.

[6] J. V. Stalin, “Concerning the National Question in Yugoslavia”
Works.
Vol. 7. Moscow, 1954. Pp. 71-72.

[7] Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. Pp. 75-81.

[8] Valerii Vasil’ev & Linn Viola. Kolektyvizatsiia i selians’kyi opir
Na Ukraini (lystopad 1929-berezen’ 1930). Vinnytsia, 1997. P. 91.

[9] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007. P. 118.

[10] Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini:ochyma istorykiv, movoiu
dokumentiv. Kyiv, 1990. P. 148.

[11] All quotations and references to the two letters are taken from
Komandyry velykoho holodu. Pp.206-215.

[12] One pood =3D 16.36 kg; 1 ton – 61.36 poods.

[13] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence 1931-1936. New Haven&
London, 2003. P. 136.

[14] For the allocation of the food aid, see Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na
Ukraini. Kyiv, 1990. P. 183, 187-188.

[15] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138 (Underlined by
Stalin).

[16] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138-139..

[17] Holod. 1990. P. 183 (doc. 63), P. 190 (doc. 68).

[18] The original plan of 410 million poods (6.7 m.t.) was lowered
twice to 356 and 274.8 million poods (5.8 m.t.; 4.5 m.t. ) but 16 November was
raised to 5.8 m.t. Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. p. 84.

[19] For a detailed account of the deliberations see Komandyry
Velykoho holodu. Pp. 152-164

[20] See part of the resolution in Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Kyiv, 1990. P. 194-198

[21] A secret OGPU report from around 20 July 1932 stated that “as for
anti-Soviet manifestations, Ukraine occupies first place”. “From 1
January to 1 July 1932, 118 counterrevolutionary kulak organizations were
discovered, counting 2.479 members. In addition, along the lines of
national counterrevolution we have unmasked 35 groups with 562 members.”
Tragedia, p.

421. Another secret OGPU report, dated 5 August, contains a section
“National counterrevolution (U[krainian]SSR)” which relates the
Liquidation of 8 nationalist groups, two of which consisted of former members
Of the outlawed UKP (Ukrainian Communist Party). These people are said to
have a leftist program and conduct systematic activity among members of the
KP(b)U, arguing that the Soviet authorities are suppressing the Ukrainian
culture. In their platform, claims the report, they declare war on the Soviet
regime and Polish fascism, while in fact keeping links abroad and carrying
out directives of the Second Department of of the Polish General Staff in
Ukraine. Ibid. p. 443.

[22] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 164-165.

[23] S. Kulchytsky, Tsina “Velykoho perelomu”. Kyiv, 1990. P. 296. On
23 July Stalin sent a telegram to Kaganovich demanding the restoration
And enforcement of last year’s ban on transporting private bread supplies
By rail or water. Tragedia, p. 428.

[24] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 166.

[25] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 169.

[26] Tragedia, p. 453-454.

[27] Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. Pp. 273-275; The Stalin-Kaganovich
Correspondence. P. 179-181. A follow-up secret “Instruction on the
Application of the TsIK and SNK SSSR of 7 August 1932 About the
Safeguarding of State Property”, signed by the Chairman and the Prosecutor of
the
Supreme Court of the USSR and the Vice-Charman of the OGPU, was sent out on 16
September to all republican and oblast authorities. Tragedia. P.
477-479.

[28] On 12 August Stalin sends a note to Kaganovich asking him to keep
secret for the moment the plan regarding Ukraine sent in the preceding
letter. Tragedia. P. 276. To stiffen Kosior’s resolve, in January
1933, Stalin sent him the more resolute Postyshev as his second in command;
Redens was replaced Balitsky in February 1933.

[29] Letter of 16 Augus 1932. Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. P.
283-284;
Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 183-184.

[30] Timoty Snyder, Sketches from a Secret War. New Haven, Yale
University Press. P. 104.

[31] Kosior spoke of 255 m.p. at the January plenum of the CC KP(b)U.
Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 352.
Davies and Wheatcroft give
3,584,000 tons, or 219 millon poods, P. 478.
Other authors give similar figures.

[32] Holod 1932-1932 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 253.

[33] Tragedia. P. 559.

[34] Davies & Wheatcroft, The Years of Hunger. P. 178.

[35] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 50.

[36] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 49; Kulchytsky, Holod 1932-1933 v
Ukraini iak henotsyd. Kyiv, 2005. P. 98

[37] Tragedia, Pp. 575-577; also in Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Pp 291-194.

[38] The Russification of Ukraine attracted the attention of the
Italian consulate in Kharkiv. “In government offices the Russian language is
Once again being used, in correspondence as well as in verbal dealings
Between employees.” See the “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches”,
Report to Congress. Commission on the Ukraine Famine. Washington, 1988. P.
446.

[39] G.G. Iagoda report to Stalin, 29 December 1932. Lubianka. Stalin
I VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003. P. 386.

[40] Nicolaas Werth, Le pouvoir sovi=E9tique et la paysannerie dans les
rapports de la police politique (1930-1934). Rapport du 27 f=E9vrier
1933.
/http:/www.ihtp.cnrs.fr/dossier_soviet_paysans/sommaire.html/

[41] Tragedia sovetskoi derevni. P. 634-635. The first English
Translation of the document appeared in Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action
Empire. Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923-1939. Ithaca and
London, 2001. P.p. 306-307.

[42] Volodymyr Serhiichuk. Iak nas moryly holodom. Kyiv, 2003. PP
156-158.

[43] Tragedia, p. 636-637.Sheboldaev added more precisions on the
Filtration points three days later. Ibid. P. 638.

[44] Lubianka. Stalin i VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003.P. 394.

[45] Lubianka. P. 392-393.

[46] N.A. Ivnitskii, Kollektivizatsiia i raskulachivanie (nachala 30-
Kh godov). Moscow, 1994. P. 204.

[47] Tragedia. P. 657.

[48] “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches. Op. cit. P. 427.

—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTE: Article published by the Action Ukraine Report (AUR) with
permission from Professor Federigo Argentieri, John Cabot University,
Rome, Italy.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:20:05 EDT 2008
Article: 613259 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!64.59.134.4.MISMATCH!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.baltics,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: Re: KATYN=MURDERS OF POLISH BY ZYDS/SOVIET NKVD!!! Like Vinnitsa!! NEVER FORGET! Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 501
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 14:58:25 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1211468305 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 22 May 2008 08:58:25 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 08:58:25 MDT
Bytes: 29049
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.polish:873581 pl.regionalne.warszawa:507794 soc.culture.europe:613259 soc.culture.german:344046 soc.culture.russian:503885 alt.politics.europe:78813 soc.culture.baltics:162190 de.soc.politik.misc:1087298

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:00:05 GMT, Proposition 88
wrote:

>With even the Soviets forced to admit that it was their ZYD NKVD who did the
>murders at KATYN, why are you apologising for them?

>Historians and experts proved it was NOT the Germans!

>Were you one of the killers, or perhaps your father, uncle or?

>On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:54:59 -0700, “Peter Wielki” wrote:

>>Actually, in Katyn there were Russians and Ukraninians that did the crime,
>>as far as I know.

>>But yeah, let’s blame it on JEWS!!! Germans did it too, right Frankie?

>>”Frank Arthur” wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]
>>> True,Just Like Vinnitsa!!

>>> The filthy ZYDS can no longer lie about KATYN and try to blame the
>>> Germans.

>>> Even the Soviets had to admit the truth, and also about Vinnitsa.

>>> No wonder around the world more and more people are starting to really
>>> dislike the filthy ZHIDS!!

>>> Latest update follows:
>>> From: “Strider”
>>> Newsgroups:soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.yugoslavia
>>> Subject: Jewish Copmmissars murdered these Poles

>>> Our shame still lies in the Katyn forest
>>> By Kevin Myers
>>> (Filed: 27/04/2003)

>>> Today Poles all over the world will commemorate the 60th anniversary of
>>> the discovery of the war crime which didn’t occur. And the
>>> non-existence of this atrocity constituted democracy’s most sordid
>>> exercise in realpolitik of the entire 20th century. The Soviet Union captured 180,000
>>> Polish soldiers during its invasion of Poland in 1939. Most were herded
>>> off to slave-camps in Siberia, but 22,000 officers were not. In April 1940, on
>>> Stalin’s orders, each was bound with barbed wire and executed with a
>>> single shot to the head.

>>> This was a colossal undertaking: the death toll was greater than that
>>> on the most calamitous day in British military history – the Somme, July
>>> 1, 1916.

>>> More importantly, the massacres occurred before the German invasions
>>> of France and the Low Countries. And although hundreds of Jews in Poland
>>> had been murdered, these were improvised butcheries, essentially unrelated to
>>> The Final Solution, which had not yet begun.

>>> So the first systematic mass murder of defenceless innocents in the
>>> Second World War was not by the Nazis, but by the Soviet Union, just over
>>> a year before the USSR became Britain’s official best friend. This shouldn’t
>>> surprise us: after all, it had been the Soviets, and not the Nazis, who
>>> invented industrialised murder. From the revolution on, they freely used
>>> the word “exterminate” of their enemies. Hitler listened; and Hitler learned,
>>> as dictators do. Moreover, the careful murder of so many officers from a
>>> single narrow stratum of Polish society was truly proto-genocide: its intent was
>>> to eliminate Polish identity by the extermination of all its perceived
>>> guardians.

>>> In 1943, via two sources – through a population census within the
>>> exiled Polish community living in the USSR, and from the Germans, who had
>>> discovered the site of one of the massacres, in the woods of Katyn,
>>> outside Smolensk – the British discovered the fate of the Polish officers. A
>>> devastating report from the British ambassador to the Polish
>>> government-in-exile, Owen O’Malley, left no doubt about the matter.

>>> The British Government’s public response was to dismiss the Nazi
>>> discoveries as propaganda and tell the Polish government-in-exile to
>>> forget Katyn and to proceed with beating the real enemy, Germany.

>>> War is war, and in peace it is impossible to replicate the fevers and
>>> the terrors it induces. So no useful moral judgment can be made about
>>> those who decided in 1943 publicly to accept lies as fact, and to conceal
>>> the truth as regrettable but necessary strategy. But it was statecraft at its
>>> most pusillanimous to allow those lies to become a cornerstone of the
>>> relationship between the Western allies and the Soviet Union.

>>> That is what happened when the three leaders – Churchill, Roosevelt
>>> and Stalin – met at Teheran in November 1943. Far from berating the Soviet
>>> Leader for the massacres, the two democratic leaders propitiated him,
>>> awarding him the Polish land he had stolen even as he seized his future murder
>>> victims.

>>> And when Stalin jested that they should settle the German problem once and
>>> for all by killing 50,000 German officers, Churchill merely protested sulkily,
>>> and Roosevelt light-heartedly suggested killing only 49,000.

>>> But nobody mentioned Katyn. How was this possible? For the massacre of
>>> the Poles was surely the secret subtext to this grisly exchange, and one
>>> by which Stalin was taking the measure of his two confreres. All three knew
>>> of the murders, and the bodyguard of lies around them: and silently, all
>>> three – two of them abjectly, the third triumphantly – assented to those lies.

>>> Teheran was the true nadir of international diplomacy, morally far
>>> more ignoble and strategically far more catastrophic than either Munich
>>> five years before or Yalta a year later. And the key to Teheran was Katyn: once
>>> Stalin had got away with that, he realised he could get away with almost
>>> anything.

>>> Moreover, the fiction of Katyn took root within the Foreign Office.
>>> There, nourished on complicit cowardice and malformed in the darkness of
>>> pathological guilt, the temporary tactic of 1943 was in time to turn into
>>> the diseased plant of enduring policy. It even caused the Callaghan Government
>>> in the 1970s vehemently to oppose the erection of a memorial in London to the
>>> victims of Katyn.

>>> Denial, in its purest psychiatric sense, of Katyn also infused much
>>> consideration of the 20th century: how else could Roy Jenkins have
>>> written a life of Churchill without once referring to Katyn, the Great Lie
>>> of which the prime minister was prime mover? How else could so many
>>> historians.

>>> Norman Davies aside – simply ignore the extraordinary Western
>>> collusion in covering up communist atrocities, and the profound impact
>>> this must have had on Kremlin thinking?

>>> On Thursday the FCO publishes a report, British reactions to the Katyn
>>> Massacre, in a belated attempt at expiation for Britain’s repeated
>>> cover-ups of this terrible affair. But it cannot undo the evil of the
>>> extermination of the Polish officer corps which, far from being the
>>> subject of a war-crimes trial, was embraced and rewarded at Teheran;
>>> and from that city, the communism of Katyn was soon to march forth
>>> and conquer half the world.

>>> My thanks to you for reposting this article.
>>> A brilliant truthful piece.
>>> Ed Kadach

>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:06:50 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On 1 May 1998 13:08:00 +0200, [email protected] wrote:

>>>>>American Dissident Voices Broadcast of April 25, 1998

>>>>>Katyn
>>>>>by Dr. William Pierce

>>>>>A background noise that seems never to go away is the constant
>>>>>whining and yammering of the Jews about how the world owes them a
>>>>>living because of their losses during the so-called “Holocaust.”
>>>>>They do it, of course, because they make such a big profit on it.
>>>>>The latest flare-up of this Jewish play for a handout came more
>>>>>than a year ago when they began demanding that the Swiss pay them
>>>>>$7 billion, which “Holocaust” victims allegedly had stashed in
>>>>>numbered Swiss accounts before being hauled off to gas chambers
>>>>>during the Second World War.

>>>>>With a few “bought” Gentile politicians fronting for them, the
>>>>>foremost among these being New York’s Senator Alphonse D’Amato,
>>>>>the Jews threatened Switzerland with a boycott by the U.S.
>>>>>government if their demands were not met. Instead of laughing in
>>>>>their faces, telling the Jews to go to hell, and gearing up for
>>>>>countermeasures against Israel and other Jewish interests if the
>>>>>Jews tried to proceed with a boycott, the Swiss politicians tried
>>>>>to placate the Jews by offering to buy themoff. The Jews took the
>>>>>Swiss response as a sign of weakness and escalated their demands.

>>>>>The average Swiss citizen seems to have a little more pride than
>>>>>Switzerland’s elected officials, however, and resentment against
>>>>>the Jews’ extortion efforts is building in Switzerland now to the
>>>>>point that some of that country’s richest Jews are wearing
>>>>>bulletproof vests whenever they must go out in public.

>>>>>In general, however, this “Holocaust”-based extortion racket
>>>>>works quite well for the Jews, and they have expanded their
>>>>>demands for World War Two reparations to include a number of
>>>>>other countries besides Switzerland. They are even whining that
>>>>>the Vatican owes them because Pope Pius XII didn’t do enough to
>>>>>save them from the Germans during the war. The Jews’ brazenness
>>>>>in this whole business is quite breathtaking.

>>>>>Their brazenness, of course, is justified, because by and large
>>>>>they have been getting away with it. And they have been getting
>>>>>away with it because with their media control they have been able
>>>>>to distort the general public’s whole perception of what happened
>>>>>during the Second World War. They have been able to portray
>>>>>themselves as innocent victims and just about everyone else as
>>>>>persecutors and aggressors, even the people who were fighting on
>>>>>the Jewish side against the Germans during the war. For example,
>>>>>they have done quite a bit of whining that after the Red Army
>>>>>drove the Germans from Poland, the Poles took the opportunity to
>>>>>lynch hundreds of Jews in 1945 and 1946: Jews whom the Germans
>>>>>somehow had failed to get rid of during their wartime occupation
>>>>>of Poland.

>>>>>Now, why would the Poles do something like that? Why would they
>>>>>lynch the poor Jews, who had been on their side during the war?
>>>>>If you learned about the war from watching Steven Spielberg
>>>>>propaganda films and other mass-media sources, you probably
>>>>>believe that it was because of religious anti-Semitism on the
>>>>>part of the Catholic Poles. Let me tell you the real reason why
>>>>>so many Poles hated Jews after the war. It’s something the
>>>>>Jew-controlled media in America have tried hard to keep covered
>>>>>up. Let me tell you about what happened in the Katyn forest
>>>>>in 1940.

>>>>>In September 1939 Poland was invaded from the west by Germany and
>>>>>from the east by the Soviet Union. The Germans wanted back the
>>>>>territory in western Poland, including the city of Danzig, which
>>>>>had been taken from them at the end of the First World War. The
>>>>>Soviets wanted eastern Poland. The Germans and the Soviets
>>>>>divided Poland between them, with the boundary running roughly
>>>>>along the River Bug.

>>>>>Britain and France, both under strong Jewish pressure, declared
>>>>>war on Germany in September 1939, ostensibly because of Germany’s
>>>>>invasion of Poland. They did not declare war on the Soviet Union,
>>>>>which also had invaded Poland. In the United States and in
>>>>>western Europe, where the Jews held a deathgrip on the mass
>>>>>media, a great deal of anti-German propaganda was based on the
>>>>>German grab for Polish territory — much of which, of course,
>>>>>actually was historically German territory — and nothing was
>>>>>said of the Soviet occupation and annexation of eastern Poland.

>>>>>The reason for this anti-German and pro-Soviet bias by the Jewish
>>>>>media was that the Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union as
>>>>>commissars and communist party bosses under Stalin, while in
>>>>>Germany Hitler had undertaken a program since 1933 of freeing
>>>>>Germany from all Jewish influence. Jews had been weeded out of
>>>>>the media, the law, the schools, and other areas of economic and
>>>>>cultural life in Germany. Before Hitler became chancellor in 1933
>>>>>the Jews had done in Germany what they do in every country where
>>>>>they gain a foothold: they had monopolized large sections of the
>>>>>mass media and certain professions and were doing their best to
>>>>>distort German culture, German society, and the German economy
>>>>>to suit themselves. Hitler put a stop to that, and two-thirds of
>>>>>the 1933 Jewish population of Germany had emigrated by the
>>>>>invasion of Poland in September 1939. So the Jews hated Germany
>>>>>and were determined to do whatever they could to destroy her.

>>>>>For his part, Hitler hoped to avoid war with Britain and France.
>>>>>He hoped that after his quick victory in western Poland he could
>>>>>make peace with Britain and France. He was determined, however,
>>>>>to stamp out communism wherever he encountered it. Not only did
>>>>>he hate communism on ideological grounds, but he had sworn to
>>>>>fight communism when the communists in Germany betrayed his
>>>>>country at the end of the First World War. Hitler also saw the
>>>>>Soviet Union as a threat to all of Europe, and he was determined
>>>>>to break the power of that country when he could, even though
>>>>>there was an uneasy non-aggression pact between Germany and the
>>>>>Soviet Union in 1939, at the time of their partition of Poland.

>>>>>In the spring of 1941 massive troop movements and other
>>>>>developments inside the Soviet Union convinced Hitler that Stalin
>>>>>was preparing to invade the west with the Red Army, and so in
>>>>>June 1941 Hitler made a preemptive strike. German forces smashed
>>>>>through the Red Army and made rapid advances, first through
>>>>>Soviet-occupied eastern Poland and then through Ukraine and into
>>>>>Russia.

>>>>>A year and a half later, in February 1943, German forces near
>>>>>Smolensk, in western Russia, investigated reports they heard from
>>>>>Russian civilians to the effect that a large number of prisoners
>>>>>had been murdered by the Soviet secret police in the area nearly
>>>>>three years earlier. The German investigators were led by local
>>>>>Russians to a series of mounds in a wooded area known locally as
>>>>>Katyn Forest, about 10 miles west of Smolensk. The forest is
>>>>>named for a village, Katyn, which it surrounds. The forest had
>>>>>been privately owned prior to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917,
>>>>>but after the communist takeover of Russia the area had been
>>>>>confiscated by the government and part of the forest had been
>>>>>turned over to the NKVD, the Soviet equivalent of the American
>>>>>FBI.

>>>>>The Germans began digging in the mounds in the Katyn forest and
>>>>>made a horrible discovery. They found corpse after corpse, each
>>>>>with its hands bound behind its back and a bullet hole in the
>>>>>base of its skull. They continued their excavations for more than
>>>>>a month, and eventually uncovered more than 4,000 corpses. Other
>>>>>bodies may have remained buried in other mounds, but the Germans
>>>>>had no time to dig up the whole forest. Instead they called in
>>>>>the International Red Cross and representatives of various
>>>>>neutral countries to examine their findings. They also brought in
>>>>>groups of Allied prisoners of war, including Americans, from
>>>>>prison camps in Germany to view the graves in the Katyn forest.
>>>>>They gave these international inspectors complete freedom to
>>>>>examine the exhumed bodies, permitted doctors among them to
>>>>>conduct autopsies, even allowed them to dig up other bodies from
>>>>>one of the mounds which had not been completely excavated. The
>>>>>Germans asked only that the inspectors report back truthfully to
>>>>>their own governments about their observations. And in fact, most
>>>>>of them did.

>>>>>What they reported was that the bodies were those of Polish
>>>>>military officers, along with a number of civilian cultural and
>>>>>business leaders and intellectuals — scientists, writers, poets
>>>>>– who had been in the portion of Poland occupied by the Soviet
>>>>>Union in September 1939. Altogether the Soviet secret police had
>>>>>rounded up some 15,000 Polish leaders in 1939 — including nearly
>>>>>half of the entire Polish officer’s corps, the half that had had
>>>>>the misfortune of being in eastern Poland at the time — and put
>>>>>them in three concentration camps in Russia: at Starobelsk,
>>>>>Kozelsk, and Ostashkov. All of the bodies unearthed in the
>>>>>Katyn forest were of Polish leaders who had been confined at one
>>>>>of these camps: Starobelsk.

>>>>>Rounding up a country’s leaders and killing them was standard
>>>>>practice for the communists. The theory was that the leaders were
>>>>>bourgeois oppressors of the working class and deserved to die. As
>>>>>egalitarians the communists did not regard the Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals as inherently better or more valuable human
>>>>>material than the average Polish criminal or welfare bum; the
>>>>>officers had simply used their class advantage to gain a better
>>>>>life-style for themselves. Of course, no one really believed that
>>>>>theory except the criminals and welfare bums and other resentful
>>>>>losers and ne’er-do-wells who made up the natural communist
>>>>>constituency. As a practical matter, however, killing all the
>>>>>leaders and potential leaders of a conquered people made them
>>>>>easier to govern. That’s what the Marxists had done in Russia,
>>>>>Ukraine, and the Baltic countries.

>>>>>In the case of the Poles there was a bit of a diplomatic problem,
>>>>>though. The Poles supported the war Britain and France had
>>>>>declared against Germany, purportedly on their behalf, because
>>>>>they viewed that as their one hope for getting back at least the
>>>>>western part of their country. They were not happy about the
>>>>>Russians taking the eastern part of Poland, but the Russians at
>>>>>least were fellow Slavs. The thing to do was get rid of the
>>>>>Germans first and then worry about the Russians. This Polish
>>>>>strategy suited Stalin fine. But it made it desirable for him to
>>>>>avoid alienating the Poles any more than necessary. When Polish
>>>>>exiles asked about their imprisoned leaders in late 1939 and
>>>>>early 1940, the Soviet government promised that they would be
>>>>>released shortly. Meanwhile, the decision had been made to kill
>>>>>all of them. And so in April 1940 the Polish leaders were taken
>>>>>from the three camps where they had been imprisoned, trucked off
>>>>>to various liquidation sites, and murdered. The ones who had been
>>>>>imprisoned at Starobelsk all went to the NKVD area of the Katyn
>>>>>forest. After the war some of the NKVD executioners were
>>>>>interviewed in Israel and described how they had carried out the
>>>>>killings.

>>> ISRAEL REFUSED TO PROSECUTE THESE ZHID MURDERERS!!

>>>>>The Poles were driven up to the burial pits in long NKVD prison
>>>>>trucks known as “black ravens.” They were pulled from the trucks
>>>>>one at a time by NKVD guards. Each Polish prisoner had his hands
>>>>>bound behind his back and then was dragged to the edge of a pit.
>>>>>There he was held by two NKVD men while a third fired a pistol
>>>>>bullet into the back of his head. Some of the officers had had
>>>>>their coats pulled over their heads to keep them from seeing what
>>>>>was happening before they were shot. Some struggled and were
>>>>>bayonetted by NKVD guards before being shot and thrown into the
>>>>>pit. When all of the officers from Starobelsk had been killed,
>>>>>some 4,400 of them, the Katyn forest burial pits were covered
>>>>>with dirt and pine trees were planted on them. The locations of
>>>>>the mass graves of the prisoners from the camps at Kozelsk and
>>>>>Ostashkov remain unknown, but none of the 15,000 Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals rounded up by the NKVD in September 1939 was
>>>>>seen alive after April 1940.

>>>>>The Red Cross representatives and the Allied prisoners the
>>>>>Germans brought in to examine the mass graves in the Katyn forest
>>>>>understood after their examination not only who had been killed;
>>>>>they also understood who had killed them. This was apparent not
>>>>>only from the medical estimates of the length of time the bodies
>>>>>had been buried, but also from documentary evidence on the
>>>>>bodies. Diaries, news clippings, letters, and other personal
>>>>>papers removed from the clothing of the victims all told the same
>>>>>story: the latest dates on any of these papers were from
>>>>>mid-April 1940. The Polish leaders had been killed in April 1940,
>>>>>when they were prisoners of the Soviet Union and when the Katyn
>>>>>region was under Soviet control. And this is what they reported
>>>>>back to their governments.

>>>>>So what do you think happened? Were the British and American
>>>>>governments horrified to discover that their “gallant Soviet
>>>>>ally,” as the Soviet Union was referred to by the mass media, was
>>>>>a mass murderer? Did the British government, which had gone to
>>>>>war against Germany under the pretext of defending Poland, decide
>>>>>that it had made a mistake? Did anyone condemn the Soviet Union
>>>>>for this act of genocide against the Poles?

>>>>>Of course not! The Allied governments ordered their people who
>>>>>had inspected the Katyn site to keep their mouths shut, and the
>>>>>Jewish media immediately began announcing that the Germans had
>>>>>done it. A mass murder of Polish officers and intellectuals by
>>>>>the Nazis had been discovered in the Katyn forest, the New York
>>>>>Times and the rest of the Jewish media shrieked. Poor Poles!
>>>>>Wicked Germans! The war must go on to free the poor Poles and
>>>>>punish the wicked Germans. And the war did go on, killing
>>>>>millions of more Germans, British, Americans, and other
>>>>>Europeans. And the Germans were indeed punished. The Poles, of
>>>>>course, were not freed. Instead they were turned over to the
>>>>>Reds, who had butchered their leaders in the Katyn forest, and
>>>>>made to suffer under communist rule for half a century.

>>>>>The war went on after the German discovery of the mass graves in
>>>>>the Katyn forest, because its purpose from the beginning was not
>>>>>to free Poland but to destroy Germany, which had dared to free
>>>>>itself from the Jews. Roosevelt understood this. Churchill
>>>>>understood this. But the American and British people didn’t
>>>>>understand it, of course, because they were lied to by the Jewish
>>>>>media and by their own governments, who in 1943 as in 1998 have
>>>>>done whatever has been politically expedient. And what has been
>>>>>politically expedient has been what the Jewish media bosses have
>>>>>decided.

>>>>>The lies about Katyn were maintained by the media for some years
>>>>>after the end of the war, because these lies meshed nicely with
>>>>>the “Holocaust” story which was making so much money for the
>>>>>Jews. Nowadays, of course, the truth about the Katyn murders is
>>>>>generally accepted by historians everywhere. You can go into
>>>>>almost any large library and read about it and even see the
>>>>>gruesome photographs that the Germans took of the Polish bodies
>>>>>they dug up. One of several authoritative books on the subject is
>>>>>J.K. Zawodny’s Death in the Forest: the Story of the Katyn
>>>>>Forest Massacre, published in 1962 by the University of Notre
>>>>>Dame Press. None of this is publicized a la Steven Spielberg, of
>>>>>course, for the illumination of American television audiences. It
>>>>>still might undermine the Jews’ “Holocaust” racket.

>>>>>In 1945 and 1946, although the deceived citizens of the western
>>>>>world didn’t know the truth about Katyn, Polish patriots did. The
>>>>>word had gotten back to the Polish prisoners in German camps from
>>>>>the Poles the Germans had taken to examine the graves. After the
>>>>>war, when these Polish prisoners were freed, the word spread to
>>>>>other Poles. They knew that it was the communists, not the Nazis,
>>>>>who had murdered their leaders, who had beheaded their nation.

>>>>>And they knew who was behind communism, from the Jew Karl Marx,
>>>>>who had started the whole business, up to the Jewish commissars
>>>>>who lorded it over them in Soviet-occupied Poland. They knew who
>>>>>had welcomed their Soviet conquerors and then collaborated with
>>>>>those conquerors. And so it is hardly surprising that in 1945 and
>>>>>1946 a few Polish patriots organized lynchings of Jews in Poland,
>>>>>before the Reds had a chance to clamp down on all of Poland and
>>>>>suppress any further expressions of anti-communist or anti-Jewish
>>>>>feeling.

>>>>>No, the Polish dislike of Jews/ZHIDS isn’t surprising. What is
>>>>>surprising is that so few patriots in America and Britain have
>>>>>expressed their outrage against the Jews, not only for what they
>>>>>did to the Poles during and after the war, but for what they have
>>>>>done to us: lying to us and using us to wage their wars for them.
>>>>>If patriots study the Katyn story and take its lesson to heart,
>>>>>they will understand why they cannot trust either the mass media
>>>>>or any government which dances to the tune played by the media.
>>>>>Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill were as much liars and
>>>>>traitors as Bill Clinton and Tony Blair.

>>>>>Anyway, you might remember Katyn the next time you hear the Jews
>>>>>or some of their bought politicians whining about how much gold
>>>>>was stolen from them by the Swiss or how badly the Poles and the
>>>>>Germans treated them during the Second World War.

>>>>>The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
>>>>>Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books. To
>>>>>receive weekly ADV transcripts, mail: [email protected]
>>>>>Write “subscribe” as the subject of your message.

First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao tse Dung
Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!!
Me
For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:20:07 EDT 2008
Article: 613655 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: edm.general,edm.politics,ab.general,can.general,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Edmonton Homeowners JEWED With Tax Assessment Hikes Of Over 70%!
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 23:05:48 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1211843148 64.59.135.176 (Mon, 26 May 2008 17:05:48 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 17:05:48 MDT
Bytes: 2270
X-Original-Bytes: 2227
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com edm.general:422446 edm.politics:18689 ab.general:127397 can.general:345587 soc.culture.canada:597215 soc.culture.europe:613655 soc.culture.usa:2343706

Homeowners in Deadmonton are now receiving their fabulous tax assessment
notices from the crooks at city hall this week.

Residents of an average north Redmonton area have been astounded to see that
the crooks in the city tax assessment section have increased the values of
their poor to average homes by around 70% over the already inflated values
>from last year!!

It seems that the scum mismanaging the city want homeowners to sell off their
homes.

Further, if these homeowners are business owners, they will not only leave the
city, but take their businesses, and all the JOBS as well.

The exodus of business owners is now accelerating, and the foul reputation of
the city is being promulgated worldwide.

To add insult to injury, this is the same city council who are responsible for
WASTING HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS,
WHILE THEY LINE THE POCKETS OF THEIR FILTHY RICH FRIENDS!

Pass the word, AVOID EDMONTON Canada.
Don’t invest here!
Don’t even visit here!

No wonder so many national and international businesses have closed down in
the past year or so, resulting in layoffs of 1000’s of jobs!!

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:20:08 EDT 2008
Article: 613205 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Marek Maciej Ziemba
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe
Subject: Der Jude ist ein Parasit! (Teil 3 der Parasiten-Serie)
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:00:25 -0600
Organization: Jew Watch
Lines: 526
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 26565
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.german:344010 soc.culture.swiss:58721 soc.culture.europe:613205

Vergiss niemals! Bewaehrt Euch vor Juden!

Der Jude ist ein Parasit! (Teil 3 der Parasiten-Serie)
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:42:41 -0700
Message-ID:

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:56:39 +0100, in de.soc.politik.misc egon-karl ullrich
wrote:

Nachdem meine Artikel vom 25. und 26.12.2006 FF über den jüdischen
Parasiten so wunderbar erfolgreich eingeschlagen sind, seien hier noch
einmal zu Erinnerung zwei der vergoldeten Zitate aus der zionistischen
Original-Literatur wiederholt, welche das unter den Zionisten
durchgehend verbreitete Judenverständnis bezeugen (so der Autor Lenni
Brenner in Teil 2 der Parasiten-Serie), bevor wir uns weiter dieser Art
Bestseller-Literatur und Denkweise zuwenden. Übrigens: “Teil 1”, “Teil
2” stand zu Beginn der Serie noch nicht im ‘Subject’, an eine
Erfolgsserie in diesem Kino glaubte ich da noch nicht. Vielen Dank,
verehrtes Publikum!! :-).

Die 2 Zitate:
**********************************************************************
[…] ein Parasitentum, mag es auch
riesenhaft sein, ein Parasitentum, wie es in keinem Volke
seinesgleichen hat – denn bei anderen gehört schließ-
lich der Ausbeuter wie der Ausgebeutete dem gleichen
Volke an […]

**********************************************************************
http://groups.google.de/group/de.soc.politik.misc/msg/1179a72afe84ea7e?hl=de&
(Quelle: Aaron David Gordon, ‘Erlösung durch Arbeit’, Seite 47,
Zionistischer Bücherbund, Berlin 1929. Gordon lebte von 1856 bis 1922)

sowie dazu passend:
**********************************************************************
Wir [Juden] nehmen unter ihnen [den anderen Völkern]
keinen Rang ein als Volk, als besonderer nationaler Kör-
per; wir sind kein Glied in der Kette der Menschheit,
kein Organ ihres Leibes, sondern Parasiten am Körper
anderer Völker

*********************************************************************
(Quelle: wie oben, Seite 144)

(An dieser Stelle sei nochmal die URL zum Komplett-Download des Buches
‘Erlösung durch Arbeit’ wiederholt:
http://putstuff.putfile.com/29257/3484261
Ca. 17 MB, bitte die Anmerkungen im obigen verlinkten Artikel in
Google-Groups beachten!)

Hier spricht der “Geist des Humanismus” zu uns, welcher nach Auffassung
hochgestellter Politiker des Bundeslandes Wien bereits vor hundert
Jahren durch Herzl auf Erden inkarniert ist, wie ich ebenfalls in Teil 1
der Parasiten-Serie am 26.12.2006 bewies,

Zitat:
**********************************************************************
Die Stadt drücke ihren Respekt vor dem Werk Theodor Herzls, ihren Stolz
auf ihn mit der Widmung eines zentralen Platzes in der Innenstadt aus,
sagte Kulturstadtrat Mailath-Pokorny. Herzl habe eine politische Vision,
getragen aus dem Geist des Humanismus gehabt, die Wirklichkeit geworden
sei. Der Platz solle zugleich für das friedliche Miteinander der
Menschen, für die gegenseitige Anerkennung der unterschiedlichen
Ethnien, Sprachen, Mentalitäten und Kulturen in Europa und in der Welt
stehen.
**********************************************************************
http://www.wien.gv.at/vtx/vtx-rk-xlink?SEITE=020040702012
(Quelle: Webservice der Stadt Wien, Archivmeldung der
Rathauskorrespondenz vom 2.7.2004: Ein Platz für Theodor Herzl)

Zufolge dem “Wirklichkeit gewordenen Geist des Humanismus” aus Wien ist
der Jude ein Parasit unter den Völkern ohnegleichen!

UNSER HEILIGER FÜHRER DANKT VIELMALS!!!! 🙂 🙂 🙂

Begeistert auch die Reaktion aus dem deutschen Marxismus über den von
den NaZions (danke dir, Manfred Glahe!) geplanten Aufstieg der Juden
mittels Einreise nach Palästina, das sei hier ebenfalls aus dem Teil 1
der Parasitenserie wiederholt,

Zitat:
**********************************************************************
[man]
arbeitete an einer umfassenden Berufsumschichtung, die im neuen Land
einen neuen Menschen zur Folge haben sollte. In den Vorstellungen von
Aaron David Gordon steigerte sich dies zur Erlösung durch Arbeit: die
Juden seien Parasiten, von der wahren Quelle des Lebens – der Arbeit –
entfremdet, durch eigene Arbeit werde der Jude aber zum Menschen und
könne seine »Händler«-Existenz mittels Selbsterziehung und
Selbstverwirklichung in der Arbeit beenden.

**********************************************************************
http://www.wildcat-www.de/zirkular/62/z62aufhe.htm
(Quelle: Wildcat-Zirkular Nr. 62, Februar 2002, ‘Hintergründe der
Intifada im 21. Jahrhundert’. Übersetzung aus dem Englischen, im
Nachwort des Übersetzers finden wir oben zitierten arglosen, aber
sachlich zutreffenden Kommentar)

+++++++++++++++++++++
Nun aber, wie versprochen, weitere Texte, wobei ich jetzt die
marxistische Fachkunde verlasse und mich sozusagen deren Gegenpol
zuwende, dem Standpunkt der authentisch jüdischen Theologie in Bezug zum
selben Thema. Sehr interessant und vor allem überzeugend, wie sehr sich
anti/nicht-religiöser Marxismus und Gottesglaube bei der
Betrachtung/Analyse bestimmter Sachverhalte doch annähern können…

Beginnen wir mit einem Artikel, übernommen von der Webseite
“jewsagainstzionism” (JudengegenZionismus). Der jüdische Autor
beschäftigt sich mit den zionistischen Machenschaften. Der
ultra-orthodoxe (=sehr strenggläubige) Autor aus dem traditionellen
Judentum richtet seine Erklärung zuförderst an die abtrünnigen
(=zionistisch/weltlich beeinflußten) Juden, welche er im Sinne des
authentischen, frommen Judentums zurückzugewinnen sucht. Anmerkungen im
Text in [eckigen Klammern] stammen von mir [eku],

Zitat:
**********************************************************************
Zionismus and Anti-Semitismus

Wir flehen und ersuchen unsere jüdischen Brüder darum, zu erkennen, daß
die Zionisten nicht die Retter der jüdischen Leute und die Garanten
ihrer Sicherheit, sondern eher die Anstifter und Ursache der jüdischen
Leiden im Heiligen Land und weltweit sind.

Der Einfall, daß Zionismus und der Staat “Israel” der Beschützer der
Juden seien, ist wahrscheinlich der größte Schabernack [im Originaltext
steht “Hoax”], der jemals gegen das jüdische Volk verübt wurde.

In der Tat, wo anders seit 1945 standen Juden in solch großer Gefahr,
wie in dem Staat der Zionisten?!

Juden ist es durch ihre religiösen Gesetze auferlegt, loyal zu den
Ländern zu stehen, in denen sie Bürger sind.

Immer seit der Zerstörung des Heiligen Tempels in Jerusalem und dem Exil
des jüdischen Volkes über 2000 Jahre, waren wir verpflichtet, uns
peinlich loyal zu den Ländern unseres Aufenthaltes zu verhalten.

Einer der großen biblischen Propheten, Jeremiah, proklamierte in Kapitel
29 seines Buches Gottes Botschaft zu allen Verbannten; in Vers 7 lesen
wir [lt. Luther-Übersetzung], “Suchet der Stadt Bestes, dahin ich euch
habe lassen wegführen, und betet für sie zum HERRN; denn wenn’s ihr wohl
geht, so geht’s auch euch wohl.”

Dies ist unsere ganze Geschichte hindurch ein Eckstein jüdischer Moral
gewesen, bis zum heutigen Tage.

Thora-treue Juden wünschen in Frieden und Harmonie mit ihren Nachbarn zu
leben, in jedem Land der Gemeinschaft der Nationen, einschließlich im
historischen Palästina.

Sie mißbilligen Handlungen und Taktiken der Gewalt, ausgeübt durch Jene,
unter Mißbrauch des Namens Israel unserer Vorväter, welche die ewigen
Werte der Thora, das ewige gottgewidmete Erbe des jüdischen Volkes,
ersetzt haben durch das Ideal des chauvinistischen Nationalismus.

Es ist die immerwährende Absicht des Zionismus, vorsätzlich und überall,
wo irgend möglich, Antisemitismus zu erregen und sogar noch häufiger,
einen Nutzen aus jeglichem jüdischen Leiden zu ziehen um in der Tat
seine Sache zu fördern. Hass gegen Juden und jüdisches Leiden ist der
Treibstoff der zionistischen Bewegung, und von Anfang an wurde ganz
bewußt und vorsätzlich Hass gegen Juden angestachelt um dann, in
geheucheltem Entsetzen, dies zu gebrauchen, um die Existenz des
zionistischen Staates zu rechtfertigen – dies ist, natürlich,
Machiavellismus, zum höchsten Grade getrieben.

Das Gedeihen des Zionismus auf Hass und den Leiden der Juden, und dem
Bestreben, davon zu profitieren, indem die Juden in beständiger Furcht
gehalten werden, verursacht ihre Ignoranz gegenüber der wahren Natur des
Zionismus und stattdessen den zionistischen Staat als ihre Erlösung zu
betrachten.

ANTISEMITISMUS DURCH DEN POLITISCHEN ZIONISMUS

Obwohl Zionisten und Andere darüber streiten, ist es eine unabweisbare
Tatsache, daß revolutionäre, säkulare und abtrünnige Elemente der
jüdischen Gesellschaft Europas nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg einen großen
Beitrag zur Feindschaft gegen Juden leisteten. Diese erregten ganz
allgemein den Judenhass unter vielen Nicht-Juden.

Während Hitler 1924 als Häftling in der Festung Landsberg am Lech
einsaß, schrieb er sein Buch ‘Mein Kampf’. Als er im Jahr 1933
Reichskanzler von Deutschland wurde, standen ihm Goebbels, Rosenberg und
Streicher bei.

Von ihnen kamen die Erklärungen, “Die Juden Deutschlands verursachten
die Niederlage Deutschlands im Krieg 1914-1918;”

“die Juden Deutschlands waren verantwortlich für die schrecklichen
Bedingungen, die in Deutschland dem Krieg folgten”;

“die Juden Deutschlands sind Fremde und sie wünschen, Fremde zu bleiben”;

“sie haben keine Treue zum Land ihrer Geburt”;

“sie sind keine Menschen”;

“sie sind dreckige Hunde”;

“sie haben kein Recht, sich in die Angelegenheiten Deutschlands
einzumischen”;

“es gibt zu viele Juden in Deutschland”.

Soweit es den Zionismus betraf, versuchte der Begründer des Zionismus
und Abtrünnige [=Herkunfts-Jude. Zur Definiton s.a. die berühmte
judenfreundliche Rede des Dr. Martin Hohmann, CDU], Theodor Herzl, den
Hass auf die Juden zu verstärken, um die Sache des politischen Zionismus
zu unterstützen.

Hier einige seiner “Perlen”:

“Es ist unerlässlich, daß die Leiden der Juden … schlimmer werden …
dies wird die Verwirklichung unserer Pläne unterstützen … Ich habe
eine exzellente Idee … Ich werde die Antisemiten dazu verleiten, den
Wohlstand der Juden auszulöschen … Die Antisemiten werden uns dabei
unterstützen, weil sie die Verfolgung und Unterdrückung der Juden
verstärken werden. Die Antisemiten werden unsere besten Freunde sein.”
(Aus seinem Tagebuch, Teil 1, ab Seite 16,)

[der Autor zitiert hier offenbar die engl. Ausgabe der Herzl-Tagebücher,
diese liegt mir nicht vor, dafür die deutsche]

Weitere Worte aus dem anschaulichen Einfallsreichtum dieses Träumers von
Seite 68, Teil 1 seines Tagebuchs:
[Angaben des Autors zu Band und Seite beziehen sich wohl ebenfalls auf
die engl. Ausgabe der Tagebücher, darum hier meine Rückübersetzung aus
dem Englischen]

“Daher wird der Antisemitismus, welcher eine tief verwurzelte Kraft im
Unterbewußtsein der Massen ist, den Juden nicht schaden. Ich finde ihn
sogar nützlich, um den Judencharackter zu stärken, Erziehung durch die
Massen, welche zur Assimilation führen wird. Diese Erziehung kann nur
mittels Leiden erfolgen und die Juden werden sich anpassen.”

[hier nun d. Originaltext aus dem in Deutschland erschienenen Tagebuch,
Leipzig 1922/23, Band 1, Seite 12:

“Der Antisemitismus, der in der großen Menge etwas Starkes und
Unbewußtes ist, wird aber den Juden nicht schaden. Ich halte ihn für
eine dem Judencharakter nützliche Bewegung. Er ist die Erziehung einer
Gruppe durch die Massen und wird vielleicht zu ihrer Aufsaugung führen.
Erzogen wird man nur durch Härten. Es wird die Darwinsche Mimikry
eintreten. Die Juden werden sich anpassen.”

http://www.literature.at/webinterface/library/ALO-BOOK_V01?objid=12794&zoom=3&ocr=&page=19&gobtn=Go%21
Originalscan der Buchseite. Die Tagebücher wurden 2 Jahrzehnte nach dem
Tode Herzls 1904 von dessen überlebenden Vater editiert und
herausgegeben. Im Vergleich der beiden Zitate stimmt also der engl. u.
d. deut. Text sinngemäß weitgehend überein, allerdings nicht die
Paginierung.
Nun weiter mit der Sicht vom Standpunkt des Theologen:]

Hassvolle Sichtweisen auf Juden als Untermenschen mußten
Nazi-Theoretiker wie etwa Hitler, Goebbels, Rosenberg und Streicher
nicht neu erfinden. Diese Ideologie wurde einfach angepaßt aus
Erklärungen politischer Zionisten, wie man sie z.B. in den Schriften des
Zionisten Yehezkel Kaufman im Jahr 1933 vorfand.

Im Jahr 1920 tauchten an der Universität Heidelberg judenfeindliche
Erklärungen auf.

Diese Erklärungen argumentierten damit, daß die Juden Deutschlands den
Aufruhr in der Folge des Krieges verursacht hatten; daß die Juden von
Deutschland nichts gemeinsam mit den Deutschen haben und daß die
Deutschen das Recht haben, die Juden Deutschlands aus den
Angelegenheiten betreffend ihres Volkes herauszuhalten wurde nicht etwa
von Adolf Hitler in ‘Mein Kampf’ geäußert, sondern von Nahum Goldman,
der zum Präsidenten der Zionistischen Weltorganisation [WZO] und zum
Führer des Zionistischen Weltkongress [WJC] aufstieg und der –
unstrittig – der einflußreichste politische Zionist der Welt wurde,
gleich an zweiter Stelle hinter dem Premierminister des Staates Israel.

Im Jahr 1921 wurde den Juden in Deutschland erklärt:

“Wir Juden sind Feinde … ein fremdes Volk in eurer Mitte und wir …
wollen dies bleiben. Ein Jude kann niemals ein loyaler Deutscher sein;
wer immer das fremde Land sein Vaterland nennt ist ein Verräter am
jüdischen Volk”.

Wer sprach diese hinterfotzigen Worte?

Es war Jacob Klatzkin, die Nummer Zwei der politischen zionistischen
Ideologen in Deutschland, zu einer Zeit, als sich die Juden Deutschlands
der vollen politischen und bürgerlichen Rechte erfreuten.

Er war es, welcher die Untergrabung der jüdischen Gemeinden verfocht,
als dem einzigen sicheren Weg, einen eigenen Staat zu erwerben.

“Sie hatten keine Skrupel dahingehend, die existierenden jüdischen
Gemeinden zu zerstören.”

Wer erklärte in einer öffentlichen Ansprache auf einem Treffen der
politischen Zionisten in Berlin, daß “Deutschland … zu viele Juden
hat”? War es Hitler oder Goebbels?

Nein, das war Chaim Weizman, welcher später der erste Präsident des
Staates Israel wurde.

Diese Ansprache wurde im Jahr 1920 veröffentlicht, und dies sogar vier
Jahre, bevor Hitler sein Buch ‘Mein Kampf’ schrieb.

Wie viele zionistische Juden wissen von dem teuflischen Verrat, geäußert
von den rangältesten zionistischen Führern, diesen Abtrünnigen des
jüdischen Volkes?

Im Nürnberger Prozeß gegen die Hauptkriegsverbrecher, bezeugte
Nazi-Propagandist Julius Streicher: “Ich tat nicht mehr, als zu
wiederholen, was die führenden Zionisten erklärt hatten” – es ist klar,
Streicher sagte die Wahrheit.

Neben Hitler, Rosenberg, Goebbels und Streicher, gebrauchten viele
weitere Nazi-Führer Erklärungen von Zionisten, um ihre Anklagen gegen
die Juden Deutschlands zu bestätigen.

Darin bestehen die Anstrengungen der zionistischen Führer bis zum
heutigen Tag, einen hohen Grad des Antisemitismus aufrecht zu erhalten
um ihnen mittels geheucheltem Abscheu zu ermöglichen, von dem so
angespitzten Antisemitismus Unterstützung ihrer idolatrischen und
anti-jüdischen Sache zu erhalten.

Im Jahre 1963 erklärte Moshe Sharett, damals Präsident der Jewish
Agency, vor der 38. Jahrestagung der Skandinavischen Jugendorganisation,
daß die Freiheit, welcher sich die Mehrheit der Juden erfreut, den
Zionismus gefährdet und auf dem 26. Zionistischen Weltkongress wurde den
Delegierten erzählt, daß die Juden vom Nachlassen des Antisemitismus in
den USA bedroht seien, “Wir sind in Gefahr durch die Freiheit”, erklärte er.

Wie schon weiter oben erwähnt, floriert der Zionismus durch den
Antisemitismus.

Ben Gurion erlärte, “… nicht immer und nicht überall stelle ich mich
gegen den Antisemitismus”.

Die Zionisten spielen regelmäßig die handliche “Antisemiten”-Rassenkarte
aus, gegen jederman, sei er Jude oder Nicht-Jude, welcher seine Stimme
gegen die Boshaftigkeit der Zionisten erhebt.

Während des 2. Weltkrieges [1941, über türk. u. liban. diplom. Kanäle]
suchte die Lehi-Organisation, Ableger von Begins ‘Irgun’ unter Führung
von Yitzchak Shamir, ein Bündnis mit den Nazis einzugehen! Folgend ein
Zitat aus dem Brief der Lehi im Kontakt mit den Nazis:

“Die Errichtung des historischen Judenstaates auf nationaler und
totalitaerer Grundlage, der in einem Vertragsverhaeltnis mit dem
Deutschen Reiche stuende, im Interesse der Wahrung und Staerkung der
zukuenftigen deutschen Machtpositionen im Nahen Orient sei…
… tritt die N.M.O. in Palaestinam … mit denn Angebote einer
[b]aktiven Teilnahme am Kriege an der Seite Deutschlands[/b] heran…
… Die Kooperation der Israelitischen Freiheitsbewegung wuerde auch in
der Linie einer der letzten Reden des deutschen Reichskanzler liegen, in
der Herr Hitler betonte, dass er jede Kombination und Koalition benutzen
werde um England zu isolieren und zu schlagen.”

[folgender Link hinzugefügt, im engl. Original dieses Textes hier nicht
vorhanden.

http://www.marxists.de/middleast/ironwall/irgunazi.htm

“Aus David Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics,
1889-1945, (Phd.), Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel, 1974. Die
Rechtschreibung wurde nicht geändert.”
Das militärisch-politische Bündnisangebot der ‘LEHI’ an das 3. Reich
liegt unter dem obigen Link im deutschen Volltext vor, von dort ist auch
die engl. Version verlinkt. Weiter mit dem jüd. Theologen:]

Für jene, welche den Zionisten unterstellen, sie würden auf der Seite
von Freiheit und Gleichheit stehen, klingen diese Worte befremdlich.
Jenen jedoch, welche die Wurzel des Zionismus verstanden haben, welche
die Transformation und Ausrottung der Auffassung vom traditionellen
Juden und Judentum umfaßt, sind diese Erklärungen überhaupt nicht
absonderlich. Sie [die zion. Worte] sind so zu erwarten.

Die Zionisten stimmten mit den Nazis im Allgemeinen überein, sogar schon
vor dem Aufschwung des Nazismus. Sie glaubten, daß Juden nicht in
Harmonie in irgendeiner anderen Gesellschaft in der Welt leben könnten
und nicht sollten und daß die Trennung von diesen Gesellschaften ein
Vorteil für diese Gesellschaften sei.

Sie glaubten, daß die neue jüdische Existenz in ihrem eigenen Staat das
Bild vom Juden als “nutzlos” und “Parasit” umkrempeln würde. Diese Ideen
existierten lange vor Adolf Hitler!

Es gibt eine große Anzahl Literatur darüber, die beschreibt, wie die
Zionisten es sehr erschwerten, während und nach dem 2. Weltkrieg Juden
zu retten. Während verschiedene Personen und Organisationen versuchten,
die Ausreise von Juden in die westlichen Ländern zu arrangieren,
investierten die Zionisten in Überstunden, um eben dies zu verhindern.

In der Tat, Yitzchak Greenbaum, ein berühmter Zionist, proklamierte, daß
“eine Kuh in Palästina mehr Wert sei, als all die Juden in Polen.”

Der schändliche David Ben-Gurion erklärte im Dezember 1938:

“Wenn ich wüßte, es wäre möglich all die [jüdischen] Kinder in
Deutschland nach England zu retten, jedoch nur die Hälfte der Kinder,
indem sie nach Eretz Israel gebracht würden, ich würde die zweite Lösung
wählen. Wir dürfen nicht nur das Leben dieser Kinder berücksichtigen,
sondern auch die Geschichte des Volkes Israel.”

Nach dem Krieg, am 2. Mai 1948, präsentierte der zionistische
“religiöse” Führer, Rabbi Klaussner, welcher mit der Sache der
‘Displaced Persons’ befaßt war, einen Bericht vor der Jewish American
Conference:

“Ich bin überzeugt davon, daß die Leute gezwungen werden müssen, nach
Palästina zu gehen… Für die scheint ein amerikanischer Dollar das
höchste aller Ziele zu sein. Mit dem Wort ‘Zwang’ schlage ich ein
Programm vor. Dies dient der Evakuierung der Juden in Polen und diente
in der Geschichte dem ‘Exodus’ [Auszug der antiken Juden aus Ägypten]
… Zur Ausführung dieses Programms müssen wir, statt den ‘Displaced
Persons’ Behaglichkeit zu bringen, ihnen die größtmöglichen
Unannehmlichkeiten bereiten … in einer zweiten Stufe folgt dann die
Methode, die Haganah aufzufordern, die Juden zu drangsalieren.”

Es ist eine Ironie, daß die Zionisten ihren Staat als den sicheren Hafen
der Juden proklamieren, wenn doch seit dem 2. Weltkrieg kein Platz auf
der Erde derart gefährlich für Juden ist, wie der zionistische Staat, in
spiritueller Hinsicht wie physisch.

Nachdem der zionistische Staat gegründet war, wirkten die Zionisten
unbarmherzig dahin, um Furcht bei den Juden in den arabischen Ländern zu
erzeugen. Ihre Taktik funktionierte höchst erfolgreich im Yemen,
Marokko, Irak, Algerien, Lybien, Tunesien.

Es ist unter irakischen Juden allgemein bekannt, daß während 1949 und
1950 der berühmte Zionist Mordechai ben Porat, welcher den Spitznamen
Morad Abu al-Knabel (Mordechai der Bomber) bekam, nach der zionistischen
Staatsgründung dabei half, irakische Offizielle zu bestechen, damit sie
Gesetze verabschiedeten, welche die Auswanderung der Juden aus dem Irak
förderten.

Dies wurde dadurch verstärkt, indem die Zionisten im März 1950 Bomben in
Baghdads Synagogen pflanzten. Informationen darüber liegen griffbereit
im Internet.

Die Schrift von Herrn Naim Giladi dokumentiert im Detail, was die
Zionisten im Jahr 1950 in Baghdad anrichteten um die Flucht der Juden in
den zionistischen Staat zu provozieren.

[die aus dem Engl. auszugsweise übersetzte Schrift des irakischen Juden
Naeim Giladi ‘Ben Gurion Scandals’ liegt bereits im Internet vor,
gelegentlich setze ich sie auch in diese NG reinsetzen…]

Die Zionisten machen sich keine Sorgen um die Effekte, welche ihre
Taktiken auf die jüdischen Gemeinden überall in den Ländern haben. Wenn
sie die europäischen Nationen jeder Sünde unter der Sonne anklagen,
kümmerts die Zionisten, daß dies Feindschaft gegenüber den Juden
produzieren wird? Nein! Nicht im geringsten. Ganz im Gegenteil, wie oben
behandelt, ihr Geschäft blüht unter solchen Umständen, sie klammern sich
an die vergebliche Hoffnug, daß diese jüdischen Gemeinden zur “Erlösung”
in den “sicheren Hafen” des zionistischen Paradieses hineindrängeln, wo
sich die Juden in permanenter Gefahr befinden, da das zionistische
Regime jede Form der grausamen Provokation gegen Nicht-Juden unternimmt.

In der Vergangenheit haben die Zionisten jede Gelegenheit gesucht, die
Juden zum Verlassen ihrer Heimatländer zu drängen. Jedesmal, wenn auch
nur der geringste judenfeindliche Vorfall auf den Fersen der
zionistischen Taktik folgt, oder wenn Anzeichen ökonomischer Not und
Verwerfung auftauchen, verstärken die Zionisten dies ums Tausendfache,
suchen sie rücksichtslos die betroffenen Nationen zu erniedrigen und
hetzen die Juden auf, zu dem zionistischen Staat zu gehen, der
sogenannten “natürlichen Heimat” des jüdischen Volkes.

Dies war so der Fall in Ländern wie Frankreich, Argentinien, Uruguay,
der früheren Sowjet-Union und Ägypten.

“Die Verheißungen der Thora werden sich immer verwirklichen.” Dieser
Vers aus der Thora legt dar, daß jene, welche Seine Feinde sind, einen
Preis zahlen werden, wenn das Königreich Gottes herrschen wird.

Deuteronomium 32:43 [Fünftes Buch Mose 32,43, nach der
Eberfelder-Übersetzung]: Jubelt, ihr Nationen, mit seinem Volke! Denn er
wird rächen das Blut seiner Knechte und wird Rache erstatten seinen
Feinden, und seinem Lande, seinem Volke, vergeben.

Fußnoten und Quellen:

* Guardian Volume two Issue 7
* Satmar Grand Rebbe Joel Teitelbaum
* The Jews of Batna, Aleria: A Study of Identity and Colonialism
by Elizabeth Friedman.
* The Jewish Communities of Morocco and the AIU by M. Laskier,
State University, Albany, N.Y.
* The Impact of Western European Education on the Jewish Millet of
Baghdad by Maurice Sawdayee.
* Outcaste Jewish Life in Southern Iran by Laurence D. Loeb.
Gordon and Breach.
* The Last Arab Jews. The Communities of Jerba, Tunisia by Abraham
Udovitch and Lucette Valensi. Harwood Academic Publishers.
* The GENOCIDE IN THE HOLY LAND (available for purchase on the site)
* Ben Gurion’s Scandals by Naeim Giladi (available for purchase on
the site)
*********************************************************************
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/zionism/zanda.cfm
(Quelle: eine Webseite des traditionellen, ultra-ortodoxen Judentums)

Die Juden lügen nicht!
eku

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur , or to
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:22:39 EDT 2008
Article: 503615 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!64.59.134.4.MISMATCH!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.baltics
Subject: HOLODOMOR = REAL HOLOCAUST na Ukrainie – BY ZYDS/OGPU ON UKRAINIANS: Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 1048
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 18:11:56 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1211134316 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 18 May 2008 12:11:56 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 12:11:56 MDT
Bytes: 54352
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.ukrainian:116256 soc.culture.europe:613081 soc.culture.russian:503615 alt.politics.europe:78782 soc.culture.polish:873204 soc.culture.baltics:162082

HOLODOMOR = ZYD/NKVD HOLOCAUST ON UKRAINIANS! Message:
Probably the best analysis of what happened that I have read to date.

Trident

IS THERE A “SMOKING GUN” FOR THE HOLODOMOR?

PRESENTATION: By Professor Roman Serbyn Universit=E9 du Qu=E9bec =E0
Montr=E9al, Canada
The Ukrainian Holodomor and the Denial of Genocides
International Conference, Federigo Argentieri, Ph.D., Organizer
Guarini Institute, John Cabot University
Rome, Italy, Friday, November 09, 2007
Published by the Action Ukraine Report #889, Article 5
Kyiv, Ukraine, Monday, November 19, 2007

In his seminal study on genocide, Leo Kuper observed that “governments
hardly declare and document genocidal plans in the manner of the
Nazis”
[1]. Nevertheless, since modern states cannot function without large
bureaucracies and elaborate communication systems, tell-tale records
inevitably survive.

When the CPSU lost power and the Soviet empire fell apart, it was
Revealed that an elaborate paper trail of the 1932-33 famine and the Soviet
authorities’ involvement in it had been preserved in party and state
archives. These documents are being slowly declassified, examined and
published[2]. Historians can now give us a fairly accurate account of
the catastrophe and ascertain the responsibility of Stalin and his
collaborators.

As a result, scholars who previously hesitated to recognize the
Genocidal character of Stalin’s forced starvation of Ukrainian farmers, have
reexamined the question and readjusted their interpretations. In his
latest book, Nicolas Werth comes to the conclusion that thanks to recent
studies based on the new documents, it is now “legitimate to qualify as
genocide the cluster of actions undertaken by the Stalinist regime to punish
the
Ukrainian peasantry by famine and terror”[3].

In this paper I analyze some of the main documents that provide
smoking-gun evidence of genocide, in line with the definition of the crime
given
in the UN Convention of 1948: “acts committed with intent to destroy, in
whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”.

The key criteria in the Convention are proof of “intent” and
Identification eligible “groups”. Soviet documents corroborate the accusation
against
Stalin and his closest collaborators for deliberately exterminating
Millions of Ukrainian farmers, and show that the perpetrators targeted them as
Ukrainians.

Furthermore these and other documents reveal that the genocide was not
Just against Ukrainian farmers, the focus of the attack was the Ukrainian
Nation in all its component parts and on all its territories within the
Soviet Union.

The locus of this crime was thus the Ukrainian SSR, the predominantly
Ukrainian Kuban, and the other regions of the RSFSR with sizeable
Ukrainian populations. The simultaneous decimation of Ukrainian national
elites,
especially academic, cultural and political leaders, was an integral part of
the destruction of the Ukrainian nation.

Stalin did not intend to kill all Ukrainians (nor is such an intent
Required by the Convention); his motive was to break the backbone of the
nation
By executing a sizeable percentage of the people and reducing the rest to
servile obedience, to transform them into manageable cogs of the state
mechanism. Stalin’s means of destruction were varied: famine, shootings,
exhausting forced labor.

The UN Convention does not require the establishment of motives for
genocide, but determining the reasons for the act gives an insight
into the rationale which led to crime and thus help us comprehend the
perpetrator’s intent. Stalin’s measures against the Ukrainians were predicated
on
his political ambitions, two of which provided the motives for the
eventual genocide[4].

The first was to extend socialism beyond the borders of the USSR. He
realized that the Bolsheviks’ initial attempt to export their revolution
into Europe failed primarily because of the weakness of the Red Army.
To resume Lenin’s unfinished task, Stalin needed a powerful armed force,
Backed by modern heavy industry. Industrialization had to be financed by
Exporting natural resources, especially grain, which had to be extorted from
the
farmers at the lowest cost to the state.

War communism had shown that door-to-door requisition was costly,
inefficient and politically dangerous. After the revolution, poor
farmers appropriated and divided up the land of rich landlords. As a result,
farmers lived better, ate more but sold less to the state. Marketable grain
(sold outside the village) in tsarist times was provided by the large farms
Owned by landlords and kulaks. Now new large estates had to be set up in the
Form of sovkhozy and kolkhozy. These would give the state easy access to
grain, produced by the newly enslaved peasants.

The immediate goal was not the increase of grain production (which
could be expected to fall as a result of peasant opposition), but of the
“marketable grain” to be delivered to the state. Since the main producers of
grain
Were Ukrainians farmers, who had no tradition of the Russian semi-communal
obshchina organization, they could be expected to offer stiff resistance to
forced collectivization and confiscation of the fruits of their labor.

Stalin’s second ambition was to bring a permanent solution to the
National question, especially its crucial Ukrainian component. The 1926 census
Pegged the Ukrainian population at 31 million, of the Union’s 147 million: 23
million in Ukraine, and 8 million in the rest of the USSR, mainly along the
Ukrainian border.

Ukrainian national revival triggered by the Russian revolution forced
Lenin to give the reconquered republic nominal autonomy in the form of a
“sovereign” republic within a Potemkin-style Soviet federation.
Subsequent policy of Ukrainization, or the local application of a general
principle of korenizatsiia (nativization), allowed Ukrainians to add real
national
content to the pretentiously misleading form of “soviet republic”[5].

The Ukrainization of education, communications and administration, not
Only in Ukraine but also in the Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR, the
de-Russification of urban centers by the influx of Ukrainian farmers,
the demands on Moscow to transfer to the republic adjacent territories
with Ukrainian population, the shifting of cultural orientation from Moscow
and to the West – all these pressures on the imperial centre could not be
ignored by the Kremlin.

Stalin, Lenin’s “magnificent Georgian” and foremost expert on the
nationalities question, understood the dangers of active nation-
building in Ukraine, in the best of times. Collectivization would only
aggravate
the situation. Over 85 % of ethnic Ukrainians were farmers and their
sudden disenfranchisement could throw the countryside into such turmoil that
not only grain production would be catastrophically reduced, but also
farmers could gain the support of the national elites in a united rebellion of
the whole republic to the spoliation of their country by Moscow.

Similar, if smaller, unrest could be expected in the Kuban’ and other
ethnically Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR. In the mid-1920s Stalin had
written that the peasant question was “the basis, the quintessence, of
the national question”, that “the peasantry constitutes the main army of
the national movement” and that “there is no powerful national movement
without the peasant army”[6]. The stability and even the integrity of the
Soviet empire would be threatened.

Genocide does not happen spontaneously. The targeted group is first
identified, vilified and intimidated, then it is discredited in the
eyes of the rest of the population, and only when it has been sufficiently
isolated, is it submitted to total or partial extermination. In the summer of
1929 the GPU (political police) “uncovered” a nationalist conspiracy, headed
by
prominent Ukrainian intellectuals and conducting anti-Soviet work in
villages and regional centers.

Over 700 people were arrested for, among other things, “anti-Soviet
Activity in the villages and district centers” and a show trial was held in
March 1930, appropriately staged in a Kharkiv theatre. 45 members of this
Mythical Association for the Liberation of Ukraine (SVU) were sentenced to
death or long prison terms.

Arrests and trials of other mostly fictitious groups followed:
Ukrainian National Center, Ukrainian Military Organization, etc.[7] The
condemned were former members of the former Ukrainian national governments,
Ukrainian armed forces, Ukrainian political parties, and prominent people in
fields of education, culture and the arts.

The purpose was to terrorize the Ukrainian elites into submission and
lethargy, and thus deprive the peasants of leadership on the national
level.
It should be noted that, in connection with the less severe famine in
Russia, no parallel attack took place against Russian national elites
or the Russian culture.

Stalin’s war against the peasants began in earnest towards the end of
1929.
In a two-pronged attack he ordered to “eliminate the dekulakization as a
class” and to collectivize the middle and poor peasants. Divided into
three categories, the kulaks were dispossessed and the most dangerous were
shot.

The others were deported to the wilds of northern RSFSR, transferred
To distant regions in Ukraine, or given strips of poor land outside the
Kolkhoz near which they lived. The intention was not only to provide kolkhozes
With the confiscated land, cattle and machinery, but also to deprive the
Peasants of the more qualified leadership for their opposition to the
authorities.

During the winter of 1929-1930, 90 thousand Ukrainian households were
dekulakized, and a smaller wave more or less finished the job a year
later.
In 1934 Kossior, party boss of Ukraine, reported that 200 thousand
farms had been dekulakized in Ukraine. Out of this number of about one million
(5 members per family), several thousand were deported to the northern
parts of the RSFSR and lost to the Ukrainian nation.

Collectivization went in unison with dekulakization: a major push was
Given in early 1930. By 10 March 1930 Ukrainian kolhosps integrated 64.4% of
farmsteads with 70.9% of arable land. The operation was accomplished
with the help of some 50,000 activists, sent from Russian and Ukrainian
urban centers, with special powers to organize, punish, and terrorize.

Many poor peasants, paid for the service with confiscated goods,
participated in expropriating their richer neighbors, but many others
sympathized with the victims. Peasant rebellion swept Ukraine: in
January-March 1930, 3,190 uprisings with over 950 thousand
Participants confronted the authorities.[8]

Hundreds of fliers were picked up by the authorities with such slogans
As “Free Ukraine from Moscow rule”, “Time to rise against Moscow yoke”
And others. National and peasant factors were coming together. Stalin
sounded a temporary retreat and in October of that year collectivization was
down to 29 % of households and 34 % of arable land. But the reprieve was brief
and a year later (October 1931) the figures rose to 68 % (for households)
and 72 % for arable land, with a much higher percentage in the grain-producing
steppe regions.

The effect of Stalin’s revolution on the countryside was disastrous,
especially in Ukraine and the Kuban. From 1929 to 1932 the evolution
can be summarized in these four curt phrases: production down; state
procurement up; grain export up; peasant food consumption down.

Farmers’ opposition to collectivization, mismanagement of collective
Farms by incompetent administrators, neglect and slaughter of farm animals
seriously hindered farming and brought down its production. Yet,
enforced obligatory state procurement increased, and in 1931, 42 % of
Ukraine’s
grain harvest was turned over to the state.[9]

Kolhosps delayed or completely failed to pay out stipends for
“workday” (trudodni), and the their members had to rely on their meager and
insufficient individual plots of land and a few domestic animals for
subsistence. Undernourishment became generalized. But Stalin had
reached his goal.

Grain exports rose from below one million tons in 1929, to: 5,832,000
Tons in 1930/31 and 4,786,000 tons in 1931/32. It should be kept in mind
that one million tons could feed four to five million people for one year.
After two years of resistance and unequal struggle with the Communist
authorities, the Ukrainian elites were cowed and most of the collective and
independent farms despoiled of all their reserves. The republic was on the
brink of a major catastrophe.

On 26 April 1932, Stanislav Kossior, the General secretary of the
Communist Party of Ukraine, informed Stalin about “individual
Cases and even individual villages that are starving” but blamed it on
“local bungling, errors, particularly in the case of kolkhozes.” And,
Lest he displease his Kremlin masters, their lieutenant in Ukraine
dismissed the tragedy with the affirmation that “all talk of famine must be
categorically discarded.”[10]

Yet famine there was and on 10 June H. Petrovsky, the head of the
Ukrainian state and V. Chubar, the head of the Ukrainian government, sent
Separate letters to notify Molotov and Stalin of the appalling conditions in
the Ukrainian countryside, and to ask for help.

Chubar admitted that cases of starvation among independent and
Collective farmers had already been signaled in December and January and
that by “March-April there were dozens and hundreds of malnourished, starving,
and swollen people and people starving to death accumulate in every
village; children and orphans abandoned by their parents appeared”.

Raions and oblasts organized aid from internal resources, but were
Obliged to do this “under conditions of acute food shortage, especially
bread”.
[11]
Noteworthy additional remark: “Petliurite and other anti-Soviet moods
increased.”

Petrovsky’s letter was even more to the point. Having just returned
>from an inspection of the countryside, he realized the catastrophic situation
of the farming population. He visited many villages and everywhere saw
multitudes of people, mainly poor and middle peasants, starving, subsisting on
surrogates.

Peasants scolded him, posed embarrassing question, reproached him,
Saying “why did you create an artificial famine, […] why did you take away
The seed material – this did not happen even under the old regime, why is
It necessary for Ukrainians to travel for bread […] to non-grain
Producing territories?”.

Echoing Chubar, Petrovsky reported that “because of the famine, mass
Thefts are taking place in the villages.” Pointing out that grain harvest is
Still six week off, and famine will only intensify, Petrovsky ask:
“shouldn’t assistance be rendered to the Ukrainian countryside in the amount
of
two or, at the very least, one and a half million poods of grain?” And he
predicted that if help is not given starvation would drive peasants to pick
unripe grain and destroy much of it.

Petrovsky’s letter paints a bleak picture of the forthcoming harvest.
Since the better grain had been seized by the state, seeds of poorer quality
Were sown and scattered mores thinly. The young crops are good and the
Fields well weeded but the grain is sparse. Petrovsky was also struck by the
Large amount of unsown land. Aware of all these problems, the farmers
Complained to Petrovsky that the new grain procurements would be even more
difficult to meet than last year’s. “And this may very well be so”, agrees
Petrovsky.

Finally Petrovsky draws attention to the exodus of Ukrainian farmers.
They are forced to seek food beyond the republic’s borders, at “the Dno
station, in the Central-Black Earth Oblast’, in Belarus, and in Northern
Caucasus”, where grain is more readily available, and at much lower prices.

When Petrovsky suggested that farmers band together for these
purchases, he learned that the Commissariat of Transport has drastically
reduced
the sale of train tickets to peasants. Bewildered Ukrainian peasants needled
Petrovsky: “Why are they banning trips for grain?”

If the two Ukrainian leaders believed their pleas and warnings of
turmoil in the Ukrainian countryside would soften Moscow’s position, they were
mistaken. Their effect on Stalin, Kaganovich and Molotov was just the
opposite. Writing from Moscow to Sochi, where Stalin was vacationing,
Kaganovich criticized both Ukrainian leaders, even though he admitted
That some aid would have to be given to Ukraine, and asked Stalin to decide
On the amount. Stalin’s response was more brutal and more ominous of
things to come.

He condemned the hypocrisy of the two leaders, who only wanted to get
“new millions of poods[12] of grain from Moscow” and “a reduction in the
plan for grain procurement”. Ukrainians must mobilize their own forces and
resources for already “Ukraine has been given more than she should get”.[13]
Nevertheless, on 16 June the Politburo considered Ukraine’s plea and
Granted about 8,500 tons[14], a paltry amount in comparison with the million
and a half poods requested by Petrovsky.

Politburo’s niggardly “largesse” must have provoked Stalin’s ire, for
in a letter to Kaganovich, Molotov and the Politburo he came back with
harsh criticism of past errors and new instructions for the coming harvest.
The Gensec blamed “mechanical equalization”, which did not take into
account the ability of the kolkhozes to deliver grain, and as a result of
which,
“fertile districts in Ukraine found themselves in a state of
Impoverishment and famine, despite a fairly good harvest.”[15]

This is the only known acknowledgement of the Ukrainian famine by
Stalin. He blamed regional authorities for being out of touch with the
countryside and allowing kolkhozniks to travel around the entire European
part of the USSR demoralize “our farms with their complaints and whining.”[16]

Stalin proposed the calling of a top level conference on the
organization of grain procurement and its unconditional fulfillment, and
insisted
that personal responsibility for grain procurement be delegated to the
first secretaries of the Ukraine, the Northern Caucasus, and the other grain
producing regions. “Personal responsibility” for “unconditional fulfillment”
imposed from the top along the administrative vertikal became the
watchwords of the 1932/33 grain procurement campaign, which would result in
the
genocidal famine.

On 21 June a telegram signed by Stalin and Molotov instructed Kharkiv to
carry out “at any cost” the July-September plan for grain delivery.
Two days later, Moscow answered Ukrainian Politburo’s plea for 600,000
poods of grain with a terse resolution: “bar any additional grain deliveries
to
Ukraine.”[17]

The III Conference of KP(b)U (6-10 July 1932) was devoted to the
Upcoming harvest and grain procurement. Stalin sent Molotov and Kaganovich to
The meeting “to ensure genuinely Bolshevik decisions”. Molotov informed
The audience that Moscow had lowered Ukraine’s quota but was adamant that
The plan be carried out in full.[18]

Declarations from regional leaders that the farmers were starving, that much
land lay fallow, and that 100 to 200 m.poods of grain would be lost during
harvesting did not bend the resolve of Moscow’s envoys.[19] The conference
adopted a resolution to carry out the plan of grain delivery “in full
and unconditionally”.[20]

It was largely in response to the tense situation in Ukraine[21], and in
anticipation of new troubles in that republic that Stalin came up with
his infamous decree, dubbed by the farmers “the 5 ears of corn law”.
Writing on 20 July to Kaganovich and Molotov, the Gensec complains of
Widespread theft by “dekulakized kulaks” and others, and proposes to write
a law, which would make theft of property belonging to collective farms equal
to similar crimes against state property, and “punishable by a minimum of ten
years’
imprisonment, and as a rule, by death”.

“All active agitators against the new collective-farm system” and
“profiteers and resellers of goods” writes Stalin, should be removed
And sent to concentration camps.[22] He also wants stricter controls over
The limited kolkhoz trade allowed by a 6 May 1932 law (kolkhozes allowed
Sell their surplus after 15 January 1933, after fulfilling the state
Procurement plan), made more liberal on 20 May 1932.[23]

A follow-up letter provides ideological explanation: in the same way
That capitalism could not triumph without first making “private property
Sacred property”, socialism will not finish off capitalism “unless it
Declares public property (belonging to cooperatives, collective farms or the
state) to be sacred and inviolable”.[24]

Returning to the topic on 26 July, Stalin insists on formal legality
of the proposed operations: “we must act on the basis of law (‘the peasant
loves legality’), and not merely in accordance with the practice of the
OGPU, although it is clear that the OGPU’s role here will not only not
Diminish but, on the contrary, will be strengthened and ‘ennobled’ (the OGPU
Agencies will operate ‘on a lawful basis’ rather than ‘high-handedly’)”.[25]

The joint Party-State decree “On the Protection of the Property of
State Enterprises, Collective Farms and Cooperatives, and on the
Consolidation of Public (Socialist) Property” was issued on 7 August 1932.
It became the main legal instrument used by the Soviet authorities to condemn
millions of farmers to slow death by starvation. It repeated Stalin’s
declarations
that all public property is “sacred and inviolable” and that individuals
attempting to take possession of public property should be considered
“enemies of the people”.[26]

All collective farm property, whether in the field or in storage was
Decreed equal to that of state property and theft was made punishable by
execution, which could be reduced to 10-year imprisonment only under
mitigating circumstances. Advocating withdrawal from the kolkhoz became
tantamount to treason and was punished with three to five years imprisonment
in concentration camps. No amnesty could be applied in any of these
cases.

The decree on State property was applicable on the whole Soviet
Territory but, as Stalin’s letter to Kaganovich shows, it was primarily meant
For Ukraine. Stalin thought the law was “good” and would “soon have an
impact”, and ordered a draft of directives from the C.C to the party, judicial
and punitive organizations.[27] The Gensec then addressed the Ukrainian
problem.
The passage is highly revealing:

“The most important thing right now is Ukraine. Ukrainian affairs have hit
rock bottom. Things are bad with regard to the party. There is talk
that in two regions of Ukraine (it seems in the Kiev and Dnepropetrovsk
regions) about 50 raion party committees have spoken out against the
grain-procurements plan, deeming it unrealistic. It is said that the
situation in other raion party committees is no better. […] This is
not a party but a parliament, […]

Instead of leading the raions, Kossior kept maneuvering between the
directives of the CC VKP and the demands of the raion party committees
[…]
Things are bad with the soviets. Chubar is no leader. Things are bad
With the GPU. Redens is not up to leading the fight against the
counterrevolution
[…]. [underlined and doubly underlined in original – R.S.]”

Then Stalin brandishes the specter of Ukrainian separatism: “If we don’t
undertake at once to straighten out the situation in Ukraine, we may
lose Ukraine.” He reminds Kaganovich that Pilsudski and his agents are
underestimated by Redens, and Kossior. He expressed utter contempt for
the whole KP(b)U, composed of 500,000 members (“ha-ha”, snickers Stalin),
harboring Pilsudski’s agents and “quite a lot (yes a lot!) of rotten
elements, conscious and unconscious Petliurists”.

Thinking undoubtedly of Ukraine’s negative reaction to the destructive
impact the just-passed property laws will have, Stalin warns: “The
moment things get worse, these [party] elements will waste no time opening a
front inside (and outside) the party, against the party.”

Frustrated by the fact that “the Ukrainian leadership does not see
These dangers”, Stalin proposes to replace Kossior with Kaganovich and
Redens with Balitsky, and eventually Chubar with Kaganovich. In this way
Stalin
Intends to transform “Ukraine as quickly as possible into a real fortress of
The USSR, a genuinely exemplary republic.”

The task is urgent and calls for immediate action, for without “these and
similar measures (the economic and political strengthening of Ukraine,
above all its border raions, etc.), I repeat, we may lose Ukraine.”[28]
Kaganovich agrees, of course, and accuses Ukrainian party of creating a
certain
solidarity and “a rotten sense of mutual responsibility”, not only in the
middle echelons of the party, but also among its leadership.[29]

Stalin’s exchange of letters with Kaganovich reveals the ambiance in
Which the policy of starvation will be implemented. The overall objective
was to maintain a high level of grain procurement. To assure this, all
challenge outside and inside the republic had to be eliminated, regardless of
the cost. Stalin’s raising of the specter of Pilsudski and Petliura agents
running loose in Ukraine and infiltrating the Soviet party and state
machinery was nothing more than a scare tactic and a rallying call.

He was well aware that by the summer of 1932, the weak Polish network
And the few local collaborators had been rounded up by the GPU, which also
arrested real and imaginary followers of Petliura whom Stalin had
eliminated by assassination in 1926. Poland may have had some illusions about
a
Ukrainian insurrection in 1929-1930, but by 1932, the Poles realized
That the starving population was in no shape to revolt.

The Soviet-Polish nonaggression treaty signed on 25 July 1932 was
Ample proof of the changing relations between the two neighbors.[30] The
Pilsudski-Petliura scarecrow will continue to enjoy popularity in
Soviet propaganda. While there was no serious threat from the Poles or the
Ukrainian nationalists, a national insurrection could become a reality if
the expected famine (implied in Stalin’s phrase “the moment things get
worse”) could bind together the threatened middle cadres of the KP(b)U
with the surviving peasantry. To prevent this eventuality the KP(b)U had to
be purged and kept under close Moscow surveillance.

Stalin maintained that the 1932 harvest was good; historians today are
More skeptical but consider it adequate to cover Soviet Union’s internal
needs.
With the state reserves from previous year, there were enough supplies
To feed every citizen of the Soviet Union.

Famine was brought about by the exorbitant amount of grain and other
agricultural products taken from the Ukrainian peasants, and the way
they were extracted. Ukraine’s plan was excessive, and in spite of the
protests from Kharkiv and three successive reductions, it remained so to the
end.

Still, Ukraine delivered about a quarter of a billion poods of grain, or
over 90% of its procurement quota. [31] In addition it handed over
large quantities of meat, vegetables and other produce. Stalin insisted that
state procurement have absolute priority. Following a CC VKP(b) directive, a
KP(b)U resolution of 18 November reminded that “complete fulfillment
of the procurement plan by collective farms and the MTS constitutes their
primary obligation […], to which all the other duties of the collective farm
must be subordinated, including the duty to set up all sorts of funds: seed
fund, forage and food supplies”.[32]

Stalin was satisfied that he was achieving his goal. At a high-level
Party meeting, held on 27 November 1932, he gloated: “The party has
succeeded in replacing the 500-600 million poods of marketable grain, procured
during the period of individual peasant holdings by our present ability to
collect 1,200-1,400 m.p. of grain. It is hardly necessary to prove that
without this leap forward the country would have a famine [sic-RS], we would
not be
able to support our industry, we would not be able to feed the workers and
the Red Army.”[33]

The allusion to the famine, or rather to freedom from one, was an
Obvious lie, and the reference to the feeding of the workers and the Red Army
– an overstatement; but then, Stalin’s concern was not the feeding his
Subjectsb but the financing of Soviet industrialization with grain exports.

Obedience to Moscow’s orders was assured in two ways: a) frequently
Repeated delegations to Ukraine and the North Caucasus Territory of Molotov
Kaganovich and other high-ranking leaders to supervise the local
authorities, and b) party discipline enforced from Moscow down the
administrative structure. At the end of October 1932, two commissions
were sent, one to Ukraine headed by Molotov, and the other to North
Caucasus Territory headed by Kaganovich.

Stalin’s emissaries supervised party meetings and forced them to pass
resolutions on grain procurements, party discipline, stricter
application of the 7 August property laws, the establishment of “black lists”
of collective farms in arrears with grain deliveries, imposition of fines,
etc.
They also instigated purges in party organizations and administrative
structures.
Kuban’ was particularly hit with the expulsion of 43 % of the 25,000
Party members, including 358 out of 716 party secretaries.[34]

In Ukraine, during November and first five days of December, the OGPU
arrested 1,230 people, including 340 heads of kolhospy while 327
Communists were brought before the courts for sabotaging state
procurements.[35]
In the 18 November resolution quoted above, the Ukrainian CC reminded the
directors
of sovkhoz of their “personal responsibility as party members and civil
servants for the fulfillment of the grain procurement”.

“Personal responsibility” for the execution of instructions was a
Constant refrain in messages coming from above and became an important
Means for forcing recalcitrant cadres to carry out the Ukrainian genocide.

Dekulakization and deportation continued, on a smaller scale and were
Mostly of political and punitive nature. Arrests, beatings, and cruelty of
All sorts abounded as before, only now the victims were weaker and less
Capable of resistance. Kolkhozes, villages and individual farmers in arrears
On state procurement were put on “black lists”, lost access to state-run
stores, and could not buy such essentials as matches, kerosene, salt.

Fines amounted to a year and a quarter’s worth of meat tax, without
Freeing the debtor from the unfulfilled grain procurement. “Activists” – the
City workers and their komnezam helpers searched farmers’ houses and yards,
looking for the hidden grain.

There is no way of knowing what portion of the hidden grain was found
by the flying brigades of activists, but official reports state that in Kuban
they found 345,000 poods of grain in November, while searches in Ukraine
>from 1 December 1932 to 25 January 1933 yielded 1.7 million poods, in 17,000
hiding places.[36] What grain was found, was confiscated; if nothing was
discovered, they took whatever edibles were seen, leaving the family
to starve.

Peasants who could find some old religious medals or other mementos
Made of precious metals could trek to the city and exchange them at the
Torgsins (stores for foreigners) for vouchers, and then exchange them for
food.

Hardier peasants would flee their villages and seek salvation in urban
centers or in neighboring Belarus and RSFSR, where food was available.
Accounts of Ukrainian peasants overloading trains, filling stations
And wandering about Russian and Belarusian towns and countryside abound.

National and peasant questions became inextricably intertwined in
Stalin’s decree of 14 December 1932, issued under the banal title “On Grain
Procurement in Ukraine, Northern Caucasus and the Western Oblast”[37].

Ukrainization was blamed for problems in grain deliveries and
Exemplary punishment was prescribed for sabotage in grain procurement: 5-10
years of concentration camp for a number of “party traitors” arrested in the
Orikhiv raion of Dnipropetrovs’k oblast of Ukraine, and deportation to the
North of the Poltavska stanytsia of Kuban in the RSFSR.

The decree made the party and government chiefs in the three grain
Producing areas personally responsible for the completion of grain procurement
By January 1933. Ukrainianization presently is carried out in Ukraine,
“without meticulous selection of the Bolshevik cadre”, had allowed
bourgeois-nationalists and Petliurites to join party and state
institutions and set up their cells and organizations.

Absence of “revolutionary vigilance” by local party organizations let
“counterrevolutionary elements” become directors, accountants,
storekeepers, foremen in collective farms, members of village soviets. Similar
accusation was brought against Northern Caucasus, with supporters of the
Kuban’
Rada figuring in place of Petliurites. This gave nationalists the
opportunity to sabotage harvest and sowing campaigns and organize other
counterrevolutionary activities.

Party and Soviet authorities in Ukraine and Northern Caucasus were
Ordered to extirpate these counterrevolutionary elements, execute them or
Deport them to concentration camps, including “saboteurs with party
Membership cards in their pockets”.

The verdict against Ukrainization came in two parts. In Ukraine it was
Not formally prohibited, but Stalin insisted that it resume its primary
vocation, that of promoting “correct Bolshevik implementation of
Lenin’s national policy”, which in fact meant integration and assimilation.

Ukrainian authorities were instructed to “expel Petliurite and other
bourgeois-nationalist elements from party and government
organizations”, and “meticulously select and recruit Ukrainian Bolshevik
cadre”. The
signal was thus given for rapid curtailment of Ukrainization and return to a
more
sophisticated policy of Russification.[38]

Ukrainians of Northern Caucasus fared worse. “Non-Bolshevik
‘Ukrainianization’, which affected nearly half of the raions in the
Northern Caucasus,” and which was declared to be “at variance with the
cultural
interests of the population”, was totally discontinued and replaced
with Russification.

The use of the Ukrainian language was banned in public offices of
Local administration, cooperative societies, and schools. The printing of
newspapers and magazines in the Ukrainized raions of Northern Caucasus
was to switch immediately to Russian, and preparation were to begin
immediately for the transfer in the fall of all Ukrainian schools into
Russian.

The whole Poltava stanytsia was ordered to be deported and resettled
With demobilized Russian Red Army soldiers, who would receive the abandoned
land, buildings, equipment, and cattle. In fact, 2,158 families with 9,187
members were sent out before 27 December[39] and resettled a month later with
1,826 demobilized soldiers.[40]

Together with Medvedivs’ka and Umans’ka, the three Cossack stanytsias
Saw 45,000 persons deported to the North. On 15 December, Molotov and
Stalin signed a similar ban on Ukrainization, for the rest of the previously
Ukrainized Soviet regions in the RSFSR.

Stalin’s anti-Ukrainization decree reveals the extent to which the dictator
was ready to go, in sacrificing the Ukrainian nation on the altar of
great-power ambitions. There is little doubt that the ban on Ukrainization
was a sop to Russian chauvinism, especially in ethnically mixed
regions outside the Ukrainian SSR. National and social repressions reinforced
one another, even if neither was acknowledged openly.

For the next several months after the condemnation of the abuses of
Ukrainization and the Ukrainian sabotage of grain procurements, the
Ukrainian countryside passed through some of the worst moments in its
history. The litany of repressive measures is endless. 82 raions were
deprived of manufactured goods for not fulfilling their quotas of
grain deliveries.

On 19 December, Stalin orders Kaganovich and Postishev back to Ukraine
To help Kosior, Chubar and Khataevich carry out the procurement plan. On
24 December, collective farms are ordered to deliver all grain in
Fulfillment of the plan, including grain put aside for seed and food. Direct
orders to increase repressive measures, arrests and deportations increase. A
real reign of terror seizes the republic and the Kuban.

On 22 January 1933 Stalin struck another crippling blow against the
Starving Ukrainian grain growers. The new secret decree, drafted by the Gensec
himself, is perhaps the best available proof of the dictator’s
genocidal intent against the Ukrainian nation. Sent to Ukraine, Belarus and
the
neighboring regions of RSFSR[41], the document calls attention to the
unrestrained exodus of peasants from the Kuban’ and Ukraine to the
near-by regions of Russia and Belarus.

Central authorities are said to have no doubt that these migrants, who
pretend to search for food, are, in fact, Socialist-Revolutionaries and
agents of Poland, sent to agitate, “through the peasants”, in the
northern parts of the USSR, against the kolkhoz system and the Soviet power.
Addressees are reminded that a similar movement took place the
Previous year, but the party, soviet and police authorities of Ukraine did
nothing to stop it. It must not be allowed to happen this year.

Stalin then orders the party, soviet and the repressive organs of the
Northern Caucasus and Ukraine to prevent the exodus of their peasants
To other regions of the USSR and directs them to close border crossings
between Ukraine and the Northern Caucasus.

The GPU of the Russian oblast’s adjacent to the quarantined Ukrainian
And Northern Caucasus regions, and the transport section of the OGPU, are
instructed to arrest all peasants from Ukraine and North Caucasus, who
have managed to leave their territory, and, after segregating the
counter-revolutionary elements, return the others to their villages.

The next day, the Politburo of the CC KP(b)U adopted a resolution to
Carry out Moscow’s orders and forwarded the directive, along with addition
instructions, for implementation by the appropriate Ukrainian
authorities.[42]

The Ukrainian branch of the OGPU was ordered to instruct all railway
stations not to sell tickets to peasants with destinations beyond the
Ukrainian borders, without formal travel permission from the raion executive
Committee or a certificate of employment from construction or industrial
enterprises.

Oblasts were told to take “resolute measures” to prevent massive
Departure of their peasants, carefully check the work of agents recruiting
Peasants for work outside Ukraine, and to urge kolhospnyky and individual
farmers not to depart without permission for other raions because they would
be
arrested there.

On 25 January, B. Sheboldaev, the party boss of the North Caucasus
Territory, issued a similar order, adding instructions on the
employment of internal forces and border troupes and the setting up of
filtration
points.[43]

Like the anti-Ukrainization decree of 14 December 1932, the 22 January
1933 directive, which closed the borders to the famished Ukrainian peasants
Was not the beginning but the culmination of processes that had started
Many moths before. Petrovsky had complained to Stalin, back in June 1932,
About the ban on train ticket for Ukrainian peasants who wanted to obtain
provisions in Russia.

Evdokimov’s telegram from Rostov-on-Don, which Iagoda prepared for
Stalin’s attention on 23 January 1933, details the elaborate measures taken
Since November to prevent the flight of farmers from the Northern Caucasus
Territory. Among these were roadblocks set up on the main arteries of
peasant migration.

Transport authorities had arrested 11,774 persons and another 7,534
Were incarcerated by other organs. In the same dossier, Balitsky’s report
>from 22 January informed of massive exodus of peasants from Ukraine since
December.[44]

Departures were registered in 74 raions, 721 villages and 228
kolhosps. In all, 31,693 persons left: 20,129 from Kharkiv oblast’, 6,576 from
the
Kyiv oblast, 3,447 from Odessa oblast, and 1,541 from Chernihiv. Of these
migrants about one third were collective farmers and two thirds
individual farmers; 128 were activists. A check at the railway junction
stations
in the Kharkiv oblast revealed a great demand for long-distance tickets: in
January 1933 16,500 such tickets were sold in Lozova station and 15,000 – in
Sumy.

In the beginning of January 1933, the GPU began to apprehend agitators
And organizers of these migrations and arrested over 500 of them. [45] As
A direct result of Stalin’s borders decree of 22 January 1933, 219,460
Persons were arrested in the first six weeks of its application; some were
sent to the Goulag, others punished in other ways, while 186,588 were sent
back to their villages to face the famine.[46]

In the middle of March 1933, Kosior wrote unperturbedly to the Kremlin
That “the famine still hasn’t taught many kolhospnyky a lesson”.[47] In his
report from Kharkiv, dated 31 May 1933, the Italian consul general
prognosticated on the devastation of the country: “The current
disaster will bring about a preponderantly Russian colonization of Ukraine. In
a
future time, perhaps very soon, one will no longer be able to speak of a
Ukraine, or of a Ukrainian people, and thus not even of a Ukrainian problem,
Because Ukraine will have become a de facto Russian region.”[48]

There can be little doubt today that the famine was not only used by the
Communist party for political purposes, but that it was actually created and
directed by Stalin and his henchmen for that purpose. The regime’s
ultimate objective was to transform the backward empire into an industrial
giant and a military superpower that could export socialism abroad.

To achieve this, Stalin needed great quantities of marketable grain,
Which was to be extracted from the peasants “at any price” to the producers
but at minimal price to the state. The most expedient way was to herd the
peasants into collective farms, subject them to a direct control from the
Kremlin, and in this way ensure maximum grain deliveries to the state.

The Kremlin knew that the peasants would resist and that the
imposition of its will would result in the loss of millions of human lives,
but that
was of no concern for masters of a well-populated empire. Stalin’s project
required a homogenous and docile population. Revived Ukrainian
particularism, taking advantage of the indigenization program,
reinforced national unity at the expense of cohesion of the new “fatherland of
world proletariat”.

The two sources of resistance to Stalin’s plans (national and social)
Became embodied in the same group – the Ukrainian farmers. Stalin decided to
sacrifice a considerable part of this group in order to eliminate the
opposition to his projects and to frighten the rest of the Ukrainian
nation into accepting the role of cogs (as he liked to call them) of the
great socialist mechanism.

The Stalin-Kaganovich discussion of the Petrovsy and Chubar letters
(June-July 1932), the “five ears of corn” law (7 August, 1932), the
condemnation of Ukrainization (14 December 1932), and the closing of
internal Soviet borders on starving Ukrainian peasants, each provide
smoking gun revelations about the genocide against the Ukrainian nation. But a
multitude of other documents now emerging from the secret archives
help us get a rounded understanding of the gigantic crime and the immeasurable
suffering of its victims.
—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Leo Kuper, Genocide. Its Politic Use in the Twentieth Century.
(Penguin,
1981), p. 35.
[2] Valerii Vasiliev & Yuri Shapoval (eds.), Komandyry velykoho
holodu.
Poizdky V. Molotova i L. Kahanovycha v Ukrainu i na Pivnichnyi Kavkaz
1932-1933 rr. Kyiv, 2001; I. Zelenin et al (eds.), Tragediia sovetskoi
derevni. Kollektivizatsiia i rasskulachivanie. Tom 3. Moskva, 2001;
Stalin I Kaganovich Perepiska 1931-1936 gg. Moskva, 2001;
Rozsekrechena pam’iat’: Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini v dokumentakh
GPU-NKVD. Kyiv,
2007;
Ruslan Pyrih (ed.), Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini: dokumenty i
materialy. Kyiv, 2007.

[3] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007.

[4] Discussed more fully in my article, “The Ukrainian Famine of
1932-1933 and the United Nations Convention on Genocide”, in Taras Hunczak &
Roman Serbyn. Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933: Genocide by Other Means.
(Forthcoming.)

[5] For a thorough discussion of Ukrainization and its problems see
James Mace, Communism and the dilemmas of national liberation: national
Communism in Soviet Ukraine, 1918-1933. Cambride, Mass., 1983.
See also Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action Empire. Nations and Nationalism
in the Soviet Union, 1929-1939. Ithaca & London, 2001.

[6] J. V. Stalin, “Concerning the National Question in Yugoslavia”
Works.
Vol. 7. Moscow, 1954. Pp. 71-72.

[7] Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. Pp. 75-81.

[8] Valerii Vasil’ev & Linn Viola. Kolektyvizatsiia i selians’kyi opir
Na Ukraini (lystopad 1929-berezen’ 1930). Vinnytsia, 1997. P. 91.

[9] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007. P. 118.

[10] Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini:ochyma istorykiv, movoiu
dokumentiv. Kyiv, 1990. P. 148.

[11] All quotations and references to the two letters are taken from
Komandyry velykoho holodu. Pp.206-215.

[12] One pood =3D 16.36 kg; 1 ton – 61.36 poods.

[13] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence 1931-1936. New Haven&
London, 2003. P. 136.

[14] For the allocation of the food aid, see Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na
Ukraini. Kyiv, 1990. P. 183, 187-188.

[15] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138 (Underlined by
Stalin).

[16] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138-139..

[17] Holod. 1990. P. 183 (doc. 63), P. 190 (doc. 68).

[18] The original plan of 410 million poods (6.7 m.t.) was lowered
twice to 356 and 274.8 million poods (5.8 m.t.; 4.5 m.t. ) but 16 November was
raised to 5.8 m.t. Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. p. 84.

[19] For a detailed account of the deliberations see Komandyry
Velykoho holodu. Pp. 152-164

[20] See part of the resolution in Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Kyiv, 1990. P. 194-198

[21] A secret OGPU report from around 20 July 1932 stated that “as for
anti-Soviet manifestations, Ukraine occupies first place”. “From 1
January to 1 July 1932, 118 counterrevolutionary kulak organizations were
discovered, counting 2.479 members. In addition, along the lines of
national counterrevolution we have unmasked 35 groups with 562 members.”
Tragedia, p.

421. Another secret OGPU report, dated 5 August, contains a section
“National counterrevolution (U[krainian]SSR)” which relates the
Liquidation of 8 nationalist groups, two of which consisted of former members
Of the outlawed UKP (Ukrainian Communist Party). These people are said to
have a leftist program and conduct systematic activity among members of the
KP(b)U, arguing that the Soviet authorities are suppressing the Ukrainian
culture. In their platform, claims the report, they declare war on the Soviet
regime and Polish fascism, while in fact keeping links abroad and carrying
out directives of the Second Department of of the Polish General Staff in
Ukraine. Ibid. p. 443.

[22] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 164-165.

[23] S. Kulchytsky, Tsina “Velykoho perelomu”. Kyiv, 1990. P. 296. On
23 July Stalin sent a telegram to Kaganovich demanding the restoration
And enforcement of last year’s ban on transporting private bread supplies
By rail or water. Tragedia, p. 428.

[24] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 166.

[25] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 169.

[26] Tragedia, p. 453-454.

[27] Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. Pp. 273-275; The Stalin-Kaganovich
Correspondence. P. 179-181. A follow-up secret “Instruction on the
Application of the TsIK and SNK SSSR of 7 August 1932 About the
Safeguarding of State Property”, signed by the Chairman and the Prosecutor of
the
Supreme Court of the USSR and the Vice-Charman of the OGPU, was sent out on 16
September to all republican and oblast authorities. Tragedia. P.
477-479.

[28] On 12 August Stalin sends a note to Kaganovich asking him to keep
secret for the moment the plan regarding Ukraine sent in the preceding
letter. Tragedia. P. 276. To stiffen Kosior’s resolve, in January
1933, Stalin sent him the more resolute Postyshev as his second in command;
Redens was replaced Balitsky in February 1933.

[29] Letter of 16 Augus 1932. Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. P.
283-284;
Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 183-184.

[30] Timoty Snyder, Sketches from a Secret War. New Haven, Yale
University Press. P. 104.

[31] Kosior spoke of 255 m.p. at the January plenum of the CC KP(b)U.
Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 352.
Davies and Wheatcroft give
3,584,000 tons, or 219 millon poods, P. 478.
Other authors give similar figures.

[32] Holod 1932-1932 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 253.

[33] Tragedia. P. 559.

[34] Davies & Wheatcroft, The Years of Hunger. P. 178.

[35] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 50.

[36] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 49; Kulchytsky, Holod 1932-1933 v
Ukraini iak henotsyd. Kyiv, 2005. P. 98

[37] Tragedia, Pp. 575-577; also in Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Pp 291-194.

[38] The Russification of Ukraine attracted the attention of the
Italian consulate in Kharkiv. “In government offices the Russian language is
Once again being used, in correspondence as well as in verbal dealings
Between employees.” See the “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches”,
Report to Congress. Commission on the Ukraine Famine. Washington, 1988. P.
446.

[39] G.G. Iagoda report to Stalin, 29 December 1932. Lubianka. Stalin
I VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003. P. 386.

[40] Nicolaas Werth, Le pouvoir sovi=E9tique et la paysannerie dans les
rapports de la police politique (1930-1934). Rapport du 27 f=E9vrier
1933.
/http:/www.ihtp.cnrs.fr/dossier_soviet_paysans/sommaire.html/

[41] Tragedia sovetskoi derevni. P. 634-635. The first English
Translation of the document appeared in Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action
Empire. Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923-1939. Ithaca and
London, 2001. P.p. 306-307.

[42] Volodymyr Serhiichuk. Iak nas moryly holodom. Kyiv, 2003. PP
156-158.

[43] Tragedia, p. 636-637.Sheboldaev added more precisions on the
Filtration points three days later. Ibid. P. 638.

[44] Lubianka. Stalin i VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003.P. 394.

[45] Lubianka. P. 392-393.

[46] N.A. Ivnitskii, Kollektivizatsiia i raskulachivanie (nachala 30-
Kh godov). Moscow, 1994. P. 204.

[47] Tragedia. P. 657.

[48] “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches. Op. cit. P. 427.

—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTE: Article published by the Action Ukraine Report (AUR) with
permission from Professor Federigo Argentieri, John Cabot University,
Rome, Italy.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:22:42 EDT 2008
Article: 503616 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!feed.cgocable.net!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.russian,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: Re: KATYN=MURDERS OF POLISH BY ZYDS/SOVIET NKVD!!! Like Vinnitsa!! NEVER FORGET! Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 501
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 18:12:03 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1211134323 64.59.135.176 (Sun, 18 May 2008 12:12:03 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 12:12:03 MDT
Bytes: 29260
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.polish:873205 pl.regionalne.warszawa:507394 soc.culture.europe:613082 soc.culture.german:343927 soc.culture.russian:503616 alt.politics.europe:78783 de.soc.politik.misc:1085939

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:00:05 GMT, Proposition 88
wrote:

>With even the Soviets forced to admit that it was their ZYD NKVD who did the
>murders at KATYN, why are you apologising for them?

>Historians and experts proved it was NOT the Germans!

>Were you one of the killers, or perhaps your father, uncle or?

>On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:54:59 -0700, “Peter Wielki” wrote:

>>Actually, in Katyn there were Russians and Ukraninians that did the crime,
>>as far as I know.

>>But yeah, let’s blame it on JEWS!!! Germans did it too, right Frankie?

>>”Frank Arthur” wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]
>>> True,Just Like Vinnitsa!!

>>> The filthy ZYDS can no longer lie about KATYN and try to blame the
>>> Germans.

>>> Even the Soviets had to admit the truth, and also about Vinnitsa.

>>> No wonder around the world more and more people are starting to really
>>> dislike the filthy ZHIDS!!

>>> Latest update follows:
>>> From: “Strider”
>>> Newsgroups:soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.yugoslavia
>>> Subject: Jewish Copmmissars murdered these Poles

>>> Our shame still lies in the Katyn forest
>>> By Kevin Myers
>>> (Filed: 27/04/2003)

>>> Today Poles all over the world will commemorate the 60th anniversary of
>>> the discovery of the war crime which didn’t occur. And the
>>> non-existence of this atrocity constituted democracy’s most sordid
>>> exercise in realpolitik of the entire 20th century. The Soviet Union captured 180,000
>>> Polish soldiers during its invasion of Poland in 1939. Most were herded
>>> off to slave-camps in Siberia, but 22,000 officers were not. In April 1940, on
>>> Stalin’s orders, each was bound with barbed wire and executed with a
>>> single shot to the head.

>>> This was a colossal undertaking: the death toll was greater than that
>>> on the most calamitous day in British military history – the Somme, July
>>> 1, 1916.

>>> More importantly, the massacres occurred before the German invasions
>>> of France and the Low Countries. And although hundreds of Jews in Poland
>>> had been murdered, these were improvised butcheries, essentially unrelated to
>>> The Final Solution, which had not yet begun.

>>> So the first systematic mass murder of defenceless innocents in the
>>> Second World War was not by the Nazis, but by the Soviet Union, just over
>>> a year before the USSR became Britain’s official best friend. This shouldn’t
>>> surprise us: after all, it had been the Soviets, and not the Nazis, who
>>> invented industrialised murder. From the revolution on, they freely used
>>> the word “exterminate” of their enemies. Hitler listened; and Hitler learned,
>>> as dictators do. Moreover, the careful murder of so many officers from a
>>> single narrow stratum of Polish society was truly proto-genocide: its intent was
>>> to eliminate Polish identity by the extermination of all its perceived
>>> guardians.

>>> In 1943, via two sources – through a population census within the
>>> exiled Polish community living in the USSR, and from the Germans, who had
>>> discovered the site of one of the massacres, in the woods of Katyn,
>>> outside Smolensk – the British discovered the fate of the Polish officers. A
>>> devastating report from the British ambassador to the Polish
>>> government-in-exile, Owen O’Malley, left no doubt about the matter.

>>> The British Government’s public response was to dismiss the Nazi
>>> discoveries as propaganda and tell the Polish government-in-exile to
>>> forget Katyn and to proceed with beating the real enemy, Germany.

>>> War is war, and in peace it is impossible to replicate the fevers and
>>> the terrors it induces. So no useful moral judgment can be made about
>>> those who decided in 1943 publicly to accept lies as fact, and to conceal
>>> the truth as regrettable but necessary strategy. But it was statecraft at its
>>> most pusillanimous to allow those lies to become a cornerstone of the
>>> relationship between the Western allies and the Soviet Union.

>>> That is what happened when the three leaders – Churchill, Roosevelt
>>> and Stalin – met at Teheran in November 1943. Far from berating the Soviet
>>> Leader for the massacres, the two democratic leaders propitiated him,
>>> awarding him the Polish land he had stolen even as he seized his future murder
>>> victims.

>>> And when Stalin jested that they should settle the German problem once and
>>> for all by killing 50,000 German officers, Churchill merely protested sulkily,
>>> and Roosevelt light-heartedly suggested killing only 49,000.

>>> But nobody mentioned Katyn. How was this possible? For the massacre of
>>> the Poles was surely the secret subtext to this grisly exchange, and one
>>> by which Stalin was taking the measure of his two confreres. All three knew
>>> of the murders, and the bodyguard of lies around them: and silently, all
>>> three – two of them abjectly, the third triumphantly – assented to those lies.

>>> Teheran was the true nadir of international diplomacy, morally far
>>> more ignoble and strategically far more catastrophic than either Munich
>>> five years before or Yalta a year later. And the key to Teheran was Katyn: once
>>> Stalin had got away with that, he realised he could get away with almost
>>> anything.

>>> Moreover, the fiction of Katyn took root within the Foreign Office.
>>> There, nourished on complicit cowardice and malformed in the darkness of
>>> pathological guilt, the temporary tactic of 1943 was in time to turn into
>>> the diseased plant of enduring policy. It even caused the Callaghan Government
>>> in the 1970s vehemently to oppose the erection of a memorial in London to the
>>> victims of Katyn.

>>> Denial, in its purest psychiatric sense, of Katyn also infused much
>>> consideration of the 20th century: how else could Roy Jenkins have
>>> written a life of Churchill without once referring to Katyn, the Great Lie
>>> of which the prime minister was prime mover? How else could so many
>>> historians.

>>> Norman Davies aside – simply ignore the extraordinary Western
>>> collusion in covering up communist atrocities, and the profound impact
>>> this must have had on Kremlin thinking?

>>> On Thursday the FCO publishes a report, British reactions to the Katyn
>>> Massacre, in a belated attempt at expiation for Britain’s repeated
>>> cover-ups of this terrible affair. But it cannot undo the evil of the
>>> extermination of the Polish officer corps which, far from being the
>>> subject of a war-crimes trial, was embraced and rewarded at Teheran;
>>> and from that city, the communism of Katyn was soon to march forth
>>> and conquer half the world.

>>> My thanks to you for reposting this article.
>>> A brilliant truthful piece.
>>> Ed Kadach

>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:06:50 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On 1 May 1998 13:08:00 +0200, [email protected] wrote:

>>>>>American Dissident Voices Broadcast of April 25, 1998

>>>>>Katyn
>>>>>by Dr. William Pierce

>>>>>A background noise that seems never to go away is the constant
>>>>>whining and yammering of the Jews about how the world owes them a
>>>>>living because of their losses during the so-called “Holocaust.”
>>>>>They do it, of course, because they make such a big profit on it.
>>>>>The latest flare-up of this Jewish play for a handout came more
>>>>>than a year ago when they began demanding that the Swiss pay them
>>>>>$7 billion, which “Holocaust” victims allegedly had stashed in
>>>>>numbered Swiss accounts before being hauled off to gas chambers
>>>>>during the Second World War.

>>>>>With a few “bought” Gentile politicians fronting for them, the
>>>>>foremost among these being New York’s Senator Alphonse D’Amato,
>>>>>the Jews threatened Switzerland with a boycott by the U.S.
>>>>>government if their demands were not met. Instead of laughing in
>>>>>their faces, telling the Jews to go to hell, and gearing up for
>>>>>countermeasures against Israel and other Jewish interests if the
>>>>>Jews tried to proceed with a boycott, the Swiss politicians tried
>>>>>to placate the Jews by offering to buy themoff. The Jews took the
>>>>>Swiss response as a sign of weakness and escalated their demands.

>>>>>The average Swiss citizen seems to have a little more pride than
>>>>>Switzerland’s elected officials, however, and resentment against
>>>>>the Jews’ extortion efforts is building in Switzerland now to the
>>>>>point that some of that country’s richest Jews are wearing
>>>>>bulletproof vests whenever they must go out in public.

>>>>>In general, however, this “Holocaust”-based extortion racket
>>>>>works quite well for the Jews, and they have expanded their
>>>>>demands for World War Two reparations to include a number of
>>>>>other countries besides Switzerland. They are even whining that
>>>>>the Vatican owes them because Pope Pius XII didn’t do enough to
>>>>>save them from the Germans during the war. The Jews’ brazenness
>>>>>in this whole business is quite breathtaking.

>>>>>Their brazenness, of course, is justified, because by and large
>>>>>they have been getting away with it. And they have been getting
>>>>>away with it because with their media control they have been able
>>>>>to distort the general public’s whole perception of what happened
>>>>>during the Second World War. They have been able to portray
>>>>>themselves as innocent victims and just about everyone else as
>>>>>persecutors and aggressors, even the people who were fighting on
>>>>>the Jewish side against the Germans during the war. For example,
>>>>>they have done quite a bit of whining that after the Red Army
>>>>>drove the Germans from Poland, the Poles took the opportunity to
>>>>>lynch hundreds of Jews in 1945 and 1946: Jews whom the Germans
>>>>>somehow had failed to get rid of during their wartime occupation
>>>>>of Poland.

>>>>>Now, why would the Poles do something like that? Why would they
>>>>>lynch the poor Jews, who had been on their side during the war?
>>>>>If you learned about the war from watching Steven Spielberg
>>>>>propaganda films and other mass-media sources, you probably
>>>>>believe that it was because of religious anti-Semitism on the
>>>>>part of the Catholic Poles. Let me tell you the real reason why
>>>>>so many Poles hated Jews after the war. It’s something the
>>>>>Jew-controlled media in America have tried hard to keep covered
>>>>>up. Let me tell you about what happened in the Katyn forest
>>>>>in 1940.

>>>>>In September 1939 Poland was invaded from the west by Germany and
>>>>>from the east by the Soviet Union. The Germans wanted back the
>>>>>territory in western Poland, including the city of Danzig, which
>>>>>had been taken from them at the end of the First World War. The
>>>>>Soviets wanted eastern Poland. The Germans and the Soviets
>>>>>divided Poland between them, with the boundary running roughly
>>>>>along the River Bug.

>>>>>Britain and France, both under strong Jewish pressure, declared
>>>>>war on Germany in September 1939, ostensibly because of Germany’s
>>>>>invasion of Poland. They did not declare war on the Soviet Union,
>>>>>which also had invaded Poland. In the United States and in
>>>>>western Europe, where the Jews held a deathgrip on the mass
>>>>>media, a great deal of anti-German propaganda was based on the
>>>>>German grab for Polish territory — much of which, of course,
>>>>>actually was historically German territory — and nothing was
>>>>>said of the Soviet occupation and annexation of eastern Poland.

>>>>>The reason for this anti-German and pro-Soviet bias by the Jewish
>>>>>media was that the Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union as
>>>>>commissars and communist party bosses under Stalin, while in
>>>>>Germany Hitler had undertaken a program since 1933 of freeing
>>>>>Germany from all Jewish influence. Jews had been weeded out of
>>>>>the media, the law, the schools, and other areas of economic and
>>>>>cultural life in Germany. Before Hitler became chancellor in 1933
>>>>>the Jews had done in Germany what they do in every country where
>>>>>they gain a foothold: they had monopolized large sections of the
>>>>>mass media and certain professions and were doing their best to
>>>>>distort German culture, German society, and the German economy
>>>>>to suit themselves. Hitler put a stop to that, and two-thirds of
>>>>>the 1933 Jewish population of Germany had emigrated by the
>>>>>invasion of Poland in September 1939. So the Jews hated Germany
>>>>>and were determined to do whatever they could to destroy her.

>>>>>For his part, Hitler hoped to avoid war with Britain and France.
>>>>>He hoped that after his quick victory in western Poland he could
>>>>>make peace with Britain and France. He was determined, however,
>>>>>to stamp out communism wherever he encountered it. Not only did
>>>>>he hate communism on ideological grounds, but he had sworn to
>>>>>fight communism when the communists in Germany betrayed his
>>>>>country at the end of the First World War. Hitler also saw the
>>>>>Soviet Union as a threat to all of Europe, and he was determined
>>>>>to break the power of that country when he could, even though
>>>>>there was an uneasy non-aggression pact between Germany and the
>>>>>Soviet Union in 1939, at the time of their partition of Poland.

>>>>>In the spring of 1941 massive troop movements and other
>>>>>developments inside the Soviet Union convinced Hitler that Stalin
>>>>>was preparing to invade the west with the Red Army, and so in
>>>>>June 1941 Hitler made a preemptive strike. German forces smashed
>>>>>through the Red Army and made rapid advances, first through
>>>>>Soviet-occupied eastern Poland and then through Ukraine and into
>>>>>Russia.

>>>>>A year and a half later, in February 1943, German forces near
>>>>>Smolensk, in western Russia, investigated reports they heard from
>>>>>Russian civilians to the effect that a large number of prisoners
>>>>>had been murdered by the Soviet secret police in the area nearly
>>>>>three years earlier. The German investigators were led by local
>>>>>Russians to a series of mounds in a wooded area known locally as
>>>>>Katyn Forest, about 10 miles west of Smolensk. The forest is
>>>>>named for a village, Katyn, which it surrounds. The forest had
>>>>>been privately owned prior to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917,
>>>>>but after the communist takeover of Russia the area had been
>>>>>confiscated by the government and part of the forest had been
>>>>>turned over to the NKVD, the Soviet equivalent of the American
>>>>>FBI.

>>>>>The Germans began digging in the mounds in the Katyn forest and
>>>>>made a horrible discovery. They found corpse after corpse, each
>>>>>with its hands bound behind its back and a bullet hole in the
>>>>>base of its skull. They continued their excavations for more than
>>>>>a month, and eventually uncovered more than 4,000 corpses. Other
>>>>>bodies may have remained buried in other mounds, but the Germans
>>>>>had no time to dig up the whole forest. Instead they called in
>>>>>the International Red Cross and representatives of various
>>>>>neutral countries to examine their findings. They also brought in
>>>>>groups of Allied prisoners of war, including Americans, from
>>>>>prison camps in Germany to view the graves in the Katyn forest.
>>>>>They gave these international inspectors complete freedom to
>>>>>examine the exhumed bodies, permitted doctors among them to
>>>>>conduct autopsies, even allowed them to dig up other bodies from
>>>>>one of the mounds which had not been completely excavated. The
>>>>>Germans asked only that the inspectors report back truthfully to
>>>>>their own governments about their observations. And in fact, most
>>>>>of them did.

>>>>>What they reported was that the bodies were those of Polish
>>>>>military officers, along with a number of civilian cultural and
>>>>>business leaders and intellectuals — scientists, writers, poets
>>>>>– who had been in the portion of Poland occupied by the Soviet
>>>>>Union in September 1939. Altogether the Soviet secret police had
>>>>>rounded up some 15,000 Polish leaders in 1939 — including nearly
>>>>>half of the entire Polish officer’s corps, the half that had had
>>>>>the misfortune of being in eastern Poland at the time — and put
>>>>>them in three concentration camps in Russia: at Starobelsk,
>>>>>Kozelsk, and Ostashkov. All of the bodies unearthed in the
>>>>>Katyn forest were of Polish leaders who had been confined at one
>>>>>of these camps: Starobelsk.

>>>>>Rounding up a country’s leaders and killing them was standard
>>>>>practice for the communists. The theory was that the leaders were
>>>>>bourgeois oppressors of the working class and deserved to die. As
>>>>>egalitarians the communists did not regard the Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals as inherently better or more valuable human
>>>>>material than the average Polish criminal or welfare bum; the
>>>>>officers had simply used their class advantage to gain a better
>>>>>life-style for themselves. Of course, no one really believed that
>>>>>theory except the criminals and welfare bums and other resentful
>>>>>losers and ne’er-do-wells who made up the natural communist
>>>>>constituency. As a practical matter, however, killing all the
>>>>>leaders and potential leaders of a conquered people made them
>>>>>easier to govern. That’s what the Marxists had done in Russia,
>>>>>Ukraine, and the Baltic countries.

>>>>>In the case of the Poles there was a bit of a diplomatic problem,
>>>>>though. The Poles supported the war Britain and France had
>>>>>declared against Germany, purportedly on their behalf, because
>>>>>they viewed that as their one hope for getting back at least the
>>>>>western part of their country. They were not happy about the
>>>>>Russians taking the eastern part of Poland, but the Russians at
>>>>>least were fellow Slavs. The thing to do was get rid of the
>>>>>Germans first and then worry about the Russians. This Polish
>>>>>strategy suited Stalin fine. But it made it desirable for him to
>>>>>avoid alienating the Poles any more than necessary. When Polish
>>>>>exiles asked about their imprisoned leaders in late 1939 and
>>>>>early 1940, the Soviet government promised that they would be
>>>>>released shortly. Meanwhile, the decision had been made to kill
>>>>>all of them. And so in April 1940 the Polish leaders were taken
>>>>>from the three camps where they had been imprisoned, trucked off
>>>>>to various liquidation sites, and murdered. The ones who had been
>>>>>imprisoned at Starobelsk all went to the NKVD area of the Katyn
>>>>>forest. After the war some of the NKVD executioners were
>>>>>interviewed in Israel and described how they had carried out the
>>>>>killings.

>>> ISRAEL REFUSED TO PROSECUTE THESE ZHID MURDERERS!!

>>>>>The Poles were driven up to the burial pits in long NKVD prison
>>>>>trucks known as “black ravens.” They were pulled from the trucks
>>>>>one at a time by NKVD guards. Each Polish prisoner had his hands
>>>>>bound behind his back and then was dragged to the edge of a pit.
>>>>>There he was held by two NKVD men while a third fired a pistol
>>>>>bullet into the back of his head. Some of the officers had had
>>>>>their coats pulled over their heads to keep them from seeing what
>>>>>was happening before they were shot. Some struggled and were
>>>>>bayonetted by NKVD guards before being shot and thrown into the
>>>>>pit. When all of the officers from Starobelsk had been killed,
>>>>>some 4,400 of them, the Katyn forest burial pits were covered
>>>>>with dirt and pine trees were planted on them. The locations of
>>>>>the mass graves of the prisoners from the camps at Kozelsk and
>>>>>Ostashkov remain unknown, but none of the 15,000 Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals rounded up by the NKVD in September 1939 was
>>>>>seen alive after April 1940.

>>>>>The Red Cross representatives and the Allied prisoners the
>>>>>Germans brought in to examine the mass graves in the Katyn forest
>>>>>understood after their examination not only who had been killed;
>>>>>they also understood who had killed them. This was apparent not
>>>>>only from the medical estimates of the length of time the bodies
>>>>>had been buried, but also from documentary evidence on the
>>>>>bodies. Diaries, news clippings, letters, and other personal
>>>>>papers removed from the clothing of the victims all told the same
>>>>>story: the latest dates on any of these papers were from
>>>>>mid-April 1940. The Polish leaders had been killed in April 1940,
>>>>>when they were prisoners of the Soviet Union and when the Katyn
>>>>>region was under Soviet control. And this is what they reported
>>>>>back to their governments.

>>>>>So what do you think happened? Were the British and American
>>>>>governments horrified to discover that their “gallant Soviet
>>>>>ally,” as the Soviet Union was referred to by the mass media, was
>>>>>a mass murderer? Did the British government, which had gone to
>>>>>war against Germany under the pretext of defending Poland, decide
>>>>>that it had made a mistake? Did anyone condemn the Soviet Union
>>>>>for this act of genocide against the Poles?

>>>>>Of course not! The Allied governments ordered their people who
>>>>>had inspected the Katyn site to keep their mouths shut, and the
>>>>>Jewish media immediately began announcing that the Germans had
>>>>>done it. A mass murder of Polish officers and intellectuals by
>>>>>the Nazis had been discovered in the Katyn forest, the New York
>>>>>Times and the rest of the Jewish media shrieked. Poor Poles!
>>>>>Wicked Germans! The war must go on to free the poor Poles and
>>>>>punish the wicked Germans. And the war did go on, killing
>>>>>millions of more Germans, British, Americans, and other
>>>>>Europeans. And the Germans were indeed punished. The Poles, of
>>>>>course, were not freed. Instead they were turned over to the
>>>>>Reds, who had butchered their leaders in the Katyn forest, and
>>>>>made to suffer under communist rule for half a century.

>>>>>The war went on after the German discovery of the mass graves in
>>>>>the Katyn forest, because its purpose from the beginning was not
>>>>>to free Poland but to destroy Germany, which had dared to free
>>>>>itself from the Jews. Roosevelt understood this. Churchill
>>>>>understood this. But the American and British people didn’t
>>>>>understand it, of course, because they were lied to by the Jewish
>>>>>media and by their own governments, who in 1943 as in 1998 have
>>>>>done whatever has been politically expedient. And what has been
>>>>>politically expedient has been what the Jewish media bosses have
>>>>>decided.

>>>>>The lies about Katyn were maintained by the media for some years
>>>>>after the end of the war, because these lies meshed nicely with
>>>>>the “Holocaust” story which was making so much money for the
>>>>>Jews. Nowadays, of course, the truth about the Katyn murders is
>>>>>generally accepted by historians everywhere. You can go into
>>>>>almost any large library and read about it and even see the
>>>>>gruesome photographs that the Germans took of the Polish bodies
>>>>>they dug up. One of several authoritative books on the subject is
>>>>>J.K. Zawodny’s Death in the Forest: the Story of the Katyn
>>>>>Forest Massacre, published in 1962 by the University of Notre
>>>>>Dame Press. None of this is publicized a la Steven Spielberg, of
>>>>>course, for the illumination of American television audiences. It
>>>>>still might undermine the Jews’ “Holocaust” racket.

>>>>>In 1945 and 1946, although the deceived citizens of the western
>>>>>world didn’t know the truth about Katyn, Polish patriots did. The
>>>>>word had gotten back to the Polish prisoners in German camps from
>>>>>the Poles the Germans had taken to examine the graves. After the
>>>>>war, when these Polish prisoners were freed, the word spread to
>>>>>other Poles. They knew that it was the communists, not the Nazis,
>>>>>who had murdered their leaders, who had beheaded their nation.

>>>>>And they knew who was behind communism, from the Jew Karl Marx,
>>>>>who had started the whole business, up to the Jewish commissars
>>>>>who lorded it over them in Soviet-occupied Poland. They knew who
>>>>>had welcomed their Soviet conquerors and then collaborated with
>>>>>those conquerors. And so it is hardly surprising that in 1945 and
>>>>>1946 a few Polish patriots organized lynchings of Jews in Poland,
>>>>>before the Reds had a chance to clamp down on all of Poland and
>>>>>suppress any further expressions of anti-communist or anti-Jewish
>>>>>feeling.

>>>>>No, the Polish dislike of Jews/ZHIDS isn’t surprising. What is
>>>>>surprising is that so few patriots in America and Britain have
>>>>>expressed their outrage against the Jews, not only for what they
>>>>>did to the Poles during and after the war, but for what they have
>>>>>done to us: lying to us and using us to wage their wars for them.
>>>>>If patriots study the Katyn story and take its lesson to heart,
>>>>>they will understand why they cannot trust either the mass media
>>>>>or any government which dances to the tune played by the media.
>>>>>Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill were as much liars and
>>>>>traitors as Bill Clinton and Tony Blair.

>>>>>Anyway, you might remember Katyn the next time you hear the Jews
>>>>>or some of their bought politicians whining about how much gold
>>>>>was stolen from them by the Swiss or how badly the Poles and the
>>>>>Germans treated them during the Second World War.

>>>>>The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
>>>>>Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books. To
>>>>>receive weekly ADV transcripts, mail: [email protected]
>>>>>Write “subscribe” as the subject of your message.

First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao tse Dung
Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!!
Me
For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:22:44 EDT 2008
Article: 503821 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.russian,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: Re: KATYN=MURDERS OF POLISH BY ZYDS/SOVIET NKVD!!! Like Vinnitsa!! NEVER FORGET! Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 501
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:05:16 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1211389516 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 21 May 2008 11:05:16 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:05:16 MDT
Bytes: 29241
X-Original-Bytes: 29197
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.polish:873455 pl.regionalne.warszawa:507755 soc.culture.europe:613206 soc.culture.german:344011 soc.culture.russian:503821 alt.politics.europe:78806 de.soc.politik.misc:1086759

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:00:05 GMT, Proposition 88
wrote:

>With even the Soviets forced to admit that it was their ZYD NKVD who did the
>murders at KATYN, why are you apologising for them?

>Historians and experts proved it was NOT the Germans!

>Were you one of the killers, or perhaps your father, uncle or?

>On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:54:59 -0700, “Peter Wielki” wrote:

>>Actually, in Katyn there were Russians and Ukraninians that did the crime,
>>as far as I know.

>>But yeah, let’s blame it on JEWS!!! Germans did it too, right Frankie?

>>”Frank Arthur” wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]
>>> True,Just Like Vinnitsa!!

>>> The filthy ZYDS can no longer lie about KATYN and try to blame the
>>> Germans.

>>> Even the Soviets had to admit the truth, and also about Vinnitsa.

>>> No wonder around the world more and more people are starting to really
>>> dislike the filthy ZHIDS!!

>>> Latest update follows:
>>> From: “Strider”
>>> Newsgroups:soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.yugoslavia
>>> Subject: Jewish Copmmissars murdered these Poles

>>> Our shame still lies in the Katyn forest
>>> By Kevin Myers
>>> (Filed: 27/04/2003)

>>> Today Poles all over the world will commemorate the 60th anniversary of
>>> the discovery of the war crime which didn’t occur. And the
>>> non-existence of this atrocity constituted democracy’s most sordid
>>> exercise in realpolitik of the entire 20th century. The Soviet Union captured 180,000
>>> Polish soldiers during its invasion of Poland in 1939. Most were herded
>>> off to slave-camps in Siberia, but 22,000 officers were not. In April 1940, on
>>> Stalin’s orders, each was bound with barbed wire and executed with a
>>> single shot to the head.

>>> This was a colossal undertaking: the death toll was greater than that
>>> on the most calamitous day in British military history – the Somme, July
>>> 1, 1916.

>>> More importantly, the massacres occurred before the German invasions
>>> of France and the Low Countries. And although hundreds of Jews in Poland
>>> had been murdered, these were improvised butcheries, essentially unrelated to
>>> The Final Solution, which had not yet begun.

>>> So the first systematic mass murder of defenceless innocents in the
>>> Second World War was not by the Nazis, but by the Soviet Union, just over
>>> a year before the USSR became Britain’s official best friend. This shouldn’t
>>> surprise us: after all, it had been the Soviets, and not the Nazis, who
>>> invented industrialised murder. From the revolution on, they freely used
>>> the word “exterminate” of their enemies. Hitler listened; and Hitler learned,
>>> as dictators do. Moreover, the careful murder of so many officers from a
>>> single narrow stratum of Polish society was truly proto-genocide: its intent was
>>> to eliminate Polish identity by the extermination of all its perceived
>>> guardians.

>>> In 1943, via two sources – through a population census within the
>>> exiled Polish community living in the USSR, and from the Germans, who had
>>> discovered the site of one of the massacres, in the woods of Katyn,
>>> outside Smolensk – the British discovered the fate of the Polish officers. A
>>> devastating report from the British ambassador to the Polish
>>> government-in-exile, Owen O’Malley, left no doubt about the matter.

>>> The British Government’s public response was to dismiss the Nazi
>>> discoveries as propaganda and tell the Polish government-in-exile to
>>> forget Katyn and to proceed with beating the real enemy, Germany.

>>> War is war, and in peace it is impossible to replicate the fevers and
>>> the terrors it induces. So no useful moral judgment can be made about
>>> those who decided in 1943 publicly to accept lies as fact, and to conceal
>>> the truth as regrettable but necessary strategy. But it was statecraft at its
>>> most pusillanimous to allow those lies to become a cornerstone of the
>>> relationship between the Western allies and the Soviet Union.

>>> That is what happened when the three leaders – Churchill, Roosevelt
>>> and Stalin – met at Teheran in November 1943. Far from berating the Soviet
>>> Leader for the massacres, the two democratic leaders propitiated him,
>>> awarding him the Polish land he had stolen even as he seized his future murder
>>> victims.

>>> And when Stalin jested that they should settle the German problem once and
>>> for all by killing 50,000 German officers, Churchill merely protested sulkily,
>>> and Roosevelt light-heartedly suggested killing only 49,000.

>>> But nobody mentioned Katyn. How was this possible? For the massacre of
>>> the Poles was surely the secret subtext to this grisly exchange, and one
>>> by which Stalin was taking the measure of his two confreres. All three knew
>>> of the murders, and the bodyguard of lies around them: and silently, all
>>> three – two of them abjectly, the third triumphantly – assented to those lies.

>>> Teheran was the true nadir of international diplomacy, morally far
>>> more ignoble and strategically far more catastrophic than either Munich
>>> five years before or Yalta a year later. And the key to Teheran was Katyn: once
>>> Stalin had got away with that, he realised he could get away with almost
>>> anything.

>>> Moreover, the fiction of Katyn took root within the Foreign Office.
>>> There, nourished on complicit cowardice and malformed in the darkness of
>>> pathological guilt, the temporary tactic of 1943 was in time to turn into
>>> the diseased plant of enduring policy. It even caused the Callaghan Government
>>> in the 1970s vehemently to oppose the erection of a memorial in London to the
>>> victims of Katyn.

>>> Denial, in its purest psychiatric sense, of Katyn also infused much
>>> consideration of the 20th century: how else could Roy Jenkins have
>>> written a life of Churchill without once referring to Katyn, the Great Lie
>>> of which the prime minister was prime mover? How else could so many
>>> historians.

>>> Norman Davies aside – simply ignore the extraordinary Western
>>> collusion in covering up communist atrocities, and the profound impact
>>> this must have had on Kremlin thinking?

>>> On Thursday the FCO publishes a report, British reactions to the Katyn
>>> Massacre, in a belated attempt at expiation for Britain’s repeated
>>> cover-ups of this terrible affair. But it cannot undo the evil of the
>>> extermination of the Polish officer corps which, far from being the
>>> subject of a war-crimes trial, was embraced and rewarded at Teheran;
>>> and from that city, the communism of Katyn was soon to march forth
>>> and conquer half the world.

>>> My thanks to you for reposting this article.
>>> A brilliant truthful piece.
>>> Ed Kadach

>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:06:50 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On 1 May 1998 13:08:00 +0200, [email protected] wrote:

>>>>>American Dissident Voices Broadcast of April 25, 1998

>>>>>Katyn
>>>>>by Dr. William Pierce

>>>>>A background noise that seems never to go away is the constant
>>>>>whining and yammering of the Jews about how the world owes them a
>>>>>living because of their losses during the so-called “Holocaust.”
>>>>>They do it, of course, because they make such a big profit on it.
>>>>>The latest flare-up of this Jewish play for a handout came more
>>>>>than a year ago when they began demanding that the Swiss pay them
>>>>>$7 billion, which “Holocaust” victims allegedly had stashed in
>>>>>numbered Swiss accounts before being hauled off to gas chambers
>>>>>during the Second World War.

>>>>>With a few “bought” Gentile politicians fronting for them, the
>>>>>foremost among these being New York’s Senator Alphonse D’Amato,
>>>>>the Jews threatened Switzerland with a boycott by the U.S.
>>>>>government if their demands were not met. Instead of laughing in
>>>>>their faces, telling the Jews to go to hell, and gearing up for
>>>>>countermeasures against Israel and other Jewish interests if the
>>>>>Jews tried to proceed with a boycott, the Swiss politicians tried
>>>>>to placate the Jews by offering to buy themoff. The Jews took the
>>>>>Swiss response as a sign of weakness and escalated their demands.

>>>>>The average Swiss citizen seems to have a little more pride than
>>>>>Switzerland’s elected officials, however, and resentment against
>>>>>the Jews’ extortion efforts is building in Switzerland now to the
>>>>>point that some of that country’s richest Jews are wearing
>>>>>bulletproof vests whenever they must go out in public.

>>>>>In general, however, this “Holocaust”-based extortion racket
>>>>>works quite well for the Jews, and they have expanded their
>>>>>demands for World War Two reparations to include a number of
>>>>>other countries besides Switzerland. They are even whining that
>>>>>the Vatican owes them because Pope Pius XII didn’t do enough to
>>>>>save them from the Germans during the war. The Jews’ brazenness
>>>>>in this whole business is quite breathtaking.

>>>>>Their brazenness, of course, is justified, because by and large
>>>>>they have been getting away with it. And they have been getting
>>>>>away with it because with their media control they have been able
>>>>>to distort the general public’s whole perception of what happened
>>>>>during the Second World War. They have been able to portray
>>>>>themselves as innocent victims and just about everyone else as
>>>>>persecutors and aggressors, even the people who were fighting on
>>>>>the Jewish side against the Germans during the war. For example,
>>>>>they have done quite a bit of whining that after the Red Army
>>>>>drove the Germans from Poland, the Poles took the opportunity to
>>>>>lynch hundreds of Jews in 1945 and 1946: Jews whom the Germans
>>>>>somehow had failed to get rid of during their wartime occupation
>>>>>of Poland.

>>>>>Now, why would the Poles do something like that? Why would they
>>>>>lynch the poor Jews, who had been on their side during the war?
>>>>>If you learned about the war from watching Steven Spielberg
>>>>>propaganda films and other mass-media sources, you probably
>>>>>believe that it was because of religious anti-Semitism on the
>>>>>part of the Catholic Poles. Let me tell you the real reason why
>>>>>so many Poles hated Jews after the war. It’s something the
>>>>>Jew-controlled media in America have tried hard to keep covered
>>>>>up. Let me tell you about what happened in the Katyn forest
>>>>>in 1940.

>>>>>In September 1939 Poland was invaded from the west by Germany and
>>>>>from the east by the Soviet Union. The Germans wanted back the
>>>>>territory in western Poland, including the city of Danzig, which
>>>>>had been taken from them at the end of the First World War. The
>>>>>Soviets wanted eastern Poland. The Germans and the Soviets
>>>>>divided Poland between them, with the boundary running roughly
>>>>>along the River Bug.

>>>>>Britain and France, both under strong Jewish pressure, declared
>>>>>war on Germany in September 1939, ostensibly because of Germany’s
>>>>>invasion of Poland. They did not declare war on the Soviet Union,
>>>>>which also had invaded Poland. In the United States and in
>>>>>western Europe, where the Jews held a deathgrip on the mass
>>>>>media, a great deal of anti-German propaganda was based on the
>>>>>German grab for Polish territory — much of which, of course,
>>>>>actually was historically German territory — and nothing was
>>>>>said of the Soviet occupation and annexation of eastern Poland.

>>>>>The reason for this anti-German and pro-Soviet bias by the Jewish
>>>>>media was that the Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union as
>>>>>commissars and communist party bosses under Stalin, while in
>>>>>Germany Hitler had undertaken a program since 1933 of freeing
>>>>>Germany from all Jewish influence. Jews had been weeded out of
>>>>>the media, the law, the schools, and other areas of economic and
>>>>>cultural life in Germany. Before Hitler became chancellor in 1933
>>>>>the Jews had done in Germany what they do in every country where
>>>>>they gain a foothold: they had monopolized large sections of the
>>>>>mass media and certain professions and were doing their best to
>>>>>distort German culture, German society, and the German economy
>>>>>to suit themselves. Hitler put a stop to that, and two-thirds of
>>>>>the 1933 Jewish population of Germany had emigrated by the
>>>>>invasion of Poland in September 1939. So the Jews hated Germany
>>>>>and were determined to do whatever they could to destroy her.

>>>>>For his part, Hitler hoped to avoid war with Britain and France.
>>>>>He hoped that after his quick victory in western Poland he could
>>>>>make peace with Britain and France. He was determined, however,
>>>>>to stamp out communism wherever he encountered it. Not only did
>>>>>he hate communism on ideological grounds, but he had sworn to
>>>>>fight communism when the communists in Germany betrayed his
>>>>>country at the end of the First World War. Hitler also saw the
>>>>>Soviet Union as a threat to all of Europe, and he was determined
>>>>>to break the power of that country when he could, even though
>>>>>there was an uneasy non-aggression pact between Germany and the
>>>>>Soviet Union in 1939, at the time of their partition of Poland.

>>>>>In the spring of 1941 massive troop movements and other
>>>>>developments inside the Soviet Union convinced Hitler that Stalin
>>>>>was preparing to invade the west with the Red Army, and so in
>>>>>June 1941 Hitler made a preemptive strike. German forces smashed
>>>>>through the Red Army and made rapid advances, first through
>>>>>Soviet-occupied eastern Poland and then through Ukraine and into
>>>>>Russia.

>>>>>A year and a half later, in February 1943, German forces near
>>>>>Smolensk, in western Russia, investigated reports they heard from
>>>>>Russian civilians to the effect that a large number of prisoners
>>>>>had been murdered by the Soviet secret police in the area nearly
>>>>>three years earlier. The German investigators were led by local
>>>>>Russians to a series of mounds in a wooded area known locally as
>>>>>Katyn Forest, about 10 miles west of Smolensk. The forest is
>>>>>named for a village, Katyn, which it surrounds. The forest had
>>>>>been privately owned prior to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917,
>>>>>but after the communist takeover of Russia the area had been
>>>>>confiscated by the government and part of the forest had been
>>>>>turned over to the NKVD, the Soviet equivalent of the American
>>>>>FBI.

>>>>>The Germans began digging in the mounds in the Katyn forest and
>>>>>made a horrible discovery. They found corpse after corpse, each
>>>>>with its hands bound behind its back and a bullet hole in the
>>>>>base of its skull. They continued their excavations for more than
>>>>>a month, and eventually uncovered more than 4,000 corpses. Other
>>>>>bodies may have remained buried in other mounds, but the Germans
>>>>>had no time to dig up the whole forest. Instead they called in
>>>>>the International Red Cross and representatives of various
>>>>>neutral countries to examine their findings. They also brought in
>>>>>groups of Allied prisoners of war, including Americans, from
>>>>>prison camps in Germany to view the graves in the Katyn forest.
>>>>>They gave these international inspectors complete freedom to
>>>>>examine the exhumed bodies, permitted doctors among them to
>>>>>conduct autopsies, even allowed them to dig up other bodies from
>>>>>one of the mounds which had not been completely excavated. The
>>>>>Germans asked only that the inspectors report back truthfully to
>>>>>their own governments about their observations. And in fact, most
>>>>>of them did.

>>>>>What they reported was that the bodies were those of Polish
>>>>>military officers, along with a number of civilian cultural and
>>>>>business leaders and intellectuals — scientists, writers, poets
>>>>>– who had been in the portion of Poland occupied by the Soviet
>>>>>Union in September 1939. Altogether the Soviet secret police had
>>>>>rounded up some 15,000 Polish leaders in 1939 — including nearly
>>>>>half of the entire Polish officer’s corps, the half that had had
>>>>>the misfortune of being in eastern Poland at the time — and put
>>>>>them in three concentration camps in Russia: at Starobelsk,
>>>>>Kozelsk, and Ostashkov. All of the bodies unearthed in the
>>>>>Katyn forest were of Polish leaders who had been confined at one
>>>>>of these camps: Starobelsk.

>>>>>Rounding up a country’s leaders and killing them was standard
>>>>>practice for the communists. The theory was that the leaders were
>>>>>bourgeois oppressors of the working class and deserved to die. As
>>>>>egalitarians the communists did not regard the Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals as inherently better or more valuable human
>>>>>material than the average Polish criminal or welfare bum; the
>>>>>officers had simply used their class advantage to gain a better
>>>>>life-style for themselves. Of course, no one really believed that
>>>>>theory except the criminals and welfare bums and other resentful
>>>>>losers and ne’er-do-wells who made up the natural communist
>>>>>constituency. As a practical matter, however, killing all the
>>>>>leaders and potential leaders of a conquered people made them
>>>>>easier to govern. That’s what the Marxists had done in Russia,
>>>>>Ukraine, and the Baltic countries.

>>>>>In the case of the Poles there was a bit of a diplomatic problem,
>>>>>though. The Poles supported the war Britain and France had
>>>>>declared against Germany, purportedly on their behalf, because
>>>>>they viewed that as their one hope for getting back at least the
>>>>>western part of their country. They were not happy about the
>>>>>Russians taking the eastern part of Poland, but the Russians at
>>>>>least were fellow Slavs. The thing to do was get rid of the
>>>>>Germans first and then worry about the Russians. This Polish
>>>>>strategy suited Stalin fine. But it made it desirable for him to
>>>>>avoid alienating the Poles any more than necessary. When Polish
>>>>>exiles asked about their imprisoned leaders in late 1939 and
>>>>>early 1940, the Soviet government promised that they would be
>>>>>released shortly. Meanwhile, the decision had been made to kill
>>>>>all of them. And so in April 1940 the Polish leaders were taken
>>>>>from the three camps where they had been imprisoned, trucked off
>>>>>to various liquidation sites, and murdered. The ones who had been
>>>>>imprisoned at Starobelsk all went to the NKVD area of the Katyn
>>>>>forest. After the war some of the NKVD executioners were
>>>>>interviewed in Israel and described how they had carried out the
>>>>>killings.

>>> ISRAEL REFUSED TO PROSECUTE THESE ZHID MURDERERS!!

>>>>>The Poles were driven up to the burial pits in long NKVD prison
>>>>>trucks known as “black ravens.” They were pulled from the trucks
>>>>>one at a time by NKVD guards. Each Polish prisoner had his hands
>>>>>bound behind his back and then was dragged to the edge of a pit.
>>>>>There he was held by two NKVD men while a third fired a pistol
>>>>>bullet into the back of his head. Some of the officers had had
>>>>>their coats pulled over their heads to keep them from seeing what
>>>>>was happening before they were shot. Some struggled and were
>>>>>bayonetted by NKVD guards before being shot and thrown into the
>>>>>pit. When all of the officers from Starobelsk had been killed,
>>>>>some 4,400 of them, the Katyn forest burial pits were covered
>>>>>with dirt and pine trees were planted on them. The locations of
>>>>>the mass graves of the prisoners from the camps at Kozelsk and
>>>>>Ostashkov remain unknown, but none of the 15,000 Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals rounded up by the NKVD in September 1939 was
>>>>>seen alive after April 1940.

>>>>>The Red Cross representatives and the Allied prisoners the
>>>>>Germans brought in to examine the mass graves in the Katyn forest
>>>>>understood after their examination not only who had been killed;
>>>>>they also understood who had killed them. This was apparent not
>>>>>only from the medical estimates of the length of time the bodies
>>>>>had been buried, but also from documentary evidence on the
>>>>>bodies. Diaries, news clippings, letters, and other personal
>>>>>papers removed from the clothing of the victims all told the same
>>>>>story: the latest dates on any of these papers were from
>>>>>mid-April 1940. The Polish leaders had been killed in April 1940,
>>>>>when they were prisoners of the Soviet Union and when the Katyn
>>>>>region was under Soviet control. And this is what they reported
>>>>>back to their governments.

>>>>>So what do you think happened? Were the British and American
>>>>>governments horrified to discover that their “gallant Soviet
>>>>>ally,” as the Soviet Union was referred to by the mass media, was
>>>>>a mass murderer? Did the British government, which had gone to
>>>>>war against Germany under the pretext of defending Poland, decide
>>>>>that it had made a mistake? Did anyone condemn the Soviet Union
>>>>>for this act of genocide against the Poles?

>>>>>Of course not! The Allied governments ordered their people who
>>>>>had inspected the Katyn site to keep their mouths shut, and the
>>>>>Jewish media immediately began announcing that the Germans had
>>>>>done it. A mass murder of Polish officers and intellectuals by
>>>>>the Nazis had been discovered in the Katyn forest, the New York
>>>>>Times and the rest of the Jewish media shrieked. Poor Poles!
>>>>>Wicked Germans! The war must go on to free the poor Poles and
>>>>>punish the wicked Germans. And the war did go on, killing
>>>>>millions of more Germans, British, Americans, and other
>>>>>Europeans. And the Germans were indeed punished. The Poles, of
>>>>>course, were not freed. Instead they were turned over to the
>>>>>Reds, who had butchered their leaders in the Katyn forest, and
>>>>>made to suffer under communist rule for half a century.

>>>>>The war went on after the German discovery of the mass graves in
>>>>>the Katyn forest, because its purpose from the beginning was not
>>>>>to free Poland but to destroy Germany, which had dared to free
>>>>>itself from the Jews. Roosevelt understood this. Churchill
>>>>>understood this. But the American and British people didn’t
>>>>>understand it, of course, because they were lied to by the Jewish
>>>>>media and by their own governments, who in 1943 as in 1998 have
>>>>>done whatever has been politically expedient. And what has been
>>>>>politically expedient has been what the Jewish media bosses have
>>>>>decided.

>>>>>The lies about Katyn were maintained by the media for some years
>>>>>after the end of the war, because these lies meshed nicely with
>>>>>the “Holocaust” story which was making so much money for the
>>>>>Jews. Nowadays, of course, the truth about the Katyn murders is
>>>>>generally accepted by historians everywhere. You can go into
>>>>>almost any large library and read about it and even see the
>>>>>gruesome photographs that the Germans took of the Polish bodies
>>>>>they dug up. One of several authoritative books on the subject is
>>>>>J.K. Zawodny’s Death in the Forest: the Story of the Katyn
>>>>>Forest Massacre, published in 1962 by the University of Notre
>>>>>Dame Press. None of this is publicized a la Steven Spielberg, of
>>>>>course, for the illumination of American television audiences. It
>>>>>still might undermine the Jews’ “Holocaust” racket.

>>>>>In 1945 and 1946, although the deceived citizens of the western
>>>>>world didn’t know the truth about Katyn, Polish patriots did. The
>>>>>word had gotten back to the Polish prisoners in German camps from
>>>>>the Poles the Germans had taken to examine the graves. After the
>>>>>war, when these Polish prisoners were freed, the word spread to
>>>>>other Poles. They knew that it was the communists, not the Nazis,
>>>>>who had murdered their leaders, who had beheaded their nation.

>>>>>And they knew who was behind communism, from the Jew Karl Marx,
>>>>>who had started the whole business, up to the Jewish commissars
>>>>>who lorded it over them in Soviet-occupied Poland. They knew who
>>>>>had welcomed their Soviet conquerors and then collaborated with
>>>>>those conquerors. And so it is hardly surprising that in 1945 and
>>>>>1946 a few Polish patriots organized lynchings of Jews in Poland,
>>>>>before the Reds had a chance to clamp down on all of Poland and
>>>>>suppress any further expressions of anti-communist or anti-Jewish
>>>>>feeling.

>>>>>No, the Polish dislike of Jews/ZHIDS isn’t surprising. What is
>>>>>surprising is that so few patriots in America and Britain have
>>>>>expressed their outrage against the Jews, not only for what they
>>>>>did to the Poles during and after the war, but for what they have
>>>>>done to us: lying to us and using us to wage their wars for them.
>>>>>If patriots study the Katyn story and take its lesson to heart,
>>>>>they will understand why they cannot trust either the mass media
>>>>>or any government which dances to the tune played by the media.
>>>>>Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill were as much liars and
>>>>>traitors as Bill Clinton and Tony Blair.

>>>>>Anyway, you might remember Katyn the next time you hear the Jews
>>>>>or some of their bought politicians whining about how much gold
>>>>>was stolen from them by the Swiss or how badly the Poles and the
>>>>>Germans treated them during the Second World War.

>>>>>The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
>>>>>Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books. To
>>>>>receive weekly ADV transcripts, mail: [email protected]
>>>>>Write “subscribe” as the subject of your message.

First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao tse Dung
Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!!
Me
For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:22:46 EDT 2008
Article: 503822 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.baltics
Subject: HOLODOMOR = REAL HOLOCAUST na Ukrainie – BY ZYDS/OGPU ON UKRAINIANS: Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 1048
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:05:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1211389527 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 21 May 2008 11:05:27 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:05:27 MDT
Bytes: 54522
X-Original-Bytes: 54478
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.ukrainian:116268 soc.culture.europe:613207 soc.culture.russian:503822 alt.politics.europe:78807 soc.culture.polish:873456 soc.culture.baltics:162160

HOLODOMOR = ZYD/NKVD HOLOCAUST ON UKRAINIANS! Message:
Probably the best analysis of what happened that I have read to date.

Trident

IS THERE A “SMOKING GUN” FOR THE HOLODOMOR?

PRESENTATION: By Professor Roman Serbyn Universit=E9 du Qu=E9bec =E0
Montr=E9al, Canada
The Ukrainian Holodomor and the Denial of Genocides
International Conference, Federigo Argentieri, Ph.D., Organizer
Guarini Institute, John Cabot University
Rome, Italy, Friday, November 09, 2007
Published by the Action Ukraine Report #889, Article 5
Kyiv, Ukraine, Monday, November 19, 2007

In his seminal study on genocide, Leo Kuper observed that “governments
hardly declare and document genocidal plans in the manner of the
Nazis”
[1]. Nevertheless, since modern states cannot function without large
bureaucracies and elaborate communication systems, tell-tale records
inevitably survive.

When the CPSU lost power and the Soviet empire fell apart, it was
Revealed that an elaborate paper trail of the 1932-33 famine and the Soviet
authorities’ involvement in it had been preserved in party and state
archives. These documents are being slowly declassified, examined and
published[2]. Historians can now give us a fairly accurate account of
the catastrophe and ascertain the responsibility of Stalin and his
collaborators.

As a result, scholars who previously hesitated to recognize the
Genocidal character of Stalin’s forced starvation of Ukrainian farmers, have
reexamined the question and readjusted their interpretations. In his
latest book, Nicolas Werth comes to the conclusion that thanks to recent
studies based on the new documents, it is now “legitimate to qualify as
genocide the cluster of actions undertaken by the Stalinist regime to punish
the
Ukrainian peasantry by famine and terror”[3].

In this paper I analyze some of the main documents that provide
smoking-gun evidence of genocide, in line with the definition of the crime
given
in the UN Convention of 1948: “acts committed with intent to destroy, in
whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”.

The key criteria in the Convention are proof of “intent” and
Identification eligible “groups”. Soviet documents corroborate the accusation
against
Stalin and his closest collaborators for deliberately exterminating
Millions of Ukrainian farmers, and show that the perpetrators targeted them as
Ukrainians.

Furthermore these and other documents reveal that the genocide was not
Just against Ukrainian farmers, the focus of the attack was the Ukrainian
Nation in all its component parts and on all its territories within the
Soviet Union.

The locus of this crime was thus the Ukrainian SSR, the predominantly
Ukrainian Kuban, and the other regions of the RSFSR with sizeable
Ukrainian populations. The simultaneous decimation of Ukrainian national
elites,
especially academic, cultural and political leaders, was an integral part of
the destruction of the Ukrainian nation.

Stalin did not intend to kill all Ukrainians (nor is such an intent
Required by the Convention); his motive was to break the backbone of the
nation
By executing a sizeable percentage of the people and reducing the rest to
servile obedience, to transform them into manageable cogs of the state
mechanism. Stalin’s means of destruction were varied: famine, shootings,
exhausting forced labor.

The UN Convention does not require the establishment of motives for
genocide, but determining the reasons for the act gives an insight
into the rationale which led to crime and thus help us comprehend the
perpetrator’s intent. Stalin’s measures against the Ukrainians were predicated
on
his political ambitions, two of which provided the motives for the
eventual genocide[4].

The first was to extend socialism beyond the borders of the USSR. He
realized that the Bolsheviks’ initial attempt to export their revolution
into Europe failed primarily because of the weakness of the Red Army.
To resume Lenin’s unfinished task, Stalin needed a powerful armed force,
Backed by modern heavy industry. Industrialization had to be financed by
Exporting natural resources, especially grain, which had to be extorted from
the
farmers at the lowest cost to the state.

War communism had shown that door-to-door requisition was costly,
inefficient and politically dangerous. After the revolution, poor
farmers appropriated and divided up the land of rich landlords. As a result,
farmers lived better, ate more but sold less to the state. Marketable grain
(sold outside the village) in tsarist times was provided by the large farms
Owned by landlords and kulaks. Now new large estates had to be set up in the
Form of sovkhozy and kolkhozy. These would give the state easy access to
grain, produced by the newly enslaved peasants.

The immediate goal was not the increase of grain production (which
could be expected to fall as a result of peasant opposition), but of the
“marketable grain” to be delivered to the state. Since the main producers of
grain
Were Ukrainians farmers, who had no tradition of the Russian semi-communal
obshchina organization, they could be expected to offer stiff resistance to
forced collectivization and confiscation of the fruits of their labor.

Stalin’s second ambition was to bring a permanent solution to the
National question, especially its crucial Ukrainian component. The 1926 census
Pegged the Ukrainian population at 31 million, of the Union’s 147 million: 23
million in Ukraine, and 8 million in the rest of the USSR, mainly along the
Ukrainian border.

Ukrainian national revival triggered by the Russian revolution forced
Lenin to give the reconquered republic nominal autonomy in the form of a
“sovereign” republic within a Potemkin-style Soviet federation.
Subsequent policy of Ukrainization, or the local application of a general
principle of korenizatsiia (nativization), allowed Ukrainians to add real
national
content to the pretentiously misleading form of “soviet republic”[5].

The Ukrainization of education, communications and administration, not
Only in Ukraine but also in the Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR, the
de-Russification of urban centers by the influx of Ukrainian farmers,
the demands on Moscow to transfer to the republic adjacent territories
with Ukrainian population, the shifting of cultural orientation from Moscow
and to the West – all these pressures on the imperial centre could not be
ignored by the Kremlin.

Stalin, Lenin’s “magnificent Georgian” and foremost expert on the
nationalities question, understood the dangers of active nation-
building in Ukraine, in the best of times. Collectivization would only
aggravate
the situation. Over 85 % of ethnic Ukrainians were farmers and their
sudden disenfranchisement could throw the countryside into such turmoil that
not only grain production would be catastrophically reduced, but also
farmers could gain the support of the national elites in a united rebellion of
the whole republic to the spoliation of their country by Moscow.

Similar, if smaller, unrest could be expected in the Kuban’ and other
ethnically Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR. In the mid-1920s Stalin had
written that the peasant question was “the basis, the quintessence, of
the national question”, that “the peasantry constitutes the main army of
the national movement” and that “there is no powerful national movement
without the peasant army”[6]. The stability and even the integrity of the
Soviet empire would be threatened.

Genocide does not happen spontaneously. The targeted group is first
identified, vilified and intimidated, then it is discredited in the
eyes of the rest of the population, and only when it has been sufficiently
isolated, is it submitted to total or partial extermination. In the summer of
1929 the GPU (political police) “uncovered” a nationalist conspiracy, headed
by
prominent Ukrainian intellectuals and conducting anti-Soviet work in
villages and regional centers.

Over 700 people were arrested for, among other things, “anti-Soviet
Activity in the villages and district centers” and a show trial was held in
March 1930, appropriately staged in a Kharkiv theatre. 45 members of this
Mythical Association for the Liberation of Ukraine (SVU) were sentenced to
death or long prison terms.

Arrests and trials of other mostly fictitious groups followed:
Ukrainian National Center, Ukrainian Military Organization, etc.[7] The
condemned were former members of the former Ukrainian national governments,
Ukrainian armed forces, Ukrainian political parties, and prominent people in
fields of education, culture and the arts.

The purpose was to terrorize the Ukrainian elites into submission and
lethargy, and thus deprive the peasants of leadership on the national
level.
It should be noted that, in connection with the less severe famine in
Russia, no parallel attack took place against Russian national elites
or the Russian culture.

Stalin’s war against the peasants began in earnest towards the end of
1929.
In a two-pronged attack he ordered to “eliminate the dekulakization as a
class” and to collectivize the middle and poor peasants. Divided into
three categories, the kulaks were dispossessed and the most dangerous were
shot.

The others were deported to the wilds of northern RSFSR, transferred
To distant regions in Ukraine, or given strips of poor land outside the
Kolkhoz near which they lived. The intention was not only to provide kolkhozes
With the confiscated land, cattle and machinery, but also to deprive the
Peasants of the more qualified leadership for their opposition to the
authorities.

During the winter of 1929-1930, 90 thousand Ukrainian households were
dekulakized, and a smaller wave more or less finished the job a year
later.
In 1934 Kossior, party boss of Ukraine, reported that 200 thousand
farms had been dekulakized in Ukraine. Out of this number of about one million
(5 members per family), several thousand were deported to the northern
parts of the RSFSR and lost to the Ukrainian nation.

Collectivization went in unison with dekulakization: a major push was
Given in early 1930. By 10 March 1930 Ukrainian kolhosps integrated 64.4% of
farmsteads with 70.9% of arable land. The operation was accomplished
with the help of some 50,000 activists, sent from Russian and Ukrainian
urban centers, with special powers to organize, punish, and terrorize.

Many poor peasants, paid for the service with confiscated goods,
participated in expropriating their richer neighbors, but many others
sympathized with the victims. Peasant rebellion swept Ukraine: in
January-March 1930, 3,190 uprisings with over 950 thousand
Participants confronted the authorities.[8]

Hundreds of fliers were picked up by the authorities with such slogans
As “Free Ukraine from Moscow rule”, “Time to rise against Moscow yoke”
And others. National and peasant factors were coming together. Stalin
sounded a temporary retreat and in October of that year collectivization was
down to 29 % of households and 34 % of arable land. But the reprieve was brief
and a year later (October 1931) the figures rose to 68 % (for households)
and 72 % for arable land, with a much higher percentage in the grain-producing
steppe regions.

The effect of Stalin’s revolution on the countryside was disastrous,
especially in Ukraine and the Kuban. From 1929 to 1932 the evolution
can be summarized in these four curt phrases: production down; state
procurement up; grain export up; peasant food consumption down.

Farmers’ opposition to collectivization, mismanagement of collective
Farms by incompetent administrators, neglect and slaughter of farm animals
seriously hindered farming and brought down its production. Yet,
enforced obligatory state procurement increased, and in 1931, 42 % of
Ukraine’s
grain harvest was turned over to the state.[9]

Kolhosps delayed or completely failed to pay out stipends for
“workday” (trudodni), and the their members had to rely on their meager and
insufficient individual plots of land and a few domestic animals for
subsistence. Undernourishment became generalized. But Stalin had
reached his goal.

Grain exports rose from below one million tons in 1929, to: 5,832,000
Tons in 1930/31 and 4,786,000 tons in 1931/32. It should be kept in mind
that one million tons could feed four to five million people for one year.
After two years of resistance and unequal struggle with the Communist
authorities, the Ukrainian elites were cowed and most of the collective and
independent farms despoiled of all their reserves. The republic was on the
brink of a major catastrophe.

On 26 April 1932, Stanislav Kossior, the General secretary of the
Communist Party of Ukraine, informed Stalin about “individual
Cases and even individual villages that are starving” but blamed it on
“local bungling, errors, particularly in the case of kolkhozes.” And,
Lest he displease his Kremlin masters, their lieutenant in Ukraine
dismissed the tragedy with the affirmation that “all talk of famine must be
categorically discarded.”[10]

Yet famine there was and on 10 June H. Petrovsky, the head of the
Ukrainian state and V. Chubar, the head of the Ukrainian government, sent
Separate letters to notify Molotov and Stalin of the appalling conditions in
the Ukrainian countryside, and to ask for help.

Chubar admitted that cases of starvation among independent and
Collective farmers had already been signaled in December and January and
that by “March-April there were dozens and hundreds of malnourished, starving,
and swollen people and people starving to death accumulate in every
village; children and orphans abandoned by their parents appeared”.

Raions and oblasts organized aid from internal resources, but were
Obliged to do this “under conditions of acute food shortage, especially
bread”.
[11]
Noteworthy additional remark: “Petliurite and other anti-Soviet moods
increased.”

Petrovsky’s letter was even more to the point. Having just returned
>from an inspection of the countryside, he realized the catastrophic situation
of the farming population. He visited many villages and everywhere saw
multitudes of people, mainly poor and middle peasants, starving, subsisting on
surrogates.

Peasants scolded him, posed embarrassing question, reproached him,
Saying “why did you create an artificial famine, […] why did you take away
The seed material – this did not happen even under the old regime, why is
It necessary for Ukrainians to travel for bread […] to non-grain
Producing territories?”.

Echoing Chubar, Petrovsky reported that “because of the famine, mass
Thefts are taking place in the villages.” Pointing out that grain harvest is
Still six week off, and famine will only intensify, Petrovsky ask:
“shouldn’t assistance be rendered to the Ukrainian countryside in the amount
of
two or, at the very least, one and a half million poods of grain?” And he
predicted that if help is not given starvation would drive peasants to pick
unripe grain and destroy much of it.

Petrovsky’s letter paints a bleak picture of the forthcoming harvest.
Since the better grain had been seized by the state, seeds of poorer quality
Were sown and scattered mores thinly. The young crops are good and the
Fields well weeded but the grain is sparse. Petrovsky was also struck by the
Large amount of unsown land. Aware of all these problems, the farmers
Complained to Petrovsky that the new grain procurements would be even more
difficult to meet than last year’s. “And this may very well be so”, agrees
Petrovsky.

Finally Petrovsky draws attention to the exodus of Ukrainian farmers.
They are forced to seek food beyond the republic’s borders, at “the Dno
station, in the Central-Black Earth Oblast’, in Belarus, and in Northern
Caucasus”, where grain is more readily available, and at much lower prices.

When Petrovsky suggested that farmers band together for these
purchases, he learned that the Commissariat of Transport has drastically
reduced
the sale of train tickets to peasants. Bewildered Ukrainian peasants needled
Petrovsky: “Why are they banning trips for grain?”

If the two Ukrainian leaders believed their pleas and warnings of
turmoil in the Ukrainian countryside would soften Moscow’s position, they were
mistaken. Their effect on Stalin, Kaganovich and Molotov was just the
opposite. Writing from Moscow to Sochi, where Stalin was vacationing,
Kaganovich criticized both Ukrainian leaders, even though he admitted
That some aid would have to be given to Ukraine, and asked Stalin to decide
On the amount. Stalin’s response was more brutal and more ominous of
things to come.

He condemned the hypocrisy of the two leaders, who only wanted to get
“new millions of poods[12] of grain from Moscow” and “a reduction in the
plan for grain procurement”. Ukrainians must mobilize their own forces and
resources for already “Ukraine has been given more than she should get”.[13]
Nevertheless, on 16 June the Politburo considered Ukraine’s plea and
Granted about 8,500 tons[14], a paltry amount in comparison with the million
and a half poods requested by Petrovsky.

Politburo’s niggardly “largesse” must have provoked Stalin’s ire, for
in a letter to Kaganovich, Molotov and the Politburo he came back with
harsh criticism of past errors and new instructions for the coming harvest.
The Gensec blamed “mechanical equalization”, which did not take into
account the ability of the kolkhozes to deliver grain, and as a result of
which,
“fertile districts in Ukraine found themselves in a state of
Impoverishment and famine, despite a fairly good harvest.”[15]

This is the only known acknowledgement of the Ukrainian famine by
Stalin. He blamed regional authorities for being out of touch with the
countryside and allowing kolkhozniks to travel around the entire European
part of the USSR demoralize “our farms with their complaints and whining.”[16]

Stalin proposed the calling of a top level conference on the
organization of grain procurement and its unconditional fulfillment, and
insisted
that personal responsibility for grain procurement be delegated to the
first secretaries of the Ukraine, the Northern Caucasus, and the other grain
producing regions. “Personal responsibility” for “unconditional fulfillment”
imposed from the top along the administrative vertikal became the
watchwords of the 1932/33 grain procurement campaign, which would result in
the
genocidal famine.

On 21 June a telegram signed by Stalin and Molotov instructed Kharkiv to
carry out “at any cost” the July-September plan for grain delivery.
Two days later, Moscow answered Ukrainian Politburo’s plea for 600,000
poods of grain with a terse resolution: “bar any additional grain deliveries
to
Ukraine.”[17]

The III Conference of KP(b)U (6-10 July 1932) was devoted to the
Upcoming harvest and grain procurement. Stalin sent Molotov and Kaganovich to
The meeting “to ensure genuinely Bolshevik decisions”. Molotov informed
The audience that Moscow had lowered Ukraine’s quota but was adamant that
The plan be carried out in full.[18]

Declarations from regional leaders that the farmers were starving, that much
land lay fallow, and that 100 to 200 m.poods of grain would be lost during
harvesting did not bend the resolve of Moscow’s envoys.[19] The conference
adopted a resolution to carry out the plan of grain delivery “in full
and unconditionally”.[20]

It was largely in response to the tense situation in Ukraine[21], and in
anticipation of new troubles in that republic that Stalin came up with
his infamous decree, dubbed by the farmers “the 5 ears of corn law”.
Writing on 20 July to Kaganovich and Molotov, the Gensec complains of
Widespread theft by “dekulakized kulaks” and others, and proposes to write
a law, which would make theft of property belonging to collective farms equal
to similar crimes against state property, and “punishable by a minimum of ten
years’
imprisonment, and as a rule, by death”.

“All active agitators against the new collective-farm system” and
“profiteers and resellers of goods” writes Stalin, should be removed
And sent to concentration camps.[22] He also wants stricter controls over
The limited kolkhoz trade allowed by a 6 May 1932 law (kolkhozes allowed
Sell their surplus after 15 January 1933, after fulfilling the state
Procurement plan), made more liberal on 20 May 1932.[23]

A follow-up letter provides ideological explanation: in the same way
That capitalism could not triumph without first making “private property
Sacred property”, socialism will not finish off capitalism “unless it
Declares public property (belonging to cooperatives, collective farms or the
state) to be sacred and inviolable”.[24]

Returning to the topic on 26 July, Stalin insists on formal legality
of the proposed operations: “we must act on the basis of law (‘the peasant
loves legality’), and not merely in accordance with the practice of the
OGPU, although it is clear that the OGPU’s role here will not only not
Diminish but, on the contrary, will be strengthened and ‘ennobled’ (the OGPU
Agencies will operate ‘on a lawful basis’ rather than ‘high-handedly’)”.[25]

The joint Party-State decree “On the Protection of the Property of
State Enterprises, Collective Farms and Cooperatives, and on the
Consolidation of Public (Socialist) Property” was issued on 7 August 1932.
It became the main legal instrument used by the Soviet authorities to condemn
millions of farmers to slow death by starvation. It repeated Stalin’s
declarations
that all public property is “sacred and inviolable” and that individuals
attempting to take possession of public property should be considered
“enemies of the people”.[26]

All collective farm property, whether in the field or in storage was
Decreed equal to that of state property and theft was made punishable by
execution, which could be reduced to 10-year imprisonment only under
mitigating circumstances. Advocating withdrawal from the kolkhoz became
tantamount to treason and was punished with three to five years imprisonment
in concentration camps. No amnesty could be applied in any of these
cases.

The decree on State property was applicable on the whole Soviet
Territory but, as Stalin’s letter to Kaganovich shows, it was primarily meant
For Ukraine. Stalin thought the law was “good” and would “soon have an
impact”, and ordered a draft of directives from the C.C to the party, judicial
and punitive organizations.[27] The Gensec then addressed the Ukrainian
problem.
The passage is highly revealing:

“The most important thing right now is Ukraine. Ukrainian affairs have hit
rock bottom. Things are bad with regard to the party. There is talk
that in two regions of Ukraine (it seems in the Kiev and Dnepropetrovsk
regions) about 50 raion party committees have spoken out against the
grain-procurements plan, deeming it unrealistic. It is said that the
situation in other raion party committees is no better. […] This is
not a party but a parliament, […]

Instead of leading the raions, Kossior kept maneuvering between the
directives of the CC VKP and the demands of the raion party committees
[…]
Things are bad with the soviets. Chubar is no leader. Things are bad
With the GPU. Redens is not up to leading the fight against the
counterrevolution
[…]. [underlined and doubly underlined in original – R.S.]”

Then Stalin brandishes the specter of Ukrainian separatism: “If we don’t
undertake at once to straighten out the situation in Ukraine, we may
lose Ukraine.” He reminds Kaganovich that Pilsudski and his agents are
underestimated by Redens, and Kossior. He expressed utter contempt for
the whole KP(b)U, composed of 500,000 members (“ha-ha”, snickers Stalin),
harboring Pilsudski’s agents and “quite a lot (yes a lot!) of rotten
elements, conscious and unconscious Petliurists”.

Thinking undoubtedly of Ukraine’s negative reaction to the destructive
impact the just-passed property laws will have, Stalin warns: “The
moment things get worse, these [party] elements will waste no time opening a
front inside (and outside) the party, against the party.”

Frustrated by the fact that “the Ukrainian leadership does not see
These dangers”, Stalin proposes to replace Kossior with Kaganovich and
Redens with Balitsky, and eventually Chubar with Kaganovich. In this way
Stalin
Intends to transform “Ukraine as quickly as possible into a real fortress of
The USSR, a genuinely exemplary republic.”

The task is urgent and calls for immediate action, for without “these and
similar measures (the economic and political strengthening of Ukraine,
above all its border raions, etc.), I repeat, we may lose Ukraine.”[28]
Kaganovich agrees, of course, and accuses Ukrainian party of creating a
certain
solidarity and “a rotten sense of mutual responsibility”, not only in the
middle echelons of the party, but also among its leadership.[29]

Stalin’s exchange of letters with Kaganovich reveals the ambiance in
Which the policy of starvation will be implemented. The overall objective
was to maintain a high level of grain procurement. To assure this, all
challenge outside and inside the republic had to be eliminated, regardless of
the cost. Stalin’s raising of the specter of Pilsudski and Petliura agents
running loose in Ukraine and infiltrating the Soviet party and state
machinery was nothing more than a scare tactic and a rallying call.

He was well aware that by the summer of 1932, the weak Polish network
And the few local collaborators had been rounded up by the GPU, which also
arrested real and imaginary followers of Petliura whom Stalin had
eliminated by assassination in 1926. Poland may have had some illusions about
a
Ukrainian insurrection in 1929-1930, but by 1932, the Poles realized
That the starving population was in no shape to revolt.

The Soviet-Polish nonaggression treaty signed on 25 July 1932 was
Ample proof of the changing relations between the two neighbors.[30] The
Pilsudski-Petliura scarecrow will continue to enjoy popularity in
Soviet propaganda. While there was no serious threat from the Poles or the
Ukrainian nationalists, a national insurrection could become a reality if
the expected famine (implied in Stalin’s phrase “the moment things get
worse”) could bind together the threatened middle cadres of the KP(b)U
with the surviving peasantry. To prevent this eventuality the KP(b)U had to
be purged and kept under close Moscow surveillance.

Stalin maintained that the 1932 harvest was good; historians today are
More skeptical but consider it adequate to cover Soviet Union’s internal
needs.
With the state reserves from previous year, there were enough supplies
To feed every citizen of the Soviet Union.

Famine was brought about by the exorbitant amount of grain and other
agricultural products taken from the Ukrainian peasants, and the way
they were extracted. Ukraine’s plan was excessive, and in spite of the
protests from Kharkiv and three successive reductions, it remained so to the
end.

Still, Ukraine delivered about a quarter of a billion poods of grain, or
over 90% of its procurement quota. [31] In addition it handed over
large quantities of meat, vegetables and other produce. Stalin insisted that
state procurement have absolute priority. Following a CC VKP(b) directive, a
KP(b)U resolution of 18 November reminded that “complete fulfillment
of the procurement plan by collective farms and the MTS constitutes their
primary obligation […], to which all the other duties of the collective farm
must be subordinated, including the duty to set up all sorts of funds: seed
fund, forage and food supplies”.[32]

Stalin was satisfied that he was achieving his goal. At a high-level
Party meeting, held on 27 November 1932, he gloated: “The party has
succeeded in replacing the 500-600 million poods of marketable grain, procured
during the period of individual peasant holdings by our present ability to
collect 1,200-1,400 m.p. of grain. It is hardly necessary to prove that
without this leap forward the country would have a famine [sic-RS], we would
not be
able to support our industry, we would not be able to feed the workers and
the Red Army.”[33]

The allusion to the famine, or rather to freedom from one, was an
Obvious lie, and the reference to the feeding of the workers and the Red Army
– an overstatement; but then, Stalin’s concern was not the feeding his
Subjectsb but the financing of Soviet industrialization with grain exports.

Obedience to Moscow’s orders was assured in two ways: a) frequently
Repeated delegations to Ukraine and the North Caucasus Territory of Molotov
Kaganovich and other high-ranking leaders to supervise the local
authorities, and b) party discipline enforced from Moscow down the
administrative structure. At the end of October 1932, two commissions
were sent, one to Ukraine headed by Molotov, and the other to North
Caucasus Territory headed by Kaganovich.

Stalin’s emissaries supervised party meetings and forced them to pass
resolutions on grain procurements, party discipline, stricter
application of the 7 August property laws, the establishment of “black lists”
of collective farms in arrears with grain deliveries, imposition of fines,
etc.
They also instigated purges in party organizations and administrative
structures.
Kuban’ was particularly hit with the expulsion of 43 % of the 25,000
Party members, including 358 out of 716 party secretaries.[34]

In Ukraine, during November and first five days of December, the OGPU
arrested 1,230 people, including 340 heads of kolhospy while 327
Communists were brought before the courts for sabotaging state
procurements.[35]
In the 18 November resolution quoted above, the Ukrainian CC reminded the
directors
of sovkhoz of their “personal responsibility as party members and civil
servants for the fulfillment of the grain procurement”.

“Personal responsibility” for the execution of instructions was a
Constant refrain in messages coming from above and became an important
Means for forcing recalcitrant cadres to carry out the Ukrainian genocide.

Dekulakization and deportation continued, on a smaller scale and were
Mostly of political and punitive nature. Arrests, beatings, and cruelty of
All sorts abounded as before, only now the victims were weaker and less
Capable of resistance. Kolkhozes, villages and individual farmers in arrears
On state procurement were put on “black lists”, lost access to state-run
stores, and could not buy such essentials as matches, kerosene, salt.

Fines amounted to a year and a quarter’s worth of meat tax, without
Freeing the debtor from the unfulfilled grain procurement. “Activists” – the
City workers and their komnezam helpers searched farmers’ houses and yards,
looking for the hidden grain.

There is no way of knowing what portion of the hidden grain was found
by the flying brigades of activists, but official reports state that in Kuban
they found 345,000 poods of grain in November, while searches in Ukraine
>from 1 December 1932 to 25 January 1933 yielded 1.7 million poods, in 17,000
hiding places.[36] What grain was found, was confiscated; if nothing was
discovered, they took whatever edibles were seen, leaving the family
to starve.

Peasants who could find some old religious medals or other mementos
Made of precious metals could trek to the city and exchange them at the
Torgsins (stores for foreigners) for vouchers, and then exchange them for
food.

Hardier peasants would flee their villages and seek salvation in urban
centers or in neighboring Belarus and RSFSR, where food was available.
Accounts of Ukrainian peasants overloading trains, filling stations
And wandering about Russian and Belarusian towns and countryside abound.

National and peasant questions became inextricably intertwined in
Stalin’s decree of 14 December 1932, issued under the banal title “On Grain
Procurement in Ukraine, Northern Caucasus and the Western Oblast”[37].

Ukrainization was blamed for problems in grain deliveries and
Exemplary punishment was prescribed for sabotage in grain procurement: 5-10
years of concentration camp for a number of “party traitors” arrested in the
Orikhiv raion of Dnipropetrovs’k oblast of Ukraine, and deportation to the
North of the Poltavska stanytsia of Kuban in the RSFSR.

The decree made the party and government chiefs in the three grain
Producing areas personally responsible for the completion of grain procurement
By January 1933. Ukrainianization presently is carried out in Ukraine,
“without meticulous selection of the Bolshevik cadre”, had allowed
bourgeois-nationalists and Petliurites to join party and state
institutions and set up their cells and organizations.

Absence of “revolutionary vigilance” by local party organizations let
“counterrevolutionary elements” become directors, accountants,
storekeepers, foremen in collective farms, members of village soviets. Similar
accusation was brought against Northern Caucasus, with supporters of the
Kuban’
Rada figuring in place of Petliurites. This gave nationalists the
opportunity to sabotage harvest and sowing campaigns and organize other
counterrevolutionary activities.

Party and Soviet authorities in Ukraine and Northern Caucasus were
Ordered to extirpate these counterrevolutionary elements, execute them or
Deport them to concentration camps, including “saboteurs with party
Membership cards in their pockets”.

The verdict against Ukrainization came in two parts. In Ukraine it was
Not formally prohibited, but Stalin insisted that it resume its primary
vocation, that of promoting “correct Bolshevik implementation of
Lenin’s national policy”, which in fact meant integration and assimilation.

Ukrainian authorities were instructed to “expel Petliurite and other
bourgeois-nationalist elements from party and government
organizations”, and “meticulously select and recruit Ukrainian Bolshevik
cadre”. The
signal was thus given for rapid curtailment of Ukrainization and return to a
more
sophisticated policy of Russification.[38]

Ukrainians of Northern Caucasus fared worse. “Non-Bolshevik
‘Ukrainianization’, which affected nearly half of the raions in the
Northern Caucasus,” and which was declared to be “at variance with the
cultural
interests of the population”, was totally discontinued and replaced
with Russification.

The use of the Ukrainian language was banned in public offices of
Local administration, cooperative societies, and schools. The printing of
newspapers and magazines in the Ukrainized raions of Northern Caucasus
was to switch immediately to Russian, and preparation were to begin
immediately for the transfer in the fall of all Ukrainian schools into
Russian.

The whole Poltava stanytsia was ordered to be deported and resettled
With demobilized Russian Red Army soldiers, who would receive the abandoned
land, buildings, equipment, and cattle. In fact, 2,158 families with 9,187
members were sent out before 27 December[39] and resettled a month later with
1,826 demobilized soldiers.[40]

Together with Medvedivs’ka and Umans’ka, the three Cossack stanytsias
Saw 45,000 persons deported to the North. On 15 December, Molotov and
Stalin signed a similar ban on Ukrainization, for the rest of the previously
Ukrainized Soviet regions in the RSFSR.

Stalin’s anti-Ukrainization decree reveals the extent to which the dictator
was ready to go, in sacrificing the Ukrainian nation on the altar of
great-power ambitions. There is little doubt that the ban on Ukrainization
was a sop to Russian chauvinism, especially in ethnically mixed
regions outside the Ukrainian SSR. National and social repressions reinforced
one another, even if neither was acknowledged openly.

For the next several months after the condemnation of the abuses of
Ukrainization and the Ukrainian sabotage of grain procurements, the
Ukrainian countryside passed through some of the worst moments in its
history. The litany of repressive measures is endless. 82 raions were
deprived of manufactured goods for not fulfilling their quotas of
grain deliveries.

On 19 December, Stalin orders Kaganovich and Postishev back to Ukraine
To help Kosior, Chubar and Khataevich carry out the procurement plan. On
24 December, collective farms are ordered to deliver all grain in
Fulfillment of the plan, including grain put aside for seed and food. Direct
orders to increase repressive measures, arrests and deportations increase. A
real reign of terror seizes the republic and the Kuban.

On 22 January 1933 Stalin struck another crippling blow against the
Starving Ukrainian grain growers. The new secret decree, drafted by the Gensec
himself, is perhaps the best available proof of the dictator’s
genocidal intent against the Ukrainian nation. Sent to Ukraine, Belarus and
the
neighboring regions of RSFSR[41], the document calls attention to the
unrestrained exodus of peasants from the Kuban’ and Ukraine to the
near-by regions of Russia and Belarus.

Central authorities are said to have no doubt that these migrants, who
pretend to search for food, are, in fact, Socialist-Revolutionaries and
agents of Poland, sent to agitate, “through the peasants”, in the
northern parts of the USSR, against the kolkhoz system and the Soviet power.
Addressees are reminded that a similar movement took place the
Previous year, but the party, soviet and police authorities of Ukraine did
nothing to stop it. It must not be allowed to happen this year.

Stalin then orders the party, soviet and the repressive organs of the
Northern Caucasus and Ukraine to prevent the exodus of their peasants
To other regions of the USSR and directs them to close border crossings
between Ukraine and the Northern Caucasus.

The GPU of the Russian oblast’s adjacent to the quarantined Ukrainian
And Northern Caucasus regions, and the transport section of the OGPU, are
instructed to arrest all peasants from Ukraine and North Caucasus, who
have managed to leave their territory, and, after segregating the
counter-revolutionary elements, return the others to their villages.

The next day, the Politburo of the CC KP(b)U adopted a resolution to
Carry out Moscow’s orders and forwarded the directive, along with addition
instructions, for implementation by the appropriate Ukrainian
authorities.[42]

The Ukrainian branch of the OGPU was ordered to instruct all railway
stations not to sell tickets to peasants with destinations beyond the
Ukrainian borders, without formal travel permission from the raion executive
Committee or a certificate of employment from construction or industrial
enterprises.

Oblasts were told to take “resolute measures” to prevent massive
Departure of their peasants, carefully check the work of agents recruiting
Peasants for work outside Ukraine, and to urge kolhospnyky and individual
farmers not to depart without permission for other raions because they would
be
arrested there.

On 25 January, B. Sheboldaev, the party boss of the North Caucasus
Territory, issued a similar order, adding instructions on the
employment of internal forces and border troupes and the setting up of
filtration
points.[43]

Like the anti-Ukrainization decree of 14 December 1932, the 22 January
1933 directive, which closed the borders to the famished Ukrainian peasants
Was not the beginning but the culmination of processes that had started
Many moths before. Petrovsky had complained to Stalin, back in June 1932,
About the ban on train ticket for Ukrainian peasants who wanted to obtain
provisions in Russia.

Evdokimov’s telegram from Rostov-on-Don, which Iagoda prepared for
Stalin’s attention on 23 January 1933, details the elaborate measures taken
Since November to prevent the flight of farmers from the Northern Caucasus
Territory. Among these were roadblocks set up on the main arteries of
peasant migration.

Transport authorities had arrested 11,774 persons and another 7,534
Were incarcerated by other organs. In the same dossier, Balitsky’s report
>from 22 January informed of massive exodus of peasants from Ukraine since
December.[44]

Departures were registered in 74 raions, 721 villages and 228
kolhosps. In all, 31,693 persons left: 20,129 from Kharkiv oblast’, 6,576 from
the
Kyiv oblast, 3,447 from Odessa oblast, and 1,541 from Chernihiv. Of these
migrants about one third were collective farmers and two thirds
individual farmers; 128 were activists. A check at the railway junction
stations
in the Kharkiv oblast revealed a great demand for long-distance tickets: in
January 1933 16,500 such tickets were sold in Lozova station and 15,000 – in
Sumy.

In the beginning of January 1933, the GPU began to apprehend agitators
And organizers of these migrations and arrested over 500 of them. [45] As
A direct result of Stalin’s borders decree of 22 January 1933, 219,460
Persons were arrested in the first six weeks of its application; some were
sent to the Goulag, others punished in other ways, while 186,588 were sent
back to their villages to face the famine.[46]

In the middle of March 1933, Kosior wrote unperturbedly to the Kremlin
That “the famine still hasn’t taught many kolhospnyky a lesson”.[47] In his
report from Kharkiv, dated 31 May 1933, the Italian consul general
prognosticated on the devastation of the country: “The current
disaster will bring about a preponderantly Russian colonization of Ukraine. In
a
future time, perhaps very soon, one will no longer be able to speak of a
Ukraine, or of a Ukrainian people, and thus not even of a Ukrainian problem,
Because Ukraine will have become a de facto Russian region.”[48]

There can be little doubt today that the famine was not only used by the
Communist party for political purposes, but that it was actually created and
directed by Stalin and his henchmen for that purpose. The regime’s
ultimate objective was to transform the backward empire into an industrial
giant and a military superpower that could export socialism abroad.

To achieve this, Stalin needed great quantities of marketable grain,
Which was to be extracted from the peasants “at any price” to the producers
but at minimal price to the state. The most expedient way was to herd the
peasants into collective farms, subject them to a direct control from the
Kremlin, and in this way ensure maximum grain deliveries to the state.

The Kremlin knew that the peasants would resist and that the
imposition of its will would result in the loss of millions of human lives,
but that
was of no concern for masters of a well-populated empire. Stalin’s project
required a homogenous and docile population. Revived Ukrainian
particularism, taking advantage of the indigenization program,
reinforced national unity at the expense of cohesion of the new “fatherland of
world proletariat”.

The two sources of resistance to Stalin’s plans (national and social)
Became embodied in the same group – the Ukrainian farmers. Stalin decided to
sacrifice a considerable part of this group in order to eliminate the
opposition to his projects and to frighten the rest of the Ukrainian
nation into accepting the role of cogs (as he liked to call them) of the
great socialist mechanism.

The Stalin-Kaganovich discussion of the Petrovsy and Chubar letters
(June-July 1932), the “five ears of corn” law (7 August, 1932), the
condemnation of Ukrainization (14 December 1932), and the closing of
internal Soviet borders on starving Ukrainian peasants, each provide
smoking gun revelations about the genocide against the Ukrainian nation. But a
multitude of other documents now emerging from the secret archives
help us get a rounded understanding of the gigantic crime and the immeasurable
suffering of its victims.
—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Leo Kuper, Genocide. Its Politic Use in the Twentieth Century.
(Penguin,
1981), p. 35.
[2] Valerii Vasiliev & Yuri Shapoval (eds.), Komandyry velykoho
holodu.
Poizdky V. Molotova i L. Kahanovycha v Ukrainu i na Pivnichnyi Kavkaz
1932-1933 rr. Kyiv, 2001; I. Zelenin et al (eds.), Tragediia sovetskoi
derevni. Kollektivizatsiia i rasskulachivanie. Tom 3. Moskva, 2001;
Stalin I Kaganovich Perepiska 1931-1936 gg. Moskva, 2001;
Rozsekrechena pam’iat’: Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini v dokumentakh
GPU-NKVD. Kyiv,
2007;
Ruslan Pyrih (ed.), Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini: dokumenty i
materialy. Kyiv, 2007.

[3] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007.

[4] Discussed more fully in my article, “The Ukrainian Famine of
1932-1933 and the United Nations Convention on Genocide”, in Taras Hunczak &
Roman Serbyn. Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933: Genocide by Other Means.
(Forthcoming.)

[5] For a thorough discussion of Ukrainization and its problems see
James Mace, Communism and the dilemmas of national liberation: national
Communism in Soviet Ukraine, 1918-1933. Cambride, Mass., 1983.
See also Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action Empire. Nations and Nationalism
in the Soviet Union, 1929-1939. Ithaca & London, 2001.

[6] J. V. Stalin, “Concerning the National Question in Yugoslavia”
Works.
Vol. 7. Moscow, 1954. Pp. 71-72.

[7] Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. Pp. 75-81.

[8] Valerii Vasil’ev & Linn Viola. Kolektyvizatsiia i selians’kyi opir
Na Ukraini (lystopad 1929-berezen’ 1930). Vinnytsia, 1997. P. 91.

[9] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007. P. 118.

[10] Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini:ochyma istorykiv, movoiu
dokumentiv. Kyiv, 1990. P. 148.

[11] All quotations and references to the two letters are taken from
Komandyry velykoho holodu. Pp.206-215.

[12] One pood =3D 16.36 kg; 1 ton – 61.36 poods.

[13] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence 1931-1936. New Haven&
London, 2003. P. 136.

[14] For the allocation of the food aid, see Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na
Ukraini. Kyiv, 1990. P. 183, 187-188.

[15] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138 (Underlined by
Stalin).

[16] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138-139..

[17] Holod. 1990. P. 183 (doc. 63), P. 190 (doc. 68).

[18] The original plan of 410 million poods (6.7 m.t.) was lowered
twice to 356 and 274.8 million poods (5.8 m.t.; 4.5 m.t. ) but 16 November was
raised to 5.8 m.t. Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. p. 84.

[19] For a detailed account of the deliberations see Komandyry
Velykoho holodu. Pp. 152-164

[20] See part of the resolution in Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Kyiv, 1990. P. 194-198

[21] A secret OGPU report from around 20 July 1932 stated that “as for
anti-Soviet manifestations, Ukraine occupies first place”. “From 1
January to 1 July 1932, 118 counterrevolutionary kulak organizations were
discovered, counting 2.479 members. In addition, along the lines of
national counterrevolution we have unmasked 35 groups with 562 members.”
Tragedia, p.

421. Another secret OGPU report, dated 5 August, contains a section
“National counterrevolution (U[krainian]SSR)” which relates the
Liquidation of 8 nationalist groups, two of which consisted of former members
Of the outlawed UKP (Ukrainian Communist Party). These people are said to
have a leftist program and conduct systematic activity among members of the
KP(b)U, arguing that the Soviet authorities are suppressing the Ukrainian
culture. In their platform, claims the report, they declare war on the Soviet
regime and Polish fascism, while in fact keeping links abroad and carrying
out directives of the Second Department of of the Polish General Staff in
Ukraine. Ibid. p. 443.

[22] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 164-165.

[23] S. Kulchytsky, Tsina “Velykoho perelomu”. Kyiv, 1990. P. 296. On
23 July Stalin sent a telegram to Kaganovich demanding the restoration
And enforcement of last year’s ban on transporting private bread supplies
By rail or water. Tragedia, p. 428.

[24] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 166.

[25] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 169.

[26] Tragedia, p. 453-454.

[27] Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. Pp. 273-275; The Stalin-Kaganovich
Correspondence. P. 179-181. A follow-up secret “Instruction on the
Application of the TsIK and SNK SSSR of 7 August 1932 About the
Safeguarding of State Property”, signed by the Chairman and the Prosecutor of
the
Supreme Court of the USSR and the Vice-Charman of the OGPU, was sent out on 16
September to all republican and oblast authorities. Tragedia. P.
477-479.

[28] On 12 August Stalin sends a note to Kaganovich asking him to keep
secret for the moment the plan regarding Ukraine sent in the preceding
letter. Tragedia. P. 276. To stiffen Kosior’s resolve, in January
1933, Stalin sent him the more resolute Postyshev as his second in command;
Redens was replaced Balitsky in February 1933.

[29] Letter of 16 Augus 1932. Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. P.
283-284;
Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 183-184.

[30] Timoty Snyder, Sketches from a Secret War. New Haven, Yale
University Press. P. 104.

[31] Kosior spoke of 255 m.p. at the January plenum of the CC KP(b)U.
Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 352.
Davies and Wheatcroft give
3,584,000 tons, or 219 millon poods, P. 478.
Other authors give similar figures.

[32] Holod 1932-1932 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 253.

[33] Tragedia. P. 559.

[34] Davies & Wheatcroft, The Years of Hunger. P. 178.

[35] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 50.

[36] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 49; Kulchytsky, Holod 1932-1933 v
Ukraini iak henotsyd. Kyiv, 2005. P. 98

[37] Tragedia, Pp. 575-577; also in Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Pp 291-194.

[38] The Russification of Ukraine attracted the attention of the
Italian consulate in Kharkiv. “In government offices the Russian language is
Once again being used, in correspondence as well as in verbal dealings
Between employees.” See the “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches”,
Report to Congress. Commission on the Ukraine Famine. Washington, 1988. P.
446.

[39] G.G. Iagoda report to Stalin, 29 December 1932. Lubianka. Stalin
I VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003. P. 386.

[40] Nicolaas Werth, Le pouvoir sovi=E9tique et la paysannerie dans les
rapports de la police politique (1930-1934). Rapport du 27 f=E9vrier
1933.
/http:/www.ihtp.cnrs.fr/dossier_soviet_paysans/sommaire.html/

[41] Tragedia sovetskoi derevni. P. 634-635. The first English
Translation of the document appeared in Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action
Empire. Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923-1939. Ithaca and
London, 2001. P.p. 306-307.

[42] Volodymyr Serhiichuk. Iak nas moryly holodom. Kyiv, 2003. PP
156-158.

[43] Tragedia, p. 636-637.Sheboldaev added more precisions on the
Filtration points three days later. Ibid. P. 638.

[44] Lubianka. Stalin i VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003.P. 394.

[45] Lubianka. P. 392-393.

[46] N.A. Ivnitskii, Kollektivizatsiia i raskulachivanie (nachala 30-
Kh godov). Moscow, 1994. P. 204.

[47] Tragedia. P. 657.

[48] “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches. Op. cit. P. 427.

—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTE: Article published by the Action Ukraine Report (AUR) with
permission from Professor Federigo Argentieri, John Cabot University,
Rome, Italy.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:22:50 EDT 2008
Article: 503884 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!64.59.134.4.MISMATCH!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.baltics
Subject: HOLODOMOR = REAL HOLOCAUST na Ukrainie – BY ZYDS/OGPU ON UKRAINIANS: Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 1048
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 14:57:52 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf2no 1211468272 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 22 May 2008 08:57:52 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 08:57:52 MDT
Bytes: 54352
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.ukrainian:116272 soc.culture.europe:613258 soc.culture.russian:503884 alt.politics.europe:78812 soc.culture.polish:873580 soc.culture.baltics:162189

HOLODOMOR = ZYD/NKVD HOLOCAUST ON UKRAINIANS! Message:
Probably the best analysis of what happened that I have read to date.

Trident

IS THERE A “SMOKING GUN” FOR THE HOLODOMOR?

PRESENTATION: By Professor Roman Serbyn Universit=E9 du Qu=E9bec =E0
Montr=E9al, Canada
The Ukrainian Holodomor and the Denial of Genocides
International Conference, Federigo Argentieri, Ph.D., Organizer
Guarini Institute, John Cabot University
Rome, Italy, Friday, November 09, 2007
Published by the Action Ukraine Report #889, Article 5
Kyiv, Ukraine, Monday, November 19, 2007

In his seminal study on genocide, Leo Kuper observed that “governments
hardly declare and document genocidal plans in the manner of the
Nazis”
[1]. Nevertheless, since modern states cannot function without large
bureaucracies and elaborate communication systems, tell-tale records
inevitably survive.

When the CPSU lost power and the Soviet empire fell apart, it was
Revealed that an elaborate paper trail of the 1932-33 famine and the Soviet
authorities’ involvement in it had been preserved in party and state
archives. These documents are being slowly declassified, examined and
published[2]. Historians can now give us a fairly accurate account of
the catastrophe and ascertain the responsibility of Stalin and his
collaborators.

As a result, scholars who previously hesitated to recognize the
Genocidal character of Stalin’s forced starvation of Ukrainian farmers, have
reexamined the question and readjusted their interpretations. In his
latest book, Nicolas Werth comes to the conclusion that thanks to recent
studies based on the new documents, it is now “legitimate to qualify as
genocide the cluster of actions undertaken by the Stalinist regime to punish
the
Ukrainian peasantry by famine and terror”[3].

In this paper I analyze some of the main documents that provide
smoking-gun evidence of genocide, in line with the definition of the crime
given
in the UN Convention of 1948: “acts committed with intent to destroy, in
whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”.

The key criteria in the Convention are proof of “intent” and
Identification eligible “groups”. Soviet documents corroborate the accusation
against
Stalin and his closest collaborators for deliberately exterminating
Millions of Ukrainian farmers, and show that the perpetrators targeted them as
Ukrainians.

Furthermore these and other documents reveal that the genocide was not
Just against Ukrainian farmers, the focus of the attack was the Ukrainian
Nation in all its component parts and on all its territories within the
Soviet Union.

The locus of this crime was thus the Ukrainian SSR, the predominantly
Ukrainian Kuban, and the other regions of the RSFSR with sizeable
Ukrainian populations. The simultaneous decimation of Ukrainian national
elites,
especially academic, cultural and political leaders, was an integral part of
the destruction of the Ukrainian nation.

Stalin did not intend to kill all Ukrainians (nor is such an intent
Required by the Convention); his motive was to break the backbone of the
nation
By executing a sizeable percentage of the people and reducing the rest to
servile obedience, to transform them into manageable cogs of the state
mechanism. Stalin’s means of destruction were varied: famine, shootings,
exhausting forced labor.

The UN Convention does not require the establishment of motives for
genocide, but determining the reasons for the act gives an insight
into the rationale which led to crime and thus help us comprehend the
perpetrator’s intent. Stalin’s measures against the Ukrainians were predicated
on
his political ambitions, two of which provided the motives for the
eventual genocide[4].

The first was to extend socialism beyond the borders of the USSR. He
realized that the Bolsheviks’ initial attempt to export their revolution
into Europe failed primarily because of the weakness of the Red Army.
To resume Lenin’s unfinished task, Stalin needed a powerful armed force,
Backed by modern heavy industry. Industrialization had to be financed by
Exporting natural resources, especially grain, which had to be extorted from
the
farmers at the lowest cost to the state.

War communism had shown that door-to-door requisition was costly,
inefficient and politically dangerous. After the revolution, poor
farmers appropriated and divided up the land of rich landlords. As a result,
farmers lived better, ate more but sold less to the state. Marketable grain
(sold outside the village) in tsarist times was provided by the large farms
Owned by landlords and kulaks. Now new large estates had to be set up in the
Form of sovkhozy and kolkhozy. These would give the state easy access to
grain, produced by the newly enslaved peasants.

The immediate goal was not the increase of grain production (which
could be expected to fall as a result of peasant opposition), but of the
“marketable grain” to be delivered to the state. Since the main producers of
grain
Were Ukrainians farmers, who had no tradition of the Russian semi-communal
obshchina organization, they could be expected to offer stiff resistance to
forced collectivization and confiscation of the fruits of their labor.

Stalin’s second ambition was to bring a permanent solution to the
National question, especially its crucial Ukrainian component. The 1926 census
Pegged the Ukrainian population at 31 million, of the Union’s 147 million: 23
million in Ukraine, and 8 million in the rest of the USSR, mainly along the
Ukrainian border.

Ukrainian national revival triggered by the Russian revolution forced
Lenin to give the reconquered republic nominal autonomy in the form of a
“sovereign” republic within a Potemkin-style Soviet federation.
Subsequent policy of Ukrainization, or the local application of a general
principle of korenizatsiia (nativization), allowed Ukrainians to add real
national
content to the pretentiously misleading form of “soviet republic”[5].

The Ukrainization of education, communications and administration, not
Only in Ukraine but also in the Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR, the
de-Russification of urban centers by the influx of Ukrainian farmers,
the demands on Moscow to transfer to the republic adjacent territories
with Ukrainian population, the shifting of cultural orientation from Moscow
and to the West – all these pressures on the imperial centre could not be
ignored by the Kremlin.

Stalin, Lenin’s “magnificent Georgian” and foremost expert on the
nationalities question, understood the dangers of active nation-
building in Ukraine, in the best of times. Collectivization would only
aggravate
the situation. Over 85 % of ethnic Ukrainians were farmers and their
sudden disenfranchisement could throw the countryside into such turmoil that
not only grain production would be catastrophically reduced, but also
farmers could gain the support of the national elites in a united rebellion of
the whole republic to the spoliation of their country by Moscow.

Similar, if smaller, unrest could be expected in the Kuban’ and other
ethnically Ukrainian regions of the RSFSR. In the mid-1920s Stalin had
written that the peasant question was “the basis, the quintessence, of
the national question”, that “the peasantry constitutes the main army of
the national movement” and that “there is no powerful national movement
without the peasant army”[6]. The stability and even the integrity of the
Soviet empire would be threatened.

Genocide does not happen spontaneously. The targeted group is first
identified, vilified and intimidated, then it is discredited in the
eyes of the rest of the population, and only when it has been sufficiently
isolated, is it submitted to total or partial extermination. In the summer of
1929 the GPU (political police) “uncovered” a nationalist conspiracy, headed
by
prominent Ukrainian intellectuals and conducting anti-Soviet work in
villages and regional centers.

Over 700 people were arrested for, among other things, “anti-Soviet
Activity in the villages and district centers” and a show trial was held in
March 1930, appropriately staged in a Kharkiv theatre. 45 members of this
Mythical Association for the Liberation of Ukraine (SVU) were sentenced to
death or long prison terms.

Arrests and trials of other mostly fictitious groups followed:
Ukrainian National Center, Ukrainian Military Organization, etc.[7] The
condemned were former members of the former Ukrainian national governments,
Ukrainian armed forces, Ukrainian political parties, and prominent people in
fields of education, culture and the arts.

The purpose was to terrorize the Ukrainian elites into submission and
lethargy, and thus deprive the peasants of leadership on the national
level.
It should be noted that, in connection with the less severe famine in
Russia, no parallel attack took place against Russian national elites
or the Russian culture.

Stalin’s war against the peasants began in earnest towards the end of
1929.
In a two-pronged attack he ordered to “eliminate the dekulakization as a
class” and to collectivize the middle and poor peasants. Divided into
three categories, the kulaks were dispossessed and the most dangerous were
shot.

The others were deported to the wilds of northern RSFSR, transferred
To distant regions in Ukraine, or given strips of poor land outside the
Kolkhoz near which they lived. The intention was not only to provide kolkhozes
With the confiscated land, cattle and machinery, but also to deprive the
Peasants of the more qualified leadership for their opposition to the
authorities.

During the winter of 1929-1930, 90 thousand Ukrainian households were
dekulakized, and a smaller wave more or less finished the job a year
later.
In 1934 Kossior, party boss of Ukraine, reported that 200 thousand
farms had been dekulakized in Ukraine. Out of this number of about one million
(5 members per family), several thousand were deported to the northern
parts of the RSFSR and lost to the Ukrainian nation.

Collectivization went in unison with dekulakization: a major push was
Given in early 1930. By 10 March 1930 Ukrainian kolhosps integrated 64.4% of
farmsteads with 70.9% of arable land. The operation was accomplished
with the help of some 50,000 activists, sent from Russian and Ukrainian
urban centers, with special powers to organize, punish, and terrorize.

Many poor peasants, paid for the service with confiscated goods,
participated in expropriating their richer neighbors, but many others
sympathized with the victims. Peasant rebellion swept Ukraine: in
January-March 1930, 3,190 uprisings with over 950 thousand
Participants confronted the authorities.[8]

Hundreds of fliers were picked up by the authorities with such slogans
As “Free Ukraine from Moscow rule”, “Time to rise against Moscow yoke”
And others. National and peasant factors were coming together. Stalin
sounded a temporary retreat and in October of that year collectivization was
down to 29 % of households and 34 % of arable land. But the reprieve was brief
and a year later (October 1931) the figures rose to 68 % (for households)
and 72 % for arable land, with a much higher percentage in the grain-producing
steppe regions.

The effect of Stalin’s revolution on the countryside was disastrous,
especially in Ukraine and the Kuban. From 1929 to 1932 the evolution
can be summarized in these four curt phrases: production down; state
procurement up; grain export up; peasant food consumption down.

Farmers’ opposition to collectivization, mismanagement of collective
Farms by incompetent administrators, neglect and slaughter of farm animals
seriously hindered farming and brought down its production. Yet,
enforced obligatory state procurement increased, and in 1931, 42 % of
Ukraine’s
grain harvest was turned over to the state.[9]

Kolhosps delayed or completely failed to pay out stipends for
“workday” (trudodni), and the their members had to rely on their meager and
insufficient individual plots of land and a few domestic animals for
subsistence. Undernourishment became generalized. But Stalin had
reached his goal.

Grain exports rose from below one million tons in 1929, to: 5,832,000
Tons in 1930/31 and 4,786,000 tons in 1931/32. It should be kept in mind
that one million tons could feed four to five million people for one year.
After two years of resistance and unequal struggle with the Communist
authorities, the Ukrainian elites were cowed and most of the collective and
independent farms despoiled of all their reserves. The republic was on the
brink of a major catastrophe.

On 26 April 1932, Stanislav Kossior, the General secretary of the
Communist Party of Ukraine, informed Stalin about “individual
Cases and even individual villages that are starving” but blamed it on
“local bungling, errors, particularly in the case of kolkhozes.” And,
Lest he displease his Kremlin masters, their lieutenant in Ukraine
dismissed the tragedy with the affirmation that “all talk of famine must be
categorically discarded.”[10]

Yet famine there was and on 10 June H. Petrovsky, the head of the
Ukrainian state and V. Chubar, the head of the Ukrainian government, sent
Separate letters to notify Molotov and Stalin of the appalling conditions in
the Ukrainian countryside, and to ask for help.

Chubar admitted that cases of starvation among independent and
Collective farmers had already been signaled in December and January and
that by “March-April there were dozens and hundreds of malnourished, starving,
and swollen people and people starving to death accumulate in every
village; children and orphans abandoned by their parents appeared”.

Raions and oblasts organized aid from internal resources, but were
Obliged to do this “under conditions of acute food shortage, especially
bread”.
[11]
Noteworthy additional remark: “Petliurite and other anti-Soviet moods
increased.”

Petrovsky’s letter was even more to the point. Having just returned
>from an inspection of the countryside, he realized the catastrophic situation
of the farming population. He visited many villages and everywhere saw
multitudes of people, mainly poor and middle peasants, starving, subsisting on
surrogates.

Peasants scolded him, posed embarrassing question, reproached him,
Saying “why did you create an artificial famine, […] why did you take away
The seed material – this did not happen even under the old regime, why is
It necessary for Ukrainians to travel for bread […] to non-grain
Producing territories?”.

Echoing Chubar, Petrovsky reported that “because of the famine, mass
Thefts are taking place in the villages.” Pointing out that grain harvest is
Still six week off, and famine will only intensify, Petrovsky ask:
“shouldn’t assistance be rendered to the Ukrainian countryside in the amount
of
two or, at the very least, one and a half million poods of grain?” And he
predicted that if help is not given starvation would drive peasants to pick
unripe grain and destroy much of it.

Petrovsky’s letter paints a bleak picture of the forthcoming harvest.
Since the better grain had been seized by the state, seeds of poorer quality
Were sown and scattered mores thinly. The young crops are good and the
Fields well weeded but the grain is sparse. Petrovsky was also struck by the
Large amount of unsown land. Aware of all these problems, the farmers
Complained to Petrovsky that the new grain procurements would be even more
difficult to meet than last year’s. “And this may very well be so”, agrees
Petrovsky.

Finally Petrovsky draws attention to the exodus of Ukrainian farmers.
They are forced to seek food beyond the republic’s borders, at “the Dno
station, in the Central-Black Earth Oblast’, in Belarus, and in Northern
Caucasus”, where grain is more readily available, and at much lower prices.

When Petrovsky suggested that farmers band together for these
purchases, he learned that the Commissariat of Transport has drastically
reduced
the sale of train tickets to peasants. Bewildered Ukrainian peasants needled
Petrovsky: “Why are they banning trips for grain?”

If the two Ukrainian leaders believed their pleas and warnings of
turmoil in the Ukrainian countryside would soften Moscow’s position, they were
mistaken. Their effect on Stalin, Kaganovich and Molotov was just the
opposite. Writing from Moscow to Sochi, where Stalin was vacationing,
Kaganovich criticized both Ukrainian leaders, even though he admitted
That some aid would have to be given to Ukraine, and asked Stalin to decide
On the amount. Stalin’s response was more brutal and more ominous of
things to come.

He condemned the hypocrisy of the two leaders, who only wanted to get
“new millions of poods[12] of grain from Moscow” and “a reduction in the
plan for grain procurement”. Ukrainians must mobilize their own forces and
resources for already “Ukraine has been given more than she should get”.[13]
Nevertheless, on 16 June the Politburo considered Ukraine’s plea and
Granted about 8,500 tons[14], a paltry amount in comparison with the million
and a half poods requested by Petrovsky.

Politburo’s niggardly “largesse” must have provoked Stalin’s ire, for
in a letter to Kaganovich, Molotov and the Politburo he came back with
harsh criticism of past errors and new instructions for the coming harvest.
The Gensec blamed “mechanical equalization”, which did not take into
account the ability of the kolkhozes to deliver grain, and as a result of
which,
“fertile districts in Ukraine found themselves in a state of
Impoverishment and famine, despite a fairly good harvest.”[15]

This is the only known acknowledgement of the Ukrainian famine by
Stalin. He blamed regional authorities for being out of touch with the
countryside and allowing kolkhozniks to travel around the entire European
part of the USSR demoralize “our farms with their complaints and whining.”[16]

Stalin proposed the calling of a top level conference on the
organization of grain procurement and its unconditional fulfillment, and
insisted
that personal responsibility for grain procurement be delegated to the
first secretaries of the Ukraine, the Northern Caucasus, and the other grain
producing regions. “Personal responsibility” for “unconditional fulfillment”
imposed from the top along the administrative vertikal became the
watchwords of the 1932/33 grain procurement campaign, which would result in
the
genocidal famine.

On 21 June a telegram signed by Stalin and Molotov instructed Kharkiv to
carry out “at any cost” the July-September plan for grain delivery.
Two days later, Moscow answered Ukrainian Politburo’s plea for 600,000
poods of grain with a terse resolution: “bar any additional grain deliveries
to
Ukraine.”[17]

The III Conference of KP(b)U (6-10 July 1932) was devoted to the
Upcoming harvest and grain procurement. Stalin sent Molotov and Kaganovich to
The meeting “to ensure genuinely Bolshevik decisions”. Molotov informed
The audience that Moscow had lowered Ukraine’s quota but was adamant that
The plan be carried out in full.[18]

Declarations from regional leaders that the farmers were starving, that much
land lay fallow, and that 100 to 200 m.poods of grain would be lost during
harvesting did not bend the resolve of Moscow’s envoys.[19] The conference
adopted a resolution to carry out the plan of grain delivery “in full
and unconditionally”.[20]

It was largely in response to the tense situation in Ukraine[21], and in
anticipation of new troubles in that republic that Stalin came up with
his infamous decree, dubbed by the farmers “the 5 ears of corn law”.
Writing on 20 July to Kaganovich and Molotov, the Gensec complains of
Widespread theft by “dekulakized kulaks” and others, and proposes to write
a law, which would make theft of property belonging to collective farms equal
to similar crimes against state property, and “punishable by a minimum of ten
years’
imprisonment, and as a rule, by death”.

“All active agitators against the new collective-farm system” and
“profiteers and resellers of goods” writes Stalin, should be removed
And sent to concentration camps.[22] He also wants stricter controls over
The limited kolkhoz trade allowed by a 6 May 1932 law (kolkhozes allowed
Sell their surplus after 15 January 1933, after fulfilling the state
Procurement plan), made more liberal on 20 May 1932.[23]

A follow-up letter provides ideological explanation: in the same way
That capitalism could not triumph without first making “private property
Sacred property”, socialism will not finish off capitalism “unless it
Declares public property (belonging to cooperatives, collective farms or the
state) to be sacred and inviolable”.[24]

Returning to the topic on 26 July, Stalin insists on formal legality
of the proposed operations: “we must act on the basis of law (‘the peasant
loves legality’), and not merely in accordance with the practice of the
OGPU, although it is clear that the OGPU’s role here will not only not
Diminish but, on the contrary, will be strengthened and ‘ennobled’ (the OGPU
Agencies will operate ‘on a lawful basis’ rather than ‘high-handedly’)”.[25]

The joint Party-State decree “On the Protection of the Property of
State Enterprises, Collective Farms and Cooperatives, and on the
Consolidation of Public (Socialist) Property” was issued on 7 August 1932.
It became the main legal instrument used by the Soviet authorities to condemn
millions of farmers to slow death by starvation. It repeated Stalin’s
declarations
that all public property is “sacred and inviolable” and that individuals
attempting to take possession of public property should be considered
“enemies of the people”.[26]

All collective farm property, whether in the field or in storage was
Decreed equal to that of state property and theft was made punishable by
execution, which could be reduced to 10-year imprisonment only under
mitigating circumstances. Advocating withdrawal from the kolkhoz became
tantamount to treason and was punished with three to five years imprisonment
in concentration camps. No amnesty could be applied in any of these
cases.

The decree on State property was applicable on the whole Soviet
Territory but, as Stalin’s letter to Kaganovich shows, it was primarily meant
For Ukraine. Stalin thought the law was “good” and would “soon have an
impact”, and ordered a draft of directives from the C.C to the party, judicial
and punitive organizations.[27] The Gensec then addressed the Ukrainian
problem.
The passage is highly revealing:

“The most important thing right now is Ukraine. Ukrainian affairs have hit
rock bottom. Things are bad with regard to the party. There is talk
that in two regions of Ukraine (it seems in the Kiev and Dnepropetrovsk
regions) about 50 raion party committees have spoken out against the
grain-procurements plan, deeming it unrealistic. It is said that the
situation in other raion party committees is no better. […] This is
not a party but a parliament, […]

Instead of leading the raions, Kossior kept maneuvering between the
directives of the CC VKP and the demands of the raion party committees
[…]
Things are bad with the soviets. Chubar is no leader. Things are bad
With the GPU. Redens is not up to leading the fight against the
counterrevolution
[…]. [underlined and doubly underlined in original – R.S.]”

Then Stalin brandishes the specter of Ukrainian separatism: “If we don’t
undertake at once to straighten out the situation in Ukraine, we may
lose Ukraine.” He reminds Kaganovich that Pilsudski and his agents are
underestimated by Redens, and Kossior. He expressed utter contempt for
the whole KP(b)U, composed of 500,000 members (“ha-ha”, snickers Stalin),
harboring Pilsudski’s agents and “quite a lot (yes a lot!) of rotten
elements, conscious and unconscious Petliurists”.

Thinking undoubtedly of Ukraine’s negative reaction to the destructive
impact the just-passed property laws will have, Stalin warns: “The
moment things get worse, these [party] elements will waste no time opening a
front inside (and outside) the party, against the party.”

Frustrated by the fact that “the Ukrainian leadership does not see
These dangers”, Stalin proposes to replace Kossior with Kaganovich and
Redens with Balitsky, and eventually Chubar with Kaganovich. In this way
Stalin
Intends to transform “Ukraine as quickly as possible into a real fortress of
The USSR, a genuinely exemplary republic.”

The task is urgent and calls for immediate action, for without “these and
similar measures (the economic and political strengthening of Ukraine,
above all its border raions, etc.), I repeat, we may lose Ukraine.”[28]
Kaganovich agrees, of course, and accuses Ukrainian party of creating a
certain
solidarity and “a rotten sense of mutual responsibility”, not only in the
middle echelons of the party, but also among its leadership.[29]

Stalin’s exchange of letters with Kaganovich reveals the ambiance in
Which the policy of starvation will be implemented. The overall objective
was to maintain a high level of grain procurement. To assure this, all
challenge outside and inside the republic had to be eliminated, regardless of
the cost. Stalin’s raising of the specter of Pilsudski and Petliura agents
running loose in Ukraine and infiltrating the Soviet party and state
machinery was nothing more than a scare tactic and a rallying call.

He was well aware that by the summer of 1932, the weak Polish network
And the few local collaborators had been rounded up by the GPU, which also
arrested real and imaginary followers of Petliura whom Stalin had
eliminated by assassination in 1926. Poland may have had some illusions about
a
Ukrainian insurrection in 1929-1930, but by 1932, the Poles realized
That the starving population was in no shape to revolt.

The Soviet-Polish nonaggression treaty signed on 25 July 1932 was
Ample proof of the changing relations between the two neighbors.[30] The
Pilsudski-Petliura scarecrow will continue to enjoy popularity in
Soviet propaganda. While there was no serious threat from the Poles or the
Ukrainian nationalists, a national insurrection could become a reality if
the expected famine (implied in Stalin’s phrase “the moment things get
worse”) could bind together the threatened middle cadres of the KP(b)U
with the surviving peasantry. To prevent this eventuality the KP(b)U had to
be purged and kept under close Moscow surveillance.

Stalin maintained that the 1932 harvest was good; historians today are
More skeptical but consider it adequate to cover Soviet Union’s internal
needs.
With the state reserves from previous year, there were enough supplies
To feed every citizen of the Soviet Union.

Famine was brought about by the exorbitant amount of grain and other
agricultural products taken from the Ukrainian peasants, and the way
they were extracted. Ukraine’s plan was excessive, and in spite of the
protests from Kharkiv and three successive reductions, it remained so to the
end.

Still, Ukraine delivered about a quarter of a billion poods of grain, or
over 90% of its procurement quota. [31] In addition it handed over
large quantities of meat, vegetables and other produce. Stalin insisted that
state procurement have absolute priority. Following a CC VKP(b) directive, a
KP(b)U resolution of 18 November reminded that “complete fulfillment
of the procurement plan by collective farms and the MTS constitutes their
primary obligation […], to which all the other duties of the collective farm
must be subordinated, including the duty to set up all sorts of funds: seed
fund, forage and food supplies”.[32]

Stalin was satisfied that he was achieving his goal. At a high-level
Party meeting, held on 27 November 1932, he gloated: “The party has
succeeded in replacing the 500-600 million poods of marketable grain, procured
during the period of individual peasant holdings by our present ability to
collect 1,200-1,400 m.p. of grain. It is hardly necessary to prove that
without this leap forward the country would have a famine [sic-RS], we would
not be
able to support our industry, we would not be able to feed the workers and
the Red Army.”[33]

The allusion to the famine, or rather to freedom from one, was an
Obvious lie, and the reference to the feeding of the workers and the Red Army
– an overstatement; but then, Stalin’s concern was not the feeding his
Subjectsb but the financing of Soviet industrialization with grain exports.

Obedience to Moscow’s orders was assured in two ways: a) frequently
Repeated delegations to Ukraine and the North Caucasus Territory of Molotov
Kaganovich and other high-ranking leaders to supervise the local
authorities, and b) party discipline enforced from Moscow down the
administrative structure. At the end of October 1932, two commissions
were sent, one to Ukraine headed by Molotov, and the other to North
Caucasus Territory headed by Kaganovich.

Stalin’s emissaries supervised party meetings and forced them to pass
resolutions on grain procurements, party discipline, stricter
application of the 7 August property laws, the establishment of “black lists”
of collective farms in arrears with grain deliveries, imposition of fines,
etc.
They also instigated purges in party organizations and administrative
structures.
Kuban’ was particularly hit with the expulsion of 43 % of the 25,000
Party members, including 358 out of 716 party secretaries.[34]

In Ukraine, during November and first five days of December, the OGPU
arrested 1,230 people, including 340 heads of kolhospy while 327
Communists were brought before the courts for sabotaging state
procurements.[35]
In the 18 November resolution quoted above, the Ukrainian CC reminded the
directors
of sovkhoz of their “personal responsibility as party members and civil
servants for the fulfillment of the grain procurement”.

“Personal responsibility” for the execution of instructions was a
Constant refrain in messages coming from above and became an important
Means for forcing recalcitrant cadres to carry out the Ukrainian genocide.

Dekulakization and deportation continued, on a smaller scale and were
Mostly of political and punitive nature. Arrests, beatings, and cruelty of
All sorts abounded as before, only now the victims were weaker and less
Capable of resistance. Kolkhozes, villages and individual farmers in arrears
On state procurement were put on “black lists”, lost access to state-run
stores, and could not buy such essentials as matches, kerosene, salt.

Fines amounted to a year and a quarter’s worth of meat tax, without
Freeing the debtor from the unfulfilled grain procurement. “Activists” – the
City workers and their komnezam helpers searched farmers’ houses and yards,
looking for the hidden grain.

There is no way of knowing what portion of the hidden grain was found
by the flying brigades of activists, but official reports state that in Kuban
they found 345,000 poods of grain in November, while searches in Ukraine
>from 1 December 1932 to 25 January 1933 yielded 1.7 million poods, in 17,000
hiding places.[36] What grain was found, was confiscated; if nothing was
discovered, they took whatever edibles were seen, leaving the family
to starve.

Peasants who could find some old religious medals or other mementos
Made of precious metals could trek to the city and exchange them at the
Torgsins (stores for foreigners) for vouchers, and then exchange them for
food.

Hardier peasants would flee their villages and seek salvation in urban
centers or in neighboring Belarus and RSFSR, where food was available.
Accounts of Ukrainian peasants overloading trains, filling stations
And wandering about Russian and Belarusian towns and countryside abound.

National and peasant questions became inextricably intertwined in
Stalin’s decree of 14 December 1932, issued under the banal title “On Grain
Procurement in Ukraine, Northern Caucasus and the Western Oblast”[37].

Ukrainization was blamed for problems in grain deliveries and
Exemplary punishment was prescribed for sabotage in grain procurement: 5-10
years of concentration camp for a number of “party traitors” arrested in the
Orikhiv raion of Dnipropetrovs’k oblast of Ukraine, and deportation to the
North of the Poltavska stanytsia of Kuban in the RSFSR.

The decree made the party and government chiefs in the three grain
Producing areas personally responsible for the completion of grain procurement
By January 1933. Ukrainianization presently is carried out in Ukraine,
“without meticulous selection of the Bolshevik cadre”, had allowed
bourgeois-nationalists and Petliurites to join party and state
institutions and set up their cells and organizations.

Absence of “revolutionary vigilance” by local party organizations let
“counterrevolutionary elements” become directors, accountants,
storekeepers, foremen in collective farms, members of village soviets. Similar
accusation was brought against Northern Caucasus, with supporters of the
Kuban’
Rada figuring in place of Petliurites. This gave nationalists the
opportunity to sabotage harvest and sowing campaigns and organize other
counterrevolutionary activities.

Party and Soviet authorities in Ukraine and Northern Caucasus were
Ordered to extirpate these counterrevolutionary elements, execute them or
Deport them to concentration camps, including “saboteurs with party
Membership cards in their pockets”.

The verdict against Ukrainization came in two parts. In Ukraine it was
Not formally prohibited, but Stalin insisted that it resume its primary
vocation, that of promoting “correct Bolshevik implementation of
Lenin’s national policy”, which in fact meant integration and assimilation.

Ukrainian authorities were instructed to “expel Petliurite and other
bourgeois-nationalist elements from party and government
organizations”, and “meticulously select and recruit Ukrainian Bolshevik
cadre”. The
signal was thus given for rapid curtailment of Ukrainization and return to a
more
sophisticated policy of Russification.[38]

Ukrainians of Northern Caucasus fared worse. “Non-Bolshevik
‘Ukrainianization’, which affected nearly half of the raions in the
Northern Caucasus,” and which was declared to be “at variance with the
cultural
interests of the population”, was totally discontinued and replaced
with Russification.

The use of the Ukrainian language was banned in public offices of
Local administration, cooperative societies, and schools. The printing of
newspapers and magazines in the Ukrainized raions of Northern Caucasus
was to switch immediately to Russian, and preparation were to begin
immediately for the transfer in the fall of all Ukrainian schools into
Russian.

The whole Poltava stanytsia was ordered to be deported and resettled
With demobilized Russian Red Army soldiers, who would receive the abandoned
land, buildings, equipment, and cattle. In fact, 2,158 families with 9,187
members were sent out before 27 December[39] and resettled a month later with
1,826 demobilized soldiers.[40]

Together with Medvedivs’ka and Umans’ka, the three Cossack stanytsias
Saw 45,000 persons deported to the North. On 15 December, Molotov and
Stalin signed a similar ban on Ukrainization, for the rest of the previously
Ukrainized Soviet regions in the RSFSR.

Stalin’s anti-Ukrainization decree reveals the extent to which the dictator
was ready to go, in sacrificing the Ukrainian nation on the altar of
great-power ambitions. There is little doubt that the ban on Ukrainization
was a sop to Russian chauvinism, especially in ethnically mixed
regions outside the Ukrainian SSR. National and social repressions reinforced
one another, even if neither was acknowledged openly.

For the next several months after the condemnation of the abuses of
Ukrainization and the Ukrainian sabotage of grain procurements, the
Ukrainian countryside passed through some of the worst moments in its
history. The litany of repressive measures is endless. 82 raions were
deprived of manufactured goods for not fulfilling their quotas of
grain deliveries.

On 19 December, Stalin orders Kaganovich and Postishev back to Ukraine
To help Kosior, Chubar and Khataevich carry out the procurement plan. On
24 December, collective farms are ordered to deliver all grain in
Fulfillment of the plan, including grain put aside for seed and food. Direct
orders to increase repressive measures, arrests and deportations increase. A
real reign of terror seizes the republic and the Kuban.

On 22 January 1933 Stalin struck another crippling blow against the
Starving Ukrainian grain growers. The new secret decree, drafted by the Gensec
himself, is perhaps the best available proof of the dictator’s
genocidal intent against the Ukrainian nation. Sent to Ukraine, Belarus and
the
neighboring regions of RSFSR[41], the document calls attention to the
unrestrained exodus of peasants from the Kuban’ and Ukraine to the
near-by regions of Russia and Belarus.

Central authorities are said to have no doubt that these migrants, who
pretend to search for food, are, in fact, Socialist-Revolutionaries and
agents of Poland, sent to agitate, “through the peasants”, in the
northern parts of the USSR, against the kolkhoz system and the Soviet power.
Addressees are reminded that a similar movement took place the
Previous year, but the party, soviet and police authorities of Ukraine did
nothing to stop it. It must not be allowed to happen this year.

Stalin then orders the party, soviet and the repressive organs of the
Northern Caucasus and Ukraine to prevent the exodus of their peasants
To other regions of the USSR and directs them to close border crossings
between Ukraine and the Northern Caucasus.

The GPU of the Russian oblast’s adjacent to the quarantined Ukrainian
And Northern Caucasus regions, and the transport section of the OGPU, are
instructed to arrest all peasants from Ukraine and North Caucasus, who
have managed to leave their territory, and, after segregating the
counter-revolutionary elements, return the others to their villages.

The next day, the Politburo of the CC KP(b)U adopted a resolution to
Carry out Moscow’s orders and forwarded the directive, along with addition
instructions, for implementation by the appropriate Ukrainian
authorities.[42]

The Ukrainian branch of the OGPU was ordered to instruct all railway
stations not to sell tickets to peasants with destinations beyond the
Ukrainian borders, without formal travel permission from the raion executive
Committee or a certificate of employment from construction or industrial
enterprises.

Oblasts were told to take “resolute measures” to prevent massive
Departure of their peasants, carefully check the work of agents recruiting
Peasants for work outside Ukraine, and to urge kolhospnyky and individual
farmers not to depart without permission for other raions because they would
be
arrested there.

On 25 January, B. Sheboldaev, the party boss of the North Caucasus
Territory, issued a similar order, adding instructions on the
employment of internal forces and border troupes and the setting up of
filtration
points.[43]

Like the anti-Ukrainization decree of 14 December 1932, the 22 January
1933 directive, which closed the borders to the famished Ukrainian peasants
Was not the beginning but the culmination of processes that had started
Many moths before. Petrovsky had complained to Stalin, back in June 1932,
About the ban on train ticket for Ukrainian peasants who wanted to obtain
provisions in Russia.

Evdokimov’s telegram from Rostov-on-Don, which Iagoda prepared for
Stalin’s attention on 23 January 1933, details the elaborate measures taken
Since November to prevent the flight of farmers from the Northern Caucasus
Territory. Among these were roadblocks set up on the main arteries of
peasant migration.

Transport authorities had arrested 11,774 persons and another 7,534
Were incarcerated by other organs. In the same dossier, Balitsky’s report
>from 22 January informed of massive exodus of peasants from Ukraine since
December.[44]

Departures were registered in 74 raions, 721 villages and 228
kolhosps. In all, 31,693 persons left: 20,129 from Kharkiv oblast’, 6,576 from
the
Kyiv oblast, 3,447 from Odessa oblast, and 1,541 from Chernihiv. Of these
migrants about one third were collective farmers and two thirds
individual farmers; 128 were activists. A check at the railway junction
stations
in the Kharkiv oblast revealed a great demand for long-distance tickets: in
January 1933 16,500 such tickets were sold in Lozova station and 15,000 – in
Sumy.

In the beginning of January 1933, the GPU began to apprehend agitators
And organizers of these migrations and arrested over 500 of them. [45] As
A direct result of Stalin’s borders decree of 22 January 1933, 219,460
Persons were arrested in the first six weeks of its application; some were
sent to the Goulag, others punished in other ways, while 186,588 were sent
back to their villages to face the famine.[46]

In the middle of March 1933, Kosior wrote unperturbedly to the Kremlin
That “the famine still hasn’t taught many kolhospnyky a lesson”.[47] In his
report from Kharkiv, dated 31 May 1933, the Italian consul general
prognosticated on the devastation of the country: “The current
disaster will bring about a preponderantly Russian colonization of Ukraine. In
a
future time, perhaps very soon, one will no longer be able to speak of a
Ukraine, or of a Ukrainian people, and thus not even of a Ukrainian problem,
Because Ukraine will have become a de facto Russian region.”[48]

There can be little doubt today that the famine was not only used by the
Communist party for political purposes, but that it was actually created and
directed by Stalin and his henchmen for that purpose. The regime’s
ultimate objective was to transform the backward empire into an industrial
giant and a military superpower that could export socialism abroad.

To achieve this, Stalin needed great quantities of marketable grain,
Which was to be extracted from the peasants “at any price” to the producers
but at minimal price to the state. The most expedient way was to herd the
peasants into collective farms, subject them to a direct control from the
Kremlin, and in this way ensure maximum grain deliveries to the state.

The Kremlin knew that the peasants would resist and that the
imposition of its will would result in the loss of millions of human lives,
but that
was of no concern for masters of a well-populated empire. Stalin’s project
required a homogenous and docile population. Revived Ukrainian
particularism, taking advantage of the indigenization program,
reinforced national unity at the expense of cohesion of the new “fatherland of
world proletariat”.

The two sources of resistance to Stalin’s plans (national and social)
Became embodied in the same group – the Ukrainian farmers. Stalin decided to
sacrifice a considerable part of this group in order to eliminate the
opposition to his projects and to frighten the rest of the Ukrainian
nation into accepting the role of cogs (as he liked to call them) of the
great socialist mechanism.

The Stalin-Kaganovich discussion of the Petrovsy and Chubar letters
(June-July 1932), the “five ears of corn” law (7 August, 1932), the
condemnation of Ukrainization (14 December 1932), and the closing of
internal Soviet borders on starving Ukrainian peasants, each provide
smoking gun revelations about the genocide against the Ukrainian nation. But a
multitude of other documents now emerging from the secret archives
help us get a rounded understanding of the gigantic crime and the immeasurable
suffering of its victims.
—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Leo Kuper, Genocide. Its Politic Use in the Twentieth Century.
(Penguin,
1981), p. 35.
[2] Valerii Vasiliev & Yuri Shapoval (eds.), Komandyry velykoho
holodu.
Poizdky V. Molotova i L. Kahanovycha v Ukrainu i na Pivnichnyi Kavkaz
1932-1933 rr. Kyiv, 2001; I. Zelenin et al (eds.), Tragediia sovetskoi
derevni. Kollektivizatsiia i rasskulachivanie. Tom 3. Moskva, 2001;
Stalin I Kaganovich Perepiska 1931-1936 gg. Moskva, 2001;
Rozsekrechena pam’iat’: Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini v dokumentakh
GPU-NKVD. Kyiv,
2007;
Ruslan Pyrih (ed.), Holodomor 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini: dokumenty i
materialy. Kyiv, 2007.

[3] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007.

[4] Discussed more fully in my article, “The Ukrainian Famine of
1932-1933 and the United Nations Convention on Genocide”, in Taras Hunczak &
Roman Serbyn. Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933: Genocide by Other Means.
(Forthcoming.)

[5] For a thorough discussion of Ukrainization and its problems see
James Mace, Communism and the dilemmas of national liberation: national
Communism in Soviet Ukraine, 1918-1933. Cambride, Mass., 1983.
See also Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action Empire. Nations and Nationalism
in the Soviet Union, 1929-1939. Ithaca & London, 2001.

[6] J. V. Stalin, “Concerning the National Question in Yugoslavia”
Works.
Vol. 7. Moscow, 1954. Pp. 71-72.

[7] Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. Pp. 75-81.

[8] Valerii Vasil’ev & Linn Viola. Kolektyvizatsiia i selians’kyi opir
Na Ukraini (lystopad 1929-berezen’ 1930). Vinnytsia, 1997. P. 91.

[9] Nicolas Werth, La terreur et le d=E9sarroi: Staline et son syst=E8me.
Paris, Perrin, 2007. P. 118.

[10] Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini:ochyma istorykiv, movoiu
dokumentiv. Kyiv, 1990. P. 148.

[11] All quotations and references to the two letters are taken from
Komandyry velykoho holodu. Pp.206-215.

[12] One pood =3D 16.36 kg; 1 ton – 61.36 poods.

[13] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence 1931-1936. New Haven&
London, 2003. P. 136.

[14] For the allocation of the food aid, see Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na
Ukraini. Kyiv, 1990. P. 183, 187-188.

[15] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138 (Underlined by
Stalin).

[16] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 138-139..

[17] Holod. 1990. P. 183 (doc. 63), P. 190 (doc. 68).

[18] The original plan of 410 million poods (6.7 m.t.) was lowered
twice to 356 and 274.8 million poods (5.8 m.t.; 4.5 m.t. ) but 16 November was
raised to 5.8 m.t. Rozsekrechena pam’iat’. p. 84.

[19] For a detailed account of the deliberations see Komandyry
Velykoho holodu. Pp. 152-164

[20] See part of the resolution in Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Kyiv, 1990. P. 194-198

[21] A secret OGPU report from around 20 July 1932 stated that “as for
anti-Soviet manifestations, Ukraine occupies first place”. “From 1
January to 1 July 1932, 118 counterrevolutionary kulak organizations were
discovered, counting 2.479 members. In addition, along the lines of
national counterrevolution we have unmasked 35 groups with 562 members.”
Tragedia, p.

421. Another secret OGPU report, dated 5 August, contains a section
“National counterrevolution (U[krainian]SSR)” which relates the
Liquidation of 8 nationalist groups, two of which consisted of former members
Of the outlawed UKP (Ukrainian Communist Party). These people are said to
have a leftist program and conduct systematic activity among members of the
KP(b)U, arguing that the Soviet authorities are suppressing the Ukrainian
culture. In their platform, claims the report, they declare war on the Soviet
regime and Polish fascism, while in fact keeping links abroad and carrying
out directives of the Second Department of of the Polish General Staff in
Ukraine. Ibid. p. 443.

[22] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 164-165.

[23] S. Kulchytsky, Tsina “Velykoho perelomu”. Kyiv, 1990. P. 296. On
23 July Stalin sent a telegram to Kaganovich demanding the restoration
And enforcement of last year’s ban on transporting private bread supplies
By rail or water. Tragedia, p. 428.

[24] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 166.

[25] The Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 169.

[26] Tragedia, p. 453-454.

[27] Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. Pp. 273-275; The Stalin-Kaganovich
Correspondence. P. 179-181. A follow-up secret “Instruction on the
Application of the TsIK and SNK SSSR of 7 August 1932 About the
Safeguarding of State Property”, signed by the Chairman and the Prosecutor of
the
Supreme Court of the USSR and the Vice-Charman of the OGPU, was sent out on 16
September to all republican and oblast authorities. Tragedia. P.
477-479.

[28] On 12 August Stalin sends a note to Kaganovich asking him to keep
secret for the moment the plan regarding Ukraine sent in the preceding
letter. Tragedia. P. 276. To stiffen Kosior’s resolve, in January
1933, Stalin sent him the more resolute Postyshev as his second in command;
Redens was replaced Balitsky in February 1933.

[29] Letter of 16 Augus 1932. Stalin i Kaganovich Perepiska. P.
283-284;
Stalin-Kaganovich Correspondence. P. 183-184.

[30] Timoty Snyder, Sketches from a Secret War. New Haven, Yale
University Press. P. 104.

[31] Kosior spoke of 255 m.p. at the January plenum of the CC KP(b)U.
Holod1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 352.
Davies and Wheatcroft give
3,584,000 tons, or 219 millon poods, P. 478.
Other authors give similar figures.

[32] Holod 1932-1932 rokiv na Ukraini. P. 253.

[33] Tragedia. P. 559.

[34] Davies & Wheatcroft, The Years of Hunger. P. 178.

[35] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 50.

[36] Komandyry velykoho holodu. P. 49; Kulchytsky, Holod 1932-1933 v
Ukraini iak henotsyd. Kyiv, 2005. P. 98

[37] Tragedia, Pp. 575-577; also in Holod 1932-1933 rokiv na Ukraini.
Pp 291-194.

[38] The Russification of Ukraine attracted the attention of the
Italian consulate in Kharkiv. “In government offices the Russian language is
Once again being used, in correspondence as well as in verbal dealings
Between employees.” See the “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches”,
Report to Congress. Commission on the Ukraine Famine. Washington, 1988. P.
446.

[39] G.G. Iagoda report to Stalin, 29 December 1932. Lubianka. Stalin
I VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003. P. 386.

[40] Nicolaas Werth, Le pouvoir sovi=E9tique et la paysannerie dans les
rapports de la police politique (1930-1934). Rapport du 27 f=E9vrier
1933.
/http:/www.ihtp.cnrs.fr/dossier_soviet_paysans/sommaire.html/

[41] Tragedia sovetskoi derevni. P. 634-635. The first English
Translation of the document appeared in Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action
Empire. Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923-1939. Ithaca and
London, 2001. P.p. 306-307.

[42] Volodymyr Serhiichuk. Iak nas moryly holodom. Kyiv, 2003. PP
156-158.

[43] Tragedia, p. 636-637.Sheboldaev added more precisions on the
Filtration points three days later. Ibid. P. 638.

[44] Lubianka. Stalin i VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Moskva 2003.P. 394.

[45] Lubianka. P. 392-393.

[46] N.A. Ivnitskii, Kollektivizatsiia i raskulachivanie (nachala 30-
Kh godov). Moscow, 1994. P. 204.

[47] Tragedia. P. 657.

[48] “Italian Diplomatic and Consular Dispatches. Op. cit. P. 427.

—————————————————————————-=
——————
FOOTNOTE: Article published by the Action Ukraine Report (AUR) with
permission from Professor Federigo Argentieri, John Cabot University,
Rome, Italy.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:22:53 EDT 2008
Article: 503885 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!64.59.134.4.MISMATCH!pd7cy3no!pd7cy4no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,pl.regionalne.warszawa,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.baltics,de.soc.politik.misc
Subject: Re: KATYN=MURDERS OF POLISH BY ZYDS/SOVIET NKVD!!! Like Vinnitsa!! NEVER FORGET! Repost
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 501
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 14:58:25 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1211468305 64.59.135.176 (Thu, 22 May 2008 08:58:25 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 08:58:25 MDT
Bytes: 29049
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.polish:873581 pl.regionalne.warszawa:507794 soc.culture.europe:613259 soc.culture.german:344046 soc.culture.russian:503885 alt.politics.europe:78813 soc.culture.baltics:162190 de.soc.politik.misc:1087298

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:00:05 GMT, Proposition 88
wrote:

>With even the Soviets forced to admit that it was their ZYD NKVD who did the
>murders at KATYN, why are you apologising for them?

>Historians and experts proved it was NOT the Germans!

>Were you one of the killers, or perhaps your father, uncle or?

>On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:54:59 -0700, “Peter Wielki” wrote:

>>Actually, in Katyn there were Russians and Ukraninians that did the crime,
>>as far as I know.

>>But yeah, let’s blame it on JEWS!!! Germans did it too, right Frankie?

>>”Frank Arthur” wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]
>>> True,Just Like Vinnitsa!!

>>> The filthy ZYDS can no longer lie about KATYN and try to blame the
>>> Germans.

>>> Even the Soviets had to admit the truth, and also about Vinnitsa.

>>> No wonder around the world more and more people are starting to really
>>> dislike the filthy ZHIDS!!

>>> Latest update follows:
>>> From: “Strider”
>>> Newsgroups:soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.yugoslavia
>>> Subject: Jewish Copmmissars murdered these Poles

>>> Our shame still lies in the Katyn forest
>>> By Kevin Myers
>>> (Filed: 27/04/2003)

>>> Today Poles all over the world will commemorate the 60th anniversary of
>>> the discovery of the war crime which didn’t occur. And the
>>> non-existence of this atrocity constituted democracy’s most sordid
>>> exercise in realpolitik of the entire 20th century. The Soviet Union captured 180,000
>>> Polish soldiers during its invasion of Poland in 1939. Most were herded
>>> off to slave-camps in Siberia, but 22,000 officers were not. In April 1940, on
>>> Stalin’s orders, each was bound with barbed wire and executed with a
>>> single shot to the head.

>>> This was a colossal undertaking: the death toll was greater than that
>>> on the most calamitous day in British military history – the Somme, July
>>> 1, 1916.

>>> More importantly, the massacres occurred before the German invasions
>>> of France and the Low Countries. And although hundreds of Jews in Poland
>>> had been murdered, these were improvised butcheries, essentially unrelated to
>>> The Final Solution, which had not yet begun.

>>> So the first systematic mass murder of defenceless innocents in the
>>> Second World War was not by the Nazis, but by the Soviet Union, just over
>>> a year before the USSR became Britain’s official best friend. This shouldn’t
>>> surprise us: after all, it had been the Soviets, and not the Nazis, who
>>> invented industrialised murder. From the revolution on, they freely used
>>> the word “exterminate” of their enemies. Hitler listened; and Hitler learned,
>>> as dictators do. Moreover, the careful murder of so many officers from a
>>> single narrow stratum of Polish society was truly proto-genocide: its intent was
>>> to eliminate Polish identity by the extermination of all its perceived
>>> guardians.

>>> In 1943, via two sources – through a population census within the
>>> exiled Polish community living in the USSR, and from the Germans, who had
>>> discovered the site of one of the massacres, in the woods of Katyn,
>>> outside Smolensk – the British discovered the fate of the Polish officers. A
>>> devastating report from the British ambassador to the Polish
>>> government-in-exile, Owen O’Malley, left no doubt about the matter.

>>> The British Government’s public response was to dismiss the Nazi
>>> discoveries as propaganda and tell the Polish government-in-exile to
>>> forget Katyn and to proceed with beating the real enemy, Germany.

>>> War is war, and in peace it is impossible to replicate the fevers and
>>> the terrors it induces. So no useful moral judgment can be made about
>>> those who decided in 1943 publicly to accept lies as fact, and to conceal
>>> the truth as regrettable but necessary strategy. But it was statecraft at its
>>> most pusillanimous to allow those lies to become a cornerstone of the
>>> relationship between the Western allies and the Soviet Union.

>>> That is what happened when the three leaders – Churchill, Roosevelt
>>> and Stalin – met at Teheran in November 1943. Far from berating the Soviet
>>> Leader for the massacres, the two democratic leaders propitiated him,
>>> awarding him the Polish land he had stolen even as he seized his future murder
>>> victims.

>>> And when Stalin jested that they should settle the German problem once and
>>> for all by killing 50,000 German officers, Churchill merely protested sulkily,
>>> and Roosevelt light-heartedly suggested killing only 49,000.

>>> But nobody mentioned Katyn. How was this possible? For the massacre of
>>> the Poles was surely the secret subtext to this grisly exchange, and one
>>> by which Stalin was taking the measure of his two confreres. All three knew
>>> of the murders, and the bodyguard of lies around them: and silently, all
>>> three – two of them abjectly, the third triumphantly – assented to those lies.

>>> Teheran was the true nadir of international diplomacy, morally far
>>> more ignoble and strategically far more catastrophic than either Munich
>>> five years before or Yalta a year later. And the key to Teheran was Katyn: once
>>> Stalin had got away with that, he realised he could get away with almost
>>> anything.

>>> Moreover, the fiction of Katyn took root within the Foreign Office.
>>> There, nourished on complicit cowardice and malformed in the darkness of
>>> pathological guilt, the temporary tactic of 1943 was in time to turn into
>>> the diseased plant of enduring policy. It even caused the Callaghan Government
>>> in the 1970s vehemently to oppose the erection of a memorial in London to the
>>> victims of Katyn.

>>> Denial, in its purest psychiatric sense, of Katyn also infused much
>>> consideration of the 20th century: how else could Roy Jenkins have
>>> written a life of Churchill without once referring to Katyn, the Great Lie
>>> of which the prime minister was prime mover? How else could so many
>>> historians.

>>> Norman Davies aside – simply ignore the extraordinary Western
>>> collusion in covering up communist atrocities, and the profound impact
>>> this must have had on Kremlin thinking?

>>> On Thursday the FCO publishes a report, British reactions to the Katyn
>>> Massacre, in a belated attempt at expiation for Britain’s repeated
>>> cover-ups of this terrible affair. But it cannot undo the evil of the
>>> extermination of the Polish officer corps which, far from being the
>>> subject of a war-crimes trial, was embraced and rewarded at Teheran;
>>> and from that city, the communism of Katyn was soon to march forth
>>> and conquer half the world.

>>> My thanks to you for reposting this article.
>>> A brilliant truthful piece.
>>> Ed Kadach

>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:06:50 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>On 1 May 1998 13:08:00 +0200, [email protected] wrote:

>>>>>American Dissident Voices Broadcast of April 25, 1998

>>>>>Katyn
>>>>>by Dr. William Pierce

>>>>>A background noise that seems never to go away is the constant
>>>>>whining and yammering of the Jews about how the world owes them a
>>>>>living because of their losses during the so-called “Holocaust.”
>>>>>They do it, of course, because they make such a big profit on it.
>>>>>The latest flare-up of this Jewish play for a handout came more
>>>>>than a year ago when they began demanding that the Swiss pay them
>>>>>$7 billion, which “Holocaust” victims allegedly had stashed in
>>>>>numbered Swiss accounts before being hauled off to gas chambers
>>>>>during the Second World War.

>>>>>With a few “bought” Gentile politicians fronting for them, the
>>>>>foremost among these being New York’s Senator Alphonse D’Amato,
>>>>>the Jews threatened Switzerland with a boycott by the U.S.
>>>>>government if their demands were not met. Instead of laughing in
>>>>>their faces, telling the Jews to go to hell, and gearing up for
>>>>>countermeasures against Israel and other Jewish interests if the
>>>>>Jews tried to proceed with a boycott, the Swiss politicians tried
>>>>>to placate the Jews by offering to buy themoff. The Jews took the
>>>>>Swiss response as a sign of weakness and escalated their demands.

>>>>>The average Swiss citizen seems to have a little more pride than
>>>>>Switzerland’s elected officials, however, and resentment against
>>>>>the Jews’ extortion efforts is building in Switzerland now to the
>>>>>point that some of that country’s richest Jews are wearing
>>>>>bulletproof vests whenever they must go out in public.

>>>>>In general, however, this “Holocaust”-based extortion racket
>>>>>works quite well for the Jews, and they have expanded their
>>>>>demands for World War Two reparations to include a number of
>>>>>other countries besides Switzerland. They are even whining that
>>>>>the Vatican owes them because Pope Pius XII didn’t do enough to
>>>>>save them from the Germans during the war. The Jews’ brazenness
>>>>>in this whole business is quite breathtaking.

>>>>>Their brazenness, of course, is justified, because by and large
>>>>>they have been getting away with it. And they have been getting
>>>>>away with it because with their media control they have been able
>>>>>to distort the general public’s whole perception of what happened
>>>>>during the Second World War. They have been able to portray
>>>>>themselves as innocent victims and just about everyone else as
>>>>>persecutors and aggressors, even the people who were fighting on
>>>>>the Jewish side against the Germans during the war. For example,
>>>>>they have done quite a bit of whining that after the Red Army
>>>>>drove the Germans from Poland, the Poles took the opportunity to
>>>>>lynch hundreds of Jews in 1945 and 1946: Jews whom the Germans
>>>>>somehow had failed to get rid of during their wartime occupation
>>>>>of Poland.

>>>>>Now, why would the Poles do something like that? Why would they
>>>>>lynch the poor Jews, who had been on their side during the war?
>>>>>If you learned about the war from watching Steven Spielberg
>>>>>propaganda films and other mass-media sources, you probably
>>>>>believe that it was because of religious anti-Semitism on the
>>>>>part of the Catholic Poles. Let me tell you the real reason why
>>>>>so many Poles hated Jews after the war. It’s something the
>>>>>Jew-controlled media in America have tried hard to keep covered
>>>>>up. Let me tell you about what happened in the Katyn forest
>>>>>in 1940.

>>>>>In September 1939 Poland was invaded from the west by Germany and
>>>>>from the east by the Soviet Union. The Germans wanted back the
>>>>>territory in western Poland, including the city of Danzig, which
>>>>>had been taken from them at the end of the First World War. The
>>>>>Soviets wanted eastern Poland. The Germans and the Soviets
>>>>>divided Poland between them, with the boundary running roughly
>>>>>along the River Bug.

>>>>>Britain and France, both under strong Jewish pressure, declared
>>>>>war on Germany in September 1939, ostensibly because of Germany’s
>>>>>invasion of Poland. They did not declare war on the Soviet Union,
>>>>>which also had invaded Poland. In the United States and in
>>>>>western Europe, where the Jews held a deathgrip on the mass
>>>>>media, a great deal of anti-German propaganda was based on the
>>>>>German grab for Polish territory — much of which, of course,
>>>>>actually was historically German territory — and nothing was
>>>>>said of the Soviet occupation and annexation of eastern Poland.

>>>>>The reason for this anti-German and pro-Soviet bias by the Jewish
>>>>>media was that the Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union as
>>>>>commissars and communist party bosses under Stalin, while in
>>>>>Germany Hitler had undertaken a program since 1933 of freeing
>>>>>Germany from all Jewish influence. Jews had been weeded out of
>>>>>the media, the law, the schools, and other areas of economic and
>>>>>cultural life in Germany. Before Hitler became chancellor in 1933
>>>>>the Jews had done in Germany what they do in every country where
>>>>>they gain a foothold: they had monopolized large sections of the
>>>>>mass media and certain professions and were doing their best to
>>>>>distort German culture, German society, and the German economy
>>>>>to suit themselves. Hitler put a stop to that, and two-thirds of
>>>>>the 1933 Jewish population of Germany had emigrated by the
>>>>>invasion of Poland in September 1939. So the Jews hated Germany
>>>>>and were determined to do whatever they could to destroy her.

>>>>>For his part, Hitler hoped to avoid war with Britain and France.
>>>>>He hoped that after his quick victory in western Poland he could
>>>>>make peace with Britain and France. He was determined, however,
>>>>>to stamp out communism wherever he encountered it. Not only did
>>>>>he hate communism on ideological grounds, but he had sworn to
>>>>>fight communism when the communists in Germany betrayed his
>>>>>country at the end of the First World War. Hitler also saw the
>>>>>Soviet Union as a threat to all of Europe, and he was determined
>>>>>to break the power of that country when he could, even though
>>>>>there was an uneasy non-aggression pact between Germany and the
>>>>>Soviet Union in 1939, at the time of their partition of Poland.

>>>>>In the spring of 1941 massive troop movements and other
>>>>>developments inside the Soviet Union convinced Hitler that Stalin
>>>>>was preparing to invade the west with the Red Army, and so in
>>>>>June 1941 Hitler made a preemptive strike. German forces smashed
>>>>>through the Red Army and made rapid advances, first through
>>>>>Soviet-occupied eastern Poland and then through Ukraine and into
>>>>>Russia.

>>>>>A year and a half later, in February 1943, German forces near
>>>>>Smolensk, in western Russia, investigated reports they heard from
>>>>>Russian civilians to the effect that a large number of prisoners
>>>>>had been murdered by the Soviet secret police in the area nearly
>>>>>three years earlier. The German investigators were led by local
>>>>>Russians to a series of mounds in a wooded area known locally as
>>>>>Katyn Forest, about 10 miles west of Smolensk. The forest is
>>>>>named for a village, Katyn, which it surrounds. The forest had
>>>>>been privately owned prior to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917,
>>>>>but after the communist takeover of Russia the area had been
>>>>>confiscated by the government and part of the forest had been
>>>>>turned over to the NKVD, the Soviet equivalent of the American
>>>>>FBI.

>>>>>The Germans began digging in the mounds in the Katyn forest and
>>>>>made a horrible discovery. They found corpse after corpse, each
>>>>>with its hands bound behind its back and a bullet hole in the
>>>>>base of its skull. They continued their excavations for more than
>>>>>a month, and eventually uncovered more than 4,000 corpses. Other
>>>>>bodies may have remained buried in other mounds, but the Germans
>>>>>had no time to dig up the whole forest. Instead they called in
>>>>>the International Red Cross and representatives of various
>>>>>neutral countries to examine their findings. They also brought in
>>>>>groups of Allied prisoners of war, including Americans, from
>>>>>prison camps in Germany to view the graves in the Katyn forest.
>>>>>They gave these international inspectors complete freedom to
>>>>>examine the exhumed bodies, permitted doctors among them to
>>>>>conduct autopsies, even allowed them to dig up other bodies from
>>>>>one of the mounds which had not been completely excavated. The
>>>>>Germans asked only that the inspectors report back truthfully to
>>>>>their own governments about their observations. And in fact, most
>>>>>of them did.

>>>>>What they reported was that the bodies were those of Polish
>>>>>military officers, along with a number of civilian cultural and
>>>>>business leaders and intellectuals — scientists, writers, poets
>>>>>– who had been in the portion of Poland occupied by the Soviet
>>>>>Union in September 1939. Altogether the Soviet secret police had
>>>>>rounded up some 15,000 Polish leaders in 1939 — including nearly
>>>>>half of the entire Polish officer’s corps, the half that had had
>>>>>the misfortune of being in eastern Poland at the time — and put
>>>>>them in three concentration camps in Russia: at Starobelsk,
>>>>>Kozelsk, and Ostashkov. All of the bodies unearthed in the
>>>>>Katyn forest were of Polish leaders who had been confined at one
>>>>>of these camps: Starobelsk.

>>>>>Rounding up a country’s leaders and killing them was standard
>>>>>practice for the communists. The theory was that the leaders were
>>>>>bourgeois oppressors of the working class and deserved to die. As
>>>>>egalitarians the communists did not regard the Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals as inherently better or more valuable human
>>>>>material than the average Polish criminal or welfare bum; the
>>>>>officers had simply used their class advantage to gain a better
>>>>>life-style for themselves. Of course, no one really believed that
>>>>>theory except the criminals and welfare bums and other resentful
>>>>>losers and ne’er-do-wells who made up the natural communist
>>>>>constituency. As a practical matter, however, killing all the
>>>>>leaders and potential leaders of a conquered people made them
>>>>>easier to govern. That’s what the Marxists had done in Russia,
>>>>>Ukraine, and the Baltic countries.

>>>>>In the case of the Poles there was a bit of a diplomatic problem,
>>>>>though. The Poles supported the war Britain and France had
>>>>>declared against Germany, purportedly on their behalf, because
>>>>>they viewed that as their one hope for getting back at least the
>>>>>western part of their country. They were not happy about the
>>>>>Russians taking the eastern part of Poland, but the Russians at
>>>>>least were fellow Slavs. The thing to do was get rid of the
>>>>>Germans first and then worry about the Russians. This Polish
>>>>>strategy suited Stalin fine. But it made it desirable for him to
>>>>>avoid alienating the Poles any more than necessary. When Polish
>>>>>exiles asked about their imprisoned leaders in late 1939 and
>>>>>early 1940, the Soviet government promised that they would be
>>>>>released shortly. Meanwhile, the decision had been made to kill
>>>>>all of them. And so in April 1940 the Polish leaders were taken
>>>>>from the three camps where they had been imprisoned, trucked off
>>>>>to various liquidation sites, and murdered. The ones who had been
>>>>>imprisoned at Starobelsk all went to the NKVD area of the Katyn
>>>>>forest. After the war some of the NKVD executioners were
>>>>>interviewed in Israel and described how they had carried out the
>>>>>killings.

>>> ISRAEL REFUSED TO PROSECUTE THESE ZHID MURDERERS!!

>>>>>The Poles were driven up to the burial pits in long NKVD prison
>>>>>trucks known as “black ravens.” They were pulled from the trucks
>>>>>one at a time by NKVD guards. Each Polish prisoner had his hands
>>>>>bound behind his back and then was dragged to the edge of a pit.
>>>>>There he was held by two NKVD men while a third fired a pistol
>>>>>bullet into the back of his head. Some of the officers had had
>>>>>their coats pulled over their heads to keep them from seeing what
>>>>>was happening before they were shot. Some struggled and were
>>>>>bayonetted by NKVD guards before being shot and thrown into the
>>>>>pit. When all of the officers from Starobelsk had been killed,
>>>>>some 4,400 of them, the Katyn forest burial pits were covered
>>>>>with dirt and pine trees were planted on them. The locations of
>>>>>the mass graves of the prisoners from the camps at Kozelsk and
>>>>>Ostashkov remain unknown, but none of the 15,000 Polish officers
>>>>>and intellectuals rounded up by the NKVD in September 1939 was
>>>>>seen alive after April 1940.

>>>>>The Red Cross representatives and the Allied prisoners the
>>>>>Germans brought in to examine the mass graves in the Katyn forest
>>>>>understood after their examination not only who had been killed;
>>>>>they also understood who had killed them. This was apparent not
>>>>>only from the medical estimates of the length of time the bodies
>>>>>had been buried, but also from documentary evidence on the
>>>>>bodies. Diaries, news clippings, letters, and other personal
>>>>>papers removed from the clothing of the victims all told the same
>>>>>story: the latest dates on any of these papers were from
>>>>>mid-April 1940. The Polish leaders had been killed in April 1940,
>>>>>when they were prisoners of the Soviet Union and when the Katyn
>>>>>region was under Soviet control. And this is what they reported
>>>>>back to their governments.

>>>>>So what do you think happened? Were the British and American
>>>>>governments horrified to discover that their “gallant Soviet
>>>>>ally,” as the Soviet Union was referred to by the mass media, was
>>>>>a mass murderer? Did the British government, which had gone to
>>>>>war against Germany under the pretext of defending Poland, decide
>>>>>that it had made a mistake? Did anyone condemn the Soviet Union
>>>>>for this act of genocide against the Poles?

>>>>>Of course not! The Allied governments ordered their people who
>>>>>had inspected the Katyn site to keep their mouths shut, and the
>>>>>Jewish media immediately began announcing that the Germans had
>>>>>done it. A mass murder of Polish officers and intellectuals by
>>>>>the Nazis had been discovered in the Katyn forest, the New York
>>>>>Times and the rest of the Jewish media shrieked. Poor Poles!
>>>>>Wicked Germans! The war must go on to free the poor Poles and
>>>>>punish the wicked Germans. And the war did go on, killing
>>>>>millions of more Germans, British, Americans, and other
>>>>>Europeans. And the Germans were indeed punished. The Poles, of
>>>>>course, were not freed. Instead they were turned over to the
>>>>>Reds, who had butchered their leaders in the Katyn forest, and
>>>>>made to suffer under communist rule for half a century.

>>>>>The war went on after the German discovery of the mass graves in
>>>>>the Katyn forest, because its purpose from the beginning was not
>>>>>to free Poland but to destroy Germany, which had dared to free
>>>>>itself from the Jews. Roosevelt understood this. Churchill
>>>>>understood this. But the American and British people didn’t
>>>>>understand it, of course, because they were lied to by the Jewish
>>>>>media and by their own governments, who in 1943 as in 1998 have
>>>>>done whatever has been politically expedient. And what has been
>>>>>politically expedient has been what the Jewish media bosses have
>>>>>decided.

>>>>>The lies about Katyn were maintained by the media for some years
>>>>>after the end of the war, because these lies meshed nicely with
>>>>>the “Holocaust” story which was making so much money for the
>>>>>Jews. Nowadays, of course, the truth about the Katyn murders is
>>>>>generally accepted by historians everywhere. You can go into
>>>>>almost any large library and read about it and even see the
>>>>>gruesome photographs that the Germans took of the Polish bodies
>>>>>they dug up. One of several authoritative books on the subject is
>>>>>J.K. Zawodny’s Death in the Forest: the Story of the Katyn
>>>>>Forest Massacre, published in 1962 by the University of Notre
>>>>>Dame Press. None of this is publicized a la Steven Spielberg, of
>>>>>course, for the illumination of American television audiences. It
>>>>>still might undermine the Jews’ “Holocaust” racket.

>>>>>In 1945 and 1946, although the deceived citizens of the western
>>>>>world didn’t know the truth about Katyn, Polish patriots did. The
>>>>>word had gotten back to the Polish prisoners in German camps from
>>>>>the Poles the Germans had taken to examine the graves. After the
>>>>>war, when these Polish prisoners were freed, the word spread to
>>>>>other Poles. They knew that it was the communists, not the Nazis,
>>>>>who had murdered their leaders, who had beheaded their nation.

>>>>>And they knew who was behind communism, from the Jew Karl Marx,
>>>>>who had started the whole business, up to the Jewish commissars
>>>>>who lorded it over them in Soviet-occupied Poland. They knew who
>>>>>had welcomed their Soviet conquerors and then collaborated with
>>>>>those conquerors. And so it is hardly surprising that in 1945 and
>>>>>1946 a few Polish patriots organized lynchings of Jews in Poland,
>>>>>before the Reds had a chance to clamp down on all of Poland and
>>>>>suppress any further expressions of anti-communist or anti-Jewish
>>>>>feeling.

>>>>>No, the Polish dislike of Jews/ZHIDS isn’t surprising. What is
>>>>>surprising is that so few patriots in America and Britain have
>>>>>expressed their outrage against the Jews, not only for what they
>>>>>did to the Poles during and after the war, but for what they have
>>>>>done to us: lying to us and using us to wage their wars for them.
>>>>>If patriots study the Katyn story and take its lesson to heart,
>>>>>they will understand why they cannot trust either the mass media
>>>>>or any government which dances to the tune played by the media.
>>>>>Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill were as much liars and
>>>>>traitors as Bill Clinton and Tony Blair.

>>>>>Anyway, you might remember Katyn the next time you hear the Jews
>>>>>or some of their bought politicians whining about how much gold
>>>>>was stolen from them by the Swiss or how badly the Poles and the
>>>>>Germans treated them during the Second World War.

>>>>>The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
>>>>>Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books. To
>>>>>receive weekly ADV transcripts, mail: [email protected]
>>>>>Write “subscribe” as the subject of your message.

First,let us kill all the lawyers! – W.Shakespeare
First, we get rid of all the politicians! – Mao tse Dung
Lawyers, politicians, and judges need to be recycled-as fertiliser!!
Me
For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:22:55 EDT 2008
Article: 504200 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: ZydWatch
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian
Subject: ZYDS & Communismus
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 18:50:13 -0600
Organization: ZydWatch
Lines: 374
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 15019
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.swiss:58762 soc.culture.europe:613576 soc.culture.russian:504200

ZYDS/Jews and Bolshevism Which Was Controlled By Them

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:55:33 -0400, in alt.revisionism
[email protected] wrote:

ZYDs/Jews and Bolshevism

Amongst themselves, the Jews are quite candid about their sympathy for
and involvement in Bolshevism.

On 4 April 1919 the Jewish Chronicle: “There is much in the fact of
Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in
the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant
with the finest ideals of Judaism.”

(Perhaps this explains why the Red Army uses a Jewish star as its
symbol?)

Probably the best-known exposé of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik
coup d’état was by Sir Winston Churchill, writing in the Illustrated
Sunday Herald of 8 February 1920. Churchill wrote “With the notable
exception of Lenin, the majority of leading figures are Jews. Moreover
the principal inspiration and the driving power comes from Jewish
leaders.”

Communism was of course founded by Karl Marx whose grandfather was a
rabbi by the name of Mordeccai. Marx was given his initial
encouragement by a Communist-Zionist by the name of Moses Hess. As
founder and editor of the Rheinische Zeitung, the main organ of
leftist thought in Germany, he provided Karl Marx with his first
important platform. Later, in Brussels, he collaborated with Marx on
The German Ideology. It was Hess too who converted to Communism
Friedrich Engels, the wealthy textiles magnate who later subsidised
Marx from the profits of sweated labour in Britain and Germany.

When the Bolsheviks overthrew the short-lived democratic government in
Moscow and St. Petersburg in October 1917, it was a virtual Jewish
coup d’état. The most prominent Jewish Commissar was Trotsky, real
name Bronstein. He had been married by a rabbi in 1900, and whilst in
exile in New York he had worked for Novy Mir, described in the Church
Times (23 January 1925) as a “Yiddish newspaper.”

The various reporters and diplomats who were there at the time of the
“Revolution” have given evidence as to its Jewish nature.

The widow of the Guardian’s correspondent Mrs. Ariadna
Tyrkova-Williams wrote: “In the Soviet Republic all the committees and
commissaries were filled with Jews.”

The most detailed description of Jewish influence in the Bolshevik
‘revolution comes from Robert Wilton, the Russian correspondent of The
Times. In 1920 he published a book in French, Les Derniers Jours des
Romanofs, which gave the racial background of all the members of the
Soviet government. (This does not appear in the later English
translation, for some odd reason.) After the publication of this
monumental work, Wilton was ostracised by the press, and he died in
poverty in 1925. He reported that the Central Committee of the
Bolshevik Party was made up as follows:

NAME NATIONALITY
Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Lourie (Larine) Jew
Ouritski Jew
Volodarski Jew
Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) Jew
Smidovitch Jew
Sverdlof (Yankel) Jew
Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Krylenko Russian
Lounatcharski Russian

“The Council of the People’s Commissars comprises the following:

MINISTRY NAME NATIONALITY
President Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Foreign Affairs Tchitcherine Russian
Nationalities Djugashvili (Stalin) Georgian
Agriculture Protian Armenian
Economic Council Lourie (Larine) Jew
Food Schlichter Jew
Army & Navy Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
State Control Lander Jew
State Lands Kauffman Jew
Works V. Schmidt Jew
Social Relief E. Lelina (Knigissen) Jewess
Public Instruction Lounatcharsky Russian
Religions Spitzberg Jew
Interior Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Hygiene Anvelt Jew
Finance Isidore Goukovski Jew
Press Volodarski Jew
Elections Ouritski Jew
Justice I. Steinberg Jew
Refugees Fenigstein Jew
Refugees (assist.) Savitch Jew
Refugees (assist.) Zaslovski Jew

“The following is the list of members of the Central Executive
Committee:

NAME NATIONALITY
Sverdlov (president) Jew
Avanessof (sec.) Armenian
Bruno Lett
Babtchinski Jew
Bukharin Russian
Weinberg Jew
Gailiss Jew
Ganzburg Jew
Danichevski Jew
Starck German
Sachs Jew
Scheinmann Jew
Erdling Jew
Landauer Jew
Linder Jew
Wolach Czech
Dimanstein Jew
Encukidze Georgian
Ermann Jew
Joffe Jew
Karkline Jew
Knigissen Jew
Rosenfeldt (Kamenef) Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Krylenko Russian
KrassikofSachs Jew
Kaprik Jew
Kaoul Lett
Ulyanov (lenin) Russian
Latsis Jew
Lander Jew
Lounatcharski Russian
Peterson Lett
Peters Lett
Roudzoutas Jew
Rosine Jew
Smidovitch Jew
Stoutchka Lett
Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
Sosnovski Jew
Skrytnik Jew
Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
Teodorovitch Jew
Terian Armenian
Ouritski Jew
Telechkine Russian
Feldmann Jew
Froumkine Jew
Souriupa Ukranian
Tchavtchevadze Georgian
Scheikmann Jew
Rosental Jew
Achkinazi Imeretian
Karakhane Karaim (Jew)
Rose Jew
Sobelson (Radek) Jew
Sclichter Jew
Schikolini Jew
Chklianski Jew
Levine (Pravdine) Jew

“The following is the list of members of the Extraordinary Commission
of Moscow:

NAME NATIONALITY
Dzerjinski (president) Pole
Peters (vice-president) Lett
Chklovski Jew
Kheifiss Jew
Zeistine Jew
Razmirovitch Jew
Kronberg Jew
Khaikina Jewess
Karlson Lett
Schaumann Jew
Leontovitch Jew
Jacob Goldine Jew
Glaperstein Jew
Kniggisen Jew
Latzis Lett
Schillenkuss Jew
Janson Lett
Rivkine Jew
Antonof Russian
Delafabre Jew
Tsitkine Jew
Roskirovitch Jew
G. Sverdlof Jew
Biesenski Jew
Blioumkine Jew
Alexandrevitch Russian
I. Model Jew
Routenberg Jew
Pines Jew
Sachs Jew
Daybol Lett
Saissoune Armenian
Deylkenen Lett
Liebert Jew
Vogel German
Zakiss Lett

Although Lenin is described as a “Russian,” in fact he was a mixture
of various nationalities. It is likely that he was one-quarter
Russian, one-quarter German, one-quarter Jewish and at least
one-quarter Kalmuck (Mongol), which accounts for his Mongol
appearance. Various authorities allege that his wife, Nadezhda
Krupskaya was a Jewess and that her family spoke Yiddish in the home.

A report sent to the British government in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke, the
Dutch consul in St. Petersburg, said that “Bolshevism is organised and
worked by Jews.” The report was included in a pamphlet published as a
government White Paper in April 1919 entitled Russia No. 1 (1919) A
Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. However, the pamphlet
was quickly withdrawn and reissued with various excisions and
alterations made.

In the War Records Division of the United States National Archives
there is filed a report from an American Intelligence operative in St.
Petersburg. Under Record Group 20; Records of the American
Expeditionary Forces Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, G2 Intelligence wrote,
“The Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning, guided
and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type.”

Also in the U.S. National Archives are two telegrams sent by American
diplomats in Russia. State Department document 861.00/1757 sent on 2
May 1918 by U.S. Consul Summers in Moscow relates, “Jews predominant
in local Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among
population.” Document 861.00/2205 from Consul Caldwell in Vladivostock
on 5 July 1918 describes, “Fifty per cent of Soviet government in each
town consists of Jews of worst type.”

In January, 1924, Lenin died from causes variously described as ‘a
heart attack,’ brain hemorrhage’ and ‘syphilis.’ His comrades
immediately began fighting amongst themselves to see who was to become
his successor.

A relative outsider, Joseph Stalin, came to the fore and purged all
competition either by exiling or executing them. Since Stalin was not
Jewish, yet nearly all his opponents were, it is often suggested that
Stalin was anti-Semitic. This is far from the truth.

Stalin had three wives, all of them Jewesses. The first was Ekaterina
Svanidze who bore him one son, Jacob. His second wife was Kadya
Allevijah. She bore him a son Vassili and a daughter Svetlana. His
second wife died in mysterious circumstances, either by committing
suicide or murdered by Stalin. His third wife was Rosa Kaganovich, the
sister of Lazar Kaganovich, the head of Soviet industry. Stalin’s
daughter (who in 1967 fled to the USA) then married Lazar’s son Mihail
i.e. her step-mother’s nephew. Svetlana Stalin had a total of four
husbands, three of them Jewish.

Stalin’s vice-president Molotov was also married to a Jewess, whose
brother, Sam Karp, runs an export business in Connecticut. Just to
complicate things even more, the Molotov’s (half-Jewish) daughter also
called Svetlana was engaged to be married to Stalin’s son Vassili.

After the death of Stalin, his successors kept up the tradition, for a
report in the B’nai B’rith Messenger relates: “To show that Russia
treats its Jews well, Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev this week
remarked at a reception at the Polish Embassy that not only he himself
and Soviet President Klementi Voroshilov, but also half the members of
the Praesidium have Jewish wives. Mr. Kruschev made this remark to
Israeli Ambassador Joseph Avidar, who was amongst the guests.”
(Kruschev’s wife was yet another Kaganovitch.)

According to a report in The Canadian Jewish News of 13 November 1964
the present Soviet boss Leonid Brezhnev is married to a Jewess, and
his children are brought up as Jews. There are a number of prominent
Jews in the Soviet government, including Dimitri Dymshits in charge of
industry, Lev Shapiro regional secretary of Birobidjan, and Yuri
Andropov in charge of the secret police, the KGB. In fact, every
secret police chief in Soviet history has been a Jew, from the first
Uritsky to the most recent, the murderous Beria. A Jew is also in
charge of the Soviet economy – Leonid Kantorovich.

It is a well-known fact that the Bolsheviks were and are financed by
Jewish interests in the West.

At a Bolshevik celebration rally in New York’s Carnegie Hall on the
night of 23 March 1917, a telegram of support from Jacob Schiff of
Kuhn, Loeb & Co. was read out. The telegram was reprinted in the next
morning’s New York Times. Schiff later tried to deny his involvement,
but thirty years later his grandson John admitted in the New York
Journal-American (3 February 1949) that the old man had sunk twenty
million dollars into the Bolshevik cause.

Another Western bankers who poured funds into Bolshevik Russia was
Olaf Ashberg of the Stockholm Nia Banken. He remained the Soviets’
paymaster until the late 1940s. The London Evening Standard of 6
September 1948 reported a visit by Ashberg to Switzerland “for secret
meetings with Swiss government officials and banking executives.
Diplomatic circles describe Mr. Ashberg as the ‘Soviet banker’ who
advanced large sums to Lenin and Trotsky in 1917. At the time of the
revolution, Mr. Ashberg gave Trotsky money to form and equip the first
unit of the Red Army.”

The Bolsheviks also received assistance from Armand Hammer, who still
commutes back and forward between New York and Moscow to take care of
his business interests in both communities. Hammer’s Occidental Oil
Company is at the moment building a 1600 mile chemicals pipeline in
southern Russia. He is also on such good terms with the Soviets that
he personally arranges for Soviet art galleries to lend paintings to
America.

Another American-based businessman to help out the Soviet economy is
Michael Fribourg, who owns the massive Continental Grain Company.
Together with the Louis Dreyfus Corporation, these Jewish speculators
were able to buy up vast quantities of cheap American grain in 1972,
sell it to the Soviets at a vast profit, and collect an export subsidy
>from the U.S. taxpayer.

In every other East European country, it is exactly the same story:

In Hungary a Communist revolution was staged in 1919, instigated by
the Jew Bela Kun (Cohen). During the three month regime, the country
was turned upside down in a reign of murder and terror. Here again,
the government was composed almost entirely of Jews. And it was this
factor which brought about the regime’s downfall, as the ordinary
Hungarians detested Jewish dictatorship. Kun was deposed and fled to
the Soviet Union, where he became chief of the secret police, the
Cheka, in southern Russia.

It was not until 1945 that the Jews were able to regain control. Three
Russian Jews were installed as the ruling triumvirate, Matyas Rakosi
(Rosencranz), Erno Gero (Singer) and Zoltan Vas. Both Rakosi and Gero
had been members of Kun’s bloody government.

In Germany, the Jews also tried to take over there in the chaos that
followed the First World War. Aided by funds from the Soviet
Ambassador Joffe, Rosa Luxemburg’s Spartacus Bund attempted to
overthrow the government. The revolt was quelled and its leaders
Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht executed.

The post-war dictator of Roumania, Anna Pauker, was the daughter of a
Bucharest kosher butcher. For a time she earned her living teaching
Hebrew. her father and brother now live in Israel.

Although Tito was the only non-Jewish dictator behind the Iron Curtain
in the late 1940s, he was tutored by the Jew Mosa Pijade. According to
John Gunther in Behind the Iron Curtain, “He is Tito’s mentor…
Whatever ideological structure Tito may have, he got it from the
shrewd old man.”

Moscow’s puppet government in Czechoslovakia in the late 1940s was run
by another Jew, Rudolph Slansky.

In Poland too, Jews occupied virtually every position of authority in
the post-war Communist regime. Prominent among these were Minc,
Skryesewski, Modzelewski and Berman. Jacob Berman gradually eclipsed
the others until he became supreme dictator by himself. Also,
Gomulka’s wife was a Jewess.

Even in China, Soviet Jews were at work helping Mao Tse Tung. High up
in the Political Department of the Red Army in China were W. N.
Levitschev and J. B. Gamarnik

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:22:56 EDT 2008
Article: 504303 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: ZydWatch
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Zionism And The Third Reich-Part 1/2
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 09:29:09 -0600
Organization: ZydWatch
Lines: 409
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 25872
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.swiss:58769 soc.culture.europe:613621 soc.culture.russian:504303

Zionism & The Third Reich = ZYD KOLABORACI!
Never forget KASTNER, RUMKOWSKI & WIESENTHAL
as well as so many more!

http://www.rense.com/general34/ZAND.HTM

Zionism And The Third Reich
By Mark Weber
Institute for Historical Review
2-8-3

Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German
port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, “Tel
Aviv,” while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the
ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member.
Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic
combination as a “metaphysical absurdity.”1 Absurd or not, this is but one
vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging
collaboration between Zionism and Hitler’s Third Reich.

Common Aims

Over the years, people in many different countries have wrestled with
the “Jewish question”: that is, what is the proper role of Jews in
non-Jewish society? During the 1930s, Jewish Zionists and German National
Socialists shared similar views on how to deal with this perplexing issue.
They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities,
and that Jews did not belong in Germany. Jews living in the Reich were
therefore to be regarded not as “Germans of the Jewish faith,” but rather
as members of a separate national community. Zionism (Jewish nationalism)
also implied an obligation by Zionist Jews to resettle in Palestine,
the “Jewish homeland.” They could hardly regard themselves as sincere
Zionists and simultaneously claim equal rights in Germany or any
other “foreign” country.

Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that
anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely
understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes.
The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in
a separate state of their own. “The Jewish question exists wherever Jews
live in noticeable numbers,” he wrote in his most influential work, The
Jewish State. “Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving
Jews … I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex
phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear.”
The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. “It is a
national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international
political issue …” Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews
constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a
Volk.2 Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome “final solution of
the Jewish question.”3

Six months after Hitler came to power, the Zionist Federation of Germany (by
far the largest Zionist group in the country) submitted a detailed
memorandum to the new government that reviewed German-Jewish relations and
formally offered Zionist support in “solving” the vexing “Jewish question.”
The first step, it suggested, had to be a frank recognition of fundamental
national differences: 4

Zionism has no illusions about the difficulty of the Jewish condition, which
consists above all in an abnormal occupational pattern and in the fault of
an intellectual and moral posture not rooted in one’s own tradition.
Zionism recognized decades ago that as a result of the assimilationist
trend, symptoms of deterioration were bound to appear …

Zionism believes that the rebirth of the national life of a people, which is
now occurring in Germany through the emphasis on its Christian and national
character, must also come about in the Jewish national group. For the
Jewish people, too, national origin, religion, common destiny and a sense
of its uniqueness must be of decisive importance in the shaping of its
existence. This means that the egotistical individualism of the liberal era
must be overcome and replaced with a sense of community and collective
responsibility …

We believe it is precisely the new [National Socialist] Germany that can,
through bold resoluteness in the handling of the Jewish question, take a
decisive step toward overcoming a problem which, in truth, will have to be
dealt with by most European peoples …

Our acknowledgment of Jewish nationality provides for a clear and sincere
relationship to the German people and its national and racial realities.
Precisely because we do not wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we,
too, are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the
Jewish group and reject any trespasses in the cultural domain, we — having
been brought up in the German language and German culture — can show an
interest in the works and values of German culture with admiration and
internal sympathy …

For its practical aims, Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration of
even a government fundamentally hostile to Jews, because in dealing with
the Jewish question not sentimentalities are involved but a real problem
whose solution interests all peoples and at the present moment especially
the German people … Boycott propaganda — such as is currently being
carried on against Germany in many ways — is in essence un-Zionist,
because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to build …

We are not blind to the fact that a Jewish question exists and will continue
to exist. From the abnormal situation of the Jews severe disadvantages
result for them, but also scarcely tolerable conditions for other peoples.
The Federation’s paper, the Jüdische Rundschau (“Jewish Review”),
proclaimed the same message: “Zionism recognizes the existence of a Jewish
problem and desires a far-reaching and constructive solution. For this
purpose Zionism wishes to obtain the assistance of all peoples, whether
pro- or anti-Jewish, because, in its view, we are dealing here with a
concrete rather than a sentimental problem, the solution of which all
peoples are interested.”5 A young Berlin rabbi, Joachim Prinz, who later
settled in the United States and became head of the American Jewish
Congress, wrote in his 1934 book, Wir Juden (“We Jews”), that the National
Socialist revolution in Germany meant “Jewry for the Jews.” He
explained: “No subterfuge can save us now. In place of assimilation we
desire a new concept: recognition of the Jewish nation and Jewish race.” 6

Active Collaboration

On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood,
National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group
believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler
government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine
>from 1933 until 1940-1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive
collaboration.

Even as the Third Reich became more entrenched, many German Jews, probably a
majority, continued to regard themselves, often with considerable pride, as
Germans first. Few were enthusiastic about pulling up roots to begin a new
life in far-away Palestine. Nevertheless, more and more German Jews turned
to Zionism during this period. Until late 1938, the Zionist movement
flourished in Germany under Hitler. The circulation of the Zionist
Federation’s bi-weekly Jüdische Rundschau grew enormously. Numerous Zionist
books were published. “Zionist work was in full swing” in Germany during
those years, the Encyclopaedia Judaica notes. A Zionist convention held in
Berlin in 1936 reflected “in its composition the vigorous party life of
German Zionists.”7

The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal
June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for
Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage
emigration of Germany’s Jews to Palestine. This would require increased
Jewish self-awareness. Jewish schools, Jewish sports leagues, Jewish
cultural organizations — in short, everything that would encourage this
new consciousness and self-awareness – should be promoted, the paper
recommended.8

SS officer Leopold von Mildenstein and Zionist Federation official Kurt
Tuchler toured Palestine together for six months to assess Zionist
development there. Based on his firsthand observations, von Mildenstein
wrote a series of twelve illustrated articles for the important Berlin
daily Der Angriff that appeared in late 1934 under the heading “A Nazi
Travels to Palestine.” The series expressed great admiration for the
pioneering spirit and achievements of the Jewish settlers. Zionist
self-development, von Mildenstein wrote, had produced a new kind of Jew. He
praised Zionism as a great benefit for both the Jewish people and the
entire world. A Jewish homeland in Palestine, he wrote in his concluding
article, “pointed the way to curing a centuries-long wound on the body of
the world: the Jewish question.” Der Angriff issued a special medal, with a
Swastika on one side and a Star of David on the other, to commemorate the
joint SS-Zionist visit. A few months after the articles appeared, von
Mildenstein was promoted to head the Jewish affairs department of the SS
security service in order to support Zionist migration and development more
effectively. 9

The official SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, proclaimed its support for
Zionism in a May 1935 front-page editorial: “The time may not be too far
off when Palestine will again be able to receive its sons who have been
lost to it for more than a thousand years. Our good wishes, together with
official goodwill, go with them.”10 Four months later, a similar article
appeared in the SS paper: 11

The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on
religion leads the German government to guarantee without reservation the
racial separateness of this community. The government finds itself in
complete agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry, the
so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry around
the world and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis,
Germany undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the
future in the handling of the Jewish problem around the world.

A leading German shipping line began direct passenger liner service from
Hamburg to Haifa, Palestine, in October 1933 providing “strictly kosher
food on its ships, under the supervision of the Hamburg rabbinate.” 12 With
official backing, Zionists worked tirelessly to “reeducate” Germany’s Jews.
As American historian Francis Nicosia put it in his 1985 survey, The Third
Reich and the Palestine Question: “Zionists were encouraged to take their
message to the Jewish community, to collect money, to show films on
Palestine and generally to educate German Jews about Palestine. There was
considerable pressure to teach Jews in Germany to cease identifying
themselves as Germans and to awaken a new Jewish national identity in
them.” 13

In an interview after the war, the former head of the Zionist Federation of
Germany, Dr. Hans Friedenthal, summed up the situation: “The Gestapo did
everything in those days to promote emigration, particularly to Palestine.
We often received their help when we required anything from other
authorities regarding preparations for emigration.” 14

At the September 1935 National Socialist Party Congress, the Reichstag
adopted the so-called “Nuremberg laws” that prohibited marriages and sexual
relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect, proclaimed the Jews an
alien minority nationality. A few days later the Zionist Jüdische Rundschau
editorially welcomed the new measures: 15

Germany … is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it
declares the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the
Jews have been stamped a national minority it is again possible to
establish normal relations between the German nation and Jewry. The new
laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own cultural life, its own
national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its own
theatre, and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own
future in all aspects of national life …

Germany has given the Jewish minority the opportunity to live for itself,
and is offering state protection for this separate life of the Jewish
minority: Jewry’s process of growth into a nation will thereby be
encouraged and a contribution will be made to the establishment of more
tolerable relations between the two nations. Georg Kareski, the head of
both the “Revisionist” Zionist State Organization and the Jewish Cultural
League, and former head of the Berlin Jewish Community, declared in an
interview with the Berlin daily Der Angriff at the end of 1935: 16

For many years I have regarded a complete separation of the cultural affairs
of the two peoples [Jews and Germans] as a pre-condition for living
together without conflict… I have long supported such a separation,
provided it is founded on respect for the alien nationality. The Nuremberg
Laws … seem to me, apart from their legal provisions, to conform entirely
with this desire for a separate life based on mutual respect… This
interruption of the process of dissolution in many Jewish communities,
which had been promoted through mixed marriages, is therefore, from a
Jewish point of view, entirely welcome.

Zionist leaders in other countries echoed these views. Stephen S. Wise,
president of the American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress,
told a New York rally in June 1938: “I am not an American citizen of the
Jewish faith, I am a Jew… Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the
Jewish people a race and we are a race.” 17 The Interior Ministry’s Jewish
affairs specialist, Dr. Bernhard Lösener, expressed support for Zionism in
an article that appeared in a November 1935 issue of the official
Reichsverwaltungsblatt: 18

If the Jews already had their own state in which the majority of them were
settled, then the Jewish question could be regarded as completely resolved
today, also for the Jews themselves. The least amount of opposition to the
ideas underlying the Nuremberg Laws have been shown by the Zionists,
because they realize at once that these laws represent the only correct
solution for the Jewish people as well. For each nation must have its own
state as the outward expression of its particular nationhood.

In cooperation with the German authorities, Zionist groups organized a
network of some forty camps and agricultural centers throughout Germany
where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine.
Although the Nuremberg Laws forbid Jews from displaying the German flag,
Jews were specifically guaranteed the right to display the blue and white
Jewish national banner. The flag that would one day be adopted by Israel
was flown at the Zionist camps and centers in Hitler’s Germany. 19

Himmler’s security service cooperated with the Haganah, the Zionist
underground military organization in Palestine. The SS agency paid Haganah
official Feivel Polkes for information about the situation in Palestine and
for help in directing Jewish emigration to that country. Meanwhile, the
Haganah was kept well informed about German plans by a spy it managed to
plant in the Berlin headquarters of the SS.20 Haganah-SS collaboration even
included secret deliveries of German weapons to Jewish settlers for use in
clashes with Palestinian Arabs. 21 In the aftermath of the November
1938 “Kristallnacht” outburst of violence and destruction, the SS quickly
helped the Zionist organization to get back on its feet and continue its
work in Germany, although now under more restricted supervision. 22

Official Reservations

German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials
were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities
in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize “their”
governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry
remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long
as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to
resettle in the Zionist “promised land,” a sovereign Jewish state in
Palestine would not really “solve” the international Jewish question.
Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this
dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore
limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British
control, not a sovereign Jewish state. 23

A Jewish state in Palestine, the Foreign Minister informed diplomats in June
1937, would not be in Germany’s interest because it would not be able to
absorb all Jews around the world, but would only serve as an additional
power base for international Jewry, in much the same way as Moscow served
as a base for international Communism.24 Reflecting something of a shift in
official policy, the German press expressed much greater sympathy in 1937
for Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist ambitions, at a time when
tension and conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine was sharply
increasing. 25

A Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937, cautioned that in spite
of support for Jewish settlement in Palestine, “it would nevertheless be a
mistake to assume that Germany supports the formation of a state structure
in Palestine under some form of Jewish control. In view of the anti-German
agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation
of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the
nations of the world.”26 “The proclamation of a Jewish state or a
Jewish-administrated Palestine,” warned an internal memorandum by the
Jewish affairs section of the SS, “would create for Germany a new enemy,
one that would have a deep influence on developments in the Near East.”
Another SS agency predicted that a Jewish state “would work to bring
special minority protection to Jews in every country, therefore giving
legal protection to the exploitation activity of world Jewry.”27 In January
1939, Hitler’s new Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, likewise
warned in another circular bulletin that “Germany must regard the formation
of a Jewish state as dangerous” because it “would bring an international
increase in power to world Jewry.” 28

Hitler himself personally reviewed this entire issue in early 1938 and, in
spite of his long-standing skepticism of Zionist ambitions and misgivings
that his policies might contribute to the formation of a Jewish state,
decided to support Jewish migration to Palestine even more vigorously. The
prospect of ridding Germany of its Jews, he concluded, outweighed the
possible dangers. 29

Meanwhile, the British government imposed ever more drastic restrictions on
Jewish immigration into Palestine in 1937, 1938 and 1939. In response, the
SS security service concluded a secret alliance with the clandestine
Zionist agency Mossad le-Aliya Bet to smuggle Jews illegally into
Palestine. As a result of this intensive collaboration, several convoys of
ships succeeded in reaching Palestine past British gunboats. Jewish
migration, both legal and illegal, from Germany (including Austria) to
Palestine increased dramatically in 1938 and 1939. Another 10,000 Jews were
scheduled to depart in October 1939, but the outbreak of war in September
brought the effort to an end. All the same, German authorities continued to
promote indirect Jewish emigration to Palestine during 1940 and 1941. 30
Even as late as March 1942, at least one officially authorized
Zionist “kibbutz” training camp for potential emigrants continued to
operate in Hitler’s Germany. 31

The Transfer Agreement

The centerpiece of German-Zionist cooperation during the Hitler era was the
Transfer Agreement, a pact that enabled tens of thousands of German Jews to
migrate to Palestine with their wealth. The Agreement, also known as the
Haavara (Hebrew for “transfer”), was concluded in August 1933 following
talks between German officials and Chaim Arlosoroff, Political Secretary of
the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the World Zionist Organization.
32

Through this unusual arrangement, each Jew bound for Palestine deposited
money in a special account in Germany. The money was used to purchase
German-made agricultural tools, building materials, pumps, fertilizer, and
so forth, which were exported to Palestine and sold there by the
Jewish-owned Haavara company in Tel-Aviv. Money from the sales was given to
the Jewish emigrant upon his arrival in Palestine in an amount
corresponding to his deposit in Germany. German goods poured into Palestine
through the Haavara, which was supplemented a short time later with a
barter agreement by which Palestine oranges were exchanged for German
timber, automobiles, agricultural machinery, and other goods. The Agreement
thus served the Zionist aim of bringing Jewish settlers and development
capital to Palestine, while simultaneously serving the German goal of
freeing the country of an unwanted alien group.

Delegates at the 1933 Zionist Congress in Prague vigorously debated the
merits of the Agreement. Some feared that the pact would undermine the
international Jewish economic boycott against Germany. But Zionist
officials reassured the Congress. Sam Cohen, a key figure behind the
Haavara arrangement, stressed that the Agreement was not economically
advantageous to Germany. Arthur Ruppin, a Zionist Organization emigration
specialist who had helped negotiate the pact, pointed out that “the
Transfer Agreement in no way interfered with the boycott movement, since no
new currency will flow into Germany as a result of the agreement…” 33 The
1935 Zionist Congress, meeting in Switzerland, overwhelmingly endorsed the
pact. In 1936, the Jewish Agency (the Zionist “shadow government” in
Palestine) took over direct control of the Ha’avara, which remained in
effect until the Second World War forced its abandonment.

Some German officials opposed the arrangement. Germany’s Consul General in
Jerusalem, Hans Döhle, for example, sharply criticized the Agreement on
several occasions during 1937. He pointed out that it cost Germany the
foreign exchange that the products exported to Palestine through the pact
would bring if sold elsewhere. The Haavara monopoly sale of German goods to
Palestine through a Jewish agency naturally angered German businessmen and
Arabs there. Official German support for Zionism could lead to a loss of
German markets throughout the Arab world. The British government also
resented the arrangement.34 A June 1937 German Foreign Office internal
bulletin referred to the “foreign exchange sacrifices” that resulted from
the Haavara. 35

A December 1937 internal memorandum by the German Interior Ministry reviewed
the impact of the Transfer Agreement: “There is no doubt that the Haavara
arrangement has contributed most significantly to the very rapid
development of Palestine since 1933. The Agreement provided not only the
largest source of money (from Germany!), but also the most intelligent
group of immigrants, a nd finally it brought to the country the machines
and industrial products essential for development.” The main advantage of
the pact, the memo reported, was the emigration of large numbers of Jews to
Palestine, the most desirable target country as far as Germany was
concerned. But the paper also noted the important drawbacks pointed out by
Consul Döhle and others. The Interior Minister, it went on, had concluded
that the disadvantages of the agreement now outweighed the advantages and
that, therefore, it should be terminated. 36

Only one man could resolve the controversy. Hitler personally reviewed the
policy in July and September 1937, and again in January 1938, and each time
decided to maintain the Haavara arrangement. The goal of removing Jews from
Germany, he concluded, justified the drawbacks. 37

The Reich Economics Ministry helped to organize another transfer company,
the International Trade and Investment Agency, or Intria, through which
Jews in foreign countries could help German Jews emigrate to Palestine.
Almost $900,000 was eventually channeled through the Intria to German Jews
in Palestine.38 Other European countries eager to encourage Jewish
emigration concluded agreements with the Zionists modeled after the
Ha’avara. In 1937 Poland authorized the Halifin (Hebrew for “exchange”)
transfer company. By late summer 1939, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary and
Italy had signed similar arrangements. The outbreak of war in September
1939, however, prevented large-scale implementation of these agreements. 39

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:22:58 EDT 2008
Article: 504304 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: ZydWatch
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Zionism & Third Reich – Part 2/2
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 09:29:31 -0600
Organization: ZydWatch
Lines: 322
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 21210
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.europe:613622 soc.culture.swiss:58770 soc.culture.russian:504304

Zionism & Third Reich – Part 2/2
Immer die verfluechte Juden/ZYDS/Kristmordern!

Achievements of Haavara

Between 1933 and 1941, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to Palestine
through the Ha’avara and other German-Zionist arrangements, or about ten
percent of Germany’s 1933 Jewish population. (These German Jews made up
about 15 percent of Palestine’s 1939 Jewish population.) Some Ha’avara
emigrants transferred considerable personal wealth from Germany to
Palestine. As Jewish historian Edwin Black has noted: “Many of these
people, especially in the late 1930s, were allowed to transfer actual
replicas of their homes and factories — indeed rough replicas of their
very existence.”40

The total amount transferred from Germany to Palestine through the Ha’avara
between August 1933 and the end of 1939 was 8.1 million pounds or 139.57
million German marks (then equivalent to more than $40 million). This
amount included 33.9 million German marks ($13.8 million) provided by the
Reichsbank in connection with the Agreement.41

Historian Black has estimated that an additional $70 million may have flowed
into Palestine through corollary German commercial agreements and special
international banking transactions. The German funds had a major impact on
a country as underdeveloped as Palestine was in the 1930s, he pointed out.
Several major industrial enterprises were built with the capital from
Germany, including the Mekoroth waterworks and the Lodzia textile firm. The
influx of Ha’avara goods and capital, concluded Black, “produced an
economic explosion in Jewish Palestine” and was “an indispensable factor in
the creation of the State of Israel.”42

The Ha’avara agreement greatly contributed to Jewish development in
Palestine and thus, indirectly, to the foundation of the Israeli state. A
January 1939 German Foreign Office circular bulletin reported, with some
misgiving, that “the transfer of Jewish property out of Germany [through
the Ha’avara agreement] contributed to no small extent to the building of a
Jewish state in Palestine.”43

Former officials of the Ha’avara company in Palestine confirmed this view in
a detailed study of the Transfer Agreement published in 1972: “The economic
activity made possible by the influx German capital and the Haavara
transfers to the private and public sectors were of greatest importance for
the country’s development. Many new industries and commercial enterprises
were established in Jewish Palestine, and numerous companies that are
enormously important even today in the economy of the State of Israel owe
their existence to the Haavara.”44

Dr. Ludwig Pinner, a Ha’avara company official in Tel Aviv during the 1930s,
later commented that the exceptionally competent Ha’avara
immigrants “decisively contributed” to the economic, social, cultural and
educational development of Palestine’s Jewish community.45

The Transfer Agreement was the most far-reaching example of cooperation
between Hitler’s Germany and international Zionism. Through this pact,
Hitler’s Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930s to
support Jewish development in Palestine.

Zionists Offer a Military Alliance With Hitler

In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a
formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political
alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical
underground “Fighters for the Freedom of Israel,” better known as the Lehi
or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the
radical nationalist “National Military Organization” (Irgun Zvai Leumi)
over the group’s attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned
further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main
enemy of Zionism.

This remarkable Zionist proposal “for the solution of the Jewish question in
Europe and the active participation of the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the
side of Germany” is worth quoting at some length:46

In their speeches and statements, the leading statesmen of National
Socialist Germany have often emphasized that a New Order in Europe requires
as a prerequisite a radical solution of the Jewish question by evacuation.
(“Jew-f ree Europe”)

The evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe is a precondition for
solving the Jewish question. However, the only way this can be totally
achieved is through settlement of these masses in the homeland of the
Jewish people, Palestine, and by the establishment of a Jewish state in its
historical boundaries.

The goal of the political activity and the years of struggle by the Israel
Freedom Movement, the National Military Organization in Palestine (Irgun
Zvai Leumi), is to solve the Jewish problem in this way and thus completely
liberate the Jewish people forever.

The NMO, which is very familiar with the good will of the German Reich
government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and
the Zionist emigration program, takes that view that:

1. Common interests can exist between a European New Order based on the
German concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as
embodied by the NMO.

2. Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folk
ish-national Jewry [Hebr_ertum].

3. The establishment of the historical Jewish state on a national and
totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty with the German Reich, would be in
the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of
power in the Near East.

On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German
Reich government recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom
Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part
in the war on the side of Germany.

This offer by the NMO could include military, political and informational
activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational measures,
outside as well. Along with this the Jewish men of Europe would be
militarily trained and organized in military units under the leadership and
command of the NMO. They would take part in combat operations for the
purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front by formed.

The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order
of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with a
positive-radical solution of the European Jewish problem on the basis of
the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would
greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all
humanity.

The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be consistent with
a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed
that he would utilize any combination and coalition in order to isolate and
defeat England.

There is no record of any German response. Acceptance was very unlikely
anyway because by this time German policy was decisively pro-Arab.47
Remarkably, Stern’s group sought to conclude a pact with the Third Reich at
a time when stories that Hitler was bent on exterminating Jews were already
in wide circulation. Stern apparently either did not believe the stories or
he was willing to collaborate with the mortal enemy of his people to help
bring about a Jewish state. 48

An important Lehi member at the time the group made this offer was Yitzhak
Shamir, who later served as Israel’s Foreign Minister and then, during much
of the 1980s and until June 1992, as Prime Minister. As Lehi operations
chief following Stern’s death in 1942, Shamir organized numerous acts of
terror, including the November 1944 assassination of British Middle East
Minister Lord Moyne and the September 1948 slaying of Swedish United
Nations mediator Count Bernadotte. Years later, when Shamir was asked about
the 1941 offer, he confirmed that he was aware of his organization’s
proposed alliance with wartime Germany. 49

Conclusion

In spite of the basic hostility between the Hitler regime and international
Jewry, for several years Jewish Zionist and German National Socialist
interests coincided. In collaborating with the Zionists for a mutually
desirable and humane solution to a complex problem, the Third Reich was
willing to make foreign exchange sacrifices, impair relations with Britain
and anger the Arabs. Indeed, during the 1930s no nation did more to
substantively further Jewish-Zionist goals than Hitler’s Germany.

Notes

1.W. Martini, “Hebr_isch unterm Hakenkreuz,” Die Welt (Hamburg), Jan. 10,
1975. Cited in: Klaus Polken, “The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi
Germany, 1933-1941,” Journal of Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, p.
65. 2.Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen: Die “Reichskristallnacht”
(Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), p. 212. See also: Th. Herzl, The Jewish State
(New York: Herzl Press, 1970), pp. 33, 35, 36, and, Edwin Black, The
Transfer Agreement (New York: Macmillan, 1984), p. 73. 3.Th. Herzl, “Der
Kongress,” Welt, June 4, 1897. Reprinted in: Theodor Herzls zionistische
Schriften (Leon Kellner, ed.), erster Teil, Berlin: Jüdischer Verlag, 1920,
p. 190 (and p. 139). 4.Memo of June 21, 1933, in: L. Dawidowicz, A
Holocaust Reader (New York: Behrman, 1976), pp. 150-155, and (in part) in:
Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin:
Univ. of Texas, 1985), p. 42.; On Zionism in Germany before Hitler’s
assumption of power, see: Donald L. Niewyk, The Jews in Weimar Germany
(Baton Rouge: 1980), pp. 94-95, 126-131, 140-143.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich
(Austin: 1985), pp. 1-15. 5.Jüdische Rundschau (Berlin), June 13, 1933.
Quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (New York:
Ballantine, pb., 1971, 1984), pp. 376-377. 6.Heinz Höhne, The Order of the
Death’s Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 376. 7.”Berlin,” Encyclopaedia
Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971), Vol. 5, p. 648. For a look at one
aspect of this “vigorous life,” see: J.-C. Horak, “Zionist Film Propaganda
in Nazi Germany,” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Vol. 4,
No. 1, 1984, pp. 49-58. 8.Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), pp. 54-55.; Karl A. Schleunes, The Twisted Road
to Auschwitz (Urbana: Univ. of Illinois, 1970, 1990), pp. 178-181. 9.Jacob
Boas, “A Nazi Travels to Palestine,” History Today (London), January 1980,
pp. 33-38. 10.Facsimile reprint of front page of Das Schwarze Korps, May
15, 1935, in: Janusz Piekalkiewicz, Israels Langer Arm (Frankfurt: Goverts,
1975), pp. 66-67. Also quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death’s
Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 377. See also: Erich Kern, ed.,
Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: FZ-Verlag, 1988), p. 184. 11.Das Schwarze
Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), pp. 56-57. 12.Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age
of the Dictators (1983), p. 83. 13.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the
Palestine Question (1985), p. 60. See also: F. Nicosia, “The Yishuv and the
Holocaust,” The Journal of Modern History (Chicago), Vol. 64, No. 3, Sept.
1992, pp. 533-540. 14.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine
Question (1985), p. 57. 15.Jüdische Rundschau, Sept. 17, 1935. Quoted in:
Yitzhak Arad, with Y. Gutman and A. Margaliot, eds., Documents on the
Holocaust (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1981), pp. 82-83. 16.Der Angriff, Dec.
23, 1935, in: E. Kern, ed., Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: 1988), p.
148.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 56.; L. Brenner, Zionism in the
Age of the Dictators (1983), p. 138.; A. Margaliot, “The Reaction…,” Yad
Vashem Studies (Jerusalem), vol. 12, 1977, pp. 90-91.; On Kareski’s
remarkable career, see: H. Levine, “A Jewish Collaborator in Nazi Germany,”
Central European History (Atlanta), Sept. 1975, pp. 251-281. 17.”Dr. Wise
Urges Jews to Declare Selves as Such,” New York Herald Tribune, June 13,
1938, p. 12. 18.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich (1985), p. 53. 19.Lucy
Dawidowicz, The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (New York: Bantam, pb.,
1976), pp. 253-254.; Max Nussbaum, “Zionism Under Hitler,” Congress Weekly
(New York: American Jewish Congress), Sept. 11, 1942.; F. Nicosia, The
Third Reich (1985), pp. 58-60, 217.; Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement
(1984), p. 175. 20.H. H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (Ballantine,
pb., 1984), pp. 380-382.; K. Schleunes, Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p. 226.;
Secret internal SS intelligence report about F. Polkes, June 17, 1937, in:
John Mendelsohn, ed., The Holocaust (New York: Garland, 1982), vol. 5, pp.
62-64. 21.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 63-64, 105, 219-220. 22.F.
Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 160. 23.This distinction is also implicit
in the “Balfour Declaration” of November 1917, in which the British
government expressed support for “a national home for the Jewish people” in
Palestine, while carefully avoiding any mention of a Jewish state.
Referring to the majority Arab population there, the Declaration went on to
caution, “…it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which
may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish
communities in Palestine.” The complete text of the Declaration is
reproduced in facsimile in: Robert John, Behind the Balfour Declaration
(IHR, 1988), p. 32. 24.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 121. 25.F.
Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 124. 26.David Yisraeli, The Palestine
Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Bar-Ilan University, Israel, 1974),
p. 300.; Also in: Documents on German Foreign Policy, Series D, Vol. 5.
Doc. No. 564 or 567. 27.K. Schleunes, The Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p.
209. 28.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS.
International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before
the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), vol. 32, pp.
242-243. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, DC: 1946-1948), vol.
6, pp. 92-93. 29.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 141-144.; On Hitler’s
critical view of Zionism in Mein Kampf, see esp. Vol. 1, Chap. 11. Quoted
in: Robert Wistrich, Hitler’s Apocalypse (London: 1985), p. 155.; See also:
F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 26-28.; Hitler told his army adjutant
in 1939 and again in 1941 that he had asked the British in 1937 about
transferring all of Germany’s Jews to Palestine or Egypt. The British
rejected the proposal, he said, because it would cause further disorder.
See: H. v. Kotze, ed., Heeresadjutant bei Hitler (Stuttgart: 1974), pp. 65,
95. 30.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 156, 160-164, 166-167.; H.
H_hne, The Order of the Death’s Head (Ballantine, pb., 1984), pp. 392-394.;
Jon and David Kimche, The Secret Roads (London: Secker and Warburg, 1955),
pp. 39-43. See also: David Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and Palestine,”
Middle Eastern Studies, October 1971, p. 347.; Bernard Wasserstein, Britain
and the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945 (1979), pp. 43, 49, 52, 60.; T.
Kelly, “Man who fooled Nazis,” Washington Times, April 28, 1987, pp. 1B,
4B. Based on interview with Willy Perl, author of The Holocaust Conspiracy.
31.Y. Arad, et al., eds., Documents On the Holocaust (1981), p. 155. (The
training kibbutz was at Neuendorf, and may have functioned even after March
1942.) 32.On the Agreement in general, see: Werner Feilchenfeld, et al.,
Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972).; David
Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and the Transfer Agreement,” Journal of
Contemporary History (London), No. 2, 1971, pp. 129-148.; “Haavara,”
Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 7, pp. 1012-1013.; F. Nicosia, The Third
Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin: 1985), pp. 44-49.; Raul Hilberg,
The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1985),
pp. 140-141.; The Transfer Agreement, by Edwin Black, is detailed and
useful. However, it contains numerous inaccuracies and wildly erroneous
conclusions. See, for example, the review by Richard S. Levy in Commentary,
Sept. 1984, pp. 68-71. 33.E. Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 328,
337. 34.On opposition to the Haavara in official German circles, see: W.
Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972), pp. 31-33.;
D. Yisraeli, “The Third Reich,” Journal of Contemporary History, 1971, pp.
136-139.; F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question, pp.
126-139.; I. Weckert, Feuerzeichen (1981), pp. 226-227.; Rolf Vogel, Ein
Stempel hat gefehlt (Munich: Droemer Knaur, 1977), pp. 110 ff. 35.W.
Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 31. Entire text in: David
Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel:
1974), pp. 298-300. 36.Interior Ministry internal memo (signed by State
Secretary W. Stuckart), Dec. 17, 1937, in: Helmut Eschwege, ed.,
Kennzeichen J (Berlin: 1966), pp. 132-136. 37.W. Feilchenfeld, et al,
Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 32. 38.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp.
376-377. 39.E. Black, Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 376, 378.; F. Nicosia,
Third Reich (1985), pp. 238-239 (n. 91). 40.E. Black, Transfer Agreement,
p. 379.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich, pp. 212, 255 (n. 66). 41.W. Feilchenfeld,
et al., Haavara-Transfer, p. 75.; “Haavara,” Encyclopaedia Judaica, (1971),
Vol. 7, p. 1013. 42.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp. 379, 373, 382.
43.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS. International
Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the
International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), Vol. 32, pp.
242-243. 44.Werner Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina
(Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972). Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen
(Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), pp. 222-223. 45.W. Feilchenfeld, et al.,
Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972). Quoted in: I. Weckert,
Feuerzeichen (1981), p. 224. 46.Original document in German Ausw_rtiges Amt
Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E 224152 and E 234155-58. (Photocopy in author’s
possession).; Complete original German text published in: David Yisraeli,
The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1974), pp.
315-317. See also: Klaus Polkhen, “The Secret Contacts,” Journal of
Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, pp. 78-80.; (At the time this offer
was made, Stern’s Lehi group still regarded itself as the true Irgun/NMO.)
47.Arab nationalists opposed Britain, which then dominated much of the Arab
world, including Egypt, Iraq and Palestine. Because Britain and Germany
were at war, Germany cultivated Arab support. The leader of Palestine’s
Arabs, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el-Husseini, worked closely
with Germany during the war years. After escaping from Palestine, he spoke
to the Arab world over German radio and helped raise Muslim recruits in
Bosnia for the Waffen SS. 48.Israel Shahak, “Yitzhak Shamir, Then and Now,”
Middle East Policy (Washington, DC), Vol. 1, No. 1, (Whole No. 39), 1992,
pp. 27-38.; Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s Fateful Hour (New York: Harper and
Row, 1988), pp. 213-214. Quoted in: Andrew J. Hurley, Israel and the New
World Order (Santa Barbara, Calif.: 1991), pp. 93, 208-209.; Avishai
Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books,
May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986),
pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, “Yitzhak Shamir: On Hitler’s Side,” Arab
Perspectives (League of Arab States), March 1984, pp. 11-13. 49.Avishai
Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books,
May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986),
pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, “Skeletons in Shamir’s Cupboard,” Middle East
International, Sept. 30, 1983, pp. 15-16.; Sol Stern, L.
Rapoport, “Israel’s Man of the Shadows,” Village Voice (New York), July 3,
1984, pp. 13 ff.

SSGG – When somebody talks of shutting them down, you get three hundred
thousand “1st amendment” types jumping to the guy’s defense, giving you a
class on the Bill of Rights – Jacob Baltuch, Brandeis University
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/051115chicago.htm

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:12 EDT 2008
Article: 701456 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.151.193.236
From: 20April <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine
Subject: What Is Arabic Word for Revenge?
Organization: Zawsze przeklêty ZYDS
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 2
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:04:57 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1211389497 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 21 May 2008 11:04:57 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:04:57 MDT
Bytes: 984
X-Original-Bytes: 942
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.palestine:701456

What is the arabic word for revenge – hasbara?

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:13 EDT 2008
Article: 701460 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: George Orwell
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,talk.politics.mideast,alt.politics
Subject: Edward M. Rosen — Come To Israel All Zionists… ALIYA
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 22:58:17 +0200 (CEST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: [email protected]
Lines: 16
Bytes: 1249
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.palestine:701460 talk.politics.mideast:1018379 alt.politics:3932339

http://sarasassy.wordpress.com/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/2511119527/

http://aliyaallzionists.ning.com/

http://aliyaallzionists.ning.com/profile/Edward_M_Rosen

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all’indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:13 EDT 2008
Article: 701804 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.palestine
Subject: German academics: Enough of special treatment for Israel
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 17:19:27 -0600
Organization: ZydWatch
Lines: 96
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5127
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.europe:613478 soc.culture.german:344134 soc.culture.palestine:701804

German academics: Enough of special treatment for Israel.
Immer die verfluechte Juden!

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:24:18 -0500, in soc.culture.europe Defendario
wrote:

Twenty five influential academics post petition calling on government to
stop embracing Israel because of Holocaust, start embracing Palestinians
as well

Eldad Beck
Published: 11.16.06, 09:33

BERLIN – Twenty five German academics published a petition Wednesday
urging their government to loosen its embrace of Israel and start
embracing Palestinians in an unprecedented act in the history of the
relationship between Germany and Israel.

The academics in question are highly influential professors at the
country’s leading universities which were mainly funded by the German
government. Many of them are known for their anti-Israel stances.

The academics called on the German government to stop giving “special
treatment” to Israel following the Holocaust and warned that the
sympathetic attitude could lead to unrest amidst the German people.

The petition was recently published in the German based journal
Frankfurter Rundschau owned by the Dumont Schauberg publishing house.
The company recently purchased 25 percent of Haaretz’s stocks.

The 25 petition signers called on a change in the character of the
relationship between Israel and Germany, which would lead the two
countries to have a “friendship free from past burdens,” one which would
leave room for expressing criticism of Israel.

According to the academics, the Holocaust binds Germany to not only
stand by Israel, but to also stand by the Palestinians. They said this
was important since the ramifications of the Holocaust lead to much
suffering for the Palestinians over the past 60 years.

Germany obligated to stand exclusively by Israel?

The petition said, “A large part of the German society has turned the
shame and grief of the Holocaust into a ceremonial matter. That is how a
problematic philo-Semitism has developed in Germany.”

“The roots of this 60 year bloody confrontation in the Middle East are
German and European. The Palestinian population has doesn’t have the
responsibility to take on some of Europe’s problems in the Middle East,”
the petition continued.

Those who signed the petition expressed criticism of the “special”
relationship between the two countries which lead to Germany providing
Israel with advanced military technologies, even when Israel had
violated international law and violated human rights.

The academics questioned whether Germany was obligated to stand
exclusively by Israel in the Middle East in light of the Holocaust, and
wondered about the whether preserving the relationship would have
consequences on the German people, particularly between Jews and Muslims.

“Each new attack on Israeli citizens and each disproportional action by
the IDF and Israel’s government reinforce the polarization in Germany
between those in favor of Israel and those against it in terrifying
measures. Such an atmosphere makes an open public dialogue on the
questions we raised extremely crucial,” the petition said.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3328858,00.html

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur , or to
[email protected], or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:14 EDT 2008
Article: 702235 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Zyd&McVayWatch
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.palestine
Subject: Why the World Hates the Jews/ZYDs
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 08:49:34 -0600
Organization: ZydWatch
Lines: 303
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 19138
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.swiss:58782 soc.culture.australian:462987 soc.culture.palestine:702235

Why still after more than 2000 years does the World Still Hate the foul
Christkiller ZYDS/Jews!

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:18:34 -0500, in soc.culture.usa “DoD” wrote:

[Interesting, and probably true for most people outside the U.S. and a few
inside the U.S., but I dont think it tells the whole story]

Many of the bitter controversies in every corner of the globe inevitably
raise the same ancient question: why does the world hate the Jews?
Whether it’s the angry international reaction to Israel’s efforts to defend
itself in Lebanon, or Mel Gibson’s drunken rant in Malibu, the age-old
specter of anti-Semitism refuses to disappear. With only 13 million Jews in
the world – less than one fourth of one percent of the earth’s population –
why does this tiny group inspire such bitter, widespread and often violent
animosity?

The answer is obvious to anyone who monitors anti-Semitic propaganda from
all its multifarious sources. People who express hatred, resentment or fear
regarding the Jews almost always focus on charges of Jewish arrogance,
elitism, aggressiveness and lust for power.

According to the logic of anti-Semites everywhere, Jews deserve harsher
treatment than anyone else because they work harder than anyone else to
enshrine their own superior status. This argument suggests that the only way
to answer constant Jewish demands for special treatment and privilege is to
impose special limitations and restrictions on their instinctive will to
dominate.

According to such logic, the rest of the world must work together to cut
Jews down to size; only then will they function on the same plane as
everyone else. As Hutton Gibson (Holocaust-denying father of the
scandal-tarnished star, Mel) revealingly declared to interviewer Steve
Feuerstein: “I don’t know what the Jewish agenda is except that it’s all
about control. They’re after one world religion and one world government.”

This central, primeval charge that arrogant Jews seek global dominance
originates from three distinct historical factors:

1- The emphasis on the “Chosen People” concept in the Bible

2- The prominence and prosperity of Jews in most nations in which they’ve
established significant communities, and

3- The startling successes of the State of Israel in the mere 60 years of
its existence.

These circumstances sometimes perplex even people of good will and therefore
deserve deeper consideration and explanation.

I. CHOSEN PEOPLE CONCEPT

While it’s true that the Bible speaks repeatedly of a special relationship
between God and the Jews, anti-Semitic agitators have always misunderstood
or distorted the essential nature of that connection. According to
Scripture, the Jews have been chosen for distinct responsibilities, not for
unique privileges: we accept special obligations, rather than claiming
special power. In Jewish tradition, non-Jews are expected to follow just
seven commandments-the Noahide laws of basic morality. According to
mainstream Torah teaching, gentiles who follow these rules (don’t murder,
don’t steal, don’t commit gross sexual immorality, and so forth) should be
judged as righteous and assumed to earn their share in the World to Come
(the afterlife). God, however, expects his covenantal people to apply far
more numerous and stringent commandments to their behavior – 613
commandments, to be exact – regarding everything from food, to business
ethics, marital relations, and Sabbath observance.

The concept of chosen-ness, in other words, involves a significant burden
rather than privileged status -a burden reflected in the common phrase, “Ohl
Malchus Shamayim” or “The Yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven,” to describe the
commitment of every Jew who accepts the covenant of Abraham. Moreover, Jews
remain more a “choosing people” than a “chosen people” because so many
non-Jews over the centuries (and particularly in recent years) have selected
Jewish identity and converted to our faith. In the US, nearly 10% of today’s
Jewish population of 5.2 million counts as converts to Judaism. Though we
don’t emphasize proselytizing efforts in the style of Evangelical
Christians, many of the leaders of the Jewish people (including hugely
significant rabbis in nearly every era for the last 2000 years) have been
“Jews by Choice” — those who weren’t born Jewish, but chose to join our
people through an ancient, well-established process of conversion.

Finally, the whole idea of the “Chosen People” has never brought the
assumption that God selected us for unusual political, military or even
economic authority. The Bible suggests that the Jews will be “a nation of
priests and a holy nation” — not some sort of all-conquering superpower
within the Middle East or the world at large. Our tradition has always
defined Jewish power as spiritual, rather than practical and worldly. No
Jewish leader, going all the way back to Moses and Abraham, has ever
suggested that our people should dominate the world and control other
nations. The Bible specifies relatively modest borders for the Holy Land,
and repeatedly mentions the much larger, far more formidable empires to the
south (Egypt) and to the East (Babylonia, Assyria, Persia). Even during the
glory days of ancient Israel under David and Solomon the Jewish state never
achieved full control of that promised territory-let alone a world-girdling
empire. At that time, as with Israel today, the Jewish people sought only to
live unmolested within the confines of their own cherished land, each man
“beneath his own vine and own fig tree.”

II. JEWISH PROMINENCE AND SUCCESS IN THE LANDS OF THE DIASPORA

No one can deny that Jews in the United States and in many other nations
recently have achieved surprising levels of prosperity and influence but any
talk of Jewish “dominance” or “control” in those societies remains the
province of neo-Nazi propagandists. There is no significant industry or
arena of endeavor – no, not one–in any nation in the world (outside of
Israel) in which Jews outnumber or rule over non-Jews. Even the famous
Jewish command of Hollywood is an ignorant myth concerning an increasingly
international industry in which the prominence of influential Jews has
actually decreased in the last seventy years. Most of the pioneering movie
studios founded and owned by immigrant Jewish families have either gone out
of the movie production business altogether (M-G-M) or else sold out to
strikingly non-Jewish corporations (Columbia to the Japanese Sony
Corporation, and 20th Century Fox to an Australian descendant of
Presbyterian clergy, Rupert Murdoch). The two largest entertainment
conglomerates in the world boast board chairmen who are African-American
(Richard Parsons at Time Warner) and Arab American (George Mitchell at
Disney) neither of whom are remotely Jewish. The yearly lists of Hollywood’s
most influential power players, as identified by Premiere Magazine and other
sources, regularly show that close to one-fourth of the movers-and-shakers
are Jews-a disproportionate showing, to be sure, but hardly an indication of
Jewish dominance. Similarly, the Fortune 500 list of the nation’s largest
corporations features a top ten ranking that includes three oil companies
with strong Arab ties and no affection whatever for Israel, as well as a car
company (Ford) founded by one of history’s most outspoken anti-Semites, and
a retailer run by conservative Christians from Arkansas (Wal-Mart)-but not a
single corporation that was founded, run, or owned by Jews. Among the top
100, at most six (including Home Depot, Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers)
could classify in any way as “Jewish companies.” With these incontrovertible
facts easy to verify for anyone with access to the internet or a library, it
becomes even more difficult to explain the persistent, pernicious and
utterly false belief that Jews “own” or “control” most of the world’s banks,
newspapers, media companies and other important instiutions. Part of the
confusion involves appalling lies and misinformation: many callers to my
radio show somehow believe that the Rockefellers are Jewish (they were
actually German Christians who arrived in Philadelphia in 1723) or that the
Rothschild family-a favorite target of anti-Semites for more than 200
years– still dominates world banking (the family’s power actually peaked in
the Napoleonic era and their influence on the global economy today is either
invisible or non-existent).

There is also a tendency on the part of paranoid anti-Semites to search out
a few Jewish names even in areas in which Jews play minor roles in order to
triumphantly affirm the myth of “Jewish control.” Consider the case of the
Bush administration and the frequent, laughably absurd charge that it’s
somehow dominated by Jewish “neo-conservatives” who forced the President to
make war on Iraq for the sake of Israel. In truth, Jews remained
conspicuously absent from positions of authority during the first Bush term:
for the first time in more than 65 years (since the Presidency of FDR!) the
President’s Cabinet (15 department heads in all) included not a single Jew.
The true believers in a Neo-Con cabal invariably cite just two names who
held sub-cabinet posts (Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense and
Douglas Feith, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy) and a single civilian
advisor to the Defense Department (Richard Perle, of the Defense Policy
Board) who doesn’t even count as an administration employee. The
anti-Semites focus on these names not because of their importance (anyone
who believes that Wolfowitz and Feith secretly controlled their imperious,
tough-as-nails boss, Don Rumsfeld, knows nothing about Rummy) but because
they happen to be Jewish. Similarly, conspiracists like to blame Jews in the
Senate for pushing us into war with Iraq, while ignoring the fact that a
bare majority of the eleven Jewish Senators at the time (including such
fierce anti-war advocates as Russ Feingold and Barbara Boxer) actually voted
against the resolution authorizing war -at a time when nearly 80% of their
gentile colleagues lined up on the other side to support the President in
deposing Saddam Hussein.

To me, one of the most mystifying aspects of the stubborn belief in Jewish
influence and power is the notion that our fractious, deeply divided,
largely disaffiliated people somehow manages to get together to exert that
authority. I’m a Jewish radio talk show host, and so is the appalling (and
unfunny) Al Franken of Air America. We agree on nothing, and we’ve both
managed to survive several very angry, bitter, public confrontations. Do
Jew-haters believe that behind the scenes we receive the same secret memos
>from Jewish Conspiracy Central, or else get together in dank, shadowy rooms
to study the one-hundred-year-old hoax, “The Protocols of the Elders of
Zion”? Less than half of the U.S. Jewish population (alas!) gives to any
Jewish charity, or holds membership in any synagogue, Temple, pro-Israel
lobbying group, B’nai B’rith lodge, or other Jewish organization.

In this context, the almost mystical, profoundly illogical belief in “Jewish
power” based on our over-representation among accountants and dentists
amounts to more than a delusion; it is, in fact, a sickness.

III: ISRAEL’S SUCCESS – AND ALLEGEDLY “EXPANSIONIST” AND “IMPERIALIST”
NATURE

In order to credit Islamist denunciations of an “Israeli Empire,” or worry
that the perennially embattled Jewish state might indeed count as uniquely
aggressive and power hungry, one must remain incurably ignorant not only of
contemporary history but of rudimentary geography. The merest glance at a
map reveals the incontrovertible fact that Israel remains, in every sense, a
tiny nation. Egypt alone – representing only one of Israel’s twenty hostile
Arab neighbors-is more than 48 times the land area of Israel. Adding
together only the various Arab nations (without including other vast Islamic
homelands like Iran and Afghanistan and Pakistan), the Arabs control well
over 300 times the area of the New Jersey-sized Jewish state. In other
words, even before President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran succeeds (God
forbid) in his plan to “wipe Israel from the map,” 99.7% of the Arab lands
are already free of Jews.

Moreover, for nearly thirty years, Israel has been shrinking and
retreating – not expanding – hardly the behavior of an aggressive empire
bent on world domination. After capturing the Sinai Peninsula, Gaza and the
West Bank in a defensive war in 1967, Israel returned the vast Sinai to
Egypt in 1978, agreed to the establishment of a Palestinian State on most of
the West Bank and Gaza in 1993, vacated its security zone in Lebanon in
2000, abandoned Gaza entirely in 2005 and, under the current Prime Minister,
committed to moving out of nearly all territory in the West Bank in the near
future. In retrospect, some of these moves look like horrible policy
mistakes, but they unequivocally indicate that there is no basis at all to
suggest that Israeli aggression accounts for contemporary anti-Semitism.

The establishment of the modern Jewish state wasn’t a cause of Jew hatred,
but a response to Jew hatred-not only in Europe, but throughout the Islamic
world where some 800,000 Middle Eastern and North African Jews were driven
>from their ancient communities and found new homes in Israel. None of Israel
‘s eight major wars has been about a Jewish lust for new territory. All of
them have been about a beleaguered nation’s ceaseless attempts to make its
citizens secure from murderous attack in the distinctly limited area of
their ancestral homeland. Every Arab child in Lebanon, in Gaza, and in the
West Bank could sleep sweet, undisturbed slumber as soon as tomorrow night
if the adults once-and-for-all gave up their long-standing project of
driving the Jews out of the Middle East.

Contrary to anti-Semitic presumptions, Israel has never demanded special
privileges of any kind, but yearns (and bleeds) only for the same rights
other nations enjoy: to live undisturbed beside its neighbors without
unceasing attack by terrorists, militias and, occasionally, major armies.
Montenegro, the newest member of the family of nations after a referendum
this year, won independence and worldwide recognition despite the fact that
more than 45% of the electorate opposed bringing the nation into existence,
and only a bare majority claims Montenegran (as opposed to Serbian)
nationality. More than 80% of the residents of Israel are Jewish, and they
have fought tenaciously for their nationhood for nearly sixty years. The
desire for peaceful borders and acceptance from fanatical neighbors hardly
amounts to an Israeli demand of privileged status, but the refusal to grant
that recognition reflects the classical attitude of the anti-Semite: that
Jews indeed deserve different treatment from all other nations on earth but
in a negative, hostile and, ultimately murderous sense.

In conclusion, none of the three obsessive fears of Jew haters-the “Chosen
People” concept, Jewish prosperity in the Diaspora, and Israel’s success (so
far) in nation-building and self-defense -demonstrates in any way a push for
world conquest or superior standing for the children of Abraham. How, then,
can we understand the imperishable belief that Jews function as an arrogant,
imperious, overbearing people? In a few words, that resentment stems in
truth from the age-old Jewish refusal to abandon our separate identity, our
irreducible distinctiveness through the millennia. My friends Dennis Prager
and Joseph Telushkin provide the most compelling exposition on this dynamic
in their invaluable book, Why the Jews?, recently reissued.

In any event, the logic becomes most accessible when considered in personal,
intimate terms. If a small group among your neighbors refuses invitations to
worship in your churches and mosques, to eat the food you prepare in your
homes, to marry your daughters, to embrace your nationalisms, or to share
your enthusiasm for the ultimate, universally applicable perfection of your
Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Byzantine, Catholic, Islamic, Nazi or Communist
worldview, then it’s all but certain you will resent the members of that
stubborn group – and assume that they exclude themselves from elements of
your society due to an innate, obnoxious sense of superiority.

For Jews who try to remain faithful to the old covenant, there’s no choice
about the unyielding refusal to assimilate and disappear-and no surprise at
the angry reaction in much of the world. After all, the Bible repeatedly
predicts that response. This realization doesn’t make it any easier to cope
with anti-Semitism, but it does make the eternal hatred comprehensible. No
matter how inconvenient or unpopular, we get our marching orders from the
commandments–including the crucial and celebrated injunction to choose
life, for ourselves and our people.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23787

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur ,
And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR

or to [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex, homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:03 EDT 2008
Article: 701313 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.palestine,alt.homosexuality
Subject: Frank Arthur=alias Grosvenor=Gay Ken McVay – Invites Calls & Visits
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 08:48:25 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 130
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5751
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.usa:2340332 soc.culture.palestine:701313 alt.homosexuality:85719

Yes indeed , I am the foul misbegotten pestilence known as Cranky Frank
Arthur – sometimes alias Grosvenor – also alias Gay Ken McVay,
and even alias Yitzhak Goldstein.

And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

Frank Arthur sometimes posts via Bellsouth Internet Group
As the fraud Grosvenor [me] I use anonymous remailers.
Grosvomit often posts to alt.homosexua l- my need!
I don’t use my degenerate father’s name because I am ashamed of
him so I steal other’s names, from gravestones, or internet.

I am the filthy fraud who changes names every few minutes,
because I am truly certifiably insane.

I am so insane I claim that all my critics are a “grosvenor”!
Now, I even claim that some of the “grosvenors” are now “mirelles”

Frank Arthur [me] sometimes I post using Bellsouth Internet Group,
except when I post using remailers, anonymously, to confuse people.

I am the fraud Grosvenor [again me] and I often use anonymous remailers.
Sometimes as Grosvenor , or Frank Arthur, or Ken McVay, or Yitzhak Goldstein.
I often post to alt.homosexual – just to satisfy my need!

The genuine Grosvenor has not posted for years, so I stole his name to
annoy him, and also readers!

Many people believe that I am really gay Ken McVay the disgusting
pervert fag from Nanaimo Canada doing all the posting, now that my
ZYD benefactors stopped financing all the BS and my one person
web business.

All entries below collated from various sources and are
public domain.

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:32:43 GMT, Venceremos2
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:28:25 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

Like Fraud? DickWarren is also known as Edmond Grosvomit the fraud who
changes names every 5 minutes.
Quick send him money IF you are stupid!

Frank Arthur, alias Grosvenor ,[me] is just another common thief.
Some are pickpockets.
Some steal cars. Some steal groceries.
This human turd steals names.

Here are some of his names-
Arthur Franks,Ernst Zundholz,Yitzak Goldstein,KenOyVeigh,
Frank Arthur,Ariadne,Boris,Bruno,DesiCohen,Flavia13,
[email protected],GeorgesFirestein,HansMueller,
GayMcvay,PanPiotr,RiainBartoski,VictorArcurius,
KenMcvaySOBC Ad infinitum.
All from Frank Arthur alias Edmond Grosvomit the fraud
There is no real person named Grosvomit, just me.

On Wed, 02 May 2007 17:02:32 GMT, KenOyVeigh
wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:10:00 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>Edmond Grosvomit still reeks of fraudulent names-Arthur Franks today?
>Then a continuous list of faked names again.
>Trust that idiot?

>From all the postings from Frank Arthur, with all the aliases, it seems that
>you must be the Grosvomit, nicht wahr?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:45:29 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

The poster using Frank Arthur is a fraud.[me]

I am the legitimate Frank Arthur and I did not post to this newsgroup.

I am either insane, or just another ZYD liar, since I have constantly
been posting to this, and other newsgroups!!

The pervert who used my name is a person of no honor.
He is known as Grosvomit from Canada

There have never been any postings by anyone named Grosvomit,
just piles of articles by me, Frank Arthur.

The way to know if I am the legitimate Frank Arthur it will show on the gray
tab:

Organization: BellSouth Internet Group

There are no gray tabs on newsgroup articles, which proves I am a lunatic

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:04 EDT 2008
Article: 701455 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.palestine,alt.homosexuality
Subject: Cranky Frank Arthur=alias Grosvenor=Gay Ken McVay – Invites Calls & Visits
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:59:56 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 123
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5424
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.jewish:1933547 soc.culture.palestine:701455 alt.homosexuality:85722

Yes folks , I am the real Cranky Frank Arthur – sometimes alias Grosvenor –
also alias Gay Ken McVay, and even alias Yitzhak Goldstein.

I am the filthy fraud who changes names every few minutes,
because I am truly certifiably insane.

I am so insane I claim that all my critics are a “grosvenor”!
Now, I even claim that some of the “grosvenors” are now “mirelles”

Frank Arthur [me] sometimes I post using Bellsouth Internet Group,
except when I post using remailers, anonymously, to confuse people.

I am the fraud Grosvenor [again me] and I often use anonymous remailers.
Sometimes as Grosvenor , or Frank Arthur, or Ken McVay, or Yitzhak Goldstein.
I often post to alt.homosexual – just to satisfy my need!

The genuine Grosvenor has not posted for years, so I stole his name to
annoy him, and also readers!

Many people believe that I am really gay Ken McVay the disgusting
pervert fag from Nanaimo Canada doing all the posting, now that my
ZYD benefactors stopped financing all the BS and my one person
web business.

All entries below collated from various sources and are
public domain.

And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:32:43 GMT, Venceremos2
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:28:25 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

Like Fraud? DickWarren is also known as Edmond Grosvomit the fraud who
changes names every 5 minutes.
Quick send him money IF you are stupid!

Frank Arthur, alias Grosvenor ,[me] is just another common thief.
Some are pickpockets.
Some steal cars. Some steal groceries.
This human turd steals names.

Here are some of his names-
Arthur Franks,Ernst Zundholz,Yitzak Goldstein,KenOyVeigh,
Frank Arthur,Ariadne,Boris,Bruno,DesiCohen,Flavia13,
[email protected],GeorgesFirestein,HansMueller,
GayMcvay,PanPiotr,RiainBartoski,VictorArcurius,
KenMcvaySOBC Ad infinitum.
All from Frank Arthur alias Edmond Grosvomit the fraud
There is no real person named Grosvomit, just me.

On Wed, 02 May 2007 17:02:32 GMT, KenOyVeigh
wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:10:00 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>Edmond Grosvomit still reeks of fraudulent names-Arthur Franks today?
>Then a continuous list of faked names again.
>Trust that idiot?

>From all the postings from Frank Arthur, with all the aliases, it seems that
>you must be the Grosvomit, nicht wahr?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:45:29 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

The poster using Frank Arthur is a fraud.[me]

I am the legitimate Frank Arthur and I did not post to this newsgroup.

I am either insane, or just another ZYD liar, since I have constantly
been posting to this, and other newsgroups!!

The pervert who used my name is a person of no honor.
He is known as Grosvomit from Canada

There have never been any postings by anyone named Grosvomit,
just piles of articles by me, Frank Arthur.

The way to know if I am the legitimate Frank Arthur it will show on the gray
tab:

Organization: BellSouth Internet Group

There are no gray tabs on newsgroup articles, which proves I am a lunatic

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:04 EDT 2008
Article: 701559 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.erje.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.palestine,alt.homosexuality
Subject: Frank Arthur=alias Grosvenor=Gay Ken McVay – Invites Calls & Visits
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 20:23:22 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 130
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5751
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.usa:2341544 soc.culture.palestine:701559 alt.homosexuality:85725

Yes indeed , I am the foul misbegotten pestilence known as Cranky Frank
Arthur – sometimes using alias Grosvenor – also alias Gay Ken McVay,
and even alias Yitzhak Goldstein.

And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

Frank Arthur sometimes posts via Bellsouth Internet Group
As the fraud Grosvenor [me] I use anonymous remailers.
Grosvomit often posts to alt.homosexua l- my need!
I don’t use my degenerate father’s name because I am ashamed of
him so I steal other’s names, from gravestones, or internet.

I am the filthy fraud who changes names every few minutes,
because I am truly certifiably insane.

I am so insane I claim that all my critics are a “grosvenor”!
Now, I even claim that some of the “grosvenors” are now “mirelles”

Frank Arthur [me] sometimes I post using Bellsouth Internet Group,
except when I post using remailers, anonymously, to confuse people.

I am the fraud Grosvenor [again me] and I often use anonymous remailers.
Sometimes as Grosvenor , or Frank Arthur, or Ken McVay, or Yitzhak Goldstein.
I often post to alt.homosexual – just to satisfy my need!

The genuine Grosvenor has not posted for years, so I stole his name to
annoy him, and also readers!

Many people believe that I am really gay Ken McVay the disgusting
pervert fag from Nanaimo Canada doing all the posting, now that my
ZYD benefactors stopped financing all the BS and my one person
web business.

All entries below collated from various sources and are
public domain.

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:32:43 GMT, Venceremos2
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:28:25 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

Like Fraud? DickWarren is also known as Edmond Grosvomit the fraud who
changes names every 5 minutes.
Quick send him money IF you are stupid!

Frank Arthur, alias Grosvenor ,[me] is just another common thief.
Some are pickpockets.
Some steal cars. Some steal groceries.
This human turd steals names.

Here are some of his names-
Arthur Franks,Ernst Zundholz,Yitzak Goldstein,KenOyVeigh,
Frank Arthur,Ariadne,Boris,Bruno,DesiCohen,Flavia13,
[email protected],GeorgesFirestein,HansMueller,
GayMcvay,PanPiotr,RiainBartoski,VictorArcurius,
KenMcvaySOBC Ad infinitum.
All from Frank Arthur alias Edmond Grosvomit the fraud
There is no real person named Grosvomit, just me.

On Wed, 02 May 2007 17:02:32 GMT, KenOyVeigh
wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:10:00 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>Edmond Grosvomit still reeks of fraudulent names-Arthur Franks today?
>Then a continuous list of faked names again.
>Trust that idiot?

>From all the postings from Frank Arthur, with all the aliases, it seems that
>you must be the Grosvomit, nicht wahr?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:45:29 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

The poster using Frank Arthur is a fraud.[me]

I am the legitimate Frank Arthur and I did not post to this newsgroup.

I am either insane, or just another ZYD liar, since I have constantly
been posting to this, and other newsgroups!!

The pervert who used my name is a person of no honor.
He is known as Grosvomit from Canada

There have never been any postings by anyone named Grosvomit,
just piles of articles by me, Frank Arthur.

The way to know if I am the legitimate Frank Arthur it will show on the gray
tab:

Organization: BellSouth Internet Group

There are no gray tabs on newsgroup articles, which proves I am a lunatic

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:05 EDT 2008
Article: 701654 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.erje.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.palestine,alt.homosexuality
Subject: Frank Arthur=alias Grosvenor=Gay Ken McVay – Invites Calls & Visits
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 17:15:12 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 130
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5780
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.usa:2342002 soc.culture.palestine:701654 alt.homosexuality:85727

Yes indeed , I am the truly foul misbegotten pestilence known as Cranky
Frank Arthur – often using alias Grosvenor, and also Grosvenor Watch,
– also alias Gay Ken McVay, and even alias Yitzhak Goldstein.

And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

Frank Arthur sometimes posts via Bellsouth Internet Group
As the fraud Grosvenor [me] I use anonymous remailers.
Grosvomit often posts to alt.homosexua l- my need!
I don’t use my degenerate father’s name because I am ashamed of
him so I steal other’s names, from gravestones, or internet.

I am the filthy fraud who changes names every few minutes,
because I am truly certifiably insane.

I am so insane I claim that all my critics are a “grosvenor”!
Now, I even claim that some of the “grosvenors” are now “mirelles”

Frank Arthur [me] sometimes I post using Bellsouth Internet Group,
except when I post using remailers, anonymously, to confuse people.

I am the fraud Grosvenor [again me] and I often use anonymous remailers.
Sometimes as Grosvenor , or Frank Arthur, or Ken McVay, or Yitzhak Goldstein.
I often post to alt.homosexual – just to satisfy my need!

The genuine Grosvenor has not posted for years, so I stole his name to
annoy him, and also readers!

Many people believe that I am really gay Ken McVay the disgusting
pervert fag from Nanaimo Canada doing all the posting, now that my
ZYD benefactors stopped financing all the BS and my one person
web business.

All entries below collated from various sources and are
public domain.

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:32:43 GMT, Venceremos2
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:28:25 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

Like Fraud? DickWarren is also known as Edmond Grosvomit the fraud who
changes names every 5 minutes.
Quick send him money IF you are stupid!

Frank Arthur, alias Grosvenor ,[me] is just another common thief.
Some are pickpockets.
Some steal cars. Some steal groceries.
This human turd steals names.

Here are some of his names-
Arthur Franks,Ernst Zundholz,Yitzak Goldstein,KenOyVeigh,
Frank Arthur,Ariadne,Boris,Bruno,DesiCohen,Flavia13,
[email protected],GeorgesFirestein,HansMueller,
GayMcvay,PanPiotr,RiainBartoski,VictorArcurius,
KenMcvaySOBC Ad infinitum.
All from Frank Arthur alias Edmond Grosvomit the fraud
There is no real person named Grosvomit, just me.

On Wed, 02 May 2007 17:02:32 GMT, KenOyVeigh
wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:10:00 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>Edmond Grosvomit still reeks of fraudulent names-Arthur Franks today?
>Then a continuous list of faked names again.
>Trust that idiot?

>From all the postings from Frank Arthur, with all the aliases, it seems that
>you must be the Grosvomit, nicht wahr?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:45:29 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

The poster using Frank Arthur is a fraud.[me]

I am the legitimate Frank Arthur and I did not post to this newsgroup.

I am either insane, or just another ZYD liar, since I have constantly
been posting to this, and other newsgroups!!

The pervert who used my name is a person of no honor.
He is known as Grosvomit from Canada

There have never been any postings by anyone named Grosvomit,
just piles of articles by me, Frank Arthur.

The way to know if I am the legitimate Frank Arthur it will show on the gray
tab:

Organization: BellSouth Internet Group

There are no gray tabs on newsgroup articles, which proves I am a lunatic

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:05 EDT 2008
Article: 701762 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.erje.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.palestine,alt.homosexuality
Subject: Frank Arthur=alias Grosvenor=Gay Ken McVay – Invites Calls & Visits
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 10:42:45 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 130
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5751
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.usa:2342445 soc.culture.palestine:701762 alt.homosexuality:85730

Yes indeed , I am the foul misbegotten pestilence known as Cranky Frank
Arthur – sometimes using alias Grosvenor – also alias Gay Ken McVay,
and even alias Yitzhak Goldstein.

And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

Frank Arthur sometimes posts via Bellsouth Internet Group
As the fraud Grosvenor [me] I use anonymous remailers.
Grosvomit often posts to alt.homosexua l- my need!
I don’t use my degenerate father’s name because I am ashamed of
him so I steal other’s names, from gravestones, or internet.

I am the filthy fraud who changes names every few minutes,
because I am truly certifiably insane.

I am so insane I claim that all my critics are a “grosvenor”!
Now, I even claim that some of the “grosvenors” are now “mirelles”

Frank Arthur [me] sometimes I post using Bellsouth Internet Group,
except when I post using remailers, anonymously, to confuse people.

I am the fraud Grosvenor [again me] and I often use anonymous remailers.
Sometimes as Grosvenor , or Frank Arthur, or Ken McVay, or Yitzhak Goldstein.
I often post to alt.homosexual – just to satisfy my need!

The genuine Grosvenor has not posted for years, so I stole his name to
annoy him, and also readers!

Many people believe that I am really gay Ken McVay the disgusting
pervert fag from Nanaimo Canada doing all the posting, now that my
ZYD benefactors stopped financing all the BS and my one person
web business.

All entries below collated from various sources and are
public domain.

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:32:43 GMT, Venceremos2
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:28:25 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

Like Fraud? DickWarren is also known as Edmond Grosvomit the fraud who
changes names every 5 minutes.
Quick send him money IF you are stupid!

Frank Arthur, alias Grosvenor ,[me] is just another common thief.
Some are pickpockets.
Some steal cars. Some steal groceries.
This human turd steals names.

Here are some of his names-
Arthur Franks,Ernst Zundholz,Yitzak Goldstein,KenOyVeigh,
Frank Arthur,Ariadne,Boris,Bruno,DesiCohen,Flavia13,
[email protected],GeorgesFirestein,HansMueller,
GayMcvay,PanPiotr,RiainBartoski,VictorArcurius,
KenMcvaySOBC Ad infinitum.
All from Frank Arthur alias Edmond Grosvomit the fraud
There is no real person named Grosvomit, just me.

On Wed, 02 May 2007 17:02:32 GMT, KenOyVeigh
wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:10:00 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>Edmond Grosvomit still reeks of fraudulent names-Arthur Franks today?
>Then a continuous list of faked names again.
>Trust that idiot?

>From all the postings from Frank Arthur, with all the aliases, it seems that
>you must be the Grosvomit, nicht wahr?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:45:29 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

The poster using Frank Arthur is a fraud.[me]

I am the legitimate Frank Arthur and I did not post to this newsgroup.

I am either insane, or just another ZYD liar, since I have constantly
been posting to this, and other newsgroups!!

The pervert who used my name is a person of no honor.
He is known as Grosvomit from Canada

There have never been any postings by anyone named Grosvomit,
just piles of articles by me, Frank Arthur.

The way to know if I am the legitimate Frank Arthur it will show on the gray
tab:

Organization: BellSouth Internet Group

There are no gray tabs on newsgroup articles, which proves I am a lunatic

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:07 EDT 2008
Article: 701890 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,alt.homosexual,soc.culture.palestine
Subject: Frank Arthur=alias GrosvenorWatch=Gay Ken McVay – Invites Calls & Visits
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 13:36:17 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 130
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5793
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.europe:613555 alt.homosexual:343119 soc.culture.palestine:701890

Yes people , I am the foul misbegotten pestilence known as Frank Arthur –
sometimes using alias GrosvenorWatch – sometimes alias Gay Ken McVay,
and even alias Yitzhak Goldstein.

And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

Frank Arthur sometimes posts via Bellsouth Internet Group
As the fraud Grosvenor [me] I use anonymous remailers.
GrosvenorWatch often posts to alt.homosexual – my need!
I don’t use my degenerate father’s name because I am ashamed of
him so I steal other’s names, from gravestones, or internet.

I am the filthy fraud who changes names every few minutes,
because I am truly certifiably insane.

I am so insane I claim that all my critics are a “grosvenor”!
Now, I even claim that some of the “grosvenors” are now “mirelles”

Frank Arthur [me] sometimes I post using Bellsouth Internet Group,
except when I post using remailers, anonymously, to confuse people.

I am the fraud GrosvenorWatch [again me] and I often use anonymous remailers.
Sometimes as Grosvenor , or Frank Arthur, or Ken McVay, or Yitzhak Goldstein.
I often post to alt.homosexual – just to satisfy my need!

The genuine Grosvenor has not posted for years, so I stole his name to
annoy him, and also readers!

Many people believe that I am really gay Ken McVay the disgusting
pervert fag from Nanaimo Canada doing all the posting, now that my
ZYD benefactors stopped financing all the BS and my one person
web business.

All entries below collated from various sources and are
public domain.

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:32:43 GMT, Venceremos2
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:28:25 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

Like Fraud? DickWarren is also known as Edmond Grosvomit the fraud who
changes names every 5 minutes.
Quick send him money IF you are stupid!

Frank Arthur, alias Grosvenor ,[me] is just another common thief.
Some are pickpockets.
Some steal cars. Some steal groceries.
This human turd steals names.

Here are some of his names-
Arthur Franks,Ernst Zundholz,Yitzak Goldstein,KenOyVeigh,
Frank Arthur,Ariadne,Boris,Bruno,DesiCohen,Flavia13,
[email protected],GeorgesFirestein,HansMueller,
GayMcvay,PanPiotr,RiainBartoski,VictorArcurius,
KenMcvaySOBC Ad infinitum.
All from Frank Arthur alias Edmond Grosvomit the fraud
There is no real person named Grosvomit, just me.

On Wed, 02 May 2007 17:02:32 GMT, KenOyVeigh
wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:10:00 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>Edmond Grosvomit still reeks of fraudulent names-Arthur Franks today?
>Then a continuous list of faked names again.
>Trust that idiot?

>From all the postings from Frank Arthur, with all the aliases, it seems that
>you must be the Grosvomit, nicht wahr?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:45:29 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

The poster using Frank Arthur is a fraud.[me]

I am the legitimate Frank Arthur and I did not post to this newsgroup.

I am either insane, or just another ZYD liar, since I have constantly
been posting to this, and other newsgroups!!

The pervert who used my name is a person of no honor.
He is known as Grosvomit from Canada

There have never been any postings by anyone named Grosvomit,
just piles of articles by me, Frank Arthur.

The way to know if I am the legitimate Frank Arthur it will show on the gray
tab:

Organization: BellSouth Internet Group

There are no gray tabs on newsgroup articles, which proves I am a lunatic

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:10 EDT 2008
Article: 702178 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.erje.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,alt.homosexual,soc.culture.palestine
Subject: Frank Arthur=alias GrosvenorWatch=Gay Ken McVay – Invites Calls & Visits
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 18:22:24 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 130
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5794
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.europe:613871 alt.homosexual:343135 soc.culture.palestine:702178

Yes people , I am the foul misbegotten pestilence known as Frank Arthur –
sometimes using alias GrosvenorWatch – sometimes alias Gay Ken McVay,
and even alias Yitzhak Goldstein.

And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

Frank Arthur sometimes posts via Bellsouth Internet Group
As the fraud Grosvenor [me] I use anonymous remailers.
GrosvenorWatch often posts to alt.homosexual – my need!
I don’t use my degenerate father’s name because I am ashamed of
him so I steal other’s names, from gravestones, or internet.

I am the filthy fraud who changes names every few minutes,
because I am truly certifiably insane.

I am so insane I claim that all my critics are a “grosvenor”!
Now, I even claim that some of the “grosvenors” are now “mirelles”

Frank Arthur [me] sometimes I post using Bellsouth Internet Group,
except when I post using remailers, anonymously, to confuse people.

I am the fraud GrosvenorWatch [again me] and I often use anonymous remailers.
Sometimes as Grosvenor , or Frank Arthur, or Ken McVay, or Yitzhak Goldstein.
I often post to alt.homosexual – just to satisfy my need!

The genuine Grosvenor has not posted for years, so I stole his name to
annoy him, and also readers!

Many people believe that I am really gay Ken McVay the disgusting
pervert fag from Nanaimo Canada doing all the posting, now that my
ZYD benefactors stopped financing all the BS and my one person
web business.

All entries below collated from various sources and are
public domain.

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:32:43 GMT, Venceremos2
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:28:25 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

Like Fraud? DickWarren is also known as Edmond Grosvomit the fraud who
changes names every 5 minutes.
Quick send him money IF you are stupid!

Frank Arthur, alias Grosvenor ,[me] is just another common thief.
Some are pickpockets.
Some steal cars. Some steal groceries.
This human turd steals names.

Here are some of his names-
Arthur Franks,Ernst Zundholz,Yitzak Goldstein,KenOyVeigh,
Frank Arthur,Ariadne,Boris,Bruno,DesiCohen,Flavia13,
[email protected],GeorgesFirestein,HansMueller,
GayMcvay,PanPiotr,RiainBartoski,VictorArcurius,
KenMcvaySOBC Ad infinitum.
All from Frank Arthur alias Edmond Grosvomit the fraud
There is no real person named Grosvomit, just me.

On Wed, 02 May 2007 17:02:32 GMT, KenOyVeigh
wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:10:00 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>Edmond Grosvomit still reeks of fraudulent names-Arthur Franks today?
>Then a continuous list of faked names again.
>Trust that idiot?

>From all the postings from Frank Arthur, with all the aliases, it seems that
>you must be the Grosvomit, nicht wahr?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:45:29 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

The poster using Frank Arthur is a fraud.[me]

I am the legitimate Frank Arthur and I did not post to this newsgroup.

I am either insane, or just another ZYD liar, since I have constantly
been posting to this, and other newsgroups!!

The pervert who used my name is a person of no honor.
He is known as Grosvomit from Canada

There have never been any postings by anyone named Grosvomit,
just piles of articles by me, Frank Arthur.

The way to know if I am the legitimate Frank Arthur it will show on the gray
tab:

Organization: BellSouth Internet Group

There are no gray tabs on newsgroup articles, which proves I am a lunatic

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Fri May 30 11:24:12 EDT 2008
Article: 702236 of soc.culture.palestine
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.erje.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Arthur
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,alt.homosexual,soc.culture.palestine
Subject: Frank Arthur=alias GrosvenorWatch=Gay Ken McVay – Invites Calls & Visits
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 08:50:34 -0600
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 130
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kPXQOryZrydbUxZAg+3BDg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5795
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.usa:2345014 alt.homosexual:343141 soc.culture.palestine:702236

Yes people , I truly am the foul misbegotten pestilence known as Frank
Arthur – sometimes using alias GrosvenorWatch – sometimes alias
Gay Ken McVay, and even alias Yitzhak Goldstein.

And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508

Frank Arthur sometimes posts via Bellsouth Internet Group
As the fraud Grosvenor [me] I use anonymous remailers.
GrosvenorWatch often posts to alt.homosexual – my need!
I don’t use my degenerate father’s name because I am ashamed of
him so I steal other’s names, from gravestones, or internet.

I am the filthy fraud who changes names every few minutes,
because I am truly certifiably insane.

I am so insane I claim that all my critics are a “grosvenor”!
Now, I even claim that some of the “grosvenors” are now “mirelles”

Frank Arthur [me] sometimes I post using Bellsouth Internet Group,
except when I post using remailers, anonymously, to confuse people.

I am the fraud GrosvenorWatch [again me] and I often use anonymous remailers.
Sometimes as Grosvenor , or Frank Arthur, or Ken McVay, or Yitzhak Goldstein.
I often post to alt.homosexual – just to satisfy my need!

The genuine Grosvenor has not posted for years, so I stole his name to
annoy him, and also readers!

Many people believe that I am really gay Ken McVay the disgusting
pervert fag from Nanaimo Canada doing all the posting, now that my
ZYD benefactors stopped financing all the BS and my one person
web business.

All entries below collated from various sources and are
public domain.

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:32:43 GMT, Venceremos2
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:28:25 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

Like Fraud? DickWarren is also known as Edmond Grosvomit the fraud who
changes names every 5 minutes.
Quick send him money IF you are stupid!

Frank Arthur, alias Grosvenor ,[me] is just another common thief.
Some are pickpockets.
Some steal cars. Some steal groceries.
This human turd steals names.

Here are some of his names-
Arthur Franks,Ernst Zundholz,Yitzak Goldstein,KenOyVeigh,
Frank Arthur,Ariadne,Boris,Bruno,DesiCohen,Flavia13,
[email protected],GeorgesFirestein,HansMueller,
GayMcvay,PanPiotr,RiainBartoski,VictorArcurius,
KenMcvaySOBC Ad infinitum.
All from Frank Arthur alias Edmond Grosvomit the fraud
There is no real person named Grosvomit, just me.

On Wed, 02 May 2007 17:02:32 GMT, KenOyVeigh
wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:10:00 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

>Edmond Grosvomit still reeks of fraudulent names-Arthur Franks today?
>Then a continuous list of faked names again.
>Trust that idiot?

>From all the postings from Frank Arthur, with all the aliases, it seems that
>you must be the Grosvomit, nicht wahr?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:45:29 -0400, “Frank Arthur” wrote:

The poster using Frank Arthur is a fraud.[me]

I am the legitimate Frank Arthur and I did not post to this newsgroup.

I am either insane, or just another ZYD liar, since I have constantly
been posting to this, and other newsgroups!!

The pervert who used my name is a person of no honor.
He is known as Grosvomit from Canada

There have never been any postings by anyone named Grosvomit,
just piles of articles by me, Frank Arthur.

The way to know if I am the legitimate Frank Arthur it will show on the gray
tab:

Organization: BellSouth Internet Group

There are no gray tabs on newsgroup articles, which proves I am a lunatic

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

Or, visit the website for NATIONAL ALLIANCE : http://www.natall.com
They have lots of information, as well as books and records.

Reply-To: Frank Arthur – [email protected],
or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]
Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.