Documents

Anon probable 11, Grosvenor William 2008 – p3

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:33:31 EST 2008
Article: 1962989 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: McVayWatch
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,can.general,can.taxes,tx.general,
X-Invalid: soc.culture.usa,usa.taxes
Subject: The Reason Canadian Ken McVay is distancing himself from the San Antonio Area Foundation-Nizkor Fund? (It’s illegal for one thing!) REPOST
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:02:36 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Bytes: 38858
Lines: 934
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1962989 can.general:351632 can.taxes:128810 tx.general:54647

REPOST of Doc Tavish’s documentation proving “The reason Canadian
Kenneth McVay is distancing himself from the San Antonio Area Foundation
– Nizkor Fund? (It’s ILLEGAL for one thing!)”

Special Note May 14, 2007: The San Antonio Area Foundation has pulled all
links on their Annual Reports so as to not make available for public
scrutiny how they disperse funding and who receives it.
Nizkor is listed as a recipient in all of the Annual Reports archived.
I have some of the Annual Reports on file and I am still waiting for
Doc Tavish to furnish me a DVD of all of his “local archives.”

P.S. See related archive from google usenet:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/df5dccde3f0cf306
Nizkor Project Director Kenneth McVay is a Mamzer Totally Owned and
Controlled by Jews REPOST
Message-ID:

On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:22:25 -0000, <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:

>In article ,
>Roger wrote:
>>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> someone claiming to be Doc Tavish wrote
>> in message <[email protected]>:

>>>Can’t deal in fact so you march out the same old perjured lawsuit
>>>which Yale lost and didn’t have the guts to follow through on the
>>>appeal. You won’t be such a wise guy when you start losing major
>>>funding Mr. McBray!!

>>And the fact is, that nothing in that lawsuit was perjury and that
>>it was dismissed on a technicality.

>>So why do you continue to lie about it?

I haven’t lied but shite like you remain in denial.
Fabrication of evidence is perjury and issuing phoney subpoenas on ISPs
is a most criminal offense!

I.E.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/393e3320
dd44fda3?fwc=1
Subject: …Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of Evidence? Aren’t
Those Criminal Acts?… Message-ID:

Date: 1 Oct 2005 05:06:24 GMT

Read the above and then make the claim Yale didn’t perjure himself!

>Because he is a congenital liar.

You’re the congenital liar Kenneth McVay and here is an archive which
proves such and it is an archive documenting many of your own words too!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/f355fc7048d84254?fwc=1
Subject: $50,000+ Not Reported to CCRA by The Nizkor Project? Nizkor
Director Ken McVay is Lying About Funds He Has Apparently NOT Reported to
CCRA!!
SAAF Reports are Further Proof! V5.0 U_0315
Message-ID:
Date: 15 Mar 2006 21:47:42 GMT

Here is a brief excerpt of the above and some new additions (people you
know who also prove you to be a liar about receiving money from the
San Antonio Area Foundation):

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/19272a44fd2c3cec?fwc=1
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: STILL Waiting for Donnie….. (Or “Bradbury: Wrong Again”)
Date: 5 Jan 2001 00:32:08 GMT
Organization: The Nizkor Project
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
(Archived locally as: McVayEXHIBIT1)
What Mr. Bradbury has failed to demonstrate is that The Nizkor Project,
which I direct, has any association whatsoever with the “San Antonio Area
Foundation – Nizkor Fund.”
That is because Mr. Bradbury is not very bright. The Nizkor Project
has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the United States.
Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
>from the “San Antonio Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund”

https://nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/m/mcvay.ken/2000/San_Antonio_Area_
Foundation_donation
(Link active November 20, 2003. Archived locally as: SAAF_NizkorWEB)

“Blakely” wrote in message
news:[email protected]…
> What did you do with the $50,000 given to you to start a Nizkor
> operation in San Antonio? Since you claim you don’t have a San
> Antonio operation, is it safe to say that you simply embezzled
> the money?

No one ever gave me $50,000. That sum was donated to the San Antonio
Area Foundation… The San Antonio Area Foundation has never paid me –
or anyone else, to my knowledge… I have no connection in San Antonio,
and neither does Nizkor. Get used to it.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/7f4bbf6e9ebf08bb?fwc=1
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: BabbleTubby’s Bullshit
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 05:35:30 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
(Archived locally as: McVayEXHIBIT3)
The San Antonio Area Foundation maintains an endowment fund
for any organization they support. Ten per cent of all monies donated
go directly into an endowment fund, so that, eventually, the fund
will fuel itself.
SAAF bylaws state that the first $10,000 donated must go into the
creation of an endowment fund maintained as a part of the trust.
That endowment fund, however, has absolutely nothing to do with the
Nizkor Project, nor has the Nizkor Project ever benefited from such a
fund.
It’s entertaining watching BlubberBabble try to make sense of it all,
and it’s worth noting that he hasn’t contacted any of the people at
SAAF for further information, as I suggested. That suggests that, as
always, he doesn’t give a rat’s ass for the truth. Duh.

http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/8db801fb548cdb26?fwc=1
Subject: Re: What did Kenny McVay do with money he claims he never got?
Reply-To: [email protected]
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID:
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:57:49 GMT
(Archived locally McVay-12-30-2002DENIAL)
..The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the
United States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received
any money from the “San Antonio Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund” …The
San Antonio Area Foundation has never paid me – or anyone else, to my
knowledge… I have no connection in San Antonio, and neither does Nizkor.
Get used to it…
(This is kind of fun. You keep making an ass of yourself, and I’ll keep
laughing at you.)

End of Kenneth McVay’s (Director of The Nizkor Project) own documented
words denying he has ever received any money or benefit from the San
Antonio Area Foundation OR “The San Antonio Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund.”

NOW here is Ken McVay (as well as other sources) again but notice all
of the contradictions to all Ken McVay claimed above!

http://www.ghwk.de/engl/linksengl1.htm
(Archived locally as: linksengl)
House of the Wannsee Conference
Memorial and Educational Site
——————————-
Related Links

[…]

USA

[…]

The Mazal Library – A Holocaust Resource
c/o The San Antonio Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund
600 Sandau, San Antonio, Tx 78216

http://www.google.com/search?as_q=Nizkor+&num=20&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-
1&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=San+Antonio+Area+Foundation&as_oq=
&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=
i&as_sitesearch=&safe=images
Searched the web for Nizkor “San Antonio Area Foundation”.
Results 1 – 12 of about 35 (Search done November 22, 2003 5:51AM CST.
Return page archived locally as: GOOGLEsaaf2Nizkor)

Sample returns:

http://www.fpp.co.uk/HNet/Mott231000.html
Real History and the Jewish Holocaust controversy
.. His above website is registered by the “San Antonio Area Foundation –
Nizkor Fund” c/o BASIC of 600 Sandau Suite 400, San Antonio, TX 78216,
in Texas, USA.

https://nizkor.org/hweb/people/m/mcvay-ken/put-up-shut-up.html
Put up or shut up, Mr. Giwer
.. scientific standards, Mr. Giwer will agree to the immediate release
of the trust funds to the San Antonio Area Foundation Nizkor Fund as a
tax-exempt donation. … <>

linksengl1 http://www.ghwk.de/engl/linksengl1.htm
.. The Mazal Library – A Holocaust Resource c/o The San Antonio
Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund 600 Sandau, San Antonio, Tx 78216

[PDF] Financials 2000 3-01 http://www.saafdn.org/pdf/Fin2000.pdf
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – View as HTML
http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:sAnpRlOX1HAJ:
www.saafdn.org/pdf/Fin2000.pdf+Nizkor++%22San+Antonio+Area+Foundation%22&h
l=en&ie=UTF-8
.. 3 Fund Types The San Antonio Area Foundation is dedicated to
improving the quality of … Katz Memorial Trust Beta and Melvin
Leazar Memorial Fund Nizkor Fund Mary …

[PDF] 2002 Annual Report http://www.saafdn.org/pdf/AnnRpt2002.pdf
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – View as HTML
http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:MHtPsNgO884J:www.saafdn.org/pdf/
AnnRpt2002.pdf+Nizkor++%22San+Antonio+Area+Foundation%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
.. Lemuel G. Hodgkins Trust Dan and Gloria Oppenheimer Fund San
Antonio Area Foundation Community Fund … Fund Beta and Melvin
Leazar Memorial Fund Nizkor(USA) Fund …

=============
New additions for September 28, 2005:
[PDF] 2003 Annual ReportFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
http://www.saafdn.org/docs/annual_report/AnnRpt2003.pdf
(Archived locally as: AnnRpt2003)
San Antonio Area Foundation Strategic Initiative Fund. George Weldon
Sheffield Fund … Nizkor (USA) Fund to Combat Racism & Anti-Semitism
in Mass Media …

Here is the San Antonio Area Foundation web site showing again in
2004 that Nizkor received funding:

http://sitelevel.whatuseek.com/query.go?crid=56a9e3b448c11dd2&query=
Nizkor&slice_title=&page=1&fo=1
(Archived locally as: SAAF_NizkorFund_2004)
http://sl.wus0.com/quclk.go?rd=http://www.saafdn.org/docs/annual_report/
annualReport_current.pdf&res=1&crid=56a9e3b448c11dd2&pos=1&mr=10&qu=Nizkor
Results from This Site: 1 – 1 of 1 total results for Nizkor

untitled
.. M. and Felix J. Katz Memorial Trust Ruth Lang Charitable Fund Beta
and Melvin Leazar Memorial Fund Nizkor (USA) Fund to Combat Racism &
Anti-Semitism in Mass Media James and Alberta Otterpohl Fund …
http://www.saafdn.org/docs/annual_report/annualReport_current.pdf
– 384k – 2004-09-10
(Archived locally as: annualReport_current.pdf)
I have reports on file for years 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2004 proving
San Antonio Area Foundation doled out money to the Nizkor Fund which
Ken McVay was the recipient!!
Anyone wanting the pdf files need only download them or if they get
pulled I can post them to alt.binaries. SPECIAL NOTE (September 24,2006)
I now have the 2005 report and it too shows Nizkor receiving funding!!!

Here is Ken McVay’s very own Nizkor web site showing Ken McVay was a
recipient of San Antonio Area Foundation funding back in 1996!

https://nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/m/mcvay.ken/press/express-news.960803
(Link November 20, 2003 and no disclaimers are made!! Archived locally as:
11-20-2003SAAF2NIZKOR)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/m/mcvay.ken/press/express-news.960803

San Antonio Express-News
August 3, 1996
Page 10B

“Internet project won’t let Holocaust be forgotten”
By Thomas Edwards
Express-News Staff Writer

“Nizkor” in Hebrew means “we will remember,” but it is also a
solemn promise Holocaust researcher Kenneth McVay has taken to
the Internet so that people will never forget the atrocities of
Nazi Germany.

Now his task has gotten a little easier with a $50,000 grant from
the philanthropic San Antonio Area Foundation to the Nizkor
Project, an international computer web site directed by the 55-
year-old McVay from his home in Vancouver Island, Canada…

The Nizkor Project is not only a tool to fight bigotry, it has
also “make an impact in terms of Holocaust education,” McVay said.

Some of the new material he will add to the web site — which
will have sound and movement — includes speeches by Nazi
statesmen advocating genocide, 68 volumes of military
documentation from the Nuremburg war crimes tribunals and
material from the National Archives in Washington.

Some of the new material is being donated by San Antonio resident
Harry Mazal, who is the director of the Nizkor Project in the
United States. Mazal also has one of the world’s largest private
collections of Holocaust material…

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/e6e8f845002483a1
(Archived locally as: SAAF_1)
From: [email protected] (Ken McVay OBC)
Subject: The Nizkor Project appreciates your support
Date: 1996/09/05
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
x-network: https://nizkor.org/
organization: The Nizkor Project
x-search: http://search.nizkor.org/search.html

In article <[email protected]>,
dmittle…@bpavms.bpa.arizona.edu (Danny Mittleman) wrote:

>>McVay, Kenneth (KM1343) kmc…@NIZKOR.ALMANAC.BC.CA
>> 462 – 1150 North Terminal Avenue
>> Nanaimo, BC V9S 5T8
>> CA 1-604-382-0615

> As Giwer has been so kind to repeatedly post this address, I would like
> to point out that while this is not the best address to use, you can
> send contributions to the Nizkor Project to this address. They will be
> properly received and placed to good use. You will receive a Canadian
> Tax receipt for your donation (which will work just fine in Canada no
> matter what Matt Giwer insists). If you wish to make an American
> contribution for an American tax receipt, there is a different address
> (which maybe Giwer will decide to post one day.)

In the United States, checks should be made payable to:

“SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION – Nizkor Fund”

and should be mailed to:

San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566

We thank Dr. Mittleman for pointing this out, and thank all of
you who have sent your donations in support of the Nizkor
Project.

The funds you have provided have been used to provide substantial
improvements in service.

—
The Nizkor Project | https://nizkor.org/

But I thought Ken McVay claimed: “What Mr. Bradbury has failed to
demonstrate is that The Nizkor Project, which I direct, has any
association whatsoever with the “San Antonio Area Foundation –
Nizkor Fund.”
That is because Mr. Bradbury is not very bright.
The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever
within the United States.
Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any
money from the “San Antonio Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund”_

Look at who isn’t very bright!!!
Ken McVay is a liar plain and simple.

http://groups.google.com/group/quebec.general/msg/46868da0ffff43e5
(Archived locally as: SAAF_2)
From: [email protected] (Ken McVay OBC)
Subject: Re: McVay’s Addresses & Phone Numbers again
Date: 1996/09/15
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
organization: The Nizkor Project

.. The correct information for donations is as
follows:

In the United States, checks should be made payable to:

“SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION – Nizkor Fund”

and should be mailed to:

San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566

Tel: (210) 225-2243
Fax: (210) 225-1980

More of Ken McBray contradicting himself and proving what a bold
faced liar he truly is:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/7ed1cee6db046212
(Archived locally as: SAAF_3)
From: [email protected] (Ken McVay OBC)
Subject: American funding for the Nizkor Project
Date: 1996/06/15
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Deja-AN: 160389285
references: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected] ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>
<[email protected]>
organization: The Nizkor Project

In article <[email protected]>, mcur…@eden.com (Mike Curtis)
wrote:

>mgi…@ix.netcom.com (Matt Giwer) wrote:

“Supposedly a synagogue is collected tax free
contributions for Nizkor even though Nizkor does not
have tax exempt status. ”

>This is the Troll who has to put his stamp on every thread no matter
>what.

But he’s our troll 🙂

Let him explain this one:

In the United States, checks in support of the work of The
Nizkor Project should be made payable to:

SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION – Nizkor Fund

and should be mailed to:

San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566

[…]

But Ken are you trying to tell us that after all of your begging for
funds to The Nizkor Project via the San Antonio Area Foundation –
Nizkor Fund that you never received any money as you are on record
as claiming– “The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort
whatsoever within the United States.
Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
>from the “San Antonio Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund”

This one is a real eye opener!!!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/225d5191538edc6d?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: FinstenNizkorSAAF)
From: Laura Finsten
Subject: Re: Yet another Nazional Appliance Illiteracy Alert!
Date: 1997/06/08
Message-ID:
References: <[email protected]>

<[email protected]>

On Sat, 7 Jun 1997, Michael wrote:

[…]

> All your b s aside above (as though Bnai Brith only took checks and
> gave them to Nizkor; all innocent and stuff. Ask any professional who
> deals with not-for-profits about the ease of shuffling funds.)

I have no idea how common such “shuffling [of] funds” may be.
But the key issue here is whether you have any evidence at all to
support your much repeatedly but utterly empty claim that this is
the case with the arrangement between Nizkor and B’nai Brith?
I don’t see any of you trying to smear the San Antonio Area Foundation
which, ironically, has probably provided more funding for the project
since it has a far larger pool of donors to draw upon….

~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~

I ask everyone– Who is the liar? Ken McVay or Laura Finsten?

More people proving Ken McVay receives funding from SAAF and some
are The Holocaust History Project members as well as THHP founder
and director Harry W. Mazal himself!

Here is The Holocaust History Project member Richard Graves:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/e7ef783aa4a87d80
(Archived locally as: RichGraves_SAAF-NizkorFund)
From: [email protected] (Rich Graves)
Subject: Re: Nizkor: Who the Hell are these guys?
Date: 1997/01/08
Message-ID: <[email protected]>#1/1
organization: Fans of Nizkor, https://nizkor.org/objectives.html

Here is how to donate to the Nizkor Project:

In the United States, donations for the project’s efforts should be
made payable to:

San Antonio Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund

and should be mailed to:

San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566

American donors may deduct contributions as provided in section 170 of
the Internal Revenue Code. Bequests, legacies, devises, transfers, or
gifts are deductible for federal, estate, and gift tax purposes if
they meet the applicable provisions of Code sections 2055, 2106 and
2522.

(Tavish comment: Deducting contributions funneled to Nizkor via the
San Antonio Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund is ILLEGAL!!
Nizkor is NOT a non-profit organization NOR is it a charitable
organization (I prove such further down) and anyone who is filing
deductions will be getting a visit from the IRS sooner than
they think! In coming days Nizkor is going to lose its major
American funding when the IRS moves in!!!)

We very much appreciate your donations, which assist in the
development and enhancement of The Nizkor Project website. Thank
You.

Here is Nizkor volunteer Annie Alpert:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/e7f3d611c82af26
(Archived locally as: AnnieAlpert_SAAF-NizkorFund)
From: Annie Alpert
Subject: Yep was Re: Any answers yet?
Date: 1997/01/24
Message-ID: <[email protected]>#1/1

Angus Scrimm wrote:

Who or what is Angus Scrimm? In any case–I’ll tell you what I know
about the matter:

> 7) What is the evidence offered that Nizkor is
> authorized to solicittax free contributions?

Who said they were? If you really want to make a tax-deductable
donation, though–never fear. The Nizkor Project is a designated
fund under the umbrella of the San Antonio Area Foundation, a
charitable organization that manage funds and combines investments
with other charitable organizations’ for maximum investment impact.
Donations made to the Foundation in the name of The Nizkor Project
Fund will get to Nizkor if the San Antonio Foundation approves of
the way the money is to be spent. The San Antonio Foundation will
give tax receipts for donations to the San Antonio Foundation.

San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566
—
Nizkor (USA) – An Electronic Holocaust Educational Resource
Nizkor Web: https://nizkor.org/

Does not the above have all the appearances of being a
“money laundering operation”?

Here is Harry W. Mazal himself who is the caretaker of the SAAF
– Nizkor Fund in San Antonio, Texas:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/4e874cb48c170b87
(Archived locally as: Mazal_SAAF_DonationsForNizkor)
From: [email protected] (Harry W. Mazal OBE)
Subject: Re: Attack on Alt.Revisionism — Gate.Net Refuses to Help
Date: 1996/11/21
Message-ID: <[email protected]>#1/1

Nizkor receives (very) modest donations from a number of sources.
Some are Jewish, most are not. If Mr. Giwer wishes to make a
donation to a non-synagogue based chapter of Nizkor, he may do
so through the San Antonio Area Foundation.
The address can be found on the Nizkor Web Page. Thank you!

Harry W. Mazal OBE

Nizkor (USA) An Electronic Holocaust Educational Resource
Over 1000 Megs of data: https://nizkor.org

Proof Harry W. Mazal is the caretaker of the San Antonio Area
Foundation – Nizkor Fund:

You are Here:WHOIS -> Search Results
Search Results

Registrant:
San Antonio Area Foundation – Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC (MAZAL2-DOM)
600 Sandau Suite 400
San Antonio, TX 78216 US
Domain Name: MAZAL.ORG
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
Mazal, Harry (HM1296) [email protected]
The Mazal
Library 600 Sandau, Suite 400 San Antonio, TX 78216 US
210-377-2742
Record expires on 28-Jun-2006.
Record created on 27-Jun-1997.
Database last updated on 27-Jun-2002 22:55:14 EDT.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/cfa0944d81241a6d?fwc=1
From: [email protected] (Michael Ragland)
Subject: Re: Some Holes, Some Holocaust (Danny Keren)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:19:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
(Archived locally as: WhoIsSAAFmazal)

Here is where the real criminal activity known as money laundering
and issuing illegal tax receipts comes in:

The San Antonio Area Foundation claims at its very own website the
following:

http://www.saafdn.org/faq.shtml
(Archived locally as: SAAF – Frequently Asked Questions)
Q: Who does the Area Foundation award grants to? Will it help me
with my rent and utilities? Can your organization help me?
A: Unfortunately, we may not grants fund to individuals, only
qualified nonprofits, many of which are set up to assist people
who have difficulties meeting their obligations.

(Doc Tavish comment: The Nizkor Project is Ken McVay (an individual
who is the sole operator of Nizkor which also is NOT a “nonprofit”
thus he is NOT entitled to funding!!)

http://www.saafdn.org/about/about_history.shtml
(Archived locally as: SAAF_Area Foundation – History)
By 2004, the San Antonio Area Foundation had grown to over $110 million
in assets and $65 million in charitable distributions – a fitting tribute
to Nat and Mannie Goldsmith, whose philanthropic vision inspired the
Area Foundation – spurring growth and support for the arts, humanities,
education, health and environment throughout San Antonio, Bexar County
and the surrounding area.

ALSO:

http://www.tcc.state.tx.us/cancerfunding/contact.html
(Archived Locally AS: SAAF Limited to San Antonio)
San Antonio Area Foundation
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, Texas 78212-9566
(210) 225-2243
Limitations: San Antonio area
Contact: Candes Chumney, Exec. Director

The San Antonio Area Foundation is limited to: “San Antonio,
Bexar County and the surrounding area”
YET The Nizkor Project is in Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada!!

Here is another real eye opener:

http://www.saafdn.org/about/about_glossary.shtml
(Archived locally as: SAAF Area Foundation – Glossary of Terms)
501(c)(3): Section of the Internal Revenue Code that designates an
organization as charitable and tax exempt. Organizations qualifying
under this section include religious, educational, charitable,
amateur athletic, scientific or literary groups, organizations
testing for public safety or organizations involved in prevention
of cruelty to children or animals.
Note: The tax code sets forth a list of sections — 501(c)(4-26) —
to identify other not-for-profit organizations whose function
is not solely charitable (e.g., professional or veterans organizations,
chambers of commerce, fraternal societies, etc.)
509(a): Section of the tax code that defines public charities
(as opposed to private foundations).
A 501(c)(3) organization also must have a 509(a)
designation to further define the agency as a public charity.

Proof The Nizkor Project is neither a charitable nor a non-profit
organization and is a website BUSINESS solely operated by Kenneth McVay:

From: Charity webmail
Sender: “Langdon, Blaine”
To:
Subject: Registered charity question.
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:23:26 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
(On file and archived locally with all headers as: CCRAreply)

Thank you for your e-mail.
The Charities Directorate of the Canada Customs and
Revenue Agency is responsible for the registration
and compliance of charities in Canada.
These organizations are similar to “exempt organizations”
as are registered in the United States.
However, we have no record of a registered charity
by the name of Nizkor.org…

http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/tax/nonprofit/menu-e.html
(Link active November 21, 2003. Archived locally as CCRAnpo)
Non-profit organizations – Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency
A non-profit organization (NPO) is a club, society, or association
that’s organized and operated solely for:
social welfare
civic improvement
pleasure or recreation
any other purpose except profit.

Ken McVay’s NIZKOR.ORG does not fall under any of the above categories.

Here is Ken McVay, Director of The Nizkor Project, publicly stating:
“Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website.”

http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/5c887e0f6e538d0
(Archived locally as: NizkorNOTcharity)
From: [email protected] (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Re: ATTENTION NIZKOR: Income Tax Guide to the Non-Profit
Organization (NPO) Information Return Form T1044
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, https://nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References:
<[email protected]>

Poor Mr. Bradbury… if he had a brain, he would be dangerous.

Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website.

Paranoia is a terrible thing, particularly when coupled with Mr.
Bradbury’s abysmal ignorance.

—
The Nizkor Project

Funny thing that all McVay can do is hurl insults when I show him
the goods I have on him!

Proof Nizkor is a website BUSINESS solely operated by Kenneth
McVay from a back room of his own personal residence:

http://www.geocities.com/dcjarviks/Idler/vIn15.html
(Link active November 21, 2003. Archived locally as: vIn15)
“A Voyage to Nanaimo– It takes two hours to cross the
Georgia Strait by ferry from Vancouver, British Columbia,
another half-hour by jitney from the Nanaimo terminal to
reach the home of Kenneth N. McVay, webmaster for
The Nizkor Project . The address is an ordinary
suburban split-level in a middle-class neighborhood.
There is nothing distinctive about its location. ….
I am taken to a back room, filled with computer equipment,
monitors, and books… Seated in front of the array is
McVay, apparently a 50-something computer nerd. He is
tall, thin, with short hair and glasses, wired to the
world through his ISP. The Nizkor project which McVay
runs from this room in the back of his house… ”

(Archived locally as: SolelyOperated)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/b8c8f9854d0b5919
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC ([email protected])
Subject: Blubberbury’s Bullshit and Blather
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-08-08 12:53:05 PST
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

Ken Lewis writes:
> Ken has already proven otherwise.

> The quote you have pasted below was simply never implemented.
> Nizkor was then as it is now – a website. Ken hoped to turn it
> into an organization such as you insist it is but that never
> worked out. Within weeks of that post having been
> made the whole effort to tun it into an organization fell apart.

Indeed it did. Why anyone would post an article that was nearly
five years out of date as if it had relevance is beyond me, but
then, we’re dealing with “revisionist scholars” here, so it isn’t
the least surprising.

> Thus it remains what it always was. A website run soley by Ken.

Indeed.

Now I ask everyone– Why should one lone individual such as Kenneth
McVay receive exempt donations for a website he operates from his
own residence?

All of the above is being reported to the proper authorities too!
Filing false tax returns and making deductions for donations via
a money launderer to a non-profit is a matter the IRS is very
interested in to say the least!!

More on McVay’s illegal scams:

Tavish

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:35:06 EST 2008
Article: 615316 of soc.culture.canada
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: KenMcVayWatch
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: can.general,soc.culture.canada,tor.general,soc.culture.palestine,
X-Invalid: soc.culture.jewish,alt.revisionism
Subject: Ken McVay TAX FRAUD Causing BREAKUP AT B’NAI BRITH CANADA
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:03:18 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Lines: 96
Bytes: 4915
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com can.general:351619 soc.culture.canada:615316 tor.general:348170 soc.culture.palestine:719122

In the issue of Canadian Jew News for January 17 2008,
there is a 2 page banner headline story about the ongoing
problems at B’nai Brith Canada in connection with this scandal.

On pages 6 and 17 of this issue, is a huge article about the
existing managers of BB wanting to remove as members the dissident
past presidents and long time members, who have been questioning
the mismanagement and financial irregularities.

Some of the past executives now want the whole mess to go to Court,
so that the public will get proof of the irregularities, such as
ILLEGAL CHARITABLE DONATION RECEIPTS FOR PAYMENTS TO McVAY’S BUSINESS!!

Canadian Jew News, in a banner-headline story over 2 pages [ pages 12 + 28]
of the issue for December 2007 reported ‘BATTLE BREWING AT B’NAI BRITH
CANADA’.

A key component of the war, between past presidents and other members,
versus the gang currently running BB, is that those now running BB have
centralised too much power and are unaccountable to members.

These complaints were first publicised in the New York newspaper “Forward”.

A key set of complaints, provided by 2 former national presidents of BB,
stated that too much power is concentrated at BB’s head office in Toronto,
with the organisation’s 4,000 members deprived of input in decisions.

What was even more worrisome, was that BB now refuses to provide audited
financial statements to the membership, showing what has happened to the
many millions of dollars collected.

For example, how much of the BB funds went to the one-man BUSINESS run
by shabbas-goy Ken McVay? Where B’nai Brith Canada was MONEY LAUNDERING
funds, and issuing farudulent charitable donation tax receipts, without
the approval of BB membership!!

Harry Gimpel, a former chair, says that a core group of 15-20 former
executives of BB are very concerned about the direction BB is taking.

He states that “everything was manipulated.”

“We want accountability. We are raising funds for B’nai Brith.
Where does it go? We don’t know.”

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:35:06 EST 2008
Article: 615321 of soc.culture.canada
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: McVayWatch
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.new-zealand,
X-Invalid: soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.australian
Subject: CANADIAN PASSPORTS USED BY ZIONIST KILLERS-per Zyd-Owned Newspaper-Repost
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:36:21 -0700 (MST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: [email protected]
Lines: 132
Bytes: 6168
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.canada:615321 soc.culture.palestine:719125 soc.culture.new-zealand:181738

CANADIAN PASSPORTS USED BY ZIONIST KILLERS -per Zyd-Owned Newspaper –
Repost
Organization: JewWatch

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:04:49 -0400, “El Conquistador”

wrote:

>’Misuse of Canada’s identity’ questioned in Israeli spy operation

>Stewart Bell
>National Post

>A SENIOR Cabinet official questioned the head of Israel’s security service
>about allegations Israeli undercover agents posed as Canadians during an
>operation to assassinate a Palestinian terrorist leader, newly released
>documents show.

>Although Ottawa has said publicly it was convinced all along the spy
claims
>were false, internal documents obtained yesterday show the matter has
>continued to concern the government and has been the subject of
>behind-the-scenes diplomacy.

>In a confidential report, officials said they were concerned about “other
>countries’ intelligence services misusing Canada’s identity” and that
“such
>misuse endangers Canadians travelling around the world and undermines the
>integrity of Canadian passports.”

>Ronald Bilodeau, the Privy Council Office security and intelligence
>co-ordinator and Cabinet assistant secretary, met on Oct. 1 with the head
of
>the Israeli Security Agency, whose spies allegedly used false Canadian
>identities during the operation in Gaza.

>”The ISA is reported to have recently had its agents pose as Canadians to
>lure a Palestinian, 22-year-old Akram Zatmeh, into informing on Intifada
>leaders in return for promises of resettlement in Canada,” according to a
>”Secret: Canadian Eyes Only” memo prepared for the meeting.

> The documents do not describe the response of the ISA chief, who reports
>directly to Ariel Sharon, the Israeli Prime Minister. Israel has denied
the
>claims. But the papers show Ottawa was worried about being linked to a spy
>operation and a botched assassination that killed 14 bystanders, nine of
>them children.

>The allegations surfaced in August, when Mr. Zatmeh publicly detailed how
he
>was lured into becoming an Israeli informant by agents who told him they
>were Canadians and could help him immigrate. Mr. Zatmeh said he was
>recruited by three “Canadian” agents who brought him to the Canadian
embassy
>in Tel Aviv before coercing him into helping them, with doctored photos
that
>showed him with naked women.

>On July 23, Mr. Zatmeh helped Israeli agents pinpoint the location of
Sheik
>Salah Shehadeh, a Hamas leader. Twenty minutes later, an Israeli F-16
fired
>a one-tonne missile at the building, killing not only the sheik but also
>more than a dozen bystanders.

>Mr. Zatmeh was later arrested as a collaborator and is facing a possible
>death sentence.

>”Our initial concern … was that the press articles could be seen by some
>as alleging Canadian involvement with Israel in the assassination of Sheik
>Salah Shehadeh,” according to an Aug. 29 internal government memo. “Canada
>has nothing to do with this or with any other purported Israeli
operation.”

>After the Post learned of the informant’s allegations, officials told the
>newspaper on Sept. 4 they were satisfied the claims were false. However,
>hours after the Post report on Sept. 5, John McNee, assistant deputy
>minister for Africa and the Mideast, discussed the matter with Haim Divon,
>Israel’s ambassador to Canada.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:35:07 EST 2008
Article: 615323 of soc.culture.canada
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x5!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: McVayWatch
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: can.general,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.jewish,wpg.general,
X-Invalid: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,can.politics
Subject: Jew/ZYD Lawyer GUILTY KIDDIE PORN!!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:13:14 -0700 (MST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: [email protected]m.com
Lines: 72
Bytes: 3521
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com can.general:351623 soc.culture.canada:615323 soc.culture.jewish:2014706 wpg.general:307647

Canadian Jew News have a half page headline story in the issue for
March 6 2008, detailing the criminal conviction of Winnipeg lawyer
Gary Dolovich for possessing and distributing KIDDIE PORNOGRAPHY!

Dolovich, an alleged observant ZYD, was arrested in 2006 and then
charged with 17 charges for distributing child pornography over
the internet.

Sentencing will be this spring, and he is expected to get a heavy
jail term, in accord with his criminality.

Police in Winnipeg had been alerted to Dolovich by a national police
organisation involved in prosecuting kiddie porn distributors.

This case is reminiscent of the Cantor Stuart Friedman case from
Halifax, where Friedman was distributing kiddie porn from the synagogue!!
Instead of jail, he was allowed to flee to Boston, USA, where he
supposedly assisted the FBI by turning informant on his fellow perverts.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:39 EST 2008
Article: 624958 of soc.culture.europe
Sender: Borked Pseudo Mailed
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
X-Invalid: uk.politics.misc, soc.culture.polish, alt.politics.europe,
soc.culture.palestine
Subject: Wiesel & Wiesenthal = Dynamic Duo Of ZYD Liars!!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:40:23 -0700 (MST)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!aotearoa.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news.mixmin.net
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Lines: 347
Bytes: 18625
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.swiss:59889 soc.culture.europe:624958

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:22:13 -0400, in soc.culture.jewish “ElParedon”
wrote:
“Daniel Bernard” wrote in message
news:[email protected]…
> The Dynamic Duo Of Lies

> Written by Jayne Gardner

> Part of what helped me to finally understand that I had been lied to
> about the Holocaust was the very testimony of some of the more famous
> survivors. Reading what happened to them during the war made
> absolutely no sense when stacked up against what we were being told
> about the horrors endured by the Jews in Europe’s concentration camps.
> For instance, Elie Wiesel, a man who has come to personify the
> Holocaust, told of Jews being thrown into open pits of fire at
> Auschwitz, a fate that he only managed to escape by sheer chance.
> Here he differs from the majority of survivors who told of gas
> chambers being the instrument of death for the majority of camp
> inmates:

> “Forced to choose from among several Allied war propaganda lies, he
> chose to defend the fire lie instead of the boiling water, gassing, or
> electrocution lies. In 1956, when he published his testimony in
> Yiddish, the fire lie was still alive in certain circles. This lie is
> the origin of the term Holocaust. Today there is no longer a single
> historian who believes that Jews were burned alive. The myths of the
> boiling water and of electrocution have also disappeared. Only the gas
> remains.”

> “In his autobiography, Wiesel writes:

> “Not far from us, flames were leaping up from a ditch, gigantic
> flames. They were burning something there. A lorry drew up at the pit
> and delivered its load – little children. Babies! Yes, I saw it – saw
> it with my own eyes. those children in the flames. (Is it surprising
> that I could not sleep after that? Sleep had fled from my eyes.) So
> this is where we were going. A little farther on was another and
> larger ditch for adults. [.] ‘Father,’ I said, ‘if that is so, I don’t
> want to wait here. I’m going to run to the electric wire. That would
> be better than slow agony in the flames.'”

> Compare this with the explanation given by Thies Christopherson in his
> article entitled Reflection On Auschwitz And West German Justice:

> “At first, those who died at Auschwitz were buried, but because of the
> high ground water level (one meter) in this area between the Vistula
> and Sola rivers, that practice couldn’t be continued. A labor team
> headed by SS Staff Sergeant Moll (who had been in charge of the
> agricultural nursery at Raisko) was assigned to dig up the buried
> corpses and burn them. This was done on an open fire. The most
> unbelievable stories were told about this procedure. West German
> television even broadcast a film of this which was supposedly made in
> secret by an SS man.”

> As Wiesel continues his story, he is saved by nothing short of a
> miracle:

> “Our line had now only fifteen paces to go. I bit my lips so that my
> father would not hear my teeth chattering. Ten steps still. Eight.
> Seven. We marched slowly on as though following a hearse at our own
> funeral. Four more steps. Three steps. There it was now, right in
> front of us, the pit and its flames. I gathered all that was left of
> my strength, so that I could break the ranks and throw myself upon the
> barbed wire. In the depth of my heart I bade farewell to my father, to
> the whole universe; and, in spite of myself, the words formed
> themselves and issued a whisper from my lips: Yitgadal veyitkadach
> shmé raba. May His name be blessed and magnified.. My heart was
> bursting. The moment had come. I was face to face with the Angel of
> Death. No. Two steps from the pit we were ordered to turn to the left
> and made to go into our barracks.”

> Mr. Wiesel’s lies are many and varied. When writing about the
> slaughter at Babi Yar, he wrote:

> “Later, I learn from a witness that, for month after month, the ground
> never stopped trembling; and that, from time to time, geysers of blood
> spurted from it.”

> He claimed that they killed 10,000 Jews a day at Buchenwald but some
> how, miraculously, he was always spared. Is it likely that one 15 year
> old boy could survive not one, but three concentration camps whose
> entire raison d’etre was to kill as many Jews as possible?

> It has been said that Elie Wiesel “is the Holocaust,” and yet when he
> wrote his autobiographical novel, Night there is no mention of gas
> chambers. He has been caught in lie after lie and yet to this day he
> holds to his story in spite of a great deal of evidence that he has
> been less than truthful.

> In an account of Wiesel’s time at Auschwitz, he claims that, while
> working, he injured his foot and had to spend some time in the camp
> infirmary. Of course, this begs the question as to why a camp which
> was built, ostensibly, to annihilate Jews would even have an
> infirmary. Does it make any sense that a place built for the sole
> purpose of killing Jews on a large scale would bother having an
> infirmary staffed with doctors and nurses? And if Wiesel, then a 15
> year old boy with an injured foot, could not even work, why would they
> not just kill him on the spot?

> What really convinced me that Wiesel is a liar is that, as the Russian
> army approached Auschwitz and liberation was on the horizon, why, when
> given the chance of remaining in the camp to be freed by the Soviets
> or to evacuate with the Germans, Wiesel decided, along with about
> 20,000 other survivors, to leave with the Germans? In light of what we
> have been taught about the Holocaust, why would someone leave with his
> tormentors, who, he claimed, were depraved mass murderers, instead of
> waiting for his liberators?

> It makes no sense whatsoever to rational people and it is to his
> eternal shame that Wiesel has been one of the worst offenders when it
> comes to selling Holocaust lies to an unsuspecting public, even
> winning the Nobel Peace Prize in the process. When President Jimmy
> Carter needed to choose someone to take charge of the President’s
> Commission on the Holocaust he chose an unapologetic liar, Elie
> Wiesel.

> A few weeks back, I watched the Oprah Winfrey show in which she
> escorted Mr. Wiesel around the grounds of Auschwitz. He showed great
> humility as he walked with Ms. Winfrey through the camp where he had
> been interned as a child, a performance which should be considered for
> an Academy Award in the category of keeping a poker face while
> continuing to recite the same old lies.

> Mr. Wiesel should be ashamed of himself.

> Our second liar is none other than Nazi-hunter extraordinaire, Simon
> Wiesenthal, who devoted his post war life to hunting down Nazi war
> criminals. According to Mark Webber, of the Institute For Historical
> Review:

> “Wiesenthal’s reputation as a moral authority is undeserved. The man
> whom The Washington Post has called the “Holocaust’s Avenging Angel”
> has a little known but well-documented record of reckless disregard
> for truth. He has lied about his own wartime experiences,
> misrepresented his postwar “Nazi-hunting” achievements, and has spread
> vile falsehoods about alleged German atrocities.”

> It is unclear what exactly happened during Wiesenthal’s war years,
> since he has said various things at various times that are completely
> at odds with one another. There were accusations that he was, at one
> time, a Communist fighter, and still others that he was a Nazi
> collaborator, an accusation leveled against him by Austrian Chancellor
> Bruno Kreisky, who said:

> “I really know Mr. Wiesenthal only from secret reports, and they are
> bad, very nasty. I say this as Federal Chancellor … And I say that
> Mr. Wiesenthal had a different relationship with the Gestapo than I
> did. Yes, and this can be proven. I can’t say more [now]. Everything
> else, I’ll say in court.

> My relationship with the Gestapo is unambiguous. I was their prisoner,
> their inmate, and I was interrogated. His relationship was a different
> one, I can say, and this will come out clearly. It’s bad enough what
> I’ve already said here. But he can’t clear himself by charging me with
> defaming his honor in the press, as he might wish. It’s not that
> simple, because that would mean a big court case … A man like this
> doesn’t have the right to pretend to be a moral authority. That’s what
> I say. He doesn’t have the right …

> Whether a man who, in my view, is an agent, yes, that’s right, and who
> uses Mafia methods …

> Such a man has to go….

> He is no gentleman, and I would say, to make this clear, so that he
> won’t become a moral authority, because he is not … He shouldn’t
> pretend to be a moral authority …

> I say that Mr. Wiesenthal lived in that time in the Nazi sphere of
> influence without being persecuted. Right? And he lived openly without
> being persecuted, right? Is that clear? And you perhaps know, if you
> know what was going on, that no one could risk that.

> He wasn’t a “submarine” … that is, submerged and in hiding, but
> instead, he was completely in the open without having to, well, ever
> risk persecution. I think that’s enough. There were so many
> opportunities to be an agent. He didn’t have to be a Gestapo agent.
> There were many other services.”

> Before Wiesenthal became famous for being a “Nazi hunter,” he had
> already made a name for himself spreading Holocaust propaganda,
> including the famous claim of Jewish fat being rendered and made into
> soap which was later proven to be a complete fabrication.

> In 1946, he published a book in which he included what he purported to
> be his own original sketches of the horrors going on in Mauthausen
> concentration camp. One of the drawings was of three inmates, tied to
> a post who had been murdered by the Germans. Unfortunately for Mr.
> Wiesenthal, this was soon exposed as a fraud, since the original
> drawing was an actual photograph of three German soldiers who had been
> executed by firing squad for spying and was found in a 1945 edition of
> Life Magazine.

> “The irresponsible character of this book is also shown by
> Wiesenthal’s extensive citation therein of the supposed “death bed
> confession” of Mauthausen Commandant Franz Ziereis, according to which
> four million were gassed to death with carbon monoxide at the nearby
> Hartheim satellite camp. This claim is totally absurd, and no serious
> Holocaust historian still accepts it. Also according to the Ziereis
> “confession” cited by Wiesenthal, the Germans supposedly killed
> another ten million people in Poland, Lithuania and Latvia. In fact,
> this fraudulent “confession” was obtained by torture.

> Years later, Wiesenthal was still lying about Mauthausen. In a 1983
> interview with the daily newspaper USA Today, he said of his
> experience in Mauthausen: “I was one of 34 prisoners alive out of
> 150,000 who had been put there. “This is a blatant falsehood. The
> years have apparently not been kind to Wiesenthal’s memory, because in
> his own autobiography he wrote that “almost 3,000 prisoners died in
> Mauthausen after the Americans liberated us on May 5, 1945.”

> Another former inmate, Evelyn Le Chene, reported in her standard work
> about Mauthausen that there were 64,000 inmates in the camp when it
> was liberated in May 1945. And according to the Encyclopaedia Judaica,
> at least 212,000 inmates survived internment in the Mauthausen camp
> complex.”

> Wiesenthal’s lies continued with his outrageous claims that millions
> of Jews were killed in “electrocution showers,” something that has
> since been completely debunked by historians. In 1975 and again in
> 1993, Weisenthal confessed that there were no extermination camps on
> German soil.

> “He thus implicitly conceded that the claims made at the postwar
> Nuremberg Tribunal and elsewhere that Buchenwald, Dachau and other
> camps in Germany proper were “extermination camps” are not true.”

> Wiesenthal lied yet again when he claimed that he was responsible for
> the capture and trial of Adolph Eichmann and because of his
> machinations, an innocent man by the name of Frank Walus was smeared
> and denounced (falsely) by Wiesenthal as being a Nazi war criminal.

> “It was only after an exhausting legal battle that the man who was
> vilified and physically attacked as “the butcher of Kielce” was
> finally able to prove that he had spent the war years as a peaceful
> farm laborer in Germany. Frank Walus died in August 1994, a broken and
> bitterly disappointed man. Wiesenthal’s recklessness in the Walus case
> should have been enough to permanently discredit him as a reliable
> investigator. But his Teflon reputation survived even this.”

> Wiesenthal kept the world enthralled with his hunt for the infamous
> “Angel of Death,” Dr. Josef Mengele who Weisenthal claimed had been
> sighted in various Latin-American countries. He played the role of
> “Nazi crime sleuth” with a vengeance, ultimately damaging his
> credibility with his outrageous claims.

> Wiesenthal was paid $75,000 annually for the use of his name at the
> Los Angeles Wiesenthal Centre and has been criticized widely for the
> commercializtion of the Holocaust. The director of Israels Yad Vashem
> Holocaust Centre said that: “Both the Center and Wiesenthal
> “commercialize” and “trivialize” the Holocaust.”

> It was Simon Wiesenthal who gave us the 11 million figure for the
> Holocaust, comprising 6 million Jews and another 5 million non-Jews.

> “Wiesenthal “threw out” the figure of “11 million who were murdered in
> the Holocaust — six million Jews and five million non-Jews,” said the
> Yad Vashem official. When asked why he gave these figures, Wiesenthal
> replied: “The gentiles will not pay attention if we do not mention
> their victims, too.” Wiesenthal “chose ‘five million (gentiles)’
> because he wanted a ‘diplomatic’ number, one that told of a large
> number of gentile victims but in no way was larger than that of Jews

> Towards the end of his life, Wiesenthal became disturbed by the claims
> made by “historical revisionists” and was particularly incensed by the
> work of David Duke. I’m sure that’s understandable in light of the
> fact that Wiesenthal was an adept and convincing liar and greatly
> feared having those lies exposed.

> What is particularly telling is that Simon Wiesenthal attempted
> suicide twice while in a concentration camp and both times he was
> taken to the infirmary to be nursed back to health. Surely such a
> thing would never happen in a place dedicated to exterminating every
> Jew in Europe.

> These two men, Wiesel and Wiesenthal, have come to represent the
> Holocaust. Mr. Wiesel is the consummate victim, the self-appointed
> guru of pathos and martyrdom, telling lies and fabricating aspects of
> the Holocaust in order to garner sympathy. Mr. Wiesenthal devoted his
> life to tracking down Nazi war criminals, seeking self-aggrandizement
> in the process, perhaps also trying to run from his troubling and
> largely fabricated past.

> These two men will go down in history as heroes, most likely, unless
> they are exposed, and rightly so, as charlatans and liars.

> Because that’s what they are.

ELIE WIESENTHAL was a Gestapo agent who sent dozens of Bukovina partizans
to the gallows. If he ever crossed the border into the Soviet Union he
would
have been hung on the spot!

> Daniel
> http://toutsaufsarkozy.com/

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
Stormfront – http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: HoffmanWire-subs[email protected]
Yggdrasil’s White Nationalist Library – http://www.ddc.net/ygg
American Renaissance – http://www.amren.com
Campaign for Radical Truth in History – http://www.hoffman-info.com

or to Steve Horn – [email protected]
or [email protected]
Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:41 EST 2008
Article: 624961 of soc.culture.europe
Sender: Borked Pseudo Mailed
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Subject: Dresden = A Real Holocaust = War Ein Wirkliche HOLOCAUST!!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:50:25 -0700 (MST)
Newsgroups: de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.europe,uk.politics.misc
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news.mixmin.net
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Lines: 303
Bytes: 16001
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com de.soc.politik.misc:1172088 soc.culture.europe:624961 uk.politics.misc:2475546

Dresden = A Real Holocaust = War Ein Wirkliche HOLOCAUST!!

The real HOLOCAUST on Dresden was perpetrated on the innocent
civilians of Dresden, which had no military importance, by bomber
Harris/Horowitz !!

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:58:40 -0500, in alt.politics.nationalism.white,
[email protected] (Whitey Loughmiller) wrote:

Dresden
Kevin Alfred Strom

The night of February 13th, and February 14th, Valentine’s Day, mark
an ominous anniversary in the history of Western Civilization. For
beginning on the night of February 13th, 1945, occurred the
destruction of Dresden.

On the eve of Valentine’s Day, 1945, World War II in Europe was nearly
over. For all practical purposes Germany was already defeated. Italy,
and Germany’s other European allies, had fallen by the wayside. The
Red Army was rushing to occupy vast areas of what had been Germany in
the East, while the allies of the Soviets, the British and Americans,
were bombing what was left of Germany’s defenses and food and
transportation infrastructure into nonexistence.

And what was Dresden? Most of you have probably heard of Dresden
China, and that delicately executed and meticulously detailed
porcelain is really a perfect symbol for that city.

For centuries Dresden had been a center of art and culture, and
refined leisure and recreation. She was a city of art museums and
theatres, circuses and sports stadia, a town of ancient half-timbered
buildings looking for all the world like those of medieval England,
with venerable churches and centuries-old cathedrals gracing her
skyline. She was a city of artists and craftsmen, of actors and
dancers, of tourists and the merchants and hotels that served them.
Above all, what Dresden was, was defined during the war by what she
was not. She had no significant military or industrial installations.
Because of this, Dresden had become, above all other things that she
was, a city of children, of women, of refugees, and of the injured and
maimed who were recovering from their wounds in her many hospitals.

These women and children, these wounded soldiers, these infirm and
elderly people, these refugees fleeing from the brutal onslaught of
the Communist armies to the East, had come to Dresden because it was
commonly believed at the time that Dresden would not be attacked. Its
lack of strategic or military or industrial significance, and the
well-known presence of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian
refugees and even Allied prisoners of war, seemed to guarantee safety
to the city. Surely, it was thought, not even a the most powerful and
determined enemy would be so depraved and sadistic, and so wasteful of
that enemy’s own resources, to attack such a city. But the people of
Dresden, who were happily attending the cinema or eating dinner at
home or watching the show-horses in the circus on that fateful night
were wrong, wrong, wrong. And their leaders were also wrong, for the
city was virtually open and undefended and only minimal civil defense
preparations had been made.

Dresden’s population had almost doubled in the months before the
attack, mainly as a result of the influx of refugees from the Eastern
Front, most of them women and young children.

According to British historian David Irving, the briefings given to
the British bomber squadrons before the attack on Dresden were
curiously different. In one, the soldiers were told that their target
was the railway center of Dresden. In another, they were told that the
target was a poison-gas factory. In yet another, they were told that
the target was a marshalling-grounds for troops in the city. Another
was told that the target was a major arsenal. These were all lies.
The only marshalling-grounds for what few troops were in the area were
located well outside the city. The arsenal had burned down in 1916.
There were factories for toothpaste and baby-powder in Dresden, but
none for poison gas. There were, in fact, no fewer than eighteen
railway stations in Dresden, but only one was hit by the bombing, and
that was barely touched and in fact was operating again just three
days later.

According to copious documentation unearthed by David Irving from the
archives of the American and British governments, the point of the
attack was in fact to inflict the maximum loss of life on the civilian
population and particularly to kill as many refugees as possible who
were fleeing from the Red Army. In achieving these goals it was highly
successful. It was thus planned and executed by those at the very
highest levels of the British and American governments, who to attain
their purposes even lied to their own soldiers and citizens, who to
this day have never been told the full story by their leaders.
How was this devastating effect accomplished?
At 10:10 PM on February 13th, the first wave of the attack, consisting
of the British Number 5 Bomber Group, began. The attacking force
consisted of about 2,000 bombers with additional support craft, which
dropped over 3,000 high explosive and 650,000 incendiary bombs (more
commonly known as firebombs) on the center of the city. Incendiary
bombs are not known for their efficiency per pound in destroying heavy
equipment such as military hardware or railroad tracks, but are
extremely effective in producing maximum loss of human life. The loads
carried by the bombers were over 75 per cent incendiaries. In fact,
the goal of the first wave of the attack was, according to British air
commander Sir Arthur Bomber Harris, to set the city well on fire. That
he did.

The lack of any effective anti-aircraft defenses allowed the bombers
to drop to very low altitudes and thus a relatively high degree of
precision and visual identification of targets was achieved. Despite
the fact that they could clearly see that the marked target area
contained hospitals and sports stadia and residential areas of center
city Dresden, the bombers nevertheless obeyed orders and rained down a
fiery death upon the unlucky inhabitants of that city on a scale which
had never before been seen on planet Earth.

Hundreds of thousands of innocents were literally consumed by fire, an
actual holocaust by the true definition of the word: complete
consumption by fire.

Dresden after its holocaust
The incendiaries started thousands of fires and, aided by a stiff wind
and the early-on destruction of the telephone exchanges that might
have summoned firefighters from nearby towns, these fires soon
coalesced into one unimaginably huge firestorm. Now such firestorms
are not natural phenomena, and are seldom created by man, so few
people have any idea of their nature. Basically, what happened was
this: The intense heat caused by the huge column of smoke and flame,
miles high and thousands of acres in area, created a terrific updraft
of air in the center of the column.
This created a very low pressure at the base of the column, and
surrounding fresh air rushed inward at speeds estimated to be thirty
times that of an ordinary tornado. An ordinary tornado wind-force is a
result of temperature differences of perhaps 20 to 30 degrees
centigrade. In this firestorm the temperature differences were on the
order of 600 to 1,000 degrees centigrade. This inward-rushing air
further fed the flames, creating a literal tornado of fire, with winds
in the surrounding area of many hundreds of miles per hour — sweeping
men, women, children, animals, vehicles and uprooted trees pell-mell
into the glowing inferno.

But this was only the first stage of the plan.
Exactly on schedule, three hours after the first attack, a second
massive armada of British bombers arrived, again loaded with high
explosive and massive quantities of incendiary bombs. The residents of
Dresden, their power systems destroyed by the first raid, had no
warning of the second. Again the British bombers attacked the center
city of Dresden, this time dividing their targets — one half of the
bombs were to be dropped into the center of the conflagration, to keep
it going, the other half around the edges of the firestorm. No
pretense whatever was made of selecting military targets. The timing
of the second armada was such as to ensure that a large quantity of
the surviving civilians would have emerged from their shelters by that
time, which was the case, and also in hopes that rescue and
firefighting crews would have arrived from surrounding cities, which
also proved to be true. The firefighters and medics thus incinerated
hadn’t needed the telephone exchange to know that they were needed —
the firestorm was visible from a distance of 200 miles.

It is reported that body parts, pieces of clothing, tree branches,
huge quantities of ashes, and miscellaneous debris from the firestorm
fell for days on the surrounding countryside as far away as eighteen
miles.
After the attack finally subsided, rescue workers found nothing but
liquefied remains of the inhabitants of some shelters, where even the
metal kitchen utensils had melted from the intense heat.

The next day, Ash Wednesday and Valentine’s Day, 1945, medical and
other emergency personnel from all over central Germany had converged
on Dresden. Little did they suspect that yet a third wave of bombers
was on its way, this time American. This attack had been carefully
coordinated with the previous raids. Four hundred fifty Flying
Fortresses and a support contingent of fighters arrived to finish the
job at noon. I quote from David Irving’s The Destruction of Dresden:

“Just a few hours before Dresden had been a fairy-tale city of spires
and cobbled streets …. now total war had put an end to all that.
..The ferocity of the US raid of 14th February had finally brought the
people to their knees… but it was not the bombs which finally
demoralised the people … it was the Mustang fighters, which suddenly
appeared low over the city, firing on everything that moved …. one
section of the Mustangs concentrated on the river banks, where masses
of bombed-out people had gathered. … British prisoners who had been
released from their burning camps were among the first to suffer the
discomfort of machine-gunning attacks …. wherever columns of
tramping people were marching in or out of the city they were pounced
on by the fighters, and machine-gunned or raked with cannon fire.”
[Image: Dresden skyline after Allied saturation bombing.]

Ladies and gentlemen, on this program I can only give you a bare
glimpse of the inhuman horror of the holocaust of Dresden. In Dresden,
no fewer than 135,000 innocent victims died, with some estimates as
high as 300,000. More died in Dresden than died in the well-known
attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

More destruction befell Dresden in one day than was inflicted on the
whole of Britain during the entire war. And yet you haven’t been told.
I urge every one of you to read The Destruction of Dresden by David
Irving. I assure you, after reading Irving’s book, you will never take
seriously the Establishment’s version of what happened in that war
again.

What you ought to take seriously, though, is the fact that the same
clique that controlled the traitorous Roosevelt and Churchill
governments, whose hatred of our race and civilization and whose
alliance with Communism were the real causes of the holocaust of
Dresden, still controls our government and our media today. It is they
who are pushing for a disarmed, racially mixed America. It is they who
promote the teaching of sodomy to our young children. It is they who
are destroying our industrial infrastructure in the name of a global
economy. It is they who created the drug subculture and then also the
police state agencies which pretend to fight it.

The hour is very late for America and indeed for all of Western
civilization. But if patriots will heed our call, then there is no
reason for despair. For the enemies of our nation may have power, but
their power is based on lies. Won’t you help us cut through the chain
of lies that holds our people in mental slavery?
Every year, families should commemorate the anniversary of the
holocaust of Dresden on the eve of 13th February.

Free Speech — David Irving has generously made his Destruction of
Dresden available as a free download, in PDF format, at his Focal
Point
Press website.

—

“It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate ,
tireless minority keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds
of men. ” —
Samuel Adams

” George W. Bush is so pro-Mexico that if you hit him with a stick
prizes would fall out of him. ”

–Argus Hamilton

“If you worship your enemy, you are defeated.

If you adopt your enemy’s religion you are enslaved.

If you breed with your enemy you are destroyed.”

— Polydoros

“Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice.
It is not a thing to be waited for – it is a thing to be achieved . ”

— William Jennings Bryan

www.HalTurnerShow.com
www.NatVan.com
www.NatAllNews.com
www.Stormfront.org
www.WhiteRevolution.com
www.V-News.org

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]
Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:42 EST 2008
Article: 624970 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: Frank Arthur
X-Invalid: [email protected],
X-Invalid: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,
X-Invalid: alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc
Subject: Protocols of Zion Alive in Ukraine
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:34:41 -0700 (MST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: [email protected]
Lines: 148
Bytes: 7645
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.ukrainian:117315 soc.culture.europe:624970

It seems that people in Ukraine must be more intelligent than the slaves
of the ZYDS in USA, Canada, Britain and Germany?

On 12 Apr 2005 21:00:13 -0700, [email protected] wrote:

>Eye on Eurasia: Believing the ‘Protocols’

>By Paul Goble
>UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL

>Tartu, Estonia, Apr. 12 (UPI) — A senior official of the Ukrainian
>Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate argues the “Protocols of the
>Elders of Zion” — a notorious anti-Semitic forgery of the late tsarist
>period — accurately predicts the directions in which Europe and
>Ukraine are moving.

>Vitaliy Kosovskiy, secretary of the Patriarchal Church in Ukraine and a
>professor at the Kyiv Spiritual Academy, earlier this month posted on
>the Church’s Web site an article suggesting “regardless of who wrote
>these ‘Protocols’ — employees of the tsarist police or ‘the Zionist
>elders'” — was a matter of indifference.

>What was “important,” he said, is that “although written more than 100
>years ago, they reveal the contemporary course of history.” And taken
>together with the Bible and the writings of the Church Fathers, he
>continued, they can help the Orthodox faithful in Ukraine understand
>what is happening to them and why (orthodox.org.ua/page-1513.html).

>Kosovskiy wrote the main indication of the coming of apocalyptic times
>is the “presence of world rule,” something he suggested is being
>promoted by globalization and “the community called the European
>Union.” And he says one can tell where these trends will take Ukraine
>in the future by looking into the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”

>Taking at face value language from that work, this pro-Moscow churchman
>argued “‘Europe without borders, with a common currency and with the
>unification of the human personality” is “the beginning of the end” of
>the world foretold in “Protocol No. 3.”

>Kosovskiy’s reliance on this notorious anti-Semitic forgery already is
>disturbing many in Ukraine. It should be worrying others, too. Writing
>in Kiev’s Zerkalo nedeli last month, Pavel Gavrilyuk argued Kosovskiy’s
>article was appalling on many levels (religare.ru/print15602).

>First, Kosovskiy’s approach violates all the principles of the Church.
>The notion that a forgery like the Protocols should be treated as of
>equal value to the Bible or the works of the Church Fathers for
>interpreting the world is a dangerous absurdity, Gavrilyuk wrote.

>Second, it promotes anti-Semitism within the Patriarchal church and
>thus destroys its reputation and its influence. Gavrilyuk added such
>anti-Semitic comments were a frequent feature in Patriarchate churches.

>He reported he had once heard a priest in church near Moscow deliver a
>sermon arguing that: “1.the Jews crucified Christ, 2. atheism — comes
>from the intelligentsia and science, 3. all the moral degradation in
>Russia has been brought in from America, 4. Russians are a God-chosen
>people, [and] 5. the predictions of the Apocalypse of St. John must be
>applied to the contemporary situation …because the time of the end of
>the world is near.”

>And third, Kosovskiy’s words and their appearance on the Web site
>suggests the pro-Moscow church is prepared to play the anti-Semitic
>card in a last desperate effort to try to maintain its position in
>Ukraine and Moscow’s influence in that country, a play that Gavrilyuk
>argued was based on a complete misreading of where Ukraine and
>Ukrainians are now.

>Ukrainians want to be part of Europe, Gavrilyuk insisted, precisely
>because they have escaped from the dangerous fantasies of the past
>including anti-Semitism and because they believe they can build a
>better future here and now rather than adopting the fatalistic notion
>that they must simply do nothing because the end times are near.

>Kosovskiy’s language, Gavrilyuk continued, is thus not only morally
>offensive but politically counterproductive, too. Indeed, Gavrilyuk
>suggested, the very obscurantism Kosovskiy offers will drive Ukrainians
>either into other Orthodox churches or out of the church altogether.

>But such anti-Semitic and apocalyptic language inevitably must be of
>concern to more than just the Ukrainians at whom it is addressed in the
>first instance. It must be of concern to people of good will
>everywhere. And in addition to denouncing the use of such language,
>they need to be asking two fundamental questions:

>On the one hand, why has the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow
>Patriarchate not disowned Kosovskiy’s words but chosen instead to
>distribute them widely and with its apparent imprimatur on its Web
>site? And on the other, why is Russian President Vladimir Putin so
>ready to cooperate with that church and with church officials like
>Kosovskiy?

>To the extent Gavrilyuk is right, Ukrainians are appalled with the
>answers to these questions. The rest of us should be as well.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:43 EST 2008
Article: 624972 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
X-Invalid: [email protected],
X-Invalid: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.japan,can.general,soc.culture.australian
Subject: Bombardier Aircraft UNSAFE-Too Many Crashes in Europe & Japan! Airbus Get Another 82 Orders!!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:58:58 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]t.info
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Bytes: 5180
Lines: 118
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.europe:624972 soc.culture.japan:375932 can.general:351622 soc.culture.australian:473844

News report another crash involving another Bumbardier plane – this time
in Albania.

So far there are no deaths reported from the defective Bombardier Canada
airplane crashes.

Will the flight YOU take be the one where YOU and others get killed?

AVOID FLYING ON BOMBARDIER aircraft, and tell your friends likewise.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7089318.stm

Emirates orders 82 Airbus planes

The latest Emirates deal is worth more than $20bn for Airbus
Emirates has ordered 82 Airbus jets, in a deal worth more than $20bn
(£9.6bn) for the European plane-maker.

The Dubai-based airline is buying 70 of Airbus’ mid-sized A350 model,
and 11 Airbus A380 twin-deck super jumbos.

Announced at the start of the Dubai air show, Emirates said the new
planes would play “an important role” in the growth of both the
airline and Dubai.

Emirates added that it also had the option to purchase a further 50
A350 aircraft at a future date.

Rolls-Royce deal

If this additional order goes ahead, the final deal will be worth
about $32bn for Airbus.

Emirates airlines is placing great faith in our A350 XWB and A380
programmes as well as our company and we are rightfully proud
Airbus boss Tom Enders

The latest contract win for Airbus was also good news for British
engine-maker Rolls-Royce, as Emirates has chosen its units to power
the new planes.

It will be worth up to $8.4bn for Rolls-Royce if Emirates does go on
to buy the additional 50 A350 planes.

“Emirates airlines is placing great faith in our A350 XWB and A380
programmes as well as our company and we are rightfully proud,” said
Airbus president and chief executive Tom Enders.

The order is welcome good news for Airbus parent group EADS.

Last week EADS warned it may have to deepen planned restructuring and
job cuts after its losses for the July to September period worsened to
775m euros ($1.14bn; £541m), compared with 189m euros last year.

It already plans to cut 10,000 jobs at Airbus over the next four
years.

Airbus designs and makes its wings in the UK.

>The news stories below about Quantas seem to be dated January 2002.

>All the crashes caused by defective landing gear on the Bombardier Q400,
are
>being reported in the past few weeks – in other words NOW!!

>When all of Europe is dumping the Bombardier Q400, and suing Bombardier
for
>many billions, there is definitely something wrong with Bombardier!

>As well, the media report that there are at least another 2 crashes in
Japan
>with the Bombardier Q400 this year.

>Now, the European Safety Agency is demanding a “crisis meeting” with
Canadian
>officials, to discuss the risks to European travellers caused by the
defective
>Bombardier junk!! In a publicly issued statement, ESA promised to “take
all
>measures to ensure the safety of European passengers and citizens”.

>Competitors of Bumbardier, such as EMBRAER, BAC, and the US firms, must
really
>be having a field day, now that they can tell potential buyers about all
the
>crashes with Bombardier!!

>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:21:24 -0400, “Paul” wrote:
>>>”Craig Welch” wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]…
>>>> Ned Kelly said:

>>>>>As well the European Union are saying that most European airlines are
now
>>>>>going to return all the Bombardier aircraft, following a number of
crashes in
>>>>>the past few weeks, costing many airlines untold millions in damages
due
>>>>>tounsafe Bombardier aircraft. Mind you airlines such as Horizon Air
and
>>>>>Quantasstill are flying Bombardier aircraft.

>>>> There are no Quantas Bombardier aircraft.

>>>> Craig http://www.wazu.jp/
>>>> 1,239 Unicode fonts for 82 written language groups:
>>>> Price your own web plan: http://www.wazu.jp/hosting/
>>>I believe you are incorrect.

>>>http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3078/is_200201/ai_n7819747

>>>http://www.smartmoney.com/news/on/index.cfm?story=ON-20071022-000552-
1606

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:43 EST 2008
Article: 624974 of soc.culture.europe
Sender: Borked Pseudo Mailed
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Subject: Wave Of Hatred vs. Zionazi ZYDS/Jews/Juden Increasing
X-Invalid: Due to Money LOSSES Crunch = ZYD Punch
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:13:37 -0700 (MST)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.australian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news.mixmin.net
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Lines: 625
Bytes: 32666
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.europe:624974 soc.culture.polish:896167 soc.culture.australian:473845

Wave Of Hatred vs. Zionazi ZYDS/Jews/Juden Increasing
Due to Money LOSSES Crunch = ZYD Punch

From: Peace Power
Newsgroups: soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.palestine,
soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Credit Crunch or rather Zio Punch?

John Reynolds ends his latest Observer commentary on the ethical
implications of the current economic disaster with the following
words:

“Above all we need more individuals to make a stand. The Archbishops
of Canterbury and York should go further and call for more Christians
to work in the city.” (John Reynolds, chief executive of Reynolds
Partners, and chairman of the Ethical Investment Advisory Group, The
Observer 28.9.08).

One may wonder what Reynolds refers to when calling for more
‘Christians to work in the City’. I tend to believe that more than
just a few people out there do understand pretty well what Reynolds is
suggesting. Reynolds, the chairman of the Ethical Investment Advisory
Group protests against the non-ethical spirit that has been abundant
in the City for more than a while. By pleading the Archbishops of
Canterbury and York to send more Christians to the City he may try to
suggest to us that our financial world must be spiritually de-
Judified. I must admit that it took me by complete surprise to read
such a suggestion in the politically correct Guardian. I wonder how it
happened that such an idea filtered through.

Two weeks ago I took the task of elaborating on this very issue in
front of the Cambridge Forum. The following presentation is an effort
to disentangle the horrifying tribal plot that accidentally led
towards the destruction of the American Empire and Western financial
hegemony.

Gilad Atzmon Talks About The Credit Crunch at Cambridge Forum
(16/9/08)

Dear friends, I am pretty troubled with the talk I am about to deliver
this evening. I do understand the devastating implications of my
current ideas and I am still trying to find the most appropriate words
to address the issue.

As the picture of the current economy disaster becomes ever more
clear, it becomes rather obvious, to me at least, that the ideology
and the people who are directly responsible for the mass killing of
millions of Iraqis and the displacement of many other millions, the
people who keep the Palestinians starved behind walls, are
unfortunately very much the same people who are responsible for a
class genocide of millions of disenfranchised Americans who are now on
the brink of total dispossession.

A year ago I was invited to give a talk at this platform. ‘Iraq,
Afghanistan and Palestine, What is the Common Thread?’ was the title I
picked. At the time I gave a talk carrying that topic in a conference
in Stockholm, I thought that such a topic would be relevant for a long
while. My message in Stockholm was rather simple: the common thread
between Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine is our apathy. Millions of
people are murdered, displaced, dispossessed and starved while we are
more or less nonchalant. However, we cannot be blasé anymore. The
people who are destroying Iraq and Palestine are now knocking on our
own doors.

As we all remember, two weeks before Britain was taken into an illegal
war, millions of us were marching in the streets of London waving
placards telling Blair and his cabinet what we thought of them.
Interestingly enough, now when it is clear that this war has cost the
lives of millions of innocent Iraqis, we do not do a thing. We do not
even try to chase Blair and bring him to justice. Similarly, the abuse
of Palestinians is now common knowledge, it appears on our TV screens
on a daily basis, and again we somehow keep silent.

In case some of you fail to realise, the crime in Iraq has been
committed on our behalf. Indeed, we are not as liable as Blair, the
Labour Party and the Islamophobic media circuit a la Nick Cohen and
David Aaronovitch who rushed to support this doomed war. Indeed, we
didn’t personally send soldiers to the battlefield, we did not launch
cruise missiles, nor did we praise the killing in the name of
‘democracy’ and ‘freedom’, yet, we are all somehow guilty of being
indifferent.

In case you ask yourselves why are we indifferent, I will try to
suggest an answer. We are indifferent just because we have a ‘good’
excuse. When being blamed for not doing a thing, we would all raise
our voices and shout righteously: ‘We opposed the war, we were there
to protest just before the war, we all marched in that big demo.’ Yep,
as it seems, Anglo-American liberal democracy provides us with a
pretext. Due to some ‘oldy mouldy’ leftist tradition, our political
resistance is always taking the embarrassing shape of juvenile scarf
waving, badge wearing and slogan shouting. Once every three and a half
decades we invade the streets, we shout a bit, we raise some placards.
We listen to some decaying politicians, we ejaculate collectively and
we then split rather quietly. Some go to the nearest pub, some go the
sushi bar and a few, those who can afford it, would use the
opportunity and continue to a musical in Drury Lane.

In the long run, we tend to believe that we have paid our political
and humanist dues. Sadly enough, it is our apathy towards the
suffering of others that makes Iraq, Palestine and Afghanistan into a
single narrative of Western collective indifference.

However, things are changing in front of our very eyes these days. We
cannot be indifferent anymore just because we are the ones that are
becoming the next victims of expansionist global Zionised politics.

In case you cannot tell, I will be very clear about it all. The same
Ideology that brought carnage on Iraq and Palestine is the same
ideology that makes you lose your home tomorrow.

The Wolfowitz Doctrine

Back in 1992. Dick Cheney appointed Paul Wolfowitz (Undersecretary for
Defence Policy) and his deputy Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby to draft the USA
Defense Planning Guidance (DFG) for the 1994-99 fiscal years. The
imperialist Zio-centric document that was later named as the
“Wolfowitz Doctrine” was soon leaked to the New York Times and raised
some harsh criticism. However, as history sadly teaches us, not enough
or nothing at all was done to curb Wolfowitz’s and Libby’s murderous
enthusiasm when it was still relatively young.

The astonishing document was there to merge American and global
Zionism interests into a unified belligerent practice. It all happened
in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union, bearing in mind that
America was becoming a single super power.

“Our first objective,” says Wolfowitz, “is to prevent the re-emergence
of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or
elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by
the Soviet Union.”

As much as Wolfowitz may claim to believe in ‘freedom’ and the free
market, America should not bargain over its primacy in the market and
the new world order.

“The U.S. must show the leadership necessary to establish and protect
a new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors
that they need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more
aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests.”

Wolfowitz realized already in 1992 that the world may be reluctant to
support his visionary American expansionist philosophy. America,
according to him, should therefore adopt a unilateral assertive
practice. Rather than counting on international coalitions and UN
initiatives, America better get used to the idea that it would have to
act alone. Seemingly, already in 1992 Wolfowitz appointed America as
the World police.

“Like the coalition that opposed Iraqi aggression, we should expect
future coalitions to be ad hoc assemblies, often not lasting beyond
the crisis being confronted, and in many cases carrying only general
agreement over the objectives to be accomplished. Nevertheless, the
sense that the world order is ultimately backed by the U.S. will be an
important stabilizing factor.”

Hence, Wolfowitz stresses, America should intervene when and where it
believed necessary. But then, not before too long, the Global Zionist
pops out. Wolfowitz and Libby, at the time still just ‘youngsters of
Zion’ reaffirmed U.S. commitments to the Jewish State. [1]

“In the Middle East and Persian Gulf, we seek to foster regional
stability, deter aggression against our friends and interests in the
region, protect U.S. nationals and property, and safeguard our access
to international air and seaways and to the region’s oil. The United
States is committed to the security of Israel and to maintaining the
qualitative edge that is critical to Israel’s security.”

Needless to say that knowing what we know nowadays about Neocon
murderous criminal interventional inclinations, this document
shouldn’t take us by surprise. Yet, a few questions must be asked:

How is it that America didn’t find within its political establishment
the means to resist Wolfowitz’s foreign political impetus?
How is it that America that had all the ‘necessary warnings’ had found
itself just ten years later acting as an Israeli mission force
fighting the last pockets of resistance to Jewish national
imperialism?
In short, we should wonder, how did America, once a symbol of freedom,
let itself be enslaved by such repulsive ideologies that are
associated inherently with some clear foreign tribal interests?

Oil is important

The United States of America is a big country with big roads and big
thirsty cars. Consequently, oil is the key for its stability and its
general happiness. Wolfowitz and Libby, so it seemed at the time,
found the way to heaven. They were about to kill two birds with just a
single (cruise missile) shot. They planned to rob the Arab oil and to
‘secure’ their beloved Jewish state simultaneously. Evidently, America
didn’t manage to restrain Wolfowitz’s appetite. In 2003, by the time
youngster of Zion Wolfowitz was on the verge of becoming a proper
elder, America was taken into an illegal war in Iraq. Nowadays, we can
tell without a hint of a doubt that Wolfowitz, the ‘architect of the
Second Gulf War’, has managed to drag his country into a humiliating
catastrophic defeat.

As we all know, the plan didn’t work out. America didn’t manage to put
its heavy hand on Iraqi oil. Reconstruction of Iraq is ‘yet’ to happen
and when it happens, it won’t be American company that will take the
profit. America is now inherently associated with Israel as the
biggest threat to world peace. However, Wolfowitz didn’t fail
entirely. He indeed succeeded in destroying one fierce enemy of
Israel. He toppled Saddam Hussein. But it seems as if Saddam, on his
way down, managed to pull the entire American Empire with him.
Moreover, by the time the last American soldiers will be evacuated
>from the green zone (Baghdad) it will be realized that it was actually
Wolfowitz’s doctrine failure that made Iran into the leading regional
super power.

The Greenspan Doctrine – Money Makes The World Go Round

Earlier on I raised a rather crucial question: How is it that America
failed to restrain its Wolfowitzes? How is that America let its
foreign policy be shaped by some ruthless Zionists? How come alleged
American ‘free media’ failed to warn the American people of the enemy
within?

Money is probably the answer, it indeed makes the world go round, or
at least the ‘American housing market’.

Throughout the centuries, Jewish bankers bought for themselves some
real reputations of backers and financers of wars [2] and even one
communist revolution [3]. Though rich Jews had been happily financing
wars using their assets, Alan Greenspan, the Chairman of the Federal
Reserve of the United States, found a far more sophisticated way to
finance the wars perpetrated by his ideological brothers Libby and
Wolfowitz.

Unlike old fashioned Britain, where Tony Blair recruited Lord ‘cash-
machine’ Levy to encourage his Zionist friends to donate their money
by proxy to a party that was just about to a launch a criminal war, in
America it was the most underprivileged classes who were set to
finance the current wars.

Alan Greenspan planned to provide his president with an economy boom
assuming that prosperous conditions would divert the attention from
the war in Iraq. Greenspan is not exactly an amateur economist, he
knew what he was doing. He knew very well that as long as Americans
were doing well, buying and selling homes, his President would be able
pursue implementing the ‘Wolfowitz doctrine’ destroying the ‘bad
Arabs’ in the name of ‘democracy’.

Greenspan advised the American people to buy, he repeated the old
mantra: ‘spending is patriotic’. He also managed to convince them that
if they do not have the money to spend, that should never stop them
either. They ‘would pay later’.

Without stepping too deeply into economy, it was Greenspan who
prepared the monetary ground for the rise of the subprime mortgage
companies. A lending market that specialises in high risk mortgages
and loans.

“Innovation,” said Greenspan in April 2005, “has brought about a
multitude of new products, such as subprime loans and niche credit
programs for immigrants.”

One must admit that it is almost reassuring to find out that Greenspan
cares so much about the new immigrants to the USA.

“Such developments,” continues Greenspan, “are representative of the
market responses that have driven the financial services industry
throughout the history of our country … With these advances in
technology, lenders have taken advantage of credit-scoring models and
other techniques for efficiently extending credit to a broader
spectrum of consumers.”

Greenspan admits here that he was leading the American banking system
into an ‘advanced’ experiment. Seemingly.

“Where once more-marginal applicants would simply have been denied
credit, lenders are now able to quite efficiently judge the risk posed
by individual applicants and to price that risk appropriately.”

Did I hear ‘Appropriately’?

“These improvements have led to rapid growth in subprime mortgage
lending; indeed, today subprime mortgages account for roughly 10
percent of the number of all mortgages outstanding, up from just 1 or
2 percent in the early 1990s.”

Just as in the case of Wolfowitz, Greenspan had a plan. Very much like
in the Wolfowitz’s war it even worked for a while, but disastrously,
it somehow didn’t work all the way through.

As we all remember President Bush’s embarrassing declaration of
victory in Iraq, we also realise that it didn’t take long for the
American people to acknowledge that America would never win in this
war. Similarly, Greenspan had some initial numbers to be proud of. The
subprime borrowing which he pushed for was a major contributor to an
increase in home ownership and the demand for housing. The overall
U.S. homeownership rate increased from 64 percent in 1994 to a peak in
2004 with an all-time high of 69.2 percent. Real estate had become the
leading business in America, more and more speculators invested money
in the business. During 2006, 22 percent of homes purchased (1.65
million units) were for investment purposes, with an additional 14
percent (1.07 million units) purchased as vacation homes.

These figures led Americans to believe that their economy was indeed
booming. And when economy is booming nobody is really interested in
foreign affairs, certainly they can’t be interested in two million
dead Iraqis. But then the grave reality embarked upon the very many
struggling working class Americans and immigrants who suddenly failed
to pay back money they didn’t have in the first place.

Due to the rise of oil prices and the rise of interest rates, millions
of disadvantaged Americans fell behind. By the time they drove back to
their remote, newly purchased suburban homes, there was not enough
money in the kitty to pay the mortgage back. Consequently, within a
very short time millions of houses had been repossessed. However far
more worrying, there was no one around to sell them to and the bank
took them back. The poor people of America had become poorer than
ever.

It’s something like Wolfowitz’s toppled Saddam who managed to pull the
American Empire with him. The poor Americans that were set by
Greenspan to finance the Wolfowitz’s war have managed to crush
American capitalism, as well as the American monetary and banking
system. Greenspan’s policy evidently led to class genocide that left
America’s financial system with a hole that stands now on one Trillion
dollars, but may grow far bigger within days. [4]

Kosher Snatch or Zio Punch?

Greenspan and Wolfowitz remind me the joke about insensitive surgeon
who comes out of the theatre after a 12 hours heart operation telling
the anxious family ”the operation was a great success but
unfortunately your beloved didn’t make it to the end.”

Greenspan’s and Wolfowitz’s doctrines looked promising on paper. The
operation was very successful but as it appears, the American Empire
didn’t make it to the end. It is now doomed to die. Greenspan, so he
says, did it all for the ‘immigrants’ and the ‘poor’. Wolfowitz
appointed Great America to be the global Policing force. Let me tell
you, the pattern is familiar, these wonderful people always try to
save the world. They ‘bring’ democracy to the Arabs, they ‘bring’
equality to the poor. But somehow, Israel is always set to benefit.
One has to read Herzl to know that this is what political Zionism is
all about: the setting of super powers to serve the Zionist cause.

Have you ever asked yourself how is it that the British Empire found
itself promising the Zionists a Jewish National home in 1917? Have you
ever asked yourself what Balfour received in return? [5]

Some Americans where fooled into blindly following Wolfowitz and
Greenspan, many others were disastrously stupid not to stop them in
time. As devastating as it may sound, Greenspan and Wolfowitz should
have been restrained at the least, or even not be allowed to occupy
their positions in the first place. A Zionist who declares affiliation
with foreign national interests should never be appointed by any
administration or any other political institution. Already in 1992
Americans should have known about the Zionist infiltrators within the
hub of their strategic headquarters. Americans should have been
extremely cautious after the exposure of the Jonathan Pollard
espionage affair. The AIPAC spy scandal was not a great surprise
either. However the exposure of Fibby Libby who leaked a CIA agent
(Valerie E. Wilson aka “Valerie Plame”) details just to put pressure
on her husband, Iraq war critic Joseph Wilson, should have been the
last nail in the Zio-con coffin. Seemingly Americans ignored all the
necessary warnings. Consequently, the Americans have many wounds to
lick. In fact reading the morning papers, America is becoming nothing
but a big gigantic wound, far too big to lick.

But it is not just America, Blair paid the ultimate political penalty
for his involvement with Zionist Levy, his proxy donator gang and the
other ‘Labour Friends of Israel’. The issue here is not at all about
religious belief, ethnic origin or racial orientation. We are talking
here about Zionism which is a Jewish Diaspora ideological affiliation
to a foreign national expansionist precept with global interests. As
much as America and Britain wouldn’t let a Chinese or German
nationalist take care of their strategic planning, it should ban
Zionists or those who are suspected of being ones from any proximity
to their policy making.

Clearly, and this must be said, Jews are not necessarily Zionists.
They can also be humanists, universalists, ordinary human beings,
plumbers, musicians, shopkeepers and even shoplifters. However, the
Zionists amongst the Jews are very easy to trace. They always operate
politically as Jews. They run Jewish lobbies, think tanks and pressure
groups. For that matter, Jewish American Committee (JAC), AIPAC, Jews
For Peace and Anti Zionist Jews are all different forms of Jewish
tribal national politics. They are all different forms of racially
orientated tribal pressure groups and for that matter they are all
rabid Zionists who are set to serve what they regard as Jewish tribal
interests.

Lenin and Trotzky were Jews, they were ideologists, yet they didn’t
operate primarily as Jews. Accordingly, they were not Zionists. The
Bund, on the other hand, was a rabid Zionist setting in spite of the
fact that it ‘formally’ opposed Zionism. It was Zionist just because
it operated as a tribal political setting. It was Zionist just because
it was racially orientated rather than universally motivated.

To sum it up. all Jewish tribal political operations are different
forms of Zionist formulas that are set to pressure different sectors
and to promote different and sometimes even conflicting Jewish
interests.

Please do not misinterpret my words. Jews must be welcome to operate
and engage politically, it is just the national tribal Jew that we
must be vigilant of. As I said, a tribal Jew can be a musician, he can
be a plumber, he can be a poet, he can be a film star or a university
teacher, yet you have to make sure that he doesn’t take you into a war
or even finance a war you mistakenly believe to be your own.

Interestingly enough, Michael Howard, the ex-Tory leader, though being
a Jew, never had come across as a Zionist or a Jewish tribal operator.
He was a proud Jew, he would even pepper his political arguments with
some Yiddish family tales and the odd misery schmaltz, however, as a
political leader he went beyond it all. He was an ordinary man like
many other Brits. It never appeared as if he was about to sacrifice
the interests of Britain to serve some foreign tribal interests.
Blair, on the other hand, is not a Jew, but he consciously sacrificed
the interests of Britain while being financed by Levy and his proxy
tycoons. Bush did the same by implementing the mantra of his
Greenspans and Wolfowitzes.

You may wonder at this stage whether I regard the credit crunch as a
Zionist plot. In fact it is the opposite. It is actually a Zionist
accident. The patient didn’t make it to the end. This Zionist accident
is a glimpse into Political Zionism’s sinister agenda. This Zionist
accident provides us with an opportunity to see that as far as misery
is concerned, we are together with the Palestinians, the Iraqis and
the Afghans. We share one enemy.

Furthermore, the current economic disaster endangers the security of
millions of Western Jews who have really nothing to do with global
economy, banking and global Zionism. It would be devastating to see
innocent Jews being implicated collectively by the crimes committed by
a very few tribal nationalist enthusiasts. But I do believe that as
far as Jews are concerned there may be a way out of it. It is about
time Jews took their emancipation seriously. Rather than celebrating
their symptoms collectively and publicly, they would be better off
working hard individually in searching for the meaning of universal
ethical thinking in order to adopt it. Loving your neighbour and
turning the other cheek is no doubt a good place to start. This is
exactly what the Wolfowitzes and the Greenspans failed to do or
understand and implement.

[1] The following appeared in the amended text (16/41992) that
followed the embarrassing earlier New York Times leak.

[2] http://hubpages.com/hub/Nathan_Rotschild_and_the_Battle_Of_Waterloo

[3] Jacob Schiff (the head of Kuhn, Loeb & Company) is credited with
giving twenty million dollars to the Bolshevik revolution. A year
after his death the Bolsheviks deposited over six hundred million
rubles to Schiff’s banking firm Kuhn & Loeb. (New York Journal
American 1949. February 3.)

[4] Interestingly enough, when the American Administration came to
realise the scale of the disaster, an emergency ‘bail out’ measure was
suggested to deal with the rapidly emerging black hole in American
finance. Yet, it is not the millions of deprived, dispossessed
Americans that are looked after. Nobody within the American government
or amongst legislators cares that much about the poor. Instead, the
American government is rushing to save the few rich criminal bankers.
Seemingly the lesson is not yet learned. The American policy makers
care about those who ‘roll’ the capitalist economy rather than the
people whom they are voted to serve.

[5] One may mistakenly assume that the shift of world Jewry lobbying
>from Germany to America is the product of the rise of Hitler. In fact
the Israeli author Amos Elon (The Pity of it All) provides some very
interesting historical insight into the subject. Seemingly, upon the
eve of the first war, some very powerful Jewish German lobbies were
operating in America. Apparently, prominent German American Jews
protested against America joining England and France. In a statement
to the New York Times on November 22 1914, Jacob H Schiff, head of
Khun, Loeb (at the time the second largest private bank in the USA),
charged the British and French with attempting to destroy Germany for
reasons of trade (Elon, pg. 253). Needless to say, East European Jews
who emigrated to the USA, evading the Anti-Semitic Czarist Russia
regarded the German army as a liberator. At large, American Jewry was
pro-German.

The British Government took these development rather seriously. At the
time the British Ambassador to the United States suspected a Jewish
conspiracy in America. The 1917 Balfour Declaration was largely an
attempt to divert the anti-English feelings amongst World Jewry. To a
certain extent this pretty manipulative strategy happened to be
successful at least in the short term. Following the declaration,
world Jewry, both Zionists and non Zionists, largely embraced the side
of the Allies.

http://palestinethinktank.com/2008/09/30/gilad-atzmon-credit-crunch-or-
rather-zio-punch/

Wave of Hatred of ZYDS Increasing Around the World – Separate News

From: Johnny B Jesus
Newsgroups:soc.culture.german,soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.israel,alt.re
visionism,
soc.culture.europe
Subject: ‘Wave of hatred’ warning as attacks on Jews hits record high
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:21:13 -0700 (PDT)

With taxpayers and governments in the USA, all over Europe and even Russia
and Saudi Arabia having to pay thousands of BILLIONS to bail out the ZYD-
run banks, and insurance companies, for all their crooked loans and losses,
on top of the hundreds of billions given to rogue state Israel,
no wonder people worldwide once again are hating the Christkiller ZYDS!!

The physical descriptions of perpetrators in 205 of the incidents show
96 were by white people, 28 by black people, 60 by Asians and 16 by
Arabs.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-433030/Wave-hatred-warning-attacks-
Jews-hits-record-high.html

‘Wave of hatred’ warning as attacks on Jews hits record high

Last updated at 13:36 01 February 2007

Attacks on Britain’s Jews have risen to the highest level since
records began.

A study published today shows the number of reported anti-Semitic
incidents has almost tripled in 10 years, with more than half the
attacks last year taking place in London.

The findings prompted the report’s authors to warn of a “wave of
hatred” against Jews.

The number of incidents increased to 594 last year, up by 31 per cent
on the previous year.

Violent assaults soared to 112, up by more than a third on 2005.

Incidents ranged from the unprovoked stabbing of a Jewish man in north
London to the sending of hate mail and the vandalism of Jewish
cemeteries and synagogues.

The Anti-Semitic Incidents Report 2006, compiled by the Community
Security Trust (CST), responsible for combating anti-Semitism in the
UK, blames the huge rise on a number of factors ranging from Israel’s
invasion of Lebanon last summer to the jailing of the historian David
Irving in Austria for denying the Holocaust.

The threatened suspension of Ken Livingstone as Mayor for comments
made to a Jewish Evening Standard reporter triggered 11 anti-Semitic
incidents, according to the report.

When the figures were first compiled in 1984, there were just 154
reported incidents, about a quarter of the total for last year.

Mark Gardner, CST spokesman said of the level of hate crimes: “This is
unacceptable racism, that many Jews had hoped and believed was a thing
of the past.

“Today’s anti-Semitism is a wave of hatred, intimidation and abuse
against British Jews, who are stupidly blamed and randomly attacked
over international tensions for which they bear no responsibility.”

Incidents last year include:

•
An Orthodox Jew punched in the face and almost pushed off a Tube
platform by an Arab man who screamed: “Get back to Stamford Hill, I
want to kill you all”
•
A Jewish man walking to synagogue with his two young sons suffered a
broken leg after being punched and kicked by a white man shouting
“f***ing Jew”
•
Seventy incidents of desecration and damage to synagogues, cemeteries,
Jewish schools and private homes with attacks including swastikas
daubed on walls
•
Savage assault of a 12-year-old Jewish girl Jasmine Kranat, who was
beaten unconscious on a north London bus by two teenage girls who
asked her first if she was Jewish.

The physical descriptions of perpetrators in 205 of the incidents show
96 were by white people, 28 by black people, 60 by Asians and 16 by
Arabs. The report has been passed to ministers.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or [email protected]
Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:46 EST 2008
Article: 624985 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
Newsgroups: nyc.general,soc.culture.swiss,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.europe
Subject: Satire of ZYD Bankers Verboten?
Message-ID:
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:18:27 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Lines: 87
Bytes: 4651
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com nyc.general:261280 soc.culture.swiss:59895 soc.culture.german:349517 soc.culture.europe:624985

On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 17:02:45 +0200, <[email protected]>,
“Heinrich” wrote:

New York, New York — A Saturday Night Live skit that mocked Jewish bankers
Herb and Marion Sanders and Jewish financier George Soros and identified
them as “people who should be shot” has been pulled from the NBC website
and
banned after Jewish media executives determined it was “anti-Semitic”.
The skit, which shows the Jewish bankers cackling and laughing about the
profits they’ve made before they embezzle federal bailout money and use it
to short the dollar, causing a US financial collapse, was the subject of
complaints from Jewish groups who expressed “concern” that the show did not
satire any gentile bankers.

Of course, gentile bankers that have played a direct role in the American
financial collapse are hard to find, as Soros, a Barack Obama campaign
advisor, who, together with Larry Summers and Robert Rubin, engineered much
of the US collapse, was paired by Herb and Marion Sanders, who sold
Wachovia
the failed subprime mortgage business Golden West, directly causing the
bank’s failure and its acquisition by Rubin’s Citigroup.

“There is definitely a fear among certain Jews in this industry,” a Jewish
banker speaking on terms of anonymity, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency,
“There’s a growing animosity towards the wealthy, and especially the
wealthy
that have made money on Wall Street and real estate and finance, as so many
Jews have — some legitimately, some not so. It’s very easy to generalize
that it must be the entire Jewish people.”

NBC, which, like most television networks and programs, is also controlled
by Jews, responded to complaints from the Learned Elders of Zion, manifest
in groups like the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations
and the Anti-Defamation League, and by pulling the skit and banning it from
ever airing again.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected]
or [email protected]
Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:46 EST 2008
Article: 624988 of soc.culture.europe
Sender: Borked Pseudo Mailed
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
X-Invalid: soc.culture.swiss, de.soc.politik, alt.politics.europe,
soc.culture.polish
Subject: Die Macht Der Globalen Juden!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:45:22 -0700 (MST)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.austrian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news.mixmin.net
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Lines: 34
Bytes: 2314
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.europe:624988 soc.culture.german:349520 soc.culture.austrian:1098

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:11:25 +0200, in soc.culture.polish “mkarwan”
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/2rshgq

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Chain: dizum,borked
To: [email protected],[email protected],
[email protected],[email protected]

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:47 EST 2008
Article: 624989 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe
Subject: ZYDS Want Poland to Compensate – HOLOHOAX EXTORTION!!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:46:17 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Lines: 129
Bytes: 5997
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.polish:896186 soc.culture.ukrainian:117317 soc.culture.europe:624989

Extortion Time, Jews want Poland to Compensate

On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:52:30 GMT, in soc.culture.german “Salah Jafar”
wrote:

Updated: 3:37 p.m. PT Feb 28, 2007
WARSAW, Poland – Holocaust survivors from around the world pressed Poland’s
government on Wednesday to compensate them for property confiscated by the
former communist regime.

Poland, the biggest post-communist European Union member, is the only
country
>from Eastern Europe besides Belarus that has not enacted a program for the
restitution of property seized after World War II.

Attempts to solve the issue after the collapse of communism in 1989 have
failed, mostly due to concern over the likely cost.

“When you’ve taken something away from someone, you should give it back,
period,” Israel Singer, president of the Claims Conference, said following
meetings with Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski and Speaker of Parliament
Marek Jurek.
“You don’t ask the person’s religion, you don’t ask the person’s race, you
don’t ask the person’s creed, you just give it back. That’s what we’re
here to
ask the government to do.”

Poland had Europe’s biggest Jewish community until World War II, when the
Nazis killed nearly 90 percent of the country’s 3.3 million Jews. The post-
war
communist rulers seized their property as well as that of people who left
or
fled the country.

Poland’s ruling conservatives have promised to resolve the issue and pass
relevant legislation in coming months. But the government proposal
envisages
compensation for only 15 percent of the property lost.

Neither Kaczynski nor Jurek commented publicly after the meetings.

At least $20 billion owed
Polish officials estimate total claims for pre-war real estate and other
property amount to at least $20 billion. Germans who were displaced from
Poland after the war and other groups are also seeking compensation.

Singer said the government was free to make offers based on what it
thought it
could afford but his group hoped the eventual compensation offered “won’t
be
too much less than 100 percent.”

“We think we’ve started a process that over time will lead to some
survivors
getting actual property back and others getting (compensation),” he told a
news conference.

Relations between Poles and Jews were damaged by an anti-Semitic campaign
conducted by the communist authorities in 1968 when most of the 300,000
Polish
Jews who survived the Holocaust left the country.

Relations have improved since the end of communism, with the authorities
trying to counter Poland’s reputation for anti-Semitism. The country now
has
strong ties with Israel and is a close ally of the United States.

“I think the Jewish owners deserve the right to live in these houses if
it’s
still possible, especially considering what they went through,” said a Pole
who lives near a dilapidated Warsaw apartment building once owned by Jews
who
gave only his first name, Waldemar.

“After all, the buildings belong to them.”

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:47 EST 2008
Article: 624990 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.german,
X-Invalid: alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc
Subject: APOCALYPSE AT DRESDEN=Real Holocaust-Ein Wirkliche HOLOCAUST!!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:53:27 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Bytes: 53897
Lines: 972
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com de.soc.politik.misc:1172208 soc.culture.europe:624990 soc.culture.german:349521

>On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:45:36 GMT, “Godzilla Pimp” wrote:

http://snipurl.com/dzm1
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luftangriffe_auf_Dresden

>>”German prosecutors have provoked outrage by ruling that the 1945 RAF
>>bombing of Dresden can legally be termed a “holocaust”.”

>>Well duh, it certainly was a holocaust if anything ever was (From Greek
>>holokaustos, burnt whole). They burned the whole city and everyone in it,
>>among other cities like Hamburg.

>>Besides, the Jews were not burned to death but supposedly gassed,
according
>>the final version of the fable (earlier ones included mass electrocution
and
>>steaming). No evidence of gas chambers has ever been found, of course,
>>because they never existed. But the Jews have a talent for getting the
dumb
>>”goyim” (cattle) to believe in such myths of murdered Jewish heroes,
>>Christianity being the most notable one.
>>GP

The real HOLOCAUST on Dresden was perpetrated on the innocent
civilians of Dresden, which had no military importance, by bomber
Harris/Horowitz !!

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:58:40 -0500, in alt.politics.nationalism.white
[email protected] (Whitey Loughmiller) wrote:

Dresden
Kevin Alfred Strom

And what was Dresden? Most of you have probably heard of Dresden
China, and that delicately executed and meticulously detailed
porcelain is really a perfect symbol for that city.

Dresden’s population had almost doubled in the months before the
attack, mainly as a result of the influx of refugees from the Eastern
Front, most of them women and young children.

Hundreds of thousands of innocents were literally consumed by fire, an
actual holocaust by the true definition of the word: complete
consumption by fire.

“Just a few hours before Dresden had been a fairy-tale city of spires
and cobbled streets …. now total war had put an end to all that.
.The ferocity of the US raid of 14th February had finally brought the
people to their knees… but it was not the bombs which finally
demoralised the people … it was the Mustang fighters, which suddenly
appeared low over the city, firing on everything that moved …. one
section of the Mustangs concentrated on the river banks, where masses
of bombed-out people had gathered. … British prisoners who had been
released from their burning camps were among the first to suffer the
discomfort of machine-gunning attacks …. wherever columns of
tramping people were marching in or out of the city they were pounced
on by the fighters, and machine-gunned or raked with cannon fire.”
[Image: Dresden skyline after Allied saturation bombing.]

Free Speech — David Irving has generously made his Destruction of
Dresden available as a free download, in PDF format, at his Focal
Point Press website.

From: “J Baker”
Newsgroups:
alt.abortion,alt.politics.usa,or.politics,soc.culture.jewish,can.politics
Subject: APOCALYPSE AT DRESDEN
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:57:28 -0500

APOCALYPSE AT DRESDEN

by R. H. S. Crossman (Esquire Magazine – November 1963)

The long suppressed story of the worst massacre in the history of the
world.

If the British Commonwealth and the United States last a thousand years,
men
may say that this was their darkest hour.

Were all the crimes against humanity committed during World War II the work
of Hitler’s underlings? That was certainly the impression created by the
fact that only Germans were brought to trial at Nüremburg. Alas! It is a
false impression. We all now know that in the terrible struggle waged
between the Red Army and the German Wehrmacht, the Russians displayed their
fair share of insensate inhumanity. What is less widely recognized —
because the truth, until only recently, has been deliberately suppressed —
is that the Western democracies were responsible for the most senseless
single act of mass murder committed in the whole course of World War II.

The devastation of Dresden in February, 1945, was one of those crimes
against humanity whose authors would have been arraigned at Nüremburg if
that Court had not been perverted into the instrument of Allied justice.
Whether measured in terms of material destruction or by loss of human life,
this “conventional” air raid was far more devastating than either of the
two
atomic raids against Japan that were to follow it a few months later. Out
of
28,410 houses in the inner city of Dresden, 24,866 were destroyed; and the
area of total destruction extended over eleven square miles.

As for the death roll, the population, as we shall see, had been well nigh
doubled by a last-minute influx of refugees flying before the Red Army; and
even the German authorities — usually so pedantic in their estimates —
gave up trying to work out the precise total after some 35,000 bodies had
been recognized, labeled and buried. We do know, however, that the
1,250,000
people in the city on the night of the raid had been reduced to 368,619 by
the time it was over; and it seems certain that the death roll must have
greatly exceeded the 71,879 at Hiroshima. Indeed, the German authorities
were probably correct who, a few days after the attack, put the total
somewhere between 120,000 and 150,000.

How was this horror permitted to happen? Was it a deliberate and considered
act of policy, or was it the result of one of those ghastly
misunderstandings or miscalculations that sometimes occur in the heat of
battle? There are many who will say that these are academic questions
belonging to history. I do not agree. Of course, what happened at Dresden
belongs to the prenuclear epoch. But it has a terrible relevance to the
defense strategy which the Western democracies are operating today. If the
crime of Dresden is not to be repeated on a vaster scale, we must find out
why it was committed. That, at least, has been my feeling, and there are
two
special reasons which have prompted me to go on investigating the facts for
so many years. In the first place, I was myself involved in a quite minor
capacity in the decisions which preceded it. When the Germans overran
France
in 1940 and the Chamberlain Government in London was replaced by the
Churchill Government, there was a purge in Whitehall. Unexpectedly I found
myself recruited to a secret department attached to the Foreign Office,
with
the title “Director of Psychological Warfare against Germany.” My main task
was to plan the overt and subvert propaganda which we hoped would rouse
occupied Europe against Hitler. But I soon found myself caught up in a
bitter top-secret controversy about the role of bomber offensive in the
breaking of German morale.

The Prime Minister was haunted by fears that the bloodletting of the Somme
and Passchendaele in World War I would have to be repeated if we tried to
defeat Hitler by landing and liberating Europe. So the Air Marshals found
it
easy to persuade him that if they were given a free hand they could make
these casualties unnecessary by smashing the German home front into
submission. What Hitler wreaked against London and Coventry, our bombers
would repay a thousandfold, until the inhabitants of Berlin, Hamburg and
every other city in Germany had been systematically “de-housed” and
pulverized into surrender. To achieve this, the Air Marshals demanded that
top priority in war production should be given not to preparations for the
second front, but to the construction of huge numbers of four-engined night
bombers.

Eagerly Sir Winston Churchill accepted their advice, with the backing of
his
whole Cabinet. The only warning voices raised were those of a number of
very
influential scientists who, by means of careful calculations, threw serious
doubt on the physical possibility of wreaking the degree of destruction
required. Their mathematical arguments were reinforced by the studies we
psychological warriors had made of British morale in the blitz. Assuming,
wisely as it worked out, that the German people would behave under air
attack at least as bravely as the British people, we demonstrated that the
scale of frightfulness our bombers could employ against German cities would
almost certainly strengthen civilian morale, and go stimulate the war
production that it was intended to weaken.

Early in 1941, these arguments were finally swept aside, and Britain was
completely committed to the bomber offensive. By the time it reached its
first climax in the raid on Hamburg, however, I had been transferred to
Eisenhower’s staff. I was happy, first in North Africa and then in SHAEF,
to
work with an Anglo-American staff who did not trouble to conceal how much
they detested the hysterical mania for destruction and the cold-blooded
delight in pounding the German home front to pieces displayed by the
big-bomb boys. Indeed, one of my pleasantest memories is the attitude
General Walter Bedell Smith displayed a few weeks after the Dresden raid.
Sir Winston had accused “Ike” of being soft to the German civilians and
ordered him to use terror tactics in order to panic them out of their homes
and onto the roads, and so to block the German retreat. No one contradicted
Sir Winston, but as soon as his back was turned, we were instructed to work
out a directive that would prevent him getting his way.

On V.E. Day, when I flew back to Britain in order to stand as a Labour
Candidate in Coventry, I assumed with relief that my concern with bombing
was over. But I was wrong. Within years, Coventry — the main victim of the
Luftwaffe — had “twinned” itself with Dresden, the main victim of the
R.A.F. And when Germany was divided and it became difficult for Westerners
to go behind the Iron Curtain, I had a standing invitation to visit Dresden
as the guest of its Lord Mayor. I have done so frequently, and on each
occasion I have tried to match the inside experience of bombing strategy I
acquired during the war with firsthand information from its victims “on the
other side of the hill.” I have also checked the published accounts of the
destruction of Dresden available in Western and Eastern Germany, against
the
official History of the Strategic Bombing Offensive published only two
years
ago in Britain. These researches have left me in no doubt whatever how
Dresden was destroyed, why it was destroyed, and what lessons we must draw
>from its destruction.

The prelude to the bombing of Dresden was sounded by the Russian communique
of January 12, 1945, which announced that the Red Army had resumed its
offensive all along the front, and was advancing into Prussia and Silesia.
This news could hardly have been more embarrassing, either to General
Dwight
D. Eisenhower whose armies were still recovering from the humiliating
effects of General Karl von Rundstedt’s Christmas offensive in the
Ardennes,
or to President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill who were
now preparing for the Yalta Conference due to start on February 4. Since
the
post war settlement was bound to be discussed with Josef Stalin in terms
not
of principle but of pure politics, Sir Winston felt that the impression
created by the Red Army’s occupation of Eastern Europe and advance deep
into
Germany must somehow be countered. But how? The obvious answer was by a
demonstration right up against the Red Army of Western air power. What was
required, he decided, was a thunderclap of Anglo-American aerial
annihilation so frightful in the destruction it wreaked that even Stalin
would be impressed.

January 25 was the day when the decision was taken that resulted in the
blotting out of Dresden. Until then, the capital of Saxony had been
considered so famous a cultural monument and so futile a military target
that even the Commander in Chief of Bombing Command, Air Marshal Sir Arthur
Harris, had given it hardly a thought. All its flak batteries had been
removed for use on the Eastern front; and the Dresden authorities had taken
none of the precautions, either in the strengthening of air-raid shelters,
or in the provision of concrete bunkers that had so startlingly reduced
casualties in other German cities subjected to Allied attack. Instead, they
had encouraged rumors that it would be spared either because Churchill had
a
niece living there, or else because it was reserved by the Allies as their
main occupation quarters. These rumors were strengthened by the knowledge
that no less than some 26,000 Allied prisoners were quartered in and around
the city, and that its population had doubled to well over a million in
recent weeks by streams of refugees from the East.

All this Sir Winston knew on January 26. But early on that winter morning
he
had learned that the Russian Army had crossed the Oder at Breslav and was
now only sixty miles from Dresden. Angrily he rang up Sir Archibald
Sinclair, his Secretary of State for Air, and asked him what plans he had
for “basting the Germans — in their retreat from Breslav.” Sir Archibald,
whose main function it had been to protect Bomber Command from public
criticism by a series of lying assurances that scrupulous care was taken to
bomb only military targets, remained true to type. He prevaricated over the
phone and next day replied that in the view of the Air Staff “intervention
in winter weather at very long range over Eastern Germany would be
difficult.” To this the Premier replied with a memorandum so offensive in
its controlled fury that the Minister and the Air Staff, never noted for
their moral courage, were stampeded into action. At once, orders were given
to concert with the American Eighth Air Force a plan for wiping out
Leipzig,
Chemnitz and Dresden.

Sir Winston and his staff left for Yalta, where it became only too clear
that the Premier’s forebodings were justified. Strengthened by his
victories, Stalin pressed his political demands upon a President now
weakened and very near his death, and a Prime Minister isolated and ill at
ease. When suggestions were made that the Western bombing should be used to
help the Red Army advance, the Russian generals were chilly and
unresponsive. Nevertheless, Sir Arthur Harris had already selected Dresden,
now only sixty miles from the front, for destruction. And day by day, Sir
Winston hoped that he would be able to impress Stalin with the
demonstration
of what Allied air power could achieve so near the Russian allies. But the
weather was against him. The conference broke up on the eleventh, and it
was
only three days later — long after the conference when it could no longer
have any effect on the negotiations — that the R.A.F.’s spokesman in
London
proudly announced the destruction of Dresden.

We must now turn back and see what the airmen had been planning. Sir Arthur
Harris was quick to seize the opportunity presented by the Prime Minister’s
insistence that Bomber Command must make its presence felt in Eastern
Germany. Since 1941, by a slow process of trial and error which had cost
him
many thousands of air crews, he had perfected his new technique of
“saturation precision bombardment.” First, daylight operations over Germany
had been discarded as too costly; then, with raiding confined to nighttime
target bombing, after a long period of quite imaginary successes, had been
abandoned as too wildly inaccurate. The decision was taken to set each city
center on fire and destroy the residential areas, sector by sector.

In this new kind of incendiary attack, highly trained special crews were
sent ahead to delineate a clearly defined target area with marker flares,
nicknamed by the Germans “Christmas trees.” When this had been done, all
that remained for the rest of the bomber forces was to lay its bomb carpet
so thickly that the defense, the A.R.P., the police, and the fire services
would all be overwhelmed.

This fire-raising technique was first used with complete success in the
great raid on Hamburg. Thousands of individual fires conglomerated into a
single blaze, creating the famous “fire-storms” effect, first described by
the Police President of the city in a secret report to Hitler that soon
fell
into Allied hands:

“As the result of the confluence of a number of fires, the air above is
heated to such an extent that in consequence of its reduced specific
gravity, a violent updraft occurs which causes great suction of the
surrounding air radiating from the center of the fire… The suction of the
fire storm in the larger of these area fire zones has the effect of
attracting the already overheated air in smaller area fire zones… One
effect of this phenomenon was that the fire in the smaller area fire zones
was fanned as by a bellows as the central suction of the biggest and
fiercest fires caused increased and accelerated attraction of the
surrounding masses of fresh air. In this way all the area fires became
united in one vast fire.”

The Hamburg fire storm probably killed some 40,000 people: three-quarters
by
carbon-monoxide poisoning as a result of the oxygen being sucked out of the
air; the rest by asphyxiation.

As soon as he heard that permission had been given to destroy Dresden, Air
Marshal Harris decided to achieve this by a deliberately created fire
storm,
and to increase the effect he persuaded the Americans to split the
available
bombers into three groups. The task of the first wave was to create the
fire
storm. Three hours later, a second and much heavier night force of British
bombers was timed to arrive when the German fighter and flak defenses would
be off guard, and the rescue squads on their way. Its task was to spread
the
fire storm. Finally, the next morning, a daylight attack by the Eighth Air
Force was to concentrate on the outlying areas, the new city.

Two-pronged attacks had been successfully carried out during 1944 against a
number of German towns. The three-pronged attack employed at Dresden was
unique and uniquely successful. The first wave, consisting of some two
hundred fifty night bombers, arrived precisely on time and duly created a
fire storm. The second force — more than twice as strong and carrying an
enormous load of incendiaries — also reached the target punctually, and,
undisturbed by flak or night fighters, spent thirty-four minutes carefully
spreading the fires outside the first target area. Finally, to complete the
devastation, some two hundred eleven Flying Fortresses began the third
attack at 11:30 a.m. on the following morning. Without exaggeration, the
commanders could claim that the Dresden raid had “gone according to plan.”
Everything which happened in the stricken city had been foreseen and
planned
with meticulous care.

So far, we have been looking at the Dresden raid from “our own side of the
hill” — considering the point of view of Mr. Churchill, concerned to
create
the best impression possible on Stalin at the Yalta Conference, and of Air
Marshal Harris, eager to demonstrate the technique for creating a fire
storm. But what was the impact on the Dresdeners? Inevitably the raid has
created its own folklore. Thousands of those who survived it now live in
Western Germany, each with his own memory to retail to the visitor. In
Dresden itself, the city fathers have now established an official Communist
version, of which the main purpose clearly is to put the main blame on the
“American imperialists” (we are solemnly told, for instance, that the
R.A.F.
was directed to special targets in the city by an American capitalist whose
villa on the far side of the Elbe is now a luxury club for favored
Communist
artists). Nevertheless, anyone who bothers to read the books published in
both Germanies and to compare the stories he hears from Communist and
anti-Communist witnesses soon discovers that not only the outline of events
but the details of the main episodes are agreed beyond dispute.

Dresden is one of those German cities which normally devotes Shrove Tuesday
to Carnival festivities. But on February 13, 1945, with the Red Army sixty
miles away, the mood was somber. The refugees, who were crowded into every
house, each had his horror story about Russian atrocities. In many parts of
the city, and particularly around the railway station, thousands of
latecomers who could find no corner in which to sleep were camping in the
bitter cold of the open streets. The only signs of Carnival spirit, when
the
sirens sounded at 9:55 p.m., were the full house at the circus and a few
gangs of little girls wandering about in fancy dress. Though no one took
the
danger of a raid very seriously, orders must be obeyed and the population
just had time to get down to its shelters before the first bombs fell at
nine minutes past the hour.

Twenty-four minutes later, the last British bomber was on its way back to
England, and the inner city of Dresden was ablaze. Since there were no
steel
structures in any of its apartment houses, the floors quickly capsized, and
half an hour after the raid was over the fire storm transformed thousands
of
individual blazes into a sea of flames, ripping off the roofs, tossing
trees, cars and lorries into the air, and simultaneously sucking the oxygen
out of the air-raid shelters.

Most of those who remained below ground were to die painlessly, their
bodies
first brilliantly tinted bright orange and blue, and then, as the heat grew
intense, either totally incinerated or melted into a thick liquid sometimes
three or four feet deep. But there were others who, when the bombing
stopped, rushed upstairs. Some of them stopped to collect their belongings
before escaping, and they were caught by the second raid. But some 10,000
fled to the great open space of the Grosse Garten, the magnificent royal
park of Dresden, nearly one and a half square miles in all.
Here they were caught by the second raid, which started without an air-raid
warning, at 1:22 a.m. Far heavier than the first — there were twice as
many
bombers with a far heavier load of incendiaries — its target markers had
been deliberately placed in order to spread the fires into the black
rectangle which was all the airmen could see of the Grosse Garten. Within
minutes the fire storm was raging across the grass, ripping up some trees
and littering the branches of others with clothes, bicycles and dismembered
limbs that remained hanging for days afterward.

Equally terrible was the carnage in the great square outside the main
railway station. Here, the thousands camping out had been reinforced by
other thousands escaping from the inner city, while within the station a
dozen trains, when the first sirens blew, had been shunted to the
marshaling
yards and escaped all damage. After the first raid stopped, these trains
were shunted back to the station platforms — just in time to receive the
full force of the bombardment. For weeks, mangled bodies were littered
inside and outside the station building. Below ground, the scene was even
more macabre. The restaurants, cellars and tunnels could easily have been
turned into effective bombproof shelters. The authorities had not bothered
to do so, and of the two thousand crowded in the dark, one hundred were
burned alive and five hundred asphyxiated before the doors could be opened
and the survivors pulled out.

The timing of the second raid, just three hours after the first, not only
insured that the few night fighters in the area were off their guard, but
it
also created the chaos intended and effectively interrupted all rescue
work.
For many miles around, military detachments, rescue squads and fire
brigades
started on their way to the stricken city, and most of them were making
their way through the suburbs when the bombs began to fall. Those who
turned
back were soon swallowed up in the mad rush of panic evacuation. Most of
those who proceeded toward the center perished in the fire storm.

The most terrible scenes in the inner city took place in the magnificent
old
market square, the Altmarkt. Soon after the first raid finished, this great
square was jam-packed with panting survivors. When the second raid struck,
they could scarcely move until someone remembered the huge concrete
emergency water tank that had been constructed to one side. This tank was a
hundred by fifty yards by six feet deep. There was a sudden stampede to
escape the heat of the fire storm by plunging into it. Those who did so
forgot that its sloping sides were slippery, with no handholds. The
nonswimmers sank to the bottom, dragging the swimmers with them. When the
rescuers reached the Altmarkt five days later, they found the tank filled
with bloated corpses, while the rest of the square was littered with
recumbent or seated figures so shrunk by the incineration that thirty of
them could be taken away in a single bathtub.

But perhaps the most memorable horror of this second raid occurred in the
hospitals. In the last year of the war, Dresden had become a hospital city,
with many of its schools converted into temporary wards. Of its nineteen
hospitals, sixteen were badly damaged and three, including the main
maternity clinic, totally destroyed. Thousands of crippled survivors were
dragged by their nurses to the banks of the River Elbe, where they were
laid
in rows on the grass to wait for the daylight. But when it came, there was
another horror. Punctually at 11:30 a.m., the third wave of bombers, the
two
hundred eleven American Flying Fortresses, began their attack. Once again,
the area of destruction was extended across the city. But what the
survivors
all remember were the scores of Mustang fighters diving low over the bodies
huddled on the banks of the Elbe, as well as on the larger lawns of the
Grosse Garten, in order to shoot them up. Other Mustangs chose as their
targets the serried crowds that blocked every road out of Dresden. No one
knows how many women and children were actually killed by those dive-
bombing
attacks. But in the legend of Dresden destruction, they have become the
symbol of Yankee sadism and brutality, and the inquirer is never permitted
to forget that many choirboys of one of Dresden’s most famous churches were
among the victims.

For five days and nights, the city burned and no attempt was made to enter
it. Then at last the authorities began to grapple with the crisis and to
estimate the damage. Of Dresden’s five theatres, all had gone. Of her
fifty-four churches, nine were totally destroyed and thirty-eight seriously
damaged. Of her one hundred thirty-nine schools, sixty-nine ceased to exist
and fifty were badly hit. The great zoo which lay just beyond the Grosse
Garten had been struck in the second raid, and the panicked animals had
mingled with the desperate survivors. Now they were rounded up and shot.
Those who escaped from the prisons, when they too were blown up, had better
fortune: they all managed to get away, including a number of brave
anti-Nazis.

But some things had survived destruction. The few factories Dresden
possessed were outside the city center, and soon were at work again. So too
was the railway system. Within three days, indeed, military trains were
running once again right through the city, and the marshaling yards —
untouched by a bomb — were in full operation. It was as though an ironical
fate had decided that the first fire storm deliberately created by mortal
man should destroy everything worth preserving, and leave untouched
anything
of military value.

In their salvage work, the Nazis relied on some 25,000 Allied prisoners of
war, concentrated in and around the city. Dresden, as was known very well
in
London and Washington, was not only a hospital city but a prisoner-of-war
city — still another reason why the authorities assumed it would not be
attacked. Faced with the appalling scenes of suffering, the prisoners
seemed
to have worked with a will, even after some of their fellow-prisoners had
been shot under martial law for looting.

What Dresdeners chiefly remember, of these first days after the raid, is
the
disposal of the bodies. Throughout the war, German local authorities had
been extremely careful to show great respect for death, enabling relatives
wherever possible to identify and to bury their own dead. At first, this
procedure was followed in Dresden. But weeks after the raid there were
still
thousands of unopened cellars under the smoldering ruins, and the air was
thick with the fog and sweet stench of rotting flesh. An S.S. commander
made
the decision that the daily procession of horse-drawn biers from the city
to
the cemeteries outside must be stopped. If plague was to be prevented, the
rest of the corpses must be disposed of more speedily. Hurriedly, a
monstrous funeral pyre was constructed in the Altmarkt. Steel shutters from
one of Dresden’s biggest department stores were laid across broken slabs of
ironstone. On this macabre gridiron, the bodies were piled with straw
between each layer, soaked with gasoline and set ablaze. Nine thousand
corpses were disposed of in this way, and eight cubic meters of ash were
then loaded into gasoline containers and buried in a graveyard outside the
city, twenty-five feet wide and fifteen feet deep.

If it was expected in either London or Washington that the destruction of
Dresden, despite its negligible military significance, would at least
shatter German morale, this hope was soon to be disappointed — thanks to
Paul Joseph Goebbels’ skillful exploitation of the disaster. For days, the
Propaganda Ministry in Berlin poured out, both in its foreign and in its
home services, a stream of eyewitness accounts of the stricken city, backed
up by moralistic attacks on the cold-blooded sadism of the men who created
the fire storm. In his secret propaganda, Dr. Goebbels did even better by
leaking to the neutral press a fictitious top-secret estimate that the
casualties had probably reached 260,000. As a result of this Nazi
propaganda
campaign, the German people were convinced that the Anglo-American forces
were indeed bent on their destruction. And their morale was once again
stiffened by terror of defeat.

Disturbed by the success of Dr. Goebbels’ propaganda, the airmen decided to
call a press conference on February 16 at SHAEF. As a result of the
briefing, given by a British Air Commodore, Associated Press cabled a
special dispatch all over the world, announcing “the long-awaited decision
to adopt deliberate terror bombings of German population centers as a
ruthless expedient of hastening Hitler’s doom.” The correspondents added
that the Dresden attack was “for the avowed purpose of heaping more
confusion on Nazi road and rail traffic, and to sap German morale.”

When this dispatch reached London, it was immediately censored on the
ground
that officially the R.A.F. only bombed military targets, and the
attribution
to it of terror raids was a vicious piece of Nazi propaganda. In the United
States, where the dispatch was widely publicized, the embarrassment caused
to the Administration was acute, since the Air Force spokesmen had seldom
failed to point out the difference between the indiscriminate R.A.F. night
attacks and the selective and precise nature of the daylight bombing
carried
out by the Eighth Air Force.

In order to stop awkward questions, General George C. Marshall then gave a
public assurance that the bombing on Dresden had taken place at Russian
request. Although no evidence was produced either then or since for the
truth of this statement, it was accepted uncritically and has since found
its way into a number of official American histories.

But suppression was not sufficient to stem the rising wave of public
protest. Coming as it did when the war was virtually over, the wanton
destruction of the Florence of the North and the mass murder of so many of
its inhabitants was too much, even for a world public opinion fed for years
on strident war propaganda. The publication of a lengthy report by a
Swedish
correspondent caused a revulsion of feeling.

Within a few weeks, this revulsion against indiscriminate bombing had
affected even Sir Winston Churchill. Up till now, the critics in the
British
Parliament of area bombing had been a small derided minority. Suddenly,
their influence began to grow, and on March 28, Sir Winston in response to
this new mood, wrote to the Chief of the Air Staff, beginning with the
remarkable words:

“It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of
German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under
other pretexts, should be reviewed.”

Since the Premier had taken the lead in demanding the switch from target to
area bombing and had actively encouraged each new advance proposed by Air
Marshal Harris in the technique of air obliteration, this memorandum could
hardly have been less felicitously phrased. It provided damning evidence
that so long as terror bombing was popular, the politicians would take
credit for it; but now that public opinion was revolting against its
senseless brutality, they were only too obviously running for cover and
leaving the air force to take the blame.

So outraged was the Chief of the Air Staff that on this occasion he stood
up
to Sir Winston, forcing him to withdraw the memorandum, and to substitute
for it what the official historians — who narrate this incident in full —
have described as “a somewhat more discreetly and fairly worded document.”

But in Britain at least the damage had already been done. From that moment,
Bomber Command, which for years had been the object of adulation, became
increasingly discredited, and the nickname of its Commander in Chief
changed
>from “Bomber” Harris to “Butcher” Harris. Although the bomber crews,
suffered far the heaviest casualties of any of the British armed services,
no campaign medal was struck to distinguish their part in winning the war.
In his victory broadcast of May 13, 1945, Sir Winston omitted any tribute
to
them, and after the Labour Government came to power, Earl Attlee was just
as
vindictive. In January, 1946, he omitted their Commander in Chief from his
victory honors list. Sir Arthur Harris accepted the insult loyally, and on
February 13 sailed to exile in South Africa.

The Eighth Air Force was treated more gently, both by the politicians in
Washington and by the American public. Its airmen received their share of
campaign medals, and to this day it has never been officially admitted that
by the end of the war they were bombing city centers and residential areas
as wantonly by day as the R.A.F. was by night. There was, however, an
important difference between the public image of the two Air Forces. The
British Cabinet, having secretly decided to sanction indiscriminate terror
bombing, concealed this decision from the British public and therefore
compelled Bomber Command to operate under cover of a sustained and
deliberate lie. In the case of the Eighth Air Force, self-deception took
place of lying. Instead of doing one thing and saying another, the myth was
maintained that on every mission the Flying Fortresses aimed exclusively at
military targets, and this is still part of the official American legend of
World War II. It was because it was impossible to square this legend with
what had happened at Dresden that General Marshall had to excuse American
protestation in that holocaust on the fictitious ground that the Russians
had requested the attack.

I leave it to the reader to decide which form was more nauseating —
British
lying or American self-deception. For what concerns me in this inquiry is
not the public image of Anglo-American idealism that was shattered by the
Dresden raid, but the crime against humanity which was perpetrated. That it
was decided to bomb a city of no military value simply in order to impress
Stalin. That a fire storm was deliberately created in order to kill as many
people as possible, and that the survivors were machine-gunned as they lay
helpless in the open — all this has been established without a shadow of a
doubt. What remains is to ask how decent, civilized politicians
enthusiastically approved such mass murder and decent, civilized servicemen
conscientiously carried it out.

The usual explanation — or excuse — is that strategic bombing was only
adopted by the Western powers as a method of retaliation in a total war
started by totalitarians. This is at best a half-truth. The Nazis and the
Communists dabbled in terror raids on civilian targets. But they were
old-fashioned and imperialist enough to hold that the aim of war is not to
destroy the enemy, but to defeat his armies in the field, to occupy his
country, and exploit its resources. That is why both Stalin and Hitler
preferred to use their air power, not as a separate weapon of unlimited
war,
but as a tactical adjunct to conventional land and sea operations. In fact,
the only nations which applied the theory of unlimited war really
systematically were the two great Western democracies. Both created a
gigantic strategic air force and carried out quite separate but eventually
unsuccessful attempts to defeat Germany by aerial annihilation.

Yet, at first sight, terror bombing seems to me, as an Englishman, a form
of
warfare repugnant to our national temperament, and utterly unsuited to an
island people, itself hopelessly vulnerable to indiscriminate air attack.
And I suspect that most Americans also feel that it does not conform with
the traditions of the American way of life.

Why then did both nations adopt it?

I believe that the motive which prompted us was a very characteristic
Anglo-Saxon desire to defend ourselves without preparing for war to win the
fruits of victory; without actual fighting, and (if this proved impossible)
at least to keep casualties down to a minimum among our own soldiers. Not
only do British and American fighting men demand a far higher standard of
living than most of their enemies. Even more important, they insist that
they should not be required to risk death in close combat if remote-control
methods of destroying the enemy are available. That, I am sure, is the main
reason why our politicians and generals felt morally justified in
conducting
a bomber offensive against Germany which culminated in the destruction of
Dresden.

Once we see this, we are no longer surprised that, as soon as an atomic
bomb
had been perfected, President Truman decided, with the full approval of the
British Prime Minister, to use it. In this way, he could finish off the
Japanese without a landing that would have cost thousands of American
lives!

The moral I draw from the terrible story of Dresden is that the atom bombs
employed on Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not inaugurate a new epoch in the
history of war. They merely provided a new method of achieving victory
without the casualties involved in land fighting far more deadly and far
more economical than the thousand-bomber raid of World War II. Here, our
politicians and generals felt, was the ultimate weapon which would enable
the democracies to disarm and to relax — yet deter aggression.

Alas! Nearly twenty years of bitter experience have taught us that the
world
was not made safe for democracy either by the “conventional” fire storm
created by the bombers in Dresden, or by the atomic fire storm of
Hiroshima.
Even in modern war, crime does not always pay!

—————————————————————————
—–
J Baker
[email protected]

LC ~ confessed killer of his own sister

—
“It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate ,
tireless minority keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds
of men. ” —
Samuel Adams

” George W. Bush is so pro-Mexico that if you hit him with a stick
prizes would fall out of him. ”

–Argus Hamilton

“If you worship your enemy, you are defeated.

If you adopt your enemy’s religion you are enslaved.

If you breed with your enemy you are destroyed.”

— Polydoros

“Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice.
It is not a thing to be waited for – it is a thing to be achieved . ”

— William Jennings Bryan

www.HalTurnerShow.com
www.NatVan.com
www.NatAllNews.com
www.Stormfront.org
www.WhiteRevolution.com
www.V-News.org

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE – www.zundelsite.org
IHR – www.ihr.org
OSTARA – www.ostara.org
PAMYAT – http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
Edgar J.Steele – www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
AL JAZEERA – http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
THE HOFFMAN WIRE – Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: [email protected]

or to Steve Horn – [email protected]
or [email protected]
Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:50 EST 2008
Article: 624996 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.wiretrip.org!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,
X-Invalid: soc.culture.polish,alt.politics.europe
Subject: HOLODOMOR=The REAL HOLOCAUST BY ZYDS/Ivrai
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:35:19 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Lines: 192
Bytes: 8852
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.ukrainian:117319 soc.culture.europe:624996

HOLODOMOR=The REAL HOLOCAUST BY ZYDS/Ivrai
On Ukraine Christians that ZYD Communists want us to forget !

Many more than 10 million innocent Ukrainian Christians died
in the holocaust which ZYDS want to be “forgotten” –
HOLODOMOR in Ukraine!

By ERIC MARGOLIS — Contributing Foreign Editor Toronto Sun

Five years ago, I wrote about the unknown Holocaust in Ukraine.
I was shocked to receive a flood of mail from young Americans and
Canadians of Ukrainian descent telling me that until they read my
column, they knew nothing of the 1932-33 genocide in which
Josef Stalin’s Soviet regime murdered seven million Ukrainians and
sent two million more to concentration camps.
How, I wondered, could such historical amnesia afflict so many?
For Jews and Armenians, the genocides their people suffered are
vivid, living memories that influence their daily lives.
Yet today, on the 70th anniversary of the destruction of
a quarter of Ukraine’s population, this titanic crime
has almost vanished into history’s black hole.

So has the extermination of the Don Cossacks by the
communists in the 1920s,the Volga Germans in 1941 and
mass executions and deportations to concentration camps
of Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians and Poles.
At the end of World War II, Stalin’s gulag held 5.5 million
prisoners, 23% of them Ukrainians and 6% Baltic peoples.

Almost unknown is the genocide of two million of the USSR’s
Muslim peoples:Chechens, Ingush, Crimean Tatars, Tajiks,
Bashkirs and Kazaks. The Chechen independence fighters
who today are branded as “terrorists” by the U.S. and
Russia are the grandchildren of survivors of Soviet
concentration camps.
Add to this list of forgotten atrocities the murder in
Eastern Europe from1945-47 of at least two million ethnic
Germans, mostly women and children, and the violent
expulsion of 15 million more Germans, during which two
million German girls and women were raped.

Among these monstrous crimes, Ukraine stands out as the
worst in terms of numbers. Stalin declared war on his
own people in 1932, sending Commissars V.Molotov and
Lazar Kaganovitch and NKVD secret police chief Genrikh
Yagoda to crush the resistance of Ukrainian farmers to
forced collectivization.
Ukraine was sealed off. All food supplies and livestock
were confiscated. NKVD death squads executed “anti-party
elements.” Furious that insufficient
Ukrainians were being shot, Kaganovitch – virtually the
Soviet Union’s Adolf Eichmann – set a quota of 10,000
executions a week. Eighty percent of Ukrainian
intellectuals were shot.

During the bitter winter of 1932-33, 25,000 Ukrainians
per day were being shotor died of starvation and cold.
Cannibalism became common. Ukraine, writes historian
Robert Conquest, looked like a giant version of the
future Bergen-Belsen death camp.

The mass murder of seven million Ukrainians, three
million of them children,and deportation to the gulag
of two million more (where most died) was hidden by
Soviet propaganda. Pro-communist westerners, like
The New York Times’Walter Duranty, British writers
Sidney and Beatrice Webb and French Prime Minister
Edouard Herriot, toured Ukraine, denied reports of
genocide, and applauded what they called Soviet
“agrarian reform.” Those who spoke out against the
genocide were branded “fascist agents.”

The U.S., British, and Canadian governments, however,
were well aware of the genocide, but closed their eyes,
even blocking aid groups from going to Ukraine.

The only European leaders to raise a cry over Soviet
industrialized murder were, ironically and for their
own cynical and self-serving reasons, Hitler and
Italian dictator Benito Mussolini.

Because Kaganovitch, Yagoda and some other senior
Communist party and NKVD officials were Jewish,
Hitler’s absurd claim that communism was a Jewish
plot to destroy Christian civilization became
widely believed across a fearful Europe.

When war came, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt
and British PM Winston Churchill allied themselves
closely to Stalin, though they were well aware
his regime had murdered at least 30 million people
long before Hitler’s extermination of Jews and
gypsies began. Yet in the strange moral calculus
of mass murder, only Germans were guilty.

Though Stalin murdered three times more people than
Hitler, to Roosevelt he remained “Uncle Joe.”

The British-U.S. alliance with Stalin made them his
partners in crime.
Roosevelt and Churchill helped preserve history’s
most murderous regime, to which they handed over
half of Europe in 1945.

After the war, the left tried to cover up Soviet genocide.
Jean-Paul Sartre denied the gulag even existed.

For the western Allies, Nazism was the only evil; they
could not admit being allied to mass murderers.
For the Soviets, promoting the Jewish Holocaust
perpetuated anti-fascism and masked their own crimes.

The Jewish people, understandably, saw their Holocaust
as a unique event. It was Israel’s raison d’etre.
Raising other genocides at that time would, they feared,
diminish their own. This was only human nature.

While today, academia, the media and Hollywood rightly
keep attention focused on the Jewish Holocaust, they
mostly ignore Ukraine.
We still hunt Nazi killers, but not communist killers.
There are few photos of the Ukraine genocide or Stalin’s
gulag, and fewer living survivors. Dead men tell no tales.

Russia never prosecuted any of its mass murderers, as
Germany did.
We know all about the crimes of Nazis Adolf Eichmann
and Heinrich Himmler; about Babi Yar and Auschwitz.

But who remembers Soviet mass murderers Dzerzhinsky,
Kaganovitch, Yagoda, Yezhov and Beria?
Were it not for writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn, we might
never know of Soviet death camps like Magadan, Kolyma
and Vorkuta.
Movie after movie appears about Nazi evil, while the
evil of the Soviet era vanishes from view or dissolves
into nostalgia.

The souls of Stalin’s millions of victims still cry out
for justice.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected]
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:52 EST 2008
Article: 625031 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: McVayWatch
X-Invalid: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.europe,alt.homosexual,
X-Invalid: alt.homosexuality,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Edward M. Rosen, 400 Glendale Rd. #24E, Haverton, PA 19083,SSN:186-44-1491
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:38:04 -0700 (MST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: [email protected]
Lines: 113
Bytes: 5137
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.palestine:719199 soc.culture.europe:625031 alt.homosexual:344181

Re: Edward M. Rosen, 400 Glendale Rd. #24E, Haverton, PA 19083,
SSN: 186-44-1491,
Date Of Birth: June-17-1953,

For Anyone Who Wants To Report His Tax Evasions To The Federal Governemat
Of The USA,
By Getting Kick Backs For Bumping People Up On Medical Waiting Lists

Or, perhaps useful info for ??

On Nov 5, 3:04 pm, “ElParedon” wrote:
> Send me the info Mirelle, I have a friend who is investigator, gets
> commission when he catches someone like him

Thieves like Edward Rosen, need to be stopped from stealing money not
only from the Federal Government, by tax evasion, also, stealing money
>from sick people who are so desperate they give money to shysters like
him in order to be bumped up on medical waiting lists!
Heck, I may as well give you the info now:

Edward M. Rosen, 400 Glendale Rd. #24E, Haverton, PA 19083,
SSN: 186-44-1491,
Date Of Birth: June-17-1953

For Anyone Who Wants To Report His Tax Evasions
To The Federal Governemat Of The USA, By Getting Kick Backs
For Bumping People Up On Medical Waiting Lists

Mirelle
> “Mirelle” wrote in message

> news:[email protected]…

> > On Nov 4, 4:52 pm, Rosen the Chosen wrote:
> >> On Nov 4, 7:42 pm, Mirelle wrote:
> >> > >> The fact is that you made the effort, and for what purpose

> >> > The purpose was to give the good folks who are paying taxes your info
> >> > – in case anyone wanted to report you to the Federal Government for
> >> > tax evasion.
> >> > For taking money on the side – to bump people up on medical waiting
> > > lists. Illegal thing to do, eddie-boi.

> >> No

> > Yes.
> > It is illegal to not pay taxes on all income.
> > I may have to post your info again, you are such a thief!
> > Stealing money from the Federal Government, someone may actually turn
> > you in for it, now THAT would make you stop taking all the illegal, no
> > taxes paid on it – bribe money, for bumping people up on medical
> > waiting lists!
> > On top of it being illegal for tax evasion purposes, it is unethical,
> > since no one should get better health care just because they have the
> > money to bribe shysters like you!

> > Mirelle

> Send me the info Mirelle, I have a friend who is investigator, gets
> commission when he catches someone like him

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:36:52 EST 2008
Article: 625034 of soc.culture.europe
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Ukraine 75th Anniversary of ZYD/Soviet HOLODOMOR MURDERED 10 Million
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:40:05 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Lines: 690
Bytes: 28864
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.ukrainian:117332 soc.culture.europe:625034 soc.culture.polish:896260 soc.culture.russian:514700

1932 1933 YEARS OF ARTIFICIAL FAMINE IN UKRAINE CREATED
BY THE MUSCOVITE OCCUPIERS = Christkiller ZYDS Ran NKVD
————————————————————————

PICTURE: http://www.ukar.org/famine01.gif
(Oksana Procyk, Leonid Heretz, and James E. Mace, Famine in the Soviet
Ukraine
1932-1933: A Memorial Exhibition, Widener Library Harvard University,
Harvard
University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1986, p. 71)

In selecting documents for inclusion in the Famine Archive, I have adhered
to
the general Ukrainian Archive policy of allowing room for opposing points
of
view. In order for an accurate picture of the Famine to emerge, it is
essential that opposing arguments be recognized and either confirmed or
disconfirmed; and if, upon occasion, descriptions of the Ukrainian famine
have
been inaccurate,
then having this pointed out by critics constitutes a valuable contribution
toward arriving at a true account.

To fear and to inhibit opposing arguments, or the correction of errors,
might
seem necessary only to those who worry that the Ukrainian Terror Famine has
never occurred, or who fear that permitting corrections will cast the
entire
story into doubt. But such worries and fears are groundless. Errors,
contradictions, exaggerations — all of these enter in to cloud our
perception
of every historical event, and to expect otherwise with respect to the
Ukrainian Terror Famine would be unrealistic.

Therefore, where criticism of certain Famine accounts is warranted, the
criticism must be greeted as providing a useful guide as to how to improve
the
quality of future accounts. Where any inaccuracies have been introduced by
the press, then this might be taken as an indication that the press needs
to
be both monitored and educated. Where inaccuracies have been introduced by
writers contracted primarily because of their fame, then this might be
taken
as a
warning that buying fame is not the same as buying historical fidelity.

Finally, in the case where facts are simply created out of thin air by
Soviet
or Russian representatives, then a sampling of even this too is not
inappropriate — or else the reader would be left with no awareness that any
dispute is possible, and so would go out into the world less prepared for
the
disinformation that he is certain to meet there.

http://www.ukar.org/famine06.htm
Collectivization and the famine
BY BOHDAN KRAWCHENKO
UKRAINE FAMINE 1933
Special Edition issued by the
Ukrainian Canadian Committee
Edmonton Branch
October 14, 1983

In 1932 and 1933 millions of people in Ukraine died of hunger. Unlike most
famines, the one in Ukraine was not caused by some natural calamity or crop
failure, but was man-made.

The 1920s — “Golden Era”

The peasantry — about 80 per cent of Ukraine’s population — had fought
pitched battles against landlords during the 1917 revolution to realize its
age-old dream of owning land.

When in 1918-19 the Bolsheviks occupied Ukraine and made their first
bid
to collectivize peasant land, the Ukrainian peasants resisted so fiercely
that
Lenin ordered “severe punishment” for any Bolshevik who preached
collectivization. During the 1920s, peasants organized voluntary
cooperatives
and agriculture thrived.

In this period the Ukrainian people forced the Bolsheviks to change
their
nationality policy. The Ukrainian language displaced Russian in education,
state administration and the mass media.

Ukrainians were recruited into the party and government. Within the
Communist Party of Ukraine there developed a powerful Ukrainian wing which
demanded an end to Russian domination in economic and political life.

Stalin’s policies in 1929 brought the “golden era” to an end

Collectivization
In 1928 Stalin suddenly announced accelerated industrialization in the
form of the first five-year plan. The plan was hastily put together and,
as a
result, billions of rubles were wasted.

By 1930 it became clear that Stalin’s government was running out of
funds.
Rather than rethink economic strategies, Stalin ordered more grain to be
squeezed out of the peasantry.

The quickest method of accomplishing this, according to Stalin, was to
establish collective farms by expropriating all peasant land, grain
reserves
and livestock without compensation. Also, collective farms would have to
turn
over all their produce to the state.

Interestingly enough, when the Nazis occupied Ukraine, they did not
abolish collective farms: they appreciated this finely tuned instrument for
the exploitation of the peasantry.

In Ukraine, collectivization had another aim: to “destroy the social
basis of Ukrainian nationalism — individual peasant agriculture,”
according to
the Soviet newspaper Proletarska Pravda, (22.1.1930).

It was in 1930 as well that Stalin ordered the first of a series of
purges of Ukrainian cultural and political figures — all part and parcel
of a
program to roll back the achievements of the national revival of the 1920s.

The campaign against kulaks
An essential component of forced collectivization, according to
Stalin,
was the “elimination of kulaks as a class.”

The word kulak conjures up an image of a wealthy, grasping peasant.
The
reality had little in common with the myth.

In the 1920s there were laws banning the sale and purchase of land
and of
its rent. Land was distributed on the basis of the size of the peasant
family.
Some peasant households did, of course, own more land than others. But
these
households also had larger families to support.

Compare the richest kulak in Ukraine with an industrial worker. In
the
mid-1920s the average annual income per working peasant in the richest
peasant
farm in Ukraine (comprising about 30 acres) was 200 rubles. The average
worker, by contrast, made 521 rubles a year and received many social-
security
benefits which were not available to the peasantry.

When the campaign against kulaks began, the Soviet regime was at a
loss
for a definition of the term and produced an arbitrary set of criteria.
For
example, a household owning a motor of any kind was classified as
belonging to
the kulak category.

Neither were kulaks those who hired labor. As the Russian
demographer M.
Maksudov has shown, the majority of those employing labor in the
countryside
were invalids of the First World War and the revolution, widows and
families
with few children.

The campaign against kulaks, therefore, had little to do with economic
considerations. “Dekulakization” was intended to rid the countryside of
peasants (irrespective of their material standing) who were most likely to
organize and lead resistance to forced collectivization.

According to official Soviet surveys, Ukraine had 71,500 kulak
households
in 1929. But according to official Soviet sources, between 1930 and 1932,
200,000 kulak households or one million people were “eliminated.” The plan
for the destruction of kulaks was overfulfilled by almost 200 per cent.

The deportations
Those who resisted collectivization were either executed or sent to
prison camps and their families were deported to Siberia or the Russian
Arctic
circle.
Peasant activists were deported with their families to the northern
regions of
Russian.

Here is what some eyewitnesses wrote about their experiences:
“Barefooted
and poorly clad peasants were jammed into railroad cars and transported to
the
regions of Murmansk and the like. Peasants were unloaded into snow about
two
metres deep. The frost stood at 75 degrees below zero. Without even an
axe
or a saw we began building huts from tree branches. In two weeks all the
children, the sick and the elderly had frozen to death.”

The death rate among Ukrainian peasants deported to the Sverdlovsk
region
in Russia was typical: only 2,300 of the original group of 4,800 survived
the
winter.

The suffering during the deportations was terrible enough, yet it
pales
in comparison with what happened during the famine of 1932-33.

Grain requisition campaigns
By the spring of 1930 peasant resistance to collectivization had
reached
such proportions that Stalin panicked and ordered a temporary retreat. In
an
article entitled “Dizzy with Success,” he admitted that excesses had
occurred
and falsely pinned the entire blame on local officials. Moreover, he
reassured the peasants that membership in collective farms henceforth
would be
“voluntary.”

In the spring of 1930 there occurred a mass exodus of peasants from
collective farms. Thinking that Stalin’s regime had learned its lesson,
peasants worked with a will and brought in an excellent harvest — 23.1
million
(metric) tons of grain.

But in the autumn of 1930 Stalin again changed course. He ordered the
drive for collectivization to be resumed and the maximum amount of grain
to be
taken out of Ukraine. A third of the harvest, or 7.7 million tons of
grain,
was taken by the state.

The renewed collectivization drive produced chaos in agricultural
production. The peasantry was given no incentive to produce. By the end
of
1930, for example, 78 per cent of collective farms in Ukraine had failed to
pay peasants for the days that they had worked. Ironically, peasants’
payment
in Ukraine (in kilos of food produce) was half what it was in Russia.
Reassured by his success of 1930, Stalin ordered the 1931 quota for grain
delivery to the state to be set at the same level — 7.7 million tons.

The 1931 harvest, however — 18.3 million tons of grain — was 20 per
cent
smaller than in 1930. Almost 30 per cent of the harvest was lost because
of
the breakdown of the transportation system.

Intent on exporting grain to finance industrialization, Stalin ordered
that it be requisitioned whatever the cost to the peasantry.

By the early spring of 1932, 7 million tons had been taken. The
amount
was so great that the republic was short of seed grain by 45 per cent.

Ukrainian officials knew that if the rate of grain requisitioning
continued, famine would break out. They argued with Moscow for a major
downward revision of Ukraine’s agricultural obligations for 1932.

M. Skrypnyk, Commissar of Education, in July 1932 recounted how, while
touring the Ukrainian countryside, he had heard from peasants that “we had
everything taken away from us but the broom.” V. Chubar, head of the
Ukrainian government, insisted that neither the peasants nor his
administration were at fault for the agricultural crisis, but that it was
due
to the unrealistic plans of Moscow.

Stalin did lower the amount of grain to be requisitioned in 1932 to
6.2
million tons, but this was still far above the capacities of the Ukraine in
view of that year’s poor harvest — 14.6 tons.

Neither did Stalin relax the collectivization drive and, as a result,
agriculture was plagued by chaos. Millions of tons of grain were lost.

Tightening the noose
Moscow sent a special mission, accompanied by troops, to oversee the
1932
grain requisition.

Collective farms stopped distributing food to peasants. For example,
according to official statistics, only five per cent of collective farms in
Dnipropetrovsk province handed out food produce for days worked in 1932.

To prevent peasants from feeding themselves by taking collective farm
produce, a law was passed in August 1932 stipulating the death penalty, and
under exceptional circumstances, a ten-year sentence in labor camps for
“theft
of socialist property.” Thus, it was reported in the Soviet press (Visti,
10.11.1932) that the Dnipropetrovsk court had sentenced a group of hungry
peasants to the firing squad for the theft of a sack of wheat.

An obligatory delivery system was established for each collective
farm.
The harvest was organized in the form of a military operation, with
soldiers
guarding grain from the peasants. Officials and peasants who did not
fulfill
their quotas were treated in accordance with the infamous August 1932
decree.

On 17 December 1932 regulations were tightened even further. A
complete
economic blockade was ordered of villages that did not fulfil their
obligations to the state: all trade, all shipments of food and consumer
goods,
whatever their source, were prohibited.

Officials, wrote Malcolm Muggeridge, “had gone over the country like a
swarm of locusts and taken away everything edible; they shot and exiled
thousands of peasants, sometimes whole villages; they have reduced some of
the
most fertile land in the whole world to a melancholy desert.”

Could have been avoided
The famine finally subsided in 1934, when the 1933 harvest was brought
in.
This was because, in the spring of 1933, Moscow “lent” Ukraine seed grain.
Moscow also reduced the quantity of grain to be delivered to the state to
five
million tons, about one-quarter of the 1933 harvest.

Soviet officials today deny that the famine took place, although they
do
admit that there were problems due to drought.

If that was the case, then Ukraine should have suffered a famine in
1934,
not in 1932-33. The 1934 harvest was the worst in many years — 12.3
million
tons.

But there was no famine in 1934 because Stalin reduced the amount of
grain from existing stocks to feed the population. He could have done
this in
1932-33, but he did not. Instead, he deliberately exported 1.7 million
tons
of grain to the West to pay for industrial equipment.

The offers of international relief organizations to assist the
starving
in Ukraine were rejected by the Soviet government on the grounds that there
was no famine, hence no need to aid its victims.

The borders of Ukraine were closely patrolled and starving Ukrainian
peasants were not allowed to cross into Russia in search of bread.

The toll
How many millions perished?

Harry Lang, editor of the left-wing Jewish daily Forward, published in
New York, visited Ukraine in 1933 and was told by a high-ranking state
official that six million people had perished from the famine.

Other estimates range from 6.5 to 8.5 million. We will never know the
exact number.

We do know that according to the 1926 Soviet population census there
were
31.2 million Ukrainians in the U.S.S.R. According to the 1939 Soviet
census
this number had dropped by 3.1 million to 28.1 million. (There was no
emigration from the Soviet Ukraine in this period.) Over a 13-year period,
according to Soviet statistics, the number of Ukrainians had diminished by
11
per cent. The population of the U.S.S.R., on the other hand, increased by
16
per cent and the number of Russians by 28 per cent.

A national tragedy
When the Ukrainian peasantry was under attack in 1932-33, Ukrainian
political and cultural leaders sprang to their defense. Ewald Ammende, a
German eyewitness who analysed this question, wrote in 1936: “The widest
circle of the Ukrainian intelligentsia had entered the struggle: teachers,
students, Soviet officials, all thought it was their duty to protest
against a
further sucking dry of their country…. The Soviet regime was faced by a
united people, a solid front, including everyone from the highest Soviet
officials down to the poorest peasants.”

Ukrainian cultural and political leaders paid a heavy price for
refusing
to become unwilling agents in the extermination of their own people.

In 1933, at the height of the famine, a massive purge was ordered in
Ukraine. As P. Postyshev, Stalin’s henchman in Ukraine, pointed out,
“almost
all people removed were arrested and put before the firing squad.”

The purge continued virtually uninterrupted until 1938, claiming the
lives of 80 per cent of Ukraine’s creative intelligentsia. Thousands of
priests of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church were killed, as were that
church’s 35
bishops.

The desire to stamp out a Ukrainian national consciousness was so
extreme
that, according to the famous Russian composer, Dmitrii Shostakovich,
several
hundred blind bandurysty — itinerant folk singers — were executed.

Hundreds of thousands of party members were shot. The purge was so
thorough that by 1938 not a single secretary of the Council of the People’s
Commissars in Ukraine (the cabinet), not even a single deputy of Ukraine’s
parliament, the Supreme Soviet, was left.

The purges were intended to deal a devastating blow to the existence
of
Ukrainians as a nation. At the 20th Party Congress in 1956 Khrushchev said
Stalin had even considered deporting all Ukrainians to Siberia, but “there
were too many of them and there was no place to which to deport them.”

With the famine and the purges, Stalin had come as close to
destroying a
nation as his unrestrained power would permit.

http://www.ukar.org/famine07.htm
Stalin’s Famine in Ukraine
MALCOLM MUGGERIDGE
UKRAINE FAMINE 1933
Special Edition issued by the
Ukrainian Canadian Committee
Edmonton Branch
October 14, 1983

“The novelty of this particular famine, what made it so diabolical, is
that it
was the deliberate creation of a bureaucratic mind, without any
consideration
whatever of the consequences of human suffering,” Malcolm Muggeridge said.

He was talking about the genocidal famine that swept Ukraine in the winter
on
1932 and the spring and summer of 1933.

Muggeridge was there that terrible winter and spring. As a correspondent
for
the Manchester Guardian in Moscow, he was one of the few Western
journalists
who circumvented Soviet restrictions and visited the famine regions and
then
honestly reported what he had seen.

Marco Carynnyk talked to Muggeridge at his cottage in Sussex, England.

Why did you decide to write about the famine in Ukraine?

It was the big story in all our talks in Moscow. Everybody knew about it.
There was no question about that. Anyone you were talking to knew that
there
was a terrible famine going on. Even in the Soviets’ own pieces there were
somewhat disguised acknowledgements of great difficulties there.

I realized that that was the big story. I could also see that all the
correspondents in Moscow were distorting it.

Without making any kind of plans or asking for permission I just went and
got
a ticket for Kiev and then went on to Rostov. The Soviet security is not
as
good as people think it is. If you once duck it, you can go quite a long
way.
At least you could in those days.

Going through the countryside by train one could sense the state of
affairs.
Ukraine was starving, and you only had to venture out to smaller places to
see
derelict fields and abandoned villages.

On one occasion, I was changing trains, and I went wandering around, and in
one of the trains in the station, the kulaks were being loaded onto the
train,
and there were military men all along the platform.

I’ll tell you another thing that’s more difficult to convey, but it
impressed
me enormously. It was on a Sunday in Kiev, and I went into the church
there
for the Orthodox mass. I could understand very little of it, but there was
some spirit in it that I have never come across before or after. Human
beings
at the end of their tether were saying to God, “We come to you, we’re in
trouble, nobody by You can help us.”

What were you thinking and, more importantly perhaps, what were you feeling
when you saw those scenes of starvation and privation in Ukraine? How does
one respond in such a situation?

First of all, one feels a deep, deep, deep sympathy with and pity for the
sufferers. Human beings look very tragic when they are starving. And
remember that I wasn’t unaware of what things were like because in India,
for
instance, I’ve been in a village during a cholera epidemic and seen people
similarly placed. So it wasn’t a complete novelty.

The novelty of this particular famine, what made it so diabolical, is that
it
was not the result of some catastrophe like a drought or an epidemic. It
was
the deliberate creation of a bureaucratic mind which demanded the
collectivization of agriculture, immediately, as a purely theoretical
proposition, without any consideration whatever of the consequences in
human
suffering.

That was what I found so terrifying. Think of a man in an office who has
been
ordered to collectivize agriculture and get rid of the kulaks without any
clear notion or definition of what a kulak is, and who has in what was then
the GPU and is now the KGB the instrument for doing this, and who then
announces it in the slavish press as one of the great triumphs of the
regime.

Given the deliberate nature of the famine in Ukraine, given the fact that
food
continued to be stockpiled and exported even as people dropped dead on the
streets, is it accurate to talk about this as a famine? Is it perhaps
something else? How does one describe an event of such magnitude?

Perhaps you do need another word. I don’t know what it would be. The word
‘famine’ means people have nothing whatsoever to eat and consume things
that
are not normally consumed. Of course there were stories of cannibalism
there.
I don’t know whether they were true, but they were very widely believed.
Certainly the eating of cattle and the consequent complete destruction of
whatever economy the farms still had was true.

I remember someone telling me how all manners and finesse disappeared.
When
you’re in the grip of a thing like this and you know that someone’s got
food,
you go and steal it. You’ll even murder to get it. That’s all part of the
horror.

How does one rank the famine of 1933 with other great catastrophes?

I think it’s very difficult to make a table of comparison. What I would
say
with complete truth and sincerity is that as a journalist over the last
half
century I have seen some pretty awful things.

But the famine is the most terrible thing I have ever seen, precisely
because
of the deliberation with which it was done and the total absence of any
sympathy with the people. To mention it or to sympathize with the people
would mean to go to the Gulag, because then you were criticizing the great
Stalin’s project and indicating that you thought it a failure, when
allegedly
it was a stupendous success and enormously strengthened the Soviet Union.

What sort of response did you encounter when you came back from the Soviet
Union and published your findings, particularly from people close to you,
like
the Webbs.?

The Webbs were furious about it. Mrs. Webb in her diary puts in a sentence
which gives the whole show away. She says, “Malcolm has come back with
stories about a terrible famine in the USSR. I have been to see Mr. Maisky
(the Soviet ambassador in Britain) about it, and I realize that he’s got it
absolutely wrong.” Who would suppose that Mr. Maisky would say, “No, no,
of
course he’s right”?

You published Winter in Moscow when you got back from the Soviet Union, and
you were attacked in the press for your views.

Very strongly. And I couldn’t get a job.

Why was that? Because people found your reports hard to believe?

No, the press was not overtly pro-Soviet, but it was, as it is now,
essentially sympathetic with that side and distrustful of any serious
attack
on it.

How do you explain this sympathy?

It’s something I’ve written and thought about a great deal, and I think
that
the liberal mind is attracted by this sort of regime. My wife’s aunt was
Beatrice Webb, and she and Sidney Webb wrote the classic pro-Soviet book,
Soviet Communism: A New Civilization. And so one saw close at hand the
degree
to which they all knew about the regime, knew all about the Cheka (the
secret
police) and everything, but they liked it.

I think that those people believe in power. It was put to me very
succinctly
when we were taken down to Kharkiv for the opening of the Dnieper dam.
There
was an American colonel who was running it, building the dam in effect.
“How
do you like it here?” I asked him, thinking that I’d get a wonderful blast
of
him saying how he absolutely hated it. “I think it’s wonderful,” he said.
“You never get any labor trouble.”

This will be one of the great puzzles of posterity in looking back on this
age, to understand why the liberal mind, the Manchester Guardian mind, the
New
Republic mind, should feel such enormous sympathy with this authoritarian
regime.

You are implying that the liberal intelligentsia did not simply overlook
the
regime’s brutality, but actually admired and liked it.

Yes, I’m saying that, although they wouldn’t have admitted it, perhaps not
even to themselves. I remember Mrs. Webb, who after all was a very
cultivated
upper-class liberal-minded person, an early member of the Fabian Society
and
so on, saying to me, “Yes, it’s true, people disappear in Russia.” She
said
it with such great satisfaction that I couldn’t help thinking that there
were
a lot of people in England whose disappearance she would have liked to
organize.

No, it’s an everlasting mystery to me how one after the other, the
intelligentsia of the Western world, the Americans, the Germans, even the
French, fell for this thing to such an extraordinary degree.

HOME: http://www.ukar.org/index.shtml

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:37:50 EST 2008
Article: 514675 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: FrankArthur
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.swiss,
X-Invalid: alt.politics.nationalism.white,uk.politics.misc
Subject: ZYD/Jew Ritual Murder – Introduction Before 5 Parts – Documented!
Message-ID:
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:00:33 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Lines: 168
Bytes: 9489
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.russian:514675 alt.politics.europe:79987 soc.culture.swiss:59891

INTRODUCTION

ON 15th July, 1936, Mr. Oliver Locker-Lampson, M.P., a childhood
friend of the Rothschild family, asked in the House of Commons whether
the Attorney-General proposed to institute legal proceedings against
the authors or publishers of The Fascist, the issue of that paper for
July containing allegations against the Jews of the practice of ritual
murder. The Attorney-General replied that the matter was under
consideration.

As an ultimate result of this “consideration,” I was sentenced to six
months’ imprisonment among criminals on 21st September, 1936, the
Judge in the case being a 31st Degree Mason of the Scottish Rite. But
it is important to note that the conviction was obtained, not on the
ritual murder issue alone, which was not relied upon by the
Prosecution for the purpose of silencing me, but on the whole contents
of the July Fascist, and particularly on words used by me with
reference to the disposal of the Jews.

Under the law of libel, the truth of my statements with reference to
Ritual Murder could not be used as an argument in my defence; it was
deemed sufficient under the law that the statements had been written,
and that they “rendered His Majesty’s subjects of Jewish faith liable
to suspicion, affront and boycott” and so amounted to a Public
Mischief.

I came to Court very fully prepared, if the truth of my statements
was challenged, to justify the statements I had made in The Fascist,
and was even ready to demand that “Rex,” the prosecutor, should
produce from the Public Records Office certain Close and Patent Rolls
of the State wherein Jewish Ritual Murder is recorded as an
established fact in this country! But I was forbidden by the Judge to
use this line of defence; it did not matter who else had charged the
Jews with ritual murder, or how often, or what historic facts proved
it, or how many convictions there had been under proper juridical
authority; thus, when I asked Inspector Kitchener, the only witness
who appeared against me, “When you brought this case, were you under
the impression that Ritual Murder was a thing of the past?” and he
replied “Yes,” the Judge intervened with the remark “The truth of a
libel is no defense, I must point out again.”

Again, the Attorney-General, who was acting as Prosecuting Counsel,
interrupted another question of mine to the same witness, by the
remark: “In my submission, it is correctly laid down that the
defendant is in no case allowed to prove the truth of a seditious
libel as a justification for having published it.” The Judge then
said, “That is the law as I understand it.” He made it clear to me
that to proceed further in such a line of defence would be contempt of
court, as the “truth” of the “libel” was “irrelevant” to the issue of
the trial! Such may be the law, but it is not justice!

The last thing the Judæo-Masonic Hidden Hand wanted was the truth
about Ritual Murder!

Since I came out of prison on 6th February, 1937, I have, until
recently, been too busy to write on the subject of Ritual Murder; but
finding that there are, even among anti-Jewish workers, people who,
never having investigated the matter for themselves, still imagine
that Jewish Ritual Murder not only has not existed and does not exist,
but is a fiction invented by crazy anti-Jewish fanatics, and as such,
exploited by me, in my campaign against the Jews, it becomes necessary
for me to take steps to defend my own reputation as a man of good
faith by compiling and publishing this book.

What the court procedure prevented me from doing in my own defence, I
do now in these pages, and I have no anxiety concerning the
conclusions at which my readers will arrive on the matter.

The subject of Ritual Murder has always been one that the Jewish
Money Power, which controls this country as well as most others, has
taken all possible steps to suppress. The reason is that Ritual Murder
was the dynamite which finally blew the Jew out of England in 1290,
out of Spain in 1492, and out of Germany in our time. The Jews know
it; and I know it too!

But there is no British law, and no 11th Commandment, which makes
Ritual Murder by Jews a forbidden topic in this country. Sir Richard
Burton’s book about it was published shortly after his death near the
end of the last century; Strack’s book, defending the Jews against the
accusation, was translated and published in England in 1909; whilst
the Jew, C. Roth, published his Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew in
1935. In France, as in Germany, there is free speech on the subject.

I challenge and defy the Judæo-Masonic Power, which rules this
country, by publishing the present work in 1938, not only in my own
defence, but in the public interest to break the attack on Free Speech
that is rapidly developing wherever any criticism of the past or
present conduct of Jews is concerned, an attack which relies for its
success upon the ridiculous charge that a breach of the peace is
likely if the truth about them is spoken! I do so in order that the
Jews shall not escape simply through the power of Money and Masonry
>from bearing the burden of a charge which, in my opinion, has been
proved against some of them through the ages. My object is, and always
has been, in spite of what my Masonic Judge had to say about it, to
alter “a matter of State established,” namely the status of Jews in
this country on an equality with Britons, a condition which is
imperilling our civilization, and to enlighten the public on their
true nature as beings possessing instincts utterly incompatible with
our own, so that they may be removed, legally and peacefully, to a
National Home in which they will be required to live together. In this
aim, I keep troth with the greatest of English kings, Edward I, who
expelled the Jews from these shores in 1290.

The maintenance of Free Speech demands that Jewish Ritual Murder
shall be a subject for open discussion, like Suttee and Thuggee and
the sacrifices of Aztec Mexico, all of which were ritual murders
which, like the Jewish variety, would be practised to-day if the Aryan
had not interfered to prevent them. If the world thinks that I have
not, in this book, proved my case, let it laugh! I can bear it! But
can the Jews? The Jewish Chronicle (25th September, 1936) complained
after my trial was over that there had been no opportunity for the
Jews to refute the charge of Ritual Murder. Well, they have one now!

ARNOLD LEESE.
1st March, 1938.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:37:51 EST 2008
Article: 514676 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
X-Invalid: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.swiss,
X-Invalid: alt.politics.nationalism.white,uk.politics.misc
Subject: ZYD/Jew Ritual Murder – Part 1 of 5 – Documented!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:10:55 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Bytes: 19386
Lines: 382
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.russian:514676 alt.politics.europe:79988 soc.culture.swiss:59892

CHAPTER I.

HUMAN SACRIFICE A SEMITIC TRADITION.

IT is incontestable that the ancient “Semites” manifested a peculiar
leaning towards the practice of bloody sacrifices to their gods.

Typical is the Jewish story of Abraham offering to slay with a knife
his first-born, Isaac, as an offering to Yahweh who had commanded him
so to do. More typical still is the Semitic idea that his god would
require such a murder to be done.

In Excavations at Gezer, R. A. S. Macalister tells us that the bodies
of sacrificed young children were found in all semitic strata; this
work describes the remains of these victims of which pictures are
given.

Isaiah charges the Jews with “enflaming themselves with idols under
every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clifts
of the rocks” (lvii, 5). There are many other Old Testament references
to the practice of sacrificing children to Moloch.

Says the Rev. J. Kitto in the Cyclopædia of Biblical Literature,
1895, “their altars smoked with human blood from the time of Abraham
to the fall of the Kingdoms of Judah and Israel.”

G. A. Dorsey writes in Civilization (Hamish Hamilton): “Historically
their temple at Jerusalem, like a Hindu or Aztec temple, was a
shambles — one sacrifice after another.”

The Jewish Encyclopædia (1904, Vol. VIII, p. 653) says: “The fact,
therefore, now generally accepted by critical scholars, is that in the
last days of the kingdom human sacrifices were offered to Yhwh as King
or Counsellor of the Nation and that the Prophets disapproved of
it ….”

Jesus Himself speaking to the Pharisees (St. John, viii, 44) charges
them with being hereditary murderers, which term can have no other
meaning than ritual murderers. “Ye are of your father the devil, and
the lusts of your father ye will do; he was a murderer from the
beginning.” This is in the Book on which “witnesses” are sworn when
they give evidence against “anti-semites” who expose the murder of
Christian children by Jews!

“Rabbinism was but an unfolding of Pharisaism, the full and swelling
stream of corrupt doctrines, views and practices, of which the
rivulets run up to the days of Christ and stretch back to those of
Ezra until they are lost in the fountain-head, the Religious
Philosophy of a debased Zoroastrianism.” (Rev. J. Kitto, Cyclopædia
of Biblical Literature.)

The trail of the tradition, then, is complete and leads to Rabbinism.

CHAPTER II.

THE RACIAL URGE.

SOME people say that it is the Talmud that made the Jew what he is. I
take another view. I say that it is the Jew that made the Talmud.

I believe that the urge for human sacrifice comes not through
religion but through race; the idea is, I think, an original one, and
came to me from observation on one race in particular, that known as
the Armenoid or Hither Asiatic race, which I consider has a decided
instinct towards sadism.

It is, I believe, the strong Armenoid or Hither Asiatic strain which
exists in the Jewish Nation upon which we have to lay the
responsibility for many unpleasant Jewish traits and practices, among
them Ritual Murder.

The Jews are a nation without a home, not a race; they are a mixture
of races, and the racial constituent which is most frequently to be
found among them is the Armenoid, or, as it is sometimes called,
Hither Asiatic. The other races which have contributed most to the
Jewish types, whether Ashkenazim or Sephardim, are the Mongoloid,
Negroid, Oriental and (White) Alpine.

The Armenoid race seems to have concentrated in Asia Minor, where it
predominates not only in Jews, but in Armenians, and affects the blood
of many “Turks,” “Syrians,” “Georgians” and even Kurds. From this
Asiatic centre, a veritable plague of Armenoid blood has spread in
every direction.

Northward, in the early centuries A.D., it advanced through the
Khazar Empire which flourished about 730 A.D., the ruler becoming a
converted Jew and forcing his people to do the same. Southward, the
race spread over the territories of Arabia, Egypt, the Sahara and
Southern Algeria. Westward, it has poisoned the populations of the
Balkan States and Greece, Crete, Southern Italy, Sicily and Spain.
Eastward, it has penetrated into Afghanistan and the Punjab.

Through the Jewish nation, as everyone knows, it has contaminated
almost every country in the world.

The Armenoid Race has the following physical characters: Height and
build, medium; head short from back to front, with large and fleshy
nose turned down towards the tip. The lips are rather prominent. The
hair is black and curly, the skin is of the swarthy colour, and the
eyes are black or brown. It is a marked feature of this race that the
skull goes straight up at the back; in other words, the Armenoid has
“no back to his head.” There is also a tendency for the eyebrows to
“meet” over the nose. The chin is usually poorly developed.

In temperament, the Armenoid is the reverse of candid. He excels in
low cunning, as his expression often denotes. He is good at business
because of his flair for detailed meanness, and his knowledge of the
lowest aspects of human nature. He is not usually endowed with much
courage, but deliberate cruelty is only too often manifested in his
nature. The spirit of revenge, and the nursing of hatred against
anyone who opposes him, is very marked in people of the Armenoid
type.

Every nation which contains a considerable proportion of people of
Armenoid Race soon establishes for itself a reputation for cruelty,
treachery, dishonesty and delight in power for the sake of power. That
is why such nations never flourish for long in their own territory.
They are not allowed to by their neighbours.

I hold that it is not primarily the Jewish Religion which makes the
Jewish Nation hated all the world over; it is the strong dose of
Armenoid racial blood in their veins. The Afghan is just as cruel, an
Armenoid Muslim; the Abyssinian just as treacherous, an Armenoid
Christian; the Armenian just as mean, another Armenoid Christian.

A characteristic of the religions which appeal to Armenoid people
(Jews, Mahommedans and Yezedis) is that the initiation ceremonial
usually involves some sort of mutilation, such as circumcision. The
religious laws governing the slaughter of animals for food are framed
and practised without consideration for the unnecessary pain inflicted
on the animals by the methods prescribed.

The ancient Assyrians were Armenoids by race, and were notorious for
their wanton cruelty.

Wherever the Hither Asiatic or Armenoid Race predominates, there is
organised cruelty to prisoners of war; in Afghanistan, the women come
out after a battle to search for the enemy wounded on whom they
practise horrible mutilations; in Southern Algeria, there is a similar
practice against French wounded, whilst recent operations in Abyssinia
prove that there is a craving for the same sort of thing. The Turks of
Armenoid race seem to revel in cold-blooded cruelty, whilst the
Bolshevik Jews of Russia, Hungary, Spain and elsewhere have
established the twentieth century as being as barbarous as the
twelfth . . . simply because of the racial instincts possessed by
imported Armenoids.

According to the Jewish Encyclopædia, 1903, Vol. IV, p. 99, when
performing the operation of circumcision on children, the mohel
(operator) “takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the
part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he
expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided.”

Surely this “religious rite” stamps the Armenoid as something
basically different from ourselves?

All is Race; there is no other truth.

The Aryan mind grasps with difficulty the idea that any human race
can have an instinct towards sadistic sacrifice, for the Aryan has
himself no such instinct. The Englishman does not realise that the
Jew, the Afghan, and the Armenian are differently constituted from
himself, and it is his own good-nature which has largely been
responsible for the Judaisation of mind which he himself has acquired
by allowing Jews to control him for so long.

I am convinced that it is to the Race rather than to the Talmud or
the Kabbala that we must look before we can understand the urge for
Ritual Murder and the love of torture which crops up in individuals in
all countries into which the Hither Asiatic or Armenoid Race has
penetrated.

CHAPTER III.

HUMAN SACRIFICE AND THE JEWISH RELIGION.

I AM not a student of the Talmud. I have no intention of becoming
one. For the same reason, I shall not become a student of Occultism or
of Drainage Systems. I smell the bad smells and remain aloof.

Nevertheless, because the advocates of Jewry use a certain line of
argument in denying that there has ever been any such thing as Ritual
Murder of Christians by Jews, I am obliged to quote a few
unimpeachable authorities on the subject.

This “argument” is that the Jewish religious law not only does not
sanction the practice of Ritual Murder, but forbids the consumption of
blood altogether. It is an argument that has been used throughout the
ages, and is used now, and has even been the foundation for the
verdict “Not Guilty,” in cases where Jews have been on trial for
ritual murder!

It was the argument used by the Sultan of Turkey when, for money
bribes, he issued a firman (1840) saying that the Ritual Murder
Accusations against Jews were calumnies. (Described in later chapters
in more detail).

But it is known that there have always been two methods of
instruction among the Jews: one Exoteric, which openly taught the Laws
of Moses and the Rabbinical traditions; the other Esoteric, or
mysteries confided only to certain persons bound to secrecy. This
latter, the Esoteric teaching, is associated with Occultism and what
is known as Black Magic, and the Mystical Cabbala is its source, for
certain rites and ceremonies blood is necessary; and secret rites
exist which are known only to the few.

Even if the written Jewish Laws do not sanction the practice it does
not prove that Jews have not done Murder in accordance with some
Occult Ritual. Let a Jew speak for us here: —

Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was stated (Jewish Encyclopædia, 1904, Vol.
VII, p. 650) to be “without any religious convictions,” wrote what he
himself described as “an impartial study of the history and sociology
of the Jews,” calling his book L’Antisemitisme; in the 1934 edition of
this, Vol. II, p. 215, he writes, after mentioning the accusations
against the Jews of Ritual Murder:

“To this general belief are added the suspicions, often justified,
against the Jews addicted to magical practices. Actually, in the
Middle Ages, the Jew was considered by the people as the magician par
excellence; one finds many formula of exorcism in the Talmud, and the
Talmudic and Cabbalistic demonology is very complicated. Now one knows
the position that blood always occupies in the operations of sorcery.
In Chaldean magic it had a very great importance…. Now, it is very
probable, even certain, that Jewish magicians must have sacrificed
children; hence the origin of the legend of ritual sacrifice.”

It is well known, as will be shown in Chapter VI, that Occult Rituals
exist in which all sorts of abominable practices are carried out, and
that they arise from the Jewish Cabbala.

How ridiculous then is the “argument” that because the Mosaic
Laws and the Talmud do not demand Ritual Murder, and even forbid the
use of blood, Isaac Abrahams cannot be guilty of any sort of Ritual
Murder!

Take an analogous case. The Eighth Commandment forbids stealing. Have
you ever heard that fact brought up in the defence of a Christian on
trial for that crime? Can you imagine prisoner’s counsel arguing that
John Smith could not have stolen a purse from William Brown because
the Christian religion forbids such a thing? More, can you imagine
counsel getting away with such an argument? But that is what the Jews
have often succeeded in doing.

So stupid is this hysterical shriek, “Our Laws do not permit it,”
that I, as a scientific investigator, would be willing to concede it
as a fact, without further investigation of the Jewish laws, that
Ritual Murder is contrary to these laws. I would concede it because
the point is of no importance whatever to my case against the Jew. If
the point were established what difference does it make to the verdict
of the Trent affair, the Damascus affair, or to the scores of cases I
am going to bring before you in later chapters?

Another point. Is it likely that we should find clear sanction for
such a crime as Ritual Murder in the Jewish Laws? Why, if such a thing
were to be found, I venture to say that not a Jew would be left alive,
so great would be the popular indignation against the Jewish nation.
We should treat them exactly as Sir W. H. Sleeman treated the Thugs,
the ritual murderers of India, when he stamped them out of existence
as hereditary criminals in the last century.

Dr. Erich Bischoff, the chief German authority on Jewish law and
religion, claims to have laid his finger on a passage authorising
Ritual Murder in the Thikunne Zohar (Edition Berdiwetsch, 88 b), a
book of cabbalistic theosophy. The passage runs:

“Furthermore, there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of
strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the
lawful method. Those who do not ascribe themselves to the Jewish
religious law must be offered up as sacrifices to the High God.”

Dr. Bischoff may be right. I venture no opinion.

Nevertheless, the Jewish Laws do tell us something; without any
direct sanctioning of Ritual Murder, they show us without any
possibility of doubt, that the Jew is normally at war spiritually with
the rest of mankind, and upon this argument I base my statement that
Jewish Laws show ample foundation for the scientific investigator to
take the view that there is nothing improbable in the reality of
Jewish Ritual Murder.

I am not going to take the same line as other anti-Jewish
investigators have done about this matter; I am not going to quote any
Mosaic Laws nor any Talmudic tenets. I am simply going to quote the
great explorer and orientalist, Sir Richard Burton, a Briton who made
it his business to study the Talmud closely and recorded his
conclusions on the relations it revealed as existing between Jew and
Gentile. I quote now from his
The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, edited by W. H. Wilkins, and
published by Messrs. Hutchinson in 1898.

Page 73. “The most important and pregnant tenet of modern Jewish
belief is that the Ger, or stranger, in fact all those who do not
belong to their religion, are brute beasts, having no more rights than
the fauna of the field.”

I have long known this to be the Key of International Politics; and
it shows that what would be Murder to an Aryan is only Slaughter to a
Talmudic Jew.

Page 81. “The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood
pleasing to the Lord, viz: (1) that of the Paschal holocaust; (2) that
of circumcision.”

(The Paschal holocaust is the Easter sacrifice.)

I suppose every nation has the God it deserves and admires. What sort
of a people is this whose God finds the blood obtained from
mutilations of human genital organs as “pleasing”?

Sir Richard Burton comments:

Page 115. “Obviously such cruel and vindictive teaching as that
recounted in the previous chapter must bear fruit in crime and
atrocities.”

The Jewish Schulchan Aruch, which codified the teachings of the
Talmud, goes much further in sanctioning shameful practices against
the Gentile; I do not quote it because my object is not to excite
retaliation, but to mark down the Jews as having been responsible,
either collectively or individually, for ritual murders. I want the
Gentile to take steps to remove the Jews from our midst by expulsion
to a National Home of their own, and by legal means.

There is good reason to think that it is the “Chassidim” sect to
which most recent Jewish Ritual Murders can be traced; the Chassidim
is sometimes considered to be a modern sect which arose in Poland only
in the 18th century; but the Jewish Encyclopædia (1905), Vol. IX, p.
661, says that the Pharisees were originally identical with the
Chassidim; the Chassidim are fanatical to a degree, and soaked in
mysticism.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:37:52 EST 2008
Article: 514677 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
X-Invalid: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.swiss,
X-Invalid: alt.politics.nationalism.white,uk.politics.misc
Subject: ZYD/Jew Ritual Murder – Part 2 of 5 – Documented!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:43:26 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Bytes: 47850
Lines: 900
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.russian:514677 alt.politics.europe:79989 soc.culture.swiss:59893

CHAPTER IV.

THE MOTIVE AND NATURE OF JEWISH RITUAL MURDER.

THE motive of Ritual Murder of Christians by Jews is almost certainly
hate. It is in fact the same motive that Disraeli admitted to be the
cause of revolutionary activities against Gentile governments; to use
his words (from Life of Lord George Bentinck, 1852): “The people of
God co-operate with atheists; the most skilful accumulators of
property ally themselves with Communists; the peculiar and chosen Race
touch the hand of all the scum and low castes of Europe; and all this
because they wish to destroy that ungrateful Christendom which owes to
them even its name, and whose tyranny they can no longer endure.”

Hatred of Christianity is a tradition among the Jews: just as hate of
England is a sort of perverted religion among an inferior class of
Irishmen. It must be remembered that the Hymn of Hate which was
debited to the Germans during the war was actually written by the Jew
Lissauer.

One of the principal Jewish feast-days is that of Purim. This feast
is an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the
Book of Esther of the Old Testament. The story, which is probably a
myth, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamoured of a Jewess,
Esther, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife. Haman, the
King’s minister, complained to him of the conduct of the Jews who, he
said, did not keep the laws, and obtained from the King an order to
slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to
summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon
the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for
the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being destroyed,
their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman’s ten sons, who were
hanged.

This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony,
intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day
in London, the Jewish bakers make cakes in the shape of human ears
which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called “Haman’s
Ears,” revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism of the Jew
in our midst.

The two principal feast-days associated with Ritual Murder have been
(1) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter at Easter and the former about
one month before it. When a Ritual Murder occurred at Purim, it was
usually that of an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood; it
is said that the blood was dried and the powder mixed into triangular
cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried blood of a Purim
murder might sometimes be used for the following Passover.

When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually that of a
child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who
was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and
crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished
off by wounding in the side in imitation of the murder of Christ. The
blood taken from the child was mixed either in the powdered state or
otherwise into the Passover bread.

Another festival at which it is thought that Ritual Murder has
sometimes been indulged in is Chanucah, which occurs in December,
commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem under the Maccabees in B.C.
165.

Examples of Purim murders are those of Damascus, Rhodes, Xanten,
Polna, Gladbeck and Paderborn.

Although hate is the principal motive, superstitious traditions are
also involved, one being the association of blood-sacrifices with the
idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that Jewry cannot be saved
or return to Zion unless every year the blood of a Christian is
obtained for the purpose of ritual consumption.

Political murders, such as the Jewish murder of the Tsar and his
family and of other Russians, have sometimes been accompanied by
features suggestive of ritual, but I do not wish to complicate this
book by guessing at the meaning of signs left symbolically by the
murderers.

CHAPTER V.

“A RELIC OF THE DAYS OF WITCHCRAFT AND BLACK MAGIC.”

ON 6th May, 1912, The Times published a letter, signed by many men of
authority, protesting against what they called the revival of “the
hideous charge of Ritual Murder” which was being brought against a Jew
at Kiev. “The Blood Accusation,” they said, “is a relic of the days of
Witchcraft and Black Magic.”

Unfortunately for the signatories of this letter, who numbered among
them the Archbishops of Canterbury, York and Armagh, the Cardinal
Archbishop of Westminster, Bishops galore, Dukes, Earls, Justices,
Masters of Colleges and Editors, of that period, the Blood Accusation
has nothing mediæval about it at all; it was more rife in the 19th
century than it was in mediæval times!

Unfortunately also, Black Magic is in the same category. It is not
mediæval either; there never was a wider cult of Black Magic than
there is in the year of Our Lord 1938!

How extraordinary it is that influential men can be induced to sign
such a statement as I have quoted! And how strange it is that, where
Jewish interests are at stake, these same influential Christian men
will see nothing improper in attempting to prejudice the course of the
criminal trial of the Jew Beiliss at Kiev, a course which they would
never pursue in any other cause!

Let us confound the signatories of The Times letter out of the mouths
of Jews themselves. The Jewish Encyclopædia, 1903, Vol. III, pp.
266-7, gives a list of Accusations of Ritual Murder made against the
Jews through the centuries; 122 cases are listed in chronological
order, and no less than 39 of them were made in the 19th century!
There were far more than double the number of Blood Accusations made
in the 19th century than in any previous century, according to this
authoritative Jewish list.

Let us examine the list of Ritual Murder Accusations made by a
converted Jew, Cesare Algranati, in 1913, and published in Cahiers
Romains; here are listed 101 accusations, of which 28 were made in the
19th century and only 73 for all the eight preceding centuries! Even
the Jew Roth gives the argument away, for he says (p. 16 of his Ritual
Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935), “The nineteenth century proved little
less credulous than those which preceded it.”

“Anti-semitic” authors’ lists of Blood Accusations agree in this
respect with the lists made by Jews; Der Stürmer, the paper of Julius
Streicher, in a special Ritual Murder issue published in 1934, shows
that in the 19th century 32 charges of ritual murder were made, which
is ten more than in any other century in European history recorded by
it.

The fact that the charges increase in number as the age becomes more
and more enlightened is particularly significant, because the Jewish
Money Power and its silencing activities are more developed than ever
before and might have been expected to reduce the number of charges.

Sufficient has now been said to expose the absurdity of any attempt
to consign the Blood Accusation to any mediæval limbo.

It lives to-day; I may say with the great Sir Richard Burton (The
Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, 1898, p. 129): “At any rate, sufficient
has been advanced in these pages to open the eyes of the student and
the ethnographer; it will stand on record until Elijah.”

CHAPTER VI.

“IT COULDN’T HAPPEN NOW.”

THIS argument, “It couldn’t happen now,” seems quite good enough for
a lot of people when it is applied to the matter of Jewish Ritual
Murder. It is, perhaps, comforting to the democratic mind to think
that “Progress” ensures that such an evil practice, even if it
occurred in unenlightened days, could not have survived to-day.

I wish I could see any comfort in this argument, but I don’t. There
are no facts to support it.

That the Aryan peoples have progressed I do not deny; but I do not
think there is any evidence to show any like progress among some of
the other races.

Compare the following two happenings, noting the dates:

A.D. 117. From the account of Dio Cassius in 78th Book of his
history, Chapter 32:
“Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North
Africa) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and
Greeks, and devoured their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves
in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards;
some they threw to wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in
single combat, so that in all 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did
many similar things, also in Cyprus, led by one of them named
Artemion; and there another 240,000 were slain.”

A.D. 1936. From Daily Mail, 17th September (describing the horrors of
the Red Revolution in Spain):
“Baena (Cordoba Province): Ninety-one assassinations, mostly by
shooting, hatchet blows, or strangling. Others were burned alive. Two
nuns who had been dragged from the convent of the Mother of God, had
their religious medals with the figure of the Virgin, nailed into the
sockets of their eyes.
“La Campana (Seville): Reds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde
Caraballo, who either killed or was responsible for killing 11 persons
in prison. The prisoners were fired on until they fell, covered with
petrol, and set on fire. Some were still writhing in the flames when
the city was entered.
“Lore del Rio (Seville): 138 assassinated. They were dragged to the
cemetery, lined up, and shot in the legs, being buried alive as they
fell in a trench. When the town was entered hands could still be seen
writhing above the ground.”

I cannot see much difference in outlook between the Jewish devils
responsible for both these massacres, even though there are 18
centuries between them!

In view of that, why boggle at the idea of Jewish Ritual Murder still
surviving?

Why make such a fuss when Jews are charged with the practice of
Ritual Murder? Other Asiatics are known to have practised it until
1850, and, if left to themselves, would doubtless have maintained the
custom.

In India, from 10,000 to 50,000 murders were perpetrated every year
by a religious body known as the Thugs. They were mostly people of
Mahommedan extraction, but a number of Hindus were also involved. They
used to worship Kali, the Hindu goddess of destruction. Their custom
was to club together, generally as travellers, when they would slowly
gain the confidence of some innocent person, and at a given signal,
would strangle him in a prescribed manner, which they regarded as a
religious duty; then they would rob him if he had anything to be
robbed of, and bury the body with such skill as to leave no trace. The
Thugs actually received the protection of some of the native princes
and chiefs who were thoroughly frightened of their power as a secret
religious sect. How this reminds us of the attitude of the influential
men in this country who adopt the same view of Masonry and Jewry!

Then the British Government decided the thing must stop. After many
years of investigation, Sir W. H. Sleeman stamped out the Thug sect,
and no Thuggee murders are on record since 1850. He found that Thuggee
was hereditary among male members of a family, and he achieved his
object by confining in segregation for life all male members of Thug
families.

Now my point is that Thuggee happened; and happened in the 19th
century until the British put an end to it under Sleeman. It was a
long time before the British administration learned of the existence
of Thuggee, so carefully was it concealed; another analogy with Jewish
Ritual Murder!

“It couldn’t happen now.” Why not?

And on 13th September, 1937, a telegram was sent to The Times from
Delhi reporting the sacrifice of a 17-year-old youth to propitiate the
rain-god, in Sirmoor State. The youth was led through the village of
Gunpur by a crowd of people headed by a priest and the village
headman, and beheaded on a special altar to the accompaniment of
devotional songs. The head was found by the police at the foot of the
deity in the village temple.

As Aryan rule over India relaxes, Thuggee and other human sacrifices
will re-appear.

“It couldn’t happen now.” Why not, again?

Here is an extract from Magick by the “Master Therion”, published in
1929 by the Lecram Press, 26 Rue d’Hautpool, Paris, pp. 94-5:

“. . . it was the theory of the ancient magicians that any living
being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the
size and health of the animal, and in quality according to its mental
and moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is
liberated suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the
Circle, or Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot
escape…. For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly
choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A
male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most
satisfactory and suitable.”

A footnote on p. 95 says “(4) It appears from the Magical

Records of Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on
an average about 150 times every year between 1912 e.v. and 1928
e.v.”

This footnote refers to the last sentence in the paragraph quoted
above. The italics are all mine.

“It couldn’t happen now.” Why not, in the Devil’s name?

Sir Richard Burton shows that the disappearance of children at
Passover was talked of in Rome and in the other towns of Italy
throughout the early part of the 19th century when efficient policing
was unknown, as also throughout the century at Smyrna and other places
in the Levant and in Turkey.

It couldn’t happen now? But the Jewish method of cattle slaughter
happens now and is specially exempted from the objects of the
Slaughter of Animals Act, 1933, which Act orders that all cattle for
Gentile food must be stunned with a mechanically-operated instrument
before the throat is cut. The Jewish method is cutting the throat from
ear to ear without any previous stunning. It has been condemned by a
Government Commission held in 1904 as failing in rapidity, freedom
>from unnecessary pain and instantaneous loss of sensibility. Yet it
“happens now” and is protected in this our England, by an English Law,
and remains unattacked by the Royal Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals.

Why couldn’t it happen now?

To this day, we learn from Jewish sources (B’nai B’rith Messenger,
California, 3rd April, 1936) that the Samaritans, an unorthodox Jewish
sect who keep Passover by solar computation, indulge in bloody
sacrifices of animals on that feast-day; an account is given of a
visit to the scene of sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in the 20th century,
and these words are used:

“I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is
withdrawn from the neck of the lamb of sacrifice.”

Here is a paragraph from a periodical which shall be unnamed, of
1936, showing that the urge to the “Mysteries” is not dead:

“The sophisticated Pharisee of the 20th century unceasingly gives
thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients.
The worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that
which is not evident. Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard
themselves as victimised by that person whose words or actions they do
not understand. We love the obvious because it flatters us, and hate
the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with faint praise.
Riddles are irksome. The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with facts for
his fetish, the modernist is more foolish than his forebears. Decrying
superstition, he is most superstitious; rejecting fancies, he is the
fanciful product of a fictitious age. The modern world is bored with
its own importance; life itself has become a botheration. Suffering
>from chronic ennui, how can a world ever become interested in anything
but itself? Smothered in their self-complacency, these all-sufficient
ones ask for facts. But what facts are there that fools can
understand? How can the helpless superficial grasp the hopelessly
profound, for are not realities reserved for the wise?”

Alongside this clotted nonsense was a picture of a ritual murder,
with the victim crucified, below it, a portrait of the author, an
obvious Jew.

I take it that “it would happen now” if this Jew had his way!

CHAPTER VII.

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER IN ENGLAND BEFORE THE
EXPULSION OF 1290.

THE first known case happened in 1144; after that, cases cropped up
>from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm by
Edward I. The most famous of these cases was that of Little St. Hugh
of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological order; and I
do not deny the possibility of some of them in which details are
lacking, being “trumped-up” ones, where death may have been due to
causes other than ritual murder and the Jews blamed for it; but the
case of St. Hugh, particularly, was juridically decided, and the Close
and Patent Rolls of the Realm record definitely cases at London,
Winchester and Oxford. There seems no reason to doubt that many cases
of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even undiscovered.

1144. Norwich. A twelve-year-old boy was crucified and his side
pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in
a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that
the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they
thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and
return to Palestine, and that it was their custom to draw lots to
decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last
year the lot fell to Narbonne but in this year to Norwich. The boy was
locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The
Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial.

In J. C. Cox’s Norfolk Churches, Vol. II, p. 47, as also in the
Victoria Country History of Norfolk, 1906, Vol. II, is an illustration
of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual Murder of St.
William, the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the
Power of Jewish Money has had it removed. No one denies this case as a
historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a Ritual
Murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew
(1935) says: “Modern enquirers, after careful examination of the
facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in
consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his
relatives.” How these modern enquiries arrived at a conclusion like
that after all these years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a
compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the
boy’s death to be celebrated as a martyrdom of a saint without having
satisfied themselves that wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion
and the piercing of the side. And why the relatives

should bury the boy in a sack and then dig it up and hang it in a tree
would puzzle even a Jew to explain.

John Foxe’s Acts and Monuments of the Church records this ritual
murder, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The Prior,
William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the
leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish Ritual
Murder; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew!) it
is made clear that his career, quite apart from this Ritual Murder
case, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral
courage.

1160. Gloucester. The body of a child named Harold was found in the
river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly dated
1168. Recorded in Monumenta Germaniæ Historica, Vol. VI (Erfurt
Annals); Polychronicon, R. Higdon; Chronicles, R. Grafton, p. 46.

1181. Bury St. Edmunds. A child called Robert was sacrificed at
Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there
was supposed to cause ‘miracles.’ Authority: Rohrbacher, from the
Chronicle of Gervase of Canterbury.

1192. Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in Jewish Encyclopædia
as being a false charge. Details lacking.

1232. Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. Mentioned in
Hyamson’s History of the Jews in England; also in Annals of
Winchester; and conclusively in the Close Roll 16, Henry III, membrane
8, 26.6.1232.

1235. Norwich. In this case, the Jews stole a child and hid him with
a view to crucifying him. Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates of date 1847,
says of this case, “They (the Jews) circumcise and attempt to crucify
a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000
marks.” Further authority Huillard Breolles Grande Chronique, III, 86.
Also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m. 23.

1244. London. A child’s body found unburied in the cemetery of St.
Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul’s.
Authority: Social England, Vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. Traill.

1255. Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and
crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy’s mother
found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Joppin or
Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did
so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the
crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical
investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body,
and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was
executed.

Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in Lincoln
Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been at work, for
between 1910 and 1930, a notice was fixed above the shrine as follows:
“The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as
that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a
small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are many
incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and the
existence

of similar stories in England and elsewhere points to their origin in
the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages and the common
superstition, now wholly discredited, that ritual murder was a factor
of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made as early as the 13th
century by the Church to protect the Jews against the hatred of the
populace and against this particular accusation.”

At a recent visit to Lincoln of the Jewish Historical Society, in
1934, the Mayor, Mr. G. Deer, said to them: “That he (St. Hugh) was
done to death by Jews for ritual purposes cannot be other than a libel
based upon the prejudices and ignorance of an unenlightened age.” The
Chancellor on the same occasion said: “It was quite obviously one of
the very many cases of slander spread about the Jews from time to
time. No doubt, the child died or fell down the well.”

These people, Jews and Gentiles, bring no evidence whatever for their
statements; it couldn’t have happened, they say. Why not?

Was Henry III, weak in character as we know him to have been, ever
charged with being an immoral man? Did the judges not examine the
body, which was only four weeks dead? Is Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates
(1847 edition) mediæval and superstitious when it said of this case
“They (the Jews) crucify a child at Lincoln, for which 18 are hanged”?
There are no ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’ here! Or does Copinus’s confession not
tally with that of Theobald, quoted above in the first Norwich case?
Copinus said, “For the death of this child, nearly all the Jews in
England had come together and every town had sent deputies to assist
in the sacrifice.”

No one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and
Judaised Gentiles unite in denying the fact of Ritual Murder.

Strack, in his The Jew and Human Sacrifice, written in defence of the
Jews against the Blood Accusation, omits all mention of this famous
case, which is the subject of the Prioress’s Tale (Canterbury Tales)
of Chaucer and is referred to in Marlowe’s Jew of Malta. Hyamson’s
History of the Jews in England devotes the whole of Chapter IX to
“Little St. Hugh of Lincoln,” showing the importance of the Ritual
Murder issue in the Jewish mind to-day.

The following Close Rolls of the Realm refer to the case of St. Hugh:
Henry III, 39, m. 2, 7.10.1255; 39, m. 2, 14.10.1255; 40, m. 20,
24.11.1255; 40, m.13, 13.3.1256; 42, m. 6; 19.6.1258. And the Patent
Rolls, Henry III, 40, m.20, 26.11.1255; 40, m.19, 9.12.1255; 40,
27.3.1256; and 40, m.5, 20.8.1256.

1257. London. A child sacrificed. Authority: Cluverius, Epitome
Historiæ, p. 541. Details lacking.

1276. London. Boy crucified. Authority: The Close Roll of the Realm,
4, Edward I, membrane 14, 3.3.1276.

1279. Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates,
1847, says of this case: “They (the Jews) crucify a child at
Northampton for which 50 are drawn at horses’ tails and hanged.”
Further authorities: Reiley, Memorials of London, p. 15; H. Desportes,
Le Mystère du Sang.

1290. Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, mem. 21, 21st June, 1290,
contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet,
detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.

Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling
the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe
that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in
toleration.

The reader will see (p. 20) that it was a similar ritual case which
was one of the main stimulants to the King and Queen of Spain to expel
professing Jews from that country in 1492.

The Jews, in attempting to escape responsibility for these deaths by
Ritual Murder, do not hesitate to impugn the probity of two of the
Kings of England, against whose moral character no one else has dared
to cast a slur. Here are some examples. From the Jewish Chronicle
Supplement, April, 1936, p. 8 (speaking of the Lincoln case in the
reign of Henry III):

“Henceforth and especially under the zealously Christian Edward I,
the Crown and its officers became almost a worse peril to the Jews
than mobs intent on loot and led on by fanatic priests and money. When
18th century writers of history began to examine the old records in a
new sceptical temper, some may be found venturing on such unkind
surmises as that the alleged crucifixions of Christian children only
seemed to happen when kings were short of money.” The foul accusation
against men of upright character is repeated by the Jew Hyamson
(History of the Jews in England, 1928 edition, p. 21), who writes: “It
has also been pointed out that the Blood Accusation was as a rule made
at a time at which the Royal Treasury needed replenishing.”

To deny that the cases of St. William of Norwich and St. Hugh of
Lincoln were Jewish Ritual Murders is to accuse certain English Kings,
certain English Clergy, and certain English administrators, known to
be men of good morals, of murdering and torturing Jews to get their
money, after accusing them of horrible crimes. In the case of St.
Hugh, the sentence was juridical; in the case of St. William, the mob
took the matter into their own hands because the Sheriff would take no
action himself.

Whom do you believe — the Jews or the English?

“It is difficult to refuse all credit to stories so circumstantial
and so frequent.” So says Social England concerning Ritual Murders in
England Vol. I, p. 407, 1893, edited by H. D. Traill.

A significant fact is that Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates, at least up
to 1847, quoted the Ritual Murders in Norman and Plantagenet England
as undisputed facts. In later editions in the sixties, all mention of
them is extirpated! We may take it that the Jewish Money Power began
to dictate to the Press in England somewhere in the fifties of the
last century.

CHAPTER VIII.

WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN EARLY AND MEDIÆVAL TIMES,
1171 TO 1510.

IN this, and subsequent chapters, I place descriptions of cases in
chronological order, in which there seems to me to be no reason
whatever to dispute the historical accuracy of the facts given.

In this Chapter, I record such cases between 1171 and 1510 inclusive;
and I would point out to the reader the great importance of the murder
of St. Simon of Trent in 1475 and of the Toledo case in 1490; in fact,
should the reader be one of those who approach the subject as
unbelievers, I recommend that he should read about these two cases
first, and the others after.

The following abbreviations are used in this Chapter among the
references to authorities:

Magd. Cent. for Magdeburg Centuries, a Protestant History of the
Christian Church compiled at Magdeburg, sixteenth century.

Chron. Hirsaug. for Chronicon Hirsaugiense, a history produced by
Abbot J. Trithemius, 1514.

Cosm. Munst. for Sebastian Munster’s Cosmographia Universalis, 1544.

Spec. Vinc. for Vincent of Beauvais’s Speculum Historiale, of 13th
century.

1171. Blois, France. At Passover, a Christian child was crucified,
his body drained of blood and thrown into the river. A number of Jews
were executed. Authority: Monumenta Germaniæ Historica, VI, 520; Magd
Cent., 12, c. 14 and 13, c. 14.

1179. Pontoise. The authorities for this case are the Bollandists
(Acta, Vol. III, March, 591); Madg. Cent., 23, c. 14; Spec. Vinc, 129,
c. 25; and Cosm. Munst., 23, c. 14. A boy named Richard was tortured,
crucified and bled white. Philip Augustus’s chaplains and historians,
Rigord and Guillaume l’Armoricain, attested this case. The body of the
boy was taken to the Church of the Holy Innocents in Paris and he was
canonised as St. Richard.

Under date 1080, Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates, 1847, p. 282, says:
“Thinking to invoke the divine mercy, at a solemnisation of the
Passover, they (the Jews) sacrifice a youth, the son of a rich
tradesman at Paris, for which all the criminals are executed and all
Jews banished [from] France.”

1192. Braisne. Philip Augustus attended to this case personally, and
had the criminals burnt. It was a case of the crucifixion of a
Christian sold to the Jews by Agnes, Countess of Dreux, who considered
him guilty of homicide and theft. Authority: Histoire des Ducs et
Comtes de Champagne, IV, 1st part, p. 72, Paris, 1865 by A. de
Jubainville; Spec. Vinc., 129, c. 25; Gaguin, L. 6, De Francis; Magd.
Cent., 12, c. 14, col. 1670.

1235. Fulda, Hesse-Nassau. Five children murdered; Jews confessed
under torture, but said the blood was wanted for healing purposes.
Frederick II exonerated the Jews from suspicion, but the Crusaders had
already dealt with a number by putting them to death. Frederick II
called together a number of converted Jews, who denied the existence
of Jewish ritual murder. But Frederick’s bias is evident in his own
words when, in publishing his decision, he gives his objects in
calling these people together, “although our conscience regarded the
innocence of the aforesaid Jews adequately proved on the ground of
several writings.” Had Frederick II lived to-day, he would have relied
little upon religious literature in deciding whether Jewish Ritual
Murder exists or not. Authority: Chron. Hirsaug., and Magd. Cent., 13,
c. 24.

1247. Valreas, France. Just before Easter, a two-year-old girl’s
body was found in the town moat with wounds on forehead, hands and
feet. Jews confessed under torture that they wanted the blood of the
child, but did not say that it was for ceremonial purposes. Pope
Innocent IV said that three of the Jews were executed without
confessing, but the Jewish Encyclopædia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 261, says
they confessed.

1250. Saragossa. A boy crucified, afterwards canonised as St.
Dominiculus. Pius VII, 24th Nov., 1805, confirmed a decree of the
Congregation of Rites of 31st August, according this canonisation.

1261. Pforzheim, Baden. An old woman sold a seven-year-old girl to
the Jews, who bled her, strangled her and threw the body into the
river. The old woman was convicted on the evidence of her own
daughter. A number of Jews were condemned to death, two committing
suicide. Authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, p. 838; Rohrbacher,
L’ Histoire Universelle de l’Eglise Catholique, Vol. XVIII, pp.
697-700; Thos. Cantipranus, De ratione vitæ Vol. II, xxix. The child
was canonised as a saint.

1287. Berne. Rudolf, a boy, was murdered at Passover in the house of
a rich Jew called Matler. Jews confessed that he had been crucified;
many were put to death. The boy was canonised as a martyr, and his
name can be found in several martyrologies. Documental authorities:
Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, April; Helvetia sancta (H. Murer); Karl
Howald, Die Brunnen zu Bern, 1848, p. 250; Cosm. Munst., 13, p. 482.
But a stone monument still exists in Berne commemorating the crime. It
is called The Fountain of the Child-Devourer, and is now on the
Kornhausplatz. It represents a monster, with a Jewish countenance,
eating a child. The figure wears the Judenhut, the hat prescribed for
the Jews to wear by decree of the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215. This
monument was first placed in a street of the Jews’ quarter as a
reminder of the monstrous crime and as a punishment for the whole of
Berne Jewry. Later, it was removed to its present situation.

1288. Troyes, France. Some Jews were tried for a ritual murder and
13 were executed by burning. Authority: Jewish Encyclopædia, 1906,
Vol. XII, p. 267.

1286. Oberwesel, on the Rhine. A boy named Werner was tortured for
three days at Passover, hanged by the legs and bled white. The body
was found in the river. This boy was beatified in the diocese of
Treves, and his anniversary is on 19th April. A sculptured
representation of this ritual murder is still to be seen in the
Oberwesel Church. Authorities: Aventinus, Annals of Bavaria, 1521, 17,
p. 576; Chron. Hirsaug., Magd. Cent., 13, c. 14.

1462. Rinn, Innsbruck. A boy called Andreas Oxner was bought by the
Jews and sacrificed for his blood on a stone in the forest. The body
was found by his mother in a birch-tree. No Jew was apprehended
because, the border being near, they had fled when the crime was made
known. The Abbe Vacandard, defender of the Jews, says there was no
trial. Well, of course there wasn’t. Even in 1937 there is no trial
for a crime where the criminals have escaped! The boy has been
sanctified by Pope Benedict XIV in his Bull Beatus Andreas, Venice,
1778, which says he was “cruelly assassinated by the Jews in hatred of
the faith of Jesus Christ.” This last is admitted by Pope Clement XIV,
who wrote his report on the investigation he made into the matter of
Jewish Ritual Murder when, as Cardinal Ganganelli, he had been
commissioned by Pope Benedict XIV to go into the matter; and in this
report, he says “I admit the truth of another fact, which happened in
the year 1462 in the village of Rinn, in the Diocese of Brixen, in the
person of the Blessed Andreas, a boy barbarously murdered by the Jews
in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ.” No one questions the
historical occurrence of this case. An engraving on wood representing
the Ritual Murder still exists in the church.

1468. Sepulveda, Segovia, Spain. The Jews sacrificed a Christian
child on a cross. The Bishop of Segovia investigated the crime, and
ordered the culprits to Segovia, where they were executed. It is
important to know that this Bishop was himself son of a converted Jew;
Jean d’Avila was his name. Colmenares’s History of Segovia records the
facts of the case, which was juridically decided by a man of Jewish
blood. That may be the reason that one finds no mention of it in
Strack’s book in defence of the Jews, The Jew and Human Sacrifice.

1475. The Case of St. Simon of Trent.
In 1475, a three-year-old boy named Simon disappeared in the Italian
town of Trent; the circumstances were such that suspicion fell upon
the Jews. Hoping to avert this suspicion, they themselves “found” the
child’s body in a conduit where they afterwards confessed to having
thrown it. Examination of the body, however, revealed that the boy had
not been drowned; there were strange wounds on the body, of
circumcision and crucifixion. About seven Jews were arrested; they
were tortured and confessed that the boy had been ritually murdered
for

the purpose of obtaining Christian blood to mix with the ceremonial
unleavened bread; these confessions were made separately and agreed in
all essential details. The Jews were tried and were ultimately
executed. The officer in charge of the investigation of the crime,
Jean de Salis de Brescia, had before him a converted Jew, Jean de
Feltro, who described how his father told him that Jews of his town,
Lanzhat, had killed a child at Passover to get the blood of which they
partook in wine and cakes.

No one has ever dared to try and deny the historical events of this
case; only the Jews invent “reasons” why it was not Ritual Murder! But
there is no escape from the opposite conclusion. In 1759 in answer to
a Jewish appeal from Poland, the Inquisition sent Cardinal Ganganelli
(later he became Pope Clement XIV) to investigate and report on the
whole subject, with particular reference to the many cases then being
reported in Poland; although this man went out with a biased mind in
favour of the Jews (in his report, he says: “With my weak faculties I
endeavoured to demonstrate the non-existence of the crime which was
imputed to the Jewish nation in Poland,” hardly the spirit in which to
enter upon such an investigation!), he actually says of this Trent
case (see Report of Cardinal Ganganelli, in C. Roth’s The Ritual
Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935, p. 83): “I admit then as true the fact
of the Blessed Simon, a boy three years old, killed by the Jews in
Trent in the year 1475 in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ
(although it is disputed by Basnage and Wagenseil); for the celebrated
Flaminio Cornaro, a Venetian Senator, in his work On the Cult of the
Child St. Simon of Trent (Venice, 1753) disposes of all the doubts
raised by the above-mentioned critics.”

The Jews try to throw discredit on the judges who condemned the
Jewish murderers by quoting Pope Sixtus IV who refused to sanction the
cult of St. Simon; but the reason for this was that the cult was not
then authorised by Rome, but was a popular movement without authority
and contrary to Church discipline; this same Pope later expressed his
approval of the verdict on the Jews in the Papal Bull XII Kal. July,
1478.

We have not only the testimony as to the correctitude of the
proceedings from Sixtus IV; but also that of several other Popes; such
as Sixtus V, who regularised the popular cult of St. Simon by
ratifying it in 1588, as cited by Benedict XIV in Book I, Ch. xiv, No.
4 of his On the Canonisation of the Saints; also by this same Pope
Benedict XIV in his Bull Beatus Andreas of 22nd February, 1755, in
which he confirms Simon as a saint, a fact omitted from the arguments
of that advocate for the Jews, Strack (The Jew and Human Sacrifice);
Gregory XIII recognised Simon as a martyr, and even visited the
shrine; and, as already stated, Clement XIV was obliged to recognise
that it was a case of Jewish murder in hatred of Christianity.

St. Simon’s shrine is in the Church of St. Peter, Trent; relics of
him are still shown, among them the sacrificial knife.

In short, the Ritual Murder of St. Simon at Trent is supported by
such evidence that those who doubt it are thereby condemning without
reason high juridical and ecclesiastical authorities whose probity and
intelligence there is not the slightest excuse to deny.

1480. Venice. This case, as admitted in the Jewish Encyclopædia,
1906, Vol. XII, p. 410, was settled by trial. Three Jews were
executed.

1485. Padua, Italy. The victim in this case was canonised as St.
Lorenzino, Pope Benedict XIV mentioning him as a martyr in his Bull
Beatus Andreas. This case was attested by the Episcopal Court of
Padua.

1490. Toledo. This is a most important case, the circumstances of
which have been clarified for us by W. T. Walsh in his interesting
book on Isabella of Spain, 1931 (Sheed & Ward), in which he devotes
pp. 441 to 468 to his researches on this Ritual Murder charge. Had it
not been for Mr. Walsh, I might have been influenced by the Jewish
Encyclopædia’s statement (1903, Vol. III, p. 262) that “Modern
historians even deny that a child had disappeared at all” in this
case! Strenuous efforts were made by Loeb and H. C. Lea to clear the
Jews from guilt of this murder; as also by Abbe Vacandard. Walsh shows
that on 17th October, 1490, a Jew named Yuce confessed to having been
present at the crucifixion of a boy called Christopher at La Guardia,
near Toledo. He made this confession without the “aid” of any torture;
he was not even threatened with that for one year after his
confession. On 19th July, 1491, Yuce was promised immunity from
punishment for himself and described the whole crucifixion and gave
the names of his accomplices. On 25th October, 1491, a jury of seven
noted Renaissance scholars who occupied the Chairs at Salamanca
University examined the case and were unanimous in finding Yuce
guilty. Not until after this did Yuce undergo torture. This torture
was applied to make him say for what reason the boy Christopher had
been crucified instead of being killed in any other way; but no
“leading” questions were employed in the examination. After this, the
case went before a second jury of five learned men of Avila, who
considered the evidence concerning Yuce’s accomplices, who had been
arrested and under examination; they unanimously declared them guilty.
Eight Jews (some of them Marranos, or pretended converts to
Christianity) were executed.

Writing of the efforts made to discredit the trials in this case,
Walsh says (p. 464): “Must we assume that they (the two learned
juries) were all murderous fanatics, willing to sacrifice innocent
men, and that Dr. Loeb, Dr. Lea, and on the Catholic side the somewhat
too credulous Abbe Vacandard were better qualified to weigh the
evidence after the lapse of four centuries?”

Walsh is not an “anti-semite.” He is a historian, and has not
suggested that ritual murder is part of any official Jewish ceremony.
But he says: “The historian, far from being obliged to make wholesale
vindication of all Jews accused of murder, is free, in fact, bound to
consider each individual case upon its merits.”

Walsh states (p. 441) that this case of Ritual Murder was “one of the
chief factors, if not the decisive one, in the decision of Fernando
and Isabel” (for the expulsion of the Jews from Spain). He shows that
the

complete record of testimony in the trial of one of the accused has
been available since it was published in 1887 in the Bulletin of the
Royal Academy at Madrid (Vol. XI, pp. 7-160), from the original
manuscript. (This was, of course, before the Red revolution!)

Walsh charges Lea, the pro-Jewish author, of intellectual dishonesty
(p. 628) in writing in his Inquisition in Spain decrying the
influential men who were jurors in this case.

“If the Inquisitors sent eight men to a shameful death without being
convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt, the honest verdict
of history cannot shrink from finding not only Torquemada and his
judges, but King Fernando and Queen Isabel, Cardinal Mendoza and
several of the most illustrious professors of Salamanca University
guilty of complicity in one of the most brutal judicial murders on
record.” (Walsh, p. 442.)

Those who shrink from charging the Jews with the practice of Ritual
Murder thereby condemn some of the finest characters on the stage of
European history.

Finally, we must record that the murdered boy was canonised as St.
Christopher on the authority of Pope Pius VII.

1494. Tyrnau, Hungary. A boy was bled white and killed. The Jew
culprits were betrayed by the confession of women, who were persuaded
to do so by the sight of some instruments of torture, which however
were not applied to them. The Jews, arrested after this confession,
themselves confessed that this was the fourth child they had killed
for the blood, but they said they wanted this for medical purposes.
Authority: Bollandists, Acta, April, Vol. II, p. 838.

1510. Brandenberg. Several Jews were accused in Berlin of buying a
small Christian boy, bleeding him and killing him. They confessed, and
41 were executed. Authorities: Richard Mun, Die Juden in Berlin; Sir
Richard Burton, The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, 1898, p. 126.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:37:56 EST 2008
Article: 514679 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: KenMcVayWatch
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,pl.regionalne.warszawa,
X-Invalid: de.soc.politik.misc,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.swiss,
X-Invalid: soc.culture.austrian,soc.culture.europe
Subject: Der ewige Jude = The Eternal Jew/ZYD
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:29:52 -0700 (MST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: [email protected]
Lines: 63
Bytes: 2909
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.polish:896177 soc.culture.russian:514679 pl.regionalne.warszawa:532194

Der ewige Jude = The Eternal Jew/ZYD

It is still here at:
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4664969119079760194
as well as at a few other sites, so enjoy seeing this documentary.

On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:02:41 +0200, Matthias Kern
wrote:
>Art Franks schrieb:
>> On 3 Aug 2006 14:22:20 -0700, in can.politics “Listen to Goyfire
>> Radio” wrote:

>>
htt
p://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=8441356137394932381&q=eternal+jews

>Very useful your posting in 6 newsgroups:

>We’re sorry, but this video may not be available.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

Reply-To: Frank Arthur ,
Feel free to call, or even visit me;
FRANK H ARTHUR
378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
ATLANTA, GA 30315
(770) 739-6508
Map to Frankie’s residence:
http://www.google.com/lochp?hl=en&tab=wl&q=378%20MCDONOUGH%20BLVD%20SE+ATL
ANTA+GA+30315

or to Steve Horn ,
or [email protected]

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:37:56 EST 2008
Article: 514680 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.swiss,
X-Invalid: alt.politics.nationalism.white,uk.politics.misc
Subject: ZYD/Jew Ritual Murder – Part 4 of 5 – Documented!
Message-ID:
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:23:10 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Bytes: 36516
Lines: 726
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.russian:514680 alt.politics.europe:79990 soc.culture.swiss:59897

CHAPTER XI.

WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN THE PRESENT CENTURY.

THE best known of these is the Beiliss case at Kiev, 1911-13. It will
be noticed that there are several cases also in Germany at the time
when the Jews were the supreme power there previous to Hitler’s
success.

1900. Konitz, West Prussia. A 19-year-old youth, Ernst Winter, was
murdered in March. His body had been dismembered and parts of it were
found in different localities. The culprits were never discovered, but
two Jewish agents were sentenced to imprisonment for false witness and
for the subornation of

witnesses during the enquiry! The post mortem examination was said to
have shown death due to suffocation, but the county physician had
previously pronounced death to have occurred from loss of blood. A
large assembly of foreign Jews visited the town the night of the
murder and left next day. This case aroused the country against the
Jews, and its description occupied 2½ pages of the Jewish
Encyclopædia.

1911-13. Kiev, Russia.
This is by far the most important proved ritual murder case of the
20th century and is generally known as the Beiliss Case.

In 1911, a 13-year-old boy’s body was found at Kiev with curious
wounds and drained of blood. A Jew named Beiliss was arrested on
suspicion.

It was proved that the murder took place inside the premises of a
Jewish brick factory to which only Jews had access. This factory
contained a Jewish hospice with a secret synagogue attached.

After long-drawn-out preliminaries, Beiliss, who was proprietor of
the factory, was tried; the jury found that there was no proof that he
himself was the culprit, although half of them considered he was; the
verdict therefore having to be unanimous, he was declared Not Guilty.
But the jury agreed as to the cause of the boy’s death; their verdict
about this was as follows:

The boy “after being gagged, was wounded with a perforating
instrument in the nape of the neck, temples and neck, which wounds
severed the cerebral vein, the left temporal and jugular arteries,
producing thus profuse hæmorrhage; and afterwards, when Joutchinski
(the boy’s name) had lost about five glasses of blood. His body was
pierced with the same instrument, lacerating thus the lungs, the
liver, the right kidney and the heart, where the last wounds were
inflicted, in all 47 wounds, causing acute suffering to the victim and
the loss of practically all the blood of the body, and finally
death.”

Thus, although the murder could not be fixed upon any particular
individual, its ritual character was quite certain, the boy being
first bled and then killed.

There were many strange features about this trial, viz.:

(1) On 17th October, 1913, the presiding Judge had to warn the Jewish
pressmen against persisting in reporting perverted renderings of the
evidence, and said that if they continued in this practice, they would
be refused permission to attend the Court.

(2) Two children, Genia and Valentine Tcheberiak, who were important
witnesses against Beiliss, died suddenly shortly after his arrest.
This was after they had eaten sweetmeats given to them by a degraded
police agent called Krassowsky. They were examined by two Jewish
doctors at the hospital and were certified to be suffering from
dysentery, the bacilli of that disease having been found in them
according to the report.

Next, it was discovered that their mother had been offered (and had

refused) a bribe of 40,000 roubles by a Jew lawyer to take upon
herself the guilt for the murder of the stabbed boy Joutchinski.

Finally, the Jews actually suggested she had poisoned the two
children, the Jews having characteristically forgotten for the moment
those dysentery bacilli that had been reported to have been
discovered!

(3) Several important witnesses gave expert opinion that the Jews use
Christian blood to mix with the unleavened bread at certain feasts,
and that Christian children are killed by Jews for the purpose.

One of these was Father Pranaitis, theologian and Hebraist, who
considered that the evidence showed every sign of it being a Jewish
ritual murder. Father Pranaitis said that the Zohar, the cabbalistic
book of the Chassidim sect of Jews, described the ritual of murder,
prescribing thirteen stabs in the right temple, seven in the left one,
which is exactly how the head of the murdered boy had been treated.

Another expert witness was Professor Sikorski of Kiev University, a
medical psychologist, who also regarded the case as one of Ritual
Murder.

After the Jewish Bolshevik revolution, the Cheka shot the Judge, the
Public Prosecutor and many of the witnesses, including Father
Pranaitis, the medical expert Kozoratov, and Professor Sikorski.
Professor Pawlow, who was a witness for the defence, became a leading
scientist in Bolshevik Russia!

The ex-General Alexandre Netchvoldov of the Russian Imperial Army,
tells us the rest in an article, “La Russie et les Juifs,” in Le Front
Unique, published at Oran, 1927, p. 59: Quoting Evrijskaja Tribuna of
24th August, 1922, he says “that at a visit of the Rabbi of Moscow to
Lenin, the first word Lenin said to his visitor was to ask him if the
Jews were satisfied with the Soviet tribunal which had annulled the
Beiliss verdict, saying that Joutchinksy had been killed by a
Christian!”

Yes, Bolshevism is Jewish!

(4) A “British protest,” published in The Times, dated 6th May, 1912,
signed by the usual Archbishops and bishops, together with dukes (such
as the late Duke of Norfolk who had been married to a Jewish woman),
earls (such as Rosebery, married to a Rothschild), and people like the
late Rt. Hon. A. J. Balfour, fulminated against the “revival” of the
Ritual Murder charge; the “Blood Accusation” was described in this
protest as “a relic of the days of witchcraft and black magic, a cruel
and utterly baseless libel on Judaism.”

Is it not amazing that where Jewish interests are concerned,
Englishmen of standing will try to influence the course of justice by
thus interfering before Beiliss had even been tried?

Beiliss died in America in 1934, and his funeral was made that of a
Jewish national hero.

1928. Gladbeck, Germany. This occurred at the time of Purim; twenty-
year-old lad called Helmuth Daube was found dead in front of his home,
with his throat cut, his genital organs missing, whilst there were
wounds on the hands and stabs in the abdomen. There was no blood about
where the body was found and it was bloodless. Experts said in Court
that the throat showed the Jewish ritual cut. The Jews set to work and
eventually a young

Gentile called Huszmann was accused of the murder, unnatural lust
being alleged as a feature in the crime. The case was conducted
against Huszmann by a Jew called Rosenbaum, and special police had
been sent from Berlin to enquire about the circumstances; the
President of the Police at Berlin was the Jew Bernhard Weiss. These
special police did what they could to convince the Court that it was a
“lust-murder,” but Huszmann was acquitted. The Bochumer Abendblatt and
Der Stürmer both gave their opinion that it was a Ritual Murder by
Jews, and the latter paper was suppressed for a time, and its editor
imprisoned.

1929. Manau, Germany. A five-year-old boy named Kessler disappeared
on 17th March. The body was found in a wood, with throat cut from ear
to ear superficially whilst there was a deep stab in the neck cutting
the main vessels. The body was bloodless and there was no blood found
near it. It was just before Passover, and the local Jewish butcher had
suddenly disappeared. Dr. Burgel, the Court doctor, said it was a case
of Ritual Murder. The Jew Money Power got to work to influence the
authorities and public opinion. Before the official inquiry, the
Public Prosecutor announced that it was not a case of Ritual Murder.
The Judge decided the boy had met with an accidental stab from the
branch of a tree or from an animal’s horn, and the case was dropped.
No one was ever arrested for the crime.

1932. Paderborn, Germany. Martha Kaspar was the Gentile servant in
the household of a Jewish butcher named Meyer. This man had a son
Kurt, and this Kurt had had sexual relations with the servant who
became pregnant. She demanded that he should marry her, and the father
and son promised that this should happen, but secretly decided to make
away with the girl. On 18th March, near Purim, she disappeared. Two
days later some human flesh was found on the road, and the Jewish
Press began to spread the idea that there had been a “lust-murder.”
Investigation revealed blood on Kurt’s clothes and in a hayloft of
Meyer’s, and both the Meyers were arrested. Dr. Frank, a Jewish
lawyer, succeeded in getting the father certified as a lunatic and
sent to an asylum, but he was soon freed and fled the country. The
son, Kurt, said he had attempted to procure abortion, and that he had
cut the girl’s body up and distributed it in various places; a doctor
told the Court that some litres of blood must have been taken. Later,
Kurt said he had killed the girl in a fit of temper. The Court brought
in a verdict of manslaughter, and sentenced Kurt Meyer to 15 years’
imprisonment. The general newspapers did not report the case; Der
Stürmer said it was Ritual Murder, and was suppressed for a time.
These circumstances cause me to include this case among the “well-
authenticated” ones.

It will be noted that the last three cases occurred at a time when
the Jews were supreme in Germany just before the Hitler revolution,
when it was easy to suppress all expression of opinion as to the true
nature of the murders.

CHAPTER XII.

THE JEWISH DEFENCE.

THE Jews and their advocates use sundry arguments whereby they seem
to have successfully camouflaged and almost obliterated in this
country the trail of historic fact concerning the practice of Ritual
Murder. When the author was proceeded against in 1936 for daring to
mention Jewish Ritual Murder, the trial was reported in some
newspapers under the heading “Amazing Story,” as though he had
invented it! Let us list the Jewish “arguments” and answer them:

1. That the confessions made by the accused Jews were extracted by
torture.

This is true of many mediæval cases; it is unlikely that the Jews
would confess without such aids to memory, because of the certain dire
consequences that would follow the confession.
But I have shown in Chapter 13 (which see) that many confessions of
the practice of Ritual Murder by Jews have been made by those who have
been converted to the Christian faith and made freely; many
confessions have been made by accused Jews without torture, or by
their relations without torture; whilst at Damascus, where the
bastinado was used to aid the memory of the accused, it inspired them
to reveal where the fragments of the bodies of the murdered men were
to be found, and they were found in the indicated spots; I take it
that Jews do not allege that the bastinado endowed the culprits with
telepathic second sight?
There is thus nothing in the argument.

2. That the Jewish laws not only do not sanction the practice of
Ritual Murder, but forbid the use of blood.

In other words, John Smith cannot be guilty of theft from William
Brown because the Eighth Commandment says ‘Thou shalt not steal.’
There is nothing in this argument, dealt with in Chapter III.

3. That the Blood Accusation is the result of mediæval and ignorant
superstition.

In Chapter V, I show that there were, according to the Jews
themselves, more Blood Accusations in the 19th century than in any
previous one.
There is therefore nothing in this argument.

4. That the guilt of the Jews was not juridically established.

The emptiness of this statement is shown in Chapter XIV, where a
number of cases are quoted in which, through the centuries, competent
and full authority decided the guilt of the accused or approved the
verdict.
There is nothing in this argument.

5. That it couldn’t happen now.

Chapter VI is devoted to meeting this objection.
It will be seen that there is nothing in the objection.
The objection appeals to the good-nature of the Aryan mind which
cannot conceive anything so alien as a desire to commit Ritual

Murder. It is the false teaching of Equality of Race, spread by
Masonry, perverted religion and democracy, that is responsible for
this attitude of mind.

6. That Papal Bulls refuse credence to the charge of Ritual Murder.

This matter is dealt with in Chapter XV.
There are Popes who obviously wished to register their disbelief in
the practice of Ritual Murder by Jews, and did so.
There are other Popes who equally registered by their actions and
Bulls that they did believe in the charge.
So there is nothing in the argument.

7. That Pope Gregory XIV’s report of 1758 (made when he was Cardinal
Ganganelli) is a final and incontrovertible refutation of the charge.

In Chapter XV, I have shown how actually this report by the Cardinal
is proved utterly unreliable as he says in it that “he endeavoured to
demonstrate the non-existence of the crime,” which shows that he did
not endeavour to demonstrate the truth, which is all that an
investigator has any right to do; whilst he specifically admits that
St. Simon of Trent and St. Andreas of Rinn were killed by Jews in
hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ. Thus, Pope Gregory XIV is that
most valuable witness in the support of the Blood Accusation — the
unwilling witness.

8. The charges are unworthy of credence because they have been
brought by anti-semites.

This is an argument used by the Jew, Israel Abrahams, in his article
on Ritual Murder in the 11th edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica,
in which he writes: “The literature on the other side is entirely anti-
semitic and in no instance has it survived the ordeal of criticism.”
How strangely the Jewish mind works! How could anyone fail to be
“anti-semitic” if they believed that Jews commit ritual murder of
Gentile children?
If there is not a glut of literature on the subject in English, it is
not any ordeal of criticism which has brought about the scarcity, but
the Jewish Money Power which has been brought to bear on that
literature, making it so scarce that no one can get hold of it.
Instance, Sir Richard Burton’s The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, by an
author of unimpeachable integrity and illustrious fame, a book the
fate of which has been described on page 28, which see.

So much for the Jews’ methods of defence by argument. Now let us see
what other methods of defence they adopt. These are:

1. The killing of authors or witnesses, or of others with knowledge
of the subject.

On page 27 are recorded the circumstances surrounding the death of
Gougenot des Mousseaux, author of Le Juif, le Judaisme et la
Judaisation, etc.; on page 32 is registered the fact of the death of
child witnesses in the Kiev case, 1911-13; on p. 33 is given the fate
of the Judge, counsel and expert witnesses in the same case, all
murdered by the Jewish Bolsheviks.

2. Violent abuse of lawyers, witnesses for the prosecution or
accusers.

This is a modern development since the Jews obtained control
over the Gentile press. It was marked in cases of the 19th and 20th
centuries.
The Jewish Press in this country has succeeded in so reviling the
name of Herr Julius Streicher, editor of Der Stürmer, that many decent
citizens take it for granted that Herr Streicher is a kind of crazy
and sadistic devil instead of (as we know him to be) a gallant and
faithful German officer.

3. Disappearance of books containing evidence of Ritual Murders.

Under the description of the 1840 Damascus case, I give particulars
of the fate of the Official Dossier, and of Gougenot des Mousseaux’s
and Sir Richard Burton’s books.
The suppression of reports of trials has been noted in pre-Hitler Jew-
controlled Germany in the 20th century.

4. The silencing of reference to Ritual Murder.

The penal laws are stretched in the Jew-run countries to secure the
imprisonment of anyone daring to break the Jew-imposed silence on the
subject of Ritual Murder. Herr Julius Streicher was imprisoned in 1928
for this “offence,” and the author of the present work was sentenced
by a 31st degree Scottish Rite Masonic Judge in 1936 to six months
imprisonment among criminals on a trumped-up charge of the same
nature.
Nevertheless there is no law in England forbidding reference to
Ritual Murder.

5. Deliberate misrepresentation of the statements of authoritative
people.

A good example of this is described on pp. 43-44, where the late
Baron Rothschild endeavoured to use Cardinal Merry del Val’s
confirmation of the authenticity of a certain Papal letter as a
confirmation of a false interpretation of the contents of that letter
made by Baron Rothschild himself. Another example is in the case of
the Jewish Encyclopædia, Hyamson’s History of the Jews in England and
Lucien Wolf’s Essays in Jewish History, all of which assert that the
Khedive of Egypt declared the condemned Jews in the Damascus murder to
be innocent; he simply released them contemptuously for spot cash,
without any such declaration.

6. Bribery of the witnesses for the prosecution, the officials of
the courts, or the Potentates who could overrule those courts.
Examples of this are the cases of Rhodes and of Damascus in 1840,
Tisza Eszlar in 1882, Konitz in 1900, and Kiev, 1911-13.

7. False accusations of innocent people.

As in the cases of Kiev and of Gladbeck.

8. The production of a corpse supposed to be that of the missing
victim, but actually that of someone who died from a cause other than
Ritual Murder; this was done in the Tisza Eszlar case.

9. Refusal or threatened refusal of loans to governments.
From Jewish sources, I give on p. 27 an instance where Rothschild
influence in the matter of loans clearly governed the attitude of the
Austrian consul at Damascus through the Chancellor Metternich, in the
1840 case.
On p. 30 is shown how the same Rothschild family were able to

threaten the Government of Hungary so as to induce it to cause the
acquittal of the accused Jews in the 1882 case at Tisza Eszlar.

In all methods of propaganda, the Jew Money Power finds ready allies
among the gullible Gentiles, particularly among Archbishops,
politicians, and even with Royalty. These rely chiefly on the idea
that the Blood Accusation is a relic of the dark and wicked ages of
the past, an idea which I have shown to have no foundation in fact.

How is it that influential Gentiles so readily lend themselves in
support of the Jews against the Blood Accusation? The answer to this
question deserves a short chapter to itself. (See Chapter XX.)

There have been a number of books published from time to time
refuting the Blood Accusation; some of these are written by Jews,
others by Gentiles. Among such, the best known are those of Strack and
Cecil Roth. The works of Drs. Loeb and Lea are proved worthless; these
concerned the Toledo case of 1490.

The Jew and Human Sacrifice, by H. L. Strack, Regius Professor of
Theology at Berlin, went through eight editions before it was
published in English in 1909. Strack was a Gentile, but his French
edition was prefaced by the Jew Theodore Reinach, who was both son-in-
law and nephew to Baron Jacques Reinach, who was found dead in bed
after a warrant for his arrest had been issued in connection with the
Panama Canal scandal.

The English edition is a book of 289 pages, of which only pp. 160 to
274 are relevant to the issue. The book is damned because (1) there
is no mention of the case of St. Hugh of Lincoln; (2) no mention of
Benedict XIV’s Bull in which that Pope beatifies St. Simon of Trent, a
victim of ritual murder, whilst the Bulls of other Popes are freely
quoted as an argument against the Blood Accusation; (3) in describing
the Damascus case, no mention is made that the flogging of the accused
Jews caused them actually to reveal where the remains of the two
murdered men were to be found; and (4) the authorities quoted by
Strack with regard to the La Guardia, Toledo, ritual murder have been
proved by Walsh utterly unreliable.

The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935, by the Jew, Cecil Roth, is
adequately dealt with on page 45, which see.

CHAPTER XIII.

EVIDENCE OF CONVERTED JEWS.

Jews who have professed conversion to Christianity have sometimes
denied that there is any practice of Ritual Murder of Christians among
people of the Jewish faith. On the other hand, many “converts” have
confessed that Jews practice Ritual Murder.

When one considers that the history of the Marrano (“converted” Jew)
community has conclusively shown that the conversion of these Jews was
simply a ruse and as false as the Jew himself, and that the
establishment of the Inquisition of Spain was almost entirely due to
the

fact that the pretended converts could be dealt with in no other way,
they practising Jewish rites secretly whilst outwardly pretending to
be devout followers of the Church, one will naturally place more
credence on those “converts” who admit that Jewish Ritual Murder is
practised than on those who deny it.

It would be interesting to know whether those converts, who have
admitted the fact of Ritual Murder, were people with a mixture of
either the Aryan or of the Alpine racial strain in their blood. But
that knowledge is denied to us.

The cases which have come to light in which Jewish converts to
Christianity or to Mahomedanism have confessed that Ritual Murder is
practiced by Jews are chronologically arranged below:

1144. Theobald, a monk and a Jewish convert, of Cambridge, came
forward at the time when enquiry was being made into the death of St.
William of Norwich, and said that as a Jew in Norwich he himself had
known that a child was to be sacrificed at that place in 1144. He said
that the custom of the Jews was to draw lots as to where the deed
should be done, and that it fell to Norwich to supply the blood which
was required by them in the year 1144; the Jews believed that without
the shedding of human blood, they could never gain their freedom and
return to Palestine.

1468. Bishop Jean d’Avila, himself the son of a converted Jew,
actually investigated the Ritual Murder case in Segovia, Spain, and
himself found the Jews guilty, who were afterwards executed (see page
18).

1475. Hans Vayol, converted Jew, charged the Rabbi of Ratisbon with
Ritual Murder for the sake of the blood. Authority: Jewish
Encyclopædia, Vol. II, p. 16 (1903).

1475. Wolfkan of Ratisbon, Jewish convert to Christianity, charged
the Jews with the Ritual Murder of St. Simon of Trent for the sake of
the blood they required for their Passover celebrations. Authority:
Ibid, Vol. XII, p. 554 (1906).

1475. A converted Jew, Jean de Feltro, described to the officer
investigating the Ritual Murder of St. Simon of Trent, how his father
had told him that the Jews of his town had killed a child at Passover
to get the blood for their Passover bread.

1490. Torquemada, himself of Jewish blood (Roth, History of the
Marranos, 1931, p. 39), must have confirmed the sentence of death
against the Jews responsible for the Toledo ritual murder, and it
would be through him that Ferdinand and Isabella would learn about it.
The Ritual Murder case was one of the main factors which disposed the
King and Queen to expel the Jews from Spain.

1494. Alonzo de Spina, stated by a Jew historian to have been of
Jewish blood (History of the Marranos, Roth, 1932, p. 34) accused the
Jews of murdering children for ritual purposes. He occupied the high
position of Rector of Salamanca University, and his accusation was
made in his work Fortalitium Fidei.

1555. Hananel di Foligno, of Rome, Jewish convert to Christianity,
accused the Jews before Pope Marcellus II of the Ritual Murder of a
boy. Enquiry under the auspices of a Cardinal resulted in a Mahomedan
apostate, guardian of the murdered boy, being charged with the
crucifixion of his ward “for the sake of getting possession of some
property.” This sounds like the usual cock-and-bull story which, under
the powerful influence of Jew Money, is resorted to when Courts are
faced with the difficult job of shielding Jews from “the Blood
Accusation.” Why on earth should the man crucify the boy instead of
quietly getting rid of him in a more usual manner? Authority: Jewish
Encyclopædia (1903), Vol. V, p. 423.

1614. Samuel Friedrich Brenz, a Jew, who was converted in 1610,
wrote a book revealing the Ritual Murder practice of the Jews. It was
called Judischer Abgestreifter Schlangenbalg and was published at
Nuremberg. The title translated is The Jewish Serpent’s Skin Stripped.
The Jewish Encyclopædia’s description of the author speaks of his
“crass ignorance, hatred, falsehood and pernicious fanaticism.” The
book was republished in 1680 and again in 1715.

1720. Paul Christian Kirchner, converted Jew, admitted in his
Judisches Ceremoniel, Frankfurt, that dried Christian blood was
considered useful as a remedy for certain diseases of women.

18–. Paulus Meyer, converted Jew, accused the Jews of Ritual Murder
in his Wolfe in Schafsfell, Schafe in Wolfspelz (Wolf in Sheep’s
Clothing, etc.). He had a libel action brought against him by the Jews
he accused of being involved in a case of alleged ritual murder, and
was sentenced to four months’ arrest.

The Jewish Encyclopædia describes all these last three authors as
“malicious and ignorant enemies of their people.”

17–. A converted Jew, Serafinovicz, wrote a book admitting Ritual
Murder as a Jewish practice. Authority: The Jew, C. Roth, Ritual
Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935, p. 24.

1759. A converted Jew, J. J. Frank, formed a sect called the
Frankists at Lemberg. These people were all Jews who had become
Christians in revolt against the evils taught in the Talmud. They said
that it was the Talmud which was the root of all the troubles between
Jews and Gentiles. Prince Etienne de Mikoulissky, administrator of the
archdiocese of Lemberg, instituted public debates between the
Frankists and the Talmudic Jews. A debate held in July took place in
which various matters were dealt with point by point until six points
had been settled; the seventh one was the Frankists’ declaration that
“the Talmud teaches the employment of Christian blood and he who
believes in the Talmud ought to make use of this blood.” The Frankists
said they had learned this in their youth as Jews. Under the heading
Baruch Yavan, the Jewish Encyclopædia, 1903, Vol. II, p. 563, admits
that the Frankists brought the blood accusation against the
Talmudists; also in Vol. VII, p. 579, under Judah Lob ben Nathan
Krysa.

The Frankists completely defeated their opponents in these debates.
Ultimately they became assimilated into the Christian community.

There is a large bibliography with reference to the Frankist
community, of which the following two works may receive mention here:
La malfaisance juive, by Pikulski, Lvov, 1760; and Materiaux sur la
question relative aux accusations portees contre les Juifs a propos
des crimes rituels, by J. O. Kouzmine, St. Petersburg, 1914.

1803. A converted ex-Rabbi wrote a book in the Moldavian language in
1803 which was published again in Greek in 1834 by Giovanni de Georgio
under the title Ruin of the Hebraic Religion. This converted Rabbi
called himself by the name Neophyte. Extracts from his book were
quoted in Achille Laurent’s Relation Historique des Affaires de Syrie
depuis 1840 à 1842, a book described on p. 24 under the Damascus case.
This extract gives very full information, confirms the murder,
crucifixion and bleeding of Christians by Jews for Ritual purposes and
the use of the blood for mixing with the Passover bread; and says that
the practice is handed down by oral tradition and that nothing appears
about it in writing in the Jewish religious books. Monniot in his Le
Crime Ritual chez les Juifs copies long extracts from Laurent’s
quotations from Neophyte.

1826. Paul Louis Bernard Drach, ex-Grand Rabbi of Strasburg,
published a Deuxième lettre d’un rabbin converti, Paris, 1827. On page
7 he said: “The zeal of these Rabbis goes as far as dedicating to
death all those who follow the doctrine of the Trinity, and
consequently all Christian Israelites.”

1840. Ex-Rabbi Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, who became a Mahommedan during
the Damascus Ritual Murder trial, gave evidence that the blood of the
murdered Father Thomas had been ordered by the Grand Rabbi Yakoub el
Entabi, and was required for the use of zealous persons who sent
Yakoub their flour for Passover, in which he mixed the Christian’s
blood. The employment of the blood was a secret of the Grand Rabbis.

1913. A converted Jew, Cesare Algranati, enumerated a number of
ritual murders for a book Cahiers Romains, 1913, a Catholic
publication of Rome. Its date was 29th November, 1913. Over 100 cases
are cited, of which 27 were in the 19th century. Authority: A. Arcand,
in Le Miroir, Montreal, September, 1932, p. 12.

CHAPTER XIV.

CASES CONFIRMED BY CONSTITUTED AUTHORITY.

THE Jews are wont to pretend that the Blood Accusation, as they call
it, is the product of mediæval superstition and credulity, and anti-
Jewish prejudice. They bring forward as examples cases where Jews have
been wrongfully charged with Ritual Murder or against whom there was
insufficient evidence, the mob taking the initiative and lynching
every Jew it could lay hands on.
Such things have occurred, but they are quite useless in support of
the Jewish claim of innocence of Ritual Murders.
There is an exact analogy in more modern times in the case of the
negroes of the Southern States of the U.S.A. Everyone knows that
lynching has been resorted to where negroes have been suspected of
certain outrages against white women and children. Everyone knows also
that sometimes the mob, in its racial thirst for vengeance, and in its
impatience of the slow and corrupt legal procedure, has lynched
innocent men. But no one will argue on such grounds that negroes
guilty of such offences have not frequently met with the rough justice
they deserved at the hands of the mob, or that negroes never attack
white women and children! Yet the Jews bring forward this same rotten
argument to shield themselves from the charge of Ritual Murder!
Because innocent Jews have been lynched, no Jew ever does a Ritual
Murder!
We have, fortunately, many cases on record in which constituted
authority has duly tried the Jewish murderers and found them guilty,
or has, sometimes without finding the culprit, given a verdict
concerning the cause of death which leaves no doubt as to its ritual
character. Let me enumerate some of these:

1192. Jews convicted after personal investigation by Philip
Augustus, a sagacious man of good judgment.

1255. The case of “Little St. Hugh” at Lincoln, duly tried by proper
authority and the judgment approved of by King Henry III.

1288. Jews tried by proper authority for ritual murder at Troyes.

1468. Jews tried by the Bishop of Segovia, himself son of a
converted Jew.

1475. Jews tried at Trent by proper authority.

1480. Jews tried at Venice by proper authority.

1485. Jews tried at Padua by proper authority.

1490. Jews tried for the Toledo ritual murder by the most learned
men of the Universities of Salamanca and of Avila, under proper
authority.

1494. Jews tried by proper authority for ritual murder at Hungary.

1670. Jew tried by proper authority at Metz. Sentenced by order of
Parliament.

1698. Jew tried by the highest tribunal of the land for a ritual
murder at Sandomir, Poland.

1748. Jews tried for ritual murder at Duniagrod, Poland, by
Episcopal Court.
1753. Jews tried by Episcopal Court at Kiev for a ritual murder at
Zhytomir.

1753. Jews tried by Episcopal Court for ritual murder at Pavalochi,
Poland.

1831. Jews tried by proper authority at St. Petersburg for ritual
murder.

1840. Jews tried by proper authority at Damascus for the ritual
murder of Father Thomas and his servant.

1852 and 1853. Jews tried for two ritual murders at Saratov. Actual
trial eight years after the murder.

1899. Jew convicted of the Polna murder by proper authority.

1911-13. Verdict of the Court in the Kiev case that the victim had
been first bled and then killed; murderer not identified. See p. 32.

Finally we may also mention the case at Breslau in 1888 (see Chapter
XVIII) where a rabbinical student was found guilty of extracting blood
>from a Christian boy without intention to cause fatal injury.
It is interesting to note that when the Jew, Jacob Selig, made his
appeal to the Pope in 1758 complaining of “persecution” of Jews in
Poland by means of the blood accusation, he admitted that the cases he
complained of had been brought before the Courts!
In pre-Hitler Jew-controlled Germany, there were several cases in
which the Courts were obviously made use of for the smothering of the
Ritual Murder Accusation, just as the Old Bailey was made use of in
1936 in an endeavour to silence me on the same matter.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:37:58 EST 2008
Article: 514682 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
X-Invalid: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.swiss,
X-Invalid: alt.politics.nationalism.white,uk.politics.misc
Subject: ZYD/Jew Ritual Murder – Part 3 of 5 – Documented!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:11:51 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Lines: 625
Bytes: 33321
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.russian:514682 alt.politics.europe:79991 soc.culture.swiss:59898

CHAPTER IX.

WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH
CENTURIES.

NATURALLY, here we get a number of juridically decided cases, as might
be expected.

1603. Verona. A Jew was tried on a charge of killing a child to get
its blood for an infamous purpose. He was acquitted. The sentence of
acquittal, dated 28th February, 1603, given in full in the Jew Roth’s
The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew (p. 78), released the accused
“because the Hebraic rite abhors the shedding of blood” and “various
Princes held this rumour of the use of blood to be vain and false.” We
hold that such absurd reasoning as an excuse for acquittal is clear
proof that the Court was bought.

1670. Metz. As this was a very strongly established case, one does
not find any mention of it in Strack’s book in defence of the Jews! A
three-year-old boy was lost by his mother on the way to a well. The
boy was wearing a red cap, and witnesses had seen him carried away by
a Jew mounted on a horse. This Jew was Raphael Levi. At first, the
boy’s body could not be traced. The Jews, becoming frightened, spread
the report that wolves must have killed him in the forest. The forest
was searched and eventually the head, neck and ribs of a boy were
found, together with clothes which were identified as the missing
boy’s, red cap and all, by the boy’s father. But as these clothes were
neither torn nor bloody, it was concluded that the wolf story was a
“blind,” and then witnesses came forward who had seen Raphael Levi
with the boy in such places and at such times as to remove all doubt
of his guilt. Levi was sentenced to death by the order of the
Parliament of Metz, and was burned alive. Authority: La France Juive,
by Drumont.

1698. Sandomir, Poland. Authority: The Jew Cecil Roth, in Ritual
Murder Libel and the Jew, p. 24. The highest tribunal in the land,
that of Lublin, condemned a Jew for Ritual Murder, the local court
having exculpated him.

1748. Duniagrod, Poland. Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by
Episcopal Court. Mentioned by Roth.

1753. Pavalochi, Poland. Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by
Episcopal Court. Mentioned by Roth.

1753. Zhytomir, Poland. In this case, a three-year-old boy was
murdered; Jews were tried by the Episcopal Court of Kiev and condemned
to death. A painting supposed to commemorate this murder is even now
visited by pilgrims to the Carthusian Monastery at Kalwarya near
Cracow. Authority: The Jew Cecil Roth, in Ritual Murder Libel and the
Jew, p. 25.

Of course, the Jew Roth denies that the cases quoted were Ritual
Murders.

CHAPTER X.

WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN NINETEENTH CENTURY.

AMONG these are the famous cases at Damascus, 1840; Tisza Eszlar,
1882; and Polna, 1899. In this century, the Jewish Money Power had
obtained control over the finances of many European countries, and the
reader will see for himself how it was exerted on Rulers, Governments,
Courts and “public opinion” whenever the Blood Accusation was brought
against the Jews.

1823. Velisch, Russia. On Easter Sunday, a 2½-year-old boy
disappeared. His body was found in a marsh one week later; there were
punctured wounds all over the body and the skin was scarified. There
were wounds of circumcision; the feet were bloody and a bandage had
been tied around the legs. The body had been

undressed, washed, and again dressed. No blood was found near the
body, which was drained of blood. Doctors gave evidence on oath that
the child had been tortured to death. Some years later, five Jews were
arrested together with three Russian women who had become Jewesses;
these three women confessed that they had, one week before Passover in
1823, been made drunk by a Jewess who kept an inn and that the latter
had bribed one of them to procure a boy. One of these converted
Jewesses described how the boy had been forcibly circumcised by the
Jews and rolled about in a barrel until his skin was scraped all over.
The boy had been taken to the school where a number of Jews were
assembled, laid in a trough, and all present had made stabs with a
nail in his side and temples. When the boy died under this torture,
his body was taken to a wood by two of the converted Jewesses; and the
third woman took a bottle of the blood of the boy to the Jewess
innkeeper aforesaid. Next day, the Rabbi’s wife took the three women
again to the school where the Jews were gathered; bottles were filled
>from the trough by means of a funnel, and the Rabbi dipped a nail into
the blood and dropped a little onto a number of pieces of cloth, one
piece of which was given to everyone present. The case went to the
Imperial Council at St. Petersburg, all the lower courts which dealt
with the case having found the Jews guilty. The Imperial Council
reversed the verdict and, on 18th January, 1835, the three Russian
Jewish convert women were sent to Siberia whilst all the Jews were
acquitted of the crime! Authorities: Recorded in the Jewish
Encyclopædia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 267; described in Der Stürmer, May,
1934.

1831. St. Petersburg. The daughter of a non-commissioned officer was
the victim in this case. There were five judges, of whom four
recognised the ritual character of the murder. The Jewish murderers
were transported to Siberia. Monniot says the facts of this case are
not contested.

1840. Rhodes. On the eve of Purim a small Greek boy was missed; he
had been seen entering a house in the Jewish quarter; after that he
was never seen again. It is interesting to note that the time of this
event was the same as in the famous Damascus case, which see. Yusuf
Pasha, Governor of the island, took depositions of witnesses and sent
to Constantinople for instructions as to what to do next. Meanwhile,
“at the instigation of the Greek clergy and the European
consuls” (admits the Jewish Encyclopædia, 1905, Vol. X, p. 401) the
Jewish quarter was blockaded and the leading Jews arrested. The
Austrian Consul, however, supported the Jews, Austria being in need of
loans from the Rothschilds. But “owing to the efforts of Count
Camondo, Cremieux and Montefiore” (to quote again from the Jewish
Encyclopædia) “a firman was obtained from the Sultan which declared
all accusations of ritual murder null and void.” The Jews were
released! Now Camondo, Cremieux and Montefiore were all rich Jews.
Cremieux

and Montefiore figure in the Damascus case, which see. Count Camondo
“exercised so great an influence over the sultans Abd-al-Majid and Abd-
al-Aziz and over the Ottoman Grand Viziers and ministers that his name
became proverbial. He was banker to the Ottoman Government….” (All
this is from the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 521) There
cannot be a shadow of doubt that the proceedings in this case were
stopped by the force of the Jewish Money Power, in spite of all the
efforts of “the Greek clergy and the European consuls.” Authorities:
M. P.-N. Hamont in Egypt under Mehemet Ali, and the Jewish
Encyclopædia as cited.

1840. The Damascus Case.
This case, now almost completely forgotten by Democracy, convulsed
Europe for a considerable time owing to the agitation induced by the
Jewish Money Power which left no stone unturned to misrepresent and
vilify the individuals responsible for bringing the Jews to justice.

Achille Laurent, a Member of the Société Orientale, brought together
the full details of the trial of the culprits as reported in Arab
newspapers at the time, and he published the whole facts of the case
in Relation historique des Affaires de Syrie, 1840-1842 (Historic
Account of Syrian Affairs, 1840-1842), which was produced in France as
a Yellow Book in two volumes, in 1846.

The Jewish Festival of Purim fell on 15th February, 1840. Father
Thomas, a Catholic monk disappeared in Damascus on 5th February. His
servant went to look for him and disappeared also.

The French Consul, Comte Ratti-Menton, began to make enquiries, and
got the Sherif Pasha to investigate. After a while seven Jews were
arrested. They confessed, some after receiving chastisement with the
bastinado, to having murdered Father Thomas for the sake of his blood.
Four of them were promised pardon if they would speak the truth; these
were Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, who became a Mahomedan, explaining that that
was necessary before he could confess about the crimes of other Jews;
Aslan Farkhi; Suliman, a barber; and Mourad el Fathal. They confessed
very fully. Sixteen Jews were found to have been involved, and all
were arrested.

Several of the Jews, including Mourad el Fathal, Mousa Abou-el-Afieh,
Isaac Arari and Aaron Arari, described how the blood was required and
collected from the cut throat of the victim to send to a Rabbi for use
in preparing ceremonial bread (pains azymes).

The Grand Rabbi was brought before the Court of Investigation; his
name was Yakoub el Entabi. He was required to listen carefully to the
examination of Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, and to the answers of that Jew,
and to confirm or deny each statement made by Mousa. In this way, the
Rabbi admitted that blood was required for the ceremonial bread. He
also confessed to having received Father Thomas’s blood.

According to the Turkish custom, the bastinado was freely applied to
make the Jews speak. The Jewish Money Power has endeavoured to make
the world believe that it was only the torture which enforced
confession from innocent men.

Unfortunately for the Jewish Money Power, one of the questions asked
was about the place where the remains of Father Thomas had been
disposed of; and the remains were found where the prisoners said they
were — that is, in a covered conduit. These remains were identified
by European doctors as being those of Father Thomas.

Further, the wretches confessed to serving Father Thomas’s servant in
the same way, i.e., cutting his throat, collecting his blood, and
disposing of the remains, this time in a latrine.

No amount of bastinado or torture could wring from an innocent man
information as to the whereabouts of the remains of the victim of a
murder.

We spare the reader the sickening details of the crime according to
the confessions and admissions of the depraved Jewish murderers; long
extracts from the trial’s proceedings can be obtained in the following
French book: Le Crime Rituel chez les Juifs, by A. Monniot, prefaced
by the celebrated Edouard Drumont, 1914, from P. Tequi, 82 Rue
Bonaparte, Paris, price 10 francs. This book shows that the
confessions made by the culprits agreed in every detail, and that the
questions they had to answer were not “leading questions”.

Fourteen Jews were found guilty, and ten were condemned to death, two
having died.

Our business is not to horrify; it is to expose the methods of Jewish
intrigue and corruption which were used to conceal the guilt of the
culprits in fear of the natural reaction of the Gentile to the facts
if they became generally known.

As soon as the first reports of the case reached the West of Europe
the Jewish Money Power rose like one man to try and cover the obvious
tracks made by the obvious criminals. Money can, as we know only too
well, accomplish wonders on a democracy as also on the findings and
policy of Eastern (and alas! often also Western) potentates.

It will perhaps be best to deal with each of these matters
separately:

1. The Press Agitation. This was on the usual Jewish lines; Ritual
Murder was “a Gentile invention”; Comte Ratti-Menton, the French
Consul, who had insisted on the investigation, was attacked from every
angle; the Jews were being persecuted, and so on and so forth.

2. Agitation by Public Meetings. For example, in London, the
gullible democracy was induced to flock to a big meeting at the
Mansion House in London, there to denounce the Blood Accusation of
which they knew nothing at all, and to offer the Jews the sympathy of
the British Nation! Paris, New York, Philadelphia and other towns
followed suit!

3. Bribery of the Khedive of Egypt by Money. The rich Jews, Moses
Montefiore in England, Cremieux and Munck in France, went off hotfoot
to the East. They applied to the Khedive of Egypt, whose regime
included Damascus, for a revision of the sentence. He was offered and
accepted a huge sum of money and released the condemned Jews.

Note the result. The Jews proclaimed everywhere that the Khedive had
reversed the verdict! He had done nothing of the kind. There was no

reversal and no re-trial. The words of the Khedive’s firman which he
issued to release the Jewish murderers give the whole thing away:

“From the account and demand of Messrs. Moses Montefiore and
Cremieux, who came to us as delegates of all Europeans professing the
religion of Moses, we have recognised that they desire the liberation
and safety for the Jews who have been detained or who have taken
flight in the case of the examination of the affair of Father Thomas,
monk, missing in Damascus; he and his servant, Ibrahim.

“And as, because of their numerous population, it would not be
convenient (convenable) to refuse their demand and request, we order
that the Jew prisoners shall be released and that the fugitives be
given safety for their return. And you will take all possible measures
that none are badly treated and that they are left undisturbed
everywhere. Such is our will. Mehemet Ali.”

He released the Jews therefore because of the numbers of Jews in the
population . . . and undoubtedly for cash received. He knew their
guilt, and never denied it. Yet the Jewish Encyclopædia (1903, Vol.
IV, p. 420) actually ventures to assert that the three rich Jews
secured from the Khedive a “recognition of the innocence” of the
condemned men. The Khedive’s price for releasing them is stated to
have been half a million piastres. A converted Rabbi, Chevalier P. L.
B. Drach, wrote in his The Harmony between the Church and the
Synagogue (1844, Paris, p. 79): “Money played a great role in this
business.”

4. Bribery of the Sultan. Having won the first round with the
Khedive, the Jew Montefiore went on to see the Sultan of Turkey, and
secured from him a decree that the Blood Accusation was baseless and
that the Jews henceforth were to be on the same footing in the
Sultan’s dominions as other non-Muslims. The price of this was a huge
bribe from the House of Rothschild.

The Sultan Abd-ul-Mejid’s firman said “that a thorough examination of
the religious books of the Hebrews has demonstrated the absolute
prohibition of the use of either human or animal blood in any of their
religious rites. It follows from this defence that the charges against
them and their religion are calumnies.” This, as shown in Chapter III,
is mere sophistry, but even in 1936 a Miss C. M. Finn had the
effrontery to bring forward the firman as “evidence” that the Blood
Accusation is false; this was in a letter to the Jewish Chronicle, 2nd
October, 1936.

The wording of the firman is quoted in the Jewish Encyclopædia, Vol.
I, p. 47 (1906).

On his way home, Montefiore tried to get an audience with the Pope,
Gregory XVI, but was refused an audience.

5. Attempted Bribery of the French Consul. Comte Ratti-Menton, the
French Consul who had shown such determination in having the ritual
murderers dealt with, and who was a most upright man, wrote to the
Sherif Pasha on 22nd April to say that the Jews had, through the
Austrian Consulate, offered him half a million piastres to have the
evidence suppressed. Needless to say, when this honourable man was
found in-

corruptible, the advocates of the Jews got busy as stated above to
besmirch his reputation. Thiers, the French Foreign Secretary,
replying to Jew-inspired attacks on the French Consul Ratti-Menton,
stated in the Chamber of Deputies, 3rd June, 1840, “Let it be known to
you, gentlemen, I repeat it, that in all the Chancellories the
Israelites are in insistence for that affair and our Consul can lean
only on the Minister of Foreign Affairs for France. A French agent who
is in his right will always be protected against all influences,
whatever they may be.” M. Thiers also said that the Comte’s superior
officer, M. Cochelet, Consul for Egypt, approved of his subordinate’s
action and that the English Consul was of the same mind.

6. Bribery of Austrian Diplomats. Throughout the proceedings, the
Austrian Consul supported the Jews against the charge of ritual
murder. Here, from a Jewish source, is the reason, duly confessed:
>From The History of the Jews in Vienna, by the Jew, Max Grunwald, 1936
(Philadelphia), pp. 228-9:

“Following the policy of the House [of Rothschild] in other
countries, where it obtained privileges for the Jews in return for
loans — in Rome, the abolition of the Ghetto, and in England, Jewish
emancipation — Solomon [Rothschild] obtained from Metternich
concessions to the Jews in legislation. It was he who influenced the
Chancellor to take a favourable stand in the Damascus blood-accusation
case of 1840.”

There you have it; Rothschild’s money power; the Austrian Chancellor,
Metternich; the Austrian Consul at Damascus; the Consul’s attitude
towards the Ritual Murder charge. A continuous chain of Jewish
corruption by Money.

7. Suppression of the Reports of the Trial. We have already mentioned
in the second paragraph of this description of the case the record of
the trial published in Achille Laurent’s book. This book cannot now be
obtained anywhere. Gougenot des Mousseaux, however, had printed a very
full account of the trial (taken from Laurent) in his work Le Juif, le
Judaisme et la Judaisation des Peuples Chretiens, a work which earned
for him the praise of Pope Pius IX who made him a Chevalier; and the
writer has had a copy of this lent to him. But Gougenot des
Mousseaux’s book is now very rare, and the Chevalier himself died
suddenly in mysterious circumstances nine hours after receiving a
warning letter. Monniot, in a work mentioned in the Bibliography (p.
56), has, however, made it easy for anyone who desires to read the
details of the trial to do so.

But, the reader may ask, what about the official dossier of the
affair? This naturally reposed in the archives of the French Foreign
Office. But Desportes in his Mystère du Sang reported that under the
Ministry of Cremieux (one of the Jews who went East to bribe the
Khedive to release the ritual murderers of Damascus) it disappeared
(in 1870)! As this report aroused comment, the Chancellerie made a
declaration (5th May, 1892) that it was incorrect and that the dossier
remained complete at the Ministry. However that may be, when Albert
Monniot in 1913 desired to consult the documents themselves to assist
him in writing his Le Crime

Rituel chez les Juifs, he found that he was refused permission to
peruse them. Whether they are still extant or not, therefore, we
cannot tell; all we know is that the secrets of the Jew are well
guarded. But not well enough, as I hope the reader will by now agree.

Sir Richard Burton, the great explorer and orientalist who was
English Consul at Damascus 30 years after the Ritual Murder, studied
the whole question of the Blood Accusation, and eventually wrote The
Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, of which I have the edition edited by W.
H. Wilkins and published by Hutchinson in 1898. This work contains a
damning indictment of the Talmud, and a list of Jewish Ritual Murders,
but Wilkins in his Preface (p. x) writes: “In the exercise of the
discretion given to me, I have thought it better to hold over for the
present the Appendix on the alleged rite of Human Sacrifice among the
Sephardim and the murder of Padre Tomaso (Father Thomas); the only
alternative was to publish it in a mutilated form.”

Let us follow therefore (1) the Book, (2) the Appendix on Ritual
Murder.

(1) The Book. This is easy. It is well nigh unobtainable.

(2) The Appendix on Ritual Murder. What happened to it? This is what
happened to it:

See D. L. Alexander versus Manners Sutton, King’s Bench Division,
27th March, 1911, reported in The Times the following day. Herein D.
L. Alexander, a Jew and President of the Jewish Board of Deputies was
able to show that he had obtained an assignment of the manuscript from
the surviving executors of Sir Richard Burton. The executors had sold
them to a bookseller, who, in turn, sold them to Manners Sutton; and
he (Sutton), not knowing of any assignment, made arrangements for the
publication of the Appendix. D. L. Alexander brought the action to
stop this publication from taking place, claiming copyright and
delivery to him of the manuscript. The Jew won his case.

It remains only to say that Father Thomas’s gravestone in the
cemetery at Damascus bore (and presumably still bears) the inscription
in Arabic and in Italian: “Here lie the remains of Father Thomas of
Sardinia, Capuchin Missionary, assassinated by the Jews, 5th February,
1840.”

1852 and 1853. Saratov. Two ritual murders are involved this time;
one, a 10-year-old boy in December, 1852; the other, 11-year-old, in
January, 1853. After a flood, both bodies were found on the bank of
the Volga, pierced with many wounds. Eight years afterwards, two Jews,
Schiffermann and Zourloff, were duly tried for these murders and
convicted. They were sentenced to 28 years’ labour in the mines, and
they died during their imprisonment. This, being a juridically decided
case, the sentence in which was passed for “killing two Christian boys
and having made them endure marytrdom” by the Senate and submitted to
the Russian Empire Council, is, of course, not mentioned in Strack’s
book! Authority: Monniot’s Le Crime Rituel chez les Juifs, 1914, p.
257.

1880. Smyrna. Many Jews were massacred after a missing child’s body
had been found on the beach covered with punctured wounds at Passover.
Authority: Moniteur de Rome, 15th June, 1883.

1882. The Tisza Eszlar Case in Hungary.
This is a nineteenth century case, where the prisoners had duly
confessed, and where, after long drawn out proceedings, they were all
acquitted as the result of the Organised Power of Jewish Money.

Esther Solymosi, 14 years old, disappeared on 1st April; the five-
year-old son of the Jewish sexton told some women that his mother had
enticed the girl into their house, whence she had been slipped by some
Jews into the synagogue premises. This report came to the ears of Mrs.
Solymosi, Esther’s mother, who immediately reported to the police. An
enquiry was set on foot, on 19th May, under Dr. Josef Bary, and it is
largely from a book written 50 years later by Dr. Bary, who became
President of the Supreme Court of Justice in Hungary, that the facts
of the enquiry have come to light. This book is of over 600 pages, and
is called A tiszaeszlari bunper (The Tisza Eszlar Murder Trial). These
facts can also be checked from the diary of the Hungarian Minister for
Justice of the period, Theodor Pauler, which diary had been kept in
the Hungarian National Museum.

Another son of the Jewish sexton was Maurice Scharf, aged 14. He
admitted that he had seen through the keyhole of the synagogue door
that Esther had been murdered by certain Jews and bled white, her
blood being collected in a vase. It was found by ocular view on the
spot that the place where these events were said to have occurred was
actually in sight to anyone looking through the keyhole. Witnesses
also said they had heard cries from the synagogue on the day when the
girl was first missing.

To test the veracity of the 14-year-old Maurice, the Judge told him
that his tale could not be true as Esther was alive; the boy replied
that “no one could be alive after being cut on the neck like that.”

A number of Jews were arrested, and confessed that they had taken
part in the ritual murder of Esther to get her blood for the
Passover.

One would think that there would be little more to report.

But no! All Israel got to work with its Money Power, and the Press of
every country in Europe was employed to throw calumny on the Hungarian
Court and on Hungarian Justice. The Public Prosecutors were bribed and
set to work to discredit the honourable Judge who presided over the
Court. No stone was left unturned, no filthy corrupting action left
untried, to defeat the course of justice; and the Jews won. Here are
some of the minor methods by which the Jews with their money tried to
confuse the issue:

1. By paying the debts of, or bribing the officials.

2. By offering Esther’s mother a bribe to say that her daughter was
alive and in a situation elsewhere. This was done by the Jew
Reiszmann.

3. By trying to steal the Court records from the house of the Judge.

4. By altering the synagogue lock, so that it was no longer possible
to see the place of the murder by looking through the keyhole.

5. By spreading reports that Esther had run away; or had been

drowned. The Examining Judge caused the river to be dragged without
result.

6. By arranging that a corpse should turn up and be “identified” as
Esther’s. On 18th June, a girl’s body dressed in Esther’s clothes,
which were far too small for the purpose, was drawn out of the River
Theiss by Jewish raftsmen. The mother denied that the corpse was
Esther’s although she recognised Esther’s clothes. A committee of
experts examined the body, and found that the hair and eyebrows had
been shaved off, obviously to conceal identity. They also found that
the body was that of a girl 18 years old (Esther was only 14) and that
death was due not to drowning but to tuberculosis. It became so
obvious that the body had been “found” for a purpose, that the Jewish
raftsmen were interrogated; and they confessed that the corpse had
been taken over by them from a Jew called Herschko, that it had been
dressed in Esther’s clothes, put in the river, and then “discovered”
and landed.

It was found also that the body could not have been in the water over
four days; that death could not have taken place more than 10 days
previously. Esther had been missing for 78 days.

However, in spite of all this exposure of corruption, the Court found
itself, as it were, an isolated unit in a hostile Europe; and the Jews
were all acquitted!

Then it was found that on 21st July, 1883, Baron Bela Orczy, the
Hungarian Minister, had visited Minister for Justice Pauler and had
told him that Goldschmidt, the Budapest representative of
Rothschild’s, had demanded that the charges be withdrawn! At this
time, debt-conversion was a serious matter for Hungary, and chiefly
depended on the Rothschild Money Power. Later, Baron Orczy told Pauler
that Goldschmidt actually demanded that the two Public Prosecutors who
had made condemnation of the prisoners impossible should be
decorated!

The sort of thing that had been “worked” against all the evidence may
be explained by giving one example: In November, 1882, a new Committee
of Experts was formed to make a further examination of the body found
in the river five months before, and this committee declared that the
findings of the former committee had no scientific basis, that the
body was Esther’s and that as the throat was not cut, it could not
have been a case of ritual murder!

So ends a dismal tale of the foulest Jewish trickery to enable a few
miserable degenerates to escape from well-merited punishment.

1891. Xanten, Prussia. A five-year-old boy called Hegmann was
murdered, his threat cut and the body bloodless. “The Government did
all in its power to suppress the rumour” of ritual murder (Jewish
Encyclopædia, Vol. I, p. 645). The doctor who examined the body said
(29th June) that: “The trace of blood appears as an after-bleeding.”
On 9th July, he retracted this and explained that his mistake was due
to it being dark at the time of his examination! I think by this time
the reader will guess what happened between 29th June and 9th July to
his banking account. The Minister of Justice, de Schelling, was a Jew.
The accused Jewish ritual slaughterer, who had been arrested, was
acquitted.

1899. The Polna Case (Bohemia).
Agnes Hruza, 19 years of age, was murdered 29th March, 1899. On 1st
April, her body was found in a wood with the head nearly severed from
the body. In spite of this frightful wound, there was no blood about,
although the body itself, of course, was almost bloodless.

A man called Peschak had seen a Jew Hilsner with two other Jews on
the day of the murder on the spot where the body was found. Hilsner
was arrested and tried; another witness testified that he had seen the
prisoner very agitated on 29th March, coming from the spot where the
body was found.

The Court, whilst recognising that Hilsner must have had accomplices,
found him guilty and condemned him to death. He then confessed, and
implicated two other Jews, but later retracted these statements, as
also his confession. The two men produced satisfactory alibis.

By the Power of Jewish Money and the agitation it was able to raise,
a new trial was ordered. Meanwhile Dr. Baxa, attorney for the murdered
girl’s mother, had in a speech in the Bohemian Diet, 28th December,
accused the Government of showing partiality to the Jews in the way
they handled this case.

Then, another girl’s body was found, too decomposed to show the cause
of death; this was the body of Maria Klima who had disappeared 17th
July, 1898. Hilsner was charged with both murders when the case came
on again in November. This time, a witness stated that at the time of
the first murder, Hilsner had a ritual slaughterer’s knife.

Dr. Baxa insisted that it was a case of Ritual Murder. The Court
found the prisoner guilty, without however alleging ritual reasons,
and the prisoner was sentenced to death on 14th November, 1900.
However, the Emperor intervened, and the sentence was commuted to life
imprisonment.

The prisoner’s counsel at this trial was Masaryk, later President of
Czecho-Slovakia, this work seems to have stood him in good stead in
after life!

Hilsner was released from prison by the Marxists in the rioting of
1918; he died a few years later.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:38:01 EST 2008
Article: 514695 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
X-Invalid: [email protected],
X-Invalid: [email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,alt.politics.europe,soc.culture.swiss,
X-Invalid: alt.politics.nationalism.white,uk.politics.misc
Subject: ZYD/Jew Ritual Murder – Part 5 of 5 – Documented!
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:01:01 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Bytes: 38393
Lines: 759
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.russian:514695 alt.politics.europe:79992 soc.culture.swiss:59900

CHAPTER XV.

THE ATTITUDE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TOWARDS JEWISH
RITUAL MURDER.

THE Jew, Cecil Roth, in Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935, p. 20,
says: “The Catholic Church never gave the slightest countenance to the
calumny” (the blood accusation). This seems to be very inaccurate, as
we shall demonstrate.

The Jews say that the Popes Innocent IV, Gregory X, Martin V,
Nicholas V, Paul III, Clement XII and Clement XIV have all expressed
disbelief in the Ritual Murder practice of Jews.

Let us first take the case of Innocent IV, who has issued Bulls about
the matter on 28th May and 5th July, 1247, and again on 25th
September, 1253. Now the first of these simply demands that no action
should be taken against Jews on a Ritual Murder charge unless they
have been tried and found guilty; the Bull of 1253 defended the Jews
against the charge of Ritual Murder because the Old Testament did not
sanction that practice!

But the views of Innocent IV are dealt with in the Catholic Bulletin,
Dublin, August, 1916, pp. 435-8, from which I shall quote. The late
Lord Rothschild was greatly perturbed about a Ritual Murder trial
which was going on at Kiev in 1913, and which we describe fully in
this book (see p. 32). He wrote a letter to Cardinal Merry del Val,
asking him to

state whether the Bull of Innocent IV dated 5th July, 1247, was
authentic; Lord Rothschild said that this Bull declared that Ritual
Murder was “an unfounded and perfidious invention.” When the Cardinal
replied that the letter was authentic, this was taken to mean that
Innocent IV had denied the existence of ritual murder by Jews! But
note that no such statement as Baron Rothschild imputed to Innocent IV
was contained in the Bull!

Let the Catholic Bulletin deal with the matter in its own words:

“The document [the Bull] consists of two parts, one part sums up the
case as presented by the Jews themselves. The Pope states that he has
received a complaint that the Jews are being oppressed and pillaged by
both ecclesiastical and secular princes, that they are being cast into
prison, and even put to death, without trial or confession of guilt,
that they are being falsely accused of ritual crime which they assert
is manifestly opposed to their law, namely the Divine Scriptures. The
second part, which alone expresses the Pope’s mind, is as follows:
‘not wishing, therefore, that the said Jews be unjustly harassed,
whose conversion God expects in his mercy . . . we wish that you
should show yourselves benign and favourable towards them. Restore to
their proper state those of the mentioned matters that you find to
have been rashly attempted by the said Nobles against the Jews, and do
not permit that in the future they should be for those or similar
pretexts unjustly molested by anyone.’

“Jews must consider Christians to be very uncritical and gullible if
they think they can he induced to accept this document as a papal
declaration that ritual crime does not exist. It is obvious that the
Sovereign Pontiff merely gives instructions according to general
principles, ordering that the Jews should not be unjustly oppressed or
molested. He makes no pronouncement whatever regarding the truth or
falsehood of the specific charges. Naturally, he must leave the
decision regarding this point to the judgment of the bishops to whom
he writes. Least of all was he likely to be impressed by the sophistry
that ritual crime could not exist among the Jews because it was
forbidden in the sacred Scriptures. None could know better than he
that it was not the teaching of the Scriptures, but the infamous
teachings of the Talmud that caused people to look upon Jews as a
grave danger to society. Only three years before the appearance of his
letter, namely in 1244, he showed plainly what he thought of the
Talmud by pressing Louis IX to collect from his subjects all the
copies he could obtain and consign them to the flames.”

Before leaving Innocent IV, I ask the reader to realise the typical
Jewish cunning exhibited by Rothschild in exploiting the answer of
Cardinal del Val regarding the authenticity of the letter as
confirming an interpretation of that letter’s contents by Rothschild!
How Jewish!

Gregory X in a Bull of 7th October, 1272, is a little more explicit
than Innocent IV; the same exhortation is made for legal trial of all
cases, but he says that they should “not be arrested again on such
ground-
less charge unless (which we think impossible) they are captured in
flagrant crime.” Gregory thus does not deny that the crime exists; he
says he thinks it is impossible.

Pope Martin V, Nicholas V, Paul III and Clement XIII issued
statements which show to my satisfaction, although not apparently to
that of some anti-Jew writers, that they did not wish to support the
opinion that the Ritual Murder charge was a true one against the
Jews.

Then we come to Clement XIV. Before he became Pope, he was Cardinal
Ganganelli. He was despatched by the Inquisition in 1759 to
investigate Ritual Murder charges against the Jews in Poland, and he
wrote a long report about it. This report is quoted in full in Roth’s
Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew and is, indeed, the only “evidence”
brought forward by Roth in that book, published in 1935.

From beginning to end of Ganganelli’s report, there is nothing that a
scientific investigator would regard as evidence that Ritual Murder
was not practised by Jews. The Polish cases he admits were juridically
decided; and he brings forward examples of definitely false charges of
Ritual Murder such as everyone knows have arisen, but which do not in
the least affect the question as to whether Ritual Murder happens or
not. He merely opposes his opinion to those of the men in authority on
the spot.

But there is more. Definitely, and far from being able to refute the
charge of Ritual Murder against Jews, Ganganelli admits the Ritual
Murders of St. Simon of Trent and of St. Andreas of Rinn in these
words:

“I admit then, as true, the fact of the Blessed Simon, a boy three
years old, killed by the Jews in Trent in the year 1475 in hatred of
the faith of Jesus Christ”; and “I also admit the truth of another
fact, which happened in the year 1462 in the village of Rinn, in the
Diocese of Brixen, in the person of the Blessed Andreas, a boy
barbarously murdered by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus
Christ.”

One thing concerning Ganganelli’s report seems to have escaped the
notice of other anti-Jewish workers, and to my mind it damns the
report from the beginning; in undertaking an investigation such as
that with which Ganganelli was confronted, one should surely start
with an unbiased outlook? Read Ganganelli’s admission about his own
outlook when he went to Poland to investigate:

“With my weak faculties, I endeavoured to demonstrate the non-
existence of the crime which was imputed to the Jewish Nation in
Poland.”

The Cardinal set forth, not to find out whether Ritual Murder existed
in Poland or not, but “to demonstrate the non-existence of the crime”!
And yet, he had to admit the crimes of Trent and of Rinn!

Thus, the book Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, by the Jew Roth,
which relies entirely upon Ganganelli for its material, is valueless
except to the anti-Jewish worker to whom it is a God-send! Yet, what a
good “press” this book had when it was published in 1935! The Morning
Post greeted it (16th January, 1935) with headlines “Ritual Murder:
Jewish people absolved: striking denunciation,” and called the book “a
final and incontrovertible refutation of the hideous Ritual Murder

accusation.” It is clear that the critic had either never taken the
trouble to read the book or was deliberately misleading the public as
to its contents; it is no “incontrovertible refutation”; it is an
unscientific conglomeration of irrelevant matter, with a confession of
bias and of the truth of the Ritual Murder accusation itself. The
Catholic Times (15th February, 1935) says: “The learned Cardinal
completely refutes the persecutors of the Jews and conclusively shows
the flimsiness of the charges against them and their inherent
absurdity.” Ganganelli “completely refutes” nothing, and all that he
“conclusively shows” is that Ritual Murders were a Jewish practice.

The Birmingham Mail, 22nd September, 1936, is typical of the attitude
of the “British” critics of the book: “It is symptomatic of the
unhealthy state of the Continental mind that credence can be given in
certain parts of Europe to the atrocious libel in which it is alleged
that Christian blood is a necessary concomitant of the Jewish Passover
celebrations.”

Although the book was widely advertised when it came out, the Jews
seem to have realised that it merely gives evidence in favour of
Ritual Murder, for I found it difficult to get a copy in 1936, having
ultimately to resort to a friend in the second-hand book trade to get
one for me.

Thus Clement XIV, far from being a witness for the defence of the
Jews, is an unwilling witness of the truth of the anti-Jewish
accusation.

And what of the Popes who have supported the Ritual Murder accusation
by their acts? There are many.

Sixtus IV approved in his Bull XII Kal. July, 1478, of the conduct of
the Bishop who dealt with the Jews in the St. Simon case at Trent. The
Jews endeavoured to enlist Sixtus IV on their side by pointing out
that he had suspended the cult of St. Simon of Trent; this was done by
Sixtus IV solely as a disciplinary measure, for Simon had not yet been
beatified by papal authority, but was being made the centre of a local
cult.

Gregory XIII recognised Simon as a martyr and himself visited the
shrine.

Sixtus V ratified the cult of St. Simon in 1588, allowing the
celebration of mass in his name. This is confirmed as a fact by
Benedict XIV.

Benedict XIV himself in a Bull Beatus Andreas (1778, Venice, IV, p.
101 seq.), beatified both Simon and Andreas, two boys murdered by the
Jews “in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ”; “the Jews,” he said,
“used every means to escape the just punishment that they had merited
and to escape the just anger of the Christians.”

How significant of the methods of the advocates for the Jew, to note
that in Strack’s book, no mention whatever is made of Benedict XIV’s
Bull, although the actions of Sixtus IV are wilfully misinterpreted!

Pius VII, 24th November, 1805, confirmed a decree of the Congregation
of Rites of 31st August according to the Church at Saragossa the right
to honour Dominiculus, killed by the Jews in hatred of the faith of
Jesus Christ (see p. 17). He also authorised for the church at Toledo
the same privilege in respect to St. Christopher, the boy crucified by
the Jews near that place in 1490 (see p. 20).

In 1867, the Congregation of Rites authorised the cult of Lorenzino,
at Vicenza, Padua, ritually murdered by Jews.

Gregory XVI, also, gave his support to the anti-Jewish accusers when
he honoured Gougenot des Mousseaux by making him a Chevalier of the
Order of St. Gregory the Great, in reward for writing his book, Le
Juif, le Judaisme et la Judaisation des Peuples Chretiens, in which
Gougenot des Mousseaux devoted a chapter charging the Jews with Ritual
Murder of Christians for the sake of their blood.

Pius IX refused to see the Jew Montefiore when the latter was
returning from his visits to Egypt and to Constantinople, where he had
bribed the Khedive and the Sultan so that the Jews at Damascus could
escape the consequences of their guilt of the Ritual Murder of Father
Thomas and his servant; this, in spite of a shameless Jewish
persistence which has been fully described in Sir Moses Montefiore’s
biography. That showed what Pius IX thought about it, and he himself
was of Jewish blood.

Pope Leo XIII bestowed distinctions on Edouard Drumont, author of La
France Juive, who accused the Jews of Ritual Murder therein.
Authority: Jewish Encyclopædia (1905), Vol. X, p. 127.

To sum up: The Popes who have appeared to disbelieve the existence of
the Ritual Murder crime have, with the exception of Clement XIII, been
those who lived in the least enlightened times; many later Popes have
given very clear evidence that they hold the opposite opinion. The
reader has the facts before him and can judge for himself.

Remember that although other martyred boys, victims of Jewish Ritual
Murder, have been regarded in many places as saints without papal
authority, there is no record of papal disapproval of these cults
except in the case of Sixtus IV, already mentioned, whose action was
purely disciplinary and who himself specifically approved of the
conduct of the Ritual Murder Case to which the matter referred. Such
locally beatified “saints” or martyrs were St. William of Norwich
(1144), St. Richard of Pontoise (1179), St. Hugh of Lincoln (1255),
St. Werner of Oberwesel (1286) and St. Rudolph of Berne (1287). In
every such case it is quite obvious that the cult had the full
approval at least of the episcopal authorities over the places
mentioned.

Those who condemn the Blood Accusation as a wicked invention for the
purpose of persecuting Jews and robbing them, must at the same time
condemn wholesale some of the highest dignitaries of the Catholic
Church, men against whom nothing is known beyond that they had
excellent characters, like William Turbe, Bishop of Norwich to give an
English example.

When the reader peruses the details of the cases that I have cited in
this book, he will realise that Episcopal Courts have dealt with many
of them; in other words, the Jews were condemned by the existing
religious authority of the day.

Many of the earliest records we have of these Ritual Murders come
>from the pens of Catholic historians, such as the Bollandists, a body
of Belgian Jesuits; a list of the principal works on the subject will
be found at the end of the book.

Father Creagh, Redemptorist, publicly accused Jews of the prac-

tice of Ritual Murder, on 11th January, 1904, in a speech in Limerick.
Authority: Jewish Encyclopædia (1904), Vol. VIII, p. 89.

Perhaps I may best wind up this chapter by giving the names of the
twelve members of juries who investigated, considered and condemned
the Jews in the Ritual Murder case of La Guardia in Toledo, together
with their qualifications: (1) Maestre Fray Juan de Santispiritus,
Professor of Hebrew, Salamanca University; (2) Maestre Fray Diego de
Bretonia, Professor of Scripture; (3) Fray Antonio de la Pena, Prior;
(4) Dr. Anton Rodriguez Carnejo, Professor of Canon Law; (5) Dr.
Diego de Burgos, Professor of Civil Law; (6) Dr. Juan de Covillas,
Professor of Canon Law; (7) Fray Sebastian de Hueta; (8) Licentiate
Alvaro de Sant Estevan, Queen Isabel’s corregidor for Avila; (9) Ruy
Garcia Manso, Bishop Talavera’s provisor; (10) Fray Rodrigo Vela,
head of the Franciscan Monastery, Avila; (11) Dr. Tristan, Canon of
Avila; (12) Juna de Saint Estevan.

On the findings of such men of standing we surely have every right to
rely?

CHAPTER XVI.

THE ATTITUDE OF THE PROTESTANT CHURCH.

THIS may be summed up very briefly. The Protestant Church appears to
have allied itself to Jewry, if one may judge from the political views
expressed by our Archbishops and most of our bishops. These views are
almost invariably similar to those expressed by Masons, and are almost
always pernicious.

However, there was a time when Protestants were Protestants,
unaffected by Masonry or by the powerful propaganda of which Jewish
money is the source.

Martin Luther seems to have had an inkling of the true nature of the
Jew when he said: “How the Jews love the Book of Esther, which is so
suitable to their bloodthirsty, revengeful, murderous appetite and
hopes. The sun has never shone on such a bloodthirsty and revengeful
people, who fancy themselves to be the chosen people so that they can
murder and strangle the heathen.” (From the Erlangen edition of
Luther’s Table Talks, Vol. XXXII, p. 120.)

This seems plain speaking enough; but we find the Jew, C. Roth,
(Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew), citing Martin Luther as having
condemned the “libel” of Ritual Murder “in unqualified terms.”

However, the Jewish Encyclopædia (1904), Vol. VIII, p. 213,
definitely states that Luther charged the Jews with Ritual Murders.

At Magdeburg in 1562, a Protestant History of the Christian Church
was compiled, called the Magdeburg Centuries; it was compiled by a
number of Lutheran theologians headed by M. Flacius, and was first
published at Basle as the Historia Ecclesiæ Christi. This work records
the ritual murders of Blois, Pontoise (Paris), Braisne, Fulda, Berne
and Oberwesel.

John Foxe in his Acts and Monuments of the Church (1563) says: “For
every year commonly their [the Jews’] custom was to get some Christian
man’s child from his parents and on Good Friday to crucify him in
despite of our religion.” He describes the ritual crucifixion of
British children by Jews at Norwich and Lincoln, before the
expulsion.

The learned and distinguished Puritan, William Prynne, a fearless
fighter against evil, in his Short Demurrer to the Jewes long
discontinued Remitter into England, 1656, gave details and references
of the Ritual Murders at Norwich, Gloucester, and Bury St. Edmunds in
England, and those of Blois, Braisne, Richard “of Paris,” Fulda,
Prague, Werner of Oberwesel, Rudolph of Berne, Simon of Trent and
others. In Book I, p. 67, he says: “The Jews . . . have ofttimes . . .
maliciously acted it [crucifixion] over and again in
representation; . . . by crucifying sundry Christian children on Good
Friday or near Easter, on a Crosse, in a most barbarous manner, in
derision of our Saviour’s death and passion.” On p. 68 he quotes
several authorities “that the Jews in Paris did every year steal some
Christian child, or another brought up in the King’s Court, and
carrying him to a secret house or vault, did, on Good Friday or Easter-
Day, in contempt and derision of Christ and Christian religion crucify
him on a Crosse . . . and that they have been frequently apprehended,
persevering in this wickednesse; for which, upon Direction, they were
usually murdered, stoned, burned, destroyed, hanged, by the furious
multitude’s violence, or executed, imprisoned, banished by Christian
Kings and Magistrates, yet such was their malice to Christ, that they
would still persevere therein, and act it over again upon every
opportunity.”

This book of Prynne’s, which ran into two editions, is in the British
Museum and Guildhall Libraries, but is unobtainable, though stated by
booksellers to be of no great rarity or value; in the London Library
there is no copy, but there is a Jewish refutation of it!

Our nation has been so carefully schooled by the Jewish Money Power,
which has been able to destroy or rarefy all sources of information on
Ritual Murder, that the twentieth century Protestant Church has come
to believe that the thing is a mere relic of mediæval superstition.

CHAPTER XVII.

OTHER CASES WORTHY OF CREDENCE.

THIS book is not intended to be an exhaustive history of Jewish
Ritual Murder. In previous chapters I have described the cases which
occurred before the Expulsion of the Jews from England, and also the
cases which appear to me to be historical events admitting of no
reasonable doubt as to their correct interpretation as Jewish Ritual
Murders.

In this chapter, I am listing a number of reported cases of Ritual
Murder which, whilst being in my opinion worthy of credence, are not
supported by the same detail or authority that constitute
authenticity.

There are many discoveries of bodies of children, thought to have
been ritually murdered by Jews, which are not mentioned in this list,
and since the Sultan issued his firman in 1840 denying that Ritual
Murder existed among the Jews, it is not surprising that many of these
cases happened in territories under Turkish rule.
The following reports of alleged Ritual Murder appear to me worthy of
record:
A.D. 419. Socrates (Hist. Eccles., Lib. VII, Chap. XVI) gives an
account of a case at Inmestar, a town between Chalcis and Antioch.
The Syrian Posidonius (135-51 B.C.), and the first century Greeks
Apollonius Molon and Apion had previously reported that it was a
Jewish custom to sacrifice annually a Greek boy, specially fattened
for the occasion. The probable reason for the Ritual Murder accusation
being made against Christians themselves in the early years of the
Religion was that many of these Christians were of Jewish origin.

1285. Munich. Illustrated in Bavaria Sancta.

1270. Wissembourg. Monniot quotes on p. 148 of his Le Crime Rituel
chez les Juifs a letter dated 19th November, 1913, from the curé of
the town, in which the details of this case are quoted from the
Alsatian historian Hertzog, who says the victim’s tomb was for many
years in the church.

1283. Mayence.
1303. Weissensee (Thuringia).

1305. Prague. The mob took the law into its own hands in a case of
alleged crucifixion of a Christian at Passover.

1331. Lieberlingen. Child’s body found in well with wounds
indicating that it had been sacrificed by Jews. The judges of the
place had a number of Jews burned.

1345. Munich. Illustrated in Bavaria Sancta.

1347. Cologne. The sacrificial knife in this case is preserved at
the Church of St. Sigbert.
1401. Diessenhofen.

1407. Cracow. A Polish priest, Budek, charged the Jews with
murdering a boy at Easter.

1429. Ravensbourg.
1435. Palma.
1470. Endingen, Baden. Jews burned for killing eight years
previously four Christians ritually.
1529. Posing, Hungary. Child murdered for its blood. Many Jews
burned after confession by torture of some.

1598. Podolia. Jews tried and condemned, after a rabbi had confessed
to killing four-year-old Albert at Passover and bleeding him.

1764. Orcuta, Hungary. Boy found dead, covered with wounds
suggestive of Ritual Murder.
1791. Tasnad, Hungary. Jews condemned for murdering and bleeding a
boy, on the evidence of the small son of one of them aged five years.
Accused received the royal pardon.

1797. Galatz, Rumania. About this time “The Ritual Murder accusation
became epidemic” (Jewish Encyclopædia, 1905, Vol. X, p. 513).

1812. Corfu. Three Jews were condemned for the murder of a Christian
child. Monniot (Le Crime Rituel chez les Juifs) says the archives of
the island report this case.

1847. Mount Lebanon. Mentioned by Sir Richard Burton in The Jew, the
Gypsy and El Islam, 1898, p. 128.

1935. Afghanistan. The White Russian paper Nasch Put of Harbin, 7th
October, reports a case in Afghanistan where a Mahommedan child was
robbed and riddled with stabs by Jews, the Court verdict being that
this was done for ritual purposes.

I repeat that there are many other cases of Ritual Murder accusations
not mentioned in this book; they are omitted because I have
insufficient detail concerning them.

CHAPTER XVIII.

TWO QUEER HAPPENINGS.

1839. A Remittance of Blood. During the Damascus Ritual Murder trial,
the French Consul, Comte Ratti-Menton, by whose energy and
determination the case was brought to light, received a letter from
Comte de Suzannet, who wrote: “Nearly a year ago, a box arrived at the
custom-house that a Jew came to claim on being asked to open it, he
refused and offered first 100 piastres, then 200, then 300, then 1,000
and at last 10,000 piastres (2,500 francs). The custom-house official
persisted, and opened the box, discovering therein a bottle of blood.
On asking the Jew for an explanation, the latter said that they had
the custom of preserving the blood of their Grand Rabbis or important
men. He was allowed to go, and left for Jerusalem.”

Comte Ratti-Menton then looked for the chief of the customhouse, but
found he had died! His successor, who had been associated with him,
only vaguely recollected the affair; but he confirmed that the box had
contained several bottles of red liquid and that he thought the Jew
who came to claim it was Aaron Stambouli of Damascus who had told him
that the substance was an efficacious drug.

The quick death of the chief custom-house officer is not surprising;
witnesses of the crimes of the Jews are subject to a sudden demise.
But the reader will perhaps be more impressed by the fact that this
Aaron Stambouli was one of those subsequently found guilty of the
Ritual Murder of Father Thomas at Damascus and condemned!

1888. Breslau, Germany. On 21st July, Max Bernstein, aged 24, a
pupil at the Talmudic College, met an eight-year-old Christian boy,
Severin Hacke, bought him some sweetmeats and took him to his
(Bernstein’s) home. There, he stripped the boy of his clothing and
with a knife made incisions in a certain part of the child’s body,

collecting the blood that came from the cuts on a piece of blotting-
paper. When the boy was naturally frightened, the Jew told him there
was no need for fear as he only wanted a little blood.

The boy went home and said nothing about the matter; but his father,
seeing the scars, questioned him and the truth came out.

Bernstein was arrested, and the prosecuting attorney after preventing
a manoeuvre on the part of the defending counsel to have the case
settled behind closed doors, maintained that this was a ritual case
for the extraction of blood for the needs of a Jewish rite.

The Court, however, refused to recognise this, but sentenced
Bernstein to three months’ imprisonment for having made incisions in
the body of the child.

The facts of this case are not disputed by anyone. The Jews, of
course, spread the rumour that Bernstein was a religious maniac. Dr.
Edmond Lesser of Breslau wrote a report to that effect which the Royal
Scientific Committee for the Medical Profession endorsed. This
Professor was a Jew, of course. But the reader should note that the
report was issued in 1890, and that the Court itself never had any
such “expert” propaganda before it!

CHAPTER XIX.

WHAT OF THESE?

DURING my trial I asked the only witness brought against me,
Inspector Kitchener, “Are you a Detective-Inspector?”

Kitchener: “Yes.”
Leese: “Are there any cases of child-murder nowadays which cannot be
solved?”
Kitchener: “Yes.”
Leese: “Has it ever occurred to you that some of them may be cases of
Ritual Murder by Jews?”
The Judge: “If it had, he would have acted without evidence, and he
has no right to.”

In the belief that it is the business of the detective first to
investigate and then to collect evidence, and then to act upon that
evidence, I give here some facts on recent happenings which seem to me
to open up the necessary field for investigation. They are, the
Chorlton murder, the Lindbergh baby case, and a queer business in the
Argentine.

1928. Chorlton, Manchester.

A school-boy named O’Donnell was murdered on 1st or 2nd December, just
before the Jewish feast of Chanucah, which commemorates the recovery
of Jerusalem by the Maccabees.

The throat had been cut; the body was drained of blood; it was found
on some waste ground and it was remarkable that there was no

blood on the boy’s clothes and hands. There was a pool of blood seven
yards from the body. The wound was pronounced by experts as not being
self-inflicted. A police witness said the body seemed to have been
dragged along the grass; the Coroner suggested that someone had washed
the boy’s hands.

The police were completely baffled; it was certain that the work was
not that of any maniac, but that the crime was premeditated, and was
in fact, “the perfect crime.” The verdict at the inquest was an open
one.

The affair was reported in The Times, 3rd, 4th and 6th December 1928,
and in the early edition only of that of 23rd February, 1929; also in
the Manchester Evening papers, 6th to 13th December, 1928.

My only comment is that the murder could not have been done on the
spot where the body was found, since the boy’s clothes and hands were
not stained with blood, indicating that the boy must have been naked
when the throat was cut; therefore, some blood was probably poured
onto the ground a few yards away to mislead the detectives.

Ritual murders have several times been discovered by the fact that no
blood has been found at the place where the corpse, bled white, has
been recovered.

1932. The Lindbergh Case.

Colonel Lindbergh’s son was missed on 1st March, 1932. The Jewish
Feast of Purim was on 22nd March. A child’s body was found on 12th
May, dead at least two months according to the experts, with the skull
fractured in two places.

I cannot see that it has ever been proved that the body found was
that of Colonel Lindbergh’s son. It is true that the child’s clothes
were identified, but the ‘body’ was only a skeleton, and the
‘identification’ by the nursemaid, Betty Gow, was made by means of the
clothes and a matter of ‘twisted toes.’ (We must remember that the
Tisza Eszlar case, see p. 30, was conjured with by the finding and
false identification of a body dressed in the murdered girl’s
clothes.)

Chas. Lindbergh, the father, America’s air hero, appointed two Jews,
Salvatore Spitale and Irving Bitz, as intermediaries between himself
and a gang who pretended to know where his son was. The Purple Gang,
all-Jewish and headed by a Jew called Fleischer, was the object of the
police search.

Ultimately, a German called Hauptmann was arrested, and the whole
Jewish Press of America condemned him several score of times before
his trial; actually he was ultimately found “guilty” on evidence which
would not have hanged a dog, and met his death in the electric chair.

The condemned man said that Reilly, his lawyer, had brought about his
fate by sabotaging his defence; Reilly went insane and committed
suicide.

Hauptmann said that the receiver of the kidnap ransom was Isador
Fisch, a Jew; but he had died.

The mob of people outside the death-house at Hauptmann’s execution,
shouted and joked and laughed in the same obscene fashion as did the
female furies over the victims of the guillotine in the French Revolu-

tion. It was commonly considered in America that Hitler, not
Hauptmann, had been found guilty!

It is possible that Hauptmann was paid to steal the child, without
knowing that it was going to be anything but an ordinary kidnapping;
and that the boy was intended for Ritual Slaughter for Purim.

It was Chas. Lindbergh’s father who had strongly opposed the
establishment of the Federal Reserve Banking System sponsored by
powerful Jewish interests and had also brought to public notice the
wicked circular letter of the American Banking Association which
ordered the member banks to deflate “to make a monetary stringency
among your Patrons.” This, it is thought, might determine the choice
of the innocent child of Hon. Chas. Lindbergh’s famous son for a
victim.

1937. Argentine.

On 28th February the Sunday Pictorial (London) reported that the two-
year-old Eugenio Iraola had been kidnapped and killed for ritual
purposes; the heading under which this appeared was “Millionaire’s
Baby as Human Sacrifice.” Eight arrests were made, including that of
Ganceda Silva. The next (and last) we hear of this case is in the
London Evening News of 24th March, which simply reports: “While
awaiting trial for kidnapping and murder, Jose Gancedo has hanged
himself in his cell at Dolores, Buenos Ayres.” That, of course,
simplified matters! It will be noticed that the suggestive name of
Silva had already been lost by the deceased!

CHAPTER XX.

IRRELEVANT MEDITATIONS.

I WRITE this chapter in an endeavour to try and account for the
strange attitude adopted by Gentiles, often influential people, in
rushing forward to shield the Jews, not only from the Ritual Murder
charge, but from accusations concerning other activities hostile to
Western Civilization.

Consider the Letter of Protest signed by archbishops, bishops, lords,
justices, editors and professors, which was sent to The Times as
stated on p. 8 against the “revival” of the Blood Accusation against a
Jew at Kiev, 1911-13. Consider that the trial of the accused had not
been made. Consider that none of the signatories would have thought it
proper to intervene in the course of justice in a foreign country on
behalf of anyone not a British subject. Yet they did it for the sake
of a Jew. Why?

Here is another instance: Mr. J. Hall Richardson reports it on pp.
216-217 of his book, From the City to Fleet Street (S. Paul & Co.,
1927). He is writing of the murders of Jack the Ripper, and he says:

“It would scarcely be believed that the Metropolitan Police held the
clue to the identification of the murderer in their own hands and
deliberately threw it away under the personal direction of the then
Commissioner of Police, Sir Chas. Warren, who acted in the belief that
an anti-Semitic riot might take place if a certain damning piece of
writing were permitted to remain on the walls.”

Writing of the murderer: — “Some freak of fancy had led him to write
upon the wall this sentence: ‘The Jewes are not the men to be blamed
for nothing.’

“I have never learned that any photographic record was made of this
inscription, and when the City Police came to hear of it, they were
horrified that their colleagues in the Metropolitan Force had wiped
away what might have been an important piece of circumstantial
evidence as to the class to which the murderer belonged.”

That the Jack the Ripper murders were ritual I do not allege; but
that they were Jewish seems to be established by the above-quoted
paragraphs. Yet the clue was passed over and the murderer remained at
large. In what other cause would such an important piece of evidence
be ignored, and the whole community’s interests sacrificed for the
sake of a Jew? It is significant that Sir Chas. Warren was not only
District Grand Master in Masonry, 1891-5, but was actually the founder
of the first research Lodge — Quatuor Coronati.

Is it a sort of mass hypnotism worked upon people who have already
either consciously or unconsciously accepted some sort of mental or
spiritual subservience to Jewish influence? Is it cabbalistic?

I cannot answer the question, but I find no other explanation for the
wholesale denunciation which is made by so many authoritative Britons
against those who have the courage to come forward and state their
conviction that the Jews have been responsible for the Ritual Murder
of Christians. I know I shall be subjected to a long-continued typhoon
of abuse and libel against which I shall have no defence except the
contents of this book. I can only ask those who feel compelled to take
part in the campaign against what is inaccurately called “anti-
semitism” to pause and ask themselves whether they are really mentally
free, or whether they are almost unconsciously directed in their
intended action by alien tenets absorbed perhaps in their youth under
Old Testament teachings, in adult life by Masonic influence, or by
Jewish books.

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website for
JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION WITH
NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case – no wonder
people around the world are really disliking the Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:38:03 EST 2008
Article: 514699 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeeder.wxs.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: Frank Arthur
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.ukrainian,
X-Invalid: soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.swiss,alt.politics.europe,uk.politics.misc
Subject: ZYDS Killed ZYDS – Nazis Kept Hands Clean
Message-ID:
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:40:04 -0700 (MST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: [email protected]
Lines: 164
Bytes: 8605
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.polish:896259 soc.culture.russian:514699 soc.culture.ukrainian:117331

From: “ElParedon”
Newsgroups:
soc.culture.
jewish,alt.r
evisionism,s
oc.culture.israel,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.russian
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:54:26 -0400

In his moving letter to the editor below, Israel Shahak underlines that
almost all the administrative tasks and policing required by the Nazis was
placed in Jewish hands, that Jewish collaborators were ubiquitous, and that
it was Jewish collaborators who rendered the Jewish Holocaust feasible and
who stood as obstacles in the path of Jewish resistance. Note,
particularly, that the children of the Warsaw ghetto were taught to fear
the
Jewish collaborator more than the Ukrainian collaborator:

Falsification of the Holocaust

Letter to the editor by Prof. Israel Shahak,
published on 19 May 1989 in Kol Ha’ir, Jerusalem. Available online
at:
http://www.kaiwan.com/codoh/newsdesk/890519.HTML

I disagree with the opinion of Haim Baram that the Israeli
education system has managed to instil a “Holocaust awareness” in its
pupils
(Kol Ha’Ir 12.5.89). It’s not an awareness of the Holocaust but rather the
myth of the Holocaust or even a falsification of the Holocaust (in the
sense
that “a half-truth is worse than a lie”) which has been instilled here.
As one who himself lived through the Holocaust, first in Warsaw
then in Bergen-Belsen, I will give an immediate example of the total
ignorance of daily life during the Holocaust. In the Warsaw ghetto, even
during the period of the first massive extermination (June to October
1943),
one saw almost no German soldiers. Nearly all the work of administration,
and later the work of transporting hundreds of thousands of Jews to their
deaths, was carried out by Jewish collaborators. Before the outbreak of
the
Warsaw Ghetto Uprising (the planning of which only started after the
extermination of the majority of Jews in Warsaw), the Jewish underground
killed, with perfect justification, every Jewish collaborator they could
find. If they had not done so the Uprising could never have started. The
majority of the population of the Ghetto hated the collaborators far more
than the German Nazis. Every Jewish child was taught, and this saved the
lives of some of them “if you enter a square from which there are three
exits, one guarded by a German SS man, one by an Ukrainian and one by a
Jewish policeman, then you should first try to pass the German, and then
maybe the Ukrainian, but never the Jew”.
One of my own strongest memories is that, when the Jewish
underground killed a despicable collaborator close to my home at the end of
February 1943, I danced and sang around the still bleeding corpse together
with the other children. I still do not regret this, quite the contrary.
It is clear that such events were not exclusive to the Jews, the
entire Nazi success in easy and continued rule over millions of people
stemmed from the subtle and diabolical use of collaborators, who did most
of
the dirty work for them. But does anybody now know about this? This, and
not what is “instilled” was the reality. Of the Yad Vashem (official state
Holocaust museum in Jerusalem – Ed.) theatre, I do not wish to speak at
all.
It, and its vile exploiting, such as honouring South Africa collaborators
with the Nazis are truly beneath contempt.
Therefore, if we knew a little of the truth about the Holocaust,
we would at least understand (with or without agreeing) why the
Palestinians
are now eliminating their collaborators. That is the only means they have
if they wish to continue to struggle against our limb-breaking regime.

Kind regards,

[Israel Shahak]

Here is the story of one such Jewish collaborator:

Moldetsky, a leader of the Zionist Workers Party (Poalei Zion),
who was appointed head of the council of elders in Bedzin, and who, over
the
course of years, chose thousands of Jews for forced labor and
extermination,
succeeded in remaining alive. For the mass deportations, Moldetsky
published a decree which was completely fraudulent and deceiving, in which
he said: “Jews, dress up in your holiday clothes and march joyfully to the
gathering places mentioned above. No one is to remain at home. …” The
Jews, in their innocence, obeyed him. The result was that people with
large
families – as well as the elderly – a total of 8,000, were sent to
Auschwitz. The babies were pushed into sacks by the Nazis.
…
After the war, Moldetsky – by merit of Zionist activities – was
understandably one of the first to receive an immigration certificate to
Palestine. His collaboration in the murder of tens of thousands of Jews
did
not make him unfit in the eyes of the officials of the Jewish Agency, who
were distributing the certificates. He went to Eretz Yisroel where, it has
been reported, the revengeful hand of the Jews of Bedzin killed him while
he
was taking a trip in the mountains.
(Reb Moshe Shonfeld, The Holocaust Victims Accuse: Documents and
Testimony on Jewish War Criminals, Neturei Karta of U.S.A., Brooklyn, 1977,
pp. 122-123)

The media make much of Ukrainians welcoming the invading Germans. For
example, on October 24, 1993, Morley Safer stated on the 60 Minutes story
The Ugly Face of Freedom that “The same square [in Lviv, Ukraine] greeted
Hitler’s troops fifty years ago as liberators,” making this seem like a
symptom of a Ukrainian sympathy for Naziism. What Mr. Safer did not
specify
is who were the people in that square who were welcoming Hitler’s troops,
and the truth was that all people – Ukrainians, Poles, and Jews – welcomed
Hitler’s troops. Jews welcomed Hitler’s troops? Yes, so it would appear:

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Now with more evidence coming out proving ZHID COLLABORATION
WITH NAZIS – another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case –
no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
Christkiller ZHIDS!!

or to Steve Horn – [email protected],
or Ariadne
or [email protected]

Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Feel free to subscribe us to maillists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

From [email protected] Sun Nov 30 14:38:03 EST 2008
Article: 514700 of soc.culture.russian
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
From: Frank Arthur
Cc: [email protected]
X-Invalid: [email protected],[email protected]
Newsgroups: soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.russian
Subject: Ukraine 75th Anniversary of ZYD/Soviet HOLODOMOR MURDERED 10 Million
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:40:05 -0700 (MST)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit – Mail2News
Lines: 690
Bytes: 28864
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.ukrainian:117332 soc.culture.europe:625034 soc.culture.polish:896260 soc.culture.russian:514700