Documents

Alb 0894, Bouthillier Arthur

> Who does “white nationalism” actually serve?

Whites.

> My thesis is that “white nationalism” serves the politically sophisticated
> subcultures most likely to rule “whites” in the absence of competition
> from nonwhites.

Your thesis is unsupported. White nationalism serve the nationalization
of Whites. It serves to bind them as one people and gives them political
autonomy.

> The so-called “white nationalist movement” most emphatically does NOT
> serve the interests of those of Norther European heritage.

Being of Northern European heritage, I would like you to support this.
Being a White Northern European, I believe that my race and its descendents
are best served when we see ourselves as a whole nation and we aspire to
political independence (i.e. we become increasingly nationalistic).

> Nationalism means centralism and centralism attracts political animals
> to positions of leadership.

Wrong. Nationalism and centralism have nothing whatsoever to do with each
other. Nationalism is a socio-ethnic movement which seeks to unify and
liberate a people. Even your expressions about “People of my own heritage
(Northern European)…” are nationalistic.

> People of my own heritage (Northern European) are best served by
> allying themselves with the decentralist impulses

You’ve said it now prove it. I happen to disagree with you. Although
I believe a decentralist cultural movement is vital, I think that it
must come to see itself as a movement which seeks to embody its political
interests in one or more political regimes.

> Northern Europeans have a proud and ancient history of individualism
> that predates Christianity.

Whatever. Pre-Christian Nordics were very tribal. Tribalism is nationalism.

> Nationalism is anathema to our ancient traditions of individual sovereignty
> — traditions that we reasserted during the framing of the U.S. Constitution
> when we had a brief haitus from encroaching cultures.

Nationalism is anathema only to anti-nationalism. It implies no particular
doctrine other than that a particular social group exists, that it must
have political sovereignty and that its interests are paramount. Read a
book before you start attacking the very basis of your own philosophy.
Whether you like it or not, YOU are a White nationalist despite the fact
that you badmouth nationalism.

> We shouldn’t begrudge nationalist/centralist movements. They may
> well be appropriate for groups such as Farrakhan’s constituency.

Enough of your ridiculous juxtaposition. Because it is good for Farrakhan’s
constituency, it surely must be bad for us….

> However, when we look at the history of nationalistic movements in
> Northern Europe, we see a history of take-over by socially sophisticated
> subcultures.

Let’s see… The Irish Republican Army and Sinn Fein sure are “taken over”
by SSS’s (Socially Sophisticated Subcultures).

The solution is to become socially sophisticated ourselves. Besides, the
term “socially sophisticated” is relative and is hardly refers to any
particular people.

> For example, the National Socialist German Workers Party came to be led
> by a man who probably had a Jewish grandparent (ie: Adolph Hitler).

Prove it.

> The closest historic parallel to modern day “white nationalism” probably
> comes in the early days of the Communist Party.

What?!? You need to go get a book on nationalism and study it before
making ridiculous claims.

> Why should we suspect that an almalgamation of European nationalist
> movements would really be substantially better for the genuine
> interests of my people?

Because it will unify us as a people and acquire our political
self-determination. It will install one or more regimes which will
be solely dedicated to promoting our interests.

> Farrakhan is offering us the best deal of any public figure today — not
> the “white” nationalists.

If you think so, then go join him.

> The fact is there have been enormous shifts of power in the last
> decades WITHIN the “white” community

Probably because people like you offer sophistry instead of true political
weapons to fight with. Nationalism is the desire of a people to remain
a people and seek political and social independence. It can take many
different forms. Like I have said earlier, even your call for a decentralized
Nordic existence is nationalistic.

> … away from those of my own heritage (Northern European) and toward those
> of Mediterranian heritage and mostly toward those of Jewish heritage.

Since when were either of those groups White?

> The only way out for Americans of Northern European heritage is to:
>
> 1) blah.
> 2) blah.
> 3) blah.

There are many options and the ones you mention are clearly ridiculous.

> 1) Acknowledge their specific obligations to American Indians and
> African Americans.

Sure, I’ll acknowledge my obligations to them by warning them that they
had better get out of our way.

> 2) Pay up and separate.

We’ll pay with blood.

> 3) Live up to our heritage and pursue a pioneering destiny through
> the development of technologies that expand the supply of the most
> basic needs such as environmentally benign agricultural capacity,

We may have a pioneering destiny but that is still many generations
away.

> I differ in that I believe we must allow communities to have autonomy
> and self-determination by whatever boundries and criteria for membership
> they see fit.

Sounds like nationalism to me.

> More importantly, I think history will bear out my position as the most
> effective and moral one.

There is nothing moral about your positions. You demand that Whites today
accept moral responsibility for something that they didn’t do. According
to you, we are born guilty. It is you and people like you that have
created the lack of direction and moral strenght needed to secure our
people.

> I believe “whites” that pursue integration will continue to face the same
> decimation that those of Norther Eurpoean heritage of experienced have in
> recent decades.

The decimation is the result of coercion by a government and its social
policies in a manner which is not in our interests. The solution is
obvious: get a government that represents our interests.

> Those “whites” that react violently and pursue conscious or unconscious
> genocide will be defeated and find themselves adrift in the backwaters of
> humanity.

Prove it.

> This warning applies to all potential white nationalists but especially to
> Jewish white nationalists who appear poised to lead Judeo-Christian Western
> Civilization as one enormous nation and society.

See, your problem is obvious. The reason people like you would let SSS’s
take over is because you include them in your constituency group. Jews are
not White.

> The promotion of politics exterminates apolitical genes in the population.
> The promotion of frontiers gives apolitical genes a route to survival.

You have yet to have proven the existence of “political genes.” Assuming
such genes existed, frontiers would not give such genes a proper route
to express themselves. In fact, it is entirely possible that pursuing
frontiers would lead to their extermination because they would not be
used properly. All of this is purely ridiculous. Politics is controlled
by social norms, not genetics. If you would stop promoting ridiculous
social norms, then we could adequately develop our political strength.

Besides, like I said earlier, the reason that SSS’s could gain any kind
of foothold is because of people like you. Jews are not White. The
Southern Europeans are not White. So it is ridiculous for you to say that
there has been a shift WITHIN the White community. That you provide them an
opportunity for social manipulation is the reason that they are doing so.

You provide them with those opportunities by: 1) Saying that they are
White and 2) Saying that we have an “original sin” for the activities
of our ancestors. Both are wrong; you are wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
APendragon
[email protected]
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Article 7881 of alt.skinheads:
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!psgrain!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!
nic-nac.CSU.net!clstac!aelebouthill
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Drinkin’ songs…
Date: 2 Aug 94 00:20:23 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1994Aug2.002023.1@clstac>
References:
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsb.is.csupomona.edu

In article , [email protected] (Jason Smith) wr

> A little postscript, as an afterthought…
>
> Who else here thinks Irish songs are the *best* damn drinking
> songs around?! What is it with Irish music, that’s so bloody energetic?

ME! ME! ME!! Long live the Irish Rovers! Long live the Clancy Brothers.
Long live Tommy Makem!!!! They are endowed by the gods to sing of beer!

Art

Article 7901 of alt.skinheads:
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!psgrain!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!
nic-nac.CSU.net!clstac!aelebouthill
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Rwanda
Date: 2 Aug 94 20:47:00 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Lines: 14
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1994Aug2.204700.1@clstac>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsb.is.csupomona.edu

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
(Gregg Sneirson) writes:

> a>The situation in Rwanda was caused by the Jews.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Could you expand on this? How is the animosity between the Tutsis and
> the Hutus attributable to Jewish people?

Hey Snierson,
ever hear of flame bait? You just bought some. Don’t you get it?

Art
14 Words

Article 7921 of alt.skinheads:
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!zip.eecs.umich.edu!
panix!ddsw1!news.kei.com!eff!news.duke.edu!convex!cs.utexas.edu!
math.ohio-state.edu!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!clstac!aelebouthill
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Who is “WHITE?”
Date: 4 Aug 94 10:00:49 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Lines: 65
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1994Aug4.100049.1@clstac>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.is.csupomona.edu

> While Pendragon and I are men of differing temperaments and opinions,
> we share blood that is under attack. All else is secondary.

I agree. Because of that, I will not further pursue this issue other
than expressing my viewpoint that you are wrong on a few major issues:
1) Whites aren’t born with an original sin for being borne of Whites
2) There is nothing moral about positing [1]
3) Whites don’t need to leave North America to be moral
4) Whites are just as capable of engaging in successful politics
as long as they don’t start from a losing position [i.e. that they
don’t have any right to North America] or by not developing our
necessary political potentials.

> Different genotypes have different strategies for competition and victory
> when placed in conflict with others.

So? Humans have greater mental abilities and culture is far more influential
than genetics in most circumstances. “The Envelope of Capabilities” defined
by genetics is rarely pushed in most human endeavors; ergo, culture is a
more significant factor in the long term because it affects all of those
times when genetics is not tested.

> We win through force, they win through deceipt and manipulation.

You’re wrong; we win by whatever it takes. Summarizing what Clausewitz said,
war is politics by other means: “War is a mere continuation of policy by
other means.” Your conception of what war is might be fine for cannon
fodder, but the reality of war seen by generals and politicians far
exceeds the ability of cannon fodder to appreciate.

> The last thing we need is to promote situations in which deceipt and
> manipulation are allowed to insinuate themselves into our social fabric
> out of a sense of self-sacrifice to the group during a possibly
> artificially extended period of “inescapable” militarism.

Nonsense, the key principle of warfare is deception; if you are unable
to appreciate that, you might win a battle or two here and there but you
will not win the war. Because one has limited resources, one must apply
them so as to attain the highest benefit for the lowest detriment. In
order to do this, you must use deception. Read what the Jews say their
god told them in the Bible: “By way of deception thou shalt wage war.”
If you can’t appreciate the meaning of that, become cannon fodder, not
a leader. You’re fighting the wrong war.

Another important principle of warfare is concentration of resources
to overcome the enemy’s lack of resources (which can only occur AFTER
deception). Since our resource is our people, they must be led to bring
about the most effective results. We have tremendously greater resources
than any other single enemy of ours but they are obviously being misplaced.
In order to bring a human resource to bear on a problem, they must know
for what they fight. Once they know why they fight, they must be emplaced
so as to bring about the most effect tactical victories in order to
satisfy the strategic aspects of policy.

If you are to learn anything from Nordic history, learn that the Celts,
with their highly developed warrior culture based on individual acheivement,
could not overcome the professional soldiers of the Roman legions. Despite
the fact that the Celts often outnumbered the legions, the legions won
because of the proper (strategic) emplacement of their resources. The
history books abound with stories of the Romans’ wonderment at the Celtic
spirit which, though they had to admit was wonderful, could not overcome
the coordinated and disciplined attacks of the legions.

Arthur LeBouthillier
The White race must survive.
Article 8110 of alt.skinheads:
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!news.mic.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!
agate!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!clstac!aelebouthill
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
Subject: FAQ: W H I T E P O W E R 7.13.94
Date: 11 Aug 94 18:30:37 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Lines: 589
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1994Aug11.183037.1@clstac>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.is.csupomona.edu

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: WHITE POWER

Last Update: 13 July 1994

RECENT UPDATES
————–
Added Book: The Aryans

WHITE POWER
———–

What is White Power?

White Power is an empowering philosophy of White racial nationalism and
ethnicity. It refers to a diverse range of philosophies from leftist
National Socialism, to White Pride, to rightist White Supremacy. Perhaps
the simplest imperative about what White Power stands for exists in
the “14 words” coined by former Bruder Schweigen member, David Lane:

We must secure the existence of our people
and a future for White children.

Where does the term White Power come from?

Although it is possibly a response to black nationalist Stokely
Carmichael’s book _Black_Power_, the phrase “White Power” was a
popular term coined by participants at a George Lincoln Rockwell
rally in Marquedt Park, Illinois in 1967. Spontaneously the
attendants started rallying behind the call for White Power. It
has been a popular phrase since then and was the title of George
Lincoln Rockwell’s book _White_Power_.

What is an Aryan?

Aryan is a term that many ancient Indo-European peoples called
themselves. It means “good,” “best,” or “noble.” The ancient
Hindus called themselves Aryans and derivitives of this term
are evident in the country-names of Erin (Ireland) and Iran (Aryan).
Today, some people of the European branch of Indo-Europeans call
themselves that as a unique indicator of who they are and what their
racial ideals are.

What is ZOG?

ZOG (for Zionist Occupation Government ) is a euphemism for those
governments which purport to represent white people while actually
subscribing to an anti-white agenda. These governments often put
“Israel First,” while seconding the interests and desires of racial
and nationalist whites for the interests of multi-racial societies and
world government.

Aren’t all White Power advocates White supremacists?

No. Supremacy refers to an alleged right to rule over other races.
Although some White Power people are White Supremacists, many are
not. Those who are not supremacists are actually White nationalists or
separatists and advocate for the formation of a White homeland in
a manner which does not deny the human rights of non-whites.

What differences are there in White Power groups?

There are many different viewpoints collected under the term White Power.
A few of the philosophical viewpoints are:

Supremacists – Supremacist arguments state that the White race is
inherently superior and therefore is justified in ruling over
other peoples. They often state that Whites assuming power over
all of the earth’s inhabitants is doing them a favor since Whites
are the only people superior enough to make good judgements.

National Socialists – based on Adolf Hitler’s doctrine as outlined
in his book Mein Kampf, the adherents of this viewpoint often
don’t see this as a “right-wing” cause but rather as a racially
progressive left-wing movement. National Socialism is founded
on several doctrines: nationalism, the long-view of history and
racism. It adheres to the viewpoint of The Leader Principle
whereby a people are best led by strong leaders rather than by
their inherent weaknesses which democracy brings out.

Christian Identity – this religious doctrine believes that Whites
are the true Israelites described in the bible. It adheres to a
doctrine of two-creations in Genesis whereby God created all of
the other animals and races and then created the Adamic (White)
race. They cite the fact that Adam means “able to show blood in
the face” which would refer uniquely to the White race. They also
believe that Jesus’s message has become corrupted because he did
not come for all peoples, but as said in Matthew 15:24 “I am not
sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

White Nationalists – this refers to a number of ideological viewpoints
which view the White race as an ethnic nation which must have its
own homeland in order to survive. Its adherents believe that the
only state which can legitimately represent the White race is one
which is purposely organized to represent it.

Separatists – this catch-all identifier applies to many people who
are not ideological at all. They merely recognize that we Whites
are a different people and that we must survive as a people. They
advocate the separation of the races, usually in different
homelands for the different races. Some separatists advocate
“The Northwest Imperative” which calls for the formation of a
White homeland in the Pacific Northwest.

Often, many of these viewpoints are expressed within a single group.
The members of these groups bring differing ideas about what the goals
of White Power should be, what programs can best attain its ideals,
what a good White society is and how a White nation-state should be
organized. But, despite these differences they are all agreed on one
point: The White race must survive.

What is a race?

The word race derives from the Spanish word raza which means “line.”
It refers to genetic lineage. A race is a lineal ethnic group which
because of its genetic heritage, exhibits unique phenotypic features
or patterns. However, despite these genetic features, race also
refers to an ethnicity and an ethnic identity that is based on these
features. As racists use the term, it is not equivalent to the
biological word “race” which is merely a sub-breeding group of a
species. Although as racists use the term a race is a sub-breeding
group of the human species, it also refers to a set of group ideals
and norms consistent with the maintenance of that ethnic group.

What is racism?

Racism is the promotion of a race and its interests. It refers to a
desire to maintain a unique ethnic identity closely bound to the
physical characteristics that define that group. It also refers to
a whole body of social norms which are consistent with maintaining
that group and promoting a society which is consistent with racial
ideals.

What is race-mixing?

Race-mixing is the mixing of races, also known as miscegenation.
The term “race-mixer” refers to those who advocate mixed-race
societies as an ideal and those who engage in sexual relations with
those of other races. Race-mixing is highly frowned upon by racists
and race-mixers are often severely admonished.

What is a Hammerskin?

In Pink Floyd’s _The_Wall_ movie, there is a video segment sung to
the tune “Up against the Wall,” where Pink takes on the visage of
a powerful leader. During this sequence, hundreds of skinheads march
through the street and chase the “Pakis” (Pakistanis) out of England.
Although the movie is largely opposed to that viewpoint, young skinheads
were emboldened by the image of strength and came to call themselves
Hammerskins. As these groups spread throughout the U.S. and Canada,
they took on regional prefixes like: Western Hammerskins, Northern
Hammerskins, Confederate Hammerskins and other names.

Why do you hate?
Why do you hate Jews?
Why do you hate Blacks?
Why do you hate everybody?

White Power advocates love their race. Because of that, they are
strongly opposed to any attempts to harm it by means of loss of
territory, loss of economic or political self-determination, loss
of cultural identity, disenfranchisement or race mixing. In order to
preserve their race and its interests, they are often willing to engage
in hostile acts against perceived threats to it.

Why don’t you get a life?

White Power advocates do have lives which are based on different
principles and ideals from those of race-mixers.

CONTEMPORARY BOOKS ON WHITE POWER
———————————

The following are somewhat “objective” in their appraisal of White Power
advocates:

Blood In the Face by James Ridgeway

The New Reich: Violent Extremism in unified Germany and beyond
by Michael Schmidt

Skinheads shaved for battle: a cultural history of American Skinheads
by Jack B. Moore

The Silent Brotherhood: Inside America’s Racist Underground
by Kevin Flynn and Gary Gerhardt

Is God a racist?: the right wing in Canada
by Stanley R. Barrett

The following are heavily biased against White Power and often misrepresent it:

Armed and Dangerous: The rise of the survivalist right
by James Coates

Brotherhood of Murder
by Thomas Martineze with John Guinther

Free to Hate: The rise of the right in post-communist Eastern Europe
by Paul Hockenos

Skinhead Streetgangs
by Loren Christensen. Paladin Books ISBN 0-87364-756-4

Any ADL publication

MAGAZINE ARTICLES ABOUT WHITE POWER AND WHITE POWER SKINHEADS
————————————————————-

“Mainstream” Hatred by Mira L. Boland, ADL in The Police Chief
magazine, June 1992 (other articles can be found in that issue
and in other issues).

Hitler’s Offspring by Martin A. Lee in The Progressive, March 1993

Hatred Rising: The Sound of Jackboots in Europe and Russia
by Derek Ingram in World Press Review February 1994

Inside South London’s Nazi Headquarters
in New Statesman and Society (British magazine) January 1993

Long Day’s Journey Into White by Kathy Dobie,
in The Village Voice April 28, 1992

BOOKS AND ARTICLES OF INTEREST TO THOSE WITH A WHITE IDENTITY
(thought-provoking books and articles with supportive arguments)
—————————————————————-

Articles:
America’s Changing Colors
in Time magazine, 9 April 1990

Can American Democracy Survive? by Bruce D. Porter
in Commentary November 1993

Race Unconsciousness and the White Male by Frederick R. Lynch
in Society magazine Jan/Feb 1992

Seeds of Racial Explosion by Timur Kuran
in Society magazine October 1993

The Ordeal of Immigration in Wausau by Roy Beck
in The Atlantic Monthly, April 1994

The American Family Transformed by David A. Hamburg
in Society magazine Jan/Feb 1993

Books:
Ethnic Identity: The Transformation of White America
by Richard D. Alba

Tribes: How Race, Religion and Identity Determine Success in the
New Global Economy by Joel Kotkin

Spirit of ’69 Available from:
S.T. Publishing
PO Box 12
Dunoon, Argyll
PA23 7BQ
Scotland

Wider die Misstrauensgesselschaft
Irenaeus Eibel Eibelsfeldt
Pieper-Verlag

The Aryans
by V. Gordon Childe. Copyright 1993 Barnes & Noble Books
ISBN 0-8829-139-7

WHITE POWER BOOKDEALERS
———————–

Aryan Free Press Books, P.O. Box 6853 Champaign Illinois 61826

National Vanguard Books, P.O. Box 330 Hillsboro WV 24946

NS Publications, Box 27486 Milwaukee WI 53227

— “Those who do not read have no advantage over those who cannot read.” —

WHITE POWER NEWSLETTERS, NEWSPAPERS AND MAGAZINES
————————————————-

Aryan Free Press Books P.O. Box 6853 Champaign Illinois 61826

Aryan Nations/Church of Jesus Christ Christian
P.O. Box 362 Hayden, Idaho 83835

The Balance
C/O Cause
1101 Post Oak Blvd. Suite 9497
Houston, TX 77056

Instauration
Howard Allen Enterprises, Inc.
Box 76
Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920
$35/year

The Jubilee [ A wonderful Christian Identity newspaper ]
P.O. Box 310
Midpines, CA 95345

National Vanguard
by National Alliance P.O. Box 330 Hillsboro WV 24946

New Order
by NSDAP-AO P.O. Box 6414 Lincoln, Nebraska 68506

NS Kindred P.O. Box 256 N.S.J. Ca 95960

Plexus: A National Socialist Theoretical Journal
by National Worker’s League P.O. Box 642376 Omaha Ne 68164-8376

Remarks
P.O. Box 234
Aurora, NY 13026-0234

Stormfront: Forecast for Tomorrow
P.O. Box 6637
West Palm Beach, FL 33405

WAR P.O. Box 65 Fallbrook Ca. 92088

The War Eagle P.O. Box 6881 Champaign Illinois 61826

HAMMERSKIN CHAPTERS * denotes where to write to said band
——————-

Confederate Hammer Skins:
PO Box 741314 dallas, TX, 75374-1314
PO Box 460837 Garland, TX, 75046-0837
PO Box A0211 Oklahahoma City, OK, 73162
PO Box 772 Tulsa OK 74101
1926 HWY. 31 S. Ste.101 Birmingham, AL 35244
PO Box 88 Butler, TN, 37640
PO Box 670781 Marietta, Ga 30066-0130
661 Blanding Blvd. Ste. 329 Orange Park, Fl. 32073

Northern Hammer Skins:
PO Box 6773 East St. Paul, MN 55106 *Bound for Glory & Vanguard
PO Box 734 Midlothian, Il 60445 *Final Slution
PO Box 08-1371 Rochester, MI 48308 * Max Resist
PO Box 03, Kenosha WI 53141
PO Box 33 Germantown, WI 53022
PO Box 600 Stevens Point, WI 54481
PO Box 1845 Stow, OH 44224-0845
913 Bristol, IN 46507
3404 St Louis, MO 63143

Eastern Hammer Skins:
PO Box 9441 Newark, DE 19714-9441 *Nordic Thunder
PO Box 273 Earlville, PA 19519
PO 21 Stewartstown, PA 17363
PO Box 410444 East Cambridge, MA 02141

Canada:

Northern Hammer Skins:
34026 Lachine, Quebec H8S 4H4 *Ragnarok & Involved Patriots
46079 Co.P. Gal ies Chagnon, Levis, G6V-8S3
252 Winnipeg, Man R3C 2G9
6054 Station A, Toronto, On. M5W 1X4 *White Riot
265 Surrey, BC, V3T 4W8 *Odin’s Law

Europe:

Swiss Hammerskins: PO Box 656, 6014 Littau
German Hammerskins: PO Box 1133, 6830 Schwetzingen
British Hammerskins BM Box 1245 London WC1N 3XX
Charlemagne Hammerskins: BP 142, 94733 Nogent s/Marne Cedex, France
Exiled Charlemagne Hammerskins: c/o Northern Hammer Skins, St. Paul
Bohemia Hammerskins PO Box 70 Trutnov 4, 54102 Czech Republic
PO Box 49, Hronov 1, 59431
PO Box 8, Slapanice, 66451
PO 100, Novy Jicin, 74111

Australia:

Southern Cross Hammerksins:
533, Moorabbin, Victoria 3189 *Fortress
186, Annandale, NSW, 2038

INTERNATIONAL CONTACTS
———————-

British National Party
P.O. Box 117
Welling Kent DA
163 DW

Afrikaner Resistance Movement
POS BUS 4118
Pretoria 0001
South Afrika

Ethnic Peoples Worldwide Fed.
CP2544 CH1002
Lausanne, Switzerland

MUSIC, T-SHIRTS, SKINZINES
————————–

For North American White Power music, contact:

Krowbar Records
P.O. Box 40383
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
70835-0383, USA

Nordic Wolfpack!
P.O. Box 8
13143 Monk, Piereefonds
Montreal, Quebec
H8Z 1T4 Canada

Phoenix Records
P.O. Box 898
Walnut, California
91788, USA

Resistance Records
P.O. Box 24700
Detroit, Michigan
48224, USA

Totenkopf Services
1040 S. Mount Vernon
Suite 123
Colton, CA
92324, USA

For European White Power, contact:

Rock-o-Rama Records
Kaiserstr. 119
50321 Bruehl
Germany

For all Skrewdriver T-Shirts or CD’s, contact:

Renewal of Identity (R.I.D.)
P.O. Box 249
Derby DE21 9EG
England

For the latest in White Power music, read:

Blood & Honour
B.M. Box 5608
London, WC1 3XX
England

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Blood & Honor
P.O. Box 1234
Long Beach, CA
90801 USA

$3.00/issue US and Canada
$4.00/issue International
$18.00/6 issues US and Canada
$24.00/6 issues International

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

MZ (Moderne Zeiten)
Postfach 103035
40021 Duesseldorf
Germany

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Rampage: A Skinhead Voice
P.O. Box 19
Coalville
Leicester LE67 1DS
England

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

SledgeHammer: The Voice of the White Nations,
by the Northern Hammer Skins
PO Box 428
Gatineau Quebec, J8P 7A1 Canada

$25.00/yr. (12 issues) in Canada
$30.00/yr. U.S.
$35.00/yr. Overseas
All rates are in Canadian funds

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Resistance
The Music Magazine of the True Alternative
P.O. Box 24700
Detroit, Michigan 48224 USA

$12.00/yr (4 issues)

Resistance is one of the best quality White Power music magazines around.

HOTLINES ( Telephone numbers to hear a White Power message )
————————————————————

WAR (White Aryan Resistance)
Fallbrook, California, USA
(619) 723-8996

Equal Rights for Whites
Canada
(416) 699-4868

Euro-Canadian Action Line
Canada
(416) 631-3545

Info Line for Shows & Events
(416) 631-3927

POWS Soldiers captured while fighting for their racial nation
—- ——————————————————–

David Tate W/155209 Frank Silva #09993-016
Missouri State Prison B2 Room 422
P.O. Box 900 P.O. Box PMB
Jefferson City, MO 65102 Atlanta, GA 30315

David Lane #12873-057 Bruce Pierce 04181-085
USP High PO Box 7000 P.O. Box 1000
Florence CO 81226 Marion, IL 62959

Randy Evans 09882-016 Gary Yarbrough
P.O. Box 1000 #09883-016 US PEN.
Marion, IL 62959 A-206 P.O. Box 1000
Leavenworth, KS 66048

Yorie Von Kahl 04565-059 Richard Scutari
Box 1000, J-3 Unit #34840-080
Lewisburg, PA 17837 P.O. Box 1000
Marion, IL 62959

MARTYRS: Those who gave their lives for their race
————————————————–

Kathy Ainsworth

Gordon Kahl
Died: 3 June 1983
Summary: A leader of the Posse Commitatus, Gordon Kahl was shot
and immolated by the FBI.

Robert Jay Mathews
Born: 16 January, 1949
Died: 8 December 1984
Summary: Founder of the Bruderschweigen (The Silent Brotherhood),
sometimes called The Order. Bob Mathews fought for his racial
nation until he was immolated by the FBI at a Whidbey Island
shootout.

Samual Weaver
Died: 21 August 1992
Summary: 14-year old Samual was shot in the back by Feds who were
trespassing on his father’s property.

Vicki Weaver
Died: 4 June 1983
Summary: Shot in the face by Fed sniper Lon Haruchi while holding
her baby.

Article 8251 of alt.skinheads:
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!
usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!clstac!aelebouthill
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: I don’t understand racism at all…
Date: 21 Aug 94 22:52:48 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Lines: 44
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1994Aug21.225248.1@clstac>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsb.is.csupomona.edu

>> I don’t understand racism at all…

Do you understand ethnicity?

> Well, try this:
>
> [Horse and Dog stuff deleted]

Racism predated the pseudo-scientific Darwinism. Racism is plainly and
simply the promotion of a race. A race is a lineal ethnic group. A lineal
ethnic group is distinguished from your run-of-the-mill ethnic group in
that it consists primarily of people of a single lineal heritage. Your
run-of-the-mill ethnic group (like the so-called “Hispanics”) can be
composed of people of many different heritages (a so-called “Hispanic”
might be either White, Black, Indian, Asian or cocker-spaniel).

Anyways, the difference lies in the definition of what constitutes the
society and what the ends of that society are. In racism, the members
of the society are not all those warm bodies who happen to live in a
given territory, but those people of acceptable heritages. The purpose
of a racial society is to promote the interests of that group ONLY and
without compromise. Doesn’t seem so hard to understand does it?

>> The real difference is that it is illogical and inefficient to
>> discriminate based on race in an interdependent human society.

Stop with the pseudo-intellectual humanistic garbage: “interdependent
human society.” All societies are interdependent within themselves.

Besides, I don’t want my society to continue to be or to be more
“interdependent” with other societies to the degree that it destroys
my own. I don’t want to belong to some “Global Village/Global Slum
World Tribe.” I want to belong to and promote the White race.

>> No sense in discriminating against an individual trait or a race trait
>> if it is productive to a society as a whole.

Right, but it DOES make sense to discriminate against an individual
trait or race if they AREN’T productive to the society as a whole
(especially if they happen to belong to people who are foreign to that
society and its ideals).

Arthur LeBouthillier
The White Race must survive.

Article 8258 of alt.skinheads:
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!torn!spool.mu.edu!agate!library.ucla.edu!
csulb.edu!nic-nac.CSU.net!clstac!aelebouthill
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: I don’t understand racism at all…
Date: 22 Aug 94 23:30:10 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Lines: 31
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1994Aug22.233010.1@clstac>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsb.is.csupomona.edu

> I’m not trying to be an asshole, just seems like some of the WP people
> on here think that arguing is bad.

If you are refering to me, then I apologize for my acerbic responses.
I am merely used to dealing with half-wits who don’t want to think and
so I respond in a “less than kind” manner. I believe that arguing can be
a very productive thing; it helps people understand and learn. Of course,
merely because we argue does not mean that we must agree.

> In every businness transaction it is not needed to get along with the
> other party, but I would think that it would help.

But it must be realized that business is a MEANS not an END. Anyways,
“getting along” does not mean advocating miscegenation and the destruction
of one’s nation.

> The examples you have given are States, ruled by inexperienced governments.

The examples Mr. Smith gave were multi-racial/ethnic States. These States
were artificially produced by the colonial powers in such a manner that
ethnic rivalries could be played against each other while ensuring the
dominance of the colonialists.

> The colonies that you speak of may have been doing well economically
> under white rule, simple because it was an oppressive white rule.

So if they had oppressive black rule would they do as well? The empirical
evidence doesn’t support that.

Arthur LeBouthillier
14 Words

Article 8290 of alt.skinheads:
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!torn!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!
nic-nac.CSU.net!clstac!aelebouthill
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: I don’t understand racism at all…
Date: 23 Aug 94 22:46:55 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Lines: 86
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1994Aug23.224655.1@clstac>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.is.csupomona.edu

[email protected] writes:

> I think the point that you bring up here feeds my analysis on why there
> are problems in Africa now.

But you miss the larger point in my previous post. There were no “Africans.”
There were disparate and different tribes which warred against each other
and of which the colonial powers took advantage. Just as there was no
“Africa,” there was no “India;” India was merely hundreds of fiefdoms and
kingdoms without centrality or commonality. Depending on your definition,
there are over a 1,000 different languages there. The commonality that
all the “Indians” have today is their previous dominance by the British
empire.

The Africans have never developed into true nations as we know them; the
states that exist are the products of Colonialism. Even today, the nations
are still fragmented and warring.

I know people like to talk about a time when there were “great kingdoms”
in Africa, but that is a pure exaggeration. The most highly developed
state of which I know was “Greater Zimbabwe” which was hardly more than
a large town (at maximum there were 10,000 people there). The civilization
that was represented there was largely a product of trading with Arabs.

Anyways, my intent is not to degrade blacks. If they develop themselves,
if they had previously been developed, then great. However, it does not
serve my nation to have them cohabiting, miscegenating and demanding
legal privileges.

> I still fail to see the racial view behind it all.

Well, first you say “I don’t understand racism” and now you’re telling
us what it means. First, like I said earlier, racism predates Darwinistic
justifications of it. Second, it has been extremely misrepresented and
maligned in the past 50 years. Older dictionaries reflect a much different
definition of racism than current ones do; there, one can find better
definitions.

Let’s start at the beginning:

-ISM = … 3. action, conduct, or qualities characteristic of
[i.e. patriotism]. 4. the doctrine, school, theory, or
principle of [i.e. cubism, socialism] 5. devotion to
[i.e. nationalism]… <>

RACE = … 5. any group of people having the same ancestry, clan,
lineage…

The above definitions come from Webster’s New World Dictionary. Now,
it should be noted that a dictionary is only a reference of commonly
used definitions and, as such, merely denotes common usage.

From the above, it can be seen that RACE-ISM is/can be described as
devotion to one’s race or the doctrine that advocates that. However, if
one examines most dictionaries’ definitions of racism, it becomes obvious
that the definition of racism is clearly misrepresented. Nationalism isn’t
the hatred of other nations, it is devotion to one’s own; consequently,
racism is devotion to one’s race (at least my own brand of racism is).

In reality, racism is merely a kind of ethnicity (in fact it predates
the concept of ethnicity as we know it today). As I stated earlier, the
thing that distinguishes a “race” from a mere “ethnic group” is its
lineal specificity. Whereas an “ethnic” group may be composed of people
of many different lineages/races, a race consists of those people of
limited and common lineages.

In examining ethnicity/racism it is important to realize that beyond
a mere method of classifying people, it reflects a social ethic for a
group of people. It defines who the members of a society are, what their
goals and roles are and what is good and bad. This ethic states that good
is that which serves one’s people. It is a collectivist ethic which
advocates amity within the nation and enmity to those outside.

> … we haven’t seen oppressive black rule until recently … I think it
> would be the same if the roles were reversed.

Well, the conditions for “oppressive” black rule haven’t existed since
large black civilizations haven’t existed. One might point out ancient
Egypt, however, Egypt didn’t start out black but became that over time.
But, one could definitely say that ancient Egypt was “oppressive” since
it was a theistic empire based on slavery (which is no different than
any other civilization up until this century).

Arthur LeBouthillier
The White Race must survive.

Article 8305 of alt.skinheads:
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!torn!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!
nic-nac.CSU.net!clstac!aelebouthill
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: I don’t understand racism at all…
Date: 24 Aug 94 16:15:18 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Lines: 20
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1994Aug24.161518.1@clstac>
References: <1994Aug21.225248.1@clstac> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.is.csupomona.edu

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (wondrboy) writes:
> [email protected] wrote:
> : >> I don’t understand racism at all…
> :
> : Arthur LeBouthillier
> : The White Race must survive.
>
> The white race will destroy itself.
>
That’s entirely possible. If it does destroy itself, it is because it
is following self-destructive ethics (liberalism, conservatism, marxism,
capitalism and other -isms). The only hope for the White race lies in
another -ism: racism.

Arthur LeBouthillier
By the deeds of heroes
and the blood of martyrs,
all good comes to be.

Article 8314 of alt.skinheads:
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!torn!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!
nic-nac.CSU.net!clstac!aelebouthill
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
Subject: FAQ: WHITE POWER 08.22.94
Date: 25 Aug 94 09:31:00 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Lines: 607
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1994Aug25.093100.1@clstac>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.is.csupomona.edu

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: WHITE POWER

Last Update: 22 August 1994

RECENT UPDATES
————–
Removed Newspaper: Sledgehammer
Added Article: Small is Beautiful
Added Magazine: Up Front (The Heritage Front)
Added Phoneline: The Heritage Front
Added Phoneline: Realm of Indiana
Added Book: Hard Right: The New White Power in South Africa
Added Book: Organizing for Power and Empowerment

WHITE POWER
———–
What is White Power?

We must secure the existence of our people
and a future for White children.

Where does the term White Power come from?

What is an Aryan?

What is ZOG?

Aren’t all White Power advocates White supremacists?

What differences are there in White Power groups?

There are many different viewpoints collected under the term White Power.
A few of the philosophical viewpoints are:

Separatists – this catch-all identifier applies to many people who
are not ideological at all. They merely recognize that we Whites
are a different people and that we must survive as a people. They
advocate the separation of the races, usually with different
homelands for the different races. Some separatists advocate
“The Northwest Imperative” which calls for the formation of a
White homeland in the Pacific Northwest.

What is a race?

The word race derives from the Spanish word raza which means “line.”
It may also derive from the latin word “ratio.” It refers to genetic
lineage. A race is a lineal ethnic group which because of its genetic
heritage, exhibits unique phenotypic features or patterns. However,
despite these genetic features, race also refers to an ethnicity and
an ethnic identity that is based on these features. As racists use the
term, it is not equivalent to the biological word “race” which is
merely a sub-breeding group of a species. Although as racists use the
term a race is a sub-breeding group of the human species, it also
refers to a set of group ideals and norms consistent with the
maintenance of that ethnic group and an ethnic society.

What is racism?

What is race-mixing?

What is a Hammerskin?

Why do you hate?
Why do you hate Jews?
Why do you hate Blacks?
Why do you hate everybody?

Why don’t you get a life?

White Power advocates do have lives which are based on different
principles and ideals from those of race-mixers.

CONTEMPORARY BOOKS ON WHITE POWER
———————————

The following are somewhat “objective” in their appraisal of White Power
advocates:

Blood In the Face by James Ridgeway

The New Reich: Violent Extremism in unified Germany and beyond
by Michael Schmidt

Skinheads shaved for battle: a cultural history of American Skinheads
by Jack B. Moore

The Silent Brotherhood: Inside America’s Racist Underground
by Kevin Flynn and Gary Gerhardt

Is God a racist?: the right wing in Canada
by Stanley R. Barrett

Hard Right: The New White Power in South Africa
by Johann van Rooyen ISBN 1-85043-788-2