[UseNet header trimmed]

From: yawen@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: CHARGES
Date: 19 Oct 1996 00:36:19 GMT
Message-ID: <5497q3$l52@news.enter.net>
References: <327c82b7.2292514@199.0.216.204>

tm@pacificnet.net (tom moran) writes:

What should one make of it if someone makes charges of anti-Semitism, neo-Nazism and/or racism and can't or refuses to follow up with an argument for proof?

Which, in your case, has not happened. In case it has slipped your memory, when you made a challenge that I prove that you are an anti-Semite and a liar, I accepted. I agrred to present such proof before an impartial forum with a few minor conditions. They were:

1. That the Federal Rules of Evidence be used.

2. That the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure related to discovery and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 be used.

3. That the loser to pay the cost of of the ADR (Alternate Dispute Resolution) body and the cost of any transcription or videotaping.

I even suggested that the American Arbitration Association (the oldest and most respected body doing ADR) be the forum and gave you the telephone number of their Los Angeles office.

You lied about this several times, but you have never either agreed or refused this offer.

So the real question is this:

What can you say about someone who hasn't the courage of his convictions to agree to an impartial arbritation.

--YFE

[ Index ]

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor