David Irving's Hitler [Continued]
No one, neither Hitler nor
Goebbels,[29] to whom
Irving
ascribes the main culpability, ever made statements such as
Hitler did. But
Irving claims that they, the most loyal of
the loyal, committed the dirty deed behind the Führer's
back!
There is considerable evidence that Hitler made all important
decisions by himself, often to the consternation of his
closest associates, and that he especially during the war
insisted on a complete overview of all the events. He paid
attention to innumerable details, the movement of divisions
and regiments, the numbers of hostages to be shot, the design
and development of decorations. It is therefore quite
unthinkable that he would miss even a day of the Holocaust,
the mass murder of Jewry, that enormous undertaking with
thousands of participants, quite apart from the victims.
Bormann at least, the all-knowing secretary, would have
promptly informed him of it. But it wasn't necessary to
inform Hitler. He knew well what was happening.
He even announced his intentions openly, on the 30th of
January 1939, before the Parliament of Greater Germany,[30]
Here are his words, the meanings of which would only later on
become clear:
I shall once again be your prophet: if
international Jewry with its financial power in
and outside of Europe should manage once more to
draw the peoples of the world into a world war,
then the result will not be the Bolshevization of
the world and thus the victory of Jewry but rather
the total destruction of the Jewish race in
Europe.
Ever since Mein Kampf, this was one of Hitler's two major war
aims. The other was the conquest of territory for "living
space"[31] in the East. That is why for him the war only
started with the attack on the Soviet Union. Previous
military undertakings had been mere campaigns, intended to
open the path to Russia. After the collapse of France in the
summer of 1940 the road was clear. Immediately thereafter he
began with his preparations.
In that connection an unlikely information source has come to
the fore. After the war Himmler's masseur and confidant,
Felix Kersten, reported that his patient had once told him
the following: immediately after the campaign against France,
Himmler was called to the Führer's headquarters. There
Hitler is said to have revealed that he, Himmler, would have
to carry out the destruction of the European Jews. Himmler is
said to have raised objections, to have spoken for the plan
to resettle the Jews on the African island of Madagascar, but
that the Führer insisted on his order.
Granted, this is not a very sound source, especially since
Kersten tells the story differently in different editions of
his book. But the story is nonetheless believable: at that
very time Hitler also revealed his plan of conquests to his
generals. The fact that territorial conquest and destruction
of the Jews were closely interrelated, even interdependent,
provides still deeper insight into Hitler's world view.
Actually it is quite believable that Himmler raised
objections.[32] In the territories occupied by Germany there
lived four million Jews and a similar number would be found
in the parts of Russia slated for conquest. Approximately
half of these were women and children. Hi 1 was supposed to
collect and then murder all of them. Aside from the
incredible problems of transport and organization he would be
needing hundreds if not thousands of soldiers or police,
prepared to kill defenseless men, women and children. It is
understandable that Hi 1 would have seen this as an
impossible task, that he would have even regarded it with
pure horror.
An echo of these sentiments can be heard in his [Himmler's]
later record of his secret discussions [33] On October 6,
1943 he said the Jewish question had for him become "the most
difficult question of my life ' and then he continued:
Gentlemen: that short sentence 'The Jews are to be
destroyed" is easily spoken. But for him who must
carry it out, it requires the hardest and most
difficult tasks possible. [...] We had to face the
question: How is it with the women and children? I
have decided also in this to find a clear
solution. I could not see my way clear to destroy
the men -- let's say it clearly: murder or have them
murdered-and then to let the children grow up to
avenge themselves on our sons and grandchildren. A
most difficult decision had to be made to make
this people completely disappear from the earth.
On May 5,1944:
At the beginning or before the war, the Führer
warned the Jews: "Should you once again incite the
European peoples to war, it will not lead to the
destruction of the German people but to the
destruction of the Jews." ... Perhaps you can feel
with me how difficult it was to follow this
soldierly order that had been given me and which I
have fulfilled in obedience and good faith.
On May 24, 1944:
Yet another question vital for the inner security
of the Reich and for Europe was the Jewish
question. It was solved as ordered, rationally and
without compromise.
And on June 21, 1944
It was the most terrible problem and the most
terrible task that could have been given to any
organization, the task of solving the Jewish
question.
Who, besides Hitler, could have ordered that terrible task,
that "soldierly order"? Between the two men stood no
intermediary.
[Continued]
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
[
Previous |
Footnotes |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
A Faulty History Dissected
Two Essays by Eberhard Jäckel
Translation & Comments by H. David Kirk
Who Really Gave the Order?