The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Six Questions
Clan Huber Won't Answer

Clan Huber:

During the course of your journey through the sewers of digital messaging, you have provided a number of frauds, insults, deceits and outright lies, all aimed at defaming Jewish people.

Now that I have clearly and unequivocably called you a blatant liar, you can prove me wrong by answering the following questions. In the event you suffer from memory failures, I will be considerate enough to continue to republish these questions from time to time so that you will not be denied the fair and public opportunity to respond, and clear your, er, good name.

Perhaps Prodigy users will be kind enough to post this series of questions to your favourite Prodigy discussion groups, so that you will be certain to see them, and internet users will forward them to as well.

Question 1

On January 29, 1996, you made the following statement:

"We have long known that the WIESENTHAL center for pagan studies has doctored so-called holocaust pictures. Go to the so-called holocaust museum in DC & they'll show you thousands of smelly shoes of so-called victims. Makes you wonder, though, how so-called victims had shoes & sneakers made in China in 1955......." (Huber, Air Photos)

Although you have been asked to provide proof that the Simon Wiesenthal Center has doctored Holocaust pictures, you have failed to do so. Not surprisingly, although you were also asked to provide proof that the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum included shoes made in China in 1955 as evidence of the Holocaust, you have shown yourself either unwilling or unable to do so.

(I toured the USHMM on March 26, 1996, and inspected the display of shoes from Maidanek. Alas, I was unable to determine where these "Chinese shoes and sneakers" are. The Museum, however, provides a photograph of these shoes, so perhaps you will examine it and circle those shoes which came from China, so I can locate them.)

Please demonstrate that you are not a fraud and a liar, and prove that your assertions are true, or admit, here and now, that you are a liar, and retract them.

Question 2

On February 1, 1996, you refered to the Holocaust as "alleged:"

"No sooner does someone deny the alleged holocaust, than you label them as dispassionate & disinterested." (Huber, Gas Chambers, Feb. 1)

In response to the following query:

"Can those of you who deny the Holocaust explain where the Jews of Eastern Europe went?"

You replied:

"They have been known to wander, hence the term 'Wandering j*w'. Also the term from inbreeding , known as wandering eye." (Huber, 27th Question)

One day later, you commented about "another holocaust," which suggests that you do, in fact, believe the historical record, (Huber, Air Photos, Feb. 5) and you also speak of the Holocaust as historical reality in your exchanges on Prodigy (See huber.0295).

You seem confused about the Holocaust, denying it on one day, and affirming it on the next. Please explain this seeming contradiction.

Question 3

In your UseNet articles, you never spell the word "Jew." Instead, you insert an asterisk where the 'e' belongs.

In March 1996, you stated, "NEVER capitalize, never spell j*w." In a February 1995 Prodigy article, however, we find you writing the following:

"Fazel, I am still awaiting your offer to post the article about the Jews killing 30,000 Germans in cold blood after the Russian breach of the border." (huber.0295)

As both spelling the full word and capitalizing the word is obviously your practice on Prodigy, but not on UseNet, it would be instructive if you would explain why you have deliberately misrepresented your practice.

Question 4

On March 7, 1996, you published an article attributed to James Brolin, of the "Cicero Gazett." You included the following claim:

"Two dozen spies were named, from the sect'y to walter LIPPMAN to alger HISS, klaus FUCHS, "MLAD", War Dept. official william ULLMAN, intelligence official joseph JULIUS, Treas Dept.'s harold GLASSER, the Air Forces's george SILVERMAN, and nathan SILVERMASTER of the Bd. of Economic Warfare.

ALL BUT TWO ARE jewish. Even as Hitler ravaged Europe, even as millions of Britains, Americans, Poles & French were dying to subdue the holocaust, jews spying on America and were giving up American secrets for Russian & German shekels, dooming their brothers in the gas-chambers of Auschwitz to death." (Huber, "a jewish" "NIZKOR should" and others)

To which, William Anderson replied:

"Mr. Huber, above, lists nine people accussed of spying for the Soviet Union, and claims that all but two of them are Jewish. The nine are:

1) The secretary to Walter Lippmann. Mr. Huber does not name the secretary, because "Lippmann" sounds Jewish, but the secretaries name, May Price, does not.

2) Alger Hiss. Scion of one of Baltimore's oldest protestant families. Not a Jew by any stretch of the imagination.

3) Klaus Fuchs. Son of German Quakers. Not a Jew.

4) Mlad. Mlad is a code name for a physicist who worked on the Manhattan project and may have passed information to the Soviets. Huber does not tell you this physicist's name, because "Mlad" sounds vaguely foreign and potentially Jewish, and "Theodore Hall" does not. (Anderson, real revisionism)

Anderson goes on to point out that you, Mr. Huber, lied when you made the claim "All but two are Jewish," and establishes this fact beyond all dispute. The question, therefore, is why?

Why did you tell this blatant lie, Mr. Huber?

Question 5

On and about May 20, 1996, you published an article under your "M. Huber" account which purported to be a citation from a web page. Your text read, in part, as follows:

"...journal that the Nazis were an aberration, that they were the exact opposite of all that his Germany represented, something from an eyewitness which contradicts the new book by Goldhagen who blames all Germans, even little babies." (Huber, Survivor's Story)

A check of your own reference, however, contained the following text:

"...journal that the Nazis were an aberration, that they were the exact opposite of all that his Germany represented."

Clearly, Mr. Huber, you altered the original text, and forged the final paragraph. It is equally clear that you have not read Mr. Goldhagen's book - had you done so, you would not have lied about his thesis.

Question Five is presented in two parts:

5-1: Why did you lie about your alteration of the text, Mr. Huber?

5-2: Which page of Mr. Goldhagen's book ("Hitler's Willing Executioners") blames "all Germans, even little babies" for the Holocaust?

Question 6

On June 19, 1996, you told the following whopper:

"A perfect example of lies by McFlea. Magnetic tape media were not invented prior to the fifties. In fact, the 'plastics' which enabled manufacture of 'tape' were a product of the fifties." (Huber, Brit Rabbi)

William Anderson, quoting from a reference work called "World of Invention," offered the following rebuttal:

"The invention of magnetic recording tape is variously attributed to J.A. O'Neill, who is said to have created a paper version in 1927 in the United States, and the German engineer Fritz Pfleumer, who in 1928 developed a tape made by bonding a thin coating of oxide to strips of either paper or film. It was Pfleumer who filed the first audiotape patent in 1929...

"In 1935, the German electronics firm AEG produced a prototype of a record/playback machine, called a magnetophon, based on Pfleumer's ideas but using plastic tape. BASF went on to refine the tape AEG had used, presenting the first usable magnetic tape at the Berlin Fair in 1935. The first public tape recording was made by the London Philharmonic Orchestra at the BASF factory in Ludwigshafen, Germany, in 1936."

Mr. Anderson concluded by noting that the first plastics were developed in 1836. (Anderson, Re: Brit Rabbi)

Question Six is an easy one: Why did you lie about these basic issues?

Work Cited

Citations are appended to the original plaintext version

The original plaintext version of this file is available via ftp.

[ Index ]

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.