Revisionism & Holocaust
In face of such overwhelming
proofs of the existence of the Holocaust, denying its reality is as inconceivable
as doubting the reality of the earthquake that hit San Francisco.
One can wonder whether it
is worthwhile answering the Revisionists. Does one do more harm than good
in bringing young minds to dwell on such awful aspects of humanity?
On the other hand, it is
a fact that Revisionists are cropping up, that their fundamental racial
spirit gives signs of awakening in some European countries.
It is urgent to prepare oneself
to be able to react against the appearance of a Nazi spirit. Two things
are particularly necessary:
First, one must realize that
the holders of a hidden Nazi spirit can (as the Nazi's did in Germany)
begin to gain partisans by proposing measures that seem capable of solving
impending problems such as reducing unemployment by expelling immigrants
(or Jews); developing social cohesion by creating a scape-goat against
which a majority can unite (Jews in Germany, immigrants today in France,
where unemployment is very high (12.5%); giving hope to a desperate generation
of youngsters by launching big works, etc.
One must analyze what hides
itself behind those projects. When President Roosevelt launched the management
of forests in the Rockies to give work to youngsters during the great depression,
there was no Nazi spirit background. When in certain European countries
extreme rightists propose drastic measures against immigration, a spirit
similar to the Nazi one can be detected.
Secondly, one must analyze
what made Hitler's crimes more vicious, more destructive of human dignity,
more condemnable than other collective crimes committed by humanity during
past religious or civil wars.
Here, I will call the Bible
to the rescue:
The Bible says in Matthew
12:31a, "Wherefore I say unto you, all manner of sin and blasphemy shall
be forgiven unto men."
The Bible also says in Matthew
12:31b and 18:7, "The blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven
unto men." "Woe to that man by whom the offense cometh."
The rounding up at Oradour
in France of more than 600 old men, women, and children (the whole population
of the village) in a church that was set on fire because a sniper had shot
one German soldier, is a war atrocity -- but committed on the spur of the
moment, perhaps under exasperation at finding snipers everywhere; the men
who committed it have already reached their level of degradation. They
are killing but not degrading other people.
The shooting of over 70 American
prisoners during the Battle of the Bulge is another war atrocity, but committed
in the heat of the battle.
These acts fall under Matthew
12:31a. They must be forgiven with time, though not forgotten.
Hitler's government gave
orders to annihilate in the most efficient, streamlined, tailorized way,
all the Jewish, Polish, and gypsy population of Europe. It recruited the
directors, managers, employees willing (or not so willing but accepting)
and capable to commit mass murder.
But mass murder can't practically
be carried out without committing the unforgivable crime: The offense against
the Spirit of Man, in the victim as well as in his torturer, by reducing
them both to an extreme degree of degradation. Physical, but also often
moral, degradation for the victim (think of respites gained through denunciation,
having sex with guards, etc.) Moral degradation for all of Hitler's servants
and subjects all along the line. This falls under Matthew 12:31b and 18.7.
The camp commander who had
a lamp shade made for his wife from the skin of one of his human victims
may be guilty of both types of atrocity: a) as a user of that lamp which
reveals his own degradation, and b) by forcing someone to make that lamp
thus degrading another man.
Any gesture must be avoided
that tends to blur the radical distinction that should be maintained between
individual spontaneous atrocity and organized atrocity, such as in a genocide
which necessarily implies the consecutive degradation of many men. That
is why President Reagan's visit to Bitburg was, in my opinion, an unfortunate
mistake. President Reagan's mistake may have been inspired by Chancellor
Kohl for the latter's personal political interest just before German elections,
precisely because that visit to a nazi cemetery could be stretched to a
general forgiveness of all German's crimes.
This fundamental difference
between crime against men and crime against their spirit did not seem to
be perceived by the President nor the general public when they said:
"Forty years have passed,
one must forgive; the Germans are not the only people who have committed
atrocities." Both are perfectly true, but one must try to respect the distinction
between Matthew 12:31a and Matthew 12:31b and 18:7, between spontaneous
crimes that harm physically, and organized crimes that entail a moral degradation
of the criminal and often of the victim.
It's not always easy. For
instance: when you are annihilating men, women and children, husbands or
fathers, wives or mother, babies or teenagers, you just can't carry on
a streamlined operation like carrying coal on a conveyor belt to a furnace.
Mothers separated from their children will shriek and tear themselves to
pieces and bite their aggressors and throw themselves against any obstacle.
And Hitler's servants, while they are pushing them into a truck or gas
chamber can't do it keeping their calm. They have to descend one more step
of degradation and get into a state of frenzy, into a fit of mad cruelty.
At that instant, in my opinion, they are less responsible than when they
accept their job and their pay.
The actors at Oradour or
The Bulge should with time be forgiven, as well as must be pitied and confided
to God's clemency: Not so the bottom line of actors of the Holocaust who
were appointed to their infamous jobs because of their sadistic natural
dispositions.
The organizers of the Holocaust,
however, must not be forgiven, at least by men. God will, in his wisdom
and clemency, judge if Matthew 12:31b applies to them.
There are mountains of documents
to prove that the Holocaust was willed, directed, and encouraged from the
top, but such a program involves necessarily the degradation not only of
the victim and his torturer, but of all those who participate directly
or indirectly in carrying it out:
- Degradation of the public
when the Jews are obliged to carry a yellow star, and the public does not
react by wearing stars also.
- Degradation again of the
public, the police and the metro personnel in Paris when the Jews are confined
to the last car of each train and the public does not fill that car to
capacity.
- Degradation of the truck
drivers and train engineers when they have to carry loads (of Jews
or prisoners) to grouping camps, then to slave factories, then to extermination
camps.
- Degradation of the presidents,
vice-presidents, directors, etc. of the big German industrial concerns
who received and worked to exhaustion the prisoners, even building plants
inside Auschwitz.
- Degradation of all the inhabitants
nearby who suspected what was going on. Of the peasants who saw the trains
go by daily bringing their load of victims.
- Degradation of the German
railroad system when it wrote (this is just an example) from Berlin on
June 9, 1942 a technical official note to the SS, Walter Rauff, in charge
of organizing transportation of prisoners (my translation from the French
translation): "The normal loading of trucks is usually 9 to 10 by
square meter. In Saurer cars, which are very spacious, the maximum use
of space is not possible. Not because of excess of weight, but because
loading to maximum. capacity impairs the vehicles' stability on the road...."
And again: "Experience
has proved that one could do without light.... However, one has observed
that at the moment of closing the doors, the load presses always against
them as soon as lights are out. This stems from the fact that the load
hurls itself towards outside light if the lights are put out in the vehicle,
making the closing of the doors all the more difficult. Moreover, one has
been able to observe that, because of the disquieting nature of obscurity,
shrieks burst out always as the doors are closed. It would therefore be
advisable to turn on the lights just before and during the first few minutes
of the operation."
(Notice the term "the load"
speaking of human beings.)
Have I made clear the difference
between what is forgivable by man and what is not forgivable by man?
One must not forget and one
must remain vigilant because the germs of intolerance, dictatorship,
disrespect for man's spirit are present everywhere and, given a climate
of indifference, could spring up and take over with devastating consequences.
[ Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
A Message to American
Youth
Chapter II