Holocaust Denial Today
It should therefore not surprise us that Holocaust denial is
also anti-Zionist. The term Zionist rather than Jew is often
used in Holocaust denial lexicon. Israel figures prominently
as the conspirator and benefactor state. The Palestinian
people appear in tandem with the German people as the two
communities victimized by the Jews. The aim is to bar the
Jewish state from its legitimate place in the community of
nations, in the same way that Nazism denied, and neo-Nazism
intends to deny, Jews their rightful place in the societies
of the diaspora. The integral inclusion of anti-Zionism in
Holocaust denial makes it uniquely dangerous. Of all
antisemitic ideologies, Holocaust denial has brought about
the convergence of the radical right and the radical left.
Right and left are elements as anathema to one another as
fire and water yet Jews are able to work such miracles even
among their enemies.
A number of radical leftists in France are intimately
connected to Holocaust denial. They include Serge Thion, who
is a defender of both Rassinier and Faurisson. Thion is
linked with the Marxist publishing house "La Vieille Taupe"
(The Old Mole), founded by Pierre Guillaume. Guillaume is
the publisher of many of Faurisson's works and has now
associated himself with Henri Roques. The most shocking
association of all is that of the world-famous Jewish
linguist and radical Noam Chomsky. Chomsky has described the
Holocaust as "the most fantastic outburst of collective
insanity in human history". Yet this did not lead him to
prevent a piece he had allegedly written purely to uphold
the right of free speech from being used as an introduction
to one of Faurisson's books. It also did not stop him from
giving Guillaume publication rights in France to one of his
important books. As Professor Werner Cohn has pointed out in
his pamphlet "The Hidden Alliances of Noam Chomsky",
Guillaume's publishing house is a very obscure one and, if
it has any credibility at all, it has it in good measure as
a result of the connection with Chomsky.
A number of radical leftists, because of their antagonism
towards Israel and their anti-Zionism, have become Holocaust
deniers or, at the very least, are not loath to associate
with deniers. In the same way that the neo-Nazis have to
deny the Holocaust to whitewash Nazism, radical leftists
have to deny the Holocaust to undermine the strongest
justification for the creation and the existence of the
State of Israel. And the radical leftists also resort to the
Orwellian inversion of images. Israel is described as a Nazi
state and accused of perpetrating genocide on the
Palestinians.
There is also, as Paul Berman has pointed out, a certain
strain of the left which mistrusts the west under all
circumstances, and so it has come to mistrust the west on
the whole matter of World War 11 as well. As far as these
leftists are concerned there is no difference between
bourgeois democracy and bourgeois Nazism and fascism.
Furthermore, twentieth century genocide flies in the face of
Marxist optimism and the assurance of the inevitability of
historical progress. Marxist optimism can only be saved if
the various genocides that we have witnessed in the
twentieth century can be portrayed as "rumours" rather than
realities.
In the convergence of the left and the right, in Holocaust
denial the circle, paralleling Rassinier's own life, has
finally been closed.
Paul Berman, in his analysis of Holocaust denial, has
written that "It has long been known that in times of acute
social crisis antisemitism takes to the streets. The
corollary now looming into focus is that in times of acute
ideological crisis, antisemitism takes to the intellectual
presses." Our examination of Holocaust deniers in Europe and
North America clearly indicates that one can take Berman
some steps further, to say that antisemitism has not only
infiltrated certain intellectual presses but has become the
preserve of a portion of the western intelligentsia
Holocaust deniers are in the main university-educated
teachers, academics, writers, professionals. They are not
exactly like flat earthers. They are not mere kooks or
inconsequential eccentrics dealing with a rather bizarre but
harmless theory.
Holocaust denial is a matter of concern to the Jewish
community, certainly, but in fact it should be of concern to
all who prize democracy. The ultimate aim or consequence of
Holocaust denial is the collapse of the open, pluralistic
societies which we have all built together and hold so dear.
[In Edmond Y. Lipsitz, ed. Canadian Jewry Today: Who's Who
in Canadian Jewry. Downsview, Ontario. J.E.S.L. Education
Products, 1989, pp. 30-36.]
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
[
Previous |
Index ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Manuel Prutschi, Canadian Jewish Congress