You conclude by saying:

I believe that we are wasting valuable time by discussing the details.

You asked for conversion plans, I showed them to you, and this is "wasting valuable time"?

This eagerness to change the subject, to insist that the evidence is irrelevant, makes sense when I consider the bulk of your letter: random rhetoric about the Holocaust, strewn together haphazardly, with no real attempt at dialogue, and with no intention of answering my questions. The common denominator of your website is antisemitism^[*], with Holocaust-denial playing a supporting role, and for that reason I do not hold out much hope that your analysis of evidence on the Holocaust will progress much beyond "so what?"

Pressac wrote his book and he could not prove the existence of homicidal gas chambers.

He most certainly could, and did, as I explained to Greg Raven three weeks ago. (Predictably, Mr. Raven has had no comment.)

Faurssion [sic] wrote a condemnatory critique of Pressac's book and had to face court charges. Where is the logic in all this kind of behaviour, Mr McCarthy?

Same question I've answered already.

In conclusion, Mr McCarthy, let me say again that I wish we can begin to make these plans talk and not have people talk about them.

Your conclusion, like most of the rest of your letter, is rhetoric.

I don't think we're going to get very far with further correspondence, Dr. Toben, since my initial attempt to get two simple questions answered was met with non-answers and myriad diversions. If you'd like to try again, though, you have my email address.

Footnote: a good example of the blatant antisemitic content of your website would be your "Open Letter to the Leaders of World Jewry":

I am writing this letter to you not because I hate you but because I wish to save you from yourselves. [...] The anti-Gentilism and the hate for everything that is not Jewish, makes me sick because this hatred takes us back to the roots of antisemitism - your anti-Gentile Babylonian Talmud.

[ Previous | Index ]