Nazi Conspiracy & Aggression
[Page 577]
B. DURING KALTENBRUNNER'S TERM IN OFFICE AS CHIEF OF THE
SECURITY POLICE AND SD, NUMEROUS AND VAST CRIMES WERE
COMMITTED BY THE SIPO AND SD IN THE COURSE OF OFFICIAL
DUTIES.
As Chief of the Security Police after 30 January 1943,
Kaltenbrunner was the head of the RSHA and the regional
offices of the Gestapo, SD, and Kripo. Directly under
Kaltenbrunner were the Chiefs of the main offices of the
RSHA, including Amt III (the SD), Amt IV (the Gestapo), Amt
V (the Kripo), and Amt VI (the SD in foreign intelligence)
(L-219).
Kaltenbrunner had direct responsibility over the offices of
the RSHA. All important matters had to be referred to him or
had to be handled under general or special authority granted
by him to office chiefs.
"To my knowledge no chief of office or any of the
officials of the RSHA, authorized to sign, had the
right to sign in any principal affairs of particular
political significance without consent of the Chief of
the Security Police -- not even during
[Page 578]
his temporary absence. From my own experience I can
furthermore declare that the chief of Amt IV, Mueller,
particularly was very hesitant in signing documents
concerning questions of general nature and in some
cases of greater importance, and that he put aside
events of such nature in most cases for the return of
the Chief of the Security Police, whereby often much
time was lost." (L-50).
Schellenberg, the Chief of Amt VI of the RSHA, has stated:
During Kaltenbrunner's term in office as Chief of the
Security Police and SD, the following crimes were committed
by the SIPO and SD pursuant to policy established by the
RSHA or orders issued out of the RSHA for all of which he
was responsible by virtue of his office.
(1) Mass murders of civilians of occupied countries by
Einsatz Groups. A general discussion of this and the
following twelve crimes of the Gestapo and SD appears in
Section 6 of Chapter XV. That this crime continued after
January 1943 is shown by the following documents: 3012-PS;
2752-PS; 2890-PS.
(2) Screening of prisoner of war camps and executing racial
and political undesirables. That this crime continued after
January 1943 is shown by the following document: 2622-PS.
(3) The taking of recaptured prisoners of war to
concentration camps, where in some cases they were executed.
That this crime continued after January 1943 is shown by the
following documents: 1650-PS; L-158; 1514-PS.
(4) Establishing concentration camps and committing racial
and political undesirables to concentration and annihilation
camps for slave labor and mass murder. That this crime
continued after January of 1943 is shown by the following
documents: D-50; D-46; L-41; 701-PS.
[Page 579]
(5) Deportation of citizens of occupied countries for forced
labor and disciplining of forced labor. That this crime
continued after January 1943 is shown by the following
document: 3012-PS; 1063-B-PS.
(6) The execution of captured commandos and paratroopers and
protection of civilians who Iynched Allied fliers. That this
crime continued after January 1943 is shown by the following
documents: 1276-PS; 532-PS; 526-PS; R-110; 745-PS.
(7) The taking of civilians of occupied countries to Germany
for secret trial and punishment. That this crime continued
after January 1943 is shown by the following document: 835-
PS.
(8) Punishment of citizens of occupied territories under
special criminal procedure and by summary methods. That this
crime continued after January 1943 is shown by the following
document: L-5.
(9) The execution and confinement of persons in
concentration camps for crimes allegedly committed by their
relatives. That this crime continued after January 1943 is
shown by the following document: L-37.
(10) Seizure and spoliation of public and private property.
That this crime continued after January 1943 is shown by the
following documents: 2620-PS; L-18.
(11) Murder of prisoners in SIPO and SD prisons. That this
crime continued after January 1943 is shown by the following
document: L-53.
(12) Persecution of Jews. That this crime continued after
January 1943 is shown by the following documents: L-18; 1061-
PS; 2375-PS; 2605-PS.
(13) Persecution of the churches. That this crime continued
after January 1943 is shown by the following document: 1815-
PS.
The
original plaintext version of this file is available via ftp.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Individual
Responsibility Of Defendants
Ernst Kaltenbrunner
(Part 2 of 4)
"All decisions of principal character are signed by the
Chief of the Security Police personally. An office
chief has only the authority to sign 'acting for' and a
chairman 'by order of' if the subjects treated in the
respective decrees fit into the general laid-down
principles according to the plan of distribution of
authority. Ir. case of doubt it was the duty to get the
question cleared up by reporting it to the Chief of
Security Police and SD." (L-34)
"I know of no limitation placed on Kaltenbrunner's
authority as Chief of the Security Police and SD
(RSHA). He promptly entered upon the duties of the
office and assumed direct charge of the office and
control over the Amts *** He made it very clear in his
official relations with all of us who were his Amt
Chiefs that he was the head of the office exercising
full executive powers and deciding all matters of
policy. He permitted us to issue directives within the
organization in our own names pursuant to fixed
policies established by him, but all important matters
had to be submitted to him whether he signed them or we
signed them. He was constantly informed of all matters
of importance which went on in the entire organization.
(2939-PS)