Nazi Conspiracy & Aggression
[Page 425]
A few weeks after the Munich agreement, on 14 October 1938,
another conference was held in Goering's office. He began
with the statement that Hitler had instructed him to
organize a gigantic armament program which would make
insignificant all previous achievements. He indicated that
he had been ordered to build as rapidly as possible an air
force five times as large, to increase the speed of Army and
Navy armament, and to concentrate on offensive weapons,
principally heavy artillery and heavy tanks. He then
proposed a specific program designed to accomplish these
ends. (1301-PS)
(e) Military Mobilization for War. In his dual role as Reich
Air Minister and Commander-in-Chief of the German Air Force,
it was Goering's function to develop the Luftwaffe to
practical war strength. As early as March 1935 Goering
frankly announced to world that he was in the process of
building a true military air force:
Two months later, in a speech to 1,000 Air Force officers,
Goering spoke in a still bolder vein:
In the same year, he signed his name to the Conscription Law
which provided for compulsory military service and
constituted an act of defiance on the part of Nazi Germany
in violation of the Versailles Treaty. (1654-PS)
Goering's statements during this period left no doubt in the
minds of Allied diplomats that Germany was engaged in full
mobilization of air power for an impending war.
[Page 426]
the Nazis had decided to concentrate on air power as
the weapon of terror most likely to give Germany a
dominant position and the weapon which could be
developed the most rapidly and in the shortest time . .
. High ranking Nazis with whom I had to maintain
official contact, particularly men such as Goering,
Goebbels, Ley, Frick, Frank, Darre and others,
repeatedly scoffed at my position as to the binding
character of treaties and openly stated to me that
Germany would observe her international undertakings
only so long as it suited Germany's interests to do
so." (2385-PS)
(2) The Launching of Aggressive War. Goering was the central
figure in the preparation of Germany for military
aggression. In German economic development and military
growth he held the key positions throughout the prewar
period. Although he held no official position in the field
of foreign affairs, Goering also figured prominently in all
of the major phases of Nazi international aggression between
1937 and 1941. As "No. 2 Nazi" he was a leading participant
in every major plan of territorial aggrandizement or
offensive military strategy.
Goering was the prompter and director of the diplomatic
tragicomedy leading to the Austrian Anschluss. In the middle
of November 197, Mr. Bullitt, the American Ambassador to
France, reported the following conversation with Goering:
When the time came, on 11 March 1938, Goering was in
complete command. Throughout the afternoon and evening of
that day he directed by telephone the activities of Seyss-
Inquart, also of Keppler, Ullrich, and the other Nazi
operatives in Vienna. (2949-PS); the pertinent portions of
these telephone conversations
[Page 427]
have already been referred to in Section 3 of Chapter IX on
Aggression against Austria.)
In the late afternoon Goering gave the following order to
Seyss-Inquart:
Early the same evening he dictated to Seyss-Inquart the
telegram which the latter was to send to Berlin requesting
the Nazi Government to send German troops to "prevent
bloodshed" Two days later he was able to call Ribbentrop in
London and say:
Goering played a similarly important role in the attack on
.Czechoslovakia. In March of 1938, at the time of the
Anschluss with Austria, he had given a solemn assurance to
the Czechoslovakian Minister in Berlin that the developments
in Austria would in no way have a detrimental influence on
the relations between Germany and Czechoslovakia, and had
emphasized the continued earnest endeavor on the part of
Germany to improve these mutual relations. In this
connection, Goering used the expression: "Ich gebe Ihnen
mein Ehrenwort. (I give you my word of honor) " (TC-27). On
the other hand, in his address to German airplane
manufacturers on 8 July 1938, he made his private views on
this subject clear:
[Page 428
this case we could put the entire responsibility on
England because she has engaged herself so deeply in
this business." (R-140)
The
original plaintext version of this file is available via ftp.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Individual
Responsibility Of Defendants
Herman Wilhelm Goering
Part 4 of 11)
"After the German government expressed willingness to
help, it became necessary to make a clear demarcation
within German aviation, namely in this respect: which
air force will be able to be made available? This
situation brought about the decision as to those of the
German aviation who will in future belong to the Air
Force and those who will in future remain in civil
aviation or in sport aviation. It was necessary to mark
this separation also outwardly, so that the members of
the German Air Force became soldiers according to the
law and their leaders became officers." (2292-PS)
"I repeat: I intend to create a Luftwaffe which, if the
hour should strike, shall burst upon the foe like a
chorus of revenge. The enemy must have a feeling of
being lost already before even having fought ***"
"Goering and Milch often said to me or in my presence
that
"I asked Goering if he meant that Germany was
absolutely determined to annex Austria to the Reich. He
replied that this was an absolute determination of the
German Government. The German Government at the present
time was not pressing this matter because of certain
momentary political considerations, especially in their
relations with Italy; but Germany would tolerate no
solution of the Austrian question other than the
consolidation of Austria in the German Reich. He then
added a statement which went further than any I have
heard on this subject: He said, 'There are schemes
being pushed now for a union of Austria, Hungary, and
Czechoslovakia, either with or without a Hapsburg at
the head of the unit. Such a solution is absolutely
inacceptable to us, and for us the conclusion of such
an agreement would be an immediate casus belli." (L-
151)
"Now, remember the following: You go immediately
together with Lt. General Muff and tell the Federal
President that if the conditions which are known to you
are not accepted immediately, the troops who are
already stationed in and advancing to the frontier will
march in tonight along the whole line, and Austria will
cease to exist." (2949-PS)
"Yes, the last march into the Rhineland is completely
over-shadowed. The Fuehrer was deeply moved, when he
talked to me last night. You must remember it was the
first time that he saw his homeland again. Now, I
merely want to talk about political things. Well, this
story we have given an ultimatum, that is just foolish
gossip." (2949-PS)
"Beyond this they fear that once we have pocketed
Czechoslovakia, we will attack Hungary, the Romanian
oil wells, etc. Moreover, since there are democratic
countries on the one hand, and authoritarian ones on
the other, there is enough inflammable matter in the
world anyway. When, how and where this inflammable
matter will explode, no one among us can say. It may
happen within some months, but it may also take some
years. At present, the situation is this that
Czechoslovakia has promised the Sudeten Germans to meet
them half way. I am convinced that they will satisfy no
more than some of their unimportant demands. Such
action on their part would probably suit our policy
best, since in