The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: documents/protocols/1996/protocols.0496

From Wed Apr 24 10:46:43 PDT 1996
Article: 32484 of alt.revisionism
From: (Mike Curtis)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: JEWS and WANNSEE
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 02:26:41 GMT
Organization: Adhesive Media, Inc.
Lines: 147
Message-ID: <4lk3gs$>
References: <4lca3r$12k$> <4le1qo$>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 (Mike Curtis) wrote:

>Cliff Swiger <76053.707@CompuServe.COM> wrote:

>>But, let's consider the famed Protocols of Zion which allegedly 
>>lay the groundwork for the Jews and
>>their New World Order. Naturally, I have read this document and 
>>find amazing just how much has
>>come to pass since their discovery. Now everyone is told that the 
>>Protocols of Zion are a forgery. In
>>fact, I believe the U.S. Congress even passed some sort of 
>>resolution declaring them a fraud. To
>>the best of my knowledge, the Protocols of Zion are not signed, 
>>officially stamped, no "original" is
>>available, and Professor Nilus also "discovered" this manuscript, 
>>(a translation handed to him by a
>>friend who vouched for it's authenticity). But, the Protocols of 
>>Zion have predicted, with extreme
>>accuracy, many of the events that have developed to the present 

>Same old crap Swiger. and let's see, how many times have you been told
>that it didn't take congress to make them forgeries. 

>From Paul Johnson's _History of the Jews_, Harper and Row, 1987:

>" It was the commonest of all anti-Semitic smears that Jews 'worked
>together' behind the scenes. The notion of a general Jewish
>conspiracy, involving secret meetings of Jewish sages, was inherent in
>the medieval blood libel and had reached written form on numerous
>occasions. Napoleon I's summoning of the Sanhedrin gave it unfortunate
>impetus. Thereafter it had become part of the stock-in-trade of the
>Tsarist secret police, the Okhrana. It was part of the grievances of
>this body thatthe Tsars were not sufficiently assiduous in putting
>down radical conspiracies, especially Jewish ones. At some point int
>the 1890s, one of their Paris agents was asked to concoct a document
>which could be used to demonstrate to Nicholas II the reality of the
>Jewish threat. The forger, whoever he was, used a pamphlet by Maurice
>Joly, written in 1864, attributing to Napoleon III ambitions to
>dominate the world. The original had no reference to the Jews at all,
>but for the monarch was now substituted a secret conference of Jewish
>leaders who states that, by exploiting modern democracy, they were
>close to attaining their objectives. This was the origin of the
>*Protocols of the Elders of Zion." (pp. 455-6)

>Well, it didn't work and the Tsar wasn't impressed. He even wrote on
>the document: "A worthy cause is not defended by evil means." 

>Johnson continues: "The police then planted it in various quarters and
>in 1905 it first attained published form as an additional chapter in
>Serge Nilus' book *The Great Little*. It aroused little interest."

>He goes on to point out how it was used during the Bolshevik
>revolution against Lenin and his putsch and the association of Jews
>within it. Let's jump to page 70 of Richard Pipes' _The Russian
>Revolution_ published in paper by Vintage Books in 1991:

>"The bureaucratic conservatives and their supporters on the extreme
>right wing of public opinion relied heavily on anti-Semitism as an
>instrument of politics. Although modern anti-Semitism originated in
>France and Germany, it is in Russia that it entered official ideology.
>To the conservatives, Jews presented the single most dangerous threat
>to that political and social stability which they regarded as the main
>concern of state policy. Jews destabalized Russia in two capacities:
>as revolutionaries and as capitalists. The police authorities were
>convinced that they formed the principle element in the revolutionary
>parties: Nicholas II only echoed them when he claimed that nine-tenths
>of the revolutionaries and socialists in Russia were Jews. But Jews
>also upset the socioeconomic equilibrium of Russia by introducing free
>market operations. The obvious contradiction in the claim that the
>members of the same religious group were both beneficiaries and mortal
>foes of capitalism was resolved in the *Protocols of the Elders of
>Zion*, a scurrilous forgery concocted at the end of the nineteenth
>century by the tsarist police, which claimed that in the pursuit of
>their alleged historic mission--the destruction of Christianity and
>world domination--Jews resorted to every conceivable means, even to
>the extent of organizing pogroms against themselves. . . Although
>(with some minor exceptions) the Imperial Government did not
>encourage, let alone instigate, anti-Jewish pogroms, its unconcealed
>policy of discrimination against Jews and the tolerance of
>anti-Semitic propaganda conveyed to the population the impression that
>it approved of them."

>Richard Pipes on page 101 of _Russia Under the Bolchevik Regime_,
>Knopf, 1993 says:

>". . .*Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a forgery fostered, and
>perhaps partially created by the Tsarist police; having attracted
>scant attention on publication in 1902, the *Protocols* now gained
>worldwide notoriety. . . The connection between Jewry and Communism,
>drawn in the aftermath of the Revolution and exported from Russia to
>Weimar Germany, was instantly assimilated by Hitler and made into a
>cardinal tenent of the Nazi movement."

>Page 105: "Finally, there was the murder of the Imperial family,
>particulars of which emerged during the winter of 1918-19. The killing
>was immediately blamed on the Jews, who had in fact played a secondary
>role in it; the fate of the ex-tsar was identified with the martyrdom
>of christ and interpreted in the light of the *Protocols* as yet
>another step in the Jewish march to world mastery."

>Page 255: "The work . . .is the so-called *Protocols of the Elders of
>Zion*, a forgery that, in the words of its historian, Norman Cohn,
>provided the 'warrant' for Hitler's genocide. The author of this
>fabrication has not been identified, but was apparently compiled in
>the late 1890s in France from anti-Semitic tracts published during the
>Dreyfus Affair under the stimulus of the first international Zionist
>Congress, held in Basel in 1897. [Paul Johnson writes of this also,
>btw.] The Paris branch of the tsarist Okhrana, the Russian secret
>police, seems to have had a hand in it. . . 

>"The so-called 'Protocols' were first published in 1902 in a St.
>Petersburg periodical. Three years later, during the 1905 Revolution,
>they came out in book form edited by Sergei Nilus under the title *The
>Great in the Small and Anti-Christ*. . . Nilus, its most assiduous
>propagator, complained that no one took the book seriously."

>Deborah Lipstadt's *Denying the Holocaust* ought to put another nail
>in your *Protocols* coffin. On page 24 she informs us that "[t]he
>deniers draw inspiration from the *Protocols*, which has enjoyed a
>sustained and vibrant life despite the fact it has long been proved a

>And for the final nail, Lucy Dawidowicz says in *The Holocuast and the
>Historians on page 41 says that Normon Cohn's work, mentioned above by
>Richard Pipes, on the *Protocols* was a model work on the history of

>So this is what we are dealing with in these silly post by Cliff

>This ought to do for now. 

>>So, by ignoring the content of these two documents, we find that 
>>they are practically mirror images
>>of each other based upon the facts presented. I now ask: what 
>>logic is it that contends one is
>>spurious and the other genuine? It is not logic at all friends. 
>>It is political, religious and racial
>>power. "CONTINUED"

>By the way cliff you can post many more lines here on usenet than you
>could on CIS.

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.