Archive/File: holocaust/usa/willenbring.01
Last-Modified: 1994/07/05
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 1994 8:28:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: WILLENA@HBFULLER.COM
To: kmcvay@oneb.almanac.bc.ca
Message-ID: <940701082852.60200222@HBFULLER.COM>
Subject: Holocaust Denial Research Paper
_Vergasungskeller_
_The Case Against the Auschwitz Gas Chambers_
by
Andrew Willenbring
Five and a half decades ago the first of millions of "social
undesirables" were being shipped east from Germany and other occupied
territories to camps in the east of Poland. By the end of the Second
World War millions of them would be dead - by starvation, disease, or
execution. Every history course dealing with World War Two has a
section on the Holocaust, this attempted genocide of the European
Jews. The Holocaust spawned organizations world wide devoted to
making sure that this kind of disgusting manifestation of racial
hatred never happens again. However, there is a movement in this
country and others that maintains that the whole thing is a
fabrication, a lie told by the "International Jewish Community" to
create revenue, in the form of reparations payments from Germany, and
immunity from criticism for the State of Israel. For those who
believe in the reality of the Holocaust, Revisionism, as it is called,
represents some of the worst atrocities committed in relation to the
genocide since the event itself; not merely because it is the denial
of the reality of it, although that is a part of it, but because
Revisionist hate and lies are clothed in the guise of scholarly
research. However, to those who support them, the Revisionists are
the last best hope for truth, freedom, and peace for the future.
I. The Gas Chambers in History
During World War Two, the Nazi government in Germany operated
concentration camps, to which were sent those persons who, for reasons
of race, religion, ethnic background, or political views were deemed
of lesser value than the Aryan "Master Race" in order to separate
them and keep that Aryan race pure. However, for a few of those races
and ethnicities, separation wasn't enough. The Nazi philosophy held
such races as Gypsies and Jews so low that only extermination was
acceptable. So certain of the camps, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka, and
Auschwitz being the most notable, were built as or converted to
Extermination Camps. The camp that has perhaps been the focus of the
greatest amount of study of any of the Death Camps, as they were
known, was Auschwitz.
The concentration camp known as Auschwitz took its name from the
small town about forty miles west of Krakow, in Eastern Poland, near
which it was constructed shortly after the annexation of Poland by
Germany. It held about ten thousand prisoners. In March of 1941 a
second camp was constructed about one and one half miles away, known
as Auschwitz II, or Birkenau (McVay, "Auschwitz", page 2). While the
first camp housed mostly prisoners who were fit for work, Birkenau's
residents were for the most part the very old, very young, and the
ill.
However, gassing did not start at Auschwitz until the fall of
1941 (McVay, "Auschwitz", introduction) while the Kommandant of the
camp, Rudolf Hoess, was away on business. Hauptsturmfuehrer Fritsch, one
of Hoess' subordinates, made the conclusion that if the insecticide
Zyklon B killed lice it could kill people just as well, and the first
experimental gassing with that gas took place with a group of
condemned Russian POWs as guinea pigs (McVay, "Auschwitz", page 3).
That experimental first gassing took place in the Main camp, in a
building known today as Krema I ("Krema" is a contraction of the
German word for "crematorium"). Later, four more Krema (II, III, IV,
V) were built at Birkenau, where most of the gassings took place.
Krema I was used for a very short period and then converted to an air
raid shelter (McVay, "Auschwitz", page 3). The best estimates of the
number of Jews, Gypsies, and other prisoners who died at Auschwitz
indicate the total to be between one and one and a half million
persons (McVay, "Auschwitz", page 12).
The gassing of prisoners often followed a standard pattern. The
victims would be led into a room were they were told to undress, hang
their clothes on hooks on the wall, and remember the number of the
hook. They were promised food and work to do after the "shower" they
were about to receive. Then, with soap and towels, they were rushed
into the gas chambers and gassed (McVay, "Auschwitz", page 8). After
about a half hour, _Sonderkommandos_, groups of prisoners forced to work
at the gas chambers, would go in with gas masks, carry out all the
dead bodies, and take them to be cremated (McVay, "Auschwitz", page
8).
Much of the evidence corroborating the existence of the Auschwitz
gas chambers comes from testimony, affidavits, and documentary
evidence at the Nuremberg trials after the Second World War. Many of
the officers and men who worked at Auschwitz testified about the
genocidal policies of the Nazi regime, and to the murderous operations
at Auschwitz. The gas chambers themselves were destroyed by the Nazis
when they evacuated the camp, so they were not available for
examination (Krema I was reconstructed to its form as a gas chamber by
the Soviets soon after the War, however). Kommandant Hoess himself
provided very important information to the prosecutors during and
after that trial.
After almost five decades, the truth about the Holocaust of
European Jews is still being sought. Exactly how many Jews, Gypsies,
Russians, and others deemed undesirable by Hitler's Nazi regime were
killed may never be known. However, estimates can be made, and one of
those estimates is given here:
Eichmann's interrogation regarding the total number of victims
supports Fleming's figure of about five million killed (Request
eichmann eichmann.005), while figures compiled by Yehuda Bauer,
of Yad Vashem, Jerusalem, are somewhat higher. Bauer's figures
are in the right-most column:
German Reich (boundaries of 1938) 130,000 125,000
Austria 58,000 65,000
Belgium 26,000
Belgium & Luxembourg 24,700
Bulgaria 7,000
Czechoslovakia (boundaries of 1938) 245,000 277,000
France 64,000 83,000
Greece 58,000 65,000
Hungary & Carpatho-Ukraine 300,000 402,000*
Italy 8,000 7,500*
Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia 200,000
Luxembourg 3,000
Netherlands 101,800 106,000
Norway 677 760
Poland (boundaries of 1939) 2,700,000
Polish-Soviet area 4,565,000
Romania (boundaries prior to 1940) 220,000 40,000
USSR (boundaries prior to 1939) 800,000
Yugoslavia 54,000 60,000*
-----------------
4,975,477 5,820,960
* May be underestimated
(McVay, "Auschwitz", page 11)
Other estimates also exist, some based on differences in prewar
and postwar populations, or compiled from records kept by the Nazis
about how many were killed where, how many were sent from where, how
many were gassed right away, and how many were left when the camps
were liberated.
II. Revisionism and the Gas Chamber
Revisionists present several bases for their arguments against
the Nazi gas chambers. One is the basic disbelief that the Nazis had
a genocidal policy in any way. Some believe that while Hitler's
government was actively anti-Semitic, and that many Jews died in the
concentration camps, the deaths were not intentional, and not very
many Jews died even accidentally or from disease (this is the argument
that comprises most of the beginning premise of _Hoax of the Twentieth
Century_, by Arthur R. Butz); not anywhere near six million, anyway
(Butz).
Another argument against the use of gas chambers for
extermination is that the gas chambers never existed, that the
buildings and rooms so long designated as killing areas were more
innocent things, such as morgues for prisoners who died of old age or
disease, disinfection rooms for the delousing of new inmates, or even
rooms containing fuel preparation equipment for the nearby cremation
ovens. This argument is supported by Revisionists who cite that much
of the Nuremberg Trial testimony was obtained under conditions that
would have denied it admissibility in any American court; a very great
deal was gained under duress or after promises of leniency in
sentencing, promises that seldom were made good (Butz, chapter I).
This testimony was extremely important to the conclusion that
destroyed buildings contained gas chambers or that cryptic language in
documents concerning "special treatment", "_Sonderbehandlung_", really
meant genocide, so any reason to mistrust this evidence throws doubt
on the whole extermination conclusion.
The last of the three possible functions of the rooms called gas
chambers that have been stated above, that the gas chambers were rooms
full of equipment for the preparation of fuel for the crematoria, is
based in the German language itself. The word _Vergasungskeller_, found
in the Nuremberg Military Tribunal Document NO-4473, a memo from "the
chief of the Auschwitz construction management to the head of the SS
engineering group" (Butz, pg121) has been translated as "gas chamber".
However, that is only one of the meanings. The root, _Vergasung_, was
used in World War One to indicate the military use of poison gas
against the enemy. However, in a technical context, such as that
presumably present in a letter of the type in question, _Vergasung_
indicates carburetion or gasification. The type of crematoria in use
at Auschwitz used coke, a form of coal, as a fuel to keep the bodies
burning. This coke needed to be prepared by carburating it so that it
would burn correctly. Therefore, _Vergasungskeller_ could mean
"carburetion cellar" (Butz, page 120-121).
Others argue that the eye witness testimony is either inaccurate
or outright false, either because the buildings were not ventilated
well enough for the _Sonderkommando_ to remove the corpses as quickly as
witnesses have claimed, or because the gases would have exploded with
all the guards smoking, another claim made fairly consistently by
witnesses. The best known proponent of the lack of ventilation
argument is a man named Frank Leuchter. Mr. Leuchter published a
report, known as the "Leuchter Report", in which he claims to be an
engineer, and proceeds to show that for various reasons the places
designated as gas chambers were unfit for that use because of less
than adequate ventilation, sealing, and volume of the chamber itself,
as well as that the chambers did not provide for safe exhausting of
the cyanide gas after gassing (McVay, "Leuchter").
The other part of the argument, related to the first, is that
smoking guards would have ignited the gases used for extermination.
Zyklon B, the material used by Germans to delouse buildings, and
allegedly exterminate Jews, gives off the gas HCN, hydrocyanic acid,
which at sufficient concentrations is extremely explosive (McCarthy).
Revisionists make the argument that because the "alleged" chambers
were not ventilated, or not ventilated well enough, the burning
cigarettes and the gas would have come in contact and caused an
explosion (McCarthy).
III. Denying Revisionism
Let us begin with the argument against a Nazi genocidal policy.
It is hard to give credence to any assertion that the Nazi government
did not have a genocidal policy. Events like the liquidation of the
Warsaw Ghetto, along with the descriptions of the treatment and living
conditions of the prisoners and the extermination procedure itself
given by eyewitnesses would seem to directly oppose this view. Also,
the histories of the era, as well as Nazi tomes such as Hitler's own
_Mein Kampf_, definitely indicate not only a systematic "dehumanization"
of Jews and others, but a violent attitude, which on many occasions
did manifest itself in actual physical violence on the part of men in
the field, with no obvious discouragement from government officials.
So, it would appear that any idea that the Nazis had no genocidal
intentions toward the "social undesirables" is false at best.
The argument that the rooms designated as gas chambers were
technologically not able to perform that task is founded on a piece of
work by Frank Leuchter, the Leuchter Report, based on "scientific"
work done by Mr. Leuchter after a visit to the Auschwitz site. Mr.
Leuchter has admitted that the basis of credibility on his part, his
status as an engineer, is pure fabrication. He has claimed that
status on several occasions, most notably in his "Report" and at the
Canadian trial of a man named Ernst Zundel, at which he claims to be
not only an engineer, but an expert on means of execution. At the
Zundel trial, he testified that he had contracted with two prisons,
San Quentin in California, and a prison in North Carolina, to sell
services and equipment to both institutions. However, when contacted,
officials at both places denied any contract. Also, at a later trial
in which he was the defendant, he admitted that he is "not and [has]
never been registered as a professional engineer".
The problem with the argument that Zyklon B is too explosive is
one of concentration. The minimum concentration of Zyklon B required
for an explosion is around fifty-six thousand parts per million (ppm).
This is almost two hundred times the concentration necessary to kill
humans in just a few minutes, three hundred ppm. While this argument
is sometimes continued with the stipulation that because HCN gas, the
active agent in Zyklon B, is slightly lighter than air (twenty-seven
grams per mole for HCN as opposed to twenty-eight and eight tenths
grams per mole for air) it would form dense pockets given time, that
is obviously not an accurate statement. For instance, if gases were
that easily separated, the entire atmosphere, made up of about seventy
percent nitrogen and thirty percent oxygen, would be entirely oxygen
near the surface and entirely nitrogen at altitude, and not fairly
well mixed together, as we know it is (McCarthy).
VI. Conclusion
For decades, historians have told us that the Nazi regime under
Adolf Hitler was responsible for the deaths of millions of Jews and
Gypsies, Russians, homosexuals, the insane, and political prisoners.
Historians have told us that the Nazis used poison gas chambers to
murder most of them. They have told us that when the Jews and Gypsies
weren't being killed they were being forced to live in terrible
conditions in which disease was rampant, perform backbreaking labor
for the benefit of German industry and the German state. And they
have told us that all of this was done in the name of a "master race"
which Hitler believed in to the point of attempting to exterminate the
other races. But now, in the United States, Canada, France, Germany,
and all over the world, there are people who call themselves
Revisionists saying that all those historians are wrong, that history
has been consciously altered for someone's gain. And the gain is
going to the very people who were supposedly so severely persecuted.
It can be quite a distressing and overwhelming situation for those who
have lived with the standard history for so long.
The arguments used by these Revisionists seem to center around
attacks on the evidence for the Holocaust. "The guards couldn't have
smoked like witnesses said" and "'_Vergasung_' doesn't necessarily mean
gassing someone" are two examples discussed above of this Revisionist
tactic of disproving something by doubting the evidence presented.
However, in this authors opinion, it is not enough to merely cast some
vague suspicion on the veracity and credibility of the evidence.
There must be some evidence to the contrary. If they could find a Jew
who was at Auschwitz and would testify that no one was ever killed
there intentionally, or if the few existing pictures of the equipment
believed to have been used in the genocide of the Jews showed
something that could prove beyond a doubt that people were not gassed,
then that would be something concrete in favor of Revisionist
arguments.
But there is nothing of the kind. Pictures and plans show what
must be gas chambers. Witnesses tell of atrocities and killings.
Even the perpetrators of these acts, the guards and officers of the
camps and the high officials of the government, have admitted, under
oath and in signed affidavits, that these things that the Revisionists
seek to discount did in fact happen, that they, as guards and officers
did do these things, and that they, as officers of the armed forces
and officials, did attempt to cover it up.
One gets the feeling that perhaps Revisionists are trying redeem
a racial pride, or strengthen a racial prejudice, with these
arguments. Some arguments, like the assertion that because HCN is a
different density than normal air it will collect in dense pockets,
seem logical when first presented, but don't stand up to scrutiny. An
argument like that requires blind faith, which is what Revisionists
are trying to get away from in the first place.
Admittedly, there are arguments that are difficult to refute.
For example, without a fluency in 1940s German, this author cannot
make a conclusion about the accuracy of the definitions given for the
German word _Vergasung_. However, the vast preponderance of real,
concrete evidence that can be found supports the unfortunate reality
of the Holocaust.
Works Cited
McVay, Kenneth N. (1994) "HOLOCAUST FAQ: Auschwitz-Birkenau: Layman's
Guide" Usenet news.answers. Available via anonymous ftp from
rtfm.mit.edu in pub/usenet/news.answers/holocaust/auschwitz/
part01 (and ~/part02). 24 pages.
Kotsikonas, Anastasios. (1992) "The Leuchter Report: A Laymnan's
Guide: Holocaust Denial & The Big Lie. Available via E-Mail from
The Old Frog's Almanac (ListServ) archive site at
listserv@oneb.almanac.bc.ca, Archive Leuchter, files
Leuchter.faq1 and Leuchter.faq2. 27 pages.
McCarthy, Jamie R. (1992) "Gannon.gas." Available via E-Mail from The
Old Frog's Almanac (ListServ) archive site at
listserv@oneb.almanac.bc.ca, Archive B-CPU, file Gannon.gas.
Butz, Arthur R. _The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against
the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry_. Torrance, CA:
Institute for Historical Review, c. 1976, 1983 printing.
Hitler, Adolf. _Mein Kampf_. Boston, MA. Houghton Mifflin Co., c.
1971.
_Bibliography_
Butz, Arthur R. _The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against
the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry_. Torrance, CA:
Institute for Historical Review, c. 1976, 1983 printing.
Hitler, Adolf. _Mein Kampf_. Boston, MA. Houghton Mifflin Co., c.
1971.
McVay, Kenneth N. (1994) "HOLOCAUST FAQ: Auschwitz-Birkenau: Layman's
Guide" Usenet news.answers. Available via anonymous ftp from
rtfm.mit.edu in pub/usenet/news.answers/holocaust/auschwitz/
part01 (and ~/part02). 24 pages.
Oertelt, Henry. "A Holocaust Survivor's Testimony." St John's
University, 17 April, 1994, 7:00 PM.
Old Frog's Almanac Archive Site. A large archive of files about the
Holocaust is available via E-Mail from the Old Frog's Almanac
listserver. E-Mail to listserv@oneb.almanac.bc.ca with a blank
subject line, and in the body, "get archive_name filename". A
list of those files available at the Old Frog's Almanac that were
consulted in relation to this paper follows:
Archive File Archive File
Auschwitz Deathcamp.03 Auschwitz Glossary
B-CPU B-CPU.anti-sem B-CPU Gannon.gas
B-CPU.faq Gannon.words
B-CPU.files Liar
B-CPU.001 Liberators
Blasted.001 Lie.04
Christian.news Lie.06
Cmelon.001 Lie.07
Gannon Newyorker.net
Gannon.001 Nexus.001
Gannon.002 Pfaust-bcpu
Gannon.0708 Players.faq
Gannon.0714 Scrolls.refute
Gannon.0730 Winston.refute
CODOH Arno.1 CODOH MSU.001
Arno.book MSU.002
CODOH.museum MSU.003
CODOH.oregonian NWU.001
Duke.001 Oregonian.net
Harvard.001
Irving Hitlers.war
Reinhard Appendix.arad Reinhard Reinhard.faq2
Prolog.arad
Holocaust Hoess.intro.01 Holocaust JIN.intro
/bibliography Holocaust.oed /IHR IFZ.001
Leuchter Leuchter.faq2
Netherlands Holland.003
IHR IHR.faq2 IHR IHR.intro.text
Poland YVS16.01 Poland YVS16.index
Vidal-Naquet, Pierre. _Assassins of Memory: Essays on the Denial of
the Holocaust_. New York, Columbia University Press, c. 1992.
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.