Shofar FTP Archive File: people/v/von.ebersdorf.johannes/usenet/2009/v.ebersdorf.200902
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:19 EST 2009
Article: 1988345 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-08.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: ethnic knolling: Pikelhaube's Hatred Of Germans
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <64udncwSSNFTCB_UnZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@vex.net> <97c1ae4a-7aa7-4972-9174-97279b162258@u14g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <77i7o4lpchngp00adf143klc3vj248ooa8@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 72
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:20:27 -0500
Bytes: 4657
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1988345
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:14:35 -0500, Gord McFee
wrote:
>On 1/31/2009 11:34 AM, Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:44:14 -0500, Gord McFee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:56:15 -0800 (PST), in
>>> <97c1ae4a-7aa7-4972-9174-97279b162258@u14g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
>>> "Bent Attorney Esq." wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jan 30, 9:40 am, "Kurt Knoll" wrote:
>>>>> "Kenneth McVay OBC" wrote in
>>>>> messagenews:XoadnRQknevQkR7UnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d@vex.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article , Kurt Knoll
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Kenneth McVay OBC" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:64udncwSSNFTCB_UnZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@vex.net...
>>>>>>>> In article , Kurt Knoll
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "I'll Always Be 30-01-09"
>>>>>>>>> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:Xns9BA2D08C414ECTheonlyonethatcares@87.106.137.111...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Kurt Knoll" wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:O3tgl.7971$PH1.1351@edtnps82:
>>>>>>>>>>> How reliable is you Bundeswehr I mean the one under
>>>>>>>>>>> American & Jewish control.
>>>>>>>>>> How reliable is Bacque? He is after all, university
>>>>>>>>>> slime
>>>>>>>>> How can this be why do you not talk the German
>>>>>>>>> holocaust survivors. from Ikes camp and be truthfully
>>>>>>>>> about it.
>>>>>>>> You are knolling again, and Bacque has been thoroughly
>>>>>>>> debunked. Even the German military laughs at him. Read
>>>>>>>> some of the books writen about it.
>>>>>>> The survivors of Ikes death camp will not agree with you
>>>>>>> when they have seen all the things you do not want people
>>>>>>> to know. Up until now you have discredited anyone who is in
>>>>>>> your holocaust way and did so intentionally.
>>>>>> Since Eisenhower did not run any death camps, there could be
>>>>>> no survivors. Historians have pointed out Bacque's errors,
>>>>>> and the Bundeswehr has pointed out Bacque's errors. You are
>>>>>> simply too blinded by hatred to accept the truth.
>>>>> I but my trust in survivors of Ikes death camp and not in a
>>>>> lunatic like you.
>>>>>
>>>> I second that. I also put my trust in what Bacque and the writer
>>>> of 'After the Reich' have written. They confirmed what I already
>>>> knew.
>>> Hitler used the same approach to reading. It was OK as long as it
>>> confirmed what "he already knew".
>>
>> This is just hot air from Gourd. How the hell would he know anything
>> about Hitler's approach to reading, or that of anybody else.
>
>Because unlike you, I have researched it and read the relevant
>literature, including Mein Kampf and the Tischgespräche.
LOL
You treat Mein Kampf as if it were sacred scripture. At the time that
this book was written, Hitler was in jail in Bavaria and could not
possibly even know if he would ever be in a position to fulfill the
various fantasies presented in the book. Most of what you claim he
said, he didn't even say or intend. These are all your half-baked
interpretations of what you wanted the guy to have said.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:19 EST 2009
Article: 1988620 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Already in 1925, Hitler was obsessed with gassing Jews
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <3n73o41in7l10l5poi5q3nv71627lsf1q6@4ax.com> <0657o45lu7nnti5q98c2pbhhqak8hec633@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 45
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:51:46 -0500
Bytes: 3024
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1988620
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:03:18 -0600, Roger wrote:
>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote
> in message :
>
>>On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:44:56 -0600, Roger wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> And in WW2 the germans used the gas in the camps...to kill Jews
>
>>>>>>>And others, including Germans, Roma, Poles, Russians, Jehovah's Witnesses,
>>>>>>>freemasons, and so on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And, including German children. Getting caught murdering German children
>>>>>>>was one of the reasons Hitler shifted to verbal orders.
>
>>>>>>You seem to make up this nonsense on the fly.
>
>>>>>Which of the above do you dispute?
>
>>>>My parents lived in Germany during the period in question, and while
>>>>they were not big fans of the NS regime, most of the so-called allied
>>>>postwar "history" is propaganda nonsense. Neither of my parents have
>>>>ever heard of the "murder of German children", other than postwar by
>>>>the "liberators".
>
>>>So, your parents were ignorant of the T4 programme.
>>>
>>>This means it never happened?
>
>>Whatever happened obviously didn't happen the way your propaganda
>>claims it did.
>
>Why "obviously," especially when one considers your demonstrated
>ignorance?
>
>So far, you're 0 for one specifically disputing anything in this
>thread.
Oh get off the pot. Much of your stuff is so patently preposterous
that dispute would be totally superfluous.
>
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:20 EST 2009
Article: 1988621 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: ethnic knolling: Pikelhaube's Hatred Of Germans
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <64udncwSSNFTCB_UnZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@vex.net> <97c1ae4a-7aa7-4972-9174-97279b162258@u14g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <77i7o4lpchngp00adf143klc3vj248ooa8@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 90
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:53:22 -0500
Bytes: 5351
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1988621
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:33:58 +1000, "B. Cramer"
wrote:
>
>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>news:s25ao4l5upb95vpn6rvfn79v2dkjlrlphg@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:14:35 -0500, Gord McFee
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On 1/31/2009 11:34 AM, Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:44:14 -0500, Gord McFee
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:56:15 -0800 (PST), in
>>>>> <97c1ae4a-7aa7-4972-9174-97279b162258@u14g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> "Bent Attorney Esq." wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 30, 9:40 am, "Kurt Knoll" wrote:
>>>>>>> "Kenneth McVay OBC" wrote in
>>>>>>> messagenews:XoadnRQknevQkR7UnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d@vex.net...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article , Kurt Knoll
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Kenneth McVay OBC" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:64udncwSSNFTCB_UnZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@vex.net...
>>>>>>>>>> In article , Kurt Knoll
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "I'll Always Be 30-01-09"
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns9BA2D08C414ECTheonlyonethatcares@87.106.137.111...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Kurt Knoll" wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:O3tgl.7971$PH1.1351@edtnps82:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How reliable is you Bundeswehr I mean the one under
>>>>>>>>>>>>> American & Jewish control.
>>>>>>>>>>>> How reliable is Bacque? He is after all, university
>>>>>>>>>>>> slime
>>>>>>>>>>> How can this be why do you not talk the German
>>>>>>>>>>> holocaust survivors. from Ikes camp and be truthfully
>>>>>>>>>>> about it.
>>>>>>>>>> You are knolling again, and Bacque has been thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>> debunked. Even the German military laughs at him. Read
>>>>>>>>>> some of the books writen about it.
>>>>>>>>> The survivors of Ikes death camp will not agree with you
>>>>>>>>> when they have seen all the things you do not want people
>>>>>>>>> to know. Up until now you have discredited anyone who is in
>>>>>>>>> your holocaust way and did so intentionally.
>>>>>>>> Since Eisenhower did not run any death camps, there could be
>>>>>>>> no survivors. Historians have pointed out Bacque's errors,
>>>>>>>> and the Bundeswehr has pointed out Bacque's errors. You are
>>>>>>>> simply too blinded by hatred to accept the truth.
>>>>>>> I but my trust in survivors of Ikes death camp and not in a
>>>>>>> lunatic like you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I second that. I also put my trust in what Bacque and the writer
>>>>>> of 'After the Reich' have written. They confirmed what I already
>>>>>> knew.
>>>>> Hitler used the same approach to reading. It was OK as long as it
>>>>> confirmed what "he already knew".
>>>>
>>>> This is just hot air from Gourd. How the hell would he know anything
>>>> about Hitler's approach to reading, or that of anybody else.
>>>
>>>Because unlike you, I have researched it and read the relevant
>>>literature, including Mein Kampf and the Tischgespräche.
>>
>> LOL
>>
>> You treat Mein Kampf as if it were sacred scripture. At the time that
>> this book was written, Hitler was in jail in Bavaria and could not
>> possibly even know if he would ever be in a position to fulfill the
>> various fantasies presented in the book. Most of what you claim he
>> said, he didn't even say or intend. These are all your half-baked
>> interpretations of what you wanted the guy to have said.
>
>Ole gourd is an expert on German language, yanno. He's even got Holmanstein
>bluffed with his mastery of the language. He's even got Germans bluffed with
>his mastery of their very own language.
>
>Such a mensch, him.
Old gourd is a marvel indeed. LOL
>
>
>>
>>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:20 EST 2009
Article: 1988622 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: ethnic knolling: Pikelhaube's Hatred Of Germans
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <64udncwSSNFTCB_UnZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@vex.net> <97c1ae4a-7aa7-4972-9174-97279b162258@u14g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <77i7o4lpchngp00adf143klc3vj248ooa8@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 11
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:54:03 -0500
Bytes: 1728
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1988622
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:13:35 -0500, Gord McFee
wrote:
>On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:20:27 -0500, in
>, Johannes von Ebersdorf
> wrote:
>
>[troll dismissed]
It seems that you fit your own running away line.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:20 EST 2009
Article: 1990795 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: a good country
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 64
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:15:15 -0500
Bytes: 3645
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990795
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:48:27 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
wrote:
>
>"Topaz" wrote in message
>news:0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com...
>> Iran's President Rebukes Western Ban on Open Holocaust Research
>> Press TV (Iran)
>> http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=83891§ionid=351020101
>>
>> Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says Western countries have
>> blocked research on the Holocaust to achieve their political
>> objectives. "Western countries have prevented any kind of research on
>> the Holocaust for almost 60 years
>
>This is, frankly, bullshit. The Holocaust is studied and researched every
>day in Western countries.
Nobody does "research" on this topic, because they approach the topic
with a closed mind set on the official version. If your "research"
findings differ from the official version, count on sacrificing your
career and possibly your freedom.
The holocaust "researchers" do the same kind of research as Paul
Cameron does on sexuality, where Cameron already has his mind made up
about the findings before the research even starts.
> Holocaust Deniers and "revisionists" have been
>able to present opposing views in various forums, their "evidence" has been
>examined, and on the whole been demonstrated worthless.
>
>And Mr. Ahmadinejad's idea was to hold a "conference" on the topic, one that
>he ensured could not be attended by those who knew the most about the topic.
>Apparently, his version of history cannot bear scrutiny.
>
>So, this is a flat-out lie by a foolish "leader" who cannot provide fuel to
>his own people to keep them from freezing to death in winter, who has
>mismanaged his country, which has an annual inflation rage of over 24% and
>has to *import* fuel because his government has neglected its
>infrastructure/.
>
>This statement is nothing but political propaganda from a government that
>extended a death sentence to a citizen who urged other citizens not to
>follow their political and religious leaders "like monkeys". Calling for
>an end to rule by clergy can, and has, resulted in long prison sentences.
>
>This looks to me like an action of a government that desperately does not
>want its people to look behind the curtain. It needs external enemies,
>because it is incompetent.
>
>And it's interesting that this kind of government - one that kills and
>imprisons its citizens to stifle dissent and expression - is called "good"
>by "Topaz", and is warmly embraced by the Holocaust Denier and "revisionist"
>crowd.
>
>HTH
>-pk
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:21 EST 2009
Article: 1990796 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Why Canadians(and others)are dying in Afghanistan
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <4vjro41ohv18n5ssln1lvj2pvmfri2ejtf@4ax.com>
References: <7542d4c9-bb3c-43f2-9a44-7b7ecd3a96ed@l38g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:16:49 -0500
Bytes: 2193
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990796
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:17:17 -0800 (PST), "Bent Attorney Esq."
wrote:
>{
>In Dec. 97, Unocal invited a senior Taliban delegation to Houston,
>Texas, to discuss a major oil deal. Unocal, with Washington's
>blessing and support, wanted to build the oil pipeline across
>Afghanistan linking the Caspian Basin oil fields of Central Asia with
>Pakistan's coast. This new trans-Afghanistan pipeline would form the
>principal export conduit for the newly discovered energy resources of
>Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan and put even more of the
>world's energy supplies under US control.
>But Osama bin Laden reportedly advised the Taliban's Mullah Omar to
>reject the Unocal contract in favor of a better deal from an Argentine
>consortium, Bridas. This infuriated the Clinton administration, which
>had been previously advised by Khalilzad to improve relations with the
>Taliban. As a result, the Taliban was put on Washington's blacklist.
>}
>American Raj, page 195 by Eric S. Margolis
There seems to be no American project anywhere in the world that
doesn't have some sort of corrupt background agenda in addition to the
official published agenda.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:21 EST 2009
Article: 1990797 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Israel to Pope - You've only begun to apologize
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <6uvcrlFhk4ijU1@mid.individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 20
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:19:23 -0500
Bytes: 1768
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990797
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:47:30 +0100, "Heinrich"
wrote:
>So the Pope gave in and told the Bishop he would have to believe in the
>magic of the Holocaust or he would have no career.
Heinrich, I suppose the man can believe what he wishes, but he is
obliged to pay lip service to the holocaust™. How does the old German
saying go? "Die Gedanken sind frei" It seems, however, that expression
of these thoughts is anything but free.
>
>BUT
>
>Israel's foreign ministry welcomed the Vatican's remarks last night, saying:
>"Admonishing the manifestation of Holocaust denial is the first step in the
>right direction". But it said Israel expected "more explicit and unequivocal
>decisions and statements on this issue".
>
>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009...olocaust-views
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:21 EST 2009
Article: 1990798 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Ratzinger slams Merkel over criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net> <2uilo4h2e5vt1qvkfrd2ee286fb700o3p2@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 80
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:23:05 -0500
Bytes: 4325
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990798
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:00:58 +0000, Daniel Bernard
wrote:
>On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:08:11 +0100, "Heinrich"
>wrote:
>
>>Georg Ratzinger has defended his brother Pope Benedict XVI over his decision
>>to rehabilitate Bishop Williamson, a Holocaust denier, into the Catholic
>>Church - and slammed Angela Merkel for her criticism.
>>
>>Williamson (68) was excommunicated from the Catholic Church in 1988 and has
>>now been rehabilitated by Benedict XVI. He has often publicly denied the
>>Holocaust, as well as airing other outrageous conspiracy theories.
>>"He doesn't need me to defend him. But it angers me how unjust and badly
>>informed the people who are attacking him are," the Regensburg Music
>>Director, 'Domkapellmeister', Georg Ratzinger told German newspaper
>>'Leipziger Volkszeitung'. He finds the harsh criticism the Pope has received
>>from people in his native Germany, as well as from the rest of the world,
>>unjust: "We always speak about an informed society, when in reality it is
>>uninformed."
>>
>>Georg Ratzinger (85) finds German Chancellor Angela Merkel's
>
>Merkel can ESAD.
>
>The Catholic Church does not need a fucking Lutheran telling it how to
>run its affairs.
LOL
Is Angela actually Lutheran? I was always told that she was RC.
>
>> open criticism
>>of the Pope particularly disappointing: "I always saw her as a rational
>>woman. But perhaps at the moment she is under pressure to say something
>>irrational." Ratzinger says he speaks with his brother in the Vatican on the
>>phone, but doesn't discuss the scandal: "We usually talk about personal
>>things."
>>
>>German bishop Gregor Maria Hanke has also slammed Merkel's opinion, saying
>>he finds it disconcerting "how the Pope's integrity is now being questioned
>>by politicians and statesmen."
>>
>
>
>>Even members of the German Parliament are criticising Merkel for involving
>>herself in the debate surrounding the rehabilitation: CSU politician Bernd
>>Posselt warned the Chancellor about continuing to "act as the Pope's
>>teacher."
>>
>>Angela Merkel has, however, received support from members of her own party,
>>the Central Council of Jews
>
>The Jew Council can fuck off.
>
>The Catholic Church does not need a bunch of fucking Jews telling it
>how to run its affairs.
>
>>and SPD head Franz Muntefering, who said: "I
>>think it is unacceptable to rehabilitate a bishop who denies the Holocaust."
>>
>Muntefering can either fuck off and join another religion or toe the
>Catholic line.
>
>Bishop WIlliamson was not excommunicated because of his views on the
>so-called Holocaust. Therefore his views on the so-called Holocaust
>should not affect his rehabilitation into the Catholic Church.
>
>>After days of silence the Pope and the Vatican issued a statement "firmly
>>rejecting" the views of Williamson and ordering him to publicly recant them
>>in order to stay in the Church
>
>Bishop Williamson also questioned the official line regarding the WTC
>attacks.
>
>Should he recant those views simply to placate Americans?
>
>Boche like Merkel and Munterfering should stop trying to foist their
>German Holocaust guilt on the rest of the world.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:22 EST 2009
Article: 1990799 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Ratzinger slams Merkel over criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net> <2uilo4h2e5vt1qvkfrd2ee286fb700o3p2@4ax.com> <16vlo4p2cenvejupd98ehjusllfrdkld05@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 29
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:25:37 -0500
Bytes: 1907
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990799
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:51:22 -0500, Eli Grubman
wrote:
>On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:43:55 +0000, Daniel Bernard
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:20:55 -0500, Eli Grubman
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>"Ah have a dreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeam".
>>>- Martin Luther (1483 - 1546)
>>>
>>>Eli
>>
>>"Jews are full of the devil's faeces ... which they wallow in like
>>swine."
>>
>>Martin Luther (1483 - 1546)
>
>The man obviously had talent. Too bad he got assassinated.
Martin Luther was never assassinated. Such things are very rare in
Germany. It was the American, Martin Luther KING, who was
assassinated, a rather common occurrence in the USA.
>
>Eli
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:22 EST 2009
Article: 1990800 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Ratzinger slams Merkel over criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <2nkro4t9rnvlje2bid11d5jc0lo23tmq3n@4ax.com>
References: <6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net> <2uilo4h2e5vt1qvkfrd2ee286fb700o3p2@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 46
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:29:56 -0500
Bytes: 2852
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990800
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:57:06 +0100, Poor Eli Grabmen is a Real
Psychopath! LOL wrote:
>On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:00:58 +0000, Daniel Bernard wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:08:11 +0100, "Heinrich"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Georg Ratzinger has defended his brother Pope Benedict XVI over his decision
>>>to rehabilitate Bishop Williamson, a Holocaust denier, into the Catholic
>>>Church - and slammed Angela Merkel for her criticism.
>>>
>>>Williamson (68) was excommunicated from the Catholic Church in 1988 and has
>>>now been rehabilitated by Benedict XVI. He has often publicly denied the
>>>Holocaust, as well as airing other outrageous conspiracy theories.
>>>"He doesn't need me to defend him. But it angers me how unjust and badly
>>>informed the people who are attacking him are," the Regensburg Music
>>>Director, 'Domkapellmeister', Georg Ratzinger told German newspaper
>>>'Leipziger Volkszeitung'. He finds the harsh criticism the Pope has received
>>>from people in his native Germany, as well as from the rest of the world,
>>>unjust: "We always speak about an informed society, when in reality it is
>>>uninformed."
>>>
>>>Georg Ratzinger (85) finds German Chancellor Angela Merkel's
>>
>> Merkel can ESAD.
>>
>> The Catholic Church does not need a fucking Lutheran telling it how to
>> run its affairs.
>
>
>That woman got courage
That is a bit of an overstatement. Angela is very much a political
animal who checks the direction of the wind frequently. She is no
friend of Germany or its people.
> and that's how she became German chancellor. A lot of
>Catholics agree with her criticism and are much more harsh than she is on
>that strange, bookish Pope who continues living in a theological cloud
>cuckoo land.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:23 EST 2009
Article: 1990801 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Ratzinger slams Merkel over criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net> <2uilo4h2e5vt1qvkfrd2ee286fb700o3p2@4ax.com> <8804944a-d6f8-4a9a-8413-f744bd0ec4bc@z27g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 43
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:31:00 -0500
Bytes: 3042
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990801
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:47:03 -0800 (PST), StarDust
wrote:
>On Feb 5, 5:57 am, Poor Eli Grabmen is a Real Psychopath! LOL
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:00:58 +0000, Daniel Bernard wrote:
>> > On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:08:11 +0100, "Heinrich"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >>Georg Ratzinger has defended his brother Pope Benedict XVI over his decision
>> >>to rehabilitate Bishop Williamson, a Holocaust denier, into the Catholic
>> >>Church - and slammed Angela Merkel for her criticism.
>>
>> >>Williamson (68) was excommunicated from the Catholic Church in 1988 and has
>> >>now been rehabilitated by Benedict XVI. He has often publicly denied the
>> >>Holocaust, as well as airing other outrageous conspiracy theories.
>> >>"He doesn't need me to defend him. But it angers me how unjust and badly
>> >>informed the people who are attacking him are," the Regensburg Music
>> >>Director, 'Domkapellmeister', Georg Ratzinger told German newspaper
>> >>'Leipziger Volkszeitung'. He finds the harsh criticism the Pope has received
>> >>from people in his native Germany, as well as from the rest of the world,
>> >>unjust: "We always speak about an informed society, when in reality it is
>> >>uninformed."
>>
>> >>Georg Ratzinger (85) finds German Chancellor Angela Merkel's
>>
>> > Merkel can ESAD.
>>
>> > The Catholic Church does not need a fucking Lutheran telling it how to
>> > run its affairs.
>>
>> That woman got courage and that's how she became German chancellor. A lot of
>> Catholics agree with her criticism and are much more harsh than she is on
>> that strange, bookish Pope who continues living in a theological cloud
>> cuckoo land.
>
>She's an ex-communist!
She lived in the DDR to be sure, but she was always a Christian
Democrat, since that party was tolerated by the SED.
>Do you like communists?
>JS
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:23 EST 2009
Article: 1990802 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Ratzinger slams Merkel over criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net> <6v0dmbFhl9b5U1@mid.individual.net> <9r3mo49sak7o2074p9v5budu7vnuo34h36@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 48
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:34:59 -0500
Bytes: 2577
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990802
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:45:11 -0500, Eli Grubman
wrote:
>On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:10:20 +0000, Daniel Bernard
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:40:05 -0500, Eli Grubman
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:09:49 +0000 (UTC), TallHenry
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <6v0dmbFhl9b5U1@mid.individual.net>,
>>>>Heinrich wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "TallHenry" schreef in bericht
>>>>> news:gmev5j$8s0$1@pcls6.std.com...
>>>>
>>>>>> In article <6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net>,
>>>>>> Heinrich wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Georg Ratzinger
>>>>
>>>>>> Was he also in the Hitler Youth, like his brother?
>>>>
>>>>> every young german was forced to go with the hitker jugend,
>>>>
>>>> They're all a bunch of fucking Nazi pigs. We should
>>>>have nuked Berlin. Well, next time...
>>>
>>>What would you have nuked Berlin with, jew asshole? Your fucking
>>>torah rolls?
>>>
>>Jew hair?
>
>Stale bagels?
>
>>Anyway, if they had nukes Berlin they would have ended up killing more
>>Jews than ever died in the camps.
>
>Pretty much the same holds today. It's a magnet for Izzies,
>apparently.
They seem to follow the money. One doesn't see them that much in poor
countries.
>
>Eli
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:23 EST 2009
Article: 1990803 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Ratzinger slams Merkel over criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net> <6v0dmbFhl9b5U1@mid.individual.net> <4f25326f-401f-41f7-9337-da3a07ca2145@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 21
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:40:17 -0500
Bytes: 1824
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990803
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:03:27 -0800 (PST), "Bent Attorney Esq."
wrote:
>On Feb 5, 10:07 am, "Heinrich" wrote:
>> "TallHenry" schreef in berichtnews:gmev5j$8s0$1@pcls6.std.com...
>>
>> > In article <6uvvktFhfp7...@mid.individual.net>,
>> > Heinrich wrote:
>>
>> >> Georg Ratzinger
>>
>> > Was he also in the Hitler Youth, like his brother?
>>
>> every young german was forced to go with the hitker jugend, dombo.
>>
>> merkel is to blame because she is a puppet in the hands of those german jews
>
>That she is. She doesn't act the way she does because of her
>Lutheranism.
She is a politician, in the pejorative use of that term.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:24 EST 2009
Article: 1990804 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Ratzinger slams Merkel over criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <53lro416aeg5ttlkl4ot37aojmrtradse5@4ax.com>
References: <6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net> <6v0dmbFhl9b5U1@mid.individual.net> <135f4642-f7dd-438f-86a4-c76150a8ba5c@v4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 40
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:39:13 -0500
Bytes: 2678
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990804
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:05:08 -0800 (PST), "Bent Attorney Esq."
wrote:
>On Feb 5, 10:09 am, TallHenry wrote:
>> In article <6v0dmbFhl9b...@mid.individual.net>,
>>
>> Heinrich wrote:
>> > "TallHenry" schreef in bericht
>> >news:gmev5j$8s0$1@pcls6.std.com...
>> >> In article <6uvvktFhfp7...@mid.individual.net>,
>> >> Heinrich wrote:
>> >>> Georg Ratzinger
>> >> Was he also in the Hitler Youth, like his brother?
>> > every young german was forced to go with the hitker jugend,
>>
>> They're all a bunch of fucking Nazi pigs. We should
>> have nuked Berlin. Well, next time...
>
>Berlin was devastated enough. How could you have made it worse by
>nuking it, and what problems would nuking it have solved?
These people are totally ignorant of science. Hiroshima and Nagazaki
were spectacular because they were virgin targets and they were
dropped on cities constructed mainly out of wood. Modern, heavy
structures in both cities survived almost to the point directly under
the bomb.
Berlin would have been totally unspectacular, since there would have
been almost no combustibles left in the downtown and the buildings all
come under the heading of modern, very heavy construction. Some of the
mountains of rubble might have been shifted, but that would have been
all.
>You sound like some kook who is still at war with Germany. Oh well,
>we get all kinds on this NG.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:25 EST 2009
Article: 1990805 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Ratzinger slams Merkel over criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net> <6b4dc7ab-c94d-42de-a52b-bff59669e184@a39g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 14
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:40:49 -0500
Bytes: 1489
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990805
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:02:19 -0800 (PST), "Bent Attorney Esq."
wrote:
>On Feb 5, 10:04 am, TallHenry wrote:
>> In article <6uvvktFhfp7...@mid.individual.net>,
>>
>> Heinrich wrote:
>> > Georg Ratzinger
>>
>> Was he also in the Hitler Youth, like his brother?
>
>What exactly was wrong about being in the Hitler Youth?
Nothing. People were obliged to be members.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:26 EST 2009
Article: 1990806 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Ratzinger slams Merkel over criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 50
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:41:29 -0500
Bytes: 3523
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990806
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:53:33 +1000, "Karl" wrote:
>Merkel is a crypto Jew.
No, she is just an overly flexible politician with no scruples.
>
>
>"Heinrich" wrote in message
>news:6uvvktFhfp7hU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Georg Ratzinger has defended his brother Pope Benedict XVI over his
>> decision to rehabilitate Bishop Williamson, a Holocaust denier, into the
>> Catholic Church - and slammed Angela Merkel for her criticism.
>>
>> Williamson (68) was excommunicated from the Catholic Church in 1988 and
>> has now been rehabilitated by Benedict XVI. He has often publicly denied
>> the Holocaust, as well as airing other outrageous conspiracy theories.
>> "He doesn't need me to defend him. But it angers me how unjust and badly
>> informed the people who are attacking him are," the Regensburg Music
>> Director, 'Domkapellmeister', Georg Ratzinger told German newspaper
>> 'Leipziger Volkszeitung'. He finds the harsh criticism the Pope has
>> received from people in his native Germany, as well as from the rest of
>> the world, unjust: "We always speak about an informed society, when in
>> reality it is uninformed."
>>
>> Georg Ratzinger (85) finds German Chancellor Angela Merkel's open
>> criticism of the Pope particularly disappointing: "I always saw her as a
>> rational woman. But perhaps at the moment she is under pressure to say
>> something irrational." Ratzinger says he speaks with his brother in the
>> Vatican on the phone, but doesn't discuss the scandal: "We usually talk
>> about personal things."
>>
>> German bishop Gregor Maria Hanke has also slammed Merkel's opinion, saying
>> he finds it disconcerting "how the Pope's integrity is now being
>> questioned by politicians and statesmen."
>>
>> Even members of the German Parliament are criticising Merkel for involving
>> herself in the debate surrounding the rehabilitation: CSU politician Bernd
>> Posselt warned the Chancellor about continuing to "act as the Pope's
>> teacher."
>>
>> Angela Merkel has, however, received support from members of her own
>> party, the Central Council of Jews and SPD head Franz Muntefering, who
>> said: "I think it is unacceptable to rehabilitate a bishop who denies the
>> Holocaust."
>>
>> After days of silence the Pope and the Vatican issued a statement "firmly
>> rejecting" the views of Williamson and ordering him to publicly recant
>> them in order to stay in the Church
>>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:26 EST 2009
Article: 1990808 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: pope horrified by german criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <6mlro4530rn3efm4ven9qla1pi3hece3jn@4ax.com>
References: <6v0ha4FhioacU1@mid.individual.net> <9f6dnRwizZc-3RbUnZ2dnUVZ_sPinZ2d@giganews.com> <11vmo456lbfgcj7imubpujdhgeo4llrmr0@4ax.com> <0YadnQqCh4WyGRbUnZ2dnUVZ_hqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 89
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:45:58 -0500
Bytes: 4959
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990808
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:40:13 -0600, Roger wrote:
>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Neil Harrington wrote
> in message <0YadnQqCh4WyGRbUnZ2dnUVZ_hqdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>
>>"Roger" wrote in message
>>news:11vmo456lbfgcj7imubpujdhgeo4llrmr0@4ax.com...
>
>>>>>>(Well, I
>>>>>>suppose a new addition is about due, since the story does change from
>>>>>>time
>>>>>>to time.)
>
>>>>> As does all history, when new information becomes available.
>>>>>
>>>>> But wait -- you claim that the Holocaust "story" can never change
>>>>> because it is illegal.
>
>>>>Bullshit. That makes no sense and obviously I never said any such thing.
>>>>On
>>>>the contrary, I have said repeatedly that the Holocaust story is in a
>>>>state
>>>>of more or less continuous change as older parts are shown to be
>>>>ridiculous
>>>>and the story is adjusted to suit. (For example, the story no longer has
>>>>Zyklon B gas coming out of shower heads. That part of the fairy tale has
>>>>been abandoned. So has the soap made from "pure Jewish fat.")
>
>>> The normative understanding
>
>>Ah, "normative" again! What a wonderfully defensive word you seem to believe
>>that to be. Any Holocaust story later proven to be nonsense can be excused
>>on the grounds it wasn't "normative," which evidently is a term to be
>>retroactively applied as necessary for defense of the overall fable.
>
>So, you don't understand what "normative" means. Might I suggest you
>educate yourself?
>
>>> never had Zyklon B coming out of shower
>>> heads. Nor did it have "pure Jewish fat" soap.
>
>>Nevertheless, that "pure Jewish fat" soap was a regular feature of many if
>>not most Holocaust museums.
>
>Your proof of this is ... ?
Give it up Roger, you are just making yourself more ridiculous than
you already were.
>
>>No one raised the question of whether it was
>>"normative" history at the time. It was just part of the bullshit that was
>>expected to be accepted by all, and of course anyone who questioned it would
>>be condemned as a "Holocaust denier" -- at the very least.
>
>>> Any more than the
>>> normative understanding of the American Revolution depend on George
>>> Washington throwing a silver dollar across the Potomac.
>
>>But Washington's trans-Potomac silver dollar pitch was nowhere near as
>>important to that part of American history as the poison-gas-spewing shower
>>heads were to the Holocaust mythology.
>
>On what objective scale do you assert this?
>
>>> Which reminds me: got any proof that at the time they were called
>>> "silver dollars" and not "Spanish dollars?"
>
>>Sure. From Wikipedia:
>>
>>"Before the Revolutionary War, coins from many European nations circulated
>>freely in the American colonies, as well as decimal coinage issued by the
>>various colonies. Chief among these was the Spanish silver "dollar" coins
>>(also called pieces of eight or eight reales) minted in Mexico and other
>>colonies with silver mined from Central and South American mines. These
>>coins, along with others of similar size and value, were in use throughout
>>the colonies and later the United States and were legal tender until 1857."
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar_(United_States_coin)
>
>Nothing there even pretends to show that at the time they were called
>"silver dollars" and not "Spanish dollars."
>
>Care to try again?
>
>
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:26 EST 2009
Article: 1990810 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: pope horrified by german criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <11vmo456lbfgcj7imubpujdhgeo4llrmr0@4ax.com> <0YadnQqCh4WyGRbUnZ2dnUVZ_hqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 102
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:46:58 -0500
Bytes: 5462
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990810
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:09:54 -0600, Roger wrote:
>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Neil Harrington wrote
> in message :
>
>>"Roger" wrote in message
>>news:td1no4l3lpugi4hg4qgsn877pd0mf4p6bd@4ax.com...
>
>>>>> never had Zyklon B coming out of shower
>>>>> heads. Nor did it have "pure Jewish fat" soap.
>
>>>>Nevertheless, that "pure Jewish fat" soap was a regular feature of many if
>>>>not most Holocaust museums.
>
>>> Your proof of this is ... ?
>
>>The many photos of such soap in those museums that were online. I suppose
>>they've mostly been removed now out of embarrassment, but you could always
>>Google this if you're really interested.
>
>I'm interested in your inability to support your lies.
Roger, look to your own lies before sanctimoniously and hypocritically
berating others for alleged untruths.
>
>>Remember, the Jews buried lots of this "pure Jewish fat" soap with full
>>funeral ceremonies in the new state of Israel in 1948. IIRC, they buried
>>four bars in one place and a couple of cases of the stuff in another. I
>>remember there were two separate burial ceremonies.
>
>Then you should have no problem documenting such funeral ceremonies.
>
>>So they took it *very* seriously. Lots of "oy veys," weeping and wailing,
>>praying and what have you, as they buried the Ivory thinking it was maybe
>>Uncle Irving.
>
>Even if this was true -- what difference would it have to the
>normative understanding of the history you try to deny?
>
>>>>No one raised the question of whether it was
>>>>"normative" history at the time. It was just part of the bullshit that was
>>>>expected to be accepted by all, and of course anyone who questioned it
>>>>would be condemned as a "Holocaust denier" -- at the very least.
>
>Your proof of this is ... ?
>
>>>>> Any more than the
>>>>> normative understanding of the American Revolution depend on George
>>>>> Washington throwing a silver dollar across the Potomac.
>
>>>>But Washington's trans-Potomac silver dollar pitch was nowhere near as
>>>>important to that part of American history as the poison-gas-spewing
>>>>shower heads were to the Holocaust mythology.
>
>>> On what objective scale do you assert this?
>
>>It's obvious.
>
>No, it's not.
>
>On what objective scale do you assert Washington's silver dollar toss
>was nowhere near as important to that part of American history as the
>poison-gas-spewing shower heads were to the Holocaust?
>
>>>>> Which reminds me: got any proof that at the time they were called
>>>>> "silver dollars" and not "Spanish dollars?"
>
>>>>Sure. From Wikipedia:
>>>>
>>>>"Before the Revolutionary War, coins from many European nations circulated
>>>>freely in the American colonies, as well as decimal coinage issued by the
>>>>various colonies. Chief among these was the Spanish silver "dollar" coins
>>>>(also called pieces of eight or eight reales) minted in Mexico and other
>>>>colonies with silver mined from Central and South American mines. These
>>>>coins, along with others of similar size and value, were in use throughout
>>>>the colonies and later the United States and were legal tender until
>>>>1857."
>>>>
>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar_(United_States_coin)
>
>>> Nothing there even pretends to show that at the time they were called
>>> "silver dollars" and not "Spanish dollars."
>
>>Obviously Americans called their silver dollars "silver dollars" or
>>"dollars," as it says in the article, not "Spanish dollars."
>
>Nothing in that article says they were called silver dollars.
>
>>Are you being deliberately obtuse, or are you really having trouble with
>>this?
>
>I'm only pointing out that you have no factual basis for your claims
>about Spanish dollars, anymore than you have about your claims about
>the Holocaust.
>
>
>
>
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:27 EST 2009
Article: 1990812 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: pope horrified by german criticism
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <6v0g9hFhfts7U1@mid.individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:49:17 -0500
Bytes: 1789
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990812
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:54:40 +0000 (UTC), Alan-from-Elimbah
wrote:
>In article ,
>Neil Harrington wrote:
>
>> That gets you the free downgrade to full plonkee status you've been striving
>> for.
>
>The rule has been established, folks. To get plonked by
>Neil, you have to prove at least three times that he's a
>liar and a moron. IOW, you have to reply to at least three
>of his posts.
>
Lots of people have put the jerk who goes by "I'm here..." on a purge
list. The guy simply has nothing worthwhile to say or contribute to a
discussion, except of course name-calling and invective.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:27 EST 2009
Article: 1990894 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: a good country
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 166
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:57:17 -0500
Bytes: 8346
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990894
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:09:45 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
wrote:
>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>news:gnjro45apono9hh9747dfa17hub90hqac3@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:48:27 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Topaz" wrote in message
>>>news:0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com...
>>>> Iran's President Rebukes Western Ban on Open Holocaust Research
>>>> Press TV (Iran)
>>>> http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=83891§ionid=351020101
>>>>
>>>> Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says Western countries have
>>>> blocked research on the Holocaust to achieve their political
>>>> objectives. "Western countries have prevented any kind of research on
>>>> the Holocaust for almost 60 years
>>>
>>>This is, frankly, bullshit. The Holocaust is studied and researched
>>>every
>>>day in Western countries.
>>
>> Nobody does "research" on this topic,
>
>Yes, they do. There's plenty of real research and real debate that goes
>on all the time.
>
>Your denial of this doesn't affect reality.
>
>> because they approach the topic
>> with a closed mind set on the official version.
>
>Actually they start their approach from a study of the available data.
>
>If you have a problem with the data, or with the methods, why aren't you
>publishing your rebuttals?
>
>Accepting the Holocaust denier or "revisionist" version generally requires
>the *exclusion* of data, which is generally why it isn't used. Getting
>caught excluding data is a fast track to loss of credibility, which is why
>"revisionists" have so little.
>
>> If your "research"
>> findings differ from the official version, count on sacrificing your
>> career and possibly your freedom.
>
>Sorry, but this is just false, as the functionalist vs intentionalist
>debate, which ran for some time in countries where Holocaust denial faces
>legal sanctioned, shows.
>
>Despite all the arguing, lectures and publications, nobody was arrested,
>nobody's carrer was damaged and nobody went to jail.
>
>So we can readily see that what you pretend to base your "argument" on is
>not factual. And it's not like this is even hard to find out.
>
>There are only a handful of countries where Holocaust denial is illegal, and
>all of them made it illegal because what is underneath it is the promotion
>of racial ideologies that destroyed large portions of Europe and killed
>millions. These countries have direct and bitter experience with that and
>want nothing to do with the promotion of these ideologies.
>
>> The holocaust "researchers" do the same kind of research as Paul
>> Cameron does on sexuality, where Cameron already has his mind made up
>> about the findings before the research even starts.
>
>If you think that this is the case, please show us references to your
>challenges to the methods of these researchers in the peer-reviewed
>journals. What letters or articles have you written showing that their
>data or methods are flawed or incorrect?
>
>Your "argument" referencing Dr. Cameron is undermined by the fact that very
>few scientists or courts pay attention to him or respect his studies,
>methods, or data, largely because there have been numerous challenges to
>them, and his work hasn't withstood the challenges.
>
>In contrast, genuine historical researchers have their work checked by
>others and it does withstand challenges.
>
>If you want to make a valid comparison, you're going to have to do a *lot*
>better than this. Perhaps you could start by trying to understand what a
>comparison *is*.
>
>There aren't any Holocaust deniers or "revisionists" who have contributed
>anything significant or meaningful to our understanding of the history.
Revision is a standard feature of all history, except the holocaust™.
The only thing unique about the holocaust™ is that revisionism is
either prohibited or violently opposed. Obviously the story does not
stand up to criticism. The Roman Church in the middle ages didn't like
revisionists such as Galileo who challenged their geocentric notions
of the universe.
>Much of their material can be easily shown to be of very poor quality, and
>they aren't published in the mainstream journals because they are just not
>good enough. Their work does not stand up to scrutiny.
>
>Meanwhile, the Iranian government set up and promoted a "conference" that
>was *exactly* what you pretend to abhor. They deliberately held it in a
>place where only a select few of a specific viewpoint could attend; those
>who know most about the topic were prohibited, by law, from attending.
>
>This shows the inherent weakness of the Holocaust denier and "revisionist"
>position. It just can not stand up to real scrutiny, and requires the
>active support of a government that suppresses other viewpoints with force
>of law, and I do mean force in the active sense.
>
>And yet, you are silent on this point.
>
>Not a word from you on the restrictive attendance policy or what it means
>about the validity of the Holocaust denier or "revisionist" "argument".
>
>And before you go off claiming that this is comparable to the situation with
>the accepted view of the history, it isn't.
>
>Remember that only a few countries outlaw Holocaust denial, and the accepted
>view is not seriously challenged in countries where it is perfectly legal.
>The accepted history is the same whether Holocaust denial is legal or not.
>
>
>-pk
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Holocaust Deniers and "revisionists" have been
>>>able to present opposing views in various forums, their "evidence" has
>>>been
>>>examined, and on the whole been demonstrated worthless.
>>>
>>>And Mr. Ahmadinejad's idea was to hold a "conference" on the topic, one
>>>that
>>>he ensured could not be attended by those who knew the most about the
>>>topic.
>>>Apparently, his version of history cannot bear scrutiny.
>>>
>>>So, this is a flat-out lie by a foolish "leader" who cannot provide fuel
>>>to
>>>his own people to keep them from freezing to death in winter, who has
>>>mismanaged his country, which has an annual inflation rage of over 24% and
>>>has to *import* fuel because his government has neglected its
>>>infrastructure/.
>>>
>>>This statement is nothing but political propaganda from a government that
>>>extended a death sentence to a citizen who urged other citizens not to
>>>follow their political and religious leaders "like monkeys". Calling for
>>>an end to rule by clergy can, and has, resulted in long prison sentences.
>>>
>>>This looks to me like an action of a government that desperately does not
>>>want its people to look behind the curtain. It needs external enemies,
>>>because it is incompetent.
>>>
>>>And it's interesting that this kind of government - one that kills and
>>>imprisons its citizens to stifle dissent and expression - is called "good"
>>>by "Topaz", and is warmly embraced by the Holocaust Denier and
>>>"revisionist"
>>>crowd.
>>>
>>>HTH
>>>-pk
>>>
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:27 EST 2009
Article: 1990927 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: a good country
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 297
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:06:57 -0500
Bytes: 13888
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990927
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:03:19 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
wrote:
>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>news:o94so4d9msn6c01v2k5bubet1tlv8fn1kg@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:09:45 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>news:gnjro45apono9hh9747dfa17hub90hqac3@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:48:27 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Topaz" wrote in message
>>>>>news:0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Iran's President Rebukes Western Ban on Open Holocaust Research
>>>>>> Press TV (Iran)
>>>>>> http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=83891§ionid=351020101
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says Western countries have
>>>>>> blocked research on the Holocaust to achieve their political
>>>>>> objectives. "Western countries have prevented any kind of research on
>>>>>> the Holocaust for almost 60 years
>>>>>
>>>>>This is, frankly, bullshit. The Holocaust is studied and researched
>>>>>every
>>>>>day in Western countries.
>>>>
>>>> Nobody does "research" on this topic,
>>>
>>>Yes, they do. There's plenty of real research and real debate that goes
>>>on all the time.
>>>
>>>Your denial of this doesn't affect reality.
>>>
>>>> because they approach the topic
>>>> with a closed mind set on the official version.
>>>
>>>Actually they start their approach from a study of the available data.
>>>
>>>If you have a problem with the data, or with the methods, why aren't you
>>>publishing your rebuttals?
>>>
>>>Accepting the Holocaust denier or "revisionist" version generally requires
>>>the *exclusion* of data, which is generally why it isn't used. Getting
>>>caught excluding data is a fast track to loss of credibility, which is why
>>>"revisionists" have so little.
>>>
>>>> If your "research"
>>>> findings differ from the official version, count on sacrificing your
>>>> career and possibly your freedom.
>>>
>>>Sorry, but this is just false, as the functionalist vs intentionalist
>>>debate, which ran for some time in countries where Holocaust denial faces
>>>legal sanctioned, shows.
>>>
>>>Despite all the arguing, lectures and publications, nobody was arrested,
>>>nobody's carrer was damaged and nobody went to jail.
>>>
>>>So we can readily see that what you pretend to base your "argument" on is
>>>not factual. And it's not like this is even hard to find out.
>>>
>>>There are only a handful of countries where Holocaust denial is illegal,
>>>and
>>>all of them made it illegal because what is underneath it is the promotion
>>>of racial ideologies that destroyed large portions of Europe and killed
>>>millions. These countries have direct and bitter experience with that
>>>and
>>>want nothing to do with the promotion of these ideologies.
>>>
>>>> The holocaust "researchers" do the same kind of research as Paul
>>>> Cameron does on sexuality, where Cameron already has his mind made up
>>>> about the findings before the research even starts.
>>>
>>>If you think that this is the case, please show us references to your
>>>challenges to the methods of these researchers in the peer-reviewed
>>>journals. What letters or articles have you written showing that their
>>>data or methods are flawed or incorrect?
>>>
>>>Your "argument" referencing Dr. Cameron is undermined by the fact that
>>>very
>>>few scientists or courts pay attention to him or respect his studies,
>>>methods, or data, largely because there have been numerous challenges to
>>>them, and his work hasn't withstood the challenges.
>>>
>>>In contrast, genuine historical researchers have their work checked by
>>>others and it does withstand challenges.
>>>
>>>If you want to make a valid comparison, you're going to have to do a *lot*
>>>better than this. Perhaps you could start by trying to understand what a
>>>comparison *is*.
>>>
>>>There aren't any Holocaust deniers or "revisionists" who have contributed
>>>anything significant or meaningful to our understanding of the history.
>>
>> Revision is a standard feature of all history, except the holocaustT.
>
>This is a false statement.
>
>All history is reviewed, including the history of the Holocaust, and all
>study and contributions revise our understanding.
>
>Holocaust denial and "revisionism"
I refuse to play your game and buy into your "newspeak". You are just
like the American fundies with their loaded words of "lifestyle" and
"choice".
Your stock phrase of "holocaust denial" is a tool for deception and
intimidation. Personally, I don't "deny" anything. I don't "deny" the
tooth-fairy, for example, I just don't believe in it.
I find your "evidence" half-baked and hence I don't believe all your
stories. I would agree that large numbers of Jews died during WW2 and
that the NS authorities persecuted them, but I generally don't use
your newspeak word "holocaust" because it is a loaded term. Much of
the holocaust has been shown to have no basis, so it isn't exactly a
topic about which I feel any guilt or concern.
> is something entirely different, and is
>not derived from a motivation to understand the real history.
>
>> The only thing unique about the holocaustT is that revisionism is
>> either prohibited or violently opposed.
>
>You haven't understood what I wrote at all, did you?
>
>The fact of the intentionalist vs. functionalist debate shows that your
>"argument" in this case is not based on anything factual.
>
>Holocaust deniers and "revisionists" are not engaged in real historical
>efforts, and are treated according to their real political motivation.
>
>> Obviously the story does not stand up to criticism.
>
>If by this you mean the story presented by Holocaust deniers and
>"revisionists", no, it doesn't.
>
>And that's strictly because there is no information from them that can
>significantly change our understanding of the history.
>
>What Holocaust deniers and "revisionists" present is substandard at best,
>and sometimes is outright fabrication. It fails when challenged.
>
>Accepted history *does* stand up to criticism, or it wouldn't be accepted.
>
>> The Roman Church in the middle ages didn't like
>> revisionists such as Galileo who challenged their geocentric notions
>> of the universe.
>
>Perhaps you haven't noticed that for some timenow, even centuries, in the
>Western world, religious groups no longer dictate to the scientific or
>research communities.
>
>Only in theocratic states is this still the case, and not co-incidentally,
>that is where the primary market for Holocaust denial and "revisionist"
>material exists. In those jurisdictions, this is a tool of foreign policy,
>a tool used to focus hatred to Jews and Israel - and to distract the
>population from their own governments and leaders.
>
>It's telling that you raise this "argument" about the Roman church and don't
>even understand that the only governments that support Holocaust denial and
>"revisionism" are theocratic; in all other jurisdictions, free discussion
>and criticism determines what is accepted. Your "argument" thus
>discredits itself.
>
>If Holocaust deniers and "revisionists" were actually able to uncover
>material that changes our understanding, they could and would present it.
>There are plenty of governments and groups that would fund them and protect
>them. They would have plenty of support and more money than they could
>handle.
>
>But they don't do this because they just don't have and can't come up with
>any material that can do this. It doesn't exist, and is getting harder to
>fabricate as more archval material becomes available.
>
>For an example, consider the non-existent "Krege report". The idea is
>that Krege used a GPR unit at Treblinka in 1999, and produced data that
>could prove that no camp ever existed where Treblinka is and was. He
>apparently found no soil disturbances in an area where buildings had been
>erected and farming had been practiced and that had been bombed repeatedly.
>It shouldn't be too hard to detect a problem with the "no soil disturbance"
>idea.
>
>So this "report", which should have taken no more than a few weeks to
>prepare in 1999, has still not been delivered in 2009. That's a decade
>of failure to publish simple data.
>
>The reason for this failure cannot be a lack of funding or support, since
>this material would be the 'holy grail' to governments that value Holocaust
>denial as a political tool. Krege would be awash in offers of cash, support
>and benefits and offers to publish. He would be an international star -
>and rightly so. So why hasn't he published?
>
>The reason Krege hasn't published can only be that his errors are so
>egregious that even Leuchter supporters won't touch it. It's likely that
>Krege has himself realized the gross problems with his effort and is quietly
>trying to fold his papers and leave the lectern.
>
>There simply is no rational reason to believe that the history of the
>Holocaust differs in any significant way from what we understand it to be,
>or that Holocaust deniers or "revisionists" have anything serious to offer.
>If they did, we'd have seen it by now.
>
>
>>>Much of their material can be easily shown to be of very poor quality, and
>>>they aren't published in the mainstream journals because they are just not
>>>good enough. Their work does not stand up to scrutiny.
>>>
>>>Meanwhile, the Iranian government set up and promoted a "conference" that
>>>was *exactly* what you pretend to abhor. They deliberately held it in a
>>>place where only a select few of a specific viewpoint could attend; those
>>>who know most about the topic were prohibited, by law, from attending.
>>>
>>>This shows the inherent weakness of the Holocaust denier and "revisionist"
>>>position. It just can not stand up to real scrutiny, and requires the
>>>active support of a government that suppresses other viewpoints with force
>>>of law, and I do mean force in the active sense.
>>>
>>>And yet, you are silent on this point.
>
>And still, you remain silent.
>
>-pk
>
>
>>>
>>>Not a word from you on the restrictive attendance policy or what it means
>>>about the validity of the Holocaust denier or "revisionist" "argument".
>>>
>>>And before you go off claiming that this is comparable to the situation
>>>with
>>>the accepted view of the history, it isn't.
>>>
>>>Remember that only a few countries outlaw Holocaust denial, and the
>>>accepted
>>>view is not seriously challenged in countries where it is perfectly legal.
>>>The accepted history is the same whether Holocaust denial is legal or not.
>>>
>>>
>>>-pk
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Holocaust Deniers and "revisionists" have been
>>>>>able to present opposing views in various forums, their "evidence" has
>>>>>been
>>>>>examined, and on the whole been demonstrated worthless.
>>>>>
>>>>>And Mr. Ahmadinejad's idea was to hold a "conference" on the topic, one
>>>>>that
>>>>>he ensured could not be attended by those who knew the most about the
>>>>>topic.
>>>>>Apparently, his version of history cannot bear scrutiny.
>>>>>
>>>>>So, this is a flat-out lie by a foolish "leader" who cannot provide fuel
>>>>>to
>>>>>his own people to keep them from freezing to death in winter, who has
>>>>>mismanaged his country, which has an annual inflation rage of over 24%
>>>>>and
>>>>>has to *import* fuel because his government has neglected its
>>>>>infrastructure/.
>>>>>
>>>>>This statement is nothing but political propaganda from a government
>>>>>that
>>>>>extended a death sentence to a citizen who urged other citizens not to
>>>>>follow their political and religious leaders "like monkeys". Calling
>>>>>for
>>>>>an end to rule by clergy can, and has, resulted in long prison
>>>>>sentences.
>>>>>
>>>>>This looks to me like an action of a government that desperately does
>>>>>not
>>>>>want its people to look behind the curtain. It needs external enemies,
>>>>>because it is incompetent.
>>>>>
>>>>>And it's interesting that this kind of government - one that kills and
>>>>>imprisons its citizens to stifle dissent and expression - is called
>>>>>"good"
>>>>>by "Topaz", and is warmly embraced by the Holocaust Denier and
>>>>>"revisionist"
>>>>>crowd.
>>>>>
>>>>>HTH
>>>>>-pk
>>>>>
>>>
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:31:28 EST 2009
Article: 1990928 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: a good country
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 284
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:11:50 -0500
Bytes: 13448
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1990928
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:03:19 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
wrote:
>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>news:o94so4d9msn6c01v2k5bubet1tlv8fn1kg@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:09:45 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>news:gnjro45apono9hh9747dfa17hub90hqac3@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:48:27 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Topaz" wrote in message
>>>>>news:0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Iran's President Rebukes Western Ban on Open Holocaust Research
>>>>>> Press TV (Iran)
>>>>>> http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=83891§ionid=351020101
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says Western countries have
>>>>>> blocked research on the Holocaust to achieve their political
>>>>>> objectives. "Western countries have prevented any kind of research on
>>>>>> the Holocaust for almost 60 years
>>>>>
>>>>>This is, frankly, bullshit. The Holocaust is studied and researched
>>>>>every
>>>>>day in Western countries.
>>>>
>>>> Nobody does "research" on this topic,
>>>
>>>Yes, they do. There's plenty of real research and real debate that goes
>>>on all the time.
>>>
>>>Your denial of this doesn't affect reality.
>>>
>>>> because they approach the topic
>>>> with a closed mind set on the official version.
>>>
>>>Actually they start their approach from a study of the available data.
>>>
>>>If you have a problem with the data, or with the methods, why aren't you
>>>publishing your rebuttals?
>>>
>>>Accepting the Holocaust denier or "revisionist" version generally requires
>>>the *exclusion* of data, which is generally why it isn't used. Getting
>>>caught excluding data is a fast track to loss of credibility, which is why
>>>"revisionists" have so little.
>>>
>>>> If your "research"
>>>> findings differ from the official version, count on sacrificing your
>>>> career and possibly your freedom.
>>>
>>>Sorry, but this is just false, as the functionalist vs intentionalist
>>>debate, which ran for some time in countries where Holocaust denial faces
>>>legal sanctioned, shows.
>>>
>>>Despite all the arguing, lectures and publications, nobody was arrested,
>>>nobody's carrer was damaged and nobody went to jail.
>>>
>>>So we can readily see that what you pretend to base your "argument" on is
>>>not factual. And it's not like this is even hard to find out.
>>>
>>>There are only a handful of countries where Holocaust denial is illegal,
>>>and
>>>all of them made it illegal because what is underneath it is the promotion
>>>of racial ideologies that destroyed large portions of Europe and killed
>>>millions. These countries have direct and bitter experience with that
>>>and
>>>want nothing to do with the promotion of these ideologies.
>>>
>>>> The holocaust "researchers" do the same kind of research as Paul
>>>> Cameron does on sexuality, where Cameron already has his mind made up
>>>> about the findings before the research even starts.
>>>
>>>If you think that this is the case, please show us references to your
>>>challenges to the methods of these researchers in the peer-reviewed
>>>journals. What letters or articles have you written showing that their
>>>data or methods are flawed or incorrect?
>>>
>>>Your "argument" referencing Dr. Cameron is undermined by the fact that
>>>very
>>>few scientists or courts pay attention to him or respect his studies,
>>>methods, or data, largely because there have been numerous challenges to
>>>them, and his work hasn't withstood the challenges.
>>>
>>>In contrast, genuine historical researchers have their work checked by
>>>others and it does withstand challenges.
>>>
>>>If you want to make a valid comparison, you're going to have to do a *lot*
>>>better than this. Perhaps you could start by trying to understand what a
>>>comparison *is*.
>>>
>>>There aren't any Holocaust deniers or "revisionists" who have contributed
>>>anything significant or meaningful to our understanding of the history.
>>
>> Revision is a standard feature of all history, except the holocaustT.
>
>This is a false statement.
>
>All history is reviewed, including the history of the Holocaust, and all
>study and contributions revise our understanding.
>
>Holocaust denial and "revisionism" is something entirely different, and is
>not derived from a motivation to understand the real history.
>
>> The only thing unique about the holocaustT is that revisionism is
>> either prohibited or violently opposed.
>
>You haven't understood what I wrote at all, did you?
>
>The fact of the intentionalist vs. functionalist debate shows that your
>"argument" in this case is not based on anything factual.
That is like any election in the USSR where all the candidates are
different flavours of Communist. Both functionalists and
intentionalists have bought into the dogma and are mainly arguing
about how many angels can sit on the head of a pin rather than if the
angels even exist in the first place.
>
>Holocaust deniers and "revisionists" are not engaged in real historical
>efforts, and are treated according to their real political motivation.
>
>> Obviously the story does not stand up to criticism.
>
>If by this you mean the story presented by Holocaust deniers and
>"revisionists", no, it doesn't.
>
>And that's strictly because there is no information from them that can
>significantly change our understanding of the history.
>
>What Holocaust deniers and "revisionists" present is substandard at best,
>and sometimes is outright fabrication. It fails when challenged.
>
>Accepted history *does* stand up to criticism, or it wouldn't be accepted.
>
>> The Roman Church in the middle ages didn't like
>> revisionists such as Galileo who challenged their geocentric notions
>> of the universe.
>
>Perhaps you haven't noticed that for some timenow, even centuries, in the
>Western world, religious groups no longer dictate to the scientific or
>research communities.
The holocaust lobby seems to be the exception.
>
>Only in theocratic states is this still the case, and not co-incidentally,
>that is where the primary market for Holocaust denial and "revisionist"
>material exists. In those jurisdictions, this is a tool of foreign policy,
>a tool used to focus hatred to Jews and Israel - and to distract the
>population from their own governments and leaders.
>
>It's telling that you raise this "argument" about the Roman church and don't
>even understand that the only governments that support Holocaust denial and
>"revisionism" are theocratic; in all other jurisdictions, free discussion
>and criticism determines what is accepted. Your "argument" thus
>discredits itself.
>
>If Holocaust deniers and "revisionists" were actually able to uncover
>material that changes our understanding, they could and would present it.
>There are plenty of governments and groups that would fund them and protect
>them. They would have plenty of support and more money than they could
>handle.
>
>But they don't do this because they just don't have and can't come up with
>any material that can do this. It doesn't exist, and is getting harder to
>fabricate as more archval material becomes available.
>
>For an example, consider the non-existent "Krege report". The idea is
>that Krege used a GPR unit at Treblinka in 1999, and produced data that
>could prove that no camp ever existed where Treblinka is and was. He
>apparently found no soil disturbances in an area where buildings had been
>erected and farming had been practiced and that had been bombed repeatedly.
>It shouldn't be too hard to detect a problem with the "no soil disturbance"
>idea.
>
>So this "report", which should have taken no more than a few weeks to
>prepare in 1999, has still not been delivered in 2009. That's a decade
>of failure to publish simple data.
>
>The reason for this failure cannot be a lack of funding or support, since
>this material would be the 'holy grail' to governments that value Holocaust
>denial as a political tool. Krege would be awash in offers of cash, support
>and benefits and offers to publish. He would be an international star -
>and rightly so. So why hasn't he published?
>
>The reason Krege hasn't published can only be that his errors are so
>egregious that even Leuchter supporters won't touch it. It's likely that
>Krege has himself realized the gross problems with his effort and is quietly
>trying to fold his papers and leave the lectern.
>
>There simply is no rational reason to believe that the history of the
>Holocaust differs in any significant way from what we understand it to be,
>or that Holocaust deniers or "revisionists" have anything serious to offer.
>If they did, we'd have seen it by now.
>
>
>>>Much of their material can be easily shown to be of very poor quality, and
>>>they aren't published in the mainstream journals because they are just not
>>>good enough. Their work does not stand up to scrutiny.
>>>
>>>Meanwhile, the Iranian government set up and promoted a "conference" that
>>>was *exactly* what you pretend to abhor. They deliberately held it in a
>>>place where only a select few of a specific viewpoint could attend; those
>>>who know most about the topic were prohibited, by law, from attending.
>>>
>>>This shows the inherent weakness of the Holocaust denier and "revisionist"
>>>position. It just can not stand up to real scrutiny, and requires the
>>>active support of a government that suppresses other viewpoints with force
>>>of law, and I do mean force in the active sense.
>>>
>>>And yet, you are silent on this point.
>
>And still, you remain silent.
>
>-pk
>
>
>>>
>>>Not a word from you on the restrictive attendance policy or what it means
>>>about the validity of the Holocaust denier or "revisionist" "argument".
>>>
>>>And before you go off claiming that this is comparable to the situation
>>>with
>>>the accepted view of the history, it isn't.
>>>
>>>Remember that only a few countries outlaw Holocaust denial, and the
>>>accepted
>>>view is not seriously challenged in countries where it is perfectly legal.
>>>The accepted history is the same whether Holocaust denial is legal or not.
>>>
>>>
>>>-pk
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Holocaust Deniers and "revisionists" have been
>>>>>able to present opposing views in various forums, their "evidence" has
>>>>>been
>>>>>examined, and on the whole been demonstrated worthless.
>>>>>
>>>>>And Mr. Ahmadinejad's idea was to hold a "conference" on the topic, one
>>>>>that
>>>>>he ensured could not be attended by those who knew the most about the
>>>>>topic.
>>>>>Apparently, his version of history cannot bear scrutiny.
>>>>>
>>>>>So, this is a flat-out lie by a foolish "leader" who cannot provide fuel
>>>>>to
>>>>>his own people to keep them from freezing to death in winter, who has
>>>>>mismanaged his country, which has an annual inflation rage of over 24%
>>>>>and
>>>>>has to *import* fuel because his government has neglected its
>>>>>infrastructure/.
>>>>>
>>>>>This statement is nothing but political propaganda from a government
>>>>>that
>>>>>extended a death sentence to a citizen who urged other citizens not to
>>>>>follow their political and religious leaders "like monkeys". Calling
>>>>>for
>>>>>an end to rule by clergy can, and has, resulted in long prison
>>>>>sentences.
>>>>>
>>>>>This looks to me like an action of a government that desperately does
>>>>>not
>>>>>want its people to look behind the curtain. It needs external enemies,
>>>>>because it is incompetent.
>>>>>
>>>>>And it's interesting that this kind of government - one that kills and
>>>>>imprisons its citizens to stifle dissent and expression - is called
>>>>>"good"
>>>>>by "Topaz", and is warmly embraced by the Holocaust Denier and
>>>>>"revisionist"
>>>>>crowd.
>>>>>
>>>>>HTH
>>>>>-pk
>>>>>
>>>
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:32:20 EST 2009
Article: 2461219 of soc.culture.usa
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa
Subject: Re: They're of on the warcrimes bit again.
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <8q1eo4l67mr91eflpb1gae2d1f2pbume3u@4ax.com>
References: <6vUfl.15200$cu.13253@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1817fc4b-c2aa-496a-8c5f-0a7c751b8b43@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <6uav9sFeinrfU1@mid.individual.net> <8ed470ad-578e-4c8b-a604-4a04203f4e10@v5g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <8b057035-6e53-492f-93d1-7278a87c99bf@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <39e9c2dc-bc2e-4c97-86fa-b153113523f5@p23g2000prp.googlegroups.com> <8OqdnfrG_JvNGB7UnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <6unu11Fgbho4U1@mid.individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 47
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:50:17 -0500
Bytes: 2998
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.usa:2461219
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:51:28 -0000, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh."
wrote:
>Westprog wrote:
>> B. Cramer wrote:
>>
>>>>> Not at all. far too many errors but Israeli friendly, just as you
>>>>> like it. Hamas did stop attacking Israel and Israel admitted they
>>>>> had, but don't let the truth get in the way of your bias.
>>
>>>> Does not that beg the question as to why Hamas was attacking Israel
>>>> in the first place?
>>
>>>> Why the car bombs?
>>
>>>> Why the suicide bombers?
>>
>>> All in retaliation for earlier yid atrocities committed against the
>>> Palestinian people.
>>
>>
>> The car and suicide bombs were carried out indiscriminately against
>> innocent civilians.
>>
>> However, they weren't taking place at the time of the Israeli attack
>> on Gaza. If the Palestinians are to be bombed, it should be for what
>> they are currently doing.
>
>Currently, they, Hamas, broke the ceasefire and attacked Israel with
>rockets, injuring two people. Israel has since retaliated, justifiably so
>IMO
There is no justification for the Israeli action. It is like you
murdering two of your neighbour's children because their dog crapped
on your lawn. That is essentially the Israeli notion of
disproportionate reprisal. In the USA you would end up in a gas
chamber or on a lethal injection table for your "disproportionate
reprisal", and in the long run, Israel's stupidity in Gaza will end in
Israel's demise.
>, and what is wrong with these Arabs? Never twist the tail of a Tiger you
>have no defence against!
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:32:20 EST 2009
Article: 2461220 of soc.culture.usa
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa
Subject: Re: They're of on the warcrimes bit again.
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <1817fc4b-c2aa-496a-8c5f-0a7c751b8b43@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <6uav9sFeinrfU1@mid.individual.net> <8ed470ad-578e-4c8b-a604-4a04203f4e10@v5g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <8b057035-6e53-492f-93d1-7278a87c99bf@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <39e9c2dc-bc2e-4c97-86fa-b153113523f5@p23g2000prp.googlegroups.com> <8OqdnfrG_JvNGB7UnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <6unu11Fgbho4U1@mid.individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 48
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:54:41 -0500
Bytes: 3126
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.usa:2461220
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:07:02 -0500, Eli Grubman
wrote:
>On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:51:28 -0000, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh."
> wrote:
>
>>Westprog wrote:
>>> B. Cramer wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Not at all. far too many errors but Israeli friendly, just as you
>>>>>> like it. Hamas did stop attacking Israel and Israel admitted they
>>>>>> had, but don't let the truth get in the way of your bias.
>>>
>>>>> Does not that beg the question as to why Hamas was attacking Israel
>>>>> in the first place?
>>>
>>>>> Why the car bombs?
>>>
>>>>> Why the suicide bombers?
>>>
>>>> All in retaliation for earlier yid atrocities committed against the
>>>> Palestinian people.
>>>
>>>
>>> The car and suicide bombs were carried out indiscriminately against
>>> innocent civilians.
>>>
>>> However, they weren't taking place at the time of the Israeli attack
>>> on Gaza. If the Palestinians are to be bombed, it should be for what
>>> they are currently doing.
>>
>>Currently, they, Hamas, broke the ceasefire and attacked Israel with
>>rockets, injuring two people. Israel has since retaliated, justifiably so
>>IMO, and what is wrong with these Arabs? Never twist the tail of a Tiger you
>>have no defence against!
>
>Disproportionate retaliation is justified? Are you some kind of th*ck
>Ir*sh boghopper?
Naturally, if disporportionate retaliation is OK, then all manner of
excesses can be excused. A Jewish Pole murdered the German legate in
Paris in 1938, so by the Israeli concept of disproportionate reprisal,
Kristallnacht was perfectly justified, since if one person from a
group does something reprehensible, they are all guilty according to
modern Israeli thinking.
>
>Eli
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Sun Feb 8 02:32:20 EST 2009
Article: 2462996 of soc.culture.usa
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa
Subject: Re: G-D LOVES JEWS MORE THAN ANY OTHER PEOPLE ON EARTH
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <38264f57-5739-4793-b91b-1d7507de4565@q30g2000prq.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 12
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:35:27 -0500
Bytes: 1455
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com soc.culture.usa:2462996
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:34:19 -0800 (PST), NefeshBarYochai
wrote:
>Jews are the cleanest, smartest, kindest, most generous modest people
>on the face of the earth and in the heavens above and all throughout
>the Universe. Jews are the best people and G-d loves Jews more than
>any other people in existence.
LOL
Now all you need to to prove that your Jewish god actually exists, as
opposed to just being another religious fable of many.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:48:28 EDT 2009
Article: 1991226 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: a good country
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <3rg0p41djn1nhoe99uj7vseia8e8umfs02@4ax.com>
References: <0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 18
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:55:36 -0500
Bytes: 1980
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1991226
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:19:19 -0600, Roger wrote:
>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote
> in message :
>
>>Much of
>>the holocaust has been shown to have no basis, so it isn't exactly a
>>topic about which I feel any guilt or concern.
>
>You're apparently concerned enough to lie about it.
>
>
I don't lie about the so-called holocaust. I really don't have that
much interest in it. I just object to destructive lies designed to
make German people hate themselves so that they can be more easily
exploited.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:48:28 EDT 2009
Article: 1991227 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: a good country
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <51h0p45v89hvibqnak51hveeiunefs1jcd@4ax.com>
References: <0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 415
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:02:50 -0500
Bytes: 17749
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:1991227
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:18:48 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
wrote:
>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>news:f5mso45ont55cv3g05cme1bujtte4ugn4a@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:03:19 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>news:o94so4d9msn6c01v2k5bubet1tlv8fn1kg@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:09:45 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>>>news:gnjro45apono9hh9747dfa17hub90hqac3@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:48:27 -0500, "Patrick Keenan"
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Topaz" wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> Iran's President Rebukes Western Ban on Open Holocaust Research
>>>>>>>> Press TV (Iran)
>>>>>>>> http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=83891§ionid=351020101
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says Western countries have
>>>>>>>> blocked research on the Holocaust to achieve their political
>>>>>>>> objectives. "Western countries have prevented any kind of research
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> the Holocaust for almost 60 years
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>This is, frankly, bullshit. The Holocaust is studied and researched
>>>>>>>every
>>>>>>>day in Western countries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nobody does "research" on this topic,
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, they do. There's plenty of real research and real debate that
>>>>>goes
>>>>>on all the time.
>>>>>
>>>>>Your denial of this doesn't affect reality.
>>>>>
>>>>>> because they approach the topic
>>>>>> with a closed mind set on the official version.
>>>>>
>>>>>Actually they start their approach from a study of the available data.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you have a problem with the data, or with the methods, why aren't you
>>>>>publishing your rebuttals?
>>>>>
>>>>>Accepting the Holocaust denier or "revisionist" version generally
>>>>>requires
>>>>>the *exclusion* of data, which is generally why it isn't used. Getting
>>>>>caught excluding data is a fast track to loss of credibility, which is
>>>>>why
>>>>>"revisionists" have so little.
>>>>>
>>>>>> If your "research"
>>>>>> findings differ from the official version, count on sacrificing your
>>>>>> career and possibly your freedom.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sorry, but this is just false, as the functionalist vs intentionalist
>>>>>debate, which ran for some time in countries where Holocaust denial
>>>>>faces
>>>>>legal sanctioned, shows.
>>>>>
>>>>>Despite all the arguing, lectures and publications, nobody was arrested,
>>>>>nobody's carrer was damaged and nobody went to jail.
>>>>>
>>>>>So we can readily see that what you pretend to base your "argument" on
>>>>>is
>>>>>not factual. And it's not like this is even hard to find out.
>>>>>
>>>>>There are only a handful of countries where Holocaust denial is illegal,
>>>>>and
>>>>>all of them made it illegal because what is underneath it is the
>>>>>promotion
>>>>>of racial ideologies that destroyed large portions of Europe and killed
>>>>>millions. These countries have direct and bitter experience with that
>>>>>and
>>>>>want nothing to do with the promotion of these ideologies.
>>>>>
>>>>>> The holocaust "researchers" do the same kind of research as Paul
>>>>>> Cameron does on sexuality, where Cameron already has his mind made up
>>>>>> about the findings before the research even starts.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you think that this is the case, please show us references to your
>>>>>challenges to the methods of these researchers in the peer-reviewed
>>>>>journals. What letters or articles have you written showing that their
>>>>>data or methods are flawed or incorrect?
>>>>>
>>>>>Your "argument" referencing Dr. Cameron is undermined by the fact that
>>>>>very
>>>>>few scientists or courts pay attention to him or respect his studies,
>>>>>methods, or data, largely because there have been numerous challenges to
>>>>>them, and his work hasn't withstood the challenges.
>>>>>
>>>>>In contrast, genuine historical researchers have their work checked by
>>>>>others and it does withstand challenges.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you want to make a valid comparison, you're going to have to do a
>>>>>*lot*
>>>>>better than this. Perhaps you could start by trying to understand what
>>>>>a
>>>>>comparison *is*.
>>>>>
>>>>>There aren't any Holocaust deniers or "revisionists" who have
>>>>>contributed
>>>>>anything significant or meaningful to our understanding of the history.
>>>>
>>>> Revision is a standard feature of all history, except the holocaustT.
>>>
>>>This is a false statement.
>>>
>>>All history is reviewed, including the history of the Holocaust, and all
>>>study and contributions revise our understanding.
>>>
>>>Holocaust denial and "revisionism"
>>
>> I refuse to play your game and buy into your "newspeak".
>
>It's not a game and it's plain speaking. Holocaust denial and "revisionism"
>are not based on an honest evaluation of historical data or sources, and
>does not value the truth.
>
>This is why the Iranian government chose to hold their Holcoaust
>"revisionist conference" in a location where those truly familiar with the
>topic would be barred, by force of arms, from attending.
>
>If Holocaust deniers and "revisionists" honestly valued truth and freedom of
>speech, they would have themselves refused to attend because of this.
>After all, these are the very people who complain long and loud about
>restrictions on speech in a handful of countries.
>
>Instead, they chose to demonstrate a hypocritical double standard.
>
>I wonder how much they were paid.
>
>> You are just
>> like the American fundies with their loaded words of "lifestyle" and
>> "choice".
>
>So now the words and their real meanings give you problems.
>
>> Your stock phrase of "holocaust denial" is a tool for deception and
>> intimidation. Personally, I don't "deny" anything.
>
>Actually, you do, as you demonstrate just a few lines down. You are quite
>clear in it.
>
>Your inability to comprehend the meaning of your own words is revealing.
>
>> I don't "deny" the
>> tooth-fairy, for example, I just don't believe in it.
>>
>> I find your "evidence" half-baked and hence I don't believe all your
>> stories.
>
>Certainly there are a few aspects that have been shown to not be factual,
>but the overwhelming majority of the evidence is clear, unambiguous, and has
>withstood challenges and examination for over sixty years.
>
>> I would agree that large numbers of Jews died during WW2 and
>> that the NS authorities persecuted them,
>
>It went well beyond persecution into organised mass murder, not just of Jews
>but of other groups as well.
That appears to be your claim, but I'm not convinced of its accuracy
or validity.
>
>And I think that you know this.
>
>> but I generally don't use
>> your newspeak word "holocaust" because it is a loaded term.
>
>So the words scare you?
The words are not frightening, but they are loaded in the same sense
as the question "How you stopped beating your wife?". No matter how
you answer, the result is damage.
>
>> Much of
>> the holocaust has been shown to have no basis,
>
>And this is where you demonstrate that you are, in fact, denying.
>
>This is denial because in fact, very little of the history has been shown to
>"have no basis". You deny that the evidence is valid. But the evidence,
>which is varied and voluminous, overwhelmingly shows that the events occured
>largely as we understand them to have.
>
>Yes, there are a few incidents where the stories are not consistent with
>what actually happened, but these are an insignifcantly small percentage.
That is simply your interpretation. Others may not share that
interpretation, but that hardly makes them reprehensible in some
fashion. That is the only unique thing about the holocaust, namely
that dissent is the same thing as heresy for some religious cult.
>
>> so it isn't exactly a
>> topic about which I feel any guilt or concern.
>
>And yet, as noted, you find it necessary to misrepresent it.
Misrepresentation is almost entirely the province of some of my
opponents in this newsgroup, especially when they talk about Germany,
a country about which they apparently know or understand almost
nothing.
>
>-pk
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> is something entirely different, and is
>>>not derived from a motivation to understand the real history.
>>>
>>>> The only thing unique about the holocaustT is that revisionism is
>>>> either prohibited or violently opposed.
>>>
>>>You haven't understood what I wrote at all, did you?
>>>
>>>The fact of the intentionalist vs. functionalist debate shows that your
>>>"argument" in this case is not based on anything factual.
>>>
>>>Holocaust deniers and "revisionists" are not engaged in real historical
>>>efforts, and are treated according to their real political motivation.
>>>
>>>> Obviously the story does not stand up to criticism.
>>>
>>>If by this you mean the story presented by Holocaust deniers and
>>>"revisionists", no, it doesn't.
>>>
>>>And that's strictly because there is no information from them that can
>>>significantly change our understanding of the history.
>>>
>>>What Holocaust deniers and "revisionists" present is substandard at best,
>>>and sometimes is outright fabrication. It fails when challenged.
>>>
>>>Accepted history *does* stand up to criticism, or it wouldn't be accepted.
>>>
>>>> The Roman Church in the middle ages didn't like
>>>> revisionists such as Galileo who challenged their geocentric notions
>>>> of the universe.
>>>
>>>Perhaps you haven't noticed that for some timenow, even centuries, in the
>>>Western world, religious groups no longer dictate to the scientific or
>>>research communities.
>>>
>>>Only in theocratic states is this still the case, and not co-incidentally,
>>>that is where the primary market for Holocaust denial and "revisionist"
>>>material exists. In those jurisdictions, this is a tool of foreign
>>>policy,
>>>a tool used to focus hatred to Jews and Israel - and to distract the
>>>population from their own governments and leaders.
>>>
>>>It's telling that you raise this "argument" about the Roman church and
>>>don't
>>>even understand that the only governments that support Holocaust denial
>>>and
>>>"revisionism" are theocratic; in all other jurisdictions, free discussion
>>>and criticism determines what is accepted. Your "argument" thus
>>>discredits itself.
>>>
>>>If Holocaust deniers and "revisionists" were actually able to uncover
>>>material that changes our understanding, they could and would present it.
>>>There are plenty of governments and groups that would fund them and
>>>protect
>>>them. They would have plenty of support and more money than they could
>>>handle.
>>>
>>>But they don't do this because they just don't have and can't come up with
>>>any material that can do this. It doesn't exist, and is getting harder to
>>>fabricate as more archval material becomes available.
>>>
>>>For an example, consider the non-existent "Krege report". The idea is
>>>that Krege used a GPR unit at Treblinka in 1999, and produced data that
>>>could prove that no camp ever existed where Treblinka is and was. He
>>>apparently found no soil disturbances in an area where buildings had been
>>>erected and farming had been practiced and that had been bombed
>>>repeatedly.
>>>It shouldn't be too hard to detect a problem with the "no soil
>>>disturbance"
>>>idea.
>>>
>>>So this "report", which should have taken no more than a few weeks to
>>>prepare in 1999, has still not been delivered in 2009. That's a decade
>>>of failure to publish simple data.
>>>
>>>The reason for this failure cannot be a lack of funding or support, since
>>>this material would be the 'holy grail' to governments that value
>>>Holocaust
>>>denial as a political tool. Krege would be awash in offers of cash,
>>>support
>>>and benefits and offers to publish. He would be an international star -
>>>and rightly so. So why hasn't he published?
>>>
>>>The reason Krege hasn't published can only be that his errors are so
>>>egregious that even Leuchter supporters won't touch it. It's likely that
>>>Krege has himself realized the gross problems with his effort and is
>>>quietly
>>>trying to fold his papers and leave the lectern.
>>>
>>>There simply is no rational reason to believe that the history of the
>>>Holocaust differs in any significant way from what we understand it to be,
>>>or that Holocaust deniers or "revisionists" have anything serious to
>>>offer.
>>>If they did, we'd have seen it by now.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Much of their material can be easily shown to be of very poor quality,
>>>>>and
>>>>>they aren't published in the mainstream journals because they are just
>>>>>not
>>>>>good enough. Their work does not stand up to scrutiny.
>>>>>
>>>>>Meanwhile, the Iranian government set up and promoted a "conference"
>>>>>that
>>>>>was *exactly* what you pretend to abhor. They deliberately held it in
>>>>>a
>>>>>place where only a select few of a specific viewpoint could attend;
>>>>>those
>>>>>who know most about the topic were prohibited, by law, from attending.
>>>>>
>>>>>This shows the inherent weakness of the Holocaust denier and
>>>>>"revisionist"
>>>>>position. It just can not stand up to real scrutiny, and requires the
>>>>>active support of a government that suppresses other viewpoints with
>>>>>force
>>>>>of law, and I do mean force in the active sense.
>>>>>
>>>>>And yet, you are silent on this point.
>>>
>>>And still, you remain silent.
>>>
>>>-pk
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Not a word from you on the restrictive attendance policy or what it
>>>>>means
>>>>>about the validity of the Holocaust denier or "revisionist" "argument".
>>>>>
>>>>>And before you go off claiming that this is comparable to the situation
>>>>>with
>>>>>the accepted view of the history, it isn't.
>>>>>
>>>>>Remember that only a few countries outlaw Holocaust denial, and the
>>>>>accepted
>>>>>view is not seriously challenged in countries where it is perfectly
>>>>>legal.
>>>>>The accepted history is the same whether Holocaust denial is legal or
>>>>>not.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>-pk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Holocaust Deniers and "revisionists" have been
>>>>>>>able to present opposing views in various forums, their "evidence" has
>>>>>>>been
>>>>>>>examined, and on the whole been demonstrated worthless.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And Mr. Ahmadinejad's idea was to hold a "conference" on the topic,
>>>>>>>one
>>>>>>>that
>>>>>>>he ensured could not be attended by those who knew the most about the
>>>>>>>topic.
>>>>>>>Apparently, his version of history cannot bear scrutiny.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So, this is a flat-out lie by a foolish "leader" who cannot provide
>>>>>>>fuel
>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>his own people to keep them from freezing to death in winter, who has
>>>>>>>mismanaged his country, which has an annual inflation rage of over 24%
>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>has to *import* fuel because his government has neglected its
>>>>>>>infrastructure/.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>This statement is nothing but political propaganda from a government
>>>>>>>that
>>>>>>>extended a death sentence to a citizen who urged other citizens not to
>>>>>>>follow their political and religious leaders "like monkeys". Calling
>>>>>>>for
>>>>>>>an end to rule by clergy can, and has, resulted in long prison
>>>>>>>sentences.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>This looks to me like an action of a government that desperately does
>>>>>>>not
>>>>>>>want its people to look behind the curtain. It needs external
>>>>>>>enemies,
>>>>>>>because it is incompetent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And it's interesting that this kind of government - one that kills and
>>>>>>>imprisons its citizens to stifle dissent and expression - is called
>>>>>>>"good"
>>>>>>>by "Topaz", and is warmly embraced by the Holocaust Denier and
>>>>>>>"revisionist"
>>>>>>>crowd.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>HTH
>>>>>>>-pk
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:48:29 EDT 2009
Article: 1991228 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!core-easynews!easynews.com!easynews!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: a good country
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <5fh0p41mitodahe343hahp25fm0fo1pjnm@4ax.com>
References: <0mdho41dk3k9jb11b9utggcb958jtc4b6p@4ax.com>