From email@example.com Tue Dec 19 03:07:52 PST 1995 Article: 16691 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!overload.lbl.gov!news.emf.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: firstname.lastname@example.org (CODOHmail) Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism Subject: Re: WHAT PATTON SAID (was: Is Griswold making things up again?) Date: 19 Dec 1995 03:58:01 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 19 Sender: email@example.com Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <email@example.com> Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org (CODOHmail) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:11311 alt.politics.nationalism.white:8465 alt.discrimination:39754 alt.revisionism:16691 >From Fresh816: >Oh, contraire. > >Italy was the FIRST front in the west, or the extension of it. The drive >began in North Africa then to Italy via Sicily. Normandy opened the >SECOND front. This is simple military history. Au contraire. When Russia was dissipating the might of the German war machine with the blood of her people, there was only one front, the Eastern. Stalin and company desperately urged the Allies to open what was quite naturally referred to as a second front, in Europe. Because it got a lot more press, many people erroneously believe that the Normandy invasion established the second front, when in fact, as another poster has noted, that distinction belongs to the Italian campaign. Suppose Normandy technically could be called a third front, but never heard it referred to that way. You are correct in one thing, however. This is simple military history.
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor