From email@example.com Sat Jan 10 21:17:21 EST 1998 Article: 159226 of alt.revisionism From: "CARLOS W. PORTER"
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: he gassed them, he gassed them not Date: 11 Jan 1998 01:54:20 GMT Organization: Tornado News Processing System Lines: 153 Message-ID: <01bd1e25$354ffe20$155795c2@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.108.40.206 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161 Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.cmc.net!syix.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159226 I don't suppose it occurs to people that the Jews are placing the world upon the horns of a dilemma. Let's be logical. Either Hitler gassed the Jews, or he didn't. Let' say he did. HE GASSED THEM The Jews say the Germans killed 2/3 of the Jews in Europe. If that is true, it means that American intervention in Europe -- which cost us a trillion dollars and 250,000 lives -- saved 1/3 of the Jews in Europe from certain destruction. I repeat: If Hitler gassed 2/3, then we saved 1/3. The Jews can't have it any other way. That being the case, do we get any gratitude? Of course not. Instead, all of the accusations that used to be made against the Germans are now made against the White Race as a whole. The Pope is guilty for the Holocaust (or so the Jews say). Christianity is guilty for the Holocaust (or so the Jews say). Western civilization is guilty for the Holocaust (or so the Jews say). We are all guilty for the Holocaust (or so the Jews say). Maybe some day life will be discovered on other planets, so that we can hear about how Martians and Venusians are guilty for the Holocaust. Our guilt for the Holocaust can never be erased (or so the Jews say). Centuries, eons, ages, may pass, but our guilt for the Holocaust will remain (or so the Jews say). When our culture, nation, and race have become extinct through immigration, abortion, race-mixing, the constant promotion of homosexuality and Zero-Birth Rate as a way of life, etc. etc., our guilt for the Holocaust will remain, unextinguished for all time (or so the Jews say). When all the industry is in China and all the Chinese are in Europe; when car-theft, drug-pushing, and whoring are the only gainful occupations left; when our sons have all become AIDS-infected drug addicts or drag queens; when our daughters have all become race-mixing, guilt-obsessed field sluts, aborting their own children and adopting Africans instead, our guilt for the Holocaust will remain, unextinguished for all time (or so the Jews say). No country lives in the past. No country spends all its time worrying about something that happened in a foreign country fifty years ago. Whatever Hitler did to the Jews, it was a matter between foreigners. It's not only something other nations had nothing to do with, it's something we put a stop to, at considerable cost to ourselves. Hundreds of millions of people have been killed in the twentieth century (usually because the Jews wanted it that way), but no matter; only Jews are important. Only Jews have rights; only Jews have feelings. I have 4 children educated in Catholic schools. They know nothing about the Christian religion. They know nothing about the Bible. They know nothing about the Middle Ages or the Renaissance. They've never heard of Communism or Stalin. But they know all about Auschwitz. They know all about homosexuals, transsexuals, transvestites, condoms and AIDS, because they learn it in school! This is all that is left of the religion that produced thousands of martyrs and built the cathedrals of Europe. This is the world that tens of millions of people died for. The Jews say they want a G-d world. But what they have given us is a filth world, an excrement world; in short, a J-w world. It used to be that the Jews only wished to destroy the German. That day is finished. Now they want to destroy us all. All law, all morals, all art, all culture, all religion, must be perverted and destroyed to suit the Jews. Why? Because of the Holocaust. Because a foreigner killed foreign Jews. I have faith in my children. They are good children. But I see no future for them. They remind me of goldfish swimming in a sewer. They seem to think it perfectly natural that their future should be blotted out for the benefit of billions of Africans and Asians; that the world should be filled with disease to avoid interfering with the pleasures of deviants; that there should be no future for White children. If you have 4 children and are White, people treat you like a sex-fiend, like you can't control yourself. So many children!!! But all the other races can have 8 or 10, and that is wonderful. We are supposed to feed them, care for them, cure their diseases, admit them as immigrants, provide them with a modern standard of living; we must LITERALLY prefer them over our own children! And what is the excuse for it all? Because a foreigner killed foreign Jews! No matter where in the world we live, we can't write our own immigration laws without interference from the Jews. We can't even expel illegal immigrants without interference from the Jews, because it reminds them of "when they were being rounded up for the Holocaust", etc. etc.. The cave paintings at Lescaux and Altamira are among the most beautiful artistic creations in history, and they are 20,000 years old. Yet the race that created them is doomed to extinction. What is our guilt? Is it some crime we committed? No. We are being destroyed for an act of kindness. We took pity on the Jews. This means that we are doomed to become extinct as a race because of something some foreigner did to a load of foreigners 50 years ago! So what is the lesson to be learned from all this? That the Jews are ungrateful? Of course not. Jewish ingratitude has been proverbial since Biblical times. Every act of kindness shown to them becomes a new injustice to be expiated through eternal atonement (and hundreds of tons of gold). No. The real lesson of the Holocaust (assuming that it is a historical fact) is that, with Jews, partial killing and pogroms DO NOT WORK. If you could kill 90% of them, it would teach the remaining 10% absolutely NOTHING. They would NEVER understand that they had it coming to them TO ANY EXTENT AT ALL, even 1%. The lesson of the Holocaust is that partial killing of Jews does not work -- it must be ALL or NOTHING. Really, we should thank the Jews for making matters so clear to us. Since killing all the Jews is impossible and should not be attempted -- but since the Jews never seem to learn anything and since Israel is a failure -- perhaps the Jews will be kind enough to colonize the moon to escape anti-Semitism? Perhaps it could be paid for out of reparations collected >from the Palestinians. Now let's look at the other horn of the dilemma. HE GASSED THEM NOT Of course, the above only applies if the Holocaust is a "proven fact", i.e., if Hitler really gassed the Jews. If it's all lies -- and a filthy, disgusting, degrading pack of lies at that -- then the situation is incomparably worse. C.W.PORTER End of text From firstname.lastname@example.org Sat Jan 10 21:17:22 EST 1998 Article: 159253 of alt.revisionism From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: why dispute the holocaust? Date: 11 Jan 1998 01:37:59 GMT Organization: Tornado News Processing System Lines: 122 Message-ID: <01bd1e22$ed654400$155795c2@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.127.116.11 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161 Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!newsxfer.visi.net!europa.clark.net!18.104.22.168!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159253 WHY DISPUTE THE HOLOCAUST? By Prof. Roger Dommergue (A Jew by birth and by education) A new campaign has been launched to show the fraudulent nature of the belief that Germany under Hitler undertook a systematic programme with the objective of a mass extermination of the Jews, especially, that 6 million were killed in gas chambers. There are certain explanations to be given first for the benefit of those who are not familiar with the revisionist cause, and who will probably ask a few questions, or only think them: Question no. 1: if you admit that Jewish deaths in the Nazi concentration camps amounted to several thousands, why is it so important to prove that the figures are not millions? Does the gravity of the crime depend on the numbers? Answer: Why is so important for the Holocaust true believers to perpetuate this number using millions instead of thousands, to such an extent that Draconian punitive measures, including imprisonment, must be implemented to suppress doubt as to the numbers? Of course, if several thousand were deliberately killed instead of several million, the crime would be just as repugnant! But the subject of doubting the scale of the alleged extermination is to cast doubt upon the entire credibility of the legend of the Holocaust itself, since if it can be established that the exterminationists lied as to the numbers, it can therefore furthermore be asked whether they lied about other things as well! Was there ever a real programme of deliberate extermination? Or did the thousands who really died (Jews and non-Jews) die of other causes? And if that is the case, does the fault really lie with the Nazi authorities? Question no. 2: Why is it so important to cast doubt upon the truth of the Holocaust and make such an issue of the matter, particularly when that causes so much offence? Answer: Hasn't it ever occurred to you that the offence is just as great as great to the Germans, particularly if it involves a monstrous hoax? Why should the feelings of Germans be considered less important than the feelings of Jews? It is incredible that a judge should state: "If there was no extermination of Jews under Hitler, this is equivalent to saying that all the Jewish witnesses are liars, and you do not have the right to call them liars, since that would disturb public order and engender racial hatred?" Thus, lies when they are Jewish lies must be protected from examination by the law, without regard for the racial hatred which they engender against the Germans! It is important to dispute the Holocaust for one single reason: IF… our pubic life is directed by a mechanism of lies, it is vital for us to recognize that fact, since those who lie on one matter are likely to lie to us on many others! WE WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO DEAL WITH ANY OF OUR CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS BEFORE ESTABLISHING THE TRUTH IN ALL FIELDS! In fact, for some 50 years, the public has been subjected to permanent propaganda intended to depreciate many of the greatest national European achievements of history. There are many reasons to believe that this propaganda is the same as that which is responsible for the flood of lies about the Second World War and the so-called Holocaust. These discoveries compel us to conclude that the reasons for attempting to suppress free discussion on the truth of the Holocaust… very far removed >from those who pretend that they only wish to protect the sensibility of certain people and hit something really indisputably sinister. THE REASONS: The history of the Holocaust has supplied the formula for destroying the nations and races of the world, which is the principal ambition of Zionism, with the exception of their own (see many passages >from the Old Testament). The Zionist plan has this objective, it is therefore a Zionist objective to destroy the racial identity of the peoples of the world (always with the exception of their own), an identity which is the most vital element of an independent nation. Through this sort of pressure, they frighten and reduce to silence all opposition to the Zionist power and to the progressive destruction of the national idea! There is no doubt as to the success of this sinister tactic: millions of "Gentiles" have been terrified to express patriotic or racial sentiments by fear of stigmatization (by their own justices systems, at that!!!) as the advocates of a new Holocaust. The tortuous logic which governs us today insists that if one wishes to protect one's nation or race (unless one is a Jew!!!) one must necessarily aim at the hatred and extermination of others! In addition to the absurdity of such an idea, and the enormous confession which it contains, perhaps relating to a tragic past, is, alas, that it is a reality that the reasoning powers of the "Gentiles" has been largely atrophied by the impact of Holocaust propaganda. This explains the catastrophic acquiescence of so many Europeans in the loss of sovereignty of their homelands and the invasion of their countries by non-white immigration. It is therefore URGENT, and in the present framework in which ALL RACISM IS CONDEMNED, to publicly and openly examine THE RACIST JEWISH MYTH OF THE HOLOCAUST, in such a way that we may then capable of seeing and thinking clearly on these problems which affect our own national and racial future, without being handicapped by a sense of guilt by association of ideas, a sense of guilt carefully inculcated by the ONLY RACISM WHICH IS ACCEPTED IN THE WORLD!!! If it is ANTI-SEMITIC to suggest that the Holocaust is a fraud, isn't is DICTATORIALLY RACIST to insist to forbid all free discussion about it? It is necessary to say another word about the ultimate motive in suppressing the search for the truth, which has perhaps become the principal motive of the most lucid among the Zionists already feeling a sense of fear: IF THE LIE WERE GENERALLY REVEALED, THE RESULT WOULD BE A WAVE OF HOSTILITY, likely sooner or later to engender a true Holocaust. To prevent such a reaction, the wound must be cleaned without delay, as long as the old basis of civilization still exists in Europe! A Europe which, despite its losses and its ruin, would be content to free itself from the Jewish yoke, in politics, in the media, in economics, a yoke which "deculturizes" us, but from which the Europeans would still be content simply to denounce as a lie in the face of the world. Later, the "multi-racial" societies engendered by Zionism could turn against the Zionists and prove themselves to be more ferocious to the sorcerer's apprentices of Zionism and their racial brethren who believed in good faith in this devastating myth! Judaism declared war in 1932, 1933, and 1939, a war which cost 50 million real deaths, against a Germany which was the only rampart against both international capitalism and bolshevism… the two jaws of the pincers "made in Zion" which have crushed EUROPE! IT IS A RIGHT AND A DUTY TO SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH ABOUT THIS TRAGEDY! End From email@example.com Mon Jan 12 08:29:01 EST 1998 Article: 159464 of alt.revisionism From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: holocaust museum of stupidity Date: 12 Jan 1998 13:40:08 GMT Organization: Tornado News Processing System Lines: 99 Message-ID: <01bd1f51$01c5e380$065795c2@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: 22.214.171.124 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161 Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!bofh.vszbr.cz!europa.clark.net!126.96.36.199!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-peer-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!news.idt.net!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159464 HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF STUPIDITY Now Opening at a Location Near You [On 5 December 1997, the court rejected the defendant's defence of justified absence due to pedal-driven brain-bashing machine induced injuries, partly on the grounds that he had failed to specify the exact date of his injury! How stupid can you get? He was given one week in which to object, in German.] TRANSLATION OF JUDGEMENT OF 5 DECEMBER 1997 18 Ns 112 Js 116737/96 Regarding: Criminal proceedings against Porter, Carlos For incitement to racial hatred [Short excerpts only] …[The defendant] stated that he had been unable to attend the main trial on 10 October 1997 due to "severe cranial injuries and concussion". With regards to the other statements, reference is made to the letter of the defendant dated 5 November 1997, which was translated. [This means: the letter of 7 November will be ignored.] […etc., etc., blah, blah, blah.] …The mere assertion of severe cranial injuries and concussion is insufficient to constitute justified failure to appear. Because there is no indication of the date [!!!]. In addition, the claim was not substantiated [!]. The doctor's certificate mentioned by the accused in his letter of 05.11.1997, was not presented [!]. Nor was this failure made good in the letter of the defendant dated 7.11.1997 in which the accused stated that he had recovered from his cranial injuries [!]. Furthermore, the accused, in his letter to the court dated 1 September 1997, had [already] stated at length that he would refuse to appear. [OK; so why bother with the trial?] […etc., etc., blah, blah, blah.] Kunert Presiding Judge Regional Court [certified true copy, etc., etc.] [The defendant was then given one week in which to protest the rejection of his defence of justified absence due to pedal-driven brain-bashing machine induced injuries.] …The objection must be in German.] --- OBJECTION [by fax on 5 January 1997] Judge Kunert, [address, references, etc.] Es ist mein Pflicht, Ihnen mitzuteilen , dass, indem Sie die Glaubwuerdigkeit meiner durch die in dem Nuernbergerprozess beschriebenen (IMT VII 377 [416-417]) Pedal-angetriebene Gehirnzertruemmerungsmachine verursachten Kopfverletzungen anzweifeln bzw leugnen, Sie mich in meiner Menchenwuerde verletzen, was mir ganz schwere psychische und Gefuehlsleiden verursachen muss. Ich fuehle mich herabwuerdigt und beleidigt. Sie werden von meinem Rechtsanwalt hoeren. Im uebrigens, wuerde ich am 9. Oktober schwer verbrannt durch Ausstrahlungen von deutschen Atomwaffen aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg [IMT XVI 529-530 ) und bin immer noch radioactiv. Carlos W. Porter [translation] It is my duty to inform you that in disputing or denying the credibility of my cranial injuries caused by the pedal-driven brain-basing machine described in the Nuremberg Trial transcript [IMT VII 377 [416-417] you injure my dignity as a human being, causing me serious psychic disturbances and emotional anguish. I feel humiliated and insulted. You will be hearing >from my lawyer about this. I also suffered severe radiation burns on 9 October 1997 while handling the German World War II atomic bomb described in the Nuremberg trial transcript [IMT XVI 529-530 ) and am still radioactive. Carlos W. Porter [to be continued] From firstname.lastname@example.org Wed Jan 14 06:05:25 EST 1998 Article: 159639 of alt.revisionism From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: verb autrotten in German documents Date: 13 Jan 1998 17:16:40 GMT Organization: Tornado News Processing System Lines: 42 Message-ID: <01bd2038$731bc8a0$155795c2@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: 188.8.131.52 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161 Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!oronet!news-stk-11.sprintlink.net!news-stk-3.sprintlink.net!news-west.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159639 I have made a bit of a study of the use of the verb "ausrotten" in the German original of The Decline of the West, by Oswald Spengler (Deutsche Taschenbuch Verlag, Muenich). As you know, the book was finished in 1922, and published in 1923. "Ausrotten" appears to be a fairly unusual verb in German. Spengler uses the verb "vernichten" (to exterminate or destroy) many times, but the verb "ausrotten" (to exterminate or destroy) occurs only 5 times, on pages 932, 1050, and 1066. On pp. 1050 and 1066 it is used to mean physical extermination or killing. On p. 932 it is used purely figuratively. The sentence is: "In der Zerstoerung von Sybaris durch Kroton, der sicherlich nur als Hoehepunkt eines wilden Religionskrieges in der geschichtlichen Erinnerung haften blieb, entlud sich derselbe Hass, der auch in Karl I von England und seinen froehlichen Kavalieren nicht nur eine Irrlehre, sondern auch die weltliche Gesinnung ausrotten wollte." "The destruction of Sybaris by Croton, which certainly remained in historical memory as simply the climax of a savage war of religion, was an explosion of the same hatred which also wished to extirpate, in Charles I of England, not only a false doctrine, but a worldly way of thinking." If "ausrotten" means to "exterminate", one can exterminate a king and his cavaliers, but not a "false doctrine" and a "worldly way of thinking". Did Oliver Cromwell erect gas chambers to exterminate the king and his cavaliers? Or was he merely content with a social and religious revolution? Yours faithfully, Carlos W, Porter From email@example.com Wed Jan 14 06:05:25 EST 1998 Article: 159647 of alt.revisionism From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: chemistry of the holocaust Date: 13 Jan 1998 17:16:03 GMT Organization: Tornado News Processing System Lines: 547 Message-ID: <01bd2038$38676700$155795c2@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.108.40.206 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161 Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!news.greennet.net!uunet!in4.uu.net!korova.insync.net!news.io.com!mr.net!news-chi-1.sprintlink.net!news-east.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159647 THE CHEMISTRY OF THE HOLOCAUST It has escaped the notice of most people that stories of a "Nazi Holocaust" during World War II are actually impossible as regards the chemistry of poisons. This can be verified by calling or writing the American Cyanamid Co., Box 31, Linden, NJ 07036, telephone (201) 862-6000, or by consulting standard reference works such as the various editions (in particular the 11th) of the Encyclopedia Britannica under "Hydrocyanic Acid", "Prussic Acid", "Poisons", Gleason's Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, or Legal Medicine and Toxicology by Peterson, Haines and Webster (2nd edition). One might be permitted to ask: (a) whether there is any such thing as an "amethyst-blue crystal of hydrogen cyanide" (Reitlinger, The Final Solution, p. 160; Shirer, Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, p. 970); (b) whether hydrogen cyanide can be solidified at room temperature in an ordinary tin can (Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews, p. 566, "The hydrogen cyanide, solidified into pellets, immediately passed into the gaseous state"); (c) whether hydrogen cyanide can be made to crystallize in a vacuum and become gaseous upon exposure to air ("I used Zyklon B, which was a crystallized prussic acid", Rudolf Hoess at Nuremberg, quoted in Shirer, p. 968); (1) (d) whether potassium cyanide becomes immediately gaseous upon exposure to air '"The use of special chemicals, such as Zyklon B [potassium cyanide] ..... from a special opening in the ceiling, Zyklon B crystals were introduced, becoming immediately gaseous". Moshe Pearlmann, The Capture and Trial of Adolph Eichmann, pp. 375, 385) (Note: Is potassium cyanide a crystal?); (e) whether any salt of cyanide in the absence of an acid could release lethal quantities of poisonous gas in 30 seconds ("He gave me a bottle containing about half a pint of salts. I think they were salts of cyanide... I introduced a certain quantity of salt through a tube... they breathed for about half a minute before they fell to the floor". Joseph Kramer at the Balsen Trial, quoted in Shirer, p. 981); (f) whether humidity is an antidote to cyanide poisoning ("The subject, a girl aged 15, was saved by contact with the humidity of the cement floor", Reitlinger, p. 157; (g) whether victims of cyanide poisoning retain consciousness ("We knew when the people were dead, because their screaming stopped". Rudolf Hoess, former Auschwitz commander, at Nuremberg, quoted in Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, p. 968); (1) This is medically impossible. The Merck Index of Dangerous Properties of Industrial Chemicals (p. 623) describes the symptoms of cyanide poisoning as "unconsciousness, convulsions and respiratory arrest". Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products (Gleason, p. 76) lists them as "unconsciousness followed promptly by violent convulsions". The Encyclopedia Britannica ("Prussic Acid", 1911) says, "The patient is quite unconscious". Legal Medicine and Toxicology (Peterson, Haines and Webster, 2nd Edition) remarks (Vol. 2, p. 678), "The patient falls to the ground insensible", and mentions a case history in which the victim was unconscious for six hours! The same standard reference work contains numerous case histories of accidental or suicidal cyanide poisoning. P. 682: "... fell to the ground insensible... died quietly without any further struggle 15 or 20 minutes after taking the poison... he did not scream... fell to the ground completely insensible, he died in about 10 minutes"; p. 681: "... loss of consciousness... complete insensibility... signs of returning consciousness in two hours after admission..."; p. 679: ... "a healthy woman... died in 15 to 20 minutes. ... in another case a man took a similar dose and was insensible for four hours, but recovered"; p. 677: "In some cases the patient staggers a few steps, and then falls down and dies in five minutes or less without sound or convulsion". Hoess could only ascertain death by entering the chamber and taking pulse or heartbeat. Cyanide is not practical for mass killing in concentrations less than that required to cause instant death ("Poison Gas Warfare", 1922 Supplement, Encyclopedia Britannica). (2) The concentrations required to kill quickly are extremely high and must be exactly known - not guessed at by listening to unconscious people. (h) whether anything can be a crystal, a pellet, a "gas crystal" (?) (Shirer, p. 971), a salt and a gas all at the same time, as well as two different chemicals at once ("this dangerous gas", etc, "these tins of gas". Rudolf Hoess in Poland six months later, according to the Communist ghost-written autobiography, Commandant at Auschwitz, p. 208); (i) whether any solid of cyanide intended to kill fleas and lice would be an efficient instrument for purposes of mass murder, compared to the ethyl cyanide or cyanic acid used in the manufacture of fulminate of mercury (Leschke, Clinical Toxicology, p. 56) or the acrylonitrile used to make Buna nitrile (GBR) rubber ("Organically bound cyanides, i.e., acrylonitrile, are sometimes used as fumigant gases, especially for grains", Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, p. 74; "Also developed by the Germans (GBR) ... manufactured in large tonnage during the war... copolymerized with acrylonitrile... up to 40% acrylonitrile by volume". Colliers Encyclopedia, "Rubber", 1965); Please note: the Monowitz Rubber Plant at Auschwitz was one of the largest in the world, established by I.G. Farben. Farben held the patient for Zyklon B, and was supposedly cooperating in the mass gassings. Krupp established a huge munitions plant at Auschwitz. Fulminate of mercury is a primary explosive related chemically to the cyanides (Encyclopedia Britannica, "Fulminic Acid"). Hydrocyanic acid is explosive (Sax, Dangerous Properties of Industrial Chemicals, p. 764); (j) whether cyanide gas is heavier than air, since it was supposedly released from the ceiling, ("... looking up at the shower heads, from which no water came... realized the gas was coming out of the vents..." Shirer, p. 970). (k) whether "powerful fans" are a smart way to get rid of cyanide gas in an industrial complex housing 200,000 people, etc. (3) Needless to say, the answer to every one of these questions is "No". Zyklon B was a commercially manufactured fumigant intended for fleas and lice packed in a 200-gram tin can. Since 200 grams of pure hydrocyanic acid could kill at least 2,000 people, it was evidently highly diluted (4). Hydrocyanic acid "in the pure state is said to kill with a lightning-like rapidity. It is met with in commerce only in a diluted state..." (Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition, "Poisons"). "A stout, muscular man, aged 40, drank by mistake half an ounce of 1.48 percent solution of hydrocyanic acid... fell suddenly, completely insensible... he died... in about ten minutes" (Legal Medicine and Toxicology, Vol. 2, p. 682). At the rate of 60-100 milligrams per person, the manufacture of 1,000 tons of nitrile rubber could require enough pure hydrocyanic acid for the preparation of acrylonitrile to "gas" the entire world! (Note: In practice, as opposed to theory, "mass gassings" require huge amounts of poison, because the air acts as a dilutant and filter. The liquid must evaporate and fill the entire chamber to an extremely high concentration, which takes time. To kill 2000 people in 2 minutes would probably require a ton of pure cyanide). (5) According to pre-Nuremberg technical literature, the active ingredient in Zyklon B was a liquid "absorbed in granular diatomite" (Encyclopedia Britannica, "Hydrocyanic Acid", 1943). A single inhalation of pure hydrocyanic acid (60 milligrams) produces near instantaneous unconsciousness followed by death in several minutes. Zyklon B (which the "Holocaust experts" claim was used to gas the Jews), in contrast, was so fantastically weak that to kill clothes moths with Zyklon required 16 grams per cubic meter over a 24-hour exposure. (Source: Document NI-9912, Office of the Chief Counsel for War Crimes, 1947, a translation of directions issued by the Health Institute of the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia in Prague, p. 6). A Polish Communist, Pelagia Lewinska (Twenty Months at Auschwitz, p. 55), has remarked: "The gas [Zyklon] was too weak, did not always kill the lice and did no harm whatsoever against the nits". According to post-Nuremberg Jewish "historians", Zyklon B was a commercial bug-bomb packed in a tin can which apparently no one ever opened, containing non-existent crystals, salts or pellets compressed to kill fleas, reacting in an impossible way and releasing fumes which went down instead of up, producing impossible symptoms, and that this dilute mixture was used in preference to tons of an extremely powerful poison which was readily available! THE OVENS The German edition of Shirer's Rise and Fall (p. 1025 in the Knaur paperback edition) contains a footnote which is apparently the result of a legal action brought against the German publishers by the manufacturer of the crematory ovens at Belgrade (the Didier-Werke). The note observes that the "dimensions are those which are standard for crematory ovens of a not-very-modern design intended for smaller cemeteries, and would be unsuitable for mass burnings". Anyone who has ever tried to burn magazines in a trash can will immediately recognize that the technical problems involved in designing a crematory oven capable of burning several thousand corpses a day would be practically insurmountable. Such an oven would have to be equipped with giant mechanical arms to keep the bodies stirred up as well as an apparatus to keep the fuel and air evenly distributed. Photographs of German ovens taken immediately after the war show 18-inch doors about two feet off the floor. Those at Buchenwald have even been photographed with the doors open, showing back and side walls, grid and grate, very clearly. The story according to Hilberg, Shirer and others is that the ovens proved "inefficient", and the bodies were finally burned in the open using wood and petroleum for fuel. The buildings were razed and the landscape altered by planting trees (!) thus conveniently destroying all real evidence. (Source of "information": The Soviet Union at Nuremberg). Legal Medicine and Toxicology observes (Vol. 2, pp. 881-883) that it requires 40 hours to burn a human body using wood as fuel. "A body of ordinary size is completely cremated when gas is used as a fuel in one hour; when petroleum is used, from one and a half to two hours are required. The ash which remains, which consists entirely of mineral substances, all organic compounds having been destroyed, weighs from five to nine pounds, depending on the size of the body". This means 15,000 to 27,000 tons of ashes for six million people. Where is it? As usual, we are left with only the Communists to tell us how it all came to disappear. The cremation of 16,000 bodies a day (according to Rudolf Hoess) using petroleum as fuel would require over 1,000 ovens. Where are they? The larger camps have four or five; the smaller camps have one or two; and they are coal-fired. What kind of murder program is this? When one considers that there are no oversize ovens; no "gas chambers" which have not repeatedly been proven to be merely shower baths, which is what they were supposed to have been in the first place ("See those shower heads? This is a gas chamber. Two dollars, please".); no significant quantity of ashes or skeletons; no documents which are not Zionist or Communist forgeries; that the chemical reactions, symptoms and crematory processes described are impossible; and that Jews have never cooperated with a census at any time in history (see I Chronicles: 21 and II Samuel: 24), one is tempted to ask: if millions of them really disappeared during the war, how would we know it? By believing what we see on TV? Surely not. The slaughter of 1.5 million Cambodians by the Communists was given an average of 20-seconds evening network-news coverage per month. By contrast an imaginary atrocity involving Jews 40 years ago gets nine and one-half hours in one week! Is this lack of proportion coincidental? Notes: (1) The "confession" referred to in (c) and (g) was written entirely in English by Lt. Col. Smith W. Brookhart Jr. (reportedly still living at 18 Hillside Drive, Denver, Colorado USA 80215). There is no proof that Hoess understood English. The translation into German dated 3 days later was never signed. Brookhart was the son of a Senator from Washington, Iowa. A person who knows the family well is Rev. George McDaniel of St. Ambrose University, 518 Locust St., Davenport, Iowa. (2) What the article actually says is: "A gas is classed as immediately fatal when death follows exposure for a period of two minutes to a certain concentration (i.e., a certain proportion of the air breathed). A higher concentration may cause instantaneous death. The only known compounds which, in concentrations practically obtainable, produce immediate death are those containing cyanogen. The chief disadvantage of these compounds is that when the concentration is not sufficient to cause death, they have no effect at all... the specific lethal gases will only produce their effect in very high concentrations, which means that a large number of shells must be used simultaneously over a certain area..." (3) These fans never existed. See the Leuchter Report. (4) This is an error. See the Leuchter Report. (5) American prisons have been known use up to 2 pounds of cyanide salt in acid to generate the gas required to kill one convict in a very small chamber in much longer than 2 minutes. The convict is unconscious in 40 seconds, but may take 15 minutes to die. See "Until You Are Dead: Executions in America" by Frederick Drimmer, pp. 57-59. See also page 12, column 1 of the Leuchter Report, Focal Point edition. This essay was written in 1978 and revised in 1985. It has been rendered obsolete by the Leuchter Report published in 1988. I continue to make the essay available despite its shortcomings because it was only the impossibility of the chemical reactions which first convinced me that the Holocaust was a lie. "ANTI-SEMITISM" IN THE ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA A truism of liberalism is that the truth may be approximated through a comparison of opinion. In the Encyclopedia Britannica, for example, all articles dealing directly with Jewish matters are written by Jews and Rabbis, dripping with self-pity and self-praise. Articles on peripheral subjects, however, tell a different story. From the 1911 ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA RUSSIA: "The Semitic race is represented by upwards of 5,000,000 Jews... The rapidity with which they peopled certain towns (e.g., Odessa) and whole provinces was really prodigious. The law of Russia prohibits them from entering Great Russia, only the wealthiest and best educated enjoying this privilege; nevertheless they are met with everywhere, even in the Urals. Their chief abodes, however, continue to be Poland... Organized as they are into a kind of community for mutual protection and mutual help, they soon become masters of the trade wherever they penetrate. In the villages, they are mostly innkeepers, intermediaries in trade, and pawnbrokers..." (vol. XXIII, p. 855). "The numerous outbreaks against the Jews are directed, not against their creed, but against them as keen business men and extortionate money-lenders..." (p. 885). "The wealth of Russia consisting mainly of raw produce, the trade of the country turns chiefly on the purchase of this for export... this traffic is in the hands of a great number of middlemen - in the West, Jews, and elsewhere Russians - to whom the peasants are for the most part in debt..." (p. 890). "In the rest of the country they had not been allowed to reside in the villages, because their habits of keeping vodkashops and lending money at usurious interest were found to demoralize the peasantry..." (p. 906). RUMANIA: "Their improvidence soon got them into the hands of Jewish money-lenders, who, fortunately for the peasants, were by law unable to become proprietors of the soil..." (vol. XXIII, p. 828). "The bitter feeling against them in Rumania is not so much due to religious fanaticism as to the fear that if given political and other rights they will gradually possess themselves of the whole soil... in many places they have a monopoly of the wine and spirit shops, and retail trade generally; and as they are always willing to advance money on usery, and are more intelligent and better educated than the ordinary peasant, there is little doubt that in a country where the large landowners are proverbially extravagant, and the peasant proprietors needy, the soil would soon fall into the hand of the Jews were it not for the stringent laws which prevent them from owning land outside the towns. When in addition it is considered that the Moldavian Jews, who are mostly of Polish and Russian origin, speak a foreign language, wear a distinguishing dress and keep themselves aloof >from their neighbours, the antipathy in which they are held by the Rumanians generally may be understood" (p. 829). HUNGARY: "The Jews... monopolize a large portion of trade, are with the Germans the chief employers of labour, and control not only the finances but to a great extent the government and the press of the country. Owing to the improvidence of the Hungarian landowners and the poverty of the peasants, the soil of the country is gradually passing into their hands" (vol. XIII, p. 897). GERMANY: "Nearly all the bankers and stockbrokers in Germany were Jews. Many of the leaders of the liberal parties, e.g., Bamberger and Lasker, were of Jewish origin; the doctrines of Liberalism were supported by papers owned and edited by Jews; hence the wish to restore more fully the avowed Christian character of the state, coinciding with the attack on the influence of finance, which owed so much to the Liberal economic doctrines, easily degenerated into attacks on the Jews" (vol. XI, p. 888). From the 1922 ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA POLAND: "THE JEWISH QUESTION: One of the most important questions to be considered by the new Polish State is that of the Jews. Numerically they form roughly one seventh of the population. In Warsaw a third of the population are Jews; in many provincial towns four out of every five inhabitants are Jews, and in some nine out of ten, and of these the vast majority are Eastern Jews who in language, religion, and customs differ from the population. Their language is Yiddish, a Middle-High German dialect; for the purposes of writing, Hebrew characters are used. Their dress is peculiar to themselves and their unclean habits and low standards of conduct "are neither European nor modern". The Western Jew is the more civilized type which is generally found in Western Europe, speaking the language and conforming to the habits of Western civilization. "The Eastern Jew is essentially a business or commercial man, but rarely a producer. He is usually a middleman or intermediary. In towns the majority of the shops are owned by Jews, but they are a race apart, hated and despised by the rest of the population, devoted to their religion, which is a primitive type of Judaism. "The Jews have been settled in Poland between 800 and 1,000 years so that they can hardly be considered "strangers" in the land; in fact the Slavs cannot be considered very much more native than they. It was not, however, until about 20 years ago that the present quarrel between the Jews and the Poles began. The Tsarist Government drove the Jews out of Russia but gave them exceptional advantages in Poland. These Litvaks (as they were called) openly professed themselves the partisans of Russia & founded the Jewish press which set to work openly to fight against Polish autonomy. The Poles attacked the Jews before the war by means of a national boycott, the only means by which one subject race could attack another. During and after the war the hostility to the Jews was increased by the fact that in the German occupation the Jew was a willing tool of the invader and by the close connection between the Jews and Bolshevism. The hostility to the Jews was marked in 1918 and 1919 by excesses in which some 200-300 have in fact been killed, but which have been enormously exaggerated by the Jewish press. "... Capt. Peter Wright, in his very valuable and interesting report states (Cmd 674, 1920, pp. 17-36) that the great majority of the poor Jews are of the Eastern type and extreme Orthodoxy (Chassidim). They form an immense mass of squalid and helpless poverty and Capt. Wright's only recommendation is that the richer Jews should study the condition of the poor Jews, who either trade as small middlemen, as hawkers or touts... They are driven to all sorts of illicit and fraudulent practices and in England, in the East End of London... too large a proportion of convictions for such offenses can be laid to their account. They are unfit for the modern economic world for want of education and for Western society because of their habits and want of cleanliness. They are devoted to their strange old religion but as they grow richer their piety, as the Chief Rabbi told Capt. Wright, is destroyed by wealth and they take too little interest in their poorer brethren. No one who knows Poland can be surprised at the Polish attitude or the desire of the Poles to be rid of this corrupting influence" (vol. XXXII, p. 123). HUNGARY: "The Jewish question has become important in Hungary... As they grew rich through trade, the ghetto became too small for them. As they owned no land, they were not tied to the soil and streamed into the cities, where they found more opportunities of making money and adding to their wealth. Above all Budapest, as the centre of commerce and industry and the seat of the banks, had a strong attraction for them. Three distinct classes of the Jews grew up: the Orthodox, who wished to remain Jews with all the habits and customs of the ghetto; those who in most respects relinquished their position of religious isolation and strove after assimilation... and thirdly the cosmopolitan Jews, the revolutionaries, who were the enemies of all national feeling and represented materialistic internationalism. It was the part played by this third class of Jews... which has made the Jewish question acute in Hungary. As Hungary has no true middle class, they exercised great influence on the intellectual life of the country..." (vol. XXXI, p. 408). "Instead of the national heroes, Marx, Engels & Lenin were glorified... In boys and girls schools, the pupils received enlightened instruction in the processes of generation, birth, etc., with disastrous results to the juvenile morality" (p. 416). "The leaders of the Social Democrats and Bourgeois Radicals were, almost without exception, of Jewish origin. This was also the case with the most prominent members of Government of the Republic..; these were the men who had made it impossible to resist the invasion of Hungary by force of arms..." (p. 415). "Since most of the ruling politicians and People's Commissars... belonged to the younger generation of Jews anti-Communist feeling in the country assumed more and more the character of anti-Semitism" (p. 417). "One consequence of the Bolshevist rule was the still more intense development of anti-Semitic feeling. Since the leaders of the Communists were chiefly recruited among the younger Jewish intellectual circles, the National Assembly in order to prevent the creation of a Jewish intellectual proletariat, in Sept. 1920, proclaimed "Numerus Clausus" for the universities. Under this clause, Jews could only be admitted to the universities in proportion to their percentage of the population" (p. 418). ANGOLA: "Southern Angola in 1909-11, was regarded as a probable choice by the Jewish Territorial Association as a field for colonization, and Portugal enacted land laws with a view to that contingency. But Angola was rejected as a home for the Jews" (vol. XXX, p. 139). From the 1928 ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA JEWS: "The Jewish population of the world on the outbreak of the War in 1914 may be estimated at about 14,900,000... "The Jews whole-heatedly supported the revolution... Among the Bolshevik leaders & their satellites were a certain number of Jews... At the same time, the American Jews began to play a part of growing importance in the Zionist movement and were concerned in the negotiations leading up to the Balfour Declaration (*) of which President Wilson was a consistent and influential advocate" (vol. II, p. 605). "In both Russia and Hungary a prominent part in the Bolshevik movement was played by men who, though long disassociated from the Jewish community, were nevertheless of Jewish birth" (p. 606). HUNGARY: "The people's commissars and practically all the leading persons were Jews, a fact which explains the anti-Jewish feeling which later prevailed in Hungary..." (vol. II, p. 393). ZIONISM: "Not long after the outbreak of the war, Dr. Weizmann and his friends were brought in touch with a number of influential public men... What the Zionists proposed was, in effect, that Great Britain should make it part of the policy to provide in the peace settlement for the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jews... "By the beginning of 1916, the British Government had come to the conclusion that there were other and more practical reasons for taking Zionism seriously... "The hour of decision was approaching in the United States, where there was a Jewish population of over 3,000,000... A declaration in favour of Zionism would help to rally Jewish opinion throughout the world to the side of the Allies... President Wilson had personally intervened to make it clear that he would welcome a British pronouncement in favour of Zionism... in 1922 resolutions associating the United States with the policy embodied in the Declaration were unanimously adopted by both Houses of Congress. At the insistence of Great Britain a Zionist delegation was given a hearing by the Peace Conference in Paris on Feb. 27, 1919..." (vol. III, p. 1139). "The Arabs did not take kindly to the Balfour Declaration, which they did not altogether unnaturally misconstrue... there were anti-Jewish demonstrations in Jerusalem in 1920..." (p. 1140). BAVARIA: "Meanwhile, the Nationalist leagues had gained in strength and now began to defy the Governments orders. The most powerful of them were the National Socialists, an extreme militaristic, nationalist, and, above all, anti-Semite body, nominally democratic in tendency, but actually largely used by the rich to break strikes and attack Socialism. This body was raised from obscurity by one Hitler, a good demagogue but no politician... Hitler and other leaders were sent to prison or lunatic asylums" (vol. I, p. 342). There is a saying in French: the more things change the more they are the same. The Jew is eternal. ----------------------------------------------------------------- * The Balfour Declaration was a declaration made by Lord Balfour on Nov. 2, 1917, that the British government favoured a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine, supposedly, without prejudice to the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities. This theft of Palestine from its people has caused more pain and suffering to the Palestinians than the Iraqis would have ever brought upon Kuwait by its annexation. From firstname.lastname@example.org Wed Jan 14 06:05:26 EST 1998 Article: 159762 of alt.revisionism From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: war crimes trials Date: 14 Jan 1998 11:38:06 GMT Organization: Tornado News Processing System Lines: 233 Message-ID: <01bd20d2$550bce60$035795c2@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.127.116.11 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161 Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!tor-nx1.netcom.ca!chippy.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159762 War Crimes Trials By Carlos Porter ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Approximately 10,000 "War Crimes Trials" have been held since 1945. Trials of Japanese military personnel ended in 1949, yet "war crimes trials" of Germans and Eastern Europeans continue to date. Almost invariably, the charge is "violation of the laws and customs of war", derived, in turn, from international conventions signed at the Hague in 1899 and 1907. That these trials have little or no basis in law is clear from the wording of the treaties which are said to have been violated. Let us take a typical example, the Hague Declaration (IV, 3) of 1899 on the Use of Expanding Bullets, dated July 29, 1899. The Convention states, "The Contracting Parties agree to abstain from the use of bullets which expand or flatten easily in the human body, such as bullets with a hard envelope which does not entirely cover the core, or is pierced with incisions. "The present Declaration is only binding for the Contracting Powers in the case of a war between two or more of them. "It shall cease to be binding from the time when, in a war between the contracting Powers, one of the belligerants is joined by a non-contracting Power". The United States never ratified this convention, which, thus, never became "international law" in any war involving the United States. This was because American troops were busy using expanding bullets against Philipinos whom they had just "liberated" from the Spanish. American refusal to ratify this convention meant, not only that the United States was free to continue using expanding (or dum-dum) bullets legally in all wars, but from the moment the United States entered any conflict, all other belligerants were free to use them as well. (**) This is called an "all-participation clause". There are fourteen Hague Conventions, almost all of which contain similar clauses, and for this reason have had little or no application since 1907. The Fifth Hague Convention Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land of 18 October 1907, for example, states: Art. 20: "The provisions of the present Convention do not apply except between Contracting Powers, and then only if all the belligerants are parties to the Convention". This Convention was never ratified by Great Britain, and never applied after August 4, 1914. Art. 1: "The territory of neutral Powers is inviolable". Nevertheless, the British and Americans never tired of quoting this clause against the German and Japanese despite their own violation of the neutrality of Iceland, Greenland, Persia, Irak, Portuguese Timor, and the planned violation of Scandinavian neutrality. The Third Hague Convention Respecting the Opening of Hostilities states, article 1, states: "The contracting powers recognize that hostilities between themselves must not commence without previous and explicit warning, in the form either of a reasoned declaration of war or an ultimatum with conditional declaration of war". The problem here is that the "warning" may be as little as one minute, and no verbal formula is required. Poland received two ultimatums and was the first to mobilize. America received a formal declaration 25 minutes late, of which it had actual knowledge 10 days beforehand. However, the basis of nearly all "war crimes trials" has been the Fourth Hague Convention Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land. In the words of Telford Taylor, Chief Counsel and Representative of the United States for the Prosecution of War Crimes at Nuremberg: "An Annex to the Convention," consisting of 56 articles, sets forth various requirements and limitations with respect to the conduct of hostilities, the treatment of prisoners of war, and the exercise of authority over the occupied territory of a hostile state" (*). This, then, is the Convention which the Germans and Japanese were alleged to have violated in 10,000 trials. What does the Convention say exactly? Art. 2: "The provisions... of the present Convention do not apply except between contracting Powers, and then only if all the belligerants are parties to the Convention". This condition has remained unfulfilled since August 1, 1914. Non-signatories during WWII included Italy, Greece, and the national states of Yugoslavia. Communist Russia repudiated all Czarist agreements and never made any pretence of obeying the Hague or Geneva Conventions. Art. 3: "Belligerants violating the Convention may be made to pay compensation". This is self-explanatory. No trials were contemplated. THE ANNEX TO THE 4th HAGUE CONVENTION The Annex to the Convention was the real basis for nearly all of these 10,000 trials. This is the Convention which defines "war crimes" and "war criminals"... Articles 1 and 2 prohibit guerrilla warfare, stating that belligerants must be "commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates... have a fixed distinctive emblem recognizable at a distance... carry arms openly... and conduct their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war". Thus the European and Asian resistance movements were illegal. Article 43 requires collaboration with occupation governments. "The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country". The "collaborators" shot, hanged, or imprisoned after WWII were acting in compliance with international law. Article 23 (3) prohibits weapons calculated to cause unnecessary suffering. Napalm, phosphorous, jellied gasoline, etc. are illegal. Articles 25, 27 and 56 prohibit bombardment "by whatever means" of undefended cities, cultural monuments, etc... The fire bombings of Dresden and civilian areas of Hamburg, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, etc., were illegal. Article 6 states that belligerants may utilize the labour of prisoners of war, officers excepted, for the public service, for private persons or their own account. German and Japanese "slave policy" was perfectly legal insofar as it applied to members of resistance groups or lower ranking military personnel. Article 8: "Prisoners of war are subject to the laws, regulations and orders in force of the State in whose power they are. Any act of insubordination justifies the adoption towards them of such measures of severity as may be considered necessary". So much for the "mistreatment of prisoners" which formed the basis of so many war crimes trials. Article 46: "Private property cannot be confiscated". The post-WWII expulsions and confiscations were illegal. The provisions of the Versailles Treaty which confiscated the private property of all German citizens resident outside Germany, including missionaries on South sea islands, who were expelled and sent home penniless, were illegal. Art. 5: "Prisoners... cannot be confined except as an indispensable measure of safety, and only while the circumstances which necessitate the measure continue to exist", and Art. 20: "After the conclusion of peace, the repatriation of prisoners shall be carried out as quickly as possible". The prolonged detention of German and Japanese prisoners by the British, French, Russians and Americans for years after the war was illegal. Art. 7: "Prisoners of war shall be treated as regards board, lodging, and clothing on the same footing as the troops of the Government who captured them". The conditions of detention in "Eisenhower's death camps" were illegal whatever the death rate. (See Other Losses by James Bacque). Art. 32: "A person is regarded as a parlementaire who has been authorized by one of the belligerants to enter into communications with the other... he has a right to inviolability". The detention of Rudolph Hess was illegal. Finally, article 23 (h) prohibits declaring "abolished, suspended, or inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile party". If these treaties have any application at all (which is doubtful), the real war criminals were the Americans, the British, the French, and the Russians. The illegalities of "war crimes" proceedings include the admissibility of oral and written hearsay, the introduction of the concept of "conspiracy" into international law (unknown prior to 1945), the total lack of any pre-trial inquest or forensic evidence, and trial before a court itself composed of actual "war criminals". To return to the writings of Telford Taylor: "The issues surrounding the war crimes trials are numerous and complex; discussion and criticism of what was done should be welcomed by all who hope for a continuing development of international law... but what should have been done instead is a problem generally ignored by those who condemn what was done in fact" (*) The alternative is a fair trial before an impartial court under existing procedures and proper rules of evidence. FOOTNOTES: (*) "The Legality of the Trials", in "Trials at Nuremberg", History of the Second World War, Volume 8, No. 7 3/6, Purnell & Sons, 1969. (**) Dum dum bullets, first manufactured by the British at Dum Dum, India, are of advantage only in jungle warfare against primitive tribes, where the danger is of sudden rushes of large numbers at close quarters. They are not used in European warfare because they are inaccurate and tend to foul guns. If they offered an advantage, they would be used regardless of any treaty. Back to Top of Page ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CODOH can be reached at: Post Office Box 3267 Visalia CA 93278 Email: CODOHmail@aol.com Back to Main Index From email@example.com Wed Jan 21 12:12:32 EST 1998 Article: 160603 of alt.revisionism From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: holocaust museum of stupidity Date: 12 Jan 1998 13:40:08 GMT Organization: Tornado News Processing System Lines: 99 Message-ID: <01bd1f51$01c5e380$065795c2@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: 18.104.22.168 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161 Path: news.trends.ca!ftn.hub.org!hub.org!vncnews!HSNX.wco.com!jupiter.dnai.com!ultra.sonic.net!uunet!in3.uu.net!nntp.ntr.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:160603 HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF STUPIDITY Now Opening at a Location Near You [On 5 December 1997, the court rejected the defendant's defence of justified absence due to pedal-driven brain-bashing machine induced injuries, partly on the grounds that he had failed to specify the exact date of his injury! How stupid can you get? He was given one week in which to object, in German.] TRANSLATION OF JUDGEMENT OF 5 DECEMBER 1997 18 Ns 112 Js 116737/96 Regarding: Criminal proceedings against Porter, Carlos For incitement to racial hatred [Short excerpts only] …[The defendant] stated that he had been unable to attend the main trial on 10 October 1997 due to "severe cranial injuries and concussion". With regards to the other statements, reference is made to the letter of the defendant dated 5 November 1997, which was translated. [This means: the letter of 7 November will be ignored.] […etc., etc., blah, blah, blah.] …The mere assertion of severe cranial injuries and concussion is insufficient to constitute justified failure to appear. Because there is no indication of the date [!!!]. In addition, the claim was not substantiated [!]. The doctor's certificate mentioned by the accused in his letter of 05.11.1997, was not presented [!]. Nor was this failure made good in the letter of the defendant dated 7.11.1997 in which the accused stated that he had recovered from his cranial injuries [!]. Furthermore, the accused, in his letter to the court dated 1 September 1997, had [already] stated at length that he would refuse to appear. [OK; so why bother with the trial?] […etc., etc., blah, blah, blah.] Kunert Presiding Judge Regional Court [certified true copy, etc., etc.] [The defendant was then given one week in which to protest the rejection of his defence of justified absence due to pedal-driven brain-bashing machine induced injuries.] …The objection must be in German.] --- OBJECTION [by fax on 5 January 1997] Judge Kunert, [address, references, etc.] Es ist mein Pflicht, Ihnen mitzuteilen , dass, indem Sie die Glaubwuerdigkeit meiner durch die in dem Nuernbergerprozess beschriebenen (IMT VII 377 [416-417]) Pedal-angetriebene Gehirnzertruemmerungsmachine verursachten Kopfverletzungen anzweifeln bzw leugnen, Sie mich in meiner Menchenwuerde verletzen, was mir ganz schwere psychische und Gefuehlsleiden verursachen muss. Ich fuehle mich herabwuerdigt und beleidigt. Sie werden von meinem Rechtsanwalt hoeren. Im uebrigens, wuerde ich am 9. Oktober schwer verbrannt durch Ausstrahlungen von deutschen Atomwaffen aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg [IMT XVI 529-530 ) und bin immer noch radioactiv. Carlos W. Porter [translation] It is my duty to inform you that in disputing or denying the credibility of my cranial injuries caused by the pedal-driven brain-basing machine described in the Nuremberg Trial transcript [IMT VII 377 [416-417] you injure my dignity as a human being, causing me serious psychic disturbances and emotional anguish. I feel humiliated and insulted. You will be hearing >from my lawyer about this. I also suffered severe radiation burns on 9 October 1997 while handling the German World War II atomic bomb described in the Nuremberg trial transcript [IMT XVI 529-530 ) and am still radioactive. Carlos W. Porter [to be continued]
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor