Archive/File: people/i/irving.david/libel.suit/transcripts/day017.05
Last-Modified: 2000/07/20
Q. Would I be right in suggesting that this order
effectively created a killing field, and that anybody else
who fitted the title of Jew who came within that killing
field was therefore at risk, put it that way?
A. This certainly creates an atmosphere in which clearly
there will be lots of killing and it will not be
restricted to military combat, that there will be killing
of those that are seen to be an ideological and racial
enemy, as well as military. I think, when we look at, in
a sense, the kinds of proposals that are brought forward,
very revealing are not only the Kommissar order and the
agreement between the military and the Einsatzgruppen, but
the economic plans that come forward, such as the May 2nd
meeting of the State secretaries, in which they say, for
Germany to be blockade proof, we must take lots of
material out of the Soviet Union, and we must be very
clear that, when we do this, umpteen million Russians are
going to starve to death. So we have an atmosphere of a
war of destruction in which civilian life is going to be
. P-37
totally cheap.
Q. He does not say, as a result of our taking economic goods
out of the country, millions of people, preferably Jews,
are going to die. That is just any Russians?
A. This is that lots of Russians will die, lots of civilians
will die. Then, of course, if we cast that, as an
historian, to put it into the wider context, you would not
disagree with that, I think.
Q. Yes.
A. The wider context basically is where people have been
shot, Jews have been shot in larger percentages than
others, where people have starved, the Jews have starved
first. So, if you have a programme of shooting and
starving, one can begin with the fact that there is going
to be a large loss of Jewish life, that this would be
clear to anyone in the context of Nazi Germany in the
spring of 41. That is not yet. That is not yet an
explicit order for the killing of Soviet Jewry. It is a
creation of, we might say, a hunting licence. No one
will
get into trouble killing Jews. One will get credits
rather than anything against them.
Q. I agree entirely, but the focus is at this stage on
this
document strictly, shall we say, the upper 10,000? It
is
the Judao-Bolshevik intelligentsia and their
hierarchy,
all the way down to the Kommissars, is that right?
A. The focus is selective killing and indiscriminate
. P-38
starvation.
Q. The emphasis is on this as a measure of war? This is
the
kind of war we are going to be fighting?
A. No. The emphasis is on measure of a war that is
understood to be both military and ideological and
racial.
Q. A war to the death, yes.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Professor Browning, where do you get
indiscriminate starving from?
A. That is a document I believe is not one that I cited.
It
is a protocol of a meeting of the State secretaries on
May
2nd 1941. It is a Nuremberg document, in which the
protocol is that we all agree that, when we take out
of
the Soviet Union what is necessary to make Germany
blockade proof, we must be perfectly clear that this
will
mean the mass starvation of umpteen million Russians.
So
it is a document that speaks to what was clear to
everybody involved in the planning process, that this
war
of destruction was going to mean a vast loss of life.
Given what had happened in Poland, I would argue,
everyone
understood that, in a vast loss of life, Jewish life
was
even cheaper than other life. That is what I would
call
the beginning of this first phase of the decision
making
process. It sets up a genocidal atmosphere, it does
not
yet set up a systematic plan for total liquidation.
MR IRVING: Can I leap forward ----
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Mr Irving, I am going to highlight that.
. P-39
I am also going to suggest -- the questions have been
fast
and furious this morning. That is not a criticism.
I suspect you would quite welcome a break and I am
sure
the transcriber would. It has been actually quite
intensive this morning.
MR IRVING: Can I have one short question? On that point
we
shall round it off and let us say that this kind
genocidal
order, is it not almost identical to the Morgantower
decision of September 1944, where the Americans said,
let
us do this to the Germans, we do not care how many
starve?
A. I would have to look at that document before I could
say
whether it was similar or not. What we do know of
course
is that that document never was implemented.
Q. It was signed by both Roosevelt and Churchill, was it
not?
A. I would have to see such a document.
MR IRVING: Thank you.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: I think five minutes is enough just to
have a
breathing space.
(Short Adjournment).
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Mr Irving, can we just identify the
Kommissar
document you refer to? I am not sure I know where
that
is.
MR IRVING: The Kommissar order is in May 1941, I believe,
about May 7th or May 5th. These March 1941 documents,
I believe I am right in saying, are the kind of
working
. P-40
level papers, are they not? I do not know exactly
what is
before the witness. I do not have copies of these
documents.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: I only mention it and perhaps we can
locate
it in due course.
MR IRVING: The Kommissar order is important because it was
dictated by Hitler to General Jodl, I think, so it
very
clearly represents Hitler's thoughts. That would be
useful if I do obtain a copy and bring it into court
tomorrow.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: If we can at some stage, yes.
MR IRVING: May I ask what this particular document was
that
you were quoting from?
A. The State secretary's meeting.
Q. No, the actual one with the references to the
Judao-Bolshevik intelligentsia?
A. This is footnote 137 from page 55 from the opinion by
Peter Longerich.
Q. And there are two more documents that Mr Rampton
wished
you to consider, I believe?
MR RAMPTON: Yes. They are just summarized on pages 55 and
56. There in fact may be four, paragraphs 15.1, 15.2,
two
documents, and 15.3 on page 56, all in March of 1941.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, thank you very much. Professor
Browning, looking at those further documents, they do
not,
as it were, perhaps add anything, but they maybe
confirm
. P-41
what you have already said in relation to the 3rd
March
document. Is that fair?.
A. Yes. What I think they confirm is that Hitler does not
see
this, and does not want his generals and others to see
it,
as a conventional war, but that it has a very strong
ideological dimension to it, and that the enemy to be
destroyed is not just the Soviet army and its power to
resist, but what he considers to be Judao-Bolshevism,
communism, he uses different phrases.
MR IRVING: Would it be right to say that at this time
Hitler
had knowledge of the manner in which the Soviet Union
fought its wars, both its colonial wars as in Spain,
for
example, and also in the Finnish winter war of 1939 to
1940?
A. What picture the German intelligence portrayed of the
Soviet Union in all of this, is an area that others
have
studied, it is not an area that I think I could speak
with
authority.
Q. Would he be familiar with the activities of the
Russian
Kommissars within the Red Army hierarchy?
A. It is very likely he would have been given even a more
lurid description than maybe would have been
historically
accepted but that is just speculation on my part. As
I say, I cannot think of any documents at the moment
that
I could speak from with authority.
Q. The Soviet Commissart system was a political agitator,
am
. P-42
I correct, within each Army unit to make sure that
they
pointed their guns in the right direction, roughly?
A. It was to establish, in a sense, a dual control of
military units, someone who would be there with
military
expertise and someone with political, what they called
reliability.
Q. Did these Commissarts have an NKBD rank?
A. That I do not know.
Q. Can you estimate for the court approximately what
percentage of these Commissarts were, in fact, Jewish?
A. I have absolutely no idea.
Q. No idea. Very well. But if a substantial percentage
were
either Jewish or were perceived by the Nazis to be
Jewish,
would that justify the kind of language that Hitler
used
in these military plannings for the coming Russian
campaign?
A. No, I do not see that Jews who were part of the NKBD,
in a
sense, often were totally secular Jews separate from
the
Jewish religious communities in these towns, that they
had
given up, in a sense, their Jewish identity. They
were
often all part of the Jewish communities that were
going
to face the onslaught of the genocide. So if you ask
me
is there a justification, my answer would be
absolutely
not.
Q. Are you aware that, in fact, the Jewish community
formed
the backbone of the Red Army and of the NKBD?
. P-43
A. I am certainly not aware of that and I doubt that that
is
the case.
Q. Are you aware of the fact that 300 heroes of the
Soviet
Union of General's rank were Jewish?
A. I do not know the number, but I do not know that it is
relevant.
Q. Welt, I am just trying to establish the fact there may
have been a military reason for Hitler to have used
this
kind of language in preparing his Generals for the
very
ugly war that was to come.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: If that were so, I just wonder, Professor
Browning, whether the word "intelligenzija" would have
been used? It is an odd word if one is talking in
terms
of talking military combat, is it not? Is that right
or
wrong?
A. Well, I think for Hitler he equates Bolshevism and the
Communists with Jews, and in a sense he is talking
about
-- he sometimes used "leadership", sometimes he uses
"intelligenzija" and in his mind these are
intertwined.
Q. The point I was really putting to you is if one is
talking
about military extermination, if that is a fair way of
putting it, one would expect to find a reference to
not
"intelligenzija" but "senior military personnel" or
something of that kind?
A. Yes, I mean, and that I think is there as well, but
the
fact that he adds these others would again reinforce
the
. P-44
point I am making that there is a strictly ideological
racial dimension as well as a military dimension.
Q. More than a struggle of arms?
A. Yes.
MR IRVING: Is it not right, however, also to say that in
defeating the Soviet Union, he would not only have to
defeat the Red Army, he would also have to defeat the
Soviet hierarchy, the bureaucracy; he would have to
eradicate that as well in order to implement the
German
colonial rule on those regions?
A. Have to eradicate what?
Q. The bureaucracy, the entire Bolshevik hierarchy?
A. That certainly was his goal, yes.
Q. And the Nazis frequently used the phrase "Jewish
Bolshevik"; it had become a bit of a slogan, had it
not?
A. It was more than a slogan. It was a reflection of
their
mentality.
Q. My Lord, I think we have taken that question as far as
we
can go, unless your Lordship has further questions on
those particular documents?
MR JUSTICE GRAY: No, not at all.
MR RAMPTON: May I just add this? It may save time later
on.
Your Lordship was asking about the guidelines ----
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes.
MR RAMPTON: --- for Barbarossa, conduct of troops. The
date
is 19th May 1941 and the relevant part is summarized
in
. P-45
and translated on page 5 of part 2 of Longerich.
MR IRVING: Yes. This is not a Commissart order, but it is
very much a parallel document.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Right. That is very helpful.
MR IRVING: It effectively says that ordinary court
procedures
will not apply and this kind of thing.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Thank you very much, Mr Rampton. I was
not
aware of that at all.
MR IRVING (To the witness): Are you familiar with those
guidelines of May 19th 1941? Can you answer questions
about it, roughly, were they specifically anti-Jewish
in
nature?
A. There are, I would say, three key orders, one is the
Commissart order, one is the order concerning military
jurisdiction and then there is the troop, guidelines
for
the troops, in which "Jews", simply the term "Jews",
is
put in the same line with saboteurs, guerrillas, so
that,
in effect, Jews are created as a class that can be
equated
on the basis of who they are with other targets who
are
defined by what they do. This, of course, is the
essence
of a racial genocide.
Q. Are you familiar with the origins of these three
documents
you have mentioned?
MR JUSTICE GRAY: I think you mention them in your own
report
actually, do you not?
A. I am not sure if I mention the three documents.
. P-46
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.