Archive/File: people/i/irving.david/libel.suit/transcripts/day011.19
Last-Modified: 2000/07/20
MR RAMPTON: I think that Pressac's book must originally have
A. No. This is the only edition.
Q. Did he write it in English or did someone translate it for
him?
A. It translated by Behalteklasse Foundation.
Q. Have you got the introduction to chapter 3?
A. Part 3, chapter 3, yes.
Q. Can you read that to yourself. We will all read it at the
. P-166
same time to ourselves. Then I will ask you ----
MR IRVING: Could you give me a page number, please?
MR RAMPTON: I am sorry, it is 481 of Pressac.
A. Introduction?
Q. Introduction. Just read the introduction to yourself.
A. "The testimony by Henrich Tauber ..."
Q. Not out loud. Just read it to yourself.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: It does not really matter.
MR RAMPTON: Tell us when you have finished.
A. I have read it.
Q. You have read it?
A. Yes.
Q. That, if I may summarize it, is Mr Pressac's on view of
Tauber as it comes off the written page, is it not?
A. Yes.
Q. Is it an assessment with which you agree or disagree?
A. I agree with that.
Q. If I may summarize, the effect is that Tauber is a modest,
sober and careful witness, is that right?
A. Yes.
Q. You have to say yes because otherwise the tape cannot read
your mind. At the bottom he says: "Henrich Tauber's
deposition enabled me at the last moment to authenticate
the testimony of Dr Paul Bendal that I was on the point of
invalidating." Do you see right at the bottom of the
introduction? Do you have that?
. P-167
A. Yes.
Q. Do you know what it was in the testimony of Dr Paul Bendal
that Pressac was on the point of invalidating and that
Tauber validates?
A. I do not remember any more. It is sometime since I read
Pressac.
Q. Right. Another piece of disorder I am afraid, Professor.
Can you turn to pages 110, 111?
A. Of what?
Q. Of your report.
A. I am there.
Q. Towards the top of page 110 you are writing about a number
of people who are known to have died at certain times from
disease at Auschwitz?
A. Yes.
Q. Then you say this: "It must be remembered, however, that
the mortality figures which the concentration camps sent
to Berlin only apply to the deaths of registered
prisoners", and you have already told us that. Then you
make reference to the evidence of SS, he was a General was
he not, Oswald Pohl?
A. Yes, he was I think Obergruppenfuhrer by that time.
Q. Whatever, he was in charge of the concentration camp
system as a whole, is that right?
A. Yes, he was the kind of -- officially he was called the
Economic Director, so some way off the SS, and that really
. P-168
ran the concentration camps. He was not the inspector of
the concentration camps. As a business adventure, yes.
By a business venture he was.
MR IRVING: My Lord, this of course is not matter that was
raised in the cross-examination. So I am puzzled.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: It may turn out to be. That is the problem.
You never know where ----
MR IRVING: As long as your Lordship is alert to that.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: --- it is going.
MR RAMPTON: I had understood that Mr Irving relied on the
death books and the decrypts as showing that the number of
people who died at Auschwitz was very small.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes. I think that is right, although there
was not any cross-examination on that.
MR RAMPTON: I know, but it may be convenient.
MR IRVING: The only mention of the death books is when I was
querying the character of the deaths, the age spectrum,
rather than statistics.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: It is part of your case, is it not, that the
death books give a very different picture from the sort of
figures that Professor van Pelt speaks of?
MR IRVING: It is a subtly different picture on the question of
the killing of the old and sick.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: If it is part of your case, and I do not
criticise you for not cross-examining to it, I think it is
for Mr Rampton to be able to put these questions.
. P-169
MR IRVING: This specific document of course is not one that I ----
MR RAMPTON: Anyhow, it does arise indirectly and quite
immediately out of the questions which were put about
selection to which I am immediately coming after this.
Did in fact the head of this system General Pohl
say at his trial in Nuremberg that the people who were
directly exterminated were never registered?
A. He says that no information about it has been transmitted
to Berlin.
Q. His subordinate was Dr Lolling?
A. Yes.
Q. Who was in charge of the inspectorate presumably. He
said, the last answer at the top of page 111, in answer to
his own counsel, his own attorney: "The figures about
exterminations were not reported to the inspectorate at
all, and constantly Dr Rolling could not evaluate them for
his statistics."
A. That is true.
Q. Thank you. Now I want to ----
MR IRVING: My Lord, that was very definitely not a matter
which I raised in cross-examination of this witness.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: I tried to explain why I think it is
legitimate. In a way we are having to take short cuts in
this case. You have lots of points which, in a perfect
world, I would have said to you, Mr Irving, you must put
. P-170
that point to Professor van Pelt, but we be would here to
Christmas and beyond if we did that. So we are not
requiring you to put all those points. But it does not
mean Mr Rampton cannot get evidence from this witness,
especially if it is in his report, which bears on the
point that you are going to take, although you have not
cross-examined to it.
MR IRVING: My understanding was re-examination is only
permitted on matters that I cross-examined on.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: In a normal case that is true. I am not
bending the rules in Mr Rampton's favour. I am in fact
bending them in your favour, because I have not required
you to cross-examine on this point, do you follow me?
MR IRVING: Very well.
MR RAMPTON: Normally in the old days, and I thank goodness we
are not in the old days any more, if the point had not
been taken in cross-examination, I would have to say to
the Judge: Well, I am afraid it cannot be taken in
closing.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: That is what I mean by taking short cuts in
this case.
MR RAMPTON: I do not say that.
Does that evidence of General Pohl reflect upon
the death books figures so-called that have emerged from Moscow?
A. No. It suggests, I mean Pohl only talks about of course
. P-171
information being transmitted to Berlin, but certainly the
question is how would information be gathered in
Auschwitz, and then of course we get other corroborating
information like, for example, that of Pery Broad who
worked in the political department who said that there was
no registration of people who were not admitted to the
camp. That is information that once the transport had
arrived, and once basically the people had been sent to
the gas chamber, all records, all traces of these people
also in the records were removed, or at least, you know,
there was maybe some record about a number of people that
had arrived but they were not registered.
Q. Does it also reflect, tell me if it does not, on the
so-called Hinsley decrypt question?
A. In the way it has been posed by Mr Irving, yes.
Q. Yes. To put it another way, would you expect to find
references to the extermination of unregistered prisoners
in decrypts going from Auschwitz to Berlin?
A. No.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: It is the same point, is it not? The Hinsley
decrypt point is the same point about non-registration of
those who were going allegedly to be exterminated.
MR RAMPTON: You told us some time ago, Professor, last week,
that upon arrival to begin with the transports were
divided up for selection at the old Judenamter which was
between the two camps?
. P-172
A. Yes.
Q. But that by the time of the Hungarian action in 1944, the
Summer of 1944, they had built one spare right up through
Birkenhau towards the two crematoria 2 and 3?
A. Yes. The spare had been in construction for a longer
time, but it was completed in I think March, March 1944.
Q. Yes.
A. Late March, maybe early April.
Q. Could you take that file H2 (vi) again, please?
A. H2(vi), where is that?
Q. In tab 4 we find something called the "Auschwitz Album".
That is not its official title in any sense. Can you say
briefly what this Auschwitz album actually is? I will ask
you about the photographs in a moment, but if you could
tell us what the book is?
A. This is a book which was found on the evacuation of the
camp by a person called Lily Meyer as the camp was being
evacuated. It is a picture book made either for an
individual SS man or maybe for the Auschwitz SS, recording
a couple of arrivals and subsequent kind of delousing
registration into the camp, and also the fate of other
people, at least until any come to the crematorium, of
Hungarian Jews.
Q. Right. So the photographs which we find inside are,
therefore, of what date?
A. They are of the Summer 1944.
. P-173
Q. By whom were they taken?
A. They were taken by an SS man.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: How do you know they are the Summer of 1944?
A. Because that is when the Hungarian action occurred.
Q. That is circular, is it not?
A. But the book itself identifies this. It identifies the
action as a Hungarian action.
MR IRVING: That was surely May 1944.
A. May 1944, whatever, yes.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Well, it may not matter.
MR RAMPTON: It does not sound as though it is controversial.
It is in fact quite a well-known book. These photographs
have been known about for a very long time?
A. Yes, apart from -- there are three basically sources of
photographs, at least from Birkenhau, which is the
Bauleitung photographs we saw today a few of, showing the
construction, showing the construction of the buildings in
Birkenhau. Then we have a number of photos, a small
number of photos which would have been made illegally by
prisoners, probably a sonderkommando who found a camera in
what was left over in the undressing room. These are very
shaky photographs where you see people running and you see
some burning of bodies in a kind open pit. Then this one
which is a large collection made by the SS, one does not
really know for what reason, except ----
MR IRVING: Where is the second collection from, is it Moscow?
. P-174
A. The second collection.
Q. Yes.
A. There are three or four photographs. I think they are the
original negatives. No, there are no negatives. Original
prints on Auschwitz.
MR RAMPTON: The particular pages that I want to refer to are a
little bit difficult to find, because the bundle has not
been paginated, but at the bottom of each photograph there
is usually a printed number.
A. Yes.
Q. If you turn the file sideways, I hope you can find a
photograph which has a printed number 15 at the bottom?
A. 15?
Q. Yes.
A. 15.
Q. Yes, 15.
MR IRVING: My Lord, I am again nervous about this introduction
of fresh evidence of the re-examination phase.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Well, this does arise of out
cross-examination.
MR RAMPTON: This arises directly out of questions about
selection.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Do you remember questions about where the
selection process took place and how it changed from being
on the railway platform, I think it was originally, and
then they built the spare and it was sometimes done
. P-175
there. Is that a fair summary of the evidence?
MR RAMPTON: There is a very direct and relevant point to be
made at the end of this little exercise, if Mr Irving will
be patient. Do you see that photograph, Professor?
A. Yes, I see.
Q. Just tell me, I will make a suggestion and answer then
I will ask for information. Am I looking northwards?
A. No. You are looking towards the West.
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.