Archive/File: people/i/irving.david/libel.suit/transcripts/day014.10
Last-Modified: 2000/07/20
MR RAMPTON: Let me take the first one on this page 3, may I,
Mr Irving? This is your action report No. 12, I think, of
July 1997. The reference is given if you want to look at
it. "Why are they [the Jews] so blind that they cannot
see the linkage between cause and effect? They protest,
what, us? when people accuse them of international
conspiracy. They clamour, 'Ours, ours, ours' when hoards
of gold are uncovered and then when anti-Semitism
increases and the inevitable mindless pogroms occur, they
ask with genuine surprise, why us?"
Mr Irving, is that a fair quote in the context
from ----
A. Can I read the two paragraphs before that?
Q. Yes, please do.
A. To set it in context: "Three hours work today on
discovery", that is for this action two years ago already,
"compiling exhaustive files for my papers for my libel
actions, my archive files on the Judenfrage, the Jewish
problem. Depressing.
"There is an item in today's Jewish Chronicle
which reports that, according to a study by the University
of Tel Aviv, anti-Semitic incidents everywhere are on the
decline. There has been an 8.1 per cent decline in
Britain over the 12 month period to the end of 1996.
"There are two significant exceptions, however.
. P-84
An increase in anti-Semitic propaganda in Switzerland
during 1996 was generated by 'Jewish claims for the return
of money and of the property of Holocaust victims or their
heirs'. The other exception is Australia 'where there was
a 12 per cent rise over the previous year'."
I then continue with the passage that you have
put before his Lordship which is the conclusion to be
drawn from this fact, that in Australia -- "In fact,
Australia today is on fire about me again, about my not
being allowed into the country. The Prime Minister of
Australia this morning has criticised me. This kind of
thing generates the anti-Semitism in countries", and this
is precisely what this is about.
Q. You do not see anything in what I have just read which
might account for the Australians' unwillingness to have
you on their shores?
A. On the contrary, this is saying cause and effect. Why is
there increasing anti-Semitism in Switzerland today when
it is going down everywhere else in the world? Answer, we
know why. Why is there anti-Semitism today in Australia
today? Answer, we know why.
Q. But you are adopting it, are you not? You are saying the
anti-Semitism is justified on account of the fact that the
Jews are greedy?
A. Did I say justified or explicable? Is there a subtle
difference there, do you think?
. P-85
Q. We will read the next passage, Mr Irving.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: I cannot find the reference. K4, tab 10, page 60.
MR RAMPTON: At 1.
A. This is a typical example of something being taken out of
context and the word "explicable" being changed into
"justifiable". This is a typical manipulation.
Q. If you say so, Mr Irving. It is going to get worse, I am
afraid. Can we read the next passage? This is rather a
long passage so perhaps you would like to have a look?
This is taken from your interview with Errol Morris on 8th
November 1998.
My Lord, the passage in the file is at page 60
of tab 10. 60 is written in the round circle. It is at
the bottom of the left-hand column of page 22 of the
action report.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Is this your second one?
MR RAMPTON: No, that is first one your Lordship was asking
after.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, I did find it. I am sorry. I have it now.
MR RAMPTON: This comes from, if you want the reference,
Mr Irving, pages 25 to 27.
A. I have it. I have the full text in front of me. Once
again you left off the opening passage which explains what
I am saying.
. P-86
Q. Which opening passage?
A. You begun half way down the paragraph of what I said.
Q. I will read the whole thing if it bothers you.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Mr Irving, I have just read the opening part
of that paragraph. It makes no difference at all to what
is relied on, I do not think, does it?
A. No, what I am saying is if somebody calls me a liar, which
frequently happens, especially in this courtroom, even
when I am on oath, I shrug my shoulders.
Q. And then you contrast that with the Jewish reaction?
A. And I contrast that with the sensitivity of the Jewish
community. When they are called liars, then suddenly all
the force and majesty of the law is called in and you are
invited to go before the Magistrate and all the rest of
it, and this generates anti-Semitism, in my view.
MR RAMPTON: Well, Mr Irving, I am going look at something
which I suggest is a massive exercise in the generation of
anti-Semitism. It is you speaking at line 39 on page 25
of the file.
You see: "It is certainly is inexcusable.
Every country, every people, particularly the Jewish
people, I think are robust enough to survive the knocks,
to survive the insults, to survive the impugning of their
integrity". So far so good.
"If somebody says to me, 'David Irving, I think
you are a liar', I shrug my shoulders and say, 'So, so
. P-87
what? You are entitled to your opinion'. But if somebody
says to the Jewish community, 'Jewish community, we think
you are a liar', suddenly the jail doors are swung open
and people say, 'This way, come on, you have called them a
liar'" ----
A. Like Karl Philip, for example, fined 3,000 deutschemarks
for some utterance. That is precisely the example, and
that generates anti-Semitism, in my view.
Q. Yes, "... and this I think does harm to the Jewish people
in the long run because the non-Jewish people will say,
'What is it about these people?' Irving: I am deeply
concerned about this and I have said this to people
like Daniel Goldhagen who I challenged to the debate at a
meeting in New Orleans a few months ago. I said, 'You
have written a book called Hitler's Willing Executioners.
You have talked to us this evening at great length about
who pulled the trigger, but the question which would
concern me if I was a Jew is not who'" ----
A. "If I were a Jew".
Q. --- "'pulled the trigger, but why? Why are we disliked?
Is it something we are doing? I am disliked. Dave Irving
is disliked. I know that because of the books I write.
I could be instantly disliked by writing. I could become
instantly liked by writing other books. You people'", by
which, of course, you mean the Jews, "'are disliked on a
global scale. You have been disliked for 3,0000 years and
. P-88
yet you never to seem to ask what is at the root'",
misspelt, "'of this dislike. You pretend that you are not
disliked but you are disliked. No sooner do you arrive as
a people in a new country, then within 50 years you are
already being disliked all over again. Now what is it?
And I do not know the answer to this. Is it built into
our microchip? When a people arrive who call themselves
the Jews, you will dislike them? Is there something in
our microchip? Is it in our microchip that we do not like
the way they look? Is it envy because they are more
successful than us? I do not know the answer, but if
I was a Jew, I would want to know what the reason is why
I am being disliked, and not just disliked in a kind of
nudge, nudge, wink, wink, he is not very nice kind of sort
of way, but we are being disliked on a visceral, gut
wrenching, murderous level, that no sooner do we arrive
than we are being massacred and beaten and brutalized and
imprisoned until we have to move on somewhere else. What
is the reason? I would want to know the answer to that,
and nobody carries out an investigation about that".
Then I have to go on: "(Interviewer) What would
you say the reason is? (Irving) I am just looking at this
as an outsider; I come from Mars and I would say they are
clever people. I am a racist, I would say they are a
clever race. I would say that, as a race, they are better
at making money than I am". That is a racist remark, of
. P-89
course, Mr Irving. It is worthy of Dr Joseph Goebbels, is
it not?
A. Now then, you are taking words here and you are putting
your own intonation on them: "If I am a racist, then
I would say these things, I say things in a racist kind of
way -- there are better people than us, they play the
violin better, they make money better than us and this
would generate my envy".
Q. "But they appear to be better at making money", you repeat
yourself, "than I am".
A. That is right, I am putting myself in a position of the
critics. I am trying to find reasons why people are
anti-Semetic. I am talking here to a television
interviewer. We are investigating the reasons why people
may become anti-Semetic in my own rather clumsy and
incoherent way. We are trying to find what makes people
anti-Semetic. Is it because the Jews are better than us?
Is it because they play the violin or the piano better
than us, better at making money than us or is there
something built into our microchip?
Q. Yes, Mr Irving.
A. I think this is a very coherent expression of the whole
anti-Semitic tragedy, that nobody knows what it is that
makes people dislike foreigners, the xenophobia that is
inside every human being.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: That sentence (I do not know whether
. P-90
Mr Rampton has read it yet or not), you say: "If I was
going to be crude, I would say not only are they better at
making money but they are greedy", that is you, Mr Irving,
saying the Jews are greedy, is that right, or have I
misunderstood?
A. No, this is the two or three levels down in the argument,
my Lord; this is putting myself into the skin of a person
who is asking questions about those clever people. There
should be triple quotation marks around this.
MR RAMPTON: Oh, no, Mr Irving, that will not do; that is
another rash and hasty ----
A. If you read on, you will see exactly why we are talking
about the Swiss gold business.
Q. I am going to read on, Mr Irving. That is exactly why
I said it was a rather rash answer.
A. This is precisely the moment when Abraham Foxman and the
Jewish newspaper 'Forward' have said: "Sure, we
bludgeoned them until they had parted with the money".
That was his headline: "Yes, we bludgeoned them". This
is the kind of thing that generates anti-Semitism as
witnessed what happened in Switzerland.
Q. So every time there is a pogrom or a machine gunning into
a pit, or a mass gassing, it is entirely the Jews' fault
because some of them make money and some of them are good
at the piano, is that right, and some of them are clever?
A. I regard that a very childish oversimplification of what
. P-91
I have tried to set out in two paragraphs there.
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.