Archive/File: people/i/irving.david/libel.suit/transcripts/day029.04
Last-Modified: 2000/07/25
(The video was shown).
. P-27
MR RAMPTON: Stop there, please.
A. You are right. You are absolutely right. In that
particular one I did not put in the rider that that is the
one they show the tourists.
Q. You did not. Frequently you have not. Not only have
you not put in the rider, you have added other gas
chambers elsewhere, Treblinka, Belzec. Not here. In the
documents we were looking at yesterday.
A. You are adding them now verbally into my speech.
Q. No, I am not.
A. Shall we just abide by the speech that I was speaking
here?
Q. You said a moment ago that you never make any reference to
any gas chamber but the one which was reconstructed by the
Poles after the war. That is simply false, is it not?
A. The one that is faked by the Poles after the war.
Q. Yes, whatever you like. It is simply a false statement,
is not, Mr Irving? We saw a whole lot of statements by
you yesterday, did we not?
A. Will you please ask the question again because you --- -
Q. Your statement that you never make reference to any but
what you call the fake gas chamber at Auschwitz (i), gas
chamber singular, is a false statement, is it not?
A. I frequently refer to gas chambers elsewhere, yes.
Q. Yes.
A. But in what connection?
. P-28
Q. In the context of saying that they never existed.
A. In Dachau, for example. We now know that eyewitnesses
reported there were gas chambers in Dachau, and we now
know the German government has confirmed there were never
any gas chambers in Dachau. That is a typical example.
Q. Mr Irving, I do not believe you have that bad a memory. I
really do not.
A. You just asked me a question and I have answered it.
Q. In that case I am going to have to remind you of what you
were shown but yesterday. Laborious, but necessary.
A. Dachau is typical example of survivors who were caught out lying.
Q. You will have to be patient with me, Mr Irving. I will
find it. This is just an example from page 156 of
yesterday's transcript, if you have yesterday's
transcript. This is a speech by you at Moers that we
looked at yesterday.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Would you like a copy of it?
A. If it is not going to be too tedious.
MR RAMPTON: I will read it out. You said: "The dummies are
still standing in Auschwitz, because the German government
has no sway there". Page 156, line 8. "The dummies are
still standing in Auschwitz because the German government
has no sway there, and understandably that is problem for
you" -- that is the Germans -- "that you have a
government in Bonn that allows its own people to be
. P-29
defamed by all countries of the world, although in the
meantime it is cried out that these things in Auschwitz,
and probably in Maidonek, Treblinka and in other so-called
extermination camps in the East, are all dummies".
That is a direct quote from your speech in Moers.
A. Yes. Are you quoting the speech to me? Are you going to
quote something from the exchange that follows? If so,
I cannot quite understand why we are looking at
yesterday's exchange rather than looking at the actual speech.
Q. Because it was the easiest way to what you said in Moers.
I have it in the file.
A. Of course, if you do it that way, we do not know exactly
what was said in the actual speech.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: We can track it down, I am sure.
MR RAMPTON: Page 3, tab 5, Mr Irving.
A. Perhaps we can just wait to see what the question is and
then it may not be worth the effort.
Q. I have put the question already. You made a statement not
more than a couple of minutes ago that you never make
reference to the non-existence of gas chambers except in
relation to what you call the fake gas chamber at
Auschwitz (i). That statement was false, was it not?
A. "The dummies were still standing in Auschwitz, these
things in Auschwitz and probably in Maidonek, Treblinka
and in the other so-called extermination camps". I think
. P-30
the word "probably" therefore has to be looked at and
emphasised.
Q. Carry on. Read on.
A. In other words ----
Q. Read on. The fact is that Auschwitz we know that what
they show the tourists is fake because the Poles have no
now admitted it. I am sorry, "reconstructed" is what you
call it.
Q. What?
A. But the other places, Maidonek, Treblinka and so on, my
hands are tied in really dealing with that because, for
the purposes of this court action, I am not challenging them.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: I think we are getting a bit confused here.
A. My Lord, perhaps I can help?
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, because I may have misunderstood the
position. I think it all arose out of your saying to
Mr Rampton earlier that, whenever you refer to no Jews, or
virtually no Jews, having died in concentration camps, you
add the rider that you are really talking about what you
call the dummy constructed after the war at Auschwitz.
A. I hesitate to allow your Lordship to put words into my mouth.
MR RAMPTON: Let us go back on the transcript for today and we
will find it.
A. I am much more specific than that, and I say that, in this
. P-31
rather tasteless way, more women died on the back seat of
that car than died in the gas chamber at Auschwitz,
meaning the one they showed the tourists.
MR RAMPTON: It is when I was reading the transcript before we
saw the video. We will get the exact words, my Lord.
A. It is part of the gramophone record, if I can put it like that.
MR RAMPTON: In the light of yesterday's evidence from
Professor Funke -- I cannot read that. Now, Mr Irving, I
am going to read you back your answer.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Page 24.
MR RAMPTON: Page 24 of today. This what gave rise to all of
this, you see, Mr Irving. You made yet another, shall
I say courteously -- "The applause drowned the rest of the
sentence, unfortunately, which is, 'in the gas chambers of
Auschwitz which are shown to the tourists'. I always say
exactly the same thing". It was a false statement, that,
was it not?
A. It was clearly wrong.
Q. Yes.
A. But not deliberately wrong. I have this same part of my
speech that I deliver again and again and it is possible
that, in the heat of this particular speech which was
spoken without notes, as you will see ----
Q. No, Mr Irving.
A. -- to a non-skinhead audience.
. P-32
Q. What was false is that you always say exactly the same
thing. You do not. You frequently refer to the
non-existence of any gas chambers in the plural.
A. I think you will have to show me the passages where
I frequently say this.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: The point is you deny the existence of gas
chambers and, when you do that, you do not talk only of
the dummies such as the one that was constructed after the
war at Auschwitz. That I think is the point.
A. If that is the point he is trying to make, then of course
he is wrong because I have made it quite plain earlier in
this case that I accept that in Auschwitz Birkenhau gas
chamber experiments were conducted, for example, in the
bunkers, the two buildings called the bunkers, and to that
degree I certainly do not deny it.
MR RAMPTON: I expect you have been reading the Eichmann
memoirs, have you not?
A. Not yet. If you know how little time I have.
Q. If you do a word search on them, look for the word
"Vergasungslager".
A. I take your tip. Thank you very much.
"Vergasungslager"?
Q. Yes, "Vergasungslager", gassing camps, Mr Irving.
A. I will tell you the result of that when I come here
tomorrow.
Q. I am just going to finish. My Lord, unless your Lordship
. P-33
wants me to ----
A. Mr Rampton, if you intend to rely on that particular word,
I think you should show me the passage so I can comment on
it now, rather than just leave it hanging in mid air.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: At the moment we have not gone to the
Eichmann diaries at all, and I do not know whether we are
even going to.
MR RAMPTON: I am going to continue, my Lord, if I may, with
page 18 of the transcript, unless your Lordship would like
to see it on the screen.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: No, I think not.
A. That is certainly not the way to introduce the Eichmann
memoirs, to do it like that, just to throw one word out.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: They have not been introduced, Mr Irving. Let
us go back to page 18.
MR RAMPTON: After the statement that more women died on the
back seat of Edward Kennedy's car at Chappaquidick than
died in the gas chambers (plural) at Auschwitz, there is
some applause which did not drown out anything else you
said. You then continued: "Now" you think that is
tasteless. What about this? I am forming an association
especially dedicated to all these liars, the ones who try
and kid people that they were in these concentration
camps. It is called the Auschwitz Survivors of the
Holocaust and Other Liars Assholes", and you spell it out
for them so that they get the joke. "Cannot get more
. P-34
tasteless than that but you have got to be tasteless
because these people deserve all our contempt and in fact
they deserve the contempt of the real Jewish community and
the people, whatever their class and colour, who did
suffer." I do not know that I need to go on.
A. Yes. I got something wrong, of course.
Q. What was that?
A. The title of that association. It is the Association of
Spurious Survivors of the Holocaust, but, once again, in
the heat of the talk, I got it wrong.
Q. I am awfully sorry about that. The fact is, Mr Irving,
what you are doing here, as you were at Hagenau and on
other occasions that we have seen ----
A. Mocking the liars.
Q. Oh yes, Mr Irving, but why the applause?
A. Because I am a good speaker, Mr Rampton.
Q. What?
A. I am a good speaker.
Q. Mr Irving, Professor Funke had you bang to rights, did he
not? What you are doing is appealing to, feeding,
encouraging, the most cynical radical anti-Semitism in
your audiences, are you not?
A. Do liars not deserve to be exposed as such? If you saw
the audience as you saw them in that film, did you see any
skinheads or extremists or people wearing arm bands?
I did not. They looked like a perfectly ordinary bunch of
. P-35
middle-class Canadians.
Q. No doubt they too, Mr Irving, will spread the word, if
I may use that terminology?
A. Is that evidence or are you asking me a question?
Q. I am asking you a question. That is what you are hoping,
is it not?
A. Spread the word that there are elements of the Holocaust
story that need to be treated with scepticism, yes.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Mr Irving, an I ask you this? Of these
eyewitnesses, are you saying that they have come to
believe what they say about their experiences and that is
why they need psychiatric treatment? Or are you saying
that they are collectively telling lies, deliberate falsehoods?
A. Different people have different motives or different
reasons. There are different reasons why they tell
stories that are not true in this particular context. We
saw the witness Professor van Pelt in the video and in his
report talking of the almost mystical and religious awe in
which he holds the site of Auschwitz. I can well
understand that. It has become very central to their
existence as the Jewish people. It has become an
important part of their social awareness. It has become
very close to religion in some aspects, in my view. It
has become almost blasphemy to trample on any part of that
ground. It has become holy ground, both in the physical
. P-36
concrete sense and in the metaphysical sense. As with any
religion, there are hangers on, people who believe they
were there, people who believe they touched the cloth, if
I can put it like that. There have been an increasing
number in recent years -- Benjamin Wilkormierski is one
example Ely Wiesel is another -- who have capitalized on,
or instrumentalized, the Holocaust. Now, I am not a
psychologist, I am not a psychiatrist, but I have looked
into some of the learned psychiatric texts that have been
written about this phenomenon of the man who believes he
is a survivor, the man who has been through a traumatic
experience and either puts himself in the middle of an
experience that he was on the periphery of, or who puts
himself into an experience when he was not there at all.
That is what the reference to the psychiatric problem is
in this. It is put admittedly in the most tasteless
possible way. Nobody can accuse me of not having been
tasteless, and I probably deserve to be horse whipped for
it, but the fact is that I am dealing here with a serious
problem concerning the eyewitness accounts from Auschwitz.
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.