Archive/File: people/i/irving.david/libel.suit/transcripts/day028.03 Last-Modified: 2000/07/25 . P-19 MR IRVING: Precisely. Your Lordship has made exactly the point I was hoping that the witness would make. Photograph 16, is that the Lowebrau Bierhall in Munich? A. I do not know, maybe. Q. Obviously dressed up for some kind of function, listening to me speak? A. Where is it? When is it? Q. In Munich. A. When is it? Q. Probably about 1984, thereabouts, 1989. That again is the kind of audience -- they do not look particularly extreme or violent? A. In '94 you were in Germany? Q. No, '84. No. 17, there is a meeting to which you refer. Is it not a demonstration, photograph No. 17? A. Yes. Q. German historians, liars and cowards? A. Who is the left person? Q. That is Mr Pedro Varela. Do you recognise him? A. OK. Q. Yes. Does he look like a violent person or extreme? MR JUSTICE GRAY: Well, again.... MR IRVING: The point is it is difficult to judge by appearances. I mean, I might be violent or extreme. The point I am trying to make, witness, and would you agree with, is, it is difficult to tell when you look at an . P-20 audience who the people are? We do not know who is in this court room, we might have John George Hague, the acid bath murderer. He might be one of these members of the public or someone like that and we do not know, do we? MR JUSTICE GRAY: Mr Irving, the case against you is not that these people look like extremists, but that they have a track record of extremism and that you associated with them. So I do not think we want to spend terribly long on their physical appearance. MR IRVING: Yes. But unless I am mistaken also the case against me is in part that these extremist organisations that I have been addressing, you would have expected all the trappings, "bovva boots", skinheads and flags -- MR JUSTICE GRAY: I follow that point. MR IRVING: And the rest of it. These, on the face of it, these meetings appear to be respectable, middle-class, rather boring lectures. (To the Witness) Now I would like to return to your report, please, page 39. A. Just a second. Q. You refer to the NPD, can I ask you the simple question; is the NPD illegal or banned? A. Just a second. What page? Q. Page 39 of your report. A. So be it. Q. Is the NPD -- it is a political party in Germany, is it . P-21 not? A. Yes. Q. Is it illegal or banned? A. It is not banned. Q. So there is no reason why one should not address if one was invited to a function organized by NPD, or is there? A. I stated yesterday it is formally not legal, but it is perceived by the social sciences, as well as by the official institutions as a hardcore, right-wing extremist. Q. Yes, well, we know how much weight we have attach to that, I think. A. No, we are different on that. Q. Yes, but the left wing -- MR JUSTICE GRAY: Well, do not argue about it, we have the evidence. MR IRVING: You mention Franz Schonhuber, I am not going to dwell upon him, but he was a popular Bavarian television host? A. Yes. Q. Which is how I first came to know him. I was on his show, is that correct? A. I did not -- Q. So that is how I first came to know him. Lower down that page you refer to a man at 4.1.3, a man, Gottfried Kussel, do you have any evidence at all that I have any kind of contacts with Mr Kussel? . P-22 A. -- you were at the same demonstration, for example. Q. Being in the same room, that kind of thing? A. I alluded to that, that that is different and the Halle demonstration, he was at the top of this demonstration and that shows something for this kind of demonstration. It is not like a, you know, anarchist way, they are this and they are the others, he was at the top of the demonstration. Q. You mean at the front -- A. He represented, at the head of it, yes, and he represented the new leadership of the Kuhnen connection where you spoke to. Q. -- yes. A. To whom you spoke. Q. I do not want to interrupt you, but we certainly do not want to view that video again unless his Lordship orders, but you are not suggesting in any of those shots showing Mr Kussel I was also visible? A. The shots we did not see shows the hotel hall in the longer version and I saw it several times, and there the people went out and in, and you were asked you if you would -- so far as I recall, but we have to see it then again, if you will also meet Kussel and you said something I cannot recall. So it was -- you were aware somehow, and you drove to Halle I think three hours or more from Hamburg with Uschi or Ursula Worch, one of the leaders of . P-23 this Kuhnen connection at that time, so you may have known, and if not it seems, for me at least, you are responsible not to whom you speak to. Q. So to boil down what you are saying, what you are saying is I was in the same large city as Kussel and that he was at the head of the demonstration on shots of film we have seen but I am not in those shots and that you say there are other shots of film -- are you saying that I am together with him in those shots of film? A. I do not know. But you were together at the meeting, he -- if we go very carefully through the video again I think you will see him at the spot where you spoke. So you cannot deny, you cannot deny that this is a Kussel/Kuhnen connection, demonstration to whom you spoke. This is a clear cut case. You know it. Q. Now you are bringing in Michael Kuhnen. We have already established that I have no contact whatsoever with Michael Kuhnen -- A. It does not matter, we refer -- we agreed even to call these groups "the Kuhnen crew" or "the Kuhnen connection", we can also say "Sinnungsgemeinschaft". So I know what I am speaking about. These groups at that very meeting at 9th November '91 met. These were clear cut neo-Nazi groups organized by Christian Worch, by Uschi Worch and you were invited by Uschi Worch the other day in the evening, according to a diary, to meet this demonstration . P-24 and to talk to them. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, this is getting a bit repetitive, if I may say so, I have the evidence about Kussel. I think he can move on now. MR IRVING: Yes. Footnote 117 on that page, 39, we find Deckert, how many meetings do you think that the schoolteacher, Dr Deckert, organized for me as chairman? A. -- I do not know, you know better. Q. Two meetings; is that right? A. Yes. Q. One in Stuttgart and one in Weinhart? A. Could be, yes. Q. Both reputable bodies? A. Excuse me? Q. Both reputable bodies, the one in Stuttgart was to a veterans association, the one in Weinheim was to some other little splinter group? A. I do not know, you know better. But I know what you spoke to and who Deckert is, and for the Lordship I just want to remind you that this is very famous and influential member of the NPD at that time, and got a bit later the leadership of this same NPD, and in which in that time the NPD radicalized with respect to hardcore revisionism, and with respect, and this is even for my assessment more important, radicalized in organizing these groupings we are talking -- we talk just a minute -- we talked just a . P-25 minute about -- no, we talked about just a minute ago, for example, in Halle. Q. Yes. A. These groupings came after they were banned in '92, '93, '94, '95, all the more to this NPD organized and led by this Deckert, so a you have good friend. Q. You are talking '92, '93, '94, it is getting rather vague now, because from '93 onwards I was never in Germany? A. Oh, no, I can be very precise. I said bans were sent to these groups from '92 onwards. Q. Can I make it very simple for you -- A. You were there, or you could go into the country, and you did up to the end of '93. Q. -- 9th November 1993. Let me make simple for you, Dr Funke, and ask outright, do you know of any occasion when I addressed a meeting to an organization which was at that time illegal or banned in Germany? A. So far I know you do not address a meeting that was banned -- of a group that was banned at that time. Q. Thank you. A. That was not my point at all. Q. You say you have seen the correspondence between myself and Gunther Deckert who is one of names on the list? A. Yes. Q. Your footnote on page 39. A. Yes, OK. . P-26 Q. Was there anything extremist about that correspondence? A. We go into the correspondence. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Well, if we must, yes, but -- MR IRVING: Can I ask you if there was any anti-Semitism expressed in that correspondence? A. I have to go into -- you know, piece by piece and then we can decide. MR JUSTICE GRAY: RWE 2, tab 8. A. 2, tab 8, excuse me, I am not familiar with this (Pause). MR JUSTICE GRAY: I am sorry, did I tell you the wrong one, it is my fault, maybe it is 9, RWE tab 9. MR IRVING: I am not sure this is the right way to do this, my Lord. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Well, this is not really your fault. I think this is not going to be a productive exercise. If you do not object, Mr Irving, do you mind me asking Mr Rampton, he may not be able to help off the top of his head, but is there anything you particularly rely on in the Deckert correspondence as being extremist? I have looked through the index and there does not appear to be anything. MR RAMPTON: Not as being explicitly extremist, no. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Otherwise, we will spend half an hour trawling through for no purpose. MR RAMPTON: I quite agree. If I should find something -- MR JUSTICE GRAY: You can re-examine. MR RAMPTON: Then I shall include it in some submissions later. . P-27 MR JUSTICE GRAY: Or re-examination. MR IRVING: Let me ask, Dr Funke -- A. Just a second, can I just go through 30 seconds more? MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, if you find some extremist references. MR IRVING: That will be very helpful. MR RAMPTON: I would not expect to find it in the correspondence anyway. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Nor would I , which is why I wonder what the purpose of this is. A. -- oh, yes. MR RAMPTON: I would, would I? A. Yes, you would, I have one, but I want to use my 20 seconds. MR JUSTICE GRAY: You might extend that briefly. A. I am not -- I refer to the following, it is II, it is at the beginning of No. One, tape 8, and the second page, 12th May '91, right. Do you have it? II. Q. Yes. A. There in the middle it is stated, but I have to check what are the references, the audio cassette and what have you, "in three/four years, at the latest, these legends will no longer hold water the legend will be over and then the tables will be turned and the whole" and so forth drowned out in past. This statement, if this is included in what you referring to here, we have to go to the sentence before and after, so far I see it can be referring to the . P-28 Holocaust thing. If so, then of course it fits in my perception of what is extremist. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Thank you very much. MR IRVING: He organized a meeting for me in Weinheim on September 3rd 1990, did he not, nearly ten years ago now; is that right? A. Yes, it is the time that is of interest. Q. Yes, he has been in prison for seven years for being chairman of that meeting, has he not? A. I do not think so, seven years, but -- Q. He is still in prison now? A. -- but several times, for a quite lot of time, right. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes. MR IRVING: Paragraph -- do you approve of the imprisonment of people for chairing meetings where historians speak? MR JUSTICE GRAY: Well, I do not think that is helpful. MR IRVING: Paragraph 4.2.6 on page 42, you mention -- A. OK, just a second I have to, it is not so wide this space. 42, you say? Q. -- page 42, paragraph 44.2.6. A. Yes. Q. You mention Worch, Christian Worch and his wife Uschi? A. Yes.
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor