Archive/File: people/i/irving.david/libel.suit/transcripts/day004.15
Last-Modified: 2000/08/01
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Anyway we have got the ----
A. Well, Mr Rampton keeps on coming back to it like a dog
that keeps on digging up an old bone.
Q. --- question and the answer.
Mr Irving, to learn how to read Himmler's handwriting last
night or whenever it was, Friday maybe, which you already
knew. Now I want to turn aside or I want to go into the
future, rather. Can you have your Hitler's War book of
1991, please?
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Which part?
MR RAMPTON: Part 2, my Lord. Please turn to page 464. My
Lord, I had better read from the beginning of where the
text comes out of quotation.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Right.
MR RAMPTON: "Given his table company", that is Hitler's table
company, "Himmler, Lammas and Colonel Hanzeitzer on this
occasion, this is surely a significant private discourse
by the Fuhrer"?
A. Would it not be more to point to read the paragraph?
Q. I am not really going to ask you about that, but I will if
you want me to?
A. Please do.
. P-133
Q. On January 25th, we are in 1942, are we not? It starts at
the bottom of 463, my Lord.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Are you going to be discussing the Roman Jews
at this point?
MR RAMPTON: No.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: I really do not think, Mr Irving, it is going
to be relevant. We will obviously read anything that you
think is relevant but I do not think ----
A. Well, it is just a passage that is incompatible with the
notion that Adolf Hitler was simultaneously giving orders
for the liquidation of Jews.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: All right, well, let us have it. I was
trying to save time.
MR RAMPTON: We are going to have to come back to it.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Of course.
MR RAMPTON: Because again it is, what shall we say, to put it
neutrally at the moment, it is another crass error
by Mr Irving ----
A. Another.
Q. --- so we say. "Hitler reflected out loud: 'If I extract
the Jews today, our citizens get uneasy, what is happening
to him then, but did these same people care one hoot what
happened to the Germans", in italics, "who had to
emigrate. We've got to get it over fast. It is no better
to pull out a tooth a bit at a time over three months.
Once it is out, the agony is over. The Jews have got to
. P-134
get out of Europe, otherwise we'll never reach a European
consensus. He is the worst troublemaker everywhere and
really aren't I, in fact, terrifically humane? During the
... ceremony in Rome the Jews were maltreated. Up to
1830 they hounded eight Jews through the city on asses
every year. All I say is he has got to get out. If he
drops ... in the process, I can't help it. I do see one
thing, however, their total elimination, absolute
ausrotung, if they won't leave willingly.
"Given his table company, Himmler, Lammas and
Colonel Hanzeitzer on this occasion, this is surely a
significant private discourse by the Fuhrer. On January
27th, he repeated the same arguments over dinner to a
different audience, 'The Jews have got to get out of
Europe. The best thing would be for them to go to Russia.
I have no sympathy with the Jews'
"Three days later speaking in the Berlin Sport
Palaste he reminded his audience of his prophetic warning
to the world's Jews in 1939.
"Early in March 1942, Heydrich held a second
interministerial conference to examine the awkward problem
posed by half and quarter Jews. If allowed to remain,
they might, perhaps, be sterilised. The top level
opinion, i.e. Hitler, is quoted to the effect that they
must draw a sharp distinction between Jews and non- Jews as
it would not be acceptable for a mini race of semi Jews to
. P-135
be perpetuated in law. This classification process would
call for a colossal administrative effort, so the idea was
shelved. A subsequent memorandum in Reichjustice ministry
file cited this highly significant statement by Hans
Lammas headed 'The Reich Chancellory', 'The Fuhrer has
repeatedly stated that he wants ... (reading to the words)
... After the war they might be allocated a remote
territory like Madagascar as a national home."
Much of that, Mr Irving, we are going to come
back to later on. This is the bit. I read that by way of
chronological introduction:
"Dr Goebbels, agitating from Berlin, clearly
hoped for a more speedy and ruthless solution although he
held his tongue when meeting his Fuhrer. On March 19th he
quoted in his diary only this remark by Hitler: 'The Jews
must get out of Europe. If need be, we must resort to the
most brutal methods'. That Goebbels privately knew more
is plain from his diary entry on 27th. 'Beginning with
Lublin', he recorded, 'The Jews are being pushed out
eastwards from the General Government. A barbaric and
indescribable method is being employed here and there is
not much left of the Jews themselves. By and large, you
can probably conclude that 60 per cent of them have to be
liquidated while only 40 per cent can be put to work."
"Dr Goebbels recorded further that ... (reading
to the words) ... And the cycle started over again. 'The
. P-136
Jews have nothing to laugh about now' commented Goebbels,
but he evidently, never discussed these realities with
Hitler. Thus, this two-faced minister dictated after a
further visit to Hitler on April 26th: 'I have once again
talked over the Jewish question with the Fuhrer. His
position on this problem is merciless. He wants to force
the Jews right out of Europe. At this moment Himmler is
handing the major transfer of Jews from the German cities
into the eastern gettoes."
Now, you cited two Goebbels' entries there in
part, and you make it clear that it is only in part. The
first question, for the entry of 27th March 1942, had you
read the whole of the entry?
A. I did, and I read it not only in the original paper
diaries in the Hoover Library in California where that
particular page is now kept, the original, I also read
it
on microfilm in the American national archive's
version
that was microfilmed in 1947 because, obviously, this
was
a very contentious entry and a lot of right wing
radicals
tried to make out that this was a fake entry in some
way,
and that the CIA or the OSS or someone had dumped it,
had
inserted it into the Goebbels' diaries. When I went
to
Moscow, that was one of the first plates I looked for,
just to complete the circle of evidence that it was a
genuine entry. So I read it many times.
Q. You have, so you have read the whole of that entry?
. P-137
A. Yes, indeed.
Q. Well, then could I ask that Mr Irving be given ----
A. Of course there is much more to than that.
Q. Yes. Can I ask Mr Irving be given Professor Evans'
report, please?
MR JUSTICE GRAY: You may already have it. I think it is
coming up from behind.
MR RAMPTON: What about the entry of 26th April?
A. You want me to find a particular page in the report
first.
MR JUSTICE GRAY: No, I think Mr Rampton wants to know
whether
you have read it?
A. Yes, of course. I read that one on microfilm because
I have the entire diaries that were then available on
microfilm since 1970 about, my Lord.
MR RAMPTON: I am going to ask you if you will to look at
the
translation (and the German is set out there too) at
page
400 of Professor Evans' report?
A. Are we going to challenge my translation or just the
content?
Q. No, do not leap ahead, Mr Irving.
A. I need to know what I am looking at.
Q. You fall at the fences if you do that. Could you just
read to yourself, either way round, it matters not to
me,
first of all or second of all, the English and the
German
to yourself. I want you to say whether you think the
translation is a fair one.
. P-138
A. In other words, the translation?
Q. I am sure you know the German very well, but I would
like
you to see whether you agree or not that Professor
Evans'
translation is a fair one, then we can all get on with
the
words.
A. Well, let us assume that it is a fair translation. If
I
----
MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, that may save time in the end,
I suspect, because you are going to come to particular
passages.
MR RAMPTON: Yes, I do not want to ask questions about a
passage in English which the witness may dispute.
That is
all. Your quotation if you still have it open on page
464 ----
A. Yes.
Q. --- stops, I think, well, as a direct quote it stops,
first of all, in the penultimate line of page 464 as a
direct quotation?
A. Yes.
Q. Then you go on to report the next sentence in
Goebbels'
text?
A. Yes.
Q. Carefully and unobtrusively you say Professor Evans
that
does not work too conspicuously?
A. Yes.
Q. I do not think you have got any of the rest of it?
. P-139
A. It is pure Goebbels' waffle, yes.
Q. What?
A. If you have the read Goebbels' diaries, you know he
waffles endlessly. He is dictating to a diligent
manservant who takes down everything he dictates. He
waffles. If he was writing this in handwriting, he
would
have done it in half the length. It is the old
Goebbels'
gramophone record that he is putting on again.
Q. There is a reference, if you can go back, please, to
Professor Evans' version, again to the Reichstag
prophecy,
is there not?
A. Yes.
Q. And he says "that prophecy is beginning to realize
itself
in the most terrible manner"?
A. Yes.
Q. "And must not allow any sentimentalities to rule in
these
matters. If we did not defend ourselves against them,
the
Jews would annihilate us. It is a struggle for life
and
death between the areas and race and the Jewish
bacillus"?
A. Yes.
Q. Now, "the Jewish bascillus" was not Goebbels' ugly
concept
but Hitler's, was it not?
A. That is correct. Hitler repeatedly, particularly in
1941
onwards, started talking about the Jewish bacillus.
Q. He did indeed.
. P-140
A. Which I quoted in my book, of course.
Q. He talked about eliminating the Jewish bacillus on a
number of occasions?
A. Yes, or "combating" the bacillus rather than
"eliminating"
it.
Q. What? Sometimes he uses the word "eliminierum" which
I
suppose means "eliminate". "No other government and
no
other regime could muster the strength for a general
solution of the question. Here too the Fuhrer is the
persistent and the word is "Vorkampfer"?
A. "Pioneer", yes.
Q. Pioneer?
MR JUSTICE GRAY: That is "protagonist" really, is it not?
A. Even better.
MR RAMPTON: "Protagonist"?
A. And it would be an accurate, a deliberate, 100 per
cent --
excellent.
Q. And "Wortfuhrer", is that a spokesman?
A. "Champion".
Q. A "champion", yes, stronger than "spokesman" of a
radical
solution of the question -- sorry, "of a radical
solution
which is demanded by the way things are and thus
appears
to be unavoidable". You never in this book, or the
previous edition of this book, make any reference to
that
statement by Goebbels about Hitler's position in this
general solution, do you?
. P-141
A. This is Goebbels reporting Hitler's position.
Q. It is indeed.
A. Yes, but does it really advance our sum knowledge of what
Hitler's position was?
Q. Indeed it does, indeed it does, Mr Irving. It at least,
one might put it like this, might lead one to be a bit
cautious, might it not, about saying that Goebbels kept
the ghastly truth from his leader, Adolf Hitler?
A. Well, I have a reason for saying that.
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.