Archive/File: people/i/irving.david/libel.suit/transcripts/day028.17 Last-Modified: 2000/07/25 Q. And tell me whether you think, or perhaps with the help of the interpreter, tell me whether you think that that is a fair -- what the English says is a fair version of what the German says. THE INTERPRETER: We are just comparing the two. MR RAMPTON: Yes, please. THE INTERPRETER: I would say it should be added "they are all nothing but dummies". Q. Nothing but? A. Yes, it is not translated literally. MR IRVING: All just dummies. MR RAMPTON: Just dummies? A. And the things -- Q. All just dummies? A. -- yes, the things in Auschwitz and probably you also in Mydanik Treblinka and in the other death camps. Q. Yes, extermination camps? A. So-called. Q. So-called? A. In the East, all just dummies. Q. Mock ups, fakes, dummies. Thank you very much. Then we go back to page 61, if we may, paragraph . P-157 5.3.7, in his report on Irving's court appearance Philip wrote: In his statement the researcher of contemporary history, Irving, when into the Leuchter report and reaffirmed his view according to which it was not possible to there to have been gas chambers for killing people in Auschwitz, Birkenhau or Mydarnik". Mr Irving was invited by the judge to challenge that statement, the question he did not. The question I have of you, have you any reason to doubt that that is an accurate report of what Mr Irving said? A. I have no question about that. MR IRVING: My Lord, your Lordship's invitation did not refer to that statement, it was to another one. MR RAMPTON: Could the witness please be given file K3. MR IRVING: My Lord, is it accepted that was not a statement that was challenged? MR RAMPTON: I do not know. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Well, we certainly looked at that, and to be honest I actually cannot remember. MR RAMPTON: No, I cannot either, but that was my note. MR IRVING: I do not want it to go in the transcript that I allowed that -- specifically allowed -- MR RAMPTON: Well, we can see from the transcript whether it was or it was not. MR JUSTICE GRAY: The transcript will tell us what has happened anyway. . P-158 MR IRVING: There is a difference between my, for various reasons not having wanted to slow up the cross-examination, picking on paragraph after paragraph, and specifically to declining an invitation to comment on a paragraph. MR RAMPTON: Does your Lordship have K3 in court? MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, I do. MR RAMPTON: Tab 12, please. A. Thank you. Yes. Q. If you look at the beginning of tab 12, this is an interview in English between somebody called Roley Levin. A. Right. Q. And Mr Irving, unedited this interview, so we need not worry about that, dated 28th November '91, and Mr Levin starts off by saying: You made a very powerful speech tonight, what is the message you are trying to get across? I am sorry, what is the message you are trying to get across to an audience of Germans like this". So it looks as though, does it not, it is a reference to some speech that has been made in Germany. Do you happen to know which speech it was that it is referring to at this date? I could not trace it in the -- A. No. Q. -- in the material I have got. MR IRVING: Could I have a copy of this while we are doing this? . P-159 MR JUSTICE GRAY: Have you not got K3? You have not brought it with you. MR RAMPTON: Certainly, you should have that. MR IRVING: What is the reference again? MR JUSTICE GRAY: K3, tab 12. It is a television programme, is it, that is the date of the television programme? MR RAMPTON: That is the date of the interview perhaps or television programme, but what Miss Rogers is suggesting, I bet she is right, the film crew apparently followed Mr Irving round during the Halle period, which was on the 9th, and probably did an interview with him that same day. MR JUSTICE GRAY: The problem with that is the speech was not -- MR RAMPTON: (Pause while counsel confer) She knows far more than I do. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Halle was in the middle of the day, was it not. MR RAMPTON: Yes, that is right, and apparently his speech was on 6th and 7th November as well. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Right, well, it may not matter anyway. MR RAMPTON: It may not matter very much, but what I am anxious to ---- THE WITNESS: The NPD meeting in Hamburg of the 7th November? Q. Yes, that is right, that is it? A. Maybe that is it. Q. All I am anxious to establish is that this is a reference . P-160 to what Mr Irving said in Germany, which apparently it is, now can you turn to page 5, you will find that in small print at the top right hand corner of the page. A. Yes. Q. I will start, if I may, with the second quote from Mr Levin it is: One of your themes when you talk to an audience like this is that the Holocaust never happened, that the gas chambers were a fiction. Can we pause there. Assuming that records the theme, or one of the themes that Mr Irving dealt with on this occasion in Hamburg, do you have any knowledge of the content of that speech beyond what we find in this interview? A. No. Q. Right. Irving: Well, those are two separate things. I mean by the Holocaust, do you mean the gas chambers? If by the Holocaust, which is this rather unpleasant kind of Madison Avenue image that the Jewish community have developed, the Holocaust with a capital H, you imagine that you are going to see the letter R after it as kind registered trademark. I am not allowed to use the word Holocaust in my books to describe any other tragedy. Now my editors say, no, that is reserved for what happened to the Jews. Levin: But you told your audience tonight that the gas chambers [plural], were a fiction: Irving: Oh, yes, the gas chambers are a very . P-161 clear piece of propaganda, that we British very cunningly, cunningly cannived at and contrived during World War II and that is my considered opinion as a British historian and I think in two, two or three years people will accept you I am right again. Levin: The idea of the gas chambers was invented by the British during the war, and then the so-called gas chambers at -- again he uses the plural that perhaps not his fault at Auschwitz were built by the Poles after the war in order to deceive people. MR IRVING: Can you read the next paragraph, please. MR RAMPTON: I am going to read the next three paragraphs, actually: "Certainly the gas chamber [single] that is shown to tourists in Poland now in Auschwitz is built by the Polish government after the war and the director of the Auschwitz museum and director of Auschwitz museum archives, Dr Piegel (?), has admitted this in private talks with other historians that it is in fact a fake." I am not sure that quite fair on Dr Piegel. MR IRVING: Just leave it as it is without any interspersed remarks. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Quite right. MR RAMPTON: "Levin: It is important to you to get across to a German audience like this that people are told lies about the gas chambers [plural] or they never really happened. I prefer, says David Irving, I prefer the word legends. . P-162 In fact, it is in fact a lie. Propaganda is basically lying. What is is now going around is not a lie, it is a legend. There is a difference. A legend is something that people, innocent and ordinary people believe and in turn retell to other innocent and ordinary people." Professor Funke, are you aware of any evidence that the whole gas chamber story, the gas chambers, plural, were nothing more then a clever piece of propaganda that the British invented? A. There is no evidence for that. MR IRVING: Can he be asked if he is aware of any evidence that what is shown to the tourists is a fake or reconstruction? MR RAMPTON: That is common ground, Mr Irving, we all know that it is a reconstruction, the Stammlager gas chamber at Auschwitz, that never been in contention. MR IRVING: Never been in contention? MR JUSTICE GRAY: Never been in contention, the only only question is whether -- MR RAMPTON: If Mr Irving had read Professor van Pelt's report properly he would have understood that it was never in contention -- MR IRVING: My Lord, I was fined $20,000 for saying that, that is the contention in my book. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Honestly, I attach no importance, I am afraid, it must be painful for you, but it is not relevant . P-163 to my task that you were fined, and I know perfectly well what was constructed at Auschwitz, and, personally, as I have told you before, and I will say it again, I see nothing remotely objectionable. But to say that they are all dummies seems to me to be different matter altogther. MR RAMPTON: Yes and all invention of British propaganda, that is what Mr Rampton -- MR IRVING: I am answering in terms here, one gas chamber - - MR JUSTICE GRAY: You can make that comment later on, this is re-examination, so do not -- MR IRVING: If I can comment later on. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, please. MR RAMPTON: Now one of the things that you were cross-examined about, Professor Funke, is to be found at page 69 of your report. Again, I do not remember offhand whether or not this was challenged, in paragraph 5.3.27. A. Just a second. Q. So sorry, you will need to keep that file K3 for just a moment. We need page 69 of your report. A. Yes I have both. Yes. Q. Before you go to the indented quotation there is some German in square brackets (German spoken); yes? A. Yes. Q. Above that you it is translated at: "The letter was headed with a quote from Irving, hundreds of millions of honest, intelligent people are being duped by extremely . P-164 financially strong and brilliantly made postwar propaganda". Can you turn, please, back to tab 5 of K3 and to page 20, I think it is. A. K3? Q. Yes. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Same blue file. MR RAMPTON: K3 tab 5, it is the speech in Moers and this time it is in English? A. Yes, just a second. Q. Tab 5, page 20, the bottom of the page. Bearing in mind as you look at this what we just read in your report on page 69, which you attributed Mr Irving, we see this, and this is Mr Irving speaking, this is his speech at Moers on 9th March 1990. A. Yes. Q. In the middle of the page there is a line which begins "and this Holocaust religion"; do you see that? A. Yes. Q. He says this: "In this Holocaust religion is gaining credence in the meantime, has hundreds of millions of credible and decent people, millions of Jews amongst them, firmly believing that 6 million of their co-religionists were murdered and no one is asking them the important question: How come there are so many millions of Jews again if so many millions of them are exterminated? No . P-165 one asks themselves that question because you simply do not question a religion, it is a sort of blasphemy." Do you see any resonance or similarity between what Mr Irving there said and what he said in the middle of page 69 of your report? A. Oh, yes. It is a kind of attacking what he calls a legend, or what he may call also a lie, that became a religion, so-called religion, of millions of honest people. So it is a kind of way of thinking that because he says the essence of the Holocaust is a lie, and the people do not believe that it is a lie, but it is the truth, this truth is a religion. Q. The whole story? A. The whole story. Q. The whole story -- A. The whole history of the Holocaust is a religion. They believe in, although it is not true in the essence, and this goes with a lot of -- and to say this is a kind of blasphemy is, of course, a very cynical reference, cynical sentence to those who really survived, and still are living, and, of course, to those who died by this mass killings.
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor