Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!news.gmi.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news From: email@example.com (Matt Giwer) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: A question about the tone of language in this group... (was Re: Baron exp... Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 07:37:25 GMT Organization: images incarnate Lines: 20 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References:
<email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: tam-fl4-05.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Jul 14 2:39:16 AM CDT 1996 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 On 14 Jul 1996 04:12:29 GMT, EEGG87A@prodigy.com (A Huber) wrote: >> >>Furthermore, Mr. Giwer has made dozens, if not hundreds, of claims >>thus far, and has never provided a single shred of supporting data >>when asked nicely by participants in this group. >This is a REVISIONIST Newsgroup. j*ws are not "participants", but >rather spammers and flamers. Why should anyone waste the time to provide >a j*w with supporting data? The group is for discussion amongst persons >holding similar views. The sooner the revisionists understand this, the >higher will be the quality of discourse. Well stated. Holohuggers are not welcome here. They are here only to disrupt the purpose of the NG and should receive complaints to their IPS for their existance here.
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor