Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!news.gmi.edu!news.sojourn.com!newsfeed.concentric.net!news.texas.net!cdc2.cdc.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!netnews.worldnet.att.net!ix.netcom.com!news From: firstname.lastname@example.org Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: An honest doubt-of-the-day Date: Mon, 01 Jul 1996 07:24:38 GMT Organization: images incarnate Lines: 60 Message-ID: <email@example.com> References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: tam-fl1-10.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Mon Jul 01 2:27:52 AM CDT 1996 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 email@example.com (Hilary Ostrov) wrote: >In <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com (DvdThomas) >wrote: >>Hilary Ostrov writes: >>>In any event, since you seem to have dismissed the vast body of >>>testimony and other evidence available, please do tell us what might >>>constitute "more convincing proofs" or "revisions" for your >>>doubt-of-the-day, Mr. Ehrlich. >>"and other evidence available"? Perhaps you could share this information. >> My personal doubt of this day is the likelihood of your being able to >>come up with anything beyond the testimony. This relates specifically to >>homicidal gassings. >Certainly, Mr. Thomas. >http://www.nizkor.eye.net/features/qar/ >And if you happen to be speaking to Mr. Ehrlich you might just mention >to him that I'm anxiously awaiting his response to my post, including >the bulk of it which provides some context for the paragraph you quote >and which I notice you have deleted - without so noting. >hro >======================= >Hilary Ostrov >e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org >http://haven.uniserve.com/~hostrov/ >Co-Webmaster - The Nizkor Project http://www.almanac.bc.ca/ If there was ever a personification of the "simpering bitch" reference this person is it. ======== Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: One man's opinion From: email@example.com (Matt Giwer) Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 21:13:10 GMT "The Nuremberg Trials ... had been popular throughout the world and particularly in the United States. Equally popular was the sentence already announced by the high tribunal: death. But what kind of trial was this? ...The Constitution was not a collection of loosely given political promises subject to broad interpretation. It was not a list of pleasing platitudes to be set lightly aside when expediency required it. It was the foundation of the American system of law and justice and [Robert Taft] was repelled by the picture of his country discarding those Constitutional precepts in order to punish a vanquished enemy." -- U.S. President, John F. Kennedy John Kennedy, Profiles in Courage (New York: Harper and Row, 1964), p.189-190. Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!news.gmi.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Matt Giwer) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Rampant Irony Deficiency Alert Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 09:56:06 GMT Organization: images incarnate Lines: 35 Message-ID: <email@example.com> References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
<email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: tam-fl5-13.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Jul 10 2:57:33 AM PDT 1996 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 On 9 Jul 1996 16:41:49 GMT, email@example.com (william c anderson) wrote: >Matt Giwer (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote: >: On Mon, 08 Jul 1996 06:58:59 -0400, email@example.com wrote: >: >In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com wrote: >: >> >: >> Nice try, fatbroad. >: >: >Mr. Giwer continues to show respect for those with differing opinions. >: >: What is your problem, Schwartze? >: >: Are you as fat as she is? >Mr. Giwer continues to demonstrate his devotion to rational, invective- >free argument. That is the way it goes. You have a bitch hiding behind female immunity and men like you trying to earn points to screw her should you be in her part of the world. This is really very transparent. We live in a sex neutral world. Sorry about that. Grow up and learn what is going on.
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor