From cswiger@westco.net Thu Dec 26 10:07:52 PST 1996 Article: 93004 of soc.culture.german Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news-out.internetmci.com!metro.atlanta.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-10.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-chi-8.sprintlink.net!news.dmsc.net!usenet From: cswiger@westco.net (Cliff Swiger) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,comp.org.eff.talk,nl.scientology,soc.culture.german,alt.gif-agreement Subject: Re: The Final Solution or just another whining Nazi? Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 02:23:27 GMT Organization: Donna Marie Software & Consulting, Inc. Lines: 79 Distribution: inet Message-ID: <32c1c97d.357702831@news.dmsc.net> References: <199612200104.RAA14620@mailmasher.com> <32bd757c.7408284@193.12.69.3><01bbf0ae$45ef3160$22b0f1ce@cswiger> <59nu11$1j1u$1@news.gate.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.241.176.22 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.religion.scientology:221969 comp.org.eff.talk:72724 soc.culture.german:93004 alt.gif-agreement:1526 Rev. Gypsy: >Ah but wasn't Germany originally a part of the Holy Roman Empire and a >vassal of the Roman Empire before that? Or even before that it was shared >by a group of rather nasty smelling tribes. How far back are we gonna go >in this ridiculous claim of who owned what? This is a worthwhile point you've made here. Certainly the argument could go on and on. But, the Treaty of Versailles created a division between the German people in an area known as the Polish Corridor. Adolf Hitler simply wanted to reunite the German people in that region with the Third Reich which is what they desired. His conquest was not one of wealth, minerals, etc. It was for the unification of German people as defined by the NSDAP. CS>: And wasn't that CS>: area inhabited by ethnic Germans? >And your point is? Britain was originally an area inhabited by Celts, but >I doubt that you'd say that this entitles the Celts to rule the isles with >an iron hand for a thousand years (but then, knowing a pin head like you, >you probably would). Just being there does not a mandate make. You're talking about "tribal" conflicts, not racial ones. Besides, Celts include Britons and Gauls. CS>: Also, what's this about a "holocaust?" >Reality, just perhaps? But then you live in your own little private world, >then don't you? Be sure and take your medication before nodding off, >Herr Scheisskoph. Reality? I don't think so. Its a PERCEPTION. Reality tells us things like even state-of-the art crematoria take 90 minutes to cremate a corpse at temperatures hundreds of degrees hotter than those available in circa 1940. But, the PERCEPTION is that the Germans could somehow cremate bodies at ten times that rate! >So we should just ignore the testimony of thousands of eye witnesses, >including those G.I.'s (who according to you were probably all Jewish, >right?) who saw the ovens, gas chambers and emaciated bodies? Or even >those POW's from all allied nations who had the distinct misfortune of >being stuck in those same camps irrespective of their religion? "Eyewitness" testimony is just that. And, in a court of law, it is the most UNreliable. Most of the "incriminating evidence" stems from the famed "War Refugee Board Report" which is full of inconsistencies and contradictions. Not only that, the two "eyewitnesses", Verba and Wetzler, were incamped JEWS who surely didn't have any particular ax to grind now did they? There were indeed ovens at the camps. They were used to cremate the dead. And, yes, there were a lot of emaciated bodies strewn about at the end of the war. You can thank the old JEW Henry Morgenthau for that condition. When you attempt to raze a nation to the ground, with saturation bombing, you cut off a lot of supply routes. Routes which supply food and medical supplies. No one has ever stepped forward to demonstrate just how any of these gas chambers operated. And don't EVEN try to suggest that pharmacist Pressac (who I think dipped into his personal stock to excess). He has been ripped to shreds with each revision of his original. More often you get testimony like this from the Jew Eugene Aroneanu: "800 or 900 meters from the spot where the ovens are located, the prisoners climb into small wagons that run on rails. In Auschwitz, they are of different sizes, with a capacity of 10 to 15 people. As soon as it is loaded, the wagon is set in motion at full speed down the sloping corridor. At the end of the corridor is a wall: Behind it is the entrance to the oven. When the wagon strikes the wall, the wagon tilts over, and hurls its load of living human beings into the oven. It is followed by another wagon with another group, and so on." Eyewitness account indeed!! How gullible are we to be? Cliff Swiger Wahrheit Macht Frei From cswiger@westco.net Fri Dec 27 12:24:33 PST 1996 Article: 93067 of soc.culture.german Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!noc.van.hookup.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-chi-13.sprintlink.net!news.dmsc.net!usenet From: cswiger@westco.net (Cliff Swiger) Newsgroups: soc.culture.german Subject: Holocaust Nonesense Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 02:30:09 GMT Organization: Donna Marie Software & Consulting, Inc. Lines: 79 Message-ID: <32c33489.450656808@news.dmsc.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.241.176.27 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 Rev. Gypsy: >Ah but wasn't Germany originally a part of the Holy Roman Empire and a >vassal of the Roman Empire before that? Or even before that it was shared >by a group of rather nasty smelling tribes. How far back are we gonna go >in this ridiculous claim of who owned what? This is a worthwhile point you've made here. Certainly the argument could go on and on. But, the Treaty of Versailles created a division between the German people in an area known as the Polish Corridor. Adolf Hitler simply wanted to reunite the German people in that region with the Third Reich which is what they desired. His conquest was not one of wealth, minerals, etc. It was for the unification of German people as defined by the NSDAP. CS>: And wasn't that CS>: area inhabited by ethnic Germans? >And your point is? Britain was originally an area inhabited by Celts, but >I doubt that you'd say that this entitles the Celts to rule the isles with >an iron hand for a thousand years (but then, knowing a pin head like you, >you probably would). Just being there does not a mandate make. You're talking about "tribal" conflicts, not racial ones. Besides, Celts include Britons and Gauls. CS>: Also, what's this about a "holocaust?" >Reality, just perhaps? But then you live in your own little private world, >then don't you? Be sure and take your medication before nodding off, >Herr Scheisskoph. Reality? I don't think so. Its a PERCEPTION. Reality tells us things like even state-of-the art crematoria take 90 minutes to cremate a corpse at temperatures hundreds of degrees hotter than those available in circa 1940. But, the PERCEPTION is that the Germans could somehow cremate bodies at ten times that rate! >So we should just ignore the testimony of thousands of eye witnesses, >including those G.I.'s (who according to you were probably all Jewish, >right?) who saw the ovens, gas chambers and emaciated bodies? Or even >those POW's from all allied nations who had the distinct misfortune of >being stuck in those same camps irrespective of their religion? "Eyewitness" testimony is just that. And, in a court of law, it is the most UNreliable. Most of the "incriminating evidence" stems from the famed "War Refugee Board Report" which is full of inconsistencies and contradictions. Not only that, the two "eyewitnesses", Verba and Wetzler, were incamped JEWS who surely didn't have any particular ax to grind now did they? There were indeed ovens at the camps. They were used to cremate the dead. And, yes, there were a lot of emaciated bodies strewn about at the end of the war. You can thank the old JEW Henry Morgenthau for that condition. When you attempt to raze a nation to the ground, with saturation bombing, you cut off a lot of supply routes. Routes which supply food and medical supplies. No one has ever stepped forward to demonstrate just how any of these gas chambers operated. And don't EVEN try to suggest that pharmacist Pressac (who I think dipped into his personal stock to excess). He has been ripped to shreds with each revision of his original. More often you get testimony like this from the Jew Eugene Aroneanu: "800 or 900 meters from the spot where the ovens are located, the prisoners climb into small wagons that run on rails. In Auschwitz, they are of different sizes, with a capacity of 10 to 15 people. As soon as it is loaded, the wagon is set in motion at full speed down the sloping corridor. At the end of the corridor is a wall: Behind it is the entrance to the oven. When the wagon strikes the wall, the wagon tilts over, and hurls its load of living human beings into the oven. It is followed by another wagon with another group, and so on." Eyewitness account indeed!! How gullible are we to be? Cliff Swiger Wahrheit Macht Frei From cswiger@westco.net Fri Dec 27 12:24:34 PST 1996 Article: 93072 of soc.culture.german Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.mtl.hookup.net!noc.van.hookup.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!agate!howland.erols.net!feed1.news.erols.com!news.enteract.com!insync!eit.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-chi-13.sprintlink.net!news.dmsc.net!usenet From: cswiger@westco.net (Cliff Swiger) Newsgroups: soc.culture.german Subject: More Jewish Lies Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 02:22:52 GMT Organization: Donna Marie Software & Consulting, Inc. Lines: 40 Message-ID: <32c327c4.447387270@news.dmsc.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.241.176.27 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 As the Holocaust is rapidly being exposed, for the Jewish lie that it is, some might wonder just how such a seemingly well anchored edifice can come crashing down. Most Holocaust mythologists refer incessantly to the insurmountable amount of TESTIMONY. I find it appropriate to share with you some of this "testimony"; similar testimony that sent many fine, respectable German officers to prison or death. Sigismund Bendel, who claims to have belonged to the Sonderkommando at Birkenau, reports on the cremation of gassing victims beside crematorium 4: "Thick, black smoke ascends from the pits. It all happens so quickly and is so unimaginable that I think I am dreaming.......An hour later everything is back to normal. The men take the ashes out of the pits and make a pile. Another transport is brought to crematorium IV." Oh aren't those Germans efficient! Incinerating corpses in OPEN PITS, removing the ashes and making a pile all in about an hour! Telephone your local crematory and ask then how long it takes to cremate a single body. Don't even include the time necessary to pulverize the bones. You'll find out it takes about an hour and one half utilizing a gas fired chamber taht operates at many hundreds of degrees hotter than an OPEN PIT. Here's more!: Czech witness, Filip Muller, describes the incineration pits and the process near crematorium IV: "The 120-foot-long, 18-to-24-foot-wide, 7-to-8-foot-deep pits had indentations at one end to which the human fat ran off. The prisoners had to pour this fat over bodies so that they might burn more easily." Can you imagine such a design! It was this kind of absolutely absurd "testimony" that was given judicial notice at the various trials of German military personnel. Have you Germans in Germany made your reparation payments to Israel today! Cliff Swiger Wahrheit Macht Frei From cswiger@westco.net Sat Dec 28 10:21:27 PST 1996 Article: 93130 of soc.culture.german Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!noc.van.hookup.net!laslo.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-chi-13.sprintlink.net!news.dmsc.net!usenet From: cswiger@westco.net (Cliff Swiger) Newsgroups: soc.culture.german Subject: Re: More Swiger Lies Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 04:54:04 GMT Organization: Donna Marie Software & Consulting, Inc. Lines: 34 Message-ID: <32c4a7c9.545711851@news.dmsc.net> References: <32c327c4.447387270@news.dmsc.net> <5a1bmq$15s@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.241.176.25 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 Dear Mr. McVay: >What "Jewish lie" has been "exposed," Mr. Swiger? As anyone >perusing your archived material here >(ftp.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi?people/s/swiger.cliff.g) quickly >discovers, you have never been successful at defending _your_ lies >with regard to the Holocaust, let alone establishing anyone elses. Sounds as though this is merely your opinion, Mr. McVay. Actually, we who are now expounding the truth, surrounding the alleged Holocaust, have made tremendous gains. No doubt we'll continue to encounter mythologists, like yourself, who, for whatever motivation, persist in the propagation of the Holocaust lie. I've dropped into the Nizkor site and reviewed those chosen files myself. Actually, I think they're pretty good. >Burning pits were used, Mr. Swiger - get used to it. After you >have done so, you may wish to explain how the time required to >cremate a single corpse in a modern furnace has any relevance to >the Holocaust. Take your time - we'll wait. How asinine. I'm fully aware that burning pits were used to dispose of the deceased. Something had to be done to curb the typhus epidemics that were rampant at that time. Ken, did the allies not also use outdoor buring installations after their murderous attack on Dresden? And for what reason? You simply cannot leave decomposing bodies laying around for sanitary reasons. The particular spin involved here, by Holocaust mythologists, is that the instances of the Germans buring corpses in pits at the labor camps was some sort of a program of genocide. Its easy for Holocaust theorists to take a situation like this and mold it into a legendary event. Cliff Swiger Wahrheit Macht Frei From cswiger@westco.net Sat Dec 28 10:21:28 PST 1996 Article: 93133 of soc.culture.german Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!nnrp.info.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!news.sgi.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-chi-13.sprintlink.net!news.dmsc.net!usenet From: cswiger@westco.net (Cliff Swiger) Newsgroups: soc.culture.german Subject: Re: Swiger's Holocaust Nonesense Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 04:54:38 GMT Organization: Donna Marie Software & Consulting, Inc. Lines: 117 Message-ID: <32c4a7f5.545755125@news.dmsc.net> References: <32c33489.450656808@news.dmsc.net> <5a1cue$1l6@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.241.176.25 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 Hi Ken: >Hitler planned the systematic rape of Eastern Europe, and his >concept of "living space" played a large roll. Hitler was quite >clear about his plans; if you are interested in learning the truth >(Mr. Swiger's past performance suggests he is not, but there are, >after all, others here who are), you might wish to peruse >http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/imt/nca/nca-01/nca-01-09-aggression-01-07.html >as a good starting point. Look, I agree that Hitler believed in the sword making way for the plow. And, I agree with him 100%. So I don't pull any punches when it comes to my politics. We could debate forever on what is "right" and what is "wrong". I could certainly draw parallels between what is going on in Israel with the Palestinians and what Hitler wrote about in Mein Kampf. It is a pointless argument based upon one's own definition of abstracts. There is no reality in "right" and "wrong", but there is reality as to whether a "Hollywood style" Holocaust occurred. The reality is: It did not. For what its worth, I recognized the Holocaust as a myth BEFORE becoming a National Socialist. You condemn Hitler, but Theodore Herzel certainly had no reservations about his plans now did he? Sorry for the parallel. >Poor Mr. Swiger... he has yet to grasp the concepts involved, and >continues to hope that he can convince someone - anyone - that >modern single-body cremation statistics have anything at all to do >with Nazi-era crematoria statistics from places like >Auschwitz-Birkenau. The perception, Mr. Swiger, is that you are >trying a bit of tired old Nazi slight of hand. Is that what it is? "......old Nazi slight of hand" or priciples of engineering? And, it has a lot to do with the ALLEGATIONS that the German National Socialists somehow defied the laws of physics. People like you think if you torture enough individuals and get confessions, pile up reams of forged documents and have sentences handed down from kangaroo courts and star chambers you can change gravitational acceleration from 9.806 m/s2 to 25 m/s2. It just doesn't work that way, Ken. Science catches up with you in the end......And the end is near for your Holocaust fiction. >The history of the Holocaust, as Mr. Swiger knows (but would >rather you did not know) is certainly not based upon eyewitness >testimony. It is, however, based - like all historical events - >upon the convergeance of evidence. In this case, most of the >evidence has been provided by the Nazis themselves, as Mr. Swiger >most certainly knows, since he's been trying to peddle his >nonsense for some time now. German trials, Nazi documentation is >copious to the point where it is probably fair to say it may well >be another century before it has all been sifted by scholars >seeking more information. I want you read what George A. McDonough had to say about the trials in post WW2 Germany. McDonough served BOTH as a prosecutor and a defense counsel. "...........Hearsay evidence was admitted indiscriminately and sworn statements of witnesses were admissible regardless of whether anybody knew the person who made the statement or the individual who took the statement. If a prosecutor considered a statement of a witness to be more damaging than the witness' oral testimony in court he would advise the witness to go back to his home, submit the statement as evidence, and any objection by defense counsel would be promptly overruled." Certainly this is out of line with Western jurisprudence. But, I'm not here to cry about the injustices doled out at the "trials." Most everyone now knows they were a total farce and disgrace. You assert yourself with the statement that " most of the evidence has been provided by the Nazis themselves,...." Well, if judicium semper pro veritate accipitur applies in all instances, then the Puritains in early America PROVED that there were witches,..... and humans copulated with the Devil! Certainly so since the theocracy had plenty of testimony, witnesses and confessions. My appeal is to common sense. Particularly with the Germans today who have been lied to and abused by Jewish Holocaust mythologists. Wahrheit Mact Frei! >400,000 pages of captured Nazi documentation has recently come to >light in Hungary, for instance, which documents the deportation of >Hungarian Jewry... no eyewitness testimony needed, as the SS did a >fine job on their own of documenting their crimes. A peurile attempt at euphemism. How many times do we have to clobber this one into the ground, Ken? The NSDAP had every intention of "exterminating" Jewry within the the Reich. To do this it was necessary to deport Jews from German territory. But this forced deportation did not occur until World Jewry declared war on Germany. Prior to this, International Zionists collaborated with Adolf Hitler to have the Jews relocate to Palestine. You know all about this but, for your own personal motives, you won't admit it. >Mr. Swiger is, of course, invited to discuss Pressac in >alt.revisionism, which is the newsgroup he prefers to avoid... >perhaps that is because Mr. Swiger knows that his brand of >"history" has been seen there often enough to hold little >challenge - or interest - for anyone with a mind that works. Look Ken, you know full well that Pressac did a miserable disservice to your ilk. The guy has no grasp on mathematics or engineering. He tried to convince others just what mistakes Vrba and Wetzler made IN THIER OWN TESTIMONY! The guy is a total moron. I sincerely believe he dipped into his own pharmacutical stock. Nonetheless, if I want to discuss him, I'll do it wherever I choose if there are others who are interested. >Nazi account indeed!! How gullible are we to be, Mr. Swiger? Fact is Ken, the "testimony" I posted is an extreme insult to the intelligence of most everyone. Its horrendous that such a contorted fabling would actually be admitted in a court..........even a kangaroo court. What is absolutely sickening is that German military personnel were actually imprisoned or executed based upon such idiotic attestations. Cliff Swiger Wahrheit Macht Frei From cswiger@westco.net Mon Dec 30 10:00:40 PST 1996 Article: 90020 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.mtl.hookup.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!clicnet!news.clic.net!wesley.videotron.net!news-penn.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news-stock.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-11.sprintlink.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-ana-24.sprintlink.net!news.dmsc.net!usenet From: cswiger@westco.net (Cliff Swiger) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: There was no decision Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 03:54:41 GMT Organization: Donna Marie Software & Consulting, Inc. Lines: 105 Message-ID: <32c72e94.26820415@news.dmsc.net> References: <3yknoOev18mC065yn@login.dknet.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.241.176.29 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 Dkeren: >Me? Just read this group. All "revisionists" here constantly >lie through their teeth, every day. Nearly all of them are >blatant Nazis and antisemites; expressions like "kike filth", >"Jewish scum", etc, are so common here that hardly anyone >bothers to comment on them anymore. There seems to be a lot of emotion in alt.revisionism. I've posted there a time ot two (when I was subscribed to CompuServe) and received some very nasty E-mail from alt.revisionism participants. I openly admit my National Socialist position, but I always try to stay with the facts and not let my emotions get the best of me. This happened a time or two with me in the fora of CompuServe. One is much better off to simply stay with the facts. ># If revisionism really was that stupid as you are trying to ># make it, how come that the French and the German government ># and parliament fear it so much that they have taken so drastic ># steps as to have people thrown in jail for expressing ># revisionist views in public. Ole brings up an excellent point here. Even though the mannerisms of alt.revisionism aren't the most polite, there are still a lot of damaging facts being printed there. Countries like France and Germany, who have demonstrated their commitments to International Jewry, shiver at the information being exchanged there. >Nazism was stupid. You agree with this, right? But didn't it >prove to be very dangerous? Stupid is a very abstract term. I see National Socialism as a form of government that is very appealing to intellectuals. National Socialism is a very scientific oriented political ideology. National Socialism probably was/is "dangerous" to it's political rivals such as communism, democracy and Zionism. But, this can also be viewed 180 degrees. >Suppose that X is a model citizen. Never did anything bad in >his life. One day, Y, who hates X, starts publishing all >over the place that X is a child molester. It is a *stupid* >claim; he has no evidence whatsoever. But Y is still a >criminal, right? So, in principle, publishing something >stupid can be a crime - in the moral sense of the word - right? Depends on who is defining "morality." For instance, the Jewish Talmud teaches that a Jew must never testify in behalf of a non-Jew if the party in opposition be Jewish. This is perfectly moral in Jewish culture. You seem to subscribe to European values rather that Jewish. And, when we consider your last paragraph, National Socialist Germany has suffered exactly what you print here! There was no Jewish Holocaust yet many German military personnel have been imprisoned or put to death in lack of all the evidence. It was purely an example of political might............To the victors go the spoil. >Look at what "revisionism" led to. It led to, among other >things, the Nizkor project. One of the main goals of >Nizkor is Holocaust documentation, and I am proud of >having contributed to this goal. Thus, as a direct result >of "revisionism", a rather large amount of Holocaust >documentation - texts, photographs, scans of documents, >recordings - is a few mouse clicks away from millions >of people. In the past, people would have to go to a >library and search for it. No more. It's right there >on your screen. Because of "revisionism", more people >will know more about the Holocaust. No question about it. I would certainly expect to see Holocaust mythologists increase their propaganda efforts as revisionism continues to destroy the Holocaust legend. The tactic being employed by Nizkor is nothing innovative. In fact, distribution and presentation of mass disinformation is responsible for the birth of the Holocaust myth itself. Every revisoinist and revisionist sympathizer understands this. But, the jig is up. The Holocaust will eventually be understood by the world's masses to be a hoax. As a special note here, not all revisionists are National Socialists like myself. Many are simply demanding that the truth be understood as concerns the Holocaust myth. >Is "revisionism" dangerous, potentially? Well, it can >succeed only if antisemitism succeeds. It is, plain and >simple, another tool of antisemitism. But all these tools >are really the same. So, can antisemitism succeed? Of >course it can, potentially, as can other hate campaigns; >we are not a better people than we were 50 years ago. The >only thing we can say is that we are more knowledgeable. >And that is our hope. I think you're avoiding the main premise of revisionism and attempting to short-circuit that premise, (not revisionism), for personal, socio-political reasons. Revisionism seeks truth. Revisionism is NOT responsible for political actions that may occur as a result of exposing that truth. You call revisionism "another tool of antisemitism" and categorize it with "other hate campaigns" which is totally asinine and paranoid. How delicately you and other Holocaust mythologists attempt to associate the abstract "hate" with any organization or movement that is in opposition to your own. Your success here depends on whether you can shovel off your own definition of "hate" to others in the legal and political realm. Via emotion and/or fear, you are trusting that any talk or thought contrary to accepted Holocaust dogma will be considered "hateful" and, in your best case, illegal as it is in many countries. It has absolutely nothing to do with truth. Cliff Swiger Wahrheit Macht Frei From cswiger@westco.net Mon Dec 30 10:59:35 PST 1996 Article: 93224 of soc.culture.german Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!noc.van.hookup.net!laslo.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-ana-24.sprintlink.net!news.dmsc.net!usenet From: cswiger@westco.net (Cliff Swiger) Newsgroups: soc.culture.german Subject: Re: There was no decision Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 02:01:33 GMT Organization: Donna Marie Software & Consulting, Inc. Lines: 41 Message-ID: <32c71db6.22502345@news.dmsc.net> References: <6k0noOev1eb4065yn@login.dknet.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.241.176.32 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 Ole: >In article , Daniel Keren wrote: >> >>And now, you'll ask, if there was a decision to kill all Jews, >>why did some survive? The answer to that one is simple: the >>Nazis didn't have enough time to kill all of them. >Or there was simply no decision to kill them in the first place. >-- >Ole Kreiberg http://login.dknet.dk/~olk Of course there was no decision to kill them. There has NEVER been produced a document that indicates the NSDAP had any intentions of commiting genocide "Hollywood Holocaust Style" against the Jews. You can bet the NSDAP had every intention of forcibly expelling them for the Third Reich, and I don't blame them. But, even the decision to deport the Jews by force did not occur until International Jewry declared war on Germany. Prior to this it was an agreement between Zionists and the National Socialists. The Wannsee Conference is often referred to as the meeting whereby the "extermination" program was expounded upon. But, anyone who reads the document for themselves can easily understand that the NSDAP's plans amounted to nothing more than relocating Jews to the east for labor detail. There were, however, special provisions for the elderly, women and children commonly referred to as Theresienstadt. Now there is a lot of talk about the "Wannsee Protocol" which was given judicial notice in the Wilhelmstrasse Trial. Holocaust mythologists, in their folly and ignorance, assume that a court decision or recognizance of a particular document somehow validate the same. I'll leave the following information about the "Wannsee Protocol" to the readers. "The Wannsee Protocol bears no official imprint, no date, no signature, and was written with an ordinary typewriter on small sheets of paper. And, the "original" is not availble for examination. Anyone could have produced this "protocol". Cliff Swiger Wahrheit Macht Frei From cswiger@westco.net Mon Dec 30 17:16:54 PST 1996 Article: 90041 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!noc.van.hookup.net!nic.mtl.hookup.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!clicnet!news.clic.net!wesley.videotron.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pen-14.sprintlink.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-chi-13.sprintlink.net!news.dmsc.net!usenet From: cswiger@westco.net (Cliff Swiger) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Swiger's Holocaust Nonesense Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 04:52:50 GMT Organization: Donna Marie Software & Consulting, Inc. Lines: 117 Message-ID: <32c49178.539997574@news.dmsc.net> References: <32c33489.450656808@news.dmsc.net> <5a1cue$1l6@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.241.176.25 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 Hi Ken: >Hitler planned the systematic rape of Eastern Europe, and his >concept of "living space" played a large roll. Hitler was quite >clear about his plans; if you are interested in learning the truth >(Mr. Swiger's past performance suggests he is not, but there are, >after all, others here who are), you might wish to peruse >http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/imt/nca/nca-01/nca-01-09-aggression-01-07.html >as a good starting point. Look, I agree that Hitler believed in the sword making way for the plow. And, I agree with him 100%. So I don't pull any punches when it comes to my politics. We could debate forever on what is "right" and what is "wrong". I could certainly draw parallels between what is going on in Israel with the Palestinians and what Hitler wrote about in Mein Kampf. It is a pointless argument based upon one's own definition of abstracts. There is no reality in "right" and "wrong", but there is reality as to whether a "Hollywood style" Holocaust occurred. The reality is: It did not. For what its worth, I recognized the Holocaust as a myth BEFORE becoming a National Socialist. You condemn Hitler, but Theodore Herzel certainly had no reservations about his plans now did he? Sorry for the parallel. >Poor Mr. Swiger... he has yet to grasp the concepts involved, and >continues to hope that he can convince someone - anyone - that >modern single-body cremation statistics have anything at all to do >with Nazi-era crematoria statistics from places like >Auschwitz-Birkenau. The perception, Mr. Swiger, is that you are >trying a bit of tired old Nazi slight of hand. Is that what it is? "......old Nazi slight of hand" or priciples of engineering? And, it has a lot to do with the ALLEGATIONS that the German National Socialists somehow defied the laws of physics. People like you think if you torture enough individuals and get confessions, pile up reams of forged documents and have sentences handed down from kangaroo courts and star chambers you can change gravitational acceleration from 9.806 m/s2 to 25 m/s2. It just doesn't work that way, Ken. Science catches up with you in the end......And the end is near for your Holocaust fiction. >The history of the Holocaust, as Mr. Swiger knows (but would >rather you did not know) is certainly not based upon eyewitness >testimony. It is, however, based - like all historical events - >upon the convergeance of evidence. In this case, most of the >evidence has been provided by the Nazis themselves, as Mr. Swiger >most certainly knows, since he's been trying to peddle his >nonsense for some time now. German trials, Nazi documentation is >copious to the point where it is probably fair to say it may well >be another century before it has all been sifted by scholars >seeking more information. I want you read what George A. McDonough had to say about the trials in post WW2 Germany. McDonough served BOTH as a prosecutor and a defense counsel. "...........Hearsay evidence was admitted indiscriminately and sworn statements of witnesses were admissible regardless of whether anybody knew the person who made the statement or the individual who took the statement. If a prosecutor considered a statement of a witness to be more damaging than the witness' oral testimony in court he would advise the witness to go back to his home, submit the statement as evidence, and any objection by defense counsel would be promptly overruled." Certainly this is out of line with Western jurisprudence. But, I'm not here to cry about the injustices doled out at the "trials." Most everyone now knows they were a total farce and disgrace. You assert yourself with the statement that " most of the evidence has been provided by the Nazis themselves,...." Well, if judicium semper pro veritate accipitur applies in all instances, then the Puritains in early America PROVED that there were witches,..... and humans copulated with the Devil! Certainly so since the theocracy had plenty of testimony, witnesses and confessions. My appeal is to common sense. Particularly with the Germans today who have been lied to and abused by Jewish Holocaust mythologists. Wahrheit Mact Frei! >400,000 pages of captured Nazi documentation has recently come to >light in Hungary, for instance, which documents the deportation of >Hungarian Jewry... no eyewitness testimony needed, as the SS did a >fine job on their own of documenting their crimes. A peurile attempt at euphemism. How many times do we have to clobber this one into the ground, Ken? The NSDAP had every intention of "exterminating" Jewry within the the Reich. To do this it was necessary to deport Jews from German territory. But this forced deportation did not occur until World Jewry declared war on Germany. Prior to this, International Zionists collaborated with Adolf Hitler to have the Jews relocate to Palestine. You know all about this but, for your own personal motives, you won't admit it. >Mr. Swiger is, of course, invited to discuss Pressac in >alt.revisionism, which is the newsgroup he prefers to avoid... >perhaps that is because Mr. Swiger knows that his brand of >"history" has been seen there often enough to hold little >challenge - or interest - for anyone with a mind that works. Look Ken, you know full well that Pressac did a miserable disservice to your ilk. The guy has no grasp on mathematics or engineering. He tried to convince others just what mistakes Vrba and Wetzler made IN THIER OWN TESTIMONY! The guy is a total moron. I sincerely believe he dipped into his own pharmacutical stock. Nonetheless, if I want to discuss him, I'll do it wherever I choose if there are others who are interested. >Nazi account indeed!! How gullible are we to be, Mr. Swiger? Fact is Ken, the "testimony" I posted is an extreme insult to the intelligence of most everyone. Its horrendous that such a contorted fabling would actually be admitted in a court..........even a kangaroo court. What is absolutely sickening is that German military personnel were actually imprisoned or executed based upon such idiotic attestations. Cliff Swiger Wahrheit Macht Frei From cswiger@westco.net Tue Dec 31 09:10:12 PST 1996 Article: 90064 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!thor.atcon.com!pumpkin.pangea.ca!eru.mt.luth.se!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!insync!eit.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-chi-13.sprintlink.net!news.dmsc.net!usenet From: cswiger@westco.net (Cliff Swiger) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: More Swiger Lies Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 04:52:48 GMT Organization: Donna Marie Software & Consulting, Inc. Lines: 34 Message-ID: <32c48d8f.538996292@news.dmsc.net> References: <32c327c4.447387270@news.dmsc.net> <5a1bmq$15s@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.241.176.25 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 Dear Mr. McVay: >What "Jewish lie" has been "exposed," Mr. Swiger? As anyone >perusing your archived material here >(ftp.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi?people/s/swiger.cliff.g) quickly >discovers, you have never been successful at defending _your_ lies >with regard to the Holocaust, let alone establishing anyone elses. Sounds as though this is merely your opinion, Mr. McVay. Actually, we who are now expounding the truth, surrounding the alleged Holocaust, have made tremendous gains. No doubt we'll continue to encounter mythologists, like yourself, who, for whatever motivation, persist in the propagation of the Holocaust lie. I've dropped into the Nizkor site and reviewed those chosen files myself. Actually, I think they're pretty good. >Burning pits were used, Mr. Swiger - get used to it. After you >have done so, you may wish to explain how the time required to >cremate a single corpse in a modern furnace has any relevance to >the Holocaust. Take your time - we'll wait. How asinine. I'm fully aware that burning pits were used to dispose of the deceased. Something had to be done to curb the typhus epidemics that were rampant at that time. Ken, did the allies not also use outdoor buring installations after their murderous attack on Dresden? And for what reason? You simply cannot leave decomposing bodies laying around for sanitary reasons. The particular spin involved here, by Holocaust mythologists, is that the instances of the Germans buring corpses in pits at the labor camps was some sort of a program of genocide. Its easy for Holocaust theorists to take a situation like this and mold it into a legendary event. Cliff Swiger Wahrheit Macht Frei From cswiger@westco.net Tue Dec 31 13:35:14 PST 1996 Article: 93283 of soc.culture.german Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!noc.van.hookup.net!laslo.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-hub.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news.dmsc.net!usenet From: cswiger@westco.net (Cliff Swiger) Newsgroups: soc.culture.german Subject: More Jewish Lies! Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 02:38:42 GMT Organization: Donna Marie Software & Consulting, Inc. Lines: 59 Message-ID: <32c87006.109123414@news.dmsc.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.241.176.22 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 To All: Perhaps one of the most "incriminating" tidbits of testimonial evidence against the NSDAP is the War Refugee Board report of November 1944 on Auschwitz-Birkenau. Walter Rosenberg, who later changed his name to Rudolf Verba, and Alfred Wetzler supposedly escaped from Birkenau on April 7, 1944 and, along with others, put together a report about their experiences at Auschwitz-Birkenau. This report of lies, has , like all other hostlie "eyewitness" testimony directed at post WW2 Germans, been exposed as a Jewish fraud. Verba and Wetzler went to great lengths to describe the "gas chambers", crematoria and the general layout of the "death camp." Now I think most individuals of European ancestry, with any common comprehension of Western Jurisprudence, understand that hearsay evidence IS NOT ADMISSIBLE in criminal prosecutions. Germans today need to etch into the convolutions of their brain that honorable German officers and soldiers (perhaps some are your relatives) were imprisoned and put to death based upon Jewish misinformation like that of Verba and Wetzler. Even today Germany is constantly reminded of the "horrific deeds of it's past government" and made to feel shamed by nearly every mass media outlet. Let's see just what Vrba himself knew about Auschwitz-Birkenau during a cross examination. "At the Zundel trial, Vrba confirmed having frequent contacts with members of the 'Sonderkommando' who were working in the crematoria, stating that he drew the plan of crematoria II & III in exact accordance WITH THEIR INFORMATION!" (Emphasis mine). To attorney Christie's question as to whether the plan was accurate, Vrba answered:" "This I cannot say. It was said that as we were not in the large crematoria, we reconstructed it from messages which we got from members of the Sonderkommando working in that crematorium, and therefore, that (was) approximately how it transpired IN OUR MIND (Emphasis mine), and in our ability to depict WHAT WE HAVE HEARD (Emphasis mine). After Vrba finally admitted that neither he nor Wetzler had EVER (Emphasis mine) entered ANY (Emphasis mine) of the crematoria he continued: "Consequently, we had to rely on rough information which we got from the Sonderkommando who worked inside; and to reproduce a map without being trained in architechture, from HEARSAY (Emphasis mine) descriptions of the other eyewitnesses, of course, is not such a simple thing." Rough information? Hearsay? I ask you what person (or better yet, what governments) would ever give any weight to such second and third hand information IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL!? Well, it doesn't much matter now for the accused; the damage has already been done. But, every self-respecting German should be angered over such a turn of events. Although Germany is currently under the jackboot of Jewish tyranny as regards freedom speech, this will not last in the face of the truth. Cliff Swiger Wahrheit Macht Frei Credit for quotes in above to: Carlo Mattogno and the IHR
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.