From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Thu Apr 11 10:34:13 PDT 1996
Article: 17085 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Re: Towards a Free White Nation
Date: 11 Apr 1996 06:25:22 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <4ki8ki$m3j@dfw-ixnews8.ix.netcom.com>
References:  <4kf8lp$c0j@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-17.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Apr 11  1:25:22 AM CDT 1996

In <4kf8lp$c0j@newsbf02.news.aol.com> timgoins@aol.com (Tim Goins)
writes: 
>
>Please explain to me just what you consider WHITE. If you think this
>nation, USA, is a white nation or was a white nation, then regardless
of
>your race, you are an ignorant fool.
>
>This nation was first populated by the Indians and/or their ancestors.
>
>Then the so called WHITE folks came. Had it not been for the Indians
they
>would have starved and died off. Then came more white trash and with
them
>came their negro slaves. The WHITE race and the negros deserve each
other.
>
>If you want to have a cleansing to the roots then all of you radical
>WHITES should go back to Europe where you belong and let the Indian
>Nations have their land back.

A nation is a biological entity, not a geographic entity. Nations can,
in fact, move from place to place. It has happened many times.
Sometimes they unite by conquest or consent, sometimes they spin off
new nations. But in any case, lines on a map do not a nation make --
genes do.

The American nation is composed of the descendants of Europeans who
created a branch of the European family of nations on the soil of North
America. They encountered other nations when they got here --
Amerindian nations, note the plural form. All these nations had been
competing for living space and resources on this continent for
millennia. The Europeans committed the sin of being fabulously
successful at the inevitable competition.

Your suggestion that all Whites should go back to Europe is an
interesting one. If we could be guaranteed an all-White Europe, perhaps
such a move, harrowing as it might be for all concerned, would be
worthwhile. For if we do not achieve living space of our own somewhere,
we will surely become extinct. As Garret Hardin has stated: No two
subspecies of the same species can coexist in the same teritory.

All the best,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Sat Apr 13 10:21:42 PDT 1996
Article: 30824 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism
Subject: A Jewish Defector Speaks
Date: 12 Apr 1996 21:26:32 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 648
Message-ID: <4kmhq8$d3l@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-19.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Apr 12  4:26:32 PM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:17192 alt.revisionism:30824


Here is part of the testimony of Benjamin Freedman, the Jewish
businessman who defected from the Jewish establishment that I referred
to in my earlier post.

Begin article:
----------------------------------------------

A Jewish Defector Warns America:
Benjamin Freedman Speaks

by Benjamin H. Freedman


Introductory Note

Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing
individuals of the 20thcentury. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a
successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the
principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with
organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent
the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his
considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the
Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman knew
what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest
levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power
over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with
Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt,
Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers
of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961
at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's
patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor
ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr.
Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is
more urgent than ever before.  -- K.A.S.

*

HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, the Zionists and their co-religionists have
complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too
complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their
co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the
absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad
statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are
few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one
side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by
Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally,
but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to
the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean.

Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one
week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the
French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French
youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was
defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't
want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian
army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had
crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England
peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the
lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let's call the
war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.”
England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They
had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that
Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and
being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the
Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I
am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the
documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: “Look here.
You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to
accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win
this war if the United States will come in as your ally.” The United
States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young;
we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: “We will guarantee
to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you
on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the
war.” In other words, they made this deal: “We will get the United
States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine
after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and
Turkey.” Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody,
as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any
reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that
never had any connection or any interest or any right in
what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay
the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they
did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I
don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was
almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the
newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the
media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews;
and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because
many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany
lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want
Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and
the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance
France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and
they said: “As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not
one cent!” But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside
Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting
Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time,
everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to
green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been
telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting
Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the
Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They
were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands.
They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on
Germany.

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice
Brandeis, saying “Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from
England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get
the United States into the war.” That's how the United States got into
the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in
it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room.
There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our
war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered
into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain
Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have
never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they
said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have
something in writing that shows that you are going to keep
your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.” They didn't
know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So
they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a
letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at
large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the
Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the
Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the
United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you
hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't
think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the
war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When
the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace
Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation
representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought
to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when
they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all
these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European
territory, said, “How about Palestine for us?” And they produced, for
the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this
Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh,
so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war.”
The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they
suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because
the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any
cost.

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans
realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews
had never been better off in any country in the world than
they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100
times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this
country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the
North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr.
Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had
the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the
biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No
question about that. The Germans felt: “Well, that was quite a
sellout.”

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation:
Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were
winning. And we told the Soviet Union: “Well, let's quit. We offer you
peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing.” And all of a sudden Red
China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing
them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with
reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass.
Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the
Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had
thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the
Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was
brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United
States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show
his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts
to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so
nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in
Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all
went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated
very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no
reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a
so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you
read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922,
and 1923 wrote in all their papers --
and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling
against the Jews in Germany is
due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought
about by Jewish intercession
in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves
admitted that. It wasn't that the
Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better
than Coca-Cola or
Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment
against those people
merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It
was economic. It was anything
but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and
pulled down the shades
and said “Shema' Yisroel” or “Our Father.” Nobody cared in Germany any
more than they do in
the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was
due to one thing: the
Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for
which Germany was
responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful.
They built up a big navy.
They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time
of the French
Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities,
dukedoms, and so forth. Three
hundred separate little political entities. And between that time,
between the times of Napoleon
and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50
years they became one of
the world's great powers. Their navy was rivalling Great Britain's,
they were doing business all
over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better
products. What happened
as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down
Germany. There
isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those
three countries decided to
wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat,
they naturally resented it.
But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair.
Professor Tansill, of
Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the
State Department, wrote
in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by
Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew
whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called
camps of political
prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.
They were in excellent
shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with
Communists. Well, a lot of them
were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of
the Communists in
Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers,
and labor leaders, and
Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over
Bavaria for a few days.
Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over
the government for
three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland
because he thought the
Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that
he was going to meet
the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for
security. After the Communist
threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to
get back into their former
status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without
hurting a single hair on
anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the
Prohibitionists fought
anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with
pistols. Well, that's the
way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you,
there were 80 to 90
million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of
one per cent of the
population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press,
and they controlled
most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the
mark was devalued
and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world
to really understand that they
had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I
say, discriminated against
them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would
shun the Chinese,
or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had
sold us out to an enemy and
brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam.
Jews from every country in
the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany:
“You fire Hitler, and you
put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist
or no matter what he
was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are
serving an ultimatum upon
you.” You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews
do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of
Jews in Amsterdam, the
conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the
American delegation
and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States
and went from the steamer
to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio
broadcast throughout the
United States in which he in effect said, “The Jews of the world now
declare a Holy War against
Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans.
And we are going to
starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott
against them. That will
destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business.”
And it is a fact that two
thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only
be imported with the
proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two
thirds of Germany's
population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for
more than one third of the
population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was
printed in the New York
Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that “this
economic boycott is our
means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the
National Recovery
Administration,” which some of you may remember, where everybody was to
be boycotted
unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was
declared unconstitutional
by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world
declared a boycott
against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one
thing in any store anywhere
in the world with the words “made in Germany” on it. In fact, an
executive of the Woolworth
Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of
crockery and dishes into the
river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a
dish marked “made in
Germany,” they were picketed with signs saying “Hitler,” “murderer,”
and so forth, something like
these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging
to the R. H. Macy chain,
which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be
Jews, a woman found
stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked “made in Germany.”
Well, they were cotton
stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been
observing women's legs for
many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton
stockings on them. I saw Macy's
boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying
“murderers,” “Hitlerites,”
and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew
had been hurt in
Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no
murder, there was
nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, “Who are these people to declare a boycott
against us and throw all
our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill?
Who are they to do that to
us?” They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on
stores owned by Jews. Why
should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part
of a boycott that was
going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who
were going to dictate
who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a
young Jew from Poland
walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official,
that the Germans really
started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then
breaking windows and
having street fights and so forth.

Now I don't like to use the word “anti-Semitism” because it's
meaningless, but it means
something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that
there was any feeling in
Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and
for this world-wide
boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II,
because after this thing got out
of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock
horns in a war to see
which one was going to survive.

In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans
had decided that Europe
is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the
Germans decided they
were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to
re-arm.

In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The
Soviet Union was
becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that “Our turn was going
to come soon, unless
we are strong.” The same as we in this country are saying today, “Our
turn is going to come
soon, unless we are strong.” Our government is spending 83 or 84
billion dollars for defense.
Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that
took over Russia, and
then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries
of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from
which we cannot emerge a
victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear
bombs are measured in
terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million
tons of TNT. Our nuclear
bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when
they were first
developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a
capacity of 200 megatons,
and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union
have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a
nuclear war, humanity is
finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the
curtain goes up on Act 3: Act
1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World
War III. The Jews of the
world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are
determined that they are going to
again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine
as their foothold for their
world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone
have I read it, but many
here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys
may be on their way
to that war tonight; and you you don't know it any more than you knew
that in 1916 in London the
Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to
war in Europe. Did you
know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You
weren't permitted to know it.
Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other
insiders knew it.

Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was
liaison to Henry Morgenthau,
Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there
was talk around the
office there. I was “confidential man” to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who
was chairman of the finance
committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the
treasurer. So I sat in these
meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the
others, and I heard them
drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what
has become the Federal
Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.
Justice Brandeis and
President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand.
President Woodrow Wilson
was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on
as a newborn baby.
That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent
our boys over there to be
slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their
“commonwealth.” They've fooled
you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, “Gentlemen, any witness
who you find has told a
single lie, you can disregard all his testimony.” I don't know what
state you come from, but in
New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that
witness told one lie, disregard his
testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because
they are known as Jews. I
don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because
I know what they are.)
The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's
population of those people who
call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike
tribe who lived deep in the
heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove
them out of Asia into eastern
Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At
the time, Russia did
not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom
was the biggest country
in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs
wanted to go to war, the
Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful
they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go
into the details of that now.
But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other
pagans and barbarians
elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the
degeneracy of his
kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith --
either Christianity, Islam, or
what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning
a top, and calling out
“eeny, meeny, miney, moe,” he picked out so-called Judaism. And that
became the state
religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura
and brought up
thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his
people became what we
call Jews. There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a
toe in the Holy Land.
Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time.
Not one of them! And yet
they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed
insurrections in Palestine by
saying, “You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their
Promised Land, their ancestral
home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys
as your Lord and Savior.
You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew,
and we're Jews.” But
they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish
were converted. It is as
ridiculous to call them “people of the Holy Land,” as it would be to
call the 54 million Chinese
Moslems “Arabs.” Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54
million Chinese have
accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000
miles away from Arabia,
>from  Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese
decided to call
themselves “Arabs.” You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who
believes that those 54
million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a
religious faith a belief that
had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the
Irish became Christians,
nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new
crop of inhabitants.
They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but
they had accepted
Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a
Mongoloid race who
were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took
the Talmudic faith, they had
no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was
Catholic, everybody had to be
a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became
what we call today Jews.
Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the
world to say, “We're going to
use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their
ancestral homeland, their
Promised Land.” Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they
control the newspapers, the
magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and
because they have the
ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking
the same language, it is not
too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white
if you heard it often enough.
You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black
white. And nobody could blame
you.

That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all
the misery that has befallen the
world.

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so
sacred to them? I was
one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser.
I'm here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up
for the very first
prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You
repeat three times a short
prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an
agreement with God Almighty that
any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve
months shall be null and
void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the
pledge shall not be a pledge.
They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches
that whenever you take an
oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you
recited on the Day of
Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you
depend on their
loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans
depended upon it in 1916.
We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the
same reason.


*********
This article was based on the American Dissident Voices programs of
13th and 20th May, 1995.
A cassette recording containing both of these programs under the title
Benjamin Freedman
Speaks is available for $12 postpaid from National Vanguard Books.
Further revelations of Mr.
Freedman are available on our two-part series on tape entitled The
Hidden Tyranny Revealed,
which is available for $9.95 plus $1.50 postage and handling as our
item number 604.





-------------------------------------------------------
For further information write to National Vanguard Books, PO Box 330,
Hillsboro WV 24946
USA.



From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Sun Apr 14 09:25:45 PDT 1996
Article: 31025 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.wildstar.net!imci5!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: arthur GOLDBERG a traitor
Date: 13 Apr 1996 02:03:10 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 94
Message-ID: <4kn20u$otn@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kggqi$142q@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> <4khhfq$4kq@news.enter.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-11.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Apr 12  9:03:10 PM CDT 1996

In <4khhfq$4kq@news.enter.net> yawen@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
writes: 
>
>>   EEGG87A@prodigy.com (A Huber) vomits:
>>
>>  Twenty years before he became a distinguished Cabinet member and
then a 
snip
>>  
>>  The FBI file offers a variety of reasons for suspecting Goldberg's 
>>  Communist connections. 
>>  
>>  He was one of the Chicago sponsors of a "National Conference on 
>>  Constitutional Liberties of America," the file notes, and he
>>  served as a lawyer for the Chicago Committee on Conscientious
Objectors. 
>
>	Wow.  What a traitor.  He actually believed in Constitutional
Liberties! 
>Well, we all know that no true American believes in them!  Few can
even 
>pronounce them.  Perhaps the scoundrel actually objected to people
being held in 
>"custodial detention' without a trial on the word of a crazed
transvestite.
>
snip
>	11.  He could locate the USSR on a map of the world!
>
>	I think we all owe H*b*r a favor for exposing this evil creature.
 I sleep 
>better at night knowing that there are people out there who could
reveal the real 
>nature of a man who, on the surface, seems like a patriotic Amercian
who rose to 
>the top of his profession by dint of native intelligence, learning,
and hard work and 
>was not afraid to stand up for ideals in which he believed.  Next week
H*b*r will tell 
>us the truth about Fanny Brice -- a real doyen of unAmerican deviltry
if there ever 
>was one!
>
>	--YFE

YFE, you fail to address the fact that he was identified as a
Communist, as mentioned in the original post:

>> Arthur Goldberg held a special place in the files 

of the FBI: He was targeted for "custodial detention" as a Communist
just 

before the United States entered World War II. 

In 1941, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover wrote to the bureau's Chicago
field 

office that Goldberg, then a labor lawyer, was "closely associated with

Communist leaders in Illinois." <<

As for the organizations mentioned, I do not have the files of the Dies
Committee before me, but it is well-known and even snickered over in
some leftish circles that Communist fronts often, perhaps always, had
innocent-sounding pro-American names. I suspect the reason that these
groups raised the FBI's eyebrows was because they were known at the
time to be Communist fronts. And it is a commonplace that many "former"
Communists who just happened to become "disenchanted" with Stalin at an
opportune time in their careers rose high in the FDR and later
administrations. Their desire to change America toward a multicultural,
internationalist stance never varied, however.

Was Goldberg a Communist? He certainly appeared to travel in the same
circles as Communists. I confess I don't have the information to
document his actual membership in the party. But I don't need that to
prove he was a traitor to America.

He was a long-time proponent of ending American sovereignty, and
closely associated with such other world-government enthusiasts as
Chester Bowles of the United World Federalists, Harry Ashmore of the
Fund for the Republic and admirer of Ho Chi Minh, Earl Browder, former
General Secretary of the Communist Party, USA, and Robert Maynard
Hutchins of the Fund for the Republic (another deceptive-sounding name
by the way) who authored no fewer than 35 editions of a "world
constitution."

Goldberg shared membership and official posts with these nice folks in
their myriad interlocking organizations.

With all good wishes for a return to the Old America,

Kevin Alfred Strom



From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Sun Apr 14 11:09:27 PDT 1996
Article: 17230 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!globe.indirect.com!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!decwrl!amd!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.oj-simpson,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Re: Abraham Lincoln was a "Racist"?
Date: 13 Apr 1996 15:42:06 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <4koi0e$cvb@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4jvo92$2c8_001@dial152.skypoint.net> <31645a02.4447557@news.flash.net> <4kbr5i$rcs@news.pyrotechnics.com> <4kcnt1$g98@decaxp.harvard.edu> <4klnr4$evo@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-19.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Apr 13 10:42:06 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.fan.oj-simpson:48443 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17230 alt.politics.white-power:25218


The important thing about discussing Lincoln's views on race (which
could reasonably be described as far to the right of Mr. David Duke) --
or Jefferson's, or Mason's, or Monroe's, (which could be similarly
described) is to point out the hypocrisy of the successor regime which
now rules America.

Not wanting to alarm the boobs, who after more than 60 years of rule by
their enemies still don't get it, the establishment wants to keep the
images of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, etc., as icons to keep alive
the illusion of governmental continuity. But the _ideas_ of these men
are extremely inconvenient, and are almost always suppressed except in
tiny out-of-context driplets used when a new revolutionary decree has
to be justified.

Gradually, the ruling elite is phasing out and de-emphasizing the old
figures, however, and replacing them with a new pantheon with more
acceptable neo-Marxist ideas. "Martin Luther" King is the most
prominent example. After a generation or two, unless the American
people retake their nation, Jefferson et al. will be little more than a
footnote, while we may get several chapters on "I am a Marxist" King
and "How to be a Good Communist" Mandela, adorned with sidebars of
immortal poetry (?) by the unavoidable Maya Angelou.

Happy internetting,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Sun Apr 14 11:12:45 PDT 1996
Article: 25218 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!globe.indirect.com!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!decwrl!amd!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.oj-simpson,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Re: Abraham Lincoln was a "Racist"?
Date: 13 Apr 1996 15:42:06 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <4koi0e$cvb@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4jvo92$2c8_001@dial152.skypoint.net> <31645a02.4447557@news.flash.net> <4kbr5i$rcs@news.pyrotechnics.com> <4kcnt1$g98@decaxp.harvard.edu> <4klnr4$evo@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-19.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Apr 13 10:42:06 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.fan.oj-simpson:48443 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17230 alt.politics.white-power:25218


The important thing about discussing Lincoln's views on race (which
could reasonably be described as far to the right of Mr. David Duke) --
or Jefferson's, or Mason's, or Monroe's, (which could be similarly
described) is to point out the hypocrisy of the successor regime which
now rules America.

Not wanting to alarm the boobs, who after more than 60 years of rule by
their enemies still don't get it, the establishment wants to keep the
images of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, etc., as icons to keep alive
the illusion of governmental continuity. But the _ideas_ of these men
are extremely inconvenient, and are almost always suppressed except in
tiny out-of-context driplets used when a new revolutionary decree has
to be justified.

Gradually, the ruling elite is phasing out and de-emphasizing the old
figures, however, and replacing them with a new pantheon with more
acceptable neo-Marxist ideas. "Martin Luther" King is the most
prominent example. After a generation or two, unless the American
people retake their nation, Jefferson et al. will be little more than a
footnote, while we may get several chapters on "I am a Marxist" King
and "How to be a Good Communist" Mandela, adorned with sidebars of
immortal poetry (?) by the unavoidable Maya Angelou.

Happy internetting,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Sun Apr 14 19:15:38 PDT 1996
Article: 17335 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.wildstar.net!cancer.vividnet.com!hunter.premier.net!insync!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Re: "Hate Monger" Broadcasts?
Date: 14 Apr 1996 05:10:02 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <4kq1ba$ktf@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>
References:  <4ja5oi$d9p@news1.h1.usa.pipeline.com> <4jakf5$sf8@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4jdbl8$hb6@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us> <4je3gu$5bm@huron.eel.ufl.edu> <4jk29k$mju@nkosi.well.com> <4jos83$ovr@homenet.hom.net>  <4kgmg8$e8e@reader2.ix.netcom.com> <4kpbpu$se7@news.xs4all.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-04.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Apr 13 10:10:02 PM PDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca rec.radio.shortwave:39864 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17335

In <4kpbpu$se7@news.xs4all.nl> hbhjv@xs4all.nl (Herbert Visser) writes:


>
>>73,
>
>>Kevin Alfred Strom
>
> If you're so concerned with trying to convince the people in the USA
>that they should live in an all-white country, why the hell (which is
>what your country would become in this case)

Oh, yes. We all know that the Whiter a country is, the more it
resembles Hell. Haiti and Norway would seem to disprove your asertion.

> are you doing this on
> shortwave so that we get these idiotic broadcasts here in Europe
> as well ??  And I'm sure they can also be picked up in Africa. Now,
> that would make sense !!  

My program has received positive responses from every continent except
Antarctica. We especially desire to reach Europe with our program.

You know what we do with people like
> you ??  We arrest them  and put them in jail.  If an American is
>spreading racist propaganda in Europe, via leaflets and so on, that
> person will be arrested the moment he will be spotted over here.
> I don't see any difference with Americans who broadcast hate
> radio progarmmes directed against minor races, and whose broadcasts
> can be picked up in Europe or whose web pages can be seen on 
>Internet over here. 
>
>                                           Herbert Visser
>                                            Amsterdam
> 
>

Thank you for your frankness. This is what I have been warning my
listeners about for the last four years. We still have some freedom of
speech left in the United States, but powerful forces are working to
take that freedom away. They have already done so in Europe, as Mr.
Visser proves perfectly here.

With all good wishes and 73,

Kevin Alfred Strom

Outlawing an idea tends to prove its truth.


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Sun Apr 14 21:02:20 PDT 1996
Article: 31133 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.wildstar.net!imci5!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Hollywood - Capital of Degradation
Date: 14 Apr 1996 06:37:45 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <4kq6fp$p9e@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>
References: <316fab10.5552148@news.pacificnet.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-16.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Apr 14  1:37:45 AM CDT 1996

In <316fab10.5552148@news.pacificnet.net> tm@pacificnet.net (tom moran)
writes: 
>
>
>	Drugs, kinky sex, glitter, chase scenes, musclemen as heroes,
>special effects, flaming infernos, fame seeking, crawling, begging,
>selling of souls, collapsed spirits, insanity, box office receipts. 

You haven't said the half of it...

How about an inverted morality in which hatred of White people is
elevated to a moral imperative -- in which those who wish to commit
unspeakable acts are raised to the level of moral paragons -- in which
anything which tends to the destruction of Western Man is by definition
good, and that which tends to our preservation is the ultimate in evil.

As long as you "go with the flow," though, any form of debauchery is
available for your delectation... _any_ form...

That's Hollywood, that's New York, that's the establishment that has
ruled America for lo these many decades.

It is what a friend of mine dubbed "the evil funhouse."

With all good wishes,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Mon Apr 15 09:03:55 PDT 1996
Article: 31267 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.wildstar.net!cancer.vividnet.com!hunter.premier.net!insync!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.oj-simpson,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads,soc.culture.african.american
Subject: Re: A simple solution.
Date: 14 Apr 1996 18:48:56 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <4krhao$s11@dfw-ixnews1.ix.netcom.com>
References: <3170502F.142F@spectra.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-20.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Apr 14  1:48:56 PM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.california:24495 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17392 alt.politics.white-power:25513 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:292857 alt.fan.oj-simpson:48457 alt.revisionism:31267 alt.skinheads:18517 soc.culture.african.american:114845

In <3170502F.142F@spectra.net> Rad  writes: 
>
>Why do 3rd world people continue pour into the US? Is there a SHORTAGE

>of such people here? Certainly not. There are many tens of millions of

>black and Hispanic Americans, but they are CITIZENS and thus, don't
have 
>to work if they don't want to. Abolish welfare they'll all get busy
damn 
>quick and the demand for illegals will evaporate.
>
>One little side benefit; all of the white trash women who let
themselves 
>get knocked up by the first nigger who slaps them around will think 
>twice about having a niggerbaby without Uncle Sugar to pay for it.
>
>We can solve this folks, by simply DOING NOTHING. Abolish Welfare. No 
>fences necessary.
>-- 
>Rad
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>To do something, say something, see something, before anybody
>else-these are things that confer a pleasure compared with which
>other pleasures are tame and commonplace, other ecstacies cheap and 
>trivial. Mark Twain (1835-1910), US author. The Innocents Abroad
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Despite the fact that I would support emergency aid for elderly or
disabled people in a future White America, abolishing welfare as it
exists now would be an excellent step -- and even though our rulers in
occupied Washington don't want to stop the gravy train that buys them
votes, fiscal realities may force them in this direction. However, they
will cut off money for many other things first, and civil chaos may
prevail.

That, however, may not be a bad thing... we need something to get us
off dead center and force the comfortable boobs to the realization that
there has been a revolution in this country and they lost.

Cheers,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Tue Apr 16 09:15:19 PDT 1996
Article: 31488 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!loki.tor.hookup.net!hookup!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!hodes.com!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
Date: 16 Apr 1996 07:48:24 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 137
Message-ID: <4kvjc8$snq@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-27.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Apr 16  2:48:24 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:25658 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17465 alt.discrimination:45657 alt.revisionism:31488 alt.skinheads:18688

In <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> ai433@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
(John Baglow) writes: 
>
>Loser Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) chunders:
>
>>> Just read this editorial by Eric Margolis, in the Ottawa Sunday
Sun, page
>>> C3, about the goings-on in Liberia.  For brevity's sake, I'm only
posting
>>> the relevant part:
>>> 
>>> "... He (Master Sgt. Samuel K. Doe), was overthrown in 1990.  Doe,
an
>>> illiterate and remarkably murderous thug, enjoyed personally
shooting or
>>> bayonetting political enemies and cabinet ministers.  He was
captured by
>>> rebels led by a certain Prince Johnson, who cut Doe up into
bite-sized
>>> chunks, and ate him with pepper sauce, thus digesting one of
Africa's more
>>> loathsome tyrants.... "
>>> 
>>> THIS is negro politics?  Wake up and face reality, you goddamn
snivelling
>>> liberal turds.
>> 
>> Hmm, no liberal replies to this.  I wonder why?
>
>Well, I'm not a "liberal", Griswald, but let me have a go at this.
>
>To characterize this event (assuming your brother under the skin Eric
>Margolis is even remotely accurate in his description) as typical of
>"negro [sic] politics" would be like portraying Bosnian conflict
>civilities (such as forcing one man to bite another man's testicles
off,
>one of hundreds of well-documented atrocities) as typical of "white
>politics." 
>
>It's no go, dumbster. Give it up.
>
>2 words,
>John
>
>
>--
>**********************************************************************
*******
>John Baglow		"Oh, baby, is this really the end--
>			 To be stuck outside of Moncton
>			 With the Whitehorse blues again?"		


John,

Nietzsche was right - man is something From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca>

In <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> ai433@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
(John Baglow) writes: 
>
>Loser Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) chunders:
>
>>> Just read this editorial by Eric Margolis, in the Ottawa Sunday
Sun, page
>>> C3, about the goings-on in Liberia.  For brevity's sake, I'm only
posting
>>> the relevant part:
>>> 
>>> "... He (Master Sgt. Samuel K. Doe), was overthrown in 1990.  Doe,
an
>>> illiterate and remarkably murderous thug, enjoyed personally
shooting or
>>> bayonetting political enemies and cabinet ministers.  He was
captured by
>>> rebels led by a certain Prince Johnson, who cut Doe up into
bite-sized
>>> chunks, and ate him with pepper sauce, thus digesting one of
Africa's more
>>> loathsome tyrants.... "
>>> 
>>> THIS is negro politics?  Wake up and face reality, you goddamn
snivelling
>>> liberal turds.
>> 
>> Hmm, no liberal replies to this.  I wonder why?
>
>Well, I'm not a "liberal", Griswald, but let me have a go at this.
>
>To characterize this event (assuming your brother under the skin Eric
>Margolis is even remotely accurate in his description) as typical of
>"negro [sic] politics" would be like portraying Bosnian conflict
>civilities (such as forcing one man to bite another man's testicles
off,
>one of hundreds of well-documented atrocities) as typical of "white
>politics." 
>
>It's no go, dumbster. Give it up.
>
>2 words,
>John
>
>
>--
>**********************************************************************
*******
>John Baglow		"Oh, baby, is this really the end--
>			 To be stuck outside of Moncton
>			 With the Whitehorse blues again?"		


John,

Nietzsche was right - man is something to be overcome. Europeans do act
madly at times. But, given the choice, who wouldn't rather live in
Vienna or even Sarajevo than in the blood and excrement-soaked streets
of Monrovia or almost anywhere else in Africa (or occupied Washington,
DC for that matter)? In the former Belgian Congo, the grand colonial
buildings literally fall to pieces as monkeys swing in and out of the
broken windows, and trees grow up in the middle of the cracked cement
of the old wide avenues.

Europeans have managed to drag themselves at least few inches above the
filth of savagery. And, if our race survives, that's only the
beginning. The White race as it exists now is certainly no ideal, and I
never said it was. We have a long way to go -- farther than can be seen
by any living man.

But the race must not slip backwards -- and the African gene pool would
take us back 200,000 years. We must look toward the highest and best in
the European race -- and then toward the stars.

Happy internetting,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Tue Apr 16 09:53:58 PDT 1996
Article: 17465 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!loki.tor.hookup.net!hookup!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!hodes.com!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
Date: 16 Apr 1996 07:48:24 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 137
Message-ID: <4kvjc8$snq@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-27.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Apr 16  2:48:24 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:25658 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17465 alt.discrimination:45657 alt.revisionism:31488 alt.skinheads:18688

In <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> ai433@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
(John Baglow) writes: 
>
>Loser Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) chunders:
>
>>> Just read this editorial by Eric Margolis, in the Ottawa Sunday
Sun, page
>>> C3, about the goings-on in Liberia.  For brevity's sake, I'm only
posting
>>> the relevant part:
>>> 
>>> "... He (Master Sgt. Samuel K. Doe), was overthrown in 1990.  Doe,
an
>>> illiterate and remarkably murderous thug, enjoyed personally
shooting or
>>> bayonetting political enemies and cabinet ministers.  He was
captured by
>>> rebels led by a certain Prince Johnson, who cut Doe up into
bite-sized
>>> chunks, and ate him with pepper sauce, thus digesting one of
Africa's more
>>> loathsome tyrants.... "
>>> 
>>> THIS is negro politics?  Wake up and face reality, you goddamn
snivelling
>>> liberal turds.
>> 
>> Hmm, no liberal replies to this.  I wonder why?
>
>Well, I'm not a "liberal", Griswald, but let me have a go at this.
>
>To characterize this event (assuming your brother under the skin Eric
>Margolis is even remotely accurate in his description) as typical of
>"negro [sic] politics" would be like portraying Bosnian conflict
>civilities (such as forcing one man to bite another man's testicles
off,
>one of hundreds of well-documented atrocities) as typical of "white
>politics." 
>
>It's no go, dumbster. Give it up.
>
>2 words,
>John
>
>
>--
>**********************************************************************
*******
>John Baglow		"Oh, baby, is this really the end--
>			 To be stuck outside of Moncton
>			 With the Whitehorse blues again?"		


John,

Nietzsche was right - man is something From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca>

In <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> ai433@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
(John Baglow) writes: 
>
>Loser Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) chunders:
>
>>> Just read this editorial by Eric Margolis, in the Ottawa Sunday
Sun, page
>>> C3, about the goings-on in Liberia.  For brevity's sake, I'm only
posting
>>> the relevant part:
>>> 
>>> "... He (Master Sgt. Samuel K. Doe), was overthrown in 1990.  Doe,
an
>>> illiterate and remarkably murderous thug, enjoyed personally
shooting or
>>> bayonetting political enemies and cabinet ministers.  He was
captured by
>>> rebels led by a certain Prince Johnson, who cut Doe up into
bite-sized
>>> chunks, and ate him with pepper sauce, thus digesting one of
Africa's more
>>> loathsome tyrants.... "
>>> 
>>> THIS is negro politics?  Wake up and face reality, you goddamn
snivelling
>>> liberal turds.
>> 
>> Hmm, no liberal replies to this.  I wonder why?
>
>Well, I'm not a "liberal", Griswald, but let me have a go at this.
>
>To characterize this event (assuming your brother under the skin Eric
>Margolis is even remotely accurate in his description) as typical of
>"negro [sic] politics" would be like portraying Bosnian conflict
>civilities (such as forcing one man to bite another man's testicles
off,
>one of hundreds of well-documented atrocities) as typical of "white
>politics." 
>
>It's no go, dumbster. Give it up.
>
>2 words,
>John
>
>
>--
>**********************************************************************
*******
>John Baglow		"Oh, baby, is this really the end--
>			 To be stuck outside of Moncton
>			 With the Whitehorse blues again?"		


John,

Nietzsche was right - man is something to be overcome. Europeans do act
madly at times. But, given the choice, who wouldn't rather live in
Vienna or even Sarajevo than in the blood and excrement-soaked streets
of Monrovia or almost anywhere else in Africa (or occupied Washington,
DC for that matter)? In the former Belgian Congo, the grand colonial
buildings literally fall to pieces as monkeys swing in and out of the
broken windows, and trees grow up in the middle of the cracked cement
of the old wide avenues.

Europeans have managed to drag themselves at least few inches above the
filth of savagery. And, if our race survives, that's only the
beginning. The White race as it exists now is certainly no ideal, and I
never said it was. We have a long way to go -- farther than can be seen
by any living man.

But the race must not slip backwards -- and the African gene pool would
take us back 200,000 years. We must look toward the highest and best in
the European race -- and then toward the stars.

Happy internetting,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Tue Apr 16 09:58:48 PDT 1996
Article: 25658 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!loki.tor.hookup.net!hookup!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!hodes.com!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
Date: 16 Apr 1996 07:48:24 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 137
Message-ID: <4kvjc8$snq@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-27.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Apr 16  2:48:24 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:25658 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17465 alt.discrimination:45657 alt.revisionism:31488 alt.skinheads:18688

In <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> ai433@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
(John Baglow) writes: 
>
>Loser Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) chunders:
>
>>> Just read this editorial by Eric Margolis, in the Ottawa Sunday
Sun, page
>>> C3, about the goings-on in Liberia.  For brevity's sake, I'm only
posting
>>> the relevant part:
>>> 
>>> "... He (Master Sgt. Samuel K. Doe), was overthrown in 1990.  Doe,
an
>>> illiterate and remarkably murderous thug, enjoyed personally
shooting or
>>> bayonetting political enemies and cabinet ministers.  He was
captured by
>>> rebels led by a certain Prince Johnson, who cut Doe up into
bite-sized
>>> chunks, and ate him with pepper sauce, thus digesting one of
Africa's more
>>> loathsome tyrants.... "
>>> 
>>> THIS is negro politics?  Wake up and face reality, you goddamn
snivelling
>>> liberal turds.
>> 
>> Hmm, no liberal replies to this.  I wonder why?
>
>Well, I'm not a "liberal", Griswald, but let me have a go at this.
>
>To characterize this event (assuming your brother under the skin Eric
>Margolis is even remotely accurate in his description) as typical of
>"negro [sic] politics" would be like portraying Bosnian conflict
>civilities (such as forcing one man to bite another man's testicles
off,
>one of hundreds of well-documented atrocities) as typical of "white
>politics." 
>
>It's no go, dumbster. Give it up.
>
>2 words,
>John
>
>
>--
>**********************************************************************
*******
>John Baglow		"Oh, baby, is this really the end--
>			 To be stuck outside of Moncton
>			 With the Whitehorse blues again?"		


John,

Nietzsche was right - man is something From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca>

In <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> ai433@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
(John Baglow) writes: 
>
>Loser Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) chunders:
>
>>> Just read this editorial by Eric Margolis, in the Ottawa Sunday
Sun, page
>>> C3, about the goings-on in Liberia.  For brevity's sake, I'm only
posting
>>> the relevant part:
>>> 
>>> "... He (Master Sgt. Samuel K. Doe), was overthrown in 1990.  Doe,
an
>>> illiterate and remarkably murderous thug, enjoyed personally
shooting or
>>> bayonetting political enemies and cabinet ministers.  He was
captured by
>>> rebels led by a certain Prince Johnson, who cut Doe up into
bite-sized
>>> chunks, and ate him with pepper sauce, thus digesting one of
Africa's more
>>> loathsome tyrants.... "
>>> 
>>> THIS is negro politics?  Wake up and face reality, you goddamn
snivelling
>>> liberal turds.
>> 
>> Hmm, no liberal replies to this.  I wonder why?
>
>Well, I'm not a "liberal", Griswald, but let me have a go at this.
>
>To characterize this event (assuming your brother under the skin Eric
>Margolis is even remotely accurate in his description) as typical of
>"negro [sic] politics" would be like portraying Bosnian conflict
>civilities (such as forcing one man to bite another man's testicles
off,
>one of hundreds of well-documented atrocities) as typical of "white
>politics." 
>
>It's no go, dumbster. Give it up.
>
>2 words,
>John
>
>
>--
>**********************************************************************
*******
>John Baglow		"Oh, baby, is this really the end--
>			 To be stuck outside of Moncton
>			 With the Whitehorse blues again?"		


John,

Nietzsche was right - man is something to be overcome. Europeans do act
madly at times. But, given the choice, who wouldn't rather live in
Vienna or even Sarajevo than in the blood and excrement-soaked streets
of Monrovia or almost anywhere else in Africa (or occupied Washington,
DC for that matter)? In the former Belgian Congo, the grand colonial
buildings literally fall to pieces as monkeys swing in and out of the
broken windows, and trees grow up in the middle of the cracked cement
of the old wide avenues.

Europeans have managed to drag themselves at least few inches above the
filth of savagery. And, if our race survives, that's only the
beginning. The White race as it exists now is certainly no ideal, and I
never said it was. We have a long way to go -- farther than can be seen
by any living man.

But the race must not slip backwards -- and the African gene pool would
take us back 200,000 years. We must look toward the highest and best in
the European race -- and then toward the stars.

Happy internetting,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Tue Apr 16 10:11:23 PDT 1996
Article: 18688 of alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!loki.tor.hookup.net!hookup!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!hodes.com!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
Date: 16 Apr 1996 07:48:24 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 137
Message-ID: <4kvjc8$snq@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-27.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Apr 16  2:48:24 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:25658 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17465 alt.discrimination:45657 alt.revisionism:31488 alt.skinheads:18688

In <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> ai433@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
(John Baglow) writes: 
>
>Loser Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) chunders:
>
>>> Just read this editorial by Eric Margolis, in the Ottawa Sunday
Sun, page
>>> C3, about the goings-on in Liberia.  For brevity's sake, I'm only
posting
>>> the relevant part:
>>> 
>>> "... He (Master Sgt. Samuel K. Doe), was overthrown in 1990.  Doe,
an
>>> illiterate and remarkably murderous thug, enjoyed personally
shooting or
>>> bayonetting political enemies and cabinet ministers.  He was
captured by
>>> rebels led by a certain Prince Johnson, who cut Doe up into
bite-sized
>>> chunks, and ate him with pepper sauce, thus digesting one of
Africa's more
>>> loathsome tyrants.... "
>>> 
>>> THIS is negro politics?  Wake up and face reality, you goddamn
snivelling
>>> liberal turds.
>> 
>> Hmm, no liberal replies to this.  I wonder why?
>
>Well, I'm not a "liberal", Griswald, but let me have a go at this.
>
>To characterize this event (assuming your brother under the skin Eric
>Margolis is even remotely accurate in his description) as typical of
>"negro [sic] politics" would be like portraying Bosnian conflict
>civilities (such as forcing one man to bite another man's testicles
off,
>one of hundreds of well-documented atrocities) as typical of "white
>politics." 
>
>It's no go, dumbster. Give it up.
>
>2 words,
>John
>
>
>--
>**********************************************************************
*******
>John Baglow		"Oh, baby, is this really the end--
>			 To be stuck outside of Moncton
>			 With the Whitehorse blues again?"		


John,

Nietzsche was right - man is something From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca>

In <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> ai433@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
(John Baglow) writes: 
>
>Loser Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) chunders:
>
>>> Just read this editorial by Eric Margolis, in the Ottawa Sunday
Sun, page
>>> C3, about the goings-on in Liberia.  For brevity's sake, I'm only
posting
>>> the relevant part:
>>> 
>>> "... He (Master Sgt. Samuel K. Doe), was overthrown in 1990.  Doe,
an
>>> illiterate and remarkably murderous thug, enjoyed personally
shooting or
>>> bayonetting political enemies and cabinet ministers.  He was
captured by
>>> rebels led by a certain Prince Johnson, who cut Doe up into
bite-sized
>>> chunks, and ate him with pepper sauce, thus digesting one of
Africa's more
>>> loathsome tyrants.... "
>>> 
>>> THIS is negro politics?  Wake up and face reality, you goddamn
snivelling
>>> liberal turds.
>> 
>> Hmm, no liberal replies to this.  I wonder why?
>
>Well, I'm not a "liberal", Griswald, but let me have a go at this.
>
>To characterize this event (assuming your brother under the skin Eric
>Margolis is even remotely accurate in his description) as typical of
>"negro [sic] politics" would be like portraying Bosnian conflict
>civilities (such as forcing one man to bite another man's testicles
off,
>one of hundreds of well-documented atrocities) as typical of "white
>politics." 
>
>It's no go, dumbster. Give it up.
>
>2 words,
>John
>
>
>--
>**********************************************************************
*******
>John Baglow		"Oh, baby, is this really the end--
>			 To be stuck outside of Moncton
>			 With the Whitehorse blues again?"		


John,

Nietzsche was right - man is something to be overcome. Europeans do act
madly at times. But, given the choice, who wouldn't rather live in
Vienna or even Sarajevo than in the blood and excrement-soaked streets
of Monrovia or almost anywhere else in Africa (or occupied Washington,
DC for that matter)? In the former Belgian Congo, the grand colonial
buildings literally fall to pieces as monkeys swing in and out of the
broken windows, and trees grow up in the middle of the cracked cement
of the old wide avenues.

Europeans have managed to drag themselves at least few inches above the
filth of savagery. And, if our race survives, that's only the
beginning. The White race as it exists now is certainly no ideal, and I
never said it was. We have a long way to go -- farther than can be seen
by any living man.

But the race must not slip backwards -- and the African gene pool would
take us back 200,000 years. We must look toward the highest and best in
the European race -- and then toward the stars.

Happy internetting,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Tue Apr 16 12:21:59 PDT 1996
Article: 17474 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!lll-winken.llnl.gov!venus.sun.com!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Re: "Hate Monger" Broadcasts?
Date: 16 Apr 1996 05:08:23 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <4kva07$ns1@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
References:  <4ja5oi$d9p@news1.h1.usa.pipeline.com> <4jakf5$sf8@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4jdbl8$hb6@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us> <4je3gu$5bm@huron.eel.ufl.edu> <4jk29k$mju@nkosi.well.com> <4jos83$ovr@homenet.hom.net>  <4kgmg8$e8e@reader2.ix.netcom.com> <4kpbpu$se7@news.xs4all.nl> <4kq1ba$ktf@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> <4krvv7$ehq@news1.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-27.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Apr 16 12:08:23 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca rec.radio.shortwave:39868 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17474

In <4krvv7$ehq@news1.panix.com> fresh@panix.com (Andrew Mathis) writes:


>
>What the hell is 73?  Or 88?
>
>>Kevin Alfred Strom
>
>>Outlawing an idea tends to prove its truth.
>
>Name three.
>
>Andrew Mathis - 18
>-------------------------------------
>"If they give you ruled paper,
>Write the other way."
>               --Juan Ramon Jimenez
>

Since we are conversing on rec.radio.shortwave, I will forbear replying
to all the political comments now and take that discussion to
alt.politics.nationalism.white exclusively should you have any actual
questions.

In radio parlance "73" means "best regards" and "88" means "love and
kisses."

Three ideas that were outlawed:

1. The theory of natural selection.

2. The heliocentric model of the solar system.

3. The non-existence of witches and demons.

73,

Kevin Alfred Strom WB4AIO


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Tue Apr 16 18:32:36 PDT 1996
Article: 31546 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!xmission!news.cc.utah.edu!news.cs.utah.edu!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.oj-simpson,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads,soc.culture.african.american
Subject: Re: A simple solution.
Date: 16 Apr 1996 07:15:54 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 103
Message-ID: <4kvhfa$es8@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>
References: <3170502F.142F@spectra.net> <4ksge2$fau@express.ior.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-27.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Apr 16  2:15:54 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.california:24541 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17488 alt.politics.white-power:25710 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:293422 alt.fan.oj-simpson:48468 alt.revisionism:31546 alt.skinheads:18734 soc.culture.african.american:114923

In <4ksge2$fau@express.ior.com> tblocker@on-ramp.ior.com (Tom) writes: 
>
>

>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>To do something, say something, see something, before anybody
>>else-these are things that confer a pleasure compared with which
>>other pleasures are tame and commonplace, other
ecstacies cheap and 
>>trivial. Mark Twain (1835-1910), US author. The
Innocents Abroad
>who I suspect would not like having you quote him.
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>Did you ever study American History. The largest
threat our nation
>ever faced was that created by bigots like
yourself. (slavery and
>civil war) I am white middle aged male republican
and you don't speak
>for me. With this much hate I would gladly
exchange you for a few
>illegals. The US would certainly be better off.
The more I think about
>it the more I suspect you are joking. No one in
the 20th century can
>be this hateful.
>Tom
>
>

Your opinion is way off, Tom. Here is a quote from
Mark Twain:

In the U.S. cotton states, after the war... the
Jew came down in force, set up shop on the
plantation, supplied all the Negroes' wants on
credit, and at the end of the season was the
proprietor of the Negro's share of the present
crop and part of the next one. Before long, the
whites detested the Jew.

The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The
reason is not concealed. The movement was
instituted because the Christian peasant stood no
chance against his commercial abilities. The
Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When
settlement day came, he owned the crop; the
next year he owned the farm - like Joseph.

In the England of John's time everybody got into
debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative
enterprises into his hands. He was the King of
Commerce. He had to be banished from the
realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him
400 years ago, and Austria a couple of
centuries later.

In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his
activities. If he entered upon a trade,
the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took
the business. If he exploited
agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law
had to step in to save the
Christian from the poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he
found ways to make
money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical
commercial look. Religious
prejudices may account for one part of it, bit not for the other nine.

Protestants have persecuted Catholics - but they did not take their
livelihoods away from them.
Catholics have persecuted Protestants - bit they never closed
agriculture and the handicrafts
against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do
with the world's attitude
toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event
..

I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large
degree due to religious
prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of
his life. He was at it in
Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole
human race his enemy.

You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read
in the Cyclopedia
Britannica that the Jewish population in the United States was 250,000
I wrote the editor and
explained to him that I was personally acquainted with more Jews than
that, and that his figures
were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me that they
had reasons to suspect
that for business reasons, many Jews did not report themselves as Jews.
It looks plausible. I am
strongly of the opinion that we have an immense
Jewish population in America. I am assured by
men competent to speak that the Jews are
exceedingly active in politics. (Mark Twain
[Samuel Clemens]  "Concerning the
Jews,"; Harper's Monthly Magazine, September 1899)


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Mon Apr 22 06:36:12 PDT 1996
Article: 32229 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Griswold the hypocryte (Bell can't spell)
Date: 21 Apr 1996 08:49:20 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <4lcsqg$1a8@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kt3ls$sth@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l0tp1$nli@bell.maths.tcd.ie>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-28.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Apr 21  1:49:20 AM PDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:26151 alt.politics.nationalism.white:17838 alt.discrimination:45849 alt.revisionism:32229 alt.skinheads:19582

In <4l0tp1$nli@bell.maths.tcd.ie> dbell@maths.tcd.ie (Derek Bell)
writes: 
>
>bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold) writes:
>>They're not, and you KNOW that negro "politics" are bestial.  Stop
being
>>so damn obtuse.
>
>	Come on, Lester. You picked *one* incident from a war and claimed
it
>was typical of black people. Now when someone else points out that
similar
>incidents have happened between white people, you ignore it. You have
one
>standard for black people and another for whites. Face it, you are a
>blatant hypocryte!
>
>	Derek
>-- 
>Derek Bell  dbell@maths.tcd.ie  WWW:
http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/index.html
>
>                 Remember, `Exon' is a four-letter word.

No, Griswold is right.

My company were bidding on a contract in Liberia once, and I received a
briefing on doing business there.

In addition to the standard warnings about filth and disease in the
Negro paradise, the impassibility of the major "highways" for six
months out of the year, and the propensity of the political geniuses at
the ruling "True Whig Party" (its actual name) to outfox their
political opponents by blowing their brains out at close range with
revolvers, we were given hints on getting your materials to their
destination in Monrovia.

In short, the docks and airports are loaded with thugs who want to
steal your shipment. However, if you pick a bunch of thugs, taking care
to pick the biggest and most vicious, and pay them handsomely, they
will defend your shipment from the other thugs -- most of the time.

With all good wishes,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Fri Apr 26 23:52:21 PDT 1996
Article: 32913 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.emf.net!news.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.oj-simpson,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads,soc.culture.african.american
Subject: Re: Mark Twain and the Jews
Date: 26 Apr 1996 08:29:02 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 80
Message-ID: <4lq1ge$59@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
References: <3170502F.142F@spectra.net> <4ksge2$fau@express.ior.com> <4kvhfa$es8@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <4lcuc8$jdm@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4ljpuj$blp@shiva.usa.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-26.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Apr 26  3:29:02 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.california:24809 alt.politics.nationalism.white:18225 alt.politics.white-power:26629 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:296632 alt.fan.oj-simpson:48580 alt.revisionism:32913 alt.skinheads:20324 soc.culture.african.american:115568

In <4ljpuj$blp@shiva.usa.net> hkatz@earth.usa.net (Harry Katz) writes: 

>
>	If Jews or Jewish interests are threatened anywhere in the
>	world, a huge, well-oiled machine comes into play, demanding
>	capitulation or retribution.
>
>The name of this "well-oiled machine" might prove helpful in verifying
>its existence.  My experience is that there are Jewish organizations
>that do attempt to stand up for Jewish interests in the world, but if
>not for them, who would stand up for Jews?  We do not ask for anyone
>else to fight our battles for us.  Every other group in the world is
>entitled to organize for their own defense and benefit without
comment,
>but only Jews are taken to task for defending their own interests as
>best they might.
>
>Furthermore, this "well-oiled machine" seldom is effective unless the
>rest of the world joins in the protest.  Jewish organizations are
>nothing more than publicity agents, informing the world of events
>that they consider unfair or anti-Semitic.  If the rest of the world
>does not respond, then the Jews lose!
>
>Finally, Mr. Strom does not clarify what he means by "Jewish
interests."
>He does seem to imply that there is something wrong with having a
>"well-oiled machine" ready to respond if "Jews... are threatened!"
>
>

Nothing "wrong" with the Jews having their well-oiled machine -- is it
wrong for the wolf to have sharp teeth or the porcupine to have spines?
But what would organized Jewry say if there were a "World Aryan
Congress" with the budget and clout of the World Jewish Congress? Or a
"Society From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.oj-simpson,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads,soc.culture.african.american
Subject: Re: Mark Twain and the Jews
References: <3170502F.142F@spectra.net> <4ksge2$fau@express.ior.com> <4kvhfa$es8@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <4lcuc8$jdm@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4ljpuj$blp@shiva.usa.net>

In <4ljpuj$blp@shiva.usa.net> hkatz@earth.usa.net (Harry Katz) writes: 

>
>	If Jews or Jewish interests are threatened anywhere in the
>	world, a huge, well-oiled machine comes into play, demanding
>	capitulation or retribution.
>
>The name of this "well-oiled machine" might prove helpful in verifying
>its existence.  My experience is that there are Jewish organizations
>that do attempt to stand up for Jewish interests in the world, but if
>not for them, who would stand up for Jews?  We do not ask for anyone
>else to fight our battles for us.  Every other group in the world is
>entitled to organize for their own defense and benefit without
comment,
>but only Jews are taken to task for defending their own interests as
>best they might.
>
>Furthermore, this "well-oiled machine" seldom is effective unless the
>rest of the world joins in the protest.  Jewish organizations are
>nothing more than publicity agents, informing the world of events
>that they consider unfair or anti-Semitic.  If the rest of the world
>does not respond, then the Jews lose!
>
>Finally, Mr. Strom does not clarify what he means by "Jewish
interests."
>He does seem to imply that there is something wrong with having a
>"well-oiled machine" ready to respond if "Jews... are threatened!"
>
>

Nothing "wrong" with the Jews having their well-oiled machine -- is it
wrong for the wolf to have sharp teeth or the porcupine to have spines?
But what would organized Jewry say if there were a "World Aryan
Congress" with the budget and clout of the World Jewish Congress? Or a
"Society en law of today that "there is no such thing as legitimate
criticism -- or even characterization -- of Jews by non-Jews." If there
is such a thing, please bring it to this forum's attention!

With hopes for the continued existence of White children, I am

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Sun Apr 28 22:51:32 PDT 1996
Article: 20789 of alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.jumppoint.com!news3.ottawa.istar.net!istar.net!torn!news.bconnex.net!news.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!hodes.com!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
Date: 26 Apr 1996 09:00:35 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <4lq3bj$7p@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kt3ls$sth@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kukph$56m@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l1mld$2ig@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l3k78$er4@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l434o$4ik@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <3176A0CE.200C@scott.net> <317DD49F.26C2@teleport.com> <317E7367.115F@scott.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-26.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Apr 26  4:00:35 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:26976 alt.politics.nationalism.white:18549 alt.discrimination:46138 alt.revisionism:33531 alt.skinheads:20789

In <317E7367.115F@scott.net> evil Beavis  writes: 
>

>
>
>You do not agree with the argument that countries like Zimbabwe and
South Africa has the 
>right to be ruled by, or at least mainly influenced by the majority
and original 
>population of those countries? 
>
>eB

In South Africa, the "majority" (Negro) and "original" (Capoid)
populations are different, so your question needs to be rephrased.

If we are to defer to the "original" population always, I suppose the
shrews and the insects predate us all.

As to other questions in this thread:

Are Negroes backward, compared to Whites? It is almost as plain as the
nose on your face, as someone suggested. It is the difference between
the Apollo space missions and a bark canoe. It is the difference
between the invention of the semiconductor and failing to invent the
wheel.

Did Africans "fail to evolve"? Literally speaking, no; every species
evolves in some way. We all arose from the tadpole or something similar
if you go back far enough. Comparatively speaking, yes; those who
remained in tropical Africa did not evolve _as far_ from our pre-human
ancestors, compared with those humans who travelled to and evolved in
Ice Age Europe. Humans have smaller jaws and larger frontal lobes than
apes; Blacks less so, though, in both those categories than Europeans
or Orientals. Everyone can see this is true by observing or even
visualizing monochrome silhouettes of a Negro and a European -- no
color in the picture at all, but the prognathism (portruding jaw) and
receding forehead of the Black, among other features make racial
identification easy.

Now, primitive doesn't necessarily mean "bad." Even hyenas and bacteria
have their place on Earth, which is inherently an "even playing field"
where failures are punished by extinction.

With good wishes to all,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Sun Apr 28 22:56:24 PDT 1996
Article: 33531 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.jumppoint.com!news3.ottawa.istar.net!istar.net!torn!news.bconnex.net!news.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!hodes.com!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
Date: 26 Apr 1996 09:00:35 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <4lq3bj$7p@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kt3ls$sth@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kukph$56m@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l1mld$2ig@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l3k78$er4@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l434o$4ik@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <3176A0CE.200C@scott.net> <317DD49F.26C2@teleport.com> <317E7367.115F@scott.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-26.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Apr 26  4:00:35 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:26976 alt.politics.nationalism.white:18549 alt.discrimination:46138 alt.revisionism:33531 alt.skinheads:20789

In <317E7367.115F@scott.net> evil Beavis  writes: 
>

>
>
>You do not agree with the argument that countries like Zimbabwe and
South Africa has the 
>right to be ruled by, or at least mainly influenced by the majority
and original 
>population of those countries? 
>
>eB

In South Africa, the "majority" (Negro) and "original" (Capoid)
populations are different, so your question needs to be rephrased.

If we are to defer to the "original" population always, I suppose the
shrews and the insects predate us all.

As to other questions in this thread:

Are Negroes backward, compared to Whites? It is almost as plain as the
nose on your face, as someone suggested. It is the difference between
the Apollo space missions and a bark canoe. It is the difference
between the invention of the semiconductor and failing to invent the
wheel.

Did Africans "fail to evolve"? Literally speaking, no; every species
evolves in some way. We all arose from the tadpole or something similar
if you go back far enough. Comparatively speaking, yes; those who
remained in tropical Africa did not evolve _as far_ from our pre-human
ancestors, compared with those humans who travelled to and evolved in
Ice Age Europe. Humans have smaller jaws and larger frontal lobes than
apes; Blacks less so, though, in both those categories than Europeans
or Orientals. Everyone can see this is true by observing or even
visualizing monochrome silhouettes of a Negro and a European -- no
color in the picture at all, but the prognathism (portruding jaw) and
receding forehead of the Black, among other features make racial
identification easy.

Now, primitive doesn't necessarily mean "bad." Even hyenas and bacteria
have their place on Earth, which is inherently an "even playing field"
where failures are punished by extinction.

With good wishes to all,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Mon Apr 29 08:07:56 PDT 1996
Article: 33592 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!xmission!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!csusac!csus.edu!csulb.edu!newshub.csu.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!tns.sdsu.edu!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.oj-simpson,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Defending the White race
Date: 26 Apr 1996 07:18:35 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <4lptcb$r0q@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
References: <3170502F.142F@spectra.net> <4ksge2$fau@express.ior.com> <4kvhfa$es8@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <4lcuc8$jdm@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4lfdej$7q0@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>  <4lhgl3$aoj@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ljp5v$38d@moe.cc.emory.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-26.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Apr 26  2:18:35 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.california:24911 alt.politics.nationalism.white:18582 alt.politics.white-power:27013 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:298031 alt.fan.oj-simpson:48621 alt.revisionism:33592 alt.skinheads:20854

In <4ljp5v$38d@moe.cc.emory.edu> libwca@larry.cc.emory.edu (william c
anderson) writes: 

>First, there's no such thing as the "White Race".  Second, beating
>somebody in a business deal doesn't constitute and act of 
>aggression, and thus doesn't justify a violent response--if it did,
>I'd be within my rights to whack out everybody who ever got a

Correction -- Mr. Griswold made no reference to violence; and the
original article referred to _legislation_ restricting Jews.
 
>contract I wanted.  Third, puffing your pathetic self-image by
>strutting around in your security-guard uniform babbling about 
>imaginary conspiracies hatched by treacherous JOOOOS wouldn't do
>anything to help the "white race" even if such a thing did exist.
>
>Bill

Saying that there is no such thing as the White race is approximately
equivalent to saying that there is no such thing as the Pacific Ocean.

As for "jooos" (curious variant spelling, that, but you aren't very
consistent in the number of "o"s), please examine the testimonies of
Benjamin Freedman and Victor Ostrovsky before deciding that this group
(does it also "not exist" in your world-view, by the way?) has never
engaged in covert activities in pursuit of its perceived interests. I
assure you that they have engaged in such activities -- and continue to
do so.

For those who are interested in such things, go to your local library
and examine the Encyclopedia of Associations. There you will find
perhaps 600 different Jewish organizations listed, each in its own way
devoted to advancing the interests of that most pre-eminent among the
Middle Eastern races. (And this list includes only organizations
operating in the United States!) A numerically much larger group -- the
European race -- has virtually nothing by comparison. In fact,
organizations devoted to stamp-collecting probably have more
organizations and total membership than those devoted to welfare and
survival of the European race. It is quite sad.

With my best wishes to all,

Kevin Alfred Strom



From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Mon Apr 29 08:12:58 PDT 1996
Article: 18549 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.jumppoint.com!news3.ottawa.istar.net!istar.net!torn!news.bconnex.net!news.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!hodes.com!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
Date: 26 Apr 1996 09:00:35 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <4lq3bj$7p@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kt3ls$sth@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kukph$56m@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l1mld$2ig@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l3k78$er4@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l434o$4ik@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <3176A0CE.200C@scott.net> <317DD49F.26C2@teleport.com> <317E7367.115F@scott.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-26.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Apr 26  4:00:35 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:26976 alt.politics.nationalism.white:18549 alt.discrimination:46138 alt.revisionism:33531 alt.skinheads:20789

In <317E7367.115F@scott.net> evil Beavis  writes: 
>

>
>
>You do not agree with the argument that countries like Zimbabwe and
South Africa has the 
>right to be ruled by, or at least mainly influenced by the majority
and original 
>population of those countries? 
>
>eB

In South Africa, the "majority" (Negro) and "original" (Capoid)
populations are different, so your question needs to be rephrased.

If we are to defer to the "original" population always, I suppose the
shrews and the insects predate us all.

As to other questions in this thread:

Are Negroes backward, compared to Whites? It is almost as plain as the
nose on your face, as someone suggested. It is the difference between
the Apollo space missions and a bark canoe. It is the difference
between the invention of the semiconductor and failing to invent the
wheel.

Did Africans "fail to evolve"? Literally speaking, no; every species
evolves in some way. We all arose from the tadpole or something similar
if you go back far enough. Comparatively speaking, yes; those who
remained in tropical Africa did not evolve _as far_ from our pre-human
ancestors, compared with those humans who travelled to and evolved in
Ice Age Europe. Humans have smaller jaws and larger frontal lobes than
apes; Blacks less so, though, in both those categories than Europeans
or Orientals. Everyone can see this is true by observing or even
visualizing monochrome silhouettes of a Negro and a European -- no
color in the picture at all, but the prognathism (portruding jaw) and
receding forehead of the Black, among other features make racial
identification easy.

Now, primitive doesn't necessarily mean "bad." Even hyenas and bacteria
have their place on Earth, which is inherently an "even playing field"
where failures are punished by extinction.

With good wishes to all,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Mon Apr 29 08:15:03 PDT 1996
Article: 26976 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.jumppoint.com!news3.ottawa.istar.net!istar.net!torn!news.bconnex.net!news.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!hodes.com!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Negroes aren't primitive?
Date: 26 Apr 1996 09:00:35 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <4lq3bj$7p@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kr3f5$duk@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ks9gt$4oi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kt3ls$sth@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kukph$56m@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l1mld$2ig@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l3k78$er4@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l434o$4ik@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <3176A0CE.200C@scott.net> <317DD49F.26C2@teleport.com> <317E7367.115F@scott.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-26.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Apr 26  4:00:35 AM CDT 1996
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:26976 alt.politics.nationalism.white:18549 alt.discrimination:46138 alt.revisionism:33531 alt.skinheads:20789

In <317E7367.115F@scott.net> evil Beavis  writes: 
>

>
>
>You do not agree with the argument that countries like Zimbabwe and
South Africa has the 
>right to be ruled by, or at least mainly influenced by the majority
and original 
>population of those countries? 
>
>eB

In South Africa, the "majority" (Negro) and "original" (Capoid)
populations are different, so your question needs to be rephrased.

If we are to defer to the "original" population always, I suppose the
shrews and the insects predate us all.

As to other questions in this thread:

Are Negroes backward, compared to Whites? It is almost as plain as the
nose on your face, as someone suggested. It is the difference between
the Apollo space missions and a bark canoe. It is the difference
between the invention of the semiconductor and failing to invent the
wheel.

Did Africans "fail to evolve"? Literally speaking, no; every species
evolves in some way. We all arose from the tadpole or something similar
if you go back far enough. Comparatively speaking, yes; those who
remained in tropical Africa did not evolve _as far_ from our pre-human
ancestors, compared with those humans who travelled to and evolved in
Ice Age Europe. Humans have smaller jaws and larger frontal lobes than
apes; Blacks less so, though, in both those categories than Europeans
or Orientals. Everyone can see this is true by observing or even
visualizing monochrome silhouettes of a Negro and a European -- no
color in the picture at all, but the prognathism (portruding jaw) and
receding forehead of the Black, among other features make racial
identification easy.

Now, primitive doesn't necessarily mean "bad." Even hyenas and bacteria
have their place on Earth, which is inherently an "even playing field"
where failures are punished by extinction.

With good wishes to all,

Kevin Alfred Strom


From ka_strom@ix.netcom.com Wed May  1 00:14:41 PDT 1996
Article: 18638 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.jumppoint.com!news3.ottawa.istar.net!istar.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: ka_strom@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Alfred Strom)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Re: Ignorance Abounds
Date: 26 Apr 1996 07:37:28 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <4lpufo$rj8@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4kseff$bpo@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kt3ls$sth@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4kukph$56m@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l1mld$2ig@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l3k78$er4@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l434o$4ik@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l48r9$cbi@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l528a$51a@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l52gc$57l@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l5bvk$fb9@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4l6siu$lp7@freenet-news.carleton.ca>  <4lj340$rs6@doc.zippo.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-mn1-26.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Apr 26  2:37:28 AM CDT 1996

In <4lj340$rs6@doc.zippo.com> Jennifer Addison writes: 

>>
>>
>>Do you actually beleive what you say or are you just trying to stir
up an 
>argument by writing that "negroes are backwards" ?  Sounds to me like
you need to 
>revise you rascist attitude and seek out some education!

Well, Jennifer, we can all use more knowledge, though I am not so sure
about what passes for education these days.

Just to help you, I think you meant "your," not "you" on the last line
of your post. And I have never before encountered the word "rascist."

Perhaps you meant "racist."

Actually, racism is good. It drives evolution and differentiation among
subspecies. Eventually subspecies differentiate enough so that they do
not interbreed. So are all new species formed.

This implies no value judgement, of course. It may well be that the
fecundity of the African will have greater survival value than the
frontal lobe development of the Indo-European. Time will tell.

Happy Internetting,

Kevin Alfred Strom

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor