The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/s/smith.jason/1994/smith.0594


Archive/File: fascism/canada smith.j.0594
Last-Modified: 1994/06/08

Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca> 
Date: Sun, 1 May 1994 05:04:13 GMT
Lines: 31

In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>The error Jason Smith and his fellow criminals and sociopaths make is
>that they assume that the veneer of democratic freedoms and individual
>rights is something they can rely on for themselves to further their
>murderous goals (there is nothing ambiguous about the above, it is a
>threat to murder those who disagree with them.)

	First, you attempt to put words into my mouth, where none are
forthcoming.  There was no threat, and none was implied.  Whatever your
twisted paranoid schizophrenic brain reads into it, is entirely a
different matter.  And people accuse Nazis of dreaming up conspiracy
theories...

>Indeed, various government employees are quite constrained in their
>ability to act. However, if I were Jason Smith I'd still be concerned
>about the rest of the population and the dark of the night. Like any
>body, the body politic has its anti-bodies capable of exicising its
>most diseased bits.

	...and after condemning me for threating people, proceeds with a
very thinly veiled threat of his own.  Who is trying to excise free speech
now?  Who's the real fascist.  And frankly, the dark of night doesn't
scare me.  I've got more scars than you do brains from people like you. 
Try again.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins

Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: IHR???
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <2pflng$nd0@cat.cis.Brown.EDU>
Date: Sun, 1 May 1994 05:07:00 GMT
Lines: 14

In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>Or, perhaps put into a form they'd understand: Karl Marx had
>absolutely outstanding academic credentials, even his greatest
>detractors wouldn't question that.

	Bogus.  After having difficulty in his studies, Karl Marx's
friends cinvinced him to submit his doctorate thesis to the university at
Jena, which was known for its lax standards at the time.

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 00:37:43 GMT
Lines: 72

In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>Bullshit, as usual, you are lying, here's the quote you so
>conveniently elided from your response:
>
>>	Well, believe it or not, some do take us seriously.  Perhaps because
>>they believe that if there ever is a resurgence, they'll be the first to go.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^
	Can you not read?  You put my post up as the very proof intended
to condemn me, but all you did was show us your own stupidity and
inability to read, as well as your intolerance of differing opinions.  One
thing I do pride myself on is the ability to listen to other people's
points of view.  All you do when you slam me blindly like that is ruin
your own credibility.

>You seem to be having a problem reading and understanding English, Smith.

	Wow!  Amazing!  You use my arguments to defend
yourself.  Are you a nazi?

>Fuck you, does that register?

	Ah!  More ignorance!

>
>I don't give a rat's ass about your pathetic mewings for fairness and
>justice you nazi scum. I mainly look forward to the day your cellmates
>are placing bets on how much of their urine you can drink.

	Frankly, I've been to prison.  Kikes don't get too far there, let
me tell you.  For the most part, prison is segregated, and with good
reason.  Little Jew boys like you would make decent boy-toys for the 'mates.

>I realize you nazis rely heavily on others' sense of fairness to get
>them to braid the rope to hang them with, but sorry, I am not a stupid
>person and I do not fall for that crap. When I need advice on how to
>treat nazi-wannabes justly I refer to Mein Kampf and other ravings and
>actions of their own heros for a standard.

	  I've never even read Mein Kampf in its entirety.  You want
a summary?  The masses are sheep.  It's the Jew's fault.  End of book.  I
certainly don't idolize Hitler, and I frankly don't care for your inane
expressions of opinion.  If you can debate intelligently and articulately,
instead of spewing forth shit, get back to me.  Until then, fuck off. 
Seeing as name-calling and foul language are the only way to communicate
with you, I'll stoop to your level.

>Umm, hey brain-boy, was that sentence supposed to mean something?

	Yes, better men than you have tried.
>
>You don't seem to get it, I don't give a shit about your opinion on
>the matter. I am fully aware of what your type understands, a jackboot
>pressed firmly against the mouth until the teeth and jaws are heard to
>make a loud crack.

	Then that makes it unanimous!  I don't give a flying nun's fuck
what you think.

>You have as much interest in fairness and justice and rational
>discourse as your average rabid animal, and should be treated as such.

	My daddy's bigger than your daddy...

	You may think the world revolves around you, and you may be
right.  The asshole's located in the center of the body...  Promptly fuckoff.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 00:41:12 GMT
Lines: 21


In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>Don't talk about "rights" until you show some interest in others'
>rights.
>
>As a self-proclaimed Nazi we all know your interest in "rights".
>About the same interest as your average hostage taker or pedophile:
>Only his own and only when cornered.

	There you go making assumptions again.  That's dangerous. 
Underestimating the enemy always is.  You know nothing about me, nor of my
principles.  Quit making assumptions, and then you'll be on the track to
intelligent debate.  If I follow your thinking, then all Communists are
Stalinists.  Or all Orientals wear cameras.  That's stereotyping, and is
exactly what you accuse me of.  Grow up.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2prjjo$2b2e@whale.st.usm.edu> 
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 00:48:55 GMT
Lines: 32



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>By "borscht" we can assume this is supposed to be a reference to a
>food associated with Ashkenazi Jews (generally a beet soup actually of
>Russian origin)?
>
>Go ahead, keep making your anti-semitic remarks while mewing for
>justice and fairness. See where it gets you, nazi-boy.

	You're an idiot, Barry.  Yes, Borscht is a food.  It was in
reference to the 'wiener power', and had absolutely nothing anti-semitic
in its content.  The more you try to discredit me, the stupider you look. 
Shut your hole.

	You seem to assume that everything that comes out of my mouth is a
racist, anti-semitic remark.  This is no more true than anything else you say.
I'm like everyone else, I get up, shit, shower, and shave, go to work
(where there are minorities, and I deal with them on a daily basis), come
home, eat dinner, watch TV (Star Trek, usually), crack a beer or two,
watch the hockey finals, then go to bed to repeat the process.  Gee.  That
sounds racist to me!

	You are the most pathetic anti-nazi I have ever seen.  Instead of
battling me with logic and intelligence, you spew stereotypes and
assumptions that are purely based on emotional responses.



-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca> 
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 1994 22:54:14 GMT
Lines: 25


In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>
>From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
>>	Well, believe it or not, some do take us seriously.  Perhaps because
>>they believe that if there ever is a resurgence, they'll be the first to go.
>
>Remember these (and similar) lines well next time Jason Smith and his
>fellow sociopaths begin screaming for their rights and fair play.

	Barry, you fool.  Learn to read.  Read the post over again, as
many times as you like.  Now, did I say that "my ilk" were going to rid
the world of all undesirables?  No...  What was said was that the people
who take us seriously _believe_ they'll be the first to go.  Quite a
difference, there, don't you think?  So what you're advocating is taking
away the rights of the right-wing to protect others?  Sounds like fascism
to me...

Jason
The Oxymoron

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca> 
Date: Sun, 1 May 1994 05:04:13 GMT
Lines: 31

In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>The error Jason Smith and his fellow criminals and sociopaths make is
>that they assume that the veneer of democratic freedoms and individual
>rights is something they can rely on for themselves to further their
>murderous goals (there is nothing ambiguous about the above, it is a
>threat to murder those who disagree with them.)

	First, you attempt to put words into my mouth, where none are
forthcoming.  There was no threat, and none was implied.  Whatever your
twisted paranoid schizophrenic brain reads into it, is entirely a
different matter.  And people accuse Nazis of dreaming up conspiracy
theories...

>Indeed, various government employees are quite constrained in their
>ability to act. However, if I were Jason Smith I'd still be concerned
>about the rest of the population and the dark of the night. Like any
>body, the body politic has its anti-bodies capable of exicising its
>most diseased bits.

	...and after condemning me for threating people, proceeds with a
very thinly veiled threat of his own.  Who is trying to excise free speech
now?  Who's the real fascist.  And frankly, the dark of night doesn't
scare me.  I've got more scars than you do brains from people like you. 
Try again.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 00:37:43 GMT
Lines: 72



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>Bullshit, as usual, you are lying, here's the quote you so
>conveniently elided from your response:
>
>>	Well, believe it or not, some do take us seriously.  Perhaps because
>>they believe that if there ever is a resurgence, they'll be the first to go.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^
	Can you not read?  You put my post up as the very proof intended
to condemn me, but all you did was show us your own stupidity and
inability to read, as well as your intolerance of differing opinions.  One
thing I do pride myself on is the ability to listen to other people's
points of view.  All you do when you slam me blindly like that is ruin
your own credibility.

>You seem to be having a problem reading and understanding English, Smith.

	Wow!  Amazing!  You use my arguments to defend
yourself.  Are you a nazi?

>Fuck you, does that register?

	Ah!  More ignorance!

>
>I don't give a rat's ass about your pathetic mewings for fairness and
>justice you nazi scum. I mainly look forward to the day your cellmates
>are placing bets on how much of their urine you can drink.

	Frankly, I've been to prison.  Kikes don't get too far there, let
me tell you.  For the most part, prison is segregated, and with good
reason.  Little Jew boys like you would make decent boy-toys for the 'mates.

>I realize you nazis rely heavily on others' sense of fairness to get
>them to braid the rope to hang them with, but sorry, I am not a stupid
>person and I do not fall for that crap. When I need advice on how to
>treat nazi-wannabes justly I refer to Mein Kampf and other ravings and
>actions of their own heros for a standard.

	  I've never even read Mein Kampf in its entirety.  You want
a summary?  The masses are sheep.  It's the Jew's fault.  End of book.  I
certainly don't idolize Hitler, and I frankly don't care for your inane
expressions of opinion.  If you can debate intelligently and articulately,
instead of spewing forth shit, get back to me.  Until then, fuck off. 
Seeing as name-calling and foul language are the only way to communicate
with you, I'll stoop to your level.

>Umm, hey brain-boy, was that sentence supposed to mean something?

	Yes, better men than you have tried.
>
>You don't seem to get it, I don't give a shit about your opinion on
>the matter. I am fully aware of what your type understands, a jackboot
>pressed firmly against the mouth until the teeth and jaws are heard to
>make a loud crack.

	Then that makes it unanimous!  I don't give a flying nun's fuck
what you think.

>You have as much interest in fairness and justice and rational
>discourse as your average rabid animal, and should be treated as such.

	My daddy's bigger than your daddy...

	You may think the world revolves around you, and you may be
right.  The asshole's located in the center of the body...  Promptly fuckoff.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 00:41:12 GMT
Lines: 21



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>Don't talk about "rights" until you show some interest in others'
>rights.
>
>As a self-proclaimed Nazi we all know your interest in "rights".
>About the same interest as your average hostage taker or pedophile:
>Only his own and only when cornered.

	There you go making assumptions again.  That's dangerous. 
Underestimating the enemy always is.  You know nothing about me, nor of my
principles.  Quit making assumptions, and then you'll be on the track to
intelligent debate.  If I follow your thinking, then all Communists are
Stalinists.  Or all Orientals wear cameras.  That's stereotyping, and is
exactly what you accuse me of.  Grow up.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2prjjo$2b2e@whale.st.usm.edu> 
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 00:48:55 GMT
Lines: 32


In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>By "borscht" we can assume this is supposed to be a reference to a
>food associated with Ashkenazi Jews (generally a beet soup actually of
>Russian origin)?
>
>Go ahead, keep making your anti-semitic remarks while mewing for
>justice and fairness. See where it gets you, nazi-boy.

	You're an idiot, Barry.  Yes, Borscht is a food.  It was in
reference to the 'wiener power', and had absolutely nothing anti-semitic
in its content.  The more you try to discredit me, the stupider you look. 
Shut your hole.

	You seem to assume that everything that comes out of my mouth is a
racist, anti-semitic remark.  This is no more true than anything else you say.
I'm like everyone else, I get up, shit, shower, and shave, go to work
(where there are minorities, and I deal with them on a daily basis), come
home, eat dinner, watch TV (Star Trek, usually), crack a beer or two,
watch the hockey finals, then go to bed to repeat the process.  Gee.  That
sounds racist to me!

	You are the most pathetic anti-nazi I have ever seen.  Instead of
battling me with logic and intelligence, you spew stereotypes and
assumptions that are purely based on emotional responses.



-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca> 
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 1994 22:54:14 GMT
Lines: 25



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>
>From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
>>	Well, believe it or not, some do take us seriously.  Perhaps because
>>they believe that if there ever is a resurgence, they'll be the first to go.
>
>Remember these (and similar) lines well next time Jason Smith and his
>fellow sociopaths begin screaming for their rights and fair play.

	Barry, you fool.  Learn to read.  Read the post over again, as
many times as you like.  Now, did I say that "my ilk" were going to rid
the world of all undesirables?  No...  What was said was that the people
who take us seriously _believe_ they'll be the first to go.  Quite a
difference, there, don't you think?  So what you're advocating is taking
away the rights of the right-wing to protect others?  Sounds like fascism
to me...

Jason
The Oxymoron

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca> 
Date: Sun, 1 May 1994 05:04:13 GMT
Lines: 31



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>The error Jason Smith and his fellow criminals and sociopaths make is
>that they assume that the veneer of democratic freedoms and individual
>rights is something they can rely on for themselves to further their
>murderous goals (there is nothing ambiguous about the above, it is a
>threat to murder those who disagree with them.)

	First, you attempt to put words into my mouth, where none are
forthcoming.  There was no threat, and none was implied.  Whatever your
twisted paranoid schizophrenic brain reads into it, is entirely a
different matter.  And people accuse Nazis of dreaming up conspiracy
theories...

>Indeed, various government employees are quite constrained in their
>ability to act. However, if I were Jason Smith I'd still be concerned
>about the rest of the population and the dark of the night. Like any
>body, the body politic has its anti-bodies capable of exicising its
>most diseased bits.

	...and after condemning me for threating people, proceeds with a
very thinly veiled threat of his own.  Who is trying to excise free speech
now?  Who's the real fascist.  And frankly, the dark of night doesn't
scare me.  I've got more scars than you do brains from people like you. 
Try again.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 00:37:43 GMT
Lines: 72



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>Bullshit, as usual, you are lying, here's the quote you so
>conveniently elided from your response:
>
>>	Well, believe it or not, some do take us seriously.  Perhaps because
>>they believe that if there ever is a resurgence, they'll be the first to go.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^
	Can you not read?  You put my post up as the very proof intended
to condemn me, but all you did was show us your own stupidity and
inability to read, as well as your intolerance of differing opinions.  One
thing I do pride myself on is the ability to listen to other people's
points of view.  All you do when you slam me blindly like that is ruin
your own credibility.

>You seem to be having a problem reading and understanding English, Smith.

	Wow!  Amazing!  You use my arguments to defend
yourself.  Are you a nazi?

>Fuck you, does that register?

	Ah!  More ignorance!

>
>I don't give a rat's ass about your pathetic mewings for fairness and
>justice you nazi scum. I mainly look forward to the day your cellmates
>are placing bets on how much of their urine you can drink.

	Frankly, I've been to prison.  Kikes don't get too far there, let
me tell you.  For the most part, prison is segregated, and with good
reason.  Little Jew boys like you would make decent boy-toys for the 'mates.

>I realize you nazis rely heavily on others' sense of fairness to get
>them to braid the rope to hang them with, but sorry, I am not a stupid
>person and I do not fall for that crap. When I need advice on how to
>treat nazi-wannabes justly I refer to Mein Kampf and other ravings and
>actions of their own heros for a standard.

	  I've never even read Mein Kampf in its entirety.  You want
a summary?  The masses are sheep.  It's the Jew's fault.  End of book.  I
certainly don't idolize Hitler, and I frankly don't care for your inane
expressions of opinion.  If you can debate intelligently and articulately,
instead of spewing forth shit, get back to me.  Until then, fuck off. 
Seeing as name-calling and foul language are the only way to communicate
with you, I'll stoop to your level.

>Umm, hey brain-boy, was that sentence supposed to mean something?

	Yes, better men than you have tried.
>
>You don't seem to get it, I don't give a shit about your opinion on
>the matter. I am fully aware of what your type understands, a jackboot
>pressed firmly against the mouth until the teeth and jaws are heard to
>make a loud crack.

	Then that makes it unanimous!  I don't give a flying nun's fuck
what you think.

>You have as much interest in fairness and justice and rational
>discourse as your average rabid animal, and should be treated as such.

	My daddy's bigger than your daddy...

	You may think the world revolves around you, and you may be
right.  The asshole's located in the center of the body...  Promptly fuckoff.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 00:41:12 GMT
Lines: 21



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>Don't talk about "rights" until you show some interest in others'
>rights.
>
>As a self-proclaimed Nazi we all know your interest in "rights".
>About the same interest as your average hostage taker or pedophile:
>Only his own and only when cornered.

	There you go making assumptions again.  That's dangerous. 
Underestimating the enemy always is.  You know nothing about me, nor of my
principles.  Quit making assumptions, and then you'll be on the track to
intelligent debate.  If I follow your thinking, then all Communists are
Stalinists.  Or all Orientals wear cameras.  That's stereotyping, and is
exactly what you accuse me of.  Grow up.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2prjjo$2b2e@whale.st.usm.edu> 
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 00:48:55 GMT
Lines: 32



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>By "borscht" we can assume this is supposed to be a reference to a
>food associated with Ashkenazi Jews (generally a beet soup actually of
>Russian origin)?
>
>Go ahead, keep making your anti-semitic remarks while mewing for
>justice and fairness. See where it gets you, nazi-boy.

	You're an idiot, Barry.  Yes, Borscht is a food.  It was in
reference to the 'wiener power', and had absolutely nothing anti-semitic
in its content.  The more you try to discredit me, the stupider you look. 
Shut your hole.

	You seem to assume that everything that comes out of my mouth is a
racist, anti-semitic remark.  This is no more true than anything else you say.
I'm like everyone else, I get up, shit, shower, and shave, go to work
(where there are minorities, and I deal with them on a daily basis), come
home, eat dinner, watch TV (Star Trek, usually), crack a beer or two,
watch the hockey finals, then go to bed to repeat the process.  Gee.  That
sounds racist to me!

	You are the most pathetic anti-nazi I have ever seen.  Instead of
battling me with logic and intelligence, you spew stereotypes and
assumptions that are purely based on emotional responses.



-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:    <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 16:24:26 GMT
Lines: 13



In a previous article, v140pxgt@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu (Daniel B Case) says:

>Oooh! What have you done time for, Jason-ripping the heads of parking meters?
>Putting cherry bombs in toilets?

	Aggravated assault (which was reduced to assault causing bodily
harm via plea-bargain), and being in a residence illegally.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:    >        Aggravated assault (which was reduced to assault causing bodily
>>harm via plea-bargain), and being in a residence illegally.
>
>As in breaking and entering or as in squatting? 

	Well, there was no breaking involved, just entering.  It's some
obscure charge, similar to trespassing.  Basically, I was in the guy's
house without an invitation, after which I proceeded to turn his face into
an assorted crimson mish-mash.



-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <2prjjo$2b2e@whale.st.usm.edu> Jason leaps to his own defense:
>
>>        You seem to assume that everything that comes out of my mouth is a
>>racist, anti-semitic remark.  This is no more true than anything else you say.
>
>Then, in article  al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA 
>(Jason Smith) writes:
>
>>        Frankly, I've been to prison.  Kikes don't get too far there, let
>>me tell you.  For the most part, prison is segregated, and with good
>>reason.  Little Jew boys like you would make decent boy-toys for the 'mates.
>
>Maybe not everything, Jason, but a pretty fair sample.  
>
	If he wants to play name-calling games, two can play that game.  I
won't go so far as to say, 'well he started', but the evidence is there to
suggest it...


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q3et6$661@mits.mdata.fi>   <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd In article ,
>Jason Smith  wrote:
>
>>	Aggravated assault (which was reduced to assault causing bodily
>>harm via plea-bargain), and being in a residence illegally.
>
>So you ARE a dangerous, violent individual also physically?
>Have you ever considered that there might be something wrong
>deep down in your beeing - in your attitudes towards life
>and other human beings?

	This coming from someone a few weeks ago who threatened to punch
me out if he ever saw me in a bar.  Eat your words, Kari.  You don't even
know the circumstances behind the charges.  I don't feel the necessity to
justify my actions to you, but I will tell the group what happened, and
they can condemn me as they wish.  For starters, the assault wasn't
racially motivated.  It wasn't even 'skinhead' motivated.  My sister was
beaten by some lug, and the police refused to do anything.  I took justice
into my own hands, and beat the pusbag into a lump.  The difference here
is, he knew I was coming after him, and I'm fairly well-known around these
parts, so the police didn't have much difficulty tracking me down, and I
went without a fuss.  Pleaded guilty too, but on a reduced charge.  I had
nothing to hide, and admitted everything to the police.  I'd do it again
if I had to.  Rapists, child molesters, and men who beat women should be
hung by their testicles with piano wire.

	Secondly, how would you even recognise me in a bar?  Do you have
some special ability to sense racists in an enclosed area?  Must be
awfully distracting, considering nobody is free from prejudice.

Loyalty above all else except honour
Jason

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q3t6s$fl9@mits.mdata.fi> <2q3et6$661@mits.mdata.fi> <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd 
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 03:58:04 GMT
Lines: 68



In a previous article, kauhunen@mits.mdata.fi (Kari Nenonen) says:

>Ok. A point for you. I'm not even trying to say that it was a methafor or
>something, just wrote it because I got pissed off with your rantings and I
>thought that it was language that you understand. Bar fighting is not
>exactly my hobby though :-). Maybe I was drunk too, don't remember any moore.
>Can't resist internet when I've taken one or two too much and there is a
>computer available. Does this qualify for an apolorgise for threatening you
>with physical violence in the cyber space?

	Apology accepted.  I guess I owe you one too.  Now we're on the right
track back to civilised human dialogue.  The Net is addictive, is it not?

>Well, in certain circumstances I might have done the same. Guess I just have
>to be gratefull that any of my dear ones has never been beaten up by anybody.
>But then again, you seem generally to support values that - if they were
>more prevailing - would cause even more beatings and killings of innocent
>women and children that happens to-day in this world.

	You certainly should be grateful that you've never had to deal with
something like that.  Again, I don't advocate political violence, but I will
defend myself if attacked.  I can't say the same for some of my political
'allies,' however.  Then again, it isn't a phenomenon restricted solely to
'nazis.'  Plenty of anti-racists engage in violent acts too.

>I could have made that statement too (put not in public ;-) I could (and
>maybe I should) write more about this issue. But let's just say here that
>in spite of my rage for that kind of criminals I'm not a supporter of
>brutal and inhuman punishments. Because they don't help the society at
>large: they are just revenge and no matter how righteous, they'll make
>the society only harder. Still... when I was 12-years old, one of my
>class mates (a boy) and a friend was raped and brutally killed by a
>pedophile. The man got a life time for it. When I was 25 I read in
>a paper that this same man (who had been free for a year!) had "found
>Jesus". There he was "a new born Christian" in a family magazine, broadly
>smiling. Don't want to write what I thought in that moment.

	That's sick.  The only way he should have found Jesus is through
the grave.  I can't say I agree with you about punishment, though.  Such
punishments would certainly act as deterrents.  Of course, the criminally
insane are hard to deter...

>Wouldn't you be that bald headed guy who would try to bother me with
>his nazi leaflets while I'm trying to concentrate in drinking and
>watching hockey?  :-)

	Hardly.  I keep my politics to where it's appropriate.  When I go
to a bar, it's to drink, and watch the game.  Canadiens lost, dammit!  And
San Jose just beat Toronto, of all the retarded things in this world! 
Incidentally, not every bald guy is a skinhead, and not all skinheads are
racist.  You probably wouldn't even be able to tell I was one at a casual
glance, anyway.

>Yes. But loyalty to whom and honour in what consept?

	Well, I'm sure you won't like this, but to my family, first and
foremost.  My race second.  I will never beat a man when he's down, and
believe it or not, I believe in fair play.  No backstabbing, and
definitely no sucker punches.  I respect, though I do not agree with, my
enemy, and I expect the same kind of respect in return.  Anything else
would be nothing short of anarchy and war.

Jason

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.discrimination
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: A lot of Whites are uneducated
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q3ira$re5@unix1.circ.gwu.edu>  
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 22:38:36 GMT
Lines: 22



In a previous article, cr873x@unix1.circ.gwu.edu (Ezekiel Hughes) says:

>	So it seems that many whites aren't as smarts as they thought they
>were.  As a result, when a black person or minority gets the job, the cry
>Affirmative Action.  However, the real answer is they were too stupid to
>get hired.  White men still are afraid to admit they they are no better
>than the rest of us.  Yes, those of you who were passed over were not
>competitive enough.  Plain and simple.  Stop blaming your shortcomings on
>a concept that most of you can't define.

	Whites may not be educated, but the blacks that are were educated
in White schools, or in schools based on the American premise of school,
with knowledge taought them by Whites in White schools.  And whenever a
black doesn't get hired, he screams racism, and wants affirmative action
to cover for his shortcomings.  Stop blaming Whites for the shortcomings
of your culture.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: New Thread!
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2prcch$31l@news.nd.edu> 
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 1994 15:20:06 GMT
Lines: 11



In a previous article,  (-ME-) says:

>fuckin drun slob.  just like white trash....

	Fuckoff.  Go do some crack.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: readme real skinheads.
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:     
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 1994 22:44:29 GMT
Lines: 12



In a previous article, lra0322@mcdata.com (Lawrence Allen) says:

>Yes, I have to say that suicide was the only logical out for him.
>The media circus that would have come to life around him would 
>have made the Gulf War coverage seem like a thumbnail editorial.

	Bingo!!!

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Another thread!
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <94120.174335MB0527A@auvm.american.edu>  <2prcvi$31l@news.nd.edu>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 1994 22:50:26 GMT
Lines: 32


In a previous article, MB0527A@auvm.american.edu (Michael P. Beck) says:

>I don't think Jason has EVER tried to hide the fact that he was in the nick.
>He knows that he broke the law, was caught, and sent up the river for it.
>So the fuck what?  Are you such a pariah that you've never done anything
>illegal?!  Jason just got caught.

	In this vein, I think I was fully justified.  The fucker I nailed
kicked the shit out of my sister, and the cops wouldn't do a thing.  I did
the only thing left... I did the fucker myself.  I put an end to his days of
cripple-free life.  The original charge was aggravated assault, but was
reduced through a plea bargain.  The difference between me and the guy who
did my sister: I got nicked.  I may have broken the law, but I'd do it
again if faced with the same circumstances.  It's called justice.  If the
system won't give it to you, get it yourself.  Vigilantism at its best. 
Coming soon to a town near you...!

>And so the fuck what if he was in prison.  I'm sick to fucking death of gits
>like you who think anyone who has ever committed a crime should be locked up
>forever.  He did his time, let the man live his life now...
>Chances are he learned from his mistake(s)...

	Probably not... well, yeah.  This time, I just won't get caught...

	mikey... that git still hoverin' around your GF?

	Oh, and ME, fuckoff...


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: New Thread!
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q17v6$mg3@bach.udel.edu> <2prcch$31l@news.nd.edu> <94121.005052MB0527A@auvm.american.edu> <2q0png$17t@news.nd.edu> <
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 00:20:43 GMT
Lines: 24



In a previous article, rabbit@bach.udel.edu (Shawn Flanagan) says:

>I'm not so sure I could say the same. For instance, my brother started
>some shit with this one very large guy in high school. The guy wasn't
>bothering anyone, and my brother was being the typical jock asshole that
>he has always been. My bro. socked the guy in the back of the head and
>this guy procedded to turn my brother into a crimson spot on the hall
>floor. I stood there and laughed. I didn't help my brother because he was
>in the wrong. I love him dearly, but if he did something that would put me
>in the position to have to choose between him and what I thought was
>right, I couldn't go with blind 'party allegence'. I'd just have to sit
>there and pick up what was left of him. And besides fighting is stupid.

	That's where I differ.  I'll back up my mates, right or wrong. 
Hell, I'm usually into it before they are, but believe you me, they'll
hear about it if I had to put my neck on the line for them.  Difference
is, I'll be there for them, but I'll take it up with them at a more
opportune moment.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: POWER-----------BULLSHIT-------
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q329i$ase@masala.cc.uh.edu> <1994Apr24.163135.5805@muvms6> 
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 16:16:39 GMT
Lines: 34



In a previous article,  (Frank) says:

>This is addressed to all the fascists here (Davis, Hammy Skins, etc) Are
>ALL of you idiots? Thus far, all I've argued with are people that are
>little more than intellectually inept, frustrated white Amerikans who know
>little or nothing about world events, have done little sociological,
>economic or historical research, except to do a limp defense of Holocaust
>revision (that was on another group-- sorry) and have a fundamental lack of
>understanding about the dynamics of economics, politics and repression on a
>world level. All you morons base all your understanding on this toilet
>nation without doing a shred of reading about other countries. And I don't
>mean the mainstream press. I mean books, not TV. All of you are pathetic.
>I've seen better defenses out of mass murderers.

	Frank, you're an idiot.  I can't remember you ever debating
anything with me, as I don't even respond to your posts.  You're not worth
the effort, and frankly, this isn't the forum for doing so.  It's been
said time and again that this isn't the forum for political debate, as it
tends to degenerate and bore alot of people.  You can post your opinions,
yes, but don't expect me to go for the bait.  I posted a newlsletter, yes.
 It wasn't a debate, however.  Those who want it, have it.  Those who
don't, don't need to have it.  There was no debate involved, or at least,
there wasn't supposed to be.  Post your 'zines, I frankly don't care.  I
can tell you this much: I won't even comment on them.  I ignore most of
the shit that goes on here, except with idiots like -ME-, and I've begun
to ignore him as well.  Do us a favor, and do the same.  Nobody wants to
debate shit with you, and that's why I don't respond to your posts.

Loyalty above all else except honour
Jason
-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Chicago Projects
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q37kv$t38@utdallas.edu> <2pbrjh$7qv@news.nd.edu> <2padsl$451@cwis.isu.edu>  <2pgscu$
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 16:18:29 GMT
Lines: 22



In a previous article, pjeremy@utdallas.edu () says:

>Frank () wrote:
>> > 					--Blue Eyed Devil
>
>> If your complaint is that people use their names, why not use yours? That's
>> it. Thank you. Are there any smart Nazis out there. I'm bored with slamming
>> the stupid ones.
>
>> --Frank

>Gee Frank, thanks for showing me the error of my ways.  By the way, my 
>names in the header line, but not everybody can read.

	Well, Frank seems to think he's slammed everybody too.  Maybe he's
not reading the same Net we are?


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Black Neighbourhoods
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2pou91$89t@bach.udel.edu>  
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 22:29:53 GMT
Lines: 22



In a previous article, cs932090@ariel.cs.yorku.ca (JOANNA I TIMARIU) says:

>I do believe that what you call your "opinion" is only a way of manipulating
>the freedom of speech to promote hatred. 

	Oh please, every time someone makes a general observation, the
left-wing makes some kind of crack about 'racism.'  They're forever using
racism as a crowbar, and make scapegoats of everyone in an attempt to make
them feel guilty for the plights of minorities.  I frankly think this is
creating a serious backlash among people who are not racist, but are tired
of being called one.  You're perpetuating racism more than you're helping
it by creating problems instead of addressing the real issues.  Nowhere in
that post did he perpetuate hatred.  You want hatred?  Here's hatred: Kill
'em all...

	I'm not advocating it, I'm just showing you the difference.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Black Neighbourhoods
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:    <2pou91$89t@bach.udel
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 14:14:45 GMT
Lines: 19



In a previous article, ai433@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Baglow) says:

>
>
>In a previous article, ar040@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Maria Laude) says:
>
>Without getting into a long discussion, but because Maria and I come from
>the same region: the Social Planning Council here indicates that the
>average stay on welfare is somewhere around four months. And more than
>forty percent of those receiving social assistance are children. Doesn't
>sound like the stereotypical "welfare bum" is the norm.

	You're from Baltimore, too, John!?


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Black Neighbourhoods
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q5iig$7hi@masala.cc.uh.edu> <2pbrjh$7qv@news.nd.edu> <1994Apr27.233828.1@mac.cc.macalstr.edu> <2pou91$89t@bach.udel.
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 14:21:49 GMT
Lines: 33



In a previous article,  (Frank) says:

>... capitulating to a system of 'democracy' that claims to have its
>interests at heart, accepting education from a school network that still
>promotes that Columbus discivered Amerika, the Civil War was all about
>slaves and doesn't even know who people like Marcus Garvey, Sekou Toure and
>Gabriel Prosser are, fights for entrance to government that cares less
>about civil rights and more for maintaining order...

	Last time I checked, a democracy was rule by majority.  Seeing as
Whites are still the majority in the US, it stands to reason that the
government would look out for its interests.  Those who aren't happy
with this simple fact, can find other places to live, becazsue frankly,
nobody is asking them to stay.  Instead of welfare and reparations, the
government should just give them a boat ticket.  In the long run, it
would cost less.

>Or that they should expect to have their grievances redressed by the State,
>or that they should vote, or that they can ever expect justice in Amerika.

	It's called representative government.  If they elect
representatives to support their views, they will be heard.  As yet, they
aren't doing that.  Until they do, they are an insignificant minority. 
Justice is relative, and not absolute.

	You're just spewing forth more Communist rhetoric.  That stuff was
discredited long ago... hey, speaking of which, what happened to Ben?!


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Another thread!
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <767976060.AA01408@rochgte.fidonet.org>  
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 18:53:55 GMT
Lines: 53



In a previous article, Skinflower@f127.n163.z1.fidonet.org (Skinflower) says:

>Jason -
>
>        Well, you know my views on relationships. Heheh! Hate 'em. Why bother
>with the extra burden. We both have enough problems as it is. In my case it is
>finding work, getting my UI checks, digging up money for school, money for
>getting my scooter running, money to pay off debts, money for buying the
>clothes to wear to the might be job and temp agency interviews, money, money,
>money..... sigh...

	Sigh!  Don't I know it!  Thing is, I hate being alone too...  It's
a vicious circle.  In my case it's finding work, to pay the LONG DISTANCE
bills, my $3000 dollar loan, and to get a new pair o' boots!  Got an
interview Friday at Bell Canada... imagine that, a fascist working for a 
Crown corporation... heheh...  Where did you say Recording Engineering was
being offered?  You wouldn't happen to have the address, would you?  I'd
like to write for info... It was in London, was it not?  Student loan,
here I come!

>        So _TekWar_ was absolutely horrid! Barely watched the first hour
>without falling asleep. Thankfully _Lovejoy_ was on at 10:00pm to save me from
>the poor acting and horrible music. How about them Special FX? Hahah! Hoo boy.
>-1 fer Shatner. Blech.

	I watched the whole thing.  I say _watched_, not listened.  I was
on the phone most of the way through it.  I liked the FX, and that's about
it.  Although, I like the idea of homocidal suicide androids...

>        I've got to go and see _Back Beat_ when it comes out. Looks like it
>might be good..... You going to check out _The Flintstones_? Looks like a
>laugh...... What *I* need is a good SciFi flick. It's been a while since a
>really good one has come out. Can't wait for the next _Star Wars_ flick! How
>many years till it comes out?!

	That the new Beatles flick?  Yeah, I guess it's a must see.  I've
just *got* to see the Flintstones, though!  Batman mask of the Phantasm
too.  What say we rent it some night?  Star Wars is being written as we
speak.  It starts shooting this summer, I believe.  Should be out in about
two years...

>        Anyways, wanted to post something non-political and all. Seems to me
>that too many ov these people spend alot ov there time wacking off... Ahem.

	Yeah... how about some mutual masturbation instead?  ;)

Your loving Hubby,
Jason

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q69gr$2df@netnews.alf.dec.com>  <2q49rv$g3k@search01.news.aol.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 23:14:51 GMT
Lines: 12



In a previous article, harry@tsc.csc.cxo.dec.com (Harry Katz) says:

>Apparently, Jason Smith must be the last of the gentiles, since a flame
>against him is a flame against "all gentiles!"

	Wow!  I knew there was a conspiracy, but this big?!?!?!?!!?


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.discrimination
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: South African reparations(was black reparations)
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q788l$4fj@news.duke.edu> <2pq94q$1ms@panix2.panix.com> <2pr5c8$4cu@tut.msstate.edu> <2q44b9$joq@panix2.panix.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 1994 05:28:34 GMT
Lines: 20



In a previous article, dlh@duke.edu (Darryl Hamilton) says:

> But waht do you all think about the Blacks in South Africa? should  they be
>paid reparations for waht the white minority government put them through for
>all these years? 

Nope.

>and the white south africans, unlike their american
>counterparts do not have the cop out excuse that they were  not around when
>all these bad things were being done to the blacks in their country. So what
>to do?

Reinstate Apartheid.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Chicago Projects
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q156d$ms5@masala.cc.uh.edu> <2pbrjh$7qv@news.nd.edu> <2padsl$451@cwis.isu.edu>  <2pg
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 23:08:27 GMT
Lines: 36



In a previous article,  (Frank) says:

>I'd like you cite the specific history book you derived this from, ie title
>and author (please don't pull a Mr. Davis and try to weasel out). In
>virtually every history book I read, the VAST majority of slavetrading was
>done by whites. Now, it was estimated by Y. N. Kly, a professor, that the
>total of the trade was around 3-5 percent (see _Psychological Chains of
>Slavery_) by Africans. In those cases they weren't traded for guns, but
>food and luxury items (read _Rebellion and Revolution_ in you local
>library). Please cite something before shooting off your stupid racist
>mouth.

	You are so much like every other weaselly little anti-fascist,
spewing forth stats and references for everything.  Want to know
something?  Stats and figures, and citations don't mean a thing, because
people will be racist no matter what the stats are, and no matter what you
say.  You can't use statistics to refute basic emotions and natural laws
of survival.  Survival of the species is the highest law, and if you don't
believe me, read some Darwin.  It's called social Darwinism.  It's been
going on since life was perpetuated on the planet.  Species compete for
resources, and thus survival.  Man is just the most savage animal, and
sentience doesn't necessarily mean intelligence.  We are aware of our
existance, and are capable of reasoning, but this does not remove the
basic impulses which drive us to survive and perpetuate our own.  Keep
spewing stats.  It won't change anybody's mind.

>If your complaint is that people use their names, why not use yours? That's
>it. Thank you. Are there any smart Nazis out there. I'm bored with slamming
>the stupid ones.

	You must really hate yourself.

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Calling all skins...calling all skins
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q1vvf$bb@post-office.nevada.edu> <94121.005208MB0527A@auvm.american.edu> <2q1hl3$l84@cwis.isu.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 23:22:58 GMT
Lines: 12



In a previous article, tommy@nevada.edu (GREG HJELSTROM) says:

>Guess it was ok if as long as he was white....
>(This type of post sure convinces me that skinheads are just trying to 
>be "proud of the white race")

	Who asked you?

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Greater Vision
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q6jej$jbq@masala.cc.uh.edu> <2q6fd3$qdf@cwis.isu.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 23:31:46 GMT
Lines: 43



In a previous article,  (Frank) says:

>Wow, I missed you. SO glad you decided to grace us with your presence
>again. Out burning crosses and molesting kiddies again, eh? I'm glad you've
>come up with such a grand proposition for this list, seeing as you've been
>here maybe two weeks. You never answered another question either: are you
>even a skin in the first place? And, seeing as you've had a propensity to
>lie, even if you say you are, why should anyone believe your sorry ass.

	This coming from someone who started posting his self-righteous
arrogant shit around the same time.

>Wait a sec-- Klanners are anti-abortion. If you want to step to me again, I
>can cite off quotes and publications. KKKer John Baumgardner in Florida is
>only one who's spoken against abortion and Hammy Skins in Florida protested
>in front of an abortion clinic. I can get you the specific date if you'd
>like. Contradicting yerself. But hell, why not? The Nationalist Movement
>organization is the same.

	Well, of course.  Why kill White babies?  One of the rationales
behind immigration is because the birth rate isn't keeping up with desired
and projected growth.  The simple fact of the matter is, we're spending
millions helping out third-world coutries who are tribal in nature, and
who only kill the very people trying to feed them, we're spending millions
on refugees and immigrants with welfare and (in Canada) health care and
innoculations when they enter, when people here can't even afford
families.  If they want to raise the birth rate, give people incentives to
have children.  Provide day-care, give 'baby bonuses', nationalise key
industries, improve health care, education, etc... Then we won't need
non-white immigration to bolster our population and in turn, the tax base.
 Rampant government spending is another problem.  In the long run, taxes
could be lowered, offering an even bigger break for the White North American.

>You're hiding out in Idaho and you're talking home of the brave? Whatta
>fuckin' punk. Fuck Idaho and fuck Amerika.

	If you hate it so much, why are you so upset about racists in the
country?  Get the hell out!

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis=Commies (was Re: Skin Killers)
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q5o7a$mlj@bach.udel.edu>   <2q5jh6$824@masala.cc.uh.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 May 1994 15:05:53 GMT
Lines: 43



In a previous article, rabbit@bach.udel.edu (Shawn Flanagan) says:

>This is what I like to see!!! REAL INTELECTUAL DEBATE. not stupid "I
>fucked your mom" and "bring your ass down to south bend bitch" type stuff.

	That's what I've been trying to say.

>
>If there is going to be anything political on this newsgroup, this is the
>type of stuff it should be. Cited references and all. I can't wait to here
>Northern Hammers response to this one. Remember jason... be nice and back
>up your arguements with cited evidence. And don't flame cause frank did
>make a whole lot af sense (even if you don't agree with him, cutie)

	He may have made sense to you.  I see it pretty much as humanistic
rhetoric, based on the old 'brotherhood of man' routine.  I think he's
been listening to John Lennon's 'Imagine' too much.  But enough of that.
I guess I'll have to go back and read the post again, because I really see
no cause to post a reply to it.  I've been debating this shit since
October here, and frankly, it's getting tiresome.  I hate to brag, but
even the anti-racists agree that I am probably the nicest, most sensible
'nazi' here.  Not to mention articulate.  It's too bad it is wasted on
some folks, who can't see past their own emotional reasons for disliking
racism.  Racism is rooted in the age-old instinct of survival of one's
kind.  Naturally, most people prefer to be among their own kind, and
racism is the outgrowth of that instinct.  Humans have given it bad
connotations.  Humans have tried to defeat the most natural laws, and in
so doing have disabled some of our most primal defenses and instincts. 
The more civilised we become, the more savage we become.

>-shaun(who is in a real flirtatious mood right now, and would probably
>like jason if he wasn't a nazi ;-) )

	If I do respond to his posts, it'll be for you, and certainly not
because I feel the need to justify myself, or even debate the issue.  I
just can't resist a flirtatious woman... ;)  And frankly, if you met me, you
wouldn't even know I was a 'nazi.'


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Black Neighbourhoods
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q63in$eo5@bach.udel.edu> <2q5iig$7hi@masala.cc.uh.edu> <1994Apr27.233828.1@mac.cc.macalstr.edu> <2pou91$89t@bach.ude
Date: Wed, 4 May 1994 15:19:33 GMT
Lines: 59



In a previous article, rabbit@bach.udel.edu (Shawn Flanagan) says:

>The reason why the powers that be can't screw around with peoples civil
>rights is cause down here in the usa we got this thing written on a peice
>of hemp paper. it's called the constitution. don't you folks up in canada
>have one??? they're really neato and they even clean up spills pretty cool..
>better than paper towels. And they give something for high schoolers to
>memorize. If you don't have one you just don't know what you're missing :-)

	There's an inherent difference between human rights, so called
'civil rights', and political rights.  Everybody has a right to human
rights, and as you said, protection under the law.  That does not give
them an inherent right to vote, or to hold positions of power as
minorities in an ethnic state comprised of a majority of some other kind.
We do have a Constitution in Canada, which was *not* ratified by Quebec,
my province of residence.  Canada has been wrangling with its Constitution
for 125 years.  We had a new one written a few years back.  Time to try again.

>Give the 'minorities' a few years. they'll catch up. And then when you're
>asked to go back to europe, will you go????? Do you see the error in your
>logic?  

	That is the strength of my logic, rather.  I do not intend to let 
minorities become a majority.  We have to stop the influx of non-white
immigrants, and protect ourselves from the same fate that the Indian
suffered.  I have no intention whatsoever to let myself become a minority.

>It's like this. If the constitution doesn't protect some people then it
>doesn't protect anyone. If you can go around violating peoples rights and
>the powers that be allow you than what happens when the powers that be are
>'minorities' (shaking in your boots yet (snicker, snicker)) Being as you
>already set the precedent that basically states that the constitution
>isn't worth shit anymore by violating peoples right to EQUAL PROTECTION
>UNDER THE LAW (which is *very* important students, please make a note of that)
>then that same equal protection isn't going to apply to you either.
>ya dig.

	Equal legal protection.  I don't need a Constitution or a Bible to
tell me that murder, theft, and vandalism are wrong.  Everybody has the
right to be protected against such things, and to have their wrongs
redressed through justice.  That still does not give any other group the
right to encroach upon my sovereignty as an ethnic nation.  Any group that
wishes self-determination is considered a valid ethnic group under UN law.
(except for Whites, I might add).

>I get sea sick. Like I said, if the government was run by african
>americans or whatever the minority to hate for the day is (sort of like
>baskin robbins) and they asked.. no told you to get on a boat and go back
>to wherever you came from...would you??...could you???

	Would I have a choice?  If this nation was an Afrian American
nation, and had been from the git-go, I imagine I would.  Who wants to
stay where they're not wanted?


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Black Neighbourhoods
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <1994May4.080122.1@mac.cc.macalstr.edu> <2q5iig$7hi@masala.cc.uh.edu> <2pbrjh$7qv@news.nd.edu> <1994Apr27.233828.1@mac
Date: Wed, 4 May 1994 16:27:58 GMT
Lines: 35



In a previous article, plunney@mac.cc.macalstr.edu (TIGGER) says:

>Actually, Jason, the REAL poly sci definition of the republican democracy that
>the US is is rule by majority with accountablity (I think that's the right 
>word) to the minority. Hence, the three "equally" balanced sections of State,
>the executive, legislative, and judicial, and the system of checks and
>balances.

	Republican democracy in the States has proved a failure. 
Webster's Encylopaedic dictionary defines Democracy as:

	govt. by the people, with the people possessing entire control and
equal rights in all that concerns or belongs to the state. (...)
Originated in small Grecian states in which the method corresponded more
closely to our earlier direct tn.-meetings than to modern representative
govt., and where the right to vote was limited to certain classes.

	A class can further be defined as: n. any division, order, kind, sort;

	Using these definitions, democracy can apply to the ruling class
only, which *can be* an ethnic majority, group or 'class.'  Human rights
are extended to all, political rights are not.  Considering Ancient Greeks
were White, it can also be assumed that democracy is a White ideal.  In
this vein, the Constitution of the United States was also a White ideal,
and if I remember correctly, it took amendments to that Constitution to
give Blacks citizenship and the right to vote.  I submit that the United
State, as a nation, was intended for White majority rule, with provisions
for minority rights, but not extending those rights to those of a
political nature.  You don't need to be a nazi to figure that one out.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.discrimination
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Black Crime
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q8e5k$1r5t@whale.st.usm.edu> <2pu561$2o3a@whale.st.usm.edu> <2pub31$inb@mustang.alleg.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 May 1994 16:12:29 GMT
Lines: 16



In a previous article, wwatkins@whale.st.usm.edu (William Matt Watkins) says:

>Here, let me put it in the babytalk you might understand:
>Me weak.
>You weak.
>We try harder.
>Them strong.
>Them not have to try so hard.  Them used to it.
>Ugh!

	Bwahahahahaha!!!  Good one...

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <1994May3.143129.10330@msus1.msus.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 May 1994 05:47:20 GMT
Lines: 13



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>Condone? Who condoned? The Nazis who ran the country at the time
>condoned it. That's one reason Hitler and his henchmen are referred to
>as madmen. They sacrificed thousands and thousands of their fellow
>countrymen rather than broker peace when defeat was inevitable.

	I seem to recall Churchill doing the same.

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Anti-Whites
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qb94f$hu2@bach.udel.edu> <1994May5.090701.1@clstac>
Date: Thu, 5 May 1994 18:30:03 GMT
Lines: 22



In a previous article, rabbit@bach.udel.edu (Shawn Flanagan) says:

>Jeez, jason doesn't seem to have a problem with me being bi. I don't agree
>with his veiws for the most part, but at least he's made me feel sort of
>welcome. 

	Unh-hunh... well, no comment.  That's your business, and frankly,
I do have a personal as well as philosophical problem with it, as I see it
as unnatural.  However, it didn't have anything to do with the subject at
hand, and still doesn't.  Besides, regardless of my philosophical
attitudes towards it, I still don't mind watching a couple of women going
at each other like banshees in heat... ;)  Name me one guy whose deepest
fantasy isn't to make it with two women.  It's only fantasy.  No harm in that.

	And you're still welcome.
	<;^}


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Back on Track
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Thu, 5 May 1994 18:55:16 GMT
Lines: 8



	It seems to me that this group has degenerated into a political
debate group.  What happened to revisionism?  I can't see one post which
has something to do with revisionism.  Well, besides Ken Mcvay's perpetual
holocaust posts...

-- 


Article 11741 of alt.revisionism:
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Back on Track
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qbr7f$ppb@access2.digex.net> 
Date: Fri, 6 May 1994 05:08:49 GMT
Lines: 13



In a previous article, mstein@access.digex.net (Michael P. Stein) says:

>    You know, now that you mention it, I haven't seen the Zumabot around
>here lately.  Is someone forging cancels as fast as the 'bot can post, or
>has UUNET finally pulled his plug?  Is it just my site?  Has anyone else
>seen articles from you-know-who? 

	You're right!  I just hope we didn't speak too soon... knock on wood...


-- 


Article 13930 of alt.discrimination:
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: South African reparations(was black reparations)
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qcbik$1fb@panix.com> <2q788l$4fj@news.duke.edu> <2pq94q$1ms@panix2.panix.com> <2pr5c8$4cu@tut.msstate.edu> <2q44b9$j
Date: Fri, 6 May 1994 05:12:03 GMT
Lines: 14



In a previous article, jlopez@panix.com (J Lopez) says:

>Wow!  I've never put a person in my killfile before.

	Wow!  Am I supposed to care?
>
>Oh well, here goes.

Ditto.


-- 


Article 6164 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: SledgeHammer
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <768151956.AA01678@rochgte.fidonet.org>  
Date: Thu, 5 May 1994 22:48:38 GMT
Lines: 11



In a previous article, Skinflower@f127.n163.z1.fidonet.org (Skinflower) says:

>Oh.... Ignore Jasons comments about calling Scooters "Rice Putters". :)

	I love you too, Rachel.  For those of you who don't know, it's a
running gag with her and I...


-- 


Article 6166 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: A Real discussion
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qbqef$69r@news.nd.edu>  
Date: Thu, 5 May 1994 23:10:08 GMT
Lines: 31



In a previous article,  (crissy) says:

>without getting into fights.  I would really like to communicate with Jason
>and Steve, if they can control themselves.  I already know about Frank and
>ME.

	Have you been reading the same news group as I have?  I don't
recall doing any 'dissing' without provocation, and although Mr. Frank
thinks he has slammed everyone on the Net, when I respond with something
other than name-calling, he doesn't respond.  I guess avoidance is the
best way to not look too ignorant in light of what he said.  Had you been
reading this group before these self-righteous arrogant folks came on, you
would realise that I have earned the respect of many an anti-racist, both
here and on alt.revisionism because of my restraint and common-sense
approach.  You can catch more flies with honey than vinegar...

	And frankly, the White and Black Power movements aren't such
enemies as you may think.  Both advocate a separation of the races, and
oppose race-mixing.  I'd say that was a good start.  In fact, Black Power
movements have been known to contribute funds to White Power movements
such as WAR.  The only problem is this: American Black Power movements
are a contradiction in terms.  America was founded on a White premise, and
Black Power would mean the rule of the minority over the majority.  Sorry,
but that doesn't wash...

Jason
European Unity, White Power, Pride and Dignity

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Shaun Flanagan
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Fri, 6 May 1994 05:20:18 GMT
Lines: 13



	Oi!  I tried to reply to your E-mail, but it was returned as
undeliverable - twice.  I'll try again, but I'm not guaranteeing anything.
 It's very strange...

	Anyhow, I'm not ignoring you...

	BTW, your address is rabbit@udel.edu is it not?  Just checking...

Jason

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.discrimination
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: South African reparations(was black reparations)
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qcbik$1fb@panix.com> <2q788l$4fj@news.duke.edu> <2pq94q$1ms@panix2.panix.com> <2pr5c8$4cu@tut.msstate.edu> <2q44b9$j
Date: Fri, 6 May 1994 05:12:03 GMT
Lines: 14



In a previous article, jlopez@panix.com (J Lopez) says:

>Wow!  I've never put a person in my killfile before.

	Wow!  Am I supposed to care?
>
>Oh well, here goes.

Ditto.


-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: A Real discussion
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qedb1$ahu@masala.cc.uh.edu> <2qbqef$69r@news.nd.edu> 
Date: Fri, 6 May 1994 23:09:51 GMT
Lines: 51



In a previous article,  (frank) says:

>Actually I wasn't aware that you'd responded to anything I've written. my
>servber doesn't always get things through and consequently I don't see
>anything you write. I'm certainly curious, although my hopes aren't that
>high since your comrades don't respond to my stuff either. Maybe they are
>and my server isn't getting them in, but I read from different cvomputers
>and I would think ONE response could make it.

	Well, after both you *and* Shaun goosed me a little, I decided to
respond.  I don't tend to, because this isn't the group, and it was agreed
long ago to keep politics off this group.

>Would you per chance be willing to sum up some of your responses? I
>apologize if my non-response has given you the impression that I don't want
>to respond or that "avoidance is the best way to not look too ignorant in
>light of what he said." I'm perfectly willing to defend my beliefs to you
>or any other Nazi on the list, but if it doesn't clear, I don't see it.

	Forgive my assumption, but it certaily did seem like you were
doing the very same thing of which you accused both Steve and Xavier.

>I don't think I've "slammed everyone" but when people like Davis and Xavier
>post stuff, I respond with citations and get no response, I wonder. I would
>like a discussion with use of researched fact and some logic, but have yet
>to find it, thus I respond with what most fascists enjoy and do understand
>-- name-calling.

	Well, I would most certainly appreciate it if you didn't put me in
the same category as those two semi-literate individuals.  On a personal
level, I think Steve is ok, but his posts aren't exactly brain food. 
Xavier, on the other hand, is just an idiot with an Oriental fetish.  He
is not only an inarticulate racist, but a hypocrite as well.  Frankly,
neither do my cause any good.  I don't believe I've engaged in any
name-calling, except to point out that you seemed inordinately sure of
yourself, and as such, came off as arrogant and condescending, not to
mention self-righteous.  Your points are all things that have been said
before, and it gets tiresome refuting the same arguments all the time. 
I've been debating this here for a long time now, and it gets tiresome. 
I'd much rather talk about beer and music, but if you insist...

	BTW, I tried to respond via E-mail, but your address is blocked
out, and I was unable to do so.  If you want an E-mail response, you could
be so kind as to give me your address.

Jason
I do it for you, and the love of our land...

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: FUCKING STUPID POLITICAL WANKY BASTARDS
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <1994May6.131254.1@mac.cc.macalstr.edu>  
Date: Sat, 7 May 1994 05:32:19 GMT
Lines: 27



In a previous article, plunney@mac.cc.macalstr.edu (TIGGER) says:

>Great.
>
>Now Ken Mcvay's back.

	Ain't that *the* joke?!  I think I liked Ben better...  well,
maybe not...

>You can all go to hell.

	Love you too, Tig.  For once, I'm trying to keep out of it.  Seems
people just won't let me.   sucks to be me.

>fuckers.

	Fucker...

	Take a pill Tig, you know we love you...

*Hugs*

Jason

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Rhounda
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <6MAY199422455756@utarlg.uta.edu> <2qbr7n$6rt@cwis.isu.edu> <2qbume$scm@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>  <
Date: Sat, 7 May 1994 05:36:31 GMT
Lines: 16



In a previous article, jjh1231@utarlg.uta.edu (HOGAN,JEFFREY,JOHN) says:

>Question??  If the holocaust never happened ..Why is Hitler 
>worshiped to be a God??

	You poor sod, Hitler isn't worshipped any more than you are.  He
is one of the foremost thinkers in National Socialist ideology, but even
his theories and philosphies were borrowed.  He is admired for his
political will, strength, determination, and philosophies.  Not the
holocaust.  Granted, some of his policies left something to be desired,
but Germany was a good place to be in 1933...
Jason

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   
Date: Sun, 8 May 1994 03:31:47 GMT
Lines: 16



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>No, you face it Mr Skaliks, you don't know what the hell you are
>talking about, you are making it up as you go along to fit your own
>pre-conceived notions, and you are making a laughable idiot out of
>yourself.

	I'm surprised you didn't call him an anti-semite and a nazi,
Barry.  It seems to be a staple defense in your case.  Discredit your
opponent by ridiculing him, and associating him with the most vile image
you can conjure up.  And you have the gall to call him an idiot?


-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Anti-Whites
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qjnhj$4c2@chopin.udel.edu> <1994May5.203215.1@mac.cc.macalstr.edu> 
Date: Mon, 9 May 1994 05:53:49 GMT
Lines: 24



In a previous article, rabbit@chopin.udel.edu (Shawn Flanagan) says:

>Maybe, you can give me some "dick drinking" advice warpiglet, I've been 
>"munching rug" for so long that i've sort of forgot. Being as you seem to
>know so much about it maybe you could post some advice? =^)

	Well, you should apply firm but even pressure, with some suction
(not too much, hickeys there hurt!), and even some hand pressure at the
base, if you like.  Of course, there should be some in-out action,
preferably as deep as you can take it without gagging... ah, hell, gag! 
Am I starting to sound like I know what I'm doing?  Ick... No!  It's just
the way I like it... ;)

>my mom would slap me silly if she knew her daughter was speaking like this.
>oh, well. fuck her.

	You should really respect your mother more... particularly on
Mother's day...

Jason

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: KKK and Coors
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   
Date: Mon, 9 May 1994 05:56:21 GMT
Lines: 16



In a previous article, ah199@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Melissa J. Schurr) says:

>	Does anyone have any written references to the president of Coors'
>affiliation with the KKK.  Many people tell me that the president is also
>high up the KKK but no one seems to have an article, book, whatever, which
>states it.  Even if you have ideas on where to look i'd appreciate it.

	I think that's funy, considering none of the skins I know'll drink
the shit because it is "Jewish."  Coors, some time ago, got 'kosher'
approval (how you can make beer kosher is beyond me...)  They also donate
money to Jewish organisations.  I've got the article here...


-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: A Real discussion
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qkg3h$khp@crl.crl.com> <2qbqef$69r@news.nd.edu>    <2qdtnp$he2@news.nd.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 May 1994 06:07:00 GMT
Lines: 25



In a previous article, bkoen@crl.com (Bryan Koen) says:

>BTW folks, in case anybody hasn't checked recently we Americans are look 
>upon to kindly in other countries.

	Ok... I couldn't really make sense of the above sentence, since
its grammar is rather bad, but I'm working on an assumption here.  If my
assumption is wrong, forgive me, flame me, or fuckoff.  

	Funny you should say that... typical American arrogance.  I
suppose it has something to do with diplomacy, however, when while you're
in a foreign country, they don't spit in your faces.

	Canadians are not too fond of Americans as a whole, and the French
despise them.  Mexicans hate you too, as do most South American countries.
 The English think you're uncultured, Germans don't like you either
(although most of the mentioned countries do marvel at your industrial
capabilities and your bizzarre lifestyles).  The Japanese, for the most
part, dislike Americans as well, as do the Russians, Eastern Bloc
countries, Middle East, and much of Africa.  I don't see where you got the
idea you were looked upon kindly...

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Anti-Whites
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qlb44$18t@bach.udel.edu> <2qjnhj$4c2@chopin.udel.edu> <1994May5.203215.1@mac.cc.macalstr.edu> Are you certain that you've never done this before. You sound like you
>have the technique down quite well.

	Sorry to disappoint the bum-rushers out there, but it comes from
having to show inexperienced girlfriends how to do it - just the way I
like it.

>Golly gee jason. I know a ton of men who would absolutly *LOVE* to meet you.
>If you ever decide to try it out I have a.... ehm... toy that you could
>practice on. And I would definatly not mind 'helping' you practice.

	I bet.  Don't give 'em my address, I can do without their amorous
advances.  And frankly, if you had me, you wouldn't need that toy... ;)
I'd rather munch a rug anyday...

>Oh, jeez. I really can't stand the woman and right now she's not
>especially thrilled about me. We barely talk. And to tell you the truth I
>like that jest fine.

	Might it have something to do with the funky way you look?  Or
perhaps your 'rug-munching' lifestyle?  I wouldn't speak to my daughter
either, sad to say.  I'd still love her, because she would be my daughter,
but I wouldn't want to have to deal with that shit...

>-shaun (who is infecting alt.skinheads with more punk rock faggot shit.
>heh heh heh.)

	Nothin' funny about it my dear... it was once, now it's getting a
little stale...

	Love anyways,
	Jason


-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Is this shit still going on?...
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qleh4$e5e@masala.cc.uh.edu> <2ql258$gk3@fenugreek.csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 May 1994 15:45:45 GMT
Lines: 16



In a previous article,  (Frank -- bored) says:

>Hey, I said it a while ago -- and (I think) I'm the only one who said it:
>I'd get off the politics if the fascists did.

	You poor sod... you began posting your shit, we didn't ask you to.
 You sound like a few others who have been here before, and left.  Their
noble cause: to defend the rest of the group from fascists and racists. 
Sorry, but I'm sure the group is quite capable of defending itself.  Quit
pulling that kid's game 'I'll stop if you stop...'  Your intent is good,
I'm sure, but nobody wants it here.  G'bye...


-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: POWER-----------BULLSHIT-------
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <1994Apr24.163135.5805@muvms6>  <2q329i$
Date: Mon, 9 May 1994 18:55:14 GMT
Lines: 17



In a previous article, wix@pwrsys30.mfg.sgi.com (Wil Ferguson) says:

>What did you expect from a group who refer to the fifth grade as
>"my senior year?"

	Considering I've got a college-level education, that's a pretty
bad generalisation.  Kinda like saying all blacks are criminals...

Sod...

Jason



-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re:Trying to get a totally different thread started.(anti-whites)
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qlsmj$nh@bach.udel.edu> <2qlb44$18t@bach.udel.edu> <1994May5.203215.1@mac.cc.macalstr.edu> Don't worry. I'm NOT that mean ;^)

	Thank you.  I think that would fall under the category of cruel
and unusual punishment...

>Ahh. But alas I don't. So until that day... and besides, my girlfriend
>would be jealous.

	So?

>Same here. Although I must say that there is something nice about a penis
>in my..... oh never mind.

	Yes, nevermind...

>Whoa there jason. Who said anything about me being 'funky looking'. As a
>matter of fact, I'm quite non-descript. If you saw me you wouldn't even
>know that I was a punk rocker. I am quite pretty though. I don't look
>anywhere near as deseil dyke as a lot of the people I know.

	Well, you said you were a punk-rocker.  Most of the ones around
here sport green 'hawks and shit like that... really ghastly.  As for your
being pretty, well, that's pretty subjective.  Let's just say I've heard
*that* one before!

>Nah, that isn't it at all. My sister is queer also. (my brother 
>is too, but he's too afraid to admit it.) No she doesn't really care about
>that. She gets along well with the Sig other. She just tends to be too
>controling/overbearing/abusive/tons of dysfunctional stuff that noone
>here would care to hear about.

	Wonderful family... what did your parents do to you?

>Quite a bit of a double standard there, don't you say, sparky. You don't
>mind watching the female fags going at it, but god forbid your daughter
>turns out to be one....;^)

	That jibe about women was a joke, although I must admit seeing it
doesn't disgust me.  It's the moral lack and depravity behind it I find
repulsive.  No double standard there.  And besides, there's nothing wrong
with a little fantasy... it's healthy.  I'd like to catch a couple of
women going at it... then I'd join in.  Show 'em how it's done... (Is my
ego showing?  ;)

>Hey, are you in her bed with her? Then you don't really have to deal with it
>then do you? Like I said before, "If you don't like it then don't look."
>At least you'd still love her. My SO's parents aren't overly thrilled with
>their daughter in law

	Go figger.

>Oh well, you and I have a different sense of humor. I got a really bad
>joke to tell:
>
>Q: What has 6 legs and works at McDonalds?
>
>A: The rest of Nirvana.

	Now *that* was funny.  Call me sadistic, but when I heard some of
his fans went and blew out their brains after his funeral, I laughed so
hard at the stupididty of it all.  You have to be somewhat mentally
unbalanced to kill yourself because some talentless guitar player in a
formerly obscure band killed himself.  It's a sad commentary about today's
youth...  Hahahahaha!

>love you anyways jason,

	Gee... thanks.

Jason

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: RE: How Odd
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <1994May9.203629.13589@martha.utcc.utk.edu> ,<1994May9.130547.2417@eku.acs.eku.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 May 1994 03:49:38 GMT
Lines: 20



In a previous article, page@utkvx.utk.edu () says:

>AND i pray that you learn to use no bias language!!!!! 
>i do not agree with the skinhead movement, but you have no right to
>come on this newsgroup and critizize other peoples beliefs as being wrong
>when you make a statement so slanderous against women.  Women are human
>beings also and deserve equal credit as such, so until you are perfect and
>no longer make such gender bias remarks, you have no right to tell someone
>else that their views are wrong.  Their views may differ from yours and mine,
>but they have the right to free speech just like anyone else--as long as it
>does not physically hurt anyone.

	Oh, great, a feminazi.  The male gender is used in the English
language when gender is not specific, as a way of simplifying sentence
structure.  You're probably one of the ones who wants to change 'manhole
cover' to 'personhole cover.'

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Wot's all this then?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  
Date: Tue, 10 May 1994 04:06:57 GMT
Lines: 34



In a previous article, thug@er3.rutgers.edu (Rob Skin) says:

>Oi!
>	In reference to my previous post about the hammer skins, I now know the answer. I just found some of J. Smith's posts where he goes apeshit racist in explicit detail. So to you me boy, as well as to the rest of you Hammer skin sallys, I say; Oi! Fuck off to all you friggin ponces! Your less vulgar racism is even worse than the idiots who go around screaming Heil Hitler. At least they always say wot they mean eh? Punks like you just want to straddle the line of minimal skin acceptance. Think I'm wron

	Fuck off you sorry ass chump.  you know nothing about me, and if
you had any respect whatsoever, you wouldn't be spewing your shit in such
an overbearing, repulsive, self-righteous way.  Funny how I get along with
people on this group, mostly because I'm reasonable, unlike yourself. 
Nobody needs you to defend them, and nobody needs you to incite them
either.  You accuse me of inciting hatred, and yet you spew the very same
hateful rhetoric.  You tell people 'if you're not against them, you're
with them,' and that's not the issue.  Not everybody is political, and not
everybody cares.  Most people have better things to do, like listening to
music (regardless of the lyrics), and drinking beer.  If that's their
lifestyle, and they choose to live that way, then they can do as they damn
well please, and they don't need you to tell them to get off their asses. 
You have alot of angst bottled up... maybe you've been bettered by a few
too many racists in your life.  And I'm certainly not one to sit idly
behind a computer and make threats.  I've got the scars to prove it. 
Considering I haven't made any threats, unlike yourself, I would think
that quite commendable.  I don't feel the need to go out and engage in
pointless violence, unlike yourself, to prove a point.  I can use my
energy towards more productive things.  It's called maturity.  Let's hope
someday you reach it.  Until such time, I would advise you to seek
counseling.

>k off! Got words to defend this chump? Fuck off! Thinkin o threatening me? Bring it sally, I'll put your dick in the fucking dirt. Not a threat, just an invitation. Cuz I'm tired of skins being middle of the road about racism, when without blacks, skin would not exist. I'm sick of hearing how "I don't care if the song's racist, it's a skin anthem". I've heard this from me boys, as well as reading shit like it on this group. Maybe this acceptance of repulsive ideals is part of the reason most of socie

	Yeah, yeah, whatever...

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: How Odd
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qo6k7$rdb@violet.csv.warwick.ac.uk> <2qnn9j$suh@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 May 1994 15:26:28 GMT
Lines: 20



In a previous article, esvms@csv.warwick.ac.uk (SPEED FREEK=) says:

>    How nice. That's the town I was born in.   We still havn't
>    met, and I don't think we will. But you will meet some of
>    my skinhead friends. Think twice next time you vomit your 
>    racist puke around you motherfucker. It's a shame cos
>    your obviously a talented chap. You gonna lose your fucking
>    Kneecaps man... hehehe.     See you down the Bulldog in 
>    your fucking wheelchair.   

	Hey, Pitt, you haven't taken care of this ass yet?  A Paki no
less!  No self-respecting skin should be helping this guy out...  And you
aren't even racist!  Poor fucking sod, put him out of his misery...

Jason


-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: POWER-----------BULLSHIT-------
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qorcl$j0h@nic-nac.CSU.net> 
Date: Tue, 10 May 1994 22:25:29 GMT
Lines: 25



In a previous article, ysham@nextlab7.calstatela.edu (Yvonne Sham-Shackleton) says:

>> The saddest thing is after education you continue to be a rascist. You  
>are the worse sort, i often excuse trailer park white trash for having  
>nothing more than their skin to be proud of, unfortunately people who  
>obviously should have more in their life views than hate, continue to  
>embrace it. 

	My education has allowed me to work positively towards my goals,
and rather than 'hate' other races through misunderstanding, love my own
and embrace its achievments and traditions.  Racism is not based on
ignorance of other cultures, but rather exposure to them.  I can
contribute more to my society than some backwoods inbred redneck.

>It makes me sad, and i still hope God Bless you because i am willing to  
>allow for copassion. 

	Well, I'd like 'co-passion' too, if you're willing to indulge in
casual sex, but judging by the religious nature (blech) of your post, I
would think not...

-- 

Newsgroups: alt.discrimination
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Virgin?!?!?!?!
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   
Date: Wed, 11 May 1994 17:31:16 GMT
Lines: 27



In a previous article, ao811@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (David H. Johnston) says:

>
>
>Is there anybody out there who thinks that there is much discrimination
>against virgins? I'm 19 and still a virgin. Some people say that there is
>a lot of discrimination on T.V. and what not. I'm just wondering what
>people think.

	I think you need to get laid... but seriously, if you choose to
save it for someone you care about deeply, more power to ya.  I didn't,
and I sometimes regret it, but most times I don't... ;)

	I don't think there is much discrimination, and there shouldn't be
any in your daily life, unless you're telling everyone (for the record,
most people don't want to know, and don't care) that you'r a virgin.  If
they treat you funny, it may be more because of your forthrightness in
stating you're a virgin.  It's not everyday someone comes up and says 'hi,
I'm a virgin.'  If they think you're wierd, it's normal...

Jason


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: POWER-----------BULLSHIT-------
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qqjm3$kgc@bach.udel.edu> <2qorcl$j0h@nic-nac.CSU.net>  In article ,
>Jason Smith  wrote:
>>
>>	Well, I'd like 'co-passion' too, if you're willing to indulge in
>>casual sex, 
>
>Jason, forchristsake, you're such a whore ;^)

	Thanks!  But, she said it first... ;)

>Double blech, my sentiments exactly

	Blech...


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Calling SPEED FREEK...
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qr0ef$eka@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> <2qolpa$7ar@comfrey.csv.warwick.ac.uk> <2qqn2a$nun@violet.csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 May 1994 17:08:12 GMT
Lines: 18



In a previous article, libmlm@cc.emory.edu (Matthew L Miller) says:

>:     you didn't respond. I don't give a fuck, I just need an excuse.

	You are an excuse... a sad one.

> I would also venture to say that the "British by birth, etc" .sig is 
>racist, and reason enough for this bald eunuch to get his eardrums popped. 

	You're so full of shit, your eyes must be brown.  That is a common
expression used by Brits, even here in Canada.  No racism there,
patriotism perhaps, racism no.  You lefties construe anything mildly
patriotic as racist.  Fuckoff.

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:    <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 16:24:26 GMT
Lines: 13



In a previous article, v140pxgt@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu (Daniel B Case) says:

>Oooh! What have you done time for, Jason-ripping the heads of parking meters?
>Putting cherry bombs in toilets?

	Aggravated assault (which was reduced to assault causing bodily
harm via plea-bargain), and being in a residence illegally.


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <2prjjo$2b2e@whale.st.usm.edu> Jason leaps to his own defense:
>
>>        You seem to assume that everything that comes out of my mouth is a
>>racist, anti-semitic remark.  This is no more true than anything else you say.
>
>Then, in article  al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA 
>(Jason Smith) writes:
>
>>        Frankly, I've been to prison.  Kikes don't get too far there, let
>>me tell you.  For the most part, prison is segregated, and with good
>>reason.  Little Jew boys like you would make decent boy-toys for the 'mates.
>
>Maybe not everything, Jason, but a pretty fair sample.  
>
	If he wants to play name-calling games, two can play that game.  I
won't go so far as to say, 'well he started', but the evidence is there to
suggest it...


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q3et6$661@mits.mdata.fi>   <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd In article ,
>Jason Smith  wrote:
>
>>	Aggravated assault (which was reduced to assault causing bodily
>>harm via plea-bargain), and being in a residence illegally.
>
>So you ARE a dangerous, violent individual also physically?
>Have you ever considered that there might be something wrong
>deep down in your beeing - in your attitudes towards life
>and other human beings?

	This coming from someone a few weeks ago who threatened to punch
me out if he ever saw me in a bar.  Eat your words, Kari.  You don't even
know the circumstances behind the charges.  I don't feel the necessity to
justify my actions to you, but I will tell the group what happened, and
they can condemn me as they wish.  For starters, the assault wasn't
racially motivated.  It wasn't even 'skinhead' motivated.  My sister was
beaten by some lug, and the police refused to do anything.  I took justice
into my own hands, and beat the pusbag into a lump.  The difference here
is, he knew I was coming after him, and I'm fairly well-known around these
parts, so the police didn't have much difficulty tracking me down, and I
went without a fuss.  Pleaded guilty too, but on a reduced charge.  I had
nothing to hide, and admitted everything to the police.  I'd do it again
if I had to.  Rapists, child molesters, and men who beat women should be
hung by their testicles with piano wire.

	Secondly, how would you even recognise me in a bar?  Do you have
some special ability to sense racists in an enclosed area?  Must be
awfully distracting, considering nobody is free from prejudice.

Loyalty above all else except honour
Jason

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:    >        Aggravated assault (which was reduced to assault causing bodily
>>harm via plea-bargain), and being in a residence illegally.
>
>As in breaking and entering or as in squatting? 

	Well, there was no breaking involved, just entering.  It's some
obscure charge, similar to trespassing.  Basically, I was in the guy's
house without an invitation, after which I proceeded to turn his face into
an assorted crimson mish-mash.



-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q3t6s$fl9@mits.mdata.fi> <2q3et6$661@mits.mdata.fi> <2pn5qg$56@sol.sun.csd 
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 03:58:04 GMT
Lines: 68



In a previous article, kauhunen@mits.mdata.fi (Kari Nenonen) says:

>Ok. A point for you. I'm not even trying to say that it was a methafor or
>something, just wrote it because I got pissed off with your rantings and I
>thought that it was language that you understand. Bar fighting is not
>exactly my hobby though :-). Maybe I was drunk too, don't remember any moore.
>Can't resist internet when I've taken one or two too much and there is a
>computer available. Does this qualify for an apolorgise for threatening you
>with physical violence in the cyber space?

	Apology accepted.  I guess I owe you one too.  Now we're on the right
track back to civilised human dialogue.  The Net is addictive, is it not?

>Well, in certain circumstances I might have done the same. Guess I just have
>to be gratefull that any of my dear ones has never been beaten up by anybody.
>But then again, you seem generally to support values that - if they were
>more prevailing - would cause even more beatings and killings of innocent
>women and children that happens to-day in this world.

	You certainly should be grateful that you've never had to deal with
something like that.  Again, I don't advocate political violence, but I will
defend myself if attacked.  I can't say the same for some of my political
'allies,' however.  Then again, it isn't a phenomenon restricted solely to
'nazis.'  Plenty of anti-racists engage in violent acts too.

>I could have made that statement too (put not in public ;-) I could (and
>maybe I should) write more about this issue. But let's just say here that
>in spite of my rage for that kind of criminals I'm not a supporter of
>brutal and inhuman punishments. Because they don't help the society at
>large: they are just revenge and no matter how righteous, they'll make
>the society only harder. Still... when I was 12-years old, one of my
>class mates (a boy) and a friend was raped and brutally killed by a
>pedophile. The man got a life time for it. When I was 25 I read in
>a paper that this same man (who had been free for a year!) had "found
>Jesus". There he was "a new born Christian" in a family magazine, broadly
>smiling. Don't want to write what I thought in that moment.

	That's sick.  The only way he should have found Jesus is through
the grave.  I can't say I agree with you about punishment, though.  Such
punishments would certainly act as deterrents.  Of course, the criminally
insane are hard to deter...

>Wouldn't you be that bald headed guy who would try to bother me with
>his nazi leaflets while I'm trying to concentrate in drinking and
>watching hockey?  :-)

	Hardly.  I keep my politics to where it's appropriate.  When I go
to a bar, it's to drink, and watch the game.  Canadiens lost, dammit!  And
San Jose just beat Toronto, of all the retarded things in this world! 
Incidentally, not every bald guy is a skinhead, and not all skinheads are
racist.  You probably wouldn't even be able to tell I was one at a casual
glance, anyway.

>Yes. But loyalty to whom and honour in what consept?

	Well, I'm sure you won't like this, but to my family, first and
foremost.  My race second.  I will never beat a man when he's down, and
believe it or not, I believe in fair play.  No backstabbing, and
definitely no sucker punches.  I respect, though I do not agree with, my
enemy, and I expect the same kind of respect in return.  Anything else
would be nothing short of anarchy and war.

Jason

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2q69gr$2df@netnews.alf.dec.com>  <2q49rv$g3k@search01.news.aol.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 23:14:51 GMT
Lines: 12



In a previous article, harry@tsc.csc.cxo.dec.com (Harry Katz) says:

>Apparently, Jason Smith must be the last of the gentiles, since a flame
>against him is a flame against "all gentiles!"

	Wow!  I knew there was a conspiracy, but this big?!?!?!?!!?


-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <1994May3.143129.10330@msus1.msus.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 May 1994 05:47:20 GMT
Lines: 13



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>Condone? Who condoned? The Nazis who ran the country at the time
>condoned it. That's one reason Hitler and his henchmen are referred to
>as madmen. They sacrificed thousands and thousands of their fellow
>countrymen rather than broker peace when defeat was inevitable.

	I seem to recall Churchill doing the same.

-- 
Northern Hammer Skins


Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Back on Track
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Thu, 5 May 1994 18:55:16 GMT
Lines: 8



	It seems to me that this group has degenerated into a political
debate group.  What happened to revisionism?  I can't see one post which
has something to do with revisionism.  Well, besides Ken Mcvay's perpetual
holocaust posts...

-- 


Article 11741 of alt.revisionism:
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Back on Track
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qbr7f$ppb@access2.digex.net> 
Date: Fri, 6 May 1994 05:08:49 GMT
Lines: 13



In a previous article, mstein@access.digex.net (Michael P. Stein) says:

>    You know, now that you mention it, I haven't seen the Zumabot around
>here lately.  Is someone forging cancels as fast as the 'bot can post, or
>has UUNET finally pulled his plug?  Is it just my site?  Has anyone else
>seen articles from you-know-who? 

	You're right!  I just hope we didn't speak too soon... knock on wood...


-- 


Article 11807 of alt.revisionism:
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazis on Internet
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   
Date: Sun, 8 May 1994 03:31:47 GMT
Lines: 16



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>No, you face it Mr Skaliks, you don't know what the hell you are
>talking about, you are making it up as you go along to fit your own
>pre-conceived notions, and you are making a laughable idiot out of
>yourself.

	I'm surprised you didn't call him an anti-semite and a nazi,
Barry.  It seems to be a staple defense in your case.  Discredit your
opponent by ridiculing him, and associating him with the most vile image
you can conjure up.  And you have the gall to call him an idiot?


-- 

Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   
Date: Thu, 12 May 1994 16:39:49 GMT
Lines: 27


In a previous article, meidan@ecf.toronto.edu (MEIDAN  AMIR) says:

>The main thing about alcoholic drinks that makes them "un"-kosher is the
>fact that in ancient times they use to make them to be used in pagan
>religious rituals.  That is generally not so today, but the tradition is
>observed by making sure that the original intention of the manufaturer was
>not so.  Other factors include the sterility of the plant, and an inspection
>of the ingrediants that are used to make sure that none of them are prohibited
>or prepared in an "un"-kosher manner.  To the best of my knowledge, there
>are no ingredients in beer that are not kosher.  You see, all you had to
>do is ask...

	Exactly the point of my question.  Since there are no 'un-'kosher
ingredients, how can one then make it kosher, by paying a kosher tax? 
It's ridiculous...

>I don't see how that has any bearing on whether you should drink the beer
>or not.  The fact that it's not the best tasting beer is a different story
>though...

	It tastes like shit, to be frank.  Even here in Canada...


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Calling SPEED FREEK...
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qr5rv$uk@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> <2qr0ef$eka@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> <2qolpa$7ar@comfrey.csv.warwick.ac.uk> <2qqn2a$nun@
Date: Thu, 12 May 1994 16:49:29 GMT
Lines: 25



In a previous article, libmlm@cc.emory.edu (Matthew L Miller) says:

>OK mister anglophile, what sort of logical flip-flop do you use to 
>distinguish between "British" and "English"? As far as I'm concerned, 
>patriotism, nationalism and racism are the same thing, and are all the  
>products of closed-mindedness, short-sightedness, and general 
>ignorance--all of which you display quite adeptly, I might add!--

	How wrong you are...  Patriotism is devotion to one's country,
regardless of race or ethnic origin.  Are you trying to tell me the Black
marines are racist in their patriotism?  Nationalism is devotion to one's
nation, which is normally defined along ethnic grounds.  Nationalism may
or may not incorporate patriotism, in which case it is not ethnic
nationalism, but state nationalism, more properly defined as statism. 
Racism is classification by; or devotion to; one's race.  Racists may not
be nationalist, nor patriotic, just as Nationalists may not be patriotic,
and patriots may not be racist or nationalistic, although all three groups
may contain elements of the other two.  If you want to accuse me
of ignorance, I'd suggest you at least look things up before you accuse
me.  It's like the stove calling the kettle black...

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Validity
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Thu, 12 May 1994 18:29:47 GMT
Lines: 54



	In the past, the question of the validity of our views, and of our
ethnic group, have been questioned.  I will address this question in this
post, at least partially.

	As to the validity of our views: we may be a minority in the
population.  This however, does not invalidate our position.  Supposing 1%
of the population is racist enough to want seperation of the races, and a
homeland within North America.  Admittedly, some are more extremist, but
I'm being reasonable here.  1% of the population of the United States is
what?  2,500,000.  If 2 and a half million people hold these views, or
parts thereof (I'm willing to bet that much more than 1% of the population
is racist...), do they not constitute a valid group?

	Now that we have established the validity of our claims, and of
our ethnic group, is it unreasonable to expect self-determination rights
for this segment of the population?  The UN supports self-determination
for any valid ethnic group, and 2.5 million people is certainly a  valid
group.  I see the basis for basic human rights violations being laid here...

	Add to this all the other White racists in the world.  Include
Canada, Australia, the UK, and continental Europe.  Assuming the same 1%
ratio, do they not too consist of a valid ethnic group?  The only question
that remains is where to situate these people.  The problem lies in the
respective nationalistic tendencies of each group.  Nobody wants to leave
what they call home.  Therefore, Brits wish to stay in Britain, Germans in
Germany, French in France, etc... ad infinitum.  *This* is the problem we
must rectify.  Should we establish *one* nation-state, and have all White
nationalists there?  Or, should areas be set aside within each country to
let these people assume their right to self-determination?  Many will say
that trade with other countries will be a barrier.  I submit that any
country will willingly trade with this nation state (in the first case),
or the various states can trade between each other (in the second case). 
There will be no reason to impose sanctions for human rights violations,
as there will be none.  Immigration would be restricted to whites only. 
That is not a violation of anyone's rights, but an exercise of the
government, which is already practised in many countries today.  If there
is nobody to discriminate against within a society, there will be no
discrimination.

	And please, no stupid comments like 'go to Antarctica'... we have
enough idiots here.

---
The women will smile, on Victory day
And the children will laugh, and they'll sing, and they'll play
The forests will echo our praise
For the proud new dawn of our race...

Northern Hammer Skins

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Dumb-Ass, In-Bred Americans
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2qutga$kvf@charnel.ecst.CSUChico.EDU>  <1994May12.103332.15320@unix.brighton.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 15:22:25 GMT
Lines: 38



In a previous article, tibor@ecst.csuchico.edu (tibor@ecst.csuchico.edu) says:

>Well then I might suggest that you were thought a lie SIR...  We did save
>your buts in WWII and in WWI, altough most of EUROPE's buts as well.  The
>French we had to bail out twice this century.  You ghost looking, bad 
>wheatered, left-side of the riad drivers, on small narrow windy roads od
>england are a bunch of pussys when it comes to fighting wars.  We kicked
>your asses in the 16-th century and we can do it again in the 21st..

	And you, sir, are a dumb-ass inbred American.  You've been taught
the same old laughable patriotic drivel that the rest of the world derides
you for.  America did not win the war for anybody, but rather sat it out
until the war was irrevocably won whether they entered or not.  It may
have taken longer, but it would have happened.  The reverses in the Soviet
Union were taking place, and Hitler had already turned his back and
abandoned England.  America's sole contribution to the war was supplies
via FDR's lend-lease program.  While Canada, Britain, France, Poland,
Russia, the Baltic states, the Caucasus, and all manner of other countries
had been fighting for years, the US rested on its laurels, and entered the
war only when it was a given that their casualty rate would be
insignificant.  The casualties suffered in WWII by the US can't even
compare to the losses suffered by coutries entered in the war from the
start.  By waiting until the very end, and then sweeping through with its
vast industrial might, FDR secured a world role for the US, where before
the power center had been Europe.  American soldiers are not better
trained, just better equipped, with the vast resources the US has.  In
field exercises with foreign soldiers, they get regularly trounced by
Canadians, Brits, Swedes...

	Good luck in the next war, considering you'll be its primary
target.  I guess I'd better say goodbye now...

Jason

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Dumb-Ass, In-Bred Americans
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <1994May12.103332.15320@unix.brighton.ac.uk> In article <1994May14.014023.27966@cs.wm.edu>,
>archon@physics.physics.wm.edu (Patick Crotty) wrote:
>> 
>> Oh really?  And who's going to be stupid enough to fight us?  You?
>> Buddy, you can barely keep a leash on Northern Ireland.
>
>Hey! Didn't they already leave? Oh, wait. Sorry. That was the Israelis from
>the West Bank. Oh, well, give it a year or so. As soon as all of their
>downtown London department stores have been reduced to rubble from IRA
>bombs, they'll leave.

	Actually, I'm Canadian.  I seem to recall kicking the US's ass
every time they tried to invade Canada.  Remember 1812?

	And that doesn't change the fact that America didn't enter both
world wars until they were a sure thing.  Cowards, hiding behind your
patriotism and self-importance.  You pull out every time things get
tough... Vietnam, Somalia, etc...  You didn't win WWII, everyone else did
with their lives.  US casualties were insignificant compared to European
casualties, Chinese casualties, and particularly Russian casualties.  Even
German casualties.  And then you expect the rest of the world to be at
your feet and feel grateful for letting us bleed ourselves dry,only to
have you sweep in at the last minute?  Next time, stay out, and we'll take
care of ourselves, thank you.  We don't need you lording your imagined
supremacy over us...

	Dumb ass, inbred Americans...

Jason Smith


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Dumb-Ass, In-Bred Ame
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   
Date: Mon, 16 May 1994 00:47:59 GMT
Lines: 19



In a previous article, MARTIN.SHARLOW@knight.gemstar.com (martin sharlow) says:

> Get a life. I don't know where you got your info from but even
>if it was true I'd say we pulled off a grand coup and we
>deserve our spoils!

	Obviously, I wasn't brainwashed with patriotic American drivel. 
That 'Grand Coup' you supposedly pulled off was done on the backs and
blood of MILLIONS of people who had been fighting the war for years.  If
Japan hadn't attacked, you never would have entered the war, you selfish
self-important sod...

Jason Smith


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: traitors
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2pcs3o$j61@cwis.isu.edu> 
Date: Mon, 16 May 1994 00:03:17 GMT
Lines: 18



In a previous article, brittg@efn.org (Britt Green) says:

>
>
>	For those of you who've read all of "Rob Skin's" posts, I'm sure 
>we'd all agree that "Mr. Skin" get's the award for Best New Yorker Trying 
>to Cop a Poor Englishman Voice.
>
>	--Britt

	Oi!  To that, mate...!

Jason

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: traitors
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2r5h1l$hmf@bach.udel.edu> <2pcs3o$j61@cwis.isu.edu>  
Date: Mon, 16 May 1994 00:06:02 GMT
Lines: 20



In a previous article, rabbit@bach.udel.edu (shaun flanagan) says:

>I'd really like to hear how mr.skin speaks. All i've read was his poor
>grasp of an english accent. I betcha he pronounces hardcore like "hawdkur"
>But I don't think he's from new york. I think he said that he's from
>jersey. 

	Even worse, although I hope the Devils clean up on the Rangers...
I know, I know, not likely...

Jason

Oi saw the sOin, and it Oipened up my Ois,...
	[sung to the tune of 'I saw the sign...']


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: Dumb-Ass, In-Bred Ame
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2r6p8t$553@mailer.fsu.edu> 
Date: Mon, 16 May 1994 15:40:50 GMT
Lines: 13



In a previous article, eflahert@garnet.acns.fsu.edu (Edward Flaherty) says:

>	You know, I used to like Englishmen.  But what do you expect? 
>They don't even know what REAL football is.

	I'm Canadian, and British football has been around much longer
than your American version.  You should maybe call it tackleball, or
something.  Or steroidball...

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Jason's turning into a hippy (was Re: traitors)
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2r7q23$rk9@bach.udel.edu> <2r5h1l$hmf@bach.udel.edu>   
Date: Mon, 16 May 1994 15:19:59 GMT
Lines: 25



In a previous article, rabbit@bach.udel.edu (shaun flanagan) says:

>In article ,
>Jason Smith  wrote:
>
>>Oi saw the sOin, and it Oipened up my Ois,...
>>	[sung to the tune of 'I saw the sign...']
>
>Jason,  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>        This does not sound like you. You weren't perchance, tripping on
>acid when you wrote this? ;^) 

	Hippy?  HIPPY?!!  Since when do hippies listen to dance music? 
Anyhow, I wasn't tripping on acid, I was merrily on my way to being drunk
at O'toole's on Friday.  While everyone was on the dance floor dancing, I
was trying to deal with my irrepressible urge to slam into them, moshing
them into an unrecognizable pulp...

	Ask Skinflower, she was there!  :)


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: South Africa
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2r7q6o$rvq@bach.udel.edu> <2qi567$ms4@cwis.isu.edu> <16FB8380.WBOLTON@vmd.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 May 1994 15:21:05 GMT
Lines: 19



In a previous article, rabbit@bach.udel.edu (shaun flanagan) says:

>In article <16FB8380.WBOLTON@vmd.cso.uiuc.edu>,
>  wrote:
>
>>Steve be careful about what you post, I have it on good source that you have
>>some dark skin in your families past would you care to comment on this.
>
>I'd like to hear this story. I love mud slinging. Please, do tell.

Heehee... me too!

Jason


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazi joke compliments of alt.tasteless.jokes
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   
Date: Thu, 19 May 1994 14:29:15 GMT
Lines: 20



In a previous article, jtrumbull@hostel.island.net (Jim Trumbull) says:

>Not a group to post humor, but I couldn't resist:
>
>>But we all know about the real scum, So here's a real one:
>>
>>
>>Two people sit in the train. "I have a great joke about nazis", says the
>>first one. "Watch out, I'm a nazi" answers the other one. so the first
>>one says "Ok, I'll speak slowly".

	That's old... funny, though.  First time I heard it, it was an
ethnic joke... go figger!

Jason

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: White Power
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <19940519073327UOD2891@MVS.UDEL.EDU> <1994May18.213156.1662@cs.wm.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 May 1994 14:13:27 GMT
Lines: 12



In a previous article, UOD2891@MVS.UDEL.EDU (shaun flanagan) says:

>I could go on for hours about this, but it really isn't realative to the
>newsgroup. After all jesus wasn't a skin....

	Bingo!  He was a hairy...


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Nazism on the 'net
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2reicc$lo9@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>  
Date: Thu, 19 May 1994 14:16:04 GMT
Lines: 20



In a previous article, en883@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Roderick Potts) says:

>
>Hey, some friends told me about a Nazi board that you can get to
>on the net. Does it exist? Does anybody know of any Nazi boards at 
>all? 
>all? Just wondering.
>

	That depends... what's your angle on the race issue?  I'm not
afraid to say I'm a White Nationalist, and as such, I like to contact
other people of like mind on the Net.  Let me know, either way...

Jason Smith
Northern Hammer Skins

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: What About Being Bald for Style more than Statement?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2qtsq8$s8q@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> 
Date: Thu, 19 May 1994 18:35:07 GMT
Lines: 38



In a previous article, cs932090@ariel.cs.yorku.ca (JOANNA I TIMARIU) says:

>But from what I'm reading so far, most of them ARE nazis. Why would a 
>self-proclaimed "skinhead" newspaper (posted by the (!) self-proclaimed 
>"intelligent nazi" Northen Hammers in this very newsgroup) be just a big pile 
>of racist and propagandistic bullshit? Because "skinhead" , in the big picture,
>does symbolize this political stand. That's why. 

	Well, even I'm intelligent enough to notice the discrepancies and
ignorance in your post.  I guess that makes it 'self-proclaimed.'  For
your information, oh god of knowledge, I've said it many times before:
most skins are not racist.  People who post to this group as racists are
usually not skins.  Steve isn't.  Arthur isn't.  Hermann isn't.  I think
the only two who are are myself, and Warpiglet to a degree.  As well, the
'zine that was posted never made the claim of being a skinhead 'zine.  It
is a political 'zine, edited and published by the Northern Hammer skins,
with the mjority of contributors being non-skins, as well as many
subscribers.  This is a far cry from being a 'skinhead' 'zine.

 > 
>Of course, when it comes to me, I won't just judge automatically any person 
>with a shaven head to be a nazi. No. Passing judgements too quickly would 
>be something that the racist party would do. I'd fall in the same category
>as them. 

	But you're willing to make sweeping generalisations about most
skins being 'notsis,' which is something that would be generally
attributed to our camp as well.  Label something, it will go away...

>Not anti-white. Not anti-anything. Anti-hate. 

	Not anti-anything, but anti-hate?  How is that possible?  Isn't
that being anti-something?  Wow!  These twists of logic and reason
never cease to amaze me...
-- 



Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: An Appeal for Aid: Racism in Salmon Arm, B.C.
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <1994May22.045333.18262@oneb.almanac.bc.ca>  
Date: Sun, 22 May 1994 17:20:58 GMT
Lines: 32



In a previous article, kmcvay@oneb.almanac.bc.ca (Ken Mcvay) says:

>   Eileen Pressler, head of the Council on Public Affairs, through
>   her lawyer, Doug Christie, is suing David Lethbridge, director of
>   SACAR, for libel.
[...]
>        The libel action taken by the Presslers stems from a CBC AT
>   broadcast concerning a building project undertaken by the
>   Presslers.  During this broadcast I referred to the organization
>   run by Ms. Pressler as anti-Semitic and racist.  I further gave
>   my opinion that the buildings being erected by the Presslers
>   might be used to hold meetings of extreme right-wingers.  Leaders
>   in other anti-racist and anti-fascist organizations are concerned
>   that should the Presslers win their libel suit, a precedent will
>   be set which will allow organized racist groups across the
>   country to sue their opposition and to effectively muzzle any
>   voices that speak up against the neo-Nazi, holocaust denial,
>   agenda.  We must not allow this to happen.

	Hope they take him for everything he's got.  Anti-racist groups
have been trying to muzzle us for years, it's time the shoe was on the
other foot.  Combined with the sure aquittal of George Burdi of the Church
of the Creator, it will set back the anti-racist forces enormously, and
set a precedent which will allow us to double our efforts.  See you in
court...

Jason

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: An Appeal for Aid: Racism in Salmon Arm, B.C.
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <1994May22.045333.18262@oneb.almanac.bc.ca> 
Date: Sun, 22 May 1994 23:34:26 GMT
Lines: 60



In a previous article, bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) says:

>It is evidence of a perversely sick and distorted mind to argue that
>it's about time the criminals got to punish everyone else, as if this
>were some schoolyard game where everyone gets their turn.

	As if we're criminals for pursuing an agenda of self-determination
and ethnic survival and seperatism...

>No doubt this silly and spiteful lawsuit will be resolved as one would
>expect, as another great loss and setback for the bilious and twisted
>hatemongers Mr Smith so well represents here, at which point Mr Smith
>will either be silent about the matter or spew his near psychotic
>lather about it all being evidence of injustice for the unjust.

	Don't use your moral code to judge me; how can you honestly say
that I am unjust?  I represent a viable portion of the population, and as
such, deserve the same rights as everyone else.  Naturally, you're going
to say something like 'look who's talking about rights, the same person
who would take them, away, blah, blah, blah,' and all that other
inflammatory anti-racist rhetoric.  Quit propagandising, and trying to
impose your moral and ethical code on people, along with your failed
multi-ethnic experiment you call society.  Let people make up their own
minds as to who they want to be surrounded by... their own, or the likes
of you.  I can bet they'll take their own.

>It is truly astounding to me how those who have absolutely no interest
>in justice scream for their own justice only when it would seem to be
>to their personal advantage.

	It's called politics, Barry.

>How stupid do they think we are???

	Honestly?

>A libel suit is not exactly an attempt to un-muzzle someone. I am sure
>the distinction is lost on Mr Smith and in his troglodytic, coloring
>book view of the world it's just oh good someone's is doing something
>bad to the good people it's about time.

	There you go again, 'bad'.  I'm not bad, are you bad?  I can't say
that someone trying to couteract what I'm trying to do, and what I see as
just, to be good, however.

	Again Barry, you're nothing but a poor sod lost in his paranoid
schizophrenia.  In one breath, you say we're idiots, and that we'll never
come to power, and the next, you're trying to couteract all our 'evil.' 
If we're so inneffective and our policies so revolting, what exactly are
you afraid of?

'Nuff said...

Jason


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.discrimination
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: WCBS-News racist towards Irish?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  
Date: Sun, 22 May 1994 17:43:55 GMT
Lines: 18



In a previous article, ronaldd@cbnewse.cb.att.com (ronald.h.davis) says:

>this piece of trash isn't even worth that much.  here is some
>clown who makes it a point to identify lester holt's race, and
>then wants to turn around and make up some bogus racism against
>white people argument.  ridiculous.  few things honk me off more
>than idiots like this guy who insist on trying to make it appear
>that white people are the real victims of racism by black people.

	Take a pill!  That's not what he was doing, even if he would be
justified in doing so.

Jason

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.discrimination
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: WCBS-News racist towards Irish?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   <2rhm52$qs8@news.acns.nwu.edu>
Date: Sun, 22 May 1994 17:49:18 GMT
Lines: 17



In a previous article, johnc@rci.ripco.com (Dangerous) says:

>(Unless, maybe you want Channel 2 to decide that the next time a young
>black kid from the inter-city is interviewed, they'll provide sub-titles,
>'just in case someone from omaha wouldn't understand their slang'.

	They probably should.  Inner-city kids, with their 'slang' aren't
speaking coherent english, but an aberration of the language.  I would
venture to say that the majority of people wouldn't understand them.  I
guess 'it's a black thang, they wouldn't understand...'

Jason

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: What About Being Bald for Style more than Statement?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2qtsq8$s8q@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>  To Jason Smith:
>
>I don't know about you, but when a magazine that is definately racist and 
>propagandistic is published by northen SKINS, I am tempted to think that 
>it represents the opinion of a group of people that call themselves SKINS. 
>Maybe my logic is flawed somewhere in the middle. So, what you are saying is 
>that the people editing this magazine are mostly non-skins, but call themselves
>skins just for the heck of it. Aha. 

	Do I have to repeat everything?  The editors and Publishers are
Northern Hammer Skins, not the majority of the contributors/writers.  If
Doubleday Publishing puts out a book, is it a book by Doubleday?  Hardly. 
It's written by an author, or collection of said authors.  What I said is
exactly what I meant, but unfortunately, your head is too far up your ass
to see it.

>_THEY_ called themselves skins. It wasn't me the one to name them. 

	I am a skin, and I am the editor.  The writers aren't, but the
group that pays the costs of mailing and publishing are the Northern
Hammer Skins.  Is that clearer to you now?

>Oh really. Why do I even attempt to explain myself. I think that what I was
>saying was clear enough.. Not being ANTI-ANYTHING _MEANS_ , in an
>ultimate analysis, being ANTI-HATE. But I won't be able to make you see this,
>because all that you'll be able to do is look at this sentence and laugh your
>head off. 

	You're right.  You keep saying the funniest things, after all...

Jason
Auslaender Raus!

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: What About Being Bald for Style more than Statement?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:    <19MAY199417144975@utarlg.u
Date: Sun, 22 May 1994 04:10:26 GMT
Lines: 36


In a previous article, cs932090@ariel.cs.yorku.ca (JOANNA I TIMARIU) says:

>>Couldn't of replied better myself.  And im not a nazi or racist.
>>And, yes, joanna, there is a huge difference there.

	Thank you.

>
>I really hope that you could have replied better. And I'm glad to hear that 
>you're not racist. 

	Why?  He might not have made you feel as stupid?

>From reading this newsgroup for the past month or so, it would be really
>tough not to arrive to the conclusion that skins and nazis are two notions 
>that walk hand in hand. I'm glad to hear someone disapprove of that. 

	Well, most people who post are A) not skins, like yourself.  B)
The only time things get back to debating politics and mudslinging is when
sods like you come into the group with your ignorance, and spout off about
how all skins are racist.  This gets the anti-racists going, which gets
the racists going, and then we have a rumble.  We came to a consensus long
ago about politics in this group: we neither want nor need any. 
Unfortunately, people like yourself are too shortsighted to see beyond the
rigmarole that goes on here.  Usually, we get along quite well, both
racists and anti-racist, because we have one thing in common: we're
skinheads.  The next time you feel like being stupid, go to
alt.net.idiots, and open your mouth, otherwise fuckoff.

	Hey, Tigger, you're rubbing off on me!

Jason

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: What About Being Bald for Style more than Statement?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:   I thought that the editors represent the opinion of a paper. Silly me. 

	They do, but to say from that that all skins are racist is an
extension of reality.

>You are the one that can decide WHAT articles are going to be in the newspaper,
>then. The articles in the zine were a pile of bullshit. Don't try to argue 
>that. The editors have decided to publish those articles. All the articles 
>were of the same magnitude of racism. There was not even ONE voice against
>racism in that zine. What other proof do you need? 

	Of course!  You really are clueless, aren't you?  The Northern
Hammer SKINS are a racist skinhead group, which is not to say by extension
that all skins are racist.  And prove to me beyond a doubt that any *one*
of those articles was bullshit.  I'm not talking about your personal
opinions and views on the matter, but solid proof.  I'll bet you can't. 
What you view as bullshit, I view as truth.  Just because you disagree
doesn't make it bullshit.  Truth is relative to the observer's viewpoint,
as are all matters, so I'd suggest you just quit while I'm ahead...

	York, eh?  How you got in there is a mystery beyond all mysteries...


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: What About Being Bald for Style more than Statement?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <19MAY199417144975@utarlg.uta.edu>  <22MAY199406041778@uta
Date: Sun, 22 May 1994 23:22:48 GMT
Lines: 22



In a previous article, cs932090@ariel.cs.yorku.ca (JOANNA I TIMARIU) says:

>As I have said before, I am glad to hear that and the fact that I got such
>response has changed my mind about the way I was seeing things. But whenever
>I say this phrase , it seems to be overlooked. Therefore I won't say anything
>else in this message. 

	Maybe I should point out to you that even the anti-racists here
agree with me that you're a dupe.  Does that tell you something?  I think
it's almost eerie how we can both agree how retarded you are...

>Except that I'm tired of trying to have a discussion with a bunch of abusive 
>swines. 

	If you'd shut your hole, and quit being stupid, perhaps people
wouldn't be so abusive.  Like I said, even the anti-racists agree with me
on this point.  Go away.  Fuck off.  'Nuff said...

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: What About Being Bald for Style more than Statement?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  I knew that Carleton had world-famous low standards. But this is ridiculous.

	Considering I'm not a Carleton student, as are none of the other
people who post via Freenet, the community-based Internet access board
based at Carleton U, I won't take that as an insult.  Perhaps York should
teach you to read an address, among other things.  I still don't
understand how someone of your obviously limited intelligence and
ignorance could have gotten in... and you call me ignorant for being
what *I* am?!  That's like the stove calling the kettle black... (pardon
the pun...)  I guess it just goes to show you that in our education
system, high grades aren't necessarily indicative of intelligence or ability.

Jason



-- 



Article 6474 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: What About Being Bald for Style more than Statement?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <22MAY199423304397@utarlg.uta.edu> <19MAY199417144975@utarlg.uta.edu>  <22MAY199406041778
Date: Mon, 23 May 1994 05:26:59 GMT
Lines: 23



In a previous article, jjh1231@utarlg.uta.edu (HOGAN,JEFFREY,JOHN) says:

>THEN LEAVE>>>YOU WON"T BE MISSED.....

	Thank you.

	So... anyone try that new beer: Red Dog?  I gotta have a go at it
myself.  I haven't gotten around to it yet, though.  Maybe next weekend! 
Or all week!!

	Anybody have beer-tasting experiences to relate?  Or
beer-upchucking experiences?  *Those* are the best ones, the ones you
don't want anybody to know, because you made such a fool of yourself... 
Hehe, I've a few of those myself, but that's another post...

Jason



-- 



Article 6475 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Interested Party...
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2rpcte$o15@search01.news.aol.com>  
Date: Mon, 23 May 1994 05:36:16 GMT
Lines: 24



In a previous article, chele2@aol.com (Chele2) says:

>Basically I would like to know what angle or well..whatever..this
>board takes.  What I mean is, what kind of people are out there, both
>side of the age-old argument?  
>
>I am interested in getting into the discussions here,  but I hate to
>offend anyone, I suppose.  I'm really just interested..  Are there
>both rascist and non-rascist skins, only one kind, more kinds?  Let
>me here what is going on.  Believe me, I have a lot to say and
>nowhere to say it....

	Oh no!  Not another one!  Perhaps you should enter into private
chats with Joanna, and provide each other with your vast wealth of
knowledge...

	And it's racist, not rascist... What is a rasce, anyways?

Jason

-- 



Article 14635 of alt.discrimination:
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Black reparations
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2rt1j3$o89@news.duke.edu> <2rp0va$4vk@giga.bga.com> <2rqusi$jg2@news.duke.edu> <2rr1m2$2kl@Tut.MsState.Edu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 15:51:57 GMT
Lines: 16



In a previous article, dlh@duke.edu (Darryl Hamilton) says:

> Yep I sure do. But my tax money goes to a variety of things.
> I reparations were paid ( I think it's useless to ask for them)
> what percentage of your taxes do you think would go towards that?
> 1,5, 10 ,15 ?

	Too Much, at any rate...

Jason
Northern Hammer Skins

-- 



Article 6502 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Jason's turning into a hippy (was Re: traitors)
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <769696826.AA03962@rochgte.fidonet.org>  
Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 15:20:18 GMT
Lines: 20



In a previous article, Skinflower@f127.n163.z1.fidonet.org (Skinflower) says:

>         HAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!!! Oh Gawd no! Jason on acid?! Don't think I'd
>really want to see that.

	At least you know me well enough to know I wouldn't be dropping
*that* shit!  Beer for me, thanks!

>         Actually, you should've been here when Jason actually started singing
>*that*. {stiffling laughter}

	You can laugh... you did that night, along with everyone else!

Jason
Northern Hammer Skins

-- 



Article 6513 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Interested Party...
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2rpcte$o15@search01.news.aol.com> 
Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 00:06:23 GMT
Lines: 18



In a previous article, cs932090@ariel.cs.yorku.ca (JOANNA I TIMARIU) says:

>Yes, there are skins that are non-racist, I'm already convinged by that. I'm 
>also sure that there are intelligent skins out there, althogh Jason 
>represents a very strong argument against this. 

	This coming from an idiot.  I think there's already been a
consensus out there that I am one of the most well-read and articulate
racists around.  What seems to escape you, is that I wouldn't waste any of
it on you, as you're a lost cause.

End of Thread.
Jason

-- 



Article 6522 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: News report...
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 18:32:42 GMT
Lines: 19



	Hmmm... to those interested, I just did an interview with a CTV
reporter, Terry Marcotte.  It lasted an hour, and he wanted to know about
the use of the computer in furthering my goals and aims insofar as the
White movement is concerned -  how it helps forge links, organise, etc... 
I told him everything I could, without giving away too much.  It should be
interesting to note how it will be edited to make me look stupid... it's
always the case; but if just one person takes my message to heart, it will
have been worth it.

	It's playing Sunday, on Sunday edition of CTV news, for those of
you who get it...

Jason
Loyalty above all else except honour

-- 



Article 6525 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Wot's all this then?
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2s08t6$8pq@bach.udel.edu>   Yes. I agree that an eye for an eye and all that shit. But threatening to
>kick someones ass because they say something that you hate is fascism.
>pure and simple.

	Bingo!  Finally, an enlightened person!  I've been trying to tell
militant anti-fascists that from the git-go.  They accuse *me* of using
violence to further my goals, and then threaten to kick my ass for
thinking the way I do.  That's it: let's instill peace and harmony in
these fascists by making them bleed...

>If it ever came down to where I had to choose, between say helping a
>non-racist skin or a racist-skin, the non-racist skin will always have my
>back. The racist skin only might have my back. (sorry jason. :( )

	Yeah, yeah... that's 'cause you haven't had me yet... ;)  Then
again, how would you tell if I was a racist skin, if you saw me in a
confrontation on the street?  Is there some kind of racism-radar?  Wow! 
Gotta git me one a doze!

>My head was never in my ass. God, and I have wierd sexual practices ;^)

	I'd *pay* to see that!!!!

Jason
Northern Hammer Skins
To thine own self be true...

-- 



Article 6542 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Swindler's Jest
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2s38mf$nhl@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>  
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 00:38:40 GMT
Lines: 20



In a previous article, en883@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Roderick Potts) says:

>If the holocaust is a BIG lie, then whose bodies are those that
>were burned in the ovens? Why did six million Jews mysteriously
>disappear in the space of about five or six years? Also, why is 
>it that at the Nurmberg trials, many Nazis admitted to having
>mudered countless Jews?

	I don't really want to get into this here... there is another group
for this, it's called alt.revisionism.  However, if these bodies were
burned, as you say, where is the evidence?  Did you see them?  As to
having *mudered* countless Jews, they must have fadered a couple too...

Jason
Morbid sense of humour is my own...

-- 



Article 6552 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Swindler's Jest
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2s38mf$nhl@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> 
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 15:59:49 GMT
Lines: 26



In a previous article, cs932090@ariel.cs.yorku.ca (JOANNA I TIMARIU) says:

>The idea of starting a new thread with you does not appeal to me at all, trust
>me. However, you were the first one to jump in and insinuate that the 
>Holocaust didn't exist. How can you? The ones that lived through the 
>Holocaust and got out of it alive due to some incredible luck are still 
>living amongst us! If you really want to, I can introduce you to some of them. 

	Then don't respond.  I wasn't responding to you, in any event. 
Besides, are you so humour-impaired that you can't see a joke for what it
is?  "Mudered", "Fadered?"...  

	I've met Holocaust survivors.  It doesn't impress me.  Call me
cold.  Quebec has the highest percentage of holocaust survivors in the
world, bar Israel.  Montreal's chock full of 'em.  Just like that other
gentleman who figures listening to Martin King's "I have a dream" speech
will change anyone's mind...  I've heard it.  It didn't impress me either.
Keep trying, though...

Jason
Northern Hammer Skins

-- 



Article 38103 of alt.conspiracy:
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Deadly Bug in England
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2s06hl$ea5@news.u.washington.edu> <2s508a$cn9@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 16:16:12 GMT
Lines: 23



In a previous article, prc@world.std.com (Peter R Cook) says:

>	Two corrections:
>
>	1) It's a bacteria, not a virus.

	Hmmm... I was under the impression that it was a virus; they have
to treat it with anti-biotics, which are usually reserved for virii.

>	2) It doesn't eat the skin, it eats away at the fat tissue underneath
>	   the skin, causing the skin to collapse and die.

	And as a result, causing Gangrene infections as well.  A case has
been diagnosed recently (yesterday) in Canada, in my town of
Gatineau, Quebec.  The woman is in hospital, in critical condition, and is
receiving massive amounts of antibiotics.  Hope she pulls through...

Jason

-- 



Article 6565 of alt.skinheads:
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: News report...
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2s6tui$gc6@pipeline.com>  
Date: Sat, 28 May 1994 17:29:17 GMT
Lines: 19



In a previous article, david@pipeline.com (David Custer) says:

>Why not sell taped copies of your interview?  I for one will 
>buy it.

	Thanks for the support, but the interview was an hour long, which
will probably be reduced to a 5 minute blurb edited so that everything I
say is taken out of context.  I doubt it will be an entire hour... God
forbid!  I was nervous as Hell!  At one point I found myself looking at
the floor, instead of at the interviewer... chalk it up to camera shyness.
 Next time'll be better...

Jason
To thine own self be true...

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: FAQ: WHITE POWER
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca (Usenet News Admin)
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <1994May30.045645.64799@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <1994May22.214433.1@clstac> <1994May23.210706.10162@cs.wm.edu>  <1994May29
Date: Mon, 30 May 1994 19:36:30 GMT
Lines: 60



In a previous article, tres@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu () says:

>OK whitey, why dont you and the rest of your ilk sit down and figure out once
>and for all where you came from, and where you home land is, and go there and
>leave the rest of the world alone. May I suggest that you build a nice trailor
>park in antarchtica? Then you and your white trash race will live some where
>fitting: All white, cold, boring and cheap and trashy.

	Our homeland will be wherever we decide to make it, with or
without your approval.

>Have you ever stopped to think that the rest of the world does not care one
>little bit about your silly white fantasy? 

	Have you ever stopped to think about all the other peoples fighting
to establish homelands in this world?  People fighting for their land and
their right to exist as a people, with self-determination?  Nobody seems
to laugh at the Palestinians, or the IRA, or the Kurds.  Could it be
because it's hard to laugh in the face of a gun?  Armed insurrection is
their solution.  Unlike them, we choose to fight within the constraints of
the system.  Within a system that is geared to our repression, and
consequently makes achieving our goals more difficult.  Even in the face
of this, we continue.  Despite your derision, we will fight.  Now, when we
come to power, through democratically elected means, that will mean that
the MAJORITY will support our mandate.  As such, we'll be well within our
rights to do whatever we please with the country within that mandate.  If
that means removing all political rights from non-whites, so be it.  We
have the power of majority on our side, and we do not feel the need to
pander to minority needs, unlike the current government, which is a
hippocrisy, because technically, we are a minority as it stands.  Maybe
I'm in line for a grant?!

>The vast majority of people in the real worldlook at people like you as kooks,
>crazies, freaks and wierdo's. You are a momentary distraction, a curriosity,
>but not a very interesting or engaging one. 

	Ah, but nobody laughs at the other peoples in the world fighting
for their survival and homeland (whatever they perceive that to be, right
or wrong).  They are hardly freaks and wierdos, but rather "freedom
fighters", and "rebels."  Only Whites get laughed at.  Perhaps armed
insurrection is the answer.  I just may begin to advocate it, after all. 
I don't see it as a real solution, but it will get people to take notice,
if nothing else.

>> The White race must survive
>
>And it just might, but hopefully without the likes of you.
>You do not represent the white race.

	And you do?  Your homosexuality does not exactly promote the
survival of even the HUMAN race.  Remember what sex is for? 
Procreation... I don't think getting it in the poop shoot accomplishes that.

Jason
Having a bad day...

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: FAQ: WHITE POWER
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca (Usenet News Admin)
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <1994May22.214433.1@clstac> <1994May23.210706.10162@cs.wm.edu> <1994May23.170742.1@cls
Date: Mon, 30 May 1994 22:10:36 GMT
Lines: 19



In a previous article, brerbear@netcom.com (Buddy Bear) says:

>That, I won't do, mate. I been lurking here, waiting for this crap to 
>go away, so I could talk about skins, but you won't go away. So I am 
>taking the offensive. Take your white power crap some fucking where else. 
>Then I'll shut up.  

	Oooohh.... we have a scrapper...

	I love it when the higher echelons of our society get involved. 
It makes me feel warm and fuzzy all over.

Jason
To thine own self be true

-- 


Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: FAQ: WHITE POWER
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca (Usenet News Admin)
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2sdki8$atn@post-office.nevada.edu> <1994May22.214433.1@clstac> <1994May23.210706.10162@cs.wm.edu>  <1994May29.233226.
Date: Tue, 31 May 1994 06:39:59 GMT
Lines: 29



In a previous article, tommy@nevada.edu (GREG HJELSTROM) says:

>HA! This is pretty funny, since you and a bunch of your white power friends
>grew up here, now its your homeland!?????  I happen to know a lot of blacks,
>asians, mexicans, etc. who grew up here so I guess its their homeland too.
>Now it sounds like America again!

	There's just one fault with your logic: none of those peoples
founded this nation.  None of the founding fathers was Black nor Asian,
and I don't know too many who came over on the Mayflower...

>You have no moral, legal, or other right to a separate homeland in the US
>or anywhere else for that matter.

	We have every right to do so.  Just as Israel exists, and
Palestine, and the Kurds fight for their rights, so do we have not only
every moral and legal right, but every moral and legal obligation to do
so.  Who are you to judge my morality, or to say what my rights are or are
not?  Self-righteousness is not a quality, despite what you may think...

>(mourning for the poor oppressed downtrodden white race)

Jason
(mourning for Greg)

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Go Tell Survivors the Holocaust Doesn't Exist.
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca (Usenet News Admin)
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <2se25i$e6d@nic.umass.edu>  
Date: Tue, 31 May 1994 15:18:14 GMT
Lines: 16



In a previous article, dbrown@k12.ucs.umass.edu (Daniel A. Brown Bernardston ES)) says:

>Somewhere in Israel there is a kibbutz village inhabited by survivors of the
>Nazi Death Camps and their descendants. I suggest you go there, call a
>meeting and tell THEM the Holocaust is a fraud.
>
>If your sorry asses come out of this meeting in one piece, I might be
>agreeable to listening to YOU.

	Buy me a plane ticket...


-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: FAQ: WHITE POWER
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca (Usenet News Admin)
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <1994May30.045645.64799@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <1994May22.214433.1@clstac> <1994May23.21070
Date: Tue, 31 May 1994 15:30:25 GMT
Lines: 55



In a previous article, feit@cs.buffalo.edu (Elissa Feit) says:

>that's really funny - most people KNOW where they consider their homeland 
>to be. If you don''t have one, I suggest you don't have one.

	Wow!  What logic!  If we don't have one, we don't have one?!  In
actual fact, the White nations span much of the globe, encompassing The
Unites States, Canada, and Europe.

>Furthermore, why don't you think you already have self-determination?
>Someone stopping you?

	Obviously, if we don't have a state geared to our needs and wants
as a people, with a sufficient infrastructure to ensure our survival. 
This includes institutions such as courts to uphold our laws, a
constitution defining those laws, and a government to manage our affairs. 
The current government is not one inclined towards giving us
self-determination, much as any government in the world resists giving up
power, or land.

>You don't know that. I doubt that homosexuality is a modern trait - it's
>probably been with us all along. It probably evolved with us. Thus, it
>prbably DOES have some survival characteristics: if every adult is busy
>with kids, then there's no extra people to lighten the work, to make food,
>to take care of kids whose parents die, etc.

	Homosexuality is an abberation, left over from our days as apes. 
Animals engage in homosexuality, not civilised humans.  It contributes not
a thing to our society, and you're using examples which can easily be
managed within a society free of such activity.  Firstly, not *every*
adult will be busy with kids.  Normally, one or the other can stay at home
with them (remember the nuclear family?).  There are usually plenty of
single people to lighten the work.  People can make their own bloody food,
they're called farmers.  As for kids whose parents die, that's what foster
parents and adoption are for.  I hardly think handing them over to a
homosexual is good child-rearing.  We've survived millenia without
homosexuals contributing anything to society, particularly not what you
mentioned,as these tasks have always been handled quite well in our
society, and every other, for that matter.  Even if this were true,
homosexuals comprise such a minority as to not contribute significantly.

>Seems to me like homosexuality has EVERY attribute for promoting species
>survival. But of course, you're being short-sighted again, andletting your
>hatred blind you to possibilities.  Pity.

	Seems to me you're just looking for arguments where there are
none.  Pity.

Jason
To thine own self be true

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: Re: Lot's of sad people on this here net.
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca (Usenet News Admin)
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:  <2se1j3$e6d@nic.umass.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 May 1994 15:32:47 GMT
Lines: 16



In a previous article, brittg@efn.org (Britt Green) says:

>	Yeah...I like that idea.  I would pay the big cash to say Jason 
>with a black pride afro! 
>
>	Boot to the head, Daniel, you wanker asshole,

	Haha!  Interesting concept... Maybe I could do standup in Blackface?

Jason
Boot to da head...

-- 



Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
From: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Subject: PGP...
Message-ID: 
Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca (Usenet News Admin)
Reply-To: al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Jason Smith)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 1994 00:11:55 GMT
Lines: 18



	I just got my hands on PGP version 2.3a.  For those of you who
don't know what that is, it's a security software program which allows you
to encrypt your E-mail and files.  Only the intended recipient can decode
them.  I'd suggest we begin using it (at least the 'notsis' should)
between us to ensure our communications privacy.  Remember, Big Brother is
watching...

	If anybody wants a copy, I can E-mail one using uuencode, but you
must have uudecode to decode it.  I can also provide BBSs and FTP sites
that carry it...

Jason
Victory shall be ours...

-- 




Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.