From email@example.com Fri Oct 18 09:55:29 PDT 1996 Article: 75398 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.erols.net!news2.digex.net!access5!karlpov From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Charles R.L. Power) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Allied atrocities--stainless Stele forgery? Date: 18 Oct 1996 06:25:04 -0400 Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA Lines: 25 Message-ID:
References: <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: access5.digex.net firstname.lastname@example.org (Kurt Stele) writes: >Shitlock Holmes, get a copy of January 9th, 1949 and then prove to me the Washington >"DAILY" News wasn't Sunday-issued in 1949. > ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ Stele, Moron, there was no such issue because that title was not issued on Sunday in 1949. How do I know? MLK, the main public library in the District, has a microfilm collection of the WASHINGTON DAILY NEWS. Ah, there's January 8, 1949. Ah, there's January 10, 1949. Oops, there's nothing inbetween. I checked with the librarian in the newspaper section to see if the paper's Sundays were stored elsewhere. She replied that they were not, and that as she recalled, that title had no Sunday edition in the 60s, either. >Then obtain a copy of the SUNDAY PICTORIAL and eat your words asshole. As should have been evident by my post, I don't have easy access to all British periodicals, if indeed there was such a periodical as the SUNDAY PICTORIAL. In any case, I simply pointed out that the WASHINGTON DAILY NEWS cite was bogus, since the WASHINGTON DAILY NEWS did not appear on the date shown. What was *your* source, Kurtzi? Who gave you those cites?
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor