From email@example.com Sat Oct 5 11:48:54 PDT 1996 From: "Annie Alpert, OFB"
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Weber and SoapRe: Made from 100% pure Jewess hair Date: Sat, 05 Oct 1996 10:47:38 -0400 Message-ID: <3256750A.50F9@ccnis.net> [Speaking of Mark Weber, of the Institute for Historical Review] Here's an example of the level of research Weber uses. He cited author Gitta Sereny in his article for the Journal of Historical review: "In spite of all the apparently impressive evidence, the charge that the Germans manufactured soap from human beings is a falsehood, as Holocaust historians are now belatedly acknowledging. He later said that: "Gitta Sereny another Jewish historian, noted in her book Into That Darkness: "The universally accepted story that the corpses were used to make soap and fertilizer is finally refuted by the generally very reliable Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation into Nazi Crimes." A quick look at Dr. Sereny's book reveals that Mr. Weber is not telling the entire story. For one reason or another he neglected to provide the FULL quote. Following Mr. Weber's sentence we find this: "The Authority has found after considerable research that only one experiment was made, with `a few corpses from a concentration camp. When it proved impractical the idea was apparently abandoned.' Yipes! Changes the meaning considerably, doesn't it? In case you don't get the full meaning of the entire quote, I respectfully reproduce it here: "The universally accepted story that corpses were used to make soap and fertilizer is finally refuted by the Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation of Nazi Crimes. The Authority has found after considerable research that only one experiment was made, with `a few corpses from a concentration camp. When it proved impractical the idea was apparently abandoned.' In other words, there WAS an experimental effort to produce soap from human remains according to Gitta Sereny and (more importantly) the Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation of Nazi Crimes--AND MARK WEBER KNEW ABOUT IT ALL THE TIME, BUT LIED ABOUT IT. The IHR can't plead innocence on their continued rehashing of this either because Pat Larson, an IHR associate, was posting on Prodigy under the name John Weir (nickname CHIGGER) and this information was posted directly to him. The question remains: Why is the IHR pushing this false claptrap on you? Who does they think they're fooling?
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor