From ww409@freenet.victoria.bc.ca Tue Oct  1 19:13:47 PDT 1996
Article: 54102 of alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.mtl.hookup.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!n3ott.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!van.istar!west.istar!n1van.istar!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!guitar.sound.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-chi-13.sprintlink.net!news.up.net!news
From: Schoedel 
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Subject: Re: Bonehead racists
Date: 29 Sep 1996 19:15:20 GMT
Organization: Victoria Freenet
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <52mhs8$fen@btc1.up.net>
References: <3249CE6A.32F8@ix.netcom.com> <843763460.22133.0@ont1-135.up.net> 
NNTP-Posting-Host: ont1-128.up.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K)
X-URL: news:qutDyHnyD.8Co@netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:70721 alt.politics.nationalism.white:31930 alt.politics.white-power:45477 alt.discrimination:54102

qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman OBC) wrote:

>Now you've taken up drinking?  You didn't before!

I didn't? :-)  Seriously though, I am hardly a drunkard. 

Schoedel




From ww409@freenet.victoria.bc.ca Fri Oct  4 07:42:58 PDT 1996
Article: 45670 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!nntp.portal.ca!van-bc!n1van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!tor.istar!east.istar!news.nstn.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!newsfeed.pitt.edu!news.duq.edu!newsgate.duke.edu!newshost.convex.com!cnn.exu.ericsson.se!eua.ericsson.se!news.algonet.se!eru.mt.luth.se!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-3.sprintlink.net!news.up.net!news
From: Ronald Schoedel 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.equality,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics,alt.politics.youth,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.correct
Subject: Re: Why Isn't Cross Burning a Civil Right?
Date: 3 Oct 1996 23:09:06 GMT
Organization: Victoria Freenet
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <531h2i$l1b@btc1.up.net>
References: 
NNTP-Posting-Host: ont1-131.up.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K)
X-URL: news:taa-0110962117500001@news.anet-dfw.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:45670 alt.politics.nationalism.white:32091 alt.politics.usa.constitution:94305 alt.politics.correct:141971

taa@scm.net (tony alberts) wrote:
>Is the First Amendment dead? Here, we have a person who expressed his God
>given American right to protest what he hated, which I assume, is African
>Americans? He felt that the First Amendment guaranteeing not only freedom
>of speech but freedom of religion allowed him to do that. So, instead of
>burning a flag which is protected by law, he burned a cross which is
>supposed to be protected by law. But the blacks don't like that, so his
>freedom of speech and religion were denied. Here's the story.


How about the fact he aimed an act of hatred against someone, on someone
else's property, without provocation?  Suppose that could be the reason
it's against the law???

Could it be?  Where do you get your warped views, sir?

Schoedel

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor