The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/s/savage.rick/1996/rs.0796


From rsavage@netcom.com Mon Jul  1 10:20:11 PDT 1996
Article: 24208 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.9
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:53:11 GMT
Lines: 68
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24208 alt.conspiracy:63234 alt.christnet:75604 alt.religion.christian:93606


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

 CHAPTER IX 

WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH  CENTURIES. 

       NATURALLY, here we get a number of juridically decided cases,
       as might be expected. 

       1603. Verona. A Jew was tried on a charge of killing a child to get
       its blood for an infamous purpose. He was acquitted. The sentence
       of acquittal, dated 28th February, 1603, given in full in the Jew
       Roth's _The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew_ (p. 78), released the
       accused "because the Hebraic witch abhors the shedding of blood"
       and "various Princes held this rumour of the use of blood to be vain
       and false?" We hold that such absurd reasoning as all excuse for
       acquittal is clear proof that the Court was bought. 

       1670. Met. As this was a very strongly established case, one does
       not find any mention of it in Strack's book in defence of the Jews!
       A three-year-old boy was lost by his mother on the way to a well.
       The boy was wearing a red cap, and witnesses had seen him carried
       away by a Jew mounted on a horse. This Jew was Raphael Levi. At
       first, the boy's body could not be traced. The Jews, becoming
       frightened, spread the report that wolves must have killed him in
       the forest. The forest was searched and eventually the head, neck
       and ribs of a boy were found, together with clothes which were
       identified as the missing boy's, red cap and all, by the boy's father.
       But as these clothes were neither torn nor bloody, it was concluded
       that the wolf story was a "blind," and then witnesses came forward
       who had seen Raphael Levi with the boy in such places and at such
       times as to remove all doubt of his guilt. Levi was sentenced to
       death by the order of the Parliament of Metz, and was burned alive.
       Authority: La France Juive, by Drumont. 

       1698. Sandomir, Poland. Authority: The Jew Cecil Roth, in Ritual
       Murder Libel and the Jew, p. 24. The highest tribunal in the land,
       that of Lublin, condemned a Jew for Ritual Murder. the local court
       having exculpated him. 

       1748. Duniagrod, Poland. Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by
       Episcopal Court. Mentioned by Roth. 

       1753. Pavalochi, Poland. Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by
       Episcopal Court. Mentioned by Roth. 

       I753. Zhytomir, Poland. In this case, a three-year-old boy was
       murdered; Jews were tried by the Episcopal Court of Kiev and
       condemned to death. A painting supposed to commemorate this
       murder is even now visited by pilgrims to the Carthusian Monastery
       at Kalwarya near Cracow. Authority: The Jew Cecil Roth, in Ritual
       Murder Libel and the Jew, p. 25. 

       Of course, the Jew Roth denies that the cases quoted were Ritual
       Murders. 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Mon Jul  1 10:20:12 PDT 1996
Article: 24236 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news1.io.org!winternet.com!newsfeed.concentric.net!news.texas.net!cdc2.cdc.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!csn!nntp-xfer-1.csn.net!decwrl!amd!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.3 (repost)
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 05:27:34 GMT
Lines: 171
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24236 alt.conspiracy:63337 alt.christnet:75691 alt.religion.christian:93714


>From  the GOAL WWW page:  http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/

MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

CHAPTER III 

HUMAN SACRIFICE & THE JEWISH RELIGION 

       I AM not a student of the Talmud. I have no intention of becoming
       one. For the same reason, I shall not become a student of Occultism
       or of Drainage Systems. I smell the bad smells and remain aloof. 

       Nevertheless, because the advocates of Jewry use a certain line of
       argument in denying that there has ever been any such thing as
       Ritual Murder of Christians by Jews, I am obliged to quote a few
       unimpeachable authorities on the subject. - 

       This "argument" is that the Jewish religious law not only-does not
       sanction the practice of Ritual Murder, but forbids the consumption
       of blood altogether. It is an argument that has been used throughout
       the ages, and is used now, and has even been the foundation for the
       verdict "Not Guilty," in cases where Jews have been on trial for
       ritual murder! 

       It was the argument used by the Sultan of Turkey when, for money
       bribes, he issued a firman (1840) saying that the Ritual Murder
       Accusations against Jews were calumnies. (See p. 26). 

       But it is known that there have always been two methods of
       instruction among the Jews: one Exoteric, which openly taught the
       Laws of Moses and the Rabbinical traditions; the other Esoteric, or
       mysteries confided only to certain persons bound to secrecy. This
       latter, the Esoteric teaching, is associated with Occultism and what
       is known as Black Magic, and the Mystical Cabbala is its source, for
       certain rites and ceremonies blood is necessary; and secret rites
       exist which are known only to the few. 

       Even if the written Jewish Laws do-not sanction the practice it does
       not prove that Jews have not done Murder in accordance with some
       Occult Ritual. Let a Jew speak for us here: -- 

       Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was stated (Jewish Encyclopaedia 1904,
       Vol. VII, p. 650) to be "without any religious convictions," wrote
       what he himself described as "an impartial study of the history and
       sociology of the Jews," calling his book L-Antisemitisme; in the
       1934 edition of this, Vol. II, p. 215, he writes, after mentioning the
       accusations against the Jews of Ritual Murder. 

       "To this general belief are added the suspicions, often justified,
       against the Jews addicted to magical practices. Actually, in the
       Middle Ages, the Jew was considered by the people as the magician
       par excellence; one finds many formula of exorcism in the Talmud,
       and the Talmudic and Cabbalistic demonology is very complicated.
       -Now one knows the position that blood always occupies in the
       operations of sorcery. In Chaldean magic it had a very great
       importance.... Now, it is very probable, even certain, that Jewish
       magicians must have sacrificed children; hence the origin of the
       legend of ritual sacrifice.." 

       It is well known, as will be shown in Chapter VI, that Occult Rituals
       exist in which all sorts of abominable practices are carried out, and
       that they arise from the-Jewish Cabbala. 

       How ridiculous then is the "argument-" that because the Mosaic
       Laws and the Talmud do not demand Ritual Murder, and even
       forbid the use of blood, Isaac Abrahams cannot be guilty of any sort
       of Ritual Murder! 

       Take an analogous case. The Eighth Commandment forbids stealing.
       Have you ever heard that fact brought up in the defence of a
       Christian on trial for that crime ? Can you imagine prisoner's
       counsel arguing that John Smith could not have stolen a purse from
       William Brown because the Christian religion forbids such a thing?
       More, can you imagine counsel getting away with such an
       argument? But that is what the Jews have often succeeded in doing. 

       So stupid is this hysterical shriek, "Our Laws do not permit it," that
       I, as a scientific investigator, would be willing to concede it as a
       fact, without further investigation of the Jewish laws, that Ritual
       Murder is contrary to these laws. I would concede it because the
       point is of no importance whatever to my case against the Jew. If
       the point were established what difference does it make to the
       verdict of the Trent affair, the Damascus affair, or to the scores of
       cases I am going to bring before you in later chapters? 

       Another point. Is it likely that we should find clear sanction for
       such a crime as Ritual Murder in the Jewish Laws? Why, if such a
       thing were to be found, I venture to say that not a Jew would be left
       alive, so great would be the popular indignation against the Jewish
       nation. We should treat them exactly as Sir W. H. Sleeman treated
       the Thugs, the ritual murderers of India, when he stamped them out
       of existence as hereditary criminals in the last century. 

       Dr. Erich Bischoff, the chief German authority on Jewish law and
       religion, claims to have laid his finger on a passage authorising
       Ritual Murder in the Thikunne Zohar (Edition Berdiwetsch, SS b),
       a book of cabbalistic theosophy. The passage runs: 

       "Furthermore, there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of
       strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the
       lawful method. Those who do not ascribe themselves to the Jewish
       religious law must be offered up as sacrifices to the High God." 

       Dr. Bischoff may be right. I venture no opinion. 

       Nevertheless, the Jewish Laws do tell us something; without any
       direct sanctioning of Ritual Murder, they show us without any
       possibility of doubt, that the Jew is normally at war spiritually with
       the rest of mankind, and upon this argument I base my statement
       that Jewish Laws show ample foundation for the scientific
       investigator to take the view that there is nothing improbable in the
       reality of Jewish Ritual Murder I am not going to take the same line
       as other anti-Jewish investigators have done about this matter; I am
       not going to quote any Mosaic Laws nor any Talmudic tenets. I am
       simply going to quote the great explorer and orientalist, Sit Richard
       Burton, a Briton who made it his business to Study the Talmud
       closely and recorded his conclusions on the relations it revealed as
       existing between Jew and Gentile. I quote now from his _The Jew,
       the Gypsy and El Islam_, edited by W. H. Wilkins, and published by
       Messrs. Hutchinson in I898. Page 73. 

       "The most important and pregnant tenet of modern Jewish belief is
       that the Ger, or stranger, in fact all those who do not belong to
       their religion, are brute beasts, having no more rights than the
       fauna of the field." 

       I have long known this-to be the Key of International Politics; 
and it
       shows that what would be Murder to an Aryan is only Slaughter to
       a Talmudic Jew. 

       Page 81. "The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood
       pleasing to the Lord, viz: (I) that of the Paschal holocaust; (2) that
       of circumcision." (The Paschal holocaust is the Easter sacrifice.) 

       I suppose every nation has the God it deserves and admires. What
       sort of a people is this whose God Ends the blood obtained from
       mutilations of human genital organs as "pleasing"? 

       Sir Richard Burton comments: 

       Page II5. "Obviously such cruel and vindictive teaching as that
       recounted in the previous chapter must bear fruit in crime and |
       atrocities." 

       The Jewish Schulchan Aruch, which codified the teachings of the
       Talmud, goes much further in sanctioning shameful practices
       against the Gentile; I do not quote it because my object is not to
       excite retaliation, but to mark down the Jews as having been
       responsible, either collectively or individually, for ritual 
murders. I
       want the Gentile to take steps to remove the Jews from our midst by
       expulsion to a National Home of their own, and by legal means. 

       There is good reason to think that it is the "Chassidim" sect to
       which most recent Jewish Ritual Murders can be traced; the
       Chassidim is sometimes considered to be a modern sect which arose
       in Poland only in the 18th century; but the Jewish Encyclopaedia
       (1905), Vol. IX, p. 661, says that the Pharisees were originally
       identical with the Chassidim; the Chassidim are fanatical to a
       degree, and soaked in mysticism. 



-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Mon Jul  1 10:35:11 PDT 1996
Article: 63234 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.9
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:53:11 GMT
Lines: 68
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24208 alt.conspiracy:63234 alt.christnet:75604 alt.religion.christian:93606


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

 CHAPTER IX 

WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH  CENTURIES. 

       NATURALLY, here we get a number of juridically decided cases,
       as might be expected. 

       1603. Verona. A Jew was tried on a charge of killing a child to get
       its blood for an infamous purpose. He was acquitted. The sentence
       of acquittal, dated 28th February, 1603, given in full in the Jew
       Roth's _The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew_ (p. 78), released the
       accused "because the Hebraic witch abhors the shedding of blood"
       and "various Princes held this rumour of the use of blood to be vain
       and false?" We hold that such absurd reasoning as all excuse for
       acquittal is clear proof that the Court was bought. 

       1670. Met. As this was a very strongly established case, one does
       not find any mention of it in Strack's book in defence of the Jews!
       A three-year-old boy was lost by his mother on the way to a well.
       The boy was wearing a red cap, and witnesses had seen him carried
       away by a Jew mounted on a horse. This Jew was Raphael Levi. At
       first, the boy's body could not be traced. The Jews, becoming
       frightened, spread the report that wolves must have killed him in
       the forest. The forest was searched and eventually the head, neck
       and ribs of a boy were found, together with clothes which were
       identified as the missing boy's, red cap and all, by the boy's father.
       But as these clothes were neither torn nor bloody, it was concluded
       that the wolf story was a "blind," and then witnesses came forward
       who had seen Raphael Levi with the boy in such places and at such
       times as to remove all doubt of his guilt. Levi was sentenced to
       death by the order of the Parliament of Metz, and was burned alive.
       Authority: La France Juive, by Drumont. 

       1698. Sandomir, Poland. Authority: The Jew Cecil Roth, in Ritual
       Murder Libel and the Jew, p. 24. The highest tribunal in the land,
       that of Lublin, condemned a Jew for Ritual Murder. the local court
       having exculpated him. 

       1748. Duniagrod, Poland. Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by
       Episcopal Court. Mentioned by Roth. 

       1753. Pavalochi, Poland. Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by
       Episcopal Court. Mentioned by Roth. 

       I753. Zhytomir, Poland. In this case, a three-year-old boy was
       murdered; Jews were tried by the Episcopal Court of Kiev and
       condemned to death. A painting supposed to commemorate this
       murder is even now visited by pilgrims to the Carthusian Monastery
       at Kalwarya near Cracow. Authority: The Jew Cecil Roth, in Ritual
       Murder Libel and the Jew, p. 25. 

       Of course, the Jew Roth denies that the cases quoted were Ritual
       Murders. 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Mon Jul  1 10:35:12 PDT 1996
Article: 63337 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news1.io.org!winternet.com!newsfeed.concentric.net!news.texas.net!cdc2.cdc.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!csn!nntp-xfer-1.csn.net!decwrl!amd!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.3 (repost)
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 05:27:34 GMT
Lines: 171
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24236 alt.conspiracy:63337 alt.christnet:75691 alt.religion.christian:93714


>From  the GOAL WWW page:  http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/

MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

CHAPTER III 

HUMAN SACRIFICE & THE JEWISH RELIGION 

       I AM not a student of the Talmud. I have no intention of becoming
       one. For the same reason, I shall not become a student of Occultism
       or of Drainage Systems. I smell the bad smells and remain aloof. 

       Nevertheless, because the advocates of Jewry use a certain line of
       argument in denying that there has ever been any such thing as
       Ritual Murder of Christians by Jews, I am obliged to quote a few
       unimpeachable authorities on the subject. - 

       This "argument" is that the Jewish religious law not only-does not
       sanction the practice of Ritual Murder, but forbids the consumption
       of blood altogether. It is an argument that has been used throughout
       the ages, and is used now, and has even been the foundation for the
       verdict "Not Guilty," in cases where Jews have been on trial for
       ritual murder! 

       It was the argument used by the Sultan of Turkey when, for money
       bribes, he issued a firman (1840) saying that the Ritual Murder
       Accusations against Jews were calumnies. (See p. 26). 

       But it is known that there have always been two methods of
       instruction among the Jews: one Exoteric, which openly taught the
       Laws of Moses and the Rabbinical traditions; the other Esoteric, or
       mysteries confided only to certain persons bound to secrecy. This
       latter, the Esoteric teaching, is associated with Occultism and what
       is known as Black Magic, and the Mystical Cabbala is its source, for
       certain rites and ceremonies blood is necessary; and secret rites
       exist which are known only to the few. 

       Even if the written Jewish Laws do-not sanction the practice it does
       not prove that Jews have not done Murder in accordance with some
       Occult Ritual. Let a Jew speak for us here: -- 

       Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was stated (Jewish Encyclopaedia 1904,
       Vol. VII, p. 650) to be "without any religious convictions," wrote
       what he himself described as "an impartial study of the history and
       sociology of the Jews," calling his book L-Antisemitisme; in the
       1934 edition of this, Vol. II, p. 215, he writes, after mentioning the
       accusations against the Jews of Ritual Murder. 

       "To this general belief are added the suspicions, often justified,
       against the Jews addicted to magical practices. Actually, in the
       Middle Ages, the Jew was considered by the people as the magician
       par excellence; one finds many formula of exorcism in the Talmud,
       and the Talmudic and Cabbalistic demonology is very complicated.
       -Now one knows the position that blood always occupies in the
       operations of sorcery. In Chaldean magic it had a very great
       importance.... Now, it is very probable, even certain, that Jewish
       magicians must have sacrificed children; hence the origin of the
       legend of ritual sacrifice.." 

       It is well known, as will be shown in Chapter VI, that Occult Rituals
       exist in which all sorts of abominable practices are carried out, and
       that they arise from the-Jewish Cabbala. 

       How ridiculous then is the "argument-" that because the Mosaic
       Laws and the Talmud do not demand Ritual Murder, and even
       forbid the use of blood, Isaac Abrahams cannot be guilty of any sort
       of Ritual Murder! 

       Take an analogous case. The Eighth Commandment forbids stealing.
       Have you ever heard that fact brought up in the defence of a
       Christian on trial for that crime ? Can you imagine prisoner's
       counsel arguing that John Smith could not have stolen a purse from
       William Brown because the Christian religion forbids such a thing?
       More, can you imagine counsel getting away with such an
       argument? But that is what the Jews have often succeeded in doing. 

       So stupid is this hysterical shriek, "Our Laws do not permit it," that
       I, as a scientific investigator, would be willing to concede it as a
       fact, without further investigation of the Jewish laws, that Ritual
       Murder is contrary to these laws. I would concede it because the
       point is of no importance whatever to my case against the Jew. If
       the point were established what difference does it make to the
       verdict of the Trent affair, the Damascus affair, or to the scores of
       cases I am going to bring before you in later chapters? 

       Another point. Is it likely that we should find clear sanction for
       such a crime as Ritual Murder in the Jewish Laws? Why, if such a
       thing were to be found, I venture to say that not a Jew would be left
       alive, so great would be the popular indignation against the Jewish
       nation. We should treat them exactly as Sir W. H. Sleeman treated
       the Thugs, the ritual murderers of India, when he stamped them out
       of existence as hereditary criminals in the last century. 

       Dr. Erich Bischoff, the chief German authority on Jewish law and
       religion, claims to have laid his finger on a passage authorising
       Ritual Murder in the Thikunne Zohar (Edition Berdiwetsch, SS b),
       a book of cabbalistic theosophy. The passage runs: 

       "Furthermore, there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of
       strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the
       lawful method. Those who do not ascribe themselves to the Jewish
       religious law must be offered up as sacrifices to the High God." 

       Dr. Bischoff may be right. I venture no opinion. 

       Nevertheless, the Jewish Laws do tell us something; without any
       direct sanctioning of Ritual Murder, they show us without any
       possibility of doubt, that the Jew is normally at war spiritually with
       the rest of mankind, and upon this argument I base my statement
       that Jewish Laws show ample foundation for the scientific
       investigator to take the view that there is nothing improbable in the
       reality of Jewish Ritual Murder I am not going to take the same line
       as other anti-Jewish investigators have done about this matter; I am
       not going to quote any Mosaic Laws nor any Talmudic tenets. I am
       simply going to quote the great explorer and orientalist, Sit Richard
       Burton, a Briton who made it his business to Study the Talmud
       closely and recorded his conclusions on the relations it revealed as
       existing between Jew and Gentile. I quote now from his _The Jew,
       the Gypsy and El Islam_, edited by W. H. Wilkins, and published by
       Messrs. Hutchinson in I898. Page 73. 

       "The most important and pregnant tenet of modern Jewish belief is
       that the Ger, or stranger, in fact all those who do not belong to
       their religion, are brute beasts, having no more rights than the
       fauna of the field." 

       I have long known this-to be the Key of International Politics; 
and it
       shows that what would be Murder to an Aryan is only Slaughter to
       a Talmudic Jew. 

       Page 81. "The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood
       pleasing to the Lord, viz: (I) that of the Paschal holocaust; (2) that
       of circumcision." (The Paschal holocaust is the Easter sacrifice.) 

       I suppose every nation has the God it deserves and admires. What
       sort of a people is this whose God Ends the blood obtained from
       mutilations of human genital organs as "pleasing"? 

       Sir Richard Burton comments: 

       Page II5. "Obviously such cruel and vindictive teaching as that
       recounted in the previous chapter must bear fruit in crime and |
       atrocities." 

       The Jewish Schulchan Aruch, which codified the teachings of the
       Talmud, goes much further in sanctioning shameful practices
       against the Gentile; I do not quote it because my object is not to
       excite retaliation, but to mark down the Jews as having been
       responsible, either collectively or individually, for ritual 
murders. I
       want the Gentile to take steps to remove the Jews from our midst by
       expulsion to a National Home of their own, and by legal means. 

       There is good reason to think that it is the "Chassidim" sect to
       which most recent Jewish Ritual Murders can be traced; the
       Chassidim is sometimes considered to be a modern sect which arose
       in Poland only in the 18th century; but the Jewish Encyclopaedia
       (1905), Vol. IX, p. 661, says that the Pharisees were originally
       identical with the Chassidim; the Chassidim are fanatical to a
       degree, and soaked in mysticism. 



-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |



Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.