The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/s/savage.rick/1996/rs.0696


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 12:01:08 PDT 1996
Article: 24132 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - intro
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:09:44 GMT
Lines: 148
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24132 alt.conspiracy:63061 alt.christnet:75469 alt.religion.christian:93470

>From  the GOAL WWW page:  http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/

My Irrelevant Defence being 
Meditations Inside Gaol and Out on 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

by ARNOLD LEESE

INTRODUCTION 

       ON 15th July, 1936, Mr. Oliver Locker-Lampson, M.P., a
       childhood friend of the Rothschild family, asked in the House of
       Commons whether the Attorney-General proposed to institute legal
       proceedings against the authors or publishers of _The Fascist_, the
       issue of that paper for July containing allegations against the Jews of
       the practice of ritual murder. The Attorney-General replied that the
       matter was under a consideratlon. 

       As an ultimate result of this "consideration," I was sentenced to six
       months' imprisonment among criminals on 21st September, 1936,
       the Judge in the case being a 31st Degree Mason of the Scottish Rite.
       But it is important to note that the conviction was obtained, not on
       the ritual murder issue alone, which was not relied upon by the
       Prosecution for the purpose of silencing me, but on the whole
       contents of the July Fascist, and particularly on words used by me
       with reference to the disposal of the Jews. 

       Under the law of libel, the truth of my statements with reference to
       Ritual Murder could not be used as an argument in my defence; it
       was deemed sufficient under the law that the statements had been
       written, and that they " rendered His Majesty's subjects of Jewish
       faith liable to suspicion, affront and boycott " and so amounted 
       to a Public Mischief. 

       I came to Court very fully prepared, if the truth of my statements
       was challenged, to justify the statements I had made in _The
       Fascist_, and was even ready to demand that "Rex," the prosecutor,
       should produce from the Public Records Office certain Close and
       Patent Rolls of the State wherein Jewish Ritual Murder is recorded
       as an established fact in this country I But I was forbidden by the
       Judge to use this line of defence; it did not matter who else had
       charged the Jews with ritual murder, or how often, or what historic
       facts proved it, or how many convictions there had been under
       proper juridical authority; thus, when I asked Inspector Kitchener,
       the only witness who appeared against me, "When you brought this
       case, were you under the impression that Ritual Murder was a thing
       of the past?" and he replied " Yes," the Judge intervened with the
       remark "The truth of a libel is no defense, I must point out 
       again." 
 
       Again, the Attorney-General, who was acting as Prosecuting
       Counsel, interrupted another question of mine to the same witness,
       by the remark: "In my submission, it is correctly laid down that the
       defendant is in no case allowed to prove the trash of a seditious 
       libel as a justification for having published it." The Judge then 
       said, "That is the law as I understand it." He made it clear to me 
       that to proceed further in such a line of defence would be contempt of
       court, as the "truth" of the "libel" was "irrelevant" to the issue of
       the trial! Such may be the law,-but it is not justice! 

       The last thing the Judaeo-Masonic Hidden Hand wanted was the
       truth about Ritual Murder! 

       Since I came out of prison on 6th February, 1937, I have, until
       recently, been too busy to write on the subject of Ritual Murder;
       but finding that there are, even among anti-Jewish workers, people
       who, never having investigated the matter for themselves, still
       imagine that Jewish Ritual Murder not only has not existed and does
       not exist, but is a fiction invented by crazy anti-Jewish fanatics, 
       and as such, exploited by me, in my campaign against the Jews, it
       becomes necessary for me to take steps to defend my own
       reputation as a man of good faith by compiling and publishing this
       book. 

       What the court procedure prevented me from doing in my own
       defence, I do now in these pages, and I have no anxiety concerning
       the conclusions at which my readers will arrive on the matter. 

       The subject of Ritual Murder has always been one that the Jewish
       Money Power, which controls this country as well as most others,
       has taken all possible steps to suppress. The reason is that Ritual
       Murder was the dynamite which finally blew the Jew out of
       England in 1290, out of Spain in 1492, and out of Germany in our
       time. The Jews know it; and I know it too! 

       But there is no British law. and no 11th Commandment which
       makes Ritual Murder by Jews a forbidden topic in this country. Sir
       Richard Burton's book about it was published shortly after his death
       near the end of the last century; Strack's book, defending the Jews
       against the accusation, was translated and published in England in
       1909; whilst the Jew, C. Roth, published his Ritual Murder Libel
       and the Jew in 1935. In France, as in Germany, there is free speech
       on the subject. 

       I challenge and defy the Judaeo-Masonic Power, which rules this
       country, by publishing the present work in 1938, not only in my
       own defence, but in the public interest to break the attack on Free
       Speech that is rapidly developing wherever any criticism of the past
       or present conduct of Jews is concerned an attack which relies for
       its success upon the ridiculous charge that a breach of the peace is
       likely if the truth about them is spoken I I do so in order that the
       Jews shall not escape simply through the power of Money and
       Masonry from bearing the burden of a charge which, in my
       opinion, has been proved against some of them through the ages.
       My object is, and always has been, in spite of what my Masonic
       Judge had to say about it, to alter "a matter of State established,"
       namely the status of Jews in this country on an equality with
       Britons, a condition which is imperilling, our civilization, and to
       enlighten the public on their true nature as beings possessing
       instincts utterly incompatible with our own, so that they may be
       removed, legally and peacefully, to a National Home in which they
       will be required to live together. In this aim, I keep troth with the
       greatest of English kings, Edward I, who expelled the Jews from
       these shores in I290. 

       The maintenance of Free Speech demands that Jewish Ritual Murder
       shall be a subject for open discussion, like Suttee and Thuggee and
       the sacrifices of Aztec Mexico, all of which were ritual murders
       which, like the Jewish variety, would be practised to-day if the
       Aryan had not interfered to prevent them. If the world thinks that I
       have not, in this book, proved my case, let it laugh ! I can bear 
       it!  But can the Jews? The Jewish Chronicle (25th September, 1936)
       complained after my trial was over that there had been no
       opportunity for the Jews to refute the charge of Ritual Murder.
       Well, they have one now! 

                                ARNOLD LEESE. 
                                 1st March, 1938.


                In compiling this work I have received the most valuable
                assistance from certain members of the Imperial Fascist
                League, who require no thanks for that help. I should like to
                acknowledge the guidance I have received in private letters
                from Sir. G., of Bristol, and from the work, Le Crime
                Rituel chez les Juifs, by Mr. A. Monniot; also from the
                articles contained in Mr. A. Arcand's now defunct paper. 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 12:01:09 PDT 1996
Article: 24133 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.conspiracy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.1
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:11:40 GMT
Lines: 63
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24133 alt.christnet:75470 alt.religion.christian:93471 alt.conspiracy:63062


>From  the GOAL WWW page:  http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/

MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

 CHAPTER I 
 HUMAN SACRIFICE A SEMITIC TRADITION. 

       IT is incontestable that the ancient "Semites" manifested a peculiar
       leaning towards the practice of bloody sacrifices to their gods. 

       Typical is the Jewish story of Abraham offering to slay with a knife
       his first-born, Isaac, as an offering to Yahweh who had commanded
       him so to do. More typical still is the Semitic idea that his god
       would require such a murder to be done. 

       In Excavations at Gezer, R. A. S. Macalister tells us that the bodies
       of sacrificed young children were found in all semitic strata; this
       work describes the remains of these victims of which pictures are
       given. 

       Isaiah charges the Jews with "enflaming themselves with idols under
       every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clifts
       of the rocks" (lvii, 5). There are many other Old Testament
       references to the practice of sacrificing children to Moloch. 

       Says the Rev. J. Kitto in the Cyclopaedia of Biblical Literature
       I895, "their altars smoked with human blood from the time of
       Abraham to the fall of the Kingdoms of Judah and Israel." 

       G. A. Dorsey writes in Civilization (Hamish Hamilton):
       "Historically their temple at Jerusalem, like a Hindu or Aztec
       temple. was a shambles--one sacrifice after another." 

       The Jewish Encyclopedia (1904, Vol. VIII, p. 653) says: "The fact,
       therefore, now generally accepted by critical scholars, is that in the
       last days of the kingdom human sacrifices were offered to Yhwh as
       King or Counsellor of the Nation and that the Prophets disapproved
       of it ...." 

       Jesus Himself speaking to the Pharisees (St. John, viii, 44) charges
       them with being hereditary murderers, which term can have no
       other meaning than ritual murderers. "Ye are of your father the
       devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do; he was a murderer
       from the beginning." This is in the Book on which "witnesses" are
       sworn when they give evidence against "anti-semites" who expose
       the murder of Chrisian children by Jews! 

       Rabbinism was but an unfolding of Pharisaism, the full and swelling
       stream of corrupt doctrines, views and practices, of which the
       rivulets run up to the days of Christ and stretch back to those of
       Ezra until they are lost In the fountain-head, the Religious
       Philosophy of a debased Zoroastrianism." (Rev. J. Kitto, Cyclopedia
       of Biblical Literature.) 

       The trail of the tradition, then, is complete and leads to 
       Rabbinism. 
-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 12:01:10 PDT 1996
Article: 24136 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.conspiracy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news.fibr.net!nntp.primenet.com!winternet.com!n1ott.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!van.istar!uniserve!news.sol.net!newspump.sol.net!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!uwm.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.2
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:13:13 GMT
Lines: 132
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24136 alt.christnet:75478 alt.religion.christian:93479 alt.conspiracy:63074


>From  the GOAL WWW page:  http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/

MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

 CHAPTER II 
THE RACIAL URGE 

       SOME people say that it is the Talmud that made the Jew what he is.
       I take another view. I say that it is the Jew that made the 
       Talmud. 

       I believe that the urge for human sacrifice comes not through
       religion but through race; the idea is, I think, an original one, and
       came to me from observation on one race in particular, that known
       as the Armenoid or Hither Asiatic race, which I consider has a
       decided instinct towards sadism. 

       It is, I believe, the strong Armenoid or Hither Asiatic strain which
       exists in the Jewish Nation upon which we have to lay the
       responsibility for many unpleasant Jewish traits and practices,
       among them Ritual Murder. 

       The Jews are a nation without a home, not a race; they are a
       mixture of races, and the racial constituent which is most frequently
       to be found among them is the Armenoid, or, as it is sometimes
       called, Hither Asiatic. The other races which have contributed most
       to the Jewish types, whether Ashkenazim or Sephardim, are the
       Mongoloid, Negroid, Oriental and (White) Alpine. 

       The Armenoid race seems to have concentrated in Asia Minor,
       where it predominates not only in Jews, but in Armenians, and
       affects the blood of many "Turks," "Syrians," "Georgians" and even
       Kurds. From this Asiatic centre, a veritable plague of Armenoid
       blood has spread in every direction. 

       Northward, in the early centuries A.D., it advanced through the
       Khazar Empire which flourished about 730 A.D., the ruler
       becoming a converted Jew and forcing his people to do the same.
       Southward, the race spread over the territories of Arabia, Egypt,
       the Sahara and Southern Algeria. Westward, it has poisoned the
       populations of the Balkan States and Greece, Crete, Southern Italy,
       Sicily and Spain. Eastward, it has penetrated into Afghanistan and
       the Punjab. 

       Through the Jewish nation, as everyone knows, it has contaminated
       almost every country in the world. 

       The Armenoid Race has the following physical characters: Height
       and build, medium; head short from back to front, with large and
       fleshy nose turned down towards the tip. The lips are rather
       prominent. The hair is black and curly, the skin is of the swarthy
       colour, and the eyes are black or brown. It is a marked feature of
       this race that the skull goes straight up at the back; in other words,
       the Armenoid has "no back to his head." There is also a tendency
       for the eyebrows to "meet" over the nose The chin is usually poorly
       developed. 

       In temperaments the Armenoid is the reverse of candid. He excels
       in low cunning, as his expression often denotes. He is good at
       business because of his flair for detailed meanness, and his
       knowledge of the lowest aspects of human nature. He is not usually
       endowed with much courage, but deliberate cruelty is only too often
       manifested in his nature. The spirit of revenge, and the nursing of
       hatred against anyone who opposes him, is very marked in people
       of the Armenoid type. 

       Every nation which contains a considerable proportion of people of.
       Armenoid Race soon establishes for itself a reputation for cruelty
       treachery, dishonesty and delight in power for the sake of power.
       That is why such nations never flourish for long in their own
       territory. They are not allowed to by their neighbours. 

       I hold that it is not primarily the Jewish Religion which makes the
       Jewish Nation hated 211 the world over; it is the strong dose of
       Armenoid racial blood in their veins. The Afghan is just as cruel,
       an Armenoid Muslim; the Abyssinian just as treacherous, an
       Armenoid Christian; Armenian just as mean, another Armenoid
       Christian. 

       A characteristic of the religions which appeal to Armenoid people
       (Jews, Mahommedans and Yezedis) is that the initiation ceremonial
       usually involves some sort of mutilation, such as circumcision. The
       religious laws governing the slaughter of animals for food are
       framed and practised without consideration for the unnecessary pain
       inflicted on the animals by the methods prescribed. 

       The ancient Assyrians were Armenoids by race, and were notorious
       for their wanton cruelty. 

       Wherever the Hither Asiatic or Armenoid Race predominates, we
       End-there is organised cruelty to prisoners of war; in Afghanistan,
       the women come out after a battle to search for the enemy wounded
       on whom they practise horrible mutilations; in Southern Algeria,
       there is a similar practice against French wounded, whilst recent
       operations in Abyssinia prove that there is a craving for the same
       sort of thing. The Turks of Armenoid race seem to revel in
       cold-blooded cruelty, whilst the Bolshevik Jews of Russia, Hungary,
       Spain and elsewhere have established the twentieth century as being
       as barbarous as the twelfth . . . simply because of the racial 
       instincts possessed by imported Armenoids. 

       According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, I903, Vol. IV. p. 99, when
       performing the operation of circumcision on children, the mohel
       (operator) "takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the
       part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he
       expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided." 

       Surely this "religious rite" stamps the Armenoid as something
       basically different from ourselves? 

       All is Race; there is no other truth. 

       The Aryan mind grasps with difficulty the idea that any human race
       can have an instinct towards sadistic sacrifice, for the Aryan has
       himself no such instinct. The Englishman does not realise that the
       Jew, the Afghan, and the Armenian are differently constituted from
       himself, and it is his own good-nature which has largely been
       responsible for the Judaisation of mind which he himself has
       acquired by allowing Jews to control him for so long. 

       I am convinced that it is to the Race rather than to the Talmud or
       the Kabbala that we must look before we can understand the urge
       for Ritual Murder and the love of torture which crops up in
       individuals in all countries into which the Hither Asiatic or
       Armenoid Race has penetrated. 
-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 13:35:52 PDT 1996
Article: 63120 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.conspiracy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!laslo.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.3
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:16:23 GMT
Lines: 89
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24167 alt.christnet:75526 alt.religion.christian:93524 alt.conspiracy:63120


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

                                 CHAPTER IV 

MOTIVE & NATURE OF JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

       THE motive of Ritual Murder of Christians by Jews is almost
       certainlv hate. It is in fact the same motive that Disraeli 
       admitted to be - the cause of revolutionary activities against 
       Gentile governments A to use his words (from Life of Lord George
       Bentinck, I852): 

       "The people of God co-operate with atheists -- the most skilful
       accumulators of property ally themselves with Communists; the
       peculiar and chosen Race touch the hand of all the scum and low
       castes of Europe -- and all this because they wish to destroy that
       ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name, and
       whose tyranny they can no longer endure." 

       Hatred of Christianity is a tradition among the Jews: just as hate of
       England is a sort of perverted religion among an inferior class of
       Irishmen. It must be remembered that the Hymn of Hate which was
       debited to the Germans during the war was actually written by the
       Jew Lissauer 

    One of the principal Jewish feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is
       an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the
       Book of Esther of the Old Testament. The story, which is probably
       a myth, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamoured of a
       Jewess, Esther, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife.
       Haman, the King's sister, complained to him of the conduct of the
       Jews who, he said did not keep the laws, and obtained from the
       King an order to slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and
       prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen
       Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang
       Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian.
       Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered,
       including Haman's ten sons, who were hanged. 

       This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony,
       intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this
       day in London, the Jewish bakers make cakes in the shape of human
       ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called "
       Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and
       barbarism of the Jew in our midst. 

       The two principal feast-days associated with Ritual Murder have
       been (I) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter at Easter and the
       former about one month before it. When a Ritual Murder occurred
       at Purim, it was usually that of an adult Christian who was
       murdered for his blood; it is said that the blood was dried and the
       powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the
       dried blood of a Purim murder might sometimes be used for the
       following Passover. 

       When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually that of a
       child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who
       was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and
       crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes
       finished off by wounding in the side in imitation of the murder of
       Christ. The blood taken from the child was mixed either in the
       powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread. 

       Another festival at which it is thought that Ritual Murder has
       sometimes been indulged in is Chanucah, which occurs in
       December, commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem under the
       Maccabees in B.C. I65. 

       Examples of Purim murders are those of Damascus, Rhodes,
       Xanten Polna, Gladbeck and Paderborn. 

       Although hate is the principal motive, supersitious traditions are
       also involved, one being the association of blood-sacrifices with the
       idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that Jewry cannot be
       saved or return to Zion unless every year the blood of a Christian is
       obtained for the purpose of ritual consumption. 

       Political murders, such as the Jewish murder of the Tsar and his
       family and of other Russians, have sometimes been accompanied by
       features suggestive of ritual, but 1 do not wish to complicate this
       book by guessing at the meaning of signs left symbolically by the
       murderers. 
-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 13:35:54 PDT 1996
Article: 63121 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!laslo.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.4
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:38:01 GMT
Lines: 97
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24168 alt.conspiracy:63121 alt.christnet:75527 alt.religion.christian:93525


>From  the GOAL WWW page:  http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/

MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

 CHAPTER IV 

MOTIVE & NATURE OF JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

       THE motive of Ritual Murder of Christians by Jews is almost
       certainlv hate. It is in fact the same motive that Disraeli 
       admitted to be - the cause of revolutionary activities against 
       Gentile governments A to use his words (from Life of Lord George
       Bentinck, I852): 

       "The people of God co-operate with atheists -- the most skilful
       accumulators of property ally themselves with Communists; the
       peculiar and chosen Race touch the hand of all the scum and low
       castes of Europe -- and all this because they wish to destroy that
       ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name, and
       whose tyranny they can no longer endure." 

       Hatred of Christianity is a tradition among the Jews: just as hate of
       England is a sort of perverted religion among an inferior class of
       Irishmen. It must be remembered that the Hymn of Hate which was
       debited to the Germans during the war was actually written by the
       Jew Lissauer 

     One of the principal Jewish feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is
       an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the
       Book of Esther of the Old Testament. The story, which is probably
       a myth, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamoured of a
       Jewess, Esther, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife.
       Haman, the King's sister, complained to him of the conduct of the
       Jews who, he said did not keep the laws, and obtained from the
       King an order to slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and
       prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen
       Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang
       Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian.
       Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered,
       including Haman's ten sons, who were hanged. 

       This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony,
       intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this
       day in London, the Jewish bakers make cakes in the shape of human
       ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called "
       Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and
       barbarism of the Jew in our midst. 

       The two principal feast-days associated with Ritual Murder have
       been (I) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter at Easter and the
       former about one month before it. When a Ritual Murder occurred
       at Purim, it was usually that of an adult Christian who was
       murdered for his blood; it is said that the blood was dried and the
       powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the
       dried blood of a Purim murder might sometimes be used for the
       following Passover. 

       When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually that of a
       child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who
       was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and
       crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes
       finished off by wounding in the side in imitation of the murder of
       Christ. The blood taken from the child was mixed either in the
       powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread. 

       Another festival at which it is thought that Ritual Murder has
       sometimes been indulged in is Chanucah, which occurs in
       December, commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem under the
       Maccabees in B.C. I65. 

       Examples of Purim murders are those of Damascus, Rhodes,
       Xanten Polna, Gladbeck and Paderborn. 

       Although hate is the principal motive, supersitious traditions are
       also involved, one being the association of blood-sacrifices with the
       idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that Jewry cannot be
       saved or return to Zion unless every year the blood of a Christian is
       obtained for the purpose of ritual consumption. 

       Political murders, such as the Jewish murder of the Tsar and his
       family and of other Russians, have sometimes been accompanied by
       features suggestive of ritual, but 1 do not wish to complicate this
       book by guessing at the meaning of signs left symbolically by the
       murderers. 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 13:35:55 PDT 1996
Article: 63130 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!news.erinet.com!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!chi-news.cic.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.6
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:43:54 GMT
Lines: 204
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24172 alt.conspiracy:63130 alt.christnet:75530 alt.religion.christian:93531


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

CHAPTER VI 

COULDN'T HAPPEN NOW? 

       THIS argument, "It couldn't happen now," seems quite good enough
       for a lot of people when it is applied to the matter of Jewish Ritual
       Murder. It is, perhaps, comforting to the democratic mind to think
       that "Progress " ensures that such an evil practice, even if it
       occurred in unenlightened days, could not have survived to-day. 

       I wish I could see any comfort in this argument, but I don't. There
       are no facts to support it. 

       That the Aryan peoples have progressed I do-not deny; but I do not
       think there is any evidence to show any like progress among some
       of the other races. 

       Compare the following two happenings, noting the dates: 

       A.D. 117. From the account of Dio (Cassius in 78th Book of his
       history Chapter 32: 

       "Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North
       Africa) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and
       Greeks, and devoured their bodies, drank the blood, clothed
       themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the
       head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were
       compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were
       killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also its Cyprus, led
       by one of them named Artemion; and there another 40,000 were
       slain." 

       A.D. 1936. From Daily Mail, 17th September (describing the
       horrors of the Red Revolution in Spain): 

       "Baena (Cordoba Province): Ninety-one assassinations, mostly by
       shooting hatchet blows, or strangling. Others were burned alive.
       Two nuns who had been dragged from the convent of the Mother of
       God, had their religious medals with the figure of the Virgin, nailed
       into the sockets of their eyes. 

       "La Campana (Seville): Rcds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde
       Caraballo, who either killed- or was responsible for killing II
       persons in prison. The prisoners were fired on until they fell,
       covered with petrol, and set on fire. Some were still writhing in the
       flames when the city was entered. 

       "Lore del Rio (Seville): 138 assassinated. They were dragged to the
       cemetery, lined up, and shot in the legs, being buried alive as they
       fell in a trench. When the town was entered hands could still be seen
       writhing above the ground." 

       I cannot see much difference in outlook between the Jewish devils
       responsible for both these massacres, even though there are 15
       centuries between them! 

       In view of that, why boggle at the idea of Jewish Ritual Murder still
       surviving? 

       Why make such a fuss when Jews are charged with the practice of
       Ritual Aturder? Other Asiatics are known to haxre practised it until
       I850, and, if left to themselves, wotlld doubtless have maintained
       the custom. 

       In India, from 10,000 to 50,000 murders were perpetrated every
       year by a religious body known as the Thugs. They were mostly
       people of Mahommedan extraction, but a number of Hindus were
       also involved. They used to worship Kali, the Hindu goddess of
       destruction. Their custom was to club together, generally as
       travellers, when they would slowly gain the confidence of some
       innocent person, and at a given signal, would strangle him in a
       prescribed manner, which they regarded as a religious duty; then
       they would rob him if he had anything to be robbed of, and bury
       the body with such skill as to leave no trace. The Thugs actually
       received the protection of some of the native princes and chiefs who
       were thoroughly frightened of their power as a secret religious sect.
       How this reminds us of the attitude of the influential men in this
       country who adopt the same view of Masonry and Jewry! 

       Then the British Government decided the thing must stop. After
       many years of investigation, Sir W. H. Sleeman stamped out the
       Thug sect, and no Thuggee murders are on record since I850. He
       found that Thuggee was hereditary among male members of a
       family, and he achieved his object by confining in segregation for
       life all male members of Thug families. 

       Now my point is that Thuggee happened; and happened in the 19th
       century until the British put an end to it under Sleeman. It was a
       long time before the British administration learned of the existence
       of Thuggee, so carefully was it concealed; another analogy with
       Jewish Ritual Murder! 

       "It couldn't happen now." Why not? 

       And on 13th September, 1937, a telegram was sent to The Times
       from Delhi reporting the sacrifice of a 17-year-old youth to
       propitiate the rain-god, in Sirmoor State. The youth was led
       through the village of Gunpur by a crowd of people headed by a
       priest and the village headman, and beheaded on a special altar to
       the accompaniment of devotional songs. The head was found by the
       police at the foot of the deity in the village temple. 

       As Aryan rule over India relaxes, Thuggee and other human
       sacrifices will re-appear. 

       "It couldn't happen now." Why pot, again? 

       Here is an extract from Magick by the "Master Therion", published
       in 1929 by the Lecram Press, 26 Rue d'Hautpool, Paris, pp. 94-5: 

       "...it was the theory of the ancient magicians that any living being
       is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size
       and health of the animal, and in quality according to its mental and
       moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated
       suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle,
       or Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape....
       For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that
       victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of
       perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and
       suitable 

       A footnote on p. 95 says "(4) It appears from the Magical Records
       of Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an
       average about 150 times every year between I9I2 e.v. and I928
       e.v." 

       This footnote refers to the last sentence in the paragraph quoted
       above. The italics are all mine. 

       "It couldn't happen now." Why not, in the Devil's name? 

       Sir Richard Burton show us that the disappearance of children at
       Passover was talked of in Rome and in the other towns of Italy
       throughout the early part of the 19th century when efficient
       policing was unknown, as also throughout the century at Smyrna
       and other places in the Levant and in Turkey. 

       It couldn't happen now? But the Jewish method of cattle slaughter
       happens now and is specially exempted from the objects of the
       Slaughter of Animals Act, 1933, which Act orders that all cattle for
       Gentile food must be stunned with a mechanically-operated
       instrument before the throat is cut. The Jewish method is cutting the
       throat from ear to ear without any previous stunning. It has been
       condemned by a Government Commission hold in I904 as failing in
       rapidity, freedom f am unnecessary pain and instantaneous loss of
       sensibility. Yet it "happens now" and is protected in this our
       England, by an English Law, and remains unattacked by the Royal
       Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. 

       Why couldn't it happen now? 

       To this day, we learn from Jewish sources (B'nai B'rith Messenger,
       California, 3rd April, 1936) that the Samaritans, an unorthodox
       Jewish sect who keep Passover by solar computation, indulge in
       bloody sacrifices of animals on that feast-day; an account is given 
       of a visit to the scene of sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in the 20th
       century, and these word, are used: 

       "I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is
       withdrawn from the neck of the lamb of sacrifice." 

       Here is a paragraph from a periodical which shall be unnamed, of
       1936, showing that the urge to the "Mysteries" is not dead: 

       "The sophisticated Pharisee of the 20th century unceasingly gives
       thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients.
       The worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that
       which is not evident. Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard
       themselves as victimised by that person whose words or actions they
       do not understand. We love the obvious because it flatters us, and
       hate the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with faint
       praise. Riddles are irksome. The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with
       facts for his fetish, the modernist is more foolish than his 
       forebears.  Decrying superstition, he is most superstitious; 
       rejecting fancies, he
       is the fanciful product of a fictitious age. The modern world is
       bored with its own importance; life itself has become a botheration.
       Suffering from chronic ennui, how can a world ever become
       interested in anything but itself? Smothered in their
       self-complacency, these all-sufficient ones ask for facts. But what
       facts are there that fools can understand? How-can the helpless
       superficial grasp the hopelessly profound, for are not realities
       reserved for the wise?" 

       Alongside this clotted nonsense was a picture of a ritual murder,
       with the victim crucified, below it, a portrait of the author, an
       obvious Jew. 

       I take it that- "it would happen now" if this Jew had his way! 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 13:35:55 PDT 1996
Article: 63131 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!news.erinet.com!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!chi-news.cic.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.8
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:52:16 GMT
Lines: 327
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24173 alt.conspiracy:63131 alt.christnet:75531 alt.religion.christian:93532


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
 JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

CHAPTER VIII 
WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN EARLY AND MEDIEVAL TIMES
      1171 TO 1510 

       IN this, and subsequent chapters, I place descriptions of cases in
       chronological order, in which there seems to me to be no reason
       whatever to dispute the historical accuracy of the facts given. 

       In this Chapter, I record such cases between 1171 and 1510
       inclusive; and I would point out to the reader the great importance
       of the murder of St. Simon of Trent in 1475 and of the Toledo case
       in 1490; in fact, should the reader be one of those who approach the
       subject as unbelievers, I recommend that he should read about these
       two cases first, and the others after. 

       The following abbreviations are used in this Chapter among the
       references to authorities: 

       Magd. Cent. for Magdeburg Centuries, a Protestant History of the
       Christian Church compiled at Magdeburg, sixteenth century. 

       Chron. Hirsaug. for Chronicon Hirsaugiense, a history produced
       by Abbot J. Trithemius, 1514. 

       Cosm. Munst. for Sebastian Munster's Cosmographia Universalis,
       1544. 

       Spec. Viva. for Vincent of Beauvais's Speculum Historiale, of
       13th century. 

       1171 Blois, France. At Passover, a Christian child was crucified, his
       body drained of blood and thrown into the river. A number of Jews
       were executed. Authority: Monumenta Germania Historica, VI,
       520; Magd Cent., 12, C. 14 and 13, C. 14. 

       1179. Pontoise. The authorities for this case are the Bollandists
       (Acta, Vol. III, March, 591); Madg. Cent., 23, c. 14; Spec. Vinc,
       129, C. 25; and Cosm. Munst., 23, C. 14. A boy named Richard was
       tortured, crucified and bled white. Philip Augustus's chaplains and
       historians, Rigord and Guillaume l'Armoricain, attested this case.
       The body of the boy was taken to the Church of the Holy Innocents
       in Paris and he was canonised as St. Richard. 

       Under date 1080, Haydn's _Dictionary of Dates_, 1847, p. 282,
       says: "Thinking to invoke the divine mercy, at a solemnisation of
       the Passover, they (the Jews) sacrifice a youth, the son of a rich
       tradesman at Paris, for which all the criminals are executed and all
       Jews banished France." 

       1192. Braisne. Philip Augustus attended to this case personally, and
       had the criminals burnt. It was a case of the crucifixion of a
       Christian sold to the Jews by Agnes, Countess of Dreux, who
       considered him guilty of homicide and theft. Authority: Histoire des
       Ducs et Comtes de Champagne, IV, 1st part, p. 72, Paris, 1865) by
       A. de Jubainville; Sped. Vinc., 129, c. 25; Gaguin. L. 6, De Francis;
       Magd. Cenf., 12, C. 14, col. 1670. 

       1235. Fulda, Hesse-Nassau. Five children murdered; Jews confessed
       under torture, but said the blood was wanted for healing purposes.
       Frederick II exonerated the Jews from suspicion, but the Crusaders
       had already dealt with a number by putting them to death.
       Frederick II called together a number of converted Jews, who
       denied the existence of Jewish ritual murder. But Frederick's bias is
       evident in his own words when, in publishing his decision, he gives
       his objects in calling these people together, "although our
       conscience regarded the innocence of the aforesaid Jews adequately
       proved on the ground of several writings." Had Frederick II lived
       today, he would have relied little upon religious literature in
       deciding whether Jewish Ritual Murder exists or not. Authority:
       Chron. Hirsaug., and Magd. Cent., 13, C. 24. 

       1247. Valreas, France. Just before Easter, a two-year-old girl's
       body was found in the town moat with wounds on forehead, hands
       and feet. Jews confessed under torture that they wanted the blood of
       the child, but did not say that it was for ceremonial purposes. Pope
       Innocent IV said that three of the Jews were executed without
       confessing, but the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 261, says
       they confessed. 

       1250. Saragossa. A boy crucified, afterwards canonised as St.
       Dominiculus. Pius VII, 24th Nov., 1805, confirmed a decree of the
       Congregation of Rites of 31st August, according this canonisation. 

       1261. Pforzheim, Baden. An old woman sold a seven-year-old girl
       to the Jews, who bled her, strangled her and threw the body into the
       river. The old woman was convicted on the evidence of her own
       daughter. A number of Jews were condemned to death, two
       committing suicide. Authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, p. 838;
       Rohrbacher, L' Histoire Universelle de l'Eglise Catholique, Vol.
       XVIII, pp. 697-700; Thos. Cantipranus, De ratione vitae Vol. II,
       xxix. The child was canonised as a saint. 

       1287. Berne. Rudolf, a boy, was murdered at Passover in the house
       of a rich Jew called Matler. Jews confessed that he had been
       crucified; many were put to death. The boy was canonised as a
       martyr, and his name can be found in several martyrologies.
       Documental authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, April; Helvetia
       sancta (H. Murer); Karl Howald, Die Brunnen zu Bern, 1848, p.
       250; Cosm. Aims., 13, p. 482. But a stone monument still exists in
       Berne commemorating the crime. It is called The Fountain of the
       Child-Devourer, and is now on the Kornhausplatz. It represents a
       monster, with a Jewish countenance, eating a child. The figure
       wears the Judenbut, the hat prescribed for the Jews to wear by
       decree of the Fourth Lateran Council in I2I5. This monument was
       first placed in a street of the Jews' quarter as a reminder of the
       monstrous crime and as a punishment for the whole of Berne
       Jewry. Later, it was removed to its present situation. 

       1288. Troyes, France. Some Jews were tried for a ritual murder
       and 13 were executed by burning. Authority: Jewish Encyclopedia,
       1906, Vol. XII, p. 267. 

       1286. Oberwesel, on the Rhine. A boy named Werner was tortured
       for three days at Passover, hanged by the legs and bled white. The
       body was found in the river. This boy was beatified in the diocese
       of Treves, and his anniversary is on 19th April. A sculptured
       representation of this ritual murder is still to be seen in the
       Oberwesel Church. Authorities: Aventinus, Annals of Bavaria,
       1591, 17, p. 576; Chron. Hirsaug., Magd. Cent., 13, c. 14. 

       1462. Rinn, Innsbruck. A boy called Andreas Oxner was bought by
       the Jews and sacrificed for his blood on a stone in the forest. The
       body was found by his mother in a birch-tree. No Jew was
       apprehended because, the border being near, they had fled when the
       crime was made known. The Abbe Vacandard, defender of the
       Jews, says there was no trial. Well, of course there wasn't. Even in
       1937 there is no trial for a crime where the criminals have escaped
       ! The boy has been sanctified by Pope Benedict XIV in his Bull
       Beatus Andreas, Venice, 1778, which says he was " cruelly
       assassinated by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ." This
       last is admitted by Pope Clement XIV, who wrote his report on the
       investigation he made into the matter of Jewish Ritual Murder
       when, as Cardinal Ganganelli, he had been commissioned by Pope
       Benedict XIV to go into the matter; and in this report, he says "I
       admit the truth of another fact, which happened in the year 1462 in
       the village of Rinn, in the Diocese of Brixen, in the person of the
       Blessed Andreas, a boy barbarously murdered by the Jews in hatred
       of the faith of Jesus Christ." No one questions the historical
       occurrence or this case. An engraving on wood representing the
       Ritual Murder still exists in the church. 

       1468. Sepulveda, Segovia, Spain. The Jews sacrificed a Christian
       child on a cross. The Bishop of Segovia investigated the crime, and
       ordered the culprits to Segovia, where they were executed. It is
       important to know that this Bishop was himself son of a converted
       Jew; Jean d'Avila was his name. Colmenares's History of Segovia
       records the facts of the case, which was juridically decided by a
       man of Jewish blood. That may be the reason that one finds no
       mention of it in Strack's book in defence of the Jews, The Jew and
       Human Sacrifice. 

       1475. The Case of St. Simon of Trent. In I475, a three-year-old boy
       named Simon disappeared in the Italian town of Trent; the
       circumstances were such that suspicion fell upon the Jews. Hoping
       to averr this suspicion, they themselves "found" the child's body in
       a conduit where they afterwards confessed to having thrown it.
       Examination of the body, however, revealed that the boy had not
       been drowned; there were strange wounds on the body, of
       circumcision and crucifixion. About seven Jews were arrested; they
       were tortured and confessed that the boy had been ritually
       murdered for the purpose of obtaining Christian blood to mix with
       the ceremonial unleavened bread; these confessions were made
       separately and agreed in all essential details. The Jews were tried
       and were ultimately executed. The officer in charge of the
       investigation of the crime, Jean de Salis de Brescia, had before him
       a converted Jew, Jean de Feltro, who described how his father told
       him that Jews of his town, Lanzhat, had killed a child at Passover to
       get the blood of which they partook in wine and cakes. 

       No one has ever dared to try and deny the historical events of this
       case; only the Jews invent "reasons" why it was not Ritual Murder!
       But there is no escape from the opposite conclusion. In 1759 in
       answer to a Jewish appeal from Poland, the Inquisition sent
       Cardinal Ganganelli (later he became Pope Clement XIV) to
       investigate and report on the whole subject, with particular
       reference to the many cases then being reported in Poland; although
       this man went out with a biased mind in favour of the Jews (in his
       report, he says: "With my weak faculties I endevoured to
       demonstrate the non-existence of the crime which was imputed to
       the Jewish nation in Poland," hardly the spirit in which to enter
       upon such an investigation I), he actually says of this Trent case 
       (see Report of Cardinal Ganganelli, in C. Roth's The Ritual Murder
       Libel and the Jew, 1935, p. 83): "I admit then as true the fact of the
       Blessed Simon, a boy three years old, killed by the Jews in Trent in
       the year 1475 in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ (although it is
       disputed by Basnage and Wagenseil); for the celebrated Flaminio
       Cornaro, a Venetian Senator, in his work On the Cult of the Child
       St. Simon of Trent (Venice, 1753) disposes of all the doubts raised
       by the above-mentioned critics." 

       The Jews try to throw discredit on the judges who condemned the
       Jewish murderers by quoting Pope Sixtus IV who refused to
       sanction the cult of St. Simon; but the reason for this was that the
       cult was not then authorised by Rome, but was a popular movement
       without authority and contrary to Church discipline; this same Pope
       later expressed his approval of the verdict on the Jews in the Papal
       Bull XII Kal. July, 1478. 

       We have not only the testimony as to the correctitude of the
       proceedings from Sixtus IV; but also that of several other Popes;
       such as Sixtus V, who regularised the popular cult of St. Simon by
       ratifying it in 1588, as cited by Benedict XIV in Book I, Ch. xiv,
       No. 4 of his _On the Cononisation of the Saints_; also by this same
       Pope Benedict XIV in his _Ball Beatus Andreas_ of 22nd February,
       I755, in which he confirms Simon as a saint, a fact omitted from the
       arguments of that advocate for the Jews, Strack (The Jew and
       Human Sacrifice); Gregory XIII recognised Simon as a martyr, and
       even visited the shrine; and, as already stated, Clement XIV was
       obliged to recognise that it was a case of Jewish murder in hatred of
       Christianity. 

       St. Simon's shrine is in the Church of St. Peter, Trent; relics of him
       are still shown, among them the sacrificial knife. 

       In short, the Ritual Murder of St. Simon at Trent is supported by
       such evidence that those who doubt it are thereby condemning
       without reason high juridical and ecclesiastical authorities whose
       probity and intelligence there is not the slightest excuse to 
       deny. 

       1480. Venice. This case, as admitted in the Jewish Encyclopedia,
       I906, Vol. XII, p. 410, was settled by trial. Three Jews were
       executed. 

       1485. Padua, Italy. The victim in this case was canonised as St.
       Lorenzino, Pope Benedict XIV mentioning him as a martyr in his
       Bull Beatus Andreas. This case was attested by the Episcopal Court
       of Padua 

       I490. Toledo. This is a most important case, the circumstances of
       which have been clarified for us by W. T. Walsh in his interesting
       book on Isabella of Spain, I93I (Sheed & Ward), in which he
       devotes pp. 441 to 468 to his researches on this Ritual Murder
       charge. Had it not been for Mr. Walsh, I might have been
       influenced by the Jewish Encyclopedia's statement (1903, Vol. II1,
       p. 262) that " Modern historians even deny that a child had
       disappeared at all " in this case ! Strenuous efforts were made by
       Loeb and H. C. Lea to clear the Jews from guilt of this murder; as
       also by Abbe Vacandard. Walsh shows that on >7th October, I490,
       a Jew named Yuce confessed to having been present at the
       crucifixion of a boy called Christopher at La Guardian near Toledo.
       He made this confession without the " aid " of any torture; he was
       not even threatened with that for one year after his confession. On
       19th July, I49I, Yuce was promised immunity from punishment for
       himself and described the whole crucifixion and gave the names of
       his accomplices. On 25th October, 1491, a jury of seven noted
       Renaissance scholars who occupied the Chairs at Salamanca
       University examined the case and were unanimous in finding Yuce
       guilty. Not until after this did Yuce undergo torture. This torture
       was applied to make him say for what reason the boy Christopher
       had been crucified instead of being killed in any other way; but 
       no "leading" questions were employed in the examination. After this,
       the case went before a second jury of five learned men of Avila,
       who considered the evidence concerning Yuce's accomplices, who
       had been arrested and under examination; they unanimously
       declared them guilty. Eight Jews (some of them Marranos. or
       pretended converts to Christianity) were executed. 

    Writing of the efforts made to discredit the trials in this case, Walsh
       says (p. 464): " Must we assume that they (the two learned juries)
       were all murderous fanatics, willing to sacrifice innocent men, and
       that Dr. Leob, Dr. Lea, and on the Catholic side the somewhat too
       credulous Abbe Vacandard were better qualified to weigh the
       evidence after the lapse of four centuries?" 

       Walsh is not an "anti-semite." He is a historian, and has not
       suggested that ritual murder is part or any official Jewish
       ceremony. But he says: "The historian, far from being obliged to
       make wholesale vindication of all Jews accused of murder, is free,
       in fact, bound to consider each individual case upon its merits." 

       Walsh states (p. 441) that this case of Ritual Murder was "one of the
       chief factors, if not the decisive one, in the decision of Fernando
       and Isabel" (for the expulsion of the Jews from Spain). He shows
       that the complete' record of testimony in the trial of one of the
       accused has been available since it was published in I887 in the
       Bulletin of the Royal Academy at Madrid (Vol. XI, pp. 7-160),
       from the original manuscript. (This was, of course, before the Red
       revolution!) 

       Walsh charges Lea, the pro-Jewish author, of intellectual dishonesty
       (p. 628) in writing in his Inquisition in Spain decrying the
       influential men who were jurors in this case. 

       "If the Inquisitors sent eight men to a shameful death without being
       convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt, the honest
       verdict of history cannot shrink from finding not only Torquemada
       and his judges, but King Fernando and Queen Isabel, Cardinal
       Mendoza and several of the most illustrious professors of Salamanca
       University guilty of complicity in one of the most brutal judicial
       murders on record.?' (Walsh, p. 442.) 

       Those who shrink from charging the Jews with the practice of
       Ritual Murder thereby condemn some of the finest characters on the
       stage of European history. 

       Finally, we must record that the murdered boy was canonised as St.
       Christopher on the authority of Pope Pius VII. 

       1494. Tyrnau, Hungary. A boy was bled white and killed. The Jew
       culprits were betrayed by- the confession of women, who were
       persuaded to do so by the sight of some instruments of torture,
       which however were not applied to them. The Jews, arrested after
       this confession, themselves confessed that this was the fourth child
       they had killed for the blood, but they said they wanted this for
       medical purposes. Authority: Bollandists, Acta, April, Veil. II, 838.

       1510. Brandenbtsrg. Several Jews were accused in Berlin of buying
       a small Christian boy, bleeding him and killing him. They
       confessed, and 41 were executed Authorities: Richard Mun, Die
       Juden in Berlin; Sir Richard Burton, The Jew, the Gypsy and El
       Islam, I898, p. I26. 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 16:18:00 PDT 1996
Article: 24167 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.conspiracy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!laslo.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.3
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:16:23 GMT
Lines: 89
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24167 alt.christnet:75526 alt.religion.christian:93524 alt.conspiracy:63120


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

                                 CHAPTER IV 

MOTIVE & NATURE OF JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

       THE motive of Ritual Murder of Christians by Jews is almost
       certainlv hate. It is in fact the same motive that Disraeli 
       admitted to be - the cause of revolutionary activities against 
       Gentile governments A to use his words (from Life of Lord George
       Bentinck, I852): 

       "The people of God co-operate with atheists -- the most skilful
       accumulators of property ally themselves with Communists; the
       peculiar and chosen Race touch the hand of all the scum and low
       castes of Europe -- and all this because they wish to destroy that
       ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name, and
       whose tyranny they can no longer endure." 

       Hatred of Christianity is a tradition among the Jews: just as hate of
       England is a sort of perverted religion among an inferior class of
       Irishmen. It must be remembered that the Hymn of Hate which was
       debited to the Germans during the war was actually written by the
       Jew Lissauer 

    One of the principal Jewish feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is
       an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the
       Book of Esther of the Old Testament. The story, which is probably
       a myth, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamoured of a
       Jewess, Esther, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife.
       Haman, the King's sister, complained to him of the conduct of the
       Jews who, he said did not keep the laws, and obtained from the
       King an order to slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and
       prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen
       Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang
       Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian.
       Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered,
       including Haman's ten sons, who were hanged. 

       This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony,
       intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this
       day in London, the Jewish bakers make cakes in the shape of human
       ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called "
       Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and
       barbarism of the Jew in our midst. 

       The two principal feast-days associated with Ritual Murder have
       been (I) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter at Easter and the
       former about one month before it. When a Ritual Murder occurred
       at Purim, it was usually that of an adult Christian who was
       murdered for his blood; it is said that the blood was dried and the
       powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the
       dried blood of a Purim murder might sometimes be used for the
       following Passover. 

       When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually that of a
       child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who
       was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and
       crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes
       finished off by wounding in the side in imitation of the murder of
       Christ. The blood taken from the child was mixed either in the
       powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread. 

       Another festival at which it is thought that Ritual Murder has
       sometimes been indulged in is Chanucah, which occurs in
       December, commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem under the
       Maccabees in B.C. I65. 

       Examples of Purim murders are those of Damascus, Rhodes,
       Xanten Polna, Gladbeck and Paderborn. 

       Although hate is the principal motive, supersitious traditions are
       also involved, one being the association of blood-sacrifices with the
       idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that Jewry cannot be
       saved or return to Zion unless every year the blood of a Christian is
       obtained for the purpose of ritual consumption. 

       Political murders, such as the Jewish murder of the Tsar and his
       family and of other Russians, have sometimes been accompanied by
       features suggestive of ritual, but 1 do not wish to complicate this
       book by guessing at the meaning of signs left symbolically by the
       murderers. 
-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 16:18:01 PDT 1996
Article: 24168 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!laslo.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.4
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:38:01 GMT
Lines: 97
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24168 alt.conspiracy:63121 alt.christnet:75527 alt.religion.christian:93525


>From  the GOAL WWW page:  http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/

MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

 CHAPTER IV 

MOTIVE & NATURE OF JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

       THE motive of Ritual Murder of Christians by Jews is almost
       certainlv hate. It is in fact the same motive that Disraeli 
       admitted to be - the cause of revolutionary activities against 
       Gentile governments A to use his words (from Life of Lord George
       Bentinck, I852): 

       "The people of God co-operate with atheists -- the most skilful
       accumulators of property ally themselves with Communists; the
       peculiar and chosen Race touch the hand of all the scum and low
       castes of Europe -- and all this because they wish to destroy that
       ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name, and
       whose tyranny they can no longer endure." 

       Hatred of Christianity is a tradition among the Jews: just as hate of
       England is a sort of perverted religion among an inferior class of
       Irishmen. It must be remembered that the Hymn of Hate which was
       debited to the Germans during the war was actually written by the
       Jew Lissauer 

     One of the principal Jewish feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is
       an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the
       Book of Esther of the Old Testament. The story, which is probably
       a myth, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamoured of a
       Jewess, Esther, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife.
       Haman, the King's sister, complained to him of the conduct of the
       Jews who, he said did not keep the laws, and obtained from the
       King an order to slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and
       prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen
       Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang
       Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian.
       Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered,
       including Haman's ten sons, who were hanged. 

       This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony,
       intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this
       day in London, the Jewish bakers make cakes in the shape of human
       ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called "
       Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and
       barbarism of the Jew in our midst. 

       The two principal feast-days associated with Ritual Murder have
       been (I) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter at Easter and the
       former about one month before it. When a Ritual Murder occurred
       at Purim, it was usually that of an adult Christian who was
       murdered for his blood; it is said that the blood was dried and the
       powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the
       dried blood of a Purim murder might sometimes be used for the
       following Passover. 

       When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually that of a
       child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who
       was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and
       crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes
       finished off by wounding in the side in imitation of the murder of
       Christ. The blood taken from the child was mixed either in the
       powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread. 

       Another festival at which it is thought that Ritual Murder has
       sometimes been indulged in is Chanucah, which occurs in
       December, commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem under the
       Maccabees in B.C. I65. 

       Examples of Purim murders are those of Damascus, Rhodes,
       Xanten Polna, Gladbeck and Paderborn. 

       Although hate is the principal motive, supersitious traditions are
       also involved, one being the association of blood-sacrifices with the
       idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that Jewry cannot be
       saved or return to Zion unless every year the blood of a Christian is
       obtained for the purpose of ritual consumption. 

       Political murders, such as the Jewish murder of the Tsar and his
       family and of other Russians, have sometimes been accompanied by
       features suggestive of ritual, but 1 do not wish to complicate this
       book by guessing at the meaning of signs left symbolically by the
       murderers. 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 16:18:02 PDT 1996
Article: 24172 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!news.erinet.com!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!chi-news.cic.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.6
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:43:54 GMT
Lines: 204
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24172 alt.conspiracy:63130 alt.christnet:75530 alt.religion.christian:93531


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

CHAPTER VI 

COULDN'T HAPPEN NOW? 

       THIS argument, "It couldn't happen now," seems quite good enough
       for a lot of people when it is applied to the matter of Jewish Ritual
       Murder. It is, perhaps, comforting to the democratic mind to think
       that "Progress " ensures that such an evil practice, even if it
       occurred in unenlightened days, could not have survived to-day. 

       I wish I could see any comfort in this argument, but I don't. There
       are no facts to support it. 

       That the Aryan peoples have progressed I do-not deny; but I do not
       think there is any evidence to show any like progress among some
       of the other races. 

       Compare the following two happenings, noting the dates: 

       A.D. 117. From the account of Dio (Cassius in 78th Book of his
       history Chapter 32: 

       "Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North
       Africa) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and
       Greeks, and devoured their bodies, drank the blood, clothed
       themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the
       head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were
       compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were
       killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also its Cyprus, led
       by one of them named Artemion; and there another 40,000 were
       slain." 

       A.D. 1936. From Daily Mail, 17th September (describing the
       horrors of the Red Revolution in Spain): 

       "Baena (Cordoba Province): Ninety-one assassinations, mostly by
       shooting hatchet blows, or strangling. Others were burned alive.
       Two nuns who had been dragged from the convent of the Mother of
       God, had their religious medals with the figure of the Virgin, nailed
       into the sockets of their eyes. 

       "La Campana (Seville): Rcds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde
       Caraballo, who either killed- or was responsible for killing II
       persons in prison. The prisoners were fired on until they fell,
       covered with petrol, and set on fire. Some were still writhing in the
       flames when the city was entered. 

       "Lore del Rio (Seville): 138 assassinated. They were dragged to the
       cemetery, lined up, and shot in the legs, being buried alive as they
       fell in a trench. When the town was entered hands could still be seen
       writhing above the ground." 

       I cannot see much difference in outlook between the Jewish devils
       responsible for both these massacres, even though there are 15
       centuries between them! 

       In view of that, why boggle at the idea of Jewish Ritual Murder still
       surviving? 

       Why make such a fuss when Jews are charged with the practice of
       Ritual Aturder? Other Asiatics are known to haxre practised it until
       I850, and, if left to themselves, wotlld doubtless have maintained
       the custom. 

       In India, from 10,000 to 50,000 murders were perpetrated every
       year by a religious body known as the Thugs. They were mostly
       people of Mahommedan extraction, but a number of Hindus were
       also involved. They used to worship Kali, the Hindu goddess of
       destruction. Their custom was to club together, generally as
       travellers, when they would slowly gain the confidence of some
       innocent person, and at a given signal, would strangle him in a
       prescribed manner, which they regarded as a religious duty; then
       they would rob him if he had anything to be robbed of, and bury
       the body with such skill as to leave no trace. The Thugs actually
       received the protection of some of the native princes and chiefs who
       were thoroughly frightened of their power as a secret religious sect.
       How this reminds us of the attitude of the influential men in this
       country who adopt the same view of Masonry and Jewry! 

       Then the British Government decided the thing must stop. After
       many years of investigation, Sir W. H. Sleeman stamped out the
       Thug sect, and no Thuggee murders are on record since I850. He
       found that Thuggee was hereditary among male members of a
       family, and he achieved his object by confining in segregation for
       life all male members of Thug families. 

       Now my point is that Thuggee happened; and happened in the 19th
       century until the British put an end to it under Sleeman. It was a
       long time before the British administration learned of the existence
       of Thuggee, so carefully was it concealed; another analogy with
       Jewish Ritual Murder! 

       "It couldn't happen now." Why not? 

       And on 13th September, 1937, a telegram was sent to The Times
       from Delhi reporting the sacrifice of a 17-year-old youth to
       propitiate the rain-god, in Sirmoor State. The youth was led
       through the village of Gunpur by a crowd of people headed by a
       priest and the village headman, and beheaded on a special altar to
       the accompaniment of devotional songs. The head was found by the
       police at the foot of the deity in the village temple. 

       As Aryan rule over India relaxes, Thuggee and other human
       sacrifices will re-appear. 

       "It couldn't happen now." Why pot, again? 

       Here is an extract from Magick by the "Master Therion", published
       in 1929 by the Lecram Press, 26 Rue d'Hautpool, Paris, pp. 94-5: 

       "...it was the theory of the ancient magicians that any living being
       is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size
       and health of the animal, and in quality according to its mental and
       moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated
       suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle,
       or Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape....
       For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that
       victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of
       perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and
       suitable 

       A footnote on p. 95 says "(4) It appears from the Magical Records
       of Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an
       average about 150 times every year between I9I2 e.v. and I928
       e.v." 

       This footnote refers to the last sentence in the paragraph quoted
       above. The italics are all mine. 

       "It couldn't happen now." Why not, in the Devil's name? 

       Sir Richard Burton show us that the disappearance of children at
       Passover was talked of in Rome and in the other towns of Italy
       throughout the early part of the 19th century when efficient
       policing was unknown, as also throughout the century at Smyrna
       and other places in the Levant and in Turkey. 

       It couldn't happen now? But the Jewish method of cattle slaughter
       happens now and is specially exempted from the objects of the
       Slaughter of Animals Act, 1933, which Act orders that all cattle for
       Gentile food must be stunned with a mechanically-operated
       instrument before the throat is cut. The Jewish method is cutting the
       throat from ear to ear without any previous stunning. It has been
       condemned by a Government Commission hold in I904 as failing in
       rapidity, freedom f am unnecessary pain and instantaneous loss of
       sensibility. Yet it "happens now" and is protected in this our
       England, by an English Law, and remains unattacked by the Royal
       Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. 

       Why couldn't it happen now? 

       To this day, we learn from Jewish sources (B'nai B'rith Messenger,
       California, 3rd April, 1936) that the Samaritans, an unorthodox
       Jewish sect who keep Passover by solar computation, indulge in
       bloody sacrifices of animals on that feast-day; an account is given 
       of a visit to the scene of sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in the 20th
       century, and these word, are used: 

       "I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is
       withdrawn from the neck of the lamb of sacrifice." 

       Here is a paragraph from a periodical which shall be unnamed, of
       1936, showing that the urge to the "Mysteries" is not dead: 

       "The sophisticated Pharisee of the 20th century unceasingly gives
       thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients.
       The worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that
       which is not evident. Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard
       themselves as victimised by that person whose words or actions they
       do not understand. We love the obvious because it flatters us, and
       hate the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with faint
       praise. Riddles are irksome. The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with
       facts for his fetish, the modernist is more foolish than his 
       forebears.  Decrying superstition, he is most superstitious; 
       rejecting fancies, he
       is the fanciful product of a fictitious age. The modern world is
       bored with its own importance; life itself has become a botheration.
       Suffering from chronic ennui, how can a world ever become
       interested in anything but itself? Smothered in their
       self-complacency, these all-sufficient ones ask for facts. But what
       facts are there that fools can understand? How-can the helpless
       superficial grasp the hopelessly profound, for are not realities
       reserved for the wise?" 

       Alongside this clotted nonsense was a picture of a ritual murder,
       with the victim crucified, below it, a portrait of the author, an
       obvious Jew. 

       I take it that- "it would happen now" if this Jew had his way! 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 16:18:03 PDT 1996
Article: 24173 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!news.erinet.com!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!chi-news.cic.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.8
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:52:16 GMT
Lines: 327
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24173 alt.conspiracy:63131 alt.christnet:75531 alt.religion.christian:93532


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
 JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

CHAPTER VIII 
WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN EARLY AND MEDIEVAL TIMES
      1171 TO 1510 

       IN this, and subsequent chapters, I place descriptions of cases in
       chronological order, in which there seems to me to be no reason
       whatever to dispute the historical accuracy of the facts given. 

       In this Chapter, I record such cases between 1171 and 1510
       inclusive; and I would point out to the reader the great importance
       of the murder of St. Simon of Trent in 1475 and of the Toledo case
       in 1490; in fact, should the reader be one of those who approach the
       subject as unbelievers, I recommend that he should read about these
       two cases first, and the others after. 

       The following abbreviations are used in this Chapter among the
       references to authorities: 

       Magd. Cent. for Magdeburg Centuries, a Protestant History of the
       Christian Church compiled at Magdeburg, sixteenth century. 

       Chron. Hirsaug. for Chronicon Hirsaugiense, a history produced
       by Abbot J. Trithemius, 1514. 

       Cosm. Munst. for Sebastian Munster's Cosmographia Universalis,
       1544. 

       Spec. Viva. for Vincent of Beauvais's Speculum Historiale, of
       13th century. 

       1171 Blois, France. At Passover, a Christian child was crucified, his
       body drained of blood and thrown into the river. A number of Jews
       were executed. Authority: Monumenta Germania Historica, VI,
       520; Magd Cent., 12, C. 14 and 13, C. 14. 

       1179. Pontoise. The authorities for this case are the Bollandists
       (Acta, Vol. III, March, 591); Madg. Cent., 23, c. 14; Spec. Vinc,
       129, C. 25; and Cosm. Munst., 23, C. 14. A boy named Richard was
       tortured, crucified and bled white. Philip Augustus's chaplains and
       historians, Rigord and Guillaume l'Armoricain, attested this case.
       The body of the boy was taken to the Church of the Holy Innocents
       in Paris and he was canonised as St. Richard. 

       Under date 1080, Haydn's _Dictionary of Dates_, 1847, p. 282,
       says: "Thinking to invoke the divine mercy, at a solemnisation of
       the Passover, they (the Jews) sacrifice a youth, the son of a rich
       tradesman at Paris, for which all the criminals are executed and all
       Jews banished France." 

       1192. Braisne. Philip Augustus attended to this case personally, and
       had the criminals burnt. It was a case of the crucifixion of a
       Christian sold to the Jews by Agnes, Countess of Dreux, who
       considered him guilty of homicide and theft. Authority: Histoire des
       Ducs et Comtes de Champagne, IV, 1st part, p. 72, Paris, 1865) by
       A. de Jubainville; Sped. Vinc., 129, c. 25; Gaguin. L. 6, De Francis;
       Magd. Cenf., 12, C. 14, col. 1670. 

       1235. Fulda, Hesse-Nassau. Five children murdered; Jews confessed
       under torture, but said the blood was wanted for healing purposes.
       Frederick II exonerated the Jews from suspicion, but the Crusaders
       had already dealt with a number by putting them to death.
       Frederick II called together a number of converted Jews, who
       denied the existence of Jewish ritual murder. But Frederick's bias is
       evident in his own words when, in publishing his decision, he gives
       his objects in calling these people together, "although our
       conscience regarded the innocence of the aforesaid Jews adequately
       proved on the ground of several writings." Had Frederick II lived
       today, he would have relied little upon religious literature in
       deciding whether Jewish Ritual Murder exists or not. Authority:
       Chron. Hirsaug., and Magd. Cent., 13, C. 24. 

       1247. Valreas, France. Just before Easter, a two-year-old girl's
       body was found in the town moat with wounds on forehead, hands
       and feet. Jews confessed under torture that they wanted the blood of
       the child, but did not say that it was for ceremonial purposes. Pope
       Innocent IV said that three of the Jews were executed without
       confessing, but the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 261, says
       they confessed. 

       1250. Saragossa. A boy crucified, afterwards canonised as St.
       Dominiculus. Pius VII, 24th Nov., 1805, confirmed a decree of the
       Congregation of Rites of 31st August, according this canonisation. 

       1261. Pforzheim, Baden. An old woman sold a seven-year-old girl
       to the Jews, who bled her, strangled her and threw the body into the
       river. The old woman was convicted on the evidence of her own
       daughter. A number of Jews were condemned to death, two
       committing suicide. Authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, p. 838;
       Rohrbacher, L' Histoire Universelle de l'Eglise Catholique, Vol.
       XVIII, pp. 697-700; Thos. Cantipranus, De ratione vitae Vol. II,
       xxix. The child was canonised as a saint. 

       1287. Berne. Rudolf, a boy, was murdered at Passover in the house
       of a rich Jew called Matler. Jews confessed that he had been
       crucified; many were put to death. The boy was canonised as a
       martyr, and his name can be found in several martyrologies.
       Documental authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, April; Helvetia
       sancta (H. Murer); Karl Howald, Die Brunnen zu Bern, 1848, p.
       250; Cosm. Aims., 13, p. 482. But a stone monument still exists in
       Berne commemorating the crime. It is called The Fountain of the
       Child-Devourer, and is now on the Kornhausplatz. It represents a
       monster, with a Jewish countenance, eating a child. The figure
       wears the Judenbut, the hat prescribed for the Jews to wear by
       decree of the Fourth Lateran Council in I2I5. This monument was
       first placed in a street of the Jews' quarter as a reminder of the
       monstrous crime and as a punishment for the whole of Berne
       Jewry. Later, it was removed to its present situation. 

       1288. Troyes, France. Some Jews were tried for a ritual murder
       and 13 were executed by burning. Authority: Jewish Encyclopedia,
       1906, Vol. XII, p. 267. 

       1286. Oberwesel, on the Rhine. A boy named Werner was tortured
       for three days at Passover, hanged by the legs and bled white. The
       body was found in the river. This boy was beatified in the diocese
       of Treves, and his anniversary is on 19th April. A sculptured
       representation of this ritual murder is still to be seen in the
       Oberwesel Church. Authorities: Aventinus, Annals of Bavaria,
       1591, 17, p. 576; Chron. Hirsaug., Magd. Cent., 13, c. 14. 

       1462. Rinn, Innsbruck. A boy called Andreas Oxner was bought by
       the Jews and sacrificed for his blood on a stone in the forest. The
       body was found by his mother in a birch-tree. No Jew was
       apprehended because, the border being near, they had fled when the
       crime was made known. The Abbe Vacandard, defender of the
       Jews, says there was no trial. Well, of course there wasn't. Even in
       1937 there is no trial for a crime where the criminals have escaped
       ! The boy has been sanctified by Pope Benedict XIV in his Bull
       Beatus Andreas, Venice, 1778, which says he was " cruelly
       assassinated by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ." This
       last is admitted by Pope Clement XIV, who wrote his report on the
       investigation he made into the matter of Jewish Ritual Murder
       when, as Cardinal Ganganelli, he had been commissioned by Pope
       Benedict XIV to go into the matter; and in this report, he says "I
       admit the truth of another fact, which happened in the year 1462 in
       the village of Rinn, in the Diocese of Brixen, in the person of the
       Blessed Andreas, a boy barbarously murdered by the Jews in hatred
       of the faith of Jesus Christ." No one questions the historical
       occurrence or this case. An engraving on wood representing the
       Ritual Murder still exists in the church. 

       1468. Sepulveda, Segovia, Spain. The Jews sacrificed a Christian
       child on a cross. The Bishop of Segovia investigated the crime, and
       ordered the culprits to Segovia, where they were executed. It is
       important to know that this Bishop was himself son of a converted
       Jew; Jean d'Avila was his name. Colmenares's History of Segovia
       records the facts of the case, which was juridically decided by a
       man of Jewish blood. That may be the reason that one finds no
       mention of it in Strack's book in defence of the Jews, The Jew and
       Human Sacrifice. 

       1475. The Case of St. Simon of Trent. In I475, a three-year-old boy
       named Simon disappeared in the Italian town of Trent; the
       circumstances were such that suspicion fell upon the Jews. Hoping
       to averr this suspicion, they themselves "found" the child's body in
       a conduit where they afterwards confessed to having thrown it.
       Examination of the body, however, revealed that the boy had not
       been drowned; there were strange wounds on the body, of
       circumcision and crucifixion. About seven Jews were arrested; they
       were tortured and confessed that the boy had been ritually
       murdered for the purpose of obtaining Christian blood to mix with
       the ceremonial unleavened bread; these confessions were made
       separately and agreed in all essential details. The Jews were tried
       and were ultimately executed. The officer in charge of the
       investigation of the crime, Jean de Salis de Brescia, had before him
       a converted Jew, Jean de Feltro, who described how his father told
       him that Jews of his town, Lanzhat, had killed a child at Passover to
       get the blood of which they partook in wine and cakes. 

       No one has ever dared to try and deny the historical events of this
       case; only the Jews invent "reasons" why it was not Ritual Murder!
       But there is no escape from the opposite conclusion. In 1759 in
       answer to a Jewish appeal from Poland, the Inquisition sent
       Cardinal Ganganelli (later he became Pope Clement XIV) to
       investigate and report on the whole subject, with particular
       reference to the many cases then being reported in Poland; although
       this man went out with a biased mind in favour of the Jews (in his
       report, he says: "With my weak faculties I endevoured to
       demonstrate the non-existence of the crime which was imputed to
       the Jewish nation in Poland," hardly the spirit in which to enter
       upon such an investigation I), he actually says of this Trent case 
       (see Report of Cardinal Ganganelli, in C. Roth's The Ritual Murder
       Libel and the Jew, 1935, p. 83): "I admit then as true the fact of the
       Blessed Simon, a boy three years old, killed by the Jews in Trent in
       the year 1475 in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ (although it is
       disputed by Basnage and Wagenseil); for the celebrated Flaminio
       Cornaro, a Venetian Senator, in his work On the Cult of the Child
       St. Simon of Trent (Venice, 1753) disposes of all the doubts raised
       by the above-mentioned critics." 

       The Jews try to throw discredit on the judges who condemned the
       Jewish murderers by quoting Pope Sixtus IV who refused to
       sanction the cult of St. Simon; but the reason for this was that the
       cult was not then authorised by Rome, but was a popular movement
       without authority and contrary to Church discipline; this same Pope
       later expressed his approval of the verdict on the Jews in the Papal
       Bull XII Kal. July, 1478. 

       We have not only the testimony as to the correctitude of the
       proceedings from Sixtus IV; but also that of several other Popes;
       such as Sixtus V, who regularised the popular cult of St. Simon by
       ratifying it in 1588, as cited by Benedict XIV in Book I, Ch. xiv,
       No. 4 of his _On the Cononisation of the Saints_; also by this same
       Pope Benedict XIV in his _Ball Beatus Andreas_ of 22nd February,
       I755, in which he confirms Simon as a saint, a fact omitted from the
       arguments of that advocate for the Jews, Strack (The Jew and
       Human Sacrifice); Gregory XIII recognised Simon as a martyr, and
       even visited the shrine; and, as already stated, Clement XIV was
       obliged to recognise that it was a case of Jewish murder in hatred of
       Christianity. 

       St. Simon's shrine is in the Church of St. Peter, Trent; relics of him
       are still shown, among them the sacrificial knife. 

       In short, the Ritual Murder of St. Simon at Trent is supported by
       such evidence that those who doubt it are thereby condemning
       without reason high juridical and ecclesiastical authorities whose
       probity and intelligence there is not the slightest excuse to 
       deny. 

       1480. Venice. This case, as admitted in the Jewish Encyclopedia,
       I906, Vol. XII, p. 410, was settled by trial. Three Jews were
       executed. 

       1485. Padua, Italy. The victim in this case was canonised as St.
       Lorenzino, Pope Benedict XIV mentioning him as a martyr in his
       Bull Beatus Andreas. This case was attested by the Episcopal Court
       of Padua 

       I490. Toledo. This is a most important case, the circumstances of
       which have been clarified for us by W. T. Walsh in his interesting
       book on Isabella of Spain, I93I (Sheed & Ward), in which he
       devotes pp. 441 to 468 to his researches on this Ritual Murder
       charge. Had it not been for Mr. Walsh, I might have been
       influenced by the Jewish Encyclopedia's statement (1903, Vol. II1,
       p. 262) that " Modern historians even deny that a child had
       disappeared at all " in this case ! Strenuous efforts were made by
       Loeb and H. C. Lea to clear the Jews from guilt of this murder; as
       also by Abbe Vacandard. Walsh shows that on >7th October, I490,
       a Jew named Yuce confessed to having been present at the
       crucifixion of a boy called Christopher at La Guardian near Toledo.
       He made this confession without the " aid " of any torture; he was
       not even threatened with that for one year after his confession. On
       19th July, I49I, Yuce was promised immunity from punishment for
       himself and described the whole crucifixion and gave the names of
       his accomplices. On 25th October, 1491, a jury of seven noted
       Renaissance scholars who occupied the Chairs at Salamanca
       University examined the case and were unanimous in finding Yuce
       guilty. Not until after this did Yuce undergo torture. This torture
       was applied to make him say for what reason the boy Christopher
       had been crucified instead of being killed in any other way; but 
       no "leading" questions were employed in the examination. After this,
       the case went before a second jury of five learned men of Avila,
       who considered the evidence concerning Yuce's accomplices, who
       had been arrested and under examination; they unanimously
       declared them guilty. Eight Jews (some of them Marranos. or
       pretended converts to Christianity) were executed. 

    Writing of the efforts made to discredit the trials in this case, Walsh
       says (p. 464): " Must we assume that they (the two learned juries)
       were all murderous fanatics, willing to sacrifice innocent men, and
       that Dr. Leob, Dr. Lea, and on the Catholic side the somewhat too
       credulous Abbe Vacandard were better qualified to weigh the
       evidence after the lapse of four centuries?" 

       Walsh is not an "anti-semite." He is a historian, and has not
       suggested that ritual murder is part or any official Jewish
       ceremony. But he says: "The historian, far from being obliged to
       make wholesale vindication of all Jews accused of murder, is free,
       in fact, bound to consider each individual case upon its merits." 

       Walsh states (p. 441) that this case of Ritual Murder was "one of the
       chief factors, if not the decisive one, in the decision of Fernando
       and Isabel" (for the expulsion of the Jews from Spain). He shows
       that the complete' record of testimony in the trial of one of the
       accused has been available since it was published in I887 in the
       Bulletin of the Royal Academy at Madrid (Vol. XI, pp. 7-160),
       from the original manuscript. (This was, of course, before the Red
       revolution!) 

       Walsh charges Lea, the pro-Jewish author, of intellectual dishonesty
       (p. 628) in writing in his Inquisition in Spain decrying the
       influential men who were jurors in this case. 

       "If the Inquisitors sent eight men to a shameful death without being
       convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt, the honest
       verdict of history cannot shrink from finding not only Torquemada
       and his judges, but King Fernando and Queen Isabel, Cardinal
       Mendoza and several of the most illustrious professors of Salamanca
       University guilty of complicity in one of the most brutal judicial
       murders on record.?' (Walsh, p. 442.) 

       Those who shrink from charging the Jews with the practice of
       Ritual Murder thereby condemn some of the finest characters on the
       stage of European history. 

       Finally, we must record that the murdered boy was canonised as St.
       Christopher on the authority of Pope Pius VII. 

       1494. Tyrnau, Hungary. A boy was bled white and killed. The Jew
       culprits were betrayed by- the confession of women, who were
       persuaded to do so by the sight of some instruments of torture,
       which however were not applied to them. The Jews, arrested after
       this confession, themselves confessed that this was the fourth child
       they had killed for the blood, but they said they wanted this for
       medical purposes. Authority: Bollandists, Acta, April, Veil. II, 838.

       1510. Brandenbtsrg. Several Jews were accused in Berlin of buying
       a small Christian boy, bleeding him and killing him. They
       confessed, and 41 were executed Authorities: Richard Mun, Die
       Juden in Berlin; Sir Richard Burton, The Jew, the Gypsy and El
       Islam, I898, p. I26. 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 16:18:04 PDT 1996
Article: 24181 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!news.erinet.com!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.voicenet.com!news2.noc.netcom.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.7
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:46:27 GMT
Lines: 237
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24181 alt.conspiracy:63155 alt.christnet:75539 alt.religion.christian:93544


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

CHAPTER VII 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER IN ENGLAND BEFORE THE EXPULSION OF 1290. 

       THE first known case happened in 1144; after that, cases cropped
       up from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm
       by Edward I. The most famous of these cases was that of Little St.
       Hugh of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological
       order; and I do not deny the possibility of some of them in which
       details are lacking, being "trumped-up" ones, where death may have
       been due to causes other than ritual murder and the Jews blamed for
       it; but the case of St. Hugh, particularly, was juridically decided,
       and the Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm record definitely cases
       at London, Winchester and Oxford. There seems no reason to doubt
       that many cases of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even
       undiscovered. 

       1144- Norwich. A twelve-year-old boy was crucified and his side
       pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden
       in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge,
       confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian
       child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever
       obtain their freedom and return to Palestine, and that it was their
       custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied;
       Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne but in this year
       to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been
       known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to
       bring the Jews to trial. 

       In J. C. Cox's Norfolk Churches, Vol. II, p. 47, as also in the
       Victoria Country History of Norfolk, 1906, Vol. II, is an
       illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual
       Murder of St. William, the screen itself is in Loddon Church,
       Norfolk, unless the Power of Jewish Money has had it removed. No
       one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say
       it was not a Ritual Murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his _The Ritual
       Murder Libel and the Jew_ (1935) says: "Modern enquirers, after
       careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child
       probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and
       was buried prematurely by his relatives." How these modern
       enquiries arrived at a conclusion like that after all these sears, 
       Mr Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest
       that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a
       martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that
       wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of
       the side. And why the relatives should bury the boy in a sack and
       then dig it up and hang it in a tree would puzzle even a Jew to
       explain. 

       John Foxe's _Arts and Monuments of the Church_ records this
       ritual murder, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The
       Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich,
       was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish
       Ritual Murder; in the _Dictionary of National Biography_ (edited
       by a Jew!) it is made clear that his career, quite apart from this
       Ritual Murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character
       and moral courage. 

       II60- Gloucester. The body of a child named Harold was found in
       the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly
       dated 1168. Recorded in _Monumenta Germania Historica_, Vol.
       VI (Erfurt Annals); _Polychronicon_, R. Higdon; _Chronicles_, R.
       Grafton, p. 46. 

       1181- Bury St. Edmunds. A child called Robert was sacrificed at
       Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there
       was supposed to cause 'miracles.' Authority: Rohrbacher, from the
       _Chronicle_ of Gervase of Canterbury. 

       1192- Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in _Jewish
       Encyclopedia_ as being a false charge. Details lacking. 

       1232- Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. Mentioned in
       Hyamson's _History of the Jews in England_; also in _Annals of
       Winchester_; and conclusively in the Close Roll I6, Henry III,
       membrane 8, 26.6. I232. 

       1235- Norwich. In this case, the Jews stole a child and hid him with
       a view to crucifying him. Haydn's _Dictionary of Dates_ of date
       1847, says of this case, "They (the Jews) circumcise and attempt to
       crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine
       of 20,000 marks." Further authority Huillard Breolles _Grande
       Chronique_, III, 86. Also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m 23. 

       1244- London. A child's body found unburied in the cemetery of
       St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul's.
       Authority: _Social England_, Vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. 
       Traill. 

       1255- Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and
       crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy's mother
       found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Joppin or
       Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed,
       did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for
       the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical
       investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body,
       and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who
       was executed. 

       Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in
       Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been
       at work, for between 1910 and 1930, a notice was fixed above the
       shrine as follows: 

       "The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as
       that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a
       small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are
       many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and
       the existence of similar stories in England and elsewhere points to
       their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages
       and the common superstition, now wholly discredited, that ritual
       murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made
       as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews
       against the hatred of the populace and against this particular
       accusation." 

       At a recent visit to Lincoln of the Jewish Historical Society, in
       1934, the Mayor, Mr. G. Deer, said to them: That he (St. Hugh)
       was done to death by Jews for ritual purposes cannot be other than a
       libel based upon the prejudices and ignorance of an unenlightened
       age." The Chancellor on the same occasion said: "It was quite
       obviously one of the very many cases of slander spread about the
       Jews from time to time. No doubt, the child died or fell down the
       well." 

       These people, Jews and Gentiles, bring no evidence whatever for
       their statements; it couldn't have happened, they say. Why not? 

       Was Henry III, weak in character as we know him to have been,
       ever charged with being an immoral man? Did the judges not
       examine the body, which was only four weeks dead? Is Haydn's
       Dictionary of Dates (1847 edition) medieval and superstitious when
       it said of this case " They (the Jews) crucify a child at Lincoln, for
       which 18 are hanged"? There are no 'ifs' and 'buts' here! Or does
       Copinus's confession not tally with that of Theobald, quoted above
       in the first Norwich case? Copinus said, "For the death of this child,
       nearly all the Jews in England had come together and every town
       had sent deputies to assist in the sacrifice." 

       No one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and
       Judaised Gentiles unite in denying the fact of Ritual Murder. 

       Strack, in his _The Jew and Human Sacrifice_, written in defence of
       the Jews against the Blood Accusation, omits all mention of this
       famous case, which is the subject of the Prioress's Tale (Canterbury
       Tales) of Chaucer and is referred to in Marlowe's _Jew of Malta_.
       Hyamson's _History of the Jews in England_ devotes the whole of
       Chapter IX to "Little St. Hugh of Lincoln," showing the importance
       of the Ritual Murder issue in the Jewish mind today. 

       The following Close Rolls of the Realm refer to the case of St.
       Hugh: Henry III, 39, m. 2,7.10 1255; 39, m. 2,14.10.1255; 40, m.
       20, 24.ii.. 1255; 40,m.13,13.3.1256; 42, m. 6; 19.6.1258. And the
       Patent Rolls, Henry III, 40,m.20,26.11.1255; 40,m.19,9.12.1255;
       40,27.3.1256; and 40,m.5, 20.8.1256. 

       1257. London. A child sacrificed.. Authority: Cluverius. _Epitome
       Historia_, p. 541. Details lacking. 

       1276. London. Boy crucified. Authority: The Close Roll of the
       Realm, 4, Edward I, membrane 14, 3.3.1276. 

       1279. Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn's _Dictionary of
       Dates_, 1847, says of this case: "They (the Jews) crucify a child at
       Northampton for which 50 are drawn at horses' tails and hanged."
       Further authorities: Reiley, _Memorials of London_, p. I5; H.
       Desportes, _Le Mystere du Sang_. 

       I290. Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, mem. 21, 21st June,
       1290, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de
       Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford. 

       Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling
       the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe
       that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in
       toleration. 

       The reader will see (p. 20) that it was a similar ritual case which
       was one of the main stimulants to the King and Queen of Spain to
       expel professing Jews from that country in 1492. 

       The Jews, in attempting to escape responsibility for these deaths by
       Ritual Murder, do not hesitate to impugn the probity of two of the
       Kings of England, against whose moral character no one else has
       dared to cast a slur. Here are some examples. From the Jewish
       Chronicle Supplement, April, I936, p. 8 (speaking of the Lincoln
       case in the reign of Henry III): 

       "Henceforth and especially under the zealously Christian Edward I,
       the Crown and its officers became almost a worse peril to the Jews
       than mobs intent on loot and led on by fanatic priests and knightly
       spendthrifts who had borrowed Jewish money. When 18th century
       writers of history began to examine the old records in a new
       sceptical temper, some may be found venturing on such unkind
       surmises as that the alleged crucifictions of Christian children only
       seemed to happen when kings were short of money." The foul
       accusation against men of upright character is repeated by the Jew
       Hyamson (History of the Jews in England, I928 edition, p. 21),
       writes: "it has also been pointed out that the Blood Accusation was
       as a rule made at a time at which the Royal Treasury needed
       replenishing." 

       To deny that the cases of St. William of Norwich and St. Hugh of
       Lincoln were Jewish Ritual Murders is to accuse certain English
       Kings, certain English Clergy, and certain English administrators,
       known to be men of good morals, of murdering and torturing Jews
       to get their money, after accusing them of horrible crimes. In the
       case of St. Hugh, the sentence was juridical; in the case of St.
       William, the mob took the matter into their own hands because the
       Sheriff would take no action himself. 

       Whom do you believe the Jews or the English? 

       "It is difficult to refuse all credit to stories so circumstantial 
       and so frequent." So says _Social England_ concerning Ritual   
       Murders in England Vol. I, p. 407, I893, edited by H. D. Traill. 

       A significant fact is that Haydn's _Dictionary of Dates_, at least up
       to 1847, quoted the Ritual Murders in Norman and Plantagenet
       England as undisputed facts. In later editions in the sixties, all
       mention of them is extirpated! We may take it that the Jewish
       Money Power began to dictate to the Press in England somewhere
       in the fifties of the last century. 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 16:18:05 PDT 1996
Article: 24182 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!news.erinet.com!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.voicenet.com!news2.noc.netcom.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.5
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:41:04 GMT
Lines: 81
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24182 alt.conspiracy:63156 alt.christnet:75540 alt.religion.christian:93545


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

 CHAPTER V 

A RELIC OF THE DAYS OF WITCHCRAFT AND BLACK MAGIC 

       ON 6th May, 1912, The Times published a letter, signed by many
       men of authority, protesting against what they called the revival of
       "the hideous charge of Ritual Murder" which was being brought
       against a Jew at Kiev. "The Blood Accusation," they said, "is a relic
       of the days of Witchcraft and Black Magic." 

       Unfortunately for the signatories of this letter, who numbered
       among them the Archbishops of Canterbury, York and Armagh, the
       Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, Bishops galore, Dukes, Earls,
       Justices, Masters of Colleges and Editors, of that period, the Blood
       Accusation has nothing medieval about it at all; it was more rife in
       the 19th century than it was in medieval times! 

       Unfortunately also, Black Magic is in the same category. It is not
       medieval either; there never was a wider cult of Black Magic than
       there is in the year of Our Lord I938! 

       How extraordinary it is that influential men can be induced to sign
       such a statement as I have quoted ! And how strange it is that,
       where Jewish interests are at stake, these same influential Christian
       men will see nothing improper in attempting to prejudice the course
       of the criminal trial of the Jew Beiliss at Kiev, a course which they
       would never pursue in any other cause! 

       Let us confound the signatories of The Times letter out of the
       mouths of Jews themselves. The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol.
       III, pp. 266-7, gives a list of Accusations of Ritual Murder made
       against the Jews through the centuries; I22 cases are listed in
       chronological order, and no less than 39 of them were made in the
       19th century! There were far more than double the number of
       Blood Accusations made in the 19th century than in any previous
       century, according to this authoritative Jewish list. 

       Let us examine- the list of Ritual Murder Accusations made by a
       converted Jew, Cesare Algranati, in 1913, and published in Cahiers
       Romains; here are listed 1O1 accusations, of which 28 were made in
       the 19th century and only 73 for all the eight preceding centuries!
       Even the Jew Roth gives the argument away, for he says (p. 16 of
       his Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935), "The nineteenth
       century proved little less credulous than those which preceded 
        it." 

       "Anti-semitic" authors' lists of Blood Accusations agree in this
       respect with the lists made by Jews; Der Sturmer, the paper of
       Julius Streicher, in a special Ritual Murder issue published in 1934,
       shows that in the 19th century 32 charges of ritual murder were
       made, which is ten more than in any other century in European
       history recorded by it. 

       The fact that the charges increase in number as the age becomes
       more and more enlightened is particularly significant, because the
       Jewish Money Power and its silencing activities are more developed
       than ever before and might have been expected to reduce the
       number of charges. 

       Sufficient has now been said to expose the absurdity of any attempt
       to consign the Blood Accusation to any medieval limbo. 

       It lives today;- I may say with the great Sir Richard Burton (The
       Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, I898, P. 129): "At any rate, sufficient
       has been advanced in these pages to open the eyes of the student and
       the ethnographer; it will stand on record until Elijah." 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 16:25:56 PDT 1996
Article: 63155 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!news.erinet.com!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.voicenet.com!news2.noc.netcom.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.7
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:46:27 GMT
Lines: 237
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24181 alt.conspiracy:63155 alt.christnet:75539 alt.religion.christian:93544


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

CHAPTER VII 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER IN ENGLAND BEFORE THE EXPULSION OF 1290. 

       THE first known case happened in 1144; after that, cases cropped
       up from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm
       by Edward I. The most famous of these cases was that of Little St.
       Hugh of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological
       order; and I do not deny the possibility of some of them in which
       details are lacking, being "trumped-up" ones, where death may have
       been due to causes other than ritual murder and the Jews blamed for
       it; but the case of St. Hugh, particularly, was juridically decided,
       and the Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm record definitely cases
       at London, Winchester and Oxford. There seems no reason to doubt
       that many cases of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even
       undiscovered. 

       1144- Norwich. A twelve-year-old boy was crucified and his side
       pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden
       in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge,
       confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian
       child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever
       obtain their freedom and return to Palestine, and that it was their
       custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied;
       Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne but in this year
       to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been
       known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to
       bring the Jews to trial. 

       In J. C. Cox's Norfolk Churches, Vol. II, p. 47, as also in the
       Victoria Country History of Norfolk, 1906, Vol. II, is an
       illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual
       Murder of St. William, the screen itself is in Loddon Church,
       Norfolk, unless the Power of Jewish Money has had it removed. No
       one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say
       it was not a Ritual Murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his _The Ritual
       Murder Libel and the Jew_ (1935) says: "Modern enquirers, after
       careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child
       probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and
       was buried prematurely by his relatives." How these modern
       enquiries arrived at a conclusion like that after all these sears, 
       Mr Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest
       that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a
       martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that
       wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of
       the side. And why the relatives should bury the boy in a sack and
       then dig it up and hang it in a tree would puzzle even a Jew to
       explain. 

       John Foxe's _Arts and Monuments of the Church_ records this
       ritual murder, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The
       Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich,
       was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish
       Ritual Murder; in the _Dictionary of National Biography_ (edited
       by a Jew!) it is made clear that his career, quite apart from this
       Ritual Murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character
       and moral courage. 

       II60- Gloucester. The body of a child named Harold was found in
       the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly
       dated 1168. Recorded in _Monumenta Germania Historica_, Vol.
       VI (Erfurt Annals); _Polychronicon_, R. Higdon; _Chronicles_, R.
       Grafton, p. 46. 

       1181- Bury St. Edmunds. A child called Robert was sacrificed at
       Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there
       was supposed to cause 'miracles.' Authority: Rohrbacher, from the
       _Chronicle_ of Gervase of Canterbury. 

       1192- Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in _Jewish
       Encyclopedia_ as being a false charge. Details lacking. 

       1232- Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. Mentioned in
       Hyamson's _History of the Jews in England_; also in _Annals of
       Winchester_; and conclusively in the Close Roll I6, Henry III,
       membrane 8, 26.6. I232. 

       1235- Norwich. In this case, the Jews stole a child and hid him with
       a view to crucifying him. Haydn's _Dictionary of Dates_ of date
       1847, says of this case, "They (the Jews) circumcise and attempt to
       crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine
       of 20,000 marks." Further authority Huillard Breolles _Grande
       Chronique_, III, 86. Also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m 23. 

       1244- London. A child's body found unburied in the cemetery of
       St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul's.
       Authority: _Social England_, Vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. 
       Traill. 

       1255- Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and
       crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy's mother
       found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Joppin or
       Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed,
       did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for
       the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical
       investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body,
       and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who
       was executed. 

       Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in
       Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been
       at work, for between 1910 and 1930, a notice was fixed above the
       shrine as follows: 

       "The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as
       that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a
       small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are
       many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and
       the existence of similar stories in England and elsewhere points to
       their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages
       and the common superstition, now wholly discredited, that ritual
       murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made
       as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews
       against the hatred of the populace and against this particular
       accusation." 

       At a recent visit to Lincoln of the Jewish Historical Society, in
       1934, the Mayor, Mr. G. Deer, said to them: That he (St. Hugh)
       was done to death by Jews for ritual purposes cannot be other than a
       libel based upon the prejudices and ignorance of an unenlightened
       age." The Chancellor on the same occasion said: "It was quite
       obviously one of the very many cases of slander spread about the
       Jews from time to time. No doubt, the child died or fell down the
       well." 

       These people, Jews and Gentiles, bring no evidence whatever for
       their statements; it couldn't have happened, they say. Why not? 

       Was Henry III, weak in character as we know him to have been,
       ever charged with being an immoral man? Did the judges not
       examine the body, which was only four weeks dead? Is Haydn's
       Dictionary of Dates (1847 edition) medieval and superstitious when
       it said of this case " They (the Jews) crucify a child at Lincoln, for
       which 18 are hanged"? There are no 'ifs' and 'buts' here! Or does
       Copinus's confession not tally with that of Theobald, quoted above
       in the first Norwich case? Copinus said, "For the death of this child,
       nearly all the Jews in England had come together and every town
       had sent deputies to assist in the sacrifice." 

       No one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and
       Judaised Gentiles unite in denying the fact of Ritual Murder. 

       Strack, in his _The Jew and Human Sacrifice_, written in defence of
       the Jews against the Blood Accusation, omits all mention of this
       famous case, which is the subject of the Prioress's Tale (Canterbury
       Tales) of Chaucer and is referred to in Marlowe's _Jew of Malta_.
       Hyamson's _History of the Jews in England_ devotes the whole of
       Chapter IX to "Little St. Hugh of Lincoln," showing the importance
       of the Ritual Murder issue in the Jewish mind today. 

       The following Close Rolls of the Realm refer to the case of St.
       Hugh: Henry III, 39, m. 2,7.10 1255; 39, m. 2,14.10.1255; 40, m.
       20, 24.ii.. 1255; 40,m.13,13.3.1256; 42, m. 6; 19.6.1258. And the
       Patent Rolls, Henry III, 40,m.20,26.11.1255; 40,m.19,9.12.1255;
       40,27.3.1256; and 40,m.5, 20.8.1256. 

       1257. London. A child sacrificed.. Authority: Cluverius. _Epitome
       Historia_, p. 541. Details lacking. 

       1276. London. Boy crucified. Authority: The Close Roll of the
       Realm, 4, Edward I, membrane 14, 3.3.1276. 

       1279. Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn's _Dictionary of
       Dates_, 1847, says of this case: "They (the Jews) crucify a child at
       Northampton for which 50 are drawn at horses' tails and hanged."
       Further authorities: Reiley, _Memorials of London_, p. I5; H.
       Desportes, _Le Mystere du Sang_. 

       I290. Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, mem. 21, 21st June,
       1290, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de
       Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford. 

       Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling
       the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe
       that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in
       toleration. 

       The reader will see (p. 20) that it was a similar ritual case which
       was one of the main stimulants to the King and Queen of Spain to
       expel professing Jews from that country in 1492. 

       The Jews, in attempting to escape responsibility for these deaths by
       Ritual Murder, do not hesitate to impugn the probity of two of the
       Kings of England, against whose moral character no one else has
       dared to cast a slur. Here are some examples. From the Jewish
       Chronicle Supplement, April, I936, p. 8 (speaking of the Lincoln
       case in the reign of Henry III): 

       "Henceforth and especially under the zealously Christian Edward I,
       the Crown and its officers became almost a worse peril to the Jews
       than mobs intent on loot and led on by fanatic priests and knightly
       spendthrifts who had borrowed Jewish money. When 18th century
       writers of history began to examine the old records in a new
       sceptical temper, some may be found venturing on such unkind
       surmises as that the alleged crucifictions of Christian children only
       seemed to happen when kings were short of money." The foul
       accusation against men of upright character is repeated by the Jew
       Hyamson (History of the Jews in England, I928 edition, p. 21),
       writes: "it has also been pointed out that the Blood Accusation was
       as a rule made at a time at which the Royal Treasury needed
       replenishing." 

       To deny that the cases of St. William of Norwich and St. Hugh of
       Lincoln were Jewish Ritual Murders is to accuse certain English
       Kings, certain English Clergy, and certain English administrators,
       known to be men of good morals, of murdering and torturing Jews
       to get their money, after accusing them of horrible crimes. In the
       case of St. Hugh, the sentence was juridical; in the case of St.
       William, the mob took the matter into their own hands because the
       Sheriff would take no action himself. 

       Whom do you believe the Jews or the English? 

       "It is difficult to refuse all credit to stories so circumstantial 
       and so frequent." So says _Social England_ concerning Ritual   
       Murders in England Vol. I, p. 407, I893, edited by H. D. Traill. 

       A significant fact is that Haydn's _Dictionary of Dates_, at least up
       to 1847, quoted the Ritual Murders in Norman and Plantagenet
       England as undisputed facts. In later editions in the sixties, all
       mention of them is extirpated! We may take it that the Jewish
       Money Power began to dictate to the Press in England somewhere
       in the fifties of the last century. 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 30 16:25:57 PDT 1996
Article: 63156 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.conspiracy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!en.com!news.erinet.com!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.voicenet.com!news2.noc.netcom.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder - ch.5
Message-ID: 
Organization: SFA> http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 14:41:04 GMT
Lines: 81
Sender: rsavage@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:24182 alt.conspiracy:63156 alt.christnet:75540 alt.religion.christian:93545


MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE: 
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 

 CHAPTER V 

A RELIC OF THE DAYS OF WITCHCRAFT AND BLACK MAGIC 

       ON 6th May, 1912, The Times published a letter, signed by many
       men of authority, protesting against what they called the revival of
       "the hideous charge of Ritual Murder" which was being brought
       against a Jew at Kiev. "The Blood Accusation," they said, "is a relic
       of the days of Witchcraft and Black Magic." 

       Unfortunately for the signatories of this letter, who numbered
       among them the Archbishops of Canterbury, York and Armagh, the
       Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, Bishops galore, Dukes, Earls,
       Justices, Masters of Colleges and Editors, of that period, the Blood
       Accusation has nothing medieval about it at all; it was more rife in
       the 19th century than it was in medieval times! 

       Unfortunately also, Black Magic is in the same category. It is not
       medieval either; there never was a wider cult of Black Magic than
       there is in the year of Our Lord I938! 

       How extraordinary it is that influential men can be induced to sign
       such a statement as I have quoted ! And how strange it is that,
       where Jewish interests are at stake, these same influential Christian
       men will see nothing improper in attempting to prejudice the course
       of the criminal trial of the Jew Beiliss at Kiev, a course which they
       would never pursue in any other cause! 

       Let us confound the signatories of The Times letter out of the
       mouths of Jews themselves. The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol.
       III, pp. 266-7, gives a list of Accusations of Ritual Murder made
       against the Jews through the centuries; I22 cases are listed in
       chronological order, and no less than 39 of them were made in the
       19th century! There were far more than double the number of
       Blood Accusations made in the 19th century than in any previous
       century, according to this authoritative Jewish list. 

       Let us examine- the list of Ritual Murder Accusations made by a
       converted Jew, Cesare Algranati, in 1913, and published in Cahiers
       Romains; here are listed 1O1 accusations, of which 28 were made in
       the 19th century and only 73 for all the eight preceding centuries!
       Even the Jew Roth gives the argument away, for he says (p. 16 of
       his Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935), "The nineteenth
       century proved little less credulous than those which preceded 
        it." 

       "Anti-semitic" authors' lists of Blood Accusations agree in this
       respect with the lists made by Jews; Der Sturmer, the paper of
       Julius Streicher, in a special Ritual Murder issue published in 1934,
       shows that in the 19th century 32 charges of ritual murder were
       made, which is ten more than in any other century in European
       history recorded by it. 

       The fact that the charges increase in number as the age becomes
       more and more enlightened is particularly significant, because the
       Jewish Money Power and its silencing activities are more developed
       than ever before and might have been expected to reduce the
       number of charges. 

       Sufficient has now been said to expose the absurdity of any attempt
       to consign the Blood Accusation to any medieval limbo. 

       It lives today;- I may say with the great Sir Richard Burton (The
       Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, I898, P. 129): "At any rate, sufficient
       has been advanced in these pages to open the eyes of the student and
       the ethnographer; it will stand on record until Elijah." 



                           Continue on to Next Chapter or
                            Return to Table of Contents? 

-- 
 _____________________________________________________
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         |
|      Contact S.T.R.A.I.H.T. and Melchizedek Vigilance WWW page at:      |
|                      http://www.nilenet.com/~tmw/                       |



Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.