The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/s/savage.rick/1995/rs.1295

From Mon Dec  4 07:14:35 PST 1995
Article: 7074 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Preamble to the Law - part 3
Keywords: Law
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 07:08:11 GMT
Lines: 182

                       Preamble to the Law
                             Part 3

     This is the third and final article on the subject of The
Preamble to the Commandments of God.  We have previously located
and read the ten commandments located at Exodus 20:2-17, but our
emphasis has been placed upon the preamble to the commandments
which began in verse 2 saying "I AM the LORD thy God."

     At the end of our last article I stated that there is only one
"The Lord thy God," and in Him lies all Authority and Power.  Then
I also stated that scripture also speaks of our making judgments as
"little gods," and in this article we are going to look at these
lesser or little Gods.

     These "little gods," are really mortal men who have matured to
the point of making judgments and ruling over other men.  For
example, the 82nd Psalm, provides for us the duties and
responsibilities of magistrates or civil rulers, and before we
continue, we need to read three verses from this psalm:

     1  God standeth in the congregation of the mighty;
he judgeth among the gods.
     2  How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the
persons of the wicked? Selah.
     6  I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are
children of the most High.  Psalm 82:1-2, 6

     In verse 1 we see the word "God" which is translated from
Strong's number 430, but also in verse 1 is the word "mighty" which
was also translated from Strong's 430; therefore verse 1 should

     "God standeth in the congregation of the gods; he
judgeth among the gods."

     The idea being conveyed to us here is that magistrates were to
be regarded as representatives of God, acting in His name, and
therefore, in a subordinate sense, the name "gods" was given to

     In reading verse 2 we see that these "gods" are actually
magistrates or perhaps we might refer to them as "little gods," but
anyhow here they "judge unjustly."  And so men serving as "little
gods" are imperfect and can sometimes exercise false judgment. 
This verse also demonstrates to us that the gods spoken of in verse
1 and 6 are earthly men.

     And so we see that these magistrates are as "little gods" and
they make judgments in court, as governors or judges over other
men, but in verses 6 and 7 God states to these little gods:

     6  I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are
children of the most High.
     7  But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of
the princes.  Psalm 82:6-7

     Thus God appoints men to be gods, that is rulers and
magistrates, and it follows that not all men can be or are
appointed as these little gods.

     Now before you get mad at me for sounding like a humanist, let
me ask you, from where do you think humanism stole all its ideas? 
That's right, they pervert scripture and try to make mere men into
gods, rather than recognizing them as mere rulers or judges.  So
let me clarify further, this matter of "little gods."

     In John 10:34, Jesus Himself reminds us that scripture is true
in this matter of men being gods.  We also see in scripture that
angels are sometimes called "sons of elohim," or "sons of God," and
you can read of this in Job 1:6, Job 2:1, and Job 38:7.  Men are
further called elohim or gods in Exodus 21:6 and 22:8-9, 28.

     Unusual as it may seem, it is this historical and scriptural
doctrine that links us to our lost brethren or lost sheep of the
house of Israel throughout the northern European nations, who fell
into the Nordic heresies of Odinism, druidism, and so on.

     These beliefs indirectly recognize and give credence to the
doctrine of Adamite mandate to have dominion over the earth, and in
that sense we are also to be as "little gods."

     And perhaps if our Anglo-Saxon brethren would wake up to their
true identity as the literal descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and
Jacob, then perhaps they could then see that they have a
responsibility to God and their fellow brethren to rule, not as men
making laws over men, but as these little gods administering the
laws of God.

     But there is a grave mistake made in reference to these
"little gods."  "Little gods" are not to be worshipped, for human
beings are simply not God, and thus are susceptible to idolatry,
and even the righteous can fall by seeking to honor "little gods"
-- other men, or even angels -- with worship or divine honors which
rightly belong to God alone.

     In the context of the preamble to the law in Exodus 20:2, the
Hebrews found out Who The LORD thy God was, and that He was supreme
in power and authority.  It was the LORD thy God who ruled over
Pharaoh, over Moses, and all other little gods, be they mortal men
or angels.

     Now before we close we should briefly take a look at the First
Commandment, which in Exodus 20:3, says:

     "Thou shalt have no other gods before me."

     The word "other" has also been translated as "strange," and
the two words "before me" are not complete as translated as it
should read "before my face."  Then this verse could just as well

     "Thou shalt have no strange gods before My face."

     The meaning is that Israel was to worship no god in addition
to "The LORD thy God," the covenant keeping God of Israel.  You
see, the LORD thy God was their God and was personally known to
them.  In addition, He and His great power was revealed to them in
delivering them from the Egyptians, in dividing the Red Sea, in
bringing forth water from rock, in providing quail in the desert
and manna from heaven to feed them, and in providing a pilar of
fire to guide them.

     Yes, by such miracles The LORD thy God had revealed Himself to
Israel and in that sense He was not a strange god to them for He
was known to them by the work of His hands.

     Notice also that it does not simply say, "Thou shalt have no
other gods or no strange gods."  It says thou shalt have no other
gods "before me or before my face."  The emphasis of the command,
then, is on placing God first and foremost, and not exalting mere
men or angels on a level with The Lord thy God.

     The Hebrews were dragged out of Egypt not only in compliance
with God's promises to Abraham, but also to end their idolatry of
Pharaoh and to establish the rule and reign of "the LORD thy God." 
Yes they were to be delivered from what was described to us in
Exodus 20:2 as the "house of bondage" and delivered unto a house of
holiness, a nation of holy or separate people, a people having an
identity as the literal descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

     This deliverance can be viewed as a new form of bondage, if we
may call it that, but this time, it was to be bondage to the
kingdom of God.  But in this new bondage there was actually
liberating worship and service to God, and therefore complete and
total liberty, a liberty such as that proclaimed in Leviticus

     "... proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto
all the inhabitants thereof:..."

     Is this not the exact proclamation on our own Liberty Bell? 
And is it not significant that the founders of this country would
think to make such an inscription on the bell!  Certainly it is,
and I would suggest it is just another piece of the puzzle that
shows that the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and kindred peoples are the
literal descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

     But the main point I wanted to get across is that the
Commandments are actually much fuller teachings than we generally
recognize, and that biblical law, as we have come to call it, is
not merely a law code in the strictest sense, but teachings related
to all aspects of God.

     If we first worship God, in the manner He commands us, then
obedience and blessing in accordance with all the other laws and in
accordance with Christ's grace becomes possible.  This is the
lesson, the history, and the personality of God, and in this regard
it will behove us to rediscover the preamble to the Commandments of
the LORD thy God.

Gospel Ministries
PO Box 9411
Boise, ID  83707
Message by Pastor Bob Hallstrom

|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|  Mel Vig:  |

From Sat Dec 30 09:52:29 PST 1995
Article: 18047 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Israel-Identity.FAQ, 1 of 3
Keywords: Israel Identity Christianity
Organization: SFA>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 06:07:57 GMT
Lines: 614

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers on 
   ISRAEL- IDENTITY  (Part 1 of 3)

Last Updated 2/20/95
  Visit the SFA WWW page at:
Compiled by Rick Savage 

      "And are not they [today's "Jews"] the inventors of the
  Chosen People myth?" -- [Dr. Oscar Levy, preface, "The World
  Significance of the Russian Revolution," George Pitt Rivers 
  (Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell, 1920) vi]
      "Behold, days are coming, says the LORD when I will effect
  a New Covenant with the House of Israel and with the House of
  Judah"  [Hebrews 8:8]

Table Of Contents
 *   Introduction
 *   The Frequently Asked Questions
 *   Conclusion 
 *   Sources and other resources for further investigation
 *   When the Saxon Learns to Love!


     "Here is a paradox, a most ingenious paradox: an 
anthropological fact, many Christians may have much more 
Hebrew-Israelite blood in their veins than most of their Jewish 
neighbors." -- Alfred M. Lilienthal, "What Price Israel" (Chicago: 
Henry Regnery Company, 1953) 223.
     The statement above made by an anti-Zionist "Jew" reflects an 
idea we will prove further in this document of questions and answers.
Since the majority of information concerning the identity of the
true descendants of Biblical "Israelites" today has become so
propagandized we felt the necessity to correctly state the facts that
a growing number of people are beginning to see.  These people have 
learned through the Scriptures, and from new or previously hidden
archeological discoveries, that the "traditions of men" (Matt 15:2-6,
16:12; Col. 2:8, 1Peter 1:18) have been the controlling force in
mainstream Churchianity for a very long time.
     There are some people who blindly oppose this message.  Their
opinion is based solely on the opposition's propaganda without even
having the chance to hear, or see, both sides of the issue.  This
brief will provide an opportunity for those who are NOT so hasty to
believe that they can discern truth before hearing the whole story. 
The Apostle Paul advised us of the wisdom of hearing a matter before
we form opinions regarding it when he said:  "if anyone supposes that
he knows anything, he has not known as he ought to know," (I
Corinthians 8:2). 
     We want you to be as noble as the Bereans who "received 
the word with all readiness of mind, and search the 
see if these things are so" (Acts 17:11).  May the Spirit of Truth 
help you to discern what stands upon the Rock of Truth and what is 
built on the sinking sands of tradition.
1.  What is the Christian message of Israel's Identity in a nutshell?
    Why is it such a "minority" belief and so maligned by it's 
    These are the core points of Israel's true Identity as evidenced
      by the Scripture and proved in this document:
 *  God has a plan for physical (regenerate) Israel today.
    (Heb. 8:8-10)
 *  The "Jews" of Judaism today admit in their own literature
    (referenced later in this document) that they are NOT
    Israelites but are impostors and are indeed Christ's and
    Christian Israel's principal enemies.
 *  The truth concerning the identity of modern-day "Israel" is 
    vital information for the body of Christ, i.e. for true 
    Israel, and even for the rest of the world.
 *  The so-called or self-styled "Jews" of today are mainly 
    of Turko-Mongol Khazars who became spiritual converts to
    the condemned religion of the Pharisees (which is called 
    Judaism today) several centuries after Jesus Christ walked 
    the earth.  The Germanic kindred (white) peoples are the 
    true descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel.
 *  This understanding, i.e. knowing one's heritage or family
    tree, is in no way "anti-Semitic," especially when we find
    out who are really "Semites."  This document exposes the
    real anti-Semites!
 *  Most importantly, it was Christ who told us to "know the
    Truth, because the Truth shall make you free" (John 8:32).

    These simple truths are the core points of the Israel-Identity
message.  The opposition has flooded the media with a great deal of
disinformation.  But, if their position is as correct as it is massive,
then the numbers of people who are coming to this truth (that has
been "hidden in plain sight" in God's Word) would not be growing.
Who is the final Word on what is truth - man's word or God's
Word?  The people coming to the truth of Israel's true Identity
today are those who love God and trust the evidence of His Word
over the "traditions of men."  
     It is a known fact that a person does not change their beliefs 
easily.  It is far easier to believe as we always have and not "rock
the boat" with family, friends, or church.  However, if you are one
who desires to live in truth rather than fear you will join the many
others who did not let anything suppress their search to know truth
and live by it.
     Unfortunately, there are many people who do not desire true 
information reaching the general public and will do everything in
their power to keep the masses ignorant.  Some of these people and
their organizations are motivated out of a terror of being exposed.
Others simply don't want the change that truth inspires because they
profit from the perpetuation of the lies.  The mainstream are lazy
and don't want to expend the effort to change and many merely
respond knee-jerk fashion with what they have been indoctrinated
to believe.  Whatever the reason, when these truths are made
public those who love ease and comfort more than they love God
will create smear campaigns through Hollywood, the media,
schools, peers, as well as from the pulpits of JUDEOchurchianity.
Their purpose again is to defame, libel, slander, and attempt to
discredit what they oppose with unearned labels such as:  anti-
Semitism, racism, neo-Nazi, white supremacy, hater, or even 
"right-wing religious fanatic."  (It seems that the only FANatic that
is acceptable is the one who cheers for the local sports team and not
God.)  Some people will choose to believe these venomous lies and
call good evil and evil good.  But it is all to no avail.  The Word is
fact and the truths it contains are not going to change for our comfort,
convenience, or ill-gotten profit.
     Those who oppose honest investigation and inquiry into this
matter have a standard attack that has served their hateful purposes:
  *  Their first attempted attack is to ignore the light cast on them
     in their darkness and hope that it does not awaken those whom they
     have deluded.  
  *  This is followed by ridicule of the person, or persons, supplying
     the light.  
  *  If that doesn't work, the next step is character assassination. 
     This is usually done through the asking of unsubstantiated 
     questions to insinuate a lack of credibility or "evil" intent of 
     the person or their sources.  For example, we have all heard 
     questions like "How often do you beat your wife?". 
  *  Next, the victim, if deemed a sufficient threat, will be made the
     object of a fabricated scandal.
  *  Finally if all else fails, these emotional manipulators will
     stoop to direct intimidation and physical attack.
    This sort of behavior has many Christians afraid to even
investigate the subject of Israel's true identity today.  They do not
seek out God's truth because of a "fear of the Jews." (John 7:13). 
This fear and unbelief is an insult to the courage of Jesus the Christ
and is sin.  This lack of belief in and fear of (YHWH) God will be
our destruction.  Christ Jesus only allows us to fear God -- "...fear
not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but
rather fear Him which is able to destroy both soul and body"
(Matt. 10:28).  The fearful, cowardly and unbelieving get top billing
of those whose "place will be in the lake which burns with fire and
brimstone: which is the second death" (Rev. 21:8).  This is a terrible
price to pay for such a lack of love and faith.  Pray that our
Redeemer, Jesus the Christ, might help our unbelief and give us
     A lack of courage in our duty to bring all men to Christ's 
Salvation and Truth (I Tim. 2:4) is a failure to recognize what kind 
of Spirit we were given.  "For God has *not* given us the spirit of 
fear; but of POWER, and of LOVE, and of a SOUND MIND.  Be 
therefore not ashamed of the testimony of our Lord...who has saved 
us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our own 
works, but according to His own purpose and grace, which was 
given us in Christ Jesus before the world began" (2 Timothy 1:7-9).
     Perfect love knows no fear and truth fears no investigation.  
"There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because 
fear hath torment.  He that feareth is not made perfect in love" (I 
John 4:18).  If you fear to search out the truth, or fear the anti-
Christs in their attempts to prevent the truth from being told, you 
don't have love like you out to have it.

2.  What difference does the Israel-Identity Christian message 
     The identity of Israel is primarily important because it is the 
truth and Christ desires that "all men be saved AND come to the
knowledge of the truth," (1 Tim. 2:4). 
     It is important to discover the true identity of Israel (redeemed 
white people called of God) so that they may be restored to their 
rightful purpose and duty.  That purpose is a duty of servanthood
to their God and His world (Gen. 1:27-28; Matt. 28:18-20).  
     In this great commission, after having been redeemed and 
brought into God's Kingdom, He asks them to begin to make a 
difference in their world.  It starts by reforming their lives, their 
families, and their daily walk before Him and men.  Evangelism 
means teaching people of the Kingdom of God and to obey His 
Law-Word, through the empowering of God's Spirit.  Evangelism 
means obedience.  This is the message of Jesus as it is recorded
in the Gospel of John (14:15):  "If you love me, keep my 
commandments."  Love never contradicts God's Law-Word, but 
rather is a fulfilling of the Law (Romans 2:13; 6:1-2).  Law has 
dominion over all men (Rom. 7:1), but those who come into Christ's 
redemptive grace and walk by a desire to keep His commandments 
are redeemed from our past transgressions of His law which leads to
death.  Through our Love for Him, He helps us obey His command-
ments.  For we know that those who live after their own law will die
and are at enmity with God, but those who live after Christ's Law-
Word shall live (Rom. 8:1-13).  So, this great commission is to save
the world from the law of carnal men that leads to death, by the
saving power of God's Law-Word which leads to life.
     The Bible tells us that all of creation groans for the revealing
of the sons of God:
     "For the anxious longing of the creation waits eagerly for the 
revealing of the sons of God.  For the creation was subjected to 
futility, not of its own will, but because of Him who subjected it, in 
hope that the creation itself also will be set free from its slavery
to corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God 
(redeemed Israel).  For we know that the whole creation groans and 
suffers the pains of childbirth..." (Romans 8:19-22)   
     Who are these sons of God?  We are given a clue in verses 14 & 
15 in chapter 8 of Romans, "For as many as are led by the Spirit of 
God, they are the sons of God.  For you have not received the spirit 
of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, 
whereby we cry, Abba, Father."
     The prophet Hosea prophesied that the Israelites (not "Jews") 
would become sons of God (i.e. Christians).  At the time of Hosea, 
the Israelites were divided into two nations known as the house of 
Israel and the House of Judah.  Hosea said in Hosea 1:10,11 that 
those Israelites who were cast off (divorced) by God (and no longer 
known as "His people") would be gathered together under one 
leader (who was Christ) and be called the "sons of the living God."  
This was confirmed in the Covenant Christ made with these two 
nations of Israelites described in Hebrews 8:8-10.
     God has used other peoples for His purposes when Israel has 
been delinquent in her duty.   It is not ultimately "imperative," 
though important to Christ, to define "Israel" and return them to 
their duty.  Even though Christ came only to Israelites (Matt. 15:24) 
and is very concerned about them being fed, tended and shepherded 
(John 21:15-17), God's plan will be carried out even if He has to 
raise up children of Abraham from the very stones (Luke 3:8).  
     It *is* imperative to remove the pretenders who are fighting 
against God's purposes on His earth in the name of "Israel," (I Cor. 
15:25; Luke 19:27).  THE imperative duty of every creature is to 
fear God and see that His Will be done *on Earth* as it is in 
heaven (Eccl. 12:13,14; Matt. 6:10).  God's plan for the world is to 
bring freedom, life and salvation into it through His servants, i.e. 
Christ and everyone who follows Him (John 3:16; John 17:3; 
Romans 6:4,23 & 8::34-39; 2 Cor. 3:17; Gal. 5:1, etc, etc.).  This 
can't be done when an usurper is using the name of God's chosen 
people in direct opposition to God's plan.
     The impostors (self-styled "Jews") who have attempted to steal 
the birthright of true Israel (to rule & reign as kings and priests
with God - Ex 19:3-6) are, in reality, simply God's punishing rod on 
His rebellious people (Israel) to return them back to Him and His duty 
for them.  The "Jews" will continue to be a curse to His true Israel 
people until they repent (turn back and obey Him).  Until God's true
Israel people repent, they will continue to suffer the curses for
disobedience as outlined in Deuteronomy 28, which includes the
worst of the heathen ruling over and devouring them, 
(Deut. 28:33,43-52).
     Modern Churchianity has failed to heed the warning of Col. 2:8 
"Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, 
after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not 
after Christ," because they have dropped the charge given to them in 
II Corinthians 10:5.  Most "churches" have not heard this warning 
and have passively accepted these "Jewish Fables and 
commandments (traditions) of men" (Titus 1:14).  Thus, their 
message has become impotent and of no affect in bringing life and 
liberty into the world.
     A redeemed and awakened Israel to their Identity and duty 
toward God will again catch the Spirit that indwelled the men of 
Marlborough, Connecticut in 1773 when they made this unanimous 
     "Death is more eligible than slavery.  A freeborn people are not 
required by the religion of Jesus Christ to submit to tyranny, but 
may make use of such power as God has given them to recover and 
support their laws and liberties... (we) implore the Ruler above the 
skies, that He would make bare His arm in the defense of His 
church and people, and let Israel go." ('The Light and the Glory,' by 
Peter Marshal and David Manuel, p. 267)

3. What is the *central* proof of the Israel-Identity Christian 
   message?  What about the so-called "Messianic Jews"?
     Genetic evidence is not "central" to the Israel-Identity
Christian message.  If anything, genetics, science and His(S)tory 
supply supporting and confirming evidence of God's plan for His 
people and the world.   The Bible, God's Law-Word, is the central 
source and authority of the Israel-Identity Christian message.
     God's history, as recorded in his Word, establishes the character 
of His major players on His world-stage (ie. His sheep, Jacob/Israel; 
and His enemies, the dogs, goats and specifically - Esau/Edom -
Romans 9:13) and reveals the standards by which we can distinguish
them.  "By their fruits you shall know them" (Matt. 7:20),  "My 
sheep hear My voice and they follow Me"(John 10:27),  "If you 
obey the Lord your God...these  blessings shall come upon you..." 
(Deut. 28:1,2), "I will put My law upon their minds and I will write
them upon their hearts (Hebrews 8:10)," etc, etc.  
     Those who obey and follow Christ are His people (Gal. 3:29) and
those who denounce and hate Christ are anti-Christ enemies (I John
2:22,23).  So THE central proof of Israel's Identity would be the
acceptance of Christ Jesus as Saviour, Messiah and God.  While the
majority of people following after Christ and attempting to do His
will are the kindred Germanic (white) peoples, the self-styled
"Jewish" impostors hate Christ, Christianity, and oppose His will.
For example:
     "The widespread idea that the Jews, while rejecting Jesus' claim 
to divinity, consider him a great teacher and moral figure is 
completely false.  We don't accept his claims and we are oblivious 
to his teachings; we are simply not interested in him nor in what he 
has to say,  any more than Christians are interested in Mohammed."  
- 'Living Jewish - The Lore and Law of the Practicing Jew' by 
Michel Asheri.
     They further give us reason why they are enemies of Christ and 
Christianity in the Jewish Encyclopedia edition of 1925, vol. 5, page 
41 which states, "Edom is in modern Jewry."  The significance of 
this admission becomes more clear when we understand the 
struggle between Jacob and Esau for the birthright and get an 
understanding of why God stated that He loved Jacob and hated 
Esau (Edom) in Romans 9:13.  We suggest the book "Who is 
Esau/Edom," by Charles Weisman for an exhaustive study on the 
subject (made available below).
     As another witness, Rabbi Meir Kahane once stated: 
     "I have not the slightest sympathy for Christianity or Jesus.  As 
a believing Jew, not only is Jesus not "God" but he is neither 
Messiah nor prophet.  For the Jew he was a blasphemer, one who 
attacked the Torah as unchanging divine law and who was a false 
prophet and heretic.  ...As for Christianity, this is the faith that, in
the name of Jesus, has made life for the Jewish people a living hell 
for 19 centuries.  In its name, and in the name of Jesus, millions of 
Jews were massacred and the agony of life under Christians can 
never be sufficiently described in all its horror."  The Jewish Press, 
N.Y. Jan 6, 1989, page 49 
     Rabbi Kahane laments about Jewish persecution under 
Christians.  Is this a just complaint or merely due justice deserved?  
Are not the modern day "Jews" the inheritors of the judgment that 
their spiritual predecessors called down upon themselves when they 
stated to Pilate "Let His blood be upon us and our children" (Matt. 
27:25)?  Do these people really have any right to complain if they 
continue in the spirit of those early Jews who persecuted those who 
followed Christ in Judea, who "both killed the Lord Jesus and their 
own prophets, and have persecuted us (Christians); and they please 
not God, and are contrary to all men"?
     Some want to point to the so-called "Messianic Jews" or "Jews 
for Jesus."  The glaring fact that they still refer to themselves as 
"Jews" is an omission of their true lack of submission and sincerity 
toward Christ (Colossians 2:18-23).  Their pride in their own 
identity as "Jews" (I Corinthians 2:1-3), and their traditions (Mark 
7:8-9), supersedes what a true repentant servant of Christ would 
think of themselves.  
     The Apostle Paul referred to himself as a "prisoner", a "debtor," 
a "slave" and a "servant" who surrendered his life and identity to 
Christ so that Christ might live through Him (Gal. 2:15-21).  Gal. 
3:26-28 speaks of this surrender and submersion of our own 
identity into the identity of Christ and His body.  We "put on 
Christ" and His name, i.e. CHRISTians when we are baptized into 
Christ's death and Resurrection (Romans 6, Col 2, etc.)  We are 
then no longer known as "Jew," or "Greek," or whatever, but rather 
as CHRISTIAN.  Why then not call themselves Christian?  Why 
cling to their identity as "Jews"?  We read about what these "Jews"
really mean by the term "Messianic Jews" in Q#4 in Baruch Levy's 
letter.  The very term is blasphemy.  The Messiah has already 
come and He is Jesus the Christ.  The "Jews" are not the Messiah
or "Messianic" in any way.
     Dr. Benjamin Freedman was a converted Jew to Christianity 
who dedicated his whole fortune and life to bringing to light the 
religion of the "Jews" and the teachings of their Talmud.  To quote 
>from  his letter to Dr. Goldstein, which was compiled into a booklet 
entitled 'Facts are Facts' (made available below), he said:
     "Stimulated by this statement by an imminent Jewish Rabbi 
every Christian especially every pastor should take time to 
investigate if this is true.  Ask yourself, what do I know about the 
Talmud?  From the birth of Jesus to the present there has never 
been recorded a more vicious, vile and libelous blasphemy against 
Jesus and Christians then you will find in the pages of these 63 
volumes.  The Talmud reviles Christ and Christians in unbelievably 
foul, obscene, indecent, lewd and vile language."
     Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer, Director of Interreligious Activities
for the American Jewish Committee, considered the Talmud essential
to the training of rabbis because it is the legal basis for their
religious law:
     "The TALMUD consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and 
historical writings of the ancient rabbis.  It was edited five
centuries after the birth of Jesus.  It is a compendium of law and
lore.  It is the legal code which forms the basis of Jewish religious
law and it is the textbook used in the training of rabbis."  ("What is
a Jew," by Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer, quoted in LOOK Magazine,
17 June 1952)
     As former followers of the religion of Judaism (Talmudism) 
these so called "Messianic Jews" know it's anti-Christian basis and 
hatred for Christ better than any other.  Their identification with the
Talmudic "Jews", and their failure to warn the Christians as to the 
true nature of these people and their religion, is a glaring admission 
of where their true sympathies are.  For it is the duty of every 
Christian to "let love be without hypocrisy, abhor what is evil and 
cling to what is good" (Romans 12:9).
     With these witnesses is there any doubt as to where the self-
styled "Jews" stand?  If you are still unsure, listen to the warnings 
of your Saviour King, Christ Jesus:  "Jesus therefore said to those 
Jews which had not believed him,..Ye (Jews) are of your father the 
devil, and the lusts of your father it is your will to do...He that is
of God heareth the words of God:  for this cause, ye (Jews) hear
them not, because ye are not of God."  (John 8:31,44,47)   and,
     "I know...the blasphemy by those who say they are 'Jews' and 
are not, but are a synagogue of Satan."  (Rev 2:9)
     "Who is the liar, but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ?"
(I John 2:22.)  Who is the liar indeed?  We have just seen who
denies that Jesus is the Christ in word, deed and action.

4.  Isn't the "Jewish" god the God of the Old Testament?  Isn't this 
    why we refer to the popular belief in Christ as the 
    "Judeo"-Christian religion?
     Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser wrote in "Judaism and the Christian 
Predicament" (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967) p. 59:  "This is 
not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among 
Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the 
Hebrew Bible.  It is, of course, a fallacious impression... Judaism is 
*not* the religion of the Bible."  
     Rabbi Moshe M. Maggal, wrote:  " will notice the great 
difference between the Jewish and Christian religions.  But these are 
not all.  We consider the two religions so different that one excludes 
the other.  ...we emphasized that there is no such thing as a Judeo-
Christian religion.  ...There is not any similarity between the two 
concepts."  Rabbi Maggal (President, National Jewish Information 
Service) letter, 21 August 1961.
     So what is the nature of the "Jewish" god?  It is not the God of 
the Hebrew Bible as we have just seen by their own admission.  
They have no need of the concept of God as they have "killed off 
God" a long time ago as James Yaffe comments:  
     "And so it seems we must agree with Rabbi Richard Israel, who 
writes in "Commentary's" symposium on Jewish belief, "[The 
current discussion on] the Death of God will cause Jews to ask, 'So 
what else is new?' ... The Jewish funeral was a much more private 
affair.  We buried him [YHWH-God] quietly and in the middle of 
the night." -- James Yaffe, "The American Jews" (New York: 
Random House, 1968) 161
     James Yaffe's statement was a comment to a statement made by 
Rabbi Sherwin Wine of the Birmingham Temple:  "...the whole 
concept of God is outdated; Judaism can function perfectly well 
without it." 
     If the self-styled "Jews" have "killed off God", then what sort
of "god" do they have?  The Jewish God is the "Jew" as the Jewish 
Cabala (Kabbalah) puts it: "The Jew is the living God, God 
incarnate: he is the heavenly man.  The other men are earthly, of 
inferior race.  They exist only to serve the Jew.  They are the cattle 
seed."  Who are the racist supremacists?  "You will know them by
their fruits..."  
     In the following quote we begin to understand this "Jewish" 
idea of their "god" a little better as it is applied more directly to 
today:   "The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah.  It 
will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the 
abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the 
establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere 
exercise the privilege of citizenship.  In this *new world order* the 
children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering 
opposition.  The Governments of the different peoples forming the 
world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the
Jews.  It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private 
property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state.  
Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said 
that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the 
property of the whole world in their hands."  -Baruch Levy, Letter to 
Karl Marx, 'La Revue de Paris', p. 574, June 1, 1928

5.  Who are these self-styled "Jews" then if they are not Israelites?
     One American Jew woke up to the lie after living in the Israeli 
occupational state in Palestine.  He put it this way:  
     "The American people have been led to believe that Jews are 
"God's chosen people."  This myth was started by a small group of 
Jews.  A few Jewish leaders took excerpts from the Bible and 
interpreted them to mean that God designated them as "chosen 
people." ...
     "Leading the cry, 'We are God's Chosen People,' are the 
Zionist/Marxist (Ashkenazi) Jews who for political purposes chose 
Judaism and who don't have a drop of biblical Jewish blood in 
     "The Judeo-Christian ethic we hear so much about in America is 
a big joke - the result of an intense Zionist propaganda campaign.
     "I'll toss in one last thought about the "God's chosen people" 
myth: God said, "Beware of those who call themselves Jews and are 
not, for they lie."  Could it be the Ashkenazi Jews are the people to 
whom God was referring?"  - Jack Bernstein, "The Life of an 
American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel" (California: The Noontide 
Press, 1984) p.15-17 (To order this book see end of FAQ)
     In their own writings these self-styled "Jews" tell us it is 
incorrect to call a contemporary "Jew" an "Israelite" or a "Hebrew."  
Under the heading "A Brief History of the Terms for Jew," in the 
1980 Jewish Almanac, is the following:   "Strictly speaking it is 
*incorrect* to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew" or to call a 
contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." 1980 Jewish Almanac, 
     In "The Pharisees--The Sociological Background of Their 
Faith," Rabbi Louis Finkelstein describes these self-styled "Jews" 
and their origins:
     "Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval 
Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism.  
But throughout these changes in name...the spirit of the ancient 
Pharisee survives unaltered.  When the Jew studies the Talmud, he 
is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian 
academies..."  "...rabbinic Judaism, the first-born child of 
Pharisaism, remains a unit until this day."  (p.XXI of Forward to 1st 
Edition, "The Pharisees," Vol. 1, Philadelphia: The Jewish 
Publication Society of America, 1938 & Vol. 2, p. 622
     Jesus had quite a verbal scathing for the Pharisees in Matthew 
23.  He exposed them for the sort of people they were:  
"Hypocrites," "sons of hell," "blind guides," "fools," "full of 
robbery and self-indulgence," "whitewashed tombs...full of dead 
men's bones and all uncleanness," "full of hypocrisy and 
lawlessness," "partners with them in shedding the blood of the 
prophets," and "serpents and brood of vipers."  Not quite an 
endorsement by the One and Only Sovereign God, Jesus the Christ, 
is it?  And some fools have the gall, or should we say "Chutzpah," 
to call Jesus a "Jew!"  What blasphemy!  
     Professor of Medieval Jewish History, Abraham N. Poliak of 
Tel Aviv University, has stated "The large majority of world Jewry 
is descended from the Jews of Khazaria." ("The Thirteenth Tribe" 
by Arthur Koestler (New York: Random House, 1976) p.226) 
(Made available below.)
     The people living in Palestine in the 20th century have no racial 
nor historic connection with Palestine and are, in reality, descendants 
>from  a Turko-Mongolian tribal people who created a kingdom 
called Khazaria which existed until the 12th century.  These 
Khazarian "Jews" could just as easily have practiced Christianity, 
but for whatever reason they chose Judaism (Talmudic Pharisaism) 
and there is nothing that can be done about it.
     Obviously, if these people have *no racial, or historic connection 
with Palestine* they have no claim to the promises made to 
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel or the land known as "Israel" 
(Palestine) today.
     If this is true then there should be more evidence to support
this position, and there is.  The American People's Encyclopedia for 
1964 at 15-292 records the following reference to Khazars:
     "In the year 740 the Khazars were officially converted to 
Judaism.  A century later they were cursed by the in-coming Slavic-
speaking people and were scattered over central Europe where they 
were known as Jews.  It is from this grouping that most German 
and Polish Jews are descended, and they likewise make up a 
considerable part of that population now found in America.  The 
term Aschenazim is now applied to this....division."
     Alfred Lilienthal writes, in What Price Israel (Henry Regenery 
Co., 1953)  "Perhaps the most significant mass conversion to the 
Judaic Faith occurred in Europe, in the 8th century A.D., and that 
story of the Khazars (Turko-Finnish people) is quite pertinent to the 
establishment of the modern state of Israel."  Again, "That the 
Khazars are the lineal ancestors of Eastern European Jewry is a 
historical fact.  Jewish historians and religious textbooks 
acknowledge the fact, though the propagandists of Jewish 
nationalism belittle it as pro-Arab propaganda."
     Arthur Koestler's book 'The Thirteenth Tribe' (New York: 
Random House, Inc., 1976) blew the lid off this suppressed fact.  
Koestler notes, "In the 1960's, the number of the Sephardim was 
estimated at 500,000.  The Ashkenazim, at the same period, 
numbered about eleven million.  Thus in common parlance, Jew is 
synonymous with Ashkenazi Jew."  He further states, "For the sake 
of piquantry it should be mentioned that the Ashkenaz of the Bible 
refers to a people living somewhere in the vicinity of Mount Ararat 
and Armenia.  The name occurs in Genesis 10:3 and 1 Chronicles 
1:6 as one of the sons of Gomer, who was a son of Japheth.  
Ashkenaz is also a brother of Togarmah (and a nephew of Magog) 
whom the Khazars, according to King Joseph, claimed as their 
     Koestler further quotes an early source indicating that the 
Khazars had some connection with Gog of the land of Magog.  "At 
some date earlier than 864, the Westphalian monk, Christian 
Druthmar of Acquitania, wrote a Latin treatise 'Esposito in 
Evangelium Mattei,' in which he reported that 'there exist people 
under the sky in regions where no Christian can be found, whose 
name is Gog and Magog, and who are Huns; among them is one, 
called the Gazari (Khazars) who are circumcised and observe 
Judaism in its entirety.'"  For those interested in Bible prophecy,
the implications of this last sentence are staggering.  Read Genesis 
10:2-3 to see from whom Ashkenaz descended; notice who his 
relatives are.  Then read Ezekiel 38 & 39.
     Jewish author Alfred Lilienthal further stated: "These 
Ashkenazim Jews...have little or no trace of Semitic blood." - p. 
222, "What Price Israel."  This is now understandable from what 
Koestler revealed.
     The Jews fully understand their Khazarian heritage as the third 
edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia for 1925 records:
     "Chazars: a people of Turkish origin whose life and history are 
interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of 
Russia." The Jewish Encyclopedia, Third Edition, 1925
     There are two main "racial" branches of modern Jewry.  The 
smaller of the two is called the Sephardim, some of whose ancestors 
fled after the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. and spread across North 
Africa to Spain.  This group has been from the outset so small, in 
terms of a viable gene pool, and has mixed with such regularity over 
the centuries with the indigenous peoples wherever they lived that 
Dr. Raphael Patai, a leading Jewish scholar, felt compelled to write a 
book entitled 'The Myth of the Jewish Race' (Scribners, 1975).  In 
reviewing an earlier work by Dr. Patai, 'Israel Between East and 
West,' Dr. Camille Honig, literary editor for the Voice (Jewish 
Voice of California, Sept. 25, 1953), stated:  "If you studied Jewish 
types and communities in five continents, as this writer had the 
opportunity of doing, you would have realized that it is sheer 
nonsense, and very dangerous nonsense, as well as unscientific, to 
speak about a Jewish race."  
     In a book entitled "Races in Europe", the author, William Z. 
Ripley, states under ethnology:  "The findings of physical 
anthropology show that contrary to all popular view, there is no 
Jewish race.  "Our conclusion then is final.  It is paradoxical yet 
true, we affirm.  The Jews are not a race, but only a people after
     Perhaps it can be understood why this is.  The World Book 
Encyclopedia states:  "The Jews were once a sub-type of the 
Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the 
name Jew has lost all racial meaning."
     Since the majority of people in modern Palestine and the world 
who call themselves "Jews" are descendants from a "Turko-
Mongolian tribal people" known as Khazars, and have "little or no 
trace of Semitic blood in them," but are rather descendants of 
Ashkenaz who was one of the sons of Gomer, who was a son of 
Japheth, then anyone who would be critical or oppose these people 
cannot be anti-Semitic.  Anti-impostors, anti-liars, anti-deceivers, 
anti-con artists, anti-Christ haters, yes.  But anti-Semitic, no.

FAQ - ISRAEL IDENTITY continued in parts 2 and 3.

|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sat Dec 30 09:52:31 PST 1995
Article: 18050 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Israel-Identity.FAQ, 2 of 3
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 06:08:58 GMT
Lines: 595

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers on 
   ISRAEL- IDENTITY  (Part 2 of 3)

Last Updated 2/20/95
   SFA by WWW:
Compiled by Rick Savage 

Continued from "FAQ-Israel_Identity.pt1"

6.  Is the Israel Identity Christian message "anti-semitic"?
     The term "anti-semitism" is a nonsense smear word that is 
used to intimidate and silence those who would criticize the "Jews."
Today the true meaning of the word, "anti-semite," is anyone who
the self-styled "Jews" don't like.
     Albert Einstein exposed the true origins and use of anti-semitism
by the "Jews" when he said:  "Anti-Semitism is nothing but the 
antagonistic attitude produced in the non-Jew by the Jewish group.
The Jewish group has thrived on oppression and on the antagonism
it has forever met in the world."  (Collier's Magazine, Nov. 26, 1938)
Einstein was describing their common use of "chutzpah" for their 
own gain and profit while crying "persecution."
     Mr. Koestler, in his book, 'The Thirteenth Tribe,' stated the 
following:  "In this last chapter I have tried to show that the evidence
>from  Anthropology concurs with history in refuting the popular 
belief in a Jewish race descended from a biblical tribe." p. 199
     He again stated on p. 226, "Nevertheless the lingering influence 
of Judaism's racial and historical message, *though based on 
illusion*, acts as a powerful emotional break by appealing to tribal 
loyalty....  It is perhaps symbolic that Abraham Poliak, a professor 
of history at Tel Aviv University and no doubt an Israeli patriot, 
made a major contribution to our knowledge of Jewry's Khazar 
ancestry, *undermining the legend of the Chosen Race.*"  
     It is interesting to know that Random House advertised 
Koestler's book quite extensively and began some of their ads with 
the headline:  "What if Most Jews Aren't Really Semites at All?"  
Not only should most "Jews" be asking themselves this question 
but so should modern-day Christians.
     Identifying Israel today, while at the same time exposing the
self-styled "Jews" as impostors, cannot properly be labeled "Anti-
Semitism" as we have seen in (Q#5 above), because the people 
known as "Jews" today are primarily of Japheth's lineage, rather
than Shem's.  They have virtually no Shemite (Semite) blood 
running through their veins except for what they gained through 
inter-marriage with the European and Arabic peoples.  It could also
be argued that they have a trace of Edomite blood in them which is
present through intermarriage from an earlier time in their history
as revealed in the Jewish Encyclopedia edition of 1925, vol. 5, 
page 41, "Edom is in Modern Jewry."
     On the other hand, the majority of the white race is a race which 
has descended from Noah's son Shem and, consequently, is 
predominantly Semitic.  Many of the white race today are accused 
of being anti-Semitic.  What utter nonsense.  The accused are 
Semites!  If you want to identify people who are truly anti-Semitic"
find the people who are anti-White and anti-Christ
     "Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of 
hate - healthy, virile hate - for what the German personifies and for 
what persists in the German." - Elie Wiesel, "Legends of Our Time" 
(Hold, Rinehart and Winston, 1968) p. 142

7.  What is the difference between a Semite, a Hebrew, an Israelite, 
    and a "Jew"?  Are these terms equivalent in any way and can they
    be used interchangeably?
     A Semite (or, "Shemite") is someone descended from Shem, one 
of the sons of Noah.  A Hebrew is someone descended from Heber 
(or, "Eber"), one of the great-grandsons of Shem.  So all Hebrews 
are Semites, but not all Semites are Hebrews.
     Six generations after Heber, Abraham was born to his line, so 
Abraham was both a Hebrew and a Semite, born of the line of 
Heber and Shem. 
     Isaac was born of Abraham; then Jacob of Isaac.  Jacob's name 
was changed to "Israel," and he fathered 12 sons.  His sons and 
their descendants are called Israelites, and they would be both 
Semitic and Hebrew.  However, this would not make either 
Abraham or Isaac "Israelites."  Some, who interchange the words 
"Jew" and Israelite, call Abraham a Jew, even though Abraham was 
not even an Israelite, and the word "Jew" is not used in the Bible 
until 1,000 years after Abraham.
     One of Jacob-Israel's children was Judah (Hebrew - Yehudah).  
His descendants were called Yehudim ("Judahites").  In Greek this 
reads Ioudaioi ("Judeans").
     The confusing factor is that almost all Bible translations employ 
the word "Jew," which is a modern, shortened form of the word 
"Judahite."  Every time you come to the word "Jew" in the Old 
Scriptures, you should read "Judahite;" and every time you come to 
the word "Jew" in the New Scriptures, you should read it as 
     Once you have those proper translations in mind, then we have to 
interpret those words further, because they can have more than one 
meaning, depending on the context.  In the Old Testament, the word 
"Judahite" has three distinct usage's: (1) one who is of the tribe of 
Judah in a racial sense; (2) one who is a citizen of the southern 
"House of Judah," including the tribes of Benjamin and Levi.  Thus, 
this word can be used either tribally (racially) or geographically 
(nationally).  (3) This is also used in a religious sense of those who 
followed the religion of Judah.  At the time of Esther, many non-
Israelites "became Jews" (that is, Judahites) as the result of the 
Judahite victory (Esther 8:17).
     In the New Testament, the Greek word Ioudeos should be 
translated "Judean."  Again, this term was used in the same manner:  
(1) one who is of the tribe of Judah in the racial sense; (2) one who 
is a citizen of the province of Judea (as opposed to Galilee and 
Samaria), as is shown in John 7:1.  This usage is geographical, and 
it applied also to the non-Israelite citizens of Judea who had been 
incorporated into the nation in 135 B.C.; and (3) a follower of the 
religion of Judah as given by Moses and the prophets.  This usage 
is found in Romans 2:28 and 29.
     Most churches today make no distinction between these terms.  
One of their arguments is that the Apostle Paul said in Romans 11:1 
that he was an "Israelite," and then in Phil. 3:5 he called himself "a 
Hebrew of the Hebrews."  Therefore, they say, the terms are 
identical, and by implication they include the word "Jew" as well.  
However, Paul was also a Benjamite (Rom. 11:1), but the fact that 
he descended from Benjamin, Israel, and Heber did not mean that all 
of these men were the same person.
           Therefore, we can say:
1.  All Israelites are Hebrews and Semites.
2.  Only a few of the Israelites were called Jews (or, Judahites, 
3.  Many non-Israelites were called Jews (Judahites, Judeans) 
     simply because they lived in Judah or claimed to follow the 
     religion of the Judeans.
4.  And as we have seen previously, the self-styled or so-called
     "Jews" of Judaism are not Israelites, Hebrews or Semites but
     rather Khazars (Turkish Mongol Huns).

8.  Who are the Gentiles?  Does the word "gentile" simply mean
    non-Jew?  What does the word really mean?
    This is from "A Study Into the Meaning of the Word "Gentile"
as Used in the Bible" by Curtis Clair Ewing:
     A great deal of confusion and misunderstanding has been 
caused by the use of the word "gentile" in the English translation of 
the Bible.  
     The word 'gentile' is a translation of the Hebrew word 'goi' 
(singular) and 'goyim' (plural) and the Greek word 'ethnos' 
(singular) and 'ethne' (plural).  Using the word 'gentile' to translate 
these words is often misleading because it is a misapplication of 
the Hebrew and Greek words as used in the Bible.  The modern use 
of the word has come to mean non-Jew or non-Israel, but that 
meaning cannot be maintained in the face of the evidence.
     The Hebrew word 'goi' is a collective noun meaning 'nation' or 
sometimes a collective body of people.  But it has been translated 
into English many different ways.  The word occurs 557 times in 
the Old Testament.  The Authorized Version of the Bible translates 
it 'gentile' 30 times; 'heathen' 142 times; 'nation' 373 times; 'people' 
11 times; 'another' once.  But the American Standard Revised 
Version cuts the occurrence of  gentile from 30 to 9 times, and then 
shows in the footnotes of 5 of those 9 times that the word 'nations' 
should have been used.
     Of course the word 'nation' is not always an exact equivalent 
term because there is too much of a political significance attached 
to it.  But it is much better than the word 'gentile' and some of our 
best translators prefer the word 'nations.'   This is also shown by 
the way the Revised Version eliminates the word 'gentiles."
     The same thing is true of the Greek word 'ethnos.'  It occurs 164 
times in the New Testament.  In the Authorized Version it is 
translated 'gentiles' 93 times; 'heathen' 5 times; 'nation' or 'nations' 
64 times; and 'people' twice.  In the American Standard Revised 
Version it is 'gentiles' 96 times in the text and 7 times in the 
footnotes, making 103 occurrences altogether.  But in the footnotes 
it is corrected 15 times to read 'nations,' making the final count 88. 
So not only the Hebrew word 'goi' but also the Greek word 'ethnos' 
has been translated to read 'nations' more than any other word.
     If the reader will consult a good dictionary, you will find that 
the word 'gentile' is derived from the Latin word 'gentilis' and 
properly understood means 'non-something'.  As used by a Jew or 
an Israelite it would mean 'non-Jew' or 'non-Israelite.'  But they are 
not the only people who have a right to use the word.
     For instance, suppose a Buddhist priest spoke Latin and he 
wanted to refer to the nations that were not Buddhist, he would call 
them 'gentilis.'  In Hebrew and Greek, there is no exact equivalent 
to the Latin word 'gentilis' or the English word 'gentile,' 
nevertheless, if this same priest spoke Hebrew and Greek along 
with his Latin and wanted to refer to the nations that were not 
Buddhist, he would call them 'goyim' if speaking Hebrew and 
'ethne' if speaking Greek, and each time he would naturally include 
the Jewish and Israel people.  Likewise a Moslem priest could use 
the three languages and refer to the Jews and Israel as 'gentilis, 
goyim and ethne.'
     One important thing to always keep in mind is that 'goi' and 
'ethnos' are collective nouns and cannot properly be translated to 
mean an individual person.  They always refer to a group.  There is 
no such thing as A GENTILE; it is always plural.  'Gentiles' in its 
plural sense may at times be used to translate 'goi' and 'ethnos' but 
its use gives an added thought not intended in the original word 
which cannot in every case be justified.
     Another important word found in the Hebrew text, which needs 
only passing notice is the Hebrew word "am" and is found many 
times in the Old Testament text.  It is translated 'nation' 17 
times.  It is usually translated 'people', for it occurs that way 1,835 
times in our English text.  Occasionally it is qualified by the 
phrase, "every people," but when it is rendered "the people" it 
usually means Israel.  But this is not the word that has been the 
source of the misunderstanding.  Translations of the Hebrew word 
'goi' and the Greek word 'ethnos' have caused the trouble.
     The Hebrew word 'goi' and the Greek word 'ethnos' in their 
singular and plural forms are used in three ways in the Bible.

  1.  'In referring to the Israel and Jewish people,' let us note the 
verses which follow below found in the Old Testament and New 
Testament which refer either to Israel or the Jews as a nation and 
use the Hebrew word 'goi' and the Greek word 'ethnos.'  To 
demonstrate the absurdity of always translating the word 'goi' or 
'ethnos' as 'gentile' we suggest that you read the following verses 
substituting the word 'gentile' or 'heathen,' for 'nation' or
     Gen. 12:2 - "I will make of thee a great nation."
     Gen. 17:4,5 - "A father of many nations have I made thee."
     Gen. 20:1 - "Lord, wilt thou slay a righteous nations?" 
     Gen. 25.23 - "Two nations are in thy womb."  (Try the word 
                  heathen or gentile in that verse).
     Gen. 35:11 - "A nation and a company of nations."
     Gen. 48:19 - "Thy seed shall become a multitude of nations."
     Isa. 1:4 - "Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity."
     Isa. 10:6 - "Send him against an hypocritical nation."
     Jer. 31:36 - "Shall cease from being a nation before me."
     Luke 7:5 - "He loveth our nation and hath built us a synagogue."
     John 11:48 - "The Romans will come and take our place and 
     Acts 24:2 - "Worthy deeds are done unto this nation by the 
     Acts 24:17 - "I came to bring alms to my nation."
     From the foregoing verses and many others that could be given, 
it can easily be seen that the Hebrew word 'goi' and the Greek word 
'ethnos' do not always refer to non-Israel people.

  2.  Now let us read a few verses where the same words are used 
and, as can be seen, refer very definitely to non-Israel people.
     Gen. 14;9 - "With Chedorlaomer the king of Elam, and with 
                 Tidal king of nations."
     Gen. 21:13 - "And also the son of the bond woman will I make 
                 a nation."
     Gen. 21:18 - "For I will make of him a great nation."
     Ex. 9:21 - "...There was none like it in all the land of Egypt 
                since it became a nation."
     Ex. 34:24 - "...For I will cast out the nations before thee."
     Isa. 37:12 - "Have the gods of the nations delivered them which 
                  my fathers have destroyed?"
     Matt. 10:5 - "Go not in the way of the gentiles."
     Matt. 24:7 - "For nation shall rise against nation."
     Luke 21:24 - "They shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall 
                  be led away captive into all nations."
     Acts 7:7 - "And the 'nation' to whom they shall be in bondage 
                will I judge, said God."
     Acts 8:9 - "But there was a certain man called Simon which 
                before time in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched 
                the 'people' of Samaria."
     Acts 10:45 - "... Because that on the 'Gentiles' also was poured 
                out the gifts of the Holy Ghost."

     In the above verses three words have been used to translate the 
same Greek word 'ethnos', and they are 'nations,' 'gentiles' and 

  3.  Now we come to the third way in which the words have been 
used, and that is to describe all nations, which of course always 
'includes Israel and non-Israel nations.'
     Gen. 22:18 - "And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth 
                  be blessed."
     Gen. 25:23 - "Two nations are in thy womb."
     I Chron. 16:23,24 - "Declare his glory among the 'heathen' ...his 
                  marvelous works among the 'nations.'"
     Psa. 9:19,20 - "...Let the 'heathen' be judged in thy sight.  Put 
                  them in fear, oh Lord; that the 'nations' may know 
                  themselves to be but men."

     - Notice the last two verses have used the two words 'heathen' 
and 'nations' to translate the same word in one passage.

     Matt. 24:9,14 - "...and ye shall be hated of all nations for my 
                  name's sake," "This gospel of the kingdom shall be 
                  preached for a witness to all nations."
     Matt. 28:19 - "Go ye therefore and teach all nations."
     Acts. 10:35 - "But in every nation he that feareth him, and 
                  worketh righteousness, is accepted with him."
     Attention should also be called to another Greek word 
erroneously translated 'gentiles.'  The word is 'hellen' and means 
'Greeks.'  It is used 27 times in the New Testament.  In 20 places it 
is properly translated 'Greeks', but in 7 other places in the 
Authorized Version it is erroneously translated 'gentiles.'  This has 
been corrected in the Revised Version and nearly all subsequent 
translations.  For example, the Authorized Version translates John 
7:35 to read:  "Will he go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles, 
and teach the Gentiles?"  Nearly all revised versions translate this 
to read:  "Will he go unto the dispersed among the Greek and teach 
the Greek?"  Take as another example I Corinthians 10:32, "Give 
none offense, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the 
church of God."  Now the writer has read several articles by well-
known Bible teachers who reject the Israel identity of the Anglo-
Saxon people because they say that this verse gives the only 
classes that God now recognizes.  In other words they claim on the 
authority of this verse that the human race is divided into Jews, 
Gentiles, and the Church of God.
     That is a good example of how anything can be proved by 
taking a verse out of its context.  The context shows that Paul was 
admonishing people to be conscientious in their walk so as not to 
offend a weak brother.  The division made in the text is only 
incidental to the point he was trying to make.  And then too, the 
text does not say that there are 'only three classes of people'.  What 
it does say is, "Give none offense,' neither to the Jews, nor to the 
Gentiles, nor to the church of God."
     Now if this text were given to show a division of humanity, 
then it leaves the vast majority of the race out entirely, because the 
word that is translated 'gentiles' is a palpable mistranslation and 
should be translated 'Greeks'.  This is exactly the way the Revised 
Version gives it, as is also true of most private translations.  But 
you do not even need a Revised Version to discover this error.  
Any good Bible with a marginal reading will show this to be true.  
The Greek word that has been translated 'gentiles' in this verse is 
'hellen' and means 'Greeks'.  So, if, as these men have claimed, this 
verse proves there are only three classes of people in the world 
which God now recognizes, then they are the Jews, the Greeks and 
the Christians.  Everybody else is left out.
     By using the same method of reasoning we could quote 
Galatians 3:28 and prove that God does not recognize any 
distinction in the human race; then we could go to the other 
extreme and quote Colossians 3:11 to prove that God recognizes 
eight divisions of mankind.  In both cases we would be taking the 
verse out of their context just as these men have done.  But all of 
the confusion over this text would have been avoided if the word 
'Greeks' had been used instead of 'gentiles.'  Paul was writing to the 
Corinthians, Corinth was in Greece.  They had three classes of 
people there - Jew, Greek and Christian.  Had Paul been writing to 
the Romans he no doubt would have said, "Give none offense, 
neither to the Jews, nor to the Romans, nor to the church of God.
     Besides these two examples, there are four other places where 
hellen has been translated 'gentiles' where it should have been 
translated 'Greeks'.  These are found in Romans 2:9,10; 3:9; and I 
Corinthians 12:13.
     While on this subject a few words should be said about the way 
the word "gentiles" has been used in the Epistle to the Romans, one 
of the important books in the New Testament.  And on this matter I 
will borrow some thoughts from the late Dr. Wm. Pascoe Goard.
     In Dr. Goard's book, "Epistle to the Romans," he has given 
some illuminating comments on how the word 'ethne' refers to the 
ten-tribed Israel.  These are found in the fourth and fifth chapters 
of his book.  He shows very clearly that chapters 9,10 and 11 of 
Romans refer to ten-tribed Israel.  In these chapters the Apostle 
Paul quotes quite freely from Hosea, Isaiah and Elijah, and as Dr. 
Goard shows, all these quotations refer to facts in the history of 
Judah nor in the history of any other nation.  Thus when the word 
'gentiles'  (Greek word 'ethne') is used in these three chapters it 
definitely is ten-tribed Israel.  It is not a contrast between Israel and 
non-Israel people.  It is a contrast between Israel in 975 B. C. and 
Israel known as the nations in A.D. 60.
     Do not let the word 'gentiles mislead you.  The Greek word is 
'ethne' and means 'nations.'  The Apostle Paul in this Israel section 
of his epistle is merely contrasting Israel's former state when she 
was known as Israel with her state in his day when she was known 
as the 'nations.'  To use the popularized meaning of the word, they 
had become 'gentilized' in the sense that they were not known as 
Israel.  Israel was one nation God had called out from among the 
other nations; now she was just like the other nations.
     She had lost her identity so much that the Apostle Paul said that 
blindness was to stay on Israel until the "fullness of the gentiles" 
(nations) be come in.  (Romans 11:25)  This 'fullness of the 
gentiles' should be fullness of 'nations'.  It is a direct reference to 
Genesis 18:19, where it is stated that Ephraim was to become a 
"multitude of nations" in the last days.  This is confirmed by the 
fact that both Dr. Delitzsch's translation of the New Testament into 
Hebrew - sold by the British and Foreign Bible Society - and 
Ginsburg -Salkinson's New Testament, published by the Trinitarian 
Bible Society, for the use of the Jews, have the very same Hebrew 
words - me lo hag-goyim- in Romans 11:25, that we find in 
Genesis 48:19, in the Hebrew Old Testament, and in this verse 
ONLY.  We use the expression "multitude of nations" because it is 
given as the correct reading in most Bibles in preference to fullness 
of nations.  That time has arrived now and that is the reason our 
identity as Israel is becoming known.  As Isaiah 25:7 reads, "He 
will destroy in this mountain the face of the covering cast over all 
people, and the veil that is spread over all nations."  That veil is 
being lifted now and our real identity and the identity of other 
nations is becoming known.
     Some scholars, in translating Genesis 48:19, where the Hebrew 
is 'me lo hag-goyim' render it a 'company of gentile nations.'  The 
writer is convinced that a 'company' or 'multitude of nations' is the 
better translation.  However, there is nothing wrong with the 
translation if the right meaning is attached to the word 'gentile.  
That is, they would become so much like other nations that they 
would not be recognized as Israel.  That, of course, is a different 
meaning given to the word than is meant in the original text.
                      To summarize:
     The word 'gentile' is derived from the Latin word 'gentilis' and
is only one of several words that are used to translate the Hebrew 
word 'goi' and the Greek word 'ethnos' into English.  The best word 
to use is 'nations.'  It would have been better if the word 'gentile' 
had never appeared in the English text.  Neither 'goi' nor 'ethnos' 
necessarily mean non-Israel, as has been shown above.

9.  Is the Israel Identity Christian message "racist" and "white 
    supremacist?"  What about 'non-white' races?  Inferior?  
    Superior?  Equal?  
     Every race was created by God (Col. 1:16) unique and different.  
God called His creation *good* (I Timothy 4:4).
     He established the order of "kind after kind."  Every creature, 
beast and "race" of people were to reproduce after their own kind.  
Thus Christians should love and strive to keep each race as God 
created them.  In other words Christians should be opposed to racial 
nihilism and support racial preservation.
     Man's belief in equality is a hatred of the unique traits of every 
"race" God created.  Man hates what God called good if he mixes 
the races through interracial marriage which ultimately destroys the 
uniqueness of each racial type.  Each race has its superior traits and 
inferior ones.  There is no race that can claim "superiority" in 
everything, the key point is that they are *unique* and good 
according to His own purpose.  
     It is the duty of every Christian to preserve God's creation and 
defend the order He established! ("Kind after kind.")  The Christian 
("Identity") message is that of love for all races and a desire to 
preserve them as God created them.  If anyone claiming to be a 
Christian, "Identity" or otherwise, preaches hatred of any original 
racial type for simply being what God created them, then they are 
not preaching the Word of God, but rather that which is contrary to 
His Will.
     We are told in the parables of Christ that what God did not plant 
will be uprooted and burned (Matt. 13:25-30).  God did not create 
racially mixed people, that is man's doing through man's rejection of 
God's law-order of "kind after kind". 
     God demonstrated his dislike for the mixing of the races by 
saving only one man, Noah and we find out why in Gen.6:9,  
"These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and 
PERFECT in his GENERATIONS, and Noah walked with God."
     The word "generations" in the Hebrew concordance (Strong's 
#8435), means "descent, family, history, birth-generations."  Noah 
was perfect in all of his descent or family, there could not then have 
been any "mixed" seed in his genealogy.  We see in Genesis 11:6, 
"And the Lord said, Behold, the people is *one*."  (#259 - 
Strong's).  The meaning here is that the people were united, 
undivided, or had mixed racially, instead of being separate peoples.
God not only saved Noah because he was perfect in his generations,
but also because he "walked with God," which is just another way
of saying He obeyed God's commandments to be separate and holy
unto Him.
     Jesus came as a sword (Matt. 10:34, Rev. 2:12,16; 19:13-15), to 
divide out a people for Himself.  In Matt. 10: 5&6, Christ instructed 
His disciples to not go "into the way of the heathen, but rather go 
unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel."  Christ's message was 
not of inclusion; but separation.  All throughout Jesus' parables we 
read how he came to separate the sheep from the goats, the wheat 
>from  tares, the good seed from the bad seed, etc.  Separation is the 
message of the Gospel of the Kingdom of God.
     Most Pastors are taking the safe—and profitable—road by 
preaching "love" as a code-word for liberal "non-exclusion."  We 
Christians must surely preach the accomplishment of Christ on the 
Cross, and all that it provides for those who surrender to and accept 
it in repentance and faith, but today it is important—critically 
important—to draw an absolute distinction between "whosoever 
will" (follow Christ) and the leftist spawned false universalist non-
exclusion doctrine, which has most denominations bringing 
Buddhist monks, Islamic clerics, shamans, witches, homosexuals 
and, of course, Rabbis into their congregations to "teach" that, after 
all, we all worship the same God.
     On what basis—and why—did God separate Cain from Abel, 
Abraham from his worldly family, Isaac from Ishmael, Jacob from 
Esau?  Read Leviticus 16 about the annual ritual God gave as a 
statute to the Israelites, which He called the Day of Atonement.  
Consider carefully the significance of the two goats which were 
chosen by lot (a method of choosing which indicated God's choice), 
and their subsequent fates.  We read that we did not choose God 
but rather Jesus the Christ (God in the flesh) chose us, the white 
Israelite race.  It was a matter of choice, HIS Sovereign choice, and 
He separated them from out of the world not to be "superior" but to 
be a chosen generation (NASV says "race"), and a holy nation for 
His own possession (I Peter 2:9; John 6:44,45; II Cor. 6:17). 
     Unfortunately, the "chosen" or favored child is usually hated and 
envied by the other children as we read about in the story of Joseph 
(Genesis. 37:3-) and how he was sold to the Egyptians into slavery 
by his brothers because of their father's special favor toward 
Joseph.  But Joseph was blessed by this and raised up by God to 
eventually save his brothers and family when we read the "rest of 
the story."  So shall it be with true Christian Israel and the other 
peoples of the world when Israel is returned to their God and His 
duty for them.
     God's ways have always been "repent" or "perish."  Man can't 
blame God for the evil that man creates when he rebels against 
God's law-order.  Man has only himself to blame if he is 
responsible for mixing the races.  Any suffering brought about by 
the sin of inter-racial marriage is the responsibility of rebellious 
man, not God!
     "Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they 
separated from Israel all the mixed (mongrel) multitude" (Neh. 13:3, 
Josh. 23:12-13, etc.).
     Identifying the white peoples as Israel cannot be correctly 
labeled "White Supremacy" because this teaching does not elevate 
one race above another but separates them and mandates that one 
race (the white race) be a servant unto God and others by *God's* 
standards.  It is not "White Supremacy"; if anything, it is White 
SERVANTHOOD.  As a rule, whenever the thought of race leads
us to boastfulness or contempt, there is something false in it.  
     Israel was to be a blessing to the world.  They were given God's 
Law (Ps. 147:19-20) to be a model and "light" to the world through 
their obedience to and enforcement of His Law-Word.  Through 
their obedience they would be blessed and prosper and from these 
blessings were to teach the other people the Laws of God (Micah 
4:1,2; Rev.3:12; Rev. 21:1,2,10).  This is still Israel's duty (Gen. 
1:27-28; Matt. 28:18-20).  Christians (redeemed Israel) must begin 
applying the Great Commission, indeed, ALL of Scripture, to the 
fundamental institutions of social order: the family, the Church, and 
the State in order that nation after nation will bow before Him Who 
has "all Authority and Dominion in Heaven and on Earth," (Eph. 
1:21; I Timothy 6:14-16).  We do this by obeying His commands 
found in His Law-Word.  "For He must reign until He has put all 
His enemies under His feet," (I Cor. 15:25).
     His Word tells us, "All creation longs for the revealing of the 
Sons of God".  True Israel, the Germanic, Celtic, Scandinavian and
kindred (white) peoples, have been a blessing to the world and
continue to be at the for-front of fulfilling this duty.  When true
Israel wakes up to their identity and duty to their God, this will be
manifested in an even greater way.  

10.  Can the redemption of the house of Israel through accepting the 
    Covenant offered by Christ, *only* be granted to descendants of 
    Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?  Or is this same redemption available
    to all?  And if the same redemption is available to all, to black and 
    white, Khazar and non-Khazar, 'false' and 'true' Israelites, then 
    why does the 'identity' of the tribe of Israel matter?  How does 
    the redemption of different races or kinds or types differ,?
    Yes, only "Israel" can be "redeemed" (to be bought back).  Jesus 
Christ came to save His own (John 1:11) and to do this took on the 
very seed of Abraham (Hebrews 2:16) in order to keep the promise 
made to Abraham (Genesis 17:7).  He came into this world to 
REDEEM only Israel.  Salvation is another story and is to those 
who believe by faith.  Only true Israel was ever cast off and in need 
of being "bought back."  That Christ did come and did Redeem His 
people Israel is the testimony of the New Testament writers.  (See 
Luke 1:54-55,68-73, John 1:31, St. Matthew 15:24, Acts 5:31; 
13:23).  To keep the Law of Redemption (Lev. 25), Jesus Christ had 
to be genetically related to those that He redeemed.  Jesus the Christ 
was of the Seed of Abraham (Hebrews 2:16), of the Tribe of Judah 
(Hebrews 7:14), of the House of David (Romans 1:3), and of the 
Adamic 'race' (Matthew 1:1-16).  Besides, "original sin" (Gen. 3:6-
7, 17-19) only applies to Adam and His descendants (Romans 
5:12 also see Q#11).  Since the Bible is only a story about the 
Adamic family, specifically through Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel, 
we would expect it's specific application would generally be 
applicable only to Adamic Israelites in general.
    This does not mean that non-Israelites cannot put themselves 
under the dominion rule of Christ and under His Law-Covenant.  
Isa. 56 speaks of such people as receiving a *greater* reward, 
because they did and obeyed what was required of a people other 
than themselves.  This duty to the King of Kings and to the 
Covenant He made with Israel is one of dominion in Christ's name.  
Non-Israelites are welcome to pick up that commission and will be 
blessed for their service to the King of kings.  They shall be saved
by their faith.  
    Salvation is a consequence of redemption.  Here is how it works:
1.  Redemption is only through the King of kings, Christ Jesus (1 
     Tim. 6:14-16), as our great High Priest after the order of 
     Melchizedek (Hebrews chpts. 5-7), who has taken His seat at the 
     right hand of God (Heb. 8:1), and Has made a New Covenant 
     with His People, Israel (Heb. 8:8-10,13).
2.  When Israel is redeemed through Christ, they will again obey 
     His commandments and do their duty, i.e carry out His Will on 
     Earth (Heb. 3:18,19; Heb. 4:1,5,6,11).
3.  The duty of Israel is to bring everything into obedience to Christ 
     Jesus and His Law-Dominion (Romans 13:4, 1 Cor. 6:2; 2 Cor. 
     10:3-6, Hebrews. 10:26-31; Heb. 12:28,29; James 1:22-25).
4.  Through His Law-Dominion, peace, law and order will be 
     restored and all the earth shall be blessed and "saved" from those 
     who would oppress, enslave and destroy the people of God's 
     creation (Rev. chpts. 21 & 22).

     The key to redemption is a love for His Will to be done on Earth 
as it is in Heaven,  i.e. obedience.  "If you love Me, Keep (obey) My 
commandments" (Deut. 6:4-5, 11:1;  Matt. 22:40; I John 2:3,5).  If 
you love God, Christ Jesus, and hear His voice, you will seek out 
His plan of redemption and do what it requires of you.  This is 
merely doing our duty out of love for what He has already done for 
us in making our redemption possible by dying in our place to 
atone for our sins (rebellion against His Law - I John 3:4).  The 
plan for redemption is revealed in His New Covenant plan found in 
His Word.  We can attempt to sum it up in Matt. 28:18-20; John 
3:3,5; Acts 2:38; 8:37-39; 19:5; Romans 6; Gal. 3:27; Col. 2:11-14; 
Eph. 4:5; I Peter 3:21; etc, etc., but there is so much more.  Christ 
promised those who diligently seek shall find and those who hunger 
and thirst after it will find it. 

FAQ - ISRAEL IDENTITY continued in part 3.
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sat Dec 30 09:52:32 PST 1995
Article: 18051 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Israel-Identity.FAQ, 3 of 3
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 06:09:44 GMT
Lines: 625

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers on 
   ISRAEL- IDENTITY  (Part 3 of 3)

Last Updated 2/20/95
   SFA by WWW:
Compiled by Rick Savage 

Continued from "FAQ-Israel_Identity.pt2"

11.  What about Adam and Eve?  Were they of the white 'race' or 
     are they the mother and father of all the "races"?  
     We can not fully answer these questions in the breadth 
and depth they should be answered because of space limitations, but 
we will try to give a brief over-view.  A good reference for an 
exhaustive study on the matter is "Origins of Race and Civilization," 
by Charles Weisman, which is made available below.
1.  Adam was white:
     The book we call the Bible is a family His(S)tory of God's 
people-- the generations of Adam and more specifically of his 
descendants through Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel.  All 
Scriptural evidence indicates Adam was created a white man.  The 
name "ADAM" (aw-dawm') in Hebrew means a "ruddy human 
being" (Strong's O.T. #120).  It is derived from Strong's O.T. #119 
- ADAM (aw-dam'), which means "to show blood (in the face), i.e. 
flush or turn rosy."  The attributes of skin color are described by 
one geneticist as follows:
     "The color of normal human skin is due to the presence of three 
kinds of colored chemicals, or pigments.  The most important of 
these pigments is melanin, a dark-brown substance... The second of 
the three pigments is carotene.  This is a yellow substance which is 
present in carrots (from which it gets its name) and egg yokes as 
well as human skin...  The third pigment is hemoglobin, which is the 
red coloring matter of blood...the hemoglobin occurs in the blood 
vessels beneath the skin, so that very little can show through..  The 
presence of fair amounts of either melanin or carotene in the skin 
covers it up completely.  Hemoglobin does show up however in the 
skin of white men, particularly in those of light complexion.  It is 
the hemoglobin that accounts for pink cheeks and the ability to 
blush."   -William C. Boyd, Ph.D.  'Races and People' (1955) 
     Adam was fair and white which caused the hemoglobin (blood) 
to show in his skin making him look "ruddy" or to give him a 
"flush" look.  Thus the word "ADAM" is a descriptive name but 
here indicates certain physical characteristics that the man Adam 
possessed.  It is a common practice in both Hebrew and English 
languages to name something according to some *outstanding 
feature* or characteristic.  We thus call a bird a "red-headed 
woodpecker" because it has a red head and pecks wood.
     Adam was evidently called or named "ADAM" because he 
possessed 'aw-dam' characteristics - that being of a ruddy or rosy 
complexion coming from the blood (hemoglobin) showing through 
his non-pigmented skin. This is what ADAM meant.  People of a 
very fair complexion often appear as though they are reddish or 
sunburnt since the hemoglobin readily shows through their skin.  
This was the case with Adam and Eve.
     It is argued that other racial types get rosy cheeked as well and 
"blush".  Two facts that they can't argue with is that other races just 
don't show "blood in the face" as pronounced as the white race can 
and secondly one never asks if these other races "who blush" have 
any white mixed into their past generations.  Regardless, the ability 
to "blush, turn rosy" is an *outstanding feature* of the fair skinned 
white race.  The word "ADAM" was a descriptive term to describe 
this outstanding feature of Adam & Eve over the other races.
     That Adam and Eve were of the white race with this fair, ruddy or 
rosy complexion is verified in the Bible by the descriptions of their 
descendants.  King David, who was one of Adam's direct 
descendants, was described as being "ruddy, and of fair 
countenance." (I Samuel 16:12 and 17:42)  David's daughter Tamar 
was "fair" (2 Samuel 13:1).  Sarah and Rebekah, who were both 
descendant from Adam, were both described as being "very fair" 
(Genesis 12:11,14; Gen. 24:16; Gen. 26:7).  The daughters of Job, 
one of the Adamic patriarchs, were known as the fairest women "in 
all the land" (Job 42:15).  Solomon was described as being "white 
and ruddy" (Song of Solomon 5:10).  The Nazarites (consecrated 
persons) of Judah were "whiter than milk" and "more ruddy in 
body than rubies" (Lamentations 4:7).
2.  Were they of the white 'race' or are they the mother and father of 
all the "races"? 
     Where does the idea come from that believes Adam and Eve were 
the only (first) two people on God's created earth?  Both Creationists 
and Evolutionists agree with this false assumption.   Both positions
are wrong, but their adherents stubbornly cling to this concept as the
only  possible explanation when the truth lies elsewhere.  The
hypocrisy of the creationist's rejection of evolution should be self
evident when they claim that all men have sprung from a single pair
(Adam and Eve).   
     The "common origin" concept is needed in order to promote the 
real doctrine that is desired --the doctrine of "equality of the races."  
Without a common origin, all "equalitarian" arguments disintegrate.
The Bible does not support the "common origin" concept.  God's
creation reveals the opposite.
     When we look up at the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, we see 
Adam, supposedly the first man, unquestionably depicted as a 
handsome white man.  When we look at the various religious tracts 
on "creationism," we see Adam and Eve portrayed as the most 
perfect and attractive representatives of the white European race. 
Yet  these same religious denominations, such as Jehovah's Witness, 
also state that:  "All races descended from the first man and 
woman."  ('Did Man Get Here by Evolution or by Creation,'  
Published by Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York 
(1967) p. 113.)
     Certainly if Michelangelo had painted Adam as being a Pygmy 
or carved the marble statue of David into a Bushman type, he would 
have been excommunicated.  It would appear that the only way 
White Christians will accept a unity of races doctrine is if Adam and 
Eve are attractive white people -- yet at the same time they want all 
racial types being their descendants.  Strange inconsistency or the 
Law of Truth speaking to their hearts? 
     Bible chronologists, and those who believe in creationism, place 
Adam's creation around 4004 B.C.   There is no evidence in the 
Scriptures that indicates Adam was the first man and the progenitor 
of all races or types of man.  However, there is ample evidence that 
proves many other people were all ready in existence by the time 
Adam was created.  
      The book of Genesis provides most of this evidence.  For 
example, after Cain killed Abel he was cursed and driven out of the 
land by God.  In the fourth chapter of Genesis, Cain makes the 
statement:  "I shall be a FUGITIVE and a vagabond in the earth: it 
shall come to pass, that EVERY ONE that findeth me shall slay 
me."  If only Adam and Eve existed, then who was Cain afraid of 
that would kill him?  Who was it that he would be a fugitive from?  
It is quite clear that the "every one" which Cain was referring to 
could not be Adam and Eve.  Who was Cain referring to?  Cain was 
well aware that many people existed in the lands around them.  This 
fact is verified by God in His response to Cain in verse 15.  God 
told Cain that "whosoever" of the other people that might slay you, 
vengeance shall be on that person.  Why did God have to give Cain 
an identifying mark if the only other people that existed (Adam and 
Eve) knew Cain perfectly well?  This mark was not a signal so 
Adam and Eve could recognize Cain, but rather so that "any" of the 
other people then living could recognize Cain upon their "finding 
     If Adam and Eve were the first and only people at this time, 
then from where did Cain find a wife?  Not only was he able to find 
a wife, but there were obviously enough people to be part of the city 
built by Cain.  Cain's marriage, the birth of his son Enoch, and his 
building of a city all took place before the birth of Seth.  All these 
circumstances thus point to the existence of men independent of 
     Adam was the "first man" only in the same sense that Christ 
was the "second man," for Adam "was the figure of Christ" (Rom. 
5:14).  The basic theme of the Bible is:  Death in Adam, Life in 
Christ.  This is the "resurrected" life that was promised to be 
RESTORED to Adam and his descendants, and thus pertains to no 
other races.  The Bible is simply not a comprehensive historical
record of the origins of any other people besides the Adamic
family.  If it was, it would have to be many volumes in length.
     The Bible is quite clear about there being many people on the 
earth at the time of the story of Adam and Eve.  The Bible does not 
support the idea that Adam and Eve gave birth to all the different
races on the earth, but rather implies that Adam and Eve were a
separate creation in the midst of other people who existed prior to 
them. Since these "other" people existed before Adam, they are
called "pre-Adamic."    
     Adam was a special creation who was called for God's own 
purpose.  The Bible, and Genesis specifically, is not a comprehensive 
account on all of God's creation.  What is covered is just the history 
God felt relevant to include.  The Bible simply does not detail the 
creation and origin of any other people besides the Adamic family, 
though we read about these other people later in the Bible.  This 
understanding will eventually end the false arguments over the two
wrong concepts of Evolution vs. Creation.  
     We could go into many more details and examples but space will
not permit.  Again, we recommend C. Weisman's excellent book 
"Origins of Race and Civilization" for more details. (available 

12. If true Israel is the white 'race' how do you account for the 
    many diverse nations of Europe?  Do the different European
    peoples have a common origin?
    The simple answer is yes and we could say that the white "race" is
generally descended from the basic Germanic tribes.
     The Germanic tribes include several groups (Angles, Balts, Brits, 
Celts, Cimmerians, Danes, Franks, Frisians, Gaels, Goths, Jutes, 
Letts, Lombards, Normans, Rus, Saxons, Scots, Scythians, Swedes, 
Vandals, Walloons, etc.)  When we talk about the Anglo-Saxon, Indo-
German, Indo-Aryan or any other European-descended people we are
referring to the white race.  It should be noted that the 'Germans' are
but one of the many branches of the 'Germanic' peoples.  The
Germanic peoples were around for at least 1000 years before the
Germans and spread out over all of Europe.
     The word "German" comes from the Latin 'Germ nus' which
means "Genuine" or "authentic" in relation to a family or klan of 
people.  The peoples living in the land known as Germany today
during the Roman Empire were known as Scythians to the Romans.
As their numbers grew and they spread abroad the Romans began to
call the Scythians in the Germanic lands the "Genuine Scythians",
hence the word "German".  
     So who were the Scythians?  The Scythians were first mentioned
in history around 681-699 B.C. in Assyrian tablets found in Ninevah
(now in the British museum).  At this time the Scythians were located
among the Medes.
     It was in Assyria, specifically the cities of the Medes, where the
so-called "lost ten-tribes" were taken away into captivity (II Kings 
18:11) by Shalmaneser V of Assyria.
     Dr. Hans Gunther, professor of Berlin University in the 1920's
in his book, "Racial Elements of European History, stated,
     "... ancient writers, such as Polemon of Ilium, Galienos, Clement
of Alexandria, and Adamantios, state that the Scythians [Sacae] were
like the Kelts and Germans, and describe them as ruddy-fair.  The
Scythian tribe of the Alans are also described as having a Nordic
appearance.  Ammianus [c350 A.D.] describes them as "almost all
tall and handsome, with hair almost yellow, and a fierce look."
      Colonel J.C. Gawler states, "The Scythians were later known as
Goths, or Gothi, possibly because the Getae, an important branch of
the Scythian nation, were most in contact with the Romans, with
whom, therefore, all Scythians were [called] Gothi."
     The Roman Historian, Pliny the Elder (c50 A.D.) indicated,
     "The name Scythian has extended in every direction, even to the
Sarmatae and the Germans...beyond the Danube are the peoples of
Scythia.  The Persians have called them by the general name of 
Sacae...The more ancient writers give them the name of Aramii
(Arameans).  The multitude of these Scythians is quite innumerable
(note: Gen. 13:16; 15:5; 17:4,6); in their life and habits they much 
resemble the people of Parthia.  The tribes among them that are
better known are the Sacae, the Messagetae, the Dahae..."
    It should be noted that the land of Israel in the days of the Bible
was part of Syria.  The Israelites themselves are described in
Scripture as Syrians, and Abraham's family was Syrian. (Deut. 26:5;
Gen. 25:20.  The word Syrian (#761) means an Aramaean; a
highlander.)  The people known today as Syrians are as different
>from  the original Syrians, as the Portuguese and Egyptians were 
entirely different peoples from those who now predominate in the
lands which carry the names of their builders.
     Greater evidence that the Scythians who sired the Germanic
peoples are in fact the Israel of the Bible, is to be found in the
Scythian tombs (called tumuli) themselves which have been found
in southern Russia (Scythia and Crimea).  These tombs date from
580 B.C. to the 1st century and contain many of the symbols of the
Israelites, as well as fine animal drawings of near eastern derivation.
(These can be seen in the American Journal of Archaeology, 1914,
Vol 18, and the Illustrated London News; Jan. 3 & Feb. 14, 1914.) 
In several of these tombs, Hebrew manuscripts were found, some of
which are translated by Professor Hannay as follows:
     "I am Jehudi, the son of Moses, the son of Jehudi the Mighty, a
man of the tribe of Naphtili, which was carried captive with the
other tribes of Israel, by Prince Shalmaneser, from Samaria during
the reign of Hoshea, King of Israel.  They were carried to Halah, to
Habor-- which is Cabul --to Gozan and to the Cheronesus--which
is the Crimea."  (Haberman, p.129)
     Thousands of tombstones have been found in the Crimea in
Scythian graveyards with Hebrew-Phoenician inscriptions, 700 of
which have been translated by Professor Chwolsen of Petrograd.
Some of these read as follows:
     "This is the tombstone of Buki, the son of Itchak the priest; may
his rest be in Eden, at the time of the salvation of Israel.  In the
year 702 of the years of our exile."
     We could go on and on, but space does not permit for such a 
discussion.  For further confirming evidence we recommend the
book _Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets_ by Biblical
archaeologist E. Raymond Capt.  The book answers the question, 
"What happened to the lost 10 tribes of Israel?".  (Available below).

Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tables by E. Raymond Capt
Tracing Our White Ancestors, by Haberman
God's Covenant People - Yesterday, Today and Forever, by Ted Weiland
    (available below)
Origins of Race and Civilization, by Charles Weisman
    (available below)
Your Inheritance: Best Kept Secret in the World, by Robert Allen
Our Scythian Ancestors, W.E. Filmer
Racial Elements of European History, by Dr. Hans Gunther

13.  What are the consequences of the self-styled "Jews" NOT 
     being who they claim to be, i.e. Israelites?  (Also see Q #4)
    "We Jews, who have posed as Saviors of the World, we are today 
nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, 
its executioners."  -Dr. Oscar Levy, "The World Significance of the 
Russian Revolution," preface (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1920) x
    "We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain destroyers forever.  
Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands.  We will 
forever destroy because we need a world of our own."  -Maurice 
Samuels, 'You Gentiles', p. 155, Harcourt, Brace. 1924
     These confessions sound rather grim, don't they?  Have these 
two witnesses accurately predicted the fate of the world if these
self-styled "Jews" are allowed to continue unhindered in their evil 
schemes and destructive purposes?  What should the consequences 
be when their impersonation of and pretending to be God's 
"chosen" is exposed for the lie that it is?  What does the law on 
your heart (and the Law of God) say should be done with 
"destroyers," "executioners," and murderers?  
     Not only is the pretender's claim to be "Israel" a false and 
fraudulent one, but these same self-styled "Jews" are in fact the 
most dangerous enemies of true Israel and the world.  The 
impostors' claim on the title "Israel" is at the core of any issue 
regarding the self-styled "Jews" because it is the first and foremost 
LIE that every other "fact" concerning these people rests upon.  If 
the lie of the impostor's impersonation of God's "chosen people" 
crumbles then their very identity is founded on nothing but fraud 
and falsehood.  Any issue or claim they may make follows this lie, 
and can't be taken seriously or given any validity.
     Because this is the foundational lie upon which all of their other 
"facts" are established regarding "Jewish" identity and claims, this 
matter establishes the integrity of all their arguments which follow.  
Anything that is built on the shifting sands of falsehood and fraud 
cannot stand, that is why those who have built their foundation upon 
the Rock of Christ (1 Cor. 10:1-5; Isa. 28:16; Matt. 12:42, 24:27; 2 
Tim. 2:19) and His Truth (John 14:6) will stand eternal and will 
eventually fill the whole earth (Dan. 2:35, Isaiah 9:7.)
     With the above (Q#4), we can conclude that the Talmudists (self-
styled "Jews") have no relation to the physical Israelites, except by 
religion which they adopted and perverted to their own ends.  This 
invalidates their arguments and claims for the land in Palestine, 
since they were never a people from that area.  It makes them out to 
be representing themselves as something they are not, which makes 
them impostors who are lying about their identity.  If they lie about 
something so fundamental as their identity, how can anything else 
they say be taken seriously?  "Who is the liar, except he who denies 
that Jesus is the Christ?" (I John 2:22.)
     These self-styled "Jews" don't take too kindly to being exposed 
and are full of all sorts of hate, sarcasm and vindictive demonization 
for those who would bring these facts into the light of day.  They 
rarely have the honesty in them to admit the facts and repent from 
their political and religious agenda.  They will hardly ever admit any 
error and do not attempt to seriously refute the accusations because 
they have no desire to repent nor have they an answer for the Truth.  
They would rather indulge in ridicule, name-calling and libel, or try
to divert the discussion away from the more condemning facts.  
"He who corrects a scoffer gets dishonor for himself, and he who 
reproves a wicked man gets insults for himself" (Proverbs 9:7).
     They have no defense, so they have no choice but to indulge in 
these fruitless activities or else admit their guilt.  Through their 
unashamed use of their "Chutzpah" they wail non-stop for 
unearned sympathy like a whining two-year-old who needs a 
spanking (Prov. 22:15).  Because people can only take so much of
this, it is only a matter of time, give them enough rope to expose 
themselves and the rest is history...  The Truth WILL out! 
     Some have weakly given in to these name-calling venom 
spewers.  Very few are tolerant enough to put up with this childish 
behavior and speak the truth regardless.  The "Jews" have 
absolutely no shame in their use of the "Jewish Persecution 
Complex" (tm) and few are those who give them what they 
truly need (i.e. Prov. 22:15).
     According to Leo Rosten's "Joy's of Yiddish" (1968), the word 
"Chutzpah" is from the Hebrew and means insolence, audacity, gall, 
effrontery:  "A 'Chutzpahnik' may be defined as the man who 
shouts 'Help!' 'Help!' while beating you up."  This is a perfect 
definition of Jewish expression.  This has been a most effective 
weapon against the faithless and fearful unbelievers who are 
separated from their God, Christ Jesus.  "If God be for us, who can 
stand against us?" (Romans 8:31-39.)
     As for the "Jewish Persecution Complex" (tm), it was observed 
and first identified in print by the Jewish author, Howard F. Stein, 
writing in 'The Journal of Psychohistory' (Fall, 1978) on "Judaism 
and the Group-Fantasy of Martyrdom".  In a follow-up on this 
article he wrote the following for 'The Journal of Historical Review' 
(Winter, 1980,):
     "For the Jews, the term "Holocaust" does not simply denote a 
single catastrophic era in history, but is a grim metaphor for the 
meaning of Jewish history.  The word "Holocaust" lies at the heart 
of the Jewish experience of time itself.  One is either anxiously 
awaiting persecution, experiencing persecution, recovering from it, 
or living in a period that is a temporary reprieve from it."  -The 
Holocaust and the Myth of the Past History.
     The oft-quoted Yiddish phrase, It's "tough to be a Jew" ("schwer 
tsoo zine a Yid") perfectly illustrates the Jewish Persecution 
Complex (tm).  This sounds like a very sad way to live, but their 
pride keeps them from surrendering to Christ and acknowledging 
Him as Lord, Messiah and Sovereign God.  Who knows, they may 
be spared this self-imposed terror if they were not so unwilling to 
give up and expose the evil of the Talmudic religion and way of life 
for the damnable thing that it is in the hope that they may find grace 
>from  Jesus the Christ and only true God.  "God is the one who 
justifies" (Romans 8:33).
     More and more honest inquirers, who see through this insulting 
and distasteful behavior, are finding their belief in the infallible 
"Jew" crumbling.  These truth seekers see these people as our Lord 
Jesus the Christ saw them: "a synagogue of Satan" (Rev. 2:9, 3:9) - 
liars, pretenders, persecutors, murderers, destroyers and benefactors 
of ill-gotten gains.  It is amazing that such a people can exist, but 
these impostors who call themselves "Jews" are their own worst 
enemy because the more people they defraud, insult and enslave the 
more people will eventually awaken to the "Jews" true nature and 
     George Washington (1732-1799), our first president in America 
recognized the self-styled "Jews" for what they were: "The Jews 
work more effectively against us than the enemy's armies.  They are 
a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause 
we are engaged in.  It is much to be lamented that each State, long 
ago has not hunted them down as pests to society and the greatest 
enemies we have to the happiness of America"  (Maxims of George 
Washington, by A.A. Appleton and Co, pp. 125,126.)

14.   Conclusion - LET THE BLIND SEE!
     Isaiah prophesied of a time in Israel's future when the blind 
would see:
     "Then the eyes of those who see will not be blinded, and the ears 
of those who hear will listen. And the mind of the hasty will discern 
the truth." (Isaiah 32:3,4)
      In spite of the confusion in this present day and age, you must 
decide upon the action you will take regarding this information on 
Israel's Identity.  It is my prayer that you will be honest enough to 
seek out the true facts of the matter and accept the responsibility
that is incumbent upon you. 
      You must decide who you are going to believe:
*  The Zionist "Jews" who lie for their own political gain and profit 
    as they falsely claim to be Israelites, the Chosen People of God, 
    but who refuse to acknowledge the facts to the contrary.  
*  Your pastors who falsely declare that the "Jews" are "God's 
    Chosen People" without any proof whatsoever to substantiate 
    their claim.  
*  "Jews" who truthfully admit, to their own kind and occasionally 
    to those outside of "Jewry," (as we have seen in the above 
    Q&A's) what Jewish and non-Jewish historians have verified; 
    that the Jews of today have no historical or racial lineage to the
    sons of Jacob/Israel. 
*  The Almighty God of the Bible when He warned us of "the 
    blasphemy by those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a 
    synagogue of Satan." (Rev. 2:9, 3:9) and "Who is the liar, except
    he who denies that Jesus is the Christ?" (I John 2:22.)

     The Bible warns us, and the "Jews" themselves confess that 
these Khazar "Jews" are impostors.  Consequently, we no longer 
have any excuse for perpetrating the LIE that the modern-day self-
styled "Jews" are Israelites, the Chosen People of God.

     It does not take a genius to see that the white Christian nations 
and their people are not what they once were: that their grandeur and 
greatness are declining.  Why has it happened? Could it be because 
Israel lost her identity and her sense of obligation to her God?:

    "For what great nation is there that has a god so near to it as is 
YHWH our God whenever we call on Him?  Or what great nation is 
there that has statutes and judgments as righteous as this whole law 
which I am setting before you today?  Only give heed to yourself 
and keep your soul diligently, lest you forget the things which your 
eyes have seen, and lest they depart from your heart all the days of 
your life; but make them known to your sons and your grandsons." 
(Deuteronomy 4:7-9) 

       This description will only be said again of Israel when she 
awakens to her identity and returns to her God and His laws!
       May we who have been graciously granted a deeper 
understanding of God's Word, and who have been privileged to see 
and hear a higher calling in Jesus(Yhshua) the Christ, prove 
ourselves worthy and true to this calling. Let us awaken to the 
tremendous impact which can be made on our generation and the 
generations to come with the knowledge of Israel’s true identity.  

     LISTEN to me, you who pursue righteousness,
            Who seek YHWH (the LORD):
            Look to the rock from which you were hewn,
            And to the quarry from which you were dug.
            Look to Abraham your father,
            And to Sarah who gave birth to you in pain.
                         (Isaiah 51:1,2)

     OH THAT My people would listen to Me,
       That Israel would walk in My ways!
       I would quickly subdue their enemies,
       And turn My hand against their adversaries.
                         (Psalm 81:13,14)

     God had, and continues to have, a plan for His Covenant People 
Israel -- the kindred Germanic (white) peoples. May YHWH (the LORD
God of Israel) be magnified through YHSHUA (Jesus) THE CHRIST!
     The Creation groans for the revealing of the Sons of God!  It is
time for Israel to awaken from her slumber and turn back to her God.

Our heavenly Father, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel 
for His Son, Christ Jesus who makes our redemption possible.
All questions posed by several helpful Khazar critics

For further study, we recommend the following books available 
through Scriptures For America, PO Box 766-c, LaPorte, CO 80535.
Write Scriptures for America and ask for their free newsletter.
*  God's Covenant People: Yesterday, Today and Forever by Ted R. 
Weiland -- THE resource book for the Israel-Identity Christian 
message.  This book proves that God continues to have a plan for 
the physical Israelites under the New Covenant dispensation.  It 
exposes the impostors and establishes who Israel *is* today from 
the Scriptures, archaeology, and history, and discloses why this is of 
such significance to us.  A hard bound book, 14 chapters, in excess 
of 700 quotes with footnotes, over 30 early American and European 
testimonies, and more than 40 Biblical, archaeological, and historical 
proofs of Israel's modern-day identity.  460 pages.  $23.00 

*  The Greatest Love Story Never Told by Pastor Pete Peters -- A 
novel introduction to the Israel-Identity message that tells the story 
of the Great I-Am of the Bible as the husband, Abraham as the 
father of the Bride, Israel as the unfaithful wife and the children of 
Israel as the cast of millions.  A love story involving love, romance, 
intrigue, divorce, conspiracy and murder.  A Bible story that will 
bring you a deeper appreciation for the love of God and how love 
truly overcomes all.  An entertaining, yet serious, study into the 
Israel-Identity truth.  $5.00

*  Love: The Greatest Commandment (6 Part audio album), by 
Pastor Pete Peters.  These tapes show how important it is to 
understand what love is and is not.  We know God's ways are not 
ours, but do we know our ways are not His?  What is love?  Has 
love been perverted and if so how and why?  How do we increase in 
love?  The Bible has clear step by step instructions on how to love 
God's way.  What can steal our love?  It is time to love the King 
with all our hearts, minds, souls and strength.   $24.00

*  Facts are Facts by Benjamin H. Freedman -- A reproduction of 
Dr. Freedman's letter addressed to Dr. David Goldstein, LL.D. of 
Boston, Massachusetts, in which Dr. Freedman demonstrates the 
Khazarian ancestry of the majority of today's Jews.  This authority 
provides proof that these Khazars are not descendants of Abraham, 
Isaac, and Jacob and consequently have no lawful claim to the land 
of Palestine.  $3.00

*  Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets by Archaeologist 
Raymond Capt --  Mr. Capt verifies the Identity of Israel from 
archaeological evidence.  It is specifically a study of recently 
discovered Assyrian tablets that reveal the fate of the "Lost" Tribes 
of Israel.  256 pages, $10.00

*  The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler --  Renowned Jewish 
author, Arthur Koestler, fully documents that over 90% of today's 
"Jews" are not descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but rather 
they are descendants of the fierce Turkish, Mongolian Khazar tribes 
of the Southern Steppes of Russia.  These tribes adopted the 
religion of Judaism and thus became known as "Jews" not because 
of race but because of religion.  255 pages.  $6.00

*  Origins of Race and Civilization by Charles Weisman -- an 
expose' on the false Christian doctrines and distorted historical and 
scientific teachings on the origins of races and civilizations.  176 
pages, 83 Illustrations, 204 Footnotes, references, Bibliography, 6 
chapters.  Finally the truth about YOUR origins and destiny!  No 
other book like it.  Only $9.00

*  The Life of an American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel by Jack 
Bernstein -- Mr. Bernstein relates his story of returning to the land 
of Israel after the 1967 Six-Day War and discovering the truth 
regarding the Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews, who they are and 
who they are not.  48 pages.  $3.00

*  Who is Esau-Edom? by Charles Weisman -- Mr Weisman 
documents how Edomite blood runs through the veins of most 
"Jewish" people today.  A book which expounds upon the age-old 
battle between Esau-Edom and Jacob-Israel.  132 pages.  $8.00

*  Who Rules America -- This document will provide you with the 
documentation that can be reproduced in most public libraries on 
who controls today's media outlets.  $1.00

*  America the Conquered by Pastor Pete Peters -- This book 
provides an understanding of how America was conquered and the 
manner of her conquest.  It describes how a people can be 
conquered unaware and the motives behind the conquerors.  
Discover how it happened and what we must do.  220 pages $8.00

Scriptures for America's Shortwave Radio Log

WINB 11.915 (EST)  5:00-6:00pm    Monday - Friday
WINB 11.915 (EST)  9:00-11:00pm  Monday - Friday
WINB 11.915 (EST)  8:00-9:00pm    Saturday
WINB 11.915 (EST)  8:00-10:00pm  Sundays
WHRI   7.315 (EST)  5:00-6:00pm    Monday - Friday
WHRI   7.315 (EST)  9:00-10:00pm  Monday - Friday
WHRI   7.315 (EST)  11-12:00pm     Sundays


WHRI:  Galaxy 4, Channel 15, 7.55 Mghz
WINB:  Galaxy 3, Channel 11, 7.38 Mghz


*  Truth for the Times -- Television Program hosted by Pastor
Pete Peters, aired three times a week by Satellite on Keystone
Inspirational Network:  Galaxy 3, Transponder 11
Saturday 12:00am - 1:00 am (EST)
Monday  10:30 - 11:30pm (EST)

Other Highly Recommended Sources:

*  The Jubilee Newspaper, P.O. Box 310, Midpines, California 
95345.  Ph:  (209) 742-NEWS. --Newspaper of news, reviews and 
views from the Patriotic Christian perspective.  $2.50 for a sample 
*  NewsLight -- News Radio hosted by Paul Hall, Chris Temple 
and Louis Beam -- Every Saturday evening on 11.950 short-wave 6-
7 p.m. Pacific Time.
*  Music - Watch Out For Martial Law by Carl Klang -- inspired 
by this nation's modern-day life-and-death struggles for freedom.  
Federal Reserve Isn't Federal At All, Why the Banksters Keep Us 
Dumb, Hang-um High, Blinded By the Lies, Leave Our Guns Alone 
and more!  Carl Klang, PO Box 217, Colton, OR 97017 ($10.00 

 by - S. Grace

To a Candle, tall and white, Comes a wonder (from above):
A flame, like a guiding Light, When the Saxon learns to love.
And a world, once grim and dark, Sunk in clouds of sullen fear,
Rejoices to see the spark in his eyes, so bright and clear!
Like a lion, poised to leap, Or a sweetly-singing dove
Who watches (while others sleep) from a tower lit by love;
Like the sun, he shares a fate (Once a shadowed world revolves)
To shine, until gloomy hate, Like a morning mist, dissolves;
And the rule of Christ on earth (which the prophets much spoke of)
Arrives, like a blessed birth -- When the Saxon learns to love,

When the Saxon BURNS with love!

|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sat Dec 30 11:01:32 PST 1995
Article: 9535 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: The Jew-Free A.S.T.
Organization: SFA>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 06:11:57 GMT
Lines: 145

Introducing the 
Anointed Standard Translation of the 
New Testament

An Exactingly Literal and Accurate Translation of the New 
Testament Presented in Chronological Order with Copious Notes 
and Appendices.

THE AST IS A NEW TRANSLATION.  The AST is not a revision of any 
existing translation, or just another rewording of the KJV.  The 
AST is entirely new, starting with a careful preparation of the 
Greek texts which it was based upon, and years of research into 
the translation itself.

THE AST IS LITERAL.  The AST is certainly the most literal 
translation ever made.  Whereas most translations add words 
freely, the AST only adds in pronouns and other noncritical words 
very, very rarely, and when words are added in, they are clearly 
marked as such.  Many translations claim to aid the reader by 
being "conceptual translations."  What this means is that someone 
else has sat down and decided what the original authors meant 
and then put it in his own words for you to read.  The problem 
with this is that it opens the door to personal theology and 
personal politics, both of which are quite often wrong.  The AST is 
not a conceptual translation, it is not a paraphrase, it is a literal 

THE AST IS THEOLOGY-FREE.  Virtually every translation ever 
made into English contains a number of theological words and 
terms that hide the true meaning of the Greek words, i.e., grace, 
faith, adultery, hope, soul, sin, church, holy, saint, etc.  These 
words were picked many centuries ago by translators even 
though they knew the words did not express the actual Greek 
concept.  Their reasoning was that by picking a vague and 
imprecise term, the concepts would be defined in the pulpit and 
not in the Bible itself.  Thus, the words became theological 
euphemisms which have been twisted and perverted in the 
pulpits around the world ever since.  The AST, however, is the first 
translation in history to restore the true meaning of the Greek 
words in the translation.
    Of course, in some cases, the original meaning of the English 
word has merely been lost, as is the case with the word 'adultery'.  
The English word 'adultery' is a descendant of the Latin word used 
in early Greek-Latin lexicons.  But the English speaking world has 
failed to remember the meaning of the Latin word.  The Latin word 
was from 'ad+alter' or 'to change, corrupt, adulterate,' etc., and 
anyone familiar with the writings of Horace knows that the word 
meant 'to mongrelize' or 'to corrupt seedline'.

THE AST IS JEW-FREE.  The AST is probably the only entirely new 
translation ever undertaken in which Jews have not played a part, 
whether as editors, publishers, or as translators.  All modern 
translations have Jews on their translation teams, and even the 
King James Version relied upon Jews for linguistic, textual and 
etymological assistance.  Since the AST is "Jew-free," compromises 
have not been made regarding the racial consciousness of the New 
Testament.  In the past, translations have been watered down in 
order to hide any semblance of racial consciousness in the New 
Testament, even though the translators themselves were quite 
often aware of what they were doing.

THE AST IS INTERPOLATION-FREE.  Perhaps one of the greatest 
problems with other translations, both new and old, is the 
prevalence of interpolations in the text.  An interpolation is a 
chapter, verse, sentence, phrase, word, or even sometimes a letter 
inserted into the Greek text that changes the original meaning and 
intention of the author.  The Greek of the New Testament is taken 
>from  over 5,000 different witnesses (manuscripts, lectionaries, 
papyri, Church Fathers, etc.).  Every translation ever made, 
including the King James Version, the Geneva bible, Wyclif's Bible, 
and especially the modern translations, is the result of the 
translator deciding which words and verses were original and 
which were not.  The translators of the KJV had only 8 
manuscripts with which to make these decisions, all of which 
postdated 1,000 AD.  Today, we have over 5,000, some dating 
back to 125 AD.  More importantly, though, in other translations, 
like the KJV, the reader is unaware that these decisions are being 
made.  In the AST, however, the more than 1250 critical footnotes 
provide information about these decisions and present proof for 
and against the decisions.  This allows the reader to weigh the 
information for himself.  Here is a practical example of what this 
means.  If you were reading the KJV, or any other translation for 
that matter, and you came to Luke 23:34 and read the words, 
"And Jesus said, 'Father, forgive them, for they do not know what 
they are doing," you would not be aware that the translators of 
your particular version decided to put that sentence in there even 
though it is not contained in any Greek manuscript older than the 
fifth century.  That's right: even though it was not in the New 
Testament for the first four hundred years of its existence, it has 
been kept in your translations.  Why is this?  Because most Bible 
translators, from the times of the KJV to the present day, believe 
that if some interpolation has crept into the texts of the Greek New 
Testament through 2000 years of copying, then it must be kept 
because it is a "divinely inspired interpolation."  Yet this rule does 
not explain the many dozens of words and phrases that they omit!
    Moreover, a single letter in the Greek can greatly effect the 
English translation.  For example, in Luke 2:14, the AST reads, 
"Reputation in the highest to God, and on earth, peace among men 
with whom He is pleased."  You may recall that the KJV says 
"...peace, good will toward men."  The difference in these two 
translations is but a single letter in the Greek!  Problems as small 
as this to as large as twelve verse interpolation in John are 
discussed in detail in the more than 1,000 footnotes dealing with 
textual questions.

THE AST IS EASY TO USE.  The AST has many features which make 
it an ideal study Bible.  Each Book of the New Testament is divided 
into sections with topic headers.  It is printed in easy to read type 
with distinction given to the words of Jesus and general quotations 
as well.  Section numbers and topic headers, as well as verse and 
chapter number, are kept as unobtrusive as possible.  And while 
the AST is greatly annotated, the notes have been kept clearly 
separate from the main text so as not to interrupt study or 

THE AST CAN EMPOWER YOU!  Never before has a book been so 
powerful: the AST is a tool which you can use to finally become the 
"authority."  By using the translation in conjunction with the 
critical footnotes and the appendices, you can present arguments 
that no Judeo can face!  No longer is it a question of "your opinion," 
it is now a question of absolute, scientific, and irrefutable, 
undeniable proof!  It is not a question of what "you believe," it is 
now a question of what it says!  The only option the AST will leave 
Judeo preachers is to tell you that they do not care what the 
original Word of God says!

ORDER YOUR AST TODAY!  Many years and tens of thousands of 
man-hours in the making, the AST is 768 pages long with over 
1250 critical footnotes, nearly 100 pages of endnotes, and 
hundreds of marginal notes.  Measures 6 by 9 inches.  Only $32.00 
postpaid (US funds).

Scriptures for America
P.O. Box 766-c
LaPorte, CO 80535


|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sat Dec 30 11:01:33 PST 1995
Article: 9536 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Gods Law equals His Character
Organization: SFA>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 06:18:49 GMT
Lines: 34

- God is Holy (Psalms 145:17)
     His law is Holy (Romans 7:12)
- God is Love (I John 4:8)
     His Law is Love (Romans 13:10)
- God is Perfect (Matt. 5:48)
     His Law is Perfect (Psalms 19:7)
- God is Spiritual (John 4:24)
     His Law is Spiritual (Romans 7:14)
- God is Righteous (Psalms 145:17)
     His Law is Righteous (Psalsm 119:172)
- God is Truth (Deut. 32:4)
     His Law is Truth (Psalms 119:142)
- God is Good (Psalms 25:8)
     His Law is Good (Romans 7:12)
- God is Everlasting (Gen. 21:33)
     His Law is Everlasting (Ps. 111:7,8)
- God is Just (Deut. 32:4)
     His Law is Just (Romans 7:12)
- God is Light (I John 1:5)
     His Law is Light (Proverbs 8:23).

   Anyone who attacks God's Holy, Spiritual and Righteous Law is 
attacking God's Person and Character, since God's Law is His Character.
   When we are renewed by God's Spirit, God's Character (Law) is written 
on our hearts (Jer. 31:33, Hebrews 8:8-10).

   See SFA's WWW page for more on God's Law and the true Identity of 
God's people at:
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sat Dec 30 11:01:34 PST 1995
Article: 9573 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Re: The Jew-Free A.S.T.
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <4c3jfg$>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 16:55:22 GMT
Lines: 28
Sender: wrote:
: iSnip snip.. Rick savage
: > 
: > THE AST IS JEW-FREE.  The AST is probably the only entirely new 
: > translation ever undertaken in which Jews have not played a part, 
: > whether as editors, publishers, or as translators.

: ncrccjc responds:
: Just what the net needs another fringe loonie antisemite!!!!  

     Fringe loonie antisemite?  I guess I wont be getting any discussion 
>from  you in the future.  If you hadn't noticed what newsgroup you are 
posting to, you are off topic.  :)
     Besides, if you don't remember me than you are too new around here 
to comment.  I had to take a break and live life for awhile in the real 
world so I could affirm that some people in the world are sain and not a 
slave to the knee-jerk rabid conditioning you seem to be suffering 
     My advice to you is to go find a few good books to read.  Develop 
the skill of thinking for yourself and begin reading between the lines.  
The more ones reads the more skillful one becomes in seeing beyond the 
nicely framed narrow world-view of the mass-media and political mythology 
known as "Americanism".
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sat Dec 30 11:01:35 PST 1995
Article: 9575 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Body of Christ - ATCD
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 17:02:13 GMT
Lines: 64

From: http:/

AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY

A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize Christians

   CHURCH MEANING:  The church with its members.  Some 
churches view "membership" differently than others.  To be a 
member of some churches, you need only attend their services and 
accede to their doctrines - thus, becoming a member of the Body 
of Christ.  In other churches, one must officially join by swearing 
allegiance and taking out a document of membership - thus, being 
accepted into the Body of Christ.
   CORRECT MEANING:  The collective, societal community of 
called-out followers of Christ.  A corporate the sense of 
incorporating and synchronizing various parts which work 
together (however, not "corporate" in the sense of being 
franchised under the power of the State).
   The term, "Body of Christ," has been popularly perverted to 
refer to church membership.  However, the "Body," as a living, 
functioning entity, encompasses every-day living, working, and 
co-operating.  Churches stand in contrast to that, and are nothing 
but business of religion-for-profit.  Like a stage show, they offer 
no solutions - only temporary indulgence.
   The community, on the other hand, is the instrument of God's 
Kingdom to receive "life" as the Body of Christ.  In the 
community, "members" (ecclesians) voluntarily work, co-operate, 
and support one another.

What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary?
   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.

Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
Or by WWW at:

|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sat Dec 30 11:01:36 PST 1995
Article: 9576 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Freedom - ATC Def.
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 17:04:37 GMT
Lines: 66

From: http:/

AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY

A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize Christians

   GOVERNMENT MEANING:  Freedom to establish and 
defend "government."  Majority rule via central government.  The 
privilege to participate in choosing what form of government will 
rule you.
   CHRISTIAN MEANING:  Owing no debt or obligation to any 
man, or institution of men, except that which is owed to all men - 
i.e., to respect their freedom and rights equally with your own.  
"Owe no man any thing, but to love one another; for he that loves 
another has fulfilled the law." - Romans 13:8
   Freedom begins with a concept - a state of mind.  The mind, 
once freed, then goes on to pursue physical freedom as well.  In 
John 8:32, Jesus states:  "And you shall know the truth, and the 
truth shall set you free."  Freedom comes from truth, and cannot 
come from central government - itself being a fraud, and its 
methods primarily lies, tricks, and deceit.
   God, by teaching us His law (truth), gave us the means for 
freedom.  Jesus reiterated it.  "Truth" leads us towards freedom 
and away from slavery.
   Freedom, like truth, is not inherited.  It must be sought out by 
each generation and garnered bit by precious bit.  The pursuit of 
freedom and happiness is every man's birthright and individual 
responsibility.  It cannot be transferred or deferred to another, or a 
government.  People who don't accept individual responsibility, 
and wont' fight for their own freedom, are known as slaves.

INTRODUCTION to the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary

   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.

Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
Or by WWW at:
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sat Dec 30 11:01:36 PST 1995
Article: 9577 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Understanding Racial Diversity
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 17:13:35 GMT
Lines: 239

Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from: /pub/SF/SFA
  Visit the SFA WWW pages at:

              Notes from:  _The Racial Compact_
   A Call for Racial Rights, Preservation, and Independence
                   by Richard McCulloch
     There are different kinds of human variation.  Some 
differences are biological or genetic, others are cultural or 
environmental.  There are also different levels of human variation.  
Some differences are at the individual level, others are at the 
population or racial level.  The first distinguished us as separate 
individuals, the second distinguish a population of individuals as a 
separate race.
     In the system of biological classification called taxonomy a 
race is a subdivision or branch of a species, and a species in turn 
is a subdivision or branch of a genus.  All populations which are 
capable of interbreeding with each other and producing fertile 
offspring are considered to be members of the same species, 
regardless how great their differences or how distinct their 
relationship.  (Edward O. Wilson, _The Diversity of Life_ 
(Harvard University Press, 1992), p.38).
     A race is a population that can be distinguished as a distinct 
subgroup within a species by genetically transmitted physical 
characteristics.  It possesses a unique and distinct ensemble of 
genes, and is identified by the traits (both mental and physical) 
produced by this genetic ensemble.  Members of the same race 
share distinguishing genetic characteristics because they share a 
common genetic ancestry and a consequently similar genetic 
ensemble.  They are capable not only of producing offspring but 
of producing offspring who also share and continue their racially 
unique genetic ensemble and its distinctive traits and 
     Among non-human animal populations the degree of genetic 
differences between many species is far less than the degree of 
genetic difference between human races, and many of these 
species are biologically capable of interbreeding, but as they do 
not interbreed under natural conditions -- instinctively 
discriminating in selecting mates of their own kind -- they are 
classified as separate species.  
     There is variation among individuals in the degree of racial 
discrimination in selecting a mate.  Only a minority of 
INDIVIDUALS in any given generation interbreed with other 
races under conditions of extensive contact.  Over the course of 
generations all POPULATIONS end up mixed as the cumulative 
effect of a minority in each generation adds up to a majority -- and 
eventually a total population -- over a space of generations.)
     Traditionally, species and races have been identified by their 
morphological (external physical) traits and characteristics, and 
this is still the primary determinant, generally taking priority over 
others in the even of disagreement.  Other determinants of racial 
identity -- such as biochemical and molecular genetic analysis -- 
are usually consistent with the morphological identification when 
one allows for the extent of individual variation one can expect to 
find for these traits within a race.  
    The human genome or genetic code consists of about 100,000 
genes, each consisting of many thousands of "genetic letters," or 
nucleotide pairs of DNA (DioxyriboNucleicAcid), numbering 
three billion base pairs in total.  The interaction of these genes in 
producing genetic traits is often complex.  At least five different 
genes work together to determine skin color, and as many as 100 
work together to determine skin texture.)  All the human races 
share at least 99.5% of their three billion genetic letters in 
common, their genetic differences being limited to .5%, a 
proportion which represent about FIFTEEN MILLION genetic 
differences or mutations.  (Humans also share 98.4% of their 
DNA in common with Chimpanzees)
     This rich racial diversity of modern humanity owes its 
existence to geographic separation and the reproductive isolation 
this separation has preserved.
     In racial classification there is often a tendency to group a wide 
range of diverse racial types together into one race, attempting to 
contain all human racial variation within a few very broadly 
defined racial categories.  As a rule, what these broad racial 
categories gain in simplicity they lose in accuracy.  They can be 
regarded as useful only if they are recognized as a first level 
subdivision of species, or subspecies.
     Based on the nuclear DNA studies of Luigi Luca 
CarvalliSforza and his colleagues we can define 7 further 
branches of racial grouping or divisions.  The CONGOID 
subspecies of subSaharan Africa; CAUCASOID of Europe, Asia 
west of the Himalayas and Africa north of the Sahara; the 
NORTHEAST ASIAN of Mongolia, China, Korea and Japan; the 
AMERINDIAN, which branches from the Northeast Asians and 
migrated to the Americas; the SOUTHEAST ASIAN of 
Indochina, Burma, Malaya, Indonesia, and the Philippines; the 
PACIFIC ISLANDERS of Polynesia; and the AUSTRALOID of 
Australia, Melanesia and New Guinea.
    A branch of humanity can be regarded as a race only when its 
different genetic elements are sufficiently homogenous -- or 
genetically compatible -- that they can freely intermix without 
negating or diminishing their unique genetic ensemble and racial 
traits.  For example, the Caucasoid group includes such distinctly 
different and separate peoples as those of Sweden, Italy, Armenia, 
Egypt, Iran and India) it is clear that these groupings are too broad 
to be accurately defined as races, but should properly be regarded 
as subspecies -- or groupings of more or less related, but still 
distinctly separate, races within a species.
     Reproductive isolation, provided by geographic separation, 
made human racial diversity possible.  Reproductive isolation 
assures that those individuals who do reproduce will reproduce 
their own racial type, as it effectively limits their choice of partners 
to their own racial type.  This condition is required for the 
preservation of racial diversity.
     Even without considering the effects of interbreeding, 
geographic separation is required for the continued existence of 
all the different races in the long term.  If different races occupied 
the same territory the resulting competition between the races in 
the multiracial environment would have different effects on the 
races involved.  Some races might thrive in the multiracial 
environment while others would suffer a decline in population, not 
only in the relative terms of population share but also in absolute 
    (Note:  Gause’s law of Exclusion states that multiple animal 
species with the same requirements cannot coexist for any length 
of time in the same habitat.  All but one will eventually become 
extinct.  This law can also be applied to human races occupying 
the same territory, where the more successful race (usually 
measured by rate of population growth) eventually assimilates or 
replaces its competitors.)
     Thus the racial changes that occur in a multiracial environment 
tend toward a decrease in overall human racial diversity.  It is 
therefore misleading to identify a multiracial environment or 
society with racial diversity, as the long term effects of such a 
multiracial condition are actually to reduce and negate diversity.
     The ideology (or system of beliefs and values) that favors a 
multiracial social condition, or multiracialism, often describes this 
condition as "racial diversity."  It is a type of racial diversity, but a 
type which consists of mixing together in the same territory 
diverse races which previously were geographically separated, and 
whose diversity -- and existence -- was preserved by separation.  
This type of racial diversity that violates the conditions 
(reproductive isolation) required for continued preservation, 
creates the conditions (extensive contact) that promote 
interbreeding and the consequent destruction of racial diversity.  It 
is really a form of social diversity or racial diversity in a social 
sense.  But it in the biological or genetic sense it is anti-diversity, 
as its effects are destructive of the racial diversity.
     The two types of racial diversity (social & biological) should 
not be confused, as they are in fact incompatible opposites.  In the 
long term one cannot have both, as the social type is destructive of 
the biological type, nor can one be for both, as the promotion of 
biological racial diversity requires opposition to multiracial 
     The racial interbreeding that is an unavoidable consequence of 
a multiracial society does add a new element to social racial 
diversity in the form of the racially-mixed or hybrid offspring of 
different parent racial stocks.  But this hybrid element does not 
add to biological racial diversity.  It takes existing genetic 
characteristics from the different parent racial stocks and either 
mixes them into a new combination, blends them together into an 
intermediate form or, if they are recessive, diminishes or negates 
their occurrence.  These hybridized recombinations of racial-
genetic traits actually reduce, and are destructive of, biological 
racial diversity to the extent that they replace or deplete the parent 
racial stocks.
     The two opposing forces in the existence of races are the 
forces of life and death, or creation and destruction.  While there 
is only one creation of a race, there are many ways by which a 
race can die, many forces of racial destruction.  The racial 
destructive force of intermixture undoes, destroys or decreates the 
diversity of creation by blending different races together in a 
multiracial social condition descriptively and accurately referred to 
as a "melting pot."  The racially unique and distinct ensembles of 
genes are dissolved in the common blend and all distinctive traits 
and differences are destroyed and lost in a racial melt-down.
    The migration of vast numbers of people around the world, 
made possible by modern advances in transportation, has 
facilitated the development of multiracial societies and the 
transformation of many previously monoracial countries into 
multiracial ones.  As in many other areas of technology, 
transportation technology has advanced much more rapidly than 
our understanding of its effects, or the development of 
philosophical and moral concepts to deal with those effects and 
avoid those that are harmful.
    The implications of this vast bringing together of different races 
that had been preserved under conditions of geographic separation 
-- replacing reproductive isolation with its antithetical opposite, 
extensive contact -- are profound.  Yet these implications have 
received little attention or consideration.  If geographic separation 
of the races is replaced by multiracial social conditions it can be 
expected that racial diversity will be replaced by racial intermixture 
and result in a diminishment and loss in racial diversity.
     If those races which are most vulnerable to the effects of racial 
intermixture -- because of recessiveness of their genetic 
characteristics or the sensitivity of their reproductive behavior -- 
are subjected to multiracial conditions on a sufficient scale it is 
likely that they will become extinct, and their distinctive traits will 
be lost.  They will exist only in submersion with the  traits of 
other races, submerged in the multiracial blend or mixture  of the 
"melting pot."  The preservation of racial diversity requires  the 
preservation of the conditions of geographic separation that made 
and makes diversity possible.
     Under the impetus of two factors, modern transportation 
systems and a dominant destructive ideology, the age-old 
conditions of geographic separation are being destroyed.  The 
dominant ideology that promotes multiracialization of previously 
monoracial societies perceives the continued existence of different 
races as a matter of little or now value, importance or concern, or 
even with outright hostility as something to oppose.
     The Senegalese conservationist Baba Dioum said, "In the end, 
we will conserve only what we love."  If the world is to be made 
safe for racial diversity -- or safe AGAIN for racial diversity - its 
preservation will first have to be regarded as a matter of great 
value, importance and concern.  As we begin to have a sense of 
reverence for life in general, we should develop a reverence for the 
diversity of life, and particularly the diversity of human life.  As 
we have learned to regard that which promotes life as good, and 
that which destroys life as evil, so we should learn to regard that 
which promotes the diversity of life as good, and that which 
destroys that diversity as evil.  
     An effective racial conservation movement would depend upon 
a sense of appreciation and reverence for that which it sought to 
conserve.  Only under the protection of the ethical concept of 
rights -- in this case racial rights -- can racial diversity, the 
existence of different races, be protected and preserved in an age 
when this former protector, geographic distance, is no longer 
effective in preserving the condition of geographic separation 
racial diversity requires for its continued existence.  An ethical 
philosophy or racial preservation is needed to provide the diverse 
races with the protected habitats - the geographic separation which 
is the only effective barrier to interbreeding - that the fallen 
barriers can no longer provide. -- 

Continued in the file "Racial_Rights" and "Charter_Race_Rights" 
avaiable from FTP site below.

Visit the SFA WWW page at:  http/

|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sun Dec 31 00:05:12 PST 1995
Article: 18152 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Holocaust - Anti-Thought Control Def.
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 17:08:17 GMT
Lines: 68

From: http:/

AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY

A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize Christians

   CONTROLLED MEANING:  The annihilation of six-million 
Jews by the Nazis in World War II.
   INTENT:  A Zionist propaganda term used to create a sense of 
guilt among non-Jews, and to promote indebtedness to, and 
sympathy for, all Jews.  A form of psychological blackmail 
(brainwashing), especially among "Judeochristians," to reduce or 
prevent thoughts or actions against Jews and the oppressive state 
of Israeli -- thus, granting them carte blanche to kill the 
Palestinians with impunity and financially bleed Germany and 
   TRUE MEANING:  "Holocaust" comes from two Greek 
words: holos, meaning "whole" and kaustos, meaning "burnt."  
According to _Webster's 1828 Dictionary_, the word originally 
meant "A burntsacrifice or offering, the whole of which was 
consumed by fire."  The term is used in the Bible to indicate 
"whole burnt offerings to God"  (Heb. 10:6).  Notice that a 
"holocaust" is not just ANYTHING burnt, but AN OFFERING 
burnt.  Thus, the Jews are claiming "six-million burnt offerings."
   The fact that the Jews chose to use the word "holocaust" is 
strong indication that the so-called "six-million" were not burnt by 
the Nazis.  In fact, they weren't burnt at all except in the inventive 
minds of the Jewish Priests and the pens of the Jewish writers of 
fiction and propaganda.  This must be the case, because a Jewish 
"holocaust" could not be offered by alien enemies (Nazis).  A 
Jewish "holocaust" must be offered to the Jewish god, by Jewish 
priests!  Otherwise, they could not call it a "Jewish holocaust."

What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary?
   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.

Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
Or by WWW at:

|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sun Dec 31 00:11:21 PST 1995
Article: 9631 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Clan- Anti-Thought Control Def.
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 16:58:54 GMT
Lines: 56


AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY

A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize Christians

   CONTROLLED MEANING:  An old Scottish form of society.  
An archaic culture which, after succumbing to British rule, 
subsequently became only a novelty tradition.  In America, when 
spelled with a "k" (Klan) it refers to the Ku Klux Klan.
   CORRECT MEANING:  "Clan" is another word for "tribe" (no 
connection to the Masonic fraternity, "Ku Klux Klan").  A clan is 
a society of independent families united by the common descent 
of the heads of each household.  While Scottish culture had clans, 
the phenomenon was not limited to the Scots.  Tribal cultures 
(clans) have existed on every continent.  Ancient Hebrew culture, 
as well, was built around tribes (clans).
   As families have heads, clans also have heads - called patriarchs.  
Jacob was one such clan patriarch.  This patriarchal form of 
ecclesian society and civil government is the culture of choice for 
godly people.

What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary?
   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.

Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
Or by WWW at:
|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sun Dec 31 00:11:22 PST 1995
Article: 9632 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: 1 Nation Under God - ATCD
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 17:00:14 GMT
Lines: 52

From: http:/

AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY

A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize Christians

   CONTROLLED MEANING:  "Pluralism."  Many world-
religions joined together in America, all worshipping their god, 
each in his own way.  All religions work together.  
   TRUE MEANING:  One nation, under ONE God - as defined 
by the Christian Bible.  There are many world-religions coexisting 
along with Christianity, but they are each worshipping some other 
god.  For Christians to live in "one nation under God," that "God" 
must be the one and only true God of the Christian Bible.  Other 
gods in the land are forbidden.  God calls them "a snare" (Ex. 

What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary?
   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.

Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
Or by WWW at:

|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

From Sun Dec 31 00:11:23 PST 1995
Article: 9633 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (Rick Savage)
Subject: Holocaust - Anti-Thought Control Def.
Organization: SFA>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 17:09:57 GMT
Lines: 68

From: http:/

AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY

A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize Christians

   CONTROLLED MEANING:  The annihilation of six-million 
Jews by the Nazis in World War II.
   INTENT:  A Zionist propaganda term used to create a sense of 
guilt among non-Jews, and to promote indebtedness to, and 
sympathy for, all Jews.  A form of psychological blackmail 
(brainwashing), especially among "Judeochristians," to reduce or 
prevent thoughts or actions against Jews and the oppressive state 
of Israeli -- thus, granting them carte blanche to kill the 
Palestinians with impunity and financially bleed Germany and 
   TRUE MEANING:  "Holocaust" comes from two Greek 
words: holos, meaning "whole" and kaustos, meaning "burnt."  
According to _Webster's 1828 Dictionary_, the word originally 
meant "A burntsacrifice or offering, the whole of which was 
consumed by fire."  The term is used in the Bible to indicate 
"whole burnt offerings to God"  (Heb. 10:6).  Notice that a 
"holocaust" is not just ANYTHING burnt, but AN OFFERING 
burnt.  Thus, the Jews are claiming "six-million burnt offerings."
   The fact that the Jews chose to use the word "holocaust" is 
strong indication that the so-called "six-million" were not burnt by 
the Nazis.  In fact, they weren't burnt at all except in the inventive 
minds of the Jewish Priests and the pens of the Jewish writers of 
fiction and propaganda.  This must be the case, because a Jewish 
"holocaust" could not be offered by alien enemies (Nazis).  A 
Jewish "holocaust" must be offered to the Jewish god, by Jewish 
priests!  Otherwise, they could not call it a "Jewish holocaust."

What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary?
   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.

Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
Or by WWW at:

|        Rick Savage, P.O. Box 5251, Denver, CO 80217-5251  (u)SA         | 
|               SFA on WWW:                 |
|    Melchizedek Vigilance:    |

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.