The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/nyms/charles/1996/joebuck.1296

From Tue Dec  3 08:45:23 PST 1996
Article: 115789 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.impeach.clinton,
Subject: Re: John Salvi Martyred by Mass. Socialists
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 04:35:41 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <57oap6$>
References: <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Nov 29  7:47:50 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.conspiracy:115789 alt.impeach.clinton:69976 (Wayne Teixeira) wrote:

>Prophet John Salvi, crusader against the demonic Mainstream culture,
>was strung up and hung on orders from bureaucrats from the People's
>Republic of Massachusetts.

  How ironic that those (i.e. hypocritical American liberals) who've
long been propping up -- no, virtually CANONIZING -- that
mass-murdering abolitionist madman from the 1800s -- John Brown -- as
a "saint" for *his* violent-but-pc anti-slavery acts are the very ilk
which so demonized the late Mr. Salvi for his actions in killing a
pair of senior-citizen murderers.

From Tue Dec  3 10:22:29 PST 1996
Article: 516455 of talk.politics.misc
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: <"talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,,alt.activism,alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich,alt.society.conservatism,alt.politics.correct,alt.politics.reform,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,talk.politics,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Loan rates are too high
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 1996 06:04:40 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <57r4c7$>
References: <57nijs$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Nov 30  9:16:55 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.activism:101087 alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich:98705 alt.society.conservatism:63003 alt.politics.correct:160334 alt.politics.reform:116655 alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater:59337 talk.politics.misc:516455 talk.politics.guns:348240 (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.) wrote:

>Roy Lemons ( wrote:

>: Could someone that was telling us about the great job Clinton is doing
>: explane how Clintons plan is doing better than expected, but loan rates
>: are going sky high? 

>Sure.  The banks make money and the banks' managers make money and two out
>of three ain't bad. 

  Anyone could make a simplistic reply such as yours, Junior.
  I think the corespondent was looking for somthing a bit more
mature/thoughtful than what you were able to come up with.
  (I hear that even many Junior colleges offer some fine
intro-to-economics courses these days -- why not enroll in one for the
next semester, Junior?)

From Tue Dec  3 11:27:07 PST 1996
Article: 57176 of alt.discrimination
Newsgroups: alt.politics.equality,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.correct,alt.california
Subject: Re: Time for Pro-209ers to take to streets?
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 07:24:53 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <57gnhl$>
References: <57fsnk$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Nov 26 10:36:37 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.discrimination:57176 alt.politics.correct:159630 alt.california:28978 (Randy) wrote:

>Looks like the fix is in for the judicial review of 209. It seems that
>Thelton Henderson, the judge reviewing the anti-209ers case, is a
>black liberal and a former "civil-rights" attorney.

  Why would he vote against the very program which, very likely, let
him personally climb the social/professional/$$ ladder so relatively
  Henderson knows where his bread is buttered, rest assured.

> In the case of affirmative action, upper class and upper-middle
> class whites and white women ganged up with blacks and hispanics 

  BTW, the above describes Jesse "Hymietown" Jackson's "Rainbow
Coalition" to a "T."

>to oppress and de-opportunitize lower-class white males--those white
> males who are less competitve in the economy (less educated, 
>less well-connected, etc).

  Man, you hit the nail on the head on that one.

From Thu Dec  5 06:03:24 PST 1996
Article: 116862 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.perot,,,alt.politics.immigration
Subject: Huge rise in TB among U.S. immigrants, illegal aliens
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 05:50:09 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <585l1e$>
References:  <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Dec 04  9:02:38 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.conspiracy:116862 alt.politics.perot:66256

  Well, they say that all it frequently takes for a liberal to convert
to conservatism is to be mugged.
  Likewise, perhaps all it will take for many
"illegal-immigration's-ok-and-if-you-oppose-it-you're-a-racist" style
liberals/pc-correctness mavens to get religion about border control is
for them to catch the highly-contagious disease of tuberculosis.
  Certainly the U.S. must and will continue to welcome more immigrants
annually than any other nation on earth. 
  However, does it make sense to dangle cash welfare benefits, food
stamps, expensive health benefits and other goodies -- that even
native-born citizens aren't eligible for -- in the faces of would-be
immigrants/illegal aliens? 
  (And please, DON'T try to tell me that illegal aliens in this
country IN HUGE NUMBERS aren't receiving such benefits -- I mean,
even the ultra-liberal, ultra-pc City of Los Angeles is in a quandary
nowadays, wondering how to pay for the *free* medical care it's
taxpayers provide for the illegal aliens who call it home and who now
constitute well over 70% of it's public hospital admissions.)

>Fresh off the WWW:

>>   ATLANTA (Reuter) - Efforts to control tuberculosis in Mexico  
>>should be expanded beyond areas adjacent to the U.S. border 
>>because many cases originate in other parts of the country, 
>>federal health officials said Friday. 
>>  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said 60  
>>percent of Mexican patients treated for tuberculosis at U.S. 
>>health clinics near the border had immigrated to the U.S. from 
>>border towns. The other 40 percent were born in other parts of 
>>  ``Collaborative efforts pertaining to TB control and  
>>prevention programs should extend farther into Mexico than just 
>>in the border areas,'' said Harry Stern of the CDC's Division of 
>>Tuberculosis Elimination. 
>>  Tuberculosis cases among foreign-born persons in the U.S.  
>>rose 61 percent between 1986 and 1995. 
>>In 1995, people born in other countries accounted for 35 percent 
>>of the nation's 7,930 TB cases. 
>>  The World Health Organization reported that TB kills more  
>>adults every year than any other infectious disease and . 
>>multi-drug resistant strains were a growing problem. 

From Mon Dec  9 06:16:51 PST 1996
Article: 118188 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus,alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: Remote Viewing:  Who are we supposed to believe?
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 01:07:12 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <58flv7$>
References: <> <> <32ab344f.5955696@>
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Dec 08  4:19:51 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.prophecies.nostradamus:6378 alt.conspiracy:118188

  The first time I heard of this whole "remote-viewing" issue I was
amazed people were taking it seriously.
  Recently (about a few months ago) "The National Enquirer" -- the
largest-circulation publication in America (a sensationalistic
tabloid/scandal-sheet) -- published an article w/photo about a very
"Establishment" scientist's new book on remote viewing.
  The article contained quotes from the scientist making it clear that
he fully believed in the efficacy of "remote-viewing."
  As with ex-NASA employee Richard C. Hoagland's "face on Mars"
campaign, I was immediately skeptical of this avowedly
pro-"remote-viewing" scientist.
   In both the "face on Mars" and "remote-viewing" issues I smell
disinformation. But who may be behind it, and why?

From Tue Dec 10 06:57:44 PST 1996
Article: 118689 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,alt.conspiracy,soc.history,soc.culture.china,aus.culture.china,soc.culture.japan,soc.culture.asian,talk.politics.china,alt.personals.intercultural,soc.culture.african,soc.couples.intercultural,talk.politics.misc,misc.activism,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.netherlands,soc.culture.mexican,talk.politics.european-union,talk.politics.libertarian,soc.culture.indian
Subject: Re: Americans Letting their Nation Die - Shame on you
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 01:38:45 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <58ic6f$>
References:  <>  <> <58h2dp$> <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Mon Dec 09  6:51:27 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: soc.culture.europe:50642 alt.conspiracy:118689 soc.history:10927 soc.culture.china:129514 soc.culture.japan:86533 soc.culture.asian:220 talk.politics.china:25267 alt.personals.intercultural:2516 soc.culture.african:40475 soc.couples.intercultural:18509 talk.politics.misc:520495 soc.culture.german:92014 soc.culture.netherlands:41741 soc.culture.mexican:37651 talk.politics.european-union:7344 talk.politics.libertarian:150843 soc.culture.indian:180284

Patrick Cooper  wrote:

>Ireland has the higest rate of economic growth in the world twice that 
>the EU average. I think there are more American imigrants to Ireland 
>today than Irish to America. The smart Americas are getting out.

  I think you really may have a point here.
  Wasn't it the respected "Strategic Investment" financial newsletter
(pls correct me if I'm mistaken) which reported, a year or two ago,
that quite a number of well-to-do American citizens were emigrating
>from  the U.S.?  
  (Most of those leaving the U.S which the article identified were, it
would seem, Jewish-Americans. One was actually, if I recall correctly,
a U.S.-naturalized Israeli.)
  In any case, could it be that these people of means "see the writing
on the wall" -- and are, moreover, willing to get out of the U.S.
while they can, unlike most folks, who lack the means to do so?

From Wed Dec 11 06:34:34 PST 1996
Article: 84963 of alt.revisionism
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.immigration,alt.skinheads,alt.conspiracy,alt.religion.islam,alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Jews in Israel Hate Immigrants
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 01:17:41 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <58kvb3$>
References: <> <58d7bk$3jd$> <58dri5$>   <32b52bdd.64691104@>
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Dec 10  4:30:27 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.politics.clinton:340636 alt.discrimination:58016 alt.politics.white-power:51754 alt.politics.nationalism.white:38451 alt.skinheads:45185 alt.conspiracy:118980 alt.religion.islam:35827 alt.revisionism:84963 soc.culture.jewish:99113 (tom moran) wrote:

>	Poor Sara. She doesn't have anything to say about the post except
>what she has said. She doesn't even dispute it. 
>	Israel is the product of the Holocaust story. The Jews are
>constantly crying how they are the victims when in fact they create
>more victims than any other.

  I'm given to calling her "Sara theTerrible." 

From Thu Dec 12 10:53:38 PST 1996
Article: 119482 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: SUSAN & Vince At Hotel - Day Before Death [Fwd]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:40:45 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 105
Message-ID: <58oh6a$>
References: <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Dec 12  2:53:30 AM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

Forwarded msg follows: ("Homesteadr" James Vallaster) wrote:

>From: (Charles R. Smith)
>Subject: SUSAN & Vince At Hotel - Day Before Death
>Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 19:58:39 GMT
>Organization: SOFTWAR
>Lines: 76
>Message-ID: <58hgi5$>
>X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
>Xref: alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater:124461
>alt.politics:29610 alt.politics.clinton:401932

>Susan Thomases got to know Vince Foster pretty well according to
>published reports and FBI investigations.  Susan Thomases told
>the FBI that she last saw Mr. Foster on "Wednesday or Thursday
>before his death."  Mrs. Thomases stated, according to her FBI
>interview, that "they had lunch together with some people in
>Washington".  Yet, these detailed notes taken by experienced FBI
>agents do not contain the REAL last meeting between Susan
>Thomases and Vince Foster.

>In the book BLOOD SPORT, Mrs. Thomases told author James Stewart
>a DIFFERENT story.  Mrs. Thomases last saw Mr. Foster on the
>Wednesday evening before his death at a private Hotel called the
>Mansion on O street in DC.  Mrs. Thomases suggested that Foster
>wanted to speak with her "off campus".  Off campus meant:  Meet
>me at the secret Hotel room.

>It was there, behind closed doors, that Foster confided in Ms.
>Thomases about his massive troubles handling various White House
>scandals.  Mrs.  Thomases recalled that he was very concerned
>that David Watkins would "embelish the facts to cover himself -
>possibly at the expense of the First Lady." This meeting, which
>lasted for more than an hour, was filled with Mr.  Foster
>pouring his heart out about the Travel office.  Vince did not
>want to "let the President and Hillary down."

>When asked under oath about the obvious conflict between her
>statements to the FBI and her interviews for BLOOD SPORT,  Ms.
>Thomases stated that she told the FBI about her last meeting
>with Mr. Foster at the O street Hotel.  She could not explain
>why the FBI agents did not record this in their notes.  

>Yet, swirling in the background, behind the Travel Office matter
>was a far more compelling reason for Vince Foster to meet with
>Hillary Clinton's lawyer on the QT.  Mr. Foster has just
>successfully defended Mrs. Clinton in the Health Care disaster.
>Mr. Foster contended in the suit by the Association of American
>Physicians and Surgeons Vs. Clinton that the First Lady was a
>Federal Officer and therefore did not have to release
>transcripts of her SECRET, Health Care meetings.  On the basis
>of that argument, the Clintons won and the records remained
>secret for a while longer.

>However, Mrs. Clinton had more than a problem with the doctors.
>The same day that Vince Foster met secretly with Susan Thomases
>in a D.C. hotel room he had also taken several phone calls and a
>fax from Rose partner Brantly Buck.  Mr. Foster and Mr. Buck
>were working on finalizing Hillary Clinton's "not so" blind
>trust.  Mrs. Clinton had invested in a portfolio of stocks held
>under the name of VALUE PARTNERS.  Vince Foster advised the
>First Lady that she did not have to worry about conflict of
>interest issues between VALUE PARTNERS making large amounts of
>profit from Health Care stocks and Mrs. Clinton being in charge
>of nationalization the Health Care industry.  The basis for Mr.
>Foster's argument was that the First Lady WAS NOT A FEDERAL
>EMPLOYEE.  Totally in contradiction to his (and the Clinton's)
>previous legal defense against the suit from the doctors.  If
>this was true then the First Lady is liable under US Code TITLE
>18 "Conflict of Interest" laws.

>1 if by land, 2 if by sea.  Paul Revere - encryption 1775

>Charles R. Smith

>Pcyphered signature:

>"Governmental Corruption Must Be Challenged"
>  "Homesteadr" James Vallaster
>  2943 Oak Court
>  Granbury, Texas 76048
>"The CIA Routinely Torture/Murders Young American Children"
>      See "alt.binaries.activism.militia"

From Sat Dec 14 08:34:56 PST 1996
Article: 120113 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Faron Young smuggled drugs into US ghettos?
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 02:19:04 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <58t02b$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Dec 13  7:31:55 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

  Anyone know anything about this possibility?

From Fri Dec 20 07:13:01 PST 1996
Article: 39693 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,,,alt.politics.perot,alt.california,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Clinton to California voters: YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 06:20:40 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 83
Message-ID: <595bbr$>
References: <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Mon Dec 16 11:33:47 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater:60893 alt.politics.perot:66735 alt.california:29300 alt.politics.nationalism.white:39693

  This article from the always-informative SPOT NEWS illustrates
clearly the utter hypocrisy of President Clinton.
  Almost in the same breath that he lets it be known that his liberal
Justice ("Just-us"?) Department will pull out all stops to keep
affirmative-action ending Proposition 209 from being implemented in
California, he self-righteously talks about how the election results
in Bosnia must be respected, even if the current government is not
happy with these results.

"alt.ww"  wrote:

>William Jefferson Milosevic and the Free People of California
>Weekly Standard

>The story so far: On Election Day, California voters approved
>Proposition 209, the California Civil Rights Initiative, by 54 to 46
>percent.  CCRI mandates that in state employment, contracting,
>and education, California treat all people alike-no matter their
>color and no matter whether they are men or women.  In other
>words, no more "affirmative action" racial and gender
>preferences in state and statefunded activities.

>Before the month was out (as detailed last week by Matthew
>Rees), Thelton E. Henderson, one of Jimmy Carter's federal
>judges, put the new law on ice at the behest of the usual liberal
>litigants (the ACLU, et al.). With breathtaking arrogance and
>Orwellian hostility to the meaning of words, Henderson
>ruled that CCRI might violate the "equal protection" clause of the
>U.S. Constitution (to which clause, it can fairly be argued, CCRI is
>more faithful than federal law and federal judges).

>Enter President Clinton, who weighed in, sort of, in a most
>curious way.  On December 10, he took the occasion of remarks
>naming a new director of the Voice of America to say, more or
>less, that his administration is about to jump in head first and
>land like a ton of bricks on the side of Judge Henderson and his
>pet litigants, and against the voters of California.

>"As all of you know," the president said, "I opposed publicly and
>strongly [Prop.] 209.  I thought it was bad policy for the people of
>California, and a bad example for America.  
>Whether it is unconstitutional is a different question, and our people 
>are working very hard [at the Justice Department and the White
>House counsel's office] to work through the legal and
>constitutional issues to give me a recommendation about what
>we should do and how we should do it.  And I am eager to get
>their recommendation."

>Mere seconds later, a reporter asked a seemingly unrelated
>question about what message the president would like to send
>to the Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic, who-how best to put
>this?-opposed publicly and strongly the victory of his political
>enemies in local elections last month, which victory he thought
>was bad policy for the people of Yugoslavia and a bad example
>for Greater Serbia.  So he nullified it.
>Said President Clinton to President Milosevic: "Elections should
>be respected and the voice of the people should be heard; and
>the human, political, and civil rights of the people should be
>respected.... Our sympathies are always with free people who
>are struggling to express their freedom and want to have the
>integrity of their elections respected.,,
>Hear, hear.  And while you're at it, Mr. President, tell it to your
>Justice Department; tell it to the federal judiciary; and then try
>telling it, with a straight face, to the free people of California.

From Fri Dec 20 10:34:28 PST 1996
Article: 58757 of alt.discrimination
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,,alt.california,,,,alt.politics.perot,alt.revolution.counter,alt.politics.perot
Subject: Re: Texaco statement of December 18
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 05:11:39 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <59d4ef$>
References: <59a4gt$q96$> <59a5hk$> <59a60b$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Dec 19  8:24:47 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.discrimination:58757 alt.california:29299 alt.politics.perot:66734 alt.revolution.counter:6823

  Why no mention of the across-the-board 10% salary increase that will
be given to all Texaco's black employees?
  Are the chief executives of the company afraid that millions of
consumers would boycott Texaco if they knew that part of every dollar
they paid to it was being used to give Texaco employees of only *one*
particular racial group a 10% salary increase?

From Sat Dec 21 11:54:33 PST 1996
Article: 122759 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: Mars Face
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 09:44:50 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <59dkek$>
References: <59cs09$> <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Dec 20 12:57:56 AM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82[at] ((Delete spam-buster ([at]) to reply))

>On Fri, 20 Dec 1996 02:01:18 GMT, wrote:

>>When are the new photos of the Mars face due?

>We got them back from Kodak overnight (paid extra, too) but the damn
>Mars Face went and vetoed 'em, since he blinked when the shutter went

  You may find that very funny but I happen to know for a really true
fact that they were mailed back to Clark Photo in one of those
too-small mailers because they came out with the dreaded flash-caused
"red eye" syndrome. 
  Plus NASA had specifically ordered double prints and they only sent
single prints.

From Sat Dec 21 12:11:24 PST 1996
Article: 526567 of talk.politics.misc
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: wash.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.guns,ny.politics,,alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich,alt.politics.usa.misc,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.usa.congress,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.radical-left,alt.politics.perot,,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.clinton,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater
Subject: Re: White House Gets Subpoenas in Foreign "Donations" Scandal: AP
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 11:11:16 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <59gdt3$>
References: <> <> <59bqo4$> <59bs6s$>  
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Dec 21  4:24:35 AM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: talk.politics.misc:526567 talk.politics.libertarian:153976 talk.politics.guns:355463 alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich:102966 alt.politics.usa.misc:132237 alt.politics.usa.constitution:107842 alt.politics.usa.congress:86023 alt.politics.reform:119541 alt.politics.radical-left:141266 alt.politics.perot:66756 alt.politics.libertarian:244433 alt.politics.democrats.d:160627 alt.politics.clinton:344084 alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater:60975

  Anyone know if ABC's Peter Jennings reported on this, or did he
instead segue into a hard-hitting investigative report about "Santa
Claus College" during the available time slot in his nightly "news"
report? (Max Kennedy) wrote:


>WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Justice Department has issued subpoenas
>to the White House counsel's office and to President Clinton's legal
>defense fund. Both parties promise to cooperate with the probe.

>Authorities want to see records related to the return of $460,000 in
>questionable donations raised by an Asian-American businessman. The
>defense fund was created two years ago to defray the Clintons'
>Whitewater legal expenses.

From Sat Dec 21 12:11:26 PST 1996
Article: 526577 of talk.politics.misc
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: wash.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.guns,ny.politics,,alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich,alt.politics.usa.misc,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.usa.congress,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.radical-left,alt.politics.perot,,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.clinton,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,alt.activism
Subject: Re: Grandmother Got Run Over By a Cop: Cincinnati Strikes Again!
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 11:07:36 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <59gdm7$>
References: <> <> <59bqo4$> <59bs6s$>    
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Dec 21  4:20:55 AM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: talk.politics.misc:526577 talk.politics.libertarian:153983 talk.politics.guns:355479 alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich:102973 alt.politics.usa.misc:132242 alt.politics.usa.constitution:107851 alt.politics.usa.congress:86027 alt.politics.reform:119547 alt.politics.radical-left:141270 alt.politics.perot:66757 alt.politics.libertarian:244439 alt.politics.democrats.d:160633 alt.politics.clinton:344089 alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater:60978 alt.activism:106460

  Gimme a break! What the h#ll did she do that was "illegal"? Dropping
coins in a couple of parking meters to help someone avoid a parking
ticket? What's "illegal" about THAT? Arresting a 60-something
grandmother yet! . . . not that ANYONE, regardless of age, should ever
be arrested for feeding a parking meter!
  Only a government-paid public employee like that cop would have the
chutzpah to so brazenly do such a thing. (Max Kennedy) wrote:
>Friday December 20 

>Grandmother Ordered to Trial in Ticket Case

>CINCINNATI (Reuter) -- A 63-year-old grandmother was ordered to stand
>trial Friday for allegedly thwarting police by helping strangers avoid
>parking tickets. 
>  "I never expected this case would drag on the way it has," Sylvia
>Stayton told reporters after the decision by Municipal Court Judge
>John West. 
>  The jury trial was set for Feb. 5. 
>  Stayton was arrested on Oct. 24 and charged with obstructing official
>business and disorderly conduct after she saw a policeman writing out
>parking tickets and decided to drop a few coins in two meters to stop him. 
>  She said she didn't know who the cars belonged to and only wanted to
>do someone a favor. 
>  The policeman who ordered her to stop arrested her and she was jailed
>briefly before being released on $1,900 bond. 
>  Assistant City Prosecutor Earnest McAdams said the jury faces a
>difficult decision. 
>  "You have some people who must be wondering what right she had to
>interfere with a policeman just doing his job, and you may have others
>questioning why policemen aren't out trying to catch drug dealers instead of
>issuing parking citations," he told reporters.

From Sun Dec 22 12:09:16 PST 1996
Article: 58904 of alt.discrimination
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,,alt.california,,,,alt.politics.perot,alt.revolution.counter,alt.politics.perot
Subject: Re: Texaco statement of December 18
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 21:00:16 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <59es1c$>
References: <59a4gt$q96$> <59a5hk$> <59a60b$> <59d4ef$> <59eft5$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Dec 20  2:13:32 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.discrimination:58904 alt.california:29344 alt.politics.perot:66806 alt.revolution.counter:6836 (John E. Bredehoft) wrote:

>In article <59d4ef$>,
>JoeBuck  wrote:
>>  Why no mention of the across-the-board 10% salary increase that will
>>be given to all Texaco's black employees?

>Uh...maybe because there is no such increase?

  In fact, there IS.
  I assume you didn't read the newspaper the day after Texaco settled
the lawsuit against it? 
  Admittedly, this element of the settlement (the 10% salary increase
for all the company's black employees) has been downplayed/ignored in
subsequent reports about the case but it *IS* true nonetheless.

From Sun Dec 22 16:44:55 PST 1996
Article: 123239 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: What spy devices did Clinton's Chinese guest leave?
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 23:12:48 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <59kci4$>
References: <59hsqa$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Dec 22  2:26:12 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

>  Wang Jun, an arms dealer for Communist China, visited President
>Clinton in his private White House residence. 
>  His visit was arranged by a Chinese-American businessman whose
>company had once been investigated for selling millions of dollars of
>military-style weapons to U.S. street gangs on the West Coast.
>  After news of this visit was exposed in the media, the U.S.
>president stated, "He obviously had no business being in the White
>House. We  need to tighten up our screening procedures for future
>White House visitors."
>  Not being familiar with espionage technologies myself, I was
>wondering if anyone out there has any idea what kinds of high-tech
>electronic spying devices Mr. Wang, or similar such vistors, may have
>secreted in The White House during President Clinton's first four
>years in office? 
>  I only wish President Clinton's security staff had been as
>conscientious in screening its Communist Chinese White House visitors
>as its been in the past regarding, say, retreiving -- and going
>through with a veritable "fine-toothed comb" -- the dusty FBI files of
>a few thousand former Reagan-Bush Republican-Conservative appointees.

From Wed Dec 25 14:31:12 PST 1996
Article: 88508 of alt.revisionism
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,,,,alt.politics.radical-left,alt.politics.perot,alt.revisionism,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.journalism,alt.christnet
Subject: Peter Jennings shows the UGLY face of Israel  [was: Re: A Question for Charles (Month 6)]
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 19:28:17 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <59rshh$>
References: <59r509$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Dec 25 12:41:53 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.conspiracy:124149 alt.politics.radical-left:141845 alt.politics.perot:66898 alt.revisionism:88508 alt.politics.nationalism.white:40487 alt.politics.white-power:53329 alt.journalism:65549 alt.christnet:136542

  Anyone else see that fascinating, disturbing Peter Jennings report
on Jerusalem the other evening? The one Y Rapido, an Internet
newsgroup participant posted a very perceptive message about, and
which I forwarded to many of these groups?
  One of the most memorable -- and, for me, appalling -- segments of
the program, for both Y Rapido and myself, was when the gun-toting
American Jew Yarmuth (sp?), broke off from a loud, boisterous (and
nastily provocative) wedding parade by Jews through ancient
Palestinian neighborhoods to berate ABC's anchorman Jennings. 
  Here you had an American Jew and his Israeli cohorts -- the vast
majority of whom, ironically, apparently have absolutely no ancestral
ties to either Jerusalem or Palestine -- essentially telling the
indiginous Palestinians who've been living there for milennia, "Tough
luck! We Jews took this land [by U.S.-taxpayer-subsidized force, of
course], so get lost!"
  Another very memorable segment of the program was when the New York
City-raised wife of an certain extremist rabbi, whose followers were
also provocatively and boisterously parading through the
Palestinian-filled Old City, berated both Jennings and the indiginous
Palestinian resident who served as his tour guide.
  What remains in my mind most is how Jennings repeatedly tried to
point out to the irate rabbi's wife, "Excuse me, but this man [the
Palestinian] LIVES here, madam! This is his family's house!" 
  The militant Jewish wife of the rabbi seemed to me to be completely
heartless, utterly unconcerned with how she was offending, hurting and
wronging the Palestinian who's family history, ironically, went back
hundreds of years in that building. It was very sad, indeed.
  Thank God Peter Jennings was there on *that* single occasion to
defend the indiginous Palestinian man who the Jewish lady couldn't
comprehend actually lived there; unfortunately, Jennings, of course,
is NOT usually there to defend these poor dispossessed Palestinians in
  I mean, this incident was like someone desperately trying to point
out, "This Native American family LIVES in this house, madam! This
Indian man OWNS this house! Please don't insist that they leave so
that a white/Jewish family can move in."
  So today, as millions around the world celebrate the birth of Our
Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, let us recall that the first Christians
were Palestinians themselves. 
  Thus, when American taxes subsidize Israel's theft of Palestinian
lands and intimidation and violent persecution of them, we are
participating in the oppression of the first-Chrstians' ancestors.
  I wish everyone a Blessed, Merry Christmas.

From Wed Dec 25 15:40:03 PST 1996
Article: 40491 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.immigration,alt.skinheads,,alt.conspiracy,misc.immigration.usa,alt.politics.immigration,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.socialism.trotsky,alt.illuminati,alt.society.anarc
Subject: Re: Powderkeg USA
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 19:55:03 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <59ru3n$>
References: <59jhiq$> <59npg6$> 
X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Dec 25 11:08:39 AM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: soc.culture.europe:51598 alt.politics.nationalism.white:40491 alt.skinheads:46437 alt.conspiracy:124165 misc.immigration.usa:12770 talk.politics.guns:356964 alt.politics.socialism.trotsky:17896 alt.illuminati:20990 (Parker Beatley) wrote:

>Most likely, many persons are pro-immigrant and pro-integration, because
>they themselves live far away from some of the destruction--socially,
>culturally, and commnity-wise--that some of these groups have been guilty


> For instance, persons who never lived in Yonkers NY after the court
>ordered integration which destroyed it entirely in five years, as the city
>government warned would happen, probably think that integration is just

  In fact, I remember that ruling. So Yonkers is now "kaput"?
  So NYC has moved northwards? Damn shame.

>However, if it destroyed their own town like that, they, too, would
>be devastated and committed to ending integration forever. Nothing is
>worth the loss of one's community. I am presentl suffering that loss.

  Ever notice how the liberals usually live in nice, safe (often
Jewish) enclaves?

From Wed Dec 25 15:43:48 PST 1996
Article: 124037 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Subject: Tickle Me, Leonid dolls [Fwd]
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 06:50:10 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <59qg3v$>
References: <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Dec 24 10:03:43 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.conspiracy:124037

Forwarded msg: (ELPASKO) wrote:

>    I know that no Tickle Me, Elmo dols are available except at high
>prices.  I am willing to settle for the less popular Tickle Me, Leonid
>doll, modeled after late Soviet dictator Leonid Brezhnev.  Does anyone
>have this item?

From Wed Dec 25 15:57:33 PST 1996
Article: 527548 of talk.politics.misc
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.politics,,alt.activism,alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich,alt.society.conservatism,alt.politics.correct,alt.politics.reform,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,talk.politics,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.democrats.d,,,soc.women,talk.politics.theory,alt.flame.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.radical-left,,alt.politics.clinton,alt.christnet
Subject: Re: CHARLIE$  ANGEL$
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 00:53:07 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <59hu1q$>
References: <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Dec 21  4:06:18 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.activism:106807 alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich:103399 alt.society.conservatism:65571 alt.politics.correct:166548 alt.politics.reform:119866 alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater:61211 talk.politics.misc:527548 talk.politics.guns:356192 alt.politics.clinton:344736 alt.politics.democrats.d:161173 soc.women:128920 talk.politics.theory:97246 alt.politics.radical-left:141541 alt.christnet:136135

Al Ridemfi  wrote:

>For his efforts, Trie was a guest at the White House Christmas party
>last week. 

  Speaking of which: anyone know if, as it was in previous years,
giddy Clinton staffers decorated the White House Christmas Tree with
"cute" X-rated ornaments?
  I'd hate to see this lovely new national tradition stopped merely
due to media exposure.

From Thu Dec 26 09:42:20 PST 1996
Article: 124479 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,,
Subject: Re: Cruel setup of the INNOCENT
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 09:58:36 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <59tfh4$>
References: <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Dec 26  1:12:04 AM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.conspiracy:124479

Pearl Gladstone  wrote:

>Follow the tragic story of the imprisonment of environmental activist 
>Judi Bari at

  Was she involved in a tree-spiking incident in which a logger was
killed or, at the least, seriously injured?

From Fri Dec 27 11:37:00 PST 1996
Article: 88957 of alt.revisionism
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.immigration,alt.skinheads,alt.conspiracy,alt.religion.islam,alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,,,alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.perot
Subject: Re: Jews in I$rael Hate Immigrants
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 20:19:10 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <59rvgu$>
References: <> <58d7bk$3jd$> <58dri5$>   <32b52bdd.64691104@>  <> <> <> <58vtn1$> <> <596ogg$> <597oef$bkj$> <5995hh$> <01bbe93a$08eac840$> <01bbf051$9d918ec0$03f8cbc7@default> <> <59pd4b$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Dec 25  1:32:46 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.politics.clinton:346071 alt.discrimination:59183 alt.politics.white-power:53516 alt.politics.nationalism.white:40718 alt.skinheads:46553 alt.conspiracy:124721 alt.religion.islam:37245 alt.revisionism:88957 soc.culture.jewish:103156 alt.politics.reform:120725 alt.politics.perot:66932 (M.M.) wrote:

>Would you also please document how Jews sent forces consisting of ONLY gentiles into
>battle? The world is waiting!!!!!!!!!

  In case Kurt hasn't responded yet, let me mention the "Persian Gulf
War." That ring a bell?
  "ONLY gentiles"? No, but certainly *DISPROPORTIONATELY* gentiles, I
think it's fair to say.
  In fact, I still recall all the (now-middle-aged) 1960s
anti-Vietnam-War protestors (e.g., Stepehn Solarz and Mel Levine)
coming out STRONGLY in support of sending U.S. troops to defend
filthy-rich Kuwait *AND* I$rael back in '91 or so.
  To his credit, Pat Buchanan came out AGAINST U.S. involvement in
that war -- resulting, of course, in his subsequently being smeared as
an "anti-semite" for his position.
  Perceptively, during the Persian Gulf War Pat predicted that I$rael
would demand more money from the U.S. taxpayers at the war's end for
having "allowed" American troops to be killed and shelled with
chemical weapons in the place of I$raelis.
  Guess what? Buchanan was proved right!
  Just weeks after the conclusion of the Persian Gulf War I$rael
demanded -- and received -- an extra billion or so for its wartime
"cooperation" with the U.S. 
  Thus, at a time (1991-2) when the U.S. economy was taking a
nosedive, the American taxpayers literally compensated I$rael for
"letting" Americans fight and die in I$raelis' places!
  Of course, nowadays there's the "all-volunteer" military in place,
in which Jews are few and far between.
  Of course, this doesn't mean that loads of American Jews don't
occupy important positions as civilian analysts (e.g. the
Jewish-American spy for Israel Jonathan Pollard.) 

>Merry x-mas!!!!

  Who's "x"? Merry CHRISTmas!

From Fri Dec 27 11:37:01 PST 1996
Article: 88990 of alt.revisionism
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.immigration,alt.skinheads,alt.conspiracy,alt.religion.islam,alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,,,alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.perot
Subject: Re: Jews in I$rael Hate Immigrants
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 02:38:57 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <59va51$>
References: <> <58d7bk$3jd$> <58dri5$>   <32b52bdd.64691104@>  <> <> <> <58vtn1$> <> <596ogg$> <597oef$bkj$> <5995hh$> <01bbe93a$08eac840$> <01bbf051$9d918ec0$03f8cbc7@default> <> <59pd4b$> <59rvgu$> <59s85p$> 
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Dec 26  7:52:33 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.politics.clinton:346130 alt.discrimination:59189 alt.politics.white-power:53537 alt.politics.nationalism.white:40739 alt.skinheads:46563 alt.conspiracy:124761 alt.religion.islam:37258 alt.revisionism:88990 soc.culture.jewish:103197 alt.politics.reform:120754 alt.politics.perot:66936 (Parker Beatley) wrote:

>Also, what about the propaganda pictures of the Israelis with 
>their gas masks on trying to escape Iraqi non-gas attacks? 

  Speaking of which: does anyone else recall the Persian Gulf
War-period incident in which Israeli rabbis, fearful of an Iraqi
chemical attack, LITERALLY tore gask masks from the hands of Israeli
mothers and children so they (the panicky rabbis) could have them? 
  And don't tell me this DIDN'T happen because I read about it in a
"mainstream" daily newspaper at the time.

From Fri Dec 27 11:37:02 PST 1996
Article: 88991 of alt.revisionism
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.immigration,alt.skinheads,alt.conspiracy,alt.religion.islam,alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,,,alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.perot
Subject: Re: Jews in I$rael Hate Immigrants
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 02:50:30 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <59vaqn$>
References: <> <58d7bk$3jd$> <58dri5$>   <32b52bdd.64691104@>  <> <> <> <58vtn1$> <> <596ogg$> <597oef$bkj$> <5995hh$> <01bbe93a$08eac840$> <01bbf051$9d918ec0$03f8cbc7@default> <> <59pd4b$> <59rvgu$> <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Dec 26  6:04:07 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.politics.clinton:346131 alt.discrimination:59190 alt.politics.white-power:53538 alt.politics.nationalism.white:40740 alt.skinheads:46564 alt.conspiracy:124762 alt.religion.islam:37259 alt.revisionism:88991 soc.culture.jewish:103198 alt.politics.reform:120755 alt.politics.perot:66937

Bob Wells  wrote:

> . . .  Pat Buchanan was already well known as an anti-Semite 
>for beating up Jewish kids while growing up in Washington in the 1950s. 
>Look it up!

  Look, Pat Buchanan is/was a fighter -- and God Bless him for it!
  Pat is also well-known, on a personal basis, as a very friendly man
to people in general -- including to people of the Jewish faith. Why
shouldn't he be? 
  Even the ultra-liberal Jew and former "Crossfire" co-host Michael
Kinsley publically said Pat wasn't "antisemitic." 
   Just because Pat (like I) am concerned about the near-stranglehold
Israel has on U.S. government policy and media reporting (hence my
surprise at Peter Jennings' recent "Jerusalem Stories" program)
doesn't in the least mean we're "anti-semites." 
  (To those who insist on slinging the "antisemite" canard we
essentially say "f#ck you," however.)
  Moreover, the policeman Pat slugged while in college certainly
wasn't, to my knowledge, Jewish. "Look it up!"

From Fri Dec 27 11:37:03 PST 1996
Article: 89126 of alt.revisionism
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.censorship,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Re: Reply to a Resonable Person
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 11:13:08 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <59tjsr$>
References: <> <591k14$> <5951tn$> <595bc6$> <596u3f$> <5972s1$> <59ad1g$a11@informer1.cis.McMaster.CA> <> <59mdip$erk@informer1.cis.McMaster.CA> <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Dec 26  4:26:35 AM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.revisionism:89126 alt.censorship:113203 alt.politics.nationalism.white:40830 alt.politics.white-power:53611

Doc Tavish  wrote:

>Doc Tavish notices that she is standing ten feet away, is wearing a long black
>dress that goes all the way to the floor, she has her hair pulled back
>in a bun and has on black wire-rimmed glasses.

  Were you describing Clinton's last Supreme Court selection, Ruth
Ginsburg?  :-) 
 (You know, the one who got mugged by a needy, oppressed
African-American male in D.C. some weeks ago.)

From Fri Dec 27 11:37:04 PST 1996
Article: 89210 of alt.revisionism
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.immigration,alt.skinheads,alt.conspiracy,alt.religion.islam,alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,,,alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.perot
Subject: Re: Jews in I$rael Hate Immigrants
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 18:26:20 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <5a11li$>
References: <> <58d7bk$3jd$> <58dri5$>   <32b52bdd.64691104@>  <> <> <> <58vtn1$> <> <596ogg$> <597oef$bkj$> <5995hh$> <01bbe93a$08eac840$> <01bbf051$9d918ec0$03f8cbc7@default> <> <59pd4b$> <59rvgu$> <> <> <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Dec 27  9:40:02 AM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.politics.clinton:346413 alt.discrimination:59241 alt.politics.white-power:53650 alt.politics.nationalism.white:40874 alt.skinheads:46643 alt.conspiracy:125031 alt.religion.islam:37333 alt.revisionism:89210 soc.culture.jewish:103478 alt.politics.reform:120919 alt.politics.perot:66959

Alan Miles  wrote:

>Doc Savage wrote:
>> Which demonstrates just how worthless an ally Israel is, despite the > continuing pretention of value.

>Yup, except for Israel's being the only democratic government in the

  Israel is truly a "democracy for the few."
  Try telling the Palestinians whose ancestral lands and homes were
stolen by Miami/London/Brsibane-born Jews -- backed-up by the
U.S.-government-supported Israeli governement -- that Israel's a

> supporting American policies in the region, 

  Actually, the "policies" are purely Israeli; the fact that the U.S.
government (itself essentially under the thumb of a powerful domestic
Israel Lobby -- supports and subsidizes these policies doesn't make
them "American policies."
   Rather, they're ISRAELI policies which America merely supports. 

>keeping religious sites open for American visitors, 

  The U.S. government has NO BUSINESS paying a foreign country
billions and billions of U.S.-taxpayer dollars to "keep religios sites
open" for tourists.
  (BTW, I'm a Christian, and I'd LOVE to visit the land where Jesus
walked but, ironically, it's too DANGEROUS to do so, due to terrorism
by understandably-enraged indiginous Palestinians who might think *I*
agree with my government's shameful policies in that region!)

>and being populated by many former Americans and relatives of current Americans, 

  You MUST be kidding!
   Who cares if "many former Americans and relatives of current
Americans" populate the area? Clearly, a "former American" = "a
*FORMER* American."
  And it was these "former Americans' " own decision to move to Israel
-- often enough, cheerfully volunteering for the Israeli Army after
doing everything they could [e.g. burning their draft cards/ignoring
their Selective Service notices/fleeing to Canada) to avoid putting on
an AMERICAN Army uniform.

From Fri Dec 27 12:09:26 PST 1996
Article: 40730 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.immigration,alt.skinheads,alt.conspiracy,soc.culture.europe,alt.california,alt.politics.immigration,misc.immigration.usa,,,,alt.conspiracy,soc.culture.african.american,soc.culture.asian.american
Subject: Re: Singapore Leader Retorts Accusations Made by Hypocritical U.S.
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:46:33 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <59v72r$>
References: <59uen2$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Dec 26  7:00:11 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.politics.clinton:346103 alt.discrimination:59188 alt.politics.white-power:53529 alt.politics.nationalism.white:40730 alt.skinheads:46559 alt.conspiracy:124737 soc.culture.europe:51748 alt.california:29475 misc.immigration.usa:12795 soc.culture.african.american:133091 soc.culture.asian.american:89464

  How in the WORLD can any *U.S. Govt* officials -- who preside over
what are essentially dangerous JUNGLES called "housing projects" from
sea to shining sea -- have the chutzpah to criticize the housing
officials of another sovereign nation? I'm stunned!
  What business to they have saying ANYTHING, in fact, about the
campaign techniques of foreign government officials, period?
  Moreover, HOW UTTERLY HYPOCRITICAL to slam Singaporean 
officials -- the officials of a nation which is the envy of the world
for its extremely-low crime rates, clean, modern, well-manicured
cities, efficient transportation system, well-educated and employed
work force, and strong economy?
  When the U.S. can boast of these things, *THEN* maybe we can
criticize the splinters in the Singaporean government officials' eyes
-- not before that time.
  Methinks these nasty, hypocritical US bureaucrats may be sniping at
Singapore because Clinton's still teed-off that the country's leaders
wouldn't totally surrender to the US President's appeal that that
young delinquent's "caning" punishment be stopped.
   (You know the young man I'm referring to, the one whose father, on
CNN's Larry King,  spoke of a distant relative's persecution by the
Nazi's, apparently in an attempt to garner sympathy for his cowardly,
spoiled-brat son, who spray-painted many cars of Singaporean citizens.
Even the U.S. President himself, recall, had publically appealed to
the Government of Singapore to cancel the perpetrator's punishment.)

From Fri Dec 27 12:15:00 PST 1996
Article: 125032 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.misc,alt.conspiracy,alt.current-events.usa,alt.politics.reform,,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.usa.congress,alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.perot
Subject: Re: Govt. Terrorists to Use Mexicans Against Americans!
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 17:59:03 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <5a102d$>
References: <5a0kc2$rd0@alexander.INS.CWRU.Edu>
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Dec 27 11:12:45 AM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.politics.usa.misc:133037 alt.conspiracy:125032 alt.current-events.usa:39588 alt.politics.reform:120920 talk.politics.misc:530039 talk.politics.guns:357858 alt.politics.usa.constitution:109015 alt.politics.usa.congress:86775 alt.politics.perot:66960

ir802@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Larry L. Jansen) wrote:

>Government terrorism is going to become rampant.  They are now
>going to use Mexicans to disarm us, in their phony war on drugs.
>Now is the time to prepare for the coming genocide.  Network with
>neighbors, law enforcement, militia, military, etc.  It is later
>than you think!

  Look, I don't know about "using Mexicans to disarm us," but this
U.S.-government/liberal-led "genocide" has actually been going on for
YEARS already.
   For example, how many welfare parasites have, in the past 30 years
or so, robbed/raped/murdered/maimed law-abiding American citizens? 
  But I agree, under President Clinton the government has sunk to new
lows of outrage against the citizens. Waco, Ruby Ridge and the $50
billion "peso-Wall-Street bailout" are merely the most spectacular
crimes of our liberal/left government against The People.

From Fri Dec 27 12:15:02 PST 1996
Article: 125060 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: Foundation Watch -- Capital Research Center
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 02:04:05 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <59v83m$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Dec 26  5:17:42 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

  Let's not forget Sherman Skolnick's work in this area, as well.
Perhaps someone could re-post someof his past artciles dealing with
the foundation-as-front area?

From Sat Dec 28 09:13:34 PST 1996
Article: 89347 of alt.revisionism
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,,,,alt.politics.radical-left,alt.politics.perot,alt.revisionism,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.journalism,alt.christnet
Subject: Re: Peter Jennings shows the UGLY face of Israel  [was: Re: A Question for Charles (Month 6)]
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 10:11:06 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <59tg8h$>
References: <59r509$> <59rshh$> <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Dec 26  3:24:33 AM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.conspiracy:125208 alt.politics.radical-left:142225 alt.politics.perot:66977 alt.revisionism:89347 alt.politics.nationalism.white:40973 alt.politics.white-power:53729 alt.journalism:65784 alt.christnet:137410 (Doc Savage) wrote:

>	It has been known for decades that religious fundies will keep the
>slaughter in the Near East going forever.  It is rarely spoken that it
>is the jew fundies who started the trend.  It was when the latest
>round of fundies (zionists) moved in that the peace of four hundred
>years was broken.  And that was about the longest recorded peace in
>the area in history.  

>	It is quite unfortunate that it happened.  Centuries of peace down
>the tubes all because of jew fundies.  

  Unfortunately, Israeli Capo/Prime Minister Netanyahu -- you remember
him, dontcha?: the Israeli PM with all those weird alias's in the
*U.S. Social Security Administration*? -- seems more intent on rubbing
salt in the wounds of the already-dispossessed indiginous Palestinians
in the area.
  [Btw, for more info on Nut-'n-yahoo's various strange alias's in
official U.S. government files, check out the intriguing "BIBI-WATCH"
Web page by Israeli Kibbutz member Eric Lee -- a Righteous Jew who
bravely criticizes the murderous leader of his country. Of course,
"Bibi" is what Nut-'n-yahoo's followers affectionatly call him;
personally, *I* prefer to refer to Nut-'n-yahoo as "John Sullivan,"
one of his alias's in the U.S.'s Social Security Administration

From Sat Dec 28 10:10:00 PST 1996
Article: 40986 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,,,alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.perot,,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Peter Jennings tells the truth about Jerusalem! [Fwd/repost]
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 19:35:02 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 105
Message-ID: <59rsu8$>
References: <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Dec 25 12:48:40 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.conspiracy:125240 alt.politics.reform:121038 alt.politics.perot:66983 alt.politics.nationalism.white:40986

Forwarded and reposted:

Y Rapido  wrote:

>Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 19:37:55 -0500
>Title: Peter Jennings/Jerusalem Stories/Ali Baghdadi
>By: Ali Baghdadi


>ABC Should be commended on "Jerusalem Stories"

>By Ali Baghdadi
>December 21, 1996

>     "Jerusalem Stories", an hour long TV program aired by ABC on
>Thursday evening December 19, was an excellent journalistic accomplishment, and
>its narrator, Peter Jennings, should be thanked and complimented for his
>courage, objectivity, honesty and magnificent work. 

>     The world was shown that Palestinians are not only Muslims but also
>Christians; that some Palestinian Christians are descendants of
>Palestinian Jews who accepted the teachings of Jesus; that Jesus was
>actually a Palestinian; that Palestinian Christians are the root of
>Christianity and are responsible for conveying the message of Jesus to
>the world including Europe; that the Christian community that flourished
>under Muslim rule is dwindling today due to Israeli oppression; and that
>Christian Arabs stand solidly with their Muslim brothers in opposition
>and fear of Israeli occupation. 

>     The highlight of the program, however, was the taping of a Jewish
>wedding procession marching through the heart of an Muslim neighborhood. 
>Jewish settlers, many of them armed, were chanting and dancing in the
>street in front of Arab houses.  Peter Jennings was ridiculed, and
>described as "a liar and slime bucket" by American Jewish settlers who
>preferred to keep their daily provocation and harassment of the Arab
>residents away from American viewers. 

>     An American Jew, Abraham Yarmouth, who broke off from the Jewish
>religious procession and confronted Peter Jennings with a gun dangling
>from his waist has summed it all up.  He told millions of viewers all
>over the world that Palestinians who have lived in this area of the world
>long before the birth of Islam, Christianity and Judaism "have no right to
>Jerusalem anymore".  They have no right to any part of their homeland. 
>"They have lost the war."  Jews, however, with all due respect, have the
>right to tell the Arabs to go "bye". 

>     It is that simple.  When Zionist Jews win with American support,
>Jewish law must be applied.  Jewish "justice" must be observed.  When
>the "Chosen People" have control, the UN Charter and international law must
>no longer be of any importance.  All norms that govern human morality,
>decency, dignity and behavior must be suspended.  When the children of
>Isaac triumph, the children of Ishmael and all other children must
>accept the consequences. 

>     According to Jewish teachings, all that it takes to acquire
>something from a gentile (non-Jew) is to fight for it and win.  The loser, of
>course the gentile, must be thankful to stay alive.  However, he must turn his
>back, move and leave everything he owns behind.  He must abandon his
>house.  He must give away his farm.  He must relinquish all his rights. 
>He must accept eternal exile.  It is all his fault!  He has lost! 

>     The fact that the Palestinians have not provoked a fight and have
>been living in peace in their own homeland minding their own business
>for thousands of years does not really matter.  The fact that the Jews who
>chose to fight to win are descendants of East European tribes that
>converted to Judaism in the seventh century and are alien to Palestine,
>has actually no significance.  The fact that Jews came to Palestine as
>invaders, and that King Davidís kingdom lasted only 72 years, is not an

>     The fact that Jews were exiled by the Romans and were allowed to
>return and worship freely in Jerusalem by the Muslim Arabs fourteen
>hundred years ago must be ignored. 

>     The fact that the Palestinians hold onto the original land deeds
>for their homes, villages and cities and refuse to let go has no legal

>     Abraham Yarmouth who voluntarily chose to leave America and settle
>in Palestine teaches little children in a nursery school.  

>     The "I-win-you-lose-bye-bye" concept is not of his invention.  It
>was what he had learned in Jewish schools in New York, and that is what he
>now teaches new generations of Jewish kids in Jerusalem.  He does not
>question what he was taught or what he is teaching.  No Jew has the right to
>question the "God of Israel".  Jews must only listen and obey!  The "God
>of Israel" put those rules and demanded that Jews follow.  He is
>different from the "God of the Universe" worshipped by Muslims, Christians,
>Hindus, Buddhists and all non-Jews including men and women in the Amazon jungles
>who have never been visited by any prophet.  The "God of Israel" caters
>only to Jews and in accordance with Jewish wishes and likings. 

>     The only serious problem Zionist Jews and their God face today is
>the fact that the Palestinians do not seem to understand.  They are not
>willing to play by Jewish rules.  Three million Palestinians continue to
>insist on remaining on Palestinian soil regardless of the intimidation,
>terror and starvation to which they are subjected.  The four million who
>fled Palestine after a series of massacres carried out by Jewish armed
>forces, refuse to give away their right of return and are determined at
>their earliest opportunity to go back. 


From Sat Dec 28 10:11:16 PST 1996
Article: 125220 of alt.conspiracy
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.perot,soc.veterans,,,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.radical-left
Subject: Re: The New World Order: Hail to G.I. Joe!
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 01:57:04 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <5a1s2h$>
References: <>
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Dec 27  5:10:41 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.conspiracy:125220 alt.politics.perot:66980 soc.veterans:13958 alt.politics.democrats.d:162760 alt.politics.radical-left:142232 (Tunie2) wrote:

>Another Christmas and another year of making out like a bandit!  This year
>Santa brought me a 50th Anniversary G.I. Joe 3-Star General and a G.I. Joe
>"Urban S.W.A.T. Weapons Arsenal!"  

  Speaking of which . . . forget about that too-hyped "Tickle Me Alan
Greenspan" doll . . . the REAL Christmas bestseller for kids in the
Beltway, so I hear, was actually the "G.I. Joe U.N. (blue beret)
Model" . . . get this: it even obeys the orders of its owners! (so
long as they're barked by a non-American kid in a non-English
language, that is) . . . comes complete with bodybag and Persian Gulf
War![tm] rash stickers too, kids! 

From Sun Dec 29 02:25:15 PST 1996
Article: 41162 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (JoeBuck)
Subject: Re: If......
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 02:28:37 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <5a1ttm$>
References: <01bbf3b2$4dd42e60$0166afce@default>
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Dec 27  7:42:14 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.politics.nationalism.white:41162 alt.politics.white-power:53880

"Rad"  wrote:

>If the average white American were born in Europe his life would be much
>the same. But if the average black American were born in Africa he would be
>eating bugs and shitting on the ground.

  Frankly, the average European (of any race) enjoys MUCH lower rates
of street crime where he/she lives than the "average white American,"
I think it's fair to say.
  So, at least in that respect, the average European lives
significantly better than the average white American.

From Sun Dec 29 02:25:16 PST 1996
Article: 41171 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,,alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.perot,,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Illegal votes stand, but US citizens' Prop 209 votes ERASED
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 00:43:48 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <5a4c5b$>
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Dec 28  5:57:31 PM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: alt.conspiracy:125602 alt.politics.reform:121300 alt.politics.perot:67014 alt.politics.nationalism.white:41171

  So this is what happened last Election Day: Increasingly-documented
voter fraud on a nationwide level led Democrat candidates to victory
in several key races.
  A significant amount of credit/blame goes to the special
"Citizenship USA" drive which President Clinton personally placed his
wannabe-Prez-in-2000 V.P. in charge of about a year before.
   This program, as post-Election Day reports in even the mainstream
liberal media reveal, involved the granting of U.S. citizenship to a
massive (i.e. many thousands) number of individuals who, if proper
procedures had been followed, would not have been eligible for
citizenship due to having committed serious crimes in their caountries
of origin. 
  In other cases, persons who had never been sworn in as U.S. citizens
admit that they voted in local, state and federal elections.
  At the same time, in places like California, the votes of citizens
who overwhelmingly approved civil rights measures such as Proposition
209, which would have outlawed racial discriminationin government
hiring, have essentially been cancelled, as groups successfully
shopped for a sympathetic judge to declare the anti-affirmative-action
measure "Un-Constitutional." 
  It's as though the people who approved Proposition 209 had never
  Yet, when many of these same voters point to the massive voting
irregularities that occurred last Election day, they're branded as
"sore losers."

From Sun Dec 29 07:44:06 PST 1996
Article: 531012 of talk.politics.misc
From: (JoeBuck)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.guns,alt.conspiracy,alt.journalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,,alt.society.liberalism,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich,alt.society.conservatism,alt.politics.correct,alt.politics.reform,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,talk.politics,,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.democrats.d,soc.women,talk.politics.theory,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: Organized Voter Fraud in Dornan Race Found: LA Times
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 08:25:57 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <5a5780$>
References: <> <57496o$6jh@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <57k8uh$> <> <57nu8i$> <57qri2$> <>  <> <58ahpn$> <>  <>     <> 
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Dec 29  1:39:44 AM CST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: talk.politics.libertarian:155570 talk.politics.guns:358436 alt.conspiracy:125650 alt.journalism:65904 talk.politics.misc:531012 alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich:104973 alt.society.conservatism:66642 alt.politics.correct:168465 alt.politics.reform:121340 alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater:62358 alt.politics.clinton:347135 alt.politics.democrats.d:163227 soc.women:129781 talk.politics.theory:98378 (Max Kennedy) wrote:

>I read 6 major newspapers, two newswires from 5 different sources, 4
>news channels, and quite a number of other sources, every day, every
>It was mentioned on CNN once early in the morning and not mentioned
>It was not mentioned any where else, including the sources for the
>news wires I use.
>That is not wide spread attention.    That is supression.

  In addition ALL the local Los Angeles-area tv news shows are
avoiding the issue like the plague.

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.