From veritas.nizkor.org!cableinet.co.uk!David.M  Mon Apr 19 04:42:07 1999
Return-Path: 
Received: from veritas.nizkor.org (6122 bytes) by www.nizkor.org
	via sendmail with P:uucp/D:dotforward/T:pipe
	(sender:  owner: ) 
	id 
	for nizkor; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 04:42:06 -0400 (EDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.98 1997-Oct-16 #1 built 1997-Oct-31)
Received: from jaguars.cableinet.net(jaguars-int.cableinet.net[193.38.113.9]) (5715 bytes) by www.nizkor.org
	via sendmail with P:smtp/D:dotforward/T:pipe
	(sender:  owner: ) 
	id 
	for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 19:07:41 -0500 (EST)
	(Smail-3.2.0.98 1997-Oct-16 #1 built 1997-Oct-31)
Received: (qmail 14975 invoked from network); 3 Mar 1999 23:51:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO b52.centurione.com) (194.117.148.56)
  by jaguars with SMTP; 3 Mar 1999 23:51:16 -0000
Message-ID: <36DDCE4E.2F15@cableinet.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 00:05:34 +0000
From: David 
Reply-To: David.M@cableinet.co.uk
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
To: Kenneth McVay OBC 
CC: yawen@enter.net
Subject: Re: Himmler challenge update
References: <36DDB834.4185@cableinet.co.uk> <7bkd62$2ac6$1@hub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: kmcvay
Status: O

In response to my post, in which I indicated that the National Archives
were not prepared to release the original Himmler tapes but were
prepared to sell a certified copy thereof, and in which I discussed
issues arising from that, Kenneth McVay OBC wrote:

> In article <36DDB834.4185@cableinet.co.uk>,
> David   wrote:
>
> >You may recall that I expressed an interest in taking the Nizkor
> >'Himmler Posen speech' challenge, namely to have the tape of the speech
> >analysed, pay for the analysis if it proves the tape genuine, or watch
> >with satisfaction as Nizkor pays for the analysis if the tape is not
> >proven genuine.
>
> As I told you - I thought I had been clear - you must contact Mr.
> Edeiken and come to an agreement with respect to this process.
>
> Until you have done that, there seems little point in discussing the
> matter further.
>
> I am, given an agreement, prepared to sign a legally binding contract
> at the University of London on May 7, or St. Anne's, Oxford, on the
> 14th.
>
> --
> The Nizkor Project-----------------------http://www.nizkor.org
> Ken McVay, Director.ICQ 7015822. http://www.nizkor.org/~kmcvay
>                 Pentium III: Big Brother Inside

Let history note that he also sent me the following e-mail, which he
chose not to post in alt.revisionism:


Return-Path:
                         
             Delivered-To:
                         David.M@cableinet.co.uk
                Received:
                         (qmail 7127 invoked from network); 3 Mar 1999
22:23:54 -0000
                Received:
                         from unknown (HELO www.nizkor.org)
(198.96.119.205)
by tigers.cableinet.net with
                         SMTP; 3 Mar 1999 22:23:54 -0000
                Received:
                         from localhost (1312 bytes) by www.nizkor.org
via
sendmail with
                         P:stdio/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp
(sender:
) (ident 
                         using unix) id 
for

                         ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999
17:39:16
-0500 (EST)
                         (Smail-3.2.0.98 1997-Oct-16 #1 built
1997-Oct-31)
             Message-ID:
                         
                   From:
                         kmcvay@www.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC)
                  Subject:
                         Re: Himmler challenge update
              In-Reply-To:
                         <36DDB834.4185@cableinet.co.uk> from David at
"Mar
3, 99 10:31:23 pm"
                      To:
                         David.M@cableinet.co.uk
                    Date:
                         Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:39:16 -0500 (EST)
                X-Mailer:
                         ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
           MIME-Version:
                         1.0
            Content-Type:
                         text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:
                         7bit
           Content-Length:
                         883
          X-Mozilla-Status:
                         8011




You wrote:

> You may recall that I expressed an interest in taking the Nizkor
> 'Himmler Posen speech' challenge, namely to have the tape of the speech
> analysed, pay for the analysis if it proves the tape genuine, or watch
> with satisfaction as Nizkor pays for the analysis if the tape is not
> proven genuine.
>
> On 22 February 1999 I asked the National Archives whether the original

You have not reached an agreement with Mr. Edeiken. Why is that?

Please contact Mr. Edeiken, and come to an agreement, so that we may
sign a contract in London. Without such an agreement, there is little
point in contacting me.

Thanks for the information - all of which I am already well aware of.

Ken McVay

--
The Nizkor Project-----------------------http://www.nizkor.org
Ken McVay, Director.ICQ 7015822. http://www.nizkor.org/~kmcvay
                Pentium III: Big Brother Inside



This poses several interesting questions:

(1) If McVay knew that the National Archives would not release the
original Himmler tape, as he claims, why did he issue the challenge in
the first place?

(2) Is McVay now trying to distance himself from his challenge?

(3) Will Mr Edeiken step in and address the points from which Mr McVay
has fled?

(4) Are Nizkor prepared to attempt to persuade the National Archives to
make the original tapes available or are they not?

I now publicly challenge Mr Edeiken to address all the points made in my
original post 'Himmler Challenge Update', given that his master does not
wish to discuss the matter with me. If he, too, does not have the guts
to make his full response in alt.revisionism, I will post whatever
response comes my way on his behalf.

David E Michael

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor