From mebesius@sfu.ca Sat Dec 23 22:51:58 PST 1995
Article: 20625 of can.politics
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian,can.politics,local,van.general,soc.culture.india,bc.politics
Subject: Re: Bindy Johal
Date: 23 Dec 1995 14:58:25 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <4bh5eh$s8s@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.indian:167466 can.politics:20625 van.general:4523

If East Indian kids think Bindy is a wise guy, then there is something seriously wrong with this country.  We obviously are sending the wrond message to new Canadians--that you can ignore our laws and traditions, and bring your criminal and backwards way of life to our country.  Just last week, in New Westminster B.C., a gang of Indo-Canadian kids went through the halls of the New Westminster's only secondary school, with baseball-bats, smashing windows, lockers, and beating up any white kid they could fin
d.  News reports wondered if this was the beginning of a "race war."  The police are now guarding the school.  And parents and the media are now wondering why there are these racial tensions in their kids' school.  And now, despite all the multicult rhetoric and indoctrination, these white kids are beginning to realize that they have to stick together.  Their survival depends on it.



From mebesius@sfu.ca Wed Dec 27 13:31:19 PST 1995
Article: 20704 of can.politics
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!news.mindlink.net!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: talk.politics,can.politics,alt.politics.usa.republican,ca.politics,alt.impeach.clinton,alt.politics.clinton,alt.president.clinton,alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich
Subject: Re: COLLECTIVE GUILT: ANOTHER PERNICIOUS LIBERAL CONCEPT
Date: 27 Dec 1995 02:01:43 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <4bq9e7$jnu@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.misc:304849 can.politics:20704 alt.politics.usa.republican:125363 alt.impeach.clinton:25971 alt.politics.clinton:191036 alt.president.clinton:52862 alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich:30006

Mr. Lopez makes a good case for rejecting the liberal guilt complex.
However, he seems to be saying that such a collective guilt is applicable
to Nazi Germany (re: holocaust).  Now this is bullshit.
It is this type of thinking that makes perfectly normal white Christians
apologize for something they had nothing to do with.  So "we" give 
pro-censorship Jewish organizations everything they ask for.  Never mind
freedom of expression, or anything like that, if Jews are offended by  
anything, the state is obligated to silence those bad people who offend
the Jews.  What we are doing, in effect, is paying war reparations to
a bunch of Jews (and victims of the week) who aren't victims, for crimes
we didn't commit.  It's pathetic!



From mebesius@sfu.ca Wed Dec 27 13:31:20 PST 1995
Article: 20752 of can.politics
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: caught in the cross-fire
Date: 27 Dec 1995 15:23:40 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <4brods$7ci@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca

Decent, law-abiding citizens of Vancouver were once again caught in the
cross-fire of the East Indian drug war going on in their city.  New reports
say Paul Cheema (an associate of Bindy Johal, who was recently acquitted of
the murder of two gang rivals) was again the intended target of a drive-by
shooting this Christmas.  This was the third time rival gang members shot
at Cheema's house.  Cheema, however, remains defiant, and will not co-operate
with police.  Mr. Cheema says he knows who is shooting at him, and will
solve the problem himself.  His neighbours are not so understanding.  They 
are fed up with the bullets flying by their windows and wish something would
be done.  Some people might think if these gangster wannabes want to kill
each other let them.  Hell, give them more bullets!  The problem, however,
is that these wise guys aren't that accurate.  They have already shot and 
killed a (white) man who was walking his dog in the wrong place at the 
wrong time.  He was thought to be a member of the rival Indo-Canadian gang.
One of the troublemakers (Bindy Johal) has gone back to India for a vacation,
and hopefully, these criminals will finish their war back in India.  That way
us hard-working, tax-paying, law-abiding Canadians won't be caught in the
cross-fire.



From mebesius@sfu.ca Wed Dec 27 17:21:06 PST 1995
Article: 304849 of talk.politics.misc
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!news.mindlink.net!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: talk.politics,can.politics,alt.politics.usa.republican,ca.politics,alt.impeach.clinton,alt.politics.clinton,alt.president.clinton,alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich
Subject: Re: COLLECTIVE GUILT: ANOTHER PERNICIOUS LIBERAL CONCEPT
Date: 27 Dec 1995 02:01:43 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <4bq9e7$jnu@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca talk.politics.misc:304849 can.politics:20704 alt.politics.usa.republican:125363 alt.impeach.clinton:25971 alt.politics.clinton:191036 alt.president.clinton:52862 alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich:30006

Mr. Lopez makes a good case for rejecting the liberal guilt complex.
However, he seems to be saying that such a collective guilt is applicable
to Nazi Germany (re: holocaust).  Now this is bullshit.
It is this type of thinking that makes perfectly normal white Christians
apologize for something they had nothing to do with.  So "we" give 
pro-censorship Jewish organizations everything they ask for.  Never mind
freedom of expression, or anything like that, if Jews are offended by  
anything, the state is obligated to silence those bad people who offend
the Jews.  What we are doing, in effect, is paying war reparations to
a bunch of Jews (and victims of the week) who aren't victims, for crimes
we didn't commit.  It's pathetic!



From mebesius@sfu.ca Wed Dec 27 22:50:02 PST 1995
Article: 34539 of bc.general
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!agate!news.mindlink.net!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: can.politics,bc.general,van.general
Subject: Re: Of Anti-Racists and Cockroaches
Date: 28 Dec 1995 02:04:23 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <4bstv7$m3g@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca can.politics:20874 bc.general:34539 van.general:4539

First, to the extent that "anti-racists" and their organizations get
money from the government, then they are parasites (perhaps not cockroaches).

As for Mr. Burdi's conviction...my understanding is that he did not kick
the "anti-racist" activist in the face (someone else did) yet he was held
responsible.  This seemed like an odd way of putting a racist in jail, just
so he would be quiet.

Sorry, Ken, don't know anything about a "European Culture" club at SFU.  I
suspect it is harmless though.  I mean, there are Indo-Canadian, Chinese,
Gay and Lesbian clubs at SFU, and no one seems to care much about these
crybaby groups.  But if some "Euro-Canadians" feel the need to have a little
club, hold meetings, bitch and whine about the left-liberal climate at SFU,
that is their business.  I see no point in such a student union, and have
nothing to do with it.

It seems to bother you that I have posted to Stormfront.  Well, I have also
explored anarchist, Satanist, and other politically-incorrect sites on the 
web.  Does that mean I am an anarchist?  A Satanist?  Or a Marxist-Leninist?
Get real!  You can't label me.  I'm not an ideologue.  My views are more 
complex than your bogeyman-in-every-corner-of-Canadian-society view of the
world.  But, if you think it is your purpose in life to keep files on people,
then all the power to you.  Just don't be so quick to conclude that I am a 
white devil.  Reality is more complex than that.



From mebesius@sfu.ca Fri Dec 29 03:41:25 PST 1995
Article: 21067 of can.politics
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!nntp.pinc.com!freenet.victoria.bc.ca!freenet.carleton.ca!cunews!nott!torn!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: can.politics,bc.general,van.general
Subject: Re: Of Anti-Racists and Cockroaches and lunch?
Date: 29 Dec 1995 04:46:45 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <4bvrrl$dv@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca can.politics:21067 bc.general:34613 van.general:4552

Ken, please see "not getting anywhere quick" @ can.politics (earlier
articles).  

Q.



From mebesius@sfu.ca Fri Dec 29 12:03:25 PST 1995
Article: 21127 of can.politics
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: not getting anywhere quick
Date: 28 Dec 1995 17:32:09 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <4bukap$d8d@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca

Dear Ken,

It looks like we are not getting anywhere real quick.  Listen, I was not
at that concert/riot when what's-her-name was assaulted.  Personally, I would
never hit a women.  I know it is a sexist thing to say, but it's not my idea
of fun.  And I do not get into fights with anyone, unless they start it, and
I am forced to protect myself.  So, please, Ken, try to understand what I am
saying.  I do not condone violence.  The cockroach metaphor was probably a
poor one.  I was frustrated at hearing that someone could be convicted of
causing bodily harm, when it wasn't proven that that someone (Mr. Burdi) 
was the one who kicked the young woman in the face.  And I felt that if
it had been the other way around, and a "racist" was assaulted, that no one
would have been convicted of anything (perhaps I am too cynical and too
tired to believe in our criminal justice system).  Okay, so my frustration
made it sound like I was declaring open-season on "anti-racists."  But
let's not pretend that they are a bunch of angels either.  Apparently,
both groups were hurling insults at each other (and other stuff) and both 
groups were in a fighting mood.  If a riot/fight breaks out, why blame only
one side?  Again, I wasn't there, so I don't know what exactly happened.  
Maybe you do?  

You were also wondering about how we, in effect, are paying war reparations
to Jews who aren't victims, for crimes we didn't commit.  This has nothing
to do with the holocaust or Germany.  It has to do with the money the 
government gives multicultural groups, anti-racist groups, and Jewish groups,
because these groups are in the business of fighting evil.  I agrue that 
we are, in effect, paying for the sins of people who have nothing to do with
Canada today.  The war was fifty years ago, and we had nothing to do with
the holocaust.  We had nothing to do with slavery.  And we had nothing to do
with the genocide of the American Indians.  That is history.  It is not
something we should always be reminded of when some brings up affirmative
action or funding for this or that anti-racist group.  Just because we
are white, does not mean that we are evil.  I am tired of being told
by the media and every other elite in this country that whites ought to
feel guilty for what our ancestors did or did not do so many years ago.
And I resent that any dissent that goes against this type of liberal guilt
thinking is thought to be evidence of a deep-seated hatred of non-whites.
In this country, if you are to the right of Joe Clark, you might as well
be a hood-wearing, cross-burning Klansman. That's the way you are treated.
If you don't like being treated like a second-class citizen (see employment
equity) in your own country, you might as well be a white supremacist.  
The binary opposition that is employed to label angry whites with legitimate
concerns as the enemy effectively marginalizes their arguments and means 
they are deviants.  The multiculturalism/liberal status quo does not tolerate
dissent.  And the elites in this country know that they can treat whites with
contempt and treat their fears as irrelevant.  But I don't care anymore.
It's too late to do anything about it now.  I just have to let off a little
steam every now and then.  You understand?

If you don't, then perhaps we should get together the next time you are in
the lower mainland, Ken, and talk.  We could have lunch at White Spot or 
wherever (smoking-section? you still smoke, right?) and shoot the shit.
I think we could probably clarify things pretty quick, and have a great
hamburger at the same time.  What do you say?

Quinn



From mebesius@sfu.ca Fri Dec 29 18:15:01 PST 1995
Article: 21231 of can.politics
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!tcsi.tcs.com!agate!news.mindlink.net!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: not getting anywhere quick
Date: 29 Dec 1995 21:57:40 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <4c1o8k$nqc@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca

Thank-you, Ken, for your response.  Although you did not say you would
definitely meet with me the next time you are in the lower mainland, I
sensed a tentative yes in there somewhere.  That's good to hear.
We wouldn't want people to think that you were afraid to meet with 
someone, in person, and ask the brave questions you usually ask on the
internet.  There are some people "out there" who are extremely  insulting
and confrontational and brave, because of the relative anonymity the 
internet provides.  If you have the balls to sit across the table from me,
and ask me some tough questions, then I won't think you are one of those
chicken shit cowards that usually sends me their adolescent profanity and
death threats.  I won't agree with your view of the world, but I might
just respect you some more.  So, please, Ken, the next time you have to
be dragged to this shit hole called Vancouver, do let me know.  Private
e-mail, and it will be just us.  

Quinn



From mebesius@sfu.ca Sat Dec 30 14:24:24 PST 1995
Article: 21268 of can.politics
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Faceoff on Quebec
Date: 29 Dec 1995 07:02:15 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <4c03pn$3qo@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca

Thursday's Faceoff was yet more proof of why Canada is going to 
self-destruct.  Ms. Rebick, Leo Panitch, and former PC cabinet minister
Babe McDougall (did you notice her trendy black nail polish?) were all
saying that Quebec must have "special status"--"different powers, but 
not necessarily better powers."  Claire Hoy reminded these out-of-touch
elitist snobs that the Rest Of Canada would not support this type of
thinking.  Maybe asymmetrical federalism is on a come back.  I don't
know what the elites in this country are up to.  And I don't care.  As
far as I am concerned, Quebec is a separate nation and should go.  It
has been a big waste of time and money trying to convince everyone 
otherwise.  All I know is that I will be dreaming of Babe McDougall and 
her pampered ass tonight!  Love those eyes, and her Dana Scully red hair!
But I don't think Ms. Rebick will make it a threesome.  Feminists have
better things to do anyway, than to be sex-objects and provide 
heterosexual males with fantasies.  Maybe Ms. Rebick will be in 
k.d. Lang's dreams tonight?



From mebesius@sfu.ca Sat Dec 30 18:21:25 PST 1995
Article: 18120 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Dead Jews and Power
Date: 31 Dec 1995 00:23:02 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <4c4l56$s5@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca


In Saturday's edition of _The Globe and Mail_ "Canada's National
Newspaper" they had a section on all the famous people who died this year.

Saidye Rosner Bronfman, 99, "one of Canada's most generous patrons of the
arts and the matriarch of one of the country's wealthiest families [see
Edgar Bronfman Jr., chief executive of Seagram Co. Ltd., and MCA Inc.,
parent company of Universal].  Mrs. Bronfman devoted her life to cultural
and charitable activities, founding the Jewish branch of the Canadian Red
Cross Society."

I would suggest that she devoted her life to making sure her family
continued making money and getting their greedy little hands on more
companies and control of more power.  Question: Why would Jews need their
own branch of the Red Cross?  Why would they need their own blood supply?
Are they trying to make sure that only Jew blood is used for Jews?  Bet
their blood supply wasn't contaminated with HIV!

Sir Philip Oppenheimer, 83,  "who until 1993 was chairman of De Beers
Mining Co.'s diamond-marketing cartel, which controlled the world supply
of diamonds and ended the wild price swings that had brought disaster to
many of the smaller diamond mines."

Bullshit!  Bullshit!  Bullshit!  What brought "disaster" to these smaller
diamond companies was De Beers!  They bought up, intimidated, and used
violence, to get these suppliers out of the market.  These so-called
"wild price swings" are normally referred to as the normal workings of
the free market, and supply and demand.   Let's face it, De Beers'
hands can be seen working in the politics of every African country with
diamonds--and now in Russia with its vast diamond reserves. 

Some have argued that Harry Oppenheimer may have been the world's richest Jew. 
 It has also been said that De Beers produces and sells, at least, 85 percent 
of the world's rough, uncut diamonds.  "In these modern times, when 
price-controlling cartels have been outlawed in other industries, the survival 
of the De Beers monopoly is astonishing."  _McCall's_, March 1969, pp. 167-68.  
This observation was made in1969!  And this monopoly is still making money!

In Wilmot Robertson's _The Dispossessed Majority_, he sheds some light on
the workings of De Beers:  "The best gem diamonds come from Sierra Leone
where a company broke the De Beers monopoly for a brief period in the
early 1960s, until Oppenheimer persuaded the Sierra Leone Parliament to
'shut down' the competition....Needless to say, diamonds were not included
in the sanctions Congress [had] imposed on South Africa.  Israel's ties to 
South Africa are rather close, considering that the Zionist state
votes against South Africa whenever the latter's racial 'misbehavior'
comes up before the United Nations.  South Africa has plenty of uranium
and Israel a lot of nuclear technology."

That an Oppenheimer or a Bronfman should get so much ass-kissing press is
expected--that those with this power should expect us to embrace their
oligarchy/kleptocracy is wishful thinking.  There is too much money and
power concentrated in the hands of too few Jews (and others) and
people must know who is really in control of their country (hint: it ain't the 
politicians).



From mebesius@sfu.ca Sat Dec 30 21:19:21 PST 1995
Article: 18120 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Dead Jews and Power
Date: 31 Dec 1995 00:23:02 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <4c4l56$s5@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca


In Saturday's edition of _The Globe and Mail_ "Canada's National
Newspaper" they had a section on all the famous people who died this year.

Saidye Rosner Bronfman, 99, "one of Canada's most generous patrons of the
arts and the matriarch of one of the country's wealthiest families [see
Edgar Bronfman Jr., chief executive of Seagram Co. Ltd., and MCA Inc.,
parent company of Universal].  Mrs. Bronfman devoted her life to cultural
and charitable activities, founding the Jewish branch of the Canadian Red
Cross Society."

I would suggest that she devoted her life to making sure her family
continued making money and getting their greedy little hands on more
companies and control of more power.  Question: Why would Jews need their
own branch of the Red Cross?  Why would they need their own blood supply?
Are they trying to make sure that only Jew blood is used for Jews?  Bet
their blood supply wasn't contaminated with HIV!

Sir Philip Oppenheimer, 83,  "who until 1993 was chairman of De Beers
Mining Co.'s diamond-marketing cartel, which controlled the world supply
of diamonds and ended the wild price swings that had brought disaster to
many of the smaller diamond mines."

Bullshit!  Bullshit!  Bullshit!  What brought "disaster" to these smaller
diamond companies was De Beers!  They bought up, intimidated, and used
violence, to get these suppliers out of the market.  These so-called
"wild price swings" are normally referred to as the normal workings of
the free market, and supply and demand.   Let's face it, De Beers'
hands can be seen working in the politics of every African country with
diamonds--and now in Russia with its vast diamond reserves. 

Some have argued that Harry Oppenheimer may have been the world's richest Jew. 
 It has also been said that De Beers produces and sells, at least, 85 percent 
of the world's rough, uncut diamonds.  "In these modern times, when 
price-controlling cartels have been outlawed in other industries, the survival 
of the De Beers monopoly is astonishing."  _McCall's_, March 1969, pp. 167-68.  
This observation was made in1969!  And this monopoly is still making money!

In Wilmot Robertson's _The Dispossessed Majority_, he sheds some light on
the workings of De Beers:  "The best gem diamonds come from Sierra Leone
where a company broke the De Beers monopoly for a brief period in the
early 1960s, until Oppenheimer persuaded the Sierra Leone Parliament to
'shut down' the competition....Needless to say, diamonds were not included
in the sanctions Congress [had] imposed on South Africa.  Israel's ties to 
South Africa are rather close, considering that the Zionist state
votes against South Africa whenever the latter's racial 'misbehavior'
comes up before the United Nations.  South Africa has plenty of uranium
and Israel a lot of nuclear technology."

That an Oppenheimer or a Bronfman should get so much ass-kissing press is
expected--that those with this power should expect us to embrace their
oligarchy/kleptocracy is wishful thinking.  There is too much money and
power concentrated in the hands of too few Jews (and others) and
people must know who is really in control of their country (hint: it ain't the 
politicians).



From mebesius@sfu.ca Sun Dec 31 00:08:53 PST 1995
Article: 9607 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.uoregon.edu!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Dead Jews and Power
Date: 31 Dec 1995 00:16:02 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <4c4ko2$pc@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca


In Saturday's edition of _The Globe and Mail_ "Canada's National
Newspaper" they had a section on all the famous people who died this year.

Saidye Rosner Bronfman, 99, "one of Canada's most generous patrons of the
arts and the matriarch of one of the country's wealthiest families [see
Edgar Bronfman Jr., chief executive of Seagram Co. Ltd., and MCA Inc.,
parent company of Universal].  Mrs. Bronfman devoted her life to cultural
and charitable activities, founding the Jewish branch of the Canadian Red
Cross Society."

I would suggest that she devoted her life to making sure her family
continued making money and getting their greedy little hands on more
companies and control of more power.  Question: Why would Jews need their
own branch of the Red Cross?  Why would they need their own blood supply?
Are they trying to make sure that only Jew blood is used for Jews?  Bet
their blood supply wasn't contaminated with HIV!

Sir Philip Oppenheimer, 83,  "who until 1993 was chairman of De Beers
Mining Co.'s diamond-marketing cartel, which controlled the world supply
of diamonds and ended the wild price swings that had brought disaster to
many of the smaller diamond mines."

Bullshit!  Bullshit!  Bullshit!  What brought "disaster" to these smaller
diamond companies was De Beers!  They bought up, intimidated, and used
violence, to get these suppliers out of the market.  These so-called
"wild price swings" are normally referred to as the normal workings of
the free market, and supply and demand.   Let's face it, De Beers'
hands can be seen working in the politics of every African country with
diamonds--and now in Russia with its vast diamond reserves. 

Some have argued that Harry Oppenheimer may have been the world's richest Jew. 
 It has also been said that De Beers produces and sells, at least, 85 percent 
of the world's rough, uncut diamonds.  "In these modern times, when 
price-controlling cartels have been outlawed in other industries, the survival 
of the De Beers monopoly is astonishing."  _McCall's_, March 1969, pp. 167-68.  
This observation was made in1969!  And this monopoly is still making money!

In Wilmot Robertson's _The Dispossessed Majority_, he sheds some light on
the workings of De Beers:  "The best gem diamonds come from Sierra Leone
where a company broke the De Beers monopoly for a brief period in the
early 1960s, until Oppenheimer persuaded the Sierra Leone Parliament to
'shut down' the competition....Needless to say, diamonds were not included
in the sanctions Congress [had] imposed on South Africa.  Israel's ties to 
South Africa are rather close, considering that the Zionist state
votes against South Africa whenever the latter's racial 'misbehavior'
comes up before the United Nations.  South Africa has plenty of uranium
and Israel a lot of nuclear technology."

That an Oppenheimer or a Bronfman should get so much ass-kissing press is
expected--that those with this power should expect us to embrace their
oligarchy/kleptocracy is wishful thinking.  There is too much money and
power concentrated in the hands of too few Jews (and others) and
people must know who is really in control of their country (hint: it ain't the 
politicians).



From mebesius@sfu.ca Sun Dec 31 00:24:40 PST 1995
Article: 12803 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.uoregon.edu!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Dead Jews and Power
Date: 31 Dec 1995 00:18:36 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <4c4kss$pr@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca


In Saturday's edition of _The Globe and Mail_ "Canada's National
Newspaper" they had a section on all the famous people who died this year.

Saidye Rosner Bronfman, 99, "one of Canada's most generous patrons of the
arts and the matriarch of one of the country's wealthiest families [see
Edgar Bronfman Jr., chief executive of Seagram Co. Ltd., and MCA Inc.,
parent company of Universal].  Mrs. Bronfman devoted her life to cultural
and charitable activities, founding the Jewish branch of the Canadian Red
Cross Society."

I would suggest that she devoted her life to making sure her family
continued making money and getting their greedy little hands on more
companies and control of more power.  Question: Why would Jews need their
own branch of the Red Cross?  Why would they need their own blood supply?
Are they trying to make sure that only Jew blood is used for Jews?  Bet
their blood supply wasn't contaminated with HIV!

Sir Philip Oppenheimer, 83,  "who until 1993 was chairman of De Beers
Mining Co.'s diamond-marketing cartel, which controlled the world supply
of diamonds and ended the wild price swings that had brought disaster to
many of the smaller diamond mines."

Bullshit!  Bullshit!  Bullshit!  What brought "disaster" to these smaller
diamond companies was De Beers!  They bought up, intimidated, and used
violence, to get these suppliers out of the market.  These so-called
"wild price swings" are normally referred to as the normal workings of
the free market, and supply and demand.   Let's face it, De Beers'
hands can be seen working in the politics of every African country with
diamonds--and now in Russia with its vast diamond reserves. 

Some have argued that Harry Oppenheimer may have been the world's richest Jew. 
 It has also been said that De Beers produces and sells, at least, 85 percent 
of the world's rough, uncut diamonds.  "In these modern times, when 
price-controlling cartels have been outlawed in other industries, the survival 
of the De Beers monopoly is astonishing."  _McCall's_, March 1969, pp. 167-68.  
This observation was made in1969!  And this monopoly is still making money!

In Wilmot Robertson's _The Dispossessed Majority_, he sheds some light on
the workings of De Beers:  "The best gem diamonds come from Sierra Leone
where a company broke the De Beers monopoly for a brief period in the
early 1960s, until Oppenheimer persuaded the Sierra Leone Parliament to
'shut down' the competition....Needless to say, diamonds were not included
in the sanctions Congress [had] imposed on South Africa.  Israel's ties to 
South Africa are rather close, considering that the Zionist state
votes against South Africa whenever the latter's racial 'misbehavior'
comes up before the United Nations.  South Africa has plenty of uranium
and Israel a lot of nuclear technology."

That an Oppenheimer or a Bronfman should get so much ass-kissing press is
expected--that those with this power should expect us to embrace their
oligarchy/kleptocracy is wishful thinking.  There is too much money and
power concentrated in the hands of too few Jews (and others) and
people must know who is really in control of their country (hint: it ain't the 
politicians).



From mebesius@sfu.ca Sun Dec 31 00:24:40 PST 1995
Article: 12804 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Dead Jews and Power
Date: 31 Dec 1995 00:20:56 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <4c4l18$ru@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca


In Saturday's edition of _The Globe and Mail_ "Canada's National
Newspaper" they had a section on all the famous people who died this year.

Saidye Rosner Bronfman, 99, "one of Canada's most generous patrons of the
arts and the matriarch of one of the country's wealthiest families [see
Edgar Bronfman Jr., chief executive of Seagram Co. Ltd., and MCA Inc.,
parent company of Universal].  Mrs. Bronfman devoted her life to cultural
and charitable activities, founding the Jewish branch of the Canadian Red
Cross Society."

I would suggest that she devoted her life to making sure her family
continued making money and getting their greedy little hands on more
companies and control of more power.  Question: Why would Jews need their
own branch of the Red Cross?  Why would they need their own blood supply?
Are they trying to make sure that only Jew blood is used for Jews?  Bet
their blood supply wasn't contaminated with HIV!

Sir Philip Oppenheimer, 83,  "who until 1993 was chairman of De Beers
Mining Co.'s diamond-marketing cartel, which controlled the world supply
of diamonds and ended the wild price swings that had brought disaster to
many of the smaller diamond mines."

Bullshit!  Bullshit!  Bullshit!  What brought "disaster" to these smaller
diamond companies was De Beers!  They bought up, intimidated, and used
violence, to get these suppliers out of the market.  These so-called
"wild price swings" are normally referred to as the normal workings of
the free market, and supply and demand.   Let's face it, De Beers'
hands can be seen working in the politics of every African country with
diamonds--and now in Russia with its vast diamond reserves. 

Some have argued that Harry Oppenheimer may have been the world's richest Jew. 
 It has also been said that De Beers produces and sells, at least, 85 percent 
of the world's rough, uncut diamonds.  "In these modern times, when 
price-controlling cartels have been outlawed in other industries, the survival 
of the De Beers monopoly is astonishing."  _McCall's_, March 1969, pp. 167-68.  
This observation was made in1969!  And this monopoly is still making money!

In Wilmot Robertson's _The Dispossessed Majority_, he sheds some light on
the workings of De Beers:  "The best gem diamonds come from Sierra Leone
where a company broke the De Beers monopoly for a brief period in the
early 1960s, until Oppenheimer persuaded the Sierra Leone Parliament to
'shut down' the competition....Needless to say, diamonds were not included
in the sanctions Congress [had] imposed on South Africa.  Israel's ties to 
South Africa are rather close, considering that the Zionist state
votes against South Africa whenever the latter's racial 'misbehavior'
comes up before the United Nations.  South Africa has plenty of uranium
and Israel a lot of nuclear technology."

That an Oppenheimer or a Bronfman should get so much ass-kissing press is
expected--that those with this power should expect us to embrace their
oligarchy/kleptocracy is wishful thinking.  There is too much money and
power concentrated in the hands of too few Jews (and others) and
people must know who is really in control of their country (hint: it ain't the 
politicians).



From mebesius@sfu.ca Sun Dec 31 00:24:41 PST 1995
Article: 12821 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Japs and compensation
Date: 31 Dec 1995 03:24:45 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <4c4vpt$54a@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca

Somebody "out there" seems to think Japanese Canadians got $10,000 each, 
for compensation, for the Canadian hospitality they enjoyed during the
Second World War.  Wrong!  In 1986, it was estimated that it would cost
Canadian taxpayers (most who were not around during the war, and had
nothing to do with the internment of Japanese-Canadians) about $100 million.
But by 1990, it was revealed that it would cost over $346 million 
(_Vancouver Sun_, March 16, 1990, B3) and every Japanese "victim" would get
a $21,000 cheque (_Vancouver Sun_, March 3, 1989, A3).

As for why Japan is doing better than multicultural Canada and the 
melting pot States, I think it has to something with the fact that
Japanese have benefited from (1) stupid Americans who buy Jap crap (cars,
TVs, VCRs, etc.), and (2) Japan is one of the most racially-homogeneous
nations in the world (with no parasite Jews).

If the States was as racially-homogeneous and as racially-conscious as the
Japs, its future would look just as bright--instead of the bleak reality
it is now faced with.



From mebesius@sfu.ca Sun Dec 31 12:20:07 PST 1995
Article: 21459 of can.politics
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!agate!news.mindlink.net!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Dead Jews and Power
Date: 31 Dec 1995 00:00:03 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <4c4jq3$b1@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca


In Saturday's edition of _The Globe and Mail_ "Canada's National
Newspaper" they had a section on all the famous people who died this year.

Saidye Rosner Bronfman, 99, "one of Canada's most generous patrons of the
arts and the matriarch of one of the country's wealthiest families [see
Edgar Bronfman Jr., chief executive of Seagram Co. Ltd., and MCA Inc.,
parent company of Universal].  Mrs. Bronfman devoted her life to cultural
and charitable activities, founding the Jewish branch of the Canadian Red
Cross Society."

I would suggest that she devoted her life to making sure her family
continued making money and getting their greedy little hands on more
companies and control of more power.  Question: Why would Jews need their
own branch of the Red Cross?  Why would they need their own blood supply?
Are they trying to make sure that only Jew blood is used for Jews?  Bet
their blood supply wasn't contaminated with HIV!

Sir Philip Oppenheimer, 83,  "who until 1993 was chairman of De Beers
Mining Co.'s diamond-marketing cartel, which controlled the world supply
of diamonds and ended the wild price swings that had brought disaster to
many of the smaller diamond mines."

Bullshit!  Bullshit!  Bullshit!  What brought "disaster" to these smaller
diamond companies was De Beers!  They bought up, intimidated, and used
violence, to get these suppliers out of the market.  These so-called
"wild price swings" are normally referred to as the normal workings of
the free market, and supply and demand.   Let's face it, De Beer's
hands can be seen working in the politics of every African country with
diamonds--and now in Russia with its vast diamond reserves. 

Some have argued that Harry Oppenheimer may have been the world's richest Jew. 
 It has also been said that De Beers produces and sells, at least, 85 percent 
of the world's rough, uncut diamonds.  "In these modern times, when 
price-controlling cartels have been outlawed in other industries, the survival 
of the De Beers monopoly is astonishing."  _McCall's_, March 1969, pp. 167-68.  
This observation was made in1969!  And this monopoly is still making money!

In Wilmot Robertson's _The Dispossessed Majority_, he sheds some light on
the workings of De Beers:  "The best gem diamonds come from Sierra Leone
where a company broke the De Beers monopoly for a brief period in the
early 1960s, until Oppenheimer persuaded the Sierra Leone Parliament to
'shut down' the competition....Needless to say, diamonds were not included
in the sanctions Congress [had] imposed on South Africa.  Israel's ties to 
South Africa are rather close, considering that the Zionist state
votes against South Africa whenever the latter's racial 'misbehavior'
comes up before the United Nations.  South Africa has plenty of uranium
and Israel a lot of nuclear technology."

That an Oppenheimer or a Bronfman should get so much ass-kissing press is
expected--that those with this power should expect us to embrace their
oligarchy/kleptocracy is wishful thinking.  There is too much money and
power concentrated in the hands of too few Jews (and others) and
people must know who is really in control of their country (hint: it ain't the 
politicians).



From mebesius@sfu.ca Sun Dec 31 12:20:08 PST 1995
Article: 21486 of can.politics
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: William Thorsell and The Corrupt Canadian State He Loves
Date: 31 Dec 1995 02:49:28 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <4c4tno$4ah@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca


In a (William Thorsell?) Globe and Mail editorial that obviously had the
Editor-in-chief's stamp of approval (could have been the man himself,
I don't know),In a (William Thorsell?) Globe and Mail editorial that obviously 
had the
Editor-in-chief's stamp of approval (could have been the man himself,
I don't know), it is suggested that "a sustained public-education campaign
[read: propaganda campaign] is needed to build the consensus for action
[read: consent from the masses for a major fuck in the ass!]."  The idea
here is that Canadians have not heard enough about deficits and debts.
Nonsense!  If BCTV's Michael (Gordon) Campbell talks about the deficit
any more, I will throw my TV out the window!  The editorial concludes by
saying, "Save the state; employ the individual; act morally; cut the debt."
Save the State?  What for?  It is corrupt to its foundations!  You know it,
I know it, William Thorsell knows it, everyone knows it.  Fuck the State!
Canada deserves to die.  It has let too few run the show for too long now.
If it withers away, because no one cares to think about anymore; or it
explodes into chaos, I don't care.  Only the William Thorsells of
this country care--but this is natural--they are the ones who have benifited 
>from  this corruption.



From mebesius@sfu.ca Sun Dec 31 12:20:09 PST 1995
Article: 21622 of can.politics
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration,soc.culture.canada,can.general,bc.general,man.general,ab.general,nf.general,ns.general,ont.general,can.politics
Subject: William Thorsell and The Corrupt Canadian State He Loves
Date: 31 Dec 1995 18:27:06 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <4c6klq$p4i@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.canada:77392 can.general:63695 bc.general:34841 ab.general:5215 ont.general:29670 can.politics:21622

In a (William Thorsell?) Globe and Mail editorial that obviously
had the Editor-in-chief's stamp of approval (could have been the man himself, 
I don't know), it is suggested that "a sustained public-education campaign 
[read: propaganda campaign] is needed to build the consensus for action [read: 
consent from the masses for a major fuck in the ass!]."  The idea             
here is that Canadians have not heard enough about deficits and debts.  
Nonsense!  If BCTV's Michael (Gordon) Campbell talks about the deficit
any more, I will throw my TV out the window!  The editorial concludes by
saying, "Save the state; employ the individual; act morally; cut the debt."
Save the State?  What for?  It is corrupt to its foundations!  You know it,
I know it, William Thorsell knows it, everyone knows it.  Fuck the State!
Canada deserves to die.  It has let too few run the show for too long now.
If it withers away, because no one cares to think about anymore; or it
explodes into chaos, I don't care.  Only the William Thorsells of
this country care--but this is natural--they are the ones who have benifited
>from  this corruption.






From mebesius@sfu.ca Sun Dec 31 16:34:12 PST 1995
Article: 34839 of bc.general
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!agate!news.mindlink.net!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!news
From: mebesius@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,can.general,bc.general,van.general,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Dead Jews and Power (and hate?)
Date: 31 Dec 1995 17:55:12 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <4c6iq0$of3@morgoth.sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:9714 alt.revisionism:18257 can.general:63693 bc.general:34839 van.general:4578 soc.culture.usa:75692 soc.culture.jewish:22301


Ken, why do you think I hate Jews?  Or that I am spending my time
attacking Jews?

As for Mrs. Bronfman setting up a Jewish branch of the Red Cross, tell me
why this is necessary, and why I am wrong to assume that this has anything
to do with a Jewish blood supply?

You say De Beers has been "rather good at marketing their product"--or do
you really mean to say that they have been rather good at lying to the public
about the scarcity of their product?

If I attack Jews with too much power, does that mean that I "hate" all
Jews?  If your kind say white males make up a disproportionate number of
cops, university professors, hockey players, or whatever, and then suggest
that the state ought to use affirmative action programmes or employment equity 
or quotas or "targets" or "encourage visible minorities to apply," does that 
mean that you and your kind "hate" whites?

I think I can attack the rich and famous, and those with too much 
power--including Jews with too much power--and not "hate" Jews.  Although, I 
will admit to a strong dislike of always being told that criticism of Jewish 
power is tantamount to "hate."

As I said before, that an Oppenheimer or a Bronfman should get so much 
ass-kissing press (and sycophant justification for their privileged lifes from 
people like you, Mr. McVay) is to be expected--that those with this power 
should expect us to embrace their oligarchy/kleptocracy is wishful thinking.  
There is too much money and power concentrated in the hands of too few Jews 
(and others), and people must know who is really in control of their country 
(hint: it ain't the politicians).

  

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor